title: Interim report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the programmes of Community action on the prevention of cancer, AIDS and certain other communicable diseases, and drug dependence within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996-2000) (Decisions No 646/96/EC, 647/96/EC and 102/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council)

eurovoc_concepts:
AIDS
EU programme
cancer
disease prevention
infectious disease

text: EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 14. 10. 1999 COM(1999) 463 final INTERIM REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS on the implementation of the programmes of Community action on the prevention of cancer, AIDS and certain other communicable diseases, and drug dependence within the framework for action in the field of public health (1996-2000) (Decisions N°646/96/EC, 647/96/EC and 102/97/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. 3 Consistency and complementarity. 3 Effectiveness and the achievement of objectives. 3 Monitoring. 4 Adjustments. 4 Excerpt from the experts’ report on the three programmes. 5 The cancer programme. 5 The AIDS and communicable diseases programme. 6 The drugs programme. 8 The management of the programmes. 9 Links with Member States policies and programmes. 10 Budget. 11 2 Introduction Following the adoption of three programmes of Community action for prevention of cancer, AIDS and other communicable diseases, and drug dependence by the European Parliament and the Council, the Commission presents hereunder an interim report concerning mainly the implementation period 1996 and 1997. The inclusion of the first half of the budgetary period 1998 has been avoided as it would have unduly delayed a timely presentation of this report. In this report, the Commission highlights the degree of consistency and complementarity reached between these plans and the other relevant Community policies, programmes and initiatives and to increase the value and impact of the three plans, has performed an evaluation of the actions undertaken. On the latter point, particular regard has been given to effectiveness and the achievement of the objectives of the measures undertaken. For this purpose, the Commission has drawn on the opinions of a group of external experts, and from representatives of the Member States serving on the three management committees. The Commission also reports on the adjustments which are deemed necessary as a consequence of the information gathered. Consistency and complementarity The Commission sought consistency and complementarity between its public health and other Community policies, programmes and initiatives by a multitude of efforts on different operational levels, in particular: technological The implementation of development and demonstration (1994 – 1998) of the European Communities was closely followed by means of the inter-service consultations on publications of calls for proposals and on adoption of projects for financing. the 4th Framework programme research, for The preparation of the 5th Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration (1998 – 2002) of the European Union was actively followed by means of the inter-service consultations on the draft proposal, and consultations on project proposals, in order to ensure consistency and complementarity. Further, officials of the public health directorate were invited to all meetings of the programme committees for the specific research programmes; likewise, officials from the research directorates were invited to the meetings of the public health programme committees. In the course of the implementation of the programmes, applicants seemed also to have better understood the difference between health and health services research as foreseen under the framework programmes for research and the preventive measures for cancer, AIDS and other communicable diseases, and drug dependence covered under the relevant action plans. Effectiveness and the achievement of objectives Given the kind of objectives laid down in the three action plans, the actual coverage by specific actions following the first calls for proposals within the period of 1996 and 1997 were generally quite sufficient. A balance between the various areas of each programme was 3 made easier by the adoption of annual work programmes allowing proposals for projects to be invited in areas not yet sufficiently covered. There was one reservation that initially the European added value of projects was in many instances under developed, but stress has been placed on the development of network projects in order to resolve this shortcoming. To ensure subsidiarity, the opinion of Member States was invited through the programme committees as laid down in the specific action programmes. Thus, the necessary support of Member States for implementation of the actions selected in their countries was encouraged. At the same time, the programme committees guaranteed the required transparency of the European Commission’s actions towards the Member States. The transparency towards the European Parliament was ensured by the prior transmission to that Institution of reports and documents intended for each of the programme Committees as well as an annual list of projects financed. To ensure the highest possible standards for the quality of the actions selected, each committee not only gave a favourable opinion on the annual work plans, but was also consulted on the preparation of the calls for proposals, the selection of projects and the follow-up of their implementation. In addition, for the Cancer Programme, the Commission has formalised the existence of an Advisory Committee for Cancer prevention, formerly known as the High Level Cancer Experts Committee, composed of independent scientific experts who provide opinions to the Commission on projects to be financed and on cancer prevention issues in general. Monitoring Monitoring of the specific actions has been performed mainly through a continuous follow-up by the Commission Services of the contractual obligations of the projects financed. Adjustments To improve the European added value as an important general objective, the Commission Services have embarked on a strategy to ask for enhanced networking of applicants to ensure better cross-border co-operation, e. g. , as a means of dissemination of best practice in Europe. To cover areas of Community interest, which were not covered by specific actions selected to date, following a thorough analysis of the active portfolio, the Commission adapted each annual work plan respectively. In turn, the annual work plans aided in establishing priorities for the next calls for proposals as well as in the selection of the newly proposed actions. For the Cancer Programme, a document was agreed by the management committee and adopted by the Commission concerning simplification of procedures. 4 To further improve transparency and simplify dissemination at the same time annual reports have been produced for 19961 and 19972 by the Commission’s Services jointly for the three programmes, which give a comprehensive picture of the work of the respective unit of the Commission’s services. Following external suggestions and internal review of shortcomings the linkages between the three programmes and other public health programmes have been improved. Excerpt from the experts’ report on the three programmes Finally, excerpts from the findings of a group of independent experts who, under contract to the Commission, analysed each individual programme, are presented below: THE CANCER PROGRAMME With few exceptions, the projects have been evaluated as appropriate or very appropriate and relevant in relation to the objectives of the programme. Mostly, they properly address the various actions in terms of aims, specific objectives, design and achievements. However, in some cases such as health education projects, the targets and methods are quite often badly specified. Nevertheless, the projects in general appear to be competently implemented and managed. In addition, the timing of outputs in comparison with the proposed schedule has generally been maintained, with some exceptions. the dissemination of results has basically followed quite traditional However, pathways, such as scientific conferences and publications within scientific journals. Although these means of dissemination are certainly appropriate, they are undoubtedly not sufficient to ensure involvement