This example is subjective because the writer is not providing any information that can be supported. 'Anyone' can't see it because the writer didn't provide evidence. The statement is based on the writer's opinion of the president and, if anything, can be argued in the same manner by someone who favors the president.
This being the pouch itself, not the contraband you're carrying. Interesting to note, you can carry a contraband pouch inside of a contraband pouch and I believe only the one in the topmost slot (Or highest durability) will degrade when going through metal detectors. You lose 20% durability for every pass.
Another trick thieves will do is cut the shoulder strap of your purse or bag as they run by. So instead of carrying my usual summer bag, I purchased a much more secure bag for my trip to Italy. Actually, I ended up purchasing two items: A bag and a mini-pouch. The pouch is a Lewis N. Clark, RFID Secure, Pouch.