title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2639/98 der Kommission vom 9. Dezember 1998 zur Festsetzung des Höchstbetrags der Ausfuhrerstattung für Weißzucker für die im Rahmen der Dauerausschreibung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durchgeführte 19. Teilausschreibung

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export financing
export levy
export refund
white sugar

formats: pdf print

text: 10. 12. 98 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 335/7 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 2639/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 9. Dezember 1998 zur Festsetzung des H(cid:148)chstbetrags der Ausfuhrerstattung f(cid:129)r Weißzucker f(cid:129)r die im Rahmen der Dauerausschreibung gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durchgef(cid:129)hrte 19. Teilausschreibung DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1785/81 des Rates vom 30. Juni 1981 (cid:129)ber die gemeinsame Marktorgani- sation f(cid:129)r Zucker (1), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verord- nung (EG) Nr. 1148/98 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 17 Absatz 5 zweiter Unterabsatz Buchstabe b), in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 der Kommis- sion vom 22. Juli 1998 betreffend eine Dauerausschrei- bung f(cid:129)r die Festsetzung von Absch(cid:148)pfungen und/oder Erstattungen bei der Ausfuhr von Weißzucker (3) werden Teilausschreibungen f(cid:129)r die Ausfuhr dieses Zuckers durchgef(cid:129)hrt. Gem(cid:132)ß Artikel 9 Absatz 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/ 98 ist gegebenenfalls ein H(cid:148)chstbetrag der Ausfuhrerstat- tung f(cid:129)r die betreffende Teilausschreibung insbesondere unter Ber(cid:129)cksichtigung der Lage und der voraussichtli- chen Entwicklung des Zuckermarktes in der Gemein- schaft sowie des Weltmarktes festzusetzen. Nach Pr(cid:129)fung der Angebote sind f(cid:129)r die 19. Teilaus- schreibung die in Artikel 1 genannten Bestimmungen festzulegen. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses f(cid:129)r Zucker (cid:190) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 F(cid:129)r die gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durch- gef(cid:129)hrte 19. Teilausschreibung f(cid:129)r Weißzucker wird eine Ausfuhrerstattung von h(cid:148)chstens 49,124 ECU je 100 kg festgesetzt. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am 10. Dezember 1998 in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 9. Dezember 1998 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 177 vom 1. 7. 1981, S. 4. (2) ABl. L 159 vom 3. 6. 1998, S. 38. (3) ABl. L 206 vom 23. 7. 1998, S. 7


title: 98/738/EC: Commission Decision of 9 December 1998 amending Decision 95/506/EC authorising Member States temporarily to take additional measures against the dissemination of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith as regards the Kingdom of the Netherlands (notified under document number C(1998) 3944)

eurovoc_concepts:
Netherlands
disease prevention
plant disease
plant health control
plant health legislation
potato

formats: html pdf print

text: L 354/62 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30. 12. 98 II (Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COMMISSION COMMISSION DECISION of 9 December 1998 amending Decision 95/506/EC authorising Member States temporarily to take additional measures against the dissemination of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith as regards the Kingdom of the Netherlands (notified under document number C(1998) 3944) (98/738/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 77/93/EEC of 21 December 1976 on protective measures against the intro- duction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1), as last amended by Directive 98/2/ EC (2), and in particular Article 15(3) thereof, Whereas the harmful organism Pseudomonas solana- cearum (Smith) Smith is now known as Ralstonia sola- nacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. ; however Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith is a synonym of Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi et al. and both names are used in scientific literature and in current Community legislation; Whereas, where a Member State considers that there is an imminent danger of the introduction into its territory of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith, the cause of potato brown rot, from another Member State, it may temporarily take any additional measures which it deems necessary, as long as the Commission has not adopted such measures; Whereas the Kingdom of the Netherlands informed the other Member States and the Commission on 3 October 1995 that some samples of potatoes originating in that (1) OJ L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 20. (2) OJ L 15, 21. 1. 1998, p. 34. country were identified as infected by Pseudomonas sola- nacearum; whereas complementary reports supplied by the Netherlands indicated that more samples of the 1995 potato production including seed potatoes, showed a confirmed infection by Pseudomonas solanacearum; whereas therefore the Commission adopted Decision 95/ 506/EC of 24 November 1995 authorising Member States the temporarily to take additional measures against dissemination of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith as regards the Kingdom of the Netherlands (3); whereas Decison 95/506/EC was amended by Decisions 96/599/EC (4) and 97/649/EC (5) and extended by a limited period; Whereas the Kingdom of the Netherlands informed the other Member States and the Commission on 28 August 1998 that in the summer of 1998, samples of potatoes destined for starch production originating in that country solana- were identified as infected by Pseudomonas cearum; whereas however, it was not possible to defin- itively identify the source of contamination and whereas also the Community control regime on Pseudomonas solanacearum established by Council Directive 98/57/ it is is not yet effective in the Member States, EC (6) justified to further maintain additional measures with regard to this situation; whereas accordingly Decision 95/ 506/EC should be extended for a further limited period; (3) OJ L 291, 6. 12. 1995, p. 48. (4) OJ L 265, 18. 10. 1996, p. 18. (5) OJ L 274, 7. 10. 1997, p. 14. (6) OJ L 235, 21. 8. 1998, p. 1. 30. 12. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 354/63 Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plant Health, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 2. in Article 3(1), last subparagraph, the reference to ‘1 May 1998' shall be replaced by ‘1 May 1999'; 3. in Article 3(3), the references to ‘15 December 1997' and ‘1997' shall be replaced by ‘15 December 1998' and ‘1998' respectively. Article 2 Article 1 This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Decision 95/506/EC is hereby amended as follows: 1. in Article 1(1), the words ‘potatoes of the 1997 crop, until 30 June 1998 for seed potatoes and until 30 September 1998 for other potatoes' shall be replaced by the words ‘potatoes of the 1998 crop, until 20 August 1999'; Done at Brussels, 9 December 1998. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission


title: 1999/371/CE: Commission administrative des Communautés européennes pour la sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants - Décision n° 172, du 9 décembre 1998, concernant le modèle des formulaires nécessaires à l'application des règlements (CEE) n° 1408/71 et (CEE) n° 574/72 (E 101)

eurovoc_concepts:
family benefit
form
migrant worker
self-employed person
wage earner

