title: Reglamento (CE) nº 2048/1999 del Consejo, de 27 de septiembre de 1999, que modifica el Reglamento (CE) nº 2334/97 por el que se establece un derecho antidumping definitivo sobre determinadas importaciones de paletas de madera originarias de la República de Polonia

eurovoc_concepts:
Poland
anti-dumping duty
import
originating product
wood product

text: 30. 9. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 255/1 I (Actos cuya publicación es una condición para su aplicabilidad) REGLAMENTO (CE) No 2048/1999 DEL CONSEJO de 27 de septiembre de 1999 que modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 por el que se establece un derecho antidumping definitivo sobre determinadas importaciones de paletas de madera originarias de la República de Polonia EL CONSEJO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 384/96 del Consejo, de 22 de diciembre de 1995, relativo a la defensa contra las importa- ciones que sean objeto de dumping por parte de países no miembros de la Comunidad Europea (1) y, en particular, el apartado 4 de su artículo 9, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 (2) y, en particular, los apartados 1 y 2 de su artículo 4, Vista la propuesta de la Comisión tras consultar al Comité consultivo, Considerando lo siguiente: (1) A. PROCEDIMIENTO PREVIO El Consejo, mediante el Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97, estableció derechos antidumping definitivos sobre deter- minadas importaciones de paletas de madera clasificadas en el código NC ex 4415 20 20 originarias de la Repú- blica de Polonia y aceptó los compromisos ofrecidos por determinados productores en relación con estas importa- ciones. Se realizó un muestreo para identificar a los productores/exportadores polacos y se aplicaron dere- chos individuales que iban del 4,0 % al 10,6 % a las empresas incluidas en la muestra, mientras que a otras empresas que cooperaron no incluidas en la muestra se les aplicó un derecho medio ponderado del 6,3 %. Se estableció un derecho del 10,6 % para las empresas que no se dieron a conocer o no cooperaron en la investiga- ción. A los productores cuyos compromisos se acep- taron se les eximió de derechos antidumping respecto a la las importaciones de un tipo específico de paleta, paleta EUR, único tipo de paleta contemplado en los compromisos. (2) El apartado 1 del artículo 4 del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 estipula que, cuando cualquier parte propor- cione suficientes pruebas a la Comisión de que: — no exportó a la Comunidad o no fabricó las paletas de madera descritas en el apartado 1 del artículo 1 (1) DO L 56 de 6. 3. 1996, p. 1; Reglamento cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 905/98 (DO L 128 de 30. 4. 1998, p. 18). (2) DO L 324 de 27. 11. 1997, p. 1; Reglamento cuya última modifica- ción la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 2079/98 (DO L 266 de 1. 10. 1998, p. 1). de dicho Reglamento durante el período de investi- gación, — no está relacionada con ninguno de los productores o exportadores en Polonia que estén sujetos a los derechos antidumping impuestos por dicho Regla- mento, — ha exportado realmente a la Comunidad las mercan- cías afectadas después del período de investigación, o ha suscrito una obligación contractual irrevocable para exportar una cantidad significativa a la Comu- nidad, entonces ese Reglamento podrá modificarse concediendo a tal parte el tipo del derecho aplicable a productores que cooperaron y que no estaban recogidos en la muestra, es decir, el 6,3 %. El apartado 2 del artículo 4 del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 estipula que cualquier parte que cumpla los criterios establecidos en el apartado 1 del artículo 4 del mismo también podrá ser eximida del pago del derecho antidumping siempre que se haya aceptado un compro- miso respecto a la denominada paleta EUR ofrecido por tal parte. El Consejo, mediante el Reglamento (CE) no 2079/98 (3), modificó el Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 en sus anexos I y II. B. SOLICITUDES DE NUEVOS EXPORTADORES Trece nuevos productores exportadores polacos que pedían el mismo tratamiento que las empresas que cooperaron en la investigación original pero no fueron incluidas en la muestra han proporcionado, previa soli- citud, pruebas que demuestran que cumplen los requi- sitos establecidos en el apartado 1 del artículo 4 del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97. Las pruebas proporcio- nadas por estas empresas solicitantes se consideran sufi- cientes para permitir que el Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 trece productores se modifique incluyendo a estos exportadores en el anexo I de dicho Reglamento. El anexo I recoge los productores exportadores que estarán sujetos al derecho medio ponderado del 6,3 %. (3) (4) (3) DO L 266 de 1. 10. 1998, p. 1. L 255/2 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 30. 9. 1999 (5) Cinco de los trece productores exportadores polacos a los que se aplicará el derecho medio ponderado del 6,3 % también han ofrecido compromisos respecto a la paleta EUR que se aceptaron mediante la Decisión 1999/642/CE de la Comisión (1). Por lo tanto, estas cinco empresas deberían añadirse al anexo II del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97, que contiene una lista de empresas cuyos compromisos respecto a importaciones de paletas EUR ha aceptado la Comisión y a las que, por lo tanto, no se aplica el derecho, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Artículo 1 El anexo I del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 se sustituirá por el anexo I del presente Reglamento. El anexo II del Reglamento (CE) no 2334/97 se sustituirá por el anexo II del presente Reglamento. Artículo 2 El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día siguiente al de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. Artículo 3 El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 27 de septiembre de 1999. Por el Consejo El Presidente K. HEMILÄ (1) Véase la página 36 del presente Diario Oficial. 30. 9. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 255/3 ANEXO I Fabricantes 1. «Baum-Holz» Sp. zo. o. , Olsztyn 2. «DAST» GmbH, Poznan 3. Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow 4. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S. C. , Snietnica 5. F. P. H. «Tina», Katowice 6. F. P. H. Tadeusz Fischer, Maly Gleboczek 7. F. P. U. H. «Rol-Mar», Adam Piatek, Klodzko 8. Z. P. H. U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 9. Internationale Paletten Company Sp. , Lebork 10. «Kross-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Kolobrzeg 11. P. P. U. H. «Drewmax» Sp. zo. o. (formerly P. P. H. «Drewnex»), Krakow 12. P. P. H. «GKT» S. C. , Majdan Mowy 13. P. P. H. «Pamadex», Ligota 14. P. P. H. «Unikat», Aleksandrow IV 697 15. P. P. H. U. «Adapol» S. C. , Wolomin 16. P. P. U. H. «Alwa» Sp. zo. o. , Tychowo 17. P. P. U. H. «SMS» — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 18. P. T. H. «Mirex», Kolobrzeg 19. P. W. «Peteco» Sp. zo. o. , Warszawa 20. Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. Niepokalaneg Dzialalnose Gospodaroza, Nowy Sacz 21. Produkcja Palet «A. Adamus», Kuznia Grabowska 22. Produkcja Skup Palet Drewnanych, Stanislaw Lachowicz, Majdan Sieniawski 170 23. Przedsiebiorstwo «Amesko», Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica 24. P. H. U. «Justyna», Gubin 25. P. H. U. «Akropol», Krakow 26. P. H. U. Produkcyjne «Lech», Lech Szwez, Zary 27. Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna «Palet-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Dabrowka WLKP 28. P. P. H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 29. P. P. H. U. «AWA» Sp. zo. o. , Nowy Sacz 30. Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda 31. «Scanproduct» SA. , Czarny Dunajec 32. SC «Bed», Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin 33. S. U. T. R. «Rol Trak», Prochowice 34. Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj 35. Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam Wisniewski, Torun 36. «Transdrewneks» Sp. zo. o. , Grudziadz-Owczarki 37. W. Z. P. U. M. «Euro-Tech», Rakszawa 38. Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard Nowak, Piaszyna 39. Zaklad Produkcyjno Bohuszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno 40. Z. P. H. «Maw» SC. , Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz 41. Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy «Rolmex», E. Cackowski, Lipno 42. Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec, Muszyna 43. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S. C. , Drawsko Pomorskie 44. Z. P. H. U. «Drewex» S. C. , Asnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna 45. Z. P. H. U. «Sek-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Tarnobrzeg 46. «Euro-Mega-Plus» Sp. zo. o. , Kielce 47. «C. M. C. », Sp. zo. o. , Andrychow, Inwald L 255/4 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 30. 9. 1999 48. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 49. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica 50. Z. P. H. U. «Drewnex» S. C. , Zelazkow 45 b 51. Import-Export «Elko» Sp. zo. o. , Kalisz 52. P. P. H. U. «Probox», Import-Export, Kalisz 53. Drewpal S. C. , Stawiszyn 54. Zaman S. C. , Radom 55. «Marimpex», Pulawy 56. «AVEN» Sp. zo. o. , Kostrzyn 57. P. P. H. U. «Eurex» S. C. , Godynice 58. P. H. «Drewex» S. C. , Lebork 59. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 60. ENKEL S. C. , Pulawy 61. PAL-PACK Sp. zo. o. , Wierzchowo 62. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W. i. T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 63. Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork 64. P. P. U. H. «DREWPOL», Braszewice 65. PTN Kruklanki Sp. zo. o. , Kruklanki 66. WEDAM S. C. , Stezyca 67. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 68. Zaklad Produkcyjny «Tarta», Lubsko 69. Firma «Krausdrew», Cewice 70. «Lidal» S. C. , Miastko 71. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek Zdroj 72. P. P. H. U. «Alk», Bierzwnik 73. «Empol» S. C. , Jastrzebniki 37 74. Zaklad Producji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski, Sanok 75. P. P. H. «Drewex», Czarnkow 76. «ZAP» Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp. C, Wschowa 77. P. P. H. U. «Opal», Zygmunt Podgorski, Bukowsko 41 78. «Alega-Pol», Sp. zo. o. , Lubsko 79. P. P. H. «A-Produkt» S. C. , Resko 80. PPH «Paletex» Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow 81. Euro-Handels Sp. zo. o. , Szczecin 82. Firma «KIKO» S. C. , Poznan 83. «Enkel» Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 84. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 85. Firma Borkowski S. C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 86. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 87. «Prodpalet» Handel, Boleslawiec 88. Z. P. H. U. «Drexport» S. C. , Olecko, Osiedle Lesk 89. «Bilusa» Sp. zo. o, Klodawa 90. Pawel Bilko «Pablo», Klodawa 91. ZPW «Gober» Sp. zo. o. , Gorzow Wlkp. 92. Kisiel Malgorzata «Drew-Pal», Dobra Now 93. P. W. «Remag», Zlocieniec 94. PPUH PAL-POL S. C. , Prabuty 95. Firma «A. C. S. » S. C. , Kamien 96. Zaklad Produkcji Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych Szuta Marian, Kawcze 97. P. T. P. U. H. «ROB-POL», Milkow 98. Z. H. U. P. Agromal, Sieradz 99. SMT Sp. zo. o, Miastko 30. 9. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 255/5 100. Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 101. Artur Rochmankowski, Trzcinsko-Zdroj 102. «Depo» Sp. zo. o, Ilowa 103. B. P. R. Sp. zo. o, Warszawa 104. «Drewno», Sp. zo. o, Krzeszyce 105. P. P. H. «Astra» Sp. zo. o, Nowy Sacz 106. «D&M&D» Sp. zo. o, Blizanow 107. P. P. H. «Vector», Kalisz 108. «Palko» Sp. zo. o, Sedziszow 109. P. P. H. Pol-Wood S. C. , Rzekun L 255/6 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 30. 9. 1999 ANEXO II Fabricantes 1. «Baum-Holz» Sp. zo. o. , Olsztyn 2. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S. C. , Snietnica 3. F. P. H. «Tina» S. C. , Katowice 4. Firma «Sabelmar» S. C. , Konczyce Male 5. Z. P. H. U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 6. Internationale Paletten Company Sp. , Lebork 7. «Kross-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Kolobrzeg 8. P. P. U. H. «Drewmax» Sp. zo. o. (formerly P. P. H. «Drewnex»), Krakow 9. P. P. H. «GKT» S. C. , Majdan Nowy 10. P. P. H. «Pamadex», Ligota 11. P. P. H. «Unikat», Aleksandrow IV 697 12. P. P. H. U. «Adapol» S. C. , Wolomin 13. P. P. H. U. «Alpa» Sp. zo. o. , Dobrzyca 14. P. P. U. H. «Alwa» Sp. zo. o. , Tychowo 15. P. P. H. U. «Palimex» Sp. zo. o. , Wloszakowice 16. P. P. U. H. «SMS» — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 17. P. T. H. «Mirex», Kolobrzeg 18. P. W. «Intur-KFS» Sp. zo. o. , Inowroclaw 19. P. W. «Peteco» Sp. zo. o. , Warszawa 20. «Paletex» Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 21. Produkcja Palet «A. Adamus», Kuznia Grabowska 22. P. H. U. «Akropol», Krakow 23. P. P. H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 24. «Scanproduct» SA. , Czarny Dunajec 25. S. U. T. R. «Rol Trak», Prochowice 26. «Transdrewneks» Sp. zo. o. , Grudziadz-Owczarki 27. W. Z. P. U. M. «Euro-Tech», Rakszawa 28. Z. P. H. «Palettenwerk» — K. Kozik, Bystra Podhalanska 29. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S. C. , Drawsko Pomorskie 30. Z. P. H. U. «Sek-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Tarnobrzeg 31. «Euro-Mega-Plus» Sp. zo. o. , Kielce Código Taric adicional 8570 8571 8572 8573 8574 8575 8576 8577 8584 8585 8586 8587 8588 8589 8590 8591 8597 8662 8690 8691 8692 8713 8693 8715 8714 8716 8725 8726 8745 8526 8527 30. 9. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 255/7 Fabricantes Código Taric adicional 32. «C. M. C. », Sp. zo. o. , Andrychow, Inwald 33. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 34. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gierka, Brodnica 35. Z. P. H. U. «Drewnex» S. C. , Zelazkow 45 b 36. Import-Export «Elko» Sp. zo. o. , Kalisz 37. P. P. H. U. «Probox», Import-Export, Kalisz 38. Drewpal S. C. , Stawiszyn 39. Zaman S. C. , Radom 40. «Marimpex», Pulawy 41. «AVEN» Sp. zo. o. , Kostrzyn 42. P. P. H. U. «Eurex» S. C. , Godynice 43. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 44. ENKEL S. C. , Pulawy 45. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W. i. T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 46. P. P. U. H. «DREWPOL», Braszewice 47. PTN Kruklanki Sp. zo. o. , Kruklanki 48. WEDAM S. C. , Stezyca 49. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 50. P. P. H. U. «Alk», Bierzwnik 51. «Empol» S. C. , Jastrzebniki 37 52. Euro-Handels Sp. zo. o. , Szczecin 53. PPH «Paletex» Sibinski Jarosklaw, Czajkow 54. Firma «KIKO» S. C. , Poznan 55. «Enkel» Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 56. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 57. Firma Borkowski S. C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 58. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 59. «Bilusa» Sp. zo. o, Klodawa 60. PPUH PAL-POL S. C. , Prabuty 61. Firma «A. C. S. » S. C. , Kamien 62. «SMT» Sp. zo. o, Miastko 63. Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 64. «Palko» Sp. zo. o, Sedziszow 65. «D&M&D» Sp. zo. o, Blizanow 66. P. P. H. «Vector», Kalisz 8528 8529 8530 8531 8532 8533 8534 8535 8537 8558 8538 8539 8540 8541 8834 8556 8557 8559 8561 8560 8440 8441 8443 8444 8445 8446 8483 8484 8485 8486 8562 8563 8565 8566 8567


