title: Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) amending Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC) No 1891/97 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 04. 12. 1998 COM( 1998)727 final Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) amending Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC) No 1891/97 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway (presented by the Commission) EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. On 30 September 1997, the Council imposed, by Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC) No 1891/97, definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon from Norway, except where this product is exported by one of 190 Norwegian exporters from which the Commission, by Decision 97/634/EC, had accepted individual price undertakings. 2. On 15 August 1998, the Commission imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 1789/98, provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties on three other Norwegian exporters, which appeared to have violated the Minimum Price provision or the reporting obligation of their undertakings in relation to the fourth quarter of 1997. 3. Having been given an opportunity to comment, one company which had lost its export licence did not react. With regard to the other two companies, it was confirmed that one company did not comply with its reporting obligation within the given deadline , while the other company admitted the price violation. Therefore, the Commission concluded that these companies violated their undertakings, which should be revoked. All parties concerned were accordingly informed and given an opportunity to comment. 4. Consequently, it is proposed that the Council impose definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on these three exporters. In accordance with Article 8 (9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and with Article 13 (9) of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97, the rate of the duties to be imposed should be established on the basis of the findings of the investigations, which led to the undertakings. In this regard, it is considered appropriate to set the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty at 0. 32 ECU per kilo net product weight, and the rate of the definitive countervailing duty at the level of 3. 8%. Su. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No /98 of 1998 amending Regulations (EC) No 1890/97 and (EC) No 1891/97 imposing definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community1, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 905/982 of 27 April 1998 (hereinafter referred to as "the basic Anti-dumping Regulation"), and in particular Articles 8(9) and 9 thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community3 (hereinafter referred to as "the basic Anti-subsidies Regulation"), and in particular Articles 13(9) and 15 thereof, Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, Whereas: 1 OJ L 56, 6. 3. 1996, p. 1. 2 OJL128, 30. 4. 98, p. 18. 3 OJ L 288, 21. 10. 1997, p. 1. 3 A. PROVISIONAL MEASURES (1) In the framework of the anti-subsidy and anti-dumping investigations initiated by two separate notices published in the Official Journal of the European Communities4, the Commission accepted, by Decision 97/634/EC5, undertakings offered by the Kingdom of Norway and by 190 Norwegian exporters. (2) In monitoring the reports received for the fourth quarter of 1997, it appeared that three Norwegian exporters - Icelandic Freezing Plants Norway AS, Incofood AS, and Ma-vo Norge AS - had made sales on the Community market below the minimum price stipulated in the undertaking and were therefore in breach of their obligations under the undertaking. When given the possibility to correct any possible clerical mistakes, one company made submissions showing that it had so far been reporting to the Commission sales to its related companies in the EC, instead of its resales to the first independent buyer, as required under the terms of the undertaking. These sales to related companies represented the overwhelming majority of total export sales of the product concerned to the Community made by this company. 4 OJ C 235, 31. 8. 1996, p. 18, and OJ C 235, 31. 8. 1996, p. 20. 5 OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 81, as last amended by Commission Decision 98/540/EC, OJ L 252, 12. 9. 