title: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2362/98 of 28 October 1998 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 regarding imports of bananas into the Community (Text with EEA relevance)

eurovoc_concepts:
import
import licence
import policy
tariff quota
tropical fruit

text: L 293/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2362/98 of 28 October 1998 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 regarding imports of bananas into the Community (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, supply during the years 1994, 1995 and 1996 — these being the latest three-year period for which the Community holds firm data; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1637/98 (2), and in particular Article 20 thereof, (1) Whereas by Regulation (EC) No 1637/98 the Council amended the rules for the import of bananas introduced by Title IV of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93; whereas, in particular, that Regulation opened an autonomous tariff quota of 353 000 tonnes at ECU 75/tonne customs duty in addition to the 2 200 000 tonnes secured under the World Trade Organisation, and abolished the operator categories defined in Article 19 in its original form; whereas all the provisions necessary to implement those rules should be adopted, including such transitional measures as are justified by the speedy entry into force of this Regulation, as well as provi- sions concerning imports at the common customs tariff rate; if (2) Whereas Article 18(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/ 93 stipulates that there is no possibility of securing the agreement of producer third countries with a substantial interest in the supply of bananas to the Community for the purposes of allocating tariff quotas and, where necessary, the traditional ACP quantity — hereinafter called ‘traditional ACP bananas' — the Commission should be authorised to carry out that allocation using a single criterion; whereas the Commission’s negotiations with third countries having a substantial interest in the supply of bananas to the Community in accordance with the Council’s mandate have not achieved an agree- ment on the allocation of the tariff quotas; whereas the Commission is therefore obliged to allocate the tariff quotas on the basis of a single objective criterion, namely the exports to the Community by third countries having a substantial interest in that (1) OJ L 47, 25. 2. 1993, p. 1. (2) OJ L 210, 28. 7. 1998, p. 28. (3) Whereas Article 19 of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 provides that tariff quotas for third-country bananas and imports of traditional ACP bananas are to be managed in accordance with the method based on trade flows (‘tradi- taking account of traditional tionals/newcomers'); whereas, however, where necessary other suitable methods may be adopted; whereas, for the purpose of implementing the new arrangements in 1999, it is advisable, in the light of available knowledge on the de facto patterns of importation, to determine the rights of traditional operators in accordance with their actual imports during the three-year period 1994 to 1996; whereas the choice of that reference period is in keeping with the general consensus within the Council; (4) Whereas actual imports should be ascertained on the basis of the documents used for placing bananas in free circulation, namely import licences and the appropriate customs documents; whereas, however, in the case of the new Member States those operations must be established on the basis of the administrative documents valid prior to accession and, for the first three quarters of 1995, by means of the authorisations issued under the transitional measures in force during that period; whereas, in view of the large number of informal communications and transfers of import docu- ments against payment which occurred during the final period of application of the initial arrange- ments established by Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, actual imports can justifiably be based on proof of payment of the customs duties applicable at the time at which the goods were imported; (5) Whereas common administration of the tariff quotas and traditional ACP bananas seems likely to favour an increase in international trade and smoother trade flows and avoid unjustified distinc- tions; whereas, therefore, ‘traditional operators' and 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/33 ‘newcomers' should be defined according to the single criteria regardless of the third country or ACP country from which they are importing; whereas the rights of ‘traditional operators' should imports be determined on the basis of actual regardless of origin and supply source and should allow imports to be made from any origin; whereas that approach should be reflected in the method of administering imports by period without differen- tiation according to their different origins; (6) Whereas a share of the tariff quotas and traditional ACP bananas must be reserved for ‘newcomers'; whereas that overall allocation should be sufficient to allow operators to participate in that import trade and encourage healthy competition; (7) Whereas the distribution of available quantities between ‘traditional operators' and ‘newcomers' is likely to undergo adjustments in future, to take account of changes in the number of operators in the two groups, their imports and the number of newcomers qualifying for re-classification as tradi- tional operators as a result of their import activities; whereas adjustment should also be possible where necessary to permit satisfactory use of the quant- ities available during a given year; (8) Whereas experience from several years of applying the Community banana import arrangements indi- cates the need to tighten the eligibility criteria for new operators so as to avoid the registration of purely fictitious agents and the grant of allocations in response to artificial or speculative applications; whereas, in particular, it is justifiable to demand a minimum of experience in importing comparable products — fresh products falling within Chapters 7, 8 and, under certain conditions, 9 of the Combined Nomenclature; whereas, also, to avoid applications for annual allocations which bear little relation to operators’ actual capacities and which will not lead to applications for import licences for the corresponding quantities, submission of an application for an annual allocation should be subject to the requirement that a security in lieu of the import licence security be lodged; whereas that security should be released without delay in stages as operators actually use up their annual alloca- tions; whereas, for the same purpose, the grant of an annual allocation in subsequent years should be made subject to a minimum rate of use of the the previous annual allocation; whereas, conditions under which ‘newcomers' can gain access to the ‘traditional operators' group should be determined; lastly, (9) Whereas operators should be reminded that they may form mergers or groupings on terms and conditions defined in national legislation in order to meet their obligations and exercise the rights arising under this Regulation; and checks (10) Whereas the provisions applying to the registration of operators and the determination of their refer- ence quantities or annual allocations, as the case may be, should be adopted; whereas the verifica- tions to be carried out by the competent national authorities should be specified; whereas, lastly, the action to be taken in the event that certain obligations are not fulfilled, in particu- lar as regards registration and declarations made for the purpose of obtaining reference quantities or allocations under the import arrangements, should also be specified; for importing (11) Whereas, for the purposes of implementing the tariff quota and traditional ACP banana arrange- ments in 1999, the administrative rules based on periods as created by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 of 10 June 1993 laying down detailed rules for the application of the arrange- the ments Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1409/96 (2), should be maintained, with adjust- ments where necessary; whereas those rules relate in particular to fixing the indicative quantities for the first three quarters, the ceilings for individual applications, the frequency for the submission of licence applications and for the issue of licences, and the issue of licences for the re-use of unused quantities; bananas into (12) Whereas, for the application of Article 18(7) and (8) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, there is a need to define the items making up the balance of produc- tion, consumption, imports and exports which has to be established before an increase in the auto- nomous quota can be made in the event of an increase in demand or of exceptional circumstances affecting supplies to the Community market; (13) Whereas, except where derogations are explicitly provided for, Commission Regulation (EEC) No (1) OJ L 142, 12. 6. 1993, p. 6. (2) OJ L 181, 20. 7. 1996, p. 13. L 293/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 3719/88 of 16 November 1988 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance- fixing certificates for agricultural products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1044/98 (2), should apply; whereas, pursuant to Article 9 of that Regulation, rights resulting from licences may be transferred by the holder only once per licence or per extract from a licence during the term of validity thereof; (14) Whereas the conditions for and the effects of trans- ferring licences should be specified in the light of the definition of operator categories established by this Regulation; whereas a transfer restricted to a single transferee per licence or certificate or extract therefrom will allow trade relations to develop between the various registered operators; whereas, however, artificial trade, speculation or disturbance of normal trade should not be encouraged by permitting transfers from ‘newcomers' in favour of ‘traditional operators'; (15) Whereas all the necessary communications between operators, Member States the and Commission in pursuance of this Regulation in particular as regards the should be specified, establishment of operators’ reference quantities and allocations, the administration of tariff quotas and traditional ACP bananas by period and market monitoring; (16) Whereas, under the transitional measures necessit- ated by the application of the new arrangements on 1 January 1999, derogations should be provided for from the timetable for registering operators and from the transmission to the competent national authorities of the documentary evidence needed to establish their rights; whereas, however, applica- tions submitted must contain a list of and precise references for all documentary evidence for the rights claimed; (17) Whereas, further, the quantities which can be imported from the various origins for the first quarter of 1999 under the tariff quotas and as tradi- tional ACP bananas should be determined and the licence applications from ceiling for individual operators and a strict timetable for the submission of those applications should be fixed; (18) Whereas the changes made by this Regulation to the arrangements for the importation of bananas into the Community, and in particular the provi- sions regarding the definition of operators, call for verifications and checks by the competent national in cooperation with the authorities, Commission; whereas such operations can, if need be, reference quantities or annual allocations; whereas it follows inter alia that reference quantities and annual allo- cations may not be regarded as vested rights, nor be pleaded by operators as legitimate expectations; lead to corrections of operators’ acting (19) Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 478/95 of 1 March 1995 on additional rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 as regards the tariff quota imports of arrangements bananas into the Community and amending Regu- lation (EEC) No 1442/93 (3), as amended by Regu- lation (EC) No 702/95 (4), should be repealed; for (20) Whereas Regulation (EC) No 1637/98 applies from 1 January 1999; whereas, in order to enable opera- tors to enjoy the benefit of the provisions set out in that Regulation from that date onwards, transitional measures should be enacted which allow the Member States and the Commission to assemble all the requisite material for ensuring that licences are used from 1 January 1999 onwards; (21) Whereas the Management Committee for Bananas has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: TITLE I Introductory provisions Article 1 This Regulation lays down detailed rules for applying the arrangements for the importation of bananas under the (1) OJ L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1. (2) OJ L 149, 20. 5. 1998, p. 11. (3) OJ L 49, 4. 3. 1995, p. 13. (4) OJ L 71, 31. 3. 1995, p. 84. 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/35 tariff quotas provided for in Article 18(1) and (2) of Regu- lation (EEC) No 404/93 and for the importation of quant- ities of traditional ACP bananas as referred to in Article 16 of that Regulation, and also the arrangements outside those quotas. The tariff quotas shall be divided up among the main supplier countries and other countries as shown in Annex I hereto. bananas on their own account for subsequent marketing in the Community during a set reference period. The minimum quantity referred to in the first paragraph shall be 100 tonnes imported in any one year of the reference period. This minimum quantity shall be 20 tonnes where the imports consist entirely of bananas with a length of 10 centimetres or less. Article 2 Article 4 The tariff quotas and the traditional ACP quantities 1. shall be made available as follows: (a) 92 % to ‘traditional operators' as defined in Article 3; (b) 8 % to ‘newcomers' as defined in Article 7. 2. The distribution given in paragraph 1 may be amended to make better use of the tariff quotas and traditional ACP quantities, in particular in line with changes in the numbers of ‘traditional operators' and ‘newcomers', the volumes of their imports, and the acces- sion of ‘newcomers' to the group of ‘traditional operators' under Article 10 below. 1. Each traditional operator registered in a Member State in accordance with Article 5 shall receive, for each year and for all the origins listed in Annex I, a single reference quantity based on the quantities of bananas actually imported during the reference period. 