of the general public or even of a majority of health professionals. Positive results of note include: – The expansion and development of European networks, especially in the fields of: nutrition and cancer (mainly through the EPIC project), breast and cervical cancer screening, fight against tobacco and cancer registration; – The production and diffusion of consensus documents, guidelines, appropriate software for increasing comparability and uniform quality of data registration and anti-cancer activities over Europe; 1 2 Directorate Public Health and Safety at Work, Unit V/F/2, Implementation of action programmes targeted on diseases, Annual report 1996, Implementation of the actions: - Europe against cancer -, - AIDS and other communicable diseases -, - drug addiction prevention -, Internal document CE-V/3-97- 002-EN-C. Directorate Public Health and Safety at Work, Unit V/F/2, Implementation of action programmes targeted on diseases, Annual report 1997, Implementation of the programmes - Europe against cancer, - AIDS and other communicable diseases, - Drug addiction prevention, Internal document CE-V/3-98- 009-EN-C. 5 – The implementation of prevention and early detection programmes of appropriate quality in European areas previously uncovered or with little coverage; and, – The diffusion of quality control practices in the fields of data registration and cancer health services, according to common criteria and aiming to obtain a more uniform quality of these activities across Europe. However, a greater amount of innovation would be welcome, especially in some actions. For example, more innovation is recommended in the fields of health education techniques; for health professionals; application of new techniques for improving the performance and the effectiveness of public health programmes such as in breast and cervical cancer screening, of screening for cancers other than breast and cervix, and of methods for quitting smoking in high risk groups. teaching methods tobacco; against fight In general, from a review of the reports it is clear that all the listed projects greatly benefited and indeed were often made possible by the financial support of the Europe Against Cancer programme. For many of them, the Community financial support allowed a high intensity of inter-country exchanges, the agreement on methods, the achievement of a uniform quality and the production of common documents and statements. It is quite remarkable that in no case do the projects’ activities, given the programme framework, appear to conflict or even overlap with national programmes. On the contrary, some project documents claim synergy and beneficial effects on national health activities. However, the relation with other agencies active in the field is not always clear. For some clusters and actions, it was difficult to evaluate if there is an overlap with other activities supported by the European Community, such as BIOMED. in terms of European added value, the evaluation identified some Finally, contributions and some room for improvement. A significant majority of the projects is multinational. The tendency to finance multinational projects should be maintained and encouraged. However, multi-nationality does not automatically guarantee an acceptable level of European added value, for which a rigorous methodology, a sufficient degree of innovation and a good dissemination of results are also needed. These features characterise many, but not all the projects and actions. THE AIDS AND COMMUNICABLE DISEASES PROGRAMME With few exceptions, the projects have been evaluated as appropriate and relevant in relation with the objectives of the programme. In general, these projects delivered a range of effective and appropriate studies and interventions. Unfortunately, action 10 was not addressed by any project in 1996 and 1997 (Member States vaccination policies and programmes). Funded projects provided a mix of innovative approaches and expansion of pre- existing effective projects. In general, these properly address the various actions in terms of aims, specific objectives, design and achievements. In a few cases, such as the EchinoEuroReg project (about echinococcosis), activities do not really fit into the 6 annual priorities defined for the programme, but this relates to only a very small part of the cluster’s budget. Populations targeted by the projects were generally appropriate. However, sometimes projects excluded high priority sub-populations, which should be redressed in the future. For example, greater attention within the cluster on combating transmission of AIDS should be allocated to projects targeting the range of men who have sex with men, and also to intravenous drug users whether or not they are ‘marginalised young people’. Projects were usually well managed, and resources used cost-effectively. the The results from a number of projects are quite impressive. Many of multinational networks supported by the programme seem at first sight to be a cost- effective way of creating Community added value. However, the project reports of the networks quite often fail to give a convincing picture of actual capacity to gather expertise and experience from all the Member States and from all the relevant agencies in the Member States, as well as to disseminate information provided by these networks. It will be important to pay substantially greater attention to the issue of discrimination, which is seldom dealt with adequately in the projects, and which should be integrated into the framework of the response at all levels to AIDS, sexually transmitted and other communicable diseases. Positive results of note include: – Improvement of the co-ordination of communicable disease surveillance systems and the co-ordination of the Community response, with initial efforts focused on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, drug resistance; – The regular production of the monthly bulletin ‘Eurosurveillance’ and a weekly electronic bulletin. – Building of a network (EARSS), standardisation and validation of antibiotic resistance susceptibility testing and reporting; – Creation and development of a European network for HIV/STD (Sexually transmitted diseases) prevention for prostitutes resulting from the merging of two existing networks: EUROPAP and TAMPEP; – Analysis of border issues with regard to HIV/AIDS, STDs and development of co-operative, border crossing methods of prevention; – Maintenance and enhancement of the European network on HIV/AIDS and hepatitis prevention in prisons; expansion and further development of the European public policy network on HIV/ AIDS (EPPNA); creation of a European AIDS and enterprise network (EAEN); – Creation of two European centres for AIDS prevention, information and education (addressing youth and mobility respectively). Some critical issues were identified, in particular: 7 – Dissemination of results often occurs only through traditional pathways, such as scientific conferences and publication within scientific journals. These approaches need to be enhanced to ensure that a much wider audience is aware of the results and conclusions of funded projects; – Vaccination policies and programmes with respect to HIV/AIDS are assuming greater significance, and projects investigating this area should be encouraged in the future. For many projects, Community financial support allowed a high intensity of inter- country exchanges, agreement on methods, the achievement of a uniform and enhanced quality, and the production of common documents and statements. In most cases, projects appeared to clearly demonstrate synergism with national actions. The assessment in terms of European added value is quite complex. However, the project results in the majority of cases have significant practical relevance, and theoretically, should better inform the HIV/STD policy framework and the design and delivery of programmes in the Member States. At present, there is only limited evidence that project results are actually being disseminated widely and influencing key policy-makers regarding future direction on HIV/STD issues within the Member States and in the European Community as a whole. THE DRUGS PROGRAMME Implementation of most of the actions of the programme commenced during the first two years of the 5-year programme. However, much remains to be achieved in areas such as: relapse prevention and rehabilitation; evaluating the effectiveness of information and health education