Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? largely been positive. "The New York Times" praised Sandel's ability to teach and says, "If 'Justice' breaks no new philosophical ground, it succeeds at something perhaps no less important: in terms we can all understand, it confronts us with the concepts that lurk, so often unacknowledged, beneath our conflicts." "The Guardian" calls it a "timely plea for us to desist from political bickering and see if we can have a sensible discussion about what sort of society we really want to live in." "The Portsmouth Review" calls it an "enlightening read". Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? Justice: What's
How to Have Sex in an Epidemic interfere with medical practitioners' primary commitment to take care of their patients and was becoming a public health issue. Callen even applauded the negative responses to their advocacy published in the New York Native, because it ended up causing debate and dramatically widening the audience and popularity of "How to Have Sex" in an Epidemic. "It turns out historically to have been one of the advantages of our status as heretics," he was quoted saying in "How to Survive a Plague." Callen and Berkowitz do address the personal and political implications of their safe sex advice, specifically the loss of