2. For imports carried out in 1999 under the tariff quotas or as traditional ACP bananas, the reference period shall be made up of the years 1994, 1995 and 1996. Article 5 3. Where the total provisional reference quantities of ‘traditional operators', or the annual allocations requested by ‘newcomers', is less than the total amount allowed for the relevant category of operator, the available quantity may be allotted to the other category. The registration of their 1. traditional operators and the reference quantity shall be determination of conducted on the basis of a written application submitted by operators in any one Member State of their choice. Applications for registration shall be submitted by 1 July. TITLE II The competent authorities in each Member State are listed in Annex II. Administration of tariff quotas and traditional ACP bananas CHAPTER 1 D e f i n i t i o n o f o p e r a t o r s 2. For the purposes of determining their reference quantity, each operator shall send to the competent authority by 1 July each year: (a) a figure for the total quantity of bananas from the origins listed in Annex I actually imported during each of the years making up the reference period; Section I: ‘Traditional operators' (b) the supporting documents detailed in paragraph 3. Article 3 3. Actual following: imports shall be attested by both of the For the purposes of this Regulation, ‘traditional operators' shall mean economic agents established in the European Community during the period for determining their reference quantities, and also at the time of their registra- tion under Article 5 below, who have actually imported a minimum quantity of third-country and/or ACP-country (a) by presenting copies of the import licences used either by the holder or, in the case of a transfer under Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88 duly endorsed by the competent authorities, by the trans- feree, in order to release the relevant quantities for free circulation; and L 293/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 (b) by presenting proof of payment of the customs duties due on the day on which customs import formalities were completed. The payment shall be made either direct to the competent authorities or via a customs agent or representative. Operators furnishing proof of payment of customs duties, either direct to the competent authorities or via a customs agent or representative, for the release into free circulation of a given quantity of bananas without being the holder or transferee holder of the relevant import licence used for this purpose — or, where appropriate, of the proper customs documents and import permits in accordance with paragraph 4 — shall be deemed to have actually imported the said quantity provided that they have regis- tered in a Member State under Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 and/or that they fulfil the requirements of this Regulation for registration as a traditional operator. Customs agents or representatives may not call for the application of this subparagraph. For operators established in Austria, Finland or 4. Sweden, proof of the quantities released into free circula- tion in those Member States in 1994, and in 1995 up to the third quarter thereof, shall be furnished by presenting copies of the relevant customs documents and import permits issued by the competent authorities and duly used. Article 6 By 30 September at the latest each year, after making 1. the competent the necessary checks and verifications, authorities shall determine, in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 5, a single, provisional reference quantity for each traditional operator, on the basis of the average quantities of bananas actually imported by them from the origins listed in Annex I during the reference period. The reference quantities shall be based on a three-year average even where the operator has not imported bananas for part of that period. than 15 October of each year, 2. No later the competent authorities shall notify the Commission of the list of traditional operators they have registered and the total provisional reference quantity determined. The same notification shall contain, for each operator, the quantities their actual banana imports during the reference of licences or period, licence extracts used, and their provisional reference quantity. the serial numbers of the import As and when required, the Commission shall forward those lists to the other Member States with a view to facilitating the detection or prevention of false claims by operators. The Commission may publish any of contained in the notifications from Member States. the details 3. Using the information received under paragraph 2, and in light of the total volume of tariff quotas and traditional ACP bananas as referred to in Article 2, the Commission shall, where appropriate, set a single adjust- ment coefficient to be applied to each operator’s provi- sional reference quantity. 4. The competent authorities shall then determine the reference quantity for each operator, applying if need be the adjustment coefficient calculated under paragraph 3, and shall notify each operator of the reference quantity allocated to him, by 15 November at the latest. Section II: ‘Newcomers' Article 7 the purposes of For this Regulation and as regards imports under the tariff quotas and as traditional ACP bananas, ‘newcomers' shall mean economic agents estab- lished in the European Community who, at the time of registration: (a) have been engaged independently and on their own account in the commercial activity of importing fresh fruit and vegetables falling within Chapters 7 and 8, of the Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature and the Common Customs Tariff, or products under Chapter 9 thereof if they have also imported products falling within Chapters 7 and 8 in one of the three years immediately preceding the year in respect of which registration is sought; and (b) by virtue of this activity, have undertaken imports to a declared customs value of ECU 400 000 or more during the period referred to in point (a). Article 8 1. For the purposes of registering as a newcomer in the Member State of their choice, operators shall send to the relevant competent authority as listed in Annex II the following supporting documents: (a) proof of entry in a commercial register of the Member State or proof of any alternative registration acceptable to the said authorities; referred to in point (b) evidence of having imported the products of the (a) of Article 7, by sector presenting the import licences used or, in cases where such a licence was not compulsory, the relevant customs documents; 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/37 (c) a copy of an attestation from an independent, profes- sionally registered chartered accountant certifying imports to the value required in point (b) of Article 7, or a copy of the corresponding customs declarations stamped by the customs authorities. 2. Applications for registration shall be submitted by 1 July each year. 3. Operators may submit only one application for regis- tration in only one Member State of their choice. 4. In order to have their registration renewed, operators shall provide the competent authorities with proof that they have actually imported on their own account at least 50 % of the quantity allocated to them for the current year. Applications for renewal shall be submitted by 1 October each year and be accompanied by copies of import licences used, proof of payment of the customs duties due on the date of the completion of customs import formal- ities, and a copy of the licence(s) issued for the current quarter. 5. By 10 October each year, the Member States shall notify the Commission of the list of operators who have submitted requests for registration and for renewal of registration, and in the case of the serial numbers of licences or any licence extracts, used and issued. renewals As and when required, the Commission shall forward those lists to the other Member States with a view to facilitating the detection or prevention of false claims by operators. The Commission may publish any of contained in the notifications from Member States. the details The security shall be released in stages, in proportion to the quantities actually imported. 2. By 10 October each year, the competent authorities shall send the Commission a list of the newcomer oper- ators registered, indicating for each one the annual alloca- tion requested. The allocation requests received by the Commission 3. shall be ranked in ascending order of quantity and an annual allocation shall then be determined for each ‘newcomer' operator up to a maximum of the individual quantity requested, arrived at by a process of allocating to all operators the smallest requested quantity remaining in each round. The Commission shall determine without delay the quantities for which annual allocations are granted. If the procedure in the first subparagraph results in an operator’s receiving an annual allocation smaller than the amount requested, the security provided for in paragraph 1 shall be released in proportion to the reduction arrived at. 4. By 15 November each year, the competent author- ities in the Member States shall determine and notify to each newcomer operator the quantity allocated to him for the following year. Article 10 A newcomer operator shall obtain the status of traditional operators on applying for registration in accordance with Article 5, provided that he fulfils the conditions specified in Article 3 after three years of commercial activity following the date of first registration. Article 9 Applications shall be accompanied by the figures and supporting documents referred to in Article 5(2) and (3). 1. At the same time as the operators concerned apply for registration or renewal of their registration, they shall also request their annual quota allocation. To be accepted, such requests: (a) shall not cover a quantity greater than 10 % of the total quantity allocated annually to newcomers; and (b) shall be accompanied by proof that a security of ECU 18 per tonne requested has been lodged in accordance with Title III of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 (1). This security shall be lodged against an applicant’s performance of his obligation to apply for the allocation import granted and actually to import the quantity allocated. licences for the amount of (1) OJ L 205, 3. 8. 1985, p. 5. Article 11 The Member States shall be responsible for ensuring 1. compliance with this Section. In particular, the operators they shall check that concerned are commercially active for their own account as importers into the Community in the sector referred to in Article 7 and as independent economic units in terms of management, staffing and operations. Where there are grounds for suspecting that these conditions are not met, applications for registration and requests for annual al- locations shall be accepted only subject to the operator’s providing evidence of compliance which is considered satisfactory by the national competent authorities. L 293/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 The Member States and the Commission shall 2. exchange all information relevant to the application of this Article. quantities from each of the origins listed in Annex I may be fixed for the purposes of issuing import licences. Section III: Common provisions Article 12 For the first three quarters of the year, it may be 2. decided that applications for licences submitted by a given operator may not in total exceed a set percentage of the reference quantity fixed under Article 6(4) or the annual allocation fixed under Article 9(4). 1. The competent national authorities shall register as traditional operators and newcomers all economic agents who submit an appropriate application, whether physical persons or legal entities, and whether individual agents or groups thereof, provided that they are legally constituted under the national legislation governing the exercise of the commercial activities in question and that they satisfy the provisions of this Regulation. A group of agents may be registered as either a traditional operator or a newcomer if its members jointly meet the requirements of this Regulation. The group shall stand for each of its members in exercising their rights and fulfil- ling their obligations. 2. Operators resulting from a merger of several other operators, each with their own rights under this Regula- tion, shall enjoy the same rights as those former operators. Article 13 1. In the case of both traditional operators and newcomer operators, failure to comply with the obligation to register in only one Member State shall lead to the rejection of all applications for registration that have been submitted and the cancellation, as the case may be, of any reference quantity or of any annual allocation already granted. In addition, such failure shall result in a prohibi- tion on the submission of any further applications in the year following detection of the irregularity. 2. Where fraudulent manipulations are undertaken or fraudulent documentation is supplied with a view to obtaining an unwarranted registration, reference quantity or, where relevant, annual allocation, such registration, reference quantity or allocation shall be cancelled, without prejudice to the application of any relevant national laws. In addition, in such cases the operator shall be prohibited from applying for a new registration in any Member State during the two years following the year in which the irregularity is detected. Article 15 1. For each quarter of the year, applications for import licences shall be submitted to the competent authorities of the Member State in which operators are registered during the first seven days of the month preceding the quarter in respect of which the licences are being issued. 2. Licence applications submitted: (a) by traditional operators the wording ‘Licence application traditional operator — Regula- tion (EC) No 2362/98'; shall bear (b) by newcomer operators the wording ‘Licence application newcomer — Regulation (EC) No 2362/98'. shall bear Licence applications presented by an operator shall 3. only be accepted where: (a) they bear the wording shown in paragraph 2; (b) they indicate, in Box 8, one of the origins listed in Annex I; (c) they cover a quantity no greater than that available for the origin indicated, such quantity being published periodically before the start of the application period; (d) they cover a total quantity no greater than the quan- tity resulting from applying Article 14(2) for the quarter concerned; or no greater than the operator’s remaining reference quantity or annual allocation, as the case may be. 4. Licences shall include: CHAPTER 2 (a) in Box 20, one of the statements shown in paragraph 2, R u l e s f o r i s s u i n g i m p o r t l i c e n c e s Article 14 (b) in Box 8, an indication of the country of origin in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 3. 1. For the first three quarters of the year, an indicative quantity expressed as the same percentage of available Receipt of a licence carries the obligation to import from the origin indicated. 