text: 8. 6. 1999 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes L 143/13 DÉCISION No 172 du 9 décembre 1998 concernant le modèle des formulaires nécessaires à l’application des règlements (CEE) no 1408/71 et (CEE) no 574/72 (E 101) (1999/371/CE) LA COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES POUR LA SÉCURITÉ SOCIALE DES TRAVAILLEURS MIGRANTS, vu l’article 81, point a), du règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 du Conseil du 14 juin 1971 relatif à l’application des régimes de sécurité sociale aux travailleurs salariés, aux travailleurs non salariés et aux membres de leur famille qui se déplacent à l’intérieur de la Communauté (1), aux termes duquel elle est chargée de traiter toute question administrative découlant des dispositions du règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 et des règlements ultérieurs, vu l’article 2, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CEE) no 574/72 du Conseil du 21 mars 1972 fixant les modalités d’application du règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 relatif à l’application des régimes de sécurité sociale aux travailleurs salariés et à leur famille qui se déplacent à l’intérieur de la Communauté (2), aux termes duquel elle établit les modèles de certificats, attestations, déclara- tions, demandes et autres documents nécessaires à l’application des règlements, vu le règlement (CE) no 1606/98 du Conseil du 29 juin 1998 modifiant le règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 relatif à l’application des régimes de sécurité sociale aux travailleurs salariés, aux travailleurs non salariés et aux membres de leur famille qui se déplacent à l’intérieur de la Communauté et le règlement (CEE) no 574/72 fixant les modalités d’application du règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 en vue d’étendre leur application aux régimes spéciaux des fonctionnaires (3), considérant qu’il y a lieu d’adapter ce modèle de formulaire pour prendre en compte la décision no 164; considérant que l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen du 2 mai 1992, modifié par le protocole du 17 mars 1993, annexe VI, met en œuvre les règlements (CEE) no 1408/71 et (CEE) no 574/72 dans l’Espace économique européen; considérant que, par décision du Comité mixte de l’EEE, les modèles de formulaires nécessaires à l’application des rèeglements (CEE) no 1408/71 et (CEE) no 574/72 du Conseil seront adaptés et utilisés dans l’Espace économique européen; considérant que, pour des raisons pratiques, il y a lieu d’utiliser des formulaires identiques dans la Communauté et dans l’Espace économique européen; considérant que la langue d’émission des formulaires fait l’objet de la recommandation no 15 de la commission administrative, DÉCIDE: 1. Le modèle de formulaire E 101, reproduit dans la décision no 164 du 27 novembre 1996, est remplacé par le modèle ci-joint. 2. Les autorités compétentes des États membres mettent à la disposition des intéressés (ayants droit, institutions, employeurs, etc. ) le formulaire selon le modèle ci-joint. (1) JO L 149 du 5. 7. 1971, p. 2. (2) JO L 74 du 27. 3. 1972, p. 1. (3) JO L 209 du 25. 7. 1998, p. 1. L 143/14 FR Journal officiel des Communautés européennes 8. 6. 1999 3. Le formulaire est disponible dans les langues officielles de la Communauté et présenté de manière telle que les différentes versions soient parfaitement superposables pour permettre à chaque destinataire (ayant droit, institution, employeur, etc. ) de recevoir le formulaire imprimé dans sa langue nationale. 4. La présente décision est applicable à partir du premier jour du mois suivant sa publication au Journal officiel des Communautés européennes. Le président de la commission administrative Helmut SIEDL COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES Règlements de sécurité sociale EEE (*) Voir «Instructions» à la page 3 E 101 (1) ATTESTATION CONCERNANT LA LÉGISLATION APPLICABLE Règlement 1408/71: article 13. 2. d; article 14. 1. a; article 14. 2. b; article 14 bis. 1. a), 2 et 4; article 14 ter. 1, 2 et 4; article 14 quater a; article 14 sexies; article 17 Règlement 574/72: article 11. 1; article 11 bis. 1; article 12 bis. 2. a. , 5. c et 7. a; article 12 ter 1. Travailleur salarié Travailleur non salarié 1. 1. Nom (2). 1. 2. Prénom(s) Noms antérieurs (2). 1. 3. Date de naissance (3) Nationalité DNI (4). 1. 4. Adresse habituelle Rue. No. Bte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. 1. 5. No d’immatriculation (5). 2. Employeur 2. 1. Nom ou raison sociale Activité non salariée. 2. 2. No d’identification (6). 2. 3. L’employeur est une agence de recrutement oui non 2. 4. Adresse habituelle Téléphone. Télécopieur. E-mail. Rue. No. Boîte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. 3. 3. 1. L’assuré désigné ci-dessus a été employé par l’employeur mentionné ci-dessus depuis le. exerce une activité non salariée depuis le. dans. 3. 2. est détaché ou exercera une activité non salariée pendant une période allant probablement du. au. 3. 3. dans l’/les entreprise(s) ci-après sur le navire ci-après 3. 4. Nom(s) ou raison(s) sociale(s) de l’entreprise ou du navire. 3. 5. Adresse(s) Rue. No. Bte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. Rue. No. Bte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. 3. 6. No d’identification (6). ➀ 4. 4. 1. 4. 2. 4. 3. Qui verse le salaire et les cotisations de la sécurité sociale du travailleur détaché? L’employeur désigné au point 2 L’entreprise désignée au point 3. 4 Autre Adresse. et dans ce cas, indiquer le nom Rue. No. Bte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. E 101 5. L’assuré reste soumis à la législation du pays (1) 5. 1. conformément aux dispositions de l’article 13. 2. d 14. 1. a 14 ter. 1 du règlement no 1408/71 14. 2. b 14 ter. 2 14 bis. 1. a 14 ter. 4 14 bis. 2 14 quater. a 14 bis 4 14 sexies 5. 2. 5. 3. du. au. pour la durée de l’activité (voir lettre de l’autorité compétente ou de l’organisme désigné dans le pays d’emploi qui autorise l’assuré à rester soumis à la législation de l’État d’origine, du détachement en date du. réf. ) 6. Institution compétente dont la législation est applicable 6. 1. Dénomination. Numéro de code (7). 6. 2. Adresse Téléphone. Télécopieur. E-mail. Rue. No. Boîte. Localité. Code postal. Pays. 6. 3. Cachet 6. 4. Date. 6. 5. Signature. ➁ INSTRUCTIONS E 101 Le formulaire doit être rempli en caractères d’imprimerie, en utilisant uniquement les lignes pointillées. Il se compose de 4 pages; aucune d’entre elles ne peut être supprimée, même si elle ne contient aucune mention utile. L’institution désignée de l’État membre à la législation duquel est soumis le travailleur remplit le formulaire, à la demande du travailleur ou de son employeur, et le remet au demandeur. Si le travailleur est détaché en Belgique, aux Pays-Bas, en Finlande, en Suède ou en Islande, elle adresse également un exemplaire du formulaire: en Belgique, à l’Office national de sécurité sociale, à Bruxelles, s’il s’agit de travailleurs salariés; à l’Institut nationale d’assurances sociales pour les travailleurs indépendants, à Bruxelles, s’il s’agit de travail- leurs non salariés; à la Caisse de secours et de prévoyance des marins, à Anvers, s’il s’agit de gens de mer, ou au Service des relations internationales du ministère des affaires sociales, s’il s’agit d’un fonctionnaire; aux Pays-Bas, à la Sociale Verzekeringsbank (Banque d’assurances sociales), à Amstelveen; en Finlande, à l’Eläketurvakeskus (Institut central d’assurance pension), à Helsinki; en Suède, au Riksförsäkringsverket (Conseil national des assurances sociales), à Stockholm; en Islande, au Tryggingastofnun rikisins (Institut national de sécurité sociale) à Reykjavik. Indications pour l’assuré Avant votre départ pour aller travailler dans un autre État membre que celui où vous êtes assuré, faites-vous délivrer, selon le cas, un formulaire E 128 ou un formulaire E 106 par votre institution d’assurance maladie-maternité. Si vous-même ou un membre de votre famille avez besoin de prestations en nature (par exemple: soins médicaux, médicaments, hospitalisation, etc. ) dans le pays où vous travaillez, vous devez suivre les instructions indiquées dans le formulaire approprié. Si vous possédez un formulaire E 106, vous devez le présenter le plus vite possible à l’institut d’assurance maladie-maternité compétente du lieu où vous allez travailler. Si vous possédez un formulaire E 128, vous le gardez jusqu’au moment où vous aurez besoin d’un traitement médical. Si vous ne possédez pas ce formu- laire, l’institution d’assurance maladie — maternité du lieu où vous travaillez doit le demander à l’institution auprès de laquelle vous êtes assuré. Indications pour les employeurs L’État membre qui reçoit une demande d’application des articles susmentionnés 14. 1, 14 ter. 1 ou 17 du règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 doit informer l’employeur et le travailleur concernés des conditions dans lesquelles le travailleur détaché pourra continuer à être soumis à sa législation. L’employeur doit être informé que des contrôles pourront être effectués pendant la période de détachement afin de vérifier que celle-ci n’est pas terminée. Ces contrôles pourront porter, en particulier, sur le versement des cotisations et le maintien de la relation directe. En outre, l’employeur du travailleur détaché doit informer l’institution compétente de l’État d’origine du détachement de tout changement intervenu au cours de la période de détachement, notamment: — si le détachement demandé n’a pas eu lieu ou si la prolongation demandée du détachement n’a pas eu lieu, — si le détachement a été interrompu, à moins que cette interruption des activités du travailleur pour le compte de l’entreprise dans le pays d’emploi ne soit de caractère purement temporaire, — si le travailleur détaché a été affecté par son employeur auprès d’une autre entreprise dans l’État d’emploi. Dans les deux premiers cas, il/elle doit renvoyer le présent formulaire à l’institution compétente de l’État d’origine du détachement. Indications pour l’institution du lieu de séjour Lorsque l’intéressé produit l’attestation appropriée (E 128 ou E 106), l’institution d’assurance du pays de séjour lui accorde également, à titre provisoire, les prestations en cas d’accident du travail ou de maladie professionnelle. Dans ce cas, si ladite institution a besoin de l’attestation sur formulaire E 123, elle s’adresse le plus tôt possible: en Belgique, pour les travailleurs salariés, en cas de maladie professionnelle, au Fonds des maladies professionnelles, à Bruxelles, et, en cas d’accident du travail, à la compagnie d’assurance indiquée par l’employeur; au Danemark, à l’«Arbejdsskadestyrelsen» (Conseil national pour les accidents du travail), à Copenhague; en Allemagne, à la «Berufsgenossenschaft» (Institution d’assurance contre les accidents) compétente; en Espagne, à la «Dirección Provincial del Instituto Nacional de Seguridad Social» (Direction provinciale de l’institution nationale de sécurité sociale); en Irlande, au «Department of Health, Planning Unit» (Ministère de la santé, unité planification), à Dublin 2; en Italie, au siège provincial compétent de l’«Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro» (INAIL) (Institut national d’assurance contre les accidents du travail); au Luxembourg, à l’Association d’assurance contre les accidents; aux Pays-Bas, à la «Sociale Verzekeringsbank» (Banque d’assurances sociales), à Amstelveen; en Autriche, à l’institution d’assurance accidents compétente; au Portugal, au «Centro Nacional de Protecção contra os Riscos Profissionais» (Centre national pour la protection contre les risques professionnels), à Lisbonne; en Finlande, au «Tapaturmavakuutuslaitosten Liitto» (Fédération des institutions d’assurance contre les accidents), Bulevardi 28, 00120 Helsinki; en Suède, au «Försäkringskassan» (Office des assurances sociales); dans tous les autres États membres, à l’institution d’assurance maladie compétente; en Islande, au «Tryggingastofnun rikisins» (Institut national de la sécurité sociale), à Reykjavik; au Liechtenstein, à l’«Amt für Volkswirtschaft» (Office d’économie nationale), à Vaduz; en Norvège, au «Folketrygdkontoret for utenlandssaker» (Office national des assurances sociales à l’étranger), à Oslo. Lorsque le travailleur relève du régime français de sécurité sociale, la caisse compétente pour reconnaître le droit aux prestations est sa caisse d’affiliation, qui peut ne pas être celle figurant sur le formulaire E 101. Les formulaires E 128 ou E 123 devront être, le cas échéant, demandés à la caisse du lieu de résidence habituelle du travailleur. Lorsqu’un travailleur non salarié relève d’un régime finlandais ou islandais de sécurité sociale, il est toujours nécessaire d’exiger un formulaire E 123. Lorsqu’un travailleur qui relève d’un régime islandais de sécurité sociale subit un accident de travail ou est atteint par une maladie professionnelle, l’employeur doit toujours le communiquer à l’institution compétente. ➂ NOTES E 101 (*) Accord EEE sur l’Espace économique européen, annexe VI, sécurité sociale: aux fins de cet accord, le présent formulaire est valable également pour l’Islande, le Liechtenstein et la Norvège. (1) Sigle de l’État membre à la législation duquel le travailleur est soumis: B = Belgique; DK = Danemark; D = Allemagne; GR = Grèce; E = Espagne; F = France; IRL = Irlande; I = Italie; L = Luxembourg; NL = Pays-Bas; A = Autriche; P = Portugal; FIN = Finlande; S = Suède; GB = Royaume-Uni; IS = Islande; FL = Liechtenstein; N = Norvège. (2) Pour les ressortissants espagnols, indiquer les deux noms à la naissance. Pour les ressortissants portugais, indiquer tous les noms (prénoms, nom, nom de jeune fille) dans l’ordre de l’état civil tels qu’ils apparaissent sur la carte d’identité ou le passeport. (3) Le jour et le mois sont chacun indiqués par deux chiffres, l’année par quatre chiffres (exemple: 1er août 1921 = 01. 08. 1921). (4) Pour les ressortissants espagnols, indiquer le numéro figurant sur la carte d’identité nationale (DNI), s’il existe, même si celle-ci est périmée. À défaut, indiquer «néant». (5) Pour les travailleurs soumis à la législation belge, indiquer le numéro d’identification de sécurité sociale du travailleur (NISS). Pour les travailleurs soumis à la législation danoise, indiquer le numéro CPR. Pour les travailleurs soumis à la législation néerlandaise, indiquer le numéro SOFI. (6) Veuillez indiquer le maximum d’informations permettant d’identifier l’employeur ou l’entreprise du travailleur non salarié. Dans le cas d’un navire, indiquer son nom et son numéro d’enregistrement. Pour la Belgique, indiquer, pour les travailleurs salariés, le numéro d’enregistrement ONSS de l’employeur et, pour les travailleurs non salariés, le numéro de TVA. Pour le Danemark, indiquer le numéro SE. Pour l’Allemagne, indiquer le «Betriebsnummer des Arbeitgebers». Pour la France, indiquer le numéro SIRET. Pour l’Espagne, indiquer le «Código de Cuenta de Cotización del Empresario CCC» (code du compte de cotisation de l’employeur). Pour les travailleurs soumis à la législation finlandaise en matière d’accidents du travail, veuillez indiquer le nom de l’institution d’assurance accidents compétente. Pour la Norvège, indiquer le numéro de l’organisation. (7) À compléter si elle en dispose. ➃


title: Regulamento (CE) nº 2653/98 da Comissão de 9 de Dezembro de 1998 que altera o Regulamento (CE) nº 1397/98 que adopta a estimativa das necessidades e fixa as ajudas para o abastecimento das ilhas Canárias em produtos dos sectores dos ovos e da carne de aves de capoeira no âmbito do regime previsto nos artigos 2º a 4º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1601/92 do Conselho, no que respeita aos montantes das ajudas

