title: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Action Plan to improve energy efficiency in the European Community

eurovoc_concepts:
EU action
action programme
energy policy
energy saving

formats: html pdf

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26. 04. 2000 COM(2000) 247 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Action Plan to Improve Energy Efficiency in the European Community EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is a pressing need to renew commitment both at Community and Member State level to promote energy efficiency more actively. This is especially true when seen in the light of the Kyoto agreement to reduce CO2 emissions, where improved energy efficiency will play a key role in meeting the EU Kyoto target economically. In addition to a significant positive environmental impact, improved energy efficiency will lead to a more sustainable energy policy and enhanced security of supply, as well as to many other benefits. An estimated economic potential for energy efficiency improvement of more than 18% of present energy consumption still exists today in the EU as a result of market barriers which prevent the satisfactory diffusion of energy-efficient technology and the efficient use of energy. This potential is equivalent to over 160 Mtoe, or 1900 TWh, roughly the total final energy demand of Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece and the Netherlands combined. The Action Plan presented below outlines policies and measures for the removal of these barriers and the realisation of this potential. If a proposed indicative target for improvement of energy intensity by an additional one percentage point per year above the estimated yearly baseline change is met, this can realise two-thirds of the available savings potential by the year 2010. This would result in avoided energy consumption of over 100 Mtoe, equivalent to avoided CO2 emissions of almost 200 Mt/year or around 40% of the EU Kyoto commitment1. Meeting the Community-wide target of doubling the use of cogeneration to 18% of EU electricity production by 2010 is expected to lead to additional avoided CO2 emissions of over 65 Mt CO2/year by 20102. Three groups of mechanisms for improving energy efficiency are put forward: – – – 1 2 Measures to enhance the integration of energy efficiency into other Community non- energy policy and programme areas, such as regional and urban policy, taxation and tariff policy, etc. Measures for re-focusing and reinforcing existing successful Community energy- efficiency measures. New common and co-ordinated policies and measures. See footnote 12, page 5. European Cogeneration Review, July 1999. 2 1. 1. 1 BACKGROUND Introduction In its Resolution on energy efficiency of 7th December 19983, the Council invited the Commission to come forward as soon as possible with a proposal for a prioritised Community action plan for energy efficiency. It proposed a number of measures, sought indications of the contribution of other Community policies towards energy efficiency, and stated that the plan should show Community and Member State responsibilities, particularly regarding financing and timetables. The Resolution was itself a response to the Commission’s Communication on energy efficiency4, which set out a Community strategy for energy efficiency. The Council supported this strategy and the proposed indicative target for the Community as a whole of a one percentage point per year improvement in energy intensity5 to the year 2010 over and above that which would otherwise be attained. The European Parliament has presented a positive opinion on the Communication, expressing clearly the need for renewed and forceful action in energy efficiency and proposing an even more ambitious annual target for improving energy intensity6. In addition to the Council Resolution and the opinion of the European Parliament referred to above, opinions from individual Member States, the Economic and Social Committee, industry and other stakeholders have been taken into account. A first meeting was held with Member States on 14th January 1999 with the purpose of obtaining further information on national programmes and hearing their views on the future shape of the Action Plan. An EU- wide energy efficiency conference was held on 8-10 November 19997 where technical details of possible policies and measures were discussed. The results of this conference have also been considered. The Action Plan, as it is set out below, must be read and seen against the background of the Commission Communication and the Council Resolution on energy efficiency, which are logical steps in a process. Moreover, the Action Plan must be seen in the wider context of Community energy and environmental policy and indeed other relevant Community policies. It is also constructed in such a way as to contribute substantially to the integration of energy and environmental objectives into other policy areas8. The Council Resolution confirms the importance of an energy efficiency strategy at Community level and stresses the crucial role to be played by Member States in achieving this strategy. The Action Plan makes a point therefore of distinguishing between Community and Member States’ responsibilities. Great store is set in the Action Plan on Member States’ own 3 4 5 6 7 8 OJ C 394/01, 17. 12. 1998. Energy Efficiency in the European Community – Towards a Strategy for the Rational Use of Energy, COM(1998) 246 final, 29. 04. 1998. Changes in energy intensity for final energy consumption are a first and rough estimate indicator for changes in energy efficiency. This is due to the fact that energy intensity can also include temperature effects and the weighting effects of economic restructuring. A more definitive indicator is the bottom- up aggregation of the energy consumption of all end users, corrected for temperature and structural effects. A set of such indicators is envisaged to be produced officially by Eurostat during the year 2000. Stockmann Report, PE 228. 977/final, 25. 02. 1999 and Resolution A4-0086/99. The SAVE Conference for an Energy-efficient Millennium, Graz, Austria. Strengthening Environmental 14. 10. 1998. Integration within Community Energy Policy, COM(1998)571 of 3 policies and programmes in this field, a number of which have already led to significant progress. 1. 2 Market Barriers and Renewed Efforts to Promote Energy Efficiency The underlying assumption behind a plan of action for energy efficiency is that, whilst market forces have gradually improved energy efficiency in past years, it is clear that additional steps can and should be taken. There still remains a large economic potential for further improvement that can be estimated now to be over 18% of present energy consumption9. This remains as a result of the existence of a number of market imperfections and barriers specific to the energy and energy technology markets. Policies and measures exist which, when implemented, can reduce or even remove these barriers and lead to the realisation of a large part of this potential, thereby significantly reducing levels of energy intensity and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. Neither the Community nor the Member States’ efforts undertaken so far have managed to overcome all of the existing barriers to investment in energy efficiency. Energy prices, for example, still do not accurately reflect energy costs including externalities; lack of or incomplete information often hampers the use of cost-effective and energy-efficient technology. There are also numerous institutional and legal barriers which prevent improved energy efficiency. One example is the continued practice of selling energy in the form of kWh instead of efficient heating and cooling, lighting and power, which is what the energy consumer actually wants. There are also many different types of technical barriers to energy efficiency, including the lack of harmonised and standardised components. Another important technical barrier is the lack of appropriate transmission infrastructures. Financial barriers also exist, an example of which is the unduly short pay-back period required for many demand-side investments compared with those for energy production. 1. 3 Aims of Action Plan The mechanisms to remove existing market barriers in order to allow market forces to work effectively to improve energy efficiency are described only briefly and indirectly in the Action Plan. They have been addressed in earlier documents, including the Commission Communication on energy efficiency from 199810. The primary objectives in presenting the Action Plan for Energy Efficiency may be summarised as follows: – – – 9 10 11 To refocus attention on promoting energy efficiency and to activate stakeholders; To present for endorsement common and co-ordinated policies and actions to be undertaken in the light of the Kyoto Agreement to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 8% by the period 2008-2012, and to achieve other Community energy and environmental goals including those set forth in the European Climate Change Programme11; To clarify the roles, related costs and to suggest timetables for the Community and the Member States; MURE model estimation. European Commission March 1998. COM(1998) 246 final, 29. 04. 1998. Op cit. Draft Communication under discussion in the Commission. 4 – – – To realise the available economic potential for improving energy efficiency in line with the proposed target for reduced energy intensity of one percentage point per year, compared to a business-as–usual trend which is estimated now to be close to zero. Meeting this target would realise two-thirds of the estimated savings potential of 18% by the year 2010. This would result in avoided energy consumption of over 100 Mtoe, and avoided CO2 emissions of nearly 200 Mt/year or around 40% of the EU Kyoto commitment12. Meeting the Community-wide target of doubling the use of cogeneration to 18% of EU electricity production by 2010 is estimated to result in additional avoided CO2 emissions of more than 65 Mt CO2/year by the year 201013. To increase awareness of the fact that, although a target of 1% per year improvement is ambitious, it can be exceeded if additional resources are made available. To establish the foundation for a continuous and long-term improvement in energy efficiency through the use of market transformation, with accelerated development and diffusion of new energy-efficient technologies. forces and market 1. 4 Means of Implementation The Action Plan presented below is an integrated and coherent combination of policy instruments which reinforce each other. They are designed to complement and reinforce Member State activity in this area, not to duplicate them. Proposed actions consist of : – – – Measures designed to integrate the energy efficiency dimension into Community non-energy policies and programmes; Measures to strengthen and expand existing energy efficiency policies and measures; and new policies and measures. Many proposed actions fall Community level. In other cases, legislation is proposed when it is deemed necessary. into the category of voluntary measures, co-ordinated at The SAVE programme within the Energy Framework Programme will be used as the principal co-ordinating arm of the Action Plan, both as a basis for preparing common actions, and to provide the means of implementation and evaluation at Community level. Other Community programmes, including the 5th RTD Framework Programme, are also important in this process. The selection of measures is based on relative economic potentials in the targeted areas, on the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of implementing the measures and on their expected impact. As the measures complement each other, an optimal mix is an important objective. The time frame for the Action Plan covers essentially the period to 2010 and much of its impact will be measurable until then and beyond. Most of the actions, however, will be 12 13 This is based on a carbon intensity of 2. 2 tn CO2/toe 1996; 2. 1 tn CO2/toe in 2010. 3086 Mt CO2 emissions 1990 and a 7% baseline increase in emissions to 2010. 