title: 1999/478/EC: Commission Decision of 14 July 1999 renewing the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (notified under document number C(1999) 2042)

eurovoc_concepts:
advisory committee (EU)
appointment of members
aquaculture
common fisheries policy
professional association

formats: html pdf print

text: L 187/70 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20. 7. 1999 COMMISSION DECISION of 14 July 1999 renewing the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (notified under document number C(1999) 2042) (1999/478/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Article 1 (1) Whereas it is important for the Commission to obtain the reactions of the interests concerned on the questions raised by the establishment of a common fisheries policy (CFP); 1. An Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture is set up within the Commission, made up of one plenary committee hereafter referred to as ‘the Committee’ and four working groups referred to in Article 7. fisheries (2) Whereas an advisory committee (ACF) was created in the Commission Decision by 71/128/EEC (1) the text of which as last replaced by by Decision as Decision 97/246/EC (3); 89/4/EEC (2), amended sector (3) Whereas it appears opportune to widen, within the framework of the ACF, the dialogue on the development and management of the CFP to all parties concerned, in particular to the aquaculture sector and non-profes- sionnal organisations; whereas for this purpose it is necessary to re-examine the structure of the Committee; (4) Whereas, in order to encourage the formulation of analyses and of joint positions on the CFP, it is useful to invite the members of ACF to deal first of all with questions of concern to them; (5) Whereas in the interests of efficiency it is necessary to limit the number of members of the Committee; (6) Whereas it is useful to improve the dialogue by means of a better link between the plenary committee, assigned to direct the work of the Committee and to express opinions, charged with preparing these opinions; and the working groups (7) Whereas the mandate of the members of the Committee expires on 31 July 1999 at the end of a transitional the aforementioned period set Committee and that it is therefore appropriate to amend the text of the Decision in the sense indicated above; the reform of for 2. The Committee is composed of representatives of the following interests: professional organisations representing the producer companies, the processing industry and traders in fishery and aquaculture products and non-professional organ- isations representing the interests of consumers, the environ- ment and development. Experts of 3. representing scientific and/or economic bodies, banking and first point-of-sale are represented in the groups defined in Article 7. the fisheries sector Article 2 The Committee may be consulted by the Commission on or take up, at the initiative of its chairman or at the request of one or more of its members, questions concerning the rules of the common fisheries policy and in particular measures that the Commission may take in the framework of such rules as well as economic and social questions in the fisheries sector, apart from those which concern, as social partners, employers and workers. Article 3 The committee is composed of 20 members hereafter referred to as ‘the members’. 1. One seat is allotted to each of the 11 following interests, numbered from (1) to (11). For each of these 11 seats a full member and a deputy member is foreseen: (8) Whereas in the interests of clarity the text of Decision 71/128/EEC should be replaced, Fishing companies: 1) private shipowners Professional organisations: (1) OJ L 68, 22. 3. 1971, p. 18. (2) OJ L 5, 7. 1. 1989, p. 33. (3) OJ L 97, 12. 4. 1997, p. 27. 2) co-operative shipowners 3) producers organisations 20. 7. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 187/71 Aquaculture companies: 4) stock-breeders of mul- luscs and shellfish 5) stock-breeders of fish Downstream companies: 6) processors Trade unions: 7) traders (import/export and wholesalers) 8) fishermen and salaried employees of those companies Non-professional organisations concerned with the CFP: 9) consumers 10) environment 11) development 2. The following also have a seat on the Committee: the chairman and the vice-chairman of the Fisheries sectorial dialogue committee (1), the chairman and vice-chairman of working groups 1, 3 and 4, as referred to in Article 7, and the chairman of working group 2 as referred to in Article 7. Article 4 The members of the Committee are appointed by the 1. Commission on proposals from the organisations set up at Community level which are most representative of the interests specified in Article 3(1). The consumers' representative is proposed by the consumers' (2) committee. For each seat to be filled, except for the seats reserved for the sectoral dialogue committee on fisheries, the organisations shall propose two candidates of different nationality. For the seats allotted to the interests foreseen by Article 3(1) the proposals shall specify the name of the full member and that of the substitute. The term of office for a member of the Committee shall be three years. It may be renewable. The functions carried out are not subject to remuneration. After expiry of the three-year period, the members of the Committee remain in office until their replacement or the renewal of their mandate has been decided on. The mandate of a member comes to an end before the expiry of the three-year period through resignation or death. It may also be terminated when the body which put forward the member's candidacy requests that he or she be replaced. A person shall be appointed in accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 1 to replace such a member for the remainder of his or her term of office. The list of the Committee shall be 2. published by the Commission for information purposes in the Official Journal of the European Communities. the members of Article 5 The Committe shall elect, for a three-year duration, one chairman and two vice-chairmen. The election shall take place by a majority of two thirds of the members present. The members of the Committee referred to in Article 3(2) shall, with the exception of the shipowner member of the sectoral dialogue committee, make up the bureau of the Committee. The bureau shall elects its chairman and prepare and organise the activities of the working groups referred to in Article 7. Article 6 At the request of one of the organisations referred to in Article 4(1), the chairman may invite a delegate of this organisation to attend the meetings of the Committee. He or she may under the same conditions invite to take part in the work of the Committee as an expert any person having particular authority on one of the subjects on the agenda. Deputy members may participate at their own expense. the meetings as observers and at Article 7 The Committee shall appoint four working groups in order to prepare its opinions. The names of these groups as well as their chairmanships and composition appear in the annex to this decision. In agreement with the Commission, the participants in the working groups shall be chosen according to the agenda of each meeting by the most representative organisations set up at Community level. The representatives of biology or of the economy shall be chosen by the STECF (3). The Commission may, according to the agenda, designate additional experts. Article 8 1. The Committee shall meet on notification by the Commission according to an annual work programme adopted in agreement with the Commission. The bureau shall meet on notification by its chairman and in agreement with the Commission. 2. The representatives of the Commission services shall take part in the meetings of the Committee, the bureau and of the working groups. 3. The Commission services shall provide the secretariat of the Committee, of the bureau and of the working groups. (1) OJ L 225, 12. 8. 1998, p. 27 (98/500/EC). (2) OJ L 162, 13. 7. 1995, p. 37. (3) OJ L 297, 2. 12. 1993, p. 25. L 187/72 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20. 7. 1999 In agreement with the Commission, the Committee shall 4. draw up rules concerning the implementation of the work programme, the preparation of meetings, the location of meet- ings, reports, positions or conclusions and the formulation of opinions or recommendations. Article 9 The Committee shall be required to give an opinion on the proposals formulated by the Commission as well as on the subjects appearing in its work programme. The Commission, in requesting the opinion of the Committee, may fix the period in which the opinion will have to be delivered. The positions of the concerned interests shall appear in a report forwarded forwarded to the Commission. If the required opinion is the subject of a unanimous agree- ment of the Committee, it shall establish joint conclusions which shall be attached to the report. Article 10 Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty, the members of the Committee as well as those of the information working groups shall be required not to reveal they have received through the work of the Committee or the working groups, in the event that the Commission informs them that the required opinion or the question raised deals with a confidential matter. In this event, only the members of the Committee and repre- sentatives of the Commission services may attend the meetings. Article 11 Decisions 71/128/EEC and 97/247/EC (1) are repealed. Article 12 This Decision shall enter into force on 1 August 1999. Done at Brussels, 14 July 1999. For the Commission Emma BONINO Member of the Commission (1) OJ L 97, 12. 4. 1997, p. 28. 20. 7. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 187/73 ANNEX working groups referred to in Article 7 1. Names of the working groups Group 1: Access to fisheries resources and management of fishing activity. Group 2: Aquaculture: fish, shellfish and molluscs. Group 3: Markets and trade policy. Group 4: General questions: economics and sectoral analysis. 2. Chairmen and vice-chairmen A representative of the private shipowners shall chair working groups 1 and 4. A representative of the cooperative shipowners shall be vice-chairman of working group 1. A representative of the stock-breeders of fish and a representative of the stock-breeders of molluscs/shellfish shall alternatively chair and vice-chair working group 2. A representative of the processors shall chair working group 3. A representative of the traders shall chair working group 4. A representative of the producer organisations shall vice-chair working group 3. 3. Number of seats per interest concerned : Private shipowners Cooperative shipowners Employed fishermen Producer organisations Stock-breeders of fish Mollusc/shellfish stock-breeders Processors Traders Consumers Environment Development Biology Economy Banks Auctions and ports Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 5 3 2 1 — — — — — 1 1 1 1 — — 15 — — 1 — 6 4 — — 1 1 — 1 1 — — 15 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 — 1 1 1 19 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 — 1 1 — 18 The Commission may designate additional experts according to the agenda


title: Komission asetus (EY) N:o 1542/1999, annettu 14 päivänä heinäkuuta 1999, oliiviöljyn tosiasiallisen tuotannon ja yksikkökohtaisen tuotantotuen määrän vahvistamisesta markkinointivuodeksi 1997/1998

eurovoc_concepts:
marketing
olive oil
production aid
regulation of agricultural production

