title: 1999/198/EC: Commission Decision of 10 February 1999 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 86 of the Treaty (IV/35.767 - Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket) (notified under document number C(1999) 239) (Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

eurovoc_concepts:
Finland
airport
application of EU law
charges for use of infrastructure
competition law
dominant position

formats: html pdf print

text: L 69/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 3. 1999 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 10 February 1999 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 86 of the Treaty (IV/35. 767 — Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket) (notified under document number C(1999) 239) (Only the Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (1999/198/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation No 17 of 6 February 1962, first Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden, and in particular Article 3 thereof, Having regard to the Commission’s decision on 5 May 1997 to initiate proceedings in this case, Having given the undertaking concerned the opportunity to make known its views on the objections raised by the Commission regarding the system of discounts on landing charges in use at Finnish airports, Having consulted the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions, Whereas: I. THE FACTS (a) Subject of the Decision (1) The Commission is currently investigating, in own- initiative proceedings, the various methods used for discounting at Community airports, following Commission Decision 95/364/ EC of 28 June 1995 relating to a proceeding landing charges (2) (3) pursuant to Article 90(3) of the Treaty (2) on the system of discounts on landing charges in use at Brussels National Airport. (b) The relevant undertaking (the Finnish Civil Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket Aviation Administration, hereinafter ‘CAA') has since 1991 been a self-financing public under- taking operating under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. It was previously the Finnish Aviation Administration, a centralised department of the Finnish Ministry of Transport. Law No 1123/90 of 14 December 1990, laying down the statutes of and creating the CAA, sets out the terms of operation and objectives of the CAA. Article 2 lists the various duties of the CAA: ‘The Civil Aviation Administration shall provide airport and air navigation services for the require- ments of both civil and military aircraft (. ). The task of the Civil Aviation Administration shall be to ensure general flight safety and (. ) to deal with aviation authorisations and licences (. )'. (4) The CAA thus levies charges for the services related to the landing and take-off of the aircraft using the airport facilities which it administers. (1) OJ 13, 21. 2. 1962, p. 204/62. (2) OJ L 216, 12. 9. 1995, p. 8. 16. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 69/25 (5) (6) (7) (c) The relevant system — landing charges In its Airport Economics Manual (3), the Inter- national Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) recommends that its members base their charges on the maximum take-off weight (MTOW) of the aircraft. The landing charge is defined as follows: ‘Charges and fees collected for the use of runways, taxiways and apron areas, including associated lighting, as well as for the provision of approach and aerodrome control'. The charge is imposed to cover all ‘operation and maintenance costs, and administrative costs attrib- utable to those areas and their associated vehicles and equipment, including the expense of all labour, maintenance materials, power and fuels'. According to Article 6 of Law No 1123/90, landing charges in airports administered by the CAA can if necessary be fixed by decree. Since no such decree has been issued, it is the CAA itself that sets the Number of landings at Finnish airports in the last six months for a given airline 1 001-3 000 3 001-5 000 5 001-7 000 7 001- level of discounts. landing charges and any applicable (8) For 1998, the landing charges set by the CAA were calculated as follows: — for domestic 20 flights: FIM (4) (depending on the weight of the aircraft) per tonne of the aircraft’s MTOW, 17 or — for international flights: FIM 50,50 per tonne of the aircraft’s MTOW. (9) (10) For environmental reasons, charges for landings taking place between 22. 00 and 06. 00 hrs at any airport in Finland except Helsinki-Vantaa are multiplied by a coefficient of 1,3. The CAA has also instituted a discount linked to frequency of landing, for international flights only, calculated as follows: Discounts to apply to all landings by that airline over the next six months (in 1996) (in 1997) (in 1998) 3 % 5 % 8 % 11 % 2 % 3 % 6 % 9 % 2 % 2 % 4 % 4 % (11) A statement of objections was sent to the CAA on 20 May 1997. Two measures were singled out as being possible infringements of Article 86 of the Treaty: the progressive discount system (see point 10) and the setting of charges according to the country of origin of the flight (see point 8). (d) The main arguments of the CAA (12) While it maintains that the reasons for the intro- duction in 1977 of the frequency-based discount system are unknown, the CAA claims that ‘large- scale users' have the advantage of offering a guar- antee of payment. (13) The CAA thus argues that: ‘As far as the owner of an airport is concerned, one of the advantages offered by large-scale users of airports is that of a customer payment guarantee. The large-scale users have never experienced any difficulties in settling their accounts, nor has it been necessary to make provision for non-payment of amounts outstanding. ' (14) The CAA nevertheless points out that the discounts in question have been reduced significantly over recent years (from 20 % in 1989 to 4 % in 1998). (15) Moreover, in its reply dated 19 November 1997 to a request for information made by the Commission on 28 October 1997, the discount system would be abolished on 1 January 1999. the CAA stated that (16) Lastly, according to the CAA, this approach was approved by IATA, which, at a meeting with the CAA in April 1996, gave its ‘support to the idea of phased changes to the system' and asked the CAA to refrain from sudden changes to its system, which for would have serious certain airlines. financial consequences that (17) As regards the differentiation of charges according to the country of origin of the flight, the CAA points out the technical and operational requirements to which airports are subject (length and durability of runways, hours of operation and availability of airports) are different for domestic and for international flights. The different require- ments explain the differentiation of the charges. (3) Document 9562-1991 ICAO. (4) FIM 1 = 0,1681 EUR. L 69/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 3. 1999 II. LEGAL ASSESSMENT (23) (a) Legal provisions and procedural regula- tions applicable (18) It should be borne in mind that Regulation No 17 was rendered inapplicable to the transport sector by Council Regulation No 141 (5), as last amended by Regulation No 1002/67/EEC (6), to take account of the transport sector. the distinctive features of Consequently, the scope of Regulation No 141 and, therefore, the procedural regulations specific to the transport sector are limited to anti-competitive practices arising in connection with the transport market. (19) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 (7), as last amended by Regulation No 2410/92 (8), determines the ways in which Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty are applied to air transport services. (20) However, services associated with access to airport facilities are not directly part of the air transport services provided to passengers. These activities are therefore not covered by the procedural regulations instead fall specific to the transport sector, but under Regulation No 17 for the purposes of applying Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty. (b) Concept of an undertaking (21) that in Community The Court of Justice of the European Communities has consistently held (9) the concept of an undertaking competition law encompasses every entity engaged in an economic activity, regardless of the legal status of the entity and the way it is financed. (22) Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty apply to the behav- iour of a public entity when it is established that, through that entity, the State carries on economic activities of an industrial or commercial nature by offering goods and services on the market. It makes no difference whether the State carries out such activities directly through a body forming part of the State administration or through a body to which it has granted special or exclusive rights. It is therefore necessary to examine the nature of the activities carried out by the public undertaking or entity granted special or exclusive rights by the State (10). (5) OJ 124, 28. 11. 1962, p. 2751/62. (6) OJ 306, 16. 12. 1967, p. 1. (7) OJ L 374, 31. 12. 1987, p. 1. (8) OJ L 240, 24. 8. 1992, p. 18. (9) See in particular Case C-41/90 H(cid:148)fner and Elser v. Macroton [1991] ECR I-1979, paragraph 21, and Joined Cases C-159 and 160/91 Christian Poucet v. Assurances G(cid:130)n(cid:130)rales de France and Caisse Mutuelle R(cid:130)gionale du Languedoc-Rous- sillon [1993] ECR I-637, paragraph 17. (10) See the judgments in Case 118/85 Commission v. Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8, and in Case C-343/95 Diego Cali & Figli Srl/Servizi ecologici Porto di Genova [1997] ECR I-1547, paragraphs 16, 17 and 18. In this connection, there is no doubt that the CAA, whose core activity (11) is providing airlines with access services to civil airport facilities in return for a fee, is, according to the definition of the Court, an undertaking within the meaning of Article 86 of the Treaty. (c) Relevant market (24) As the Court of Justice has pointed out in the Port of Genoa case (12), the organisation of port activities for third parties in a single port can constitute a relevant market within the meaning of Article 86. By the same token, in the Corsica Ferries II case (13), the Court took the market for piloting services in the Port of Genoa to be the relevant market. (25) Transposing this line of reasoning to airports, the in this matter is therefore the relevant market market in services linked to access to airport infra- structures for which a fee is payable. The market definition is the same as that applied in Commis- sion Decision 95/364/EC (14). (26) More specifically, the services in question are those linked to the exploitation and maintenance of runways, taxiways and aprons, and approach guidance for civil aircraft. the use of (27) In addition, the markets for passenger and freight transport on medium and short-haul intra-EEA routes constitute a neighbouring but distinct market which is affected by the impact of an abuse on the part of the undertaking in question on the market for landing and take-off services. The effect of the abuse of the dominant position held by the CAA can therefore also be felt in this market. (28) Of the 25 airports administered by the CAA, only five have a significant volume of international Pori, (Helsinki-Vantaa, Vaasa, Turku, traffic Tampere). Disregarding Helsinki, the international traffic amounts to Stockholm, Hamburg, Copenhagen, Petrozavodsk (Russia), Murmansk (Russia) and Lulea (Sweden), as well as numerous charter flights. scheduled flights to several (29) The airports with international traffic are inter- changeable only to a limited extent and each can therefore be regarded as a distinct geographic market. (11) See points 2, 3 and 4. (12) Case C-179/90, Merci convenzionali porto di Genova/Siderur- gica Gabrielli [1991] ECR I-5889. (13) Case C-18/93, Corsica Ferries Italia/Corpo dei piloti del porto di Genova [1994] ECR I-1783. (14) Cited in footnote 2. 16. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 69/27 (30) (31) intra-EEA The airlines operating domestic or scheduled or charter flights to and from Finland are obliged to use the airports administered by the CAA (of the 29 airports in Finland, only four are private and not under the aegis of the CAA). The other airports are hundreds of kilometres away and located in other Member States. This being the case, for many passengers travelling to and from Finland, the domestic and intra-EEA flights that use the CAA-administered airports are not interchangeable with the services offered at other EEA airports. (32) Airlines running domestic or intra-EEA flights, either to or from Finland, have no option, there- fore, but to use the airports administered by the CAA, along with the airport facility access services provided in these airports. (33) (34) (35) (36) (d) Dominant position The Court of Justice has held that an undertaking benefiting from a legal monopoly in a substantial part of the common market may be regarded as holding a dominant position within the meaning of Article 86 of the Treaty (15). This is the case with the CAA, a public under- taking which, as a result of the exclusive rights granted to it under Law No 1123/90 in its capacity as airport authority, holds a dominant position on the market for landing and take-off services in respect of which the charge in question is levied, in each of the five Finnish airports with international traffic. (e) Substantial part of the common market The five Finnish airports operating intra-EEA flights were used by a total of approximately 9 million passengers in 1996 and handled more than 91 000 tonnes of freight. the common market, The airports which operate intra-EEA services, taken together, can therefore be regarded as a if one substantial part of applies the reasoning adopted by the Court in the Crespelle (16) and Almelo (17) judgments. In the Crespelle judgment, the Court stated that, ‘by thus those undertakings, a establishing, territorially contiguous in favour of series of monopolies (15) Case C-41/90 H(cid:148)fner and Elser, cited in footnote 9, para- graph 28; Case C-260/89 ERT [1991] ECR I-2925, paragraph 31. (16) Case C-323/93, Soci(cid:130)t(cid:130) agricole du Centre d’ins(cid:130)mination de la Crespelle/Coop(cid:130)rative d’(cid:130)l(cid:130)vage et d’ins(cid:130)mination artifi- cielle du d(cid:130)partement de la Mayenne [1994] ECR I-5077. (17) Case C-393/92 Commune d’Almelo et autres/Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij [1994] ECR I-1477. limited but together covering the entire territory of a Member State, those national provisions create a dominant position, within the meaning of Article 86 of the common market. ' (18). in a substantial part of the Treaty, (37) A fortiori, a contiguous series of monopolies controlled by the same undertaking (the CAA) may represent a substantial part of the common market. (f) Abuse of a dominant position The system of discounts based on frequency (38) In view of the announcement made by the CAA that this system would be abolished on 1 January 1999, and taking into account the practice estab- lished by the Commission in Decision 95/364/EC, the discount system, which was included in the statement of objections pursuant to Article 86 of the Treaty against the CAA, will no longer be dealt with in this Decision. The differentiation of charges according to type of flight (domestic or intra-EEA) (39) Article 86 is intended to cover anti-competitive practices engaged in by undertakings on their own initiative. It prohibits undertakings that hold a dominant position in a substantial part of the common market from applying dissimilar condi- tions to equivalent transactions with other trading thereby placing them at a competitive parties, disadvantage. (40) In this respect, the Corsica Ferries II judgment (19) by the Court of Justice is unambiguous. The Court held: ‘1. Article 1(1) of Council Regulation No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986, applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime trans- port between Member States and between Member States and third countries precludes the application in a Member State of different tariffs for identical piloting services, depending on whether the undertaking providing maritime transport services between two Member States operates a vessel which is authorised to engage in maritime sabotage, which is reserved to vessels flying the flag of that State. (18) Paragraph 17. (19) Cited in footnote 13. L 69/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 3. 