50% fossil-based primary energy is assumed for 2010. The Kyoto target of –8% for six GHG will require a total of 450 Mt/year of avoided CO2. European Cogeneration Review, July 1999, Op cit. 5 initiated during the present lifespan of SAVE and other ongoing Community programmes, i. e. , up to and including 2002. With regard to resources, the Action Plan assumes that present budget levels for Community programmes, including SAVE, will be at least maintained. The same is assumed for the average of the budgets for Member State energy efficiency programmes. Evaluations will provide information on the future adequacy or otherwise of funding in this field, including recommendations for funding upon the expiry of now ongoing programmes. Co-ordination of Community policies and measures with those of Member States requires a strong level of consultation. Experts meeting as well as high-level meetings on energy efficiency policies and measures will be held on a regular basis. Member State objectives and targets in the area of energy efficiency and cogeneration will be reviewed and analysed with a view to establishing their contributions to overall Community targets. Monitoring and evaluation of individual measures and programmes and of the Action Plan itself will be conducted at regular intervals. At the expiry of the implementation phase of the Action Plan, a full-scale review will be undertaken in the light of progress made in order to assess what further steps may need to be taken. This will be co-ordinated with similar monitoring and evaluation activities undertaken for renewable energy sources. More detailed information on the policies and measures proposed in this Action Plan, including suggested timetables, costs, impact analysis and responsibilities, are found in Annex 1. 2. 2. 1 PROPOSED POLICIES AND MEASURES Measures Programmes to Integrate Energy Efficiency into Non-energy Policies and A general emphasis is placed in this Action Plan on integrating energy efficiency into other non-energy policy instruments and programmes where there are known cost-effective advantages and where it is possible to do so without significantly altering the original intent of the policy or programme in question. This has been pointed out in the Commission In many cases energy Communication on Strengthening Environmental efficiency is not adequately addressed in these policy areas due to a lack of knowledge on how such goals can be attained while pursuing other policy objectives. Integration14. Transport policy is a priority area for energy efficiency as transport absorbs over 30% of total final energy consumption. Road traffic is of particular importance as its accounts for about transport CO2. Policy priorities of a non-technological nature include 85% of overall incentives for optimal occupancy of vehicles, public and private, the promotion of new and alternative infrastructure and subsequently modal shifting and modal integration, management alternatives to air transport, completion of the internal market in rail transport and changing behaviour regarding mobility. A clearer mandate is sought to accelerate and broaden these developments through incentive programmes, pilot actions and greater Member State involvement. For modern enterprise policy, sustainable development is a cornerstone. As energy efficiency is a key factor for the competitiveness of many industry sectors, it forms an important part of 14 COM(1998) 571 of 14. 10. 1998, op. cit. 6 the overall action plan on sustainable development, which is under preparation for the domain of enterprise policy. The development of self regulation and similar arrangements, often being the most effective mechanism for achieving further progress, will have a key place in this process. Where it is necessary to propose regulatory measures, there will be a full assessment of the costs and benefits arising, and the regulatory provisions will be framed in such a way as not to jeopardise the single market. Regional and urban policy and programmes, such as the Regional Development and Cohesion Funds, have potentially large energy efficiency dimensions in both Objective 1 and Objective 2 areas. The Structural Funds regulation as well as the regulation for the Regional Fund and the guidelines for the Structural Funds and their co-ordination with the Cohesion Fund support improved energy efficiency. In this respect the guidelines give priority to the promotion of energy-efficient equipment in SMEs, in households and public buildings as well as to investment by industry in energy-efficient and innovative technologies, such as Combined Heat and Power (CHP). These can therefore be more closely coupled with, for labelling and best practice initiatives in example, voluntary agreements, energy audits, Member States. The proposed Green Paper on urban policy in the transport sector will also provide information for additional initiatives. Taxation and tariff policy are important instruments for promoting energy efficiency. The Commission's tax proposal15 concerning the broadening of the minimum tax base for energy products is an example of this. It provides for a minimum base and possible tax-exemptions for energy efficiency investments. Member State measures in this area are also important and their use in promoting energy efficiency will be encouraged. Carefully designed tariff structures for energy supply and distribution can also improve efficient end use and will therefore be promoted. such as International co-operation and pre-accession activities are critical elements in promoting energy efficiency in and outside the Union. Harmonised efficiency standards for internationally traded goods and services are a good example. For the Accession Countries, the Fifth Framework early co-operation through Community programmes Programme, SAVE and Synergy will allow for approximation of legislation, dissemination of information and diffusion of technology. This process is already underway. Implementation of the Energy Charter Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects should facilitate the accession process and help CIS countries. Energy efficiency will be given increased importance in EU relations with developing countries, inter alia through actions implemented jointly and anticipated increased possibilities for generating carbon credits in these countries by increased collaborative RTD and by the transfer of energy-efficient technologies and services. International liberalisation initiatives, particularly in the framework of a new multilateral trade round, are crucial in promoting the wide diffusion of energy- efficient technologies worldwide. Member State policies and measures form the bedrock of energy efficiency in the European Union. Greater integration and co-ordination with Community Programmes will be necessary to meet proposed objectives. For this reason Member State policies and measures will be examined and Member State programmes monitored on a regular basis. Focused conferences and workshops will be held at regular intervals for the presentation of Member State activities as well as Community initiatives in an effort to re-define continually the roles of each in the implementation of individual measures. A summary table of Member State policies and 15 COM(1997)30 final. 7 measures can be found in Annex 2. This is intended to provide an indication of the frequencies of the most common categories of activities. In addition, Member State objectives and targets in the area of energy efficiency and co- generation will be reviewed and analysed in collaboration with the respective Member States. These goals will be placed in a common framework for measuring and monitoring, with a view to establishing their probable contributions to overall Community targets. 2. 2 Initiatives to Strengthen and Expand Existing Successful Energy Efficiency Policies and Measures In the following section, brief descriptions, implementation plans and complementary measures for specific ongoing programmes are presented for all end-use sectors. These initiatives are designed to reinforce and strengthen each other and normally involve considerable Member State collaboration. Detailed information on these measures, including descriptions and timetables for individual actions, are provided in Annex 1. 2. 2. 1 Transport Efficiency Unless appropriate action is taken, CO2 emissions from transport are expected to increase by about 40% between 1990 and 201016. Despite the existing difficulty to limit energy consumption in the transport sector by taxation, increased information, and similar measures a number of ambitious Community and Member State initiatives to improve energy efficiency are now under implementation with the common objective of achieving sustainable mobility. The European Union has adopted a strategy on CO2 and cars, which aims to reduce by one- third the average CO2 emissions of new cars by 2005/2010 compared to the 1995 baseline, using voluntary agreements. These must be fully implemented and monitored, and additional incentives provided to accelerate the rate of compliance. The measures presented for the transport sector include further action on vehicle fuel economy and improved pricing. The long-term EU target as expressed in the 5th Framework Programme is a 50% reduction in CO2 emissions per passenger-kilometre and per payload-kilometre. In the shorter term the aim is 5 to 10% energy savings in order to achieve aggregate reductions in CO2 emissions. Other technical targets include the improved use of hydrocarbon fuel and increased competitiveness of alternative transport fuel. With a view to monitoring and to identify successful practices in the field of environmental integration into transport policy, the Transport and Environment Reporting Mechanism (TERM) has been set up. Several of the indicators on which the Reporting Mechanism is based relate directly or indirectly to energy efficiency. As TERM has been conceived as a continuing process it will need to be further extended and to be revised regularly. 2. 2. 2 Household Appliances, Commercial and Other End-use Equipment - Energy efficiency labelling scheme For domestic appliances, the EU labelling scheme17 has been established for a number of years in an effort to increase the flow of accurate and objective consumer information. It will now be strengthened and extended to cover all major appliances and installed equipment, in full conformity with Community WTO-relevant commitments. 16 17 COM(97)481final of 1. 10. 1997. 92/L 297/16, OJ, 13. 10. 1992. 