text: L 180/4 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 15. 7. 1999 KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 1542/1999, annettu 14 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) hein(cid:132)kuuta 1999, oliivi(cid:148)ljyn tosiasiallisen tuotannon ja yksikk(cid:148)kohtaisen tuotantotuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)n vahvistamisesta mark- kinointivuodeksi 1997/1998 EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:153)JEN KOMISSIO, joka 4) ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopimuksen, ottaa huomioon rasva-alan yhteisest(cid:132) markkinaj(cid:132)rjestelyst(cid:132) 22 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) syyskuuta 1966 annetun neuvoston asetuksen 136/ 66/ETY (1), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuk- sella (EY) N:o 1638/98 (2), ottaa huomioon asetuksen (EY) N:o 1638/98 ja erityisesti sen 3 artiklan 1 kohdan, sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) 1) 2) 3) asetuksella (EY) N:o 1638/98 otettiin k(cid:132)ytt(cid:148)(cid:148)n rasva- alan yhteist(cid:132) markkinaj(cid:132)rjestely(cid:132) koskevia merkitt(cid:132)vi(cid:132) muutoksia 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) marraskuuta 1998 alkaen; erityi- sesti oliivi(cid:148)ljyn tuotantotukij(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)(cid:132) muokattiin; on tarpeen s(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:132)(cid:132) markkinointivuoden 1997/1998 tuotan- totukea koskevien, mainitun markkinointivuoden lopussa sovellettavien s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten t(cid:132)yt(cid:132)nt(cid:148)(cid:148)npanosta, jotta ennen 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)(cid:132) marraskuuta 1998 voimassa olleista j(cid:132)rjestelmist(cid:132) voidaan sujuvasti siirty(cid:132) kyseisen p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)n j(cid:132)lkeen olemassa oleviin j(cid:132)rjestelmiin, tuotantotukea on alennettava, asetuksen N:o 136/66/ETY 5 artiklassa, sellaisena kuin se on voimassa 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1998, s(cid:132)(cid:132)det(cid:132)(cid:132)n, ett(cid:132) jos yksikk(cid:148)kohtaista markkinointivuoden tosiasiallinen tuotanto ylitt(cid:132)(cid:132) kysei- seksi markkinointivuodeksi vahvistetun taatun enim- m(cid:132)ism(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)n; t(cid:132)llainen alennus ei kuitenkaan koske tuot- tajia, joiden oliivi(cid:148)ljyn keskituotanto on alle 500 kilo- grammaa markkinointivuotta kohden, neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2261/84 (3), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 1639/98 (4), 17 a artiklassa, sellaisena kuin se on voimassa 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1998, s(cid:132)(cid:132)det(cid:132)(cid:132)n, ett(cid:132) oliivi(cid:148)ljyn yksikk(cid:148)kohtaisen tuotantotuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)n, joka voidaan maksaa ennakolta, m(cid:132)(cid:132)ritt(cid:132)miseksi on tarpeen vahvistaa arvioitu kyseisen markkinointivuoden tuotanto; arvioitu tuotanto ja yksikk(cid:148)kohtaisen tuotan- totuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132), joka voidaan maksaa ennakolta, on mark- kinointivuodeksi 1997/1998 vahvistettu komission asetuksessa (EY) N:o 2095/98 (5), (1) EYVL 172, 30. 9. 1996, s. 3025/66. (2) EYVL L 210, 28. 7. 1998, s. 32. (3) EYVL L 208, 3. 8. 1984, s. 3. (4) EYVL L 210, 28. 7. 1998, s. 38. (5) EYVL L 266, 1. 10. 1998, s. 62. tukeen, on m(cid:132)(cid:132)ritelt(cid:132)v(cid:132) asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2261/84 17 a artiklan 3 kohdan mukaisesti, sellaisena kuin se on voimassa 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1998, tosiasiallinen tuotanto, jolle on my(cid:148)n- netty oikeus viimeist(cid:132)(cid:132)n kahdeksan kuukauden kuluttua markkinointivuoden p(cid:132)(cid:132)ttymisest(cid:132); t(cid:132)t(cid:132) varten niiden j(cid:132)senvaltioiden, joita asia koskee, on komission asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3061/ 84 (6), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuk- sella (EY) N:o 2455/97 (7), 12 a artiklan s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten mukaisesti ilmoitettava kyseisess(cid:132) j(cid:132)senvaltiossa tukeen oikeutettu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) komissiolle kutakin markkinointivuotta seuraavaan 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)(cid:132)n toukokuuta menness(cid:132); n(cid:132)iden ilmoitusten mukaan tukeen oikeutettu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) markki- nointivuonna 1997/1998 on Italiassa 712 847 tonnia, Ranskassa 2 480 tonnia, Kreikassa 492 364 tonnia, Espanjassa 1 147 000 tonnia ja Portugalissa 39 600 tonnia, 5) 6) 7) n(cid:132)iden m(cid:132)(cid:132)rien oikeuttaminen tukeen j(cid:132)senvaltioissa edellytt(cid:132)(cid:132), ett(cid:132) asetuksissa (ETY) N:o 2261/84 ja (ETY) N:o 3061/84 tarkoitetut tarkastukset on suoritettu; tosi- asiallisen tuotannon vahvistaminen j(cid:132)senvaltzioiden ilmoittamien, tukeen oikeutettuja m(cid:132)(cid:132)ri(cid:132) koskevien tietojen perusteella ei kuitenkaan rajoita johtop(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:148)ksi(cid:132), joita saatetaan tehd(cid:132) tarkastettaessa kyseisten tietojen oikeellisuutta tilien tarkastamisen ja hyv(cid:132)ksymisen yhteydess(cid:132), tosiasiallinen tuotanto huomioon ottaen on syyt(cid:132) vahvistaa my(cid:148)s yksikk(cid:148)kohtaisen tuotantotuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132), josta s(cid:132)(cid:132)det(cid:132)(cid:132)n asetuksen N:o 136/66/ETY 5 artiklan 1 kohdan viidennen alakohdan b alakohdassa, sellaisena ja kuin se on voimassa 31 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1998, t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) asetuksessa s(cid:132)(cid:132)detyt hallintokomitean lausunnon mukaiset, toimenpiteet ovat rasvojen ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla Oliivi(cid:148)ljyn markkinointivuonna 1997/1998 — tosiasiallinen tuotanto, jolle on my(cid:148)nnetty oikeus tuotanto- tukeen on 2 394 291 tonnia, — yksikk(cid:148)kohtaisen tuotantotuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) on 80,17 EUR 100 kilogrammalta. (6) EYVL L 288, 1. 11. 1984, s. 52. (7) EYVL L 340, 11. 12. 1997, s. 26. 15. 7. 1999 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 180/5 T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan seitsem(cid:132)nten(cid:132) p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) sen j(cid:132)lkeen, kun se on julkaistu Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:132). 2 artikla T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa j(cid:132)senval- tioissa. Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 14 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) hein(cid:132)kuuta 1999. Komission puolesta Franz FISCHLER Komission j(cid:132)sen


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1541/1999 af 14. juli 1999 om interventionstærsklen for æbler for produktionsåret 1999/2000

eurovoc_concepts:
guarantee threshold
market intervention
marketing year
pip fruit

text: 15. 7. 1999 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 180/3 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 1541/1999 af 14. juli 1999 om interventionstærsklen for æbler for produktions(cid:134)ret 1999/2000 KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — under henvisning til traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, under henvisning til R(cid:134)dets forordning (EF) nr. 2200/96 af 28. oktober 1996 om den fælles markedsordning for frugt og grøntsager (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1257/ 1999 (2), særlig artikel 27, stk. 1 og 2, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: (1) (2) (3) Ifølge artikel 27, stk. 1, i forordning (EF) nr. 2200/96 fastsættes der en interventionstærskel, n(cid:134)r markedet for et produkt, der er nævnt i bilag II til nævnte forordning, er ramt af eller kan forudses at blive ramt af uligevægt, som medfører eller kan medføre for store tilbagekøb; en s(cid:134)dan udvikling kan skabe budgetvanskeligheder for EF; for æbler fastsat en interventionstærskel der blev ved Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1547/ 98 (3), for produktions(cid:134)ret 1998/99; da betingelserne i ovennævnte artikel 27 fortsat er opfyldt for æbler, bør der ogs(cid:134) for produktions(cid:134)ret 1999/2000 fastsættes en interventions- tærskel for dette produkt ud fra en procentdel af den gennemsnitlige produktion til konsum i frisk tilstand i de sidste fem produktions(cid:134)r, som der foreligger oplys- ninger for; det bør for det p(cid:134)gældende produkt ligeledes fastsættes, hvilken periode der skal lægges til grund for beregning af interventionstærsklens overskridelse; efter ovennævnte artikel 27 medfører en overskridelse af interventionstærsklen, EF-tilbagekøbsgodtgørelsen nedsættes i produktions(cid:134)ret efter tærsklens overskridelse; det bør fastsl(cid:134)s, hvilke følger denne overskridelse f(cid:134)r for produktet, ligesom der bør foretages en nedsættelse, der at er proportional med overkridelsen, med et loft p(cid:134) en vis procentsats; (4) de i denne forordning fastsatte foranstaltninger er i over- ensstemmlse med udtalelse fra Forvaltningskomit(cid:130)en for Friske Frugter og Grøntsager — UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 Interventionstærsklen for æbler fastsættes for produk- 1. tions(cid:134)ret 1999/2000 til 486 900 t. 2. af tilbagekøbene i perioden 1. Interventionstærsklens overskridelse beregnes p(cid:134) grundlag juni 1999 til 31 maj 2000. Artikel 2 Hvis den tilbagekøbte mængde i den periode, der er fastlagt i artikel 1, stk. 2, overstiger den tærskel, der er fastsat i artikel 1, stk. 1, nedsættes EF-tilbagekøbsgodtgørelsen som fastsat efter følgende artikel 26 i produktions(cid:134)r proportionalt med overskridelsens omfang i forhold til den produktion, der er lagt til grund for beregningen af den p(cid:134)gældende tærskel. forordning (EF) nr. 2200/96 for det EF-tilbagekøbsgodtgørelsen kan dog højst nedsættes med 30 %. Artikel 3 Denne forordning træder i kraft p(cid:134) dagen for offentliggørelsen i De Europœiske Fœllesskabers Tidende. Denne medlemsstat. forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 14. juli 1999. P(cid:134) Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT L 297 af 21. 11. 1996, s. 1. (2) EFT L 160 af 26. 6. 1999, s. 80. (3) EFT L 202 af 18. 7. 1998, s. 23


title: 2000/194/EC: Commission Decision of 14 July 1999 on aid granted by Germany to Weida Leder GmbH (Weida), Thuringia (notified under document number C(1999) 3441) (Text with EEA relevance) (Only the German text is authentic)

eurovoc_concepts:
Germany
State aid
control of State aid
infringement of EU law
leather industry
water treatment