campaigns; tools with polysubstance dependence; the extension of European network of ‘test towns’ and promoting initiatives to improve the drug prevention aspect of vocational training of teachers; and, health and social care professions and other professionals responsible for young people. Much also depends on the follow up of the projects and on opportunities for the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and other European institutions to disseminate results, because dissemination by the project contractors often remains quite restricted. In the same vein, funding of European networks in the field of public health action related to drug dependence should be a priority, with the aim of disseminating project results. There are quite impressive results from a number of projects. Many of the multinational networks and teams supported by the programme seem to be a quite cost-effective way of creating Community added value. However, the project reports of the networks quite often fail in giving a convincing picture of their actual capacity to gather expertise and experience from all the Member States and from all the relevant agencies in the Member States, as well as to disseminate information when provided through these networks. A positive development is the number of networks that have proceeded in providing electronic information channels such as websites, electronic databases and other uses of the Internet. The projects funded seem to emphasise approaches targeted directly to individuals, contrasted with a lack of projects with a broader public policy approach towards 8 public health problems related to drugs. Such projects would be needed to increase the impact of the larger public policy context on the drug knowledge about phenomenon and on the feasibility of specific intervention models in different public policy contexts. As there are large political debates, both at international and European level as well as at national and municipal level, on future public policy strategies with regard to drug problems, there is a great need for research-based evidence to help policy makers to choose between different strategic alternatives. The linkages between the programme and other public health programmes managed by Directorate General V seem weak. The projects that are funded seldom use, to the maximum extent, experience in policy development outside the field of drugs, such as with addictions to chemical substances (drugs, nicotine, alcohol) or with the general training of professionals or peer training programmes. The decision to adopt the programme placed a significant emphasis on co-operation with other international and intergovernmental organisations as well as with other Community programmes and initiatives and the EMCDDA. The projects’ documentation indicates that there have been quite a few links to the EMCDDA, while the indications of co-operation with other international agencies are rather few. THE MANAGEMENT OF THE PROGRAMMES Programme management since the first years of the implementation of these programmes has improved, but there are still opportunities for further improvement. The cancer and AIDS and communicable diseases programmes were adopted in 1996, with the drugs programme not being finalised until January 1997. Thus, the creation of the formal management infrastructure, including the setting up of the programme committees and their rules of procedure and working practices, only occurred after the formal commencement of the programmes at the beginning of 1996. There has been some continuity in the management of public health actions by the Commission, from the period prior to the establishment of the programmes, to the development of management practices of the new programmes in its first years. Those responsible for managing the programmes were the same until mid-1998, but several changes among the collaborators took place, affecting continuity of knowledge. Due to the late setting up of the formal management structure for the programmes, a proper evaluation of the management can only be done in the second phase of the evaluation. However, it is possible to make some preliminary comments at this stage the implementation. A more detailed evaluation of management will be of undertaken during the second phase of the evaluation. A number of suggestions for further improving the timing and procedures for processing and deciding on project applications need to be carefully considered. the institution of an Among the points emerging, important were: the most 9 independent evaluation of all project proposals by external experts3; the need for some means of stable funding for the various European networks that were being established and that should function as a key mechanism in the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge; improved documentation through better specification of what was required both in applicants’ proposals and in contractors’ reports; a need for better links within and between programmes, with other Commission activities and with other bodies involved in public health in Europe. Various recommendations are made to address these concerns. In summary, there does not appear to be any obvious mismanagement of any aspect of the European public health programmes, but there are many opportunities for refinement of procedures and practices. LINKS WITH MEMBER STATES POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES A questionnaire was dispatched to members of the programme committees for each of the three public health programmes on 30 October 1998. The information requested focused on a description of national prevention policies, links between it and Community policy, and how these links had developed. Further questions asked for information on the management of the programmes. This attempt to canvass responses from Member States should be seen, at least, as an important step forward in the larger task of creating coherence and synergy between Community level, national and local initiatives in tackling public health problems, the seriousness of which is recognised throughout the European Community. Although unsuccessful in achieving a comprehensive picture of the specific impact of these three programmes in all Member States, these responses from a third of the Member States, nevertheless give some indications of the complexity of what is needed (21 clusters in 15 Member States, not mentioning the regionalisation of public health programmes in most of these). It is proposed that before the end of the programmes, an independent, comprehensive and comparative study be commissioned to investigate the relevant policies and practices in all Member States and to review the contribution of Community policy and initiatives to the national and local level in the Member States. 3 NB. Commission Services: this role is already carried out by the Advisory Committee for Cancer Prevention in the case of project proposals submitted to the Europe Against Cancer Programme. 10 Budget An overview of the budget allocation for the years 1996 and 1997 for the three programmes is presented as follows Budget allocation for the Europe against cancer programme: 1996 1997 1996 & 1997 Area Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) A-Data collection and research B-Information and health education C-Early detection and screening D-Training and quality control 15 29 32 24 4. 191 2. 746 1. 721 1. 757 TOTAL 100 ~10. 416 9 16 27 14 66 3. 901 2. 532 1. 591 1. 339 24 45 59 38 8. 092 5. 278 3. 312 3. 097 ~9. 363 166 ~19. 779 11 Budget allocation for the Europe against AIDS and other communicable diseases programme: 1996 1997 1996 & 1997 Area Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) 6 15 18 10 3. 246 2. 190 2. 757 1. 329 9 17 16 10 3. 316 2. 351 2. 148 1. 348 15 32 34 20 6. 562 4. 541 4. 905 2. 677 A - Surveillance and monitoring B - Combating transmission C – Information, education and Training D – Support for persons with HIV/AIDS and combating discrimination TOTAL 49 ~9. 522 52 ~9. 163 101 ~18. 685 12 Budget allocation for the Europe against drug dependence programme: 1996 19974 1996 & 1997 Area Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) Number of projects Budget (~MECU) A- data research and evaluation B- Information, health education and training 16 18 3. 080 3. 420 TOTAL 34 ~6. 500 33 ~4. 908 67 ~11. 408 4 NB. For 1997 a breakdown into rubrics A and B was not done. Instead the summary figures have been used. 13


