title: Proposal for a Council Decision adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on "Competitive and sustainable growth" (1998 to 2002)

formats: html pdf print

text: 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/33 Proposal for a Council Decision adopting a specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration on ‘Competitive and sustainable growth’ (1998 to 2002) (98/C 260/03) (Text with EEA relevance) COM(98) 305 final — 98/0179(CNS) (Submitted by the Commission on 10 June 1998) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 130i(4) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, Having regard Parliament, to the opinion of the European Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, Whereas by Decision No. /98/EC (1), the European Parliament and the Council adopted the fifth framework programme of the European Community (hereinafter referred to as ‘the fifth framework programme’) for research, technological development and demonstration (hereinafter referred to as ‘RTD’) activities for the period 1998 to 2002 specifying inter alia the activities to be carried out in the field of ‘Competitive and sustainable growth’; Whereas Article 130i(3) of the Treaty stipulates that the framework programme shall be implemented through specific programmes developed within each activity under the framework programme, and that each specific programme for implementing it, fix its duration and provide for the means deemed necessary; the detailed shall define rules Whereas, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Decision No 1110/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the fourth Council of 26 April 1994 concerning framework programme of the European Community activities technological development and demonstration (1994 to 1998) (2) and field of research, the the in the implementing Article 4(2) of the Council Decisions on the specific programmes framework programme, the Commission has had an external assessment conducted which it has transmitted to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions together with its conclusions and comments; fourth Whereas the Scientific and Technical Research Committee has been consulted on the scientific and technological content of the specific programmes, as set out in the working paper adopted by the Commission on 5 November 1997 (3); Whereas, in accordance with Article 130j of the Treaty, Council Decision 98/. /EC of. concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities and for the dissemination of research results (4) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the rules for participation and dissemination’) applies to this specific programme and allows the participation of the Joint Research Centre in the indirect actions covered by this specific programme; for implementing the purpose of Whereas, this programme, in addition to cooperation covered by the Agreement on the European Economic Area or by an association agreement, it may be appropriate to engage in international cooperation activities, in particular on the basis of Article 130m of the Treaty, with third countries or international organisations; Whereas implementation of this programme will also comprise activities and mechanisms aimed at stimulating, disseminating and exploiting RTD results, in particular vis-à-vis small and medium-sized enterprises, and activities to stimulate the mobility and training of researchers; (1) Common position 31/98, adopted by the Council on 23 March 1998 (OJ C 178, 10. 6. 1998, p. 1). (2) OJ L 126, 18. 5. 1994, p. 1. Decision as last amended by Decision No 2535/97/EC (OJ L 347, 18. 12. 1997, p. 1). (3) COM(97)553 final. (4) COM(97)587 final (OJ C 40, 7. 2. 1998, p. 14). C 260/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 Whereas, in accordance with the objectives of the first action plan for innovation, research activities under the fifth framework programme should be geared more towards innovation; are set out in Annex II. They are consistent with the fundamental principles and the three categories of selection criteria indicated in Annex I of the fifth framework programme. Whereas the implementation of this programme should be monitored with a view to adapting it, where appropriate, to scientific and technological developments; whereas in due course there should also be an assessment of progress with independent experts, the programme by HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION Article 1 In accordance with Article 3(1) of the fifth framework programme, the specific programme on ‘Competitive and sustainable growth’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the specific programme’) is hereby adopted for the period from [the date of adoption of this programme] to 31 December 2002. Article 2 2. In accordance with these principles and criteria the selection criteria indicated in Article 10 of the rules for participation and dissemination shall be applied for the selection of the RTD activities to be carried out. A selection criterion specific to this programme shall also be applied: the participation of industrial entities in the shared-cost actions should be appropriate to the nature of the activity. these criteria shall be complied with All the implementation of the programme, including the work programme referred to in Article 5(1), although they may be weighted differently. in 3. The rules for participation and dissemination shall apply to the specific programme. 4. Detailed rules for financial participation by the Community in the specific programme are defined in Article 4 of the fifth framework programme. 1. In accordance with Annex III to the fifth framework programme, the amount deemed necessary for carrying out the specific programme (hereinafter referred to as ‘the amount’) is ECU 2 895 million, including a maximum of 6,30 % ex- penditure. the Commission’s administrative for indirect RTD actions under 5. The specific programme are defined in Annexes II and IV to the fifth framework programme. the Specific rules for implementing the programme are set out in Annex III. 2. An indicative breakdown of this amount is given in Annex I. Article 4 3. Of this amount — ECU 640 million is for the period 1998 to 1999, and — ECU 2 255 million is for the period 2000 to 2002. Where appropriate, the latter figure will be adapted in accordance with Article 3(3) of the fifth framework programme. 