title: Decisão n° 4/1999 do Conselho de Associação UE-Roménia, de 27 de Setembro de 1999, que altera, através da instituição de um Comité Consultivo Misto, a Decisão n° 1/95 que adopta o regulamento interno do Conselho de Associação (95/429/CE)

eurovoc_concepts:
Association Council (EU)
Romania
advisory committee (EU)
association agreement (EU)
operation of the Institutions
rules of procedure

formats: html pdf print

text: L 270/26 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 20. 10. 1999 DECISÃO N. o 4/1999 DO CONSELHO DE ASSOCIAÇÃO UE-ROMÉNIA de 27 de Setembro de 1999 que altera, através da instituição de um Comité Consultivo Misto, a Decisão n. o 1/95 que adopta o regulamento interno do Conselho de Associação (95/429/CE) (1999/681/CE) O CONSELHO DE ASSOCIAÇÃO, Tendo em conta o Acordo Europeu que cria uma associação entre as Comunidades Europeias e os seus Estados-Membros, por um lado, e a Roménia, por outro (1), e, nomeadamente o seu artigo 111. o, (1) (2) (3) Considerando que o diálogo e a cooperação entre grupos de interesses económicos e sociais da Comuni- dade Europeia e da Roménia poderão proporcionar um importante contributo para o desenvolvimento das rela- ções recíprocas; Considerando que se afigura oportuno que esta coope- ração tenha lugar a nível dos membros do Comité Económico e Social das Comunidades Europeias, por um lado, e dos representantes do Conselho Económico e Social da Roménia, por outro, através da criação do Comité Consultivo Misto; Considerando que, sendo assim, é conveniente proceder à alteração correspondente do regulamento interno do Conselho de Associação, adoptado pela Decisão n. o 1/ /95 (2), DECIDE: Artigo 1. o Ao regulamento interno do Conselho de Associação são aditados os seguintes artigos: «Artigo 15. o É instituído um Comité Consultivo Misto encarregado de assistir o Conselho de Associação no objectivo de promover o diálogo e a cooperação entre os grupos de interesses económicos e sociais da Comunidade Europeia e os da Roménia. Este diálogo e esta cooperação contem- plarão todos os aspectos económicos e sociais das relações entre a Comunidade Europeia e a Roménia, no âmbito da aplicação do Acordo Europeu. O Comité deverá pronun- ciar-se sobre as questões que se coloquem nesses domínios. Artigo 16. o O Comité Consultivo Misto é composto por seis represen- tantes do Comité Económico e Social das Comunidades Europeias, por um lado, e por seis representantes do Conselho Económico e Social da Roménia, por outro. O comité desenvolverá as suas actividades sempre que consultado pelo Conselho de Associação ou, no que se refere à promoção do diálogo entre os grupos de interesses económicos e sociais, por sua própria iniciativa. A selecção dos membros do comité deverá efectuar-se por forma a que a composição do comité reflicta da forma mais fiel possível os diferentes grupos de interesses económicos e sociais, tanto da Comunidade Europeia como da Roménia. A presidência do comité será exercida conjuntamente por um membro do Comité Económico e Social das Comuni- dades Europeias e por um membro romeno. O Comité Consultivo Misto aprovará o seu regulamento interno. Artigo 17. o O Comité Económico e Social das Comunidades Europeias, por um lado, e o Conselho Económico e Social da Roménia, por outro, as despesas decorrentes da sua participação nas reuniões do Comité Consultivo Misto e dos seus grupos de trabalho, no que se refere tanto às despesas de pessoal, de transporte e ajudas de custo, como às despesas postais e de telecomuni- cações. suportarão respectivamente As despesas de interpretação das reuniões, assim como as de tradução e reprodução de documentos, serão suportadas pelo Comité Económico e Social, com excepção das despesas de interpretação e tradução de e para a língua romena, que serão suportadas pelos grupos de interesses económicos e sociais representados no Conselho Econó- mico e Social da Roménia. As outras despesas relativas à organização material das reuniões estarão a cargo da parte que organiza essas reuniões. » Artigo 2. o A presente decisão entra em vigor no primeiro dia do segundo mês seguinte à data da sua aprovação. Feito em Bruxelas, em 27 de Setembro de 1999. Pelo Conselho de Associação O Presidente T. HALONEN (1) JO L 357 de 31. 12. 1994, p. 2. (2) JO L 171 de 21. 7. 1995, p. 41


title: 99/660/EC: Council Decision of 27 September 1999 on the conclusion of the Convention between the European Community and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) concerning aid to refugees in the countries of the Near East, for the years 1999 to 2001

eurovoc_concepts:
Middle East
UNRWA
aid to refugees
international convention

text: L 261/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 7. 10. 1999 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COUNCIL COUNCIL DECISION of 27 September 1999 on the conclusion of the Convention between the European Community and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) concerning aid to refugees in the countries of the Near East, for the years 1999 to 2001 (1999/660/EC) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181 in conjunction with Article 300(3), first subparagraph thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1), Whereas: (1) (2) (3) (4) the Convention concluded with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) concerning aid to refugees in the countries of the Near East, approved on 22 October 1996 (2), expired on 31 December 1998; the Community assistance to UNRWA forms part of the campaign against poverty in the developing countries and thereby contributes to the sustainable economic and social development of the population concerned and the host countries in which that population lives; a new Convention should be concluded with UNRWA so that the Community's aid can continue to be provided as part of a comprehensive programme offering a measure of continuity; continued support of UNRWA operations would be likely to contribute to the attainment of the Community objectives described above, Article 1 The Convention between the European Community and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) concerning aid to refugees in the countries of the Near East, for the years 1999 to 2001, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community. The text of the Convention is attached to this Decision. Article 2 The execution of the Community programme of food aid to UNRWA shall be governed by the procedure defined in Regula- tion (EC) No 1292/96 (3). Article 3 The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the persons empowered to sign the Convention in order to bind the Community (4). This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption. Article 4 Done at Brussels, 27 September 1999. For the Council The President K. HEMILÄ (1) Opinion delivered on 16 September 1999 (not yet published in the Official Journal). (2) OJ L 282, 1. 11. 1996, p. 69. (3) OJ L 166, 5. 7. 1996, p. 1. (4) The date of entry into force of the Convention will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities by the General Sec- retariat of the Council of the European Union


title: Conclusiones del Consejo, de 27 de septiembre de 1999, sobre los resultados de la consulta pública relativa al Libro Verde sobre la convergencia (en particular los aspectos relativos a los medios de comunicación y el sector audiovisual)

eurovoc_concepts:
audiovisual industry
consultation procedure
economic convergence
pluralism in the media