1999 exclusive 2. Article 90, paragraph 1, and Article 86 of the EEC Treaty prohibit a national authority from inducing an undertaking which has been granted the right of providing compulsory piloting services in a substantial part of the common market, by approving the tariffs adopted by it, to apply different tariffs to maritime transport undertakings, depending on whether they operate transport services between Member States or between ports situated on national trade between Member States is affected. ' to the extent territory, that (41) In his opinion in the same case, Advocate-General Van Gerven stated that (20): ‘What is important is that there is no connection between those differences in tariffs and the nature of the piloting service offered, which is precisely the same in both cases (. ). For my part, I consider that what is involved here is clearly an instance of the form of abuse of a dominant position which is covered by indent (c) of the second paragraph of the EC Treaty, namely “applying Article 86 of dissimilar conditions transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage” (*). to equivalent (*) Footnote 61: In this respect, a parallel may be drawn with the situation at issue in the case of United Brands (judgment in Case 27/76 United Brands [1978] ECR 207): there the Court held that the discriminatory pricing policy practised by UBC, which invoiced distributor/ripeners at prices which differed from one Member State to another for identical quantities and types of bananas consti- tuted an abuse of a dominant position on the ground that these discriminatory practices, which varied according to the circumstances of the Member States, were just so many obstacles to the free movement of goods (paragraph 232) and that “a rigid partitioning of national markets was thus created at price levels which were artificially different, placing certain distributor/ripeners at a competitive disadvantage, since compared with what it should have been competition had thereby same been distorted” reasoning can be applied mutatis mutandis in the present case: the differentiated tariffs charged by the Corporation constitute an obstacle to freedom to provide intra-EEA shipping transport services and place persons providing such services at a disadvantageous competitive position. ' (paragraph 233). The (20) Paragraph 34. that it becomes apparent (42) Applying this line of reasoning to the airports sector, the system of differentiated landing charges (higher charges for intra-EEA flights) established by the CAA has the effect of applying dissimilar conditions for equi- valent landing and take-off services for airlines, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvan- tage, and thus constitutes an abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of indent (c) of the second paragraph of Article 86. (43) (44) It is obvious that such a system has the direct effect of putting at a disadvantage companies providing intra-Community flights by artificially altering the cost to the undertakings, depending on whether they operate domestic or intra-EEA services. the Treaty, the Regarding this infringement of CAA claims that the implementation of such a system is justified on the grounds that ‘the tech- nical and operational requirements applying to airports, and therefore the underlying costs, are different for internal flights and for international flights, primarily as a result of different require- ments regarding the following: (i) the length of the runways; (ii) the durability of the runways; (iii) the hours of operation, and (iv) the availability of the airports. ' (45) More specifically, the CAA argues as follows: (i) Requirements as to the length of the runways — the average distance of flights internal in Finland is between 300 km and 400 km, whereas the average flight distance between Finland and the other Member States varies between 1 500 km and 2 000 km, with a maximum of 3 000 km (Helsinki-Madrid), — the fleet of aircraft used for domestic flights is smaller than that used for intra-EEA flights, — the actual weight of aircraft used for domestic flights is less since the journeys are shorter than international flights, — the size of aircraft and the flight distance deter- mine runway length, — for domestic air traffic, runways of 2 000 m in length are sufficient; however, for intra-EEA flights, runways of at least 2 400 m are required. Thus, for traffic between Finland and the rest of Europe, the runways must be around 25 % longer than those for domestic traffic, 16. 3. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 69/29 — airports which accommodate large air fleets are subject to more stringent conditions regarding security and emergency arrangements; this requires considerable manpower investment and is expensive. By way of conclusion: the maintenance and capital investment costs associated with intra-EEA traffic are higher than those for domestic services. (46) The validity of the arguments advanced by the CAA is debatable, for the following reasons: — many domestic routes the Helsinki-Vantaa/Ivalo, Maarianhamina/Kittil(cid:132) and Turku/Rovaniemi routes) are of a similar distance to intra-EEA flights, example, (for — some of the intra-EEA flights are relatively short: Helsinki/Stockholm (approximately 405 km), Helsinki/Gothenburg (approximately 810 km), Helsinki/Oslo (approximately 810 km) and Helsinki/Copenhagen (approximately 910 km), — the distance of the route to be flown is not the sole criterion on which airlines base their choice of aircraft, — the CAA claimed that, whereas a runway length of 2 000 m is sufficient for domestic flights, intra-EEA or international flights would require an additional 400 m of runway. However, most of Finland’s airports have already made this investment; of the 25 administered by the CAA, only 6 have runways that are less than 2 400 m long (21). (47) Moreover, according to the figures in the Commis- sion’s possession, the airports with several of runways shorter than 2 400 m nevertheless handle the intra-EEA traffic. They are in particular following airports: Lappeenranta (2 000 m), Maar- ianhamina (1 900 m), Pori (2 000 m) and Vaasa (2 000 m) (22). The argument based on runway length is therefore not relevant. (48) As regards the claim that the aircraft used for domestic traffic are smaller than those used for intra-EEA traffic, the Commission notes that this is the airline the case. For example, not always Finnair uses for domestic routes (e. g. Helsinki-Oulu) as it does for the intra-Community routes Helsinki-Alicante or Helsinki-Barcelona. (MD-80s) aircraft same the (49) The CAA claims to have ‘monitored product costing, and in particular the cost of services asso- ciated with manoeuvring areas since 1994', and that ‘based on 1995 product costs, the cost per tonne (MTOW) of taxiway services for international traffic has risen by around 50 % compared with the cost of the same for domestic traffic'. According to the CAA, this means that ‘landing charges based solely on the MTOW are inaccurate in a system of pricing based on real costs, and therefore the landing charges for international traffic must be higher'. (50) However, the CAA itself admits that the alleged differential in costs between those incurred by the landing of an intra-EEA flight and those associated with a domestic landing is less than the differential between the landing charge for intra-EEA flights and that for domestic flights. (ii) Requirements as to the durability of runways (51) According to the CAA, because heavier aircraft are ‘in order to cater for the used for international traffic, the superstructure of international runways must be around 10 % more stable'. traffic, (52) This argument does not stand, because the runway durability factor is already taken into account, the charge being based on the weight of the aircraft. (53) (54) (55) (iii) Requirements as to the hours of operation of airports and their availability The CAA claims that, in view of the fact that 90 % of international air traffic to and from Finland passes through Helsinki, and that the departure and arrival times for international flights are fixed for both the morning and the evening, the provincial airports are also obliged to stay open in the morn- for connecting flights. This ings and evenings, means that ‘the cost of providing services must be included when calculating the cost of passenger charges'. The CAA claims that ‘international traffic requires more space for the passenger terminals and aircraft parking areas than domestic traffic, as well as more services. The CAA is therefore obliged to cover the construction costs when setting the passenger charge'. incurred by the requirements The last two arguments are irrelevant to the system in question: given that, according to the CAA, the regarding costs airport are included in the calculation of passenger charges, it follows that it is not possible to include them in the landing charges. operating hours availability and (21) Source: ACI Europe Airport Database. (22) Source: Finnish Civil Aviation Statistics. (56) In the light of the above, the Commission holds that none of the arguments put forward by the L 69/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 16. 3. 1999 CAA justifies the implementation of a system of charges that is discriminatory in nature, according to the origin of (i. e. domestic or the flight intra-EEA), such as that operated by the under- taking in question. (g) Effect on trade between Member States (62) (57) (58) In its judgment in the Corsica Ferries II case (23), the Court of Justice recognised that discriminatory practices which ‘affect undertakings providing transport services between two Member States, (. ) may affect trade between Member States'. Following a request under Article 11 of Regulation No 17 for the CAA to provide information, it was ascertained that there are no statistics that separate intra-EEA traffic from the rest of the international traffic for each airport. (59) As regards Helsinki airport, which handled 7,7 million passengers in 1996, the effect of the system in question on trade between Member States is beyond doubt. (60) As regards the other Finnish airports operating intra-EEA services (Vaasa, Turku, Tampere and Pori), apart from charter flights to the Mediter- ranean Member States and the Canary Islands, these airports operate each day to Stockholm six flights (Vaasa and Turku), five flights (Tampere), and two flights (Pori). The flights to Stockholm connect with flights to Amsterdam, Billund, Brus- sels, Copenhagen, D(cid:129)sseldorf, Frankfurt, Gothen- burg, Hamburg, London, Manchester, Milan, Munich, Paris and Vienna, on either Lufthansa/SAS or Finnair (on a code-sharing basis with its part- ners). The table below shows the volume of international flights as a proportion of overall passenger traffic for the airports in question. Airport Domestic traffic International traffic (%) Helsinki Vantaa Vaasa Turku Pori Tampere 30 66 51 72 49 70 34 49 28 51 Source: Finnish Civil Aviation Statistics 1996, p. 9. (23) Cited in footnote 13. (61) It is thus legitimate to regard the system at issue in those five airports as having an effect on trade between Member States. (h) Conclusion The foregoing analysis establishes that the system for calculating landing charges used by the CAA entails the payment, for no objective reason, of different charges, depending on the origin of the flight (domestic or intra-EEA), in respect of the same approach control, taxiway and apron areas services. (63) The Commission therefore considers the system in question is discriminatory and distorts competition on the relevant market, contrary to indent (c) of the second paragraph of Article 86 of the Treaty, that HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket has infringed Article 86 of the Treaty by using its dominant position as Finnish airport administrator to impose discriminatory landing charges in Finnish airports, according to the type of flight, that is either domestic or intra-EEA. Article 2 Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket must bring to an end the infringement referred to in Article l and inform the Commission within two months of the date of noti- fication of this Decision of the measures it has taken to that end. Article 3 This Decision is addressed to Ilmailulaitos/Luftfartsverket, PO Box 50, FIN-01531 Vantaa. Done at Brussels, 10 February 1999. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission


title: Euroopa Ühenduse ja Euroopa Nõukogu vaheline Leping, mille eesmärk on seada kooskõlas nõukogu 2. juuni 1997. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 1035/97, millega luuakse Euroopa Rassismi ja Ksenofoobia Järelevalvekeskus, artikli 7 lõikega 3 sisse tihe koostöö nimetatud keskuse ja Euroopa Nõukogu vahel

eurovoc_concepts:
Council of Europe
EU office or agency
agreement (EU)
institutional cooperation
racism
xenophobia

text: 68 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 21999A0218(01) 18. 2. 1999 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE TEATAJA Euroopa Ühenduse ja Euroopa Nõukogu vaheline LEPING, 01/3. kd L 44/34 mille eesmärk on seada kooskõlas nõukogu 2. juuni 1997. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 1035/97, millega luuakse Euroopa Rassismi ja Ksenofoobia Järelevalvekeskus, artikli 7 lõikega 3 sisse tihe koostöö nimetatud keskuse ja Euroopa Nõukogu vahel EUROOPA ÜHENDUS JA EUROOPA NÕUKOGU, VÕTTES ARVESSE, ET: Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu võttis 2. juunil 1997 vastu määruse (EÜ) nr 1035/97, millega luuakse Euroopa Rassismi ja Ksenofoobia Järelevalvekeskus (edaspidi “keskus”); keskuse eesmärk on anda ühendusele ja selle liikmesriikidele Euroopa tasandil objektiivseid, usaldusväärseid ja võrreldavaid andmeid rassismi, ksenofoobia ja antisemitismiga seotud nähtuste kohta; Euroopa Nõukogul on selles valdkonnas juba märkimisväärsed kogemused; keskus peab oma töös arvesse võtma meetmeid, mida Euroopa Nõukogu juba rakendanud on, ja pakkuma seega lisaväärtust; Euroopa Nõukogu ja eriti rassismi ja sallimatuse vastu võitlemise Euroopa komisjoniga (ECRI) tuleks luua tihedad sidemed; keskus peab määruse (EÜ) nr 1035/97 kohaselt kooskõlastama oma tegevuse Euroopa Nõukogu tegevusega, eelkõige tegevusprogrammi osas; Euroopa Nõukogu ülesanne on nimetada keskuse juhatuse liikmeks sõltumatu isik, ON KOKKU LEPPINUD JÄRGMISES: I. Teabe- ja andmete vahetus 1. Keskuse juhataja ja Euroopa Nõukogu peasekretariaadi, eelkõige rassismi ja sallimatuse vastu võitlemise Euroopa komisjoni (edaspidi “ECRI”) vahel seatakse asjakohasel tasandil sisse korrapärased kontaktid. 2. Keskus ja ECRI annavad teineteisele oma tegevuse käigus kogutud teavet ja andmeid. See ei hõlma kõnealuse kahe organi konfidentsiaalseid andmeid ja konfidentsiaalset tegevust. 3. Keskus ja ECRI võivad oma tegevuse käigus teineteisele antud teavet ja andmeid kasutada. 4. Keskus ja ECRI tagavad oma võrgustike kaudu oma tegevuse tulemuste võimalikult laialdase leviku vastastikkuse alusel. 5. Keskus ja ECRI tagavad kavandatavat, teostatavat või lõpetatud tegevust käsitleva teabe korrapärase vahetuse. II. Koostöö 6. Keskuse ja ECRI vahel peetakse korrapäraseid konsultatsioone, et kooskõlastada nende tegevust ja eelkõige töötada välja keskuse tööprogramm. Konsultatsioonide eesmärk on tagada, et nende kahe organi programmid täiendavad üksteist, ja vältida võimaluse korral tarbetut topelttööd. 7. Lisaks võib konsultatsioonide alusel kokku leppida, et keskus ja ECRI peaksid korraldama ühist ja/või täiendavat tegevust ühist huvi pakkuvates valdkondades. Sellise koostöö eesmärk on optimeerida kättesaadavaid koguvahendeid, eelkõige teaduslike uurimistööde osas. 01/3. kd ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 69 III. Esindaja nimetamine keskuse juhatusse Euroopa Nõukogu poolt 8. Euroopa nõukogu peasekretär nimetab ECRI liikmete hulgast sõltumatu isiku ja tema asetäitja keskuse juhatusse. Seda küsimust käsitletakse Euroopa Komisjoni korrapäraste kontaktide raames. ja Euroopa Nõukogu peasekretariaadi vaheliste Hecho en Estrasburgo, el diez de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y nueve. Udfærdiget i Strasbourg den tiende februar nitten hundrede og nioghalvfems. Geschehen zu Straßburg am zehnten Februar neunzehnhundertneunundneunzig. Έγινε στο Στρασβούργο, στις δέκα Φεβρουαρίου χίλια εννιακόσια ενενήντα εννέα. Done at Strasbourg on the tenth day of February in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine. Fait à Strasbourg, le dix février mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf. Fatto a Strasburgo, addì dieci febbraio millenovecentonovantanove. Gedaan te Straatsburg, de tiende februari negentienhonderd negenennegentig. Feito em Estrasburgo, em dez de Fevereiro de mil novecentos e noventa e nove. Tehty Strasbourgissa sataayhdeksänkymmentäyhdeksän. kymmenentenä päivänä helmikuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksän- Som skedde i Strasbourg den tionde februari nittonhundranittionio. 70 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 01/3. kd Por la Comunidad Europea For Det Europæiske Fællesskab Für die Europäische Gemeinschaft Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα For the European Community Pour la Communauté européenne Per la Comunità europea Voor de Europese Gemeenschap Pela Comunidade Europeia Euroopan yhteisön puolesta På Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar Por el Consejo de Europa For Europarådet Für den Europarat Για το Συμβούλιο της Ευρώπης For the Council of Europe Pour le Conseil de l’Europe Per il Consiglio d’Europa Voor de Raad van Europa Pelo Conselho da Europa Euroopan neuvoston puolesta På Europarådets vägnar