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ E-1862/99 υποβολή: Glyn Ford (PSE) προς την Επιτροπή. Δημιουργία ευρωπαϊκού δικτύου ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων.

eurovoc_concepts:
European cooperation
human rights
information network
non-governmental organisation

formats: html pdf print

text: 18. 7. 2000 EL Επι΄σηµη Εφηµερι΄δα των Ευρωπαι¤κω΄ν Κοινοτη΄των C 203 E/73 (2000/C 203 E/089) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1859/99 ypobolh·: Emmanouil Mastorakis (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (14 Oktvbri·oy 1999) Ue·ma: Χα΄ρτης της Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ς Ένωσης Απο΄ την Υπηρεσι΄α Επιση΄µων Εκδο΄σεων (Λουξεµβου΄ργο, 1999) εκδο΄θηκε ενηµερωτικο΄ φυλλα΄διο µε τι΄τλο «Η τελωνειακη΄ πολιτικη΄ της Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ς Ένωσης», σε πολλε΄ς γλω΄σσες. Στην αντι΄ληψη΄ µου ε΄πεσε η Αγγλικη΄, Γαλλικη΄ και η Ελληνικη΄ ε΄κδοση. Στη σελι΄δα 5 του φυλλαδι΄ου, ε΄χει καταχωριστει΄ ε΄γχρωµος χα΄ρτης της Ευρω΄πης, παρουσια΄ζοντας τα κρα΄τη µε΄λη της Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ς Ένωσης µε κι΄τρινο χρω΄µα και, ο΄πως σηµειω΄νεται, οι υποψη΄φιες χω΄ρες µε χρω΄µα καφε΄. Μεταξυ΄ των «υποψηφι΄ων» χωρω΄ν, περιλαµβα΄νεται και η Τουρκι΄α. Ερωτα΄ται η Επιτροπη΄ αν σκοπευ΄ει να ελε΄γξει τη διαδικασι΄α επι΄σηµης διοχε΄τευσης τε΄τοιων πληροφοριω΄ν και αν σκοπευ΄ει να αποσυ΄ρει αµε΄σως το συγκεκριµε΄νο φυλλα΄διο; Apa·nthsh toy k. Bolkestein ej ono·matow thw Epitroph·w (08 Dekembri·oy 1999) Ο χα΄ρτης απεικονι΄ζει ο΄λες τις χω΄ρες που ε΄χουν υποβα΄λει αι΄τηση προσχω΄ρησης στην Κοινο΄τητα. Η αι΄τηση της Τουρκι΄ας υποβλη΄θηκε στις 14 Σεπτεµβρι΄ου 1987. Ως εκ του΄του, η Επιτροπη΄ δεν θεωρει΄ ο΄τι χρεια΄ζεται να αποσυρθει΄ το φυλλα΄διο. (2000/C 203 E/090) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1862/99 ypobolh·: Glyn Ford (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (14 Oktvbri·oy 1999) Ue·ma: ∆ηµιουργι΄α ευρωπαι¤κου΄ δικτυ΄ου ανθρωπι΄νων δικαιωµα΄των Το ∆εκε΄µβριο του 1998 αποφασι΄στηκε, κατα΄ την διυπουργικη΄ δια΄σκεψη της Βιε΄ννης, να εκδι΄δει η Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ Ένωση ετη΄σια ε΄κθεση για τα ανθρω΄πινα δικαιω΄µατα. ∆εν θα συµφωνου΄σε η Επιτροπη΄ ο΄τι η δηµιουργι΄α ενο΄ς ευρωπαι¤κου΄ δικτυ΄ου ΜΚΟ ασχολουµε΄νων µε τα ανθρω΄πινα δικαιω΄µατα θα συνιστου΄σε χρη΄σιµο δι΄αυλο επικοινωνι΄ας ανα΄µεσα στους ΜΚΟ που εργα΄ζονται στον τοµε΄α των ανθρωπι΄νων δικαιωµα΄των και την Επιτροπη΄; Θα η΄ταν η Επιτροπη΄ διατεθειµε΄νη να υποστηρι΄ξει µελε΄τη σκοπιµο΄τητας που θα εξετα΄ζει τους δυνατου΄ς τρο΄πους λειτουργι΄ας του δικτυ΄ου αυτου΄; Apa·nthsh toy kyri·oy Patten ej ono·matow thw Epitroph·w (8 Noembri·oy 1999) Η Επιτροπη΄ αποδι΄δει πολυ΄ µεγα΄λη σηµασι΄α στις εργασι΄ες των µη κυβερνητικω΄ν οργανω΄σεων (ΜΚΟ) που επιδιω΄κουν την αποκατα΄σταση των δικαιωµα΄των του ανθρω΄που και στη σηµαντικη΄ συνεισφορα΄ τους για τη διασφα΄λιση και την προω΄θηση των δικαιωµα΄των αυτω΄ν. Στη διακυ΄ρηξη που εκδο΄θηκε στη Βιε΄ννη στις 10 ∆εκεµβρι΄ου 1998, η Ένωση ανε΄λαβε τη δε΄σµευση να εξετα΄σει τη σκοπιµο΄τητα περιοδικη΄ς διοργα΄νωσης ενο΄ς φο΄ρουµ για τα δικαιω΄µατα του ανθρω΄που µε τη συµµετοχη΄ των θεσµικω΄ν οργα΄νων της Ένωσης καθω΄ς και εκπροσω΄πων των ανωτα΄των εκπαιδευτικω΄ν ιδρυµα΄των (ΑΕΙ) και των ΜΚΟ. Το φο΄ρουµ που θα διοργανωθει΄ απο΄ την προεδρι΄α στις 30 Νοεµβρι΄ου 1999, θα περιλαµβα΄νει τους εκπροσω΄πους των θεσµικω΄ν οργα΄νων, των ΜΚΟ και των ΑΕΙ και θα αποτελε΄σει το πρω΄το στα΄διο ενο΄ς εµπεριστατωµε΄νου διαλο΄γου. Απο΄ την α΄λλη πλευρα΄, η Επιτροπη΄ εκφρα΄ζει την ικανοποι΄ηση΄ της για τη θεσµοθε΄τηση, κατα΄ το 1997, µιας οµα΄δας επαφω΄ν που συνεστη΄θη µε πρωτοβουλι΄α της ∆ιεθνου΄ς Αµνηστι΄ας, του Παρατηρητηρι΄ου για τα ∆ικαιω΄µατα του Ανθρω΄που και της ∆ιεθνου΄ς Οµοσπονδι΄ας των ∆ικαιωµα΄των του Ανθρω΄που µε σκοπο΄ να C 203 E/74 Επι΄σηµη Εφηµερι΄δα των Ευρωπαι¤κω΄ν Κοινοτη΄των EL 18. 7. 