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/39 Article 16 Within two working days following either the closing date for the submission of import licence applications for the first period under Article 15(1) or the closing date fixed under point the competent authorities shall notify the Commission of the quantities covered by licence applications. (a) of Article 18(1), This notification shall present the quantities requested, broken down according to the origins listed in Annex I and as between traditional operators and newcomers. Article 17 Where, for a given quarter and for any one or more of the origins listed in Annex I, the quantities applied for appre- ciably exceed any indicative quantity fixed under Article 14, or exceed the quantities available, a percentage reduc- tion to be applied to the amounts requested shall be fixed. Article 18 1. Where a percentage reduction has been fixed for one or more given origins under Article 17, operators who have applied for the origin(s) concerned may: licences import for (a) either renounce their use of the licence by informing the relevant issuing authority accordingly within 10 working days of publication of the Regulation fixing the reduction percentage, whereupon the security lodged against the licence shall be released imme- diately; or (b) submit one or more fresh licence applications for the origins for which available quantities have been published by the Commission, up to an amount equal to or smaller than the quantity applied for but not covered by the original licence issued. Such requests shall be submitted within the time limit laid down in point (a) and shall be subject to all the conditions governing licence applications. The Commission shall immediately determine the 2. quantities for which licences can be issued for each of the origins concerned. Article 19 The competent 1. import authorities licences for the following quarter not later than the 23rd day of the last month of each quarter. Where that day is not a working day, licences shall be issued no later than the first working day following. issue shall licences shall be issued Where Article 18 is applied, immediately after publication of the Decision referred to in Article 18(2). By way of derogation from Article 21(1) of Regula- 2. tion (EEC) No 3719/88, the term of validity of import licences shall run from the date on which they are actually issued and shall expire on the seventh day of the fourth month following the month in which they are issued. The date of actual issue shall be included in the term of validity of a licence. Licences issued under Article 18 shall have a term of the month validity expiring on the seventh day of following the end of the quarter in which they have been issued. Article 20 1. Unused quantities covered by a given licence shall be re-allocated to the same operator — whether holder or transferee — upon application, for use in a subsequent quarter but still within the year of issue of the original licence. The security shall be retained in proportion to the quantities not used up. 2. Applications for re-allocation shall be submitted within the time limit laid down in Article 15(1) and accompanied by the original or a certified copy of the unused or partly used licence(s), as well as proof that the security referred to in Article 25 has been lodged. for re-allocation and the Applications re-allocation licences themselves shall bear the following wording in Box 20: ‘Re-allocation licence — Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2362/98. ' 3. Applications for re-allocation shall not be subject to any reduction percentage that may be set under Article 17. 4. The competent authorities shall notify the Commis- sion of the quantities covered by any applications for re-allocation received, within the time limit laid down in Article 16. Article 21 import 1. Rights arising under issued in accordance with this chapter shall be transferable to a single transferee operator on the terms and conditions laid down in Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88, without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article. licences 2. Rights may be transferred: (a) between traditional operators registered under Article 5; L 293/40 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 (b) from traditional operators registered under Article 8; to newcomer operators The quantities of bananas re-exported shall not be 5. taken into account in calculating the actual imports of traditional operators or of newcomers. (c) between newcomer operators. The transfer of rights from newcomers to traditional oper- ators shall not be permitted. 3. In the event of a transfer of rights: (a) between traditional operators, the quantity transferred shall be taken into account in calculating the refer- ence quantities of the two operators for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 6(1), in order to reduce the refer- ence quantity of the transferor and increase that of the transferee; (b) between a traditional operator and a newcomer, the quantity transferred shall be taken into account by reducing the reference quantity of the transferor for the purposes of the same provisions as referred to in (a); (c) to newcomer operators in accordance with paragraph 2(b) or (c), the quantity transferred shall be taken into account when a newcomer applies to register as a traditional operator under Article 10. Article 22 shall declare immediately the 1. Operators competent authorities all quantities of bananas which have been released for free circulation and then re- exported out of the Community before the term of validity of the import licence concerned expires. They shall return to the same authorities the originals of the import licences involved. to re-exported, 2. Within a month of the end of each quarter, the competent authorities shall notify the Commission of all quantities specifying in each case the category of operators (traditional or newcomer) to whom the import licences had been issued and quoting the serial numbers of the relevant import licences or licence extracts. 3. One or more import licences shall be issued, up to the amount of quantities re-exported, either to the holder or to the transferee of the original licences, during a subsequent quarter but still within the year in which the original licence(s) was, or were, issued. The competent authorities 4. the quantities declared under paragraph 1 have actually been re-exported from the Community. shall check that The first subparagraph shall also cover re-exports carried out in 1994 from Member States to Austria, Finland or Sweden, and re-exports from the latter countries to third countries, including the Community as constituted on 31 December 1994. TITLE III Rules for imports of bananas outside the tariff quotas and of traditional ACP bananas Article 23 Import licence applications may be submitted in any 1. Member State. Licence applications and the licences themselves 2. shall bear the following wording in Section 20: ‘Non- quota imports and traditional ACP bananas — Regulation (EC) No 2362/98, Article 23'. 3. Licences shall be issued immediately, in accordance with Article 21(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88. The term of validity of licences shall be three months. 4. Within a month of the end of each quarter, Member States shall notify the Commission of the quantities covered by licences issued under this Article. TITLE IV General provisions Article 24 For the purposes of Article 18(7) and (8) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, the balance showing Community production and consumption and its imports and exports shall be based on: (a) available data on the quantities of bananas marketed in the Community during the preceding year, broken down by origin; (b) forecast production and sales of Community bananas; (c) forecast imports of bananas from all origins; (d) forecast consumption on the basis, in particular, of recent consumption trends and movements in market prices. 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/41 Article 25 TITLE V Import licence applications from traditional operators shall be accompanied by proof that a security has been lodged in accordance with Title III of Regulation (EEC) 2220/85. This security shall amount to ECU 18 per tonne. Where licences are issued for quantities less than those applied for, the security shall be released immediately in respect of the quantity not allocated. Transitional arrangements Article 28 1. By way of derogation from Articles 5(1) and 8(2), operators shall submit their applications for registration for 1999 as either ‘traditional operators' or as ‘newcomers' in the Member State of their choice by 13 November 1998 at the latest. Article 26 To be accepted, applications shall include: Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88 shall apply, with the exception of the fourth indent of Article 5(1) and Article 8(4) and (5) thereof, regard being had to the derogations contained in this Regulation. By way of derogation from Article 33(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 3719/88, proof of acceptance of an import declaration for the quantity concerned shall be furnished within 30 days of expiry of the validity of an import licence, except in cases of force majeure. Article 27 The Member States shall send the Commission the following statistical and commercial data: (a) in the case of ‘traditional operators': (i) a figure for the total quantity of bananas actually imported in each of the years of the reference period 1994 to 1996 and the serial numbers of all the import licences and licence extracts used for these imports, or, should Article 5(4) apply, the customs documents and import permits; and (ii) a list, complete with references, summarising all the documentary evidence showing that duties have been paid, in accordance with point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 5(3); (b) in the case of ‘newcomers': (i) a request for an annual allocation under Article 9(1); (ii) a list, complete with references, summarising all the documentary evidence required under Article 8(1). (a) every Wednesday: wholesale prices for yellow bananas, broken down by country of origin, as recorded the previous week on the representative markets listed in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/ 94 (1); shall hold all Operators the documentary evidence referred to in the second subparagraph at the disposal of the competent authorities so as to enable the checks and verifications required by them to be carried out. (b) on the 20th day of each month, in respect of the preceding month: figures for the volume and value of bananas which have been released for free circulation in their territory, broken down by country of origin; (c) on the 10th day of the month following expiry of the validity of import licences for each quarter: the quan- tities covered by import licences issued, the quantities covered by licences used and returned to the issuing body, and the quantities covered by unused licences; (d) on request: forecasts of production and sales. (1) OJ L 337, 24. 12. 1994, p. 66. operators' 2. By 30 November 1998 at the latest, the Member States shall send the Commission separate lists of the ‘newcomers' who have ‘traditional submitted applications for registration under the second subparagraph, together with their total provisional refer- ence quantities and total requests for annual allocations, as appropriate. The following additional items shall be included: and (a) for each ‘traditional operator': the quantity of bananas imported by them during each year in the period 1994 to 1996, their provisional reference quantity and the serial numbers of the licences and licence extracts used, or, should Article 5(4) apply, the customs docu- ments and import licences; L 293/42 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 (b) for each ‘newcomer' operator: a figure for the annual (b) 26 % of the annual allocation of a ‘newcomer' oper- allocation requested. ator. 3. In the light of the notifications received in accord- ance with point (a) of paragraph 2, the Commission shall if necessary fix a single adjustment coefficient as provided for in Article 6(3). 4. the By way of derogation from Article 6(4), competent authorities shall determine the reference quan- tity of each operator and shall notify it to them by 10 December 1998. 2. Member States shall notify the Commission of the total quantities covered by applications import licences, broken down by the origins listed in Annex I and separately for the two categories of operator, by 18 December 1998 at the latest. for 3. The Commission shall determine immediately the quantities for which licences may be issued in respect of the origins concerned. Article 29 If the quantities covered by applications for licences in respect of the first quarter of 1999 covering imports from one or more of the origins listed in Annex I exceed 26 % of the quantities set out in that Annex, the Commission fix a percentage reduction to be applied to all shall applications in respect of the origin(s) concerned. Article 30 1. By way of derogation from Article 15(1), operators shall submit applications for import licences between 14 and 16 December 1998 in the Member State where they have applied for registration. To be accepted, applications for licences submitted by a single operator must not exceed a total quantity greater than: (a) 26 % of the reference quantity of a ‘traditional opera- tor'; The competent national 4. import licences by 31 December 1998 at the latest. authorities shall issue Import licences shall be issued with a view to release for free circulation as from 1 January 1999. Licence applications and the licences themselves shall ‘Issued with a view to free bear the wording, in Box 24: circulation as from 1 January 1999'. TITLE VI Final provisions Article 31 Regulations (EEC) No 1442/93 and (EC) No 478/95 are hereby repealed as from 1 January 1999. Article 32 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 28 October 1998. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/43 ANNEX I Distribution of the tariff quotas and the traditional ACP quantity Tariff quotas (Article 18(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 404/93) — 2 200 000 t/353 000 t Ecuador: Costa Rica: Colombia: Panama: Subtotal: Other: 26,17 % 25,61 % 23,03 % 15,76 % (90,57 %) 9,43 % Traditional ACP quantity: 857 700 tonnes. L 293/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31. 10. 98 ANNEX II The authorities of the Member States competent for compiling the lists of operators and of quantities marketed are as follows: — Belgium Bureau d’Intervention et de Restitution belge/Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau Rue de Tr(cid:138)ves, 82/Trierstraat 82 B-1040 Bruxelles/Brussel — Denmark EU-Direktoratet Kampmannsgade 3 DK-1780 København V — Germany Bundesanstalt f(cid:129)r Landwirtschaft und Ern(cid:132)hrung Referat 322 Adickesallee, 40 D-60322 Frankfurt am Main — Greece Ministry of Agriculture GEDIDAGEP Directorate Fruits and Vegetables, Wine and Industrial Products 241, Acharnon GR-10446 — Spain Ministerio de Econom(cid:146)a y Hacienda Secretar(cid:146)a General de Comercio Exterior Paseo de la Castellana, 162 E-28046 Madrid — France Office de D(cid:130)veloppement de l’(cid:130)conomie agricole des D(cid:130)partements d’Outre-Mer (ODEADOM) 28, Boulevard de Grenelle F-75737 Paris Cedex 15 — Ireland Department of Agriculture and Food Horticulture Division Agriculture House (7W) Kildare Street IRL-Dublin 2 — Italy Ministero del Commercio con l’Estero DG Politica Commerciale e Gestione Regime Scambi — Div. II Viale Boston 25 I-00144 Roma — Luxembourg Minist(cid:138)re de l’Agriculture Administration des Services Techniques de l’Agriculture Service de l’Horticulture 16, Route d’Esch Bo(cid:140)te Postale 1904 L-1014 Luxembourg 31. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 293/45 — Netherlands Produktschap Tuinbouw Bezuidenhoutseweg 153 Postbus 93099 NL-2594 AG Den Haag — Austria Bundesministerium f(cid:129)r Land- und Forstwirtschaft Abteilung III A 5 — Handelspolitik und Außenhandel Stubenring 12 A-1012 Wien — Portugal Minist(cid:130)rio da Economia Direc(cid:135)(cid:209)o-Geral das Rela(cid:135)(cid:210)es Economicas Internacionais Direc(cid:135)(cid:209)o de Servi(cid:135)os de Licenciamento do Com(cid:130)rcio Externo Avenida da Rep(cid:156)blica, 79 P-1094 Lisboa Codex — Finland Maa-ja Mets(cid:132)talousministeri(cid:148) Mariankatu 23 P. O. Box 232 SF-00171 Helsinki — Sweden Jordbruksverket Vallgatan 8 S-551 82 J(cid:148)nk(cid:148)ping — United Kingdom Intervention Board External Trade Division Lancaster House Hampshire Court UK-Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 7YE