text: L 61/4 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8. 3. 2000 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 14 July 1999 on aid granted by Germany to Weida Leder GmbH (Weida), Thuringia (notified under document number C(1999) 3441) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2000/194/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof, Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof, Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above (1), Whereas: in 1995/1996 before notifying the Commission thereof, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty. The case was therefore registered on 4 March 1997 under NN 30/97. (3) By letter dated 2 March 1998, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid. The Commission Decision to initiate the proce- dure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (2). The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid. It received no such comments from interested parties. I. PROCEDURE (4) By letter dated 26 June 1998, Germany informed the Commission that the firm had filed for bankruptcy on 28 May 1998. (1) By letter dated 12 March 1996, registered as received on 21 March, Germany informed the Commission of a DEM 5 million loan to Weida Leder GmbH (Weida), Thuringia, which was intended to finance restructuring measures. By letters dated 11 April, 28 May, 3 July and 26 August 1996 and 6 March 1997, the Commission requested further information, which Germany provided by letters dated 25 July, 30 October and 7 November 1996 and 20 January and 26 May 1997. Further infor- mation was supplied in September 1997 at a meeting between the Commission and the German authorities. (2) The aid was first registered under N 242/96. However, it emerged from the information provided by Germany that Thuringia had already made aid available to the firm II. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID (5) Weida Leder GmbH (Weida) was formed from the former VEB Lederwerke Weida, which had been trans- formed into Lederwerke Weida GmbH in 1990. The main activity of the firm, located in the municipality of Weida (Thuringia), was to produce leather for the furni- ture industry. The region has high unemployment (17 %), and was classified as an Objective 1 area for the purposes of Community regional policy (areas which are underdeveloped by Community standards), so that it is (1) OJ C 256, 14. 8. 1998, p. 7. (2) See footnote 1. 8. 3. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 61/5 eligible for regional aid under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty (1). Until recently, the firm employed 97 people. Weida is almost the sole user of the plant in terms of the volumes of waste it feeds into it. (6) (7) (8) (9) A first attempt at privatising the firm failed in 1993, after which the firm's shares were returned to the port- folio of the Treuhandanstalt. On 1 October 1993, bank- ruptcy proceedings were initiated. to establish the firm on the In order, nevertheless, market and to find a suitable buyer in the meantime, the Land of Thuringia launched a rescue that it supported on a sustained basis for reasons of structural and labour- market policy as a means of ensuring the continued existence in the extremely structurally weak area of eastern Thuringia of the only fully integrated tannery in the new Länder. On 19 October 1993, Weida Leder GmbH was established: it took over the assets of the firm in respect of which bankruptcy proceedings had been initiated. The firm's shares were wholly owned by Elster Management GmbH & Co. Investitions- and Betei- ligungs KG (Elster KG). Because of the interrelationship between the companies involved, in particular the liabili- ties situation between Elster KG and the Thuringer institution governed by Aufbaubank (TAB), a credit public law and owned by the Land of Thuringia, it cannot be considered that a privatisation has as yet taken place. Because of the specific nature of the market, the Thuringian authorities' search for investors has so far proved unsuccessful. In order to remain in business and to carry out the restructuring measures planned for the period leading up to privatisation, the firm has, in recent years, carried out an investment programme and has received substantial aid for this purpose. However, despite all its financial efforts, Weida has been unable to consolidate its position. The planned turnover targets have not been met. The firm's results have also been unsatisfactory as far as its planned profits are concerned. Despite further aid intended to secure its liquidity and allow it to remain in business, the firm filed for bank- ruptcy on 28 May 1998. For the purpose of disposing of Weida's waste water and that of the other firms located on the site, the firm Abwasserreinigungsanlage Schlossmühlenweg Weida GmbH was set up, with 98 % of its shares being owned by Weida and the remaining 2 % by the municipality of Weida. This plant serves exclusively to treat the waste water of Weida and the other firms renting sites on the business park. Since the firms concerned are all service firms, they only produce urban waste water. Consequently, (1) Commission Decision 94/266/EC, OJ L 114, 5. 5. 1994, p. 21. (10) Between 1993 and 1997, Weida benefited from a variety of aid measures with the aim of stabilising the rescue carried out at the end of 1993 and improving its business structure in the context of negotiations with potential investors. (11) On 21 October 1993 the Land of Thuringia provided an outright grant of DEM 4,5 million under the SME investment safeguard programme, which was approved by the Commission on 26 November 1993 (N 408/ 93) (2), by way of initial funding to support the asset deal resulting from the bankruptcy proceedings. (12) On 7 March 1994, Thuringia took on a 90 % guarantee for a DEM 8 million loan (amount of aid: DEM 7,2 million) which the firm needed to consolidate its opera- tions. On 16 September 1994, the Land entered into a further 90 % guarantee in respect of a DEM 4 million loan (amount of aid: DEM 3,6 million). Both guarantees were underwritten by Bayerische Landesanstalt für Aufbaufinanzierung (LfA) on the basis of the Guarantee Regulation of the Land of Thuringia. The lenders were Dresdner Bank AG and Thüringer Aufbaubank (TAB), a public credit institution owned by the Land of Thuringia. The guaranteed loans were subsequently reallocated to other purposes on several occasions. In the end, DEM 6,5 million was used for investment and DEM 5,5 million for operating expenditure. Because of the time- limit placed on the guarantee for the TAB loan, the life of both loans was provisionally limited to 31 December 1997. The reason for this short life was the fact that efforts were being made to obtain refinancing from a commercial bank and, given the state of the firm even at the time when funds were provided for the loan, it could already be foreseen that it would not be possible to obtain such refinancing within a reasonable period, so that it would be necessary to extend the life of the loans and the guarantees. (13) (14) In addition to these investment and operating loans, the firm was provided with a further DEM 2 million loan from the consolidation fund (case NN 74/95) at the end of 1995 to cover the liquidity shortfalls which had arisen as a result of the firm's entry onto the market. Further liquidity support was granted between February 1996 and July 1997 under a credit mandate of the Thuringia Ministry of Finance in the form of a DEM 5 million loan and a letter of subordination covering DEM 4 million in claims. The loan was granted up to 31 December 2000 at an interest rate of 8 % per annum. (2) By its Decision of 7 April 1998 (NN 142/97; letter SG(98) D/4313 of 2 June 1998), the Commission approved the prolongation of the said aid scheme for the years 1997 to 2001; however, because of considerable doubt concerning the compatibility of how this aid scheme was being implemented, the Commission on 4 December 1998 initiated the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty; Commission Decision C 69/98; Commission letter SG(98) D/11285 of 4 December 1998. L 61/6 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8. 3. 2000 (15) Nevertheless, despite this considerable government support, a further DEM 1,5 million loan from TAB was needed at the end of 1997 to secure the firm's liquidity and enable it to remain in business. Moreover, the Land of Thuringia, as preferential creditor, issued a further letter of subordination covering another DEM 2 million in claims in order to avert bankruptcy proceedings in respect of the company's assets. (16) By administrative decisions of 19 January 1995 and 21 October 1996, Weida was awarded investment grants of DEM 1,84 million and DEM 0,34 million out of the funds of the Commission- approved joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic structures. The DEM 0,34 million grant was not paid out because of the initiation of the Article 88(2) procedure. (17) The following table gives a complete list of the state aid granted to Weida up to the end of 1997: State aid Date granted Amount of aid (DEM million) SME grant, C 69/98 (ex NN 118/98, ex 408/93 and ex ex N 480/94) ex 21. 10. 1993 90 % guarantee for a DEM 8 million loan 7. 3. 1994 90 % guarantee for a DEM 4 million loan 16. 9. 1994 4,5 7,2 3,6 Investment grants under Federal Government/Länder scheme, 1005/1006/N div. joint the 15. 12. 1995, 10. 7. 1996, 17. 9. 1996 1,84 Loan, NN 74/95 TAB loan TAB loan 12/1995 2. 1. 1996 11/1997 2,0 5,0 1,5 Total 25,64 (18) Of the approximately DEM 12,9 million investment by Weida's subsidiary in a waste water treat- ment plant, DEM 11,22 million, i. e. 87 %, was financed with public money. (19) Since this plant was urgently needed for the firm's future operations, the Treuhandanstalt decided on 4 February 1994 to contribute 40 % of the funds needed for its construction. This contribution took the form of a non-repayable grant of DEM 4,84 million. (20) In addition, the Land of Thuringia provided an investment grant of DEM 6,38 million under the joint scheme for improving regional economic structures. (21) The remaining 13 % (DEM 1,344 million) was provided by Weida as a shareholder's loan. This loan was secured by a 90 % guarantee from LfA. The loan's due date was initially fixed, in accordance with the loan agreement and in line with the duration of the guarantee, at 31 December 1997, but subsequently had to be extended owing to the firm's situation (see above). However, because of the insufficient information provided, the Commission does not have up-to-date figures on the amended terms of the loan or the guarantee. 8. 3. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 61/7 (22) The following table shows the composition of the aid received by Weida's subsidiary for the waste-water treatment plant: State aid Date granted Amount of aid (DEM million) Investment grant under the joint Federal Government/ Länder scheme 28. 11. 1994, 17. 8. 1995, 19. 10. 1995 Investment grant under the joint Federal Government/ Länder scheme 30. 4. 1997 Grant from the Treuhandanstalt (THA)/Bundesanstalt für Vereinigungsbedingte Sonderaufgaben (BvS) 9/1994 to 11/1995 90 % guarantee in respect of a DEM 1,344 million shareholder's loan from Weida 5,95 0,43 4,84 1,21 Total 12,43 (23) The aid granted to Weida and its subsidiary Abwasserrei- nigungsanlage Schlossmühlenweg Weida GmbH totals some DEM 38 million. As opposed to this, the contri- bution of its shareholder Elster KG to the financing of Weida's restructuring was limited to the nominal capital of DEM 50 000, a DEM 300 000 guarantee taken over from Mr Jessen, a partner in Elster KG, issued under the Land guarantee procedure, and a statement of co-obliga- tion — limited in time — in respect of the investment grants paid out the joint Federal to Weida under Government/Länder scheme. (24) When it initiated the procedure, the Commission expressed doubts as to the applicability of the guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (the guidelines) (1) to firms which are newly formed with the assets from a bankruptcy. Up to the time when the proceedings were initiated, no viable restructuring plan had been presented. Since Weida's financial situation had apparently worsened despite the serious doubts massive concerning its viability could not be dispelled. In addi- tion, because the privatisation had still not taken place, the financing for Weida was still provisional. Also, since no private investor could be found, it was not possible to determine whether the proposed amount of aid was appropriate to the restructuring efforts. injection of public funds, (25) The Commission also complained of the lack of relevant information which would have enabled it to assess the compatibility of the aid with Article 87 of the EC Treaty. (26) The relevant market for Weida Leder GmbH is the market for tanning products (2). The main product of the tanning sector is leather, which is made into shoes, clothing, leather goods and furniture. (27) While the leather industry is showing considerable growth in some countries of Asia, America and above all in eastern Europe and these countries have become important players internationally, in western Europe capacity and output have declined steadily. The EU tanning industry has lost a quarter of its industrial base and a third of its workers and has shrunk by over 1 000 production units and some 30 000 workers since the beginning of the 1980s. The greatest loss of production units has occurred in northern Europe. Germany has suffered a particularly sharp decline in the number of tanneries. On the other hand, the remaining tanneries in the Community has almost doubled (from some EUR 4 000 million to nearly EUR 8 000 million). EU tanners are adjusting their production to meet higher quality standards and improve the fashion content of leather. the turnover of (28) Companies have generally been owned by the same family for generations, and only 8,5 % fall within the same size category as Weida (21 to 100 employees). (29) (30) The shoe industry, taking 50 % of EU tannery products, is the tanning industry's most important market. The clothing industry accounts for some 20 %, the furniture industry for some 17 % and leather goods for 13 %. The EU leather industry has to cope with difficult economic growing in competition from third countries. There is no prospect of a marked increase in demand for leather in the conditions Europe and (1) OJ C 368, 23. 12. 1994, p. 12. (2) See Panorama of EU industry 1997, 4-25. L 61/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8. 3. 