2000 επιτρε΄ψει ανοικτε΄ς συζητη΄σεις για τα θε΄µατα των δικαιωµα΄των του ανθρω΄που µεταξυ΄ των ΜΚΟ, των µελω΄ν του Κοινοβουλι΄ου, της Επιτροπη΄ς και του Συµβουλι΄ου καθω΄ς και αντιπροσω΄πων των κρατω΄ν µελω΄ν. Αυτη΄ η οµα΄δα επαφω΄ν, που αποτελει΄ το ε΄µβρυο ενο΄ς δικτυ΄ου ΜΚΟ που εργα΄ζονται για τη διασφα΄λιση και την προω΄θηση των δικαιωµα΄των του ανθρω΄που θα µπορου΄σε να εξελιχθει΄ αν ληφθου΄ν υπο΄ψη οι καρποφο΄ρες εµπειρι΄ες που η΄δη υπα΄ρχουν στο θε΄µα αυτο΄ ο΄πως η γενικη΄ συνε΄λευση των ΜΚΟ για την ανα΄πτυξη. Κατα΄ το 2000, η Επιτροπη΄ προβλε΄πει να παρουσια΄σει µια ανακοι΄νωση για τα δικαιω΄µατα του ανθρω΄που. Κατα΄ τη συ΄νταξη΄ της θα συνεκτιµηθου΄ν οι απο΄ψεις των ΜΚΟ. Μεταξυ΄ των θεµα΄των που θα θιγου΄ν στην ανακοι΄νωση αυτη΄ περιλαµβα΄νεται το θε΄µα του καλυ΄τερου τρο΄που διευκο΄λυνσης της προστιθε΄µενης αξι΄ας της προσφορα΄ς των ΜΚΟ στις εργασι΄ες της Επιτροπη΄ς που αφορου΄ν τα δικαιω΄µατα του ανθρω΄που καθω΄ς και το θε΄µα της καθιε΄ρωσης ενδεχοµε΄νως, ενο΄ς, δικτυ΄ου. (2000/C 203 E/091) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-1865/99 ypobolh·: Robert Evans (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (14 Oktvbri·oy 1999) Ue·ma: Χρηµατοδο΄τηση της Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ς Ένωσης για τον τοµε΄α του πολιτισµου΄ σον αφορα΄ τη δια΄θεση των κονδυλι΄ων µε τα οποι΄α η Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ Ένωση χρηµατοδοτει΄ τον τοµε΄α του πολιτισµου΄, θα µπορου΄σε η Επιτροπη΄ να µας πληροφορη΄σει για το υ΄ψος των ποσω΄ν που διατι΄θενται για την επιχορη΄γηση και την προαγωγη΄ των τεχνω΄ν το΄σο εντο΄ς ο΄σο και εκτο΄ς των ορι΄ων της ΕΕ, και απο΄ ποιους δηµοσιονοµικου΄ς πο΄ρους προε΄ρχονται; Ποια ει΄ναι η κατανοµη΄, ανα΄ κρα΄τος µε΄λος, των κονδυλι΄ων που διατι΄θενται για πολιτιστικα΄ προγρα΄µµατα εντο΄ς των κρατω΄ν µελω΄ν; Ει΄ναι το α΄ρθρο 128 του Τι΄τλου IX της Συνθη΄κης η µο΄νη νοµικη΄ βα΄ση για τη χρηµατοδο΄τηση πολιτιστικω΄ν προγραµµα΄των και εκδηλω΄σεων; Και τι τµη΄µα του ο΄λου πρου¤πολογισµου΄ για τον τοµε΄α του πολιτισµου΄ διατι΄θεται, ο΄πως επιτα΄σσει το α΄ρθρο 128, για την «προβολη΄ της κοινη΄ς πολιτιστικη΄ς κληρονοµια΄ς»; Apa·nthsh thw k. Reding ej ono·matow thw Epitroph·w (23 Noembri·oy 1999) Η Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ Επιτροπη΄ γνωρι΄ζει στον κ. βουλευτη΄ ο΄τι η υποστη΄ριξη για τα αµιγω΄ς πολιτιστικα΄ σχε΄δια βασι΄ζεται στο α΄ρθρο 151 (πρω΄ην α΄ρθρο 128) της συνθη΄κης ΕΚ. Κατα΄ το τελευται΄ο οικονοµικο΄ ε΄τος 1998 χορηγη΄θηκε υποστη΄ριξη απο΄ τις γραµµε΄ς B3. 2000, B3. 2001 και B3. 2003 του πρου¤πολογισµου΄. ∆υνα΄µει αυτω΄ν των γραµµω΄ν η Ευρωπαι¤κη΄ Επιτροπη΄ υποστη΄ριξε σχε΄δια στο πλαι΄σιο του προγρα΄µµατος Raphael (B3. 2000), στο πλαι΄σιο του προγρα΄µµατος Kaleidoscope (B3. 2001), στο πλαι΄σιο του προγρα΄µµατος Ariane (B3. 2002) και στο πλαι΄σιο σχεδι΄ων πολιτιστικη΄ς συνεργασι΄ας (B3. 2003) εντο΄ς και εκτο΄ς των συνο΄ρων της Κοινο΄τητας. Για το 1998 χρηµατοδοτη΄θηκαν απο΄ τον πρου¤πολογισµο΄ 84 σχε΄δια στο πλαι΄σιο του Raphael συνολικου΄ υ΄ψους περι΄που 10 εκατ. €, 147 σχε΄δια στο πλαι΄σιο του Kaleidoscope συνολικου΄ υ΄ψους περι΄που 10 εκατ. €, 292 σχε΄δια στο πλαι΄σιο του Ariane συνολικου΄ υ΄ψους 2. 9 εκατ. € και περισσο΄τερα απο΄ 70 σχε΄δια στο πλαι΄σιο της γραµµη΄ς B3. 2003 για την πολιτισµικη΄ συνεργασι΄α συνολικου΄ υ΄ψους περι΄που 6 εκατ. €. Κα΄θε σχε΄διο αφορου΄σε δι΄κτυο µε τη συµµετοχη΄ τουλα΄χιστον τριω΄ν εται΄ρων απο΄ τρι΄α διαφορετικα΄ κρα΄τη µε΄λη η΄ χω΄ρες που ει΄ναι επιλε΄ξιµες για συµµετοχη΄ στο πολιτιστικο΄ προ΄γραµµα (χω΄ρες του Ευρωπαι¤κου΄ Οικονοµικου΄ Χω΄ρου και της Κεντρικη΄ς και της Ανατολικη΄ς Ευρω΄πης). Με αυτη΄ την ε΄ννοια η κοινοτικη΄ χρηµατοδο΄τηση προσφε΄ρεται για την ενθα΄ρρυνση της ευρωπαι¤κη΄ς συνεργασι΄ας -ο΄πως επισηµαι΄νεται σαφω΄ς στο α΄ρθρο 151 της συνθη΄κης ΕΚ- και ως εκ του΄του δεν ει΄ναι δυνατο΄ς ο καταµερισµο΄ς της χρηµατοδο΄τησης µε τη µορφη΄ πο΄ρων που εισπρα΄ττονται απο΄ κα΄θε κρα΄τος µε΄λος για πολιτισµικα΄. Το α΄ρθρο 151 της συνθη΄κης ΕΚ ει΄ναι η µο΄νη νοµικη΄ βα΄ση για τη χρηµατοδο΄τηση αµιγω΄ς πολιτιστικω΄ν σχεδι΄ων. Ωστο΄σο η παρα΄γραφος 4 του εν λο΄γω α΄ρθρου προβλε΄πει επι΄σης τη βα΄ση για την εξε΄ταση σχεδι΄ων µε πολιτιστικε΄ς πτυχε΄ς στο πλαι΄σιο α΄λλων κοινοτικω΄ν πολιτικω΄ν και προγραµµα΄των. Ένας απο΄ τους τοµει΄ς προτεραιο΄τητας του α΄ρθρου 151 ο οποι΄ος «προβα΄λλει την κοινη΄ πολιτιστικη΄ κληρονοµια΄» καλυ΄πτεται απο΄ το προ΄γραµµα Raphael