1998, p. 68. q • (3) Consequently, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1789/986, hereinafter referred to as "the provisional duty Regulation", imposed provisional anti dumping and countervailing duties on imports of farmed Atlantic Salmon falling within CN codes ex 0302 12 00, ex 0304 10 13, ex 0303 22 00 and ex 0304 20 13 originating in Norway and exported by the three companies mentioned above. By the same Regulation, the Commission removed the companies concerned from the Annex to Decision 97/634/EC listing the companies, from which undertakings were accepted. B. SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE (4) Immediately after the imposition of the provisional duties, these three Norwegian companies received disclosure in writing of the essential facts and considerations, on the basis of which these provisional duties were imposed. (5) One company did not submit any comments further to the Commission's disclosure document. Furthermore, the company had previously informed the Commission that on 1 January 1998 it had returned its export licence issued by the Norwegian authorities. (6) Within the time limit set in the provisional duty Regulation, the other two companies submitted comments in writing and were granted a hearing. OJL228, 15. 8. 1998, p. 4. S (7) Subsequent to the written submissions received, the Commission sought and examined all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of a definitive determination on the apparent violations. (8) As regards the company having reported sales to its related parties, this further examination confirmed the provisional findings set out in recital (11) of the provisional duty Regulation. Indeed, it was established that almost the totality of the transactions reported for the fourth quarter of 1997 as well as those included in the quarterly reports submitted for the third quarter 1997, and the first and second quarter 1998 within the given deadlines were in fact sales to related companies in the EC and not to independent parties, it being the latter which should have been reported, in accordance with the clear terms of the undertaking. In reaction to the disclosure document sent after the provisional duties were imposed, the company claimed that it had only made a reporting error, and on 15 September 1998 sent the Commission new reports for the third and fourth quarters of 1997 and for the first and second quarters of 1998. In addition, the company contended that the sales to first independent customers reported in the revised reports respected the Minimum Price provision. Thus, no injury was allegedly caused to the Community industry. G (9) In its undertaking, the company undertook to send the Commission, within the given deadlines, a confidential report of all sales transactions to the first unrelated customers in the Community. Furthermore, the undertaking stipulates that failure to submit the quarterly report as required within the prescribed time limits shall be considered a violation of the undertaking, except in cases of force majeure. Despite these clear terms, which the company was fully aware of, it only reported transfer sales, within the given deadlines, and thus violated its reporting obligation. Indeed, transfer sales do not allow any conclusions to be reached on the actual sales prices charged to first unrelated customers, and thus do not enable the Commission to monitor the undertaking. (10) In view of the fact that the non-compliance with the explicit reporting obligations must be construed as a breach of the undertaking, in accordance with Article 8 (7) of the basic Anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13 (7) of the basic Anti- subsidies Regulation, it is not considered necessary to establish whether actual sales price levels infringed the Minimum Price provision set in the undertaking. Indeed, this could only have shown that, in addition to having breached the undertaking by reporting in a way, which prevents its effective monitoring by the Commission, the Minimum Price set therein might have not been respected. * (11) The third company admitted that it had made a sale below the Minimum Price stipulated by the undertaking, this transaction representing the totality of sales of the presentation in question. However, the exporter claimed that for this transaction, which was admitted to be a special sale intended to be made with no profit, the Minimum Price would have been respected if unforeseen transport arrangements had not resulted in an unexpectedly low sales price. It was claimed that the goods were shipped through a border point different from the one foreseen by the company, and that they were shipped on a partial instead of a full truck load, the higher transport costs thus incurred thereby increasing the deduction per kilo for transport costs within the Community made from the DDP price to the first independent customer, in order to obtain the Community border price. Quite apart from the difficulty of verifying such hypothetical arguments, which were only gradually put forward in the course of successive explanations, the violation seems to result from the fact that the sale was planned too close at the Minimum Price level, not even yielding any profit. Given the clear terms of the Minimum Price obligation in the undertaking, which include the deduction for direct selling expenses in case of DDP sales, it is incumbent upon the company to make sure that the Minimum Price is respected regardless of whether favourable transport arrangements can be made, or otherwise. 