Lie detection Lie detector results are very rarely admitted in evidence in the US courts. In 1983 the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment published a review of the technology and found: In the 2007 peer-reviewed academic article "Charlatanry in forensic speech science", the authors reviewed 50 years of lie detector research and came to the conclusion that there is no scientific evidence supporting that voice analysis lie detectors actually work. Lie detector manufacturer Nemesysco threatened to sue the academic publisher for libel resulting in removal of the article from online databases. In a letter to the publisher, Nemesysco's lawyers wrote that
Silent Talker Lie Detector or other computer techniques", they have been established as a subfield of artificial intelligence for over 60 years and are the subject of dedicated, high impact journals such as Neural Networks. Consequently, they provide a scientifically credible basis for Silent Talker's classifiers. The distinctive features of Silent Talker are: Silent Talker has been published in peer-reviewed journals for both the psychology and artificial intelligence communities. As other lie detectors detect changes in stress, the most common approach is to disrupt this either by practicing calming techniques during lying or artificially raising stress during truth-telling. Because Silent Talker is based on