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 299/1999 della Commissione del 10 febbraio 1999 che fissa l'importo massimo della restituzione all'esportazione di zucchero bianco per la ventiseiesima gara parziale effettuata nell'ambito della gara permanente di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar

formats: pdf print

text: L 37/10 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 11. 2. 1999 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 299/1999 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 10 febbraio 1999 che fissa l’importo massimo della restituzione all’esportazione di zucchero bianco per la ventiseiesima gara parziale effettuata nell’ambito della gara perma- nente di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1785/81 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1981, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei settore dello zucchero (1), modificato da mercati nel ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1148/98 della Commis- sione (2), in particolare l’articolo 17, paragrafo 5, secondo capoverso, lettera b), considerando che in conformit(cid:133) al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 della Commissione, del 22 luglio 1998, rela- tivo ad una gara permanente per la determinazione di prelievi e/o di restituzioni all’esportazione di zucchero bianco (3), si procede a gare parziali per l’esportazione di tale zucchero; considerando che, in base alle disposizioni dell’articolo 9, paragrafo 1 del regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 un importo massimo della restituzione all’esportazione (cid:138) fissato, se del caso, per la gara parziale in causa, tenuto conto in partico- lare della situazione e della prevedibile evoluzione del mercato dello zucchero nella Comunit(cid:133) e sul mercato mondiale; considerando che dopo l’esame delle offerte (cid:138) opportuno adottare, per la ventiseiesima gara parziale, le disposizioni di cui all’articolo 1; considerando che le misure previste dal presente regola- mento sono conformi al parere del comitato di gestione per lo zucchero, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 Per la ventiseiesima gara parziale di zucchero bianco, effettuata a norma del regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98, l’im- porto massimo della restituzione all’esportazione (cid:138) pari a 50,445 EUR/100 kg. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore l’11 febbraio 1999. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 10 febbraio 1999. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 177 dell’1. 7. 1981, pag. 4. (2) GU L 159 del 3. 6. 1998, pag. 38. (3) GU L 206 del 23. 7. 1998, pag. 7


title: Regulamento (CE) n° 299/1999 da Comissão de 10 de Fevereiro de 1999 que fixa o montante máximo da restituição à exportação do açúcar branco para o vigésimo sexto concurso público parcial efectuado no âmbito do concurso público permanente referido no Regulamento (CE) n° 1574/98

text: L 37/10 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 11. 2. 1999 REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 299/1999 DA COMISS(cid:212)O de 10 de Fevereiro de 1999 que fixa o montante m(cid:145)ximo da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133) exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o do a(cid:135)(cid:156)car branco para o vig(cid:130)simo sexto concurso p(cid:156)blico parcial efectuado no (cid:131)mbito do concurso p(cid:156)blico permanente referido no Regulamento (CE) nº 1574/98 A COMISS(cid:212)O DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em contra o Regulamento (CEE) nº 1785/81 do Conselho, de 30 de Junho de 1981, que estabelece a organiza(cid:135)(cid:209)o comum de mercado no sector do a(cid:135)(cid:156)car (1), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 1148/98 da Comiss(cid:209)o (2), e, nomeadamente, o nº 5, al(cid:146)nea b), do seu artigo 17º, Considerando que, por for(cid:135)a do Regulamento (CE) nº 1574/98 da Comiss(cid:209)o, de 22 de Julho de 1998, respeitante a um concurso p(cid:156)blico permanente para a determina(cid:135)(cid:209)o de direitos niveladores e/ou de restitui(cid:135)(cid:210)es (cid:133) exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o de a(cid:135)(cid:156)car branco (3), procedeu-se a concursos p(cid:156)blicos parciais para a exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o desse a(cid:135)(cid:156)car; Considerando que, nos termos do nº 1 do artigo 9º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1574/98, (cid:130) fixado um montante m(cid:145)ximo da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133) exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o, eventualmente, para o concurso p(cid:156)blico parcial em causa, tendo em conta, nomeadamente, a situa(cid:135)(cid:209)o e a evolu(cid:135)(cid:209)o previs(cid:146)vel do mercado do a(cid:135)(cid:156)car na Comunidade e no mercado mundial; Considerando que, ap(cid:155)s exame das ofertas, (cid:130) conveniente adoptar, para o vig(cid:130)simo sexto concurso p(cid:156)blico parcial, as disposi(cid:135)(cid:210)es referidas no artigo 1º; Considerando que as medidas previstas no presente regu- lamento est(cid:209)o em conformidade com o parecer do Comit(cid:130) de Gest(cid:209)o do A(cid:135)(cid:156)car, ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO: Artigo 1º Para o vig(cid:130)simo sexto concurso p(cid:156)blico parcial de a(cid:135)(cid:156)car branco, efectuado no (cid:131)mbito do Regulamento (CE) nº 1574/98, o montante m(cid:145)ximo da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133) exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:130) fixado em 50,445 EUR por 100 quilogramas. Artigo 2º O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 11 de Feve- reiro de 1999. O presente regulamento (cid:130) obrigat(cid:155)rio em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplic(cid:145)vel em todos os Estados-membros. Feito em Bruxelas, em 10 de Fevereiro de 1999. Pela Comiss(cid:209)o Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comiss(cid:209)o (1) JO L 177 de 1. 7. 1981, p. 4. (2) JO L 159 de 3. 6. 1998, p. 38. (3) JO L 206 de 23. 7. 1998, p. 7


title: Wetgevingsresolutie houdende advies van het Europees Parlement inzake het voorstel voor een richtlijn van de Raad ertoe strekkende in de Gemeenschap een minimum van effectieve belastingheffing op inkomsten uit spaargelden in de vorm van rente te garanderen (COM(98)0295 C4-0404/98 98/ 0193(CNS))(Raadplegingsprocedure)

eurovoc_concepts:
approximation of laws
direct tax
fiscal policy
pension scheme
restriction on competition
tax on investment income

formats: html print


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 311/99 by Eolo PARODI Edinburgh- Palermo motorway and completion of the A12

eurovoc_concepts:
common transport policy
economic and social cohesion
motorway
trans-European network
transport network

text: C 341/90 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning SV 29. 11. 1999 arbetar dessutom med IAEA för att utvidga systemet för klassificering och snabb spridning av information angående INES-skalan (som drivs av IAEA) för att låta det omfatta även illegal handel. (1) (2) (3) (4) EGT L 246, 17. 9. 1980. EGT L 159, 29. 6. 1996. EGT L 35, 12. 2. 1992. EGT L 148, 19. 6. 1993. (1999/C 341/127) SKRIFTLIG FRÅGA P-0311/99 från Eolo Parodi (PPE) till kommissionen (10 februari 1999) Angående: Motorvägen ”Edinburgh 4 Palermo” och slutförandet av A12 Motorvägen ”Edinburgh 4 Palermo”, en av de förbindelser från norr till söder som är av strategisk betydelse för hela Europa, omfattar av oförklarlig anledning ett 180 km långt avbrott mellan Rosignano och Civitavecchia (Italien). Både på nationell nivå och på gemenskapsnivå förorsakar detta en flaskhals som får konsekvenser för den ekonomiska och sociala utvecklingen och handelsutvecklingen på den norra tyrrenska kusten. Problem uppstår till exempel vad gäller transport av varor till och från hamnarna och flygplatserna i området och vad gäller balansen i trafikflödet från norra till södra Italien som inte i tillräckligt hög grad kan säkerställas innan arbetet med denna viktiga sträcka har slutförts. Motorväg A1, som gör det möjligt att undvika den tyrrenska flaskhalsen, är överbelastad (särskilt från Bologna och Florens) och kan inte längre fylla det behov som finns. Det är följaktligen av största vikt att slutföra arbetet med den tyrrenska motorvägen A12 mellan Rosignano och Civitavecchia, dels för att få en optimal förbindelse mellan området vid Tyrrenska havet och Central- och Nordeuropa, dels för att säkerställa att den viktiga hamn- (Genua, La Spezia, Carrara, Livorno och Civitavecchia) och flygplatsinfrastrukturen (Genua, Pisa, Grosseto och Fiumicino) fungerar väl samt för att lösa trafikproblemen mellan Bologna och Florens. Kan kommissionen mot denna bakgrund ange 1. om den inte anser det vara av högsta intresse för EU att slutföra arbetet med motorvägen ”Edinburgh 4 Palermo”? 2. om den inte följaktligen anser att genomförandet av sträckan mellan Rosignano och Civitavecchia bör figurera bland de högst prioriterade europeiska projekten inom ramen för TEN? 3. om den inte anser att det även på nationell nivå, det vill säga från regeringens sida, behövs konkreta åtgärder för att arbetet med A12 äntligen skall slutföras? Svar från Neil Kinnock på kommissionens vägnar (16 mars 1999) 1. Vägsystemet mellan Edinburgh och Palermo omfattas av riktlinjerna för det transeuropeiska trans- portnätet (TEN-T) och är upptaget som ett projekt av gemensamt intresse i bilaga I till Europaparlamentets och rådets beslut nr 1692/96/EG av den 23 juli 1996 om gemenskapens riktlinjer för utbyggnad av det transeuropeiska transportnätet (1). Där framgår mycket riktigt att en väg planeras på sträckan Rossignano4 Civitavecchia och finansiellt stöd från gemenskapen skulle därför kunna utgå på begäran av de berörda medlemsstaterna. Översynen av riktlinjerna för det transeuropeiska transportnätet kommer att föregås av en rapport i form 2. av en vitbok där det bland annat kommer att fastslås hur riktlinjerna bör ändras. Det är därför för tidigt att i detta läge dra några slutsatser om uppdateringen av förteckningen över specifika projekt i bilaga III. 3. Medlemsstaterna är ansvariga för genomförandet av de projekt av gemensamt intresse som anges i riktlinjerna och för att fastställa prioriteringar i sina nationella planer. Det är följaktligen den italienska regeringen som fattar det slutgiltiga beslutet om en utbyggnad av sträckan Rossignano4Civitavecchia. (1) EGT L 228, 9. 9. 1996