8 C. DEFINITIVE MEASURES (12) The interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations, on the basis of which it was intended to confirm the withdrawal of the Commission's acceptance of their undertaking and to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duties. The parties were also granted a period, within which to make representations subsequent to this disclosure. (13) After having duly considered the comments submitted, it is concluded that definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties should be imposed on imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originating in Norway and exported by the companies listed in Annex I. 9 (14) The investigations which led to the undertakings were concluded by a final determination as to dumping and injury by Regulation (EC) No 1890/97, and by a final determination as to subsidisation and injury by Regulation (EC) No 1891/977. Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic Anti-dumping regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic Anti-subsidies regulation, the rate of the definitive duties for the three Norwegian companies should be fixed at the level of the duties established in those two regulations. D. DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES (15) A breach of the undertaking has been established in relation to the three exporters listed in Annex I to the present Regulation. Therefore, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties be definitively collected at the level of the definitive duties. E. UPDATING OF THE LIST OF EXPORTERS EXEMPTED FROM ANTI DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES (16) The Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1890/97 and Regulation (EC) No 1891/97 exempting the parties listed therein from the duty, should be amended to remove that exemption from the three companies listed in Annex I to the present Regulation, 7 OJ L 267, 30. 9. 1997, p. 1 and p. 19, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2052/98, OJ L 264, 29. 9. 1998, p. 17. io HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 1. The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1890/97 is hereby replaced by Annex II. 2. The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1891/97 is hereby replaced by Annex II. Article 2 The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1126/98 in relation to farmed (other than wild) Atlantic salmon falling within CN codes ex 03021200 (Taric code: 03021200*19), ex 03041013 (Taric code: 03041013*19), ex 03032200 (Taric code: 03032200*19) and ex 03042013 (Taric code: 03042013*19) originating in Norway and exported by the companies listed in the Annex I to this Regulation shall be definitively collected. Article 3 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, For the Council The President \\ ANNEXI ANNEXI ANNEXI List of companies subject to definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties List of companies subject to definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties List of companies subject to definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties UTNo UTNo UTNo Company Company Company 68 68 68 70 70 70 89 89 89 Icelandic Freezing Plants N. AS Icelandic Freezing Plants N. AS Icelandic Freezing Plants N. AS Incofood AS Incofood AS Incofood AS Ma-vo Norge AS Ma-vo Norge AS Ma-vo Norge AS Taric Taric Taric additional additional additional code code code 8165 8165 8165 8172 8172 8172 8190 8190 8190 ANNEX II List of companies benefiting from undertakings UT No Company Name Taric additional I 3 _ 7 8 II 13 14 15 16 _ 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 30 31 32 33 35 A. Ovreskotnes AS Agnefest Seafood Xlsvig Aqua Export A/S Aqua Partner A/S Arctic Group International Artie Superior A/S Arne Mathiesen A/S A/S Aalesundfisk A/S Austevoll Fiskeindustri ^g K e co A/S Refsnes Fiskeindustri A/S West Fish Ltd Astor A/S Atlantic King Stranda A/S Atlantic Seafood A/S Borkowski & Rosnes A/S Br0drene Aasjord A/S Brodrene Eilertsen A/S Bradrene Rem0 AS Christiansen Partner A/S Clipper Seafood A/A Coast Seafood A/S Dafjord Laks A/S 43 Code 8095 8325 8098 8100 8l01 8109 8lTT 8H2 8113 8114 8Tl5 8118 8l"l9 8120 8121 8122 8124 8125 8126 8128 8129 8130 8131 8133 UTNo UTNo UTNo Company Name Company Name Company Name Taric Taric Taric additional additional additional 36 36 36 39 39 39 41 41 41 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 44 46 46 46 47 47 