title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 2502/1999 av den 26 november 1999 om ändring av förordning (EEG) nr 2166/83 om införande av ett system med tillstånd för visst fiske i ett område norr om Skottland (Shetlandsområdet)

eurovoc_concepts:
Scotland
fishing area
fishing licence

formats: html pdf print

text: L 304/14 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 27. 11. 1999 KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 2502/1999 av den 26 november 1999 om ändring av förordning (EEG) nr 2166/83 om införande av ett system med tillstånd för visst fiske i ett område norr om Skottland (Shetlandsområdet) EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING med beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av rådets förordning (EEG) nr 3760/92 av den 20 december 1992 om ett gemenskapssystem för fiske och vattenbruk (1), senast ändrad genom förordning (EG) nr 1181/ 98 (2), särskilt artikel 7. 2 i denna, och av följande skäl: 1. 2. 3. I kommissionens förordning (EEG) nr 2166/83 av den 29 juli 1983 om införande av ett system med tillstånd för visst fiske i ett område norr om Skottland (Shetlands- öarna) (3), ska fastställs hur rapporteras för gemenskapens fartyg. inom området rörelser I kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1489/97 av den 29 juli 1997 om fastställande av tillämpningsföreskrifter för rådets förordning (EEG) nr 2847/93 vad beträffar satel- litbaserade kontrollsystem för fartyg (4), senast ändrad genom förordning (EG) nr 2445/1999 (5), fastställs de specifika uppgifter som gemenskapens fiskefartyg enligt kontrollsystemet är skyldiga att lämna. För att lätta berörda fiskares arbetsbörda bör de fiske- fartyg som är verksamma i området norr om Skottland (Shetlandsområdet), vilka är underställda kontrollsys- temet och som via kontrollsystemet lämnar nödvändiga 4. 5. uppgifter, medges undantag rörelser. från rapportering av Det är därför nödvändigt att ändra förordning (EG) nr 2166/83. De åtgärder som föreskrivs i denna förordning är fören- liga med yttrandet från Förvaltningskommittén för fiske och vattenbruk. HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE. Artikel 1 Följande punkt skall läggas till artikel 4 i förordning (EEG) nr 2166/83: De gemenskapsfartyg som bedriver fiskeverksamhet ”3. inom området i vilket det satellitbaserade fartygsövervak- ningssystemet används och som överför uppgifter via detta system, enligt artikel 3 i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1489/97 (*), skall medges undantag från rapportering av fartygens rörelser som avses i punkt 1. (*) EGT L 202, 30. 7. 1997, s. 18. ” Artikel 2 Denna förordning träder i kraft den sjunde dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater. Utfärdad i Bryssel den 26 november 1999. På kommissionens vägnar Franz FISCHLER Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 389, 31. 12. 1992, s. 1. (2) EGT L 164, 9. 6. 1998, s. 1. (3) EGT L 206, 30. 7. 1983, s. 71. (4) EGT L 202, 30. 7. 1997, s. 18. (5) EGT L 298, 19. 11. 1999, s. 5


title: Rozhodnutí Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 164/1999 ze dne 26. listopadu 1999, kterým se mění příloha II (Technické předpisy, normy, zkoušení a certifikace) Dohody o EHP

eurovoc_concepts:
Community certification
satellite communications
technical regulations
technical standard
telecommunications
waveband

text: 11/sv. 5 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 331 21999D0164 1. 3. 2001 ÚŘEDNÍ VĚSTNÍK EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ L 61/15 ROZHODNUTÍ SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU EHP č. 164/1999 ze dne 26. listopadu 1999, kterým se mění příloha II (Technické předpisy, normy, zkoušení a certifikace) Dohody o EHP SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR EHP, s ohledem na Dohodu o Evropském hospodářském prostoru ve znění Protokolu o úpravě Dohody o Evropském hospodářském prostoru (dále jen „Dohoda“), a zejména s ohledem na článek 98 této dohody, vzhledem k těmto důvodům: (1) (2) Příloha II Dohody byla změněna rozhodnutím Smíšeného výboru EHP č. 112/1999 ze dne 24. září 1999 (1). Rozhodnutí Komise 98/734/ES ze dne 30. listopadu 1998 o společném technickém předpisu pro pohyblivé družicové pozemské stanice (LMES) pracující ve frekvenčních pásmech 1,5/1,6 GHz (2) by mělo být začleněno do Dohody, ROZHODL TAKTO: Článek 1 V kapitole XVIII přílohy II Dohody se za bod 4zz (rozhodnutí Komise 98/578/ES) vkládá nový bod, který zní: „4zza. 398 D 0734: rozhodnutí Komise 98/734/ES ze dne 30. listopadu 1998 o společném technic- kém předpisu pro pohyblivé družicové pozemské stanice (LMES) pracující ve frekvenčních pásmech 1,5/1,6 GHz (Úř. věst. L 351, 29. 12. 1998, s. 37). “ Článek 2 Znění rozhodnutí 98/734/ES v islandském a norském jazyce, která tvoří přílohu odpovídajících jazy- kových verzí tohoto rozhodnutí, jsou platná. Článek 3 Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 27. listopadu 1999 za předpokladu, že Smíšenému výboru EHP jsou učiněna veškerá oznámení podle čl. 103 odst. 1 Dohody. Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v oddíle EHP a v dodatku EHP Úředního věstníku Evropských společenství. Článek 4 V Bruselu dne 26. listopadu 1999. Za Smíšený výbor EHP předseda N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1) Úř. věst. L 325, 21. 12. 2000, s. 23. (2) Úř. věst. L 351, 29. 12. 1998, s. 37


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 2499/1999 de la Comisión, de 26 de noviembre de 1999, por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CEE) n° 1833/92 por el que se fijan los importes de las ayudas para el suministro de las Azores y de Madeira de productos del sector de los cereales de origen comunitario

eurovoc_concepts:
EU production
Madeira
aid system
cereals
supply

formats: pdf print

text: 27. 11. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 304/9 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 2499/1999 DE LA COMISIÓN de 26 de noviembre de 1999 por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CEE) no 1833/92 por el que se fijan los importes de las ayudas para el suministro de las Azores y de Madeira de productos del sector de los cereales de origen comunitario LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CEE) no 1600/92 del Consejo, de 15 de junio de 1992, sobre medidas específicas en favor de las Azores y de Madeira relativas a determinados productos agra- rios (1), cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 562/98 (2), y, en particular, su artículo 10, (1) Considerando que los importes de las ayudas para el suministro de las Azores y de Madeira en productos del sector de los cereales se fijaron por el Reglamento (CEE) no 1833/92 de la Comisión (3), cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 2303/1999 (4); que, como consecuencia de los cambios en las cotizaciones y los precios de los productos del sector de los cereales en la parte europea de la Comunidad y en el mercado mundial, es conveniente fijar de nuevo las ayudas al abastecimiento de las Azores y de Madeira en los importes que figuran en el Anexo; (2) Considerando que las medidas previstas en el presente Reglamento se ajustan al dictamen del Comité de gestión de los cereales, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Artículo 1 El Anexo del Reglamento (CEE) no 1833/92 modificado, se sustituirá por el Anexo del presente Reglamento. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el 1 de diciembre de 1999. El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 26 de noviembre de 1999. Por la Comisión Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisión (1) DO L 173 de 27. 6. 1992, p. 1. (2) DO L 76 de 13. 3. 1998, p. 6. (3) DO L 185 de 4. 7. 1992, p. 28. (4) DO L 280 de 30. 10. 1999, p. 21. L 304/10 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 27. 11. 1999 del Reglamento de la Comisión, de 26 de noviembre de 1999, por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CEE) no 1833/92 por el que se fijan los importes de las ayudas para el suministro de las Azores y de Madeira de productos del sector de los cereales de origen comunitario ANEXO Producto (Código NC) (en EUR/t) Importe de la ayuda Destino Azores Madeira Trigo blando (1001 90 99) Cebada Maíz Trigo duro (1003 00 90) (1005 90 00) (1001 10 00) 41,50 33,00 51,00 8,00 41,50 33,00 51,00 8,00


title: Odluka Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 168/1999 od 26. studenoga 1999. o izmjeni Priloga IV. (Energija) Sporazumu o EGP-u

eurovoc_concepts:
approximation of laws
electrical energy
electricity supply
energy production
energy transport
single market

text: L_2001061HR. 01002301. xml 11/Sv. 031 HR Službeni list Europske unije 149 21999D0168 L 061/23 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE 26. 11. 1999. ODLUKA ZAJEDNIČKOG ODBORA EGP-a br. 168/1999 od 26. studenoga 1999. o izmjeni Priloga IV. (Energija) Sporazumu o EGP-u ZAJEDNIČKI ODBOR EGP-a, uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, kako je prilagođen Protokolom o prilagodbi Sporazuma o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, dalje u tekstu „Sporazum”, a posebno njegov članak 98. , budući da: (1) Prilog IV. Sporazumu izmijenjen je Odlukom Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 29/1999 od 26. ožujka 1999. (1). (2) Direktivu 96/92/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 19. prosinca 1996. o zajedničkim pravilima za unutarnje tržište električnom energijom (2) treba unijeti u Sporazum. (3) Udio nacionalnog tržišta, kao što je navedeno u članku 19. stavku 1. Direktive 96/92/EZ, za potrebe Sporazuma temelji se na izračunu prosječnog udjela Zajednice kod otvaranja tržišta električnom energijom, ODLUČIO JE: Članak 1. Iza točke 13. (Direktiva 96/57/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća) Priloga IV. Sporazumu dodaje se sljedeća točka: „14. 396 L 0092: Direktiva 96/92/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 19. prosinca 1996. o zajedničkim pravilima za unutarnje tržište električnom energijom (SL L 27, 30. 1. 1997. , str. 20. ). Odredbe Direktive se za potrebe sadašnjeg Sporazuma čitaju sa sljedećim prilagodbama: (a) u članku 3. stavku 2. ‚odgovarajuće odredbe Ugovora, posebno članak 90. ’ tumači se kao ‚odgovarajuće odredbe Sporazuma o EGP-u, posebno članak 59. ’; (b) u članku 3. stavku 3. , ‚članak 90. Ugovora’ tumači se kao ‚članak 59. Sporazuma o EGP-u’; (c) u članku 3. stavku 3. , riječi ‚interesi Zajednice’ tumači se kao ‚interesi ugovornih stranaka’; (d) u članku 7 stavku 2. , na kraju se dodaje sljedeće: ‚, kako se upućuje u Sporazumu o EGP-u, i kao što je prilagođeno za njegove potrebe’; (e) u članku 14. stavku 2. , prvoj se rečenici dodaje sljedeće: ‚,kako se upućuje u Sporazumu o EGP-u, i kao što je prilagođeno za njegove potrebe’; (f) u članku 14. stavku 5. izraz ‚Sedma direktiva Vijeća 83/349/EEZ od 13. lipnja 1983. koja se temelji na članku 54. stavku 3. točki (g) Ugovora o konsolidiranim financijskim izvještajima tumači se kao ‚Sedma direktiva Vijeća 83/349/EEZ od 13. lipnja 1983. koja se temelji na članku 54. stavku 3. točki (g) Ugovora o konsolidiranim financijskim izvještajima, kao što je navedeno u i kao što je prilagođeno za potrebe Sporazuma o EGP-u’; (g) obveza država članica koja je utvrđena člankom 19. stavkom 1. i stavkom 2. o podnošenju izvješća potrošnji električne energije od strane krajnjih potrošača za potrebe izračunavanja prosječnog udjela Zajednice kojim se određuje stupanj otvaranja tržišta, ne primjenjuje se na države članice EFTA-e. (h) u članku 22. riječi ‚odredbe Ugovora, a posebno njegovog članka 86’ tumače se kao ‚odredbe Sporazuma o EGP-u, a pogotovo njegovog članka 54. ’; (i) one države članice EFTA-e u kojima se jamstva i garancije o djelovanju dani prije stupanja na snagu Odluke br. 168/1999 Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a od 26. studenoga 1999. ne mogu ispoštovati zbog odredaba te Odluke, mogu podnijeti zahtjev za prijelazno razdoblje u skladu s člankom 24. stavcima 1. i 2. O zahtjevima za prijelazno razdoblje mora se obavijestiti Nadzorno tijelo EFTA-e, najkasnije šest mjeseci od stupanja na snagu Odluke br. 168/1999 Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a od 26. studenoga 1999. ; (j) u članku 24. stavku 3. , zadnjoj se rečenici dodaje sljedeće: ‚Island i Lihtenštajn’; (k) u članku 27. stavku 2. , na kraju se dodaje sljedeće: ‚Island i Lihtenštajn mogu, zbog posebnih tehničkih osobina njihovog sustava električne energije dobiti dodatno razdoblje od dvije godine nakon stupanja na snagu Odluke br. 168/1999 Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a od 26. studenoga 1999. kako bi primijenili obveze koje proizlaze iz Direktive. ’ ” Članak 2. Tekstovi Direktive 96/92/EZ na islandskom i norveškom jeziku, koji su priloženi odnosnim jezičnim inačicama ove Odluke, vjerodostojni su. Članak 3. Ova Odluka stupa na snagu 27. studenoga 1999. , pod uvjetom da su sve obavijesti u skladu s člankom 103. stavkom 1. Sporazuma podnesene Zajedničkom odboru EGP-a. Članak 4. Ova se Odluka objavljuje u odjeljku o EGP-u i Dodatku o EGP-u Službenom listu Europskih zajednica. Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 26. studenoga 1999. Za Zajednički odbor EGP-a Predsjednik N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1)  SL L 266, 19. 10. 2000. , str. 5. (2)  SL L 27, 30. 1. 1997. , str. 20