4. The budgetary authority shall, in compliance with the scientific and technological objectives and priorities laid down in this Decision, set the appropriations for each financial year taking into account the availability of resources within the multiannual financial perspective. In the light of the criteria set out in Article 3, and the scientific and technological objectives and priorities set out in Annex II, the Commission shall: (a) monitor the specific implementation of programme and, where appropriate, submit proposals for adapting it, in accordance with Article 5(1) of the fifth framework programme, the (b) have the external assessment provided for in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme conducted concerning the activities carried out in the fields covered by the specific programme. Article 5 1. The Commission shall draw up a work programme specifying: Article 3 (a) the content of Annex II; 1. The general outlines, the scientific and technological objectives and the priorities for the specific programme (b) the indicative timetable for the implementation of the specific programme; 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/35 (c) the coordination arrangements indicated in Annex Article 7 III; (d) and, where necessary, the selection criteria and the arrangements for applying them for each type of indirect RTD action. The work programme appropriate. shall be updated where 2. For the purpose of implementing the indirect RTD actions, the Commission shall, on the basis of the work programme, initiate the procedures set out in the rules for participation and dissemination, primarily through calls for proposals. Article 6 1. The Commission shall be responsible implementation of this specific programme. for the 2. It shall be assisted by a Programme Committee composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. 3. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Programme Committee a draft of the measures to be taken concerning: — the drawing-up and updating of the work programme referred to in Article 5(1), — the drawing-up of the terms of reference for the external assessment provided for in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme, — any adjustment to the indicative breakdown of the 1. The Programme Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft measures referred to in Article 6(3) within a time limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. The Commission shall adopt the measures envisaged if they are the Committee. in accordance with the opinion of If the measures envisaged are not in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the Commission shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken. The Council shall act by a qualified majority. If, on expiry of a period of six weeks from the referral of the matter to the Council, the Council has not acted, the the proposed measures Commission. adopted shall by be regularly shall of the 2. The Commission the Programme Committee implementation of the specific programme, and shall in particular provide it with information about the results of the evaluation and selection of the indirect RTD actions. inform progress with Article 8 amount as set out in Annex I. This Decision is addressed to the Member States. C 260/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 ANNEX I INDICATIVE BREAKDOWN OF THE AMOUNT Type of activity Total (a) Key actions (i) innovative products, processes and organisation (ii) sustainable mobility and intermodality (iii) land transport and marine technologies (iv) new perspectives for aeronautics (b) research and technological development activities of a generic nature c) Support for research infrastructures 74,3 % 24,2 % 13,8 % 5,2 % 31,1 % 24,2 % 1,5 % Total ECU 2 895 million ANNEX II THE GENERAL OUTLINES, THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL OBJECTIVES AND THE PRIORITIES INTRODUCTION Competitiveness and sustainability are the keys to the long-term future of the Union’s economy: creation of wealth and jobs, enhancement of the quality of life, and preservation of the environment and the natural resource base. They depend on the capacity of citizens, enterprises, regions, nations and the Community to generate and use the knowledge, science and technology of tomorrow, in high-quality goods, processes and services, and in new and more efficient organisational forms. Research activities are clearly crucial in generating a more competitive technological base for European industry and in fostering the transition to a sustainable world, which will involve both a transformation of working practices and an optimised use of resources. Competitiveness and sustainability can no longer be considered a matter for individual organisations or sector alone. In the context of an increasingly interlinked and globalising economy a ‘systems approach’ is necessary, in which research activities support the development of coherent, interconnected and eco-efficient industrial and social systems, responding not only to market but also to societal needs. At the heart of these systems will be efficient and quality-based productions systems, embedded in agile organisations and producing high-quality eco-friendly products and services (in Europe there are more than 2 million industrial enterprises employing more than 40 million people, with 80 million working in related services). These wealth-creating activities should, in turn, be supported by key products and services, including efficient transport systems and clean and safe vehicles, promoting trade and the sustainable mobility of goods and people. Competitive and sustainable growth also depends on the development of quality materials and reliable measurement and testing methods, as well as the optimal use of specific research infrastructures, whether physical or virtual. Such a holistic approach is the best way to improve the long-term efficiency and sustainability of Europe’s economic system in the face of world-wide evolving market constraints and socio-environmental