47 48 48 48 49 49 49 50 50 50 51 51 51 52 52 52 53 53 53 58 58 58 60 60 60 61 61 61 62 62 62 64 64 64 65 65 65 66 66 66 67 67 67 72 72 72 75 75 75 76 76 76 77 77 77 79 79 79 Delfa Norge A/S Delfa Norge A/S Delfa Norge A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Domstein Salmon A/S Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Ecco Fisk & Delikatesse Edvard Johnsen A/S Edvard Johnsen A/S Edvard Johnsen A/S Eurolaks AS Eurolaks AS Eurolaks AS Euronor AS Euronor AS Euronor AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fiskeforsyningen AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Aqua Group AS Fjord Trading Ltd. AS Fjord Trading Ltd. AS Fjord Trading Ltd. AS Fonn Egersund AS Form Egersund AS Fonn Egersund AS Fossen AS Fossen AS Fossen AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Atlantic AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fresh Marine Company AS Fryseriet AS Fryseriet AS Fryseriet AS Grieg Seafood AS Grieg Seafood AS Grieg Seafood AS Haafa fisk AS Haafa fisk AS Haafa fisk AS Hallvard Leroy AS Hallvard Leroy AS Hallvard Leroy AS Heroy Filetfabrikk AS Heroy Filetfabrikk AS Heroy Filetfabrikk AS Hirsholm Norge AS Hirsholm Norge AS Hirsholm Norge AS Hitramat & Delikatesse AS Hitramat & Delikatesse AS Hitramat & Delikatesse AS Hydro Seafood Sales AS Hydro Seafood Sales AS Hydro Seafood Sales AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Hydrotech-gruppen AS Inter Sea AS Inter Sea AS Inter Sea AS Janas AS Janas AS Janas AS Joh. H. Pettersen AS Joh. H. Pettersen AS Joh. H. Pettersen AS Johan J. Helland AS Johan J. Helland AS Johan J. Helland AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Karsten J. Ellingsen AS Code Code Code 8134 8134 8134 8136 8136 8136 8138 8138 8138 8139 8139 8139 8140 8140 8140 8141 8141 8141 8143 8143 8143 8144 8144 8144 8145 8145 8145 8146 8146 8146 8147 8147 8147 8148 8148 8148 8149 8149 8149 8150 8150 8150 8300 8300 8300 8302 8302 8302 8303 8303 8303 8304 8304 8304 8306 8306 8306 8154 8154 8154 8159 8159 8159 8428 8428 8428 8174 8174 8174 8177 8177 8177 8178 8178 8178 8179 8179 8179 8181 8181 8181 UT No Company Name Taric additional 80 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 90 92 93 96 98 99 100 iol 104 f05 107 108 TTl lT_ Fi3 114 Fl5 H6 H7 Kr. Kleiven & Co. AS Labeyrie Norge AS Lafjord Group AS Langfjord Laks AS Leica Fiskeprodukter Leonhard Products AS Lofoten Seafood Export AS Lorentz A. Lossius AS MarexAS Marine Seafood AS Marstein Seafood AS Memo Food AS Midsundfisk AS Myre Sjomat AS Naco Trading AS Namdal Salmon AS Nergard AS NilsWilliksenAS Nisja Trading AS Nor-Food AS Nordic Group ASA Nordreisa Laks AS Norexport AS NorfiProdukterAS Norfood Group AS Norfra Eksport AS NorMan Trading Ltd AS 45 Code 8182 8184 8l85 8186 8187 8423 8188 8189 8326 8 1% §197 8200 8202 8203 8206 8207 8210 82H 8213 8214 82T7 8218 8223 8227 8228 8229 8230 UT No Company Name Taric additional 119 120 121 122 123 Norsk Akvakultur AS Norsk Sjomat AS Northern Seafood AS [ Nortrade AS Norway Royal Salmon Sales AS "T_4 Norway Royal Salmon AS 126 128 129 130 134 137 140 141 142 143 144 L45 146 147 148 149 151 153 154 155 156 Norway Seafoods ASA Norwell AS Notfisk Arctic AS Nova Sea AS Ok-FishKvalheimAS Pan Fish Sales AS Polar Seafood Norway AS Prilam Norvege AS Pundslett Fisk Roger AS '. RolfOlsen Seafood AS Ryfisk AS ' Rjarvik Fisk-og fiskematforretning AS Saga Lax Norge AS Saga Lax Nord A/S Salomega AS Sangoltgruppa AS Scanfood AS Sea Eagle Group AS Sea Star International AS Sea-Bell AS (G ' : Code 8232 8233 8307 8308 8309 8312 83H 8316 8234 8235 8239 8242 8247 8248 8251 8253 8254 8256 8257 8258 8259 8260 8262 8264 8265 8266 8267 UTNo UTNo UTNo Company Name Company Name Company Name Taric Taric Taric additional additional additional Code Code Code 157 157 157 158 158 158 159 159 159 160 160 160 161 161 161 162 162 162 164 164 164 165 165 165 166 166 166 167 167 167 168 168 168 171 171 171 172 172 172 174 174 174 175 175 175 176 176 176 177 177 177 178 178 178 180 180 180 182 182 182 183 183 183 187 187 187 188 188 188 189 189 189 190 190 190 191 191 191 Seaco AS Seaco AS Seaco AS Seacom AS Seacom AS Seacom AS Seacom Nord AS Seacom Nord AS Seacom Nord AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seafood Farmers of Norway Ltd AS Seanor AS Seanor AS Seanor AS Sekkingstad AS Sekkingstad AS Sekkingstad AS Sirena Norway AS Sirena Norway AS Sirena Norway AS Kinn Salmon AS Kinn Salmon AS Kinn Salmon AS Skarpsno Mat Skarpsno Mat Skarpsno Mat SL Fjordgruppen AS SL Fjordgruppen AS SL Fjordgruppen AS SMP Marine Produkter AS SMP Marine Produkter AS SMP Marine Produkter AS Stavanger Rokeri AS Stavanger Rokeri AS Stavanger Rokeri AS Stjernelaks AS Stjernelaks AS Stjernelaks AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Stolt Sea Farm AS Storm Company AS Storm Company AS