text: 6. 10. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 283/1 I (Comunicaciones) CONSEJO CONCLUSIONES DEL CONSEJO de 27 de septiembre de 1999 sobre los resultados de la consulta pœblica relativa al Libro Verde sobre la convergencia (en particular los aspectos relativos a los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n y el sector audiovisual) (1999/C 283/01) EL CONSEJO DE LA UNI(cid:211)N EUROPEA, contenido europeo de alta calidad podr(cid:237)an desempeæar un papel importante; 1. RECORDANDO las Conclusiones del Consejo, de 24 de sep- tiembre de 1998, sobre la Conferencia Audiovisual Euro- pea: «Retos y oportunidades de la era digital» (1); 2. RECORDANDO la Resoluci(cid:243)n del Consejo y de los Repre- sentantes de los Gobiernos de los Estados miembros reu- nidos en el seno del Consejo, de 25 de enero de 1999, sobre el servicio pœblico de radiofusi(cid:243)n (2); 3. RECORDANDO las Conclusiones del Consejo, de 22 de abril de 1999, sobre los resultados de la consulta pœblica rela- tiva al Libro Verde sobre la Convergencia; 4. CONSCIENTE del debate sobre el Æmbito posible y de los mØritos y riesgos de la autorregulaci(cid:243)n, seæalados por los participantes en el Seminario de expertos de Saarbr(cid:252)cken sobre la autorregulaci(cid:243)n en los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n; 5. TOMA NOTA del hecho de que la Comisi(cid:243)n, en su Comu- nicaci(cid:243)n sobre los resultados de la consulta pœblica relativa al Libro Verde, de 9 de marzo de 1999, presenta varios mensajes clave de relevancia especial para el sector audio- visual y anuncia su intenci(cid:243)n de presentar un conjunto de principios normativos mÆs detallado en una comunicaci(cid:243)n adicional; 6. TOMA NOTA de que, en relaci(cid:243)n con el papel de la nor- mativa, se constat(cid:243) a nivel general la afirmaci(cid:243)n de la necesidad constante de alcanzar una serie de objetivos de interØs pœblico (como la protecci(cid:243)n de los menores y de la dignidad humana, la diversidad cultural y ling(cid:252)(cid:237)stica y el pluralismo), al tiempo que reconoce la necesidad de pro- mover la inversi(cid:243)n, en particular en los nuevos servicios audiovisuales; 7. TOMA NOTA de que a nivel general se constat(cid:243) el recono- cimiento de que las acciones destinadas a fomentar un (1) DO C 306 de 6. 10. 1998, p. 1. (2) DO C 30 de 5. 2. 1999, p. 1. 8. HACE HINCAPI(cid:201) en que, ademÆs de los aspectos tØcnicos y econ(cid:243)micos, los aspectos sociales, culturales y democrÆti- cos son de gran interØs para el desarrollo de la sociedad de la informaci(cid:243)n; 9. EXPRESA su convencimiento de la necesidad de evaluaci(cid:243)n y posible adaptaci(cid:243)n continuas del marco normativo na- cional y europeo teniendo en consideraci(cid:243)n el principio de subsidiariedad; 10. TOMA NOTA del hecho de que se recomend(cid:243) separar la normativa de infraestructuras y de contenidos: esto im- plica, en materia de infraestructura, la necesidad de prote- ger el acceso del pœblico a una amplia variedad de conte- nidos de los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n; 11. TOMA NOTA de que dicha separaci(cid:243)n implica, en lo que a la normativa sobre contenidos se refiere, (cid:151) tener plenamente en cuenta la especificidad del sector audiovisual, en particular siguiendo un enfoque vertical y sectorial si se da el caso, basÆndose en las estructuras normativas vigentes y tambiØn los objetivos politicos pœblicos, (cid:151) la aplicaci(cid:243)n de un rØgimen normativo adecuado a los nuevos servicios, una vez efectuados las consultas y debates debidos, que reconozcan la calidad de impre- visible del mercado y la necesidad de inversiones de envergadura para su puesta en marcha y que, al mismo tiempo, mantengan un nivel suficiente de protecci(cid:243)n de los menores, del consumidor y de otros intereses pœ- blicos importantes, (cid:151) que la autorregulaci(cid:243)n podr(cid:237)a resultar de utilidad para complementar la normativa y contribuir a la consecu- ci(cid:243)n del equilibrio correcto entre la facilitaci(cid:243)n del desarrollo de mercados abiertos y competitivos y el logro de objetivos de interØs pœblico; C 283/2 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 6. 10. 1999 12. PONE DE RELIEVE que la consulta tambiØn arroj(cid:243), en res- puesta a las tres opciones formuladas por la Comisi(cid:243)n en su Libro Verde (1), una clara mayor(cid:237)a a favor de un enfoque evolutivo de la normativa sobre contenidos, sobre la base de las estructuras vigentes. 13. HACE HINCAPI(cid:201) en que, con miras al desarrollo de las nuevas tecnolog(cid:237)as, una soluci(cid:243)n equilibrada y trans- parente de la cuesti(cid:243)n de c(cid:243)mo puede el servicio pœblico de radiodifusi(cid:243)n seguir desempeæando todo su papel de la mejor forma posible en este nuevo entorno, debe: (cid:151) reafirmar las competencias de los Estados miembros para conferir, definir y organizar el mandato de servi- cio pœblico en cada Estado miembro de conformidad con el Protocolo sobre el sistema de radiodifusi(cid:243)n pœ- blica de los Estados miembros anexo al Tratado de Amsterdam (Protocolo no 32), (1) Las tres opciones son las siguientes: 1) basarse en las estructuras actuales; 2) desarrollar un modelo normativo separado para las nuevas acti- vidades, que coexista con la normativa en materia de telecomu- nicaciones y radiodifusi(cid:243)n; 3) introducir progresivamente un nuevo modelo normativo que abarque toda la gama de los servicios nuevos y existentes. (cid:151) alentar a las organizaciones con mandato de servicio pœblico a que exploten las nuevas tecnolog(cid:237)as y, de este modo, encuentren nuevas formas de conservar y am- pliar su pœblico, a fin de cumplir dicho mandato; 14. INVITA a la Comisi(cid:243)n, sin perjuicio de las prerrogativas que le confiere el Tratado, a: (cid:151) tener en cuenta las presentes Conclusiones al redactar la comunicaci(cid:243)n mencionada en el punto 5, recono- ciendo y abordando la especificidad del sector audiovi- sual y tomando en consideraci(cid:243)n las necesidades demo- crÆticas, sociales y culturales, (cid:151) tener en cuenta el resultado de la consulta cuando, si se da el caso, elabore propuestas de medidas de potencia- ci(cid:243)n de la industria audiovisual europea, incluida la industria del sector multimedios; 15. TOMA NOTA de que las acciones inmediatas de la Comisi(cid:243)n relativas a los contenidos incluirÆn la verificaci(cid:243)n de la ejecuci(cid:243)n y aplicaci(cid:243)n por los Estados miembros de la Directiva modificada sobre la televisi(cid:243)n sin fronteras. CONCLUSIONES DEL CONSEJO de 27 de septiembre de 1999 sobre el papel de la autorregulaci(cid:243)n en vista del desarrollo de nuevos servicios de medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n (1999/C 283/02) EL CONSEJO DE LA UNI(cid:211)N EUROPEA, 1. RECORDANDO la Recomendaci(cid:243)n 98/560/CE del Consejo, de 24 de septiembre de 1998, relativa al desarrollo de la competitividad de la industria europea de servicios audiovi- suales y de informaci(cid:243)n mediante la promoci(cid:243)n de marcos nacionales destinados a lograr un nivel de protecci(cid:243)n com- parable y efectivo de los menores y de la dignidad hu- mana (1) y el plan plurianual comunitario de acci(cid:243)n para propiciar una mayor seguridad en la utilizaci(cid:243)n de Internet mediante la lucha contra los contenidos il(cid:237)citos y nocivos en la Decisi(cid:243)n no las 276/1999/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo (2); redes mundiales adoptado por 2. RECORDANDO que la Comisi(cid:243)n, en su Comunicaci(cid:243)n de 9 de marzo de 1999 sobre los resultados de la consulta pœ- blica relativa al Libro Verde sobre la convergencia, ha reco- nocido la relevancia que podr(cid:237)a tener la autorregulaci(cid:243)n; (1) DO L 270 de 7. 10. 1998, p. 48. (2) DO L 33 de 6. 2. 1999, p. 1. 3. RECONOCIENDO que aunque la autorregulaci(cid:243)n seguirÆ completando œtilmente la normativa de todos los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n en una serie de Estados miembros, en el presente documento resulta adecuado considerar el papel de la autorregulaci(cid:243)n en los nuevos servicios de medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n, 4. TOMA NOTA de que: (cid:151) en la mayor parte de los pa(cid:237)ses de Europa se han desa- rrollado sistemas de autorregulaci(cid:243)n para los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n, algunos de los cuales se extienden a to- dos los medios de comunicaci(cid:243)n (prensa, radiofusi(cid:243)n sonora, televisi(cid:243)n y publicidad en todos los medios), mientras que otros estÆn limitados a medios de comu- nicaci(cid:243)n individuales o a nuevos servicios de informa- ci(cid:243)n y comunicaci(cid:243)n, (cid:151) existen diferencias significativas en el modo en que los distintos sistemas de autorregulaci(cid:243)n estÆn organizados y complementan o contribuyen a las normativas racio- nales, lo cual es reflejo de la diversidad democrÆtica, regional y cultural de Europa,


title: Beslut nr 4/1999 av associeringsrådet EU-Rumänien av den 27 september 1999 om ändring av associeringsrådets beslut nr 1/95 rörande antagande av dess arbetsordning (95/429/EG), genom upprättande av en gemensam rådgivande kommitté

text: L 270/26 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 20. 10. 1999 BESLUT nr 4/1999 AV ASSOCIERINGSRÅDET EU–RUMÄNIEN av den 27 september 1999 om ändring av associeringsrådets beslut nr 1/95 rörande antagande av dess arbetsordning (95/429/EG), genom upprättande av en gemensam rådgivande kommitté (1999/681/EG) Kommittén skall utföra sina uppgifter efter samråd med associeringsrådets främjandet av dialogen mellan de ekonomiska och sociala intressegrup- perna, på eget initiativ. eller, när det gäller Kommitténs medlemmar skall väljas på ett sådant sätt att kommittén så långt som möjligt avspeglar de olika ekono- miska och sociala intressegrupperna i både Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien. En medlem av Europeiska gemenskapernas ekonomiska och sociala kommité skall tillsammans med en rumänsk medlem utöva ordförandeskapet i kommittén. Kommittén skall själv fastställa sin arbetsordning. Artikel 17 gememskapernas Europeiska ekonomiska och sociala kommitté, å ena sidan, och Rumäniens sociala råd, å andra sidan, skall var och en bestrida kostnaderna för sitt delta- gande i den gemensamma rådgivande kommitténs och arbetsgruppernas möten när det gäller kostnader för personal, resor och uppehälle samt porto och telekost- nader. Utgifter för tolkning vid mötena, översättning och mångfal- digande av dokument skall betalas av Ekonomiska och sociala kommittén, med undantag av utgifter för tolkning eller översättning till eller från rumänska, vilka skall bäras av de ekonomiska och sociala intressegrupperna i Rumä- niens ekonomiska och sociala råd. Utgifter i samband med det praktiska anordnandet av möten skall betalas av den part som är värd för mötena. ” Artikel 2 Detta beslut månaden efter den dag då det antogs. träder i kraft den första dagen i den andra Utfärdat i Bryssel den 27 september 1999. På associeringsrådets vägnar T. HALONEN Ordförande ASSOCIERINGSRÅDET HAR BESLUTAT FÖLJANDE med beaktande av Europaavtalet om upprättandet av en asso- ciering mellan Europeiska gemenskaperna och deras medlems- stater, å ena sidan, och Rumänien, å andra sidan (1), särskilt artikel 111 i detta, och av följande skäl: 1. 2. 3. Dialog och samarbete mellan ekonomiska och sociala intressegrupper i Europeiska gemenskapen och i Rumä- nien kan utgöra ett viktigt bidrag till utvecklingen av förbindelserna dem emellan. gemenskapernas Detta samarbete bör ske mellan medlemmarna i Euro- sociala peiska kommitté, å ena sidan, och företrädare för Rumäniens ekonomiska och sociala råd, å andra sidan, genom inrät- tande av en gemensam rådgivande kommitté. ekonomiska och Det är därför lämpligt att i enlighet härmed ändra associ- eringsrådets arbetsordning, som antogs genom beslut nr 1/95 (2). HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE. Artikel 1 Följande artiklarna skall införas i associeringsrådets arbetsord- ning: ”Artikel 15 Härmed upprättas en gemensamm rådgivande kommitté med uppgift att bistå associeringsrådet i syfte att främja dialog och samarbete mellan de ekonomiska och sociala intressegrupperna i Europeiska gemenskapen och i Rumä- nien. Denna dialog och detta samarbete skall omfatta alla ekonomiska och sociala aspekter av förbindelserna mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Rumänien inom ramen för genomförandet av Europaavtalet. Kommittén skall yttra sig över frågor som uppkommer inom dessa områden. Artikel 16 Den gemensamma rådgivande kommittén skall bestå av sex företrädare för Europeiska gemenskapernas ekonomiska och sociala kommitté, å ena sidan, och sex företrädare för Rumäniens ekonomiska och sociala råd, å andra sidan. (1) EGT L 357, 31. 12. 1994, s. 2. (2) EGT L 171, 21. 7. 1995, s. 41