title: Décision du Comité mixte de l'EEE n° 173/1999 du 26 novembre 1999 modifiant le protocole 31 de l'accord EEE concernant la coopération dans des secteurs particuliers en dehors des quatre libertés

eurovoc_concepts:
consumer information
consumer movement
consumer protection
mental health
product safety

text: 1. 3. 2001 FR Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes L 61/33 D(cid:201)CISION DU COMIT(cid:201) MIXTE DE L’EEE No 173/1999 du 26 novembre 1999 modifiant le protocole 31 de l’accord EEE concernant la coopØration dans des secteurs particuliers en dehors des quatre libertØs LE COMIT(cid:201) MIXTE DE L’EEE, vu l’accord sur l’Espace Øconomique europØen, modifiØ par le protocole portant adaptation de cet accord, ci-aprŁs dØnommØ «l’accord», et notamment ses articles 86 et 98, considØrant ce qui suit: (1) (2) (3) Le protocole 31 de l’accord a ØtØ modifiØ par la dØcision no 8/94 du ComitØ mixte de l’EEE du 7 juin 1994 (1). Il convient d’Øtendre la coopØration entre les parties (cid:224) l’accord de maniŁre (cid:224) y inclure un cadre gØnØral pour les activitØs communautaires en faveur des consommateurs [dØcision no 283/1999/CE du Parlement europØen et du Conseil (2)]. Il convient dŁs lors de modifier le protocole 31 de l’accord afin que cette coopØration Øtendue puisse commencer le 1er janvier 2000, D(cid:201)CIDE: Article premier (cid:192) l’article 6 du protocole 31 de l’accord, les paragraphes 3 (cid:224) 5 suivants sont ajoutØs (cid:224) la suite du para- graphe 2: Les (cid:201)tats membres de l’AELE participent, (cid:224) partir du 1er janvier 2000, aux activitØs communautai- «3. res rØsultant de l’acte suivant ainsi que des actes qui en dØcoulent: (cid:151) 399 D 0283: dØcision no 283/1999/CE du Parlement europØen et du Conseil du 25 janvier 1999 Øtablissant un cadre gØnØral pour les activitØs communautaires en faveur des consommateurs (JO L 34 du 9. 2. 1999, p. 1). Les (cid:201)tats membres de l’AELE contribuent financiŁrement aux activitØs visØes au paragraphe 3, 4. conformØment (cid:224) l’article 82, paragraphe 1, point a), de l’accord. 5. DŁs le dØbut de la coopØration aux activitØs visØes au paragraphe 3, les (cid:201)tats membres de l’AELE participent (cid:224) part entiŁre aux comitØs et aux groupes de travail de la CE qui assistent la Commission dans la mise en (cid:156)uvre ou l’Ølaboration de ces activitØs. » Article 2 La prØsente dØcision entre en vigueur le 1er janvier 2000, pour autant que toutes les notifications prØvues (cid:224) l’article 103, paragraphe 1, de l’accord aient ØtØ faites au ComitØ mixte de l’EEE. (1) JO L 198 du 30. 7. 1994, p. 142. (2) JO L 34 du 9. 2. 1999, p. 1. L 61/34 FR Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes 1. 3. 2001 La prØsente dØcision est publiØe dans la section EEE et au supplØment EEE du Journal officiel des Communau- tØs europØennes. Article 3 Fait (cid:224) Bruxelles, le 26 novembre 1999. Par le ComitØ mixte de l’EEE Le prØsident N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN


title: Sklep Skupnega odbora EGP št. 173/1999 z dne 26. novembra 1999 o spremembi Protokola 31 k Sporazumu EGP o sodelovanju na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode

text: 11/Zv. 5 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 21999D0173 1. 3. 2001 URADNI LIST EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI SKLEP SKUPNEGA ODBORA EGP št. 173/1999 z dne 26. novembra 1999 349 L 61/33 o spremembi Protokola 31 k Sporazumu EGP o sodelovanju na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode SKUPNI ODBOR EGP JE – ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor je bil prilagojen s Protokolom o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, v nadaljnjem besedilu Sporazum, in zlasti členov 86 in 98 Sporazuma, ob upoštevanju naslednjega: (1) (2) (3) Protokol 31 k Sporazumu je bil spremenjen s Sklepom skupnega odbora EGP št. 8/94 z dne 7. junija 1994 (1). Primerno je razširiti sodelovanje pogodbenic Sporazuma z vključitvijo splošnega okvira dejavnosti Skupnosti v korist potrošnikov (Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 283/1999/ES) (2). Protokol 31 k Sporazumu je treba spremeniti, da se omogoči izvajanje tega razširjenega sodelovanja od 1. januarja 2000 – SKLENIL: V členu 6 Protokola 31 k Sporazumu se za odstavkom 2 dodajo naslednji odstavki: Člen 1 Države Efte od 1. „3. spodaj navedenih aktov ali iz aktov, izvedenih iz njih: januarja 2000 sodelujejo pri izvajanju dejavnosti Skupnosti, ki izhajajo iz — 399 D 0283: Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 283/1999/ES z dne 25. januarja 1999 o vzpostavitvi splošnega okvira dejavnosti Skupnosti v korist potrošnikov (UL L 34, 9. 2. 1999, str. 1). Države Efte finančno prispevajo k dejavnostim iz odstavka 3 v skladu s členom 82(1)(a) Spora- 4. zuma. Države Efte od začetka sodelovanja v dejavnostih iz odstavka 3 polno sodelujejo v odborih ES in 5. drugih telesih, ki pomagajo Komisiji pri vodenju ali razvijanju teh dejavnosti. “ Ta sklep začne veljati 1. januarja 2000 pod pogojem, da so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma. Člen 2 (1) UL L 198, 30. 7. 1994, str. 142. (2) UL L 34, 9. 2. 1999, str. 1. 350 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 11/Zv. 5 Ta sklep se objavi v sklopu EGP in v Dopolnilu EGP Uradnega lista Evropskih skupnosti. Člen 3 V Bruslju, 26. novembra 1999 Za Skupni odbor EGP Predsednik N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2496/1999 der Kommission vom 26. November 1999 zur Festsetzung der Ausfuhrerstattungen für Malz

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
malt

text: 27. 11. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 304/3 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 2496/1999 DER KOMMISSION vom 26. November 1999 zur Festsetzung der Ausfuhrerstattungen für Malz DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, gestützt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 des Rates vom 30. Juni 1992 über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Getreide (1), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1253/1999 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 13 Absatz 2 dritter Unterabsatz, in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: (1) (2) Gemäß Artikel 13 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 kann der Unterschied zwischen den Notierungen oder Preisen auf dem Weltmarkt für die in Artikel 1 derselben Verordnung genannten Erzeugnisse und den Preisen für die Erzeugnisse in der Gemeinschaft durch eine Erstat- tung bei der Ausfuhr ausgeglichen werden. Bei der Festsetzung der Erstattungen sind die Faktoren zu berücksichtigen, die in Artikel 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1501/95 der Kommission vom 29. Juni 1995 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 des Rates hinsichtlich der Gewährung von Ausfuhrerstattungen und bei Störungen treffenden Getreidesektor Maßnahmen (3), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2513/98 (4). Festlegung zu zur der im (4) (5) (6) (7) menge berechnet werden. Diese Mengen sind mit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1501/95 festgesetzt worden. Die Lage auf dem Weltmarkt oder besondere Erforder- nisse bestimmter Märkte können die Differenzierung der Erstattung für bestimmte Erzeugnisse nach ihrer Bestim- mung erforderlich machen. Die Erstattung muß einmal monatlich festgesetzt werden; sie kann zwischenzeitlich geändert werden. Bei Anwendung aller dieser Vorschriften unter Berück- sichtigung der derzeitigen Lage des Getreidemarktes, insbesondere der Notierungen bzw. Preise für diese Erzeugnisse in der Gemeinschaft und auf dem Welt- markt, sind die Erstattungen gemäß dem Anhang dieser Verordnung festzusetzen. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses für Getreide — HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die Erstattungen bei der Ausfuhr von in Artikel 1 Absatz 1 Buchstabe c) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 genanntem Malz sind im Anhang festgesetzt. (3) Bei Malz muß die auf diese Erzeugnisse anwendbare Erstattung unter Berücksichtigung der zur Herstellung der betreffenden Erzeugnisse notwendigen Getreide- Diese Verordnung tritt am 1. Dezember 1999 in Kraft. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitglied- staat. Brüssel, den 26. November 1999 Für die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 181 vom 1. 7. 1992, S. 21. (2) ABl. L 160 vom 26. 6. 1999, S. 18. (3) ABl. L 147 vom 30. 6. 1995, S. 7. (4) ABl. L 313 vom 21. 11. 1998, S. 16. L 304/4 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 27. 11. 1999 zur Verordnung der Kommission vom 26. November 1999 zur Festsetzung der für Malz anzuwendenden Erstattungen bei der Ausfuhr ANHANG (EUR/t) Erzeugniscode Erstattungsbetrag 1107 10 19 9000 1107 10 99 9000 1107 20 00 9000 36,81 35,31 41,47


title: EMP Ühiskomitee otsus nr 161/1999, 26. november 1999, millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa (tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine)

eurovoc_concepts:
animal product
food inspection
veterinary drug
veterinary legislation
waste