title: Den Paritetiske Forsamling for Konventionen mellem Staterne i Afrika, Vestindien og Stillehavet og Den Europæiske Union (AVS-EU) - Beslutning om det nuværende stade i forhandlingerne om de fremtidige forbindelser AVS-EU

eurovoc_concepts:
ACP countries
ACP-EU Joint Assembly
European Union
association agreement
international negotiations
resolution

formats: html print


title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 2181/1999 av den 14 oktober 1999 om fastställande för regleringsåret 1998/99 av den beräknade olivoljeproduktionen och det enhetsbelopp för produktionsstöd som får betalas ut i förskott

eurovoc_concepts:
marketing
olive oil
production aid

text: 15. 10. 1999 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 267/19 KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 2181/1999 av den 14 oktober 1999 om fastställande för regleringsåret 1998/99 av den beräknade olivoljeproduktionen och det enhets- belopp för produktionsstöd som får betalas ut i förskott EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA FÖRORDNING olivoljeekvivalenter, nivåerna. fastställas till de nedan angivna med beaktande av Fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av rådets förordning nr 136/66/EEG av den 22 september 1966 om den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden för oljor och fetter (1), senast ändrad genom förord- ning (EG) nr 1638/98 (2), 4. 5. Vid fastställandet av förskottsbeloppet bör hänsyn tas till det stöd till åtgärder för att förbättra kvaliteten som fastställs i rådets förordning (EG) nr 1414/97 (8). De åtgärder som föreskrivs i denna förordning är fören- liga med yttrandet från Förvaltningskommittén för oljor och fetter. med beaktande av rådets förordning (EEG) nr 2261/84 av den 17 juli 1984 om allmänna bestämmelser om beviljande av stöd för framställning av olivolja och stöd till organisationer för producenter av olivolja (3), senast ändrad genom förordning (EG) nr 1639/98 (4), särskilt artikel 17a. 1 i denna, och HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE. Artikel 1 av följande skäl: För regleringsåret 1998/99 skall den beräknade produk- 1. tionen av olivolja uppgå till 1. 2. 3. I artikel 5 i förordning nr 136/66/EEG föreskrivs att enhetsbeloppet för produktionsstödet bör minskas i en medlemsstat om den faktiska produktionen överskrider den garanterade nationella kvantiteten enligt punkt 3 i samma artikel. För att bedöma omfattningen av detta överskridande bör, beträffande Spanien, Grekland och Portugal, hänsyn tas till den beräknade produktionen av bordsoliver som bearbetas till olivolja, uttryckt i oliv- oljeekvivalenter som beräknas på grundval av de bear- betningskoefficienter som anges i kommissionens beslut 98/605/EG (5), 98/619/EG (6) respektive 98/620/EG (7). I artikel 17a i förordning (EEG) nr 2261/84 föreskrivs att produktionen för det berörda regleringsåret skall beräknas för att enhetsbeloppet för det produktionsstöd för olivolja som får betalas ut i förskott skall kunna fastställas. Detta belopp bör fastställas på en nivå som innebär att varje risk för felaktig utbetalning till olivolje- producenter undviks. Detta belopp gäller också för produktion av bordsoliver uttryckt i olivoljeekvivalenter. För att produktionen skall kunna beräknas bör medlems- staterna meddela kommissionen uppgifter om prognoser för produktionen av olivolja och i förekommande fall av bordsoliver för varje regleringsår. Kommissionen får använda andra informationskällor. På grundval av dessa uppgifter bör för varje medlemsstat den beräknade produktionen av olivolja och av bordsoliver, uttryckt i — 849 300 ton för Spanien, — 2 400 ton för Frankrike, — 511 000 ton för Grekland, — 428 800 ton för Italien, — 32 550 ton för Portugal. För regleringsåret 1998/99 skall den beräknade produk- 2. tionen av bordsoliver uttryckt i olivoljeekvivalenter uppgå till — 41 400 ton för Spanien på grundval av en utjämningsko- efficient på 11,5 %, — 10 000 ton för Grekland på grundval av en utjämnings- koefficient på 13 %, — 750 ton för Portugal på grundval av en utjämningskoeffi- cient på 10 %. För regleringsåret 1998/99 skall det förskottsbelopp som 3. avses i artikel 17a. 1 i förordning (EEG) nr 2261/84 vara — 101,15 euro/100 kg för Spanien, — 117,36 euro/100 kg för Frankrike, — 87,50 euro/100 kg för Grekland, — 117,36 euro/100 kg för Italien, — 117,36 euro/100 kg för Portugal. Artikel 2 (1) EGT 172, 30. 9. 1966, s. 3025/66. (2) EGT L 210, 28. 7. 1998, s. 32. (3) EGT L 208, 3. 8. 1984, s. 3. (4) EGT L 210, 28. 7. 1998, s. 38. (5) EGT L 289, 28. 10. 1998, s. 39. (6) EGT L 295, 4. 11. 1998, s. 50. (7) EGT L 295, 4. 11. 1998, s. 54. Denna förordning träder i kraft den tredje dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. (8) EGT L 196, 24. 7. 1997, s. 4. L 267/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 15. 10. 1999 Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater. Utfärdad i Bryssel den 14 oktober 1999. På kommissionens vägnar Franz FISCHLER Ledamot av kommissionen


title: SKRIFTLIG FRÅGA E-1867/99 från Samuli Pohjamo (ELDR) till kommissionen. Norska tullar på förädlat renkött.

eurovoc_concepts:
European Economic Area
Finland
Norway
common commercial policy
meat
restriction on competition
tariff reduction