eurovoc_concepts:
Canary Islands
aid system
egg
poultrymeat
supply

text: 10. 12. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 335/51 REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 2653/98 DA COMISS(cid:212)O de 9 de Dezembro de 1998 que altera o Regulamento (CE) nº 1397/98 que adopta a estimativa das necessi- dades e fixa as ajudas para o abastecimento das ilhas Can(cid:145)rias em produtos dos sectores dos ovos e da carne de aves de capoeira no (cid:131)mbito do regime previsto nos artigos 2º a 4º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1601/92 do Conselho, no que respeita aos montantes das ajudas A COMISS(cid:212)O DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CEE) nº 1601/92 do Conselho, de 15 de Junho de 1992, que estabelece medidas espec(cid:146)ficas relativas a determinados produtos agr(cid:146)colas a favor das ilhas Can(cid:145)rias (1), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 2348/96 (2), e, nomeadamente, o nº 4 do seu artigo 3º, Considerando que, pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 1397/98 da Comiss(cid:209)o (3), foram fixados os montantes das ajudas para o abastecimento do arquip(cid:130)lago em carnes e ovos origin(cid:145)- rios do resto da Comunidade; que essas ajudas devem ser fixadas atendendo, nomeadamente, aos custos de abasteci- mento no mercado mundial, (cid:133)s condi(cid:135)(cid:210)es resultantes da situa(cid:135)(cid:209)o geogr(cid:145)fica do arquip(cid:130)lago e aos pre(cid:135)os praticados na exporta(cid:135)(cid:209)o dos animais ou produtos em causa para pa(cid:146)ses terceiros; Considerando que a aplica(cid:135)(cid:209)o dessas regras e crit(cid:130)rios (cid:133) situa(cid:135)(cid:209)o actual dos mercados no sector da carne de aves de capoeira implica a altera(cid:135)(cid:209)o dos montantes das ajudas para o fornecimentos em causa, dada a sua import(cid:131)ncia actual e a necessidade de preservar a participa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da Comuni- dade nesses fornecimentos; Considerando que o artigo 2º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1103/97 do Conselho, de 17 de Junho de 1997, rela- tivo a certas disposi(cid:135)(cid:210)es respeitantes (cid:133) introdu(cid:135)(cid:209)o do euro (4), disp(cid:210)e que, a partir de 1 de Janeiro de 1999, todas as refer(cid:136)ncias feitas num instrumento jur(cid:146)dico ao ecu s(cid:209)o substitu(cid:146)das por refer(cid:136)ncias ao euro, (cid:133) taxa de 1 EUR por 1 ECU; que, por raz(cid:210)es de clareza, (cid:130) adequado utilizar a denomina(cid:135)(cid:209)o euro no presente regulamento, sabendo-se que (cid:130) aplic(cid:145)vel a partir de 1 de Janeiro de 1999; Considerando que as medidas previstas no presente regu- lamento est(cid:209)o em conformidade com o parecer do Comit(cid:130) de Gest(cid:209)o dos Ovos e da Carne de Aves de Capoeira, ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO: Artigo 1º O anexo II do Regulamento (CE) nº 1397/98 (cid:130) substi- tu(cid:146)do pelo anexo do presente regulamento. Artigo 2º O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 1 de Janeiro de 1999. O presente regulamento (cid:130) obrigat(cid:155)rio em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplic(cid:145)vel em todos os Estados-membros. Feito em Bruxelas, em 9 de Dezembro de 1998. Pela Comiss(cid:209)o Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comiss(cid:209)o (1) JO L 173 de 27. 6. 1992, p. 13. (2) JO L 320 de 11. 12. 1996, p. 1. (3) JO L 187 de 1. 7. 1998, p. 46. (4) JO L 162 de 19. 6. 1997, p. 1. L 335/52 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 10. 12. 98 ANEXO «ANEXO II Montante da ajuda concedida para os produtos provenientes do mercado comunit(cid:145)rio C(cid:155)digo dos produtos Montante da ajuda (em EUR/100 kg) 0207 12 10 9900 0207 12 90 9190 0207 12 90 9990 0207 14 20 9900 0207 14 60 9900 0207 14 70 9190 0207 14 70 9290 0408 11 80 9100 0408 91 80 9100 28 28 28 20 58 43 N. B. : Os c(cid:155)digos dos produtos e as notas de p(cid:130)-de-p(cid:145)gina s(cid:209)o definidos no Regula- mento (CEE) nº 3846/87. »


title: Protocole additionnel sous forme d'échange de lettres entre la Communauté européenne et la République de Lettonie à l'accord sur la libéralisation des échanges conclu entre les Communautés européennes et la République de Lettonie et à l'accord européen conclu entre les Communautés européennes et leurs États membres et la République de Lettonie - Échange de notes

eurovoc_concepts:
European Association Agreement
Latvia
customs regulations
free-trade agreement
protocol to an agreement
revision of an agreement
textile product
trade agreement (EU)

formats: html print


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2642/98 della Commissione del 9 dicembre 1998 che modifica il regolamento (CE) n. 1759/98 e che porta a 889 230 tonnellate il quantitativo globale oggetto della gara permanente per l'esportazione di orzo detenuto dall'organismo d'intervento del Regno Unito

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
award of contract
barley
export
intervention agency
regions of the United Kingdom

text: L 335/12 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 10. 12. 98 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 2642/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 9 dicembre 1998 che modifica il regolamento (CE) n. 1759/98 e che porta a 889 230 tonnellate il quantitativo globale oggetto della gara permanente per l’esportazione di orzo detenuto dall’organismo d’intervento del Regno Unito LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1992, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore dei cereali (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 923/96 della Commissione (2), in particolare l’articolo 5, considerando che il regolamento (CEE) n. 2131/93 della Commissione (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2193/96 (4), fissa le procedure e le condizioni per la vendita dei cereali detenuti dagli organismi d’inter- vento; considerando che il regolamento (CE) n. 1759/98 della Commissione (5), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2205/98 (6), ha indetto una gara permanente per l’esportazione di 597 652 tonnellate di orzo detenuto dall’organismo d’intervento del Regno Unito, che il Regno Unito ha reso nota alla Commissione l’intenzione del proprio organismo d’intervento di procedere ad un aumento di 291 578 tonnellate del quantitativo oggetto della gara a fini di esportazione; che (cid:138) opportuno portare a 889 230 tonnellate il quantitativo globale oggetto della gara permanente per l’esportazione di orzo detenuto dall’organismo d’intervento del Regno Unito; immagazzinati; che occorre quindi modificare l’allegato I del regolamento (CE) n. 1759/98; considerando che le misure previste dal presente regola- mento sono conformi al parere del comitato di gestione per i cereali, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 Il regolamento (CE) n. 1759/98 (cid:138) modificato come segue: 1) Il testo dell’articolo 2 (cid:138) sostituito dal seguente testo: «Articolo 2 1. La gara concerne un quantitativo massimo di 889 230 tonnellate di orzo che possono essere espor- tate verso tutti i paesi terzi eccettuati gli Stati Uniti d’America, il Canada e il Messico. 2. Le regioni nelle quali (cid:138) immagazzinato il quanti- tativo di 889 230 tonnellate di orzo figurano nell’alle- gato I. » 2) L’allegato I (cid:138) sostituito dall’allegato del presente rego- lamento. Articolo 2 considerando che, tenuto conto dell’aumento dei quanti- tativi oggetto della gara, (cid:138) necessario apportare talune modifiche all’elenco delle regioni e dei quantitativi Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 9 dicembre 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 181 dell’1. 7. 1992, pag. 21. (2) GU L 126 del 24. 5. 1996, pag. 37. (3) GU L 191 del 31. 7. 1993, pag. 76. (4) GU L 293 del 16. 11. 1996, pag. 1. (5) GU L 221 dell’8. 8. 1998, pag. 8. (6) GU L 278 del 15. 10. 1998, pag. 14. 10. 12. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 335/13 ALLEGATO «ALLEGATO I Localit(cid:133) di magazzinaggio Quantitativi (tonnellate) North Humberside Worcestershire Lincolnshire Shropshire West Sussex York Dumfries Essex Dorset Leicestershire Suffolk Northumberland Strathclyde East Lothian Norfolk Northamptonshire Berwickshire North Lincolnshire Salisbury Gloucester Fife Keith Edinburgh Mid Lothian Pocklington York Norwich Taunton Aberdeenshire Wiltshire 64 252 50 700 142 492 40 515 23 661 75 135 19 050 8 760 22 436 11 753 20 987 10 040 33 744 45 247 19 633 9 247 6 639 49 246 45 901 25 314 10 229 7 852 33 570 12 074 12 876 44 789 13 744 18 433 10 911»


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3868/98 do Deputado W.G. van VELZEN à Comissão. Lagring av kärnavfall från kärnreaktorn i Putten (Nederländerna)

eurovoc_concepts:
France
Netherlands
United States
export of waste
fuel reprocessing
irradiated fuel
nuclear power station
nuclear reactor
radioactive waste
storage of waste

text: 15. 10. 1999 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias C 297/111 (1999/C 297/150) PERGUNTA ESCRITA P-3868/98 apresentada por W. G. van Velzen (PPE) à Comissão (9 de Dezembro de 1998) Objecto: Armazenamento dos resíduos nucleares do reactor de Petten (Países Baixos) Tomámos conhecimento das resposta dadas por Edith Cresson, em nome da Comissão, em 20 de Novembro de 1998, às minhas primeiras perguntas sobre os problemas de capacidade de armazenamento dos resíduos nucleares do Reactor de Alto Fluxo de Petten (E-3041/98) (1). De tais respostas resultar ser o Centro Comum de Investigação (CCI), enquanto entidade incumbida da exploração, o responsável por este problema. 1. A solução «de segunda via» mencionada na resposta levantará, também ela, problemas importantes, dado que a bacia do edifício do reactor está a ficar cheia. Vai a Comissão agora procurar, com urgência, uma nova solução? 2. Na resposta da Comissão, a gestão de resíduos é apresentada como uma questão nacional. Contudo, trata-se aqui de um CCI que é gerido pela Comissão. Não deverá esta assumir, por isso mesmo, parte da responsabilidade pela resolução do problema? Pretende a Comissão envolver outros Estados-membros na resolução deste problema? (1) JO C 142 de 21. 5. 1999, p. 75. Resposta dada pela Comissária Cresson em nome da Comissão (27 de Janeiro de 1999) A solução proposta para a armazenagem dos elementos de combustível usado do Reactor de Alto Fluxo 1. (HFR), em caso de atraso na disponibilidade de armazenagem na central de Habog «Centrale organisatie voor radioactief afval» (projecto COVRA), nomeadamente na piscina do reactor, é de facto uma solução limitada. No final de 1999, todo o espaço de armazenagem na piscina terá sido utilizado, sendo necessárias outras soluções. Uma vez que o combustível não irradiado foi produzido a partir de materiais de origem americana, uma outra opção poderá consistir em reexpedir o combustível usado para os Estados Unidos, à semelhança do que acontecia antes de 1988. Porém, uma condição prévia imposta pelas autoridades americanas é o compromisso de reconversão do HFR, através da substituição do combustível de urânio altamente enriquecido (UAE) pelo combustível de urânio fracamente enriquecido (UFE). Tal reconversão é todavia uma operação tecnicamente dispendiosa, que não deverá infligir perdas a nível das características técnicas deste reactor, que produz cerca de 60 % dos produtos radiofarmacêuticos utilizados na Europa, nem reduzir a sua margem competitiva neste mercado que já é muito apertada. Foram por conseguinte lançados estudos adequados e, caso se obtenham resultados positivos, o combustível usado poderá ser reexpedido para os Estados Unidos em 1999. O orçamento do HFR deverá ser adaptado a esta solução dispendiosa. O reprocessamento em França foi igualmente analisado. Esta opção apresenta determinadas vantagens, mas exige a reexpedição dos resíduos para os Países Baixos após vários anos. Por outro lado, o reprocessamento em França, com as acções que se lhe encontram ligadas, é uma solução dispendiosa não abrangida pelo orçamento do HFR. 2. Nenhum Estado-membro dispõe de instalações de eliminação de resíduos ou de combustível usado de alto nível radioactivo devidamente constituídas, aceites e autorizadas e, actualmente, existe a obrigação de reexpedir os resíduos para o país em que se situa a central. Não se preconiza qualquer tendência no sentido de uma internacionalização ou mesmo de uma «europeização» da armazenagem de resíduos. (1999/C 297/151) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-3887/98 apresentada por Glenys Kinnock (PSE) à Comissão (4 de Janeiro de 1999) Objecto: Procedimento relativo aos pedidos de financiamento das ONG Poderá a Comissão dar a conhecer o modo como são apreciados e classificados em função da sua prioridade os pedidos de financiamento a título da rubrica B7-6000 apresentados pelas ONG?