text: 328 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21999D0161 L 61/12 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE TEATAJA EMP ÜHISKOMITEE OTSUS nr 161/1999, 26. november 1999, 11/5. kd 1. 3. 2001 millega muudetakse EMP lepingu II lisa (tehnilised normid, standardid, katsetamine ja sertifitseerimine) EMP ÜHISKOMITEE, võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut, mida on kohandatud Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut kohandava protokolliga, edaspidi “leping”, eriti selle artiklit 98 ning arvestades, et: (1) (2) lepingu II lisa muudeti EMP Ühiskomitee 24. septembri 1999. aasta otsusega nr 105/1999; (1) lepingusse tuleb lisada komisjoni 4. märtsi 1999. aasta määrus (EÜ) nr 508/1999, millega muude- takse I-IV lisa nõukogu määruses (EMÜ) nr 2377/90, milles sätestatakse ühenduse menetlus veteri- naarravimijääkide piirnormide kehtestamiseks loomsetes toiduainetes, (2) ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE: Artikkel 1 Lepingu II lisa XIII peatüki punktile 14 (nõukogu määrus (EMÜ) nr 2377/90) lisatakse järgmine taane: “— 399 R 0508: komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 508/1999, 4. märts 1999 (EÜT L 60, 9. 3. 1999, lk 16). ” Artikkel 2 Komisjoni määruse (EÜ) nr 508/1999 islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis on lisatud käesoleva otsuse vastava- tes keeltes versioonidele, on autentne. Käesolev otsus jõustub 27. novembril 1999, tingimusel et EMP Ühiskomiteed on teavitatud vastavalt lepingu artikli 103 lõikele 1. Artikkel 3 Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Ühenduste Teataja EMP osa EMP kaasandes. Artikkel 4 Brüssel, 26. november 1999 EMP Ühiskomitee eesistuja N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1) EÜT L 325, 21. 12. 2000, lk 9. (2) EÜT L 60, 9. 3. 1999, lk 16


title: Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 163/1999 of 26 November 1999 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

eurovoc_concepts:
marketing
pharmaceutical product
plant health control
plant health product
product safety

text: L 61/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 1. 3. 2001 DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 163/1999 of 26 November 1999 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE, Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adjusted by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as (cid:145)the Agreement(cid:146), and in particular Article 98 thereof, Whereas: (1) (2) Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision No 63/1999 of the EEA Joint Committee of 28 May 1999 (1). Commission Directive 1999/1/EC of 21 January 1999 including substance (kresoxim-methyl) in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (2), is to be incorporated into the Agreement, an active HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 The following indent shall be added in point 12a (Council Directive 91/414/EEC) Annex II to the Agreement: in Chapter XV of (cid:145)(cid:151) 399 L 0001: Commission Directive 1999/1/EC of 21 January 1999 (OJ L 21, 28. 1. 1999, p. 21). (cid:146) Article 2 The texts of Directive 1999/1/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages which are annexed to the respective language versions of this Decision, are authentic. This Decision shall enter into force on 27 November 1999, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee. Article 3 This Decision shall be published in the EEA section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 4 Done at Brussels, 26 November 1999. For the EEA Joint Committee The President N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1) OJ L 284, 9. 11. 2000, p. 45. (2) OJ L 21, 28. 1. 1999, p. 21


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2505/1999 af 26. november 1999 om suspension af opkøb af smør i visse medlemsstater

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
butter
intervention buying

text: 27. 11. 1999 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 304/17 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 2505/1999 af 26. november 1999 om suspension af opkøb af smør i visse medlemsstater KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — under henvisning til traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 804/68 af 27. juni 1968 om den fælles markedsordning for mælk og mejeri- produkter (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1587/ 96 (2), særlig artikel 7a, stk. 1, første afsnit, og stk. 3, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: (1) (2) (3) I Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 777/87 (3), senest ændret ved akten vedrørende Østrigs, Finlands og Sveriges tiltrædelse, er det fastlagt, under hvilke omstændigheder opkøb af smør og skummetmælkspulver kan suspen- deres og siden genindføres, og hvilke alternative foran- staltninger der kan træffes i tilfælde af suspension; ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1547/87 (4), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1802/95 (5), er der fastsat kriterier for opkøb af smør ved licitation og suspension af opkøb i en medlemsstat eller, for så vidt angår Tyskland og Det Forenede Kongerige, i et område; Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2306/1999 (6) fore- skriver suspension af de nævnte opkøb i visse medlems- stater; ifølge oplysningerne om markedspriserne er den betingelse, der er fastsat i artikel 1, stk. 3, i forordning ikke mere opfyldt (EØF) nr. 1547/87, Finland, Storbritannien, bestemmelserne om, suspension gælder, bør derfor ændres; i, Spanien, Italien, og Portugal; i hvilke medlemsstater nævnte Irland, (4) de i denne forordning fastsatte foranstaltninger er i over- ensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Forvaltningskomitéen for Mælk og Mejeriprodukter — UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 De opkøb af smør ved licitation, der er fastsat i artikel 1, stk. 3, i forordning (EØF) nr. 777/87, suspenderes i Belgien, Tysk- land, Danmark, Frankrig, Grækenland, Luxembourg, Nederlan- dene, Nordirland, Østrig og Sverige. Artikel 2 Forordning (EF) nr. 2306/1999 ophæves. Artikel 3 Denne forordning træder i kraft den 27. november 1999. Denne medlemsstat. forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 26. november 1999. På Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT L 148 af 28. 6. 1968, s. 13. (2) EFT L 206 af 16. 8. 1996, s. 21. (3) EFT L 78 af 20. 3. 1987, s. 10. (4) EFT L 144 af 4. 6. 1987, s. 12. (5) EFT L 174 af 26. 7. 1995, s. 27. (6) EFT L 280 af 30. 10. 1999, s. 26


title: Afgørelse truffet af Det Blandede EØS-udvalg nr. 164/1999 af 26. november 1999 om ændring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prøvning og certificering) til EØS-aftalen

text: 1. 3. 2001 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende L 61/15 AFG(cid:216)RELSE TRUFFET AF DET BLANDEDE E(cid:216)S-UDVALG Nr. 164/1999 af 26. november 1999 om (cid:230)ndring af bilag II (tekniske forskrifter, standarder, prłvning og certificering) til E(cid:216)S-aftalen DET BLANDEDE E(cid:216)S-UDVALG HAR (cid:151) under henvisning til aftalen om Det Europ(cid:230)iske (cid:216)konomiske Samarbejdsomr(cid:229)de som tilpasset ved pro- tokollen om tilpasning af aftalen om Det Europ(cid:230)iske (cid:216)konomiske Samarbejdsomr(cid:229)de, i det fłlgende ben(cid:230)vnt »aftalen«, s(cid:230)rlig artikel 98, og ud fra fłlgende betragtninger: (1) (2) Bilag II til aftalen blev (cid:230)ndret ved afgłrelse nr. 112/1999 truffet af Det Blandede E(cid:216)S-udvalg den 24. september 1999 (1). Kommissionens beslutning 98/734/EF af 30. november 1998 om en f(cid:230)lles teknisk forskrift for landmobile satellitjordstationer (LMES), der anvender frekvensb(cid:229)ndene 1,5/1,6 GHz (2), błr indarbej- des i aftalen (cid:151) TRUFFET F(cid:216)LGENDE AFG(cid:216)RELSE: Artikel 1 Fłlgende punkt inds(cid:230)ttes efter punkt 4zz (Kommissionens beslutning 98/578/EF) i kapitel XVIII i bilag II til aftalen: »4zza. 398 D 0734: Kommissionens beslutning 98/734/EF af 30. november 1998 om en f(cid:230)lles teknisk forskrift for landmobile satellitjordstationer (LMES), der anvender frekvensb(cid:229)ndene 1,5/1,6 GHz (EFT L 351 af 29. 12. 1998, s. 37). « Artikel 2 Teksterne til beslutning 98/734/EF p(cid:229) islandsk og norsk, som er knyttet til de respektive sproglige udgaver af denne afgłrelse, er autentiske. Artikel 3 Denne afgłrelse tr(cid:230)der i kraft den 27. november 1999, forudsat at Det Blandede E(cid:216)S-udvalg har mod- taget alle fornłdne meddelelser i henhold til aftalens artikel 103, stk. 1. Denne afgłrelse offentliggłres i E(cid:216)S-afsnittet i og E(cid:216)S-till(cid:230)gget til De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende. Artikel 4 Udf(cid:230)rdiget i Bruxelles, den 26. november 1999. P(cid:229) Det Blandede E(cid:216)S-udvalgs vegne N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN Formand (1) EFT L 325 af 21. 12. 2000, s. 23. (2) EFT L 351 af 29. 12. 1998, s. 37


title: Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 171/1999 tas-26 ta' Novembru 1999 li temenda l-Anness XIII (Trasport) għall-Ftehim taż-ŻEE

eurovoc_concepts:
harmonisation of standards
high-speed transport
rail transport
technical regulations
trans-European network
transport safety

text: 346 MT Il-Gurnal Ufficjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea 11/Vol. 5 21999D0171 L 61/30 IL-GURNAL UFFICJALI TAL-KOMUNITAJIET EWROPEJ 1. 3. 2001 DECIŻJONI TAL-KUMITAT KONGUNT TAŻ-ŻEE Nru 171/1999 tas-26 ta' Novembru 1999 li temenda l-Anness XIII (Trasport) ghall-Ftehim taż-ŻEE IL-KUMITAT KONGUNT TAŻ-ŻEE, Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif aggustat bil-Protokoll li jaggusta l-Fte- him ghaż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, minn hawn iżjed 'il quddiem issir referenza ghalih bhala “l-Ftehim”, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 98 tieghu, Billi: (1) (2) L-Anness XIII ghall-Ftehim gie emendat bid-Deciżjoni tal-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE Nru 25/97 tat- 30 ta' April 1997 (1). D-Deciżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 1999/569/KE tat-28 ta' Lulju 1999 dwar parametri bażici ghas-subsis- tema ta' kmand-u-kontroll u sinjalar fir-rigward ta' sistema tal-farrovija ta' velocità gholja trans- Ewropea (2), ghandha tigi nkorporata fil-Ftehim, IDDECIEDA KIF GEJ: Artikolu 1 Dan il-punt li gej ghandu jiddahhal wara l-punt 37a (Direttiva tal-Kunsill 96/48/KE) fl-Anness XIII ghall- Ftehim: “37b. 399 D 0569: Billi d-Deciżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 1999/569/KE tat-28 ta' Lulju 1999 dwar para- metri bażici ghas-subsistema ta' kmand-u-kontroll u sinjalar fir-rigward ta' sistema tal-farrovija ta' velocità gholja trans-Ewropea, (GU L 216, ta' l-14. 8. 1999, p. 23), kif ikkoreguta bi GU L 236, tas-7. 9. 1999, p. 38. ” Artikolu 2 It-testi tad-Deciżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 1999/569/KE kif ikkoreguta bil-GU L 236, tas-7. 9. 1999, fil-lingwa Islandiża u f'dik Norvegiża, li huma annessi ghall-verżjonijiet rispettivi tal-lingwa ghal din id-Deciżjoni, huma awtentici. Din id-Deciżjoni ghandha tidhol fis-sehh nhar is-27 ta' Novembru 1999, sakemm ikunu saru n-notifiki kollha taht l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim lill-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE. Artikolu 3 Din id-Deciżjoni ghandha tigi ppubblikata fit-Taqsima taż-ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE ghall-Gurnal Ufficjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej. Artikolu 4 Maghmula fi Brussel, fis-26 ta' Novembru 1999. Ghall-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE Il-President N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1) GU L 242, ta' l-4. 9. 1997, p. 74. (2) GU L 216, ta' l-14. 8. 1999, p. 23, kif ikkoreguta bil-GU L 236, tas-7. 9. 1999, p. 38


