Product software implementation method result in ambiguity when questions arise in the execution of the implementation process. On the other hand methods can be used as a profession, meaning that the method should be taken strict and the usage of the method should be a profession, instead of a guiding principle. This view is very useful if the implementation process is very complex and is very dependent on exact and precise acting. Organizational and quality management will embrace this view, as a strict usage of any method results in more clarity on organizational level. Change management however might indicate that more flexibility in an
Business method patent method must have a practical application. However, a business method that is an abstract idea does not become patentable merely because it has a practical application. For example, a particular business method that is an abstract idea does not become patentable merely because it is programmed into a computer as an algorithm. For a business method to be patentable, the algorithm cannot be the whole invention, but only one aspect of a novel combination. See "Amazon.com, Inc. v The Attorney General of Canada, 2011 FCA 328, November 24, 2011" In April 2017, SIPO (i.e. the Chinese patent office) revised it's