responsibility. Strategic objective of the programme The objective of this specific programme must be to support research activities contributing to competitiveness and sustainability, particularly where these two objectives interact. In this context, 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/37 industry’s role will be not only to identify areas for collaboration but also to bring together and integrate projects, especially cross-sectoral projects along the value chain, so that technology uptake and innovation are more efficiently ensured across Europe. The development of new concepts such as eco-industry, intermodality, new generations of aircraft and other means of transport, and innovative approaches to the integration of new technologies will help to prepare industrial sectors for the challenges of the new millennium, and to generate a strategic vision of research in all industrial sectors throughout Europe. Research activities will focus on clearly identified needs. Answering to socio-economic needs. By stimulating holistic approaches, by strengthening the innovative capacity of the European industrial system and by fostering the creation of busineses and services built on emerging technologies and new market opportunities, the programme will help face the major challenges of society, in particularly employment. In parallel, research into sustainable mobility and environmentally friendly processes, products and services will contribute to improving quality of life. Stimulating European added value. Activities to solve the cross-border problems arising in connection with the various key actions have a clear European dimension, as does the development of norms and standards in support of Community policies. Achieving the critical mass needed to attain concrete and tangible results in cost-intensive technologies will also necessitate mobilising national and other RTD Community resources. Supporting European competitiveness. Europe suffers from a recognised gap compared with its major competitors, inasmuch as it is less able to translate its scientific knowledge into innovation. Not only research but also innovation in respect of new concepts of products and services, production systems and organisational concepts to boost competitiveness and productivity. (e. g. , eco-industries) should be fostered Ethical framework. Full respect of human rights and fundamental ethical principles will be ensured throughout all activities in the specific programme in accordance with Article 6 of the European Parliament and Council Decision on the fifth framework programme. The key actions ‘innovative products, processes and organisation’, ‘sustainable mobility and intermodality’, ‘new perspectives for aeronautics’ and ‘Land transport and marine technologies’ are intended to combine efforts in various research areas (e. g. , materials, application of information society technologies, environmentally friendly technologies, etc. ) to achieve the objectives described above. This multi-sectoral dimension will also be sought in research activities related to materials, measurement and testing, and support for research infrastructures. The approach to all these activities will also pay particular attention to the ‘innovation’ dimension and to stimulating and supporting the involvement of SMEs so as to reduce the gap between the achievement of the research results and their effective use by the economy and society. LINKS AND COMPLEMENTARY WITH OTHER PROGRAMMES RTD activities will be integrated and coordinated as necessary, within and between the different key actions and programmes, as well as with the JRC. Appropriate links will be established between these activities. This should provide mechanisms by which industry, public authorities, users and the research community can work jointly on the resolution of common problems, particularly in fields such as intelligent production systems, microsystems, next generation of aircraft and other means of transport or traffic management. The economic and technological challenge of deploying, adapting and integrating life sciences and technologies related to energy, the environment or the information society is crucial for promoting competitive and sustainable growth. The specific applications meeting this challenge form an integral part of the various activities of this programme and will be conducted in close coordination with the specific programmes concerned. Coordination with the specific programme on the ‘user-friendly information society’ is based on the following principle: activities related to information society technologies as such (including development and technology demonstration and assimilation activities) will be concentrated in the ‘user-friendly information C 260/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 society’ programme, while activities linked to the deployment and integration of these technologies and their adaptation to applications relating to competitive and sustainable growth will be conducted under this programme. Aspects related with the horizontal programmes are outlined below: — Many of the problems addressed by this programme can only be dealt with effectively in a broader international context. For this reason close coordination will be developed with the programme on confirming the international role of Community research, in particular on issues where world competition is stiff and where major geo-economic challenges are at stake. This is clearly the case for production, transport, maritime, materials and standardisation related research activities, where collaboration with international initiatives (e. g. , the Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (IMS) initiative) would bring added value to European research work. Full use will be made of the possibilities offered by COST and Eureka and by co-operation with international organisations to foster synergy between actions and projects in this programme and nationally funded research activities. In the case of co-operation with Eureka, projects corresponding to priority themes of common interest may be deployed in the context of the key actions. Specific activities aimed at facilitating the involvement of entities in third