This new Cistercian architecture embodied the ideals of the order, and was in theory at least utilitarian and without superfluous ornament. The same rational, integrated scheme was used across Europe to meet the largely homogeneous needs of the order.his new Cistercian architecture embodied the ideals of the order, and was in theory at least utilitarian and without superfluous ornament. The same rational, integrated scheme was used across Europe to meet the largely homogeneous needs of the order.
Illinois adopted an MLDA 21 law in 1980, raised from age 19. Indiana had a 21 year old minimum drinking age law since the 1930s. Michigan was the earliest state to change its MLDA from 18 to 21 in a single step, having done so in 1978. Ohio changed its MLDA from 18 to 19 in 1982 then to age 21 in 1987.Wisconsin went from age 18 to 19 in 1984 then to age 21 in 1986.owa changed its MLDA from 18 to 19 in 1978 and to age 21 in 1986. Kansas changed from 18 to 21 in a single step in 1985. Minnesota increased its MLDA from 18 to 19 in 1976 and to 21 in 1986. North Dakota had a 21 year-old minimum drinking age dating back to the 1930s and Missouri had an age 21 law since 1945.
No, the legal drinking age should not be lowered. Consuming alcohol is very serious responsibility. Not to say that serving your country at the age of 18 isn't equally as serious of a responsibility because it is, however not every 18 year old joins the military.I'm sure if the drinking age were lowered than almost every 18 year would be drinking alcohol.Not to mention, teens are going to drink and find alcohol regardless of the legal drinking age, but if the government made it legal to drink at a younger age we would certainly see more deaths due to drunk driving.ower it gahhhh. Whether the legal drinking age is 21 or 18, there are going to be problems related to alcohol. And making 21 the legal age to drink doesnât solve that problem. As a matter of fact, this is one of the reason why we see so many alcohol related deaths among teens.