Storm Company AS Superior AS Superior AS Superior AS Svenodak AS Svenodak AS Svenodak AS Terra Seafood AS Terra Seafood AS Terra Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Timar Seafood AS Torris Products Ltd. AS Torris Products Ltd. AS Torris Products Ltd. AS Troll Salmon AS Troll Salmon AS Troll Salmon AS Vie de France Norway AS Vie de France Norway AS Vie de France Norway AS Vikenco AS Vikenco AS Vikenco AS Wannebo International AS Wannebo International AS Wannebo International AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS West Fish Norwegian Salmon AS Nor-Fa Food AS Nor-Fa Food AS Nor-Fa Food AS 8268 8268 8268 8269 8269 8269 8270 8270 8270 8271 8271 8271 8272 8272 8272 8273 8273 8273 8275 8275 8275 8276 8276 8276 8277 8277 8277 8278 8278 8278 8279 8279 8279 8282 8282 8282 8283 8283 8283 8285 8285 8285 8286 8286 8286 8287 8287 8287 8288 8288 8288 8289 8289 8289 8294 8294 8294 8298 8298 8298 8317 8317 8317 8321 8321 8321 8322 8322 8322 8323 8323 8323 8324 8324 8324 8102 8102 8102 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 727 final DOCUMENTS EN 03 02 11 01 Catalogue number : CB-CO-98-727-EN-C Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg 42


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 3771/98 dell'on. Olivier DUPUIS Situazione in Angola

eurovoc_concepts:
African Union
Angola
UN Security Council
UNO
armed forces
force reduction
international conference
peacekeeping
political group
political situation

formats: html pdf print

text: 11. 10. 1999 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee C 289/83 Risposta (29 marzo 1999) Per quanto concerne la decisione del 1991 di sopprimere le vendite esenti da dazio per i viaggiatori all’interno della Comunità, il Consiglio europeo di Vienna ha chiesto alla Commissione e al Consiglio «ECOFIN» di esaminare entro il marzo del 1999 i problemi che potrebbero eventualmente sorgere in merito all’occupazione e di valutare, sulla base di proposte della Commissione, le possibilità di risolverli prendendo in considerazione anche l’eventualità di un’estensione limitata dei regimi transitori. (1999/C 289/110) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3749/98 di Glyn Ford (PSE) alla Commissione (11 dicembre 1998) Oggetto: Indipendenza delle isole Færøer Può la Commissione far sapere quali accordi e quali trattati sarà necessario rinegoziare tra le isole Færøer e l’UE nel caso in cui la Danimarca concedesse loro l’indipendenza? Quanto tempo sarà necessario a tale scopo? Risposta data dal sig. Santer a nome della Commissione (10 febbraio 1999) Le relazioni tra la Comunità e le isole Færøer attualmente sono disciplinate da due accordi fondamentali; uno sulla pesca (regolamento (CEE) 2211/80, del 27 giugno 1980, relativo alla conclusione di un accordo sulla pesca tra la Comunità economica europea, da un lato, e il governo danese e il governo locale delle isole Færøer, dall’altro (1), l’altro riguarda il commercio (decisione 6 dicembre 1996 del Consiglio, relativa alla conclusione di un accordo tra la Comunità, da un lato, e il governo danese e il governo locale delle isole Færøer, dall’altro (2)). Solo in caso di indipendenza delle isole Færøer potrebbe essere necessario prendere in esame un eventuale rinegoziato di questi accordi. (1) GU L 226 del 29. 8. 1980. (2) GU L 53 del 22. 2. 1997. (1999/C 289/111) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA P-3771/98 di Olivier Dupuis (ARE) al Consiglio (4 dicembre 1998) Oggetto: Situazione in Angola Alla luce della recente evoluzione della situazione in Angola, e segnatamente del blocco del processo di pace e degli impegni che ne derivano, voluto dal partito del Presidente Dos Santos, del divieto opposto dal governo al rappresentante del Segretario generale dell’ONU di circolare liberamente nelle regioni controllate dall’UNITA, delle importanti restrizioni e delle pressioni imposte ai membri dell’UNITA che si sono stabiliti a Luanda nel quadro degli accordi del Protocollo di Lusaka e con la garanzia della comunità internazionale, quali misure ha preso o intende prendere il Consiglio per sbloccare il processo di pace in Angola e garantire la tutela e l’incolumità dei membri dell’UNITA, che sono ormai ostaggio del processo di pace? Più in generale, non ritiene il Consiglio che sia necessario organizzare una conferenza internazionale sulla grave crisi attualmente in atto in Africa ? che potrebbe essere definita la «prima guerra mondiale africana» ? conferenza cui possano partecipare i rappresentanti di tutte le parti in conflitto in questa regione dell’Africa e che consenta di porre fine alla gestione sino ad oggi limitata e spesso non obiettiva del Consiglio di sicurezza delle Nazioni Unite, troppo spesso intesa a favorire gli interessi particolari di uno Stato anziché una vera soluzione dei problemi locali?