2000 Community. Since tanners have been faced with further difficulties as a result of the most recent scandals (e. g. BSE), which have affected the supply of hides and skins and pushed up prices rapidly, many small firms with narrow profit margins will in future have difficulties in procuring raw materials. III. COMMENTS FROM GERMANY (31) After being informed of the initiation of proceedings, Germany argued that the measures taken by the Land of Thuringia supported an asset deal resulting from the firm's bankruptcy which should be rated as a privatisa- tion. At the same time, it conceded that the role of Elster KG should be seen as that of a transitional adminis- trator, and that it must therefore be concluded that the actual privatisation of the firm had not yet taken place. Germany also stated that, although there was a rescue plan for the firm, there was no long-term restructuring plan because of the lack of a private investor willing to take over the firm. Since the firm's future direction would necessarily depend on such an investor, no such detailed planning could be presented. To that extent, the rescue plan supporting the takeover of assets would have to suffice to prove the existence of a restructuring plan. The Commission's assessment that neither the expected overall turnover figures nor the profit figures could be achieved was also rejected by Germany. Never- theless, the latter did concede that, on the basis of the firm's actual results, the originally planned turnover targets had to be corrected. The original target of 1996 for the firm to break even would therefore have to be changed to 1998. However, this would depend on achieving a reduction in interest payments to the firm's banks, something which has not been done. (32) With regard to the legal bases for the aid granted, Germany explained that the state guarantees had been granted on the basis of the Commission-approved guar- antee scheme administered by LfA and the Land of Thur- ingia. The THA/BvS financial measures associated with the setting-up of the waste water treatment plant were, it was claimed, tantamount to a grant covered by the THA scheme. (33) In conclusion, Germany informed the Commission that the firm had filed for bankruptcy on 28 May 1998. from the public purse. Since such preferential treatment distorts trade between Member States, these measures fall within the scope of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty. Schlossmühlenweg Since Abwasserreinigungsanlage Weida GmbH was 98 % owned by, and predominantly serves the needs of, Weida, the aid granted to it is examined together with the aid granted to Weida. The aid provided by Thuringia and THA/BvS was, for the most part, granted before being notified to the Commission, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty. Consequently, except where it can be said to have been granted under an aid scheme approved by the Commis- sion, it must be examined as ad hoc aid in accordance with the general rules governing the granting of State aid. (35) (36) (37) SME investment safeguard programme of the Land of Thuringia (C 69/98) the under (38) On 21 October 1993, Thuringia made a grant of DEM 4,5 million abovementioned programme, which was approved by the Commission on 26 November 1993. In its communication of 26 August 1993 to the Commission, Germany had expressly stated that the purpose of this aid programme was not to grant rescue and restructuring aid. However, Weida Leder GmbH was always to be regarded as a company in difficulty. Moreover, the aid was granted before the programme had been approved by the Commission. It is not, therefore, covered by an approved aid scheme. Thuringian fund for the consolidation of firms in difficulty (NN 74/95) (39) In December 1995, the Land of Thuringia granted a DEM 2 million loan, citing this scheme as the legal basis. Although the fund is designed to assist in the rescue and restructuring of SMEs, it is not necessary to examine in detail whether the conditions of this scheme were met because it was not approved by the Commis- sion until 6 February 1996. The aid was therefore granted without Commission approval and is not covered by an approved scheme. IV. ASSESSMENT OF THE AID (34) Germany's aid to Weida and its subsidiary Abwasserrei- nigungsanlage Schlossmühlenweg Weida GmbH was granted out of public funds. It distorts competition in the single market because it enables the assisted firms to finance a necessary operating investment almost entirely Guarantee scheme administered by LfA and the Land of Thuringia (40) Germany stated that the 90 % guarantees in respect of loans of DEM 8 million and DEM 4 million granted on 7 March and 16 September 1994 respectively were 8. 3. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 61/9 made under the guarantee scheme administered by LfA and the Land of Thuringia. It claimed that the guarantee scheme had contained no indication that the arrange- ments had not been notified at that time. In response to its request for information made when initiating the fully enough procedure, informed to be able to assess the compatibility of this aid. the Commission was not Federal Government/Länder Joint improving regional economic structures scheme for (41) The investment grants of DEM 1,84 million and DEM 0,34 million were awarded under the joint Federal Government/Länder improving regional economic structures. The DEM 0,34 million grant was not paid out owing to the initiation of the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty. scheme for (47) When applying the guidelines, it should be borne in mind that they are not generally applicable to newly formed firms (in the context of a rescue) which take over the assets of the firm which is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings. However, this principle is not applied to aid for firms in the new Länder because the transition from a planned to a market economy gives rise to particular problems. Low levels of equity capitali- sation are typical of firms in the new Länder. It can therefore be justified to regard a newly formed company as a firm in difficulty if it organises its business activity as a continuation of the firm being taken over. Given the special aid to firms growing out of a company whose assets are the subject of bankruptcy proceedings may be regarded as restruc- turing aid in certain cases. In such cases, the private investors involved in the newly formed firm must make a significant contribution to restructuring from their own funds. conversion-related problems, (42) Weida's subsidiary was awarded investment grants total- ling DEM 6,38 million for the waste water treatment plant. These funds were paid out from November 1994 to April 1997. Under the joint scheme, assistance may also be granted in respect of investment to improve infrastructure directly serving industry. (43) Although the aid granted under the joint scheme falls within the scope of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, it ranks as regional investment aid and is therefore exempt from the general prohibition on aid under Article 87(3)(a). (48) (49) (44) (45) Second THA scheme (1) The DEM 4,84 million in aid granted by THA/BvS for setting up the waste water treatment plant was a non- repayable grant, which is not covered by the THA scheme. (50) It follows from the above comments that only the DEM 8,22 million granted under the joint scheme is covered by an approved scheme. The remaining aid of DEM 29,85 million was not granted under an approved scheme. If aid has been granted which is in no way related to a programme approved by the Commission, the derogation under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty (‘aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities. , where such aid does not affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common inter- est’) may be applicable where the main purpose of the aid in question is the restructuring of a firm in difficulty. In the present case it must be stated that the financing of the company is still provisional, since Weida Leder GmbH has so far not been privatised. Consequently there is no private participation. Immediately before the bankruptcy, the tanning firm Weida Leder GmbH produced mainly leather for the furniture industry. Although the firm was unable to become firmly established on the market and there were no prospects of an improvement, the position of this sector of the leather industry was regarded as satisfac- tory in view of the seemingly sufficient level of capacity utilisation. However, it was not possible to find a private investor and the firm was financed solely on a trans- itional basis in order to keep it in business. The purpose of restructuring aid is to return the assisted firm to viability in the long term. This demands a restructuring plan which, on the basis of both physical and financial restructuring measures (e. g. capital injec- tions, debt reduction), ensures that the firm becomes competitive again and is able to survive without State aid. In the absence of such a plan, the Commission regards aid merely as operating aid designed to offset losses. Such aid is not admissible unless a realistic restructuring plan is submitted subsequently (2). The firm's viability must be restored without there being any undue effects on competition within the Community. The restructuring plan must therefore be far-reaching and sound, and it must indicate precisely which comprehensive measures will restore the firm's long-term profitability so that it will be in a position to cover all its costs and to generate a minimum return on capital. The information at the Commission's disposal adverse (46) Such aid may be considered compatible with the common market if the criteria laid down in the guide- lines are met. (1) Commission Decision E 15/92; this provides solely for guarantees and loans. (2) See concerning Iritecna the Commission notice (OJ C 328, the Commission Decision of 27 July 1994 25. 11. 1994, p. 2), concerning Air France/CDC-P (OJ L 258, 6. 10. 1994, p. 26), the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/ 92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission, [1994] ECR I-4103 (para- graph 67), and Article 6, point 6. 1(b) of the GATT Subsidies Agree- ment (OJ L 336, 23. 12. 1994, p. 156). L 61/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8. 3. 2000 does not demonstrate beyond any doubt that the aid was granted under a viable restructuring plan with concrete operational measures which would enable the Commission to identify the positive financial results of those measures. Germany actually conceded this in its reply of 26 June 1998 to the Commission letter on the initiation of the procedure, stating that in the present phase it could not present any detailed planning since the firm's future direction necessarily depended on the investor. (51) Nor, consequently, was it possible to demonstrate how the long-term viability and health of the firm can be guaranteed within a reasonable timescale and on the basis of realistic assumptions as to its future operating conditions. It was also unclear whether and how the firm intended to bring its cost structure and high finan- cial charges under control. (52) Since the Commission, in its Decision to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, had explicitly asked Germany to provide all necessary infor- mation, in particular with regard to a restructuring plan, it must now take a decision on the basis of the informa- tion available to it (1). (53) All forecasts concerning the firm's development have turned out to be incorrect. Even before the Article 88(2) procedure was initiated, it was highly unlikely that the firm would be able in the medium term to repay its loans totalling DEM 20,5 million on the basis of a positive cash flow. The forecasts assumed that it would make a loss of DEM 1,7 million in 1998. In addition, because of the letters of subordination, part of these loans effectively constituted equity capital so that any repayment of these loans would have been possible only if an equivalent amount of equity capital or sharehold- er's loans had been forthcoming. Because of its declining profitability, mounting losses, falling turnover, and soaring debt and interest payments, the firm was eventu- ally forced on 28 May 1998 to file for bankruptcy. (54) Accordingly, the Commission concludes that the condi- tions set out in the guidelines are not met. The restruc- turing aid for Weida cannot therefore be approved. (1) Case C-47/91 Italian Republic v Commission [1994] ECR I-4635 and Case C-301/87 French Republic v Commission [1990] ECR I-0307 confirmed by Joined Cases C-324/90 and C-342/90 Federal Republic of Germany and Pleuger Worthington v Commission [1994] ECR I- 1173. V. CONCLUSION (55) (56) (57) The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty. The deciding factor in the Commission's assessment was the fact that there was no investor prepared to take over the firm and that Germany failed to submit a realistic restructuring plan which would have enabled the restoration of the firm's long-term viability. Nor is there a private contribution, so that it cannot be established whether the aid granted is in proportion to the restruc- turing efforts. The condition set out in the guidelines that the long- term viability and health of the firm must be restored within a reasonable timescale and on the basis of real- istic assumptions as to its future operating conditions cannot therefore be considered to have been fulfilled, so that the aid granted to Weida Leder GmbH and its subsidiary cannot be approved. (58) The derogation provided for in Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty cannot therefore apply to the DEM 29,85 million in aid granted to Weida Leder GmbH and its subsidiary, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The aid which Germany has granted to Weida Leder GmbH, amounting to DEM 23,8 million, and to Abwasserreinigung- sanlage Schlossmühlenweg Weida GmbH, amounting to DEM 6,05 million, is incompatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty. Article 2 Germany shall take all the necessary measures to recover 1. from the recipients the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlaw- fully made available to the recipients. law. The aid to be recovered shall Recovery shall be effected in accordance with the proced- 2. ures of national include interest from the date on which it was made available to the recipients until the date of its recovery. Interest shall be calcu- lated on the basis of the reference rate used for calculating the grant equivalent of regional aid. 8. 3. 2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 61/11 Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it. Article 3 This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany. Article 4 Done at Brussels, 14 July 1999. For the Commission Mario MONTI Member of the Commission


