As the World Court pointed out, its judgment last week did not refute that crucial point: “The Court is not required by the question it has been asked to take a position…on whether international law generally confers an entitlement on entities within a State to break away from this [State].”
Como señaló el Tribunal Internacional, su sentencia de la semana pasada refutaba esa tesis decisiva: “La pregunta que se le ha formulado no exige al Tribunal que adopte una posición (...) sobre si el derecho internacional confiere en general a entidades de un Estado el derecho a separarse de él”.