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 3260/98 af Yves VERWAERDE til Kommissionen. Forenelighed mellem sammenlægningsudvalg og Fællesskabets lovgivning

eurovoc_concepts:
France
administrative procedure
agricultural holding
area of holding
competence of the Member States
right of establishment

formats: html pdf print

text: 21. 7. 1999 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende C 207/43 (1999/C 207/056) SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3255/98 af Eryl McNally (PSE) til Kommissionen (28. oktober 1998) Om: Overførsel af folkepension mellem medlemsstater Kan Kommissionen oplyse, hvilke planer, der er under udarbejdelse, medlemsstater kan overføre deres folkepension til en anden medlemsstat, hvor de har bopæl? for at personer fra de enkelte Svar afgivet på Kommissionens vegne af Pàdraig Flynn (15. december 1998) I artikel 10 i Rådets forordning nr. 1408/71 af 14. juni 1971 om anvendelse af de sociale sikringsordninger på arbejdstagere og deres familiemedlemmer, der flytter inden for Fællesskabet, (1) er det fastlagt, at invalide- eller alderspensioner samt pensioner som følge af arbejdsulykker, der gives i henhold til lovgivningen i én eller flere medlemsstater, ikke må nedsættes, ændres, ophæves, tilbagekræves eller konfiskeres, alene fordi modtageren bor i en anden medlemsstat end den, hvor den ansvarlige institution for udbetalingen af pensionen befinder sig. Denne bestemmelse gælder direkte i alle medlemsstaterne i Fællesskabet og det europæiske økonomiske samarbejdsområde (EØS). (1) En ajourført version er blevet offentliggjort i EFT L 28 af 30. 1. 1997. (1999/C 207/057) SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3260/98 af Yves Verwaerde (PPE) til Kommissionen (28. oktober 1998) Om: Forenelighed mellem sammenlægningsudvalg og Fællesskabets lovgivning I Frankrig skal en landmand, når han udnytter et vist areal og beslutter at udvide sit landbrug, først indhente tilladelse hos et sammenlægningsudvalg, hvis det nye areal alt efter departement er to eller tre gange større end det minimale udnyttede landbrugsareal. Kan Kommissionen oplyse, om der findes sådanne sammenlægningsudvalg i andre medlemsstater, og i bekræftende fald, i hvilke? Er eksistensen af sådanne udvalg forenelig med Fællesskabets lovgivning, navnlig med princippet om fri etableringsret? Svar afgivet på Kommissionens vegne af Franz Fischler (30. november 1998) Kommissionen er ikke bekendt med, at der i andre medlemsstater findes ordninger og procedurer svarende til det sammenlægningsudvalg i Frankrig, der nævnes af det ærede medlem, og som kontrollerer udvidelsen af landbrugsbedrifter. Kommissionen vil dog gerne understrege, at EF-bestemmelserne i almindelighed og anvendelsen af den fælles landbrugspolitik i særdeleshed ikke påvirker medlemsstaternes ret til at vedtage ordninger og procedurer for at kunne følge udviklingen, herunder udvidelsen af landbrugsbedrifter, f. eks. i forbindelse med en national politik for fysisk planlægning eller, mere specifikt, foranstaltninger, der skal fremme etableringen af unge landmænd. Ifølge de oplysninger, som Kommissionen råder over, strider sådanne ordninger og procedurer ikke mod princippet om fri etableringsret


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3257/98 del Francisco SANZ FERNÁNDEZ a la Comisión. Cultura y Fondos estructurales

eurovoc_concepts:
European Regional Development Fund
Structural Funds
cultural policy
financial aid
project evaluation
regional policy

text: 28. 6. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 182/55 Respuesta de la Sra. Bjerregaard en nombre de la Comisión (16 de noviembre de 1998) Los formularios existen en finés con sus correspondientes instrucciónes. Dada la publicación de la Decisión 97/266/CE de la Comisión, de 18 de diciembre de 1996, relativa a un formulario de información sobre un espacio propuesto para su inclusión en la red Natura 2000 (1), no deberían existir problemas lingüísticos para los ciudadanos finlandeses. (1) DO L 107 de 24. 4. 1997. (1999/C 182/068) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3257/98 de Francisco Sanz Fernández (PSE) a la Comisión (28 de octubre de 1998) Asunto: Cultura y Fondos estructurales ¿Puede precisar la Comisión el número, la naturaleza y el importe de las ayudas que ha concedido en el marco de los Fondos estructurales en el sector cultural (infraestructuras, patrimonio, creación, libro y lectura, nuevas tecnologías, etc. ) durante el período comprendido entre 1994 y 1998? ¿Puede detallar la Comisión su respuesta por programa operativo? Respuesta de la Sra. Wulf-Mathies en nombre de la Comisión (8 de diciembre de 1998) Como dejó claro la Comisión la comunicación titulada «Política de cohesión y cultura 6 Una contribución al empleo» (1), no le es posible dar información precisa sobre la ayuda dedicada a la cultura en el marco de los Fondos estructurales. Ello se debe a que la función de la Comisión consiste en aprobar y cofinanciar programas. Los proyectos concretos que conforman los programas son seleccionados y gestionados en los Estados miembros. Además, el hecho de que el sector cultural no sea homogéneo y de que existen grandes variaciones en la definición y la clasificación estadística de la cultura hace que sea imposible recabar datos precisos y sistemáticos al respecto. En cambio, la Comisión ha publicado algunos ejemplos de buenas prácticas en la comunicación antes citada o, más recientemente, en la publicación «Invertir en la cultura: una baza para todas las regiones», que rebasa el simple marco de los Fondos estructurales y que la Comisión va a enviar directamente a Su Señoría y a la Secretaría del Parlamento. Sin embargo, en el caso concreto de los proyectos piloto presentados al amparo del artículo 10 del Reglamento del Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (2), la Comisión ha puesto en marcha un programa de 32 proyectos de innovación cultural en el que la participación financiera total de la Comunidad asciende a 15 millones de ecus. El objetivo de estos proyectos innovadores es estudiar la capacidad de la cultura para actuar como palanca de desarrollo local, especialmente a través de las nuevas tecnologías, y contribuir a reforzar la cohesión y el desarrollo territorial de la Comunidad, fundamentalmente mediante la transferencia de conocimientos. Los proyectos aún no han concluido; cuando acaben, se evaluarán para sacar las conclusiones que puedan resultar útiles para la política regional. (1) COM(96)512 final. (2) DO L 193 de 31. 7. 1993


title: Proposition modifiée de décision du Parlement européen et du Conseil modifiant la décision n° 719/96/CE établissant un programme de soutien aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne (Programme Kaléidoscope)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU financing
EU programme
cultural cooperation
cultural event
translation