title: Decizia Comisiei din 14 iulie 1999 de stabilire a condițiilor speciale care reglementează importurile produselor pescărești și de acvacultură originare din Yemen [notificată cu numărul C(1999) 2060] (Text cu relevanță pentru SEE)

eurovoc_concepts:
Yemen
aquaculture
fishery product
import
originating product

formats: pdf print xhtml

text: 03/vol. 29 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 89 31999D0528 L 203/68 JURNALUL OFICIAL AL COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE 3. 8. 1999 DECIZIA COMISIEI din 14 iulie 1999 de stabilire a condițiilor speciale care reglementează importurile produselor pescăreș(cid:13)ti ș(cid:13)i de acvacultură originare din Yemen [notificată cu numărul C(1999) 2060] (Text cu relevanță pentru SEE) (1999/528/CE) COMISIA COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE, având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunității Europene, având în vedere Directiva 91/493/CEE a Consiliului din 22 iulie 1991 de stabilire a condițiilor de sănătate pentru producția ș(cid:13)i introducerea pe piață a produselor pescăreș(cid:13)ti (1), astfel cum a fost modificată ultima dată prin Directiva 97/79/CE a Consiliului (2), în special articolul 11, (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) întrucât o echipă de experți ai Comisiei a efectuat o inspecție în Yemen pentru a verifica condițiile în care produsele pescăreș(cid:13)ti sunt produse, stocate ș(cid:13)i expediate în Comunitate; întrucât dispozițiile legislației din Yemen privind inspecți- ile ș(cid:13)i controalele sanitar-veterinare ale produselor pescă- reș(cid:13)ti pot fi considerate echivalente celor prevăzute de Directiva 91/493/CEE; întrucât în Yemen Departamentul Tehnic de Control al Calității (TDQC) din cadrul Ministerului Bogățiilor Piscicole este capabil să verifice eficient aplicarea legislației în vigoare; întrucât procedura de obținere a certificatului de sănătate prevăzut la articolul 11 alineatul (4) litera (a) din Directiva 91/493/CEE trebuie să acopere ș(cid:13)i definirea unui model de certificat, cerințele minime privind limba (limbile) în care trebuie redactat ș(cid:13)i funcția persoanei împuternicite să îl semneze; întrucât, în temeiul articolului 11 alineatul (4) litera (b) din Directiva 91/493/CEE, pe ambalajele produselor pescăreș(cid:13)ti ar trebui să fie aplicată o ș(cid:13)tampilă cu numele țării terțe ș(cid:13)i numărul aprobării/înregistrării unității, navei fabrică, depo- zitului frigorific sau navei frigorifice de origine; întrucât, în temeiul articolului 11 alineatul (4) litera (c) din Directiva 91/493/CEE, ar trebui să fie întocmită o listă a unităților, navelor frigorifice aprobate/înregistrate; întrucât trebuie să fie întocmită o listă a navelor frigorifice înregistrate în sensul Directivei 92/48/CEE (3); întrucât aceste liste trebuie să fie întocmite fabrică sau depozitelor (1) (2) (3) JO L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15. JO L 24, 30. 1. 1998, p. 31. JO L 187, 7. 7. 1992, p. 41. pe baza unei comunicări emise Comisiei de către TDQC; întrucât, în consecință, TDQC trebuie să asigure conformi- tatea cu dispozițiile prevăzute în acest scop la articolul 11 alineatul (4) din Directiva 91/493/CEE; (7) întrucât TDQC a dat asigurări oficiale privind respectarea normelor stabilite la capitolul V din anexa la Directiva 91/493/CEE ș(cid:13)i privind îndeplinirea unor cerințe echiva- lente cu cele stabilite de directiva menționată anterior pen- tru aprobarea sau înregistrarea unităților, navelor fabrică, depozitelor frigorifice ș(cid:13)i a navelor frigorifice de origine; (8) întrucât măsurile prevăzute de prezenta decizie corespund avizului Comitetului veterinar permanent, ADOPTĂ PREZENTA DECIZIE: Articolul 1 Departamentul Tehnic de Control al Calității (TDQC) din cadrul Ministerului Bogățiilor Piscicole este autoritatea competentă în Yemen pentru verificarea ș(cid:13)i certificarea respectării de către produsele pescăreș(cid:13)ti ș(cid:13)i de acvacultură a cerințelor Directivei 91/493/CEE. Articolul 2 Produsele pescăreș(cid:13)ti ș(cid:13)i de acvacultură originare din Yemen trebuie să îndeplinească următoarele condiții. 1. fiecare lot trebuie însoțit de un certificat de sănătate original numerotat, completat corect, semnat, datat ș(cid:13)i conținând o sin- gură foaie în conformitate cu modelul din anexa A la prezenta decizie; 2. produsele trebuie să provină din unități, nave fabrică, depo- zite frigorifice aprobate sau nave frigorifice înregistrate prevă- zute de anexa B la prezenta decizie; 3. cu excepția produselor pescăreș(cid:13)ti în vrac congelate ș(cid:13)i destinate fabricării produselor alimentare conservate, toate ambalajele trebuie să aibă marcat cu litere neradiabile cuvântul „Yemen” ș(cid:13)i numărul aprobării/înregistrării unității, navei fabrică, depo- zitului frigorific sau navei frigorifice de origine. 90 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 29 Articolul 3 (1) Certificatele prevăzute la articolul 2 alineatul (1) trebuie redactate cel puțin într-o limbă oficială a statului membru în care sunt efectuate controalele. (2) Certificatele trebuie să conțină numele, funcția ș(cid:13)i semnătura reprezentantului TDQC ș(cid:13)iș(cid:13)tampila oficială a acestuia într-o culoare diferită de cea a celorlalte mențiuni. Prezenta decizie se adresează statelor membre. Articolul 4 Adoptată la Bruxelles, 14 iulie 1999. Pentru Comisie Franz FISCHLER Membru al Comisiei 03/vol. 29 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 91 ANEXA A 92 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 29 03/vol. 29 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 93 ANEXA B I – LISTA UNITĂȚILOR APROBATE Număr Nume Adresă 01-A Coastal Fishing Corporation 02 03 04 05 07 09 Public Corporation for Services and Fish Marketing Burum Fishing and Marketing Co. Sheher Fisheries Co. Mussallam Trading Est. Qataria Fish Processing Co. Ltd Trust Company (Abubakar Hassan Est) Almahra Aden Alsheher Alsheher Hodeida Hodeida Alsheher II – LISTA NAVELOR FRIGORIFICE ÎNREGISTRATE Număr Nume 08-A Yathrib (Fisheries Investment Co. Ltd) Port Almahra


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1542/1999 της Επιτροπής, της 14ης Ιουλίου 1999, για τον καθορισμό, για την περίοδο εμπορίας 1997/98, της πραγματικής παραγωγής ελαιολάδου καθώς και του ποσού της μοναδιαίας ενίσχυσης στην παραγωγή

