title: Uredba Komisije (EZ) br. 1084/1999 od 26. svibnja 1999. o utvrđivanju popisa nadležnih institucija iz članka 2. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 900/1999 kojom se zabranjuje prodaja i opskrba naftom i naftnim derivatima Savezne Republike Jugoslavije

eurovoc_concepts:
Serbia and Montenegro
international sanctions
market approval
petroleum
petroleum product

text: L_1999131HR. 01002901. xml 18/Sv. 013 HR Službeni list Europske unije 7 31999R1084 L 131/29 SLUŽBENI LIST EUROPSKE UNIJE 26. 05. 1999. UREDBA KOMISIJE (EZ) br. 1084/1999 od 26. svibnja 1999. o utvrđivanju popisa nadležnih institucija iz članka 2. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 900/1999 kojom se zabranjuje prodaja i opskrba naftom i naftnim derivatima Savezne Republike Jugoslavije KOMISIJA EUROPSKIH ZAJEDNICA, uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o osnivanju Europske zajednice, uzimajući u obzir Uredbu Vijeća br. 900/1999 od 29. travnja 1999. kojom se zabranjuje prodaja, opskrba i izvoz nafte i naftnih derivata u Saveznu Republiku Jugoslaviju (1), a posebno njezin članak 6. , budući da je potrebno odrediti popis nadležnih institucija koje mogu odobriti prodaju, opskrbu ili izvoz nafte i naftnih derivata za potrebe i pod uvjetima utvrđenim u članku 2. stavku 1. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) br. 900/1999 i koje bi trebale primiti obavijesti iz članka 2. stavka 2. te Uredbe, DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU: Članak 1. Popis nadležnih institucija iz članka 2. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) 900/1999 određuje se kako je navedeno u Prilogu ovoj Uredbi. Članak 2. Ova Uredba stupa na snagu na dan objave u Službenom listu Europskih zajednica. Ova je Uredba u cijelosti obvezujuća i izravno se primjenjuje u svim državama članicama. Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 26. svibnja 1999. Za Komisiju Leon BRITTAN Potpredsjednik (1)  SL L 114, 1. 5. 1999. , str. 7. PRILOG Nazivi i adrese nadležnih institucija iz članka 2. Uredbe Vijeća (EZ) 900/1999 BELGIJA Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, Buitenlandse Handel en Ontwikkelingssamenwerking Directie-generaal van de Buitenlandse Economische en Bilaterale Betrekkingen Dienst „Centraal en Oost-Europa” (B 13) De heer Filip David Karmelietenstraat 15 B-1000 Brussel Ministère des affaires étrangères, du commerce extérieur et de la coopération au développement (Ministarstvo vanjskih poslova, vanjske trgovine i suradnje u razvoju) Direction générale des relations économiques et bilatérales extérieures (Opća uprava za vanjske gospodarske i bilateralne odnose) Service „Europe centrale et orientale” (Služba za srednju i istočnu Europu) (B 13) M. Filip David rue des Petits Carmes 15 B-1000 Bruxelles Tel. (32 2) 501 81 64 Faks (32 2) 501 88 27 DANSKA Erhvervsfremmestyrelsen (Nacionalna agencija za trgovinu i industriju) Tine Friis Hansen Tagensvej 137 DK-2200 København N Tel. (45) 35 86 86 86 Faks (45) 35 86 86 87 NJEMAČKA Bundesausfuhramt (Savezni ured za izvoz) Referat 214, Herr Pietsch Frankfurter Strasse 29-35 D-65760 Eschborn Tel. (49 6196) 908689 Faks (49 6196) 908412 GRČKA Κύριος Гεώργιος Χριστοφής Пληρεξούσιος Υπουργός Γραφείο Κυρώσεων Βασιλίσσης Σοφίας 1, 7ος όροφος GR-106 71 Αζήνα G. George Christofis, Ministar opunomoćenik B’ Ured za sankcije 1, Vasilissis Sofias, 7. kat GR-106 71 Athens Tel. (30 1) 368 42 07 Faks (30 1) 368 42 06 ŠPANJOLSKA Ministerio de Economia y Hacienda (Ministarstvo gospodarstva i financija) Secretaria General de Comercio Exterior (Opća uprava za vanjsku trgovinu) Paseo de la Castellana, No 162 E-28046 Madrid Tel. (34) 913 49 38 60 Faks (34) 914 57 28 63 FRANCUSKA Direction générale des douanes et des droits indirects (Opća uprava za carine i neizravna prava) Bureau E/2 — Cellule Embargo (Ured E/2 — Služba za embargo) Mlle Diane Foreau 23 bis, rue de l’Universite F-75700 Pariz Cedex 07 S. P. Tel. (33 1) 44 74 48 93 Faks (33 1) 44 74 48 97 IRSKA Licensing Unit (Ured za dozvole) (Mr Michael Greene) Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Odjel za tvrtke, trgovinu i zapošljavanje) Kildare Street Ireland Dublin 2 Tel. (353 1) 631 24 46 Faks(353 1) 676 61 54 e-mail: greenem@entemp. irlgov. ic ITALIJA Ministero del Commercio con l’Estero (Ministarstvo vanjske trgovine) Direzione generale per la politica commerciale e per la gestione del regime degli scambi (Opća uprava za komercijalnu politiku i upravljanje trgovinskim režimima) Divisione IV (UOPAT) Dr. Borghese Viale Boston 25 I-00144 Roma Tel. (39 06) 59 64 75 34 Faks (39 06) 59 64 75 06 e-mail: INFO@Mincomes. IT LUKSEMBURG Office des Licences (Ured za dozvole) M. A. Paulus BP 113 L-2011 Luxembourg Tel. (352) 478 23 70 Faks (352) 46 61 38 e-mail: andre. paulus@mae. etat. lu NIZOZEMSKA Ministerie van Economische Zaken Directoraat-generaal van de Buitenlandse Economische Betrekkingen Directie Handelspolitiek en Investeringsbeleid Afdeling Exportcontrole en Sanctiebeleid (BEB/DHI/ES) mw. drs. C. M. van Dantzig Postbus 20101 2500 EC Den Haag Netherlands Tel. (31 70) 379 63 57/63 80 Faks (31 70) 379 73 92 e-mail: e. m. vandantzig@minez. nl AUSTRIJA Bundesministerium fur wirtschaftliche Angelegenheiten, Gruppe II. a Landstrasser Hauptstrasse 55-57 A-1030 Wien Tel. (43 1) 711 02/361 Faks (43 1) 715 83 47 PORTUGAL Ministério da Economia (Ministarstvo gospodarstva) Direcção Geral das Relações Económicas Internacionais (Opća uprava za međunarodne gospodarske odnose) Alice Rodrigues/Jose Gomes Avenida da Républica, 79 P-Lisboa Tel. (351 1) 791 19 43 Faks (351 1) 796 37 23 FINSKA Ulkoasiainministeriö (Ministarstvo vanjskih poslova) PL 176 SF-00161 Helsinki Tel. (358-9) 1341-5555 Faks (358-9) 629-840 Utrikesministeriet PL 176 SF-00161 Helsingfors Tel. (358 9) 1341 5555 Faks (358 9) 629 840 ŠVEDSKA Regeringskansliet (Ured švedske vlade) Utrikesdepartementet Rättssekretariatet för EU-frågor (Služba za EU pitanja) Fredsgatan 6 S-103 39 Stockholm Tel. (46 8) 405 10 00 Faks (46 8) 453 66 99 UJEDINJENA KRALJEVINA Export Policy Unit (Služba za izvoznu politiku) Department of Trade and Industry (Odjel za trgovinu i industriju) Kingsgate House 66-74, Victoria Street London SW1E 6SW Tel. (44 171) 215 89 98 Faks (44 171) 215 85 19 EUROPSKA ZAJEDNICA European Commission (Europska Komisija) Directorate-General I Mr A. de Vries, DM24 5/75 rue de la Loi/wetstraatz B-1044 Brussel/Bruxelles Tel. (32-2) 295 68 80 Faks (32-2) 295 73 31 e-mail: anthonius. de-vries@dg1. cec. be


title: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1083/1999 z dne 26. maja 1999 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 1617/93 o uporabi člena 85(3) Pogodbe za določene skupine sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj glede skupnega načrtovanja in usklajevanja voznih redov, skupnega obratovanja, posvetovanj o cenah prevoza potnikov in blaga v rednem zračnem prevozu in dodelitve časovnih blokov na letališčih

eurovoc_concepts:
air freight rate
air transport
carriage of passengers
freight rate
inter-company agreement
transport planning

formats: html pdf print

text: 294 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 07/Zv. 4 31999R1083 27. 5. 1999 URADNI LIST EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI L 131/27 UREDBA KOMISIJE (ES) št. 1083/1999 z dne 26. maja 1999 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 1617/93 o uporabi člena 85(3) Pogodbe za določene skupine sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj glede skupnega načrtovanja in usklajevanja voznih redov, skupnega obratovanja, posvetovanj o cenah prevoza potnikov in blaga v rednem zračnem prevozu in dodelitve časovnih blokov na letališčih KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3976/87 z dne 14. decembra 1987 o uporabi člena 85(3) Pogodbe za nekatere kategorije sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj v sektorju zrač- nega prevoza (1), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu Avstrije, Finske in Švedske, in zlasti člena 3 uredbe, ob upoštevanju objavljenega osnutka te uredbe (2), ob posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za sporazume in pre- vladujoče položaje v zračnem prevozu, (1) (2) (3) ker Uredba (EGS) št. 3976/87 pooblašča Komisijo za uporabo člena 81(3), nekdanjega člena 85(3) Pogodbe, v zvezi z nekaterimi skupinami sporazumov, sklepov in usklajenih ravnanj v zračnem prevozu, ki sodijo v člen 81(1) in med drugim urejajo skupno načrtovanje in usklajevanje redov letenja letalskih prevoznikov, posveto- vanja o tarifah za prevoz potnikov in prtljage ter tovora v rednem zračnem prevozu, skupno poslovanje na novih, manj zasedenih rednih zračnih prevozih, dodelje- vanje časovnih blokov na letališčih in časovni razpored operacij na letališčih z uredbo; ker je Komisija z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1617/93 (3), kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1523/96 (4), odobrila skupinsko izjemo za prej navedene zadeve; ker je navedena uredba veljala do 30. junija 1998; ker je Komisija pred 30. junijem 1998 začela obsežne preiskave za preverjanje obsega, v katerem naj bi za štiri področja zračnega prevoza iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 1617/93 še naprej veljala izjema; ker so bili zadevni gospodarski (1) UL L 374, 31. 12. 1987, str. 9. (2) UL C 369, 28. 11. 1998, str. 2. (3) UL L 155, 26. 6. 1993, str. 18. (4) UL L 190, 31. 7. 1996, str. 11. subjekti naprošeni, da skrbno ocenijo tekoče dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo na vsakem od štirih področij iz navedene uredbe, in sporočijo obseg možnosti novih subjektov za dostop na trge; ker trenutno razpoložljivi rezultati te preiskave in posve- tovanja z gospodarskimi subjekti omogočajo sklep, da ni priporočljivo razširiti skupinske izjeme za sporazume o skupnem načrtovanju in usklajevanju redov letenja in za sporazume o skupnem poslovanju; ker izhaja ta sklep iz ugotovitve, da takšni sporazumi, zlasti pri povezovanjih, zajemajo širše poslovno posvetovanje, kakor je dvo- stransko posvetovanje o tarifah, ki ga ni bilo mogoče izvzeti v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1617/93; ker naj se zato veljavnost Uredbe (EGS) št. 1617/93 ne bi razširila na ti dve zadevi, brez poseganja v možnost, da podjetja zaprosijo za posamično izjemo po členu 81(3); ker preiskav o sporazumih in usklajenih ravnanjih glede posvetovanj o tarifah za prevoz potnikov in njihove prtljage v rednem zračnem prevozu ter dodeljevanju časovnih blokov na letališčih ni bilo mogoče pravočasno končati, da bi bila nova uredba sprejeta in objavljena pred 30. junijem 1998; ker je treba zaradi pravne varnosti zadevnih podjetij in zato, da bi bilo na podlagi tekočih preiskav mogoče pri- praviti zaključke za sprejetje nove uredbe do 30. junija 2001, podaljšati uporabo določb Uredbe (EGS) št. 1617/ 93 o posvetovanjih o tarifah za prevoz potnikov in prtljage ter o dodeljevanju časovnih blokov na letališčih do navedenega datuma; (4) (5) (6) (7) ker bi bilo treba Uredbo (EGS) št. 1617/93 zato ustrezno spremeniti, 07/Zv. 4 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 295 SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO: 4. v členu 7 se „30. junij 1998“ nadomesti s „30. junij 2001“. Člen 1 Uredba (EGS) št. 1617/93 se spremeni: 1. v členu 1 se črtata prva in druga alinea; 2. člena 2 in 3 se črtata; 3. točka (ii) člena 6 se črta; Člen 2 Ta uredba začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti. Uporabljati se začne 1. julija 1998. Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah. V Bruslju, 26. maja 1999 Za Komisijo Karel VAN MIERT Član Komisije