title: Decisione n. 4/1999 del Consiglio di associazione UE- Romania, del 27 settembre 1999, che modifica, mediante istituzione di un comitato consultivo paritetico, la decisione n. 1/95 relativa al regolamento interno del Consiglio di associazione (95/429/CE)

text: L 270/26 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee 20. 10. 1999 DECISIONE N. 4/1999 DEL CONSIGLIO DI ASSOCIAZIONE UE-ROMANIA del 27 settembre 1999 che modifica, mediante istituzione di un comitato consultivo paritetico, la decisione n. 1/95 relativa al regolamento interno del Consiglio di associazione (95/429/CE) (1999/681/CE) IL CONSIGLIO DI ASSOCIAZIONE, visto l'accordo europeo che istituisce un'associazione tra le Comunità europee e i loro Stati membri, da una parte, e la Romania, dall'altra (1), in particolare l'articolo 111, (1) (2) (3) considerando che il dialogo e la cooperazione tra i gruppi d'interesse economici e sociali della Comunità europea e della Romania possono apportare un notevole contributo allo sviluppo delle loro relazioni; considerando l'opportunità di organizzare tale coopera- zione a livello dei membri del Comitato economico e sociale delle Comunità europee, da una parte, e i rappre- sociale della sentanti del Consiglio economico e Romania, dall'altra, attraverso l'istituzione di un comi- tato consultivo paritetico; considerando che occorre modificare di conseguenza il regolamento interno del Consiglio di associazione adot- tato con la decisione n. 1/95 (2), DECIDE: Articolo 1 Il regolamento interno del Consiglio di associazione è comple- tato dei seguenti articoli: «Articolo 15 È istituito un comitato consultivo paritetico con il compito di assistere il Consiglio di associazione al fine di promuo- vere il dialogo e la cooperazione tra i gruppi d'interesse economici e sociali della Comunità europea e quelli della Romania. Questo dialogo e questa cooperazione coprono tutti gli aspetti economici e sociali delle relazioni tra la Comunità europea e la Romania nell'ambito dell'applica- zione dell'accordo europeo. Il comitato consultivo parite- tico si pronuncia in merito alle questioni che sorgono in tali settori. Articolo 16 Il comitato consultivo paritetico è composto di sei rappre- sentanti del Comitato economico e sociale delle Comunità europee, da una parte, e sei rappresentanti del Consiglio economico e sociale della Romania, dall'altra. Il comitato consultivo paritetico svolge i propri compiti su consultazione del Consiglio di associazione o, per quanto riguarda la promozione del dialogo tra i gruppi d'interesse sociali ed economici, di propria iniziativa. I membri del comitato consultivo paritetico vengono sele- zionati in modo da riflettere quanto più fedelmente possi- bile i gruppi d'interesse economici e sociali della Comunità europea e della Romania. La presidenza del comitato consultivo paritetico è assicu- rata congiuntamente da un membro del Comitato econo- mico e sociale delle Comunità europee e da un membro rumeno. Il comitato consultivo paritetico adotta il proprio regola- mento interno. Articolo 17 Il Comitato economico e sociale delle Comunità europee, da un lato, ed il Consiglio economico e sociale della Romania, dall'altra, si faranno carico dei rispettivi costi derivanti dalla partecipazione alle riunioni del comitato consultivo paritetico e dei suoi gruppi di lavoro in termini di personale, spese di trasporto e indennità giornaliere, posta e telecomunicazioni. Le spese relative all'interpretazione delle riunioni, alla tradu- zione e alla riproduzione dei documenti, saranno a carico del Comitato economico e sociale, ad eccezione di quelle inerenti all'interpretazione o alla traduzione dal rumeno o in rumeno, che incomberanno al Consiglio economico e sociale della Romania. Le altre spese relative all'organizzazione materiale delle riunioni saranno a carico della parte presso la quale si svolgeranno le riunioni. » Articolo 2 La presente decisione entra in vigore il primo giorno del secondo mese successivo alla data di adozione. Fatto a Bruxelles, addì 27 settembre 1999. Per il Consiglio di associazione Il Presidente T. HALONEN (1) GU L 357 del 31. 12. 1994, pag. 2. (2) GU L 171 del 21. 7. 1995, pag. 41


title: Council Regulation (EC) No 2049/1999 of 27 September 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of stainless steel bars originating in India and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed

eurovoc_concepts:
India
anti-dumping duty
bar
import
originating product
steel

text: L 255/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 9. 1999 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2049/1999 of 27 September 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of stainless steel bars originating in India and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 2. Initiation of an accelerated review Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (3) Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), and in particular Articles 15 and 20 thereof, Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE By Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 (2), the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of stainless steel bars (hereinafter referred to as ‘the product con- cerned’) 7222 20 11, 7222 20 21, 7222 20 31 and 7222 20 81 originating in India. The measures took the form of ad valorem duties of between 0 and 25,5 % with a residual duty of 25,5 %. falling within CN codes (4) (5) (1) (2) B. CURRENT PROCEDURE 1. Request for review Subsequent to the imposition of definitive measures, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an accelerated review of Regulation (EC) No 2450/98, pursuant to Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the basic Regulation’), from two Indian producers, Sindia Steels Ltd and Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd, both located in Bombay. The companies concerned claimed that they were not related to any other exporters of the product concerned in India. Furthermore, they had not exported the product concerned to the Community during the original period of investigation (1 July 1996 to 30 June 1997), but had exported the product concerned to the Community since then. they claimed that Both companies requested the establishment of an indi- vidual rate of duty. In the case of Sindia Steels Ltd, this company had made itself known during the original investigation, but as it had not exported to the Community during the investigation period, it was al- located a weightedaverage countervailing duty of 22,1 %. Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd has been subject to the residual 25,5 % countervailing duty. The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the two Indian exporting producers concerned and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 20 the the basic Regulation. After consultation of of Advisory Committee and after the Community industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by a notice in the Official Journal (3), an accelerated review of Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 with regard to the companies concerned and commenced its investigation. 3. Product concerned The product covered by the current review is the same product as that under consideration in Regulation (EC) No 2450/98. 4. Parties concerned The Commission officially advised the two companies concerned and the Government of India. Furthermore, it gave other parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing. However, no such request was received by the Commission. The Commission sent a questionnaire to the companies concerned and received full replies within the deadline. The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of the investigation and carried out verification visits at the premises of the companies concerned. 5. Investigation period (6) The investigation of subsidisation covered the period from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1998 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the investigation period’). 6. Methodology (7) The same methodology as that used in the original investigation was applied in the current investigation. C. SCOPE OF THE REVIEW (8) This review was limited to calculating the amount of subsidisation granted to Sindia Steels Ltd and Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (1) OJ L 288, 21. 10. 1997, p. 1. (2) OJ L 304, 14. 11. 1998, p. 1. (3) OJ C 19, 23. 1. 1999, p. 17. 30. 9. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 255/9 (9) (10) (11) The Commission examined the same subsidy schemes which were analysed in the original investigation. It also examined whether the new exporters had used any subsidy schemes which were alleged in the original complaint but not used during the original investigation. It was finally examined whether the new exporters had made use of any subsidy schemes which were estab- lished after the end of the original investigation period, or had received ad hoc subsidies after this date. D. RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION 1. New exporter qualification investigation confirmed The companies concerned had not exported the product concerned during the original period of investigation and that they had begun exporting to the Community after this period. that the the companies concerned were able to Furthermore, demonstrate satisfactorily that they did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Indian exporting producers subject to the countervailing measures in force with regard to the product concerned. it is the confirmed that Accordingly, companies concerned should be considered as new exporters in accordance with Article 20 of the basic Regulation and thus individual amounts of subsidy should be deter- mined for them. The fact that Sindia Steels is already subject to a weighted-average, rather than the residual, countervailing duty on the product concerned does not in any way prejudice its right to request a new exporter review, given that all the criteria set out in the said Article 20 are fulfilled. 4. Duty entitlement passbook scheme (DEPB) General (14) It was established that the two companies concerned received benefits under this scheme. Both companies used the DEPB on a post-export basis. Under this scheme, any eligible exporter can apply for credits which are calculated as a percentage of the value of exported finished products. Such DEPB rates have been established by the Indian authorities for most prod- ucts, including the products concerned, on the basis of the standard input/output norms. A licence stating the amount of credit granted is issued automatically. DEPB on post-export basis allows for the use of such credits for any subsequent imports (e. g. raw materials or capital goods) except for goods of which the import is restricted or prohibited. Such imported goods can be sold on the domestic market (subject to sales tax) or used otherwise. DEPB credits are freely transferable. The DEPB licence is valid for a period of 12 months from the date of granting of the licence. (15) The characteristics of the DEPB have not changed since the original investigation. The subsidy conferred by the from import duty is contingent on export relief performance, and it was therefore determined during the original investigation that it is specific and countervail- able under Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regulation. 2. Subsidisation (12) On the basis of the information contained in the replies to the Commission's questionnaire, the following five schemes were investigated: Calculation of the subsidy amount — passbook scheme, — duty entitlement passbook scheme, (16) — export promotion capital goods scheme, — export processing zones/export oriented units, — income tax exemption scheme. All these schemes had been found to be countervailable investigation. during the original 3. Passbook scheme (PBS) (13) Neither of the companies concerned had availed them- selves of the passbook scheme, which on 1 April 1997, i. e. during the original investigation period, was abol- ished and replaced by its successor, the duty entitlement passbook scheme (DEPB). (1) OJ L 79, 24. 3. 1999, p. 25. (2) OJ L 79, 24. 3. 1999, p. 60. It was established that neither of the companies used the licences to make duty-free imports. Instead the com- panies sold some of their licences, and the benefit was calculated on the basis of the amount of credit in the licence regardless of the sales price of the licence. The companies concerned claimed that the benefit should be limited to the effective sales price of the licence which is the credits in the often less than the face value of licence. However, in accordance with the provisional findings in the cases of stainless steel wire from India (Commission Regulations (EC) No 618/1999 (1) and (EC) No 619/1999 (2), this claim cannot be granted since the sale of a licence at a price less than the face value is a purely commercial decision which does not alter the countervailable benefit from this scheme. L 255/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 9. 1999 (17) In order to establish the full benefit to the recipient under this scheme, this amount of credit has been adjusted by adding interest during the original invest- igation period. Since the benefits from import duty exemptions are obtained regularly during the invest- igation period, it was considered appropriate to follow the practice established in the original investigation and add interest covering a period of six months, equivalent to half of the annual commercial rate in India of 14,58 % found during the original investigation period, i. e. 7,29 %. This amount (i. e. unpaid customs duty plus interest) has been allocated over total exports during the investigation period. Sindia Steels Ltd and Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd bene- fited from this scheme during the investigation period and obtained subsidies of 11,7 % and 4,9 % respectively. Where the companies claimed deductions linked to the payment of fees for obtaining the DEPB licence, these were granted. 5. Export promotion capital goods scheme (EPCGS) General ment to export goods, and is therefore deemed to be specific and countervailable. Calculation of the subsidy amount (20) The benefit to the exporter has been calculated on the basis of the amount of unpaid customs duty due on imported capital goods by spreading this amount across a period which reflects the normal depreciation of such capital goods in the industry of the product concerned. This period has been established by using the weighted average (on the basis of production volume of the prod- ucts concerned) of depreciation periods for capital goods actually imported under the EPCGS by Indian producers during the original investigation period, resulting in a normal depreciation period of 15,5 years. Since this subsidy is equivalent to a one-time grant, the amount so calculated which is attributable to the investigation period has been adjusted by adding the annual interest rate of 14,58 %. This amount has then been allocated over total exports during the investigation period. (21) Sindia Steels Ltd obtained a benefit under this scheme of 0,3 %. (18) It was established that Sindia Steels Ltd had availed itself of this scheme. 6. Export processing zones (EPZ)/export oriented units (EOU) To benefit from the scheme, a company must provide to the relevant authorities details of the type and value of capital goods which are to be imported. Depending on the level of export commitment which the company is prepared to undertake, the company will be allowed to import capital goods at either a zero rate of duty or a reduced rate. A licence authorising the import at prefer- ential rates is issued automatically. (22) The Commission established that none of the companies was located in an EPZ or was an EOU. There is therefore no need for the Commission to assess this scheme in the context of the investigation. 7. Income tax exemption scheme (ITES) In order to meet the export obligation, goods exported must have been produced using the imported capital goods. General An application fee is payable to obtain a licence. (23) It was established that Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd had availed itself of this scheme. (19) The characteristics of the EPCGS have not changed since the original investigation. It was determined during the original investigation that the EPCGS is a countervailable subsidy as the payment by an exporter of a reduced or zero rate of duty constitutes a financial contribution by the Government of India (GOI), revenue otherwise due is foregone and a benefit is conferred on the recipient by lowering the duties payable or fully exempting him from paying the import duties. To benefit from exemptions from paying tax, a company will make the relevant claim when submitting its tax return to the Tax Authorities at the end of the tax year. The tax year runs from 1 April to 31 March. The tax return must be submitted to the authorities by the following 30 November. The final assessment by the authorities can take up to three years after submitting the tax return. The subsidy is contingent in law on export performance within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regu- lation, since it cannot be obtained without a commit- Under Section 80HHC companies can claim 100 % exemption from taxable income for profits realised on export sales. 30. 9. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 255/11 (24) from income The characteristics of the ITES have not changed since the original investigation. It was determined during the original investigation that the subsidy conferred by the relief contingent on export performance within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regulation, since it exempts profits from export sales only, and is therefore deemed to be specific and countervailable. tax is Calculation of the subsidy amount by adding interest during the investigation period. Given the nature of this subsidy, which is equivalent to a one-time grant, the commercial interest rate of 14,58 % was considered appropriate. The amount of benefit has been allocated over total exports during the tax year 1997/98. Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd obtained a benefit under this scheme of 0,6 %. 8. Other schemes (26) It was established that the new exporters had neither made use of new subsidy schemes which were estab- lished after the end of the original investigation period, nor had received ad hoc subsidies after this date. (25) As stated in recital 23, claims for benefit under section 80HHC are made when submitting a tax return at the end of the tax year. As the tax year in India runs from 1 April to 31 March, it is considered appropriate to calcu- late the benefit under this scheme on the basis of the tax year 1997/98 (i. e. 1 April 1997 to 31 March 1998). The benefit to the exporters has therefore been calculated on the basis of the difference between the amount of taxes normally due with and without the exemption. The rate of corporate tax applicable during this tax year was 35 %. In order to establish the full benefit to the recipient, this amount has been adjusted the benefit of (27) 9. Amount of countervailable subsidies Taking account of the definitive findings relating to the various schemes as set out above, the amount of coun- investigated subsidies tervailable exporting producers is as follows: each of the for DEPB EPCGS Income Tax Total Sindia Steels Ltd 11,7 % 0,3 % 12,0 % Meltroll Engineering Pvt. Ltd 4,9 % 0,6 % 5,5 % E. AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING REVIEWED (28) imports into the Based on the findings made during the investigation, Community of stainless steel bars produced and exported by the companies concerned should be subject to countervailing duties corresponding to individual amounts of subsidies established for these companies. is considered that it (29) Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 should therefore be amended accordingly. F. DISCLOSURE AND DURATION OF THE MEASURE (30) (31) The companies concerned were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to propose the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2450/98, and were given the oppor- tunity to comment. The review carried out does not affect the date on which Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 will expire pursuant to Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2450/98 is amended as follows: Article 1 L 255/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 9. 1999 (a) the duty rate for Sindia Steels Ltd (TARIC additional code: 8406) shall be 12 %; (b) the following shall be added to the list of companies subject to measures: ‘Manufacturer — Meltroll Engineering Ltd, Mumbai Rate of duty (%) 5,5 TARIC additional code A021’ This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 2 This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 27 September 1999. For the Council The President K. HEMILÄ