title: Beslut nr 173 av den 9 december 1998 om de gemensamma förfaranden som skall tillämpas av medlemsstaterna för återbetalning mellan institutioner i samband med införandet av euron

eurovoc_concepts:
euro
interinstitutional relations (EU)
monetary union
redemption

text: 29. 1. 2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 27/21 BESLUT nr 173 av den 9 december 1998 om de gemensamma f(cid:246)rfaranden som skall till(cid:228)mpas av medlemsstaterna f(cid:246)r (cid:229)terbetalning mellan institutioner i samband med inf(cid:246)randet av euron (2000/C 27/07) EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS ADMINISTRATIVA KOMMISSION F(cid:214)R SOCIAL TRYGGHET F(cid:214)R MIGRERANDE ARBETARE HAR FAT- TAT DETTA BESLUT de fall som inte avslutats f(cid:246)re den 31 december 2001 f(cid:246)r att undvika tvister mellan medlemsstaterna. med beaktande av artikel 81 a i r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 1408/71 av den 14 juni 1971 om till(cid:228)mpningen av systemen f(cid:246)r social trygghet n(cid:228)r anst(cid:228)llda, egenf(cid:246)retagare eller deras fa- miljer flyttar inom gemenskapen, enligt vilken den har till uppgift att handha alla administrativa fr(cid:229)gor och tolkningsfr(cid:229)- gor som r(cid:246)r f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 1408/71 och senare f(cid:246)rord- ningar, med beaktande av r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EG) nr 1103/97 av den 17 juni 1997 om vissa best(cid:228)mmelser som har samband med in- f(cid:246)randet av euron, med beaktande av r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EG) nr 974/98 av den 3 maj 1998 om inf(cid:246)randet av euron, med beaktande av artikel 36 och artiklarna 63. 1 och 87. 1 i ovann(cid:228)mnda f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 1408/71, med beaktande av artiklarna 93, 94, 95 och artikel 102. 1 a i r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72, med beaktande av Administrativa kommissionens beslut nr 153 om de standardblanketter som beh(cid:246)vs f(cid:246)r till(cid:228)mpningen av f(cid:246)rordningar (EEG) nr 1408/71 och 574/72, s(cid:228)rskilt blankett E 125, med beaktande av Administrativa kommissionens beslut nr 168 av den 11 juni 1998 om (cid:228)ndring av blankett E 127, och av f(cid:246)ljande sk(cid:228)l: Det (cid:228)r av administrativa sk(cid:228)l n(cid:246)dv(cid:228)ndigt att fastst(cid:228)lla gemen- samma f(cid:246)rfaranden som skall till(cid:228)mpas av medlemsstaterna f(cid:246)r (cid:229)terbetalning mellan institutionerna i samband med (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngen till euro. Det b(cid:246)r accepteras att det under (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngsperioden (fr(cid:229)n och med den 1 januari 1999 till och med den 31 december 2001) inte st(cid:228)lls n(cid:229)gra krav p(cid:229) att medlemsstaterna skall anv(cid:228)nda euron som ber(cid:228)kningshet. Det kan d(cid:228)rf(cid:246)r inte heller inf(cid:246)ras n(cid:229)got motsvarande krav p(cid:229) kostnadsers(cid:228)ttningar f(cid:246)r sjukv(cid:229)rds- f(cid:246)rm(cid:229)ner under (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngsperioden. Det beh(cid:246)vs dock regler f(cid:246)r H˜RIGENOM BESLUTAS F(cid:214)LJANDE. A. Perioden mellan den 1 januari 1999 och den 31 december 2001: 1. Fordringar enligt blanketterna E 125 och E 127 kan anges i nationell valuta. 2. Om en medlemsstat har f(cid:246)r avsikt att (cid:246)verg(cid:229) till att ange sina fordringar i euro, skall medlemsstaten omedelbart un- derr(cid:228)tta de (cid:246)vriga medlemsstaterna via Administrativa kommissionen. 3. S(cid:229) snart omr(cid:228)kningskursen (cid:228)r k(cid:228)nd f(cid:246)r de nationella valu- torna i de medlemsstater som deltar i valutaunionen, skall schablonbeloppen enligt artiklarna 94 och 95 i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72 fastst(cid:228)llas b(cid:229)de i den nationella valutan och i euro och offentligg(cid:246)ras i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. B. Perioden fr(cid:229)n och med den 1 januari 2002: 1. Fr(cid:229)n och med den 1 januari 2002 skall fordringar endast anges i euro p(cid:229) blankett E 125 och blankett E 127 som utf(cid:228)rdas av de l(cid:228)nder som deltar i valutaunionen. ˜ven (cid:246)v- riga delar p(cid:229) dessa blanketter skall anges i euro. 2. Inl(cid:228)mnade fordringar i nationell valuta enligt blankett E 125 som inte reglerats f(cid:246)re den 1 januari 2002 skall r(cid:228)knas om till euro, vilket skall ske genom att totalbeloppet f(cid:246)r varje blankett E 125 r(cid:228)knas om till euro. F(cid:246)r undvikande av tvis- ter om olika delbelopp p(cid:229) blankett E 125 skall (cid:228)ven dessa omr(cid:228)knas till euro. Omr(cid:228)kningen skall g(cid:246)ras av den institu- tion, det f(cid:246)rbindelseorgan eller den myndighet som hand- l(cid:228)gger fordringen. 3. Inl(cid:228)mnade fordringar i nationell valuta enligt blankett E 127 som inte reglerats f(cid:246)re den 1 januari 2002 skall r(cid:228)knas om till euro med beaktande av de m(cid:229)natliga genomsnittskost- nader som omr(cid:228)knats till euro av Administrativa kommis- sionen och offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning. Omr(cid:228)kningen skall g(cid:246)ras av den institution, det f(cid:246)r- bindelseorgan eller den myndighet som handl(cid:228)gger fordring- en. C 27/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 29. 1. 2000 C. Metoder f(cid:246)r att underl(cid:228)tta (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngen till euro: 1. Sekretariatet f(cid:246)r Administrativa kommissionen skall senast den 30 september 2001 fastst(cid:228)lla f(cid:246)r vilka (cid:229)r det finns fordringar enligt artiklarna 94 och 95 i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72 som (cid:228)nnu inte reglerats i enlighet med den sam- manst(cid:228)llning av krav som f(cid:246)reskrivs i artikel 101. 1 i f(cid:246)rord- ning (EEG) nr 574/72. 3. F(cid:246)r att undvika att (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngsperioden blir alltf(cid:246)r l(cid:229)ng skall medlemsstaterna respektera de tidsfrister som fastst(cid:228)lls i ar- tikel 100 i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72, om inte annat f(cid:246)ljer av bilaterala avtal. Dessutom uppmanas medlemsstaterna att anv(cid:228)nda alla till buds st(cid:229)ende medel f(cid:246)r att genomf(cid:246)ra de (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder som f(cid:246)resl(cid:229)s i rekommendation nr 20 av den 31 maj 1996 fr(cid:229)n Administrativa kommissionen f(cid:246)r snabbare reglering av fordringarna. 2. S(cid:229) l(cid:229)ngt det (cid:228)r m(cid:246)jligt skall saldot p(cid:229) de fordringar som en medlemsstat angett i nationell valuta f(cid:246)re (cid:246)verg(cid:229)ngen till euro, efter avdrag av omtvistade belopp som meddelats f(cid:246)re betalningen, regleras f(cid:246)re den 31 december 2001, om inte annat f(cid:246)ljer av bilaterala avtal. Detta beslut skall till(cid:228)mpas fr(cid:229)n och med f(cid:246)rsta dagen i den m(cid:229)nad som f(cid:246)ljer p(cid:229) att det offentliggjorts i Europeiska gemen- skapernas officiella tidning. Administrativa kommissionens ordf(cid:246)rande Helmut SIEDL ADMINISTRATIVA KOMMISSIONEN F(cid:214)R SOCIAL TRYGGHET F(cid:214)R MIGRERANDE ARBETARE (2000/C 27/08) I de genomsnittliga kostnaderna per (cid:229)r beaktas inte den minskning p(cid:229) 20 % som f(cid:246)reskrivs i artiklarna 94. 2 och 95. 2 i r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72. De genomsnittliga nettokostnaderna per m(cid:229)nad har minskats med 20 %. GENOMSNITTLIGA KOSTNADER F(cid:214)R V¯RDF(cid:214)RM¯NER (cid:150) 1996 (1) I. Till(cid:228)mpning av artikel 94 i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72 De belopp som skall (cid:229)terbetalas f(cid:246)r v(cid:229)rdf(cid:246)rm(cid:229)ner som utgetts under 1996 till familjemedlemmar i enlighet med artikel 19. 2 i r(cid:229)dets f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 1408/71 kommer att fastst(cid:228)llas p(cid:229) grundval av f(cid:246)ljande genomsnittliga kostnader: Grekland Frankrike Sverige Per (cid:229)r 169 682 GRD 8 086,80 FRF 9 632,06 SEK Netto per m(cid:229)nad 11 312 GRD 539,12 FRF 82,19 EUR 642,14 SEK II. Till(cid:228)mpning av artikel 95 i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 574/72 De belopp som skall (cid:229)terbetalas f(cid:246)r v(cid:229)rdf(cid:246)rm(cid:229)ner som utgetts under 1996 i enlighet med artikel 28 och artikel 28a i f(cid:246)rordning (EEG) nr 1408/71 kommer att fastst(cid:228)llas p(cid:229) grundval av f(cid:246)ljande genomsnittliga kostnader: Grekland Frankrike Sverige Per (cid:229)r Netto per m(cid:229)nad 268 365 GRD 21 760,73 FRF 37 342,17 SEK 17 891 GRD 1 450,72 FRF 221,16 EUR 2 489,48 SEK (1) Genomsnittliga kostnader Spanien och Luxemburg: EGT C 303, 2. 10. 1998. Genomsnittliga kostnader Belgien, Irland, Nederl(cid:228)nderna och Portugal: EGT C 56, 26. 2. 1999. Genomsnittliga kostnader Tyskland, (cid:214)sterrike och F(cid:246)renade kungariket: EGT C 228, 11. 8. 1999


title: Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 2640/98, 9. detsember 1998, millega sätestatakse Tuneesiast pärit oliiviõli impordi üksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad

eurovoc_concepts:
Tunisia
customs duties
free circulation
import licence
olive oil
originating product