countries and maintaining links with specialists from third countries trained in Europe will be carried out, which will also contribute to the international dimension of the programme. — In view of the increasing need to bridge the gap between research results and their potential applications, and of the large number of companies which could be interested in the potential results, particular attention should be paid to activities related to innovation and the participation of SMEs. This will be the case for all activities in this programme (e. g. , cooperative research, large industrial projects, support to research infrastructures), and it will be closely coordinated with the programme on the promotion of innovation and encouragement of participation of SMEs. An innovation cell will centralise promotion activities with a view to the deployment and use of the results of this programme; it will also help ensure complementarity and an interface with the innovation activities pursued under the programme ‘Innovation and the participation of the SMEs’. — Improving the know-how, skills and qualifications of European researchers in the fields covered by the programme should considerably enhance Europe’s capability to produce tangible and lasting impacts. For this reason, research activities should be developed in association with measures linked to training and socio-economic aspects, which will thus form an integral part of the programme, and of projects if appropriate. (a) KEY ACTIONS (i) Innovative products, processes and organisation Objectives and RTD priorities The overall goal of this key action is to develop new and improved methods of design, advanced equipment and process technologies for production (1) that improve the quality and reduce the costs of processes for services and products (aiming for a substantial improvement in these factors in the medium term), reduce overall life-cycle impacts, improve understanding of ‘soft technology’ aspects (organisation, management, logistics, teleworking, etc. ), so as to integrate them fully into relevant industrial processes, and ultimately contribute to employment growth (aiming at creating and maintaining in Europe a number of jobs comparable, in percentage terms, to those of Europe’s major competitors). Implementation of the key action will focus on systemic approaches to production (products, production facilities, processes and organisation) and on clustering and integrating projects into targeted groups, which will make it easier to take account of socio-economic, ecological and competition aspects. Particular attention will be paid to the involvement of (1) The term ‘production’ encompasses all industrial activities from extraction of raw materials to the processing and manufacture of components and end-products. It covers all industrial sectors and associated services, including construction. 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/39 SMEs, taking account of their specific needs and their roles in the supply chain. Where appropriate, research activities will be coordinated with the activities of other programmes, and also with international initiatives (IMS, Eureka). — Efficient design and manufacturing. The aim is to improve competitiveness through increased industrial added value, quality and responsiveness to market, reduced time to market and material in product/service combinations: intensity RTD priorities: technologies for integrated product-service design and development, multi-technology integrated products (including production equipment and facilities) and related manufacturing processes; advanced production and construction techniques and equipment for higher process accuracy and reliability; manufacturing technologies and equipment for optimal use of resources and for product miniaturisation, including the manufacture and assembly of microsystems; methods to overcome the barriers between designers and consumers. — Intelligent production. The aim is to optimise the level of performance of all elements of the industrial environment through the deployment, integration and application of information society technologies in production systems. RTD priorities: intelligent and reconfigurable production systems, machinery, and equipment; on-line control using advanced sensors; extended life and optimal use of production facilities; intelligent operation and maintenance systems, including self-repair; application of advanced technologies for flexible and interoperable supply/production/distribution systems and networks, including the integration of developments in the field of electronic commerce. — Eco-efficient processes. The goal is to minimise ‘full life-cycle’ impacts on the environment, taking account of all essential elements of the industrial system ranging from extraction through production to waste management, with emphasis on resource intensive processes. RTD priorities: clean and eco-efficient processing technologies; research aimed at mastering basic phenomena such as synthesis, catalysis, separation and reaction mechanisms, process modelling and simulation; impact monitoring and assessment of risks, in situ and on-line recovery of waste; novel processes for treatment, re-use and safe disposal of waste and for upgrading, reusing or dismantling products and production systems. — Organisation of production and work. The goal is to move towards high performance industrial systems, agile customer-driven networked industrial enterprises, including SMEs, with multi-skilled highly motivated labour force, working in efficient and pleasant workplaces and taking into consideration the diversity and specificity of European society and manufacturing tradition. RTD priorities: study of human, organisational, socio-economic and regulatory determinants for a smooth transition of enterprises towards efficient and sustainable production and consumption; new decision-making tools and new approaches to the management of change and human resources; studies on the impact and acceptance of new business ideas and new industrial production patterns, compatible with the concept of sustainability. (ii) Sustainable mobility and intermodality Objectives and RTD priorities The overall aim of this key