Suez Crisis to prefer to use the sea route through the Suez Canal. As it was, the rise of super-tankers for shipping Middle East oil to Europe, which were too big to use the Suez Canal meant that British policy-makers greatly overestimated the importance of the canal. By 2000, only 8 percent of the imported oil in Britain arrived via the Suez canal with the rest coming via the Cape route. In August 1956 the Royal Institute of International Affairs published a report titled "Britain and the Suez Canal" revealing government perception of the Suez area. It reiterates several times the strategic
Crime of aggression At the Review Conference, Japan issued two statements before and after the adoption of the amendments took place: In 2006, the House of Lords ruled in the case or "R v Jones" that the crime of aggression did not exist in English law as it applied within the United Kingdom. After its formal participation in the Review Conference as Observer, on 15 June 2010 the United States government held a special briefing on the Conference outlining what they deemed as accomplishments. The following article(s) are related with the adopted amendments concerning the provision on "crime of aggression". Exercise of jurisdiction