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 3674/98 dell'on. Gerhard HAGER Bilancio 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Community budget
European Parliament
administrative expenditure (EU)
administrative responsibility
budgetary expenditure
costing

text: C 289/70 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunità europee IT 11. 10. 1999 Risposta del sig. Flynn a nome della Commissione (24 febbraio 1999) La Commissione è consapevole dell’esistenza del problema delle molestie sul luogo di lavoro in Europa. Questi episodi o azioni possono violare l’integrità del dipendente e interferire gravemente con l’ambiente di lavoro. Attualmente i dati europei sugli episodi di «mobbing» sul luogo di lavoro non sono disponibili. L’indagine europea della Fondazione europea per il miglioramento delle condizioni di vita e di lavoro fornisce alcuni dati su problemi connessi. Ad esempio, dall’indagine risulta che il 2 % dei lavoratori nella Comunità dichiarano che nel corso degli ultimi 12 mesi sono stati oggetto di molestie sessuali sul luogo di lavoro. La Commissione sta esaminando il problema delle molestie sul luogo di lavoro nel contesto dei lavori preparatori per l’attuazione delle disposizioni del nuovo art. 13, in prospettiva dell’entrata in vigore del Trattato di Amsterdam. (1999/C 289/092) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3674/98 di Gerhard Hager (NI) al Consiglio (4 dicembre 1998) Oggetto: Bilancio 1999 il Parlamento europeo ha adottato il progetto di bilancio in prima lettura con il titolo «Bilancio per il contribuente». Sono stati operati tagli, soprattutto sul fronte delle spese. Tuttavia la voce di bilancio relativa al PE è stata aumentata dell’1,7 % rispetto all’esercizio precedente, una decisione che sarebbe stata presa per far fronte ai costi supplementari delle prossime elezioni. Ciò premesso, quali misure concrete sono previste al riguardo? A quanto ammonterebbero in effetti tali 1. aumenti? 2. Chi potrà avvalersi di questi fondi supplementari? Risposta (29 marzo 1999) L’Onorevole Parlamentare interroga il Consiglio in merito all’aumento del bilancio del Parlamento europeo dal 1998 al 1999. Tuttavia, con la sua risoluzione relativa alla sezione del bilancio concernente il Parlamento europeo, iscritta nel processo verbale della sessione del 22 aprile 1970, il Consiglio si è impegnato a non modificare lo stato di previsione delle spese del Parlamento europeo, a condizione che detto stato di previsione non pregiudichi le disposizioni comunitarie. Di conseguenza, il bilancio del Parlamento europeo è di competenza esclusiva di quest’ultimo. (1999/C 289/093) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-3677/98 di Gerhard Hager (NI) al Consiglio (4 dicembre 1998) Oggetto: Misure di bilancio in materia di asilo ed immigrazione Fonti giornalistiche (Bulletin quotidien Europe, n. 7307, pag. 8) informano che ad un incontro con i paesi candidati all’adesione, tenutosi in margine al Consiglio «Giustizia e Affari interni» di settembre, tali paesi «sarebbero stati informati sulle misure di bilancio adottate dall’UE per provvedimenti nei settori asilo e immigrazione»


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2619/98 della Commissione del 4 dicembre 1998 che modifica il regolamento (CE) n. 2042/98 che stabilisce le condizioni particolari per la concessione di aiuti all'ammasso privato nel settore delle carni suine

eurovoc_concepts:
export
pigmeat
private stock
quantitative restriction
storage premium