action is to achieve a better long-term reconciliation of the growing demand for mobility with the need to respect environmental, social, economic and safety constraints. It will help to break the link between economic growth and increased traffic volumes; reduce the negative impact of transport modes; and encourage their more sustainable use. Particular attention will be paid to intermodality and how best to integrate the respective strengths of the various modes of transport in order to provide user-oriented door to door services for both passengers and freight. This should result in a better management of mobility. C 260/40 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 — Modal and intermodal transport management systems. The aim is to develop, validate, demonstrate and facilitate the deployment of rational, high-performance transport management systems for air, sea, inland waterway, rail, road and urban transport, both on a modal basis and for integrated intermodal transport, interfacing inter alia with the possibilities offered by the programme for a user-friendly information society, including the application and validation of related information and related integrated systems to facilitate their deployment. RTD priorities: development, validation and demonstration of modal and intermodal traffic and transport management systems, including operational, regulatory, administrative and structural solutions for their deployment, and providing systems; integration of information and data exchange systems across modes including real time user information, electronic documentation and user services with transport management and logistics; second generation satellite navigation (1) and positioning systems; improvements to satellite-supported haulage; integration of services such as traffic management, vehicle and freight unit identification, location and guidance, pricing, freight planning, travel information and passenger services within the transport system. — Infrastructures and their interfaces with transport means and systems. The goal is to enhance interconnectivity and interoperability and to promote intermodality in the transport system, through integration of all its components across the modes at the levels of infrastructure, transfer points, transport means, equipment, operations, services and the regulatory framework. RTD priorities: more efficient use and reduced operating, development and maintenance costs of existing infrastructure; effective interchanges; interconnection between trans-European, regional and local networks; innovative infrastructure concept and operations; relationship between transport, land use, regional planning, environment and health; reduced congestion, energy consumption, pollution, and infrastructure degradation; integration of vehicles and public transport in the transport system; innovative concepts for sustainable mobility in urban and rural areas and for interurban traffic; safety, including for the transport of dangerous goods; accessibility, safety, security and comfort of transport, including for people with special needs; human factors such as human/machine interface, human behaviour, user and operator acceptance of new ‘intelligent’ systems, optimal training methods and use of simulators. — Socio-economic scenarios for the mobility of people and goods. The aim is to develop strategies and tools for managing the impact of economic and social developments, including deregulation and liberalisation of transport services and globalisation of economic and commercial activities, on mobility demand and transport policies. RTD priorities: scenarios on travel supply and demand and policy options for mobility demand, market organisation and accessibility; legal, institutional, organisational and financing aspects of transport systems and infrastructures; understanding of the role and constraints of logistics with a view to optimisation; benchmarking tools; methods for enforcement of regulations; methodologies to measure costs and benefits, safety, performance and impacts of different transport systems, networks and their operations; assessment of new technologies and concepts, including their impact on employment, users, the environment, work organisation, social conditions, safety and security. (iii) Land transport and marine technologies Objectives and RTD priorities The aim is to meet the technological challenges needed to develop and validate the next generation of vehicles, vessels, off-shore structures and intelligent and efficient interfaces for logistic infrastructures, and to develop off-shore and submarine technologies permitting the sustainable exploitation of marine resources. Vehicles must be capable of meeting all public demands for sustainable mobility and improved safety, while (1) Space-related activities are subject to an overall coordination across the various programmes. 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/41 reducing the environmental impact and reinforcing Europe’s economic strength. The activities under this key action will be closely coordinated with the activities on land and maritime transport under the key actions on ‘Sustainable mobility and intermodality’ and ‘Systems and services for the citizen’. — Critical technologies for road and rail vehicles. The aim is the acquisition of technologies to support the improvement of transport vehicles and major infrastructure components. Such technologies must be economical, safe, intelligent, clean, efficient, reliable and responsive to new social and economic needs and the expectations of Europeans. RTD priorities: Technologies for on-board and fixed propulsion systems characterised by high efficiency, environmental friendliness and cost effectiveness; for noise, vibration and electro-magnetic reduction, light-weight components and structures; application of microtechnologies and sensor technologies for advanced components and systems; technologies for improved safety. — Innovative road and rail vehicle concepts. The aim is the development and demonstration of new vehicle concepts using new construction techniques and materials and fulfilling all functional, technological, social and economic constraints, This should contribute