title: COMMON POSITION (EC) No 5/1999 adopted by the Council on 21 December 1998 with a view to adopting Council Directive 1999/.../EC of ... on a system of mandatory surveys for the safe operation of regular ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services

eurovoc_concepts:
carriage of passengers
ferryboat
high-speed transport
maritime safety
maritime transport
transport safety

text: 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/15 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 5/1999 adopted by the Council on 21 December 1998 with a view to adopting Council Directive 1999/. /EC of. on a system of mandatory surveys for the safe operation of regular ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services (1999/C 49/03) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, action at Community level is the most effective way of establishing a common minimum level of safety for ships throughout the Community; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 84(2), Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 189c of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas within the framework of the common transport policy further measures must be taken to in the maritime transport of improve safety passengers; (2) Whereas the Community is seriously concerned by shipping accidents involving ro-ro ferries which have resulted in a massive loss of life; whereas persons using ferries and high-speed passenger craft throughout the Community have the right to expect and to be able to rely on an appropriate level of safety; ro-ro (3) Whereas the Council invited the Commission, in its resolution of 22 December 1994 on the safety of roll-on/roll-off passenger to submit proposals for a mandatory survey and control regime for the safety of all ro-ro passenger ferries operating to or from ports of the Community, including the right of investigation of marine casualties; ferries (4), (4) Whereas in view, in particular, of the internal market dimension of maritime passenger transport, (1) OJ C 108, 7. 4. 1998, p. 122. (2) OJ C 407, 28. 12. 1998, p. 106. (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 7 October 1998 (OJ C 328, 26. 10. 1991, p. 82), Council common position of 21 December and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (4) OJ C 379, 31. 12. 1994, p. 8. (5) Whereas action at Community level is the best way to ensure the harmonised enforcement of some principles agreed upon within the International Maritime Organisation thus avoiding distortions of competition between different Community ports and ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft; (IMO), the appropriate (6) Whereas, in view of the proportionality principle, a legal is Council Directive instrument as it provides a framework for the Member compulsory uniform application of the common safety standards, while leaving each Member State the right to decide which implementation tools best fit its internal system; States’ and (7) Whereas the safety of ships in primarily the responsibility of flag States; whereas each Member State should ensure compliance with the safety requirements applicable to the ro-ro ferries and high speed passenger craft flying the flag of that Member State and to the companies that operate them; surveys in-depth preventive (8) Whereas port State control does not provide for regular and verifications for ro-ro ferries and high speed passenger craft; whereas it therefore should be verified that companies and their ferries and craft comply with the safety standards agreed within the IMO and, where appropriate, at regional level, through a system of regular mandatory inspections by host States; whereas companies should be prevented from operating such ferries and craft if these inspections reveal dangerous non-conformity with these safety standards; (9) Whereas this Directive addresses the Member States in their capacity as host States; whereas the responsibilities exercised in that capacity are based C 49/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 upon specific port State responsibilities that are fully line with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos); in (10) Whereas in the interest of improving safety and avoiding distortion of competition, the common safety standards should apply to all ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft, regardless of the flag they fly, providing regular services to or from a port in the Member States both on international voyages and on domestic voyages in sea areas line where beyond 20 miles shipwrecked persons can land, whilst leaving the possibility to the Member States to extend the scope of application of the Directive to ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft operating on domestic voyages in sea areas within 20 miles from a coast line; from a coast (11) Whereas it is necessary that host States check whether the ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft operating to and from Community ports conform to certain harmonised requirements for certification and survey by the flag State; (12) Whereas ro-ro those ferries and high-speed passenger craft should also conform, at the building stage and during their entire lifetime, with the applicable classification standards as regards the construction and maintenance of their hull, main electrical installation and control installation and should be fitted with a voyage data recorder complying with the relevant international requirements; auxiliary machinery, and (13) Whereas host States should check that the companies providing those services operate their ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft so as to guarantee maximum safety; whereas interested Member States, other than the flag State, should be allowed to participate fully in any investigation of a marine casualty; (14) Whereas it is fundamental to check that third flag State administrations concur with the companies’ commitments to cooperate with any investigation of a marine casualty or incident and to comply with the rules of recognised organisations for classification for certification; whereas such administrations should accept survey and certification procedures; the use of harmonised and, where applicable, (15) Whereas, in order to ensure continuous compliance of ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft with the requirements of this Directive, host States should carry out surveys prior to the start of a service and thereafter at regular intervals and whenever a significant change occurs in the operating circumstances; (16) Whereas in order to reduce the burden placed upon companies, due account should be taken of previous verifications and surveys; ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft should be exempted from surveys where it has been confirmed that they comply with this Directive for operation on similar routes and replacement ferries and craft should benefit from special arrangements; whereas ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft which have been surveyed to the satisfaction of the host State should not be subjected to expanded inspections under Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control) (1); (17) Whereas Member States should cooperate to exercise their responsibilities as host States; in their the performance of organisations which meet (18) Whereas Member States might find it useful to be tasks assisted recognised the requirements of Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for of marine the administrations (2); activities relevant (19) Whereas due account should be taken, in planning the surveys, of the operational and maintenance schedules of the ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft; (20) Whereas Member States should ensure that their internal legal systems enable them and any other to interested Member substantially States (1) OJ L 157, 7. 7. 1995, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 98/42/EC (OJ L 184, 27. 6. 1998, p. 40). (2) OJ L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 20. Directive as amended by Commission Directive 97/58/EC (OJ L 274, 7. 10. 1997, p. 8). 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/17 participate or cooperate in, or conduct, accident investigations on the basis of the provisions of the investigation of marine IMO Code casualties; whereas such investigations should be made publicly available; the outcome of the for (21) Whereas a set of accompanying measures in the systems, local operational areas contingency planning and restrictions will further improve safety; navigational guidance of (22) Whereas, in order to enable the monitoring of the application of this Directive, a database should be established based on the information derived from the surveys; (23) Whereas it is necessary for a Committee consisting of representatives of the Member States to assist the Commission in the effective application of this Directive; whereas the Committee set up in Article 12 of Council Directive 93/75/EEC of 13 September minimum requirements for vessels bound for or leaving Community ports and carrying dangerous or polluting goods (1) can undertake that function; concerning 1993 (24) Whereas certain provisions of the Directive may be adapted by that Committee to bring them into line with Community or IMO measures and to improve its regime to take into account future amendments to the 1974 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) which have entered a harmonised into implementation of amendments to some IMO resolutions without broadening its scope, ensure force and to HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Purpose The purpose of this Directive is to lay down a system of mandatory surveys which will provide a greater assurance of safe operation of regular ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft services to or from ports in the Member States of the Community and to provide for the right of Member States to conduct, participate in or cooperate with any investigation of maritime casualties or incidents on these services. Article 2 Definitions For the purpose of this Directive and its Annexes, (a) ‘ro-ro ferry’ shall mean a seagoing passenger vessel with facilities to enable road or rail vehicles to roll on and roll off the vessel, and carrying more than 12 passengers; (b) ‘high-speed passenger craft’ shall mean a high-speed craft as defined in Regulation 1 of Chapter X of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, as amended on the date of the adoption of this Directive, which carries more than 12 passengers; (c) ‘a passenger’ is every person other than: (i) the master and the members of the crew or other persons employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship on the business of that ship; and (ii) a child under one year of age; (d) ‘1974 SOLAS Convention’ the International Convention for the Safety Of Life At Sea, together with Protocols and amendments thereto, in force on the date of adoption of this Directive; shall mean (e) ‘High-speed Craft Code’ shall mean the ‘International Code for Safety of High-speed Craft’ contained in IMO Maritime Safety Committee Resolution MSC 36 (63) of 20 May 1994, as amended on the date of the adoption of this Directive; (f) ‘regular service’ shall mean a series of ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft crossings operated so as to serve traffic between the same two or more ports, or a series of voyages from and to the same port without intermediate calls, either: (i) according to a published timetable; or (ii) with crossings so regular or frequent that they constitute a recognisable systematic series; (g) ‘sea area’ shall mean any sea area included in a list established in accordance with Article 4 of Council Directive 98/18/EC of 17 March 1998 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (2); (h) ‘certificates’ shall mean: (i) for ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft international voyages, the safety engaged on (1) OJ L 247, 5. 10. 1993, p. 19. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 98/74/EC (OJ L 276, 13. 10. 1998, p. 7). (2) OJ L 144, 15. 5. 