title: KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS P-1719/99 esittäjä(t): Giuseppe Nisticò (PPE-DE) komissiolle. Lentohinnat.

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
air freight rate
application of EU law
common transport policy
economic and social cohesion
imposed price
less-favoured region
services of general interest

text: 18. 7. 2000 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallinen lehti C 203 E/31 (2000/C 203 E/038) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS P-1719/99 esitt(cid:228)j(cid:228)(t): Giuseppe Nistic(cid:242) (PPE-DE) komissiolle (27. syyskuuta 1999) Aihe: Lentohinnat (cid:129) Komissio ja tuomioistuin ovat toimivaltansa puitteissa jo pitk(cid:228)(cid:228)n kehottaneet eurooppalaisia lento- yhti(cid:246)it(cid:228) noudattamaan toiminnassaan vapaan kilpailun periaatteita ja ottamaan huomioon matkusta- jien odotukset. (cid:129) Monille kansallisille lentoyhti(cid:246)ille, mm. Alitalialle, on my(cid:246)nnetty valtavia summia valtion tukea komission suostumuksella. (cid:129) Lentoliikennett(cid:228) s(cid:228)(cid:228)dell(cid:228)(cid:228)n l(cid:228)hes kokonaisuudessaan yhteis(cid:246)n m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)yksill(cid:228), joiden noudattamista komissio valvoo tarkkojen s(cid:228)(cid:228)nt(cid:246)jen perusteella. (cid:129) Italian kotimaanlentojen kilometritariffit, etenkin Etel(cid:228)-Italiaan suuntautuvilla suorilla lennoilla, ovat paljon korkeammat kuin muilla Euroopan reiteill(cid:228). (cid:129) Etel(cid:228)isten alueiden kehitysmahdollisuuksien kannalta tilanne on eritt(cid:228)in ep(cid:228)oikeudenmukainen. Var- sinkin Kalabria k(cid:228)rsii tilanteesta maantieteellisen sijaintinsa vuoksi. (cid:129) Yhteis(cid:246)n s(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:246)ksiss(cid:228) todetaan, ett(cid:228) julkisen liikenteen sopimukset ovat paras tapa ottaa huomioon ep(cid:228)suotuisassa asemassa olevien v(cid:228)est(cid:246)nosien tarpeet. (cid:129) Euroopan parlamentin kuulemistilaisuudessa Romano Prodi ilmaisi olevansa valmis asettumaan parla- mentin aloitteiden taakse. (cid:129) Katsooko komissio, ett(cid:228) yhteis(cid:246)n s(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:246)ksiss(cid:228) m(cid:228)(cid:228)riteltyj(cid:228) periaatteita ja s(cid:228)(cid:228)nt(cid:246)j(cid:228) noudatetaan tyydyt- t(cid:228)v(cid:228)ll(cid:228) tavalla? (cid:129) Voitaisiinko komission mielest(cid:228) julkisia palvelusopimuksia k(cid:228)ytt(cid:228)(cid:228) kansallisen tason lis(cid:228)ksi my(cid:246)s aluetasolla? (cid:129) Aikooko komissio pyrki(cid:228) siihen, ett(cid:228) koko EU:ssa otetaan k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)n yhteiset kilometritariffit, mahdolli- sesti tietyin vaihteluv(cid:228)lein, yhten(cid:228)isyyden ja integraation lis(cid:228)(cid:228)miseksi yhteis(cid:246)n sis(cid:228)ll(cid:228)? Loyola de Palacion komission puolesta antama vastaus (21. lokakuuta 1999) yhteis(cid:246)n ilmailualan paketin muodostavat toimiluvista Kolmannen 23 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) hein(cid:228)kuuta 1992 annettu neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 2407/92 (1), yhteis(cid:246)n lentoliikenteen harjoittajien p(cid:228)(cid:228)syst(cid:228) yhteis(cid:246)n sis(cid:228)isen lentoliikenteen reiteille 23 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) hein(cid:228)kuuta 1992 annettu neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 2408/92 (1) ja lentoliikenteen kuljetus- ja rahtimaksuista 23 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) hein(cid:228)kuuta 1992 annettu neuvoston asetus (ETY) N:o 2409/92 (1). N(cid:228)m(cid:228) s(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:246)kset ovat tulleet voimaan 1. tammikuuta 1993 ja ne ovat vapauttaneet lentoliikenteen yhteis(cid:246)ss(cid:228). Erityisesti asetuksen N:o 2409/92 s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)kset sallivat yhteis(cid:246)n lentoliikenteen harjoittajien m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)t(cid:228) lentojen hinnat vapaasti. Komissio ei aio ehdottaa muutosta t(cid:228)h(cid:228)n s(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:246)kseen. lentoliikenteen harjoittajien Komission mielest(cid:228) voimassa olevat s(cid:228)(cid:228)d(cid:246)kset kattavat parlamentin j(cid:228)senen esille tuomat asiat. Ensinn(cid:228)kin vapaa kilpailu on laskenut eurooppalaisen lentoliikenteen hintoja. Toiseksi asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2408/92 4 artiklassa s(cid:228)(cid:228)det(cid:228)(cid:228)n, ett(cid:228) j(cid:228)senvaltiot voivat tietyiss(cid:228) olosuhteissa asettaa julkisen palvelun velvoitteita ja erityisesti rajoittaa hinnoitteluvapautta. Viimeksi mainittuja s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ksi(cid:228) monet j(cid:228)senvaltiot ovat soveltaneet tyydytt(cid:228)v(cid:228)sti yli sata kertaa 1. tammikuuta 1993 l(cid:228)htien useimmiten kehitysalueiden pyynn(cid:246)st(cid:228), jotka haluavat, ett(cid:228) asianmukaiset ja jatkuvat lentoyhteydet ovat my(cid:246)s heid(cid:228)n ulottuvillaan. Italia ei ole viel(cid:228) soveltanut n(cid:228)it(cid:228) s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ksi(cid:228) kotimaisiin reitteihins(cid:228). (1) EYVL L 240, 24. 8. 1992


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2041/1999 della Commissione, del 27 settembre 1999, recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli

eurovoc_concepts:
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
grape
import price
pip fruit
stone fruit

formats: pdf print

text: 28. 9. 1999 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee L 253/1 I (Atti per i quali la pubblicazione è una condizione di applicabilità) REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 2041/1999 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 27 settembre 1999 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea, (2) considerando che in applicazione di tali criteri, i valori forfettari all'importazione devono essere fissati ai livelli figuranti nell'allegato del presente regolamento, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 della Commissione, del 21 dicembre 1994, recante modalità di applicazione del importazione degli ortofrutticoli (1), modificato da regime di ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1498/98 (2), in particolare l'ar- ticolo 4, paragrafo 1, (1) regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 considerando che il risultati dei negoziati prevede, in applicazione dei quadro dell'Uruguay commerciali multilaterali nel Round, i criteri in base ai quali la Commissione fissa i valori forfettari all'importazione dai paesi terzi, per i prodotti e per i periodi precisati nell'allegato; HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 I valori forfettari all'importazione di cui all'articolo 4 del rego- lamento (CE) n. 3223/94 sono fissati nella tabella riportata nell'allegato. Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 28 settembre 1999. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 27 settembre 1999. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 337 del 24. 12. 1994, pag. 66. (2) GU L 198 del 15. 7. 1998, pag. 4. L 253/2 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee 28. 9. 1999 al regolamento della Commissione, del 27 settembre 1999, recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importa- zione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli ALLEGATO Codice NC Codice paesi terzi (1) (EUR/100 kg) Valore forfettario all'importazione 0702 00 00 0707 00 05 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0806 10 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 0809 30 10, 0809 30 90 0809 40 05 052 999 052 628 999 052 999 052 388 512 524 528 999 052 064 400 999 064 388 400 512 804 999 052 064 999 052 999 052 060 064 400 624 999 52,5 52,5 85,5 125,1 105,3 59,7 59,7 54,4 69,9 61,0 56,2 65,0 61,3 104,9 61,7 238,1 134,9 36,9 57,2 50,5 87,0 62,2 58,8 81,7 57,7 69,7 113,7 113,7 59,2 60,3 62,8 119,0 192,4 98,7 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal regolamento (CE) n. 2645/98 della Commissione (GU L 335 del 10. 12. 1998, pag. 22). Il codice «999» rappresenta le «altre origini»


title: WRITTEN QUESTION P-1719/99 by Giuseppe Nisticò (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Air fares.