title: Deċiżjoni tal-Kumitat Konġunt taż-ŻEE Nru 167/1999 tas-26 ta' Novembru 1999 li temenda l-Anness IV (Enerġija) għall-Ftehim taż-ŻEE

eurovoc_concepts:
EFTA countries
committee (EU)
electrical energy
energy transport
self-employed person
transit

text: 11/Vol. 5 MT Il-Gurnal Ufficjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea 335 21999D0167 1. 3. 2001 IL-GURNAL UFFICJALI TAL-KOMUNITAJIET EWROPEJ L 61/19 DECIŻJONI TAL-KUMITAT KONGUNT TAŻ-ŻEE Nru 167/1999 tas-26 ta' Novembru 1999 li temenda l-Anness IV (Energija) ghall-Ftehim taż-ŻEE IL-KUMITAT KONGUNT TAŻ-ŻEE, Wara li kkunsidra l-Ftehim dwar iż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, kif aggustat bil-Protokoll li jaggusta l-Fte- him ghaż-Żona Ekonomika Ewropea, minn hawn iżjed 'il quddiem issir referenza ghalih bhala “l-Ftehim”, u b'mod partikolari l-Artikolu 98 tieghu, Billi: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) L-Anness IV ghall-Ftehim gie emendat bid-Deciżjoni tal-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE Nru 29/1999 tas-26 ta' Marzu 1999 (1). Id-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 90/547/KEE tad-29 ta' Ottubru 1990 dwar it-transitu ta' l-elettriku minn grilji ta' trasmissjoni (2) ghandha tigi inkorporata fl-Anness IV tal-Ftehim. Entitajiet u grilji li huma koperti bid-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 90/547/KEE huma elenkati fl-Anness gha- liha u billi l-entitajiet u l-grilji relevanti ghall-applikazzjoni tad-Direttiva fir-rigward ta' l-Istati ta' l-EFTA huma elenkati fl-Appendici 1 ghall-Anness IV tal-Ftehim. L-Anness IV ghall-Ftehim, il-punt 8, addattament (a), il-paragrafu (iii) jiddikjara li kull wahda mill- entitajiet koncernati tista' titlob li, fir-rigward tal-kummerc bejn il-Komunità u Stat ta' l-EFTA, il- kondizzjonijiet ta' transitu jkunu soggetti ghal procedura ta' konciljazzjoni li ghandha tigi deciża mill-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE. Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea, bid-Deciżjoni 92/167/KEE ta' l-4 ta' Marzu 1992 li tistabbilixxi Kumitat ta' esperti dwar it-transitu ta' l-elettriku bejn grilji (3), ddecediet li dan il-Kumitat ghandu jagixxi wkoll bhala l-korp ta' konciljazzjoni fi hdan il-Komunità, kif hemm provdut fl-Artikolu 3(4) tad-Direttiva 90/547/KEE. Jehtieg li jigi stabbilit kumitat ta' konciljazzjoni, fir-rigward tal-kummerc bejn il-Komunità u Stat ta' l-EFTA, sabiex jiehu hsieb talbiet ghal konciljazzjoni minn entitajiet koncernati. Il-procedura ta' konciljazzjoni li ghandha tigi applikata taht l-Anness IV, il-punt 8 addattament (a), il-paragrafu (iii), ghandha tigi inkorporata fil-Ftehim, IDDECIEDA KIF GEJ: Artikolu 1 It-test il-gdid li gej ghandu jibdel il-kliem 'ghal procedura ta' konciljazzjoni li ghandha tigi deciża mill- Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE' fl-addattament (a), il-paragrafu (iii) tal-punt 8 (Direttiva tal-Kunsill 90/547/KEE) ta' l-Anness IV ghall-Ftehim: “ghall-procedura ta' konciljazzjoni stabbilita fl-Appendici 4”. (1) GU L 266, tad-19. 10. 2000, p. 5. (2) GU L 313, tat-13. 11. 1990, p. 30. (3) GU L 74, ta' l-20. 3. 1992, p. 43. 336 MT Il-Gurnal Ufficjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea 11/Vol. 5 L-Anness IV ghall-Ftehim ghandu jigi emendat kif specifikat fl-Anness ghal din id-Deciżjoni. Artikolu 2 Din id-Deciżjoni ghandha tidhol fis-sehh nhar is-27 ta' Novembru 1999, sakemm ikunu saru n-notifiki kollha taht l-Artikolu 103(1) tal-Ftehim lill-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE. Artikolu 3 Din id-Deciżjoni ghandha tigi ppubblikata fit-Taqsima taż-ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE ghall-Gurnal Ufficjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej. Artikolu 4 Maghmula fi Brussel, fis-26 ta' Novembru 1999. Ghall-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE Il-President N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN 11/Vol. 5 MT Il-Gurnal Ufficjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea 337 L-ANNESS ghad-Deciżjoni tal-Kumitat Kongunt taż-ŻEE Nru 167/1999 Dan li gej ghandu jigi miżjud bhala Appendici 4 gdid ghall-Anness IV ghall-Ftehim: “APPENDICI 4 Fir-rigward tal-kummerc fl-elettriku bejn Stat ta' l-EFTA u l-Komunità, il-kondizzjonijiet ta' transitu ghandhom ikunu soggetti ghall-procedura ta' konciljazzjoni li gejja meta entità koncernata titlobha. Ghandu jigi stabbilit kumitat ta' konciljazzjoni, minn hawn iżjed 'il quddiem issir referenza ghalih bhala ‘il-Kumitat', fuq bażi ad hoc fuq l-inizjattiva tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea jew ta' l-Awtorità ta' Sorveljanza ta' l-EFTA. Artikolu 1 Artikolu 2 Responsabilitajiet Ix-xoghol tal-Kumitat ghandu jkun dak li jipproponi kompromessi ta' konciljazzjoni, meta mitluba mill-partijiet negozja- turi, fil-każ ta' talbiet specifici ghal transitu. Artikolu 3 Komposizzjoni Il-Kumitat ghandu jkun maghmul minn tminn membri, li huma: – – – tlett rappreżentanti tal-grilji ta' vultagg gholi mhux involuti fin-negozjati li ghandhom x'jaqsmu mat-talba specifika ghal transitu li fuqha tkun giet mitluba konciljazzjoni. Ir-rappreżentanti ghandu jkollhom kompetenza rikonoxxuta u esperjenza prattika wiesgha fil-qasam ta' transitu ta' l-elettriku. Ghandhom jigu maghżula mill-President u mir- Relatur, minn fost it-tmintax-il rappreżentant tal-grilji ta' vultagg gholi ta' l-Istati Membri ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea u l-Istati ta' l-EFTA. Dawn it-tmintax-il rappreżentant huma l-hmistax-il rappreżentant tal-grilji li huma membri tal- Kumitat ta' Esperti dwar it-Trasmissjoni ta' l-Elettriku bejn il-Grilji (1) u tlett rappreżentanti, proposti mill-Awtorità ta' Sorveljanza ta' l-EFTA, tal-grilji ta' vultagg gholi fl-Istat ta' l-EFTA; rappreżentant wiehed tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea u rappreżentant wiehed mill-Awtorità ta' Sorveljanza ta' l-EFTA; żewg esperti indipendenti, wiehed mill-Komunità u wiehed minn Stat ta' l-EFTA. Il-President u r-Relatur ghandhom jahtru dawn iż-żewg esperti indipendenti minn lista li ghandha tigi stabbilita b'mod kongunt mill-Kummissjoni Ewropea u l-Awtorità ta' Sorveljanza ta' l-EFTA u ghandha tigi ppubblikata fit-Taqsima taż-ŻEE ta', u fis-Suppliment taż-ŻEE ghal, il-Gurnal Ufficjali tal-Komunitajiet Ewropej; – rappreżentant wiehed minn Eurelectric/Nordel, mahtur b'mod kongunt mill-President u mir-Relatur. Il-membri tal-Kumitat ma ghandhomx ikunu cittadini ta' jew residenti permanenti fi Stat involut fin-negozjazzjoni ta' transitu. Kunflitti ta' interessi attwali jew apparenti ghandhom jigu evitati. Artikolu 4 Operazzjoni 1. Il-Kumitat ghandu jkun presedut minn: – – ir-rappreżentant mill-Kummissjoni jekk l-entità li titlob konciljazzjoni tkun tinsab fil-Komunità, ir-rappreżentant mill-Awtorità ta' Sorveljanza ta' l-EFTA jekk l-entità li titlob konciljazzjoni tkun tinsab fi Stat ta' l-EFTA, Dawn iż-żewg rappreżentanti flimkien ghandhom jiffurmaw il-Kumitat. (1) Id-Deciżjoni tal-Kummissjoni 92/167/KEE ta' l-4 ta' Marzu 1992 (GU L 74, ta' l-20. 3. 1992, p. 43). 338 MT Il-Gurnal Ufficjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea 11/Vol. 5 L-awtorità li ma tkunx qeghda tippresjedi ghandha tagixxi bhala relatur filwaqt li l-awtorità li tkun qeghda tippres- 2. jedi ghandha tipprovdi servizzi ta' segretarjat ghall-Kumitat. 3. 4. 1. 2. 3. Il-laqghat tal-Kumitat ghandhom isiru fi Brussel, jew fi kwalunkwe post iehor jekk il-President u r-Relatur jaqblu. Il-Kumitat ghandu jadotta r-regoli ta' procedura tieghu stess. Artikolu 5 Konciljazzjoni Il-partijiet biss ghal tilwima dwar talba specifika ghal transitu jistghu jirreferu kwistjoni lill-Kumitat. La l-President u lanqas ir-Relatur ma jistghu jivvutaw. Ghandha tittiehed azzjoni fuq kwalunkwe talba ta' konciljazzjoni. Ir-rappreżentanti tal-grilji involuti fin-negozjati dwar talba specifika ghal transitu li fuqha tkun giet mitluba koncil- 4. jazzjoni mill-Kumitat ghandhom jigu mistiedna sabiex jippreżentaw l-opinjonijiet taghhom. 5. Wara diskussjoni mill-Kumitat, ir-Relatur ghandu jifformola kompromess ta' konciljazzjoni li fuqu x'aktarx ikun hemm il-kunsens fost is-sitt membri tal-Kumitat li ghandhom id-dritt jivvutaw. Fil-każ ta' nuqqas ta' qbil, ir-Relatur ghandu jifformola kompromess ta' konciljazzjoni li fuqu x'aktarx ikun hemm ftehim fost maggoranza ta' l-istess sitt membri. F'dak il-każ, l-opinjoni tal-membri ta' minorità ghandha tigi rregistrata. Il-President ghandu jippreżenta l-kompromess ta' konciljazzjoni lill-partijiet akkompanjati bi kwalunkwe opinjoni 6. ta' minorità, kemm jista' jkun malajr u mhux aktar tard mit-tmiem ta' perjodu ta' tlett xhur mid-data li fiha tkun giet ippreżentata t-talba mill-Kumitat. 7. Ir-riżultat tal-procedura ta' konciljazzjoni ma ghandux ikollu sahha ta' rbit. Rappreżentanti ta' l-Istati koncernati mit-talba ghal transitu jistghu jiehdu sehem fil-procedura ta' konciljazzjoni 8. bhala osservaturi. Artikolu 6 Konfidenzjalità Il-Membri tal-Kumitat u kwalunkwe osservaturi ma humiex mehtiega jfornu informazzjoni li jkunu saru jafu biha per- mezz tax-xoghol tal-Kumitat, fejn il-President jinformhom li l-opinjoni mitluba jew il-mistoqsija mqajjma jkollhom x'jaqsmu ma' kwistjoni konfidenzjali. ”