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 302/1999 der Kommission vom 10. Februar 1999 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2756/98 zur Eröffnung von Gemeinschaftszollkontingenten für Schafe und Ziegen sowie Schaf- und Ziegenfleisch der KN-Codes 0104 10 30, 0104 10 80, 0104 20 10, 0104 20 90 und 0204 für 1999 sowie zur Abweichung von der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1439/95 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3013/89 des Rates hinsichtlich der Einfuhr und Ausfuhr von Schaf- und Ziegenfleischerzeugnissen

eurovoc_concepts:
North Macedonia
customs duties
goat
live animal
sheep
tariff quota

text: L 37/18 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften 11. 2. 1999 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 302/1999 DER KOMMISSION vom 10. Februar 1999 zur (cid:142)nderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2756/98 zur Er(cid:148)ffnung von Gemein- schaftszollkontingenten f(cid:129)r Schafe und Ziegen sowie Schaf- und Ziegenfleisch der KN-Codes 0104 10 30, 0104 10 80, 0104 20 10, 0104 20 90 und 0204 f(cid:129)r 1999 sowie zur Abweichung von der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1439/95 zur Durchf(cid:129)hrung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3013/89 des Rates hinsichtlich der Einfuhr und Ausfuhr von Schaf- und Ziegenfleischerzeugnissen DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 77/98 des Rates vom 9. Januar 1998 (cid:129)ber bestimmte Durchf(cid:129)hrungsvor- schriften zu den Kooperationsabkommen zwischen der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft und der Ehemaligen Jugosla- wischen Republik Mazedonien (1), auf Artikel 1, insbesondere in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: In Anhang D des durch Beschluß 97/831/EG des Rates vom 27. November 1997 (cid:129)ber den Abschluß des Koope- rationsabkommens zwischen der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemein- schaft und der Ehemaligen Jugoslawischen Republik Mazedonien (2) geschlossenen Abkommens sind die Mengen bestimmter landwirtschaftlicher Erzeugnisse fest- gelegt, die im Rahmen von Zollkontingenten, Zollpla- fonds oder Referenzmengen zollfrei eingef(cid:129)hrt werden d(cid:129)rfen. Entsprechend muß der Zollsatz in Anhang III der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2756/98 der Kommission vom 18. Dezember 1998 zur Er(cid:148)ffnung eines Gemeinschaftszoll- kontingents f(cid:129)r Schafe und Ziegen sowie Schaf- und Ziegenfleisch der KN-Codes 0104 10 30, 0104 10 80, 0104 20 10, 0104 20 90 und 0204 f(cid:129)r 1999 sowie zur Abweichung von der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1439/95 zur Durchf(cid:129)hrung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 3013/89 hinsichtlich der Einfuhr und Ausfuhr von Schaf- und Ziegenfleischerzeugnissen (3) angepaßt werden. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses f(cid:129)r Schaf- und Ziegenfleisch — HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2756/98 wird wie folgt ge(cid:132)n- dert: 1. Artikel 3 Absatz 3 erh(cid:132)lt folgende Fassung: in „3. Die Mengen lebender Tiere, ausgedr(cid:129)ckt Lebendgewicht, die unter die KN-Codes 0104 10 30, 0104 10 80 und 0104 20 90 fallen und f(cid:129)r die der bei der Einfuhr mit Ursprung in besonderen Lieferl(cid:132)ndern geltende Zollsatz in der Zeit vom 1. Januar bis zum 31. Dezember 1999 auf Null gesenkt wird, sind in Anhang III angegeben. “ 2. Anhang III erh(cid:132)lt folgende Fassung: „ANHANG III MENGEN GEM(cid:142)SS ARTIKEL 3 ABSATZ 3 (1999) Laufende Nummer 09. 4035 Lebende Schafe und Ziegen (in Tonnen Lebendgewicht) — zum Zollsatz Null Ehemalige Jugoslawische Republik Mazedonien 215 Tonnen“ Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am Tag nach ihrer Ver(cid:148)ffentli- chung im Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 10. Februar 1999 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 8 vom 14. 1. 1998, S. 1. (2) ABl. L 348 vom 18. 12. 1997, S. 1. (3) ABl. L 345 vom 19. 12. 1998, S. 31


title: Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the Information Society (COM(97)0628 C4-0079/98 97/0359(COD))(Codecision procedure: first reading)

eurovoc_concepts:
approximation of laws
audiovisual communications policy
copyright
database
dissemination of information
hiring
indemnification
information policy
inshore fishing
literary and artistic property
reprography
single market
software
transmission network


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 325/99 by Luigi MORETTI Uneven distribution of air traffic between Milan's Malpensa and Linate airports

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
air transport
airport
application of EU law
transport capacity


title: Resolución legislativa que contiene el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo sobre la propuesta de reglamento del Consejo por el que se determinan los terceros países cuyos nacionales deben estar provistos de un visado al cruzar las fronteras exteriores de los Estados miembros (COM(93)0684 C3-0012/94) y la orientación del Consejo acerca de la propuesta de Reglamento del Consejo por el que se determinan los terceros países cuyos nacionales deben estar provistos de un visado al cruzar las fronteras exteriores de los Estados miembros (11323/97 - C4-0665/97 97/0922(CNS)) (Procedimiento de consulta)

eurovoc_concepts:
admission of aliens
border control
external border of the EU
foreign national
free movement of persons
immigration
residence permit
third country

text: C 150/196 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 28. 5. 1999 Mie´rcoles, 10 de febrero de 1999 Resolucio´n legislativa que contiene el dictamen del Parlamento Europeo sobre la propuesta de acto del Consejo por el que se establece el Convenio relativo a las normas de admisio´n de nacionales de terceros paı´ses en los Estados miembros (COM(97)0387 − C4-0681/97 − 97/0227(CNS)) (Procedimiento de consulta) El Parlamento Europeo, − Vista la propuesta de la Comisio´n al Consejo (COM(97)0387 − 97/0227(CNS)) (1), − Consultado por el Consejo, de conformidad con el pa´rrafo segundo del artı´culo K. 6 del Tratado de la Unio´n Europea (C4-0681/97), − Visto el artı´culo 58 de su Reglamento, − Vistos el informe de la Comisio´n de Libertades Pu´blicas y Asuntos Interiores y la opinio´n de la Comisio´n de Asuntos Exteriores, Seguridad y Polı´tica de Defensa (A4-0266/98), − Vistos el segundo informe de la Comisio´n de Libertades Pu´blicas y Asuntos Interiores y la opinio´n de la Comisio´n de Asuntos Exteriores, Seguridad y Polı´tica de Defensa (A4-0045/99), 1. Aprueba la propuesta de la Comisio´n, con las modificaciones introducidas por el Parlamento 2. Pide a la Comisio´n que modifique en consecuencia su propuesta sobre la admisio´n, y que presente una propuesta por separado relativa al estatuto para los nacionales de terceros paı´ses que residan legalmente en un Estado miembro, y que ambas propuestas se elaboren a partir del Tratado CE, tras la entrada en vigor del Tratado de Amsterdam; Pide al Consejo que le informe y que le consulte de nuevo, en caso de que pretenda apartarse del 3. texto aprobado por el Parlamento; 4. Encarga a su Presidente que transmita el presente dictamen al Consejo y a la Comisio´n. (1) DO C 337 de 7. 11. 1997, p. 9. b) A4-0043/99 Propuesta de reglamento basada en el artı´culo 100C del Tratado constitutivo de la Unio´n Europea, por el que se determinan los terceros paı´ses cuyos nacionales deben estar provistos de un visado al cruzar las fronteras exteriores de los Estados miembros (COM(93)0684 − C3-0012/94) y el proyecto de Reglamento del Consejo por el que se determinan los terceros paı´ses cuyos nacionales deben estar provistos de un visado al cruzar las fronteras exteriores de los Estados miembros (11323/97 − C4-0665/97 − 97/0922(CNS)) Esta propuesta ha sido aprobada con las modificaciones siguientes: TEXTO DE LA COMISIO´ N (*) ENMIENDAS DEL PARLAMENTO (Enmienda 1) Tı´tulo Propuesta de Reglamento basada en el artı´culo 100C del Tratado Constitutivo de la Unio´n Europea por el que se Propuesta de Reglamento provisional, basada en el artı´culo 100C del Tratado Constitutivo de la Unio´n Europea por el que (*) DO C 11 de 15. 1. 1994, p. 15


title: Recomendação do Parlamento Europeu ao Conselho referente à criação de um Corpo Civil Europeu para a Paz

eurovoc_concepts:
feasibility study
international voluntary worker


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 305/1999 van de Commissie van 10 februari 1999 tot wijziging van de restituties bij uitvoer van witte en ruwe suiker in onveranderde vorm