title: Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1081/1999 z dne 26. maja 1999 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja tarifnih kvot za uvoz bikov, krav in telic, nekaterih alpskih in gorskih pasem, razen za zakol, o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1012/98 in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1143/98

eurovoc_concepts:
bull
cow
heifer
import licence
tariff quota

text: 02/Zv. 9 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 227 31999R1081 L 131/15 URADNI LIST EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI 27. 5. 1999 UREDBA KOMISIJE (ES) št. 1081/1999 z dne 26. maja 1999 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja tarifnih kvot za uvoz bikov, krav in telic, nekaterih alpskih in gorskih pasem, razen za zakol, o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1012/98 in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1143/98 KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE kvot ter da se za ves uvoz obravnavanih živali uporabljajo carine, določene za te kvote, dokler se kvote ne izčrpajo; ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 805/68 z dne 27. junija 1968 o skupni ureditvi trga govedine in teletine (1), nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1633/98 (2), in zlasti člena 12(1) Uredbe, (ES) ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 3066/95 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o vzpostavitvi nekaterih koncesij v obliki tarifnih kvot Skupnosti za nekatere kmetijske proizvode in določa kot avtonomen in prehoden ukrep prilagoditev nekaterih kmetij- skih koncesij, določenih v evropskih sporazumih, ki upoštevajo Sporazum o kmetijstvu, sklenjen med Urugvajskim krogom mul- tilateralnih trgovinskih pogajanj (3), nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 2435/98 (4) in zlasti člena 8 Uredbe, ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 1095/96 z dne 18. junija 1996 o izvajanju koncesij, določenih v Programu CXL, pripravljenim neposredno po zaključku pogajanj GATT XXIV. 6 (5) in zlasti člena 1(1) Uredbe, (ES) (1) ker se je Skupnost v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organiza- cije (WTO) obvezala, da bo odprla dve letni tarifni kvoti, vsako za 5 000 glav bikov, krav in telic, razen za zakol, simentalske lisaste pasme in pasme Schwyz in Fribourg ter krav in telic, razen za zakol, sive, rjave, rumene in simentalske lisaste pasme in pasme Pinzgau po 6 % in 4 % carinskih stopnjah; ker naj se te kvote odprejo na večletni osnovi za dvanajstmesečna obdobja, ki se začnejo 1. julija, v nadaljnjem besedilu „leto uvoza“, določijo pa naj se podrobna pravila za njihovo uporabo; (2) ker je potrebno jamstvo, da imajo vsi zainteresirani sub- jekti v Skupnosti zlasti enak in stalen dostop do navedenih (1) UL L 148, 28. 6. 1968, str. 24. (2) UL L 210, 28. 7. 1998, str. 17. (3) UL L 328, 30. 12. 1995, str. 31. (4) UL L 303, 13. 11. 1998, str. 1. (5) UL L 146, 20. 6. 1996, str. 1. (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) ker so izkušnje pokazale, da lahko omejevanje uvoza povzroči špekulativne zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja; ker naj se, da se zagotovi pravilno delovanje načrtovanih ukrepov, večji del razpoložljivih količin dodeli „tradicional- nim“ uvoznikom bikov, krav in telic navedenih alpskih in gorskih pasem; ker lahko upravne napake pristojnih nacio- nalnih organov v nekaterih primerih omejijo dostop uvo- znikov do tega dela kvote; ker naj se predvidi odprava nji- hove morebitne prikrajšanosti; ker naj se da na voljo druga tranša uvoznikom, ki so sposobni dokazati, da v nekem obsegu dejansko trgujejo s tretjimi državami, da ne pride do vsiljevanja trgovinskih odnosov v tem sektorju v pretirano tog kalup; ker naj se s tem v zvezi in zaradi učinkovitega upravljanja od zadev- nih izvajalcev zahteva, da so v 12 mesecih pred letom obravnavanega uvoza uvozili najmanj 15 glav; ker serija 15 živali načeloma predstavlja normalen tovor in izkušnje kažejo, da je prodaja ali nabava posamezne serije mini- malna zahteva, da se posel šteje kot dejansko opravljen in gospodaren; ker je treba, zaradi preverjanja skladnosti s temi merili, zahtevke predložiti v državi članici, kjer je uvoznik regi- striran za namene DDV; ker naj se zaradi preprečitve špekulacij „tradicionalnim“ uvoznikom, ki 1. junija pred letom obravnavanega uvoza niso več vključeni v trgovino z govedino in teletino, zavrne dostop do kvot; ker naj se zagotovijo uvozne pravice, ki se dodelijo po času za premislek in, po potrebi, ob upoštevanju uporabe enot- nega odstotka znižanja; SL Uradni list Evropske unije 02/Zv. 9 228 (8) ker je treba zagotoviti upravljanje režimov s pomočjo uvoznih dovoljenj; ker naj se v ta namen zagotovijo zlasti podrobna pravila o načinu predložitve zahtevkov in o pod- robnih pravilih, ki naj se prikažejo na zahtevkih in dovo- ljenjih, če je potrebno z odstopanjem ali dopolnitvijo nekaterih določb Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 3719/88 z dne 16. novembra 1988 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj ter potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi kmetijskih proizvodov (1), nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1044/98 (2), in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1445/95 z dne 26. junija 1995 o pravilih za uporabo uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj v sek- torju govedine in teletine ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2377/80 (3), nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 2365/98 (4); (9) ker člen 82 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (5), nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 82/97 (6), predvi- deva carinski nadzor blaga, sproščenega v prosti promet po znižani carinski stopnji zaradi končne uporabe; ker naj se uvožene živali določeno obdobje spremljajo, da se zago- tovi, da se v tem času ne zakoljejo; ker naj se, da se zago- tovi, da v tem obdobju ni zakola, zahteva varščina za kritje razlike med carino po skupni carinski tarifi (SCT) in zni- žano carino, ki se uporablja na datum sprostitve obravna- vanih živali v prosti promet; in gorskih pasem, razen za zakol (7), spremenjeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 1143/98 (8); (11) ker z namenom, da se zagotovi, da se uvožene živali dolo- čeno obdobje ne zakoljejo, člen 7(2) in (3) Uredbe Komi- sije (ES) št. 1143/98 z dne 2. junija 1998 o določitvi pod- robnih pravil za tarifno kvoto za krave in telice določenih gorskih pasem s poreklom iz različnih tretjih držav, razen za zakol, ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1012/98 pred- videva, da se uvožene živali identificirajo v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 820/97 z dne 21. aprila 1997 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda in glede označevanja govedine in proizvodov iz govedine (9) ter še nekatere dodatne podrobne podatke; ker naj se glede na to, da so ti podatki že obvezni, črtata obravnavana odstavka; (12) ker naj se zaradi jasnosti popravita člen 2(1)(a) in člen 8(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1143/98; (13) ker so ukrepi, predvideni v tej uredbi, v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za goveje in telečje meso, SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO: Člen 1 (10) ker je treba razveljaviti Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1012/98 z dne 14. maja 1998 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja tarifnih kvot za uvoz bikov, krav in telic nekaterih alpskih 1. Na večletni osnovi se odprejo naslednje tarifne kvote za obdobja od 1. julija do 30. junija naslednjega leta, v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovana „leto uvoza“. Serijska št. Oznaka KN (1) Poimenovanje Krave in telice naslednjih gorskih pasem: sive, rjave, rumene in simentalske lisaste pasme in pasme Pinzgau, razen za zakol 09. 0001 ex 0102 90 05 ex 0102 90 29 ex 0102 90 49 ex 0102 90 59 ex 0102 90 69 (1) Oznaka TARIC: glej Prilogo I. Obseg kvot (glav goveda) 5 000 Carina 6 % (1) UL L 331, 2. 12. 1988, str. 1. (2) UL L 19, 26. 1. 1999, str. 4. (3) UL L 143, 27. 6. 1995, str. 35. (4) UL L 335, 10. 12. 1998, str. 39. (5) UL L 302, 19. 10. 1992, str. 1. (6) UL L 119, 7. 5. 1999, str. 1. (7) UL L 145, 15. 5. 1998, str. 13. (8) UL L 159, 3. 6. 1998, str. 14. (9) UL L 117, 7. 5. 1997, str. 1. 02/Zv. 9 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 229 Serijska št. Oznaka KN (1) Poimenovanje Biki, krave in telice naslednjih pasem: simentalske lisaste pasme in pasme Schwyz in Fribourg, razen za zakol 09. 0003 ex 0102 90 05 ex 0102 90 29 ex 0102 90 49 ex 0102 90 59 ex 0102 90 69 ex 0102 90 79 (1) Oznaka TARIC: glej Prilogo I. Obseg kvot (glav goveda) 5 000 Carina 4 % 2. Za namene te uredbe se šteje, da živali iz odstavka 1 niso za zakol, kadar se ne zakoljejo v štirih mesecih od datuma prejetja deklaracije o sprostitvi v prosti promet. živali iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 1(a) v 36 mesecih pred letom obravnavanega uvoza. Vendar se lahko v dokazanih primerih višje sile odobrijo odsto- panja. 3. Da se kvalificirajo za tarifno kvoto, vključeno pod serijsko št. 09. 0003, je treba predložiti naslednje: — za bike: zootehniško spričevalo, 3. Na podlagi zahtevkov, predloženih za uvozne pravice, se drugi del dodeli različnim uvoznikom iz odstavka 1(b) sorazmerno s količinami, za katere so zaprosili. Zahtevki za uvozne pravice: — morajo vključevati 15 glav ali več in — ne smejo vključevati več kakor 50 glav. — za živali ženskega spola: zootehniško spričevalo ali potrdilo o registraciji v rodovniški knjigi, ki potrjuje čistost pasme. Zahtevki za uvozne pravice, ki vključujejo več kakor 50 glav, se obravnavajo, kot da vključujejo le to število. Člen 2 1. Kvoti, predvideni v členu 1(1) se razdelita na dva dela, in sicer 80 %, to je 4 000 glav, in 20 %, to je 1 000 glav. (a) Prvi del, enak 80 % vsake kvote, se razdeli med uvoznike Skupnosti, ki lahko predložijo dokaz, da so v 36 mesecih pred letom obravnavanega uvoza uvozili živali po kvotah, vključe- nih v serijski št. 09. 0001 in/ali št. 09. 0003. 4. Dokaz o uvozu se zagotovi izključno s carinskimi dokumenti o sprostitvi v prosti promet, ki so jih carinski organi ustrezno potrdili. Države članice lahko sprejmejo kopije zgornjih dokumentov, ki jih je ustrezno potrdil organ izdajatelj, kadar lahko vlagatelji zado- voljivo dokažejo pristojnim organom, da ne morejo dobiti izvir- nikov. Člen 3 Vendar lahko države članice sprejmejo kot referenčno koli- čino uvoznih pravic glede na uvoz, ki se v preteklem letu ni dodelil zaradi upravne napake pristojnega nacionalnega organa. 1. Uvozniki, ki so 1. junija pred letom obravnavanega uvoza pre- nehali s svojo dejavnostjo v sektorju govedine in teletine, ne izpol- njujejo pogojev za dodelitev po prvem pododstavku člena 2(1)(a). (b) Drugi del, enak 20 % vsake kvote, se rezervira za vlagatelje, ki lahko predložijo dokaz, da so v 12 mesecih pred letom obrav- navanega uvoza uvozili najmanj 15 glav živega goveda, vklju- čenega v oznako KN 0102, iz tretjih držav. 2. Družbe, ki so nastale z združitvijo podjetij, od katerih je vsako imelo pravice na podlagi člena 2(2), uživajo enake pravice kakor podjetja iz podjetij, iz katerih so nastale. Uvozniki morajo biti vpisani v nacionalni register DDV. Člen 4 2. Na podlagi zahtevkov, predloženih za uvozne pravice, se prvi del dodeli različnim uvoznikom sorazmerno z njihovim uvozom 1. Zahtevki za uvozne pravice se lahko predložijo le v državi čla- nici, kjer je vlagatelj vpisan v nacionalni register DDV. 230 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 02/Zv. 9 2. Vlagatelji lahko predložijo le en zahtevek na kvoto, ta zahte- vek pa se nanaša le na en del kvote. 