text: 18. 7. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 203 E/31 (2000/C 203 E/038) WRITTEN QUESTION P-1719/99 by Giuseppe Nistic(cid:242) (PPE-DE) to the Commission (27 September 1999) Subject: Air fares Whereas: (cid:129) within their respective spheres of competence the Commission and the Court of Justice have for some time been calling on European airlines to comply with the principle of free competition and meet the expectations of their users; (cid:129) extensive state aids have been granted with the Commission(cid:146)s backing to numerous national airlines, including Alitalia; (cid:129) the sector is regulated almost entirely by a series of Community provisions and the Commission is required to monitor compliance with these on the basis of specific rules; (cid:129) air fares per kilometre for Italian domestic flights, particularly direct flights to the south of the country, are much higher than fares on European routes; (cid:129) this situation represents a substantial and unfair constraint on the development potential of the country(cid:146)s southern regions, especially Calabria because of its geographical position; (cid:129) public service contracts are identified in Community legislation as the most appropriate instrument for meeting the needs of disadvantaged sections of the population; (cid:129) during the hearings with the European Parliament, Mr Prodi expressed his full willingness to adopt initiatives put forward by Parliament; In the light of the above: (cid:129) Does the Commission consider that the principles and rules laid down in Community legislation are being properly observed? (cid:129) Does it believe that public service contracts are an instrument that can be used by regional as well as national governments? (cid:129) Will it work for the introduction of common air fares per kilometre applicable to all European countries, possibly with a margin for fluctuation, so as to ensure greater cohesion and integration within the Community? Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission (21 October 1999) The regulations making up the (cid:145)Third Air Package(cid:146), that is Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92, of 23 July 1992, on licensing of air carriers (1), Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, of 23 July 1992, on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (1), and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92, of 23 July 1992, on fares and rates for air services (1), all of which came into force on 1 January 1993, have liberalised air transport activities within the Community. Regulation No 2409/92 in particular provides that Community air carriers have the freedom to set passenger air fares. The Commission does not intend to propose an amendment of this text. The Commission is of the opinion, however, that regulations in force already respond to the concerns voiced by the Honourable Member. Firstly, free competition has brought about a reduction in air fares in Europe. Secondly, Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 allows Member States to impose, in certain conditions, a public service obligation and to considerably restrict tariff freedom. These latter provisions have been used satisfactorily more than a hundred times since 1 January 1993 by several Member States, often at the request of developing regions that are keen to be served by adequate and uninterrupted air routes. Italy has not so far made use of these provisions on its domestic routes. (1) OJ L 240, 24. 8. 1992


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2048/1999 του Συμβουλίου, της 27ης Σεπτεμβρίου 1999, για την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 του Συμβουλίου για την επιβολή οριστικού δασμού αντιντάμπινγκ σε ορισμένες εισαγωγές απλών παλετών από ξύλο καταγωγής Δημοκρατίας της Πολωνίας