text: 03/24. kd ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 177 31998R2640 L 335/8 EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE TEATAJA 10. 12. 1998 KOMISJONI MÄÄRUS (EÜ) nr 2640/98, 9. detsember 1998, millega sätestatakse Tuneesiast pärit oliiviõli impordi üksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad EUROOPA ÜHENDUSTE KOMISJON, võttes arvesse Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingut, nõukogu 17. juuni 1997. aasta määruse (EÜ) nr 1103/97 (teatavate euro kasutuselevõtuga seotud sätete kohta (5)) artik- liga 2 nähakse ette, et alates 1. jaanuarist 1999 asendatakse õigusaktides iga viide eküüle viitega eurole ümberarvestuskursi alusel nii, et üks euro võrdub ühe eküüga; võttes arvesse nõukogu 27. aprilli 1998. aasta määrust (EÜ) nr 906/98, milles sätestatakse Tuneesiast pärit oliiviõli impordi üldeeskirjad, (1) eriti selle artiklit 1, käesoleva määrusega ettenähtud meetmed on kooskõlas õli- ja rasvaturu korralduskomitee arvamusega, ning arvestades, et: vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 906/98 artiklile 1 tuleks sätestada Tuneesiast pärit oliiviõli impordikvootide avamise ja korralda- mise kord; oliiviõli ühenduse turule tarnimise praegune ja prog- noositav olukord teeb võimalikuks kavandatavate koguste müümise; turu häirimise oht on väike tingimusel, et import ei koondu lühikesele ajavahemikule 1998/99. majandusaastal; tuleks sätestada, et impordilitsentse antakse kõnealuse aasta jooksul välja vastavalt igakuisele graafikule; kõnealuste koguste usaldusväärseks korraldamiseks tuleb luua süsteem, mis soodustab ettevõtjaid viivitamata tagastama oma kasutamata jäänud litsentsid need välja andnud asutusele; samuti on vaja luua süsteem, mis motiveerib ettevõtjaid tagas- tama väljaandvale asutusele kehtivuse kaotanud litsentsid, et kasutamata jäänud koguseid saaks uuesti kasutada ja et komisjon teaks seda; oliiviõli import Tuneesiast ei või ületada teatavat kogust; komis- joni 16. novembri 1988. aasta määruse (EMÜ) nr 3719/88 sätestatakse (millega -toodete põllumajandussaaduste impordi- ja ekspordilitsentside ning eelkinnitussertifikaatide süsteemi kohaldamise ühised üksikasjalikud eeskirjad, (2) viimati muudetud määrusega (EÜ) nr 1044/98 (3)) artiklis 8 ettenähtud hälvet ei tuleks lubada; ja Euroopa – Vahemere piirkonna kokkuleppega, mis on sõlmitud assotsiatsiooni loomiseks ühelt poolt Euroopa Ühenduste ja selle liikmesriikide ja teiselt poolt Tuneesia Vabariigi vahel, (4) ei nähta enam ette impordi erikorda CN-koodide 1509 ja 1510 alla kuuluva ning sellise täielikult Tuneesias toodetud ja kõne- alusest riigist otse ühendusse imporditud oliiviõli osas, mis ei kuulu vähendatud tollimaksumääraga imporditava 46 000 tonni suuruse kvoodi hulka; (1) EÜT L 128, 30. 4. 1998, lk 20. (2) EÜT L 331, 2. 12. 1988, lk 1. (3) EÜT L 149, 20. 5. 1998, lk 11. (4) EÜT L 97, 30. 3. 1998, lk 2. ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA MÄÄRUSE: Artikkel 1 1. Alates 1998/99. majandusaasta 1. märtsist võib impor- tida täielikult Tuneesias toodetud ja sealt otse ühendusse veetud CN-koodide 1509 10 10 ja 1509 10 90 alla kuuluvat töötle- mata oliiviõli, mis vastab määruse (EÜ) nr 906/98 artiklis 1 ettenähtud tollimaksu kohaldamise tingimustele. 1998/99. majandusaastal antakse välja impordilitsentsid kuni 46 000 tonni kohta. litsentsid välja Ilma et see piiraks 46 000 tonni määra kohaldamist, võib 2. 1998/99. majandusaastaks vastavalt määruse (EÜ) nr 906/98 artiklis 2 sätestatud tingimustele kuni 10 000 tonni kohta kuus. Siiski vähendatakse seda kogust 5 000 tonnini märtsis ja 8 000 tonnini aprillis. Kui üheks kuuks lubatud kogust ei kasutata täielikult kõnealuse kuu jooksul, lisatakse ülejääk järgmise kuu kogusele, kuid seda ei saa enam edasi üle kanda. anda Igakuise lubatud koguse arvutamisel tuleb nädalat, mis ja lõpeb järgmisel, käsitada selle kuu osana, 3. algab ühel kuul millesse jääb neljapäev. Artikkel 2 Võttes arvesse määruse (EÜ) nr 906/98 artiklis 1 1. tuleb importijatel esitada osutatud tollimaksu kohaldamist, impordilitsentsi liikmesriikide pädevatele asutustele. Kõnealustele taotlustele tuleb lisada Tuneesia eksportijaga sõlmitud ostu-müügilepingu koopia. taotlus (5) EÜT L 162, 19. 6. 1997, lk 1. 178 ET Euroopa Liidu Teataja 03/24. kd Impordilitsentside 2. taotlused tuleb esitada iga nädala esmaspäeval ja teisipäeval. Liikmesriigid edastavad igal kolma- päeval komisjonile saadud litsentsitaotlustel olevad andmed. 3. Igal nädalal koostab komisjon arvestuse üldkogusest, mille kohta impordilitsentsi taotlused on esitatud. Komisjon lubab liikmesriikidel litsentse välja anda, kuni kuukvoot on ammen- datud; kui tekib kuukvoodi ammendamise oht, lubab komisjon liikmesriikidel impordilitsentse välja anda vastavalt saadaolevale kogusele. Kui määruses (EÜ) nr 906/98 ettenähtud maksimum- 4. kogus on kaetud, teatab komisjon sellest liikmesriikidele. Artikkel 3 1. Artikli 1 lõikes 2 ettenähtud impordilitsentside kehti- vusaeg on 60 päeva alates väljaandmise kuupäevast määruse (EMÜ) nr 3719/88 artikli 21 lõikes 2 määratletud tähenduses kuni 31. oktoobrini 1999. Litsentsid antakse välja hiljemalt esimesel järgneb päevale, mil komisjon on selleks loa andnud. tööpäeval, mis Impordilitsentside tagatise määr on 15 eküüd 100 kilogrammi netomassi kohta. Kui impordilitsentsi ei ole kasutatud ettenähtud ajavahe- ilma. Siiski arvestatakse jäädakse tagatisest 2. miku jooksul, poolikud päevad täispäevadeks: — kui litsents tagastatakse selle väljaandnud asutusele ajavahe- mikul, mis vastab esimesele kahele kolmandikule litsentsi kehtivusajast, vähendatakse tagatise tagastamatut osa 40 %, — kui litsents tagastatakse selle väljaandnud asutusele ajavahe- mikul, mis vastab viimasele kolmandikule litsentsi kehtivus- ajast, või 15 päeva jooksul pärast kehtivusaja lõppemist, vähendatakse tagatise tagastamatut osa 25 %. Olenemata artikli 1 koguselistest piirangutest saab vasta- 3. valt lõikele 2 tagastatud litsentside kogused ümber jaotada. Riigi pädevad asutused teatavad komisjonile igal kolmapäeval kogused, mille puhul on litsentsid eelmise seitsme päeva jooksul tagastatud. Artikkel 4 Artikli 1 lõikes 2 sätestatud impordilitsentsi tehakse üks järgmistest kannetest: lahtrisse 24 — Derecho de aduana fijado por el Reglamento (CE) no 906/98 — Told fastsat ved forordning (EF) nr. 906/98 — Zoll gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 906/98 — ∆ασµός που καθορίστκηκε από τον κανονισµό (EK) αριθ. 906/98 — Customs duty fixed by Regulation (EC) nr 906/98 — Droit de douane fixé par le règlement (CE) no 906/98 — Dazio doganale fissato dal regolamento (CE) n. 906/98 — Bij Verordening (EG) nr. 906/98 vastgesteld douanerecht — Direito aduaneiro fixado pelo Regulamento (CE) n. ° 906/98 — Asetuksessa (EY) N:o 906/98 vahvistettu tulli — Tull fastställd genom förordning (EG) nr 906/98. Olenemata määruse (EMÜ) nr 3719/88 artikli 8 lõikest 4 ei tohi vabasse ringlusse lubatud kogus ületada impordilitsentsi 17. ja 18. lahtris näidatud kogust. Seetõttu märgitakse litsentsi 19. lahtrisse number 0. Artikkel 5 Käesolev määrus jõustub päev pärast selle avaldamist Euroopa Ühenduste Teatajas. Käesolev määrus on tervikuna siduv ja vahetult kohaldatav kõikides liikmesriikides. Brüssel, 9. detsember 1998 Komisjoni nimel komisjoni liige Franz FISCHLER


title: Päätös N:o 173, tehty 9 päivänä joulukuuta 1998, jäsenvaltioiden hyväksymistä yhteisistä menettelytavoista korvausten suorittamiseksi laitosten välillä euron käyttöönoton jälkeen

