title: COMMON POSITION (EC) No 57/98 adopted by the Council on 24 September 1998 with a view to adoption of Council Directive 98/.../EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air

eurovoc_concepts:
air quality
anhydride
atmospheric pollutant
lead
metal pollution
oxide

text: 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/99 COMMON POSITION (EC) No 57/98 adopted by the Council on 24 September 1998 with a view to adoption of Council Directive 98/. /EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (98/C 360/04) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130s(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1), Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2), Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189c of the Treaty (3), (1) Whereas, on the basis of principles enshrined in Article 130r of the Treaty, the European Community programme of policy and action in sustainable relation the environment and to action fifth development programme) (4) envisages in particular amendments legislation on air pollutants; whereas that to programme recommends the establishment of long-term air-quality objectives; environment (the requirements (2) Whereas Article 129 of the Treaty provides that health protection form a constituent part of the Community’s other policies; whereas Article 3(o) of the Treaty provides that the activities of the Community shall include a contribution to the attainment of a high level of health protection; shall (3) Whereas, pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and management (5), the Council is to adopt the legislation provided for in paragraph 1 and the provisions laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the same Article; (1) OJ C 9, 14. 1. 1998, p. 6. (2) Opinion delivered on 29 April 1998 (OJ C 214, 10. 7. 1998, p. 1). (3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 May 1998 (OJ C 167, 1. 6. 1998, p. 110), Council Common Position of 24 September 1998 and Decision of the European Parliament of. (not yet published in the Official Journal). (4) OJ C 138, 17. 5. 1993, p. 5. (5) OJ L 296, 21. 11. 1996, p. 55. (4) Whereas the limit values laid down in this Directive are minimum requirements; whereas, in accordance with Article 130t of the Treaty, Member States may maintain or introduce more stringent protective measures; whereas, limit values may be introduced to protect the health of particularly vulnerable categories of the population, such as children and hospital patients; whereas a Member State may require that limit values be attained before the dates in this Directive; in particular, stricter laid down (5) Whereas ecosystems should be protected against the adverse effects of sulphur dioxide; whereas vegetation should be protected against the adverse effects of oxides of nitrogen; (6) Whereas different types of particles can have different harmful effects on human health; whereas is evidence that risks to human health there associated with exposure to man-made particulate matter are higher than risks associated with exposure to naturally occurring particles in ambient air; (7) Whereas Directive 96/62/EC requires that action for zones within which plans be developed concentrations of pollutants in ambient air exceed limit values plus any temporary margins of tolerance applicable in order to ensure compliance with limit values by the date or dates laid down; whereas in so far as they relate to particulate matter such action plans and other reduction strategies should aim to reduce concentrations of fine particles as part of the total reduction in concentrations of particulate matter; for (8) Whereas Directive 96/62/EC provides that the numerical values limit values and alert thresholds are to be based on the findings of work carried out by international scientific groups active in the field; whereas the Commission is to take account of the most recent scientific research data in the epidemiological and environmental fields concerned and of the most recent advances in metrology for re-examining the elements on which limit values and alert thresholds are based; C 360/100 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 (9) Whereas in order to facilitate the review of this Directive in 2003 the Commission and the Member States should consider encouraging research into the effects of the pollutants referred to herein, namely sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead; — maintain ambient air quality where it is good and improve it in other cases with respect to sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead. (10) Whereas standardised accurate measurement techniques and common criteria for the location of measuring stations are an important element in the assessment of ambient air quality with a view to obtaining comparable the Community; information across (11) Whereas, in accordance with Article 12(1) of Directive 96/62/EC, the amendments necessary for adaptation to scientific and technical progress may relate solely to criteria and techniques for the assessment of concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead or detailed arrangements for forwarding information to the Commission, and may not have the effect of modifying limit values or alert thresholds either directly or indirectly; (12) Whereas up-to-date information on concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air should be readily available to the public, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Objectives The objectives of this Directive shall be to: — establish limit values and, as appropriate, alert thresholds for concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air intended to avoid, prevent or reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment as a whole, — assess concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air on the basis of common methods and criteria, Article 2 Definitions For the purposes of this Directive: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ‘ambient air’ shall mean outdoor air troposphere, excluding workplaces; in the ‘pollutant’ shall mean any substance introduced directly or indirectly by man into the ambient air and likely to have harmful effects on human health and/or the environment as a whole; ‘level’ shall mean the concentration of a pollutant in ambient air or the deposition thereof on surfaces in a given time; ‘assessment’ shall mean any method used to measure, calculate, predict or estimate the level of a pollutant in the ambient air; ‘limit value’ shall mean a level fixed on the basis of scientific knowledge, with the aim of avoiding, preventing or reducing harmful effects on human health and/or the environment as a whole, to be attained within a given period and not to be exceeded once attained; ‘alert threshold’ shall mean a level beyond which there is a risk to human health from brief exposure and at which immediate steps shall be taken by the Member States as laid down in Directive 96/62/EC; ‘margin of tolerance’ shall mean the percentage of the limit value by which this value may be exceeded subject to the conditions laid down in Directive 96/62/EC; ‘zone’ shall mean part of their territory delimited by the Member States; ‘agglomeration’ shall mean a zone with a population concentration in excess of 250 000 inhabitants or, where the population concentration is 250 000 inhabitants or less, a population density per km2 which for the Member States justifies the need for ambient air quality to be assessed and managed; — obtain adequate information on concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air and ensure that it is made available to the public, 10. ‘oxides of nitrogen’ shall mean the sum of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide added as parts per billion and expressed as nitrogen dioxide in micrograms per cubic metre; 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/101 11. ‘PM10’ shall mean particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 10 µm aerodynamic diameter; 12. ‘PM2,5’ shall mean particulate matter which passes through a size-selective inlet with a 50 % efficiency cut-off at 2,5 µm aerodynamic diameter; 13. 14. ‘upper assessment threshold’ shall mean a level specified in Annex V, below which a combination of measurements and modelling techniques may be used to assess ambient air quality, in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 96/62/EC; ‘lower assessment threshold’ shall mean a level specified in Annex V, below which modelling or objective estimation techniques alone may be used to in accordance with assess ambient air quality Article 6(4) of Directive 96/62/EC; 15. ‘natural events’ shall mean volcanic eruptions, seismic activities, wild-land fires, high-wind events or the atmospheric re-suspension or transport of natural particles from dry regions; 16. ‘fixed measurements’ shall mean measurements taken in accordance with Article 6(5) of Directive 96/62/EC. Article 3 Sulphur dioxide 1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that concentrations of sulphur dioxide in ambient air, as assessed in accordance with Article 7, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex I from the dates specified therein. The margins of tolerance laid down in Section I of Annex I shall apply in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 96/62/EC. 2. The alert threshold for concentrations of sulphur dioxide in ambient air shall be that laid down in Section II of Annex I. 3. In order to assist the Commission in preparing the report provided for in Article 10, until 31 December 2003 Member States shall, where practicable, record data on concentrations of sulphur dioxide averaged over 10 minutes from certain measuring stations which they have selected as representative of air quality in inhabited areas close to sources and at which hourly concentrations are measured. At the same time as data are supplied on hourly concentrations in accordance with Article 11(1) of Directive 96/62/EC. Member States shall report to the Commission, for those selected measuring stations, the number of 10-minute concentrations which have exceeded 500 µg/m3, the number of days within the calendar year on which that occurred, the number of those days on which hourly concentrations of sulphur dioxide simultaneously exceeded 350 µg/m3 and the maximum 10-minute concentration recorded. zones designate States may 4. Member or agglomerations within which limit values for sulphur dioxide as laid down in Section I of Annex I are exceeded owing to concentrations of sulphur dioxide in ambient air due to natural sources. Member States shall send the Commission lists of any such zones or agglomerations together with information on concentrations and sources of the Commission in accordance with Article 11(1) of Directive 96/62/EC, Member States shall provide the necessary justification to demonstrate that any exceedances are due to natural sources. sulphur dioxide therein. When informing Within such zones or agglomerations Member States shall be obliged to implement action plans in accordance with Article 8(3) of Directive 96/62/EC only where the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex I are exceeded owing to man-made emissions. Article 4 Nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen 1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and, where applicable, of oxides of nitrogen, in ambient air, as assessed in accordance with Article 7, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex II as from the dates specified therein. The margins of tolerance laid down in Section I of Annex II shall apply in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 96/62/EC. 2. The alert threshold for concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in ambient air shall be that laid down in Section II of Annex II. Article 5 Particulate matter 1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that concentrations of PM10 in ambient air, as C 360/102 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 assessed in accordance with Article 7, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex III as from the dates specified therein. The margins of tolerance laid down in Section I of Annex III shall apply in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 96/62/EC. 2. Member States shall ensure that measuring stations to supply data on concentrations of PM2,5 are installed and operated. Each Member State shall choose the number and the siting of the stations at which PM2,5 is to be measured as representative of concentrations of PM2,5 within that Member State. Where possible sampling points for PM2,5 shall be co-located with sampling points for PM10. Within nine months of the end of each year Member States shall send the Commission the arithmetic mean, the median, the 98th percentile and the maximum concentration calculated from measurements of PM2,5 over any 24 hours within that year. The 98th percentile shall be calculated in accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 4 of Annex I to Council Decision 97/101/EC of 27 January 1997 establishing a reciprocal exchange of information and data from networks and individual stations measuring ambient air pollution within the Member States (1). Action plans for PM10 prepared in accordance with 3. Article 8 of Directive 96/62/EC and general strategies for decreasing concentrations of PM10 shall also aim to reduce concentrations of PM2,5. shall I of Annex III are exceeded owing 4. Where the limit values for PM10 laid down in Section to concentrations of PM10 in ambient air due to natural events which result in concentrations significantly in excess of normal background levels from natural sources, Member States in inform accordance with Article 11(1) of Directive 96/62/EC, providing the necessary justification to demonstrate that such exceedances are due to natural events. In such cases, Member States shall be obliged to implement action plans in accordance with Article 8(3) of Directive 96/62/EC only where the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex III are exceeded owing to causes other than natural events. the Commission zones designate States may 5. Member or agglomerations within which limit values for PM10 as laid down in Section I of Annex III are exceeded owing to concentrations of PM10 in ambient air due to the resuspension of particulates following the winter sanding of roads. Member States shall send the Commission lists of any such zones or agglomerations together with (1) OJ L 35, 5. 