8 A SAVE financed study published in September 1998 evaluated the energy labelling scheme. It found that the level of compliance was comparatively low18. In spite of this, the label, when applied, was shown to have had a substantial impact, with a third of purchasers saying that the label had influenced their choice of refrigerator or freezer. This study will form the basis of a forthcoming report to the Parliament and the Council. The previous success of the labelling scheme will now be built upon through increased and more pro-active enforcement by Member States regarding unlabelled and inaccurately labelled appliances. Increased promotion of the scheme will also be an important element in increasing its impact. The effectiveness of Member States enforcement agencies will be improved by increased co-operation. Additional supporting measures (such as a public database to disseminate information on models, efficiency levels and prices) will be implemented either by agreement with manufacturers or, failing this, by an amendment to Directive 92/7519 prescribing such a database. For office equipment the Commission will present to Council and Parliament during the year 2000 a Regulation to implement the Energy Star labelling scheme, following the conclusion of an agreement with the U. S. The energy label will also be closely co-ordinated with the Community Eco-label award scheme, which is a voluntary and selective label already applicable to certain domestic appliances, such as washing machines and refrigerators, and which is awarded only to products that meet strict environmental requirements, including requirements related to their energy consumption. - Negotiated Agreements and minimum efficiency standards A number of Member States and many manufacturers have indicated a preference for the use of negotiated agreements in the form of voluntary commitments on the part of and between equipment manufacturers, instead of regulatory legislation. These are recognised by the Commission (inter alia by means of a Recommendation) and have the same objective as mandatory minimum efficiency requirements. Since the adoption of the "Refrigerator Directive" for mandatory energy efficiency standards (96/57/EC), negotiated agreements have more and more become an accepted and practical alternative to this type of legislation. Currently two agreements have been negotiated by the Commission with appliance manufacturers: the reduction of stand-by losses of televisions and video recorders and an agreement for washing machines. In the commercial and industrial sectors there is no labelling scheme, and mandatory minimum efficiency standards are necessary here unless acceptable negotiated agreements are concluded. A large number of appliances will now be the subject of negotiated agreements or commitments. These include water heaters, air conditioners, dishwashers, driers, electric motors, pumps, fans and commercial refrigeration equipment, pending a satisfactory resolution of the issue of the involvement of the European Parliament in future negotiations. A framework Directive will also be presented which will raise the ambitions of negotiated agreements and, should it prove necessary, facilitate the adoption of mandatory minimum efficiency standards based on pre-established economic criteria. 18 19 “Cool Labels”, ECU, University of Oxford, 1998. 92/L 297/16, OJ, 13. 10. 1992, op. cit. 9 2. 2. 3 Industry (including the electricity and gas supply industry) - Long-term Agreements in industry There is a large savings potential which can be realised by the removal of technical barriers in industry through minimum efficiency protocols or equivalent agreements in which industries follow guidelines for cost-effective energy-efficient processes and methods in production. Through the use of bench-marking, Long-term Agreements have led to the increased use of effective motors, compressors, pumps, fans and other equipment, as well as to efficient processes. This has taken place nationally, where a number of Member States have ongoing programmes, comprising successful agreements with industry. An increased supporting and co-ordinating role at Community level has been sought by Member State industry and will now be implemented. Agreements in industry will be strengthened and their use expanded to include the chemical, steel, pulp and paper, cement and textile industries, and the energy supply industry, following preparatory activities. In addition, a Commission Communication on the subject of harmonisation and co-ordination of Community-level and Member State Long-term Agreements will be prepared. The purpose of this is to provide a harmonised framework to facilitate EU-wide negotiations and allow a level playing field for European industries. If after these initiatives, Long-Term Agreements were seen to be ineffective in achieving significant improvements in energy efficiency and a reduction in emissions, then the Commission would be ready to adopt mandatory energy efficiency objectives tailored to specific industries. - Combined heat and power (CHP) The use of combined heat and power (CHP) presents a substantial potential for increased energy efficiency and reduced environmental impact. It is also considered to be a priority area for many Member States. The Communication on CHP (COM(97)514 final) outlines the barriers and a strategy for the European Union, and was endorsed by Member States in December 1997 in the form of a Council Resolution20. The impact of energy market liberalisation on the penetration rate of cogeneration and the development of improved financing mechanisms will be followed closely, as will RTD in the area. It should also be noted that the Commission proposal for a revision of Council Directive 88/609/EEC on polluting emissions from large combustion plants will require that new plants apply CHP where feasible, making provision for the use of biomass and promoting efficient production with fossil fuels. The Community-wide target of raising the use of cogeneration to 18% of EU electricity production by 2010, as outlined in the Communication on CHP, will be pursued through numerous strengthening policies and measures, often in co-operation with Member States. Meeting this target is expected to lead to avoided CO2 emissions of over 65 Mt CO2/year by 201021. Measures will address i. a. the technical barriers and costs associated with connection to the grid. - Energy services offered by utilities and SME’s The Commission remains of the view that there is a need to increase the focus on the electricity and gas industry's role in promoting the development and use of energy services and energy-related services. Commitments will therefore be sought from utilities and service companies on a voluntary basis to include energy efficiency along with performance 20 21 Council Resolution of 8. 12. 1997. European Cogeneration Review, July 1999. 10 contracting and similar proven approaches to market energy efficiency as a part of their corporate goal, provided they meet normal criteria for cost-effectiveness. The use of rational planning techniques will also be encouraged. These efforts will be directed toward correcting the institutional barrier resulting from the continued practice of selling energy in the form of kWh instead of efficient heating and cooling, lighting and motive power, the services which the consumer actually wants. The Commission will continue to promote demand-side management in Member States through pilot projects and dissemination activities under the SAVE, RTD and other Community Programmes with a view to providing a comparison of demand-side and supply-side options on an equal economic basis. The impact of such activity on SME’s and the emerging market for innovative bundling of services from multi-service companies in this context will be stressed. The use of information technology in providing energy and energy-related services will be a priority area. 2. 2. 4 Buildings - An Amended Council Directive (93/76/EEC) Council Directive 93/76/EEC to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Improving Energy Efficiency (SAVE), contains six measures to be taken by Member States to promote energy efficiency in buildings and other end-use sectors. This Directive has led to the introduction of successful programmes in many Member States; in some the results have been limited. Council Directive 93/76/EEC has the potential to improve energy efficiency substantially and to avoid or reduce carbon dioxide emissions in all Member States by helping to overcome a number of barriers in buildings and in other sectors. Strengthening specific articles in the Directive will enhance the Directive`s impact by providing additional precision and more stringent monitoring requirements. The Commission envisages to propose an Amended Directive which will more clearly define the proposed measures and strengthen reporting and compliance procedures. This will allow for increased co-ordination and harmonisation of programmes which , however, will remain primarily Member States’ responsibility. The Directive will be extended to cover such areas as thermal insulation in existing buildings, installed equipment, expanded certification and granting of licenses. It is also proposed that it be extended to cover small-scale renewable transport efficiency, CHP, energy audits, energy energy use in individual buildings, management and Guarantee of Results schemes. - Additional Measures for the Building Sector Buildings account for 40% of the EU's energy requirements. The building sector offers one of the largest single potentials for energy efficiency and should thus be a major focus for action. Among the main Community actions in the building sector are the “Boilers Directive” the “Construction Products Directive” (89/106/EEC) and the “buildings” (92/42/EEC), articles in the existing Directive 93/76/EEC. Numerous technical barriers will be removed as standards and norms are established on a wider scale. Pilot projects, the Amended Directive 93/76/EEC and energy labelling will be designed to help Member States in their task of ensuring that efficient “installed systems” (heating, cooling, and hot water) and building components (e. g. , windows) are supplied by qualified installers, who use appropriate and simple design tools. In addition, for existing buildings, when renovated, energy efficiency standards will approach those for new buildings. 11 Measures to achieve efficient installed systems include best practice information, labelling and its extension into local information schemes, the incorporation of energy efficiency into public procurement, and measures to promote the upgrading of outmoded systems. This information will provide final customers with clear and reliable comparisons of the performance of the energy systems they may be considering. Also included is the extension of energy certification to such systems and training and certification of installers. Pilot projects to develop design tools and studies to identify efficient equipment and systems will likewise be proposed for use by architects, energy consultants, etc. An EU Green Light programme to promote efficient lighting and best practice in commercial and public buildings is also being launched. Measures will be taken to encourage building companies to use integrated environmental management systems such as EMAS in order to allow a more systematic inclusion of environmental issues such as the nature of building materials and to ensure and improve monitoring and evaluation of these measures. The revision of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1836/93 allowing voluntary participation by companies in the industrial sector in EMAS during the year 2000 will facilitate this. Horizontal Measures 2. 2. 5 Research and technology policy New technology plays an important role in energy efficiency under the Fifth RTD Framework € Programme. 1042 M will be allocated between 1999 and 2002 for energy, out of which some € are expected to concern energy efficiency, mainly for research on and demonstration 440 M of energy-efficient industry, technologies on the demand side (domestic and tertiary, transport), but also for utilities. The renewed focus under the Energie Programme on downstream projects promoting the market uptake of end-use technology will be an important element in technology diffusion strategy. This will be closely co-ordinated with other activities proposed below. European Energy RTD on energy efficiency will thus have a crucial impact not only in the short term but especially in the longer term in achieving a sustainable energy system. 2. 2. 6 Energy Efficiency at the Local and Regional Levels There is a large savings potential which can be realised by greater decentralisation of energy management and increased public involvement at the local and regional levels. The search costs to consumers involved in obtaining site-specific information on available technology can be reduced considerably. The Commission has encouraged the involvement of elected representatives, alongside other local partners, since the early 1990s, by supporting the establishment of energy management agencies in regions, islands and cities through, inter alia, the SAVE Programme. These agencies will now assume added responsibilities in the form of increased dissemination of information and results from Community and Member State studies, pilot actions and programmes. Networks have been set up or are being set up whose role is to promote transnational co-operation and transfer of know-how; among these are OPET's, EnR, FEDARENE, ENERGIE-CITES and ISLENET. 2. 2. 