1998, p. 1. C 49/18 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 the 1974 SOLAS certificates issued under the together with Convention as amended, relevant equipment and where appropriate exemption certificates and permits to operate; records of (ii) for ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft engaged on domestic voyages, safety certificates issued in accordance with Directive 98/18/EC together with the relevant records of equipment and where appropriate exemption certificates and permits to operate; the (i) ‘exemption certificate’ shall mean any certificate I the provisions of Regulation issued under B/12(a)(vi) of the 1974 SOLAS Convention; (j) ‘administration of the flag State’ shall mean the competent authorities of the State whose flag the ro-ro ferry or the high-speed passenger craft is entitled to fly; (k) ‘host State’ shall mean a Member State to or from whose port(s) a ro-ro ferry or a high-speed passenger craft is engaged on a regular service; (l) ‘international voyage’ shall mean a voyage by sea from a port of a Member State to a port outside that Member State, or conversely; (m) ‘domestic voyage’ shall mean a voyage in sea areas from a port of a Member State to the same or another port within that Member State; (n) ‘recognised organisation’ shall mean an organisation recognised in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 94/57/EC; ferries (o) ‘company’ shall mean a company operating one or more ro-ro to which a document of compliance has been issued in compliance with Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 3051/95 of 8 December 1995 on the safety management of roll on/roll off passenger ferries (ro-ro ferries) (1) or a company operating high-speed passenger craft, to which a document of compliance has been issued in accordance with Regulation IX/4 of the 1974 SOLAS Convention, as amended on the date of adoption of this Directive; (p) ‘Code for the investigation of marine casualties’ shall mean the Code for the investigation of marine casualties and incidents adopted by the IMO by means of Assembly Resolution A. 849(20) of 27 November 1997; (q) ‘specific survey’ shall mean a survey by the host State as specified in Articles 6 and 8; (1) OJ L 320, 30. 12. 1995, p. 14. Regulation as amended by (OJ L 19, (EC) No 179/98 Commission Regulation 24. 1. 1998, p. 35). (r) ‘qualified inspector’ shall mean a public-sector employee or other person, duly authorised by the competent authority of a Member State to carry out surveys and inspections related to the certificates and and fulfilling independence specified in Annex V; qualification criteria the of (s) ‘deficiency’ shall mean a condition found not to be in compliance with the requirements of this Directive. Article 3 Scope 1. This Directive shall apply to all ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft operating to or from a port of a Member State on a regular service, regardless of their flag, when engaged on international voyages or on domestic voyages in sea areas covered by Class A as referred to in Article 4 of Directive 98/18/EC. 2. Member States may apply this Directive to ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft engaged on domestic voyages in sea areas other than those referred to in paragraph 1. In those circumstances the relevant rules shall be applied to all ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft operating under the same conditions, without discrimination in respect of flag, nationality or place of establishment of the company. Article 4 Initial verifications required in relation to ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft 1. Prior to the start of operation by a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service, or within 12 months of the date referred to in Article 19(1) for a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft already operating a regular service on that date, host States shall check that ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft: (a) carry valid certificates, issued by the administration of the flag State or by a recognised organisation acting on its behalf; the (b) have been surveyed for the issue of certificates in accordance with relevant procedures and guidelines annexed to IMO Assembly Resolution A. 746(18) on survey guidelines under the harmonised system of survey and certification, as they stand at the time of adoption of this Directive or with procedures designed to achieve the same goal; (c) comply with the standards specified for classification by the rules of a recognised organisation, or rules accepted as equivalent by the administration of the flag State for construction and maintenance of their 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/19 hull, machinery installation; and electrical and control (d) are fitted with a voyage data recorder (VDR) for the purpose of providing information for the benefit of a possible casualty investigation. The VDR shall meet the performance IMO Assembly standards of Resolution A. 861(20) of 27 November 1997 and comply with the testing standards laid down in (IEC) International Electrotechnical Commission standard No 61996. However, for VDRs to be placed on board ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft built before the entry into force of this Directive, the exemptions requirements may be granted. These exemptions and the conditions under which they can be granted shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16; for compliance with some of in accordance with (e) comply with specific stability requirements adopted at regional level, and transposed into their national legislation the notification procedure laid down in Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on information society services (1), when operating in that region a service covered by that national legislation, provided those requirements do not exceed those specified in the Annex of Resolution 14 (Stability Requirements Pertaining to the Agreement) of the 1995 SOLAS the Conference and have been notified Secretary-General of the IMO, in accordance with the procedures specified in point 3 of that resolution. to 2. Paragraph 1(e) shall apply to high speed passenger craft only where appropriate. Article 5 Initial verifications required in relation to companies and flag States Prior to the start of operation by a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service, or within 12 months of the date referred to in Article 19(1) for a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft already operating on a regular service on that date, host States shall: 1. check that companies which operate or intend to operate such a ferry or craft on regular service: (a) take the necessary measures to ensure that the specific requirements laid down in Annex I are applied and provide the evidence of compliance with this paragraph and with Article 4 to the host States involved in the regular service; (1) OJ L 204, 21. 7. 1998, p. 37. Directive as amended by Directive 98/48/EC (OJ L 217, 5. 8. 1998, p. 18). (b) will agree in advance that host States and any substantially interested Member State may conduct, participate fully in or cooperate with any investigation of a marine casualty or incident in accordance with Article 12, and will give them access to the information retrieved from the VDR of their ferry or craft involved in such a casualty or incident. 2. Check for such a ferry or craft flying a flag other than that of a Member State, the concurrence of that flag State that it has accepted the company’s commitment to meet the requirements of this Directive. Article 6 Initial specific surveys 1. Prior to the start of operation by a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service, or within 12 months of the date referred to in Article 19(1) for a ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft already operating a regular service on that date, host States shall carry out an initial specific survey, in accordance with Annexes I and III, to satisfy themselves that the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft fulfils the necessary requirements for safe operation of a regular service. 2. Where this Article is applied prior to the start of operation, host States shall set a date for the initial specific survey which is no more than one month after receipt of the evidence necessary to complete the verification under Articles 4 and 5. Article 7 Special provisions 1. When a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft is to be engaged on another regular service, a new host State shall take the utmost account of verifications and surveys previously carried out for that ferry or craft for operation on a previous regular service covered by this Directive. Provided that the new host State is satisfied with these previous verifications and surveys and that they are relevant to the new operational conditions, Articles 4, 5 and 6 need not be applied prior to the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft starting operation on the new regular service. 2. Articles 4, 5 and 6 need not apply when a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft which complies with this Directive already operating a regular service covered by regular this Directive transfers another to C 49/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 service covered by this Directive transfers to another regular service where the route characteristics are agreed by the relevant host States to be similar, and the host States all agree that the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft fulfils all the requirements for safe operation on that service. transfer of class, the host State may, after taking account of verifications and surveys previously issued for the ferry or craft, and provided that the safe operation of the ferry or craft is not affected by this change or transfer, dispense the ferry or craft from the specific survey required by this paragraph. At the request of a company, the host States concerned may confirm in advance their agreement as to where route characteristics are similar. 3. Should the surveys referred to in paragraph 1 confirm or reveal deficiencies in relation to the requirements of this Directive warranting a prevention of operation, all costs relating to the surveys in any normal accounting period shall be covered by the company. 3. In cases where, following unforeseen circumstances, a replacement ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft must be introduced rapidly to ensure continuity of service, and paragraphs 1 and 2 are not applicable, the host State may allow the ferry or craft to start operating provided that: (a) a visual inspection and document check raise no concerns that the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft does not fulfil the necessary requirements for safe operation; and (b) the host State completes the verifications and surveys under Articles 4, 5 and 6 within one month. Article 9 Notification Host States shall inform companies promptly, in writing, of the outcome of verifications and surveys under Articles 4, 5, 6 and 8. Article 8 Article 10 Prevention of operation Regular specific surveys and other surveys 1. A host State shall prevent the operation of a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service: 1. Host States shall, once in every 12-month period, carry out: (a) when it has been unable to confirm compliance with the requirements in Articles 4 and 5; — a specific survey, in accordance with Annex III, and — a survey during a regular service, which shall aim to cover enough items listed in Annexes I, III and IV in order to satisfy the host State that the ferry or craft continues to fulfil all the necessary requirements for safe operation. (b) whenever deficiencies are found during the surveys referred to in Articles 6 and 8 which pose an immediate danger to life, the ferry or craft, its crew and passengers; (c) when there is an established failure to comply with the Community instruments listed in Annex II which poses an immediate danger of life, the ferry or craft, its crew and passengers; An initial specific survey in accordance with Article 6 counts as a specific survey for the purposes of this Article. (d) whenever it has not been consulted by the flag State on the matters referred to in Article 13(1) or (5), 2. A host State shall carry out a specific survey in accordance with Annex III each time the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft undergoes repairs, alterations and modifications of a major character, or when there is a change in management or flag, or a transfer of class. However, in case of change in management or flag, or until the host State has established that the danger has been removed and the requirements of the Directive are met. The host State shall inform the company in writing of the decision to prevent that ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft operating, giving full reasoning. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/21 2. However, where the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft is already operating a regular service and deficiencies are established, host States shall require the company to take the necessary measures for their prompt rectification or within a well-defined and reasonable period of time, provided they do not pose an immediate danger to the safety of the ferry or craft, its crew and passengers. After rectification of the deficiencies, the host States concerned shall verify that the rectification has been carried out to their full satisfaction. If this is not the case, from operating. they shall prevent ferry or craft the 3. Member States shall, in accordance with national legislation, establish and maintain appropriate procedures covering the right of appeal by a company against a decision to prevent operation. Appeals should be dealt with expeditiously. An appeal shall not cause the decision to be automatically suspended. The competent authority shall duly inform the company of its right of appeal. 4. In cases where Articles 4, 5 and 6 are applied prior to the start of operation by a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on a regular service, a decision to prevent a ship operating must be taken within one month of the initial specific survey and communicated to the company immediately. is included in the team, where appropriate by including a surveyor of a recognised organisation. The inspectors shall report deficiencies to the administrations of the host States. The host State shall communicate this information to the flag State, if that State is not a host State involved in the survey. 3. An involved host State may agree to carry out a survey at the request of another involved host State. 4. Host States, when requested by companies, shall invite the administration of the flag State which is not a host State to be represented in any specific survey under the provisions of this Directive. 5. Host States, in planning a survey in accordance with Articles 6 and 8, shall take due account of the operational and maintenance schedule of the ferry or craft. 6. The findings of the specific surveys shall be recorded in a report of which the format shall be established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16. 7. In case of persistent disagreement between host States on the fulfilment of the requirements of Articles 4 and 5(1), the administration of any host State involved in a specific the Commission the reasons of the disagreement. immediately notify survey shall to Article 11 8. The Commission shall immediately start proceedings in order to take a decision in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16. Procedures related to initial and regular specific surveys 1. Ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft that have been subject to the specific surveys to the satisfaction of the involved host State(s) shall be exempted by these host State(s) from expanded inspections referred to in Article from expanded 7(4) of Directive 95/21/EC and inspections based upon the clear grounds that they belong to the category of passenger ships referred to in Article 7(1) and Annex V. A. 3 of that Directive. 2. Administrations of two or more host States involved in a specific survey of the same ship or craft shall cooperate with each other. The specific surveys shall be carried out by a team composed of qualified inspectors of the involved host State(s). Wherever there is a need for qualitative assessment of the fulfilment of class related provisions, host States shall ensure the necessary expertise Article 12 Accident investigation 1. Member States shall define, in the framework of their respective internal legal systems, a legal status that will enable them and any other substantially interested Member State to participate, to cooperate in, or where provided for under the Code for the investigation of marine casualties, to conduct any marine casualty or incident ferry or high-speed passenger craft. involving a investigation ro-ro ‘Substantially 2. investigating interested State’, State’ and ‘marine casualty’ shall have the same meaning as investigation of marine the in casualties. the Code ‘lead for C 49/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 3. When a ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft is involved in a marine casualty, the investigation procedure shall be launched by the State in whose waters the accident or incident occurs or, if in other waters, by the last Member State visited by the ferry or craft. This State shall remain responsible investigation and coordination with other substantially interested States until such time as it is mutually agreed which is so be the lead investigating State. the for 4. Member States conducting, participating in or cooperating with such investigations shall ensure that the investigation is concluded in the most efficient way and within the shortest possible time taking into account the Code for the investigation of marine casualties. 5. Member States shall ensure that reports resulting from such an investigation are made public in accordance with point 12. 3 of the Code for the investigation of marine casualties and notified to the Commission. implement an integrated system of contingency planning for shipboard emergencies. To this end they shall make use of the framework provided by IMO Assembly Resolution A. 852(20) on guidelines for a structure of an integrated system of contingency. If two or more Member States are involved as host States in the regular service they shall jointly establish a plan for the different routes. in their capacity as host State by 5. Member States shall ensure that they have been fully involved the administration of the flag State, before the issuance of the permit to operate high speed craft, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1. 9. 3 of the High-speed Craft Code. They shall ensure that operational restrictions required by local situations, necessary to protect life, natural resources and coastal activities are established or maintained and they shall take measures to ensure the enforcement of these restrictions. Article 13 Accompanying measures Article 14 Cooperation between host States Host States involved in the same regular service shall liaise with each other when applying this Directive. 1. Member States issuing or recognising an exemption certificate shall work together with the involved host State or administration of the flag State to resolve any disagreement concerning the suitability of the exemptions prior to the initial specific survey. Article 15 Supporting measures States should operate 2. Member shore based navigational guidance systems and other information schemes in accordance with IMO Resolution A. 795(19) to assist ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft in the safe conduct of the regular service, or part of it, for the safety of which they bear responsibility. 3. Each Member State shall provide to the Commission copies of the survey reports referred to in Article 11(6), with the IMO identification number where applicable. The Commission may, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16, decide on appropriate means for allocating an identification number to other vessels. If two or more host States are involved in the regular service, the data may be provided by one of these host States. The Commission shall set up and maintain a database provided. the Conditions of access to the database shall be decided in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16. information containing 4. Member States shall ensure that companies operating ro-ro ferries or high-speed passenger craft on regular services to or from their ports are able to maintain and The Member States shall inform third States which have either flag State responsibilities or responsibilities similar to those of a host State for ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft falling under the scope of this Directive and operating between a port of a Member State and a port of a third State of the requirements imposed by this Directive on any company providing a regular service to or from a port of the Community. Article 16 Regulatory committee 1. The Commission shall be assisted by the committee set up under Article 12(1) of Directive 93/75/EEC. 2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/23 the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The chairman shall not vote. 3. (a) The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are in accordance with the opinion of the committee. is delivered, (b) If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the committee, or if no the Commission shall, opinion without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by a qualified majority. If, on the expiry of eight weeks from the date of referral to the Council, the Council has not acted, the proposed measures shall be adopted by the Commission. Article 17 Amendment procedure In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16: (a) the Annexes, (b) the definitions, (c) references to Community instruments, (d) references to IMO resolutions, may be amended to the extent necessary to bring them into line with Community or IMO measures which have entered into force, but without broadening the scope of this Directive. The Annexes may also be amended in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16 when it is necessary to improve the arrangements established by this Directive, but without broadening its scope. Article 18 Penalties provided dissuasive. for shall be effective, proportionate and Article 19 Application 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later than (. ) (*) and forthwith inform the Commission thereof. 2. The provisions of Article 4(1)(d) shall be applied no later than 30 months after the publication date of IEC standard No 61996 or by 1 January 2001, whichever of these dates comes later. 3. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States. 4. The Member States shall immediately notify to the Commission all provisions of domestic law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. The Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof. Article 20 Assessment of application Three years after the date referred to in Article 19(1), the Commission shall assess, on the basis of information to be provided by the Member States in accordance with Article 13, the application of this Directive. Article 21 Entry into force This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 22 Addressees This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Member States shall lay down the system of penalties for breaching the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties thus Done at. For the Council The President (*) 18 months after the entry into force of this Directive. C 49/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 ANNEX I SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS TO BE FULFILLED BY COMPANIES as referred to in Article 5(1), and Articles 6 and 8 Companies are to ensure that on board their ro-ro ferries and high-speed passenger craft: 1. the master is provided with appropriate information on the availability of shore-based navigational guidance systems and other information schemes to assist him in the safe conduct of the voyages, before the ferry or craft begins to sail, and that he makes use of the navigational guidance and information schemes set up by Member States; 2. the relevant provisions of paragraphs 2 to 6 of MSC/Circular 699, on revised guidelines for passenger safety instructions, are applied; 3. a table with the shipboard working arrangements is posted in an easily accessible place, and contains: (a) the schedule of service at sea and service in port; and (b) the maximum hours of work or the minimum hours of rest required for watchkeepers; 4. the master is not constrained from taking any decision, which in his professional judgment is necessary for safe navigation and operation, in particular in severe weather and in heavy seas; 5. the master keeps a record of navigational activities and incidents which are of importance to safety of navigation; 6. any damage to, or permanent deflection of shell doors and associated hull plating that may affect the integrity of the ferry or craft, and any deficiencies in the securing arrangements of such doors, are promptly reported to both the flag State administration and the host State and are promptly repaired to their satisfaction; 7. an up-to-date voyage plan is available before the departure of the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft on its voyage. In preparing the voyage plan the guidelines set out in MSC Resolution. (70), on guidelines on voyage planning, are to be taken fully into account; 8. general information about the services and assistance available to elderly and disabled persons on board is made known to the passengers and is made available in formats suitable for people with impaired sight. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/25 ANNEX II LIST OF COMMUNITY INSTRUMENTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 10(1c) — Council Directive 93/75/EEC of 13 September 1993 concerning minimum requirements for vessels bound for or leaving Community ports and carrying dangerous or polluting goods (OJ L 247, 5. 10. 1993, p. 19). Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 98/74/EC (OJ L 276, 13. 10. 1998, p. 7), — Council Directive 94/58/EC of 22 November 1994 on the minimum level of training of seafarers (OJ L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 28). Directive as last amended by Directive 98/35/EC (OJ L 172, 17. 6. 1998, p. 1), where applicable, — Council Regulation (EC) No 3051/95 of 8 December 1995 on the safety management of roll on/roll off passenger ferries (ro-ro ferries) (OJ L 320, 30. 12. 1995, p. 14). Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/98 (OJ L 19, 24. 1. 1998, p. 35). C 49/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 ANNEX III PROCEDURES FOR SPECIFIC SURVEYS (as referred to in Articles 6 and 8) 1. The specific surveys are to ensure that statutory requirements, in particular those for construction, subdivision and stability, machinery and electrical installations, loading, stability, fire protection, maximum number of passengers, life saving appliances and the carriage of dangerous goods, radiocommunications and navigation are fulfilled and are for that purpose, and where applicable at least to include: — the starting of the emergency generator, — an inspection of emergency lighting, — an inspection of the emergency source of power for radio-installations, — a test of the public address system, — a fire drill, including a demonstration of the ability to use firemen’s outfits, — the operation of the emergency fire-pump with two firehoses connected to the fire main line in operation, — the testing of the remote emergency stop controls for fuel supply to boilers, main and auxiliary engines, and for ventilation fans, — the testing of remote and local controls for the closing of fire dampers, — the testing of fire detection and alarm systems, — the testing of proper closing of fire doors, — the operation of bilge pumps, — the closing of watertight bulkhead doors; both from the local and remote control positions, — a demonstration that shows that key crew members are acquainted with the damage control plan, — the lowering of at least one rescue boat and one lifeboat to the water, starting and testing their propulsion and steering system, and recovering them from the water into their stowed position on board, — the checking that all lifeboats and rescue boats correspond to the inventory, — the testing of the ship’s or craft’s steering gear and auxiliary steering gear. 2. Specific surveys shall include the verification of the planned maintenance system on board. 3. Specific surveys shall focus on the familiarisation of crew members with, and their effectiveness in, safety procedures, emergency procedures, maintenance, working practices, passenger safety, bridge procedures and cargo and vehicle-related operations. Seafarers’ ability to understand and, where appropriate, give orders and instructions and report back in the common working language, as recorded in the ship’s logbook shall be checked. The documented evidence that crew members have successfully followed a special training shall be checked, in particular with regard to: — crowd-management training, — familiarisation training, — safety training for personnel providing direct safety assistance to passengers in passenger spaces, and in particular to elderly and disabled persons in an emergency, and — crisis management and human behaviour training. The specific survey shall include an assessment as to whether rostering patterns are causing unreasonable fatigue particularly for watch-keeping personnel. 4. Certificates of competence of the crew members issued by third States shall only be recognised when they comply with Regulation I/10 of the revised International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW Convention). 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/27 ANNEX IV INDICATIVE GUIDELINES FOR QUALIFIED INSPECTORS WHEN CARRYING OUT UNSCHEDULED SURVEYS DURING A REGULAR CROSSING (as referred to in Article 8(1)) 1. Passenger information. The means used to ensure that the passenger number for which the ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft (hereafter referred to as ‘ship’) is certified is not exceeded. That the system for registration of passenger information complies with the regulations and is effective. How the information on the total number of passengers is passed to the master and, if appropriate, how passengers undertaking a double crossing without going ashore are included in the total for the return voyage. 2. Loading and stability information. That, when applicable, reliable draught gauges are fitted and are in use. That measures are taken to ensure that the ship is not overloaded and the appropriate sub-division load line is not submerged. That the loading and stability assessment is carried out as required. That goods vehicles and other cargo are weighed where required and the figures passed to the ship for use in the loading and stability assessment. That damage control plans are permanently exhibited and that booklets containing damage control information are provided for the ship’s officers. 3. Security for sea. The procedure to ensure that the ship is secured for sea before leaving the berth, which should include a positive reporting procedure that all the shell watertight and weather-tight doors are closed. That all the vehicle deck doors are closed before the ship leaves the berth or remain open long enough only to enable the bow visor to be closed, the closing arrangements for the bow, stern and side doors, and the provision of indicator lights and TV surveillance to show their status on the navigating bridge. Any difficulties with the operation of the indicator lights, particularly the switches at the doors, should be ascertained and reported. 4. Safety announcements. The form of routine safety announcements and the posting of instructions and guidance on emergency procedures in the appropriate language(s). That the routine safety announcement takes place at the commencement of the voyage and can be heard in all public spaces, including open decks, to which passengers have access. 5. Log book entries. An examination of the log book to ensure that the entries are being made regarding the closing of the bow, stern and other watertight and weather-tight doors, drills for sub-division watertight doors, testing of steering gears, etc. Also that draughts, freeboard and stability are being recorded as well as the common working language for the crew. 6. Dangerous goods. That any cargo of dangerous or polluting goods is carried in accordance with the relevant regulations and, in particular, that a declaration concerning dangerous and polluting goods is provided together with a manifest or stowage plan to show their location on board, that the carriage of the particular cargo is permitted on passenger ships, and that the dangerous and polluting goods are properly marked, labelled, stowed, secured and segregated. That vehicles carrying dangerous and polluting goods are properly placarded and secured. That, when dangerous and polluting goods are carried, a copy of the relevant manifest or stowage plan is available ashore. That the master is aware of the notification requirements under Directive 93/75/EEC and of the C 49/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 instructions on the emergency procedures to be followed and the rendering of first aid should there be an incident involving the dangerous goods or marine pollutants. That the means of ventilating the vehicle decks is in use at all times, is increased when the engines of the vehicles are running and that there is some form of indication on the bridge to show that the vehicle deck ventilation is in operation. 7. Securing freight vehicles. How freight vehicles are secured, for example, whether block stow or individual lashings. Whether sufficient strong points are available. The arrangements for securing freight vehicles when adverse weather is experienced or expected. The method of securing coaches and motor cycles, if any. That the ship has a cargo securing manual. 8. Vehicle decks. Whether special category and ro-ro cargo spaces are being continuously patrolled or monitored by a TV surveillance system so that the movement of vehicles in adverse weather and the unauthorised entry of passengers may be observed. That fire doors and entrances are kept shut and that notices are posted to keep passengers off the vehicle decks whilst the ship is at sea. 9. Closure of watertight doors. That the policy laid down in the ship’s operational instructions for the sub-division watertight doors is being followed. That the required drills are being carried out. That the bridge control for the watertight doors is kept, when possible, on ‘local’ control. That the doors are being kept closed in restricted visibility and any hazardous situation. That crews are instructed in the correct way to operate the doors and are aware of the dangers of their misuse. 10. Fire patrols. It should be confirmed that an efficient patrol is being maintained so that any outbreak of fire may be readily detected. This should include special category spaces where a fixed fire detection and alarm system is not fitted noting that these spaces may be patrolled as indicated in paragraph 8. 11. Communications in an emergency. That there are sufficient crew members in accordance with the muster list to assist passengers in an emergency and that they are readily identifiable and able to communicate with the passengers in an emergency, taking into account an appropriate and adequate combination of any of the following factors: (a) the language or languages appropriate to the principal nationalities of passengers carried on a particular route; (b) the likelihood that an ability to use elementary English vocabulary for basic instructions can provide a means of communicating with a passenger in need of assistance whether or not the passenger and crew member share a common language; (c) the possible need to communicate during an emergency by some other means (e. g. by demonstration, hand signals, or calling attention to the location of instructions, muster stations, life-saving devices or evacuation routes when verbal communication is impractical); (d) the extent to which complete safety instructions have been provided to passengers in their native language or languages; (e) the languages in which emergency announcements may be broadcast during an emergency or drill to convey critical guidance to passengers and to facilitate crew members in assisting passengers. 12. Common working language between crew members. Verify that a working language is established to ensure effective crew performance in safety matters and that this working language is recorded in the ship’s logbook. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/29 13. Safety equipment. That the live-saving and fire appliances, including the fire doors and other items of the structural fire protection that may be readily inspected, are being maintained. That fire control plans are permanently exhibited or booklets containing the equivalent information are provided for the information of the ship’s officers. That the stowage of the lifejackets is appropriate and that the stowage of children’s lifejackets may be readily identified. That the loading of vehicles does not prevent the operation of the fire controls, emergency shut-offs, controls for the storm valves, etc. that may be located on the vehicle decks. 14. Navigational and radio equipment. That the navigational and radio communications equipment, including emergency position-indicating radio beacons (EPIRBs), are operational. 15. Supplementary emergency lighting. That supplementary emergency lighting is fitted, when required by the regulations, and that a record of deficiencies is being kept. 16. Means of escape. Marking, in accordance with the applicable requirements, and the lighting, from both the main and emergency sources of power, of the means of escape. The measures taken to keep vehicles clear of escape routes where the means of escape cross or pass through vehicle decks. That exits, particularly exits from duty free shops, which have been found to be blocked by an excess of goods, are kept clear. 17. Operations book. That copies of the operations book are provided for the master and each senior officer and that other copies are available for all members of the crew. Also that there are check lists to cover the preparation for sea and other operations. 18. Engine room cleanliness. That the engine room is maintained in a clean condition with regard to maintenance procedures. 19. Garbage disposal. That the arrangements for the handling and disposal of garbage are satisfactory. 20. Planned maintenance. All companies should have specific standing orders, with a planned maintenance system, for all safety related areas including bow and stern doors and side openings, together with their closing arrangements, but also covering engine room maintenance and safety equipment. Plans should be in place for periodically checking all items so as to maintain safety standards at the highest level. Procedures should be in place for recording deficiencies and confirming they have been properly rectified so that the master and the designated person ashore within the company management structure are aware of the deficiencies and are notified when they have been rectified within a time specified. Periodic checking of the operation of the inner and outer bow door closing arrangements should include the indicators, surveillance equipment and any scuppers in the spaces between the bow visor and the inner door and especially the closing mechanisms and their associated hydraulic systems. 21. Making a voyage. When making a voyage the opportunity should be taken to check overcrowding, including the availability of seats and the blocking of passageways, stairs and emergency exits by baggage and by passengers unable to find seats. That the vehicle deck is vacated by passengers before the ship sails and that they do not again have access until immediately prior to docking should also be checked. C 49/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 ANNEX V CRITERIA OF QUALIFICATION AND INDEPENDENCE FOR QUALIFIED INSPECTORS (as referred to in Article 2(r)) 1. The qualified inspector must be authorised to carry out the specific surveys referred to in Article 6 by the competent authority of the Member State. 2. Either: — the qualified inspector must have completed a minimum of one year’s service with the competent authority of a Member State as a flag State inspector dealing with surveys and certification in accordance with the 1974 SOLAS Convention, — and be in possession of: (a) a certificate of competency as master, enabling that person to take command of a ship of 1 600 GT or more (see STCW, Regulation II/2), or (b) a certificate of competency as chief engineer enabling him to take up that task on board a ship whose main power plant has a power equal or superior to 3 000 kW (see STCW, Regulation III/2), or (c) have passed in a Member State an examination as a naval architect, mechanical engineer or an engineer related to the maritime fields and worked in that capacity for at least five years, — the qualified inspectors mentioned under (a) and (b) must have served for a period of not less than five years at sea as officer in the deck or engine department respectively; Or: — the qualified inspector must hold a relevant university degree or an equivalent in a Member State, and — have been trained and qualified at a school for ship safety inspectors in a Member State, and — have served at least two years with the competent authority of a Member State as a flag State inspector dealing with surveys and certification in accordance with the 1974 SOLAS Convention. 3. Qualified inspectors shall have the ability to communicate orally and in writing with seafarers in the language most commonly spoken at sea. 4. Qualified inspectors shall have an appropriate knowledge of the provisions of the 1974 SOLAS Convention and of the relevant procedures of this Directive. 5. The qualified inspectors carrying out specific surveys shall have no commercial interest either in the company concerned or any other company operating on a regular service to and from the involved host State or in the ro-ro ferries or high-speed passenger craft inspected, nor shall the qualified inspectors be employed by or undertake work on behalf of non-governmental organisations which carry out statutory or classification surveys or issue certificates for that ro-ro ferry or high-speed passenger craft. 6. Inspectors not fulfilling the above criteria are also accepted if they were employed by the competent authority for statutory surveys or port State control inspections at the date of adoption of Directive 95/21/EC. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/31 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION On 19 February 1998, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a Council Directive on a system of mandatory surveys for the safe operation of ro-ro ferry and high-speed craft in regular services (1). This proposal was based on Article 84(2) of the EC Treaty. The Economic and Social Committee issued its opinion on 9 September 1998 (2). The European Parliament issued its opinion in the first reading on 7 October 1998 (3). The Commission amended its proposal in the light of the European Parliament’s opinion and transmitted it to the Council on 10 November 1998 (4). The Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 189c of the Treaty on 21 December 1998. II. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSAL The Commission proposal aims at further improving the safety of regular ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services by submitting them to extensive surveys before entry into service and at regular intervals thereafter, to investigations in marine casualties and to new technical requirements. The proposal is the latest in a series submitted in the aftermath of the accident of the Estonia, and the last proposal requested by the Council in its resolution of 22 December 1994 on the safety of roll-on/roll-off passenger ferries (5), on the basis of which the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 3051/95 on the safety management of ro-ro ferries (6), Directive 98/41/EC on the registration of persons sailing on board passenger ships (7), an amendment (8) to Directive 94/58/EC on the training of seafarers (9), Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (10) and Directive 98/18/EC on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (11). By adding the controls exercised by the Member States acting as host States to the controls already exercised by the Member States as flag States (12) or as port States (13), the proposed Directive will introduce a new element of accident prevention which responds to demands for more safety on board ferries. In doing so, the Directive will also harmonise the conditions of competition, without discriminating against vessels of third countries. (1) OJ C 108, 7. 4. 1998, p. 122. (2) OJ C 407, 28. 12. 1998, p. 106. (3) OJ C 328, 26. 10. 1998, p. 86. (4) OJ C 384, 10. 12. 1998, p. 23. (5) OJ C 379, 31. 12. 1994, p. 8. (6) OJ L 320, 30. 12. 1995, p. 14. (7) OJ L 188, 2. 7. 1998, p. 35. (8) OJ L 172, 17. 6. 1998, p. 1. (9) OJ L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 1. (10) OJ L 46, 17. 2. 1997, p. 25. (11) OJ L 144, 15. 5. 1998, p. 1. (12) See Directive 94/57/EC on ship inspection (OJ L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 20). (13) See Directive 95/21/EC on port State control (OJ L 157, 7. 7. 1995, p. 1). C 49/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION The Council’s common position followed the Commission’s proposal in its key elements but tried further to enhance safety, to alleviate the burdens laid upon shipping companies and administrations, and to streamline the Directive with other Community and IMO instruments. The common position provides for the following: (a) Extensive verifications and surveys of the vessels before and during operation The Member States to or from whose port a ro-ro ferry or a high-speed passenger craft is engaged on a regular service of more than 20 miles (host States) will: — prior to operation: — subject these ferries or craft an initial verification of their certificates, classification, voyage data recorder and stability (Article 4), — check whether the companies properly manage the ship and are fully willing to cooperate in marine casualty investigations and whether flag States concur with those companies (Article 5 and Annex I), — subject these ships to an ‘initial specific survey’ which will mainly check their compliance with the Convention on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). (Articles 6 and 7, Annexes I and III), — during their operation, subject the ships to annual ‘regular specific surveys’ (Article 8 and Annexes I, III and IV). Article 11 contains rules to be obeyed by the administrations undertaking the surveys. The companies will be informed of the outcome of the verifications and surveys (Article 9). Where the standards are not met, the ships will be prevented from operating or be required to correct their deficiencies (Article 10). (b) Involvement of host States in marine casualty investigations (Article 12) The host States will have the right fully to participate in enquiries into accidents affecting regular services serving their ports. This will remedy the present undesirable situation where flag States, who have a virtual monopoly of investigations on maritime accidents, often fail to launch casualty investigations. (c) Technical and organisational requirements and monitoring (Article 13) Member States should operate navigational guidance systems. The Commission will set up a database concerning the ships covered by the Directive in order to monitor the developments in the safety of the vessels surveyed. Companies must have contingency plans for shipboard emergencies. IV. AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT The Council followed the Commission in its proposals to accept or to reject the amendments of the European Parliament: 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/33 1. Amendments by the Parliament, accepted by the Council and the Commission, either in their entirety or in their substance Amendment 1: The purpose of the Directive (Article 1); the title The Council accepted the Parliaments’ amendment aiming at replacing ‘conditions for the safe operation. ’ by ‘mandatory surveys. ’. The Council felt that this change more precisely reflects the main contents of the Directive; moreover, the Council eliminated the word ‘conditions’ that could imply that shipping companies need to obtain a licence as a requirement for their operation. The Parliament’s proposal of aiming at an ‘uniform level of safety’ was not incorporated at the Directive only lays down minimum requirements that the shipping companies are free to exceed. The Council reformulated the title Parliament. in accordance with the modification by Amendment 2: Definition of ‘a passenger’ (Article 2(c) of the common