2. 1997, p. 14. information on concentrations and sources of PM10 therein. When informing the Commission in accordance with Article 11(1) of Directive 96/62/EC, Member States shall provide the necessary justification to demonstrate that any exceedances are due to such resuspended particulates, and that reasonable measures have been taken to lower the concentrations. Within such zones or agglomerations Member States shall be obliged to implement action plans in accordance with Article 8(3) of Directive 96/62/EC only where the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex III are exceeded owing to PM10 levels other than those caused by winter road sanding. Article 6 Lead Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that concentrations of lead in ambient air, as assessed in accordance with Article 7, do not exceed the limit values laid down in Section I of Annex IV as from the dates specified therein. The margins of tolerance laid down in Section I of Annex IV shall apply in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 96/62/EC. Article 7 Assessment of concentrations The upper and lower assessment thresholds for 1. sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead for the purposes of Article 6 of Directive 96/62/EC shall be those laid down in Section I of Annex V. The classification of each zone or agglomeration for the purposes of the same Article 6 shall be reviewed at least every five years in accordance with the procedure laid down in Section II of Annex V. Classification shall be reviewed earlier in the event of significant changes in activities relevant to ambient concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide or, where relevant, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter or lead. The criteria 2. location of for determining sampling points for the measurement of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air shall be those listed in Annex VI. The minimum number of sampling points for fixed measurements of concentrations of each relevant the 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/103 pollutant shall be as laid down in Annex VII and they shall be installed in each zone or agglomeration within which measurement is required if fixed measurement is the sole source of data on concentrations within it. from stations fixed measurement For zones and agglomerations within which 3. information is supplemented by information from other sources, such as emission inventories, indicative measurement methods and air-quality modelling, the number of fixed measuring stations to be installed and the spatial resolution of other techniques shall be sufficient for the concentrations of air pollutants to be established in accordance with Section I of Annex VI and Section I of Annex VIII. 4. For zones and agglomerations within which measurement is not required, modelling or objective estimation techniques may be used. 5. The reference methods for the analysis of sulphur dioxide, of nitrogen dioxide and of oxides of nitrogen and for the sampling and analysis of lead shall be as laid down in Sections I to III of Annex IX. particulate matter and lead is routinely made available to the public as well as to appropriate organisations such as environmental organisations, consumer organisations, organisations representing interests of sensitive populations and other relevant health-care bodies by for example, of broadcast media, press, means, information screens or computer-network services. the Information on ambient concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter shall be updated on at least a daily basis, and, in the case of hourly values for sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, wherever practicable, information shall be updated on an hourly basis. Information on ambient concentrations of lead shall be updated on a three-monthly basis. Such information shall at least indicate any excesses of the concentrations in the limit values and alert thresholds over the averaging periods laid down in Annexes I to IV. It shall also provide a short assessment in relation to limit values and alert thresholds and appropriate information regarding effects on health. The reference method for the sampling and measurement of PM10 shall be as laid down in Section IV of Annex IX. 2. When making plans or programmes available to the public pursuant to Article 8(3) of Directive 96/62/EC, Member States shall also make them available to the organisations referred to in paragraph 1. The provisional reference method for the sampling and measurement of PM2,5 shall be as laid down in Section V of Annex IX. The reference techniques for air-quality modelling shall be as laid down in Section VI of Annex IX. 6. The date by which Member States shall inform the Commission of the methods they have used for the preliminary under Article 11(1)(d) of Directive 96/62/EC shall be 18 months after the entry into force of this Directive. assessment quality air of 3. When an alert threshold laid down in Annex I or II is exceeded, details made available to the public in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 96/62/EC shall at least include the items listed in Section III of the Annex in question. 4. Information made available to the public and to organisations under paragraphs 1 and 3 shall be clear, comprehensible and accessible. 7. Any amendments necessary to adapt this Article and Annexes V to IX to scientific and technical progress shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12 of Directive 96/62/EC. Article 9 Repeals and transitional arrangements Article 8 Public information 1. Council Directive 80/779/EEC of 15 July 1980 on air-quality limit values and guide values for sulphur dioxide and suspended particulates (1) shall be repealed with effect from. (*) except that Article 1, Article 2(1), Article 3(1), Article 9, Article 15 and Article 16 of Directive 80/779/EEC and Annexes I, IIIb and IV thereto shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2005. 1. Member States that up-to-date information on ambient concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, shall ensure (*) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. (1) OJ L 229, 30. 8. 1980, p. 30. C 360/104 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 Council Directive 82/884/EEC of 3 December 1982 2. on a limit value for lead in the air (1) shall be repealed with effect from. (*) except that Article 1, Article 2, Article 3(1), Article 7, Article 12 and Article 13 of Directive 82/884/EEC shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2005. suspended particulate matter it may continue to use the guide values for the protection of ecosystems laid down in Annex II to Directive 80/779/EEC and in Annex II to Directive 85/203/EEC. Council Directive 85/203/EEC of 7 March 1985 on 3. air-quality standards for nitrogen dioxide (2) shall be repealed with effect from. (*) except that Article 1(1), first indent, and (2), Article 2, first indent, Article 3(1), Article 5, Article 9, Article 15 and Article 16 of Directive 85/203/EEC and Annex I thereto shall be repealed with effect from 1 January 2010. shall From States. (*) Member employ 4. measurement stations and other methods of air-quality assessment that comply with this Directive to assess concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and lead in ambient air to obtain data for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the limit values laid down in Directives 80/779/EEC, 82/884/EEC and 85/203/EEC until such time as the limit values laid down in those Directives cease to apply. From States may. (*) Member 5. employ measurement stations and other methods of air-quality assessment that comply with this Directive as regards PM10 to assess concentrations of suspended particulate matter for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the limit values for total suspended particulates laid down in Annex IV to Directive 80/779/EEC; for the purpose of demonstrating such compliance, however, the data so collected shall be multiplied by a factor of 1,2. 6. Member States shall inform the Commission of any exceedances of the limit values laid down in Directives 80/779/EEC, 82/884/EEC and 85/203/EEC, together with the values recorded, the reasons for each recorded instance and to prevent any recurrence, within nine months of the end of each year in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Directive 96/62/EEC until such time as the limit values laid down in those Directives cease to apply. the measures taken Article 10 Report and review in the experience acquired No later than 31 December 2003 the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report based on the application of this Directive and, in particular, on the results of the most recent scientific research concerning the effects on human health and ecosystems of exposure to sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, different fractions of particulate matter and lead, and on technological developments including the progress achieved in methods of measuring and otherwise assessing concentrations of particulate matter in ambient air and the deposition of particulate matter and lead on surfaces. With a view to maintaining a high level of protection of human health and the environment and taking into account the experience acquired in the application of this Directive in Member States including, in particular, the conditions as laid down in Annex VI under which measurement has been carried out, the aforementioned report will be accompanied by proposals for the amendment of this Directive if appropriate. In particular, the Commission will examine the limit values for the second stage for PM10 with a view to making them mandatory and will consider confirming or altering the limit values for the second stage and, if appropriate, for the first stage. In addition, the Commission will give particular attention to setting limit values for PM2,5 or different fractions of particulate matter, as appropriate. Furthermore the Commission will examine the annual limit value for the protection of human health for nitrogen dioxide and will make a proposal confirming or modifying that value. It will also examine the hourly limit value for nitrogen dioxide in the light of World Health Organisation guidelines and consider whether that limit value should be confirmed or altered. In the zones in which a Member State considers it 7. necessary to limit or prevent a foreseeable increase in pollution by sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen or Article 11 Penalties (*) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. (1) OJ L 378, 31. 12. 1982, p. 15. (2) OJ L 87, 27. 3. 1985, p. 1. Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to breaches of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. Those penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/105 Article 12 Implementation Article 13 Entry into force 1. The Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by. (*). They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When the Member States adopt those measures, these shall contain references to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such references on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States. 2. The Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive. This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Article 14 Addressees This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels,. For the Council The President (*) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. C 360/106 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX I LIMIT VALUES AND THE ALERT THRESHOLD FOR SULPHUR DIOXIDE I. LIMIT VALUES FOR SULPHUR DIOXIDE Limit values must be expressed in eg/m3. The volume must be standardised at a temperature of 293 °K and a pressure of 101,3 kPa. Date by which limit value is to be met 1 January 2005 Averaging period Limit value Margin of tolerance One hour 1. Hourly limit value for the protection of human health 350 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 24 times a calendar year 150 eg/m3 (43 %) on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2005 2. Daily limit 24 hours value for the protection of human health 125 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than three times a calendar year None 1 January 2005 3. Limit value for the protection of ecosystems Calendar year and winter (1 October to 31 March) 20 eg/m3 None. (**) (*) The date will be the first or second 1 January after the entry into force of this Directive. (**) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. II. ALERT THRESHOLD FOR SULPHUR DIOXIDE 500 eg/m3 measured over three consecutive hours at locations representative of air quality over at least 100 km2 or an entire zone or agglomeration, whichever is the smaller. III. MINIMUM DETAILS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC WHEN THE ALERT THRESHOLD FOR SULPHUR DIOXIDE IS EXCEEDED Details to be made available to the public should include at least: — the date, hour and place of the occurrence and the reasons for the occurrence, where known; — any forecasts of: — changes in concentrations (improvement, stabilisation, or deterioration), together with the reasons for those changes; — the geographical area concerned; — the duration of the occurrence; — the type of population potentially sensitive to the occurrence; — the precautions to be taken by the sensitive population concerned. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/107 ANNEX II LIMIT VALUES FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO2) AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NOx) AND THE ALERT THRESHOLD FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE I. LIMIT VALUES FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN Limit values must be expressed in eg/m3. The volume must be standardised at a temperature of 293 °K and a pressure of 101,3 kPa. Date by which limit value is to be met 1 January 2010 1 January 2010 Averaging period Limit value Margin of tolerance One hour 1. Hourly limit value for the protection of human health 200 eg/m3 NO2, not to be exceeded more than 18 times a calendar year Calendar year 40 eg/m3 NO2 2. Annual limit value for the protection of human health 50 % on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2010 50 % on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2010 Calendar year 30 eg/m3 NOx None. (**) 3. Annual limit value for the protection of vegetation (*) The date will be the first or second 1 January after the entry into force of this Directive. (**) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. II. ALERT THRESHOLD FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE 400 eg/m3 measured over three consecutive hours at locations representative of air quality over at least 100 km2 or an entire zone or agglomeration, whichever is the smaller. III. MINIMUM DETAILS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC WHEN THE ALERT THRESHOLD FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE IS EXCEEDED Details to be made available to the public should include at least: — the date, hour and place of the occurrence and the reasons for the occurrence, where known; — any forecasts of: — changes in concentrations (improvement, stabilisation, or deterioration), together with the reasons for those changes, — the geographical area concerned, — the duration of the occurrence, — the type of population potentially sensitive to the occurrence, — the precautions to be taken by the sensitive population concerned. C 360/108 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX III LIMIT VALUES FOR PARTICULATE MATTER (PM10) Averaging period Limit value Margin of tolerance Date by which limit value is to be met 24 hours 1. 24-hour limit value for the protection of human health Stage 1 50 eg/m3 PM10, not to be exceeded more than 35 times a calendar year Calendar year 40 eg/m3 PM10 2. Annual limit value for the protection of human health 24 hours Stage 2 (1) 50 eg/m3 PM10, not to be exceeded more than 7 times a calendar year Calendar year 20 eg/m3 PM10 1. 24-hour limit value for the protection of human health 2. Annual limit value for the protection of human health 1 January 2005 1 January 2005 1 January 2010 1 January 2010 50 % on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2005 20 % on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2005 To be derived from data and to be equivalent to the Stage 1 limit value 50 % on 1 January 2005 reducing every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2010 (*) The date will be the first or second 1 January after the entry into force of this Directive. (1) Indicative limit values to be reviewed in the light of further information on health and environmental effects, technical feasibility and experience in the application of Stage 1 limit values in the Member States. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/109 ANNEX IV LIMIT VALUE FOR LEAD Averaging period Limit value Margin of tolerance Annual limit value for the protection of human health Calendar year 0,5 eg/m3 (1) 100% on the entry into force of this Directive, reducing on 1 January. (*) and every 12 months thereafter by equal annual percentages to reach 0 % by 1 January 2005, or by 1 January 2010 in the immediate vicinity of specific point sources, of which the Commission must be notified Date by which limit value is to be met 1 January 2005, or 1 January 2010 in the immediate vicinity of specific industrial sources situated on sites contaminated by decades of industrial activities. The Commission must be notified of those sources by. (**) (2). In such cases, the limit value as from 1 January 2005 will be 1,0 eg/m3 (*) The date will be the first or second 1 January after the entry into force of this Directive. (**) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. (1) The process laid down in Article 10 for the review of this Directive will include consideration of the possibility of supplementing or replacing the limit value by a deposition limit value in the immediate vicinity of point sources. Such notification must be accompanied by appropriate justification. The area in which higher limit values apply must not extend further than 1 000 m from such specific sources. (2) C 360/110 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX V DETERMINATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE, NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO2) AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NOx), PARTICULATE MATTER (PM10) AND LEAD IN AMBIENT AIR WITHIN A ZONE OR AGGLOMERATION I. UPPER AND LOWER ASSESSMENT THRESHOLDS The following upper and lower assessment thresholds will apply: (a) Sulphur dioxide Upper assessment threshold Lower assessment threshold Health protection Ecosystem protection 60 % of 24-hour limit value (75 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than three times in any calendar year) 40 % of 24-hour limit value (50 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than three times in any calendar year) 60 % of winter limit value (12 eg/m3) 40 % of winter limit value (8 eg/m3) (b) Nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen Hourly limit value for the protection of human health (NO2) Annual limit value for the protection of human health (NO2) Annual limit value for the protection of vegetation (NO2) Upper assessment threshold Lower assessment threshold 70 % of limit value (140 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 18 times in any calendar year) 50 % of limit value (100 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 18 times in any calendar year) 80 % of limit value (32 eg/m3) 80 % of limit value (24 eg/m3) 65 % of limit value (26 eg/m3) 65 % of limit value (19,5 eg/m3) (c) Particulate matter The upper and lower assessment for PM10 are to be based on the indicative limit values for 1 January 2010. Upper assessment threshold Lower assessment threshold 24-hour average Annual average 60 % of limit value (30 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than seven times in any calendar year) 40 % of limit value (20 eg/m3, not to be exceeded more than seven times in any calendar year) 70 % of limit value (14 eg/m3) 50 % of limit value (10 eg/m3) 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/111 (d) Lead Upper assessment threshold 70 % of limit value (0,35 eg/m3) Lower assessment threshold 50 % of limit value (0,25 eg/m3) Annual average II. DETERMINATION OF EXCEEDANCES OF UPPER AND LOWER ASSESSMENT THRESHOLDS Exceedances of upper and lower assessment thresholds must be determined on the basis of concentrations during the previous five years where sufficient data are available. An assessment threshold will be deemed to have been exceeded if during those five years the total number of exceedances of the numerical concentration of the threshold is more than three times the number of exceedances allowed each year. Where fewer than five years’ data are available Member States may combine measurement campaigns of short duration during the period of the year and at locations likely to be typical of the highest pollution levels with results obtained from information from emission inventories and modelling to determine exceedances of the upper and lower assessment thresholds. C 360/112 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX VI LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE, NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN, PARTICULATE MATTER AND LEAD IN AMBIENT AIR The following considerations will apply to fixed measurement: I. MACRO-SCALE SITING (a) Protection of human health Sampling points directed at the protection of human health should be sited: (i) to provide data on the areas within zones and agglomerations where the highest concentrations occur to which the population is likely to be directly or indirectly exposed for a period which is significant in relation to the averaging period of the limit value(s); (ii) to provide data on levels in other areas within the zones and agglomerations which are representative of the exposure of the general population. Sampling points should in general be sited to avoid measuring very small micro-environments in their immediate vicinity. As a guideline, a sampling point should be sited to be representative of air quality in a surrounding area of no less than 200 m2 at traffic-orientated sites and of several square kilometres at urban-background sites. Sampling points should also, where possible, be representative of similar locations not in their immediate vicinity. Account should be taken of the need to locate sampling points on islands, where that is necessary for the protection of human health. (b) Protection of ecosystems and vegetation Sampling points targeted at the protection of ecosystems or vegetation should be sited more than 20 kilometres from agglomerations or more than five kilometres from other built-up areas, industrial installations or motorways. As a guideline, a sampling point should be sited to be representative of air quality in a surrounding area of at least 1 000 km2. A Member State may provide for a sampling point to be sited at a lesser distance or to be representative of air quality in a less extended area, taking account of geographical conditions. Account should be taken of the need to assess air quality on islands. II. MICRO-SCALE SITING The following guidelines should be met as far as practicable: — the flow around the inlet sampling probe should be unrestricted without any obstructions affecting the airflow in the vicinity of the sampler (normally some metres away from buildings, balconies, trees, and other obstacles and at least 0,5 m from the nearest building in the case of sampling points representing air quality at the building line), — in general, the inlet sampling point should be between 1,5 m (the breathing zone) and 4 m above the ground. Higher positions (up to 8 m) may be necessary in some circumstances. Higher siting may also be appropriate if the station is representative of a large area, — the inlet probe should not be positioned in the immediate vicinity of sources in order to avoid the direct intake of emissions unmixed with ambient air, — the sampler’s exhaust outlet should be positioned so that recirculation of exhaust air to the sampler inlet is avoided, 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/113 — location of traffic-orientated samplers: — for all pollutants, such sampling points should be at least 25 m from the edge af major junctions and at least 4 m from the centre of the nearest traffic lane, — for nitrogen dioxide, inlets should be no more than 5 m from the kerbside, — for particulate matter and lead, inlets should be sited so as to be representative of air quality near to the building line. The following factors may also be taken into account: — interfering sources, — security, — access, — availability of electrical power and telephone communications, — visibility of the site in relation to its surroundings, — safety of public and operators, — the desirability of co-locating sampling points for different pollutants, — planning requirements. III. DOCUMENTATION AND REVIEW OF SITE SELECTION The site selection procedures should be fully documented at the classification stage by such means as compass-point photographs of the surrounding area and a detailed map. Sites should be reviewed at regular intervals with repeated documentation to ensure that selection criteria remain valid over time. C 360/114 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX VII CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING MINIMUM NUMBERS OF SAMPLING POINTS FOR FIXED MEASUREMENT OF CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE (SO2), NITROGEN DIOXIDE (NO2) AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN, PARTICULATE MATTER AND LEAD IN AMBIENT AIR I. MINIMUM NUMBER OF SAMPLING POINTS FOR FIXED MEASUREMENT TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE WITH LIMIT VALUES FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH AND ALERT THRESHOLDS IN ZONES AND AGGLOMERATIONS WHERE FIXED MEASUREMENT IS THE SOLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION (a) Diffuse sources Population of agglomeration or zone (thousands) If concentrations exceed the upper assessment threshold If maximum concentrations are between the upper and lower assessment thresholds For SO2 and NO2, in agglomerations where maximum concentrations are below the lower assessment threshold 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Not applicable 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 0 to 250 250 to 499 500 to 749 750 to 999 1 000 to 1 499 1 500 to 1 999 2 000 to 2 749 2 750 to 3 749 3 750 to 4 749 4 750 to 5 999 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. 6 000 10 For NO2 and particulate matter: to inlcude at least one urban-background station and one traffic-orientated station (b) Point sources For the assessment of pollution in the vicinity of point sources, the number of sampling points for fixed measurement should be calculated taking into account emission densities, the likely distribution patterns of ambient-air pollution and the potential exposure of the population. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/115 II. MINIMUM NUMBER OF SAMPLING POINTS FOR FIXED MEASUREMENT TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE WITH LIMIT VALUES FOR THE PROTECTION OF ECOSYSTEMS OR VEGETATION IN ZONES OTHER THAN AGGLOMERATIONS If maximum concentrations exceed the upper assessment threshold If maximum concentrations are between the upper and lower assessment thresholds One station every 20 000 km2 One station every 40 000 km2 In island zones the number of sampling points for fixed measurement should be calculated taking into account the likely distribution patterns of ambient-air pollution and the potential exposure of ecosystems or vegetation. C 360/116 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX VIII DATA-QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND COMPILATION OF RESULTS OF AIR-QUALITY ASSESSMENT I. DATA-QUALITY OBJECTIVES The following data-quality objectives for the required accuracy of assessment methods, of minimum time coverage and of data capture of measurement are laid down to guide quality-assurance programmes: Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen Particulate matter and lead Continuous measurement Accuracy Minimum data capture Indicative measurement Accuracy Minimum data capture Minimum time coverage 15 % 90 % 25 % 90 % 25 % 90 % 50 % 90 % random, (one measurement a 14 % week evenly at distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) random, (one measurement a 14 % week evenly at distributed over the year, or eight weeks evenly distributed over the year) Modelling Accuracy Hourly averages 50 to 60 % Daily averages Annual averages Objective estimation Accuracy 50 % 30 % 75 % Not defined at present (1) 50 % 100 % (1) Any amendment necessary to adapt this point to scientific and technical progress will be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(2) of Directive 96/62/EC. The accuracy of the measurement is defined as laid down in the ‘Guide to Expression of Uncertainty of Measurements’ (ISO 1993) or in ISO 5725-1 ‘Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results’ (1994). The percentages in the table are given for individual measurements averaged, over the period considered, by the limit value, for a 95 % confidence interval (bias and two times the standard deviation). The accuracy for continuous measurements should be interpreted as being applicable in the region of the appropriate limit value. The accuracy for modelling and objective estimation is defined as the maximum deviation of the measured and calculated concentration levels, over the period considered by the limit value, without taking into account the timing of the events. The requirements for minimum data capture and time coverage do not include losses of data due to the regular calibration or the normal maintenance of the instrumentation. By way of derogation, Member States may apply random measurements instead of continuous measurements for particulate matter and lead if they can demonstrate to the Commission that accuracy within the 95 % confidence interval with respect to continuous monitoring is within 10 %. Random sampling must be spread evenly over the year. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/117 II. RESULTS OF AIR-QUALITY ASSESSMENT The following information should be compiled for zones or agglomerations within which sources other than measurement are employed to supplement information from measurement or as the sole means of air-quality assessment: — a description of assessment activities carried out, — the specific methods used, with references to descriptions of the method, — the sources of data and information, — a description of results, including accuracies and, in particular, the extent of any area or, if relevant, the length of road within the zone or agglomeration over which concentrations exceed limit value(s) or, as may be, limit value(s) plus applicable margin(s) of tolerance and of any areas within which concentrations exceed the upper assessment threshold or the lower assessment threshold, — for limit values the object of which is the protection of human health, the population potentially exposed to concentrations in excess of the limit value. Where possible, Member States should compile maps showing concentration distributions within each zone and agglomeration. III. STANDARDISATION For sulphur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen the volume must be standardised at a temperature of 293 °K and a pressure of 101,3 kPa. C 360/118 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 ANNEX IX REFERENCE METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF CONCENTRATIONS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE, NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN, PARTICULATE MATTER (PM10 AND PM2,5) AND LEAD I. REFERENCE METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE ISO/FDIS 10498 (Standard in draft) ambient air — determination of sulphur dioxide — ultraviolet fluorescence method. A Member State may use any other method which it can demonstrate gives results equivalent to the above method. II. REFERENCE METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN ISO 7996: 1985 ambient air — determination of the mass concentrations of nitrogen oxides — chemiluminescence method. A Member State may use any other method which it can demonstrate gives results equivalent to the above method. III. A. Reference method for the sampling of lead The reference method for the sampling of lead will be that described in the Annex to Directive 82/884/EEC until such time as the limit value in Annex IV to this Directive is to be met, when the reference method will be that for PM10 as laid down in Section IV of this Annex. A Member State may use any other method which it can demonstrate gives results equivalent to the above method. B. Reference method for the analysis of lead ISO 9855: 1993 ambient air — determination of the particulate lead content of aerosols collected in filters. Atomic absorption spectroscopy method. A Member State may use any other method which it can demonstrate gives results equivalent to the above method. IV. REFERENCE METHOD FOR THE SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT OF PM10 The reference method for the sampling and measurement of PM10 will be that described in prEN 12341 ‘Air quality — field test procedure to demonstrate reference equivalence of sampling methods for the PM10 fraction of particulate matter’. The measurement principle is based on the collection on a filter of the PM10 fraction of ambient particulate matter and the gravimetric mass determination. A Member State may use any other method which it can demonstrate gives results equivalent to the above method or any other method which the Member State concerned can demonstrate displays a consistent relationship to the reference method. In that event the results achieved by that method must be corrected by a relevant factor to produce results equivalent to those that would have been achieved by using the reference method. Each Member State must inform the Commission of the method used to sample and measure PM10. The Commission must as soon as possible carry out intercomparison exercises for PM10 sampling and measurement methods in order to provide information for the review of this Directive in accordance with Article 10. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/119 V. PROVISIONAL REFERENCE METHOD FOR THE SAMPLING AND MEASUREMENT OF PM2,5 The Commission will produce guidelines, in consultation with the committee referred to in Article 12 of Directive 96/62/EC, for an appropriate provisional reference method for the sampling and assessment of PM2,5 by. (*). A Member State may use any other method which it considers suitable. Each Member State must inform the Commission of the method used to sample and measure PM2,5. The Commission must as soon as possible carry out intercomparison exercises for PM2,5 sampling and measurement methods in order to provide information for the review of this Directive in accordance with Article 10. VI. REFERENCE MODELLING TECHNIQUES Reference modelling techniques cannot be specified at present. Any amendments to adapt this point to scientific and technical progress must be adopted in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12(2) of Directive 96/62/EC. (*) 24 months after the entry into force of this Directive. C 360/120 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL’S REASONS I. INTRODUCTION 1. On 21 November 1997, the Commission forwarded to the Council a proposal relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air, based on Article 130s (1) of the EC Treaty (1). 2. The Economic and Social Committee and the European Parliament delivered their opinions on 29 April 1998 (2) and on 13 May 1998 (3), respectively. 3. On 9 July 1998, the Commission forwarded an amended proposal (4) to the Council. 4. On 24 September 1998, the Council adopted its common position in accordance with Article 189c of the Treaty. II. OBJECTIVE In accordance with the provisions of the 1996 framework Directive on ambient air quality (5), the above proposal, with regard to sulphur dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air, aims at setting out limit values and, as appropriate, alert thresholds designed to avoid, prevent or reduce harmful effects on human health and the environment; at assessing concentrations on the basis of common methods and criteria; at obtaining adequate information and ensuring that it is made available to the public and at maintaining ambient air quality where it is good and improving it in other cases. III. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION A. Amended Commission proposal The Council adopted in full or in part, and occasionally in spirit, 21 amendments proposed by the European Parliament, of which three were originally rejected by the Commission (5). The latter amendments regard the deletion of the public information indicators (Amendments 11 and 27), as well as the provisions for time-limited derogations in respect of lead in certain areas to take account of specific circumstances (Amendment 8 — see Annex IV). B. Amendments accepted by the Commission but not included in the common position Amendment 2 (need to assess air quality in tourist areas during the peak season) This amendment was considered not appropriate since a ‘whereas’ clause as proposed would have no corresponding provision in the Articles, and since provisions for measurements, which apply irrespective of the season, are deemed sufficient to reflect the situation in peak tourist seasons. (1) OJ C 9, 14. 1. 1998, p. 6. (2) OJ C 214, 10. 7. 1998, p. 1. (3) OJ C 167, 1. 6. 1998, p. 110. (4) Directive 96/62/EC (OJ L 296, 21. 11. 1996, p. 55). (5) While sharing the Commission’s formal reasoning that Amendment 13 would not be appropriate for inclusion in the enacting terms of the Directive, the Council did emphasise the importance of research in this context. 23. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 360/121 C. Main changes or innovations introduced by the Council 1. Preamble The preamble was rearranged and streamlined, where it did not bring additional information or explanation of subsequent Articles. Additional ‘whereas’ clauses were inserted to stress that those of the Directive are minimum requirements (see fourth and in particular fifth ‘whereas’, which is meant to reflect the spirit of the European Parliament’s Amendments 3, 5 and 6). The penultimate ‘whereas’ clause, which was also added by the Council, stresses that adaptations via the committee’s procedure cannot have the effect of weakening the limit values or alert threshold (the same intention was behind Parliament’s Amendment 9). 2. Definitions (Article 2) Definitions 4 and 5 were made more user-friendly. Definition 6 was introduced in connection with new provisions (see point 3). Definition 7 was introduced to clarify subsequent provisions. 3. Special circumstances (Article 3(4), Article 5(4) and (5)) The Council recognised that in some Member States special, non-controllable, circumstances — such as natural events or specific climatic/geographic conditions — could lead to limit values being exceeded. It agreed therefore that, in such cases, Member States would be under the obligation to intervene only in respect of exceedances not due to those special circumstances, provided that they make available to the Commission the necessary justification. 4. Information to the public (Article 8) The Council reformulated and assembled in a clearer and more consistent way provisions to inform the public. It agreed to cancel the obligation to send to the Commission the list of organisations notified, which would impose an unnecessary burden on Member States. 5. Repeals and transitional arrangements (Article 9) The Council brought some technical modifications to this Article, with a view to avoiding possible double-reporting obligations during the transitional period. 6. Review (Article 10) The Council strengthened the newly introduced review clause by specifically indicating the main points which should be covered (limit values for all kinds of particulates, and for nitrogen dioxide). It also stressed that the review should take into account the latest scientific research or experience in the implementation of the Directive, and especially in the application of the criteria for measurements. 7. Date of implementation (Article 12) Given the effort which the Directive will require especially from some Member States, the Council agreed on a period of two years after entry into force. C 360/122 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 23. 11. 98 8. Alert threshold for sulphur dioxide (Annex I, Section II) The Council agreed on a 500 eg/m3 alert threshold. It considered that the threshold of 350 eg/m3 proposed by the Commission — based on the tests of exposure of particularly sensitive categories of the population whilst exercising — was likely to induce unjustified alarm in the general population. 9. Possible exceedances of the hourly limit value for NO2 (Annex II) The Council raised the number of possible exceedances to 18 per year, given in particular the difficulties to meet the limit values associated with specific climatic conditions. This point is among those to be specifically addressed in connection with the review (see point 6). 10. Limit values for particulate matter (Annex III) The Council recognised the large scientific uncertainty associated with this substance, as well as the lack of extensive practical experience in emission reductions. It agreed therefore, — to render less severe the limit values for PM10 to be met by 2005 (35 instead of 25 exceedances for the daily value; 40 eg/m3 instead of 30 for the annual limit value) — to set only indicative limit values for PM10 as regards the second stage to be implemented by 2010 — not to include at this stage provisions relating to PM2,5, on the understanding that the review scheduled for 2003 would specifically address these points (see point 6). 11. Reference methods (Annex IX) In the absence of internationally agreed standards, the Council agreed on a reference method to be used for sampling and measurement of PM10, and on a provisional reference method for PM2,5, on the understanding that the Commission will carry out intercomparison exercises in order to provide information for a review of those two methods. * * * The Commission has agreed to the amendments made by Council