7 Third-Party Financing (TPF), Guarantee of Results and Related Schemes Third-Party Financing and model contracts are presently being promoted in the public sector in Member States in accordance with Directive 93/76/EEC. Numerous TPF pilot projects have been implemented, increasingly on a purely commercial basis. This is also true of 12 Guarantee of Results schemes. Additional action, however, is needed to establish more firmly including performance the credibility and viability of these, other financing schemes, contracting and investment clearing houses in order to remove financial and institutional barriers to investments in energy efficiency. In an Amended Directive 93/76, enhanced measures to promote the use of these instruments will be proposed, while increased involvement by the European Investment Bank in using them will be explored. 2. 2. 8 Increased Dissemination of Information and Training A renewed Community information campaign is planned, focusing the attention of consumers and other stakeholders on energy efficiency and valorising its environmental and other benefits. This campaign will be implemented in co-operation with Member States and will build on the results of recent programmes and projects. Training and certification on the use and maintenance of energy-efficient technology will be expanded. In a later stage, standards of quality for training and certification will be established. Information resulting from labelling, benchmarking, best practices guidelines and results from pilot actions and studies supported by Community programmes will be made more readily available to decision-makers and other interested parties, especially through the increased use of information technology. 2. 2. 9 Increased Monitoring and Evaluation In order to promote policies, programmes and measures which provide the intended impact on energy intensity at the lowest possible cost, it is necessary to establish common effective and reliable monitoring and evaluation methods. For this to be done, increased co-operation among Member States and other organisations is required to ensure comparability of data and harmonisation of methodology. Monitoring and evaluation methodologies in Member State and Community programmes for energy efficiency are therefore to be reviewed with a view to harmonisation. Community-level activity in the area of energy intensity and energy efficiency indicators is being increased with a view to developing a set of common harmonised indicators for the Community. Eurostat and Member States will work closely together for the development of energy efficiency indicators. The work will be co-ordinated with similar activities carried out by the IEA and will exploit existing work already developed under the SAVE Programme. Tracking of the impact of specific policies and measures on emissions of CO2 will be enhanced using this and similar instruments. International comparisons of energy intensity changes will also be given special consideration. Regarding evaluations, the Action Plan, conjunction with planned evaluations of SAVE and the Energy Framework Programme. itself, will be evaluated at regular intervals in 2. 3 New Policies and Measures A number of new policies and measures are outlined below. These are measures which have been successfully implemented on a limited scale in a number of Member States. Studies and pilot actions indicate that there is added value in developing larger, EU-wide initiatives based on these successes. 13 2. 3. 1 Public Procurement of Energy-efficient End-use Technology It has been demonstrated in a number of countries, including some Member States, that the use of co-ordinated public procurement guidelines, regulations and agreements by public sector entities is an effective way to promote the diffusion and demonstration of energy- efficient technology and to provide leadership by example. Such guidelines can be applied by the EU Institutions as well as by Member State, regional and local governments. They can cover virtually all energy-using equipment, including transport vehicles. The intention is for public bodies to take the lead by setting good examples regarding energy efficiency and to use the significant public procurement potential which exists to increase demand for energy- efficient technology. This work will be closely co-ordinated with the Community environmental management and audit scheme (EMAS), the Community eco-label award scheme, with existing Member State public purchasing guidelines and practices, and with Community Best Practices as they become established. Account will also be taken of public procurement regulations and Community WTO commitments. A study of existing public procurement programmes will soon commence to provide recommendations for launching a large EU-wide pilot project to develop harmonised public sector guidelines for constructing, purchasing, leasing and maintaining energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable buildings and equipment, including that in the transport sector. The European Commission will take the lead in this endeavour by launching a public buildings initiative for energy- efficient Commission buildings, soon to be followed by suggestions for similar initiatives for the buildings of the European Parliament and the Council. 2. 3. 2 Co-operative Technology Procurement Technology procurement is an instrument used to specify and develop new energy-efficient technology, generally through a competitive tendering process. It aims at creating and launching new products with higher energy-efficiency requirements than comparable existing products on the market. Technology procurement in the present context is used to match producers' possibilities and consumers' needs and aggregated demand, and to allow the market to function more efficiently with regard to the often neglected dimension of energy efficiency. Such competitive procurements have been shown in several Member States to promote market transformation in terms of the types and availability of the energy-efficient technology which is both demanded and supplied. The results of ongoing pilot projects and discussions with Member States will provide guidance on appropriate technology areas to be pursued at Community level. Both common EU-wide procurements and co-ordinated procurements involving Member States with diverging technology requirements will be pursued. The diffusion and impact of the resulting technological improvements will be strengthened and broadened through the use of the EU labelling scheme, negotiated agreements, public procurement and best practice initiatives. 2. 3. 3. Energy Audits in Industry and the Tertiary Sector A number of Member States have implemented successful energy auditing programmes, with and without financial incentives. These have been shown to have positive and measurable effects on CO2 emissions, on competitiveness and on the profitability of the audited companies. Energy audits also produce large amounts of real data on energy consumption and energy saving opportunities in different industrial sectors, building types and technical systems. This information is often difficult and unnecessarily costly to obtain by other means. Energy audits in Member States comprise a wide range of different types of working methods and scopes of work. Energy audits can range from a preliminary study, intended to detect 14 areas where a subsequent and more detailed and targeted audit should be carried out, to a complete package of proposed measures ready for implementation. A study is planned on energy audits and optimal replication possibilities in the EU, including an updated and comprehensive review of Member State activities in this area. Thereafter, an initiative at Community level will be proposed. The main areas of interest are industry and the tertiary sectors, where it is shown that such measures are feasible and cost-effective. Consideration will be given to the approach and methodology defined in EMAS. 2. 3. 4 A Best Practice Initiative Successful Best Practice programmes have been implemented in several Member States. A feasibility study has been carried out to determine the added value of these actions and of the applicability on a Community level of such an initiative. The study has considered possible structures for wider best practice applications and possible interactions with the best available the auspices of the Integrated Pollution techniques and benchmarks developed under frameworks. A European Energy Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive and other Efficiency Best Practice Initiative, implemented in full co-operation with Member States, will now be launched as a large pilot action under the auspices of the SAVE Programme. The scheme will provide a framework for decision-makers and end-users for a comprehensive source of independent and accessible energy efficiency advice, guidance and training on new technology and techniques, adding substantially to the information necessary for a more effective functioning of the energy and energy technology markets. 3. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE COURSE OF ACTION The measures outlined in this plan of action, although ambitious, are realistic. As Member States will be called upon to participate actively in the plan, it is clearly for the Council and the Parliament to establish a mandate for the implementation of this Action Plan by endorsing it and by identifying the proposals set forth in it as priority areas. Co-ordination of Community policies and measures amongst each other and with those of Member States is also critical in the implementation of this plan. Following the first experts meeting on energy efficiency policies and measures held in January 1999, further such meetings to improve co-ordination and convergence of national and Community actions are planned, at the working as well as the policy level. These will promote a renewed impetus and commitment to energy efficiency in the context of a sustainable energy policy, permit experience to be shared and follow and review progress and co-ordination at EU and Member State level. 15 ANNEX 1 COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FOR COMMON AND CO-ORDINATED POLICIES AND MEASURES BY SECTOR AND INDIVIDUAL ACTION Transport Policy and Transport Efficiency Transport sector initiatives include transport policy, with infrastructure and modal integration and shifting, as well as technical energy efficiency. For the period 2000-2002, activities in the transport sector which promote energy efficiency include legislation, voluntary agreements, and information dissemination as well as integrated transport and land-use planning, reducing individual motorised vehicle movement, pricing, and infrastructural development. Comments (financing, impact, etc. ) Current status and timetable Definition of action Action by a. Legislative measures Auto oil II programme Passenger cars • Voluntary Agreement automotive industry. Fiscal measures • • Consumer Car Labelling Directive 1999/94/EC. information. Taxation of Energy Products COM (97)30 12. 03. 97 Efficient internal rail freight • Pricing of Directives. rail infrastructure Ongoing Ongoing. • Relationship between the State • and the railways. Technical interoperability. harmonisation and Ongoing. Under discussion Parliament, Council Cost for relevant studies. with Concluded. Limited cost for industry. Under discussion. Adopted 1999. Commission, Parliament, Council Under discussion. Parliament, Council. Non available. No direct cost. Commission, Parliament, Council. Commission, Parliament, Council. Commission, Parliament, Council. b. Other Actions Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of TEN-T*. Environmental sustainability considerations in the selection of projects. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Fair and efficient pricing of transport modes. Galileo. PACT programme**. Promotion of low and zero-emission vehicles. Promotion of electronic alternatives to transport. Revision of Council Regulation No. 1836/93 on EMAS. Communication on air transport and the environment. * ** Trans European Network. Pilot Actions for Combined Transport. Ongoing. Commission. Ongoing. Ongoing. Ongoing. Ongoing. (1998-2001). Ongoing. Ongoing. 