title: Opinion of the Commission pursuant to Article 251(2)(c) of the EC Treaty, on the amendments of the European Parliament to the common position of the Council regarding the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community framework for electronic signatures, amending the proposal of the Commission pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty

eurovoc_concepts:
approximation of laws
commercial transaction
data protection
electronic mail
information network

formats: html pdf

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26. 11. 1999 COM(1999)626 final 1998/0191 (COD) OPINION OF THE COMMISSION pursuant to Article 251(2) (c) of the EC Treaty, on the amendments of the European Parliament to the Common Position of the Council regarding the Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a Community Framework for electronic signatures AMENDING THE PROPOSAL OF THE COMMISSION pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Article 251 (2) c) requests the Commission to express its opinion on the amendments proposed by the European Parliament in its second reading. The Commission hereby presents its opinion on these amendments to the Council’s Common Position regarding the proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on a common framework for electronic signatures. The amended proposal incorporates those amendments proposed by the European Parliament at Second Reading which were accepted by the Commission. The amendments to the Commission proposal have been highlighted using strikethrough for deleted text and bold and underlined for new or amended text. 1. INTRODUCTION 1. 1. a) Background On 13 May 1998, the Commission adopted a proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on electronic signatures ‘A Common Framework for Electronic Signatures’ (COM (1998) 297 final)1 and formally transmitted the proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council on 16 June 1998. The Economic and Social Committee gave its Opinion on the 2/3 December 19982 and the Committee of the Regions on the 13/14 January 19993. The European Parliament adopted a favourable Resolution at its First Reading on the 13th January 1999, and proposed 32 amendments to the Commission proposal4. On 29 April 1999 the Commission adopted an amended proposal5 in conformity with Article 250 (2) of the Treaty, incorporating 22 of the amendments in full, in part or in principle. The Council, acting in accordance with Article 251 of the Treaty, formally adopted a common position on 28 June 19996 on which the Commission delivered its opinion on 16 July 1999. 7 In the second reading, the European Parliament on 27 October 1999 proposed 5 amendments to the Common Position8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OJ C 325, 23. 10. 1998, p. 5 OJ C 40, 15. 2. 1999, p. 29 OJ C 93, 06. 4. 1999, p. 33 OJ C 104, 14. 4. 1999, p. 49 COM (1999)195 final of 29. 4. 1999 OJ C 243 , 27. 8. 1999 p. 33 SEC(1999) 1154 final of 16. 7. 1999 (not yet published) Doc. A5 – 0034/1999 2 1. 2. b) Purpose of the Commission proposal The purpose of the Directive is to facilitate the use of electronic signatures and to contribute to their legal recognition. It aims at establishing a legal framework for electronic signatures and for certain certification services in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. The legal basis for the proposal is Art. 47 (2), 55 and 95 of the Treaty. Based on a technology-neutral approach, the proposed Directive focuses on certificates supplied to the public and aimed at identifying the sender of electronic data. To encourage the development of certification services, it prevents Member States from submitting Certification Service Providers (CSP) to prior authorisation schemes. However, Member States are free to set up voluntary accreditation schemes. It also provides for the legal recognition of electronic signatures as equivalent to hand-written signatures and establishes liability rules for CSP. Finally, the proposed Directive foresees co-operation mechanisms with third countries to meet the requirements of global electronic communications. 2. OPINION OF THE COMMISSION ON THE AMENDMENTS OF THE EP Of the 5 amendments adopted by the European Parliament at Second Reading, the Commission accepted all amendments in full. The Commission accepted those amendments because they enhance the clarity and consistency of the text. 3. CONCLUSION The Commission has accepted all amendments proposed by the European Parliament at Second Reading in whole. In accordance with Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty, the Commission amends its initial proposal, incorporating these amendments. 4. MODIFIED PROPOSAL a) Principles In response to the second reading by the European Parliament, a number of new provisions have been accepted. The majority of these serve either to remove ambiguities or to enhance the clarity and consistency of the text. In addition, there are some new ideas, which expand on the original text but do not change the fundamental principles. 3 b) Explanation of the main amendments 1. Modification of recital 16: As suggested by European Parliament’s amendment 1, the clarification that the Directive does not aim to regulate systems, which are governed by private law agreements has been added. The proposed modification aims to introduce the “principle of party autonomy” more explicitly by stating that, firstly, systems “governed by voluntary private law agreements between a defined number of participants” do not require a statutory regulatory framework and, secondly, that electronic signatures which are used within such systems should not be denied legal effectiveness and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings. The new wording does not mention explicitly the so-called “closed user groups”. This is advantageous because the text of the Directive itself does not mention “closed systems” but refers to legal agreements between private persons. This helps avoiding legal uncertainty regarding the exact definition of closed user groups, which is unknown in civil law. 2. Modification of recital 23: Amendment 3 of the European Parliament has been included, adding a new sentence to recital 23. It emphasises that multilateral agreements with third countries on mutual recognition of certification services could be beneficial in order to ensure interoperability at a global level. This is in line with the provisions laid down in Article 7 of the proposed Directive, which specifically addresses the global dimension. Article 7 (2) provides for the Commission to make proposals aimed at facilitating cross-border certification, in particular with respect to the implementation of standards and relevant international agreements. Given the global nature of electronic commerce, it is important to work toward the mutual recognition of certificates in the global marketplace. The proposed new sentence is meant to stress the significance of this issue. 3. Modification of Article 6: As suggested by European Parliament’s amendments 4 and 5, two modifications concerning Article 6 have been added. Firstly, a new phrase has been included in Article 6 (1) (a) in order to ensure that a certification-service-provider is not only liable for the accuracy of all information included in a qualified certificate but also for the completeness of all information required to be considered a qualified certificate. This is of particular significance because for a consumer it is not only important that the information included in a certificate is correct but also that a certificate contains all information necessary to be classified as a qualified certificate. Therefore, this modification contributes to a clearer wording of Article 6 (1). Secondly, amendment 5 of the European Parliament has been introduced by adding a new sentence to Article 6 (4). The additional sentence states that a certification-service-provider shall not be liable for damage arising from the use of a qualified certificate which exceeds the limit on the value of transactions for which the certificate can be used. Thus, the provision makes clear that a certification-service-provider is not liable for an excessive use of the certificate. 4 This amendment contributes to more consistency between Article 6 (3), where a similar provision already has been included, and Article 6 (4). 4. Clarification of the text: As suggested by amendment 2 of the European Parliament, the wording in recital 21 has been changed. This recital refers to Article 5 (1). It is meant to emphasise that it is national law, which determines the fields in which Member States allow electronic documents and electronic signatures to be used. The recital was part of a compromise between the Commission and the Member States in order to mitigate the “strong” wording in Article 5 (1), stating that Member States shall ensure that advanced electronic signatures satisfy the legal requirements of a signature in the same manner as a hand-written signature. The modified sentence expresses more explicit that national law governs the fields in which electronic documents and electronic signatures can be used. 5 Amended proposalΓ for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on a Community Framework for electronic signatures THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 47(2), 55 and 95 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission 9, Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee 10, Having regard to the Opinion of the Committee of the Regions 11, Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty 12, (1) (2) (3) (4) Γ 9 10 11 12 Whereas on 16 April 1997 the Commission presented to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Communication on an European Initiative in Electronic Commerce; Whereas on 8 October 1997 the Commission presented to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Communication on ensuring security and trust in electronic communication - Towards a European framework for digital signatures and encryption; Whereas on 1 December 1997 the Council invited the Commission to submit as soon as possible a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on digital signatures; Whereas electronic communication and commerce necessitate "electronic signatures" and related services allowing data authentication; whereas divergent rules with respect to legal recognition of electronic signatures and the accreditation of certification-service providers in the Member States may create a significant barrier to the use of electronic communications and electronic commerce; whereas, on the other This document is based on the German original version of the EP amendments OJ C 325, 23. 10. 1998, p. 5. OJ C 40, 15. 2. 1999, p. 29. Opinion delivered on 13 and 14 January 1999 (OJ C 93, 6. 4. 1999, p. 33). Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 January 1999 (OJ C 104, 14. 4. 1999, p. 49), Council Common Position of 28. 6. 99 (OJ C 243, of 27. 8. 1999 p. 33) (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the European Parliament of. (OJ C. ) (not yet published in the Official Journal). 6 (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) hand, a clear Community framework regarding the conditions applying to electronic signatures will strengthen confidence in, and general acceptance of, the new technologies; whereas legislation in the Member States should not hinder the free movement of goods and services in the internal market; Whereas the interoperability of electronic-signature products should be promoted; whereas, in accordance with Article 14 of the Treaty, the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods is ensured; whereas essential requirements specific to electronic-signature products must be met in order to ensure free movement within the internal market and to build trust in electronic signatures, without prejudice to Council Regulation (EC) No 3381/94 of 19 December 1994 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use goods 13 and Council Decision 94/942/CFSP of 19 December 1994 on the joint action adopted by the Council on the basis of Article J. 3 of the Treaty on European Union concerning the control of exports of dual-use goods 14; Whereas this Directive does not harmonise the provision of services with respect to the confidentiality of information where they are covered by national provisions concerned with public policy or public security; Whereas the internal market ensures the free movement of persons, as a result of which citizens and residents of the European Union increasingly need to deal with authorities in Member States other than the one in which they reside; whereas the availability of electronic communication could be of great service in this respect; Whereas rapid technological development and the global character of the Internet necessitate an approach which is open to various technologies and services capable of authenticating data electronically; Whereas electronic signatures will be used in a large variety of circumstances and applications, resulting in a wide range of new services and products related to or using electronic signatures; whereas the definition of such products and services should not be limited to the issuance and management of certificates, but should also encompass any other service and product using, or ancillary to, electronic signatures, such as registration services, time-stamping services, directory services, computing services or consultancy services related to electronic signatures; (10) Whereas the internal market enables certification-service-providers to develop their cross-border activities with a view to increasing their competitiveness, and thus to offer consumers and businesses new opportunities to exchange information and trade electronically in a secure way, regardless of frontiers; whereas in order to stimulate the Community-wide provision of certification services over open networks, certification-service-providers should be free to provide their services without prior authorisation; whereas prior authorisation means not only any permission whereby the certification-service-provider concerned has to obtain a decision by national authorities before being allowed to provide its certification services, but also any other measures having the same effect. 13 14 OJ L 367, 31. 12. 1994, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 837/95 (OJ L 90, 21. 4. 1995, p. 1). OJ L 367, 31. 12. 1994, p. 8. Decision as last amended by Decision 99/193/CFSP (OJ L 73, 19. 3. 1999, p. 1). 7 (11) Whereas voluntary accreditation schemes aiming at an enhanced level of service-provision may offer certification-service-providers the appropriate framework for developing further their services towards the levels of trust, security and quality demanded by the evolving market; whereas such schemes should encourage the development of best practice among certification-service-providers; whereas certification-service-providers should be left free to adhere to and benefit from such accreditation schemes; (12) Whereas certification services can be offered either by a public entity or a legal or natural person, when it is established in accordance with the national law; whereas Member States should not prohibit certification-service-providers from operating outside voluntary accreditation schemes; whereas it should be ensured that such accreditation schemes do not reduce competition for certification services; (13) Whereas Member States may decide how they ensure the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in this Directive; whereas this Directive does not preclude the establishment of private-sector-based supervision systems; whereas this Directive does not oblige certification-service-providers to apply to be supervised under any applicable accreditation scheme; (14) Whereas it is important to strike a balance between consumer and business needs; (15) Whereas Annex III covers requirements for secure signature-creation devices to ensure the functionality of advanced electronic signatures; whereas it does not cover the entire system environment in which such devices operate; whereas the functioning of the internal market requires the Commission and the Member States to act swiftly to enable the bodies charged with the conformity assessment of secure signature devices with Annex III to be designated; whereas in order to meet market needs conformity assessment must be timely and efficient; (16) Whereas this Directive contributes to the use and legal recognition of electronic signatures within the Community; whereas a statutory regulatory framework is not needed for electronic signatures exclusively used within closed systems, which are based on voluntary agreements under private law between a defined number of participants; nevertheless electronic signatures which fulfil the requirements laid down in this Directive and which are used within closed user-groups should be legally recognised; whereas the freedom of parties to agree among themselves the terms and conditions under which they accept electronically signed data should be respected to the extent allowed by national law; the legal effectiveness of electronic signatures used in such systems and their admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings must be recognised; (17) Whereas this Directive does not seek to harmonise national rules concerning contract law, particularly the formation and performance of contracts, or other formalities of a non-contractual nature concerning signatures; whereas for this reason the provisions concerning the legal effect of electronic signatures should be without prejudice to requirements regarding form laid down in national law with regard to the conclusion of contracts or the rules determining where a contract is concluded; (18) Whereas the storage and copying of signature-creation data could cause a threat to the legal validity of electronic signatures; 8 (19) Whereas electronic signatures will be used in the public sector within national and Community administrations and in communications between such administrations and with citizens and economic operators, for example in the public procurement, taxation, social security, health and justice systems; (20) Whereas harmonised criteria relating to the legal effects of electronic signatures will preserve a coherent legal framework across the Community; whereas national law lays down different requirements for the legal validity of hand-written signatures; whereas certificates can be used to confirm the identity of a person signing electronically; whereas advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates aim at a higher level of security; whereas advanced electronic signatures which are based on a qualified certificate and which are created by a secure-signature-creation device can be regarded as legally equivalent to hand-written signatures only if the requirements for hand-written signatures are fulfilled; (21) Whereas in order to contribute to the general acceptance of electronic authentication methods it has to be ensured that electronic signatures can be used as evidence in legal proceedings in all Member States; whereas the legal recognition of electronic signatures should be based upon objective criteria and not be linked to authorisation of the certification-service-provider involved; whereas national law governs the fields in which use of electronic documents and electronic signatures can be used; whereas this Directive is without prejudice to the power of a national court to make a ruling regarding conformity with the requirements of this Directive and does not affect national rules regarding the unfettered judicial consideration of evidence; (22) Whereas certification-service-providers providing certification-services to the public are subject to national rules regarding liability; (23) Whereas the development of international electronic commerce requires cross-border arrangements involving third countries; whereas in order to ensure interoperability at a global level, agreements on multilateral rules with third countries on mutual recognition of certification services could be beneficial; (24) Whereas in order to increase user confidence in electronic communication and electronic commerce, certification-service-providers must observe data protection legislation and individual privacy; (25) Whereas provisions on the use of pseudonyms in certificates should not prevent Member States from requiring identification of persons pursuant to Community or national law; (26) Whereas, for the purposes of the application of this Directive, the Commission should be assisted by a management committee; whereas, since the measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive are management measures within the meaning of Article 2 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission15, they should be adopted by use of the management procedure provided for in Article 4 of that Decision. 15 OJ L 184, 17. 7. 1999, p. 23. 