title: 98/561/CE: Recommandation du Conseil du 24 septembre 1998 sur la coopération européenne visant à la garantie de la qualité dans l'enseignement supérieur

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
cooperation policy
education policy
higher education

formats: html pdf print

text: L 270/56 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 7. 10. 98 RECOMMANDATION DU CONSEIL du 24 septembre 1998 sur la coop(cid:130)ration europ(cid:130)enne visant (cid:133) la garantie de la qualit(cid:130) dans l’enseigne- ment sup(cid:130)rieur (98/561/CE) LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROP(cid:144)ENNE, (4) vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne, et notamment ses articles 126 et 127, vu la proposition de la Commission, vu l’avis du Comit(cid:130) (cid:130)conomique et social (1), vu l’avis du Comit(cid:130) des r(cid:130)gions (2), statuant conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) la proc(cid:130)dure pr(cid:130)vue (cid:133) l’article 189 C du trait(cid:130) (3), (1) (2) (3) consid(cid:130)rant que tous les (cid:144)tats membres ont pour objectif la qualit(cid:130) de l’(cid:130)ducation et de la formation; que la Communaut(cid:130) est invit(cid:130)e (cid:133) contribuer (cid:133) cet effort permanent en encourageant la coop(cid:130)ration si n(cid:130)cessaire, en entre les (cid:144)tats membres et, leur action tout en appuyant et en compl(cid:130)tant respectant pleinement leur responsabilit(cid:130) en ce qui concerne le contenu de l’enseignement et l’organi- sation des syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)ducation et de formation, ainsi que leur diversit(cid:130) culturelle et linguistique; consid(cid:130)rant que, dans ses conclusions du 25 novembre 1991 (4), le Conseil a indiqu(cid:130) que l’am(cid:130)- lioration de la qualit(cid:130) de l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur est un souci commun (cid:133) tous les (cid:144)tats membres et (cid:133) tous les (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur de la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne; que, compte tenu de la diversit(cid:130) des m(cid:130)thodes utilis(cid:130)es au niveau national, les exp(cid:130)riences nationales pourraient (cid:136)tre compl(cid:130)t(cid:130)es par une exp(cid:130)rience europ(cid:130)enne acquise notamment dans le cadre de projets pilotes visant (cid:133) (cid:130)tablir une coop(cid:130)ration dans ce domaine ou (cid:133) renforcer la coop(cid:130)ration existante; consid(cid:130)rant que les r(cid:130)ponses au m(cid:130)morandum de la Commission sur l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur sou- lignent entre autres que la qualit(cid:130) devrait (cid:136)tre garantie (cid:133) tous les les (cid:130)chelons et dans secteurs, les diff(cid:130)rences entre (cid:130)tablissements se limitant aux objectifs, aux m(cid:130)thodes et (cid:133) la demande (cid:130)ducative; que l’attidude g(cid:130)n(cid:130)rale est favorable (cid:133) l’introduction de m(cid:130)thodes efficaces et acceptables d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) qui prennent en compte les exp(cid:130)riences europ(cid:130)ennes et interna- tionales et la possibilit(cid:130) d’une coop(cid:130)ration; tous (1) JO C 19 du 21. 1. 1998, p. 39. (2) JO C 64 du 27. 2. 1998, p. 63. (3) Avis du Parlement europ(cid:130)en du 18 novembre 1997 (JO C 371 du 8. 12. 1997, p. 33), position commune du Conseil du 26 f(cid:130)vrier 1998 (non encore parue au Journal officiel) et d(cid:130)cision du Parlement europ(cid:130)en du 28 mai 1998 (non encore parue au Journal officiel). (4) JO C 321 du 12. 12. 1991, p. 2. (5) (6) (7) consid(cid:130)rant qu’une (cid:130)tude r(cid:130)alis(cid:130)e par la Commis- sion sur la situation en mati(cid:138)re d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) dans les (cid:144)tats membres a r(cid:130)v(cid:130)l(cid:130) que les nouveaux syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) comportaient certains (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments communs; que les deux projets pilotes r(cid:130)alis(cid:130)s ensuite (cid:130)taient bas(cid:130)s sur un tronc commun d’(cid:130)l(cid:130)ments emprunt(cid:130)s aux syst(cid:138)mes nationaux existants; qu’ils ont mis (cid:133) l’essai une m(cid:130)thode commune avec succ(cid:138)s et ont montr(cid:130) que l’ensemble des acteurs dans ce domaine souhaitaient vivement poursuivre les (cid:130)changes d’ex- p(cid:130)riences lesquels mettent en (cid:130)vidence la diversit(cid:130) des cultures nationales en mati(cid:138)re d’(cid:130)valuation et l’importance de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) en g(cid:130)n(cid:130)ral; consid(cid:130)rant que, vu la grande diversit(cid:130) des syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)ducation dans la Communaut(cid:130), la d(cid:130)finition du terme «(cid:130)tablissement d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur» utilis(cid:130) dans la pr(cid:130)sente recommandation comprend tous les types d’(cid:130)tablissements qui conf(cid:138)rent les qualifications ou des titres de ce niveau, quelle que soit leur appellation dans les (cid:144)tats membres; que cette d(cid:130)finition est utilis(cid:130)e dans la d(cid:130)cision insti- tuant le programme Socrates; consid(cid:130)rant que les (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur doivent satisfaire aux nouvelles exigences (cid:130)ducatives et sociales d’une «soci(cid:130)t(cid:130) de la connais- sance» mondiale et aux (cid:130)volutions qui en d(cid:130)cou- lent; qu’en cons(cid:130)quence, ils s’efforcent d’am(cid:130)liorer les qualit(cid:130)s requises des services qu’ils offrent en mettant au point, le cas (cid:130)ch(cid:130)ant, de nouvelles initiatives (individuellement ou gr(cid:131)ce (cid:133) la collabora- tion dans le cadre d’associations au niveau de l’en- seignement sup(cid:130)rieur) ax(cid:130)es sur l’am(cid:130)lioration de la qualit(cid:130) de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage; leurs cons(cid:130)quences pour consid(cid:130)rant que les transformations technologiques et (cid:130)conomiques et le march(cid:130) du travail lancent de nouveaux d(cid:130)fis aux (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur et que, d’une part, les d(cid:130)fis r(cid:130)sultant de l’ouverture du march(cid:130) mondial et, d’autre part, l’afflux sans cesse croissant des (cid:130)tudiants vers les (cid:130)tablissements d’en- seignement sup(cid:130)rieur et les relations de ceux-ci avec l’(cid:144)tat et la soci(cid:130)t(cid:130), de fa(cid:135)on (cid:133) ce que soient respect(cid:130)s les normes acad(cid:130)miques existantes, les les normes de qualit(cid:130), objectifs de formation, 7. 10. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 270/57 l’autonomie et/ou l’ind(cid:130)pendance, selon les struc- tures pertinentes de chaque (cid:144)tat membre, des (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur, ainsi que la n(cid:130)cessit(cid:130) de rendre compte au public et de l’in- former; consid(cid:130)srant que la discussion sur la communica- tion de la Commission du 13 f(cid:130)vrier 1994 a r(cid:130)v(cid:130)l(cid:130) que les syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) pour- raient contribuer (cid:133) la reconnaissance mutuelle des qualifications acad(cid:130)miques et professionnelles au niveau communautaire; consid(cid:130)rant que le livre blanc de la Commission intitul(cid:130) «Croissance, comp(cid:130)titivit(cid:130) et emploi» le livre blanc intitul(cid:130) «Enseigner et apprendre — vers la soci(cid:130)t(cid:130) cognitive» ainsi que le livre vert «(cid:144)duca- tion — Formation — Recherche. Les obstacles (cid:133) la l’importance transnationale» montrent mobilit(cid:130) d’une (cid:130)ducation de qualit(cid:130) pour l’emploi et la croissance au sein de la Communaut(cid:130) et pour sa comp(cid:130)titivit(cid:130) au niveau mondial; que ces docu- ments mettent en valeur le lien qui existe entre les fonctions sociale et culturelle de l’(cid:130)ducation et de la formation, d’une part, et leurs fonctions (cid:130)cono- miques, d’autre part, et donc les aspects multiples du concept de qualit(cid:130); qu’il appara(cid:140)t clairement que des syst(cid:138)mes (cid:130)ducatifs transparents sont n(cid:130)cessaires (cid:133) la mobilit(cid:130) transnationale; consid(cid:130)rant que favoriser la mobilit(cid:130) est l’un des objectifs de la coop(cid:130)ration communautaire dans les domaines de l’(cid:130)ducation et de la formation; que le livre vert de la Commission «(cid:144)ducation — Forma- tion — Recherche. Les obstacles (cid:133) la mobilit(cid:130) transnationale» analyse les principaux obstacles juridiques, administratifs et pratiques que ren- contrent les (cid:130)tudiants qui souhaitent poursuivre leur (cid:130)tudes dans un autre (cid:144)tat membre, propose des mesures destin(cid:130)es (cid:133) am(cid:130)liorer la mobilit(cid:130) et souligne qu’une (cid:130)ducation de qualit(cid:130), qui donne aux personnes la possibilit(cid:130) d’(cid:136)tre comp(cid:130)titives au niveau international et de profiter de la libre circu- lation dans la Communaut(cid:130), b(cid:130)n(cid:130)ficie de ce type de mobilit(cid:130); consid(cid:130)rant que la taille, la structure et le finance- ment des syst(cid:138)mes d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur dans les (cid:144)tats membres diff(cid:138)rent et que les finalit(cid:130)s de ces syst(cid:138)mes vont continuer (cid:133) (cid:130)voluer; que, dans certains (cid:144)tats membres, le syst(cid:138)me d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur comprend les universit(cid:130)s et les autres (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur, souvent (cid:133) vocation professionnelle; concept, l’(cid:130)tendue et les m(cid:130)thodes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) sont d(cid:130)finis par chaque (cid:144)tat membre et qu’ils varient et (cid:130)voluent suivant les circonstances et/ou les structures; et que le les exclusives qui responsabilit(cid:130)s consid(cid:130)rant incombent aux (cid:144)tats membres en ce qui