text: 30. 9. 1999 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων L 255/1 I (Πράξεις για την ισχύ των οποίων απαιτείται δηµοσίευση) ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2048/1999 ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ της 27ης Σεπτεµβρίου 1999 για την τροποποίηση του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 του Συµβουλίου για την επιβολή οριστικού δασµού αντιντάµπινγκ σε ορισµένες εισαγωγές απλών παλετών από ξύλο καταγωγής ∆ηµοκρατίας της Πολωνίας ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ, Έχοντας υπόψη: τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας, τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 384/96 του Συµβουλίου, της 22ας ∆εκεµβρίου 1995, για την άµυνα κατά των εισαγωγών που αποτε- λούν αντικείµενο ντάµπινγκ εκ µέρους χωρών µη µελών της Ευρω- παϊκής Κοινότητας (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 9 παράγραφος 4, τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 (2), και παράγραφοι 1 και 2, ιδίως το άρθρο 4 την πρόταση που υπέβαλε η Επιτροπή µετά από διαβουλεύσεις µε τη συµβουλευτική επιτροπή, Εκτιµώντας τα ακόλουθα: (1) Α. ΠΡΟΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΗ ∆ΙΑ∆ΙΚΑΣΙΑ Το Συµβούλιο, µε τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97, επέ- βαλε οριστικούς δασµούς αντιντάµπινγκ σε ορισµένες ει- σαγωγές απλών παλετών από ξύλο που υπάγονται στον κωδικό ΣΟ ex 4415 20 20 καταγωγής ∆ηµοκρατίας της Πολωνίας και αποδέχτηκε τις αναλήψεις υποχρεώσεων που πρότειναν ορισµένοι παραγωγοί σε σχέση µε αυτές τις ει- σαγωγές. Στους πολωνούς παραγωγούς-εξαγωγείς εφαρ- µόστηκε η τεχνική της δειγµατοληψίας και επιβλήθηκαν ατοµικοί δασµοί που κυµαίνονταν από 4,0 % έως 10,6 % στις εταιρείες του δείγµατος, ενώ σε άλλες συνεργαζόµενες εταιρείες που δεν συµπεριλήφθησαν στη δειγµατοληψία, εφαρµόστηκε µέσος σταθµισµένος δασµός 6,3 %. ∆ασµός 10,6 % επιβλήθηκε στις εταιρείες οι οποίες δεν αναγγέλθη- καν ούτε συνεργάστηκαν κατά τη διάρκεια της έρευνας. Οι παραγωγοί για τους οποίους έγιναν αποδεκτές οι αναλήψεις υποχρεώσεων, απηλλάγησαν από τους δασµούς αντιντά- µπινγκ όσον αφορά τις εισαγωγές ενός ειδικού τύπου παλετών, του τύπου EUR, που είναι ο µοναδικός τύπος που καλύπτεται από την ανάληψη υποχρέωσης. (2) Το άρθρο 4 παράγραφος 1 του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 αναφέρει ότι οποιοδήποτε µέρος παρέχει επαρκή αποδεικτικά στοιχεία στην Επιτροπή ότι: (1) ΕΕ L 56 της 6. 3. 1996, σ. 1· κανονισµός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 905/98 (ΕΕ L 128 της 30. 4. 1998, σ. 18). (2) ΕΕ L 324 της 27. 11. 1997, σ. 1· κανονισµός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τε- λευταία από τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2079/98 (ΕΕ L 266 της 1. 10. 1998, σ. 1). — δεν εξήγαγε στην Κοινότητα ή παρήγαγε τις παλέτες από ξύλο που περιγράφονται στο άρθρο 1 παράγραφος 1 αυτού του κανονισµού κατά την περίοδο της έρευνας, — δεν είναι συνδεδεµένο µε τους παραγωγούς ή εξαγωγείς στην Πολωνία που υπόκεινται σε δασµούς αντιντάµπινγκ που έχουν επιβληθεί µε αυτόν τον κανονισµό, — έχει πράγµατι εξάγει τα εν λόγω αγαθά στην Κοινότητα µετά την περίοδο της έρευνας, ή έχει συνάψει ανέκκλητο συµβατική υποχρέωση να εξάγει σηµαντικές ποσότητες στην Κοινότητα, τότε αυτός ο κανονισµός µπορεί να τροποποιηθεί µε τον καθορισµό γι’ αυτό το µέρος του συντελεστή του δασµού που εφαρµόζεται στους συνεργαζόµενους παραγωγούς οι οποίοι δεν συµπεριλαµβάνονται στο δείγµα, δηλαδή 6,3 %. Το άρθρο 4 παράγραφος 2 του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 προβλέπει ότι οποιοδήποτε µέρος πληροί τα κριτήρια που καθορίζονται στο άρθρο 4 παράγραφος 1, απαλλάσσεται από την καταβολή του δασµού αντιντάµπινγκ αν γίνει αποδεκτή ανάληψη υποχρέωσης από αυτό το µέρος όσον αφορά τις παλέτες του τύπου EUR. (3) Το Συµβούλιο, µε τον κανονισµό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2079/98 (3), τροποποίησε τα παραρτήµατα Ι και ΙΙ του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97. Β. ΑΙΤΗΜΑ ΝΕΩΝ ΕΞΑΓΩΓΕΩΝ (4) ∆εκατρείς πολωνοί παραγωγοί-εξαγωγείς που ζήτησαν την ίδια µεταχείρηση µε εκείνη που αφορά τις εταιρίες οι οποίες συνεργάστηκαν στην αρχική έρευνα αλλά δεν συµπεριελή- φθησαν στη δειγµατοληψία, παρείχαν, κατόπιν αιτήσεως, αποδεικτικά στοιχεία που έδειχναν ότι πληρούν τις απαιτή- σεις του άρθρου 4 παράγραφος 1 του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97. Τα αποδεικτικά στοιχεία που παρείχαν αυτές οι αιτούσες εταιρείες, θεωρούνται επαρκή ώστε να επιτρέψουν να τροποποιηθεί ο κανονισµός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/ 97, µε την προσθήκη αυτών των δεκατριών παραγωγών- εξαγωγέων στο παράρτηµα Ι του εν λόγω κανονισµού. Το παράρτηµα Ι προσδιορίζει τους παραγωγούς-εξαγωγείς που θα υπόκεινται σε µέσο σταθµισµένο δασµό 6,3 %. (3) ΕΕ L 266 της 1. 10. 1998, σ. 1. L 255/2 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 30. 9. 1999 (5) Πέντε από τους δεκατρείς πολωνούς παραγωγούς-εξαγωγείς, στους οποίους θα επιβληθεί µέσος σταθµισµέ- νος δασµός 6,3 % πρότειναν επίσης αναλήψεις υποχρεώσεων όσον αφορά τις παλέτες του τύπου EUR που γίνονται αποδεκτές µε την απόφαση της Επιτροπής 1999/642/ΕΚ (1). Συνεπώς, αυτές οι πέντε εταιρείες πρέπει να προστεθούν στο παράρτηµα ΙΙ του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97, που περιέχει κατάλογο εταιρειών για τις οποίες η Επιτροπή έχει αποδεχθεί τις αναλήψεις υποχρεώσεων όσον αφορά τις εισαγωγές παλετών του τύπου EUR και για τις οποίες εποµένως δεν ισχύει ο δασµός αυτός, ΕΞΕ∆ΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ: Άρθρο 1 Το παράρτηµα Ι του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 αντικαθίσταται από το παράρτηµα Ι του παρόντος κανονισµού. Το παράρτηµα ΙΙ του κανονισµού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2334/97 αντικαθίσταται από το παράρτηµα ΙΙ του παρόντος κανονισµού. Άρθρο 2 Ο παρών κανονισµός αρχίζει να ισχύει την επόµενη της δηµοσίευσής του στην Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων. Άρθρο 3 Ο παρών κανονισµός είναι δεσµευτικός ως προς όλα τα µέρη του και ισχύει άµεσα σε κάθε κράτος µέλος. Βρυξέλλες, 27 Σεπτεµβρίου 1999. Για το Συµβούλιο Ο Πρόεδρος K. HEMILÄ (1) Βλέπε σελίδα 36 της παρούσας Επίσηµης Εφηµερίδας. 30. 9. 1999 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων L 255/3 ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ I Κατασκευαστές 1. «Baum-Holz» Sp. zo. o. , Olsztyn 2. «DAST» GmbH, Poznan 3. Drew-Pol Export-Import, Wodarz Norbert, Murow 4. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S. C. , Snietnica 5. F. P. H. «Tina», Katowice 6. F. P. H. Tadeusz Fischer, Maly Gleboczek 7. F. P. U. H. «Rol-Mar», Adam Piatek, Klodzko 8. Z. P. H. U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 9. Internationale Paletten Company Sp. , Lebork 10. «Kross-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Kolobrzeg 11. P. P. U. H. «Drewmax» Sp. zo. o. (πρώην P. P. H. «Drewnex»), Krakow 12. P. P. H. «GKT» S. C. , Majdan Mowy 13. P. P. H. «Pamadex», Ligota 14. P. P. H. «Unikat», Aleksandrow IV 697 15. P. P. H. U. «Adapol» S. C. , Wolomin 16. P. P. U. H. «Alwa» Sp. zo. o. , Tychowo 17. P. P. U. H. «SMS» — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 18. P. T. H. «Mirex», Kolobrzeg 19. P. W. «Peteco» Sp. zo. o. , Warszawa 20. Parafia Rzymsko-Katolicka, B. Niepokalaneg Dzialalnose Gospodaroza, Nowm Sacz 21. Produkcja Palet «A. Adamus», Kuznia Grabowska 22. Produkcja Skup Palet Drewnanych, Stanislaw Lachowicz, Majdan Sieniawski 170 23. Przedsiebiorstwo «Amesko», Andrzej Skora, Trzebnica 24. P. H. U. «Justyna», Gubin 25. P. H. U. «Akropol», Krakow 26. P. H. U. Produkcyjne «Lech», Lech Szwez, Zazy 27. Przedsiebiorstwo Obrobki Drewna «Palet-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Dabrowka WLKP 28. P. P. H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 29. P. P. H. U. «AWA» Sp. zo. o. , Nowy Sacz 30. Przedsiebiorstwo Wielobranzowe, Zdziolaw Milocki, Ostroda 31. «Scanproduct» SA. , Czarny Dunajec 32. SC «Bed», Dariusz Zuk, Krasienin 33. S. U. T. R. «Rol Trak», Prochowice 34. Stolarstwo Export-Import, Tadeusz Swirski, Dlugopole Zdroj 35. Torunskie Przedsiebiorstwo Przemyslu Drzewnego w Toruniu, Adam Wisniewski, Torun 36. «Transdrewneks» Sp. zo. o. , Grudziadz-Owczarki 37. W. Z. P. U. M. «Euro-Tech», Rakszawa 38. Wytwazanie Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych, Malgorzata i Ryszard Nowak, Piaszyna 39. Zaklad Produkcyjno Bohoszko, Ryszard Bohuszko, Osno 40. Z. P. H. «Maw» SC. , Andrzej Kulej, Lubomierz 41. Zaklad Uslugowo-Handlowy «Rolmex», E. Cackowski, Lipno 42. Zaklad Wielobranzowy Produkcyjno Uslugowy, Ryszard Potoniec, Muszyna 43. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S. C. , Drawsko Pomorskie 44. Z. P. H. U. «Drewex» S. C. , Asnieszka Pawlaczyk, Skwierzyna 45. Z. P. H. U. «Sek-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Tarnobrzeg 46. «Euro-Mega-Plus» Sp. zo. o. , Kielce 47. «C. M. C. », Sp. zo. o. , Andrychow, Inwald L 255/4 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 30. 9. 1999 48. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 49. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gerka, Brodnica 50. Z. P. H. U. «Drewnex» S. C. , Zelazkow 45 b 51. Import-Export «Elko» Sp. zo. o. , Kalisz 52. P. P. H. U. «Probox», Import-Export, Lalisz 53. Drewpal S. C. , Stawiszyn 54. Zaman S. C. , Radom 55. «Marimpex», Pulawy 56. «AVEN» Sp. zo. o. , Kostrzyn 57. P. P. H. U. «Eurex» S. C. , Godynice 58. P. H. «Drewex» S. C. , Lebork 59. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 60. ENKEL S. C. , Pulawy 61. PAL-PACK Sp. zo. o. , Wierzchowo 62. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W. i. T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 63. Biuro Uslugowo-Handlowe, Wieslaw Rzezniczek, Lebork 64. P. P. U. H. «DREWPOL», Braszewice 65. PTN Kruklanki Sp. zo. o. , Kruklanki 66. WEDAM S. C. , Stezyca 67. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 68. Zaklad Produkcyjny «Tarta», Lubsko 69. Firma «Krausdrew», Cewice 70. «Lidal» S. C. , Miastko 71. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna Import-Export, Stanislaw Kociolek, Ladek Zdroj 72. P. P. H. U. «Alk», Bierzwnik 73. «Empol» S. C. , Jastrzebniki 37 74. Zaklad Producji Drzewnej Nr. 1, Export-Import, Julian Bartkowski, Sanok 75. P. P. H. «Drewex», Czarnkow 76. «ZAP» Przedsiebiorstwo Handlowe-Uslugowe Sp. C, Wschowa 77. P. P. H. U. «Opal», Zygmunt Podgorski, Bukowsko 41 78. «Alega-Pol», Sp. zo. o. , Lubsko 79. P. P. H. «A-Produkt» S. C. , Resko 80. PPH «Paletex» Sibinski Jaroslaw, Czajkow 81. Euro-Handels Sp. zo. o. , Szczecin 82. Firma «KIKO» S. C. , Poznan 83. «Enkel» Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 84. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 85. Firma Borkowski S. C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 86. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 87. «Prodpalet» Handel, Boleslawiec 88. Z. P. H. U. «Drexport» S. C. , Olecko, Osiedle Lesk 89. «Bilusa» Sp. zo. o, Klodawa 90. Pawel Bilko «Pablo», Klodawa 91. ZPW «Gober» Sp. zo. o. , Gorzow Wlkp. 92. Kisiel Malgorzata «Drew-Pal», Dobra Now 93. P. W. «Remag», Zlocieniec 94. PPUH PAL-POL S. C. , Prabuty 95. Firma «A. C. S. » S. C. , Kamien 96. Zaklad Produkcji Skrzyn i Opakowan Drewnianych Szuta Marian, Kawcze 97. P. T. P. U. H. «ROB-POL», Milkow 98. Z. H. U. P. Agromal, Sieradz 99. SMT Sp. zo. o, Miastko 30. 9. 1999 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων L 255/5 100. Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 101. Artur Rochmankowski, Trzcinsko-Zdroj 102. «Depo» Sp. zo. o, Ilowa 103. B. P. R. Sp. zo. o, Warszawa 104. «DREWNO», Sp. zo. o, Krzeszyce 105. P. P. H. «Astra» Sp. zo. o, Nowy Sacz 106. «D&M&D» Sp. zo. o, Blizanow 107. P. P. H. «Vector», Kalisz 108. «Palko» Sp. zo. o, Sedziszow 109. P. P. H. Pol-Wood S. C. , Rzekun L 255/6 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων 30. 9. 1999 ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ II Κατασκευαστές Πρόσθετος κωδικός Taric 1. «Baum-Holz» Sp. zo. o. , Olsztyn 2. E. Dziurny — C. Nowak S. C. , Snietnica 3. F. P. H. «Tina» S. C. , Katowice 4. Firma «Sabelmar» S. C. , Konczyce Male 5. Z. P. H. U. Miroslaw Przybyiek, Klonowa 6. Internationale Paletten Company Sp. , Lebork 7. «Kross-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Kolobrzeg 8. P. P. U. H. «Drewmax» Sp. zo. o. (formerly P. P. H. «Drewnex»), Krakow 9. P. P. H. «GKT» S. C. , Majdan Nowy 10. P. P. H. «Pamadex», Ligota 11. P. P. H. «Unikat», Aleksandrow IV 697 12. P. P. H. U. «Adapol» S. C. , Wolomin 13. P. P. U. H. «Alpa» Sp. zo. o. , Dobrzyca 14. P. P. U. H. «Alwa» Sp. zo. o. , Tychowo 15. P. P. U. H. «Palimex» Sp. zo. o. , Wloszakowice 16. P. P. U. H. «SMS» — St. Mrozowicz, Suleczyno 17. P. T. H. «Mirex», Kolobrzeg 18. P. W. «Intur-KFS» Sp. zo. o. , Inowroclaw 19. P. W. «Peteco» Sp. zo. o. , Warszawa 20. P. W. «Paletex» Produkcja Palet, Roman Panasiuk, Warszawa 21. Produkcja Palet «A. Adamus», Kuznia Grabowska 22. P. H. U. «Akropol», Krakow 23. P. P. H. Zygmunt Skibinski, Kowal 24. «Scanproduct» SA. , Czarny Dunajec 25. S. U. T. R. «Rol Trak», Prochowice 26. «Transdrewneks» Sp. zo. o. , Grudziadz-Owczarki 27. W. Z. P. U. M. «Euro-Tech», Rakszawa 28. Z. P. H. «Palettenwerk»—K. Kozik, Brystra Podhalanska 29. Zaklad Przerobu Drewna S. C. , Drawsko Pomorskie 30. Z. P. H. U. «Sek-Pol» Sp. zo. o. , Tarnobrzeg 31. «Euro-Mega-Plus» Sp. zo. o. , Kielce 8570 8571 8572 8573 8574 8575 8576 8577 8584 8585 8586 8587 8588 8589 8590 8591 8597 8662 8690 8691 8692 8713 8693 8715 8714 8716 8725 8726 8745 8526 8527 30. 9. 1999 EL Επίσηµη Εφηµερίδα των Ευρωπαϊκών Κοινοτήτων L 255/7 Κατασκευαστές Πρόσθετος κωδικός Taric 32. «C. M. C. », Sp. zo. o. , Andrychow, Imwald 33. Wyrob, Sprzedaz, Skup Palet, Josef Kolodziejczyk, Aleksandrow IV 704 34. Firma Produkcyjno Transportowa Marian Gierka, Brodnica 35. Z. P. H. U. «Drewnex» S. C. , Zelazkow 45 b 36. Import-Export «Elko» Sp. zo. o. , Kalisz 37. P. P. H. U. «Probox», Import-Export, Lalisz 38. Drewpal S. C. , Stawiszyn 39. Zaman S. C. , Radom 40. «Marimpex», Pulawy 41. «AVEN» Sp. zo. o. , Kostrzyn 42. P. P. H. U. «Eurex» S. C. , Godynice 43. MACED Sklad Palet, J. Macionga, Miastko 44. ENKEL S. C. , Pulawy 45. Produkcja Stolarska Posrednictwo Export-Import, W. i. T. HENSOLDT, Lebork 46. P. P. U. H. «DREWPOL», Braszewice 47. PTN Kruklanki Sp. zo. o. , Kruklanki 48. WEDAM S. C. , Stezyca 49. Import-Export Jan Sibinski, Czajkow 50. P. P. H. U. «Alk», Bierzwnik 51. «Empol» S. C. , Jastrzebniki 37 52. Euro-Handels Sp. zo. o. , Szczecin 53. PPH «Paletex» Sibinski Jarosklaw, Czajkow 54. Firma «KIKO» S. C. , Poznan 55. «Enkel» Waldemar Wnuk, Pulawy 56. Sliwka Lucyna, Klodzko 57. Firma Borkowski S. C. Export-Import, Grabow n. Prosna 58. Produkcja — Skup Elementow i Palet, Stanislaw Gorecki, Czajkow 59. «Bilusa» Sp. zo. o, Klodawa 60. PPUH PAL-POL S. C. , Prabuty 61. Firma «A. C. S. » S. C. , Kamien 62. «SMT» Sp. zo. o, Miastko 63. Firma Transdrewneks Gadzala Antoni, Torun 64. «Palko» Sp. zo. o, Sedziszow 65. «D&M&D» Sp. zo. o, Blizanow 66. P. P. H. «Vector», Kalisz 8528 8529 8530 8531 8532 8533 8534 8535 8537 8558 8538 8539 8540 8541 8834 8556 8557 8559 8561 8560 8440 8441 8443 8444 8445 8446 8483 8484 8485 8486 8562 8563 8565 8566 8567