3. Ko Komisija uradno objavi količine, dodeljene na podlagi člena 5(1), se izdajo uvozna dovoljenja na zahtevo in v imenu trgovcev, ki so pridobili uvozne pravice. Kadar vlagatelj predloži več kot en zahtevek na kvoto, se vsi zahtevki tega vlagatelja na to kvoto štejejo za neveljavne. 4. Uvozna dovoljenja veljajo 90 dni od datuma izdaje v smislu člena 21(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3719/88. Vendar se lahko dovoljenja izdajajo le od 1. julija v letu uvoza, rok njihove veljavnosti pa poteče 30. junija naslednje leto. 3. Za namene člena 2(1)(a) in (b) morajo pristojni organi zahtevke za uvozne pravice za vsako serijsko številko skupaj z dokazom iz člena 2(4) prejeti do 15. junija pred ustreznim letom uvoza. 5. Izdana dovoljenja veljajo v vsej Skupnosti. 4. Po preverjanju predloženih dokumentov, države članice do 10. delovnega dne po končnem datumu za predložitev zahtevkov za vsako serijsko številko Komisiji pošljejo naslednje: — za dodelitev, predvideno v prvem pododstavku člena 2(1)(a), seznam uvoznikov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za sprejem, z imeni in naslovi ter številom živali, uvoženih v obdobju iz člena 2(2), 6. Brez poseganja v določbe te uredbe se uporabljata uredbi (EGS) št. 3719/88 in (ES) št. 1445/95. 7. Ne glede na člen 9(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3719/88 uvozna dovol- jenja, izdana na podlagi te uredbe, niso prenosljiva in dodeljujejo pravice le po tarifnih kvotah, kadar se izdajo na imena, ki se pojavljajo v spremljajočih deklaracijah o sprostitvi v prosti pro- met. — za dodelitev, predvideno v členu 2(1)(b), seznam vlagateljev z imeni in naslovi ter zaprošenimi količinami. 8. Člen 8(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3719/88 se ne uporablja. 5. Vsa obvestila, vključno z „ničnimi“ obvestili, se pošljejo po faksu na obrazcih iz Prilog II in III, kadar se zahtevki predložijo. Člen 7 Člen 5 1. Uvožene živali se spremljajo v skladu s členom 82 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2913/92, da se zagotovi, da se ne zakoljejo v štirih mese- cih po sprostitvi v prosti promet. 1. Komisija odloči, kolikšen odstotek zaprošenih količin se lahko dodeli. 2. Za zahtevke iz druge alinee člena 4(4) Komisija določi enoten odstotek znižanja zaprošenih količin, kadar zaprošene količine presegajo razpoložljive količine. Kadar uporaba enotnega odstotka znižanja, predvidenega v prvem pododstavku, povzroči, da se na zahtevek dodeli manj kot 15 glav, dodelitve opravijo zadevne države članice z oblikovanjem partij v serijah po 15 glav. Kadar je ostanek manjši od 15 glav, to število tvori eno partijo. izpolnjevanje obveznosti iz 2. Z namenom, da se zagotovi odstavka 1, da se uvožene živali ne zakoljejo, ter da se izterjajo neplačane dajatve, kadar ta obveznost ni izpolnjena, morajo uvozniki pri pristojnih carinskih organih položiti varščino. Var- ščina je enaka razliki med carinami, določenimi v skupni carinski tarifi, in dajatvami iz člena 1(1), ki se uporabljajo na datum spro- stitve obravnavanih živali v prost promet. Varščine se sprostijo takoj, ko se zadevnim carinskim organom predloži dokaz, da: (a) se živali niso zaklale v štirih mesecih od datuma sprostitve v prosti promet, ali Člen 6 (b) so se živali zaklale v tem obdobju zaradi višje sile ali zaradi zdravstvenih razlogov ali pa so poginile zaradi bolezni ali zaradi nesreče. 1. Za uvoz dodeljenih količin je treba predložiti eno ali več uvoz- nih dovoljenj. 2. Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja se lahko predložijo le pristoj- nemu organu države članice, kjer je vlagatelj zaprosil za uvozne pravice. V zahtevkih in dovoljenjih je navedeno: Člen 8 02/Zv. 9 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 231 (a) v okencu 8 država porekla; dovoljenja nalagajo obveznost uvoza iz navedene države; 6. Zahtevki za uvozne pravice morajo do pristojnih organov pri- speti v petih delovnih dneh od začetka veljavnosti Odločbe Komi- sije iz odstavka 3. (b) v okencu 16 oznake KN, navedene v Prilogi I; (c) v okencu 20 eno od naslednjega: — Razas alpinas y de montaña [Reglamento (CE) no 1081/1999], año de importación:… 7. Do sedmega delovnega dne po končnem roku za predložitev zahtevkov iz odstavka 6 države članice pošljejo Komisiji seznam vlagateljev in zaprošenih količin za vsako serijsko številko. 8. Za namene tega člena se smiselno uporabljajo členi 5 do 8. — Alpine racer og bjergracer (forordning (EF) nr. 1081/1999), importår:… Člen 10 — Höhenrassen (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1081/1999), Einfuhr- jahr:… Uredba (ES) št. 1012/98 se razveljavi. — Αλπικές και ορεσίβιες φυλές 1081/1999], έτος εισαγωγής … [κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. Člen 11 — Alpine and mountain breeds 1081/1999), Year of import:… (Regulation (EC) No Uredba (ES) št. 1143/98 se spremeni: — Races alpines et de montagne [réglement no 1081/1999], année d’importation:… (CE) 1. Drugi pododstavek člena 2(1)(a) se nadomesti z: — Razze alpine e di montagna [regolamento (CE) n. 1081/1999], anno d’importazione:… — Bergrassen (Verordening (EG) nr. 1081/1999), invoer- jaar:… — Raças alpinas e de montanha [Regulamento (CE) n. o 1081/1999], ano de importaçăo:… — Alppi- ja vuoristorotuja (Asetus (EY) N:o 1081/1999), tuontivuosi:… — Alp- och bergraser (förordning (EG) nr 1081/1999), importår:… Člen 9 1. Količine, ki 15. marca v letu uvoza niso vključene v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, se odobrijo pri končni dodelitvi za nave- deno leto, odprti le za uvoznike, ki so zaprosili za uvozna dovol- jenja, ki vključujejo skupno količino, do katere so upravičeni, ne glede na razliko med režimoma, predvidenima v členu 2(1)(a) in (b). 2. V ta namen države članice do 22. marca v letu uvoza pošljejo Komisiji podrobne podatke o količinah, ki niso vključene v pre- jete zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, za vsako serijsko številko. 3. Komisija odloči, kakor hitro je mogoče, o preostalih količinah. „Vendar pa lahko države članice sprejmejo kot referenčno količino uvoznih pravic glede na uvoz, ki se v predhodnem letu ni dodelil zaradi upravne napake pristojnega nacionalnega organa. “ 2. Člena 7(2) in(3) se črtata. 3. Člen 8(c) se nadomesti z: „(c) v okencu 20 eno od naslednjega: — Razas de montaña [Reglamento (CE) no 1143/98], año de importación:… — Bjergracer (forordning (EF) nr. 1143/98), importår:… — Höhenrassen (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1143/98), Ein- fuhrjahr:… — Ορεσίβιες φυλές [κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. ], έτος εισαγωγής … — Mountain breeds (Regulation (EC) No 1143/98), Year of import:… — Races de montagne [réglement (CE) no 1143/98], année d’importation:… — Razze di montagna [regolamento (CE) n. 1143/98], anno d’importazione:… 4. Zahtevki za uvozne pravice zainteresiranih uvoznikov iz odstavka 1 se morajo nanašati na 15 glav. — Bergrassen (Verordening (EG) nr. 1143/98), invoer- jaar:… Kadar se predložijo zahtevki za večje število, se obravnavajo, kot da vključujejo le to število. — Raças de montanha [Regulamento (CE) n. o 1143/98], ano de importaçăo:… 5. Vsak vlagatelj lahko predloži le en zahtevek na kvoto. Kadar vlagatelji predložijo več kot en zahtevek na kvoto, so vsi njihovi zahtevki za to kvoto nesprejemljivi. — Vuoristorotuja tuontivuosi:… (Asetus (EY) N:o 1143/98), — Bergraser (förordning (EG) nr 1143/98), importår:…“ 232 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 02/Zv. 9 Člen 12 Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti. Vendar pa se člen 10 uporablja šele od 1. julija 1999. Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah. V Bruslju, 26. maja 1999 Za Komisijo Franz FISCHLER Član Komisije 02/Zv. 9 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 233 PRILOGA I Oznake TARIC Oznake KN Oznake TARIC Serijska št. 09. 0001 ex 0102 90 05 ex 0102 90 29 ex 0102 90 49 ex 0102 90 59 ex 0102 90 69 09. 0003 ex 0102 90 05 ex 0102 90 29 ex 0102 90 49 ex 0102 90 59 ex 0102 90 69 ex 0102 90 79 0102 90 05*20 *40 0102 90 29*20 *40 0102 90 49*20 *40 0102 90 59*11 *19 *31 *39 0102 90 69*10 *30 0102 90 05*30 *40 *50 0102 90 29*30 *40 *50 0102 90 49*30 *40 *50 0102 90 59*21 *29 *31 *39 0102 90 69*20 *30 0102 90 79*21 *29 234 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 02/Zv. 9 PRILOGA II ES Faks št. (32-2) 296 60 27/(32-2) 295 36 13 02/Zv. 9 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 235 PRILOGA III ES faks št. (32-2) 296 60 27/(32-2) 295 36 13


title: Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses zu dem «Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Rates zur dritten Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 850/98 vom 30. März 1998 zur Erhaltung der Fischereiressourcen durch technische Maßnahmen zum Schutz von jungen Meerestieren»

eurovoc_concepts:
conservation of fish stocks
fishery resources
fishing area
fishing net
fishing regulations
protection of animal life

text: 22. 7. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften C 209/27 Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses zu dem „Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Rates zur dritten A¨ nderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 850/98 vom 30. März 1998 zur Erhaltung der Fischereiressourcen durch technische Maßnahmen zum Schutz von jungen Meerestieren“ (1999/C 209/08) Der Rat beschloß am 28. April 1999, den Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuß gemäß Artikel 43 und 198 des EG-Vertrags um Stellungnahme zu dem vorgenannten Vorschlag zu ersuchen. Der Ausschuß beschloß, Herrn Chagas als Hauptberichterstatter mit der Vorbereitung der Arbeiten zu beauftragen. Der Ausschuß verabschiedete auf seiner 364. Plenartagung (Sitzung vom 26. Mai 1999) einstimmig folgende Stellungnahme. 1. Einleitung 2. Allgemeine Bemerkungen 1. 1. Mit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 850/98 (1) erließ der Rat technischen Maßnahmen zum Schutz junger Meerestiere. Der Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschuß befürwortet den 2. 1. Verordnungsvorschlag. 1. 2. Nach der Annahme und Veröffentlichung dieser Ver- ordnung zeigte sich, daß diese bestimmte Aspekte, die der Kommission zur Kenntnis gebracht worden waren, noch nicht berücksichtigte. 2. 2. Mit diesem Vorschlag sollen Lücken geschlossen und bestimmte Entwicklungen berücksichtigt werden, denen mit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 850/98 noch nicht Rechnung getragen wurde. 1. 3. Mit dem nun vorliegenden Vorschlag wird die Verord- nung (EG) Nr. 850/98 in diesen Punkten geändert. (1) ABl. L 125 vom 27. 4. 1998. Brüssel, den 26. Mai 1999. 2. 3. Es handelt sich um eine folgerichtige Anpassung, die sich aus der Notwendigkeit ergibt, in bezug auf die technischen Maßnahmen den bestmöglichen Kompromiß zwischen dem idealen technischen Stand und der Realität der Fischereitätig- keit herbeizuführen. Die Präsidentin des Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses Beatrice RANGONI MACHIAVELLI


title: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the stabilisation and association process for countries of South-Eastern Europe - Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
Western Balkans
aid policy
association agreement
development policy