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
raw sugar
white sugar

text: 11. 2. 1999 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 37/21 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 305/1999 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 10 februari 1999 tot w¶ziging van de restituties b¶ uitvoer van witte en ruwe suiker in onveran- derde vorm DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EEG) nr. 1785/81 van de Raad van 30 juni 1981 houdende een gemeenschappel¶ke ordening der markten in de sector suiker (1), laatstel¶k gew¶zigd b¶ Verordening (EG) nr. 1148/98 van de Commissie (2), en met name op artikel 19, lid 4, tweede alinea, Overwegende dat de b¶ uitvoer van witte en ruwe suiker toe te passen restituties vastgesteld z¶n b¶ Verordening (EG) nr. 261/1999 van de Commissie (3); Overwegende dat toepassing van de in Verordening (EG) nr. 261/1999 neergelegde regels op de gegevens waarover de Commissie op het huidige t¶dstip beschikt, aanleiding geeft tot w¶ziging van de op dit t¶dstip geldende restitu- ties b¶ uitvoer in de zin als vermeld in de b¶lage b¶ deze verordening, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 De restituties b¶ uitvoer in onveranderde vorm van de in artikel 1, lid 1, onder a), van Verordening (EEG) nr. 1785/ 81, bedoelde producten, welke niet gedenatureerd z¶n, die vastgesteld z¶n in de b¶lage b¶ Verordening (EG) nr. 261/1999, worden gew¶zigd overeenkomstig de bedragen aangegeven in de b¶lage. Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 11 februari 1999. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepassel¶k in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 10 februari 1999. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 177 van 1. 7. 1981, blz. 4. (2) PB L 159 van 3. 6. 1998, blz. 38. (3) PB L 30 van 4. 2. 1999, blz. 25. L 37/22 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 11. 2. 1999 b¶ de verordening van de Commissie van 10 februari 1999 tot wijziging van de restituties b¶ uitvoer van witte en ruwe suiker in onveranderde vorm B(cid:246)LAGE Productcode Restitutiebedrag 1701 11 90 9100 1701 11 90 9910 1701 11 90 9950 1701 12 90 9100 1701 12 90 9910 1701 12 90 9950 — in EUR/100 kg — 43,13 43,40 43,13 43,40 (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) — in EUR/1 % sacharose (cid:253) 100 kg — 1701 91 00 9000 0,4689 1701 99 10 9100 1701 99 10 9910 1701 99 10 9950 — in EUR/100 kg — 46,89 47,27 47,27 — in EUR/1 % sacharose (cid:253) 100 kg — 1701 99 90 9100 0,4689 (1) Dit bedrag geldt voor ruwe suiker met een rendement van 92 %. Indien het rendement van de ge(cid:137)xporteerde ruwe suiker afw¶kt van 92 %, wordt het bedrag van de toe te passen restitutie berekend overeenkomstig het bepaalde in artikel 17 bis, lid 4, van Verordening (EEG) nr. 1785/81. (2) Vaststelling geschorst door Verordening (EEG) nr. 2689/85 van de Commissie (PB L 255 van 26. 9. 1985, blz. 12), gew¶zigd b¶ Verordening (EEG) nr. 3251/85 (PB L 309 van 21. 11. 1985, blz. 14)


title: United in democracy.

eurovoc_concepts:
EU institution
European Communities
European Parliament
competence of the institution


title: Regulamento (CE) n° 304/1999 da Comissão de 10 de Fevereiro de 1999 relativo à emissão de certificados de exportação de produtos transformados à base de frutos e produtos hortícolas

eurovoc_concepts:
citrus fruit
export licence
export refund
fruit juice
fruit product

text: L 37/20 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 11. 2. 1999 REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 304/1999 DA COMISS(cid:212)O de 10 de Fevereiro de 1999 relativo (cid:133) emiss(cid:209)o de certificados de exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o de produtos transformados (cid:133) base de frutos e produtos hort(cid:146)colas A COMISS(cid:212)O DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CE) nº 1429/95 da Comiss(cid:209)o, de 23 de Junho de 1995, que estabelece as normas de execu(cid:135)(cid:209)o das restitui(cid:135)(cid:210)es (cid:133) exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o no sector de produtos transformados (cid:133) base de frutos e produtos hort(cid:146)colas, com exclus(cid:209)o das concedidas a t(cid:146)tulo dos a(cid:135)(cid:156)cares de adi(cid:135)(cid:209)o (1), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 1007/97 (2), e, nomea- damente, o nº 1 do seu artigo 4º, Considerando que o Regulamento (CE) nº 2260/98 da Comiss(cid:209)o (3) fixa as quantidades em rela(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133)s quais podem ser pedidos certificados de exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o com prefi- xa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o, n(cid:209)o integrados no (cid:131)mbito da ajuda alimentar; Considerando que o artigo 4º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1429/95 fixa as condi(cid:135)(cid:210)es em que podem ser tomadas medidas especiais pela Comiss(cid:209)o, com vista a evitar a supera(cid:135)(cid:209)o das quantidades em rela(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:133)s quais podem ser pedidos certificados de exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o; Considerando que, perante as informa(cid:135)(cid:210)es de que hoje disp(cid:210)e a Comiss(cid:209)o, a quantidade de 354 toneladas de sumo de laranja com teor de a(cid:135)(cid:156)car de 55(cid:190) Brix ou mais, constante do anexo do Regulamento (CE) nº 1275/98, diminu(cid:146)da e aumentada das quantidades referidas no nº 1 do artigo 4º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1429/95, seria supe- rada se n(cid:209)o fossem impostas restri(cid:135)(cid:210)es (cid:133) emiss(cid:209)o de certi- ficados com prefixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o na sequ(cid:136)ncia dos pedidos apresentados desde 5 de Fevereiro de 1999; que (cid:130), por conseguinte, conveniente aplicar um coeficiente de redu(cid:135)(cid:209)o aos pedidos apresentados em 5 de Fevereiro de 1999, e recusar os pedidos de certificados de exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o com prefixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o apresentados posteriormente na perspectiva de emiss(cid:209)o durante o per(cid:146)odo em curso, ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO: Artigo 1º Os certificados de exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o com prefixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da resti- tui(cid:135)(cid:209)o relativos a sumo de laranja com teor de a(cid:135)(cid:156)car de 55(cid:190) Brix ou mais, cujo pedido tenha sido apresentado em 5 de Fevereiro de 1999 ao abrigo do artigo 1º do Regula- mento (CE) nº 2260/98 ser(cid:209)o emitidos nas percentagens de 82,4 % das quantidades pedidas. Em rela(cid:135)(cid:209)o ao produto supracitado, s(cid:209)o rejeitados os pedidos de certificados com prefixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da restitui(cid:135)(cid:209)o apre- sentados ap(cid:155)s 5 de Fevereiro de 1999 e antes de 20 de Fevereiro de 1999. Artigo 2º O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 11 de Feve- reiro de 1999. O presente regulamento (cid:130) obrigat(cid:155)rio em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplic(cid:145)vel em todos os Estados-membros. Feito em Bruxelas, em 10 de Fevereiro de 1999. Pela Comiss(cid:209)o Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comiss(cid:209)o (1) JO L 141 de 24. 6. 1995, p. 28. (2) JO L 145 de 5. 6. 1997, p. 16. (3) JO L 283 de 21. 10. 1998, p. 16


title: Règlement (CE) nº 303/1999 de la Commission du 10 février 1999 arrêtant des mesures exceptionnelles en rapport avec les modalités de gel des terres afin d'atténuer les effets de mauvaises conditions climatiques dans certaines régions de la Communauté

eurovoc_concepts:
atmospheric conditions
harvest
production aid
regional aid
set-aside

text: 11. 2. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 37/19 R(cid:221)GLEMENT (CE) No 303/1999 DE LA COMMISSION du 10 f(cid:130)vrier 1999 arr(cid:136)tant des mesures exceptionnelles en rapport avec les modalit(cid:130)s de gel des terres afin d’att(cid:130)nuer les effets de mauvaises conditions climatiques dans certaines r(cid:130)gions de la Communaut(cid:130) LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUT(cid:144)S EUROP(cid:144)ENNES, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, consid(cid:130)rant que le comit(cid:130) de gestion des c(cid:130)r(cid:130)ales n’a pas (cid:130)mis d’avis dans le d(cid:130)lai imparti par son pr(cid:130)sident, vu le r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1765/92 du Conseil du 30 juin 1992 instituant un r(cid:130)gime de soutien aux producteurs de certaines cultures arables (1), modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le son r(cid:138)glement article 12, (CE) no 1624/98 (2), et notamment consid(cid:130)rant que l’(cid:130)ligibilit(cid:130) au paiement compensatoire dans le cadre du r(cid:130)gime g(cid:130)n(cid:130)ral vis(cid:130) (cid:133) l’article 2, para- graphe 5, du r(cid:138)glement (CEE) no 1765/92 est assujettie (cid:133) une obligation de gel des terres; que les modalit(cid:130)s d’appli- cation fix(cid:130)es par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 762/94 de la Commission (3), modifi(cid:130) en dernier lieu par le r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 1981/98 (4), pr(cid:130)cisent que la p(cid:130)riode de gel doit d(cid:130)buter le 15 janvier au plus tard et qu’aucune production agricole n’est autoris(cid:130)e sur les terres gel(cid:130)es; se consid(cid:130)rant que, (cid:133) la suite de mauvaises conditions clima- tiques, les producteurs de diff(cid:130)rentes r(cid:130)gions de certains (cid:144)tats membres l’impossibilit(cid:130) de trouvent dans proc(cid:130)der, avant le 15 janvier 1999, (cid:133) la r(cid:130)colte de cultures, notamment de pommes de terre, betteraves (cid:133) sucre, bette- raves fourrag(cid:138)res, carottes ou panais, sur des terres desti- n(cid:130)es (cid:133) (cid:136)tre gel(cid:130)es; que, (cid:133) titre exceptionnel, il convient, sur demande d’un producteur, d’autoriser ce dernier (cid:133) proc(cid:130)der (cid:133) la r(cid:130)colte de ses cultures avant le 28 f(cid:130)vrier 1999, sans que cela interdise de reconna(cid:140)tre les terres en question comme valablement gel(cid:130)es, pour autant que le producteur prouve que les conditions applicables sont respect(cid:130)es; A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LE PR(cid:144)SENT R(cid:221)GLEMENT: Article premier ayant comp(cid:130)tente de introduit une demande Lorsqu’un producteur l’(cid:144)tat membre l’autorit(cid:130) aupr(cid:138)s de concern(cid:130), et sans pr(cid:130)judice des dispositions de l’article 3, paragraphes 3 et 4, du r(cid:138)glement (CE) no 762/94 interdi- sant la production agricole sur des terres gel(cid:130)es, peut prouver que: — (cid:133) la suite des mauvaises conditions climatiques, il n’a pas (cid:130)t(cid:130) possible de proc(cid:130)der (cid:133) une r(cid:130)colte avant le 15 janvier 1999, — si la r(cid:130)colte a eu lieu, elle a (cid:130)t(cid:130) effectu(cid:130)e avant le 28 f(cid:130)vrier 1999, — toutes les autres conditions applicables relatives aux terres gel(cid:130)es ont (cid:130)t(cid:130) respect(cid:130)es, les terres en question peuvent (cid:136)tre consid(cid:130)r(cid:130)es comme valablement gel(cid:130)es pour la r(cid:130)colte 1999. Article 2 Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement entre en vigueur le jour de sa publi- cation au Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes. Il est applicable (cid:133) partir du 15 janvier 1999. Le pr(cid:130)sent r(cid:138)glement est obligatoire dans tous ses (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments et directement applicable dans tout (cid:144)tat membre. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 10 f(cid:130)vrier 1999. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 181 du 1. 7. 1992, p. 12. (2) JO L 210 du 28. 7. 1998, p. 3. (3) JO L 90 du 7. 4. 1994, p. 8. (4) JO L 256 du 18. 9. 1998, p. 8