title: Rådets slutsatser av den 27 september 1999 om självregleringens roll mot bakgrund av utvecklingen av nya medietjänster

eurovoc_concepts:
approximation of laws
audiovisual industry
pluralism in the media
selective dissemination of information

formats: html print


title: Act of the Management Board of Europol of 27 September 1999 laying down the rules on Europol personnel files

eurovoc_concepts:
Europol
confidentiality
cross-frontier data flow
disclosure of information
personal data
protection of privacy

text: 28. 2. 2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 65/1 (Acts adopted pursuant to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union) ACT OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF EUROPOL of 27 September 1999 laying down the rules on Europol personnel files (2001/C 65/01) THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF EUROPOL, Having regard to the Council Act of 3 December 1999 laying down the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (1), and in particular Article 23 thereof, Taking account of the principles established in the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 and of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (2), or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making avail- able, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure or destruction; (c) ‘personal data filing system’ (‘filing system’) means any structured set of personal data which are accessible according to specific centralised, decentralised or dispersed on a functional or geographical basis; criteria, whether Acting on a proposal from the Director, submitted after consultation with the Europol Staff Committee in accordance with Article 23, (d) ‘controller’ means the natural or legal person, public authority, agency or any other body which alone or jointly with others determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data; HAS ADOPTED THESE RULES: Article 1 Definitions For the purpose of these rules: (a) ‘personal data’ means any information related to an identified or identifiable individual: an identifiable individ- ual shall be a person whose identity can be determined, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identification number or to one or more factors specific to his/her physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity; (b) ‘processing of personal data’ (‘processing’) means any operation or set of operations which is performed on personal data, whether or not by automated means, such as collection, recording, organisation, storage, adaptation (1) OJ C 26, 30. 1. 1999, p. 23. (2) OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31. (e) ‘processor’ means the person who processes personal data on behalf of the controller; (f) (g) ‘third party’ means any natural or legal person, public authority, agency or any body other than the data subject, the controller, the processor, and the persons who, under the direct authority of the controller or the processor are authorised to process the data; ‘recipient’ means a natural or legal person, public auth- ority, agency or any other body to whom data are disclosed, whether a third party or not; however, auth- orities which may receive data in the framework of a particular enquiry shall not be regarded as recipients; (h) ‘the data subject’s consent’ means any freely given specific and informed indication of his wishes by which the data subject signifies his agreement to personal data relating to him being processed. C 65/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28. 2. 2001 Article 2 (f) candidates handing in open applications; Name and purpose of the filing system; usage of data (g) trainees. The filing system is called the Europol personnel adminis- 1. tration system. 2. (a) Data may also be included on: spouses or ex-spouses of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1(a); 2. The purpose of the filing system is to carry out the administration of personnel working at or seconded to Euro- pol, as far as necessary in relation to their functioning at the organisation. The filing system shall be kept partly in auto- mated form, and partly in paper form. 3. Data included in the filing system may be used only where this is in line with the purpose of the filing system, is required on the basis of a legal provision, or with the consent of the person concerned. Article 3 Responsibilities 1. The Director of Europol shall be the controller of the filing system. He shall be responsible for ensuring that all persons under his authority shall operate the filing system and process the data included in it in accordance with these rules. 2. The responsibility for the day-to-day operating of the filing system shall rest with the Head of the Human Resources Unit, who shall be the processor for the filing system. He shall appoint the person(s) responsible for processing data in the filing system and ensuring that the data are complete, accurate and up-to-date. Article 4 Categories of persons Data may be included in the filing system on the 1. following categories of persons: (a) Europol staff, including local staff; (b) Europol liaison officers; (c) experts or other officers seconded to Europol under the responsibility of the Member States; (d) personnel hired through outside agencies for temporary work; (e) candidates applying for vacancies; (b) dependent child(ren), as mentioned in Article 2(2) of Appendix 5 to the Staff Regulations, of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1(a); (c) other relatives of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1(a) as far as they are considered as dependent children in Article 2(4) of Appendix 5 to the Staff Regulations; (d) other persons who have been awarded custody of the legitimate, natural or adopted child(ren) of the persons mentioned in paragraph 1(a); as far as data on those persons are relevant for the calculation of or entitlement to allowances, or as contact person in case of emergency. 3. Data may also be included on contact persons in cases of emergency of all other categories of persons mentioned in paragraph 1. Article 5 Categories of data On the categories of persons mentioned in Article 4(1), 1. with the exception of Europol liaison officers, the following categories of data may be stored: (a) (b) (c) identification data comprising name, maiden name, date and place of birth, country and place of origin, nationality, marital status, address, private telephone number, ‘Sofi- nummer’ (social security number in the Netherlands), bank- or giro-account number, name, address and tele- phone number of contact person in case of emergency; curriculum vitae information supplied by the persons mentioned in Article 4, such as education, exams, former work experience, expert knowledge and training, work- related training, competent authority of origin and start- ing date at Europol/EDU; career description including description of recruitment procedure, written test with result, the outcome of the training, screening procedure, contracts, promotions, assessment, disciplinary or job description and reference checks; similar procedures, (d) information on absences from work, holiday periods, periods of illness, or other periods of leave; 28. 2. 2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 65/3 (e) medical information of relevance to the post, as far as (c) the organisation itself; supplied by the person concerned; information concerning a pre-contract medical check-up or information necessary for the preparation of re-entry of the person concerned in his function as far as supplied by the Arbo Management Group or any other company or person employed by Europol in relation to the health situation in Article 4(1)(a); information on the official’s date of registration in the Netherlands and places and dates of main residence during the five and a half years before joining Europol/ EDU, where necessary for calculating the expatriation allowance; (d) (e) security screening authorities as far as the outcome of the screening procedure is concerned; the Arbo Management Group or any other company or person employed by Europol in relation to the health situation of the persons mentioned in Article 4(1)(a). Article 7 Review and storage periods of data information on rent levels and persons sharing the official’s accommodation, where necessary for calculating rent allowances; 1. The data included in the filing system shall be subject to review once every year to ascertain that they are still necessary for the purpose of the filing system, accurate and up-to-date. (f) (g) (h) (i) information on the custody of any dependent child(ren) as mentioned in Article 2(2) of Appendix 5 to the Staff Regulations of the persons mentioned in Article 4(1)(a), including information on allowances for these children received from other sources, as far as relevant for the calculation of household or child allowances; (j) information on salaries and allowances, as far as the salary administration of such persons is carried out at Europol. 2. On Europol liaison officers only the identification data as mentioned under point (a) will be stored. Information as mentioned under (b) and (d) may be stored, as far as such information is supplied by the person concerned or the Member State seconding the liaison officer. On the persons mentioned in Article 4(2) only the 3. data mentioned under point (a) may be stored, including information on salaries, and any additional information which is relevant for the purpose of calculating allowances. Article 6 Source of the data The data mentioned in Article 5 shall be collected from the following sources: (a) the persons mentioned in Article 4; (b) former employers, with the consent of the person con- cerned; 2. Data included in the filing system will be deleted if it is established that they are no longer necessary for its purpose. If it is established that the data concerned are incorrect or no longer up-to-date, they will be amended as necessary. The total storage time for data may not exceed a period 3. of six months when it concerns ‘open applicants’, one year for non-selected applicants for vacancies, and five years after payments of salaries, allowances or pensions from Europol have ceased for other categories. Article 8 Persons to whom data may be supplied 1. Data included in the filing system may be supplied to: (a) Directorate members, as far as necessary in relation to their management responsibilities for a particular person; (b) Member States’ seconding authorities, as far as necessary for the purpose of career planning of the person con- cerned; (c) (d) the Europol Finance Unit as far as necessary for the administration of salaries, allowances or pensions; companies that have a contract with Europol to adminis- ter social security benefits as stipulated in the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (sickness and accident insurance, insurance against invalidity and death, retirement pension, invalidity and life assurance) as far as necessary for the administration of these benefits. C 65/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28. 2. 2001 2. Data included in the filing system may be transmitted to third parties where this is in line with the purpose of the filing system, is required on the basis of a legal provision, or with the consent of the person concerned. A record shall be kept of all such transmissions. Article 13 Right of access Article 9 Direct access Data included in the filing system may be accessed 1. directly by the persons mentioned in Article 3(2). 2. All log-ins into the automated part of the system by the persons mentioned in paragraph 1 will be recorded. These data will only be used for control purposes, and will be deleted after one year. 1. Any individual wishing to exercise his right of access to data relating to him or to have such data checked may make a written request to that effect to the processor. A written answer to this request must be provided within four weeks of its receipt. 2. Access to such data may only be refused where this is strictly necessary to safeguard the interests of Europol, or to safeguard the rights of third parties. 3. If access is denied, or no answer is received within the time period specified in paragraph 1, the enquirer may put the matter to the controller. The controller shall take a final decision on the issue within four weeks after the issue has been brought before him, and shall inform the enquirer of his decision in writing. Article 10 Direct data transfer Article 14 Correction and deletion The filing system will allow direct data transfer to and 1. from the Europol finance system for the purpose of Europol’s financial administration. Direct data transfer may only take place as far as necessary for the administration of salaries, allowances and pensions. The filing system will not allow direct data transfer to 2. any other filing system. Article 11 Data security The processor shall be responsible for taking appropriate security measures for the protection of personal data stored in the Europol personnel administration system against accidental or unauthorised destruction or accidental loss as well as against unauthorised access, alteration or dissemination. Article 12 Information on collection of data The persons mentioned in Article 4 will be informed of the categories of data that are processed, the purposes of the processing, the recipients of the data and of the specific rights of the data subjects as stated in Articles 13 to 15. 1. The person to whom access to data concerning him has been granted in accordance with Article 13 may request the processor in writing to correct, supplement or delete such data if they are factually incorrect, incomplete or irrelevant for the the filing system or have been included in purpose of contravention of this Regulation. 2. The processor shall inform the enquirer in writing within four weeks of the receipt of the request if, and if so, to what extent, his request has been fulfilled. If the requested correction, supplementation or deletion 3. is denied, or no answer is received within the time period specified in paragraph 1, the enquirer may put the matter to the controller. The controller shall take a final decision on the issue within four weeks after the issue has been brought before him, and shall inform the enquirer of his decision in writing. Article 15 Right to be informed on third parties to whom data have been transmitted The processor shall inform the person concerned of any 1. transmission of data concerning him to third parties in accordance with Article 8(2). Furthermore, any individual shall have the right to request the processor in writing to inform him which data concerning him have been transmitted to third parties in accordance with Article 8(2). A written answer to this request must be provided within four weeks of its receipt. 28. 2. 2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 65/5 2. Access to information on transmissions to third parties may only be refused where this is strictly necessary to safeguard the interests of Europol, or to safeguard the rights of third parties. If access to the requested information is denied, or 3. no answer is received within the time period specified in paragraph 1, the enquirer may put the matter to the controller. The controller shall take a final decision on the issue within four weeks after the issue has been brought before him, and shall inform the enquirer of his decision in writing. Article 16 Appeals Decisions taken under these rules may be subject of a complaint to the Director under Article 92 of the Staff Regulations and of an appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Communities under the conditions laid down in Article 93 of the Staff Regulations. Article 17 Applicable law In accordance with Article 4 of the Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Police Office (Europol) concerning the headquarters of Europol, the data protection legislation of the host State shall not be applicable to personal data held by Europol for administrative purposes. Article 18 Publication and entry into force 1. These rules will be made available to all persons men- tioned in Article 4 through its electronic publication on the Europol network. A paper copy may be obtained from the Human Resources Unit. These rules shall enter into force on the day after their 2. adoption. Done at The Hague, 27 September 1999. For the Management Board of Europol The President K. RANTAMA