position) The Council accepted the inclusion of the definition of ‘a passenger’. However, for the sake of consistency, it was decided to adhere to the definition in the SOLAS Convention taken over in Directive 98/18/EC, which does not count children under one year of age as passengers. Amendments 3 and 4: Services from and to the same port (Article 2(f) of the common position) The Council agreed to extend the Directive to services to and from the same port. For the sake of conciseness, this was done by adding the words ‘or a series of voyages from and to the same port without intermediate calls’ to the opening sentence of the definition of ‘a regular service’ (Article 2(e)). Amendment 5: Definition of host State (Article 2(k) of the common position) The substitution of ‘ports’ with ‘port(s)’ was accepted, as this was also in line with the above amendment concerning the inclusion of services from and to the same port. Amendment 9: Concurrence of flag States (Article 6(3) of the proposal; Article 5(2)of the common position) The Council agreed to delete Article 6(3) of the proposal in order not to burden the companies with the obligation to provide evidence that the flag administrations at their ships comply with the Directive. However, as the collaboration of the flag States was considered to be very important, especially in conducting investigations on marine casualties involving third-country vessels, the Council established a new text which burden the host State, and not the company, with the task of checking whether third-country flag States concur with the commitments undertaken by that company. The Council also specified, in the 14th recital, what kind of concurrence is expected from the flag States. Amendment 10: Time limit for surveys (Article 8(3) of the proposal, Article 6(2) of the common position) The amendment on setting a time limit of one month for completing the initial survey was accepted. Rather than amending Article 11(5), the Council incorporated this idea in a new Article 6(2). C 49/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 Amendment 11: Informing the flag State (Article 8(4) of the proposal; Article 11(2) in fine of the common position) The Council accepted that key findings from the surveys be communicated to the flag State. However, in order not unduly to burden the administrations, only deficiencies discovered are to be reported. Amendment 12: Charging the costs of surveys (Article 8(3) of the common position) The principle was accepted that companies are charged for the costs of surveys if deficiencies are found, but only during the regular specific surveys. This idea was incorporated in new Article 8(3) while using a wording which is very close to the one in Article 16(1) of Directive 95/21/EC on port State control. Amendment 15: Assessment by the Commission (Article 20 of the common position) The Council agreed to asking for an assessment on the implementation of the Directive and introduced this idea into the new Article 20, while requiring, in order to gain sufficient experience, that the first report be submitted only three years after the implementation of the Directive. The Council also agreed to the establishment of a report concerning progress made in respect of the safety of passenger ships. However, as it is inappropriate to refer to such a report in the framework of this narrower Directive, the Council, the Member States and the Commission will make a public statement to this effect. 2. Amendments by Parliament, not accepted by the Council, nor by the Commission Amendment 6: Amendment of the guidelines for surveys (Article 5(1)(b) of the proposal; Article 4(1)(b) of the common position) The Council could not accept to refer to the survey guidelines of IMO Resolution A. 746(18) as they stand ‘at the time of the survey’, as this would lead to an automatic application of future amendments to that resolution, without any advance approval by the Community. The Council preferred using the amendment procedure in Article 17(d) for that purpose. Amendment 7: Reference to Directive 94/57/EC (Article 5(2)(a) of the proposal, 4(1)(c) of the common position) The Council considered that Directive 94/57/EC is already sufficiently referred to in the definition of ‘a recognised organisation’ in Article 2(n). Amendment 8: Exemption of voyage data recorders on board existing ships (Article 5(2)(b) of the proposal; Article 4(1)(d) of the common position) The Council did not accept that the exemptions from meeting the standards of IMO and IEC, to be given for VDRs on board existing ships, should be limited to a period of five years, as the replacement of VDRs could also involve an undue technical and economic burden on the companies operating the vessels concerned as well as the replacement of other navigational instruments. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/35 Amendment 13: Availability of information (Article 11(1) of the proposal, Article 13(3) of the common position) The Council found it inappropriate to make the information about the surveys, contained in the Commission’s database, publicly available without guarantees for their credibility and without safeguards against commercial abuse. This matter will be settled under Article 13(3), which provides that the conditions of access to that database will be decided under the ‘comitology’ procedure. Amendments 16 and 17: Headings in Annex IV (Data to be provided to the Commission) The Council decided to delete Annex IV altogether, as most data contained therein could already be found in existing databases or were not relevant for this Directive, which mainly concerns the survey of the ships. This also applies to the proposed amendments. V. AMENDMENTS BY THE COUNCIL, NOT PROPOSED BY PARLIAMENT Restructuring of the text The Council regrouped the paragraphs in an attempt to improve the logic of the text in accordance with the structure described under III. The Annex to this motivation contains a table of correspondence between the Commission proposal and the common position of the Council. The comments below follow the order of the common position. The recitals The Council completely redrafted the preamble in the light of the amendments to the Commission’s original proposal and, in particular, the modified structure of the text. Texts deleted from the proposal The Council deleted: — Article 4(1) (general requirements to operate), as the reference to ‘a requirement for providing services’ could imply that shipping companies should obtain a licence as a requirement for operation, — Article 10(3) (obligation to provide ships with an identification number), as IMO Resolution A. 600(15) was already mandatory in international trades on ships over 100 GT. However, under Article 13(3) of the common position, the procedure of Article 16 may be used for allocating an identification number to vessels not covered by that resolution, — Article 10(5), as this paragraph merely repeated other parts of the text, — Annex IV (information to be provided to the Commission) for the reasons explained under IV, amendments 16/17 above and Article 13(3) below. Article 2(h) of the common position (proposal Article 2(g)): definition of ‘certificates’ The Council divided this definition into two parts in order to make it clear that the 1974 SOLAS Convention is applicable to international voyages and Directive 98/18/EC to domestic voyages. C 49/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 Articles 4(1)(e) and 4(2) of the common position (proposal Article 5(3)): regional stability requirements The Council indicated that the regional agreements on the stability of vessels, such as the agreement of Stockholm of 28 February 1996 on stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships, should only apply as far as they have been transposed into the legislation of a host State and approved under the procedure of Directive 98/34/EC. Article 4(2) was inserted because the Stockholm Agreement does only apply to high-speed craft that have ro-ro characteristics. Article 5(1)(b) (Commission proposal Article 6(2)): cooperation of companies in accident investigations The Council chose a more positive wording. Articles 7(2) and 7(3) (new): dispensation from initial surveys in case of transfer to similar services or of urgent replacement ships These texts were inserted in order to avoid a repetition of surveys where a ship is transferred to a similar route and to ensure the continuity of a service where a vessel is introduced to cover an acute shortage of capacity. In the latter case, however, full verifications have to be carried out within a period of one month. Article 8(1) of the common position (Article 7(4) of the proposal): annual specific surveys The Council attempted better to specify the differences between the specific surveys in a port and the specific surveys during operation. The Council also dropped the idea of the Commission proposal that the surveys should be ‘unscheduled’. Article 8(2) of the common position (Article 7(3) of the proposal): specific surveys following major changes to the ship or the management The Council added the second sentence which provides for possible dispensation from specific surveys in case of change in management, flag or class. Article 10(1) of the common position (Article 4(3) of the proposal): prevention to operate before entry into service In points (b) and (c) (indents 3 and 4 of the proposal), the Council added that, in order to justify prevention of operation, the deficiencies found should ‘pose an immediate danger to life, the vessel or its crew and passengers’. This idea was copied from Article 9(2) of Directive 95/21/EC on port State control. The condition in the third indent, that the prevention from operation should last until removal of the deficiencies, was placed as a common denominator at the end of the paragraph. Article 10(3) of the common position (Article 4(4) of the proposal): the right of appeal With a view to uniformising Community legislation, the Council replaced the proposed text by another one, very similar to Article 10 of Directive 95/21/EC, while adding the requirement of an expeditious handling of the appeal. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/37 Article 10(4) (new): time limit for adoption of a decision preventing operation This text was inserted in order to expedite proceedings. Article 11(2) (Commission proposal Article 8(1)): teams of qualified inspectors The Council limited the intervention of recognised organisations (classification societies) to the assessment of the fulfilment of class-related provisions. The fourth sentence of the proposal was deleted as its contents appears elsewhere. The last sentence corresponds to amendment 11 of the European Parliament. Article 11(3) (new): possibility for one involved host State to carry out surveys at the request of another involved Hoste State This possibility was introduced in order to save coasts and to speed up the execution of the surveys. Article 11(5) (proposal Article 8(3)): surveys to take account of the operational and maintenance schedule of the ship This requirement, which in the Commission proposal concerned initial surveys only, was extended to cover regular specific surveys as well. Article 11(8) (proposal Article 8(5), second subparagraph): settling disputes among host States For the sake of speed, the Council deleted the one-month moratorium before the Commission may undertake action. Article 12(1) and new Article 12(2): (proposal Article 9(1)): powers to intervene in accident investigations This paragraph was taken from Directive 94/56/EC on the investigation of civil aviation accidents and incidents. The Council amended and completed the test in order to let the IMO Code for the investigation of maritime casualties decide who will conduct the investigation (i. e. usually the flag State). Article 12(3) (new): launching of the accident investigation procedure This text was inserted in order to expedite the initiation of investigations and to avoid that important evidence would be lost pending the designation of the lead investigating State. Article 12(5) (proposal Article 9(3): publicity The Council specified that the reports resulting from investigations should be made public in accordance with the Code for the investigation of marine casualties. Article 13(2) (Commission proposal