2000. Adopted. Council Conclusions 2000. Commission. Commission. Commission. Commission. and and Commission Member States. Commission Member States. Commission, Council, Parliament. Commission, Council Parliament. of external (Internalisation costs. ) € 1999 budget 6M Pilot actions. Pilot actions. Extended to include transport sector`s environmental impact. 16 Equipment The equipment sector below covers domestic, commercial, industrial and to a limited extent transport energy end use. Important areas are white goods, lighting, building components, brown goods and peripheral commercial and industrial equipment. Continuing work in the standardisation bodies CEN and CENELEC to improve the repeatability and reproducibility of test results for energy efficiency levels in equipment will be supplemented by efforts to improve the co-operation between test labs, and the consistency of their results. Among other measures, adequate funding to allow technical/economic analysis and mandates to the standardisation bodies shall be sought to implement these agreements. Definition of action Current status and timetable Action by Comments (financing, impact, etc. ) of on database labelling individual a. General Public information appliances. Council Regulation setting up a voluntary labelling programme for office equipment, using the Energy Star logo. Technology procurement. White Goods -Refrigerator/freezers -Phase 2: Labelling. Agreement Negotiated Amended Directive 96/57) -Washing Machines - Phase 1 Negotiated Agreement. (or Phase 2 Labelling. (Higher efficiency levels. ) Negotiated agreement. -Dishwashers Phase 1 – Negotiated agreement Phase 2 – Labelling. (Higher efficiency levels. ) -Driers – negotiated agreement. -Domestic ovens: Labelling – Electric Labelling - Gas Negotiated Agreement (electric). Lighting -Lamps Labelling Extension of Directive 98/12 to excluded types. -Proposed Directive for Ballasts. -CFL’s: Competition to increase domestic sector penetration ;cam- paign & fixtures competition. 'Green light programme'. Discussions Envisioned 2000. underway. Commission. USA Negotiations between EU and completed; agreement expected to be adopted in 2000. Following EU procure- ment for refriger- rator/freezers, motors & lighting, e. g. to be implemented. Commission, Council, Parliament. Commission, Member State industry and organisations. p. a. € 100k database. Will impact of labelling. budget for increase See also industry table. Adopt 2001; in force 2002. Commission. Study underway. Envisioned 2002. Agreed; first level in force 1998; second level in force 2000. Adopt 2001, in force 2002. Envisioned 2003. 1999. Adopt 2003; in force 2004. Envisioned end 2000. Adopt 2000, in force 2001. Adopt 2001, in force 2002. Envisioned end 2002. standards Measurement mandated Adopt 2001, in force 2002. Adoption envisioned 2000; first level in force in 2002. Finalised 2000. Launched 2000. 17 Commission. Impact 7 TWh. Commission. Mandate (on 40°C wash); study underway € budget). (250k Study completed. € Study 200k. Commission. Commission. Study completed. Study underway. Commission. Additional cost for mandate (100k ). € Commission, Coun- cil, Parliament. Commission with and Eurelectric utilities. Impact 10 TWh. National energy agencies in competition; dedicated fixtures. See (“Buildings”). Study in 2000. Commission € 150K for study. Adopt 2000; in force 2001. Commission. Study on Heating Systems € (1999) cost 300k Measurement standards €. mandate 100k Second study underway. Impact 2 TWh. Commission Commission. Study underway. € Mandate 100k. in force start Commission. Impact 7 TWh. Equipment - continued Building Components -Windows Installed Equipment -Boilers: Information (Dir. 92/75) -Water Heaters: Negotiated Agreement (elect. ). Negotiated Agreement (gas) Information (Dir. 92/75)(el. gas). -Individual air-conditioners: Labelling. Negotiated Agreement. Brown Goods -TV and VCRs (stand-by mode and on mode). Negotiated agreements. -Other consumer electronics (hi- fi, power supplies, etc). Commercial and Industrial equipment Negotiated Agreements for -Vending washers and driers. Negotiated Agreement for - Electric motors. Negotiated Pumps, air compressors, Industrial fans. Agreements machines, ovens, for Envisioned 2000. Envisioned end 2001 Adopt 2000 – 2001. Adopt 2000. Envisioned end 2000. Agreed; 2000. Envisioned 2000. Envisioned 2000. Envisioned 2000. Envisioned between end 2000 and end 2001. Commission. Commission. Study underway. Commission. Study completed. Commission. Studies underway. 18 Industry (including the electricity and gas supply industry) All industrial sectors including the energy transformation sector are included in the sector dealing with industry. Energy-intensive as well as less energy-intensive industry comprise the enterprises dealt with here. In addition to information dissemination and best practice, Long –term Agreements, audits, technology procurement and innovative financing schemes are important elements in industrial energy efficiency actions. Action by Definition of Action Current Status and timetable Comments, (financing, impact, etc. ) the with a. Programmes Draft Communication on Long- Term Agreements. Long-Term Agreement at EU level chemical industry. Long-Term Agreements in steel, pulp and paper, cement, textile, energy supply industry. Promotion of Electric Motor System database EuroDEEM to end-users; linked to VSDs, pumps, fans and compressors. Promotion of energy services and the electricity supply industry to foster demand-side measures. agreements in for Use of technology procurement at EU level equipment procurements. Energy audits in Member States reviewed and analysed. Pilot actions and to harmonise methods. Industry Programme. co-ordinate Practice Best Launch 2000. To be negotiated during 2000. To be negotiated during 2001-2002. To be carried out during 2000. Commission, Coun- cil & Parliament. Commission with Member States and industry. Commission with Member States and industry. Commission with Member States. Application in collaboration with Member State industry. Preceded by a SAVE pilot feasibility study. project or. ) (Cost 200 k Preceded by pilot projects or feasibility studies. € € Development cost of 600 k from the 4th RTD Framework Programme. Commission, Eurelectric and individual ESI companies. Commission with Member States and industry. Commission in collaboration with Member States, industry, tertiary. Commission, Member States, nat. agencies, industry. Joint study - Commission/Eurelectric on energy services; pilot actions. of Cost project € /feasibility study 300 k ). pilot € Study cost 200k. Co-ordination with EMAS, IPPC Directive, etc. (See “Buildings”). on for a Rational Amended Proposal Directive Planning Techniques. COM (97)69fi nal under review. EU pilot procurement 2000-2001. actions on Study 2000. Community Initiative 2001. Pilot action 2000-2001. 19 Buildings Buildings account for around 40% of energy consumption, and have a savings potential of over 20%. However, under the subsidiarity principle, most actions are primarily the responsibility of Member States. The various actions described in the table represent those areas where the added value of action at Community level is clearest. Definition of action heating extended and Insulation of new buildings. Requirements to other include installed systems to allow for the use of renewables. Imposing efficiency standards renewing when granting or licences, incl. rentals (e. g. for change of use, bldg. processes). Programmes or incentives to improve insulation of existing buildings. Energy certification - already in 93/76; to include installed equipment. for to be provision of schemes' installed included in Requirements systems building codes. Regular inspection of boilers, heating, air conditioning and hot water systems; promotion of upgrading. Boilers Directive. 'local The information for installations and components. Training and certification of installers. Third-Party Financ- ing and Guarantee of Results. EU Green Light programme to promote efficient lighting and best practice in commercial and public buildings. (To feed into a wider EU Best Practice Initiative. ) Public Procurement Guide- lines and demonstrate energy efficiency. Best Practice in Buildings. increase to Current status and timetable Already in 93/76/EEC and implemented in most Member States. Action by Member States, some already imposing overall energy use limits. Comments (financing, impact, etc. ) Requirement could often be higher some Member States. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. in Some limited experience in Member States. Member States. Promotion in Member States. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. Many Member already promote this. States Member States. large Programmes exist; potential for penetration, coverage of e. g. heating, air- ventilation conditioning ( HVAC). Will be Member States. encouraged in and Member States. Member States. existing Directive In 93/76/EEC for heating systems. Boilers Directive (92/42/EEC) report 2001. Pilot projects in 2000. Member States. Commission. Council, Parliament. Member States. actions Pilot projects. New co- ordinated under preparation. Participation broadened 2000. be to Member States. Commission in collaboration with Member State energy agencies. Very large savings potential in average existing building. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. Existing strengthened. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. actions be to encourage Heating cooling and efficiencies in building codes. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. Should the replacement of inefficient (20- 30 year) old systems. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. To be implemented by trained installers; linked to energy labelling of installed products. of Advice energy systems. Amended Dir. 93/76/EEC. Tertiary sector buildings. Cost of 200 k for Cost of 200k test of programme in 1999. for 4th FWP definition. for SAVE II programme € installation on € Study 2000. Pilot action 2001. Pilot action planned 2000. Commission, Council, Parliament. Commission, National agencies. € Study and pilot action cost. Strong Member State 300k participation required. See also industry. 20 CHP Initiatives promoting increased use of CHP installations will cover a range of different sectors, including industry, the domestic and tertiary sector, the power sector and the heating sector. The target for wider use of CHP will be followed by legislative measures, higher priority in programmes, and a number of other actions aimed at improving co- ordination of promotional activities, market monitoring etc. Current status and timetable Comments (financing, impact, etc. ) Definition of action Action by a. Legislative measures Combustion Large Directive. Amended Directive proposed. Member States to promote CHP through national actions. Plant 88/609 group State to the sectors, domestic the proposals amended Reform of agricultural policy and production of biomass for use in CHP. b. Programmes Projects promoting CHP in and industry, tertiary power sector and the heating sector in many Community and national programmes. Use of Structural Funds. Member according regulations. c. Other Action Co-ordination of Commission activities concerning CHP. Ad hoc for working information exchange. the for Follow-up of Directives transposition 96/92 electricity market) and 98/30 (Internal gas market). To avoid obstacles for CHP. CHP Statistics (data collection). Monitoring of CHP penetration in the European energy market. for Energy Directors-General Committee. National programmes for the promotion of CHP discussion. Actions supporting cross-border strategies for promotion of CHP at regional level. (with energy authorities, CHP producers etc. ) Promotion of CHP through public technology procurement initiatives. (Internal utilities, groups and Under Council. discussion in Parliament, Council. New proposal 2000. Commission, Member States Proposals under debate. Commission. Ongoing. Commission, Member States, Member State organisations Under discussion 2000-2006. Commission, Member States. cost for EU budget. No Feasibility studies. CHP a priority. No cost Possibly Directive 93/76/EEC. Cost available. for EU budget. an Amended in calculations not yet 5th Includes Programme and Energy Programme (SAVE). Framework Framework New initiative. Commission. No additional cost. Ongoing. Ongoing. Commission, Member States. No additional cost. Commission, Eurostat. € 0,1 M /year. To be proposed during 2000. Commission, Member States. No additional cost. New initiative. Commission, Member States, energy industry. Cost of pilot actions. New initiative. Commission. Costs of actions to be made available. studies and pilot 21 Horizontal measures Definition of action Research Policy and Technology Local and Regional level Activity. Increased Dissemination of Information. Third-Party Financing and other Financing Schemes. Increased Monitoring Evaluation. and and Current status and Timetable Increased links between technological non- technological programmes to remove barriers and develop, demonstrate and promote new approaches leading increased to energy efficiency. 