concerne la structure de leurs syst(cid:138)mes l’organisation et leurs sup(cid:130)rieur d’enseignement ainsi que (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) contraintes budg(cid:130)taires, et consid(cid:130)rant l’autonomie et/ou l’ind(cid:130)pendance, selon les structures perti- nentes de chaque (cid:144)tat membre, des (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur, I. RECOMMANDE aux (cid:144)tats membres: A. de soutenir et, le cas (cid:130)ch(cid:130)ant, de cr(cid:130)er des syst(cid:138)mes transparents d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) et ce, dans le but: — de pr(cid:130)server la qualit(cid:130) de l’enseignement sup(cid:130)- rieur dans les conditions (cid:130)conomiques, sociales et culturelles propres (cid:133) leur pays tout en tenant compte de la dimension europ(cid:130)enne et d’un monde (cid:130)voluant rapidement, sup(cid:130)rieur (cid:133) s’appuyer — d’encourager et d’aider les (cid:130)tablissements d’en- seignement sur des mesures appropri(cid:130)es, et notamment sur l’(cid:130)va- luation, pour am(cid:130)liorer la qualit(cid:130) de l’ensei- gnement et de l’apprentissage, ainsi que de la autre domaine recherche, formation (cid:133) important de leur mission, la — de stimuler les (cid:130)changes mutuels d’informa- tions concernant la qualit(cid:130) et l’(cid:130)valuation de celle-ci sur le plan communautaire et mondial et d’encourager la coop(cid:130)ration entre les (cid:130)tablis- sements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur dans ce domaine; B. de fonder les syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) sur les (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments suivants, explicit(cid:130)s en annexe: — autonomie et/ou ind(cid:130)pendance, selon les struc- tures pertinentes de chaque (cid:144)tat membre, des organismes la qualit(cid:130) dans le choix des proc(cid:130)dures et des m(cid:130)thodes, l’(cid:130)valuation de charg(cid:130)s de — adaptation des proc(cid:130)dures et des m(cid:130)thodes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) au profil et (cid:133) la mission des (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur, dans le respect de leur autonomie et/ou de leur ind(cid:130)pendance selon les structures pertinentes de chaque (cid:144)tat membre, — utilisation, en fonction des objectifs, des (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments d’(cid:130)valuation internes et/ou externes de la qualit(cid:130), adapt(cid:130)s aux proc(cid:130)dures et aux m(cid:130)thodes utilis(cid:130)es, — participation des diff(cid:130)rentes parties int(cid:130)ress(cid:130)es selon l’objet de cette (cid:130)valuation, — publication des r(cid:130)sultats de cette (cid:130)valuation sous une forme appropri(cid:130)e (cid:133) chaque (cid:144)tat membre; C. d’encourager, si n(cid:130)cessaire, les (cid:130)tablissements d’en- seignement sup(cid:130)rieur, en coop(cid:130)ration avec les structures comp(cid:130)tentes des (cid:144)tats membres, (cid:133) prendre les mesures de suivi appropri(cid:130)es; L 270/58 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 7. 10. 98 D. d’inviter les autorit(cid:130)s comp(cid:130)tentes et les (cid:130)tablis- sements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur (cid:133) accorder une importance particuli(cid:138)re (cid:133) l’(cid:130)change d’exp(cid:130)riences et (cid:133) la coop(cid:130)ration en mati(cid:138)re d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) avec les autres (cid:144)tats membres ainsi qu’avec les organisations et les associations internationales actives dans le domaine de l’enseignement sup(cid:130)- rieur; E. de promouvoir une coop(cid:130)ration entre les autorit(cid:130)s responsables de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) dans l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur et de favoriser leur mise en r(cid:130)seau. Cette coop(cid:130)ration pourrait porter totalement ou en partie sur les aspects suivants: a) favoriser et d(cid:130)velopper l’(cid:130)change d’informa- tions et d’exp(cid:130)riences, notamment sur les d(cid:130)ve- loppements m(cid:130)thodologiques des exemples de bonnes pratiques; sur et b) r(cid:130)pondre aux demandes d’expertise et de conseil des autorit(cid:130)s concern(cid:130)es dans les (cid:144)tats membres; c) soutenir les (cid:130)tablissements d’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur qui souhaitent coop(cid:130)rer sur une base transnationale dans le domaine de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130); d) favoriser les contacts avec les experts internatio- naux. Lors de la poursuite de ces objectifs, il devrait (cid:136)tre tenu compte des relations qui se d(cid:130)veloppent entre l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) et d’autres activit(cid:130)s communautaires existantes, notamment dans le cadre des programmes Socrates et Leonardo da Vinci, ainsi que de l’acquis communautaire dans le domaine de la reconnaissance des qualifications (cid:133) des fins professionnelles. II. RECOMMANDE: selon les objectifs et que la Commission, en (cid:130)troite coop(cid:130)ration avec les (cid:144)tats membres, en s’appuyant sur les programmes existants et les proc(cid:130)dures normales ouvertes et transparentes de ces pro- grammes, favorise la coop(cid:130)ration, vis(cid:130)e au point I E, entre les autorit(cid:130)s responsables de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) dans l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur et y associe les organisations et les associations d’(cid:130)tablissements d’en- seignement europ(cid:130)enne poss(cid:130)dant l’exp(cid:130)rience requise dans le domaine de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130). comp(cid:130)tence sup(cid:130)rieur (cid:133) III. INVITE: la Commission (cid:133) pr(cid:130)senter tous les trois ans au Parle- ment europ(cid:130)en, au Conseil, au Comit(cid:130) (cid:130)conomique et social et au Comit(cid:130) des r(cid:130)gions des rapports sur les progr(cid:138)s r(cid:130)alis(cid:130)s en ce qui concerne le d(cid:130)veloppement des syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) dans les diff(cid:130)- rents (cid:144)tats membres et sur les activit(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes de coop(cid:130)ration dans ce domaine, y compris sur les progr(cid:138)s r(cid:130)alis(cid:130)s concernant les objectifs mentionn(cid:130)s plus haut. Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 24 septembre 1998 Par le Conseil Le pr(cid:130)sident J. FARNLEITNER 7. 10. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 270/59 ANNEXE (cid:144)l(cid:130)ments indicatifs de l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) Les (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments mentionn(cid:130)s ci-apr(cid:138)s sont communs aux syst(cid:138)mes d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) existant en Europe. Les projets pilotes europ(cid:130)ens pour l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) dans l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur ont montr(cid:130) que tous les acteurs op(cid:130)rant dans ce domaine peuvent b(cid:130)n(cid:130)ficier de l’observation de ces (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments. L’autonomie et/ou l’ind(cid:130)pendance, selon les structures pertinentes de chaque (cid:144)tat membre, de l’organisme d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) (sur le plan des proc(cid:130)dures et des m(cid:130)thodes) est susceptible de contribuer (cid:133) l’efficacit(cid:130) des proc(cid:130)dures d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) et (cid:133) l’acceptation de leurs r(cid:130)sultats. Les crit(cid:138)res pour l’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) sont (cid:130)troitement li(cid:130)s (cid:133) la mission assign(cid:130)e (cid:133) chaque (cid:130)tablissement les diff(cid:130)rentes proc(cid:130)dures d’(cid:130)valuation par rapport aux besoins de la soci(cid:130)t(cid:130) et du march(cid:130) du travail; impliquent donc n(cid:130)cessairement la prise en compte de la sp(cid:130)cificit(cid:130) de l’(cid:130)tablissement. La connaissance des objectifs institutionnels, que ce soit au niveau de l’ensemble de l’(cid:130)tablissement, au niveau d’un d(cid:130)partement ou au niveau d’une seule unit(cid:130), est (cid:133) cet (cid:130)gard essentielle. Les proc(cid:130)dures d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) devraient comporter, en r(cid:138)gle g(cid:130)n(cid:130)rale, un (cid:130)l(cid:130)ment interne d’autor(cid:130)- flexion et un (cid:130)l(cid:130)ment externe bas(cid:130) sur l’avis d’experts externes. L’(cid:130)l(cid:130)ment interne d’autor(cid:130)flexion devrait miser sur la participation de tous les acteurs, notamment le corps enseignant et, le cas (cid:130)ch(cid:130)ant, des administrateurs responsables de l’orientation acad(cid:130)mique et professionnelle, ainsi que des (cid:130)tudiants. L’(cid:130)l(cid:130)ment externe devrait (cid:136)tre un processus de coop(cid:130)ration, de consultation et de conseil entre des experts ind(cid:130)pendants externes et des acteurs appartenant (cid:133) l’(cid:130)tablissement en question. En fonction des objectifs et des crit(cid:138)res utilis(cid:130)s lors de la proc(cid:130)dure d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) et en fonction des structures de l’enseignement sup(cid:130)rieur dans les (cid:144)tats membres, les associations professionnelles, les partenaires sociaux et les anciens (cid:130)tudiants pourraient (cid:136)tre repr(cid:130)sent(cid:130)s dans les groupes d’experts. Il serait souhaitable que des experts (cid:130)trangers participent aux proc(cid:130)dures afin de favoriser l’(cid:130)change des exp(cid:130)riences acquises dans d’autres pays. Les rapports sur les r(cid:130)sultats des proc(cid:130)dures d’(cid:130)valuation de la qualit(cid:130) devraient (cid:136)tre publi(cid:130)s sous une forme adapt(cid:130)e (cid:133) chaque (cid:144)tat membre et constituer des documents de r(cid:130)f(cid:130)rence satisfaisants pour les partenaires et pour les citoyens en g(cid:130)n(cid:130)ral


