Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? largely been positive. "The New York Times" praised Sandel's ability to teach and says, "If 'Justice' breaks no new philosophical ground, it succeeds at something perhaps no less important: in terms we can all understand, it confronts us with the concepts that lurk, so often unacknowledged, beneath our conflicts." "The Guardian" calls it a "timely plea for us to desist from political bickering and see if we can have a sensible discussion about what sort of society we really want to live in." "The Portsmouth Review" calls it an "enlightening read". Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? Justice: What's
How to Have Sex in an Epidemic to those with a lower risk of contagion. It was a model that attempted to challenge traditional anti-promiscuity and anti-gay viewpoints in previous safe sex education and AIDS prevention—as Callen and Berkowitz argued, it's what you do, not how often you do it or who you do it with. In other words, they had searched for, and come up with, what they termed the possibility of "life-affirming sex." The categories below contain summaries of the chapters of "How to Have Sex in an Epidemic" and the arguments presented therein: The authors introduce the two presiding theories of AIDS transmission and