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26. 05. 1999 COM(l999)235 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the Stabilisation and Association process for countries of South-Eastern Europe Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania Table of Contents 1. 2. 3. Political Context The existing EU Regional Approach Further development of the Regional Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stabilisation and Association Agreements Democratization, civil society and institution-building Justice and Home Affairs Trade Economic and Financial Assistance Political Dialogue • ~! ~~ ;:I ~~ 1 j I ,; l ! 4. General Conclusions Country Specific Conclusions 0 0 0 0 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Albania Annexes 1 2 EC assistance to the countries of the region since 1991 Developments in countries of the Regional Approach since 1996, in particular regarding compliance, since October 1998, with Regional Approach conditionality criteria 1 2 3 3 5 5 5 6 7 7 9 9 9 10 10 11 13. 4 fA. 1. Political context Countries of South-Eastern Europe have, for the last decade, enjoyed a great deal of support from the international community in general and the European Union in particular. Despite this, they have continued to suffer from inter-ethnic tensions and conflict. There has been a lack of substantial political or economic development. Despite major efforts to stabilise individual countries and the region as a whole, the progress made has been fragile. This is clear from the degree to which it has been jeopardised by the current conflict in Kosovo. The region is now at a turning point. A new approach to peace and stability in the wider region, involving both the countries of the wider region and the European Union, is urgently needed. At this time of tremendous upheaval and uncertainty in the region. the EU has a responsibility to contribute to the resolution both of the immediate instability and, in the longer term, to the general stabilisation and development of the region. This responsibility has been recognised, most recently, by the European Council on 14 April, and by the General Affairs Councils on 8 and 26 April, and 27 May 1999. Fulfilling this responsibility will necessitate decisions on considerable amounts of further assistance, as well as on appropriate implementation mechanisms and legal bases. The European Union faces an ever greater challenge. lt needs to play an important proactive role in the region. lt is presently responding to this challenge through the development of its existing Regional Approach to the countries of South-Eastern Europe. The further development of this Regional Approach into a Stabilisation and Association process. which will at a later stage become part of the future EU Common Strategy, will be central for the EU's political visibility and will also constitute an important element of the Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe which was approved by the Council on ·17 May. The Stability Pact will provide a framework, wider than the EU, in which all can contribute to lasting peace and stability, democracy and economic prosperity, in the region. it will help the process of integration into Euro-Atlantic structures. The proposals in the present Communication for the development of a Stabilisation and Association process will also help the development of the EU Common Strategy towards the Western Balkans. which will constitute the framework for EU relations with the region in the coming years and will be the ionger term perspective within which the prospects for proposed closer relations with the countries of the region should be seen. As at two other key stages in recent history- the emergence of independent states in Central and Eastern Europe in 1989-90and the dissolution of the former Soviet Union in 1991 - the European Union is confronted with geopolitical challenges requiring the development of new policies, and instruments, towards a group of countries. On this occasion, it must respond by offering a perspective of integration, based on a progressive approach adapted to the situation of the specific countries. The European Union has a particular interest in the region, because of its geographic proximity to Member States and candidate countries. This interest will be even higher following the future enlargements of the European Union, which will bring these countries even closer to the our borders. Stabilization of the reg1on would bring real benefits both to the region and to the EU. Instability is very costly for all concerned. The EU has spent enormous sums on repairing the results of instability - over 7bnll since 1991 (cletails at Annex I) without counting the cost of refugees within EU Member States or of other operations (UN, OSCE, NATO. )- a bill which is continuing to rise in the present circumstances. 1t is clearly more in the interest of the countries of the region, and of the European Union to which they will ultimately belong, that even a fraction of these sums should be spent instead on their political and economic development. The present conflict in Kosovo has shown the potential political effects of instability on neighbouring states. with the risk of destabilisation of the former Yugoslav Republic of ~. llacedonia, Albania and lt has also had economic effects on countries of the region, such as Romania and Bulgaria. Montenegro. -!hose countries are already on track to EU membership, and this process will not be affected by d·~·'''~lopments in this region. lt reveals, once again, the inextricably regional nature of problems in th1s z::;ne. and reinforces the need for a regional approach to the problems. The countries of the wider region, both candidates and EU Member States. have a particular contribution to rnake as examples of the progress that can be made (e. g. in democratisation, multi-~ethnicity, reform) and in the building of practica~ interdependence. 2. The existing EU Regional Approach The changed wider political context necessitates a development of existing policy. But, even without it, it would be appropriate, three years after the elaboration of the Regional Approach, to make proposals for its further development. Recent events, and the accelerated pace of the development of other related strategies, mean that the enhancement of the Regional Approach should be more ambitious. lt should respond to the challenges posed by the changed situation on the ground and the new political context. The Commission's proposals, in section 3 below, are therefore more than routine "conclusions" on. the developments in the Regional Approach countries, but also respond to the changed nature of the situation and the challenges faced. The Regional Approach provides a framework for the development of relations with five countries of the region - Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Albania - with which the EC had not, in 1996, adopted directives for the negotiation of association agreements. These five states were, and remain. differentiated into two groups. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania, which were not involved in the 1991-95 war and had more advanced bilateral relations with the EC, on the one hand, and the other three countries which are party to the Dayton I Paris peace agreements, compliance with which is an important factor in regional stability as well as relations with the EU, on the other. The primary objectives of the Regional Approach, as established in 1996, were to underpin the successful implementation of the Dayton I Paris and Erdut peace agreements and the creation of an area of political stability and economic prosperity by: a) b) promoting and sustaining democracy and the rule of law (institution-building, reform of the state and public administration, reconstitution of civil society) and respect for huma~~-r_1-~--~~Q9Ii!y_r_ig_~~~ (notably non-discrimination between citizens, and including the resettlement of refugees and displaced persons); and relaunching economic activity (rebuilding the economy, restoring and improving infrastructure. reorienting former war economies to civilian activities, and former command economies to market reforms). The Regional Approach is based, in particular, on political and economic conditionality. established by the General Affairs Council on 29 April 1997, compliance with which1 forms the basis for the development of bilateral relations with the EC in the field of trade (eligibility for autonomous trade preferences·'). financial and economic assistance (under the OBNOVA I Reconstruction' and PHARE4 programmes[-) and contractual relations6. At six-monthly intervals since 1997, the Commission has prepared reports on compliance. on the basis of which the Council has adopted Conclusions. The autonomous trade preference regime, commonly referred to as the autonomous trade measures (A TMs) is found in Regulation 70/97 of 20. 12. 96 OJ L 16 of 18. 1. 97, last amended by Regulation 2863/98 of 30. 12. 98 OJ L ]58 :\1. 12. 98. Albania is not covered by this instrument as its origin is the formor EC-SFRY Coopmation Aoroomont, denounced in 19H 1 when the SFRY ceased to exist. Wine imports from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and from Slovenia am still covered by the regime since bilateral Wine Agreements hav~ not yet been concluded with the EC. Regulation 1628/96 of. , as last amended by Regulation U51/98 of. Regulation (EEC) No. 3906/89, as amended by Regulation 3800/91 of 23. 12. 91 to include Albania, Regulation ·1366/95 of 12. 06. 95 to include Croatia. Regulation 463/96 of 11. 03. 96 to include the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Regulation 753/96 of 22. 04. 96 to include Bosnia and Herzegovina. In line with the Council Conclusions of 29 April 1997, PHARE assistance to Bosnia and Herzegovina is "limited to projects in direct support of the peace agreements, in particular the building of cross-·entity links and refugee return". Croatia has been suspended from PHARE since August 1995 and PHARE-funded projects such as CAFAO, CAM-A and CAM-ES Cooperation Agreement with Albania, in force since 1992; Cooperation Agreement with the former Yu~Joslav Ropuhlic of Macedonia, in force since 1998; Transport Agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, in forcn since 1997. 5 6 2 lt was, and remains, clear that most of these objectives cannot be achieved on a purely national basis - most of the countries of the region not only share the same aspirations for closer relations with the European Union, but they also face many of the same problems, and their economies are linked in various degrees of interdependence. The countries themselves and the European Union must therefore put more emphasis on cooperation, both bilateral, multilateral and regional. Assistance to them must also have a regional perspective, encouraging and requiring the countries concerned to work together, as well as with th~ir neighbours in the wider region and with the EU, to further their economic development. In particular, the multilateral dimension of the existing approach must be enhanced, to avoid the risks of concentrating solely on a policy of selective bilateralism to the detriment of a truly regional strategy. 