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2934/98 by José POMÉS RUIZ to the Council. The crisis in Albania

eurovoc_concepts:
Albania
EU programme
cooperation policy
economic stabilisation
international cooperation
public safety

formats: html print


title: Conclusions du Conseil du 24 septembre 1998 concernant la Conférence européenne de l'audiovisuel: «défis et possibilités de l'ère numérique»

eurovoc_concepts:
European conference
West Midlands
audiovisual communications policy
audiovisual production
competitiveness
programmes industry

text: 6. 10. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut~s europ~ennes C 306/1 I (Communications) CONSEIL CONCLUSIONS DU CONSEIL du 24 septembre 1998 concernant la Conf~rence europ~enne de l’audiovisuel: (cid:133)d~fis et possibilit~s de l’(cid:127)re num~rique(cid:176) (98/C 306/01) LE CONSEIL DE L’UNION EUROP^ENNE, 1. (cid:217)salue l’initiative commune de la Commission et du British Screen Advisory Council (BSAC) d’organiser, { Birmingham, du 6 au 8 avril 1998, la Conf~rence europ~enne de l’audiovisuel inti(cid:220) tul~e (cid:133)D~fis et possibilit~s de l’(cid:127)re num~rique(cid:176); la pr~sidence, de 2. (cid:217)reconna(cid:244)t que les questions examin~es par les quatre groupes de travail de la conf~rence de Birmingham sont des priorit~s fondamentales de la politique de l’audiovisuel; 3. (cid:217)se f~licite des id~es constructives et novatrices ~non(cid:220) les rapports desdits quatre groupes de c~es dans travail en ce qui concerne les orientations futures; 4. (cid:217)reconna(cid:244)t que les ^tats membres, la Commission et le Conseil doivent maintenant, chacun dans le cadre de leurs comp~tences respectives, ~valuer ces id~es, en tirer des priorit~s et d~cider de l’opportunit~ de leur donner suite; 5. (cid:217)invite instamment la pr~sidence autrichienne { assurer le suivi de la conf~rence de Birmingham dans cette optique; la Commission et 6. (cid:217)note en particulier les occasions que repr~sentent: -(cid:217)l’examen { mi(cid:220)parcours du programme MEDIA II, qui devrait permettre d’explorer les moyens de rendre l’industrie de programme plus forte et plus comp~titive, tenant compte de la diversit~ cultu(cid:220) relle de l’Europe et de la situation particuli(cid:127)re des petites r~gions linguistiques. Les professionnels se sont montr~s int~ress~s par la cr~ation d’instru(cid:220) ments financiers destin~s { attirer les capitaux priv~s et par la promotion de la production audio(cid:220) visuelle europ~enne sur les march~s ext~rieurs, sur la Commission -(cid:217)la consultation { laquelle donnera lieu de livre vert la convergence, qui de permettra { le plan d’action annonc~ { la fin de 1998, en tenant compte du cadre r~glementaire existant et, le cas ~ch~ant, la n~cessit~ de d~velopper les services num~riques au fur et { mesure de leur ~mergence. la Commission d’~laborer