9 (27) Whereas two years after its implementation the Commission will carry out a review of this Directive so as, inter alia, to ensure that the advance of technology or changes in the legal environment have not created barriers to achieving the aims stated in this Directive; whereas it should examine the implications of associated technical areas and submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on this subject; (28) Whereas, in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty, the objective of creating a harmonised legal framework for the provision of electronic signatures and related services cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved by the Community; whereas this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective, HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Scope The purpose of this Directive is to facilitate the use of electronic signatures and to contribute to their legal recognition. It establishes a legal framework for electronic signatures and certain certification-services in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. It does not cover aspects related to the conclusion and validity of contracts or other legal obligations where there are requirements as regards form prescribed by national or Community law nor does it affect rules and limits, contained in national or Community law, governing the use of documents. Article 2 Definitions For the purpose of this Directive: (1) (2) "electronic signature" means data in electronic form which are attached to or logically associated with other electronic data and which serve as a method of authentication; "advanced electronic signature" means an electronic signature, which meets the following requirements: (a) it is uniquely linked to the signatory; (b) it is capable of identifying the signatory; (c) (d) it is created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control; and it is linked to the data to which it relates in such a manner that any subsequent change of the data is detectable; 10 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) "signatory" means a person who holds a signature-creation device and acts either on his own behalf or on behalf of the natural or legal person or entity he represents; "signature-creation data" means unique data, such as codes or private cryptographic keys, which are used by the signatory to create an electronic signature; "signature-creation device" means configured software or hardware used to implement the signature-creation data; "secure-signature-creation device" means a signature-creation device which meets the requirements laid down in Annex III; "signature-verification-data" means data, such as codes or public cryptographic keys, which are used for the purpose of verifying an electronic signature; "signature-verification device" means configured software or hardware used to implement the signature-verification-data; "certificate" means an electronic attestation, which links signature-verification data to a person and confirms the identity of that person; "qualified certificate" means a certificate which meets the requirements laid down in Annex I and is provided by a certification-service-provider who fulfils the requirements laid down in Annex II; "certification-service-provider" means an entity or a legal or natural person who issues certificates or provides other services related to electronic signatures; "electronic-signature-product" means hardware or software, or relevant components thereof, which are intended to be used by a certification-service-provider for the provision of electronic-signature services or are intended to be used for the creation or verification of electronic signatures; "voluntary accreditation" means any permission, setting out rights and obligations specific to the provision of certification services, to be granted upon request by the certification-service-provider concerned, by the public or private body charged with the elaboration of, and supervision of compliance with, such rights and obligations, where the certification-service-provider is not entitled to exercise the rights stemming from the permission until it has received the decision by the body. Article 3 Market access Member States shall not make the provision of certification services subject to prior 1. authorisation. 2. Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 1, Member States may introduce or maintain voluntary accreditation schemes aiming at enhanced levels of certification-service provision. All conditions related to such schemes must be objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory. Member States may not limit the number of accredited certification-service-providers for reasons, which fall within the scope of this Directive. 11 3. Each Member State shall ensure the establishment of an appropriate system that allows for supervision of certification-service-providers which are established on its territory and issue qualified certificates to the public. 4. The conformity of secure signature-creation-devices with the requirements laid down in Annex III shall be determined by appropriate public or private bodies designated by Member States. The Commission shall, pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 9, establish criteria for Member States to determine whether a body should be designated. A determination of conformity with the requirements laid down in Annex III made by the bodies referred to in the first subparagraph shall be recognised by all Member States. 5. The Commission may, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9, establish and publish reference numbers of generally recognised standards for electronic- signature products in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Member States shall presume that there is compliance with the requirements laid down in Annex II, point (f), and Annex III when an electronic signature product meets those standards. 6. Member States and the Commission shall work together to promote the development and use of signature-verification devices in the light of the recommendations for secure signature-verification laid down in Annex IV and in the interests of the consumer. 7. Member States may make the use of electronic signatures in the public sector subject to possible additional requirements. Such requirements shall be objective, transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory and shall relate only to the specific characteristics of the application concerned. Such requirements may not constitute an obstacle to cross-border services for citizens. Article 4 Internal market principles 1. Each Member State shall apply the national provisions which it adopts pursuant to this Directive to certification-service-providers established on its territory and to the services which they provide. Member States may not restrict the provision of certification-services originating in another Member State in the fields covered by this Directive. Member States shall ensure that electronic-signature products which comply with this 2. Directive are permitted to circulate freely in the internal market. Article 5 Legal effects of electronic signatures Member States shall ensure that advanced electronic signatures which are based on a 1. qualified certificate and which are created by a secure-signature-creation device: (a) satisfy the legal requirements of a signature in relation to data in electronic form in the same manner as a handwritten signature satisfies those requirements in relation to paper-based data; and 12 (b) are admissible as evidence in legal proceedings. Member States shall ensure that an electronic signature is not denied legal 2. effectiveness and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is: – – – – in electronic form, or not based upon a qualified certificate, or based not certification-service-provider, or upon a qualified certificate issued by an accredited not created by a secure signature-creation device. Article 6 Liability As a minimum, Member States shall ensure that by issuing a certificate as a qualified 1. certificate to the public or by guaranteeing such a certificate to the public a certification-service-provider is liable for damage caused to any entity or legal or natural person who reasonably relies on that certificate: (a) (b) (c) as regards the accuracy at the time of issuance of all information contained in the qualified certificate and as regards the fact that the certificate contains all the information required to be considered a qualified certificate; for assurance that at the time of the issuance of the certificate, the signatory identified in the qualified certificate held the signature-creation data corresponding to the signature-verification data given or identified in the certificate; for assurance that the signature-creation data and the signature-verification data can be used in a complementary manner in cases where the certification-service-provider generates them both; unless the certification-service-provider proves that he has not acted negligently. As a minimum Member States shall ensure that a certification-service-provider who 2. has issued a certificate as a qualified certificate to the public is liable for damage caused to any entity or legal or natural person who reasonably relies on the certificate for failure to register revocation of the certificate unless the certification-service-provider proves that he has not acted negligently. 3. Member States shall ensure that a certification-service-provider may indicate in a qualified certificate limitations on the use of that certificate, provided that the limitations are recognisable to third parties. The certification-service-provider shall not be liable for damage arising from use of a qualified certificate which exceeds the limitations placed on it. Member States shall ensure that a certification-service-provider may indicate in the 4. qualified certificate a limit on the value of transactions for which the certificate can be used, provided that the limit is recognisable to third parties. The certification-service-provider 13 shall not be liable for damage arising from the use of a qualified certificate which exceeds the limit on the value of transactions placed on it. The provisions of paragraphs 1 to 4 shall be without prejudice to Council 5. Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts 16. Article 7 International aspects 1. Member States shall ensure that certificates which are issued as qualified certificates to the public by a certification-service-provider established in a third country are recognised as legally equivalent to certificates issued by a certification-service-provider established within the Community if: (a) (b) (c) the certification-service-provider fulfils the requirements laid down in this Directive and has been accredited under a voluntary accreditation scheme established in a Member State; or a certification-service-provider established within the Community which fulfils the requirements laid down in this Directive guarantees the certificate; or the certificate or the certification-service-provider is recognised under a bilateral or multilateral agreement between the Community and third countries or international organisations. 2. In order to facilitate cross-border certification services with third countries and legal recognition of advanced electronic signatures originating in third countries, the Commission shall make proposals, where appropriate, to achieve the effective implementation of standards and international agreements applicable to certification services. In particular, and where necessary, it shall submit proposals to the Council for appropriate mandates for the negotiation of bilateral and multilateral agreements with third countries and international organisations. The Council shall decide by qualified majority. Whenever the Commission is informed of any difficulties encountered by Community 3. undertakings with respect to market access in third countries, it may, if necessary, submit proposals to the Council for an appropriate mandate for the negotiation of comparable rights for Community undertakings in these third countries. The Council shall decide by qualified majority. Measures taken pursuant to this paragraph shall be without prejudice to the obligations of the Community and of the Member States under relevant international agreements. 16 OJ L 95, 21. 4. 1993, p. 29. 14 Article 8 Data protection Member States shall ensure that certification-service-providers and national bodies 1. responsible for accreditation or supervision comply with the requirements laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 17. 2. issues Member States shall ensure that a certification-service-provider which certificates to the public may collect personal data only directly from the data subject, or after the explicit consent of the data subject, and only insofar as it is necessary for the purposes of issuing and maintaining the certificate. The data may not be collected or processed for any other purposes without the explicit consent of the data subject. 3. Without prejudice to the legal effect given to pseudonyms under national law, Member States shall not prevent certification service providers from indicating in the certificate a pseudonym instead of the signatory’s name. Article 9 Committee The Commission shall be assisted by a committee 1. ["Electronic-Signature Committee"], composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission hereinafter referred to as “the committee”. Where reference is made to this paragraph, the management procedure laid down in 2. Article 4 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, in compliance with Article 8 thereof. 3. The period provided for in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be 3 months. Article 10 Tasks of the committee The committee shall clarify the requirements laid down in the Annexes to this Directive, the criteria referred to in Article 3(4) and the generally recognised standards for electronic signature products established and published pursuant to Article 3(5), in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 9. 17 OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31. 15 Article 11 Notification Member States shall notify to the Commission and the other Member States the 1. following: (a) (b) information on national voluntary accreditation schemes, including any additional requirements pursuant to Article 3(7); the names and addresses of the national bodies responsible for accreditation and supervision as well as of the bodies referred to in Article 3(4); (c) the names and addresses of all accredited national certification service providers. Any information supplied under paragraph 1 and changes in respect of that 2. information shall be notified by the Member States as soon as possible. Article 12 Review The Commission shall review the operation of this Directive and report thereon to the 1. European Parliament and to the Council by. ** at the latest. The review shall inter alia assess whether the scope of this Directive should be 2. modified, taking account of technological, market and legal developments. The report shall in particular include an assessment, on the basis of experience gained, of aspects of harmonisation. The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by legislative proposals. Article 13 Implementation 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before. ***. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions 2. of domestic law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. ** *** Three years and six months after the date of entry into force of this Directive. One year and six months after the date of entry into force of this Directive. 16 Article 14 Entry into force This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 15 Addressees This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, […] For the European Parliament The President […] For the Council The President […] 17 ANNEX I REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES Qualified certificates must contain: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) an indication that the certificate is issued as a qualified certificate; the identification of the certification-service-provider and the State in which it is established; the name of the signatory or a pseudonym, which shall be identified as such; provision for a specific attribute of the signatory to be included if relevant, depending on the purpose for which the certificate is intended; signature-verification data which correspond to signature-creation data under the control of the signatory; an indication of the beginning and end of the period of validity of the certificate; the identity code of the certificate; the advanced electronic signature of the certification-service-provider issuing it; limitations on the scope of use of the certificate, if applicable; and limits on the value of transactions for which the certificate can be used, if applicable. 18 ANNEX II REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION-SERVICE-PROVIDERS ISSUING QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES Certification-service-providers must: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) demonstrate the reliability necessary for providing certification services; ensure the operation of a prompt and secure directory and a secure and immediate revocation service; ensure that the date and time when a certificate is issued or revoked can be determined precisely; verify, by appropriate means in accordance with national law, the identity and, if applicable, any specific attributes of the person to which a qualified certificate is issued; employ personnel who possess the expert knowledge, experience, and qualifications necessary for the services provided, in particular competence at managerial level, expertise in electronic signature technology and familiarity with proper security procedures; they must also apply administrative and management procedures which are adequate and correspond to recognised standards; use trustworthy systems and products which are protected against modification and ensure the technical and cryptographic security of the processes supported by them; take measures against certification-service-provider confidentiality during the process of generating such data; forgery of certificates, and, generates signature-creation in cases where the guarantee data, maintain sufficient financial resources to operate in conformity with the requirements laid down in the Directive, in particular to bear the risk of liability for damages, for example, by obtaining appropriate insurance; record all relevant information concerning a qualified certificate for an appropriate period of time, in particular for the purpose of providing evidence of certification for the purposes of legal proceedings. Such recording may be done electronically; not store or copy signature-creation data of certification-service-provider provided key management services; the person to whom the before entering into a contractual relationship with a person seeking a certificate to support his electronic signature, inform that person by a durable means of communication of the precise terms and conditions regarding the use of the certificate, including any limitations on its use, the existence of a voluntary accreditation scheme and procedures for complaints and dispute settlement. Such information, which may be transmitted electronically, must be in writing and in readily understandable language. Relevant parts of this information must also be made available on request to third-parties relying on the certificate; 19 (l) use trustworthy systems to store certificates in a verifiable form so that: – – – – only authorised persons can make entries and changes, information can be checked for authenticity, certificates are publicly available for retrieval in only those cases for which the certificate-holder's consent has been obtained, and any technical changes compromising these security requirements are apparent to the operator. 20 REQUIREMENTS FOR SECURE SIGNATURE-CREATION DEVICES ANNEX III 1. Secure-signature-creation devices must, by appropriate technical and procedural means, ensure at the least that: (a) the signature-creation-data used for signature generation can practically occur only once, and that their secrecy is reasonably assured; (b) the signature creation data used for signature generation cannot, with reasonable assurance, be derived and the signature is protected against forgery using currently available technology; (c) the signature-creation-data used for signature generation can be reliably protected by the legitimate signatory against the use of others. 2. Secure signature creation devices must not alter the data to be signed or prevent such data from being presented to the signatory prior to the signature process. 21 ANNEX IV RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECURE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION During the signature-verification process it should be ensured with reasonable certainty that: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) the data used for verifying the signature correspond to the data displayed to the verifier; the signature is reliably verified and the result of that verification is correctly displayed; the verifier can, as necessary, reliably establish the contents of the signed data; the authenticity and validity of the certificate required at the time of signature verification are reliably verified; the result of verification and the signatory's identity are correctly displayed; the use of a pseudonym is clearly indicated; and any security-relevant changes can be detected. 22