formats: pdf print

text: COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPÉENNES Bruxelles, le 28. 10. 1998 COM(1998) 608 final 98/0282 (COD) 98/0283 (COD) Proposition modifiée de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la décision n° 2085/97/CE établissant un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction, dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture (Programme Ariane) Proposition modifiée de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la décision n° 719/96/CE établissant un programme de soutien aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne (Programme Kaléidoscope) (présentées par la Commission conformément à l'article 189 A paragraphe 2 du traité CE) Exposé des Motifs Proposition de Décision du Parlement européen et du Conseil modifiant îa Décision n°2085/97/CE établissant un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction, dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture (Programme Ariane) 1. Le 23 septembre 1998 la Commission a présenté une proposition de décision du Parlement européen et du Conseil concernant la modification de la Décision n°2085/97/CE en vue de la prolongation du programme Ariane pour Tannée 1999. 2 Le 9 octobre 1998 le Parlement européen a adopté une résolution législative (A4//355/98) dans laquelle il approuve la proposition de la Commission sous réserve de l'amendement qu'il a apporté. Cet amendement vise à augmenter l'enveloppe financière globale du programme de 7 millions d'Euros à 11,1 millions d'Euros. La Commission a estimé que - conformément à ce qu'elle avait indiqué dans sa proposition de Décision - cette modification représente une adaptation de l'enveloppe financière au budget 1999 et en conséquence elle a accepté l'amendement. Dans la présente proposition modifiée est intégré l'amendement que la Commission a accepté. Js 'Froposition. de Décisioh. dû g^hmMmyWWWWMMMiét dcrMMSWMf\ Proposition de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la Décision n°2085/97/CE du 6 octobre 1997 établissant un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction, dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture (Ariane) Proposition de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la Décision n°2085/97/CE du 6 octobre 1997 établissant un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction, dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture (Ariane) 98/0282 (COD) (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE) (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE) LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET LE CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE, LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET LE CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE, Vu le Traité instituant la Communauté européenne, et notamment son article 128, Vu la proposition de la Commission, Vu V avis du Comité des Régions, Statuant conformément à la procédure prévue à l'article 189 b du Traité, Vu le Traité instituant la Communauté européenne, et notamment son article 128, Vu la proposition de la Commission, Vu 1' avis du Comité des Régions, Statuant conformément à la procédure prévue à l'article 189 b du Traité, (1) considérant que, par Décision N°2085/97/CE du Parlement et du Conseil, un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction (le programme « Ariane »), a été établi dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture pour la période du 1er janvier 1997 au 31 décembre 1998 ; considérant que. par Décision (1) et du N°2085/97/CE du Parlement Conseil, un programme de soutien, comprenant la traduction (le programme « Ariane »), a été établi dans le domaine du livre et de la lecture pour la période du 1er janvier 1997 au 31 décembre 1998 ; que l'article considérant 8, (2) troisième alinéa de ladite Décision prévoit la prise de toute mesure propre à éviter une interruption du Programme ainsi établi ; que l'article considérant 8, (2) troisième alinéa de ladite Décision prévoit la prise de toute mesure propre à éviter une interruption du Programme ainsi établi ; (3) considérant que la Commission a présenté au Parlement européen et au Conseil, le 28 mai 1998, une proposition instrument de décision établissant un financement unique de coopération pour programmation de la et (3) considérant que la Commission a présenté au Parlement européen et au Conseil, le 28 mai 1998, une proposition instrument de décision établissant un financement unique de coopération pour programmation de la et culturelle pour la période 1er janvier culturelle pour 2000-31 décembre 2004 ; 2000-31 décembre 2004 ; la période 1er janvier (4) considérant que, en attendant l'adoption de ladite proposition, il est la continuité de nécessaire d'assurer Faction culturelle de la Communauté européenne dans les domaines couverts par le programme Ariane, (4) considérant que, en attendant l'adoption de ladite proposition, il est la continuité de nécessaire d'assurer l'action culturelle de la Communauté européenne dans les domaines couverts par le programme Ariane, DECIDENT : Article premier DECIDENT : Article premier La Décision N° 2085/97/CE est modifiée La Décision N° 2085/97/CE est modifiée comme suit : comme suit : (1) A Particle premier, la date du 31 (1) A l'article premier, la date du 31 décembre 1998 est remplacée par celle du décembre 1998 est remplacée par celle du 31 décembre 1999. 31 décembre 1999. (2) A Fartcle 6, le montant de 7 millions (2) A i'artcle 6, le montant de 7 millions d'ecus est remplacé par celui de 10 d'ecus est remplacé par celui de 11. 1 millions d'Euros. millions d'Euros. Article 2 Article 2 La présente Décision entre en vigueur le La présente Décision entre en vigueur le 1er janvier 1999. 1er janvier 1999. Fait à Bruxelles, le Fait à Bruxelles, le Par le Parlement européen Par le Parlement européen Le Président Par le Conseil Le Président Le Président Par le Conseil Le Président i/ Exposé des Motifs Proposition de Décision du Parlement européen et du Conseil! modifiant la Décision n°719/96/CE établissant un programme de soutien aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne (Programme Kaléidoscope) 1. Le 23 septembre 1998 la Commission a présenté une proposition de décision du Parlement européen et du Conseil concernant la modification de la Décision n°719/96/CE en vue de la prolongation du programme Kaléidoscope pour l'année 1999. 2 Le 9 octobre 1998 le Parlement européen a adopté une résolution législative (A4//3 56/98) dans laquelle il approuve la proposition de la Commission sous réserve de l'amendement qu'il a apporté. Cet amendement vise à augmenter l'enveloppe financière globale du programme de 26,5 millions d'Euros à 36,7 millions d'Euros. La Commission a estimé que - conformément à ce qu'elle avait indiqué dans sa proposition de Décision - cette modification représente une adaptation de l'enveloppe financière au budget 1999 et en conséquence elle a accepté l'amendement. Dans la présente proposition modifiée est intégré l'amendement que la Commission a accepté. Proposition de Décision du Parlement européen et. du Conseil '. • '. ' Proposition de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la Décision n°719/96/CE du 29 mars 1996 établissant un programme de soutien communautaire aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne (Kaléidoscope) 98/0283 (COD) Proposition de DECISION DU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET DU CONSEIL modifiant la Décision n°719/96/CE du 29 mars 1996 établissant un programme de soutien communautaire aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne (Kaléidoscope) (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour FEEE) (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour FEEE) LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET LE CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE , CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPEENNE , LE PARLEMENT EUROPEEN ET LE Vu le Traité instituant la Communauté Vu le Traité instituant la Communauté européenne, et notamment son article 128, Vu la proposition de la Commission, Vu F avis du Comité des Régions, Statuant conformément à prévue à l'article 189 b du Traité, européenne, et notamment son article 128, Vu la proposition de la Commission. Vu F avis du Comité des Régions. la procédure Statuant conformément à prévue à l'article 189 b du Traite. la procédure (1) considérant que, par Décision N°719/96/CE du Parlement et du Conseil, un programme de soutien aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne programme (le « Kaléidoscope »), a été établi pour la période 1er janvier 1996 au 31 décembre 1998; (1) considérant que. par Décision N°719/96/CE du Parlement et du Conseil, un programme de soutien aux activités artistiques et culturelles de dimension européenne programme (le « Kaléidoscope »), a été établi pour la période 1er janvier 1996 au 31 décembre 1998; que considérant (2) 8, 8, (2) troisième alinéa de ladite Décision prévoit troisième alinéa de ladite Décision prévoit la prise de toute mesure propre à éviter une la prise de toute mesure propre à éviter une interruption du Programme ainsi établi ; interruption du Programme ainsi établi ; considérant l'article l'article que (3) considérant que la Commission a présenté au Parlement européen et au Conseil, le 28 mai 1998 une proposition de Décision établissant un instrument unique de financement et de programmation pour la coopération culturelle pour la période 1er janvier 2000-31 décembre 2004 ; (3) considérant que la Commission a présenté au Parlement européen et au Conseil, le 28 mai 1998 une proposition de Décision établissant un instrument unique de financement et de programmation pour la coopération culturelle pour la période 1er janvier 2000-31 décembre 2004 ; 'Ù en considérant que, (4) attendant l'adoption de ladite proposition,, il est la continuité de nécessaire d'assurer Faction culturelle de la Communauté européenne dans les domaines couverts par le programme Kaléidoscope, en considérant que, (4) attendant l'adoption de ladite proposition,, il est la continuité de nécessaire d'assurer l'action culturelle de la Communauté européenne dans les domaines couverts par le programme Kaléidoscope, DECIDENT : Article premier DECIDENT : Article premier La Décision n° 719/96/CE est modifiée La Décision n° 719/96/CE est modifiée comme suit : comme suit : (1) A l'article premier, la date du 31 (1) A l'article premier, la date du 31 décembre 1998 est remplacée par celle du décembre 1998 est remplacée par celle du 31 décembre 1999. 31 décembre 1999. (2) A l'article 6, le montant de 26,5 (2) A l'article 6, le montant de 26,5 millions d'ecus est remplacé par celui de millions d'ecus est remplacé par celui de 34,4 millions d'Euros. 36,7 millions d'Euros. Article 2 Article 2 La présente Décision entre en vigueur le La présente Décision entre en vigueur le 1er janvier 1999. 1er janvier 1999. / Fait à Bruxelles, le Fait à Bruxelles, le Par le Parlement européen Par le Parlement européen Le Président Par le Conseil 1 Ai Président Le Président Par le Conseil Le Préskient ? ISSN 0254-1491 COM(98) 608 final DOCUMENTS FR 15 09 01 07 N° de catalogue : CB-CO-98-598-FR-C M Ha* des publications officieHcs des Comnumutucs européennes I^H. S Luxembourg