2000- 2002. Continued expansion and use and agencies networks 2000-2002. Campaign 2000-2002 to gain wide acceptance. Review and pilot studies 2000-2001. More focus on financial institutions. Harmonised methods for monitoring energy efficiency and evaluations 2000-2002 and beyond. of Action by Commission, Member States Comments (financing, impact, etc. ) € to Approximately 440 M energy efficiency RTD 1999 – 2002. Commission, Member States, nat. & local authorities. Commission, Member States. Commission, Member States, industry. Commission, Council, Parliament, Member States. Open to Associated Countries. Focus on energy efficiency in reduction strategy. Clearing houses for investments in energy efficiency to be considered. All sectors. Partially financed through SAVE. Major review of programme by 2003. 22 ANNEX 2 Member State Energy Efficiency Policies and Measures22 Number of Policies or Measures 26 implemented; 1 planned 11 implemented; 1 planned 42 implemented; 2 planned 24 implemented 68 implemented; 2 planned 27 implemented; 1 planned 9 implemented; 1 planned 25 implemented; 1 planned Type of Policy or Measure Mandatory Laws/Permits Standards Labelling Individual metering Inspections Voluntary Sectoral Agreements Certification Programmes Financial Incentives Subsidies Loans Incentives/Audits Fiscal Measures Procurement Incentives/TPF Social and Special Funds Information Technical Guides Advice Centres Consulting Energy Accounting Awards Associations Training Includes policies and measures in industry, the residential, tertiary and transport sectors. 72 implemented; 3 terminated 5 implemented 15 implemented; 1 planned 88 implemented 3 implemented 1 implemented; 1 planned 8 implemented 29 implemented 16 implemented 10 implemented 4 implemented; 2 planned 4 implemented 6 implemented 10 implemented 22 Detailed tables and analysis are available in the publication Member State Energy Efficiency Policies and Measures 1999, European Commission, 1999. 23


title: Ehdotus: neuvoston päätös Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan koskevasta assosiaationeuvostossa vahvistettavasta yhteisön kannasta

eurovoc_concepts:
Association Council (EU)
EU programme
Hungary
project evaluation
young person

text: EUROOPAN YHTEISÖJEN KOMISSIO Bryssel 26. 04. 2000 KOM(2000) 240 lopullinen 2000/0100 (ACC) Ehdotus NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖS Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan koskevasta assosiaationeuvostossa vahvistettavasta yhteisön kannasta (komission esittämä) PERUSTELUT Helsingissä joulukuussa 1999 kokoontunut Eurooppa-neuvosto vahvisti Luxemburgissa joulukuussa 1997 kokoontuneessa Eurooppa-neuvostossa käynnistetyn laajentumisprosessin merkityksen. Myös vuonna 1997 määritelty vahvistettu liittymistä valmisteleva strategia on vahvistettu uudelleen niin, että 13 ehdokasmaan osallistuminen yhteisön ohjelmiin on tärkeä osa strategiaa. Keski- ja Itä-Euroopan (KIE) kymmenen ehdokasmaan osallistumisesta yhteisön ohjelmiin kunkin maan Eurooppa-sopimuksessa. Eurooppa-sopimusten mukaisesti määrätään assosiaationeuvostot määrittävät ja yksityiskohtaiset säännöt. kunkin maan osallistumista koskevat ehdot Kaikki KIE-maat ovat osallistuneet vuonna 1999 yleissivistävää ja ammatillista koulutusta sekä nuorisoa koskeviin ohjelmiin eli Leonardo da Vinci- ja Sokrates-ohjelmien ensimmäiseen vaiheeseen sekä Nuorten Eurooppa -ohjelmaan. Eräät maista ovat osallistuneet ohjelmiin jo vuodesta 1997, toiset vuodesta 1998 tai 1999. Maiden osallistuminen kyseisiin osa ohjelmiin kehitystä. niiden Assosiaationeuvostojen päätösten, joissa säädettiin ohjelmiin osallistumisen järjestelyistä, voimassaolo päättyi 31. joulukuuta 1999, kuten myös itse ohjelmia koskevien päätösten voimassaolo. valmistelevaa liittymistä tärkeä ollut on Leonardo da Vinci -ohjelman toinen vaihe, Sokrates-ohjelman toinen vaihe ja uusi Nuoriso- ohjelma ovat jatkoa edellisille ohjelmille. Leonardo da Vinci- ja Sokrates-ohjelmien toista vaihetta koskevissa päätöksissä säädetään, että KIE-maat voivat osallistua ohjelmiin. Vastaava säännös sisältyy luonnokseen Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätökseksi yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmasta, jonka hyväksymismenettely on kesken. Kaikki KIE-maat ovat vahvistaneet halukkuutensa osallistua uusiin ohjelmiin vuodesta 2000 alkaen ja rahoittaa osallistumistaan osittain omasta kansallisesta talousarviostaan ja osittain ja 13. niille myönnettävillä vuotuisilla Phare-määrärahoilla. Kuten Luxemburgissa 12. joulukuuta 1997 pidetyn Eurooppa-neuvoston kokouksen päätelmissä todettiin, näiden maiden itse rahoittamat osuudet ovat tasaisesti kasvamassa. Koska ohjelmat ovat luonteeltaan kansainvälisiä, on kaikkien osapuolten edun mukaista, että ohjelmien ensimmäisen vaiheen aikana aloitettuja toimia voitaisiin jatkaa keskeytyksettä ohjelmien seuraavissa vaiheissa tai asiaa koskevissa uusissa ohjelmissa. Jotta KIE-maat voisivat osallistua näihin uusiin ohjelmiin niiden alusta alkaen, komissio on tehnyt ehdotukset kahdeksi kunkin assosiaationeuvoston päätökseksi, joista toinen koskee jo voimassa olevia Leonardo da Vinci II- ja Sokrates II -ohjelmia ja toinen Nuoriso-ohjelmaa. Leonardo da Vinci II- ja Sokrates II -ohjelmia koskevat ehdotetut päätökset voitaisiinkin tehdä ensin ja Nuoriso-ohjelmaa koskevat päätökset heti, kun itse ohjelmaa koskeva päätös tulee voimaan. Ehdotettujen assosiaationeuvostojen päätösluonnosten pääkohdat ovat seuraavat: • KIE-maiden osanottajien esittämiin hankkeisiin ja aloitteisiin sovelletaan samoja kyseisiä ohjelmia koskevia ehtoja, sääntöjä ja menettelyitä kuin jäsenvaltioihin erityisesti hakemusten tekemisen ja hankkeiden esittämisen, arvioinnin ja valinnan, ohjelmien täytäntöönpanoon liittyvien kansallisten rakenteiden tehtävänjaon sekä ohjelmiin osallistumisen valvontaan liittyvien toimien osalta. 2 • KIE-maat maksavat vuosittaisen rahoitusosuuden ohjelmista assosiaationeuvostojen päätösten mukaisesti. Rahoitusosuutta ei palauteta KIE-maille, jos tulokset eivät vuoden päättyessä vastaa maksettua osuutta. • Luxemburgissa kokoontuneen Eurooppa-neuvoston päätelmien mukaisesti KIE-maat kutsutaan osallistumaan tarkkailijoina ohjelmakomiteoiden kokouksiin niitä koskevien asioiden osalta. • Päätöksiä sovelletaan ohjelmien keston ajan, ja ne tulevat voimaan päivänä, jona ne tehdään. Assosiaationeuvostojen päätösten mahdollisimman pikainen tekeminen antaisi ehdokasmaille mahdollisuuden jatkaa integroitumistaan yhteisön verkostoihin ja muihin yleissivistävän ja ammatillisen koulutuksen sekä nuorisoalan toimintoihin niiden keskeytymättä. Näin ollen neuvostoa pyydetään hyväksymään liitteenä oleva ehdotus neuvoston päätökseksi koskevasta Unkarin assosiaationeuvostossa vahvistettavasta yhteisön kannasta. Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan osallistumista yhteisön 3 Ehdotus NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖS Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan koskevasta assosiaationeuvostossa vahvistettavasta yhteisön kannasta EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen ja erityisesti sen 149 artiklan yhdessä 300 artiklan 2 kohdan kanssa, ottaa huomioon komission ehdotuksen, sekä katsoo seuraavaa: (1) (2) (3) (4) Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan välisestä assosiaatiosta tehdyn Eurooppa-sopimuksen lisäpöytäkirja tehtiin 4 päivänä joulukuuta 1995 tehdyllä neuvoston ja komission päätöksellä. Lisäpöytäkirjan 1 artiklan mukaisesti Unkari voi osallistua yhteisön puiteohjelmiin, erityisohjelmiin, hankkeisiin tai muuhun toimintaan erityisesti nuorisoalalla, ja 2 artiklan mukaisesti assosiaationeuvosto päättää Unkarin osallistumisen ehdoista ja edellytyksistä kyseiseen toimintaan. 4 päivänä elokuuta 1997 tehdyn Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan assosiaationeuvoston päätöksen N:o 1/971 voimaantulon jälkeen Unkari on osallistunut Nuorten Eurooppa -ohjelmaan 1 päivästä syyskuuta 1997. Yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmasta. 2000 tehdyn Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätöksen N:o …/2000/EY2 ja erityisesti sen 11 artiklan mukaan Keski- ja Itä-Euroopan assosioituneet maat voivat osallistua tähän ohjelmaan Eurooppa- sopimuksissa, päätöksissä vahvistettujen ehtojen mukaisesti, assosiaationeuvostojen lisäpöytäkirjoissa niiden ja ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA: 1 2 EYVL L 260, 23. 9. 1997, s. 23. EYVL L …, … 2000, s. [sovittelukomitean päätös tehty 29 päivänä helmikuuta 2000]. 4 Ainoa artikla Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan Eurooppa- sopimuksella perustetussa assosiaationeuvostossa vahvistettava yhteisön kanta, joka koskee Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan, on liitteenä oleva luonnos assosiaationeuvoston päätökseksi. Tehty Brysselissä Neuvoston puolesta Puheenjohtaja 5 Luonnos Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan ASSOSIAATIONEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖS N:o …/ 2000, tehty. , Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan koskevista ehdoista ASSOSIAATIONEUVOSTO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan Eurooppa-sopimuksen Unkarin osallistumista yhteisön ohjelmiin koskevan lisäpöytäkirjan ja erityisesti sen 1 ja 2 artiklan3, sekä katsoo seuraavaa: (1) (2) (3) Lisäpöytäkirjan 1 artiklan mukaisesti Unkari voi osallistua yhteisön puiteohjelmiin, erityisohjelmiin, hankkeisiin ja muuhun toimintaan erityisesti nuorisoalalla. Lisäpöytäkirjan 2 artiklan mukaisesti osallistumisen ehdoista ja edellytyksistä kyseiseen toimintaan. assosiaationeuvosto päättää Unkarin 4 päivänä elokuuta 1997 tehdyn Euroopan yhteisöjen ja niiden jäsenvaltioiden sekä Unkarin tasavallan assosiaationeuvoston päätöksen N:o 1/974 voimaantulon jälkeen Unkari on osallistunut Nuorten Eurooppa -ohjelmaan 1 päivästä syyskuuta 1997 ja on ilmaissut haluavansa osallistua uuteen Nuoriso-ohjelmaan, ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA: 1 artikla ’Nuoriso-ohjelma’, Unkari osallistuu yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmaan, liitteissä I ja II vahvistettujen ehtojen mukaisesti; liitteet ovat tämän päätöksen erottamaton osa. jäljempänä Tätä päätöstä sovelletaan Nuoriso-ohjelman keston ajan 1 päivästä tammikuuta 2000. 2 artikla 3 4 EYVL L 317, 30. 12. 1995, s. 30. EYVL L 260, 23. 9. 1997, s. 23. 6 3 artikla Tämä päätös tulee voimaan päivänä, jona assosiaationeuvosto tekee sen. Tehty Brysselissä Assosiaationeuvoston puolesta Puheenjohtaja 7 LIITE I Ehdot Unkarin osallistumiselle Nuoriso-ohjelmaan 1. Unkari osallistuu Nuoriso-ohjelman, toimintaan kyseisestä yhteisön toimintaohjelmasta. 