text: 5. 12. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 329/9 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 2619/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 4 dicembre 1998 che modifica il regolamento (CE) n. 2042/98 che stabilisce le condizioni partico- lari per la concessione di aiuti all’ammasso privato nel settore delle carni suine LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 2759/75 del Consiglio, del 29 ottobre 1975, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore delle carni suine (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 3290/94 (2), in particolare l’articolo 4, paragrafo 6, e l’articolo 5, paragrafo 4, a norma del regolamento (CE) considerando che, n. 2042/98 della Commissione (3) gli operatori sono tenuti ad esportare i prodotti oggetto di un contratto di ammasso dopo lo svincolo dall’ammasso; che tale disposi- zione riduce considerevolmente la flessibilit(cid:133) di questo regime di sostegno, affievolendo di conseguenza l’inte- resse degli operatori nei suoi confronti; che (cid:138) quindi opportuno sopprimere tale disposizione; considerando che per garantire la parit(cid:133) di trattamento di tutti gli operatori che partecipano al regime di aiuti all’ammasso privato (cid:138) necessario che il presente regola- mento si applichi a partire dell’inizio del periodo di presentazione delle domande di contratto, ossia dal 28 settembre 1998; considerando che le misure previste dal presente regola- mento sono conformi al parere del comitato di gestione per le carni suine, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 All’articolo 1 del regolamento (CE) n. 2042/98 i paragrafi 2 e 3 sono soppressi e il paragrafo 4 diventa paragrafo 2. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il giorno della pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee. Esso si applica a decorrere dal 28 settembre 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 4 dicembre 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 282 dell’1. 11. 1975, pag. 1. (2) GU L 349 del 31. 12. 1994, pag. 105. (3) GU L 263 del 26. 9. 1998, pag. 12


title: Nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2619/98 ze dne 4. prosince 1998, kterým se mění nařízení (ES) č. 2042/98 o zvláštních podmínkách pro poskytování podpory soukromého skladování vepřového masa

text: 164 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 03/sv. 24 31998R2619 5. 12. 1998 ÚŘEDNÍ VĚSTNÍK EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ L 329/9 NAŘÍZENÍ KOMISE (ES) č. 2619/98 ze dne 4. prosince 1998, kterým se mění nařízení (ES) č. 2042/98 o zvláštních podmínkách pro poskytování podpory soukromého skladování vepřového masa KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ, s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství, vzhledem k tomu, že opatření tohoto nařízení jsou v souladu se stanoviskem Řídícího výboru pro vepřové maso, s ohledem na nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 2759/75 ze dne 29. října 1975 o společné s vepřovým masem (1), (ES) č. 3290/94 (2), a zejména na čl. 4 odst. 6 a čl. 5 odst. 4 uvedeného nařízení, trhu nařízením pozměněné organizaci naposledy vzhledem k tomu, že nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2042/98 (3) zava- skladovacího zuje hospodářské subjekty, aby po skončení období vyvážely produkty, kterých se týká smlouva o sklado- vání; že toto ustanovení značně omezuje pružnost tohoto podpůrného opatření, a v důsledku toho i zájem hospodář- ských subjektů na této činnosti; že je tudíž vhodné uvedenou povinnost zrušit; vzhledem k tomu, že je nutné, aby se toto nařízení použilo od tj. od začátku období pro podání 28. září 1998, aby se zajistilo rovné zacházení se všemi subjekty, kterých se týká režim podpory hospodářskými soukromého skladování; žádostí o smlouvy, PŘIJALA TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ: Článek 1 V článku 1 nařízení (ES) č. 2042/98 se zrušují odstavce 2 a 3 a dosavadní odstavec 4 se označuje jako odstavec 2. Článek 2 Toto nařízení vstupuje v platnost dnem vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropských společenství. Použije se ode dne 28. září 1998. Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech. V Bruselu dne 4. prosince 1998. Za Komisi Franz FISCHLER člen Komise (1) Úř. věst. L 282, 1. 11. 1975, s. 1. (2) Úř. věst. L 349, 31. 12. 1994, s. 105. (3) Úř. věst. L 263, 26. 9. 1998, s. 12