3. Further development of the Regional Approach Developments both within and outside the region mean that there is a need to react in the shor1-term to the changing situation in the region Such developments also require more long-term strategies aimed at the long-term stabilization of the countries of the Regional Approach and thus also of the wider region. Such a strategy would also underline that all countries in the region have the prospect of increasing rapprochement with the EU, in the perspective of full integration into European structures. In view of the need to define a new approach to the changed general circumstances. and to overcome the failure of the countries to adequately respond to the incentives already offered (notably as regards the need to cooperate on a bilateral, multilateral or regional level), the Commission proposes a new, enhanced approach. This would entail the development of a Stabilisation and Association process, which would in effect offer higher incentives than before to the countries concerned. These stronger incentives would, of course, require compliance with more demanding conditions, both political and economic as well as increased emphasis on the need for regional cooperation. The Commission therefore proposes the following content for the Stabilisation and Association process, combining both the development of existing instruments, and new initiatives a. imed at an improvement of the situation: • The development of Stabilisation and Association Agreements, a new kind of contractual relations, taking into account the individual situation of each country, with a perspective of EU membership on the basis of the Amsterdam Treaty and once the Copenhagen criteria have been met • The development of existing economic and trade relations with and within the region • The development I partial reorientation of existing economic & financial assistance '• • The use of new opportunities for cooperation in various fields, including justice & home affairs (in Increased assistance for democratization, civil society, education and institution-building particular following the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty) • The development of political dialogue, including at regional level Stabllisation and Association Agreements At present, there are contractual relations. in the form of Cooperation Agreements with two of the five countries - the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania. The start of negotiations for contractual relations with the other states (usually interpreted as meaning Cooperation Agreements in a first stage), under the Regional Approach, depended on compliance with both general and specific political and economic conditions8. Closer relations with the EU constitute a very important political and economic incentive for all of the countries. The perspective of contractual relations should be progressive in nature and should be seen as complementary to other stabilization efforts in the political, economic, diplomatic, humanitarian and even Wording from Art. 7 of the Common Position adopted by the Council. on the basis of Article 15 of the TEU concerning the launchins of the Stability Pact of the EU on South-Eastern Europe cf. Conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 29 April 1997 tl 3 •nilitary fields, They should therefore be developed in order to fulfil their potential as an importm;t poii!:t :~ai and economic incentive for stabilization and democratization within the region, on an individual basis, atad within the framework of the Regional Api:Jroach9. The European Union has been confronted with geopolitical challenges requiring the development or nevv instruments governing its bilateral relations with a group of countries on two other recent occasions. Th. ey ~vvere the emergence of independent states in Central and Eastern Europe in 1989-90 and with t~1e dissolution of the former Soviet Union in 1 991. On those occasions, it developed the concept of s Ji-· generis categories of contractual relat:ons - for the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, it develop. d the "Europe Agreements" (based on Article 23810 , containing a specific reference to the perspective of accession) and, for the countries of the former Soviet Union, the concept of "Partnership and Cooperation Agreements" 11. To respond to the present, changed, circumstances in the region, as well as the Conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 26 April 1999 and the proposed wording of the Stability Pact, the Commission therefore considers it appropriate that a new Stabilisation and Association process should be launched~ an element of which would be a new category of agreement • Stabilisation and As~ociation Agreements - for which Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania would, in principle, be eligible. These Agreements would be tailor-made, differentiated to take account of the specific situation of the country concerned. The main objectives would be: • To draw the region closer to the perspective of full integration into EU structures. • To support the consolidation of democracy, rule of law, economic development and reform. adequate administrative structures, and regional cooperation, • To establish a formalized framework for political dialogue, both at bilateral and regional level. • To promote economic relations, trade, investment, enterprise policy, transport and development. and cooperation in the customs area, with the perspective of closer integration into the world trading system, including the possibility of establishing a free trade area or areas, when sufficient progress has been made in economic reform, • To provide a basis for cooperation in the field of justice and home affairs, • To provide a basis for economic, social, civil, educational, scientific, technological, energy, environmental and cultural cooperation (including a plan to safeguard the cultural heritage of these regions), underpinned by "association-orientated" assistance programmes which would also be designed to facilitate approximation of legislation in accordance with relevant EC acquis. These Stabilisation and Association Agreements (SAAs) would bring a new dimension to relations with the region, replacing the prospect of a Cooperation Agreement for those countries which had not already reached that stage, and, for those that already have a Cooperation Agreement, providing a new, more advanced relationship. The conditions for the start of negotiations on such Agreements would remain those set out in the Council Conclusions of 29 April 1997 on the opening of negotiations for contractual relations. Obviously, to conclude such an enhanced relationship with the EU, a country would also have to have attained the high level of political and economic development required to meet the increased reciprocal and mutual In addition, taking into account the context of the Stabilisation and • obligations of the relevant a. cquis. 9 Wording from Para 21 of the draft Stability Pact for SouthEastern Europe, as approved by Council on 17 May 10 No-. •,; artic!e 310 of the TEU based for example, In the case of Moldova, on Articles 44(2), 47(2) last sentence, 55, 57c(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94. 133, and 308 of the TEU 4 Association process, the Stability Pact and the future _EU Common Strategy, there would be increased emphasis on progress in developing regional cooperation. As regards the ilOssible start of negotiations with the individual countriesfor Stability and Association Agreements~ more details are provided in section 4 infra, in the conclusions on the individual countrie~. The Commission will report first on the feasibility of the opening of such negotiations in the case of the former Yugosfr~v Republic of Macedonia and then on the case of Albania. In the light of recommendations made by the: Commission in its reports on the feasibility of the opening of negotiations for such Agreements, appropriate negotiating directives might be developed. Given its positive record to date, and its compliance with the relevant conditions, it is likely that negotiations will first be opened with the former it would not yet be appropriate to consider the opening of Yugos(av Republic of Macedonia. negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina or Croatia as the reievant conditions have not yet been fulfilled. But the Cotnrnission could prepare technical reports on the feasibility of the opening of such negotiations at a later stage. The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has the same general perspectives as the other states once it respects the relevant conditions. At present, it disregards the most fundamental of these. DemocratlzaHon, Civil Society and institution-building Efforts to prornote economic development, as described below, will be greatly facilitated by the stability of the underlying political structures, the maintenance of the rule of law, the effectiveness of public administration, and the viability of civil society. EU action has been, and remains. directed at these objectives. lt includes such elements as support for free and fair elections and good parliamentary practice; legislative reform and voter education; independent media; rule of law through technical assistance ·tor judicial , police and customs reform; civic education; anti-corruption programmes (drawing on experiences in the customs field in Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina), training (including higher education) and development for over-stretched and under-resourced public administrations (which will in turn contribute to stabilization, development and the effective implementation of assistance programmes): and support for civil society organizations and initiatives. Particular emphasis will be given, through civil society organisat!ons, to the post-conflict rebuilding of consensus, to conflict-resolution and to the lightening of the psychological burden consequent to war. lt could be appropriate to take into account the regional dimension in channelling financial resources to local community-based organisations while at the same time pursuing common overall objectives for the development of democracy in the region. Justice and Home Affairs Initiatives in the field of justice and home affairs could be considered - not only as a part of Stabilisation and Association Agreements, as mentioned above, but more generally. Assistance could be provided, by both the Community and Member States, for institution-building increasin~ the efficiency of law enforcement, border controls, the fight against organised crime and corruption 1 , including by means of "twinning". Co-ordinated support could also be provided in the context of migration through the development of relevant legal instruments, particularly in the area of readmission. Trade The existing system of autonomous trade preferences for the countries which emerged from former Yugoslavia (for which only Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia are presently eligible) will remair, important until contractual relations are established with Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In future, the Commission intends to split the existing system of autonomous trade preferences into separate trade preferences for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia in order to ensure a 12 within the framework of a Community Customs Assistance Mission, in the light of the achievements of CAFAO in Bosnia and Herzegovina and CAM·A in Albania 5 ~;3~1::oar. :-'nt and f';qu;tab!e share of these preferences 13 between these countries, and to prepo,~'7. t= • :::"~ futur,~::: m::gotiations for an agreement. and !n anticipation of a ''·Stabilisation and Association Agreemenr, the Commission will present, In accordance with the Council Conclusions of 9 Noverr:. )er