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 3255/98 von Eryl McNALLY an die Kommission. Übertragung von Rentenansprüchen zwischen Mitgliedstaaten

eurovoc_concepts:
free movement of persons
pension scheme
residence
social security
social-security benefit
transfer of pension rights

text: 21. 7. 1999 DE Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften C 207/43 (1999/C 207/056) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-3255/98 von Eryl McNally (PSE) an die Kommission (28. Oktober 1998) Betrifft: Übertragung von Rentenansprüchen zwischen Mitgliedstaaten Kann die Kommission Auskunft darüber erteilen, welche Möglichkeiten für Bürger unterschiedlicher Mit- gliedstaaten vorgesehen sind, um ihre Rentenansprüche an einen Wohnsitz in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat übertragen zu können? Antwort von Herrn Flynn im Namen der Kommission (15. Dezember 1998) Artikel 10 der Verordnung 1408/71 des Rates vom 14. Juli 1971 zur Anwendung der Systeme der sozialen Sicherheit auf Arbeitnehmer und deren Familien, die innerhalb der Gemeinschaft zu- und abwandern (1), sieht vor, daß Invaliditäts-, Alters- und Arbeitsunfallrentenansprüche, die im Rahmen der Gesetzgebung eines oder mehrerer Mitgliedstaaten erworben wurden, nicht gekürzt, geändert, ausgesetzt, entzogen oder konfisziert werden können aufgrund der Tatsache, daß der Empfänger einen Wohnsitz in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat hat als die für die Zahlung der Renten verantwortliche Institution. Diese Verordnung gilt unmittelbar in allen Mitgliedstaaten der Gemeinschaft und des Europäischen Wirtschaftsraums (EWR). (1) Eine aktualisierte Fassung wurde im ABl. L 28 vom 30. 1. 1997 veröffentlicht. (1999/C 207/057) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-3260/98 von Yves Verwaerde (PPE) an die Kommission (28. Oktober 1998) Betrifft: Vereinbarkeit von „commissions de cumuls“ (Kumulierungskommission) mit den Gemeinschaftsvor- schriften Beschließt in Frankreich ein Landwirt, der eine bestimmte Fläche bewirtschaftet, seinen Betrieb zu erweitern, benötigt er vorab eine Genehmigung einer „commission de cumuls“ (Kumulierungskommission), wenn die neue Fläche, je nach Departement, das Zwei- bis Dreifache der Mindestnutzfläche zum Zeitpunkt der Betriebsgründung überschreitet. Kann die Kommission genauere Angaben darüber machen, ob in anderen Mitgliedstaaten solche „commissions de cumuls“ bestehen und wenn ja, welche? Ist das Bestehen solcher Kommissionen mit dem Gemeinschaftsvorschriften und besonders mit dem Prinzip der Niederlassungsfreiheit vereinbar? Antwort von Herrn Fischler im Namen der Kommission (30. November 1998) Der Kommission ist nicht bekannt, ob in anderen Mitgliedstaaten Einrichtungen und Verfahren bestehen, die der vom Herrn Abgeordneten genannten „commission de cumuls“ in Frankreich ähneln, die die Erweiterung landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe überwacht. Die Kommission möchte jedoch betonen, daß die gemeinschaftlichen Rechtsvorschriften im allgemeinen und die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik im besonderen nicht die Möglichkeit der Mitgliedstaaten einschränken, Vorkehrungen zu treffen und Verfahren einzuführen, um die Entwicklung und insbesondere die Erweiterung landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe zu überwachen. Dabei kann es sich z. B. um Maßnahmen im Rahmen der nationalen Raumordnungspolitik oder auch um spezifische Maßnahmen zur Förderung der Niederlassung von Junglandwirten handeln. Entsprechend den der Kommission vorliegenden Informationen verstoßen diese Vorkehrungen und Verfahren nicht gegen den Grundsatz der Niederlassungsfreiheit


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3255/98 del Eryl McNALLY a la Comisión. Transferencia de los derechos de pensión entre los Estados miembros

text: 21. 7. 1999 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 207/43 (1999/C 207/056) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3255/98 de Eryl McNally (PSE) a la Comisión (28 de octubre de 1998) Asunto: Transferencia de los derechos de pensión entre los Estados miembros ¿Podría la Comisión indicar qué proyectos existen para permitir que los ciudadanos de los diferentes Estados miembros transfieran sus derechos de pensión al Estado miembro de residencia? Respuesta del Sr. Flynn en nombre de la Comisión (15 de diciembre de 1998) El artículo 10 del Reglamento 1408/71 del Consejo, relativo a la aplicación de los regímenes de Seguridad Social a los trabajadores por cuenta ajena, los trabajadores por cuenta propia y a los miembros de sus familias que se desplazan dentro de la Comunidad (1), establece que las prestaciones en metálico de invalidez, de vejez o de supervivencia, las rentas de accidentes de trabajo o de enfermedad profesional y los subsidios de defunción adquiridos en virtud de la legislación de uno o de varios Estados miembros, no podrán ser objeto de ninguna reducción, modificación, suspensión, supresión o confiscación por el hecho de que el beneficiario resida en el territorio de un Estado miembro distinto de aquél en que se encuentra la institución deudora. Este Reglamento es directamente aplicable en todos los Estados miembros de la Comunidad y en el Espacio Económico Europeo (EEE). (1) Versión actualizada publicada en DO L 28 de 30. 1. 1997. (1999/C 207/057) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-3260/98 de Yves Verwaerde (PPE) a la Comisión (28 de octubre de 1998) Asunto: Compatibilidad de las comisiones de acumulación («commissions de cumuls») con la legislación comunitaria En Francia, los agricultores que explotan una superficie determinada y deciden aumentar su explotación deben obtener previamente la autorización de una comisión de acumulación («commission de cumuls») si la nueva superficie es entre dos y tres veces (según los departamentos) superior a la superficie mínima de instalación. ¿Puede indicar la Comisión si esas comisiones existen también en otros Estados miembros? En caso afirmativo, ¿en cuáles? ¿Es la existencia de esas comisiones compatible con la legislación comunitaria y, en particular, con el principio de la libertad de establecimiento? Respuesta del Sr. Fischler en nombre de la Comisión (30 de noviembre de 1998) La Comisión desconoce la existencia en los demás Estados miembros de dispositivos y procedimientos comparables a los de la comisión de acumulación, mencionada por Su Señoría, en Francia, para controlar la extensión de las explotaciones agrarias. No obstante, la Comisión debe señalar que la normativa comunitaria, en general, y la aplicación de la política agrícola común, en particular, no menguan la potestad de los Estados miembros de adoptar dispositivos y procedimientos de seguimiento de la evolución y, en particular, la extensión de las explotaciones agrarias, en el ámbito, por ejemplo, de una política nacional de ordenación territorial, o más concretamente, de medidas destinadas a favorecer la instalación de jóvenes agricultores. Con arreglo a la información a disposición de la Comisión, estos dispositivos y procedimientos no contra- vienen el principio de la libertad de establecimiento


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 3247/98 do Deputado Ernesto CACCAVALE Monopolistiskt system för apoteksverksamheten i Italien

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
access to a profession
consumer protection
geographical distribution
monopoly
pharmaceutical industry
pharmaceutical legislation
pharmacist
pharmacology
right of establishment

text: C 320/32 Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias PT 6. 11. 1999 (1999/C 320/043) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-3247/98 apresentada por Ernesto Caccavale (UPE) à Comissão (28 de Outubro de 1998) Objecto: Sistema de regulamentação monopolista dos serviços farmacêuticos em Itália O quadro normativo e regulamentar do serviço farmacêutico em vigor em Itália prevê uma longa série de privilégios e restrições injustificadas: ( a lei atribui aos farmacêuticos com carácter exclusivo as actividades de preparação e venda ao público de medicamentos; ( a distribuição das farmácias é limitada numericamente com base em critérios demográficos, geográficos e de distância. Está, com efeito, estabelecido que deve existir uma farmácia para cada 5. 000 habitantes nas comunas com uma população até 12. 500 habitantes e uma farmácia para cada 4. 000 habitantes em todas as outras comunas. Para além disso, cada nova farmácia deve estar situada a uma distância não inferior a 200 metros das outras; ( para aceder à profissão de farmacêutico, é necessário ser aprovado num concurso público com base em títulos e provas, ou herdar a farmácia, com base em vantagens decorrentes de relações familiares; ( no que se refere às modalidades de exercício da profissão, os horários e turnos das farmácias são fixados pelo Presidente da Câmara, de acordo com as normas estabelecidas pelo Governador Civil. No que respeita à propaganda médica, a lei apenas autoriza a sua publicação nas listas telefónicas, mediante autorização prévia do Presidente da Câmara e a pedido da Ordem dos Farmacêuticos. É evidente que o alcance destas restrições a favor dos farmacêuticos é desproporcionada relativamente ao objectivo final de protecção da saúde pública. Nomeadamente, a limitação do número de farmácias parece ter como objectivo garantir os níveis de rendimento dos farmacêuticos e não uma repartição territorial racional das farmácias. Para além disso, esta medida cria situações injustificadas de rendimento monopolista. Neste contexto poderá a Comissão: ( fornecer informações acerca da actual situação do seu estudo em curso sobre esta questão? ( indicar se não considera que existem razões suficientes para considerar a regulamentação italiana claramente monopolista, em contradição com as leis europeias em matéria de concorrência? ( especificar que medidas pretende tomar de forma a proteger as exigências dos consumidores e facilitar o acesso à profissão de farmacêutico? Resposta dada por Mario Monti em nome da Comissão (15 de Janeiro de 1999) A Comissão permite-se remeter o Senhor Deputado para as respostas dadas à pergunta escrita E-3477/97 de Mimi Kestelijn-Sierens (1) e, mais especificamente sobre a regulamentação existente em Itália no que respeita a condições de exploração de farmácias de oficina, à pergunta escrita E-3011/98 de Amedeo Amadeo (2). Na verdade, a Comissão considera que, no contexto específico do direito de estabelecimento na Comunidade, medidas nacionais como as referidas (monopólio atribuído aos farmacêuticos para a venda de medicamentos não sujeitos a receita médica, critérios demográficos e geográficos que condicionam a abertura de farmácias, concurso público para poder ter autorização de abrir uma farmácia, horários e turnos dos farmacêuticos fixados pelos poderes públicos e condições restritivas em matéria de publicidade) não são contrárias ao princípio da liberdade de estabelecimento consignado no artigo 52o do Tratado CE, desde que sejam aplicadas de forma não discriminatória e proporcionadas relativamente ao objectivo pretendido. Considera igualmente que está por apurar o carácter desproporcionado destas medidas relativamente ao objectivo pretendido. Informa também o Senhor Deputado de que não existe nenhum estudo em curso na Comissão sobre as questões evocadas. (1) (2) JO C 223 de 17. 7. 1998. JO C 142 de 21. 5. 1999, p. 70