text: L 180/4 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 15. 7. 1999 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 1542/1999 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 14gr Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999 cia tom jahoqisl(cid:149), cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo elpoq(cid:148)ar 1997/98, tgr pqaclatij(cid:147)r paqacyc(cid:147)r ekaiok(cid:145)dou jah(cid:150)r jai tou poso(cid:151) tgr lomadia(cid:148)ar em(cid:148)swusgr stgm paqacyc(cid:147) G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) aqih. 136/66/EOJ tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 22ar Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1966, peq(cid:148) hesp(cid:148)seyr joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tym kipaq(cid:150)m ousi(cid:150)m (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1638/98 (2), tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1638/98 jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 3 paq(cid:145)cqa- vor 1, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (1) (2) (3) to tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje (cid:149)ti o jamomisl(cid:149)r (EJ) aqih. 1638/98 eis(cid:147)cace sglamtij(cid:146)r tqopopoi(cid:147)seir ap(cid:149) tgm 1g Moelbq(cid:148)ou 1998 stgm joim(cid:147) oqc(cid:145)mysg acoq(cid:145)r cia tom tol(cid:146)a tym kipaq(cid:150)m ousi(cid:150)m· (cid:149)ti, id(cid:148)yr, stgm paqacyc(cid:147) ekaiok(cid:145)dou· (cid:149)ti e(cid:148)mai apaqa(cid:148)tgto, cia ma epitqa- pe(cid:148) g aqlomij(cid:147) let(cid:145)basg letan(cid:151) tou jahest(cid:150)tor pou (cid:148)swue pqim jai let(cid:145) tgm 1g Moelbq(cid:148)ou 1998, ma pqobkevhe(cid:148) g evaqloc(cid:147) tym diat(cid:145)neym swetij(cid:145) le tgm em(cid:148)swusg stgm paqacyc(cid:147) tgr peqi(cid:149)dou elpoq(cid:148)ar 1997/98, pou isw(cid:151)oum sto t(cid:146)kor tgr em k(cid:149)cy peqi(cid:149)dou elpoq(cid:148)ar· em(cid:148)swusgr jahest(cid:150)r (cid:149)ti to (cid:145)qhqo 5 tou jamomislo(cid:151) aqih. 136/66/EOJ stgm (cid:146)jdos(cid:147) tou pou isw(cid:151)ei stir 31 Ojtybq(cid:148)ou 1998 pqobk(cid:146)pei (cid:149)ti g lomadia(cid:148)a em(cid:148)swusg stgm paqacyc(cid:147) pq(cid:146)pei ma leiyhe(cid:148) (cid:149)tam g pqaclatij(cid:147) paqacyc(cid:147) liar ecjejqil(cid:146)mgr peqi(cid:149)dou upeqba(cid:148)mei tg l(cid:146)cistg eccugl(cid:146)mg pos(cid:149)tgta pou jahoq(cid:148)fetai ci’ aut(cid:147) tgm (cid:148)dia peq(cid:148)odo· (cid:149)ti, emto(cid:151)toir, oi paqacyco(cid:148) tym opo(cid:148)ym g l(cid:146)sg pos(cid:149)tgta dem vh(cid:145)mei ta 500 wiki(cid:149)cqalla ekaiok(cid:145)dou am(cid:145) peq(cid:148)odo dem h(cid:148)comtai ap(cid:149) lia t(cid:146)toia le(cid:148)ysg· (cid:149)ti to (cid:145)qhqo 17a tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 2261/84 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1639/98 (4), stgm (cid:146)jdosg pou isw(cid:151)ei stir 31 Ojtybq(cid:148)ou 1998, pqobk(cid:146)pei (cid:149)ti, cia ma jahoqiste(cid:148) to pos(cid:149) tgr lomadia(cid:148)ar emisw(cid:151)seyr stgm paqacyc(cid:147) ekaio- k(cid:145)dou pou lpoqe(cid:148) ma pqojatabkghe(cid:148), ha pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqi- ste(cid:148) g ejtil(cid:150)lemg paqacyc(cid:147) swetij(cid:145) le tg sucjejqil(cid:146)mg peq(cid:148)odo· (cid:149)ti, cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo elpoq(cid:148)ar 1997/98, g ejtil(cid:150)- lemg paqacyc(cid:147) jah(cid:150)r jai to lomadia(cid:148)o pos(cid:149) tgr emisw(cid:151)- seyr stgm paqacyc(cid:147) pou lpoqe(cid:148) ma pqojatabkghe(cid:148) jaho- q(cid:148)stgjam ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2095/98 tgr Epi- tqop(cid:147)r (5)· (4) (cid:149)ti, jat(cid:145) tgm evaqloc(cid:147) tym diat(cid:145)neym pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 17a paq(cid:145)cqavor 3 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 2261/84 stgm (cid:146)jdosg pou isw(cid:151)ei stir 31 Ojtybq(cid:148)ou (1) EE 172 tgr 30. 9. 1966, s. 3025/66. (2) EE L 210 tgr 28. 7. 1998, s. 32. (3) EE L 208 tgr 3. 8. 1984, s. 3. (4) EE L 210 tgr 28. 7. 1998, s. 38. (5) EE L 266 tgr 1. 10. 1998, s. 62. 1998, pq(cid:146)pei ma jahoqiste(cid:148), to aqc(cid:149)teqo ojt(cid:150) l(cid:147)mer let(cid:145) to t(cid:146)kor tgr peqi(cid:149)dou, g pqaclatij(cid:147) paqacyc(cid:147) cia tgm opo(cid:148)a amacmyq(cid:148)stgje to dija(cid:148)yla stgm em(cid:148)swusg· (cid:149)ti, cia to sjop(cid:149) aut(cid:149), s(cid:151)lvyma le tir diat(cid:145)neir tou (cid:145)qhqou 12a tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 3061/84 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (6), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2455/97 (7), ta swetij(cid:145) jq(cid:145)tg l(cid:146)kg pq(cid:146)pei ma joimopoi(cid:147)- soum stgm Epitqop(cid:147), to aqc(cid:149)teqo l(cid:146)wqi tir 31 La(cid:155)ou pou (cid:146)petai ej(cid:145)stgr peqi(cid:149)dou, tgm pos(cid:149)tgta pou (cid:146)cime dejt(cid:147) stgm em(cid:148)swusg se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor (cid:149)ti, let(cid:145) ap(cid:149) tir joimopoi(cid:147)seir aut(cid:146)r, va(cid:148)metai (cid:149)ti g pos(cid:149)tgta pou (cid:146)cime dejt(cid:147) stgm em(cid:148)swusg, sto pka(cid:148)sio tgr peqi(cid:149)dou 1997/98, am(cid:146)qwetai cia tgm Itak(cid:148)a se 712 847 t(cid:149)mour, cia tg Cakk(cid:148)a se 2 480 t(cid:149)mour, cia tgm Ekk(cid:145)da se 492 364 t(cid:149)mour, cia tgm Ispam(cid:148)a se 1 147 000 t(cid:149)mour jai cia tgm Poqtocak(cid:148)a se 39 600 t(cid:149)mour· (cid:149)ti g apodow(cid:147) stgm em(cid:148)swusg tym em k(cid:149)cy posot(cid:147)tym ap(cid:149) ta jq(cid:145)tg l(cid:146)kg sumep(cid:145)cetai (cid:149)ti oi (cid:146)kecwoi pou amav(cid:146)qomtai stour jamomislo(cid:151)r (EOJ) aqih. 2261/84 jai (EOJ) aqih. 3061/84 (cid:146)woum dienawhe(cid:148)· (cid:149)ti, yst(cid:149)so, o jahoqisl(cid:149)r tgr pqaclatij(cid:147)r paqacyc(cid:147)r s(cid:151)lvyma le tir pkgqovoq(cid:148)er swe- tij(cid:145) le tir pos(cid:149)tgter pou (cid:146)cimam dejt(cid:146)r stgm em(cid:148)swusg pou joimopoi(cid:147)hgjam ap(cid:149) ta jq(cid:145)tg l(cid:146)kg dem pqodij(cid:145)fei ta sulpeq(cid:145)slata pou d(cid:151)mamtai ma enawho(cid:151)m jat(cid:145) tom (cid:146)kecwo tgr ajq(cid:148)beiar tym em k(cid:149)cy dedol(cid:146)mym sto pka(cid:148)sio tgr diadijas(cid:148)ar tgr ejjah(cid:145)qisgr ym kocaqiasl(cid:150)m· (cid:149)ti, kalbamol(cid:146)mgr up(cid:149)xg tgr pqaclatij(cid:147)r paqacyc(cid:147)r, pq(cid:146)- pei ma jahoqiste(cid:148) ep(cid:148)sgr to pos(cid:149) tgr lomadia(cid:148)ar em(cid:148)swusgr stgm paqacyc(cid:147) pou pqobk(cid:146)petai ap(cid:149) to (cid:145)qhqo 5 paq(cid:145)cqa- vor 1 p(cid:146)lpto ed(cid:145)vio sgle(cid:148)o b) tou jamomislo(cid:151) aqih. 136/ 66/EOJ stgm (cid:146)jdosg pou isw(cid:151)ei stir 31 Ojtybq(cid:148)ou 1998· (cid:149)ti ta l(cid:146)tqa pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai stom paq(cid:149)mta jamomisl(cid:149) e(cid:148)mai s(cid:151)lvyma le tg cm(cid:150)lg tgr epitqop(cid:147)r diawe(cid:148)qisgr kipaq(cid:150)m ousi(cid:150)m, (5) (6) (7) ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Cia tgm peq(cid:148)odo elpoq(cid:148)ar 1997/98 tou ekaiok(cid:145)dou: — g pqaclatij(cid:147) paqacyc(cid:147) cia tgm opo(cid:148)a amacmyq(cid:148)stgje to se paqacyc(cid:147) am(cid:146)qwetai em(cid:148)swusg stgm dija(cid:148)yla 2 394 291 t(cid:149)mour, stgm — to pos(cid:149) tgr lomadia(cid:148)ar emisw(cid:151)seyr stgm paqacyc(cid:147) iso(cid:151)tai pqor 80,17 euq(cid:150) am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla. (6) EE L 288 tgr 1. 11. 1984, s. 52. (7) EE L 340 tgr 11. 12. 1997, s. 26. 15. 7. 1999 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 180/5 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei tgm (cid:146)bdolg gl(cid:146)qa ap(cid:149) tgm dglos(cid:148)eus(cid:147) tou stgm Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym. (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 14 Iouk(cid:148)ou 1999. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r


title: 1999/547/CE: Décision de la Commission du 14 juillet 1999 modifiant les décisions 94/432/CE et 94/433/CE, établissant des dispositions d'application des directives 93/23/CEE et 93/24/CEE du Conseil en ce qui concerne les enquêtes statistiques sur le cheptel et la production des secteurs porcins et bovins [notifiée sous le numéro C(1999) 2080]

eurovoc_concepts:
agricultural statistics
animal production
cattle
livestock
statistical method
swine

text: 7. 8. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 209/33 D(cid:144)CISION DE LA COMMISSION du 14 juillet 1999 modifiant les d(cid:130)cisions 94/432/CE et 94/433/CE, (cid:130)tablissant des dispositions d’application des directives 93/23/CEE et 93/24/CEE du Conseil en ce qui concerne les enqu(cid:136)tes statistiques sur le cheptel et la production des secteurs porcins et bovins [notifi(cid:130)e sous le num(cid:130)ro C(1999) 2080] (1999/547/CE) LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUT(cid:144)S EUROP(cid:144)ENNES, (5) vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, vu la directive 93/23/CEE du Conseil du 1er juin 1993 concer- nant les enqu(cid:136)tes statistiques (cid:133) effectuer dans le domaine de la production de porcins (1), modifi(cid:130)e en dernier lieu par la direc- tive 97/77/CE (2), et notamment son article 6, paragraphes 2 et 3, vu la directive 93/24/CEE du Conseil du 1er juin 1993 concer- nant les enqu(cid:136)tes statistiques (cid:133) effectuer dans le domaine de la production de bovins (3), modifi(cid:130)e en dernier lieu par la direc- tive 97/77/CE et notamment son article 1er, paragraphes 2 et 3, (1) (2) (3) (4) consid(cid:130)rant que la d(cid:130)cision 94/432/CE (4), modifi(cid:130)e par la d(cid:130)cision 95/380/CE (5) et la d(cid:130)cision 94/433/CE de la Commission (6), modifi(cid:130)e par la d(cid:130)cision 1999/47/CE (7) (cid:130)tablissent les dispositions d’application des directives 93/23/CEE et 93/24/CEE du Conseil; consid(cid:130)rant que les (cid:144)tats membres peuvent (cid:136)tre auto- ris(cid:130)s, (cid:133) leur demande, (cid:133) proc(cid:130)der (cid:133) la ventilation r(cid:130)gio- nale pour les r(cid:130)sultats d(cid:130)finitifs de l’enqu(cid:136)te porcine d’avril ou de mai/juin ou d’ao(cid:150)t; consid(cid:130)rant que les (cid:144)tats membres dont le cheptel bovin est inf(cid:130)rieur (cid:133) 1,5 million d’animaux, peuvent (cid:136)tre auto- ris(cid:130)s, (cid:133) leur demande, (cid:133) renoncer totalement (cid:133) une des deux enqu(cid:136)tes de mois mai/juin ou novembre/d(cid:130)cembre; consid(cid:130)rant que des demandes de d(cid:130)rogation relatives aux possibilit(cid:130)s pr(cid:130)cit(cid:130)es ont (cid:130)t(cid:130) introduites par la Gr(cid:138)ce et la Belgique; consid(cid:130)rant que la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision est conforme (cid:133) l’avis du comit(cid:130) permanent de la statistique agricole, institu(cid:130) par la d(cid:130)cision 72/279/CEE du Conseil (8), A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LA PR(cid:144)SENTE D(cid:144)CISION: Article premier La d(cid:130)cision 94/432/CE est modifi(cid:130)e comme suit: (cid:211) l’annexe IV, point d), sous le titre «Mai/juin» «Belgique» est ajout(cid:130). le texte Article 2 La d(cid:130)cision 94/433/CE est modifi(cid:130)e comme suit: (cid:211) l’annexe V, point b), sous le titre «Novembre/d(cid:130)cembre», le texte «Gr(cid:138)ce» est supprim(cid:130); sous le titre «Mai/juin», le texte «Gr(cid:138)ce» est ajout(cid:130). Les (cid:144)tats membres sont destinataires de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Article 3 Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 14 juillet 1999. Par la Commission Yves-Thibault DE SILGUY Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 149 du 21. 6. 1993, p. 1. (2) JO L 10 du 16. 1. 1998, p. 28. (3) JO L 149 du 21. 6. 1993, p. 5. (4) JO L 179 du 13. 7. 1994, p. 22. (5) JO L 228 du 23. 9. 1995, p. 25. (6) JO L 179 du 13. 7. 1994, p. 27. (7) JO L 15 du 20. 1. 1999, p. 10. (8) JO L 179 du 7. 8. 1972, p. 1


