So far as paragraph 51 of the judgment under appeal is concerned, it should be noted that that paragraph consisted of a summary of the claims made by the Kingdom of Belgium, which argued that the Commission had required it, where there were anomalies, either to conduct on-the-spot checks or reduce the area for which aid would be granted, or conduct other administrative checks.
Vedrørende den appellerede doms præmis 51 skal det bemærkes, at denne består i en gengivelse af påstande fremsat af Kongeriget Belgien, der gjorde gældende, at Kommissionen i tilfælde af afvigelser havde pålagt det enten at foretage kontrol på stedet eller nedsætte størrelsen af det støttede areal eller foretage anden administrativ kontrol.