text: 29. 1. 2000 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallinen lehti C 27/21 P˜˜T(cid:214)S N:o 173, tehty 9 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) joulukuuta 1998, j(cid:228)senvaltioiden hyv(cid:228)ksymist(cid:228) yhteisist(cid:228) menettelytavoista korvausten suorittamiseksi laitosten v(cid:228)- lill(cid:228) euron k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)noton j(cid:228)lkeen (2000/C 27/07) EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:214)JEN SIIRTOTY(cid:214)L˜ISTEN SOSIAALITURVAN HALLINTOTOIMIKUNTA, joka demm(cid:228)lle kuin 31. joulukuuta 2001, jotta v(cid:228)ltet(cid:228)(cid:228)n j(cid:228)senvalti- oiden v(cid:228)liset riidat, ottaa huomioon sosiaaliturvaj(cid:228)rjestelmien soveltamisesta yhtei- itsen(cid:228)isiin s(cid:246)n alueella liikkuviin palkattuihin ty(cid:246)ntekij(cid:246)ihin, ammatinharjoittajiin ja heid(cid:228)n perheenj(cid:228)seniins(cid:228) 14 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) kes(cid:228)kuuta 1971 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1408/71 81 artiklan a alakohdan, jonka mukaan hallintotoimi- kunnan teht(cid:228)v(cid:228)n(cid:228) on k(cid:228)sitell(cid:228) kaikkia hallinnollisia kysymyksi(cid:228) ja tulkintakysymyksi(cid:228), jotka johtuvat asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1408/71 ja my(cid:246)hempien asetusten s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ksist(cid:228), ON P˜˜TT˜NYT SEURAAVAA: A. 1. 1. 1999(cid:150)31. 12. 2001: 1. Lomakkeisiin E 125 ja E 127 sis(cid:228)ltyv(cid:228)t saatavat voidaan il- maista kansallisena valuuttana. ottaa huomioon tietyist(cid:228) euron k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)n ottamiseen liittyvist(cid:228) s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ksist(cid:228) 17 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) kes(cid:228)kuuta 1997 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1103/97, 2. J(cid:228)senvaltioiden, jotka aikovat siirty(cid:228) kansallisesta valuutasta euroon saatavia esitt(cid:228)ess(cid:228)(cid:228)n, on ilmoitettava siit(cid:228) viipym(cid:228)tt(cid:228) toisille j(cid:228)senvaltioille hallintotoimikunnan v(cid:228)lityksell(cid:228). ottaa huomioon euron k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)notosta 3 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) toukokuuta 1998 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 974/98, ottaa huomioon edell(cid:228) mainitun asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1408/71 36 artiklan, 63 artiklan 1 kohdan ja 87 artiklan 1 kohdan, 3. Heti kun euron k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)n ottaneiden j(cid:228)senvaltioiden kansal- listen valuuttojen muuntokurssit ovat tiedossa, asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 94 ja 95 artiklan mukaiset kertasuoritus- perusteiset saatavat ilmaistaan sek(cid:228) euroina ett(cid:228) kansallisena valuuttana ja julkaistaan Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallisessa lehdes- s(cid:228). ottaa huomioon neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 93, 94 ja 95 artiklan sek(cid:228) 102 artiklan 1 kohdan a alakohdan, B. Ajanjakso, joka alkaa 1. tammikuuta 2002: ottaa huomioon neuvoston asetusten (ETY) N:o 1408/71 ja (ETY) N:o 574/72 soveltamiseksi tarvittavista mallilomakkeista 7 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) lokakuuta 1993 tehdyn hallintotoimikunnan p(cid:228)(cid:228)t(cid:246)k- sen N:o 153 ja erityisesti lomakkeen E 125, ottaa huomioon lomakkeen E-127 muuttamisesta 11 p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)n(cid:228) kes(cid:228)kuuta 1998 tehdyn hallintotoimikunnan p(cid:228)(cid:228)t(cid:246)ksen N:o 168, sek(cid:228) katsoo, ett(cid:228) 1. Euron k(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:246)n ottaneiden j(cid:228)senvaltioiden on k(cid:228)ytett(cid:228)v(cid:228) 1. p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)st(cid:228) tammikuuta 2002 alkaen lomakkeissa E 125 ja E 127 ainoastaan euroa. Lis(cid:228)ksi lomakkeiden kunkin kent(cid:228)n tiedot on ilmoitettava erikseen euroina. 2. Lomakkeisiin E 125 sis(cid:228)ltyv(cid:228)t saatavat, jotka on jo esitetty kansallisena valuuttana ennen 1. p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228) tammikuuta 2002 mutta joista ei ole viel(cid:228) saatu korvausta siihen p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228)n men- ness(cid:228), muunnetaan euroiksi muuntamalla kussakin lomak- keessa E 125 oleva kokonaissumma. Jotta ei synny riitoja lomakkeiden E 125 erillisist(cid:228) kentist(cid:228), my(cid:246)s niiden tiedot muunnetaan euroiksi. Muuntamisen suorittaa laitos, yhteys- elin tai jonka k(cid:228)sitelt(cid:228)v(cid:228)n(cid:228) saatava on sill(cid:228) hetkell(cid:228). toimivaltainen viranomainen, hallinnollisista syist(cid:228) on tarpeen vahvistaa yhteiset menettely- tavat, joita j(cid:228)senvaltiot soveltavat korvausten suorittamiseksi laitosten kesken euroon siirtymisen yhteydess(cid:228), ja on hyv(cid:228)ksytt(cid:228)v(cid:228), ett(cid:228) siirtym(cid:228)kautena (1. 1. 1993(cid:150)31. 12. 2001) j(cid:228)senvaltioiden ei ole pakko k(cid:228)ytt(cid:228)(cid:228) euroa laskentayksikk(cid:246)n(cid:228); samoin ei my(cid:246)sk(cid:228)(cid:228)n voida asettaa velvoitetta k(cid:228)ytt(cid:228)(cid:228) euroa korvattaessa luontoisetuuksien kustannuksia siirtym(cid:228)kautena; tarvitaan kuitenkin s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ksi(cid:228) tapauksista, jotka ulottuvat pi- 3. Lomakkeisiin E 127 sis(cid:228)ltyv(cid:228)t saatavat, jotka on jo esitetty kansallisena valuuttana ennen 1. p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228) tammikuuta 2002 mutta joista ei ole viel(cid:228) saatu korvausta siihen p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228)n men- ness(cid:228), muunnetaan euroiksi k(cid:228)ytt(cid:228)m(cid:228)ll(cid:228) keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)isi(cid:228) kuu- kausittaisia kustannuksia, jotka hallintotoimikunta muuntaa euroiksi ja julkaisee Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:228) t(cid:228)m(cid:228)n p(cid:228)(cid:228)t(cid:246)ksen C kohdan 1 alakohdan mukaisesti. Muun- tamisen suorittaa laitos, yhteyselin tai toimivaltainen viran- omainen, jonka k(cid:228)sitelt(cid:228)v(cid:228)n(cid:228) saatava on sill(cid:228) hetkell(cid:228). C 27/22 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallinen lehti 29. 1. 2000 C. Euroon siirtymist(cid:228) koskevat s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)kset: 1. Hallintotoimikunnan sihteerist(cid:246) m(cid:228)(cid:228)ritt(cid:228)(cid:228) ennen 30. p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228) syyskuuta 2001 ne vuodet, joita koskevia asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 94 ja 95 artiklan mukaisia saatavia ei ole suo- ritettu asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 101 artiklan 1 kohdan mukaisen saatavia koskevan selvityksen perusteella. 2. Ellei kahdenv(cid:228)lisiss(cid:228) sopimuksissa muuta m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)t(cid:228), saatavien loppusummat, jotka j(cid:228)senvaltio on esitt(cid:228)nyt kansallisena va- luuttana ennen euroon siirtymist(cid:228), on mahdollisuuksien mu- kaan suoritettava ennen 31. p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)(cid:228) joulukuuta 2001; niist(cid:228) on ensin v(cid:228)hennett(cid:228)v(cid:228) ennen suoritusta ilmoitetut kiistan- alaiset summat. 3. Pitk(cid:228)n siirtym(cid:228)kauden v(cid:228)ltt(cid:228)miseksi j(cid:228)senvaltioiden on nou- datettava asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 100 artiklassa asetet- tuja m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)aikoja, ellei kahdenv(cid:228)lisiss(cid:228) sopimuksissa muuta m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)t(cid:228). Lis(cid:228)ksi j(cid:228)senvaltioita pyydet(cid:228)(cid:228)n tekem(cid:228)(cid:228)n parhaan- sa, jotta hallintotoimikunnan suosituksessa N:o 20 ehdotetut toimet saatavien suorittamisen nopeuttamiseksi toteutetaan. T(cid:228)t(cid:228) p(cid:228)(cid:228)t(cid:246)st(cid:228) sovelletaan sen kuukauden ensimm(cid:228)isest(cid:228) p(cid:228)iv(cid:228)s- t(cid:228), joka seuraa p(cid:228)(cid:228)t(cid:246)ksen julkaisemista Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen viral- lisessa lehdess(cid:228). Hallintotoimikunnan puheenjohtaja Helmut SIEDL SIIRTOTY(cid:214)L˜ISTEN SOSIAALITURVAN HALLINTOTOIMIKUNTA (2000/C 27/08) Vuosittaisissa keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)isiss(cid:228) kutannuksissa ei oteta huomioon neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 94 artiklan 2 kohdassa ja 95 artiklan 2 kohdassa s(cid:228)(cid:228)detty(cid:228) alentamista 20 prosentilla. Kuukausittaisia keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)isi(cid:228) nettokustannuksia on alennettu 20 prosentilla. LUONTOISETUUKSIEN KESKIM˜˜R˜ISET KUSTANNUKSET (cid:150) 1996 (1) I. Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 94 artiklan soveltaminen Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1408/71 19 artiklan 2 kohdassa tarkoitettuihin perheenj(cid:228)senille vuonna 1996 annettuihin luontoisetuuksiin liittyv(cid:228)t korvattavat m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)t m(cid:228)(cid:228)ritet(cid:228)(cid:228)n seuraavien keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)isten kus- tannusten perusteella: Kreikka Ranska Ruotsi Vuodessa Netto kuukaudessa 169 682 GRD 8 086,80 FRF 9 632,06 SEK 11 312 GRD 539,12 FRF 82,19 EUR 642,14 SEK II. Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 574/72 95 artiklan soveltaminen Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 1408/71 28 ja 28a artiklan nojalla vuonna 1996 annettuihin luontoisetuuksiin liittyv(cid:228)t korvattavat m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)t m(cid:228)(cid:228)ritet(cid:228)(cid:228)n seuraavien keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)isten kustannusten perusteella: Kreikka Ranska Ruotsi Vuodessa Netto kuukaudessa 268 365 GRD 21 760,73 FRF 37 342,17 SEK 17 891 GRD 1 450,72 FRF 221,16 EUR 2 489,48 SEK (1) Keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)iset kustannukset Espanja ja Luxemburg: EYVL C 303, 2. 10. 1998; Keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)iset kustannukset Belgia, Irlanti, Alankomaat ja Portugali: EYVL C 56, 26. 2. 1999; Keskim(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)iset kustannukset Saksa, It(cid:228)valta ja Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta: EYVL C 228, 11. 8. 1999


title: 1999/272/EC: Commission Decision of 9 December 1998 on the measure planned by Austria for the clean-up of the Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill - (notified under document number C(1998) 4195) - (Only the German text is authentic) - (Text with EEA relevance)

eurovoc_concepts:
Austria
State aid
public financing
redemption
storage of waste
waste management