text: C 203 E/76 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning SV 18. 7. 2000 (2000/C 203 E/093) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-1867/99 fr(cid:229)n Samuli Pohjamo (ELDR) till kommissionen (14 oktober 1999) ˜mne: Norska tullar p(cid:229) f(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlat renk(cid:246)tt Av tradition exporterar man mycket renk(cid:246)tt fr(cid:229)n finska Lappland till Norge. F(cid:246)r branschens utveckling vore det viktigt att exportera k(cid:246)ttet i f(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlad form och inte endast i of(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlad form. Norge skyddar sin k(cid:246)ttf(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlingsindustri med h(cid:246)ga tull- och importavgifter. Avgifterna f(cid:246)r of(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlat k(cid:246)tt s(cid:228)nks tillf(cid:228)lligt d(cid:229) Norges k(cid:246)ttf(cid:246)r(cid:228)dlingsindustri beh(cid:246)ver r(cid:229)varor. F(cid:246)ljden av detta (cid:228)r att det inte l(cid:246)nar sig att f(cid:246)r(cid:228)dla renk(cid:246)tt p(cid:229) finska sidan. Vad (cid:228)mnar kommissionen g(cid:246)ra f(cid:246)r att hindra att s(cid:229)dana selektiva tullavgifter, som leder till en snedvrid- ning av konkurrensen, anv(cid:228)nds inom EES-omr(cid:229)det? Svar fr(cid:229)n Christopher Patten p(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (24 november 1999) Enligt artikel 8 i Avtalet om Europeiska ekonomiska samarbetsomr(cid:229)det (EES) omfattas inte handeln med jordbruks- och fiskeriprodukter (betecknade som varor som faller utanf(cid:246)r kapitlen 25(cid:141)97 i systemet f(cid:246)r harmoniserad varubeskrivning och kodifiering) av avtalet. EES (cid:228)r ingen tullunion, s(cid:229) det finns inga gemensamma regler om anpassning eller harmonisering av tullar eller tullf(cid:246)rfaranden. D(cid:228)rf(cid:246)r finns det ingen r(cid:228)ttslig grund enligt vilken kommissionen kan vidta (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder f(cid:246)r att (cid:246)vertala Norge att (cid:228)ndra sin tullstruktur. Det finns en m(cid:246)jlighet att inom ramen f(cid:246)r EES-avtalet (artikel 19) bilateralt f(cid:246)rhandla om en ytterligare liberalisering av handeln med jordbruksprodukter. Emellertid skulle en beg(cid:228)ran om en reformering av det norska tullsystemet otvivelaktigt leda till ett norskt motkrav om en s(cid:228)nkning av gemenskapens tullar. Kommissionen anser d(cid:228)rf(cid:246)r inte att det vore s(cid:229) klokt att nu g(cid:246)ra en s(cid:229)dan framst(cid:228)llning. (2000/C 203 E/094) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA P-1872/99 fr(cid:229)n Evelyne Gebhardt (PSE) till kommissionen (12 oktober 1999) ˜mne: Ursprungs- och kvalitetsbeteckningar fr(cid:229)n Baden-W(cid:252)rttemberg St(cid:228)mmer det som st(cid:229)tt i pressen om att EU-kommissionen vill avskaffa det statliga st(cid:246)det till beteckningar p(cid:229) livsmedel fr(cid:229)n f(cid:246)rbundsdelstaten Baden-W(cid:252)rttemberg? Vilka (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder avses d(cid:229) att vidtas och av vilka orsaker och p(cid:229) vilken r(cid:228)ttslig grund? Vilka produktbeteckningar och former f(cid:246)r betecknande av produkter avses dessutom ber(cid:246)ras? Svar fr(cid:229)n Franz Fischler p(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (5 november 1999) Kommissionen ser f(cid:246)r n(cid:228)rvarande (cid:246)ver gemenskapens ram f(cid:246)r statligt st(cid:246)d till marknadsf(cid:246)ring och reklam f(cid:246)r jordbruksprodukter (kommissionens meddelande om statliga (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder f(cid:246)r marknadsf(cid:246)ring av jorbruks- och fiskeriprodukter (1) och ramen f(cid:246)r nationellt st(cid:246)d till reklam f(cid:246)r jordbruksprodukter och vissa produkter som inte omfattas av bilaga I till EEG-f(cid:246)rdraget, men med undantag av fiskeriprodukter (2)). Syftet med (cid:246)versynen (cid:228)r att klarg(cid:246)ra de befintliga reglerna och att uppdatera dem mot bakgrund av den utveckling gemenskapens lagstiftning och domstolens r(cid:228)ttspraxis genomg(cid:229)tt. Avsikten (cid:228)r emellertid inte att g(cid:246)ra st(cid:246)rre inneh(cid:229)llsm(cid:228)ssiga (cid:228)ndringar i den befintliga lagstiftningen


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2194/1999 der Kommission vom 14. Oktober 1999 zur Festsetzung der Ausfuhrerstattungen für Getreide, Mehle, Grobgrieß und Feingrieß von Weizen oder Roggen

eurovoc_concepts:
cereal flour
cereals
export refund
meal

formats: pdf print

text: 15. 10. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 267/47 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 2194/1999 DER KOMMISSION vom 14. Oktober 1999 zur Festsetzung der Ausfuhrerstattungen für Getreide, Mehle, Grobgrieß und Feingrieß von Weizen oder Roggen DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, gestützt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 des Rates vom 30. Juni 1992 über die gemeinsame Marktorganisation für Getreide (1), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1253/1999 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 13 Absatz 2, in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: (1) (2) (3) Artikel 13 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 bestimmt, daß der Unterschied zwischen den Notie- rungen oder den Preisen auf dem Weltmarkt für die in Artikel 1 derselben Verordnung genannten Erzeugnisse und den Preisen für diese Erzeugnisse in der Gemein- schaft durch eine Erstattung bei der Ausfuhr ausgegli- chen werden kann. Bei der Festsetzung der Erstattungen sind die Faktoren zu berücksichtigen, die in Artikel 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1501/95 der Kommission vom 29. Juni 1995 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 des Rates hinsichtlich der Gewährung von Ausfuhrerstattungen und bei treffenden Getreidesektor Störungen Maßnahmen (3), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2513/98 (4), aufgeführt sind. Festlegung zu zur der im Für Mehle, Grobgrieß und Feingrieß aus Weizen und Roggen muß die auf diese Erzeugnisse anwendbare Erstattung unter Berücksichtigung der zur Herstellung der betreffenden Erzeugnisse notwendigen Getreide- (4) (5) (6) (7) menge berechnet werden. Diese Mengen sind in der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1501/95 festgesetzt worden. Die Lage auf dem Weltmarkt oder die besonderen Erfor- dernisse bestimmter Märkte können die Unterteilung der Erstattung für gewisse Erzeugnisse gemäß ihrer Bestim- mung notwendig machen. Die Erstattung muß mindestens einmal monatlich festge- setzt werden; sie kann innerhalb dieses Zeitraums abge- ändert werden. Die Anwendung dieser Modalitäten auf die gegenwärtige Lage der Getreidemärkte und insbesondere auf die Notie- rungen oder Preise dieser Erzeugnisse in der Gemein- schaft und auf dem Weltmarkt führt zur Festsetzung der Erstattung in Höhe der im Anhang genannten Beträge. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses für Getreide — HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die Erstattungen bei der Ausfuhr der in Artikel 1 Buchstaben a), b) und c) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1766/92 genannten Erzeugnisse, Malz ausgenommen, in unverändertem Zustand sind im Anhang festgesetzt. Diese Verordnung tritt am 15. Oktober 1999 in Kraft. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitglied- staat. Brüssel, den 14. Oktober 1999 Für die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 181 vom 1. 7. 1992, S. 21. (2) ABl. L 160 vom 26. 6. 1999, S. 18. (3) ABl. L 147 vom 30. 6. 1995, S. 7. (4) ABl. L 313 vom 21. 11. 1998, S. 16. L 267/48 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 15. 10. 1999 ANHANG zur Verordnung der Kommission vom 14. Oktober 1999 zur Festsetzung der Ausfuhrerstattungen für Getreide, Mehle, Grobgrieß und Feingrieß von Weizen oder Roggen Erzeugniscode Bestimmung (1) Erstattungsbetrag Erzeugniscode Bestimmung (1) Erstattungsbetrag (EUR/t) (EUR/t) 1001 10 00 9200 1001 10 00 9400 1001 90 91 9000 1001 90 99 9000 1002 00 00 9000 1003 00 10 9000 1003 00 90 9000 1004 00 00 9200 1004 00 00 9400 1005 10 90 9000 1005 90 00 9000 1007 00 90 9000 1008 20 00 9000 — 01 — 03 02 03 02 — 03 02 — — — 03 02 — — (1) Folgende Bestimmungen sind vorgesehen: 01 alle Drittländer, 02 andere Drittländer, 03 Schweiz und Liechtenstein. — 0 — 24,00 0 53,50 0 — 20,50 0 — — — 35,00 0 — — 1101 00 11 9000 1101 00 15 9100 1101 00 15 9130 1101 00 15 9150 1101 00 15 9170 1101 00 15 9180 1101 00 15 9190 1101 00 90 9000 1102 10 00 9500 1102 10 00 9700 1102 10 00 9900 1103 11 10 9200 1103 11 10 9400 1103 11 10 9900 1103 11 90 9200 1103 11 90 9800 — 01 01 01 01 01 — — 01 — — 01 01 — 01 — — 46,50 43,50 40,00 37,00 34,50 — — 87,00 — — 15,00 (2) 13,40 (2) — 15,00 (2) — (2) Enthält das Erzeugnis gepreßten agglomerierten Grieß, wird keine Erstattung gewährt. NB: Die Zonen sind diejenigen, die in der geänderten Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2145/92 der Kommission (ABl. L 214 vom 30. 7. 1992, S. 20) bestimmt sind