title: Résolution législative portant avis du Parlement européen sur la proposition de décision du Conseil relative à la conclusion d'un accord sous forme d'échange de lettres entre la Communauté européenne et la République de Slovénie concernant le système d'écopoints applicable au trafic slovène de transit à travers l'Autriche à partir du 1er janvier 1997 (COM(98)0554 C4-0623/98 98/0286(CNS)) (Procédure de consultation)

eurovoc_concepts:
Austria
Slovenia
Union transit
customs transit
protocol to an agreement
tradeable emission permit

text: 28. 5. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communaute´s europe´ennes C 150/163 Mercredi, 10 fe´vrier 1999 4. Re´gimes de se´curite´ sociale * (proce´dure sans rapport) Proposition de re`glement du Conseil modifiant le re`glement (CEE) no 1408/71 relatif a` l’application des re´gimes de se´curite´ sociale aux travailleurs salarie´s, aux travailleurs non salarie´s et aux membres de leur famille qui se de´placent a` l’inte´rieur de la Communaute´ et le re`glement (CEE) no 574/72 fixant les modalite´s d’application du re`glement (CEE) no 1408/71 (modifications diverses 1998) (COM(98)0547 − C4-0607/98 − 98/0285(CNS)) (Proce´dure de consultation) Cette proposition est approuve´e. 5. Budget de la Commission ge´ne´rale des peˆches pour la Me´diterrane´e * (proce´dure sans rapport) Proposition de de´cision du Conseil relative a` l’acceptation, par la Communaute´ europe´enne, de l’amendement au texte de l’accord de la Commission ge´ne´rale des peˆches pour la Me´diterrane´e portant e´tablissement d’un budget autonome pour ladite organisation (COM(98)0690 − C4-0702/98 − 98/0332(CNS)) (Proce´dure de consultation) Cette proposition est approuve´e. 6. Trafic slove`ne de transit a` travers l’Autriche * (proce´dure sans de´bat) A4-0039/99 Re´solution le´gislative portant avis du Parlement europe´en sur la proposition de de´cision du Conseil relative a` la conclusion d’un accord sous forme d’e´change de lettres entre la Communaute´ europe´enne et la Re´publique de Slove´nie concernant le syste`me d’e´copoints applicable au trafic slove`ne de transit a` travers l’Autriche a` partir du 1er janvier 1997 (COM(98)0554 − C4-0623/98 − 98/0286(CNS)) (Proce´dure de consultation) Le Parlement europe´en, − vu la proposition de de´cision du Conseil COM(98)0554 − 98/0286(CNS), − vu le projet d’accord paraphe´ par la Commission COM(98)0554 (1), − vu l’article 75 du traite´ CE, − consulte´ par le Conseil conforme´ment a` l’article 228, paragraphe 3, premier aline´a, du traite´ CE (C4-0623/98), − vu l’article 90, paragraphe 7, de son re`glement, − vu le rapport de la commission des transports et du tourisme (A4-0039/99); 1. approuve la conclusion de l’accord; charge son Pre´sident de transmettre le pre´sent avis au Conseil, a` la Commission, ainsi qu’aux 2. gouvernements et aux parlements des E´ tats membres et de la Re´publique de Slove´nie. (1) JO C 342 du 10. 11. 1998, p. 7


title: Ftehim bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Kunsill ta' l-Ewropa bil-għan li jistabbilixxi, skond l-Artikolu 7(3) tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1035/97 tat-2 ta' Ġunju 1997 li jistabbilixxi Ċentru Ewropew ta' Monitoraġġ dwar ir-Razziżmu u l-Ksenofobija, kooperazzjoni mill-qrib bejn dan iċ-Ċentru u l-Kunsill ta' l-Ewropa

text: 68 MT Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea 01/Vol. 3 21999A0218(01) 18. 2. 1999 IL-ĠURNAL UFFIĊJALI TAL-KOMUNITAJIET EWROPEJ L 44/34 FTEHIM bejn il-Komunità Ewropea u l-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa bil-għan li jistabbilixxi, skond l-Artikolu 7(3) tar-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 1035/97 tat-2 ta’ Ġunju 1997 li jistabbilixxi Ċentru Ewropew ta’ Monitoraġġ dwar ir-Razziżmu u l-Ksenofobija, kooperazzjoni mill-qrib bejn dan iċ-Ċentru u l-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa IL-KOMUNITÀ EWROPEA U L-KUNSILL TA’ L-EWROPA BILLI l-Kunsill ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea adotta, fit-2 ta’ Ġunju 1997, Regolament (KE) Nru 1035/97 li jistabbilixxi Ċentru Ewropew ta’ Monitoraġġ dwar ir-Razziżmu u l-Ksenofobija (hawnhekk iżjed ’il quddiem imsejjaħ “iċ-Ċentru”); BILLI l-għan taċ-Ċentru huwa illi jipprovvdi lill-Komunità u lill-Istati Membri tagħha data oġġettiva, ta’ min joqgħod fuqha u kumparabbli fuq livell Ewropew dwar il-fenomeni tar-razziżmu, tal-ksenofobija u ta’ l-anti-Semitiżmu; BILLI l-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa diġà għandu esperjenza konsiderevoli f’dan il-qasam; BILLI fl-insegwiment ta’ l-attivitajiet tiegħu ċ-Ċentru għandu jikkonsidra attivitajiet li diġà saru mill-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa u b’hekk jipprovdi valur miżjud; billi rabtiet mill-qrib għandhom ikunu stabbiliti mal-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa, u b’mod partikolari mal-Kummissjoni Ewropea kontra r-Razziżmu u l-Intolleranza (ECRI); BILLI ċ-Ċentru għandu, skond ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 1035/97, jikkoordina l-attivitajiet tiegħu ma’ dawk tal-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa, b’mod partikolari fir-rigward tal-programm ta’ attivitajiet tiegħu; BILLI huwa r-rwol tal-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa li jaħtar persuna indipendenti waħda bħala membru tal-Bord ta’ Amministrazzjoni taċ-Ċentru, FTIEHMU kif ġej: I. Skambju ta’ informazzjoni u data 1. Għandhom ikunu stabbiliti kuntatti regolari fuq livell xieraq bejn id-Direttur taċ-Ċentru u s-Segretarjat l-Ewropa, b’mod partikolari s-Segretarjat tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea kontra Ġenerali tal-Kunsill ta’ r-Razziżmu u l-Intolleranza (hawnhekk iżjed ’il quddiem imsejħa “ECRI”). 2. 3. 4. 5. Iċ-Ċentru u l-ECRI għandhom jgħaddu lil xulxin l-informazzjoni u d-data miġbura fil-kors ta’ l-attivitajiet tagħhom. Dan, iżda, ma jestendix għal data konfidenzjali u għall-attivitajiet prodotti jew magħmula miż-żewġ korpi. Informazzjoni u data mgħoddija lil xulxin tista’ tintuża miċ-Ċentru u mill-ECRI fil-kors ta’ l-attivitajiet rispettivi tagħhom. Iċ-Ċentru u l-ECRI għandhom jassiguraw, permezz tan-networks tagħhom, l-iktar disseminazzjoni wiesgħa possibbli tar-riżultati ta’ l-attivitajiet rispettivi tagħhom fuq bażi reċiproka. Iċ-Ċentru u l-ECRI għandhom jassiguraw skambji regolari ta’ informazzjoni dwar attivitajiet proposti, mibdija jew kompluti. II. Kooperazzjoni 6. Għandhom isiru konsultazzjonijiet regolari bejn iċ-Ċentru u l-ECRI sabiex jikkordinaw l-attivitajiet tagħhom u b’mod partikolari Il-għan tal-konsultazzjonijiet għandu jkun illi jassigura illi l-programmi taż-żewġ korpi jikkomplimentaw wieħed lill-ieħor u li tiġi evitata, sa fejn ikun possibbli,duplikazzjoni bla bżonn. sabiex jippreparaw il-programm ta’ ħidma taċ-Ċentru. 7. Barra minn hekk, a bażi ta’ din il-konsultazzjoni, jista’ jiġi miftiehem illi ċ-Ċentru u l-ECRI għandhom jagħmlu attivitajiet konġunti u/jew komplimentarji dwar suġġetti ta’ interess komuni. L-għan ta’ din il-kooperazzjoni għandu jkun li jsir l-aħjar użu mir-riżorsi totali disponibbli, notevolment fir-rigward ta’ proġetti ta’ riċerka xjentifika. 01/Vol. 3 MT Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea 69 III. Ħatra ta’ figura promimenti mill-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa sabiex taħdem fil-Bord ta’ Amministrazzjoni taċ-Ċentru 8. Is-Segretarju-Ġenerali tal-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa għandu jaħtar persuna indipendenti minn fost il-Membri ta’ l-ECRI sabiex isservi fuq il-Bord ta’ Amministrazzjoni taċ-Ċentru, flimkien ma’ deputat. Din il-kwistjoni għandha tiġi ttrattata fil-kuntest tal-kuntatti regolari bejn il-Kummissjoni Ewropea u s-Segretarju-Ġenerali tal-Kunsill ta’ l-Ewropa. Hecho en Estrasburgo, el diez de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y nueve. Udfærdiget i Strasbourg den tiende februar nitten hundrede og nioghalvfems. Geschehen zu Straßburg am zehnten Februar neunzehnhundertneunundneunzig. Έγινε στο Στρασβούργο, στις δέκα Φεβρουαρίου χίλια εννιακόσια ενενήντα εννέα. Done at Strasbourg on the tenth day of February in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine. Fait à Strasbourg, le dix février mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf. Fatto a Strasburgo, addì dieci febbraio millenovecentonovantanove. Gedaan te Straatsburg, de tiende februari negentienhonderd negenennegentig. Feito em Estrasburgo, em dez de Fevereiro de mil novecentos e noventa e nove. Tehty kymmentäyhdeksän. Strasbourgissa kymmenentenä päivänä helmikuuta vuonna tuhatyhdeksänsataayhdeksän- Som skedde i Strasbourg den tionde februari nittonhundranittionio. 70 MT Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea 01/Vol. 3 Por la Comunidad Europea For Det Europæiske Fællesskab Für die Europäische Gemeinschaft Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Κοινότητα For the European Community Pour la Communauté européenne Per la Comunità europea Voor de Europese Gemeenschap Pela Comunidade Europeia Euroopan yhteisön puolesta På Europeiska gemenskapens vägnar Por el Consejo de Europa For Europarådet Für den Europarat Για το Συμβούλιο της Ευρώπης For the Council of Europe Pour le Conseil de l’Europe Per il Consiglio d’Europa Voor de Raad van Europa Pelo Conselho da Europa Euroopan neuvoston puolesta På Europarådets vägnar