Article 10(2): navigational systems The Council modified the text in order not to make the establishment of navigational systems mandatory. On the other hand, the text now indicates that where they exist, these systems have to be operated in accordance with the relevant resolution of IMO. C 49/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 Article 13(3) (Commission proposal Article 10(4), Article 11(1) and Annex 4): information of the Commission and database In order to avoid overburdening the national administrations with the transmission of unmanageable masses of data, and since many data are already available at Sirenac, the Council reduced the duties of notification provided for in Article 10(4) to the provision of copies of surveys reports and deleted Annex 4. The Commission will set up its database on that basis. Article 14 (Commission proposal Article 4(5): cooperation among Member States The cooperation among Member States was placed in a general article, so as to widen the scope of that cooperation. Article 16 (proposal Article 12): ‘comitology’ For the sake of clarity, the Council explicitly wrote down in the procedure to be followed. Article 17 (proposal Article 13): amendment procedure The Council specified that only the more technical sections of the Directive, i. e. the Annexes, the definitions, the references to Community instruments and IMO resolutions may be amended in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 12. In compliance with the merely implementing nature of the ‘comitology’, it was further stipulated that the amendments may not broaden the scope of the Directive. Article 19 (proposal Article 15): date of application In order to avoid the repetition of difficulties whereby delays in the adoption procedure necessitated a revision of the date of implementation, the Council replaced the fixed transposition date by a footnote indicating that upon publication, a fixed date will be inserted into Article 19, which will be 18 months after entry into force of the Directive. Annex I: specific requirements for companies The Council made some minor changes in paragraph 3. In paragraph 7, the number of MSC Resolution. (70) will be filled in when that resolution is adopted. Annex II: Community instruments giving rise to prevention of operation The Council clarified that only certain parts of the Directive on training of seafarers are relevant for the purposes of this Directive. Annex III: procedures for surveys The Council changed the word ‘guidelines’ in the title to ‘procedures’ since, under Articles 6 and 8, Annex III is mandatory for ordinary surveys and non-mandatory for in-service surveys. All references to ‘initial’ specific surveys were deleted, as the provisions of the Annex are equally applicable to both initial specific surveys and regular specific surveys. The checking of the inventory of lifeboats (penultimate indent of 1), was modified to the checking that the lifeboats correspond to the inventory. 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/39 The checking of the ship’s hull, machinery etc. (last subparagraph of paragraph 2 of the Commission proposal) was removed as it duplicated Article 4(1)(c). In paragraph 3 (previous paragraph 2, second part), ‘safe manning’ and ‘assessment of fatigue’ were deleted. In paragraph 4, the Council replaced the reference to Directive 94/58/EC by a reference to Regulation I/10 of revised STCW, since this Directive does not apply to ships flying the flag of a third country. Paragraph 4 of the Commission proposal was deleted as it repeated Article 5(r). Annex IV (Annex V of the proposal): surveys during crossings In de title, ‘guidelines’ was changed to ‘indicative guidelines’ in order to correspond to Article 8(1), which indicates that the inspector can exercise his professional judgement when selecting the items for inspection. It was also added that Annex IV only applies to surveys during a crossing. Annex V (proposal Annex VI): criteria for the inspectors At the end of paragraph 5, the Council replaced ‘for that purpose’ by ‘for that ro-ro ferry of passenger craft’, so as to forbid inspectors to inspect a vessel in whose classification or certification he is involved, while enabling them to inspect other ships. This amendment aimed at not compromising the implementation of the Directive owing to the lack of qualified inspectors. The Council added a new paragraph 6 which is inspired by Annex VII, paragraph 5 of Directive 95/21/EC and which aims at protecting the vested rights of inspectors employed by the relevant authorities at the date of adoption of Directive 95/21/EC. C 49/40 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22. 2. 1999 TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE Commission proposal Common position Article 1 2 3 4(1) 4(2) 4(3)(1) (2) (3) (4) 4(4) — 4(5) 5(1)(a) 5(1)(b) 5(2)(a) 5(2)(b) 5(3) 6(1) 6(2) 6(3) 7(1) 7(2)(1) — 7(2)(2) — — 7(3) 7(4) — 7(5) 8(1) — 8(2) 8(3) 8(4) 8(5)(1) (2) 8(6) 9(1) — — 9(2) 9(3) 10(1) Article 1 2 3 deleted 9 and 10(1) 10(1)(a) (d) (b) (c) 10(3) 10(4) new text 14 4(1)(a) 4(1)(b) 4(1)(c) 4(1)(d) 4(1)(e) and 4(2) 5(1)(a) 5(1)(b) 5(2) 6(1) 4(1), opening sentence 5, opening sentence 6(1), first part 6(2) 7(1) 7(2) (new text) 7(3) (new text) 8(2) 8(1) 8(3) (new text) 11(1) 11(2) 11(3) (new text) 11(4) 11(5) 11(6) 11(7) 11(8) 10(2) 12(1) 12(2) (new text) 12(3) (new text) 12(4) 12(5) 13(1) 22. 2. 1999 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 49/41 Commission proposal Common position 10(2) 10(3) 10(4) 10(5) 10(6) 10(7) 11(1) 11(2) 12 13 14 15 — 16 17 Annex I Annex II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI 13(2) deleted 13(3) deleted 13(6) 13(7) 13(3) 15 16 17 18 19 20 (new text) 21 22 Annex I Annex II Annex III deleted Annex IV Annex V


title: 1999/40/CE: Decisión de la Comisión de 21 de diciembre de 1998 que deroga la Decisión 96/276/CE por la que se establecen ciertas medidas de protección respecto de los moluscos bivalvos originarios de Túnez [notificada con el número C(1998) 4340] (Texto pertinente a los fines del EEE)

eurovoc_concepts:
Tunisia
health risk
import restriction
mollusc
toxic substance
veterinary inspection

formats: html pdf print

text: L 11/48 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 16. 1. 1999 DECISI(cid:222)N DE LA COMISI(cid:222)N de 21 de diciembre de 1998 que deroga la Decisi(cid:155)n 96/276/CE por la que se establecen ciertas medidas de protecci(cid:155)n respecto de los moluscos bivalvos originarios de T(cid:156)nez [notificada con el n(cid:156)mero C(1998) 4340] (Texto pertinente a los fines del EEE) (1999/40/CE) LA COMISI(cid:222)N DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Vista la Directiva 90/675/CEE del Consejo, de 10 de diciembre de 1990, por la que se establecen los principios relativos a la organizaci(cid:155)n de controles veterinarios de los productos que se introduzcan en la Comunidad proce- dentes de pa(cid:146)ses terceros (1), cuya (cid:156)ltima modificaci(cid:155)n la constituye la Directiva 96/43/CE (2), y en particular, su art(cid:146)culo 19, Considerando que, a causa de la presencia de toxinas diarreicas en los moluscos bivalvos originarios de T(cid:156)nez en el momento de su importaci(cid:155)n en la Comunidad, la Comisi(cid:155)n adopt(cid:155) la Decisi(cid:155)n 96/276/CE (3) por la que se establecen ciertas medidas de protecci(cid:155)n respecto de los moluscos bivalvos originarios de T(cid:156)nez; Considerando que una delegaci(cid:155)n de expertos de la Comisi(cid:155)n se desplaz(cid:155) a T(cid:156)nez para valorar las medidas de protecci(cid:155)n puestas en marcha por las autoridades tune- cinas; Considerando que estas medidas de protecci(cid:155)n y las garant(cid:146)as sanitarias presentadas por las autoridades tune- cinas son suficientes para que se puedan reanudar las importaciones de moluscos bivalvos de T(cid:156)nez; Considerando que la Decisi(cid:155)n 98/569/CE de la Comi- si(cid:155)n (4) establece las condiciones aplicables a las importa- ciones de moluscos bivalvos, equinodermos, tun(cid:146)cados y gaster(cid:155)podos marinos vivos originarios de T(cid:156)nez; Considerando que, en consecuencia, es oportuno derogar la Decisi(cid:155)n 96/276/CEE; Considerando que las medidas previstas en la presente Decisi(cid:155)n se ajustan al dictamen del Comit(cid:130) veterinario permanente, HA ADOPTADO LA PRESENTE DECISI(cid:222)N: Art(cid:146)culo 1 Queda derogada la Decisi(cid:155)n 92/276/CE. Art(cid:146)culo 2 Los Estados miembros modificar(cid:145)n las medidas que aplican a las importaciones para adecuarlas a la presente Decisi(cid:155)n, de lo cual informar(cid:145)n a la Comisi(cid:155)n. Art(cid:146)culo 3 Los destinatarios de la presente Decisi(cid:155)n ser(cid:145)n los Estados miembros. Hecho en Bruselas, el 21 de diciembre de 1998. Por la Comisi(cid:155)n Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisi(cid:155)n (1) DO L 373 de 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. (2) DO L 162 de 1. 7. 1996, p. 1. (3) DO L 103 de 26. 4. 1996, p. 56. (4) DO L 277 de 14. 10. 1998, p. 31


title: Komission asetus (EY) N:o 2776/98, annettu 21 päivänä joulukuuta 1998, hedelmä- ja vihannesalan vientitukien vahvistamisesta

eurovoc_concepts:
export licence
export refund
food aid
fruit
vegetable

formats: pdf print

text: L 346/44 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 22. 12. 98 KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 2776/98, annettu 21 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) joulukuuta 1998, hedelm(cid:132)- ja vihannesalan vientitukien vahvistamisesta EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:153)JEN KOMISSIO, joka kaupan hinnat ottaen huomioon mainitun kohdan toisessa alakohdassa tarkoitetut hintano- teeraukset ja hinnat, on vahvistettava ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopi- muksen, ottaa huomioon hedelm(cid:132)- ja vihannesalan yhteisest(cid:132) markkinaj(cid:132)rjestelyst(cid:132) 28 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1996 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 (1), sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna komission asetuksella (EY) N:o 2520/ 97 (2), ja erityisesti sen 35 artiklan 11 kohdan, sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) komission asetuksessa (EY) N:o 2190/96 (3), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 1287/98 (4), annetaan hedelm(cid:132)- ja vihannesalan vientitu- kien soveltamista koskevat yksityiskohtaiset s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)t, asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 35 artiklan 1 kohdan mukai- sesti taloudellisesti merkitt(cid:132)v(cid:132)n viennin mahdollistami- seksi mainitussa tarkoitettujen tuotteiden kansainv(cid:132)lisen kaupan hintojen ja n(cid:132)iden tuotteiden yhteis(cid:148)n hintojen v(cid:132)linen erotus voidaan kattaa vienti- tuella, artiklassa asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 35 artiklan 4 kohdan mukai- tuet on vahvistettava ottaen huomioon toisaalta sesti yhteis(cid:148)n markkinoiden vihannesten hintojen ja saatavuuden ja toisaalta kansainv(cid:132)lisen kaupan hintojen tilanne tai kehitysn(cid:132)kym(cid:132)t; olisi my(cid:148)s otettava huomioon mainitun kohdan b alakohdassa tarkoitetut sek(cid:132) suunnitellun viennin taloudellinen kustannukset n(cid:132)k(cid:148)kulma, hedelmien ja asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 35 artiklan 1 kohdan mukai- sesti tuet on vahvistettava ottaen huomioon perustamisso- pimuksen 228 artiklan mukaisesti tehdyist(cid:132) sopimuksista johtuvat rajat, asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 35 artiklan 5 kohdan mukai- sesti yhteis(cid:148)n markkinoiden hinnat vahvistetaan ottaen huomioon viennille edullisimmat hinnat; kansainv(cid:132)lisen kansainv(cid:132)lisen kaupan tilanne tai tiettyjen markkinoiden erityiset vaatimukset voivat edellytt(cid:132)(cid:132) tiettyjen tuotteiden vientituen eriytt(cid:132)mist(cid:132) niiden m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikan mukaan, yhteisi(cid:132) laatuvaatimuksia koskeviin luokkiin ekstra, I ja II kuuluvia tomaatteja, sitruunoita, appelsiineja ja omenoita sek(cid:132) kuorittuja manteleita, hasselp(cid:132)hkin(cid:148)it(cid:132) ja kuorellisia saksanp(cid:132)hkin(cid:148)it(cid:132) voidaan t(cid:132)ll(cid:132) hetkell(cid:132) vied(cid:132) taloudelli- sesti merkitt(cid:132)vi(cid:132) m(cid:132)(cid:132)ri(cid:132), edell(cid:132) mainittujen yksityiskohtaisten s(cid:132)(cid:132)nt(cid:148)jen soveltami- sesta markkinoiden nykytilanteeseen tai niiden kehitysn(cid:132)- kymiin ja erityisesti hedelmien ja vihannesten hintanotee- ja kansainv(cid:132)lisess(cid:132) rauksiin ja hintoihin yhteis(cid:148)ss(cid:132) kaupassa t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n seuraa, ett(cid:132) asetuksen liitteen mukaisesti, tuet olisi vahvistettava asetuksen (EY) N:o 2200/96 35 artiklan 2 kohdan s(cid:132)(cid:132)n- n(cid:148)sten mukaisesti olisi sallittava k(cid:132)ytett(cid:132)viss(cid:132) olevien varojen mahdollisimman tehokas k(cid:132)ytt(cid:148) v(cid:132)ltt(cid:132)en kyseisten toimijoiden v(cid:132)linen syrjint(cid:132); t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n vuoksi olisi huolehdit- tava siit(cid:132), ett(cid:132) tukij(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)st(cid:132) aiemmin seuranneet kauppavirrat eiv(cid:132)t h(cid:132)iriintyisi; n(cid:132)ist(cid:132) syist(cid:132) sek(cid:132) hedel- mien ja vihannesten viennin kausiluonteisuuden vuoksi olisi vahvistettava kiinti(cid:148)t tuotteittain, komission asetuksella (ETY) N:o 3846/87 (5), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 2580/98 (6), vahvistetaan maataloustuotteiden nimikkeist(cid:148) vientitukien osalta, komission asetuksessa (ETY) N:o 3719/88 (7), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna asetuksella (EY) N:o 1044/98 (8), vahvistetaan maataloustuotteiden tuonti-, vienti- ja ennakkovahvistustodistusten j(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132)n sovel- tamista koskevat yhteiset yksityiskohtaiset s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)t, (1) EYVL L 297, 21. 