formal proposal for the upgrading of the bilaterai trade regime withAibania towards a · · 1 n:•gime s\milc. 1r to what is afforded to other countries of the region 4. The upgrading of relations by means of a Stabilisation and Association Agreement will have t:ade implications as regards the reciprocal obligations which would be involved. Trade relations with these: countries will be strengthened by their accession to the WTO. Economic and Financial Assistance Economic and political development should go hand in hand. Within the countries of the region. sound macro-economies will need strong and democratically based institutions; and balanced prosperity will in turn reinforce their political systems. The removal of economic barriers between the countries of the region will enable closer political relationships to take root. The Commission, in close cooperation with international financial institutions (IFis), will continue to monitor macro-economic developments and deepen its macro-economic dialogue with these countries. Financial assistance will be focussed on helping to build strong, stable market-based economies that are well integrated with their neighbours and with the European and global economies. In view of the needs of transition and reconstruction and of increasing infrastructure linkages, considerable investment will be needed. Attention must therefore be given to creating the right climate for private investment f~ows, in order to fill the gap between public sector capacity and funding. In 1999, financial assistance from the Community budget to the countries of the Regional Approach will be almost 700mu (see Annex 1). A considerable amount of further assistance wiil no doubt be required, to underpin the EU contribution to the implementation of the Stability Pact and the EU Common Strategy. as well as for the impact of the Kosovo crisis and the eventual cost of reconstruction. The Budgetary Authority will be required, in due course, to take the necessary decisions, on the basis of proposals from the Commission. The EU cannot commit itself to the implementation of ambitious programmes without. however, also having the necessary mechanisms and means in place to enable the flexible, well co ordinated, and efficient use of all Community assistance instruments in a manner adapted to the ~~ircumstances. The Commission will propose a legal base for the implementation of assistance to the region as a whole, taking into account the articulation with the PHARE programme, and is examining the question of appropriate implementation mechanisms I structures, including for the channelling of aid from other donors. Legal bases could be created I modified to facilitate the implementation of all Community financial assistance programmes for reconstruction (including of environmental damage) and regional co operation (the crossborder I regional use of some of which is presently not feasible due to the fact that not all potential partners are eligible for the underlying PH ARE programme). , The EU is itself a model for overcoming conflict and promoting reconciliation through close co-operation to achieve common goals, while respecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity. States aspiring to closer relations with the EU should behave in a similar manner, and EC financial assistance and the development of bilateral relations should be targeted on the regional economy and the need to promote The provision of EC and bilateral assistance (with interdependence, as has not always been the case. the exception of assistance for humanitarian purposes, democratisation and human rights) to the region • and to individual countries should take into account the readiness of the countries to co-operate with each other e. g. by the possible establishment of mutual trade preferences or free trade areac; and customs 13 This wi!l not apply for arrangements for wine which would still be global in nature. applying to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and the former Yugoslav RepuhHc of Macedonia. FRY would. obviously, only receive its "share" of the general preferences once it met the eligibility criteria for the trade preferences. For which a WTO-waiver will be reauHsted " 1 6 unions 15. Co-operation between states should also, increasingly, be a prerequisite for the establishment of closer links with the EU, and for assistance. A percentage of assistance under multi-beneficiary programmes could be reserved for multi-country or cross-border political or economic co-operation initiatives (with other countries of the region, with neighbouring candidate countries and with EU Member States). The focus could be on the development of exchanges, the creation of common projects and institutions, and the building and further development of regional strengths. On a macroeconomic level, the Commission, in co-operation with the International Financial Institutions. (IFis), will continue to monitor closely macro-economic developments. As well as grant-based assistance, the Commission, as in the past, will consider, on an exceptional basis, balance of payments support for those countries of the region (and adjacent countries) which are eligible for such support. Bilateral assistance could also include debt relief, or cancellation, especially for the countries that have been particularly hard-hit by recent costly and destabilising developments. The Commission and the World Bank have created a coordination mechanism to ensure that the regional dimension of Kosovo reconstruction is fully taken into account, and will coordi_nate donor mobilisation, economic analysis. conditions of support and implementation on the spot. Political dialogue As indicated above, the Stabilisation and Association Agreements will include the development of political dialogue on a multilateral/ regional level. Attention must also be paid to this issue, in the framework of the Stabilisation and Association process, for those countries that are not yet eligible for such Agreements. This should be in addition to bilateral political dialogue. Such dialogue should be developed at various levels (from official to ministerial) and in various formats (Presidency I Commission or the new Troika). and should whenever possible be held in a regional I sub-regional format, thereby also providing opportunities for the countries to meet to discuss issues of common and regional interest. Political Declarations. as in June 1998 for Bosnia and Herzegovina, could also be envisaged, as well as the creation of mechanisms for technical discussions, as in the EU I BiH Consultative Task Force. 4. General Conclusions The EU, on the basis of its experience to date of the Regional Approach, is ready for a long-term and substantial commitment to the stabilisation of the region. This stabilisation effort will, in the first place, focus on the five countries, while also having a broader regional approach covering the wider region. The Regional Approach, its scope, instruments and conditionality, remain basically valid. In the light of the forthcoming EU Common Strategy towards the region, as well as the proposal for a Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe, and most particularly the changed circumstances in the region, it should, however, be substantially developed. For this reason, the Commission has proposed the creation of a Stabilisation and Association process, the main feature of which will be the offer to the five countries - in return for compliance with the relevant conditions - of a new kind of contractual relations: Stabilisation and Association Agreements. Other elementswould include increased and reoriented assistance, increased support for democratisation, development of trade and political dialogue, and cooperation in new fields. While developing policies towards the region, and particularly in relation to the post-conflict situation in Kosovo, the articulation of the relationship between these policies towards the region - the existing Regional Approach and future Common Strategy, as well as the proposed Stability Pact - and those of • other actors (UN, Council of Europe, OSCE, WEU and NATO, relevant international financial institutions) needs to be considered carefully. If this strategy is to be successful, the peoples and governments of the region must also participate and make determined efforts e. g. the pursuit of WTO accession, the possible development of free trade areas between themselves and within the region, and with increased regional cooperation on a bilateral and a 15 While avoiding the creation of RS I FRY and FBiH I Croatia structures to the detriment of Bi. H as a whole 7 mu>t:ir);,err:;;~ 18ve!. as 'Ne !I as respect foi the ::ondit;onallty set out in U1e existing Reglonal Approach. The 1Jr tne internat~onal cornrnunity ;n Regi'Jtna: general, can only do so rnuch. The future of the region lies in the hands of its peo~ies and governments. and indeed any set of poncies adopted by the " Country Specific Conclusions The Commission will continue to prepare regular reports on compliance by the countries concerned with the conditionality of the Stabilisation and Association process, the next report on which will be in November 1999. As regards the totality of bilateral relations with the countries of the Stabilisation and Association process, the Commission would, at present, draw the following operational concJusions 16 in respect of the individual countries: · Bosnla and Herzegovlna Negotiations on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Bosnia and Herzegovina will be opened when it has met the relevant conditions. At the appropriate time, the Commission will prepare In the a technical report on the feasibility of the opening of negotiations for such an agreement. context of bilateral relations with BiH, and the future opening of negotiations. political and economic dialogue might be intensified. The Consultative Task Force could also play an important role. to enhance co-operation in specific areas should be considered, and communication Opportunities and dialogue should be promoted, including at a regional level. Bosnia and Herzegovina should continue, at this time, to benefit from the autonomous trade preferences extended by the European Community and will continue to benefit from PHARE assistance related to reconstruction and institution-building needs, as well as in support of the peace agreements, although it will only benefit from full "traditional" PHARE once the relevant conditions have been met by the authorities, at State and Entity level. lt is hoped that sufficient progress might be made by the end of the next reporting period, in November 1999. Croatla Negotiations with Croatia on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement will be opened when it has met the relevant conditions. At the appropriate time, the Commission will prepare a technical report on the feasibility of the opening of negotiations for such an agreement. In the context of bilateral relations, and the future opening of negotiations, communication and exchanges of views might be intensified, including in a more structured framework e. g. political dialogue and a technical consultative task force. Croatia should continue, at this time, to benefit from the autonomous trade preferences extended In order to lift the suspension ofPHARE, further progress towards by the European Community. democracy will be necessary, inter alia, in the fields of media reform, electoral reform, and refugee return, in accordance with the 29 April 1997 conditions. lt is hoped that progress on these might be made by the end of the next reporting period, in November 1999. The EC has, nonetheless. already given assistance in other fields (humanitarian, support for democratisation including independent media, and refugee-return related reconstruction) and will continue to do so. Additional assistance will be targeted on areas relevant to the development of democracy, economic regeneration of refugee return areas and education (including e. g. Tempus and European Training Foundation). Federal Republic of Yugoslavia In the light of the continuing conflict in Kosovo and the obvious non-fulfilment of relevant conditions. it is not appropriate to discuss the eligibility of the FRY for the autonornous trO'de preferences or PHARE, or the opening of negotiations for a Stabilisatlon and AssociaUon Agreement. The FRY will be eligible for such instruments once the relevant conditions are fulfilled. In the interim, the FRY 16 Based on the general assessment of developments in each of the countries (contained in Annex 2 of the present Communic~tion) as well as the more detailed factual report on compliance, since October 1998, with Regional Approach condltionality (contained in the Commission Staff Working Psper on that subject: SEC(99)714 of 17. 