Electromagnetic mass apparent mass of radiation is not correct, and on the basis of his definition of electromagnetic momentum and longitudinal electromagnetic mass Abraham changed it to formula_32, the same value for the electromagnetic mass for a body at rest. Hasenöhrl recalculated his own derivation and verified Abraham's result. He also noticed the similarity between the apparent mass and the electromagnetic mass. However, Hasenöhrl stated that this energy-apparent-mass relation "only" holds as long a body radiates, i.e. if the temperature of a body is greater than 0 K. The idea that the principal relations between mass, energy, momentum and velocity can only
Derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations where it's assumed that all body forces are describable as gradients (for example it is true for gravity), and density has been divided so that viscosity becomes kinematic viscosity. The second vector calculus identity above states that the divergence of the curl of a vector field is zero. Since the (incompressible) mass continuity equation specifies the divergence of flow velocity being zero, we can replace the flow velocity with the curl of some vector formula_84 so that mass continuity is always satisfied: So, as long as flow velocity is represented through formula_86, mass continuity is unconditionally satisfied. With this new