Etruscan numerals whether the numbers on opposite faces of Etruscan dice add up to seven, like nowadays. Some dice found did not show this proposed pattern. An aspect of the Etruscan numeral system is that some numbers, as in the Roman system, are represented as partial subtractions. So "17" is not written *"semφ-śar" as users of the Arabic numerals might reason. One instead finds "ci-em zaθrum", literally "three from twenty". The numbers 17, 18 and 19 are all written in this way. The general agreement among Etruscologists nowadays is the following (except about which of huθ and śa were "four" or "six",
Nontransitive dice 35:34. The miwin’s dodecahedra (set 2) win cyclically against each other in a ratio of 71:67. Set 1: Set 2: It is also possible to construct sets of nontransitive dodecahedra such that there are no repeated numbers and all numbers are primes. Miwin’s nontransitive prime-numbered dodecahedra win cyclically against each other in a ratio of 35:34. Set 1: The numbers add up to 564. Set 2: The numbers add up to 468. Nontransitive dice A set of dice is nontransitive if it contains three dice, "A", "B", and "C", with the property that "A" rolls higher than "B" more than