Impossible cube ambiguity present in a Necker cube illustration, in which a cube is drawn with its edges as line segments, and can be interpreted as being in either of two different three-dimensional orientations. An impossible cube is usually rendered as a Necker cube in which the line segments representing the edges have been replaced by what are apparently solid beams. In Escher's print, the top four joints of the cube, and the upper of the two crossings between its beams, match one of the two interpretations of the Necker cube, while the bottom four joints and the bottom crossing match the
Root of unity modulo n it is not a primitive root, then there would be some divisor ℓ of "k", with formula_57. In order to exclude this possibility, one has only to check for a few ℓ's equal "k" divided by a prime. That is, what needs to be checked is: Among the primitive "k"-th roots of unity, the primitive formula_23-th roots are most frequent. It is thus recommended to try some integers for being a primitive formula_23-th root, what will succeed quickly. For a primitive formula_23-th root "x", the number formula_30 is a primitive formula_25-th root of unity. If "k" does not divide formula_23,