text: 27. 4. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 109/51 COMMISSION DECISION of 9 December 1998 on the measure planned by Austria for the clean-up of the Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill (notified under document number C(1998) 4195) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (1999/272/EC) THE COMMUNITIES, COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 93(2) thereof The Commission’s decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (1). The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments. The Commission received no such comments. Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof, 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the abovementioned provisions, The abandoned and contaminated Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill is situated in Upper Austria. The land is registered under No 345/2 in the land register of 51101 Aichkirchen. 1. PROCEDURE to of the clean-up part-finance By letter dated 23 September 1997, Austria informed the Commission that the province of Upper Austria the intended contaminated Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill site, which had been abandoned. By letter dated 20 the Commission requested further October 1997, received on 18 information. Austria’s November 1997. Following a meeting in Brussels on 12 December 1997, the Commission wrote on 18 December 1997 requesting further information on matters that had still not been clarified. The information was provided by Austria by letter dated 21 January 1998; the letter also contained formal notification of the project by the Federal Government the planned part-financing of reply was The landfill was operated by Kieba BaugmbH (in liquidation), Unterseling 19, A-4672 Bachmanning ((cid:28)Kieba’) in the period from 1975 to 1983. Kieba is an SME within the meaning of the Commission recommendation of 3 April 1996 concerning the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises (2) and is currently in the process of being wound up. Kieba’s main shareholder was the late Herbert Kiener. The current owner of the land is Atlas Immobilienver- waltungsgmbH, Unterseling 19, A-4672 Bachmanning ((cid:28)Atlas’). Atlas was set up specifically in connection with the contamination and was aware of it. Atlas is an SME within the meaning of the Commission recommendation concerning the definition of small and medium-sized enterprises. The main shareholder was once again Mr Kiener. The necessary permits for carrying out the clean-up site are held by ASA operation at the landfill By letter dated 22 April 1998, the Commission informed Austria that Article 93(2) proceedings were being initiated on the notified measure. (1) OJ C 201, 27. 6. 1998, p. 8. (2) OJ L 107, 30. 4. 1996, p. 4. L 109/52 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 4. 1999 Ober(cid:246)sterreich Holding GmbH ((cid:28)ASA’), which specialises land. ASA in the decontamination of belongs to the French group Electricite´ de France (EDF) and is a large firm within the meaning of the the concerning recommendation Commission definition of small and medium-sized enterprises. The total costs of the clean-up are estimated at ATS 313,2 million (ECU 22,7 million). ASA applied to the Federal Government on 22 May 1995 and to the province of Upper Austria on 23 January 1996 for public funding of the clean-up operation. The measure is to be financed entirely by the State. (a) The Federal Government undertook to provide ATS 206,7 million (ECU 15,0 million) pursuant to a decision taken on 12 June 1996 under the assistance guidelines 1991 for the cleaning-up or making safe of contaminated sites ((cid:28)assistance guidelines 1991’) and concluded an assistance agreement with ASA for this purpose on 20 December 1996. (b) The province of Upper Austria undertook to provide ATS 106,5 million (ECU 7,7 million) pursuant to a decision taken by the Government of the province of Upper Austria on 7 November 1996 and concluded assistance agreements with ASA for this purpose on 23 and 28 April 1997. Payments will be made in the period from 1998 to 2000 on presentation of the invoices. 3. INITIAL COMMISSION POSITION In the decision on the initiation of Article 93(2) proceedings, following position: the Commission took the (a) Austria should have notified the planned State funding as ad hoc, since it is doubtful whether the assistance Federal Government guidelines 1991 in accordance with all the the since provisions guidelines do not allow the province of Upper Austria to grant funding. contained applied therein and the (b) The State funding can no longer confer any benefit on Kieba, since the firm is in the process of being wound up. (d) The fee for ASA may confer an unjustified benefit on the firm, since Austria has not sufficiently demonstrated that the fee matches the market price. (e) It is not clear whether any aid for Atlas and/or ASA can be exempted on the basis of the derogations provided for in Article 92 of the EC Treaty. 4. AUSTRIA’S POSITION By letter, dated 14 July 1998, Austria stated its position on the Commission’s decision to initiate proceedings. Austria again emphasised that the pollution had already resulted in dangerous contamination of the groundwater and that a thorough decontamination operation was urgently supporting the clean-up, Austria evidence of submitted in particular a report drawn up on 14 May 1998 by an expert in water resources, a report drawn up on 22 April 1998 by an official expert in hydrochemistry and a report drawn up on 13 May 1998 by a medical expert. the urgency of required. As Austria also pointed out that State funding for cleaning up contaminated sites was intended solely to ensure environmental protection and not to provide assistance for firms. The State funding provided by the Federal Government and the province of Upper Austria did not therefore constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the EC Treaty. Even if the aid was covered by the this were the case, assistance guidelines adopted in 1991. It did not matter whether the documents referred to in Article 4 the assistance guidelines 1991 had been (3) of submitted at the time when the assistance was approved. The stipulation in the assistance agreement with the ASA that certain individual provisions of the assistance guidelines 1991 did not apply had been included for reasons of legal certainty and was in accordance with the assistance guidelines 1991. Austria also stated that, under the assistance guidelines 1991, up to 100 % of eligible clean-up costs could be financed and that the assistance between the Federal Government and other public bodies, in particular the province of Upper Austria, was immaterial. the sharing of (c) The State funding may indirectly confer an unjustified benefit on Atlas in the form of an increase in the value of the land and the saving of decontamination costs. Furthermore, Kieba and Atlas were financially not in a position to assume even part of the clean-up measures. It was also pointed out the administrative procedure took an average of ten years from the time that 27. 4. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 109/53 when the authorities first took action until the time when the clean-up measures were completed. Austria had accordingly concluded an agreement with ASA on the financing of the clean-up measures. 5. ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE MEASURE The Commission based its assessment of the aid case on the information provided by Austria by letter dated 14 July 1998. As regards the legal instruments which Austria wished to use in order to recover the clean-up costs from Kieba, Atlas and their shareholders, Austria had submitted a legal opinion drawn up by two law firms on 24 June 1998, which had concluded that the proposed legal measures offered good prospects of success. Austria also presented an extract from the register of companies and demonstrated that Kieba was in liquidation. As is evident from the copy of a letter from Kieba’s bankruptcy administrator, dated 11 May 1998, the end of the bankruptcy proceedings is not yet in sight. An extract form the register of companies was also presented for Atlas. An assessment of Atlas’s financial situation by a credit protection association was also submitted. This from the showed that, apart site, Atlas had no other contaminated landfill explanations significant assets. According to the presented by Austria, Atlas had largely ceased its business activity. Doubts were also expressed as to whether Atlas could be held liable for cleaning up the site. This assessment was confirmed in a legal opinion drawn up by two law firms on 24 June 1998. According to the explanations presented by Austria, the relevant land is designated as grassland in the Upper Austria Regional Planning Act (1) and the land-use plan (Zl. 610-1/1996) of the municipality of Aichkirchen. In Austria’s view, it is to be assumed that, once the clean-up operation has been successfully completed, the land will be put to agricultural and forestry a opinion court-approved expert was submitted on this point, in which the market value following the clean-up was determined under a comparative value procedure on the basis of the Land Valuation Act (2). use. An drawn up by it clear also made Austria that ASA receives remuneration for its services. In the report by two court-approved experts on tendering and award procedures, which it had attached, the remuneration was deemed to be appropriate. (1) LGBl. No 114/1993. (2) BGBl. No 150/1992. 5. 1. Notification obligations Austria approved the State funding of the clean-up measures on 12 July 1996 and concluded an assistance agreement with ASA on 20 December 1996. The funding was made available in accordance with the assistance guidelines 1991. The assistance guidelines 1991 were notified to the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 2 March 1993 as an existing scheme and registered by it under number ESA 30-151. Under Federal the Government can finance up to 100 % of clean-up measures relating to contaminated sites. The scheme expired when the Commission approved, by letter dated 10 February 1997, the new assistance guidelines for 1997. Accordingly, the assistance guidelines 1991 applied in the case at issue. scheme, the However, the time the Commission notes that, at when the Federal Government approved the financing and signed the assistance agreement, the optimised clean-up procedure had not yet been completed. Agreements on such a procedure were signed on 17 and 18 June 1997 and on 14 July 1997. Under Article 4(3) of the assistance guidelines 1991, however, this information should have been available when the signed. Consequently, assistance Austria did not fulfil all the requirements provided for in the existing aid scheme. agreement was could not Furthermore, the assistance agreement between ASA and the Federal Government excluded a number of provisions contained in the assistance guidelines 1991. Austria explained that this had been necessary, because the assistance agreement between ASA and the Federal Government impose any obligations on Kieba and Atlas, since the two firms had not been involved in the assistance agreement. In the Commission’s view, however, the exclusion of such provisions confers an advantage on the polluter Kieba and the landowner Atlas. The assistance guidelines 1991 clearly impose certain obligations on landowners and polluters. In effect, the Federal Government can the grant State funding under the scheme only if polluter and landowner are prepared or are compelled to fulfil the obligations provided for in the scheme. However, since a number of provisions were excluded, the Federal Government did not comply with all the L 109/54 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 4. 1999 conditions laid down in the assistance guidelines 1991. Furthermore, under the assistance guidelines 1991, the province of Upper Austria is not allowed to provide funding. Consequently, the financing measure of the province of Upper Austria is not covered by this existing scheme. Since the Federal Government did not comply with all the requirements laid down in the assistance guidelines 1991 and since the funding provided by the province of Upper Austria is not covered by an existing or approved scheme, Austria was obliged to notify the planned State funding by the Federal Government and the province of Upper Austria as ad hoc aid pursuant to Article 93(3) of the EC Treaty. Austria did not comply with this obligation. 5. 2. Kieba under Austrian administrative law, and in particular the Water Law Act (1) the Federal Waste Management Act (2) and the Industrial Code (3), contains a number of different provisions on liability. At all events, however, provisions applicable to contaminated landfills, the polluter (tortfeasor), namely the legal person whose activity has led to the relevant hazard, bears the primary responsibility. The polluter (tortfeasor) is deemed to be either the operator of the landfill or the person who abandoned it. environmental the district administrative The Wels-Land authority (Bezirkshauptmannschaft) granted Keiba, on 29 May 1978 and on 22 May 1979 (Zl. Wa 1-16-1976) under the Water Law Act, a licence to operate a household and special waste landfill site. It was also Kieba which abandoned the landfill. According to information provided by Austria, there is abundant evidence that the firm did not comply with the licences issued to it either in terms of type of waste or in terms of the period covered. Although the licence pursuant to the Water Law Act expired on 31 December 1981 activities were continued, in all probability until April or May 1983. According to the information provided by Austria, Kieba is the only ascertainable polluter. (1) BGBl. No 215/1959, amended version BGBl. No 85/1997. (2) BGBl. No 325/1990, amended version BGBl. No 115/1997. (3) BGBl. No 50/1974. In accordance with Article 31(1) and Article 138(1) of the Water Law Act, Article 32(1) of the Federal Waste Management Act and Article 83(3) of the Industrial Code, the Austrian administrative authorities must hold this undertaking primarily liable. They therefore ordered Kieba as early as 9 August 1991 to clean up the site. Kieba successfully appealed against this order on procedural grounds. contaminated landfill The Austrian authorities did not issue any further order, nor did they intend to do so in the near future, since the Wels regional court had initiated bankruptcy proceedings against Kieba on 29 September 1996. The estate of Kieba’s main shareholder, Herbert Kiener, was also the subject of insolvency proceedings. No one has so far taken possession of the inheritance. that The Commission notes the Austrian Federal Government and the province of Upper Austria, by financing the clean-up, have assumed the obligations of the polluter, Kieba. It must be borne in mind, however, that Kieba is being wound up and no longer exercises any business activity. Consequently, Kieba can no longer derive any benefit from the State financing, and any benefit pursued in the past can no longer affect trade between Member States. For the rest, the Commission takes note of the fact that Austria has undertaken to use all available legal means to recover the costs of the clean-up from Kieba. In order to reclaim improperly made payments, an action on grounds of unjust enrichment is to be brought pursuant to Article 1042 of the Civil Code and damages claimed pursuant to Article 1295. 5. 3. Atlas and the Federal Waste The Water Law Act Management Act contain provisions on the liability of landowners. Austria doubts, however, that Atlas can be made liable on the basis of these environmental provisions. This conclusion is also drawn in the two legal opinions. The Commission would once again point out, however, that Atlas was specially set up in connection with the contamination and that Atlas was aware of it. Furthermore, there is a close shareholder link between Kieba and Atlas. In the Commission’s view, therefore, Atlas and Kieba are jointly and severally therefore ASA liable under a repayment order. If carries out clean-up operation with State assistance, the aid measure could confer a benefit on Atlas, since it would not have to pay for the clean-up costs. the 27. 4. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 109/55 that that, according The Commission notes to the information provided by Austria, the firm does not carry out any significant business activity and might indeed be the in difficulty. The danger abovementioned benefit might distort competition is therefore at present slight. However, the Commission cannot rule out the possibility that a third party might take over the shares in the firm and extend its business activity to the point where trade between Member States might be affected. State funding of the clean-up operation by ASA would strengthen Atlas’s position compared with competitors on the EEA market that do not have the benefit of being able to carry out clean-up operations on their contaminated sites free of charge. Consequently, the Commission cannot rule out the benefits accruing to Atlas the possibility that through State in future distort competition on the EEA market. With regard to Atlas, the financing may constitute State aid therefore, within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement. funding might the characteristics Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement established the principle that aid having is incompatible with the common market. Article 92(2) and Article 92(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(2) and Article 61(3) of the EEA Agreement specify which types of aid may exceptionally be considered to be compatible with the common market. In this instance, it is evident that none of these derogations applies. therein out set The derogations provided for in Article 92(2) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(2) of the EEA Agreement are not applicable, since the aid is not aid having a social character, granted to individual consumers, or aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or aid granted to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the division of Germany. The derogations provided for in Article 92(3)(a) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(3)(a) of the EEA Agreement, and the regional derogations provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement are not is situated outside an assisted area. since Atlas relevant, the Commission notes As regards the derogations provided for in Article 92(3)(b) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(3)(b) of the EEA Agreement, the relevant project does not fulfil the criteria which the Commission normally apply to (cid:28)projects of common European interest’ and that the aid is not intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State. that The first part of the derogation provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA Agreement the development of is not applicable, since the aid is not intended to contribute to the development of certain sectoral economic activities. concerning aid to facilitate certain economic areas Similarly, in Article the derogations provided for 92(3)(d) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(3)(d) of the EEA Agreement do not apply, since the aid is not intended heritage to conservation. promote culture and it The Commission also notes that is clearly not compatible with the (cid:28)polluter pays’ principle enshrined in Article 130r of the EC Treaty that a polluter should sell his contaminated land to one of his firms in order to avoid the clean-up costs, that the firm responsible for the contamination should file for bankruptcy and that the business activity should be carried on by the newly established firm. The Commission therefore considers that none of the derogations apply in this case. However, the Commission takes note of the fact that Austria has undertaken to use all available legal means to recover the costs of the clean-up from Atlas. Repayment of the clean-up costs by Atlas would, in the Commission’s view, mean that the State funding of the clean-up operation did not confer a benefit on Atlas and that no State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the EC Treaty was involved. 5. 4. ASA 29 ASA 1994, December the Environmental Protection Act (1) On Inerta Abfallbehandlungs GmbH applied, on its own initiative, for all the necessary permits under Article for 32(4) of carrying out the decontamination of the landfill site. That Act had been notified to the EFTA Surveillance Authority as an existing aid scheme. The permits (UR-450000/323-1996) were issued on 22 February 1996 under the Waste Management Act and on 8 March 1996 under the Upper Austria Nature and Countryside Protection Act. Subsequently, ASA took Inerta over Abfallbehandlungs GmbH. permits issued ASA the to (1) BGBl. No 185/1993. L 109/56 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27. 4. 1999 the Austria concluded assistance agreements with ASA, since ASA was the only company that had the necessary permits. The Commission notes, however, that agreements with ASA were concluded without giving other Austrian or foreign competitors the agreements. It must therefore be examined whether the fee for ASA corresponds to the market price. the opportunity of tendering for assistance The Commission notes that ASA is not carrying out the decontamination itself, but is acting as general contractor with responsibility and coordinating the clean-up measures. For its services as general contractor, ASA will receive a fee of ATS 37,3 million (ECU 2,7 million), which is included in the overall clean-up costs of ATS 313,2 million (ECU 22,7 million). for planning Austria has provided evidence that the fee for ASA was determined in accordance with the (cid:28)fee guidelines for general contractors’, which in turn are based on the regulations governing fees for project management and the building industry. Austria has also shown that under the agreement ASA will receive only 85 % of the amount calculated in accordance with these regulations. The opinions of two court-approved experts which have been submitted confirm that the fee corresponds to the market price. After careful examination of the information provided, the Commission concurs with Austria’s view that ASA will receive an appropriate fee for its planning and coordination work and that the fee does not comprise any aid component within the meaning of Article 92 of the EC Treaty. out that point the The Commission would investigations into whether Austria complied with Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of yet been public concluded. This Decision is wholly without prejudice to the outcome of such investigations. contracts (1) have not service the carrying-out of On the clean-up work by subcontractors, the Commission notes that, on the basis of the conditions laid down in the assistance required to apply Directive agreements, ASA is (cid:214)-Norm-A-2050 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts. Austria has provided a detailed list of the work to be performed by subcontractors and has demonstrated that most of the work to be carried out is being awarded through procedures. The Commission public tendering the remuneration for the therefore concludes that subcontractors does not aid component within the meaning of Article 92 of the EC Treaty. contain any State 6. CONCLUSIONS In view of the above assessment of the State funding of the clean-up of the contaminated Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill site, the Commission notes the following: (a) the polluter Kieba is in liquidation and no longer pursues any business activity. Consequently, Kieba from State can no longer derive any benefit financing; (b) if ASA carries out the clean-up measures with State assistance, this measure could confer a benefit on Atlas, since the firm would then be spared the clean-up costs. This would constitute State aid for Atlas, for which none of the derogations provided for in Article 92(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty is the applicable. Recovery and reimbursement of clean-up costs by Atlas would exclude the possibility of the State funding constituting State aid within the meaning of Article 92 of the EC Treaty; (c) the for firm responsible the contaminated an appropriate fee for its planning and coordination work. The aid component. cleaning to fee does not up receive contain any site, ASA, is the Federal Government Consequently, and the province of Upper Austria may, in accordance with the finance the clean-up measures in full, notification, subject to the condition that Atlas reimburses the clean-up costs. The clean-up costs must be reclaimed in full in accordance with national procedures and legal provisions, with interest running from the date of disbursement until such time as the amount has been fully reimbursed, at the rate used as net calculating for rate the grant-equivalent of regional aid in Austria, from Atlas reference the HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 (1) OJ L 209, 24. 7. 1992, p. 1. The planned State financing of the clean-up, at an estimated cost of ATS 313,2 million (ECU 22,7 27. 4. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 109/57 million), of the abandoned and contaminated Kiener Deponie Bachmanning landfill site does not constitute State aid, subject to the conditions stipulated in Article 2. Article 3 Austria shall inform the Commission within two months of notification of this Decision of the measures it has taken to comply with it. Article 2 Article 4 This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Austria. Austria shall order Atlas to repay the State financed clean-up costs and shall ensure that it receives them. Repayment shall be made in accordance with national procedures and legal provisions, with interest running from the date of disbursement until such time as the clean-up costs have been repaid by Atlas, at the rate used as the reference rate for calculating the net grant-equivalent of regional aid in Austria. Done at Brussels, 9 December 1998. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2656/98 της Επιτροπής της 9ης Δεκεμβρίου 1998 για την τροποποίηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 28/97 και την κατάρτιση προβλέψεων εφοδιασμού των γαλλικών υπερπόντιων διαμερισμάτων με ορισμένα φυτικά έλαια (εκτός του ελαιολάδου) που προορίζονται για τη βιομηχανία μεταποίησης