title: Règlement (CE) nº 2183/1999 de la Commission, du 14 octobre 1999, fixant, pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/1999, les montants des cotisations à la production ainsi que le coefficient de calcul de la cotisation complémentaire dans le secteur du sucre

eurovoc_concepts:
isoglucose
marketing
production aid
sugar levy
syrup
white sugar

text: 15. 10. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes L 267/23 RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 2183/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 14 octobre 1999 fixant, pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/1999, les montants des cotisations à la production ainsi que le coefficient de calcul de la cotisation complémentaire dans le secteur du sucre LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES, vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne, (CE) no 2038/1999 du Conseil du 13 vu le règlement septembre 1999 portant organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur du sucre (1), et notamment son article 33, paragraphe 8, et son article 34, paragraphe 5, (5) considérant ce qui suit: Communauté le rapport entre la perte globale constatée pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/1999, conformément à l'article 33, paragraphes 1 et 2, du même règlement, et les recettes de la cotisation à la production de base et de la cotisation B pour cette campagne, ce rapport étant diminué de 1; les mesures prévues conformes à l'avis du comité de gestion du sucre, au présent règlement sont (1) (2) (3) (4) l'article 7, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CEE) no 1443/82 de la Commission du 8 juin 1982 établissant des moda- lités d'application du régime des quotas dans le secteur du sucre (2), modifié en dernier lieu par le règlement (CE) no 392/94 (3), prévoit que les montants de la cotisation à la production de base et de la cotisation B ainsi que, le cas échéant, le coefficient visé à l'article 34, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 2038/1999 pour le sucre, l'iso- glucose et le sirop d'inuline doivent être fixés avant le 15 octobre pour la campagne de commercialisation précé- dente; par le règlement (CE) no 1940/98 de la Commission (4), le montant maximal visé à l'article 33, paragraphe 4, premier tiret, du règlement (CE) no 2038/1999 a été porté, pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/ 1999, à 37,5 % du prix d'intervention du sucre blanc; la perte globale prévisible constatée conformément à l'article 33, paragraphes 1 et 2, du règlement (CE) no 2038/1999 conduit, pour la fixation des montants de la cotisation à la production pour la campagne les de montants maximaux visés à l'article 33 dudit règlement, selon le cas, adaptés conformément au règlement (CE) no 1940/98; commercialisation 1998/1999, retenir à l'article 34, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 2038/ 1999 prévoit qu'une cotisation complémentaire est perçue des fabricants lorsque la perte globale constatée en application de l'article 33, paragraphes 1 et 2, dudit règlement n'est pas entièrement couverte par les recettes des cotisations à la production. Pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/1999, cette perte globale non couverte s'élève à 128 103 708 euros. Dès lors, il y a lieu de fixer à 0,16520 le coefficient visé à l'article 34, paragraphe 2, dudit règlement, qui représente pour la (1) JO L 252 du 25. 9. 1999, p. 1. (2) JO L 158 du 9. 6. 1982, p. 17. (3) JO L 53 du 24. 2. 1994, p. 7. (4) JO L 252 du 12. 9. 1998, p. 13. A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT: Article premier Les montants des cotisations à la production dans le secteur du sucre sont fixés, pour la campagne de commercialisation 1998/ 1999, à: a) 1,2638 euro pour 100 kilogrammes de sucre blanc comme cotisation à la production de base pour le sucre A et le sucre B; b) 23,6963 euros pour 100 kilogrammes de sucre blanc comme cotisation B pour le sucre B; c) 0,5330 euro pour 100 kilogrammes de matière sèche comme cotisation à la production de base pour l'isoglucose A et l'isoglucose B; d) 9,9425 euros pour 100 kilogrammes de matière sèche comme cotisation B pour l'isoglucose B; e) 1,2638 euro pour 100 kilogrammes de matière sèche équi- valent sucre/isoglucose comme cotisation à la production de base pour le sirop d'inuline A et le sirop d'inuline B; f) 23,6963 euros pour 100 kilogrammes de matière sèche équivalent sucre/isoglucose comme cotisation B pour le sirop d'inuline B. Article 2 Le coefficient prévu à l'article 34, paragraphe 2, du règlement (CE) no 2038/1999 est fixé pour la campagne de commerciali- sation 1998/1999 à 0,16520. Article 3 Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le jour de sa publication au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes. L 267/24 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 15. 10. 1999 Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre. Fait à Bruxelles, le 14 octobre 1999. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission


title: Paritätische Versammlung des Abkommens zwischen den Staaten Afrikas, des Karibischen und Pazifischen Raums und der Europäischen Union (AKP-EU) - Entschliessung zum Tod von Julius Nyerere .

eurovoc_concepts:
ACP-EU Joint Assembly
Tanzania
death
political figure
resolution