5. 99) 9 will continue to receive humanitarian and democratisation assistance and to benefit from OBNOVA I Reconstruction assistance (which is, in the main, geographically limited to Kosovo and Montenegro - assistance to Serbia is limited to support for the independent media), with particular emphasis on the return of refugees J internally dispiaced persons. As a result of the continuing conflict in Kosovo, existing measures against the FRY I Serbia are to be strengthened in line with the Council Conclusions of 26 April 1999, which also decided on an oil embargo. These include an arms embargo; a visa ban {already extended to cover those responsible for the suppression of independent media) a supply ban on equipment which could be used for terrorism or police repression; a moratorium on export credit; a freeze on Serbian I FRY Government funds held abroad; a prohibition on new investment; a flight-ban on FRY-registered airlines. The main forms of bilateral relations with the European Community apply to the state (FRY) as a whole. A. s these instruments cannot therefore be used for the benefit ofMontenegro, continuing assistance to that republic will be by means of other Community instruments. Budgetary assistance for costs related to internally displaced persons from Kosovo is being provided. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Due to the positive record achieved so far, as well as the country's compliance with the relevant conditions, and in accordance with the Conclusions of the General Affairs Council on 8 and 26 April 1999, the Commission will present a report on the feasibility of the opening of negotiations for a Stabilisation and Associati9n Agreement with this country. Taking into account discussions in the Council, the Commission could make recommendations for negotiating directives. In the interim, the Cooperation Agreement and to be implemented, and relations will intensify in that framework and in the framework of the Political Dialogue, with modification of the terms of reference of the working party on customs and taxation to cover statistical n1atteis, as a follow up to the March 1999 Cooperation Council. The country will continue to benefit from Community assistance, notably in the framework ofPHARE. The eligibility of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for additional PHARE multi-beneficiary programmes will be determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account their consistence with and value-added to the National Programme. Budgetary assistance for refugee-related expenses will also be provided. the Field of Transport will continue the Agreement in Albania In accordance with the Conclusions of the General Affairs Council on 26 April 1999, the Commission is prepared to report in due course on the feasibility of the opening of negotiations for aStablllsatlon and Association Agreement with Albania. Taking into account discussions in the Council, , the Commission could make recoil'lmendations for negotiating directives. In the interim, contractuai relations with the Community, based on the 1992 Cooperation Agreement and the connected Dec!aration on Politicai Dialogue, will be continued, and new working parties (on infrastructure and. A formai proposal for a bilateral trade regime. In accordance with General agriculture) established. Affairs Council conclusions of 9 November 1998, will be presented shortly, with a view to upgrading the bEateral trade regJme towards regional standards. ~ PHARE and other Community assistance will be continued with a view to achieving further progress in stabilisation, recovery, economic reform and democratisation in this country as well as to enhancing regional co-operation. The EU will continue, in particular, to support the re-establishment of a viable Albanian police in co-operation with the strengthened WEU Mission and, to enhance its Customs Assistance Mission, on the basis of the amended Customs Code. Budgetary assistance for refugee is being provided. Balance oJ payment support adopted recently will be related expenses impiemented without delay, and macro-economic developments will be monitored closely by the Commission and the IFis. 10 r---·--·------ ! l L- I i Annex 1 Overall EC Assistance to Kosovo's neighbouring countries 1991-99 (Mio €)u> (Commitments) CROATIA ALBANIA(2) BOSNIA (3) FYROM FRY MULTI- COUNTRY TYPE OF EC ASSISTANCE , PHARE + OBNOV A >~~HUMANIT~""l AID (ECHO) FOOD SECURITY (DGVIll) ~ALANCE OF PAYMEI\7 r SUPPORT (DG 11) I Em ~·~HER ACTIONS (4) I fl'OTAL EC ASSISTANCE 1. -~-·~-y~ I t--Member States assistance 1 (1990-97) 616. 4 41. 2 16. 5 20. 0 46. 0 122. 8 862. 9 712. 8 754. 5 1032. 1 - 60. 0 - 49. 6 290. 8 41. 7 262. 8 - - - - - - 221. 2 9. 3 17. 5 236. 7 45. 7 - 40. 0 - 2. 0 2067. 8 349. 7 322. 0 324. 4 507. 9 1165. 9 712. 4 178. 2 9. 8 236. 1 - - - 12. 3 258. 2 - TOTAL 1708. 6 1908. 7 16. 5 120. 0 46. 0 385. 1 4184. 9 3277. 2 ! ~RAND TOTAL h:-BRD. ,_,_, 1575. 7 2575. 7 1515. 6 1034. 4 68. 0 70. 0 511. 0 502. 5 143. 0 258. 2 7462. 1 792. 0 ; As ofend-April1999, except for EIB and EBRD figures which include assistance from 1991 to 1998, and Member States' assistance which covers 1990-1997 1 Grant macro-financial assistances to Albania decided in 1992 and 1994 are included in Phare financing. J Out of the 60 Meuros of balance of payment support, the 15 Meuros grant programmed for 1999 will be financed by Obnova. The total amount under Phar~bnova line has thus been reduced by J 5 to avoid double-counting. { 4) Other actions mainly include food aid to Albania provided by FEOGA ( J 2(} \1euros) ~d demining and other actions in Bosnia (200 Meuros) n. a. ==not available ~ 11 Overall EC Assistance to Kosovo's neighbouring countries in 1999 '(Mio €)<•>; (Commitments) __, ALBANIA BOSNIA CROATIA FRY FYROM IMULTI-COUNTRY TOTAL !TYPE OF EC ASSISTANCE PHARE + OBNOVA iHUMANITARIAN AID (ECHO) FOOD SECLTRITY (DGVDI) BALANCE·OFPAYMENT SUPPORT (DG IT) 118,5 146,0 15,0 23,5 68,7 2,8 56,4 5,0 7,6 182,0 7,0 5,7 20,0 60,0 IEIB I n. a. I n. a. I - I - I - I OTHER ACTIONS 10,0 1,4 0,5 0,5 I - 2,0 374,5 258,0 5,7 80,0 0,0 14,4 TOTAL EC ASSISTANCE 151,2 272,4 21,4 31,6 69,2 186,8 732,6 (I) Indicative allocanons. n. a = not available 12 Annex 2 Developments in the countries of the Regional Approach since 1996, in particular regarding compliance, since October 1998, with Regional Approach conditionality criteria The degree of political progress in each country, as described in the following paragraphs, has been influenced by its willingness to put the development of relations with the EU but· also with its neighbours in the region above_ national(ist) interests. As is evident, certain countries, in certain fields, have not yet demonstrated a commitment to the European future to which they lay claim. This commitment demands respect for democratic principles and the ideal of cooperation between states. Progress, particularly in respect of the objectives of the Regional Approach has been patchy, depending on the willingness of the countries concerned to make the necessary efforts. For example, the level of democratization has increased in all but Serbia, although respect for minority rights differs depending on the national context. Implementation of the peace agreements has been patchy, particularly insofar as refugee return and cooperation with the ICTY is concerned. Some progress has been made in bilateral relations, but not in regional cooperation per se. lt is in a triple transition process: Bosnia and Herzegovina is a special case in the Balkans. from the status of federate republic of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia to the status of independent republic; from a socialist economy to a market economy; fro~ a civil war between three ethnic groups to a peace within a "single Republic made up of two Entities. At the end of the war, Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) had lost 23o/o of its pre-war population; GDP and per capita income had dropped by three quarters, industrial production by more than 90°/o and more than 1. 2 million of its inhabitants had fled abroad, around 750,000 to EU countries. Since 1996, reforms have been slow due to the special political structure of the country and the nationalist political formations which dominated the political scene until the last elections. The September 1998 elections indicated a first partial drift from the main nationalist parties. The implementation of Dayton can be considered a success as far as its military dimension is concerned. On the civil side, much progress has been made (handing over of some war criminals to the Hague Tribunal, adoption of common symbols, establishment of common institutions, economic reconstruction). Nevertheless, the return of minority refugees, the functioning of the common institutions and judicial reform are not completely satisfactory. On the other hand, in the period 1996-1998, real growth of the economy has been of the order of an average 40o/o per year at State level, although the political obstruction to the peace process by the RS led this entity to two years of economic stagnation, until the appointment of PM Dodik (beginning 1998). The rapid improvement was from a very low base, and income levels and the provision of social services are among the lowest in Europe. The main problem of Bosnia-Herzegovina has been the lack of consolidated statehood. This is due to the attitude of BiH leaders, who still do not fully rely on cooperation within the common institutions, but also to the complexity of the institutional framework. In early 1999, there were signs of improvement in certain policy areas, especially privatization, investment legislation, customs legislation and the financial sector. Some important steps forward continue to be made in market economy reform although more efforts for proper implementation are still needed. The main risk remains poverty and social disruption, especially in the RS. Concerning democratization and respect for human rights, there has been some progress in certain fields, but recent political developments in the RS and in Kosovo have hampered, for the time being, further qualitative general improvement. Progress is still needed in cooperation