2000 tehdyssä Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätöksessä N:o. /2000/EY määriteltyjen tavoitteiden, perusteiden ja määräaikojen mukaisesti sekä siinä säädettyjä menettelyjä noudattaen, jollei tässä päätöksessä toisin säädetä. jäljempänä ’ohjelma’, 2. Nuoriso-ohjelmasta tehdyn päätöksen 5 artiklan ehtojen sekä jäsenvaltioiden ja komission kyseisen ohjelman kansallisten toimistojen velvollisuuksiin liittyvien komission antamien säännösten mukaisesti Unkarin on luotava tarkoituksenmukaiset jotta ohjelman toimien toteutusta voidaan hallinnoida koordinoidusti rakenteet, kansallisella varmistaakseen tarvittavat asianmukaisen rahoituksen kyseiselle toimistolle, jonka toimintaan ohjelmasta annetaan avustuksia. Unkarin on toteutettava kaikki muut tarpeelliset toimet taatakseen ohjelman tehokas toiminta kansallisella tasolla. toimenpiteet toteutettava tasolla, ja 3. Voidakseen osallistua ohjelmaan Unkari maksaa vuosittain osuuden Euroopan unionin yleiseen talousarvioon liitteessä II esitettyjen yksityiskohtaisten sääntöjen mukaisesti. Ohjelmassa tapahtuvien muutosten tai Unkarin valmiuksien kehittymisen huomioon ottamiseksi assosiaatiokomitealla on valtuudet tarvittaessa mukauttaa rahoitusosuutta, jotta talousarvion tasapaino säilyisi vakaana ohjelmaa täytäntöön pantaessa. 4. Osallistumisedellytykset ja yksityishenkilöiden hakemusten jättämiseen, arviointiin ja valintaan sovelletaan samoja ehtoja kuin osallistumisedellytykset järjestöihin ja yksityishenkilöihin. täyttäviin yhteisön laitoksiin, unkarilaisten järjestöjen täyttävien laitosten, voi Komissio nimittäessään riippumattomia asiantuntijoita ohjelmasta tehdyn päätöksen asiaa koskevien säännösten mukaisesti avustamaan komissiota hankkeiden arvioinnissa. huomioon myös asiantuntijat unkarilaiset ottaa 5. Ohjelman yhteisöulottuvuuden varmistamiseksi hankkeissa ja toimissa on oltava mukana vähintään yksi kumppani jostakin yhteisön jäsenvaltiosta, jotta sille voidaan myöntää yhteisön rahoitustukea. 6. Hajautetusti hallinnoitaviin toimiin sekä 2 kohdan mukaisesti perustettavan kansallisen toimiston toimintaan annettavaan rahoitustukeen Unkarille osoitetaan varoja yhteisön sekä Unkarin tasolla rahoitusosuuden perusteella. Kansallisen toimiston toimintaan myönnettävän rahoitustuen enimmäismäärä on 50 prosenttia kansallisen toimiston toimintaohjelman talousarviosta. talousarviojakauman päätettävän vuotuisen ohjelman 7. Yhteisön jäsenvaltiot ja Unkari tekevät olemassa olevien säädösten rajoissa kaikkensa helpottaakseen nuorten ja muiden edellytykset täyttävien henkilöiden vapaata liikkuvuutta ja oleskelua Unkarissa ja yhteisön jäsenvaltioissa heidän osallistuessaan tämän päätöksen soveltamisalaan kuuluvaan toimintaan. 8 8. Unkari ei sovella tämän päätöksen soveltamisalaan kuuluvien toimien yhteydessä käytettäviksi tarkoitettuihin tavaroihin ja palveluihin välillisiä veroja, tulleja, tuonti- ja vientikieltoja tai -rajoituksia. 9. Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio ja Unkari seuraavat kumppanuuden perusteella jatkuvasti Unkarin osallistumista ohjelmaan, sanotun kuitenkaan rajoittamatta Euroopan yhteisöjen komission ja Euroopan yhteisöjen tilintarkastustuomioistuimen sellaisten tehtävien hoitoa, jotka koskevat ohjelman seurantaa ja arviointia siitä tehdyn päätöksen 13 artiklan nojalla. Unkari toimittaa komissiolle tarvittavat kertomukset ja osallistuu muihin yhteisön tässä yhteydessä määräämiin erityistoimiin. tai tekemissä 10. Yhteisön varainhoitoa koskevien säännösten mukaisesti unkarilaisten tahojen kanssa tai näiden tehdyissä tilintarkastustuomioistuimen tekemistä ja tilintarkastuksista. Tilintarkastuksia voidaan tehdä kyseisten tahojen yhteisöä kohtaan oleviin sopimusvelvoitteisiin liittyvien tulojen ja menojen valvomiseksi. Asianomaisten Unkarin viranomaisten on yhteistyön ja molemminpuolisen edun nimissä annettava kohtuulliseksi ja mahdolliseksi katsottavissa määrin apua tällaisen valvonnan ja tarkastusten suorittamisessa siten kuin kussakin tilanteessa on tarpeen tai hyödyllistä. on määrättävä valtuuttamasta komission valvonnasta sopimuksissa tai niiden Jäsenvaltioiden ja komission Nuoriso-ohjelman kansallisiin toimistoihin liittyviä velvollisuuksia koskevia komission antamia säännöksiä sovelletaan Unkarin, komission ja Unkarin kansallisen toimiston välisiin suhteisiin. Jos Unkarin kansallisen toimiston laiminlyönteihin tai petoksiin, Unkarin todetaan syyllistyneen väärinkäytöksiin, viranomaiset ovat vastuussa varoista, joita ei saada takaisin. 11. Unkarin edustajat osallistuvat tarkkailijoina ohjelmakomitean kokouksiin niitä koskevien asioiden osalta, sanotun kuitenkaan rajoittamatta Nuoriso-ohjelmasta tehdyn päätöksen 8 artiklassa tarkoitettujen menettelyjen soveltamista. Unkarin edustajat eivät ole läsnä komitean kokouksissa muita asioita käsiteltäessä eivätkä äänestyksissä. 12. Hakemusmenettelyihin, sopimuksiin, annettaviin kertomuksiin ja muihin ohjelman hallinnollisiin järjestelyihin liittyvässä komission kanssa käytävässä yhteydenpidossa käytettävän kielen on oltava jokin yhteisön virallisista kielistä. 13. Yhteisö ja Unkari voivat lopettaa tämän päätöksen mukaisen toiminnan milloin tahansa ilmoittamalla asiasta kirjallisesti kaksitoista kuukautta aikaisemmin. Hankkeita ja toimia, jotka ovat käynnissä lopettamishetkellä, jatketaan, kunnes ne saadaan päätökseen tässä päätöksessä säädettyjen edellytysten mukaisesti. 9 LIITE II Unkarin rahoitusosuus Nuoriso-ohjelmasta 1. Voidakseen osallistua Nuoriso-ohjelmaan Unkari maksaa vuonna 2000 Euroopan unionin talousarvioon 1 539 000 euron rahoitusosuuden. Assosiaationeuvosto rahoitusosuudesta vuoden 2000 kuluessa. päättää Unkarin ohjelmaan seuraavina vuosina maksamasta 2. Unkari maksaa edellä mainitun rahoitusosuuden osittain kansallisesta talousarviostaan ja osittain Phare-ohjelman maakohtaisesta ohjelmastaan. Jollei Phare-ohjelman erillisestä ohjelmointimenettelystä muuta johdu, pyydetyt Phare-varat siirretään Unkarille erillisellä rahoituspöytäkirjalla. Nämä kansallisesta talousarviosta tulevan osan kanssa Unkarin kansallisen rahoitusosuuden, josta se suorittaa maksuja komission vuotuisten rahoituspyyntöjen mukaisesti. varat muodostavat yhdessä Unkarin 3. Phare-varoja pyydetään seuraavan aikataulun mukaisesti: – 760 000 euroa Nuoriso-ohjelman rahoitusosuuteen vuonna 2000. Loppuosa Unkarin rahoitusosuudesta maksetaan maan kansallisesta talousarviosta. 4. Ohjelmaan talousarvioon varainhoitoasetusta erityisesti Unkarin rahoitusosuuden hallinnoinnin osalta. sovelletaan Euroopan yleiseen unionin sovellettavaa Komissio suorittaa Unkarin edustajien ja asiantuntijoiden matka- ja oleskelukulut, jotka aiheutuvat osallistumisesta tarkkailijoina liitteessä I olevassa 11 kohdassa tarkoitetun komitean työskentelyyn tai muihin ohjelman täytäntöönpanoon liittyviin kokouksiin, samoin perustein ja samojen menettelyjen mukaisesti kuin kulloinkin on voimassa Euroopan unionin jäsenvaltioiden valtiosta riippumattomien järjestöjen asiantuntijoiden osalta. 5. Tämän päätöksen tultua voimaan ja kunkin seuraavan vuoden alussa komissio pyytää Unkaria maksamaan sen tämän päätöksen mukaista rahoitusosuutta vastaavat varat ohjelman osalta. Rahoitusosuus pankkitilille. ilmoitetaan euroina, ja se maksetaan komission euromääräiselle Unkari maksaa rahoitusosuutensa rahoituspyynnön mukaisesti: edellyttäen, – viimeistään 1 päivänä toukokuuta sen kansallisesta talousarviosta rahoitettavan osuuden osalta rahoituspyynnön viimeistään 1 päivänä huhtikuuta, tai viimeistään kuukauden kuluttua rahoituspyynnön lähettämisestä, jos tämä tapahtuu myöhemmin, että komissio lähettää – viimeistään 1 päivänä toukokuuta Phare-ohjelmasta rahoitettavan osuuden osalta edellyttäen, että vastaavat määrät on toimitettu Unkarille tähän mennessä, tai 30 päivän kuluessa kyseisten varojen toimittamisesta Unkarille. 10 Jos rahoitusosuuden maksu viivästyy, Unkari maksaa viivästyskorkoa maksamattomasta määrästä eräpäivästä alkaen. Viivästyskorkona käytetään eräpäivänä voimassa olevaa Euroopan keskuspankin euromääräisiin toimiinsa soveltamaa korkoa korotettuna 1,5 prosenttiyksiköllä. 11 RAHOITUSSELVITYS 1. TOIMENPITEEN NIMI Unkarin osallistuminen Nuoriso-ohjelmaan. 2. BUDJETTIKOHDAT B7-030 Taloudellinen tuki Keski- ja Itä-Euroopan assosioituneille maille. 6091 yhteisön ohjelmiin. ja Itä-Euroopan assosioituneiden maiden osallistumisesta Tulot Keski- 3. OIKEUSPERUSTA Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimus 300 artiklan 2 kohdan kanssa. ja erityisesti sen 149 artikla yhdessä Unkarin kanssa tehdyn Eurooppa-sopimuksen lisäpöytäkirja, osallistumisesta yhteisön ohjelmiin. jossa määrätään Yhteisön Nuoriso-toimintaohjelmasta. 2000 tehty Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston päätös N:o. /2000/EY ja erityisesti sen 11 artikla. 4. 4. 1 TOIMENPITEEN KUVAUS Toimenpiteen yleistavoite Unkarin kanssa tehdyn Eurooppa-sopimuksen lisäpöytäkirjassa määrätään Unkarin osallistumisesta yhteisön ohjelmiin useilla eri aloilla, joihin kuuluu myös nuorisoala. Sen lisäksi, että osallistuminen edistää Eurooppa-sopimusten taloudellista yhteistyötä ja kulttuuriyhteistyötä koskevien määräysten täytäntöönpanoa, se antaa Unkarille mahdollisuuden tutustua yhteisön ohjelmissa noudatettaviin menettelyihin ja menetelmiin. Unkari on osallistunut Nuorten Eurooppa -ohjelmaan 1. syyskuuta 1997 alkaen. Komission 16. heinäkuuta 1997 antaman ”Agenda 2000” -tiedonannon ja Luxemburgissa kokoontuneen Eurooppa-neuvoston päätelmien mukaisesti Unkarin osallistuminen tähän ohjelmaan on ollut osa vahvistettua liittymistä valmistelevaa strategiaa, jolla tuetaan maan valmisteluja tulevaa Euroopan unioniin liittymistä varten. Ohjelmiin osallistumiseen liittyvä päätöksentekomenettely edellyttää unionin ja Unkarin assosiaationeuvoston päätöstä. Unkarin tähän ohjelmaan osallistumisesta 4. elokuuta 1997 tehdyn assosiaationeuvoston päätöksen voimassaolo päättyi 31. joulukuuta 1999. Tämän uuden assosiaationeuvoston päätösluonnoksen tavoitteena on mahdollistaa Unkarin osallistuminen ohjelmaan tämän jälkeenkin sekä uuden Nuoriso-ohjelman ja 12 sen edeltäjän välisen jatkuvuuden varmistaminen. Kuten aiemmassa päätöksessä, siinä säädetään erityisesti Unkarin rahoitusosuuteen liittyvistä edellytyksistä sekä ohjelmaan osallistumisen käytännön järjestelyistä. 4. 2 Toimenpiteen kesto ja sen uusimista koskevat yksityiskohtaiset säännöt Kyseisen yhteisön ohjelman loppuun asti eli 31. 12. 2006. 5. 5. 1 5. 2 5. 3 MENOJEN JA TULOJEN LUOKITUS Ei-pakolliset menot Jaksotetut määrärahat Oletettu tulolaji rahoitusosuutta, Unkarin Eurooppa-sopimuksen lisäpöytäkirjan 3 artiklassa määrätään, että Unkari vastaa itse osallistumisensa kustannuksista, joten sitä pyydetään maksamaan rahoitusosuus ohjelmaan osallistumisesta. Koska mainitun artiklan mukaan yhteisö voi täydentää kansallisesta Unkarin talousarviostaan. Phare-ohjelman maakohtaisesta ohjelmasta. Tarvittavat Phare-varat kirjataan kohtaan B7-030 ja siirretään Unkarille erillisellä rahoituspöytäkirjalla. Nämä varat muodostavat yhdessä Unkarin kansallisesta talousarviosta tulevan osan kanssa Unkarin kansallisen rahoitusosuuden, josta se suorittaa maksuja komission vuotuisten rahoituspyyntöjen mukaisesti. Kun Unkari on maksanut koko osuuden, siirretään EU:n talousarviosaatavien alamomentille 6091. rahoitusosuudesta on maksettava vain otetaan Loppuosa osa se 6. MENO-/TULOLAJI – tuen osuus 100 % – yhteisrahoitus julkisen tai yksityisen sektorin muiden tulolähteiden kanssa – Yhteisön rahoitusosuuden osittaisesta tai täydellisestä takaisinmaksusta ei ole määräyksiä. – Tulojen osalta Unkarin osuus sen osallistumiskulujen kattamisesta kirjataan alamomentille 6091. Tulo kohdistetaan kyseessä olevan ohjelman menojen alamomenteille ja tarvittaessa käyttömenojen alamomenteille. Odotettavissa oleva kokonaistulo ilmoitetaan kohdassa 7. 4. RAHOITUSVAIKUTUKSET Toimenpiteen yhteenlaskettujen kustannusten välinen suhde) kokonaiskustannusten laskutapa (yksittäisten ja 7. 7. 1 Unkarin kanssa tehdyn Eurooppa-sopimuksen lisäpöytäkirjan mukaiset kyseisen ohjelman Unkarin ja rahoitusosuudessa otetaan huomioon kaksi osatekijää: talousarviojärjestelyt seuraavat: rahoitus- ovat 13 – ennakoitavissa olevat joiden laskentaperusteena ovat ohjelman määrärahat (Nuoriso-ohjelman vuoden 2000 alustava talousarvioesitys), maan kyky hyödyntää ohjelmaa, maan aiempi kokemus osallistumisesta Nuorten Eurooppa - ohjelmaan, sekä toimintakulut, – ennakoitavissa olevat hallintokulut eli kokouksista ja virkamatkoista aiheutuvat kulut. Näiden hallintokulujen arvioitu vuotuinen määrä on 19 000 euroa. käyttää Unkari rahoituksesta toimintakulujen rahoitusosuutta. täydentääkseen maan osan Phare-ohjelman vuotuisen maakohtaisen ohjelmansa talousarviosta maksettavaa kansallisesta 7. 