to the development of improved transport systems, with increased efficiency and comfort, enhanced safety and environmental friendliness, and improving availability, maintainability, manufacturability and recyclability of vehicles. Priority will be given to concepts for the long-distance transport of passengers or goods, with the key action on ‘The city of tomorrow and the cultural heritage’ dealing with the technologies and demonstrations relating to urban transport. RTD priorities: integration of new systems, structures, and power trains supported by parallel research into specific technologies for vehicle design, engineering and manufacturing operations; integration of on-board systems for intelligent and safe vehicles; integration of technologies for cost-effective vehicle design, manufacturing and use, within a whole life-cycle approach. — Human-vehicle interaction. The aim is to develop cost-effective routes for the upgrading and industrial deployment of on-board components and systems, to be translated into enhanced operability of the various land transport means, proving their flexibility, reconfigurability, robustness, and breadth of applicability. The work will focus on the incorporation of human-vehicle interaction systems within the overall production chain and vehicle concept. RTD priorities: Methodologies supporting the incorporation of human-vehicle interaction elements within the overall vehicle design and prototyping processes; effective architecture for intelligent vehicle monitoring using fault-tolerant, modular, plug-in technologies; ergonomic vehicle design; cognitive engineering technologies for effective driver-vehicle or occupant-vehicle interaction; technologies for improve cabin environment. — Advanced technologies for the development of ships and off shore platforms. The aim is the validation and demonstration of advanced technologies for the development of vessels and off shore structures complying with safety, efficiency and environmental friendliness principles. The acquisition and integration of critical technologies meeting these three objectives will cover all aspects of design, production, operation and decommissioning or dismantling. RTD priorities: development of critical technologies for vessels, systems and sub-systems, covering safety concepts, environmental protection, efficiency, production, dismantling and recycling. Research will also cover the development of the new generation of on-board systems, application of new materials, structures and components, and new, optimised and alternative power train concepts. — Use of the sea and inland waterways to transport goods and passengers. The aim is to develop and validate innovative vessel concepts with maximised performances, guided by economics while fulfilling customers requirements. This will also include new technological solutions for cargo handling, fast intermodal facilities, for port, inland waterways and marine infrastructures. C 260/42 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 RTD priorities: integration of technologies, of advanced equipment and systems for innovative vessel concepts; integration of technologies for efficient, safe and environmentally friendly transhipment facilities and operations; research to support concurrent development of technical standards, guided by life cycle approaches and performance based criteria. — Technologies for the rational and sustainable management of the sea. The aim is the development of technologies intended for the study and observation of the sea and the sustainable exploitation of the energy and mineral resources of the sea, including off shore and submarine technologies, unmanned vehicles and submarine acoustics, promoted by a coherent approach to the exploitation of the sea as a source of minerals and energy, improvement of coastal zone management and minimisation of the environmental impact of sea-based activities. RTD priorities: application of innovative technologies to monitor and forecast the state of the sea, the environment and the sea floor, especially in the deep sea, including remote controlled vehicles; safe and efficient submarine technologies for sensing, control, and data transfer in order to improve accessibility to and the exploitation of marine mineral resources, including off shore structures and floating production units. Specific coordination activities with other key actions and with Eureka are planned in order to maximise the effectiveness of Community research. (iv) New perspectives for aeronautics Objectives and RTD priorities The overall goal of this key action is to facilitate the development of aircraft and their subsystems and components in order to foster the competitiveness of the European industry while assuring the sustainable growth of air transportation. The medium-term targets of the RTD effort, including large-scale validation activities, are to substantially reduce development time and costs of new aircraft; improve efficiency (fuel consumption and maintenance costs) and reduce environmental impacts (pollutant emissions and perceived external noise) and accident rates (by at least the same factor as the growth of traffic volume). In technological terms particular emphasis will be placed on integration for subsonic aircraft and the use of enabling technologies for the second generation of supersonic aircraft. — Acquisition of critical technologies. The aim is to contribute to the long-term competitiveness of the European aeronautics industry from a strategic perspective by stimulating the development of enabling technologies and a new generation of aircraft concepts, including aircraft more respectful of the environment. RTD priorities: innovative approaches and evolutionary advances in aerodynamics, structures and application of new materials, propulsion, noise, equipment and systems, advanced sensors and avionics; development of multi-disciplinary flight mechanics and airframe-propulsion integration; methods and processes for aircraft design and manufacture. technologies, such as aeroelasticity, — Technology integration for new-generation aircraft. The aim is to facilitate the introduction and combination of the newest technologies and to demonstrate their economic