title: 1999/141/EG: Kommissionens beslut av den 10 februari 1999 om ändring av beslut 91/544/EEG om samverkansgruppen för äldre [delgivet med nr K(1999) 211]

eurovoc_concepts:
European social policy
elderly person
pension scheme
population ageing

text: L 45/54 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 19. 2. 1999 KOMMISSIONENS BESLUT av den 10 februari 1999 om (cid:132)ndring av beslut 91/544/EEG om samverkansgruppen f(cid:148)r (cid:132)ldre [delgivet med nr K(1999) 211] (1999/141/EG) EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR BESLUTAT F(cid:153)LJANDE med beaktande av F(cid:148)rdraget om uppr(cid:132)ttandet av Europeiska gemenskapen, och av f(cid:148)ljande sk(cid:132)l: Mot bakgrund av utvecklingen p(cid:134) gemenskapsniv(cid:134) beh(cid:148)ver fler medlemmar tas in i den grupp som inr(cid:132)ttats genom kommissionens beslut 91/544/EEG (1), (cid:132)ndrat genom beslut 93/417/EEG (2). Med h(cid:132)nsyn till den administrativa effektiviteten b(cid:148)r samtidigt mandattiden f(cid:148)r ordf(cid:148)randen och medlemmarna kortas ned. H(cid:142)RIGENOM F(cid:153)RESKRIVS F(cid:153)LJANDE. Beslut 91/544/EEG (cid:132)ndras p(cid:134) f(cid:148)ljande s(cid:132)tt: Enda artikel 1) I artikel 3. 2 skall orden ”25 medlemmar” ers(cid:132)ttas med orden ”24 medlemmar”. 2) Artikel 4. 3 skall (cid:132)ndras p(cid:134) f(cid:148)ljande s(cid:132)tt: a) Orden ”fem platser” skall i varje fall ers(cid:132)ttas med orden ”fyra platser”. b) F(cid:148)ljande strecksats skall l(cid:132)ggas till: ”— ESCU — European Senior Citizens Union: fyra platser”. 3) I artikel 5. 1 skall orden ”18 m(cid:134)nader” ers(cid:132)ttas med orden ”tolv m(cid:134)nader”. 4) I artikel 7. 1 skall orden ”18 m(cid:134)nader” ers(cid:132)ttas med orden ”tolv m(cid:134)nader”. 5) I bilagan skall f(cid:148)ljande strecksats l(cid:132)ggas till: ”— ESCU — European Senior Citizens Union”. Utf(cid:132)rdat i Bryssel den 10 februari 1999. P(cid:134) kommissionens v(cid:132)gnar P(cid:145)draig FLYNN Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 296, 26. 10. 1991, s. 42. (2) EGT L 187, 29. 7. 1993, s. 60


title: Sklep Komisije z dne 10. februarja 1999 o spremembi Sklepa o Povezovalni skupini za starejše osebe (notificirano pod dokument ar no številko K(1999) 211) (1999/141/ES)

text: 340 SL Uradni list Evropske unije 05/Zv. 3 31999D0141 19. 2. 1999 URADNI LIST EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI L 45/54 SKLEP KOMISIJE z dne 10. februarja 1999 o spremembi Sklepa o Povezovalni skupini za starejše osebe (notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(1999) 211) (1999/141/ES) KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ker je z vidika razvoja na ravni Skupnosti treba prilagoditi članstvo v Skupini, ki je bila ustanovljena s Sklepom Komisije 91/544/EGS (1), spremenjenim s Sklepom 93/417/EGS (2); ker je istočasno zaradi upravne učinkovitosti treba skrajšati mandate predsednika in članov Skupine, SKLENILA: Edini člen Sklep 91/544/EGS se spremeni: 1. v členu 3(2) se „25 članov“ nadomesti s „24 članov“; 2. člen 4(3) se spremeni kot sledi: (a) v vsakem primeru se „pet sedežev“ nadomesti s „štirje sedeži“; (b) doda se naslednja alinea: „— EUSO-Evropska zveza starejših občanov: štirje sedeži“; 3. v členu 5(1) se „18 mesecev“ nadomesti z „12 mesecev“; 4. v členu 7(1) se „18 mesecev“ nadomesti z „12 mesecev“; 5. v Prilogi se doda naslednja alinea: „— EUSO-Evropska zveza starejših občanov“. V Bruslju, 10. februarja 1999 Za Komisijo Pádraig FLYNN Član Komisije (1) UL L 296, 26. 10. 1991, str. 42. (2) UL L 187, 29. 7. 1993, str. 60


title: Reglamento (CE) n° 299/1999 de la Comisión de 10 de febrero de 1999 por el que se fija el importe máximo de la restitución a la exportación del azúcar blanco para la vigésima sexta licitación parcial efectuada en el marco de la licitación permanente contemplada en el Reglamento (CE) n° 1574/98

text: L 37/10 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 11. 2. 1999 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 299/1999 DE LA COMISI(cid:222)N de 10 de febrero de 1999 por el que se fija el importe m(cid:145)ximo de la restituci(cid:155)n a la exportaci(cid:155)n del az(cid:156)car blanco para la vig(cid:130)sima sexta licitaci(cid:155)n parcial efectuada en el marco de la licitaci(cid:155)n permanente contemplada en el Reglamento (CE) no 1574/98 LA COMISI(cid:222)N DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CEE) no 1785/81 del Consejo, de 30 de junio de 1981, por el que se establece una organizaci(cid:155)n com(cid:156)n de mercados en el sector del az(cid:156)car (1), cuya (cid:156)ltima modificaci(cid:155)n la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 1148/98 de la Comisi(cid:155)n (2), y, en particular, la letra b) del p(cid:145)rrafo segundo del apartado 5 de su art(cid:146)culo 17, Considerando que, en virtud de lo dispuesto en el Regla- mento (CE) no 1574/98 de la Comisi(cid:155)n, de 22 de julio de 1998, relativo a una licitaci(cid:155)n permanente para la deter- minaci(cid:155)n de las exacciones reguladoras y/o de las restitu- se ciones procede a licitaciones parciales para la exportaci(cid:155)n de dicho az(cid:156)car; sobre la exportaci(cid:155)n de az(cid:156)car blanco (3); Considerando que, de acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el apartado 1 del art(cid:146)culo 9 del Reglamento (CE) no 1574/98, debe fijarse en su caso un importe m(cid:145)ximo de la restitu- ci(cid:155)n a la exportaci(cid:155)n para la licitaci(cid:155)n parcial de que se trate, teniendo en cuenta en particular la situaci(cid:155)n de la evoluci(cid:155)n previsible del mercado del az(cid:156)car en la Comu- nidad y en el mercado mundial; Considerando que, previo examen de las ofertas, es conve- niente adoptar para la vig(cid:130)sima sexta licitaci(cid:155)n parcial las disposiciones contempladas en el art(cid:146)culo 1; Considerando que las medidas previstas en el presente Reglamento se ajustan al dictamen del Comit(cid:130) de gesti(cid:155)n del az(cid:156)car, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Art(cid:146)culo 1 Para la vig(cid:130)sima sexta licitaci(cid:155)n parcial de az(cid:156)car blanco efectuada en el marco del Reglamento (CE) no 1574/98, se fija un importe m(cid:145)ximo de la restituci(cid:155)n a la exportaci(cid:155)n de 50,445 EUR/100 kg. Art(cid:146)culo 2 El presente Reglamento entrar(cid:145) en vigor el 11 de febrero de 1999. El presente Reglamento ser(cid:145) obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 10 de febrero de 1999. Por la Comisi(cid:155)n Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisi(cid:155)n (1) DO L 177 de 1. 7. 1981, p. 4. (2) DO L 159 de 3. 6. 1998, p. 38. (3) DO L 206 de 23. 7. 1998, p. 7