between the different ethnic groups, although some positive developments occurred, particularly in the field of party politics. Co-operation from some local authorities in the RS has, very recently, Interesting progress also occurred in the media and further improvement is improved. expected in forthcoming months. Regional cooperation continues at varying levels, but the 13 inf!uence of Zagreb and Belgrade remains quite strong. The implementation ()f t Parts ;;greements is progressing slowly, for different reasons. it has shown its openness to enhanced cooperation wiih Ult lntegra 1:ion in European and Euro-At!antic structures is a There were some achievements with regard to the acceptance of 'C'lfo,~tia ~as dernonstrated its readiness. to make some efforts with a view to s+?bi!!zation and nor::11a!ization. k. rernancnai Community. Croatlan politics. r8:e·lant international and national lega: frameworks for the respect of the ru!e of law. Progrss·: has occurred in civil society, with an interestirlg evolution of popular opinion from naticma;1stic considerations, upon which Croatian political life was founded, to a more mature pluralish. : The development of the Croatian economy proceeded well until 1998 when the system. consequences of the failure to introduce structural reforms began to shovv. Significant improvements have occurred in regional cooperation as well as in the formal integration of Eastern Slavonia. The delicate issue of the return of refugees has required strong international pressure, and serious difficulties remain in the implementation of Croatia's commitments. Nevertheless, the large gap remaining between formal commitments and their implementation prevents Croatia from reaching the required standards of democratization. Despite the declared intentions of the Government, the overall scenario seems to have stalled in recent In fact, progress since October 1998 in compliance with the different sets of months. conditions is still unsuccessful, despite continuing international insistence. Democratization and respect for human rights remain the main areas of concern, notably with reference to reform of the electoral law and democratization of media, where no progress can be reported. Further substantial progress is also expected as far as respect for m1norities and their right~ is concerned. Cooperation with neighbouring countries has continued in a rather satisfactory way and Croatia has proved willing to resolve the outstanding questions by diplomatic means. Problems remain, however, as regard the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Despite rather good results in the past and a satisfactory legal framework, concern is rising regarding the increasingly worsening economic situation. As far as compliance with Dayton and Erdut obligations is concerned, positive steps have occurred in refugee return, although the process is still rather slow. Normalization of war-damaged areas continues although further effective efforts are still required, notably in the implementation of the Programme for the Reestablishment of Trust. implementation of international commitments is still selective. Real relations with Within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the picture is mixed, with contrasting developments There has been no progress in democratisation or reform in in Serbia and Montenegro. Serbia I Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). The suppression of the rights of the population since 1989 in Kosovo has finally erupted into open conflict which has had effects in In general, there has been a contradiction in FRY I Serbia between the neighbouring states. theoretical respect for democratic principles, as enshrined in the Constitution, laws, and obligations arising from signature of various international treaties and conventions, and the practical implementation of these principles. Even before the recent declaration of a State of War, there was a clear and continuing lack of respect for democratic principles, particularly for media and academic freedoms, as well as administrative and judicial proceedings. While the Constitution and laws of the FRY and Serbia provide for extensive human and minority rights, different minority groupings - the Kosovar Albanians, the Groat and Hungarian minorities, and the Sandzak Muslims - have experienced varying degrees of difficulty in the respect for and implementation of these laws, the most glaring example of which has been recent events in Kosovo. Inter alia, the Gonzale:z. recommendations remain unimplemented, and with the declaration of a State of War in March 1999 and the acceleration of massive deportations trappings of dem9cracy are now accompanied by unspeakable atrocities, even disregarded. Kosovo is now comp!etely lawless. Economic reforms have been sporadic, witr1 the ( 14 In the failure to privatise. reduction of wartime hyperinflation being progressively undone by looser monetary and fiscai policies in advance of the 1997 elections and subsequent pressure on scarce financial resources due to growing external and fiscal deficits, accelerating inflation in late 1998 and a continuing last year, policy on Kosovo has had serious consequences for the economy, both in terms of the cost of the war and, now, NATO airstrikes on the military-industrial base and. physical infrastructure. Prior to the escalation of the Kosovo crisis which has led to a deterioration in relations with neighbours and the breaking off of diplomatic relations with certain other states, FRY had made some progress in regional co operation, most notably as regards the normalisation of its relations with Croatia, but the issue of SFRY succession, and the division of SFRY debts and assets remains unresolved, with implications for FRY participation in international organisations and fora. In contrast. developments in Montenegro have been more positive. The replacement, after free and fair elections, of the pro-Milosevic regime of Bulatovic by a coalition led by President Djukanovic has resulted in a positive impulsion towards reform and democratisation, supported by the European Union. This has led to a marked exacerbation of difficulties in relations. in almost all fields and at all levels, between Belgrade and Podgorica, but has continued despite increasing pressure and threats from the federal level, and the presence of considerable numbers of refugees and displaced persons. Economic reform is taking place, though slowly. notably regarding privatisation. Montenegro was given a specific exemption, in January, from the existing ban on flights to the EC by FRY -registered carriers. During the last three years, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has been a stabilizing factor in the region. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has confirmed its political maturity and its commitment to democratic principles, with a smooth and peaceful political transition taking place, after free and fair elections. Since the new Government arrived, some substantial measures have been taken to reinforce the respect for and protection of minorities, in particular the Albanian minority, the symbol of which was the release of the Tetovo and Gostivar Mayors. But even before that, political parties representing the interests of the Albanian minority have always been in the Government. The country has proven its commitment to regional cooperation. Its determination to have good relations and to resolve pending issues with neighbours resulted recently in the signing of the Joint Declaration with Bulgaria that solved the language issue between the two countries. Beyond political relations, the country has also developed important economic and trade relations with the countries of the region (Agreements with Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and The country's cooperation with the international community in FRY have been signed). seeking a peaceful solution to the Kosovo crisis was enhanced, with its acceptance of the deployment of NATO troops as well as refugees from Kosovo. Human rights and rule of law are protected by a comprehensive set of legal protections, even if more attention may be paid to freedom of expression. Between 1996 and 1999, the economic reforms and the stabilization policy pursued by the Governments in line with IMF recommendations enabled the country to achieve macroeconomic stability, though since the end of 1998 the IMF programme has been off-track because the second tranche of the three-year loan under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF) was linked to the privatisation of twelve large industrial conglomerates, on which no agreement has yet been reached. The inflation and budgetary situations have been kept under control. Unemployment, however, has remained high since 1996. Market economy reform is ongoing, with the reform of the legal and regulatory framework, the privatization process and the reform of the banking sector still deserving particular attention. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, therefore, has not only respected the principles of the EU's regional approach, but has played an exemplary role throughout the three last years that was instrumental in achieving the objectives of this EU policy. 15 The 1996 crisis in Albania, provoked by the breakdown of the pyramid schemes in late 1996 and previous irregularities during parliamentary elections in May 1996 was contained by a coordinated international response. A government of national reconciliation was established, followed by general elections in June/July 1997 and the temporary deployment of a international protection force. A new government under PM Nano (July 1997 to October 1998) was able to achieve notable macro-economic stabilization and the first steps were taken in the winding up of the pyramid schemes and in public administration reform. Albania continued however to suffer from a lack of public order and widespread crime and corruption as a result of this and from the continuous boycott of Parliament by the Democratic Party. While freedom of expression and other basic rights were ensured, Albania remained confronted with structural problems which pre-date the crisis (poor infrastructure; weak state institutions). The fragility of the country was highlighted on several occasions, inter alia by the renewed riots in September 1998. The new government of PM Majko (since October 1998) shows a more serious commitment to face the structural problems of the country but is obviously confronted with the prevailing traditions in the Albanian society. The adoption of a- constitution in November 1998 was a milestone for democracy and the rule of law. But tangible results in law enforcement presuppose an effective strengthening of both the security forces and the judiciary. Talks outside Parliament with the Democratic Party have somewhat reduced political confrontation but normality seems still not within reach. Macro-economic stabilization has been confirmed but remains vulnerable in the light of the refugee problem and the continuing lack of public order while structural economic reforms (privatization, financial sector) still need to be tackled. All Albanian governments have pursued a moderate policy of self-restraint with respect to the situation of ethnic Albanians in neighbouring countries. The traditional low level of regional cooperation did not change with the exception of an increased economic and technical cooperation with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 16