and operational feasibility for new aeronautic products over their long life time. This will involve a multi-disciplinary approach, including technology integrator platforms at the required scale, focusing on lower design, production and operational costs, reduction of consumption, aircraft performance, and environmental aspects. RTD priorities: advanced design tools and concurrent engineering for reconfigurable, flexible, distributed and multi-site production systems; advanced developments in propulsion, structural and aerodynamic efficiency and systems performance and integration; airframe, engine and systems technologies and operational procedures to reduce significantly emissions and engine noise, and improve cabin environment. — Operational efficiency and safety. The aim, with the integration of on-board systems, is to help alleviate congestion in airports, increase air traffic management (ATM) system capacity, and improve the safety performance of aviation, to 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/43 accommodate the threefold increase in air traffic which is expected over the next 15 years. This work will be closely coordinated with the air-transport-related activities carried out under the key actions ‘Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality’ and ‘Systems and Services for the Citizen’. Particular attention will be paid to the development of on-board technologies and their incorporation into vehicles in an operational setting. RTD priorities: validation and integration of on-board systems for improving the operational capabilities of aircraft and supporting their integration within the future ATM system; maintenance techniques and condition monitoring for improved aircraft reliability and dispatch availability; technologies and methodologies, including the study of human factor aspects and flight simulation, for more effective accident prevention and improved aircraft design for passenger survivability. (b) RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES OF A GENERIC NATURE These activities, with potential multi-sectoral applications, will help the development of European technological capacity and stimulate the flow of ideas, knowledge and applications to complement and support the key actions. (i) New materials and their production and transformation Objectives and RTD activities Efforts will be made to support and network RTD projects leading to the optimisation of collaboration, information exchange, and Community added value. These networks will from the backbone of the structure of the research activities. They will also play an important role in stimulating international collaboration between Member States and with third countries (e. g. CEECs, United States, China) and developing foresight, socio-economic and strategic studies and impact and risk assessment. — Materials with a wide range of applications. The aim is to promote research on the most promising avenues for improving the functionality and performance of existing materials, and the development of new materials with distinctly new or radically improved characteristics. RTD priorities: innovative approaches such as nanostructured materials, supramolecular chemistry, colloidal systems and biomimetic chemistry; new and improved structural and light materials, in particular for construction, transport and high-temperature applications; functional materials, in particular opto-electronics and sensor-related materials, whose properties allow reliable operations; new and improved biomaterials such as implants and hybrid tissues; research improving understanding of deterioration and failure mechanisms. — Materials production and transformation processes. Research will focus on technologies which can ensure quality (especially in the context of the trend towards shorter production cycles), reliability and cost-effectiveness of materials to allow optimum exploitation. RTD priorities: materials production technologies for high-value-added sectors, especially fine chemistry, minerals, metals, polymers, composites, and ceramics; micro- and nanopowder processing technologies; surface, coating and interfacial technologies for advanced materials and functional applications. — Sustainable use of materials. Research will focus on the environmental and safety impact of new materials and the re-use of materials, with the aim of increasing the flow of secondary raw materials with reliable material properties, reducing life-cycle impacts and overcoming barriers with customers. RTD priorities: research supporting the development of materials which are easy to recycle; recycling processes guaranteeing reliable properties and cost-effectiveness of recycled materials; finding uses for waste; research supporting new applications of renewable raw materials, for example for the production of organic chemicals. C 260/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 (ii) New materials and production technologies in the steel field Objectives and RTD activities In view of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty in 2002, and the conclusions of the Amsterdam European Council (June 1987), there is an urgent need to speed up the progressive insertion of coal and steel research into the framework programme. The objective is to reduce costs, improve user satisfaction, and increase value added, to the benefit of both the iron and steel industry and suppliers, end users and other research partners. Steel research will be focused on the development of flexible, compact and safe production lines, cleaner processes, innovative steel products, and improved recycling. RTD priorities: coke production for metal-working industries, research to reduce the costs and improve the quality of coke, to improve production of reducing gases, reduce emissions, and improve the safety and health of workers in industrial installations: iron and steel making technologies for flexible and cost-effective production; technologies to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emission, improve steel cleanliness, and increase recycling rates; casting, rolling and downstream treatment, reduction of weight, and coating and surface techniques; development of improved and high-strength