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 1541/1999 de la Comisión, de 14 de julio de 1999, por el que se fija el umbral de intervención de manzanas para la campaña 1999/2000

text: 15. 7. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 180/3 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1541/1999 DE LA COMISI(cid:222)N de 14 de julio de 1999 por el que se fija el umbral de intervenci(cid:155)n de manzanas para la campa(cid:157)a 1999/2000 LA COMISI(cid:222)N DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 2200/96 del Consejo, de 28 de octubre de 1996, por el que se establece la organizaci(cid:155)n cum(cid:156)n de mercados en el sector de la frutas y hortalizas (1), cuya (cid:156)ltima modificaci(cid:155)n la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no los apartados 1 y 2 de su 1257/1999 (2), y, en particular, art(cid:146)culo 27, (1) (2) (3) Considerando que, seg(cid:156)n dispone el apartado 1 del ar- t(cid:146)culo 27 del Reglamento (CE) no 2200/96, es preciso fijar un umbral de intervenci(cid:155)n cuando el mercado de alguno de los productos incluidos en el anexo II del citado Reglamento acuse o pueda acusar desequilibrios que den o puedan dar lugar a un volumen demasiado cuantioso de retiradas; que tal situaci(cid:155)n podr(cid:146)a provocar dificultades presupuestarias para la Comunidad; fij(cid:155) un umbral de Considerando que el Reglamento (CE) no 1547/98 de la Comisi(cid:155)n (3) intervenci(cid:155)n de manzanas para la campa(cid:157)a 1998/99; que, habida cuenta de que este producto sigue cumpliendo las condiciones fijadas en el mencionado art(cid:146)culo 27, procede volver a fijar un umbral de interveni(cid:155)n de este producto para la campa(cid:157)a de comercializaci(cid:155)n 1999/2000 en funci(cid:155)n de un porcentaje de la media de la producci(cid:155)n destinada al consumo en fresco de las cinco (cid:156)ltimas campa(cid:157)as para las que de disponga de datos; que procede asimismo determinar para este producto el per(cid:146)odo que ha de tenerse en cuenta para valorar el rebasamiento del umbral de intervenci(cid:155)n; Considerando que, en aplicaci(cid:155)n del art(cid:146)culo 27 antes citado, el rebasamiento del umbral de intervenci(cid:155)n acarrea una disminuci(cid:155)n de la indemnizaci(cid:155)n comuni- taria de retirada durante la campa(cid:157)a siguiente; que es preciso determinar las consecuencias del rebasamiento para el mencionado producto y fijar una reducci(cid:155)n proporcional a su importancia, dentro de los l(cid:146)mites de un porcentaje determinado; (4) Considerando que las medidas previstas en el presente Reglamento se ajustan al dictamen del Comit(cid:130) de gesti(cid:155)n de las frutas y las hortalizas, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Art(cid:146)culo 1 El umbral de intervenci(cid:155)n de manzanas para la campa(cid:157)a 1. 1999/2000 queda fijado en 486 900 toneladas. 2. Para determinar el rebasamiento del umbral de interven- ci(cid:155)n, se tomar(cid:145)n como base las retiradas entre el 1 de junio de 1999 y el 31 de mayo de 2000. Art(cid:146)culo 2 Si la cantidad de manzanas retiradas durante el per(cid:146)ode se(cid:157)a- lado en el apartado 2 del art(cid:146)culo 1 rebasa el umbral fijado en el apartado 1 del art(cid:146)culo 1, la indemnizaci(cid:155)n comunitaria de retirada fijada en aplicaci(cid:155)n del art(cid:146)culo 26 del Reglamento (CE) no 2200/96 se reducir(cid:145), durante la campa(cid:157)a de comercializa- ci(cid:155)n siguiente, de forma proporcional a la importancia del rebasamiento respecto de la producci(cid:155)n que haya servido de base para el c(cid:145)lculo del umbral en cuesti(cid:155)n. No obstante, podr(cid:145) ser superior al 30 %. la indemnizaci(cid:155)n comunitaria de retirada no Art(cid:146)culo 3 El presente Reglamento entrar(cid:145) en vigor el d(cid:146)a de su publica- ci(cid:155)n en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas. El presente Reglamento ser(cid:145) obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 14 de julio de 1999. Por la Comisi(cid:155)n Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisi(cid:155)n (1) DO L 297 de 21. 11. 1996, p. 1. (2) DO L 160 de 26. 6. 1999, p. 80. (3) DO L 202 de 18. 7. 1998, p. 23


title: Règlement (CE) n° 1540/1999 de la Commission, du 14 juillet 1999, établissant les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation pour la détermination du prix d'entrée de certains fruits et légumes

eurovoc_concepts:
agri-monetary policy
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
pip fruit
stone fruit

formats: pdf print

text: 15. 7. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes L 180/1 I (Actes dont la publication est une condition de leur applicabilité) RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 1540/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 14 juillet 1999 établissant les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation pour la détermination du prix d'entrée de certains fruits et légumes LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES, (2) vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne, vu le règlement (CE) no 3223/94 de la Commission, du 21 décembre 1994, portant modalités d'application du régime à l'importation des fruits et légumes (1), modifié en dernier lieu par le règlement (CE) no 1498/98 (2), et notamment son article 4 paragraphe 1, (1) considérant que le règlement (CE) no 3223/94 prévoit, en application des résultats des négociations commer- ciales multilatérales du cycle d'Uruguay, les critères pour la fixation par la Commission des valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation des pays tiers, pour les produits et les périodes qu'il précise dans son annexe; considérant que, en application des critères susvisés, les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation doivent être fixées aux niveaux repris à l'annexe du présent règlement, A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT: Article premier Les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation visées à l'article 4 du règlement (CE) no 3223/94 sont fixées comme indiqué dans le tableau figurant en annexe. Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le 15 juillet 1999. Article 2 Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre. Fait à Bruxelles, le 14 juillet 1999. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 337 du 24. 12. 1994, p. 66. (2) JO L 198 du 15. 7. 1998, p. 4. L 180/2 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 15. 7. 1999 du règlement de la Commission, du 14 juillet 1999, établissant les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation pour la détermination du prix d'entrée de certains fruits et légumes ANNEXE Code NC 0707 00 05 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 0809 10 00 0809 20 95 0809 40 05 Code des pays tiers (1) Valeur forfaitaire à l'importation (EUR/100 kg) 052 628 999 052 999 382 388 524 528 999 388 400 508 512 524 528 804 999 388 512 528 804 999 052 064 999 052 061 068 400 616 999 064 624 999 61,9 130,8 96,4 54,3 54,3 55,5 61,1 44,8 60,3 55,4 86,1 69,6 74,7 63,6 55,7 82,8 101,3 76,3 98,5 63,3 76,6 72,3 77,7 137,2 79,9 108,5 187,0 155,0 90,6 216,1 170,0 163,7 83,2 258,0 170,6 (1) Nomenclature des pays fixée par le règlement (CE) no 2317/97 de la Commission (JO L 321 du 22. 11. 1997, p. 19). Le code «999» représente «autres origines»


title: A Bizottság határozata (1999. július 14.) a Koreai Köztársaságból származó élő kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákállatok és tengeri haslábúak behozatalára vonatkozó különleges feltételek megállapításáról szóló 95/453/EK határozat módosításáról (az értesítés a C(1999) 2062. számú dokumentummal történt)EGT vonatkozású szöveg

eurovoc_concepts:
South Korea
fishery resources
health control
import
mollusc
originating product

text: 248 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 03/26. kötet 31999D0530 L 203/76 AZ EURÓPAI KÖZÖSSÉGEK HIVATALOS LAPJA 1999. 8. 3. A BIZOTTSÁG HATÁROZATA (1999. július 14. ) a Koreai Köztársaságból származó élő kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákállatok és tengeri haslá- búak behozatalára vonatkozó különleges feltételek megállapításáról szóló 95/453/EK határozat módosításáról (az értesítés a C(1999) 2062. számú dokumentummal történt) (EGT vonatkozású szöveg) (1999/530/EK) AZ EURÓPAI KÖZÖSSÉGEK BIZOTTSÁGA, ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT: tekintettel az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződésre, tekintettel a legutóbb a 97/79/EK irányelvvel (1) módosított, az élő kéthéjú kagylók tenyésztésére és forgalomba hozatalára vonatkozó egészségügyi feltételek megállapításáról szóló, 1991. irányelvre (2) és különösen július 15-i 91/492/EGK tanácsi annak 9. cikkére, (1) (2) (3) (4) mivel a Koreai Köztársaságból származó élő kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákállatok és tengeri haslábúak behozatalára vonatkozó különleges feltételek megállapí- tásáról szóló, 1995. október 23-i 95/453/EK bizottsági határozat (3) 1. cikke megállapítja, hogy a Koreai Köztár- saságban a „Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishe- Inspection Station ries – National Fishery Products (NFPIS)” akvakultúra-termékek 91/492/EGK irányelv követelményeinek való megfele- lését ellenőrző és igazoló illetékes hatóság; halászati és a mivel a koreai közigazgatás átalakítását követően a halá- szati termékekre vonatkozó egészségügyi bizonyítványok kiállításával a foglalkozó illetékes hatóság „Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry” helyett a „Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries” alá került, és ez az új hatóság képes a hatályban levő jogszabályok alkalmazá- sának hatékony ellenőrzésére; mivel ezért módosítani kell a 95/453/EK határozatban említett illetékes hatóság megnevezését; (NFPIS) mivel célszerű a 95/453/EK határozat címének szóhasz- nálatát összehangolni e határozat cikkeinek szóhasznála- tával, és különösen egyértelművé tenni azt, hogy a Koreai Köztársaságból származó fagyasztott vagy feldol- gozott kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákállatok és tengeri haslábúak behozatalára vonatkozó különleges feltételeket e határozat állapítja meg; mivel az e határozatban előírt intézkedések összhangban vannak az Állat-egészségügyi Állandó Bizottság vélemé- nyével, 1. cikk A 95/453/EK határozat a következőképpen módosul: 1. a cím helyébe a következő szöveg lép: „A Bizottság 1995. október 23-i határozata a Koreai Köztár- saságból származó kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákál- latok és tengeri haslábúak behozatalára vonatkozó külön- leges feltételek megállapításáról”; 2. az 1. cikk helyébe a következő szöveg lép: „1. cikk A Koreai Köztársaságban a »Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries – National Fishery Products Inspection Station (NFPIS)« a kéthéjú kagylók, tüskésbőrűek, zsákállatok és tengeri haslábúak 91/492/EGK irányelv követelményeinek való megfelelését ellenőrző és igazoló illetékes hatóság”; 3. a 2. cikk helyébe a következő szöveg lép: „2. cikk A Koreai Köztársaságból származó és emberi fogyasztásra szánt kéthéjú kagylóknak, tüskésbőrűeknek, zsákállatoknak és tengeri haslábúaknak az e határozat mellékletében felso- rolt engedélyezett tenyésztési területekről kell származniuk. ” Ennek a határozatnak a tagállamok a címzettjei. 2. cikk Kelt Brüsszelben, 1999. július 14-én. a Bizottság részéről Franz FISCHLER a Bizottság tagja (1) HL L 24. , 1998. 1. 30. , 31. o. (2) HL L 268. , 1991. 9. 24. , 1. o. (3) HL L 264. , 1995. 11. 7. , 35. o