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 2035/98 della Commissione del 24 settembre 1998 che fissa la restituzione massima all'esportazione di frumento tenero nell'ambito della gara di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1079/98

eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
common wheat
export refund
export tax

formats: pdf print

text: L 262/42 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 25. 9. 98 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 2035/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 24 settembre 1998 che fissa la restituzione massima all’esportazione di frumento tenero nell’ambito della gara di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1079/98 LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1992, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore dei cereali (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 923/96 della Commissione (2), visto il regolamento (CE) n. 1501/95 della Commissione, del 29 giugno 1995, che stabilisce modalit(cid:133) di applica- zione del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/92 del Consiglio, riguardo alla concessione delle restituzioni all’esporta- zione e alle misure da adottare in caso di turbative nel settore dei cereali (3), modificato da ultimo dal regola- mento (CE) n. 2052/97 (4), e in particolare l’articolo 4, considerando che una gara per la restituzione e/o la tassa all’esportazione di frumento tenero verso qualsiasi paese terzo, esclusi alcuni paesi ACP, (cid:138) stata indetta con il regolamento (CE) n. 1079/98 della Commissione (5), modificato dal regolamento (CE) n. 2005/98 (6); considerando che, a norma dell’articolo 7 del regolamento (CE) n. 1501/95, la Commissione pu(cid:149), secondo la proce- dura di cui all’articolo 23 del regolamento (CEE) n. 1766/ 92 decidere, di fissare una restituzione massima all’espor- tazione, tenendo conto dei criteri precisati all’articolo 1 del regolamento (CE) n. 1501/95; che in tal caso sono dichiarati aggiudicatari il concorrente o i concorrenti la cui offerta sia pari o inferiore a detta restituzione massima, nonch(cid:130) il concorrente o i concorrenti la cui offerta verta su una tassa all’esportazione; considerando che l’applicazione degli anzidetti criteri all’attuale situazione dei mercati del cereale in oggetto induce a fissare la restituzione massima all’esportazione al livello di cui all’articolo 1; considerando che le misure previste dal presente regola- mento sono conformi al parere del comitato di gestione per i cereali, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 Per le offerte comunicate dal 18 al 24 settembre 1998, nell’ambito della gara di cui al regolamento (CE) n. 1079/ 98, la restituzione massima all’esportazione di frumento tenero (cid:138) fissata a 32,49 ECU per tonnellata. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 25 settembre 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 24 settembre 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 181 dell’1. 7. 1992, pag. 21. (2) GU L 126 del 24. 5. 1996, pag. 37. (3) GU L 147 del 30. 6. 1995, pag. 7. (4) GU L 287 del 21. 10. 1997, pag. 14. (5) GU L 154 del 28. 5. 1998, pag. 24. (6) GU L 258 del 22. 9. 1998, pag. 8


title: Decisione del Consiglio del 24 settembre 1998 relativa alla nomina di un membro titolare del comitato consultivo per la formazione dei farmacisti

eurovoc_concepts:
advisory committee (EU)
appointment of staff
pharmacist
vocational training

text: C 306/4 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit{ europee 6. 10. 98 DECISIONE DEL CONSIGLIO del 24 settembre 1998 relativa alla nomina di un membro titolare del comitato consultivo per la formazione dei farmacisti (98/C 306/04) IL CONSIGLIO DELLE COMUNIT[ EUROPEE, vista la decisione 85/434/96/CEE del Consiglio, del 16 settembre 1985, concernente l’istitu(cid:220) zione di un comitato consultivo per la formazione dei farmacisti(cid:216)(˛), in particolare gli articoli 3 e 4, considerando che, con decisione del 23 luglio 1996(cid:216)(ˇ), il Consiglio ha nominato il sig. Federico PLAZA PINOL, membro titolare del comitato per il periodo fino al 22 luglio 1999; considerando che il governo spagnolo ha designato la sig. ra. Nieves MART(cid:228)N SOBRINO in sostituzione del sig. Federico PLAZA PINOL, DECIDE: Articolo unico La sig. ra Nieves MART(cid:228)N SOBRINO (cid:127) nominata membro titolare del comitato consultivo per la formazione dei farmacisti in sostituzione del sig. Federico PLAZA PINOL per la restante durata del mandato di quest’ultimo, cio(cid:127) fino al 22 luglio 1999. Fatto a Bruxelles, add(cid:243) 24 settembre 1998. Per il Consiglio Il Presidente J. FARNLEITNER (˛)(cid:217)GU L 253 del 24. 9. 1985, pag. 43. (ˇ)(cid:217)GU C 239 del 17. 8. 1996, pag. 5


title: ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2035/98 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ της 24ης Σεπτεμβρίου 1998 για καθορισμό της μέγιστης επιστροφής κατά την εξαγωγή μαλακού σίτου στο πλαίσιο του διαγωνισμού που προβλέπεται στον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1079/98

text: L 262/42 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym 25. 9. 98 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 2035/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 24gr Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998 cia jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr l(cid:146)cistgr epistqov(cid:147)r jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) lakajo(cid:151) s(cid:148)tou sto pka(cid:148)sio tou diacymislo(cid:151) pou pqobk(cid:146)petai stom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1079/98 G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 30(cid:147)r Ioum(cid:148)ou 1992, peq(cid:148) dgliouqc(cid:148)ar joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tym sitgq(cid:150)m (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 923/96 (2), tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1501/95 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r, tgr 29gr Ioum(cid:148)ou 1995, peq(cid:148) hesp(cid:148)seyr oqisl(cid:146)mym keptoleq(cid:150)m jam(cid:149)mym evaqloc(cid:147)r tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92 tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, (cid:149)som avoq(cid:145) tg woq(cid:147)cgsg epistqov(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147), jah(cid:150)r jai ta l(cid:146)tqa ta opo(cid:148)a pq(cid:146)pei ma kalb(cid:145)momtai se peq(cid:148)ptysg diataqaw(cid:147)r tgr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tym sitgq(cid:150)m (3), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeuta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2052/97 (4), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 4, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (cid:149)ti, le tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1079/98 tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (5), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 2005/ 98 (6), pqojgq(cid:151)whgje diacymisl(cid:149)r cia tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr epistqov(cid:147)r (cid:147)/jai tou v(cid:149)qou jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) lakajo(cid:151) s(cid:148)tou pqor (cid:149)ker tir tq(cid:148)ter w(cid:150)qer ejt(cid:149)r oqisl(cid:146)mym wyq(cid:150)m AJE· (cid:149)ti to (cid:145)qhqo 7 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1501/95, pqobk(cid:146)- pei (cid:149)ti, le b(cid:145)sg tir amajoimyhe(cid:148)ser pqosvoq(cid:146)r, g Epitqop(cid:147) d(cid:151)matai, s(cid:151)lvyma le tg diadijas(cid:148)a pou pqobk(cid:146)petai sto (cid:145)qhqo 23 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EOJ) aqih. 1766/92, ma apova- s(cid:148)sei ma jahoq(cid:148)sei lia l(cid:146)cistg epistqov(cid:147) jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147), kalb(cid:145)momtar up(cid:149)xg ta jqit(cid:147)qia pou amav(cid:146)qomtai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1 tou jamomislo(cid:151) (EJ) aqih. 1501/95· (cid:149)ti stgm peq(cid:148)ptysg aut(cid:147), o diacymisl(cid:149)r jatajuq(cid:150)metai s’ eje(cid:148)mom (cid:147) s’ eje(cid:148)mour ej tym pqosveq(cid:149)mtym tym opo(cid:148)ym g pqosvoq(cid:145) e(cid:148)mai lijq(cid:149)teqg (cid:147) (cid:148)sg ap(cid:149) tg l(cid:146)cistg epistqov(cid:147) jah(cid:150)r jai s’ eje(cid:148)mom (cid:147) s’ eje(cid:148)mour tym upobakk(cid:149)mtym tym opo(cid:148)ym g pqosvoq(cid:145) avoq(cid:145) v(cid:149)qo jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147)· (cid:149)ti g evaqloc(cid:147) tym amyt(cid:146)qy jqitgq(cid:148)ym stgm paqo(cid:151)sa jat(cid:145)stasg tgr acoq(cid:145)r tou em k(cid:149)cy sitgqo(cid:151) odgce(cid:148) stom jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr l(cid:146)cistgr epistqov(cid:147)r jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) sto pos(cid:149) pou amav(cid:146)qetai sto (cid:145)qhqo 1· (cid:149)ti ta l(cid:146)tqa pou pqobk(cid:146)pomtai stom paq(cid:149)mta jamomisl(cid:149) e(cid:148)mai s(cid:151)lvyma le tg cm(cid:150)lg tgr epitqop(cid:147)r diawe(cid:148)qisgr sitgq(cid:150)m, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Cia tir pqosvoq(cid:146)r pou amajoim(cid:150)momtai sto pka(cid:148)sio tou diacymislo(cid:151) pou pqobk(cid:146)petai stom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1079/98 ap(cid:149) tir 18 (cid:146)yr tir 24 Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998, g l(cid:146)cistg epistqov(cid:147) jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) lakajo(cid:151) s(cid:148)tou jahoq(cid:148)fetai se 32,49 Ecu am(cid:145) t(cid:149)mo. (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei stir 25 Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998. O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 24 Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Franz FISCHLER L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1) EE L 181 tgr 1. 7. 1992, s. 21. (2) EE L 126 tgr 24. 5. 1996, s. 37. (3) EE L 147 tgr 30. 6. 1995, s. 7. (4) EE L 287 tgr 21. 10. 1997, s. 14. (5) EE L 154 tgr 28. 5. 1998, s. 24. (6) EE L 258 tgr 22. 9. 1998, s. 8