As the judge remarked, these proprietors were perfectly at liberty to hold or discuss their personal views on homosexuality, but what they could not do was discriminate on the basis of those views.
După cum a remarcat judecătorul, proprietarii aveau dreptul deplin de a-şi păstra sau discuta convingerile personale asupra homosexualităţii, dar nu puteau face o discriminare pe baza acestor convingeri.