title: Gemensamma EES-kommitténs beslut nr 171/1999 av den 26 november 1999 om ändring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtalet

text: L 61/30 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 1. 3. 2001 GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITT(cid:201)NS BESLUT nr 171/1999 av den 26 november 1999 om (cid:228)ndring av bilaga XIII (Transport) till EES-avtalet GEMENSAMMA EES-KOMMITT(cid:201)N HAR FATTAT DETTA BESLUT med beaktande av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsomr(cid:229)det, (cid:228)ndrat genom protokollet med justeringar av Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsomr(cid:229)det, nedan kallat avtalet, s(cid:228)rskilt artikel 98 i detta, och av f(cid:246)ljande sk(cid:228)l: (1) (2) Bilaga XIII till avtalet (cid:228)ndrades genom Gemensamma EES-kommittØns beslut nr 25/97 av den 30 april 1997 (1). Kommissionens beslut 1999/569/EG av den 28 juli 1999 om grundparametrarna f(cid:246)r delsystem t(cid:229)g- styrning f(cid:246)r det transeuropeiska j(cid:228)rnv(cid:228)gssystemet f(cid:246)r h(cid:246)ghastighetst(cid:229)g (2) b(cid:246)r inf(cid:246)rlivas med avtalet. H˜RIGENOM F(cid:214)RESKRIVS F(cid:214)LJANDE. Artikel 1 F(cid:246)ljande nya punkt skall inf(cid:246)ras efter punkt 37a (r(cid:229)dets direktiv 96/48/EG) i bilaga XIII till avtalet: (cid:148)37b. 399 D 0569: Kommissionens beslut 1999/569/EG av den 28 juli 1999 om grundparametrarna f(cid:246)r delsystem t(cid:229)gstyrning f(cid:246)r det transeuropeiska j(cid:228)rnv(cid:228)gssystemet f(cid:246)r h(cid:246)ghastighetst(cid:229)g (EGT L 216, 14. 8. 1999, s. 23), r(cid:228)ttat genom EGT L 236, 7. 9. 1999, s. 38. (cid:148) Artikel 2 Texterna till beslut 1999/569/EG p(cid:229) isl(cid:228)ndska och norska, som bifogas respektive spr(cid:229)kversion av detta beslut, (cid:228)r giltiga. Artikel 3 Detta beslut tr(cid:228)der i kraft den 27 november 1999 under f(cid:246)ruts(cid:228)ttning att alla anm(cid:228)lningar enligt artikel 103. 1 i avtalet har gjorts till Gemensamma EES-kommittØn. Detta beslut skall offentligg(cid:246)ras i EES-delen av och EES-supplementet till Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Artikel 4 Utf(cid:228)rdat i Bryssel den 26 november 1999. P(cid:229) Gemensamma EES-kommittØns v(cid:228)gnar N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN Ordf(cid:246)rande (1) EGT L 242, 4. 9. 1997, s. 74. (2) EGT L 216, 14. 8. 1999, s. 23, r(cid:228)ttat genom EGT L 236, 7. 9. 1999, s. 38


title: EEZ Apvienotās komitejas Lēmums Nr. 154/1999 (1999. gada 26. novembris), ar kuru groza EEZ līguma I pielikumu (Veterinārie un fitosanitārie jautājumi)

eurovoc_concepts:
aquaculture
fishery product
health certificate
import
third country
veterinary legislation

text: 11/5. sēj. LV Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis 21999D0154 1. 3. 2001. EIROPAS KOPIENU OFICIĀLAIS VĒSTNESIS EEZ APVIENOTĀS KOMITEJAS LĒMUMS Nr. 154/1999 (1999. gada 26. novembris), ar kuru groza EEZ līguma I pielikumu (Veterinārie un fitosanitārie jautājumi) EEZ APVIENOTĀ KOMITEJA, 317 L 61/1 ņemot vērā Eiropas Ekonomikas zonas līgumu, kas grozīts ar protokolu, ar kuru pielāgo Eiropas Ekonomi- kas zonas līgumu, še turpmāk “Līgums”, un jo īpaši tā 98. pantu, (1) tā kā Līguma I pielikums ir grozīts ar EEZ Apvienotās komitejas 1999. gada 5. novembra Lēmumu Nr. 142/1999 (1); (2) tā kā Līguma 1. protokola 4. punkta a) apakšpunktā ir paredzēti noteikumi par informācijas apmaiņu starp Kopienu un EBTA valstīm; tā kā arī jāpaātrina procedūra, saskaņā ar kuru dara zinā- mus Eiropas ekonomikas zonā Līguma vajadzībām apstiprināto uzņēmumu sarakstus, IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠĀDU LĒMUMU. 1. pants Līguma I pielikuma I nodaļas ievada daļā pēc 9. punkta (I nodaļas tiesību aktu spēkā stāšanās datums) ies- tarpina šādu punktu: “10. Eiropas ekonomikas zonas uzņēmumu saraksts — Papildus procedūrai, kas paredzēta Līguma 1. protokola 4. punkta a) apakšpunktā, Eiropas Kopie- nas dalībvalstis un EBTA valstis visām pārējām Eiropas Kopienas dalībvalstīm un EBTA valstīm tieši dara zināmus šā līguma vajadzībām apstiprināto uzņēmumu sarakstus. ” (1) OV L 15, 18. 1. 2001. , 34. lpp. 318 LV Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis 11/5. sēj. Šis lēmums stājas spēkā 1999. gada 27. novembrī ar nosacījumu, ka EEZ Apvienotajai komitejai ir iesniegti visi paziņojumi saskaņā ar Līguma 103. panta 1. punktu. 2. pants Šo lēmumu publicē Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālā Vēstneša EEZ iedaļā un EEZ papildinājumā. 3. pants Briselē, 1999. gada 26. novembrī EEZ Apvienotās komitejas vārdā — Priekšsēdētājs N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN


title: EMP Ühiskomitee otsus nr 168/1999, 26. november 1999, millega muudetakse EMP lepingu IV lisa (energeetika)

text: 11/5. kd ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21999D0168 1. 3. 2001 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE TEATAJA EMP ÜHISKOMITEE OTSUS nr 168/1999, 26. november 1999, millega muudetakse EMP lepingu IV lisa (energeetika) 339 L 61/23 EMP ÜHISKOMITEE, võttes arvesse Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut, mida on kohandatud Euroopa Majanduspiirkonna lepingut kohandava protokolliga, edaspidi “ leping”, eriti selle artiklit 98 ning arvestades, et: (1) (2) (3) lepingu IV lisa muudeti EMP Ühiskomitee 26. märtsi 1999. aasta otsusega nr 29/1999; (1) lepingusse tuleb lisada Euroopa Parlamendi 96/92/EÜ elektri siseturu ühiseeskirjade kohta; (2) ja nõukogu 19. detsembri 1996. aasta direktiiv Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi 96/92/EÜ artikli 19 lõikes 1 osutatud siseriikliku turu osa põhineb käesoleva lepingu tähenduses ühenduse keskmise osa arvutamisel elektriturgude avanemi- sel, ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE: Artikkel 1 Lepingu IV lisa punkti 13 (Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv 96/57/EÜ) järele lisatakse järgmine punkt: “14. 398 L 0092: Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiiv 96/92/EÜ, 19. detsember 1996, elektri siseturu ühiseeskirjade kohta (EÜT L 27, 30. 1. 1997, lk 20). Käesolevas lepingus loetakse selle direktiivi sätteid järgmises kohanduses: a) artikli 3 lõikes 2 asendatakse sõnad “asutamislepingu asjakohaseid sätteid, eriti artiklit 90” sõnadega “EMP lepingu asjakohaseid sätteid, eelkõige artiklit 59”; b) artikli 3 lõikes 3 asendatakse tekst “asutamislepingu artikli 90” tekstiga “EMP lepingu artikli 59”; c) artikli 3 lõikes 3 asendatakse tekst “Ühenduse huvid” tekstiga “Lepinguosaliste huvid”, d) artikli 7 lõike 2 lõppu lisatakse järgmine tekst: “sellisel kujul, nagu sellele viitab EMP leping ja nii, nagu seda on EMP lepingu rakendamiseks kohandatud”; e) artikli 14 lõikes 2 lisatakse esimesele lausele järgmine tekst: “sellisel kujul, nagu sellele viitab EMP leping ja nii, nagu seda on EMP lepingu rakendamiseks kohandatud”; (1) EÜT L 266, 19. 10. 2000, lk 5. (2) EÜT L 27, 30. 1. 1997, lk 20. 340 ET f) Euroopa Liidu Teataja 11/5. kd artikli 14 lõikes 5 asendatakse tekst “asutamislepingu artikli 54 lõike 3 punktil g põhineva konsolideeritud aastaaruandeid käsitleva nõukogu 13. juuni 1983. aasta seitsmenda direktiivi 83/349/EMÜ tähenduses” tekstiga “asutamislepingu artikli 54 lõike 3 punktil g põhineva konsolideeritud aastaaruandeid käsitleva nõukogu 13. juuni 1983. aasta seitsmenda direktiivi 83/349/EMÜ tähenduses sellisel kujul, nagu sellele viitab EMP leping ja nii, nagu seda on EMP lepingu rakendamiseks kohandatud”; g) EFTA riikide suhtes ei kohaldata artikli 19 lõigetes 1 ja 2 sätestatud kohustust, mille kohaselt liikmesriigid peavad andma aru lõpptarbijate tarbitud elektri kohta, et arvutada ühenduse keskmine osa ja määrata kindlaks turgude avanemise aste; h) artiklis 22 asendatakse tekst “asutamislepingu sätteid, eriti selle artiklit 86” tekstiga “EMP lepingu sätteid, eriti selle artiklit 54”; i) need EFTA riigid, kus enne EMP Ühiskomitee 26. novembri 1999. aasta otsuse nr 168/1999 jõustumist antud kohustustest ja tagatistest ei saa nimetatud otsuse sätete tõttu kinni pidada, võivad taotleda üleminekukorra kohaldamist vastavalt artikli 24 lõigetele 1 ja 2. Ülemineku- korra kohaldamise taotlustest tuleb teatada EFTA järelevalveametile hiljemalt 6 kuud pärast EMP Ühiskomitee 26. novembri 1999. aasta otsuse nr 168/1999 jõustumist; j) artikli 24 lõikes 3 lisatakse viimasele lausele järgmine tekst: “, Islandi ja Liechtensteini”; k) artikli 27 lõike 2 lõppu lisatakse järgmine tekst: “Oma elektrisüsteemi tehnilise eripära tõttu võivad Island ja Liechtenstein direktiivist tulenevate kohustuste rakendamiseks kasutada pärast EMP Ühiskomitee 26. novembri 1999. aasta otsuse nr 168/1999 jõustumist kahe aasta pikkust täiendavat ajavahemikku. ”” Artikkel 2 Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi 96/92/EÜ islandi- ja norrakeelne tekst, mis on lisatud käesoleva otsuse vastavates keeltes versioonidele, on autentne. Käesolev otsus jõustub 27. novembril 1999, tingimusel et EMP Ühiskomiteed on teavitatud vastavalt lepingu artikli 103 lõikele 1. Artikkel 3 Käesolev otsus avaldatakse Euroopa Ühenduste Teataja EMP osa EMP kaasandes. Artikkel 4 Brüssel, 26. november 1999 EMP Ühiskomitee eesistuja N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN


title: Regulamento (CE) n.° 2508/1999 da Comissão, de 26 de Novembro de 1999, que altera o Regulamento (CEE) n.° 3536/91, que determina a data-limite de entrada em existência do leite em pó desnatado vendido a título do Regulamento (CEE) n.° 3398/91

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
manufactured feedingstuffs
sale
skimmed milk powder

text: 27. 11. 1999 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 304/21 REGULAMENTO (CE) N. o 2508/1999 DA COMISSÃO de 26 de Novembro de 1999 que altera o Regulamento (CEE) n. o 3536/91, que determina a data-limite de entrada em existência do leite em pó desnatado vendido a título do Regulamento (CEE) n. o 3398/91 A COMISSÃO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CEE) n. o 804/68 do Conselho, de 27 de Junho de 1968, que estabelece a organização comum de mercado no sector do leite e dos produtos lácteos (1), com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) n. o 1587/96 (2), e, nomeadamente, o n. o 5 do seu artigo 7. o, Considerando o seguinte: (1) O Regulamento (CEE) n. o 3536/91 da Comissão (3), com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) n. o 2305/1999 (4), limitou a quantidade de leite em pó desnatado colocada à venda àquela entrada em exis- tência antes de 1 de Junho de 1997; tuir a data acima referida pela de 31 de Dezembro de 1997; (3) As medidas previstas no presente regulamento estão em conformidade com o parecer do Comité de Gestão do Leite e dos Produtos Lácteos, ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO: Artigo 1. o No artigo 1. o do Regulamento (CEE) n. o 3536/91, a data de «1 de Junho de 1997» é substituída pela data de «31 de Dezembro de 1997». Artigo 2. o (2) Atendendo à quantidade que se encontra disponível, bem como à situação do mercado, é conveniente substi- O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 27 de Novembro de 1999. O presente regulamento é obrigatório em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplicável em todos os Estados-Membros. Feito em Bruxelas, em 26 de Novembro de 1999. Pela Comissão Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comissão (1) JO L 148 de 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. (2) JO L 206 de 16. 8. 1996, p. 21. (3) JO L 335 de 6. 12. 1991, p. 8. (4) JO L 280 de 30. 10. 1999, p. 25


title: Decisión del Comité Mixto del EEE n° 171/1999, de 26 de noviembre de 1999, por la que se modifica el anexo XIII (Transportes) del Acuerdo EEE

text: L 61/30 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 1. 3. 2001 DECISI(cid:211)N DEL COMIT(cid:201) MIXTO DEL EEE No 171/1999 de 26 de noviembre de 1999 por la que se modifica el anexo XIII (Transportes) del Acuerdo EEE EL COMIT(cid:201) MIXTO DEL EEE, Visto el Acuerdo sobre el Espacio Econ(cid:243)mico Europeo, adaptado por el Protocolo por el que se adapta el Acuerdo sobre el Espacio Econ(cid:243)mico Europeo, en adelante denominado «el Acuerdo», y, en particular, su art(cid:237)culo 98, Considerando lo siguiente: (1) (2) El anexo XIII del Acuerdo fue modificado por la Decisi(cid:243)n del ComitØ Mixto del EEE no 25/97, de 30 de abril de 1997 (1). DeberÆ incorporarse al Acuerdo la Decisi(cid:243)n 1999/569/CE de la Comisi(cid:243)n, de 28 de julio de 1999, relativa a los parÆmetros fundamentales del subsistemas de control y mando y seæalizaci(cid:243)n del sis- tema ferroviario transeuropeo de alta velocidad (2). DECIDE: Art(cid:237)culo 1 DespuØs del punto 37a (Directiva 96/48/CE del Consejo) del anexo XIII del Acuerdo se aæadirÆ el punto siguiente: «37b. 399 D 0569: Decisi(cid:243)n 1999/569/CE de la Comisi(cid:243)n, de 28 de julio de 1999, relativa a los parÆ- metros fundamentales del subsistema de control y mando y seæalizaci(cid:243)n del sistema ferroviario transeuropeo de alta velocidad (DO L 216 de 14. 8. 1999, p. 23), corregida en el DO L 236 de 7. 9. 1999, p. 38. ». Art(cid:237)culo 2 Los textos de la Decisi(cid:243)n 1999/569/CE, corregida en el DO L 236 de 7. 9. 1999, en lenguas islandesa y noruega, anejos a las respectivas versiones ling(cid:252)(cid:237)sticas de la presente Decisi(cid:243)n, son autØnticos. La presente Decisi(cid:243)n entrarÆ en vigor el 27 de noviembre de 1999, siempre que se hayan efectuado al ComitØ Mixto del EEE todas las notificaciones establecidas en el apartado 1 del art(cid:237)culo 103 del Acuerdo. Art(cid:237)culo 3 La presente Decisi(cid:243)n se publicarÆ en la secci(cid:243)n EEE y en el Suplemento EEE del Diario Oficial de las Comu- nidades Europeas. Art(cid:237)culo 4 Hecho en Bruselas, el 26 de noviembre de 1999. Por el ComitØ Mixto del EEE El Presidente N. v. LIECHTENSTEIN (1) DO L 242 de 4. 9. 1997, p. 74. (2) DO L 216 de 14. 8. 1999, p. 23; corregida en el DO L 236 de 7. 9. 1999, p. 38