eurovoc_concepts:
French overseas department and region
agricultural product
processing industry
supply balance sheet
vegetable oil

text: L 335/56 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 10. 12. 98 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 2656/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 9gr Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1998 cia tgm tqopopo(cid:148)gsg tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 28/97 jai tgm jat(cid:145)qtisg pqobk(cid:146)xeym evodiaslo(cid:151) tym cakkij(cid:150)m upeqp(cid:149)mtiym dialeqisl(cid:145)tym le oqisl(cid:146)ma vutij(cid:145) (cid:146)kaia (ejt(cid:149)r tou ekaiok(cid:145)dou) pou pqooq(cid:148)fomtai cia tg biolgwam(cid:148)a letapo(cid:148)gsgr G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 3763/91 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 16gr Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1991, cia eidij(cid:145) l(cid:146)tqa pou avoqo(cid:151)m oqi- sl(cid:146)ma ceyqcij(cid:145) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta sta cakkij(cid:145) upeqp(cid:149)mtia dialeq(cid:148)- slata (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomi- sl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2598/95 (2), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 2 paq(cid:145)cqa- vor 6, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (cid:149)ti o jamomisl(cid:149)r (EJ) aqih. 28/97 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 9gr Iamouaq(cid:148)ou 1997, cia tir keptol(cid:146)qeier evaqloc(cid:147)r tym eidij(cid:150)m l(cid:146)tqym evodiaslo(cid:151) tym cakkij(cid:150)m upeqp(cid:149)mtiym dia- leqisl(cid:145)tym le oqisl(cid:146)ma vutij(cid:145) (cid:146)kaia pou pqooq(cid:148)fomtai cia tg biolgwam(cid:148)a letapo(cid:148)gsgr jai tgm jat(cid:145)qtisg pqobk(cid:146)- xeym evodiaslo(cid:151) (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 296/98 (4), jat(cid:145)qtise pqobk(cid:146)xeir evodiaslo(cid:151) ci’ aut(cid:145) ta pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta cia to (cid:146)tor 1998· po(cid:148)gsg jahoq(cid:148)fomtai etgs(cid:148)yr· (cid:149)ti, yr ej to(cid:151)tou, pq(cid:146)pei ma jataqtisto(cid:151)m oi pqobk(cid:146)xeir evodiaslo(cid:151) le vutij(cid:145) (cid:146)kaia pou pqooq(cid:148)fomtai cia tg letapo(cid:148)gsg se upeqp(cid:149)mtia cak- kij(cid:145) dialeq(cid:148)slata cia to (cid:146)tor 1999· (cid:149)ti, jat(cid:145) sum(cid:146)peia, pq(cid:146)pei ma tqopopoighe(cid:148) to paq(cid:145)qtgla tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 28/97· (cid:149)ti ta l(cid:146)tqa pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai stom paq(cid:149)mta jamomisl(cid:149) e(cid:148)mai s(cid:151)lvyma le tg cm(cid:150)lg tgr epitqop(cid:147)r diawe(cid:148)qisgr kipaq(cid:150)m ousi(cid:150)m, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 To paq(cid:145)qtgla tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 28/97 amtijah(cid:148)- statai ap(cid:149) to paq(cid:145)qtgla tou paq(cid:149)mtor jamomislo(cid:151). (cid:129)qhqo 2 (cid:149)ti to (cid:145)qhqo 2 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 3763/91 oq(cid:148)fei (cid:149)ti oi pqobk(cid:146)xeir evodiaslo(cid:151) cia ta ceyqcij(cid:145) pqo(cid:152)(cid:149)mta pou e(cid:148)mai sglamtij(cid:145) cia tgm jatam(cid:145)kysg jai tg leta- O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei tgm gl(cid:146)qa tgr dglo- s(cid:148)eus(cid:147)r tou stgm Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym. O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 9 Dejelbq(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1) EE L 356 tgr 24. 12. 1991, s. 1. (2) EE L 267 tgr 9. 11. 1995, s. 1. (3) EE L 6 tgr 10. 1. 1997, s. 15. (4) EE L 287 tgr 24. 10. 1998, s. 8. 10. 12. 98 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 335/57 PAQAQTGLA «PAQAQTGLA Pqobk(cid:146)xeir evodiaslo(cid:151) tym upeqp(cid:149)mtiym cakkij(cid:150)m dialeqisl(cid:145)tym le vutij(cid:145) (cid:146)kaia (ejt(cid:149)r tou ekaio- k(cid:145)dou) pou pqooq(cid:148)fomtai cia tg biolgwam(cid:148)a letapo(cid:148)gsgr jai up(cid:145)comtai stour jydijo(cid:151)r SO 1507 (cid:146)yr 1516 (ejt(cid:149)r 1509 jai 1510) cia to (cid:146)tor 1999 Dial(cid:146)qisla Pos(cid:149)tgta (se t(cid:149)mour) Cou(cid:152)(cid:145)ma Laqtim(cid:148)ja Qe(cid:152)mi(cid:149)m Couadeko(cid:151)pg 400 2 000 9 200 300 S(cid:151)moko 11 900»