title: Propuesta de Decisión del Consejo relativa a la celebración de un Protocolo sobre cuestiones veterinarias complementario del Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Europea, por una parte, y el Gobierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Autónomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra

eurovoc_concepts:
Denmark
Faroe Islands
multilateral agreement
protocol to an agreement
veterinary legislation

text: C 274 E/44 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 28. 9. 1999 Propuesta de Decisi(cid:243)n del Consejo relativa a la celebraci(cid:243)n de un Protocolo sobre cuestiones veterinarias complementario del Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Europea, por una parte, y el Go- bierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Aut(cid:243)nomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra (1999/C 274 E/07) COM(1999) 358 final (cid:151) 1999/0145(ACC) (Presentada por la Comisi(cid:243)n el 14 de julio de 1999) EL CONSEJO DE LA UNI(cid:211)N EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Uni(cid:243)n Europea y, en parti- cular, su art(cid:237)culo 133 en conjunci(cid:243)n con la primera frase del primer pÆrrafo del apartado 2 y con el apartado 4 de su art(cid:237)culo 300, Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Europea, por una parte, y el Gobierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Aut(cid:243)nomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra. El texto del Protocolo figura en Anexo a la presente Decisi(cid:243)n. Vista la propuesta de la Comisi(cid:243)n, Art(cid:237)culo 2 Visto el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo, Considerando que conviene aprobar el Protocolo sobre cues- tiones veterinarias complementario del Acuerdo entre la Co- munidad Europea, por una parte, y el Gobierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Aut(cid:243)nomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra, DECIDE: Art(cid:237)culo 1 Por la presente, queda aprobado en nombre de la Comunidad el Protocolo sobre cuestiones veterinarias complementario del Por la presente, se autoriza al Presidente del Consejo a designar a la persona o personas facultadas para firmar el Protocolo a fin de vincular a la Comunidad y proceder a la notificaci(cid:243)n prevista en el art(cid:237)culo 4 del Protocolo. Art(cid:237)culo 3 La Comisi(cid:243)n, asistida por los representantes de los servicios veterinarios de los Estados miembros, representarÆ a la Comu- nidad en el subgrupo veterinario previsto en el art(cid:237)culo 2 del Protocolo. El Consejo fijarÆ por mayor(cid:237)a cualificada sobre la base de una propuesta de la Comisi(cid:243)n la posici(cid:243)n de la Comu- nidad en el seno del ComitØ mixto en relaci(cid:243)n con las reco- mendaciones del subgrupo veterinario. 28. 9. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 274 E/45 sobre cuestiones veterinarias complementario del Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Europea, por una parte, y el Gobierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Aut(cid:243)nomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra PROTOCOLO LA COMUNIDAD EUROPEA, por una parte, y EL GOBIERNO DE DINAMARCA Y EL GOBIERNO AUT(cid:211)NOMO DE LAS ISLAS FEROE, por otra, VISTO el Acuerdo entre la Comunidad Europea, por una parte, y El Gobierno de Dinamarca y el Gobierno Aut(cid:243)nomo de las Islas Feroe, por otra, firmado en Bruselas el 6 de diciembre de 1996 (en lo sucesivo «el Acuerdo»), ALUDIENDO al deseo de consolidar y ampliar las relaciones econ(cid:243)micas existentes entre la Comunidad Europea y las Islas Feroe y de garantizar un desarrollo equilibrado de los intercambios entre las Partes, en el respeto de unas condiciones de competencia justas, RECORDANDO el compromiso de las Partes de aplicar las normas en el Æmbito veterinario de forma no discriminatoria y de no introducir ninguna medida nueva que obstaculice indebidamente los intercambios, REAFIRMANDO su compromiso de respetar los derechos y obligaciones derivados del Acuerdo sobre la Aplicaci(cid:243)n de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias de la OMC, DESEOSOS de garantizar que los intercambios de animales vivos y productos animales entre la Comunidad y las Islas Feroe se llevan a cabo preservando la salud pœblica y animal, (1) Considerando que, para ello, conviene establecer que esos intercambios se efectœen respetando las normas comunitarias del Æmbito veterinario; (2) Considerando que el Acuerdo se completarÆ en consecuencia mediante el presente Protocolo, CONVIENEN EN LAS DISPOSICIONES SIGUIENTES: Art(cid:237)culo 1 VIII. Zootecnia (incluidas las disposiciones referentes a los pa(cid:237)- Las Islas Feroe se comprometen a aplicar la normativa comu- nitaria en materia veterinaria en los Æmbitos siguientes: I. Medidas de lucha/Notificaciones de enfermedades, ses terceros), IX. Bienestar de los animales, X. Cuestiones institucionales. II. Salud animal: intercambios y despacho al mercado (ex- cepto pa(cid:237)ses terceros), Art(cid:237)culo 2 III. Medidas de protecci(cid:243)n de la salud animal, para los pro- ductos animales (excepto pa(cid:237)ses terceros), IV. Medidas de protecci(cid:243)n de la salud pœblica: normas para la comercializaci(cid:243)n en el mercado (excepto pa(cid:237)ses terceros), V. Hormonas, residuos, BST, zoonosis, residuos animales, ali- mentos medicamentosos, VI. Importaciones procedentes de pa(cid:237)ses terceros, El ComitØ mixto establecido en virtud del art(cid:237)culo 31 del Acuerdo confeccionarÆ la lista de las disposiciones comunita- rias en materia veterinaria que deberÆn aplicar las islas Feroe y fijarÆ sus condiciones de aplicaci(cid:243)n. En el seno del ComitØ mixto se crearÆ un subgrupo veterinario que examinarÆ peri(cid:243)dicamente la situaci(cid:243)n de la normativa comunitaria aplicable a las Islas Feroe. Cuando proceda, el subgrupo realizarÆ recomendaciones al ComitØ mixto con ob- jeto de modificar o actualizar la legislaci(cid:243)n pertinente. Art(cid:237)culo 3 VII. Control, identificaci(cid:243)n de los animales, asistencia mutua, El presente Protocolo forma parte integrante del Acuerdo. C 274 E/46 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 28. 9. 1999 Art(cid:237)culo 4 Art(cid:237)culo 5 El presente Protocolo serÆ aprobado por las Partes contratantes de conformidad con sus propios procedimientos. EntrarÆ en vigor el primer d(cid:237)a del mes siguiente a la notificaci(cid:243)n de que han sido completados los procedimientos por las Partes con- tratantes. El presente Protocolo se redacta en doble ejemplar en lenguas alemana, danesa, espaæola, feroesa, finesa, francesa, griega, in- glesa, italiana, neerlandesa, portuguesa y sueca, siendo cada uno de estos textos igualmente autØntico


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 1540/1999 af 14. juli 1999 om faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelsen af indgangsprisen for visse frugter og grøntsager

text: 15. 7. 1999 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 180/1 I (Retsakter hvis offentliggørelse er obligatorisk) KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 1540/1999 af 14. juli 1999 om faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelsen af indgangsprisen for visse frugter og grøntsager KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR — (2) ved anvendelse af ovennævnte kriterier skal de faste importværdier fastsættes på de niveauer, der findes i bilaget til nærværende forordning — under henvisning til traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Fællesskab, under henvisning til Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 3223/ 94 af 21. december 1994 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser til importordningen for frugt og grøntsager (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1498/98 (2), særlig artikel 4, stk. 1, og ud fra følgende betragtninger: (1) I forordning (EF) nr. 3223/94 fastsættes som følge af af de multilaterale resultaterne gennemførelsen af handelsforhandlinger under Uruguay-runden kriterierne for Kommissionens fastsættelse af de faste værdier ved import fra tredjelande for de produkter og perioder, der er anført i nævnte forordnings bilag; UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 De faste importværdier, der er omhandlet i artikel 4 i forord- ning (EF) nr. 3223/94, fastsættes som anført i tabellen i bilaget. Artikel 2 Denne forordning træder i kraft den 15. juli 1999. Denne medlemsstat. forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 14. juli 1999. På Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT L 337 af 24. 12. 1994, s. 66. (2) EFT L 198 af 15. 7. 1998, s. 4. L 180/2 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 15. 7. 1999 til Kommissionens forordning af 14. juli 1999 om faste importværdier med henblik på fastsættelsen af indgangs- prisen for visse frugter og grøntsager BILAG KN-kode 0707 00 05 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 0809 10 00 0809 20 95 0809 40 05 Tredjelandskode (1) Fast importværdi (EUR/100 kg) 052 628 999 052 999 382 388 524 528 999 388 400 508 512 524 528 804 999 388 512 528 804 999 052 064 999 052 061 068 400 616 999 064 624 999 61,9 130,8 96,4 54,3 54,3 55,5 61,1 44,8 60,3 55,4 86,1 69,6 74,7 63,6 55,7 82,8 101,3 76,3 98,5 63,3 76,6 72,3 77,7 137,2 79,9 108,5 187,0 155,0 90,6 216,1 170,0 163,7 83,2 258,0 170,6 (1) Den statistiske landefortegnelse, der er fastsat i Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 2317/97 (EFT L 321 af 22. 11. 1997, s. 19). Koden »999« repræsenterer »anden oprindelse«