11. 1996, s. 1 (2) EYVL L 346, 17. 12. 1997, s. 41 (3) EYVL L 292, 15. 11. 1996, s. 12 (4) EYVL L 178, 23. 6. 1998, s. 11 (5) EYVL L 366, 24. 12. 1987, s. 1 (6) EYVL L 322, 1. 12. 1998, s. 31 (7) EYVL L 331, 2. 12. 1988, s. 1 (8) EYVL L 149, 20. 5. 1998, s. 11 22. 12. 98 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 346/45 tilanteen vuoksi ja k(cid:132)ytett(cid:132)viss(cid:132) olevien varojen mahdolli- simman tehokkaan k(cid:132)yt(cid:148)n mahdollistamiseksi olisi yhteis(cid:148)n viennin rakenne huomioon ottaen valittava tarkoituksenmukaisin vientitukij(cid:132)rjestelm(cid:132) tietyille tuot- teille ja tiettyihin m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikkoihin, ja t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n vuoksi vien- titukia ei pit(cid:132)isi vahvistaa samanaikaisesti hedelm(cid:132)- ja vihannesalan vientitukien soveltamista koskevista yksityis- kohtaisista s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ist(cid:132) annetun asetuksen (EY) N:o 2190/ 96 1 artiklassa tarkoitettujen A1- ja A2-menettelyjen mukaisesti kyseisen vientikauden osalta; A2-menettelyss(cid:132) olisi lis(cid:132)ksi erotettava l(cid:132)hell(cid:132) ja kauempana olevat m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)- paikat, eri tuotteiden osalta s(cid:132)(cid:132)detyt m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t on syyt(cid:132) jakaa eri erityisesti vientitukij(cid:132)rjestelmien mukaisesti huomioon tuotteiden pilaantuvuus, on syyt(cid:132) ottaa huomioon A2-menettelyn osalta edellisell(cid:132) todistushakemuskaudella vahvistetut lopulliset m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t, tietyist(cid:132) euron k(cid:132)ytt(cid:148)(cid:148)n ottamiseen liittyvist(cid:132) s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ksist(cid:132) 17 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) kes(cid:132)kuuta 1997 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1103/97 (1) 2 artiklassa s(cid:132)(cid:132)det(cid:132)(cid:132)n, ett(cid:132) 1 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999 alkaen oikeudellisissa asiakirjoissa esiintyv(cid:132)t viittaukset ecuun korvataan viittauksella euroon siten, ett(cid:132) 1 ECU = 1 EUR; selkeyden vuoksi on syyt(cid:132) ottaen k(cid:132)ytt(cid:132)(cid:132) ilmaisua ”euro” t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) asetuksessa, koska sit(cid:132) sovel- letaan 8 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)st(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999, ja t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) asetuksessa s(cid:132)(cid:132)detyt toimenpiteet ovat hedelmien ja vihannesten hallintokomitean lausunnon mukaiset, ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla 1. Hedelm(cid:132)- t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n asetuksen liitteess(cid:132). ja vihannesalan vientituet vahvistetaan 2. Asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3719/88 14 a artiklassa tarkoi- tettuja elintarvikeavun yhteydess(cid:132) annettuja todistuksia ei lueta 1 kohdassa tarkoitettuihin oikeutettuihin m(cid:132)(cid:132)riin. 3. A1- ja A2-todistusten voimassaoloaika on kaksi kuukautta, sanotun kuitenkaan rajoittamatta asetuksen (EY) N:o 2190/96 4 artiklan 5 kohdan s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten sovelta- mista. 2 artikla T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan 8 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) tammikuuta 1999. T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, j(cid:132)senvaltioissa. ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 21 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) joulukuuta 1998. Komission puolesta Franz FISCHLER Komission j(cid:132)sen (1) EYVL L 162, 19. 6. 1997, s. 1 L 346/46 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 22. 12. 98 LIITE VIENTITUET HEDELM(cid:142)- JA VIHANNESALALLA Tuote (Tukeen oikeutettujen tuotteiden t(cid:132)ydelliset m(cid:132)(cid:132)ritelm(cid:132)t esitet(cid:132)(cid:132)n komission asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3846/87, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna, osassa ”hedelm(cid:132)t ja vihannekset”) Tuote- koodi M(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikka tai m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)- paikkaryhm(cid:132) (1) Tomaatit 0702 00 00 9100 Kuorettomat mantelit 0802 12 90 9000 Kuorelliset hasselp(cid:132)hkin(cid:132)t Kuorettomat hasselp(cid:132)hkin(cid:132)t Kuorelliset saksanp(cid:132)hkin(cid:132)t Appelsiinit Sitruunat Omenat 0802 21 00 9000 0802 22 00 9000 0802 31 00 9000 0805 10 10 9100 0805 10 30 9100 0805 10 50 9100 0805 30 10 9100 0808 10 20 9100 0808 10 50 9100 0808 10 90 9100 0808 10 20 9100 0808 10 50 9100 0808 10 90 9100 F F F F F XYC F XY ZD Menettely Todistusten hakuajanjakso A1 8. 1. 1999–9. 3. 1999 A2 11. –13. 1. 1999 B 15. 1. –16. 3. 1999 Tuen m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132) (EUR/netto- tonni) Arvioidut m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t (tonneina) Tuen ohjeelliset m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t (EUR/netto- tonni) Arvioidut m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t (tonneina) Tuen ohjeelliset m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t (EUR/netto- tonni) 20 50 59 285 12 20 2 815 20 50 59 Arvioidut m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)t (tonneina) 4 432 237 0 114 1 107 114 1 428 73 50 35 40 54 36 3 050 50 35 40 49 635 18 539 8 387 50 35 40 54 103 514 17 548 7 370 3 136 (1) M(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikkakoodit ovat seuraavat: X: Norja, Islanti, Gr(cid:148)nlanti, F(cid:132)rsaaret, Puola, Unkari, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Viro, Latvia, Liettua, Bosnia ja Hertsegovina, Kroatia, Slovenia, entinen Jugoslavian tasavalta Makedonia, Jugoslavian liittotasavalta (Serbia, Montenegro) ja Malta. Y: Armenia, Azerbaid(cid:243)an, Valko-Ven(cid:132)j(cid:132), Georgia, Kazakstan, Kirgisia, Moldova, Ven(cid:132)j(cid:132), Tad(cid:243)ikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Ukraina, komission asetuksen (ETY) N:o 3665/87, sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna, 34 artiklassa tarkoitetut m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikat. Z: Afrikan valtiot ja alueet lukuun ottamatta Etel(cid:132)-Afrikkaa, Arabian niemimaan valtiot (Saudi-Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Arabiemiirikunnat [Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharja, Ajman, Umm al Qaiwain, Ras al Khaima ja Fujaira], Kuwait ja Jemen), Syyria, Iran ja Jordania, Bolivia, Brasilia, Venezuela, Peru, Panama, Ecuador ja Kolumbia. C: Sveitsi, T(cid:228)ekki, Slovakia. D: Hongkong EHA, Singapore, Malesia, Indonesia, Thaimaa, Taiwan, Papua-Uusi-Guinea, Laos, Kambod(cid:243)a, Vietnam, Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentiina, Meksiko ja Costa Rica. E: Kaikki m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikat Sveitsi(cid:132) lukuun ottamatta. F: Kaikki m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)paikat


title: 1999/40/CE: Décision de la Commission du 21 décembre 1998 abrogeant la décision 96/276/CE relative à certaines mesures de protection à l'égard des mollusques bivalves originaires de Tunisie [notifiée sous le numéro C(1998) 4340] (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

text: L 11/48 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 16. 1. 1999 D(cid:144)CISION DE LA COMMISSION du 21 d(cid:130)cembre 1998 abrogeant la d(cid:130)cision 96/276/CE relative (cid:133) certaines mesures de protection (cid:133) l’(cid:130)gard des mollusques bivalves originaires de Tunisie [notifi(cid:130)e sous le num(cid:130)ro C(1998) 4340] (Texte pr(cid:130)sentant de l’int(cid:130)r(cid:136)t pour l’EEE) (1999/40/CE) LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUT(cid:144)S EUROP(cid:144)ENNES, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, vu la directive 90/675/CEE du Conseil du 10 d(cid:130)cembre les principes relatifs (cid:133) l’organisation des 1990 fixant contr(cid:147)les v(cid:130)t(cid:130)rinaires pour les produits en provenance des pays tiers introduits dans la Communaut(cid:130) (1), modifi(cid:130)e en dernier lieu par la directive 96/43/CE (2) et notamment son article 19, consid(cid:130)rant que suite (cid:133) la pr(cid:130)sence de toxine diarrh(cid:130)ique dans des mollusques bivalves originaires de Tunisie lors de leur importation dans la Communaut(cid:130), la Commission a arr(cid:136)t(cid:130) la d(cid:130)cision 96/276/CE relative (cid:133) certaines mesures de protection (cid:133) l’(cid:130)gard des mollusques bivalves originaires de Tunisie (3); consid(cid:130)rant qu’une mission d’experts de la Commission s’est rendue en Tunisie pour (cid:130)valuer les mesures de protection mises en place par les autorit(cid:130)s tunisiennes; consid(cid:130)rant que ces mesures de protection et les garanties sanitaires pr(cid:130)sent(cid:130)es par les autorit(cid:130)s tunisiennes sont suffisantes pour permettre de reprendre les importations de mollusques bivalves de Tunisie; consid(cid:130)rant que la d(cid:130)cision 98/569/CE de la Commis- sion (4) fixe les conditions particuli(cid:138)res d’importations de mollusques bivales, (cid:130)chinodermes, tuniciers et gast(cid:130)ro- podes marins vivants originaires de Tunisie; consid(cid:130)rant que d(cid:138)s lors il convient d’abroger la d(cid:130)cision 96/276/CE; consid(cid:130)rant que les mesures pr(cid:130)vues par la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)ci- sion sont conformes (cid:133) l’avis du comit(cid:130) v(cid:130)t(cid:130)rinaire perma- nent, A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LA PR(cid:144)SENTE D(cid:144)CISION: Article premier La d(cid:130)cision 96/276/CE est abrog(cid:130)e. Article 2 Les (cid:144)tats membres modifient les mesures qu’ils ap- pliquent aux importations pour les rendre conformes (cid:133) la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Ils en informent la Commission. Article 3 Les (cid:144)tats membres sont destinataires de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)ci- sion. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 21 d(cid:130)cembre 1998. Par la Commission Franz FISCHLER Membre de la Commission (1) JO L 373 du 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. (2) JO L 162 du 1. 7. 1996, p. 1. (3) JO L 103 du 26. 4. 1996, p. 56. (4) JO L 277 du 14. 10. 1998, p. 31