Lie detection Lie detector results are very rarely admitted in evidence in the US courts. In 1983 the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment published a review of the technology and found: In the 2007 peer-reviewed academic article "Charlatanry in forensic speech science", the authors reviewed 50 years of lie detector research and came to the conclusion that there is no scientific evidence supporting that voice analysis lie detectors actually work. Lie detector manufacturer Nemesysco threatened to sue the academic publisher for libel resulting in removal of the article from online databases. In a letter to the publisher, Nemesysco's lawyers wrote that
Failure detector the failure detectors would find the programs that finally crashed in a process, whereas accuracy means that correct decisions that the failure detectors made in a process. The degrees of completeness depend on the number of crashed process is suspected by a failure detector in a certain period. The degrees of accuracy depend on the number of mistakes that a failure detector made in a certain period. Failure detectors can be categorized in the following eight types: The properties of these failure detectors are described below: In a nutshell, the properties of failure detectors depend on how fast the failure