2 Kustannusten jakautuminen eri tekijöiden kesken Kustannukset ovat 1 539 000 euroa vuonna 2000, Unkarin talousarviosta ja 760 000 euroa Phare-ohjelmasta. josta 779 000 euroa rahoitetaan 7. 3 Talousarvion osaan B sisältyvät tutkimuksista, asiantuntijatapaamisista jne. aiheutuvat toimintamenot Pro memoria: enimmäismäärään saakka suhteessa EU:n 15 jäsenvaltion Nuoriso- ohjelman kansallisesta talousarviosta maksettavan rahoitusosuuden rajoissa. kaltaisiin määrärahoihin, kuitenkin maan kyseisen 7. 4 Maksusitoumusmäärärahojen ja maksumäärärahojen aikataulu Alamomentille B7-030 kirjattavat määrät: 760 000 euroa maksusitoumusmäärärahoja ja maksumäärärahoja vuonna 2000. Ennakoidut vuositulot ovat seuraavat: 1 539 000 euroa 19 000 euroa hallintokuluihin. vuonna 2000, josta 1 520 000 euroa toimintakuluihin ja 8. PETOSTEN TORJUNTATOIMET Kaikissa komission sopimuksissa ja muissa oikeudellisissa sitoumuksissa määrätään komission ja tilintarkastustuomioistuimen paikalla toteutettavista tarkastuksista. Toimenpiteiden edunsaajien velvollisuutena on muun muassa antaa kertomuksia ja rahoitusselvityksiä. Ne analysoidaan niiden sisällön ja menojen tukikelpoisuuden suhteen ottaen huomioon yhteisön rahoitustavoitteet. Talousarvion budjettikohtia koskevia petosten vastaisia säännöksiä sovelletaan myös tähän kohtaan, kun se mukautetaan Keski- ja Itä-Euroopan maita koskevaksi. 9. 9. 1 KUSTANNUSVAIKUTTAVUUSANALYYSI Määrälliset erityistavoitteet ja kohderyhmä Nuoriso-ohjelman avaamisen tavoitteena on auttaa Unkaria saamaan ohjelmasta samanlaista hyötyä kuin yhteisön jäsenvaltiot. Yhteisön nuorisoa koskevien toimien olennainen tavoite on auttaa kaikkia Euroopan kansalaisia hyödyntämään kykyjään 14 mahdollisimman hyvin sekä osoittamaan aloitteellisuutta ja luovuutta siten, että he rakentamiseen voivat täysipainoisesti. Tämän tavoitteen perustana on avoimen eurooppalaisen alueen asteittainen perustaminen nuorisoa varten. yhteiskunnan toimintaan Euroopan osallistua ja Nuoriso-ohjelman yleistavoitteena on edistää kaikkien nuorten koulutusta toimilla, joilla täydennetään jäsenvaltioiden omia tai yhteisön tasolla toteutettavia toimia yleissivistävän ja ammatillisen koulutuksen alalla. Ohjelman erityistavoitteet ovat seuraavat: – – – – – – nuorisovaihdon tehostaminen sellaisten 15–25-vuotiaiden nuorten kesken, jotka asuvat yhdessä tai useammassa jäsenvaltiossa, sellaisten nuorison käynnistämien ja nuorille suunnattujen yhteisön etua koskevien tai kansalliset innovatiivisten hankkeiden tukeminen, joilla nuorille annetaan mahdollisuus aktiiviseen ja tunnustettuun asemaan yhteiskunnassa ja kehitetään heidän henkilökohtaisia kykyjään, luovuuttaan, yhteisvastuullisuuttaan ja itsenäisyyttään, rajat ylittävien aloitteiden ja suotuisten olosuhteiden luominen korkealaatuisille tapaamisille ja kaikkien ohjelman yhteydessä toteutettujen toimintamuotojen laadun varmistaminen, nuoriso-ohjaajakoulutuksen tukeminen, jotta nuoret voisivat hyötyä yhteisistä laadukkaista toimenpiteistä, jotka liittyvät ohjelman yleistavoitteisiin, niiden jäsenvaltioiden välisen sekä välisen yhteistyön tehostaminen kokemusten vaihdon ja yhteisön tason yhteisten aloitteiden avulla; näin tuetaan jäsenvaltioita niiden pyrkimyksissä parantaa nuoria koskevien palvelujen ja toimenpiteiden laatua erityisesti kehittämällä toimia, joiden tarkoituksena on antaa nuorille tietoa ohjelman tavoitteista, sekä komission ja vahvistaminen, yhteiskuntaan yhteisvastuullisuuden osallistumisen ja sopeutumisen edistäminen sekä nuorison kannustaminen uusien taitojen ja kykyjen hankkimiseen vapaamuotoisten oppimiskokemusten kautta osallistumalla paikallisyhteisöjen hyväksi toteutettaviin kansainvälisen eurooppalaisen vapaaehtoistyön toimiin. aktiivisen nuorison 9. 2 Toimenpiteen perustelut – yhteisön rahoitustuen tarpeellisuus Koska ohjelmaan osallistumisesta johtuvat kustannukset ovat suuret taloudellinen tilanne on heikko, tuki Phare-ohjelmasta on oleellisen tärkeää. ja Unkarin – toimenpiteen toteuttamisessa käytettävien menettelytapojen valinta Kansallisesta talousarviosta suoritettavan rahoitusosuuden, jota täydennetään Phare- ohjelmasta myönnettävällä tapahtuva Unkarin yhdentyminen ohjelmaan antaa sen kansalaisille mahdollisuuden yhteistyöhön kanssa. Unkarin jäsenvaltioiden Euroopan kansalaisten yhdentymisellä yhteisön verkkoihin on suuri merkitys Unkarin valmistautumiselle tulevaan jäsenyyteen. rahoitusosuudella, myötä kansalaisten nykyisten yhteisön 15 – tärkeimmät epävarmuustekijät, jotka saattavat vaikuttaa toimenpiteen erityistuloksiin Koska hankkeet valitaan laadullisin perustein, todellinen vaikutus saadaan selville ainoastaan arvioimalla unkarilaisten organisaatioiden kykyä vastata komission ohjelman yhteydessä esittämiin tarjouspyyntöihin. 9. 3 Toiminnan seuranta ja arviointi Nuoriso-ohjelmaan kuuluvat seuranta- ja arviointimenettelyt (erityisesti arvioinnin osalta, kuten ohjelmaa koskevassa päätöksessä säädetään) koskevat myös unkarilaisten edunsaajien hyväksi rahoitettuja toimia. 10. HALLINTOMENOT (YLEISEN TALOUSARVION PÄÄLUOKAN III OSA A) Tarvittavat hallintomäärärahat saadaan varsinaisesti käyttöön vasta, kun komissio on tehnyt voimavarojen jakoa koskevan vuosittaisen päätöksensä, jossa otetaan huomioon budjettivallan käyttäjän vahvistamat lisämäärärahat ja lisähenkilöstömäärä. 10. 1 Vaikutus toimien määrään Toimien luonne Toimenpiteen hallinnointiin osoitettava henkilöstö vakinaiset virat väliaikaiset toimet Virkamiehet tai väliaikaiset toimihenkilöt A B C Muu henkilöstö Yhteensä 1 1 Josta Kesto Lisähenkilöstö ä 2000–2006 asianomaisen pääosaston tai yksikön nykyistä henkilöstöä 1 1 10. 2 Henkilöstön käytön taloudellinen kokonaisvaikutus Määrä Laskutapa (kokonaiskustannukset vuosina 2000–2006) (euroa) Virkamiehet (*) 756 000 1 henkilö x 7 vuotta x 108 000 Väliaikaiset toimihenkilöt Muu henkilöstö Yhteensä 756 000 (*) Käyttäen tehtävien hoitamiseen tarvittavia nykyisiä voimavaroja (laskelma perustuu talousarvion osastoihin A1, A2, A4, A5 ja A7). 16 10. 3 Toiminnasta aiheutuva muiden hallintomenojen kasvu (euroa) Budjettikohta A-7010 – virkamatkat A-7031 – komiteat Määrä 3 000 4 000 Laskutapa (toimen vuotuiset kustannukset) 1 100 euroa x 3 virkamatkaa vuodessa kahden osanottajan matka- ja oleskelukulut kahteen kahden päivän kokoukseen A-7030 – muut kokoukset 8 000 kahden osanottajan matka- ja oleskelukulut neljään kahden päivän kokoukseen Yhteensä 4 000 19 000 yhden asiantuntijan matka- ja oleskelukulut neljään kahden päivän kokoukseen Edellä esitetyt menot katetaan Unkarilta saaduilla tuloilla (varainhoitoasetuksen 4 artiklan 2 kohdan kolmas luetelmakohta) (katso rahoitusselvityksen kohdat 5. 3 ja 7. 4). 17


title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 832/2000 of 26 April 2000 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar for the 36th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1489/1999

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar

formats: pdf print

text: 27. 4. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 102/3 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 832/2000 of 26 April 2000 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar for the 36th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1489/1999 THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subpara- graph of Article 18(5) thereof, and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. (3) (4) Following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the 36th partial invitation to tender, the provisions set out in Article 1 should be adopted. The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, Whereas: (1) (2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1489/1999 of 7 July 1999 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar. Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1489/ 1999 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 For the 36th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1489/1999 the maximum amount of the export refund is fixed at EUR 48,860/kg. This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 April 2000. Article 2 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 26 April 2000. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 252, 25. 9. 1999, p. 1. (2) OJ L 172, 8. 7. 1999, p. 27


title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 834/2000 of 26 April 2000 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
raw sugar
white sugar

text: L 102/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 4. 2000 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2000 of 26 April 2000 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(5) thereof, Whereas: (1) (2) (3) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 provides that the difference between quotations or prices on the world market for the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of that Regulation and prices for those products within the Community may be covered by an export refund. Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 provides that when refunds on white and raw sugar, undenatured and exported in its unaltered state, are being fixed account must be taken of the situation on the Community and world markets in sugar and in particular of the price and cost factors set out in Article 19 of that Regulation; whereas the same Article provides that the economic aspect of the proposed exports should also be taken into account. The refund on raw sugar must be fixed in respect of the standard quality; the latter is defined in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 431/68 of 9 April 1968 determining the standard quality for raw sugar and fixing the Community frontier crossing point for calcu- lating cif prices for sugar (2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94 (3); furthermore, this refund should be fixed in accordance with Article 19(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999; candy sugar is defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2135/95 of 7 September 1995 laying down detailed rules of application for the grant of export refunds in the sugar sector (4); the refund thus calculated for sugar containing added flavouring or colouring matter must apply to their sucrose content and, accordingly, be fixed per 1 % of the said content. The world market situation or the specific requirements of certain markets may make it necessary to vary the refund for sugar according to destination. In special cases, the amount of the refund may be fixed by other legal instruments. The refund must be fixed every two weeks; whereas it may be altered in the intervening period. It follows from applying the rules set out above to the present situation on the market in sugar and in partic- ular sugar within the Community and on the world market that the refund should be as set out in the Annex hereto. to quotations or prices for The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto. This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 April 2000. Article 2 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 26 April 2000. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 252, 25. 9. 1999, p. 1. (2) OJ L 89, 10. 4. 1968, p. 3. (3) OJ L 349, 31. 12. 1994, p. 105. (4) OJ L 214, 8. 9. 1995, p. 16. 27. 4. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 102/7 to the Commission Regulation of 26 April 2000 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state ANNEX Product code 1701 11 90 9100 1701 11 90 9910 1701 11 90 9950 1701 12 90 9100 1701 12 90 9910 1701 12 90 9950 Amount of refund — EUR/100 kg — 40,03 40,03 40,03 40,03 (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) 1701 91 00 9000 0,4352 — EUR/1 % of sucrose × 100 kg — 1701 99 10 9100 1701 99 10 9910 1701 99 10 9950 — EUR/100 kg — 43,52 45,71 43,52 1701 99 90 9100 0,4352 — EUR/1 % of sucrose × 100 kg — (1) Applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %; if the yield is other than 92 %, the refund applicable is calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999. (2) Fixing suspended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2689/85 (OJ L 255, 26. 9. 1985, p. 12), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3251/85 (OJ L 309, 21. 11. 1985, p. 14)