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3253/98 by Maren GÜNTHER to the Commission. Commission competition 1998

eurovoc_concepts:
European Commission
European official
administrative competition
competition (EU)
equal treatment
examination
recruitment

text: 29. 4. 1999 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 118/167 (1999/C 118/211) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA P-3136/98 fr(cid:229)n Ernesto Caccavale (UPE) till kommissionen (9 oktober 1998) Ang(cid:229)ende: Ogiltigf(cid:246)rklaring av det allm(cid:228)nna uttagningsprovet f(cid:246)r tj(cid:228)nstem(cid:228)n till Europeiska kommis- sionen Genom press och tillk(cid:228)nnagivanden direkt fr(cid:229)n n(cid:229)gra av s(cid:246)kandena i kommissionens allm(cid:228)nna uttag- ningsprov som genomf(cid:246)rdes den 14 september 1998 p(cid:229) olika platser i Europa, har mycket allvarliga missf(cid:246)rh(cid:229)llanden uppdagats. Vissa s(cid:246)kande har uppgett att de p(cid:229) f(cid:246)rhand f(cid:229)tt en kopia av provet i f(cid:246)rm(cid:229)ga till analys och fattnings- f(cid:246)rm(cid:229)ga men att de ansvariga i skrivsalen under uttagningsprovets g(cid:229)ng inte brytt sig om detta n(cid:228)r det anm(cid:228)ldes. Bland de s(cid:246)kande som deltog i provet i Bryssel har flera uppgett att man mellan de olika delproven hade m(cid:246)jlighet att g(cid:229) till toaletterna med mobiltelefoner och om man s(cid:229) ville fylla i formul(cid:228)ret f(cid:246)r optisk l(cid:228)sning med svaren. I Rom tilldelades s(cid:246)kandena, som satt utspridda i olika salar, olika texter f(cid:246)r provet i franska. Under den tid som det tog att kopiera ett och samma formul(cid:228)r till alla kunde s(cid:246)kandena anv(cid:228)nda sig av olika medel f(cid:246)r att s(cid:228)tta sig i f(cid:246)rbindelse med folk utifr(cid:229)n och d(cid:228)refter komplettera svaren i formul(cid:228)ret f(cid:246)r optisk l(cid:228)sning efter det att den tid som (cid:228)r avsedd f(cid:246)r varje delprov hade g(cid:229)tt ut. I enlighet med vad som angetts p(cid:229) Internet begicks ett fatalt misstag i Milano d(cid:228)r provet h(cid:246)lls i n(cid:228)rheten av Assago och inte p(cid:229) den ort som angetts i kallelsen. N(cid:228)r det p(cid:229) n(cid:229)gra parlamentsledam(cid:246)ters initiativ kunde konstateras att ovann(cid:228)mnda uppgifter var sanningsenliga beslutade kommissionen den 24 september att ogiltigf(cid:246)rklara urvalsprovet i fr(cid:229)ga. Kan kommissionen, med anledning av att dessa allvarliga h(cid:228)ndelser stark underminerar de europeiska institutionernas trov(cid:228)rdighet, ange › vilka som var motiven till att provet ogiltigf(cid:246)rklarades, › exakt vilka missf(cid:246)rh(cid:229)llanden som har uppdagats, › p(cid:229) vilka och p(cid:229) hur m(cid:229)nga platser som dessa missf(cid:246)rh(cid:229)llanden uppdagades, › hur mycket det kostade gemenskapsbudgeten att organisera proven i fr(cid:229)ga, › vilka (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder som kommissionen har f(cid:246)r avsikt att vidta gentemot de ansvariga, › om det n(cid:229)gon g(cid:229)ng tidigare i samband med andra uttagningsprov rapporterats om liknande miss- f(cid:246)rh(cid:229)llanden, › alla tillk(cid:228)nnagivanden som gjorts i samband med andra uttagningsprov och vilka p(cid:229)f(cid:246)ljder som dessa fick? (1999/C 118/212) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-3253/98 fr(cid:229)n Maren G(cid:252)nther (PPE) till kommissionen (28 oktober 1998) Ang(cid:229)ende: Kommissionens uttagningsprov 1998 Kommissionens uttagningsprov som i september genomf(cid:246)rdes p(cid:229) 37 orter i samtliga 15 medlemsstater ogiltigf(cid:246)rklarades efter det att flera fall av fusk hade uppdagats. Ur dessa sakf(cid:246)rh(cid:229)llanden uppst(cid:229)r f(cid:246)ljande fr(cid:229)gor: 1. Hur h(cid:246)ga uppskattar kommissionen de kostnader att vara som blir f(cid:246)ljden av att provet m(cid:229)ste genomf(cid:246)ras p(cid:229) nytt och som de europeiska skattebetalarna f(cid:229)r st(cid:229) f(cid:246)r?


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3248/98 by Ernesto CACCAVALE to the Commission. Telecom Italia's monopoly in the urban telephone services sector

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
competition
consumer protection
dominant position
liberalisation of the market
monopoly
telecommunications industry
telephone
telephone charges
urban area

formats: html print


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2324/98 della Commissione del 28 ottobre 1998 che fissa l'importo massimo della restituzione all'esportazione di zucchero bianco per la tredicesima gara parziale effettuata nell'ambito della gara permanente di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
white sugar

text: 29. 10. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 290/11 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 2324/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 28 ottobre 1998 che fissa l’importo massimo della restituzione all’esportazione di zucchero bianco per la tredicesima gara parziale effettuata nell’ambito della gara perma- nente di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1785/81 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1981, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei settore dello zucchero (1), modificato da mercati nel ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1148/98 (2), in particolare l’articolo 17, paragrafo 5, secondo capoverso, lettera b), considerando che in conformit(cid:133) al regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 della Commissione, del 22 luglio 1998, rela- tivo ad una gara permanente per la determinazione di prelievi e/o di restituzioni all’esportazione di zucchero bianco (3), si procede a gare parziali per l’esportazione di tale zucchero; considerando che, in base alle disposizioni dell’articolo 9, paragrafo 1 del regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98 un importo massimo della restituzione all’esportazione (cid:138) fissato, se del caso, per la gara parziale in causa, tenuto conto in partico- lare della situazione e della prevedibile evoluzione del mercato dello zucchero nella Comunit(cid:133) e sul mercato mondiale; considerando che dopo l’esame delle offerte (cid:138) opportuno adottare, per la tredicesima gara parziale, le disposizioni di cui all’articolo 1; considerando che le misure previste dal presente regola- mento sono conformi al parere del comitato di gestione per lo zucchero, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 Per la tredicesima gara parziale di zucchero bianco, effet- tuata a norma del regolamento (CE) n. 1574/98, l’importo massimo della restituzione all’esportazione (cid:138) pari a 51,320 ECU/100 kg. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 29 ottobre 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 28 ottobre 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 177 dell’1. 7. 1981, pag. 4. (2) GU L 159 del 3. 6. 1998, pag. 38. (3) GU L 206 del 23. 7. 1998, pag. 7


title: Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2324/98 der Kommission vom 28. Oktober 1998 zur Festsetzung des Höchstbetrags der Ausfuhrerstattung für Weißzucker für die im Rahmen der Dauerausschreibung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durchgeführte 13. Teilausschreibung

text: 29. 10. 98 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 290/11 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 2324/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 28. Oktober 1998 zur Festsetzung des H(cid:148)chstbetrags der Ausfuhrerstattung f(cid:129)r Weißzucker f(cid:129)r die im Rahmen der Dauerausschreibung gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durchgef(cid:129)hrte 13. Teilausschreibung DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1785/81 des Rates vom 30. Juni 1981 (cid:129)ber die gemeinsame Marktorgani- sation f(cid:129)r Zucker (1), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verord- nung (EG) Nr. 1148/98 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 17 Absatz 5 zweiter Unterabsatz Buchstabe b), in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 der Kommis- sion vom 22. Juli 1998 betreffend eine Dauerausschrei- bung f(cid:129)r die Festsetzung von Absch(cid:148)pfungen und/oder Erstattungen bei der Ausfuhr von Weißzucker (3) werden Teilausschreibungen f(cid:129)r die Ausfuhr dieses Zuckers durchgef(cid:129)hrt. Gem(cid:132)ß Artikel 9 Absatz 1 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/ 98 ist gegebenenfalls ein H(cid:148)chstbetrag der Ausfuhrerstat- tung f(cid:129)r die betreffende Teilausschreibung insbesondere unter Ber(cid:129)cksichtigung der Lage und der voraussichtli- chen Entwicklung des Zuckermarktes in der Gemein- schaft sowie des Weltmarktes festzusetzen. Nach Pr(cid:129)fung der Angebote sind f(cid:129)r die 13. Teilaus- schreibung die in Artikel 1 genannten Bestimmungen festzulegen. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses f(cid:129)r Zucker (cid:190) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 F(cid:129)r die gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1574/98 durch- gef(cid:129)hrte 13. Teilausschreibung f(cid:129)r Weißzucker wird eine Ausfuhrerstattung von h(cid:148)chstens 51,320 ECU je 100 kg festgesetzt. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am 29. Oktober 1998 in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 28. Oktober 1998 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 177 vom 1. 7. 1981, S. 4. (2) ABl. L 159 vom 3. 6. 1998, S. 38. (3) ABl. L 206 vom 23. 7. 1998, S. 7


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 3252/98 by Karin RIIS-JØRGENSEN Mutual recognition of solar panel standards DIN 4757 and ISO 9806

eurovoc_concepts:
European standard
ISO
approval
harmonisation of standards
intra-EU trade
mutual recognition principle
quality control of industrial products
solar collector
standardisation

text: 6. 11. 1999 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 320/33 (1999/C 320/044) SKRIFTLIG FRÅGA E-3252/98 från Karin Riis-Jørgensen (ELDR) till kommissionen (28 oktober 1998) Angående: Ömsesidigt erkännande av solfångare (cid:29) DIN 4757 och ISO 9806 Kan kommissionen, inom ramen för ömsesidigt erkännande av standarder, ange om den finner det rimligt att en solfångare som har testats och uppfyllt kraven för godkännande i en medlemsstat (Danmark, ISO 9806), på nytt måste testas och godkännas (DIN 4757) då den säljs till en annan medlemsstat (Tyskland)? Man bör komma ihåg att standarderna DIN 4757 och ISO 9806 i stort sett är identiska och att både Danmark och Tyskland dessutom har ingått avtal om ömsesidigt erkännande av testresultat (genom European Accreditiation Organisation). Ett underkännande av andra medlemsstaters testresultat på området innebär i Tyskland att den säljande verksamheten indirekt tvingas acceptera ett tyskt test, eftersom tysk subvention annars uteblir, och de faktiska priserna inte blir konkurrensdugliga på den tyska marknaden. Finner kommissionen det rimligt att det skall krävas ett nationellt test för att uppfylla krav för nationell subvention? Finner kommissionen vidare det rimligt att vissa medlemsstater och regioner kan fortsätta att åberopa ”särskilda” omständigheter som skiljer sig från övriga medlemsstater/regioner? Kan kommissionen i detalj redogöra för hur den i själva verket försöker harmonisera reglerna på området för att handelsutbyte i framtiden skall kunna ske i överensstämmelse med den inre marknaden och utan dubbel kontroll? Svar från Mario Monti på kommissionens vägnar (14 januari 1999) Enligt principen om ömsesidigt erkännande har en medlemsstat inte rätt att hindra saluförandet av en produkt som härrör från en annan medlemsstat, om konsumenterna i denna medlemsstat garanteras en skyddsnivå motsvarande den nivå som nationella bestämmelser har till syfte att säkerställa eller upprätta. När sådan likvärdighet föreligger, skulle en medlemsstat bryta mot proportionalitetsprincipen om det krävdes att importerade produkter helt och fullt skulle överensstämma med de bestämmelser eller tekniska krav som gäller för inhemska produkter. Om harmoniseringsregler saknas har en medlemsstat visserligen full rätt att kräva att en produkt som redan har godkänts i en annan medlemsstat skall testas och godkännas på nytt. Samtidigt är emellertid denna medlemsstat skyldig att bidra till en minskning av de nuvarande kontrollerna av handeln inom gemenskapen. Detta innebär att medlemsstaternas myndigheter inte har rätt att i onödan kräva tekniska eller kemiska analyser eller laboratorieprov, om samma analyser eller prov redan har genomförts i den andra medlemsstaten och om myndigheterna har tillgång till dessa resultat eller kan få tillgång till dem på begäran. En frivillig industristandard (som den omnämnda Deutsches Industrienorm (DIN)) kan inte i sig anses vara en statlig åtgärd som kan bestridas. Enligt den information som Internationella standardiseringsorganisationen (ISO) har tillgång till tycks dessutom inte standarden ISO 9806 motsvara den tyska standarden DIN 4757. Kommissionen menar emellertid att det vore allvarligt om det enligt en nationell bestämmelse krävdes att produkter måste genomgå nationella test för att vara berättigade till nationella subventioner. Här skulle kommissionen behöva mer ingående uppgifter för att närmare kunna undersöka situationen. Det bästa vore därför om en ekonomisk aktör som berörs av kravet att solfångare på nytt måste testas och godkännas av en tysk myndighet kunde sända in dokumentation i ärendet till kommissionen för en bedömning med hänsyn till ovannämnda allmänna principer om ömsesidigt erkännande. För att harmonisera vissa aspekter gällande solfångare har kommissionen givit Europeiska standardiseringsorganisationen (CEN) i uppdrag att utarbeta europeiska standarder inom detta område. Detta arbete utförs av CEN:s tekniska kommitté 312 och en europeisk standard förväntas bli godkänd nästa år


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 3245/98 von Graham WATSON an die Kommission. Aromatherapie

eurovoc_concepts:
alternative medicine
approval
aromatic plant
market approval
marketing
medical plant
plant health legislation
vegetable oil

text: C 142/110 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften DE 21. 5. 1999 (1999/C 142/136) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-3245/98 von Graham Watson (ELDR) an die Kommission (28. Oktober 1998) Betrifft: Aromatherapie Wie beurteilt die Kommission angesichts der aktuellen Diskussion über Arzneimittel auf pflanzlicher Grundlage, in der die Einführung strengerer Vorschriften für diese Branche gefordert wird, die möglichen Auswirkungen auf die Aromatherapie-Branche? Ist der Kommission bewußt, daß die Aromatherapie- Branche durch Maßnahmen wie die Beschränkung des Verkaufs ätherischer Öle ausschließlich auf Apotheken und/oder Ärzte benachteiligt werden könnte? Kann die Kommission ferner dafür sorgen, daß die Aromatherapie-Branche in den zuständigen Gremien vertreten ist, so daß sie in der Debatte über strengere Vorschriften nicht übergangen wird? Antwort von Herrn Bangemann im Namen der Kommission (25. November 1998) Der Kommission sind keine gesetzgeberischen Maßnahmen oder Entwürfe für Vorschläge bekannt, die die Aromatherapie-Branche direkt betreffen könnten. Die Vorschriften zum Verkauf essentieller Öle an die Verbraucher fallen in die Zuständigkeit der Mitgliedstaaten. Es handelt sich daher um nationale Rechtsvorschriften, die den Verkauf dieser Produkte regeln. Einige in der Aromatherapie verwendete Produkte können unter die Definition von „Arzneispezialität“ in Artikel 1 der Richtlinie 65/65/EWG vom 26. Januar 1965 zur Angleichung der Rechts- und Verwaltungs- vorschriften über Arzneispezialitäten (1) fallen. Werden diese Produkte industriell hergestellt, dürfen sie nur in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn eine Zulassung gemäß den gemeinschaftlichen Rechtsvorschriften für Arzneimittel erfolgt ist. Die „aktuelle Diskussion über Arzneimittel auf pflanzlicher Grundlage“, auf die sich der Herr Abgeordnete bezieht, betrifft im wesentlichen die Frage, ob die Anforderungen im Hinblick auf den Qualitäts-, Sicherheits- und Wirksamkeitsnachweis für eine Arzneispezialität für Arzneimittel auf pflanzlicher Grundlage genauso wie für alle anderen Arzneimittel gelten sollten. Sollte die Kommission künftig beschließen, einen Vorschlag auszuarbeiten, der sich mit der vorstehenden Angelegenheit konkret beschäftigt, wird sie dafür sorgen, daß alle Betroffenen eingehend konsultiert werden. (1) ABl. L 22 vom 9. 2. 1965. (1999/C 142/137) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-3246/98 von John McCartin (PPE) an die Kommission (28. Oktober 1998) Betrifft: Stadterneuerungsgesetz 1998 in Irland Kann die Kommission mitteilen, welche Städte und Ortschaften in das der Kommission von der irischen Regierung Ende September d. J. vorgelegte Stadterneuerungsgesetz 1998 aufgenommen wurden, und angeben, ob auch regionale Gebiete in der Nähe von Flughäfen (falls ja, welche) mit einbezogen wurden? Für wann rechnet sie mit einer Entscheidung über dieses Gesetz, damit es in Irland in Kraft treten kann? Antwort von Herrn Van Miert im Namen der Kommission (2. Dezember 1998) Eine erste Prüfung der notifizierten Vorlage hat gezeigt, daß das Verfahren der irischen Regierung zur Ermittlung der in Betracht kommenden Gebiete noch nicht abgeschlossen ist. Die vorgesehenen Fördermaßnahmen sollen kleineren Gebieten in verschiedenen Städten und Ortschaften zugute kommen. Die endgültige Liste wird der Kommission übermittelt, sobald die ausgewählten Gebiete feststehen. Nach den vorliegenden Unterlagen wird kein regionaler Flughafen in die Förderung einbezogen


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 3256/98 af Bill MILLER til Kommissionen. Forstyrrelser ombord på fly og færger

eurovoc_concepts:
aircraft
alcoholic beverage
competence of the Member States
duty-free sale
excise duty
ferryboat
marketing restriction

text: C 142/112 De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende DA 21. 5. 1999 Ansvaret for takstudligning hviler helt og holdent på den italienske kommunikationsmyndighed, og Kommissionen agter ikke at tage stilling til eventuelt tilladte forhøjelser, for så vidt som de bidrager til, at taksterne kommer til at svare til udgifterne. (1) EFT L 74 af 22. 3. 1996. (2) EFT L 101 af 1. 4. 1998. (1999/C 142/139) SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL P-3249/98 af Luigi Moretti (NI) til Kommissionen (20. oktober 1998) Om: Beskatning af værdipapirer i Italien I artikel 8, stk. 5 i Den Italienske Republiks lovdekret nr. 461 af 21. november 1997 om ændring af artikel 10b i lov nr. 77 af 23. marts 1983 indføres der med de nye stk. 4 og 5 om værdipapirer, der opbevares i andre EU-medlemsstater, et skatte- og afgiftssystem, som er anderledes og strengere end det tilsvarende for værdipapirer, der opbevares i Italien. Er denne praksis i overensstemmelse med fællesskabslovgivningen, navnlig ud fra principperne om frie kapitalbevægelser og fri konkurrence? Svar afgivet på Kommissionens vegne af Mario Monti (14. december 1998) På grundlag af den af det ærede medlem omtalte lov ser det ud til, at den særlige beskatningsordning på 12,5 % gælder for afkast af værdipapirer i investeringsfonde i andre medlemsstater, der indehaves af personer med bopæl i Italien, uanset om papirerne opbevares i eller uden for Italien. Den pågældende lovgivning synes ikke at tillade, at en person med bopæl i Italien får en skattekredit svarende til den udenlandske skat, der betales ud af midlerne i en anden medlemsstat, når den særlige beskatningsordning finder anvendelse. Opbevares værdipapirerne imidlertid i udlandet, ser det ud til, at den italienske lovgivning tillader, at der bevilges en sådan skattekredit, dersom skatteyderen giver afkald på at benytte sig af den særlige beskatningsordning og lader afkastet af midlerne beskatte efter den almindelige progressive indkomstskatteskala. Kommissionen vil indhente yderligere oplysninger om den af det ærede medlem omtalte lovgivning, og den vil foretage en grundig undersøgelse af denne bl. a. med henblik på at vurdere, om den italienske lovgivning på ovennævnte punkt er forenelig med EF-retten. (1999/C 142/140) SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL E-3256/98 af Bill Miller (PSE) til Kommissionen (28. oktober 1998) Om: Forstyrrelser ombord på fly og færger I lyset af det stigende antal af forstyrrende adfærd som følge af berusede passagerer ombord på fly og færger mener Kommissionen da, at beslutningen om at fritage varer for punktafgift, når de bliver konsumeret ombord på fly eller færger, er hensigtsmæssig?