steel grades for higher performance and use in extreme conditions; cost-effective application of by-products. (iii) Measurements and testing Objectives and RTD activities — Prenormative research and technical support for standardisation. Research will focus on the development and validation of measurement and testing methods, and the production of scientific and metrological data needed to define performance and safety criteria for products and services. The goals will be to strengthen Europe’s overall competitive position and to promote the implementation of the key actions and of Community policies. RTD priorities: development of new standard and improvement of existing standards over the range of industrial requirements; support for the development of performance standards and directives to facilitate trade, to protect consumers and the work environment and to favour mutual recognition agreements. — The fight against fraud. Research will focus on developing measurement and testing systems to detect and prevent fraud, in order to better protect the economic interests of enterprises and society and the health of consumers. The long-term aim will be to keep know-how and technology ahead of the defrauder. RTD priorities: techniques to combat counterfeited or falsely labelled industrial and agricultural products; avoidance of circumvention of trade regulations and Community legislation, including customs tariffs, quotas, and waste disposal; new methods for the detection of drugs and doping, detecting false banknotes and value certificates; identification of the provenance of cultural artfacts. — Improvement of quality. Research will support the development of generic measurement and testing methods, instruments and measuring systems, including software, and this will also strengthen the SME-intensive instrumentation sector. Research will focus further on the development of quality assessment systems for private and public enterprises and on identifying measurable attributes that customers perceive to be present in quality products and services. Research needed to remove technical barriers to trade within Europe and with third countries will also be included. The activities are to be developed in conjunction with the relevant activities in the other programmes. RTD priorities: calibration and transfer standards, feasibility studies for certified reference materials and banks of reference substances to assure reliability and traceability of measurements; instruments for in situ and reference high-performance measurements; robust and portable measurements, models and software tools for the validation of measurement methods; tools to support mutual recognition agreements, for improving quality within enterprises, including SMEs, and for measuring customer satisfaction; methodologies in metrologically less developed fields. to support certification and accreditation instruments for 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/45 c) SUPPORT FOR RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES Industrial research in Europe is widely recognised for its excellence, with well-established strongholds at national level. To bring competitive advantages, scientific and technological RTD results must, however, be converted into successful applications. Apart from the development of exploitation-oriented projects, there is a real need to share facilities effectively and to exchange data and experience more efficiently, for example for testing new machines, vehicles, or processes. In addition, research constantly generates new data and in increasing quantities. Collecting and organising such data at European level will benefit industry and the whole user community. Not only will research efficiency be improved by reducing duplication but, more importantly, focusing the whole fabric of research infrastructure in Europe on common goals will enable a strategic approach to be put in place. Objective and activities Action is needed to encourage the optimum utilisation of existing research infrastructures and large installations in very close relation to the key actions. Pooling of resources and transnational access, in particular for research manufacturing centres, transport test facilities, high-power wind tunnels, industrial design computing centres, or materials and structures test facilities, are needed to better exploit new techniques based on fixed major equipment and associated instrumentation. Integration of the existing facilities must be accomplished as far as possible to avoid duplication of work, increase complementarity and ensure interoperability of data exchanges. As the stages of development of the various national institutions vary across the Community, there is also a need to reinforce collaboration, in areas such as conformity assessments, training activities and transfer of know-how. In summary, support for research infrastructures is aimed at (i) The optimum utilisation of geographically dispersed medium- and large-scale research facilities, (ii) The rapid transfer of existing and complementary RTD results to industrial applications and (iii) The improvement and interoperability of common protocols and data exchanges. — The support activities for research infrastructures are aimed at improving the information flow towards European researchers and at facilitating access to facilities to which researchers would not normally have access. This will also encourage and facilitate the improvement of existing and the promotion of new research capabilities in response to emerging needs. Support activities will stimulate access to facilities related to the various key actions, in particular to computing centres for industrial research, transport test facilities and high-power wind tunnels. — The setting up of virtual institutes will promote the coordination and the pooling of resources between research centres and organisations to achieve synergy and reap wider benefits around the objectives of the key actions and generic technologies. This activity will facilitate the creation of virtual facilities generating sufficient critical mass for research into higher performance techniques, instrumentation and technologies. Community support will be limited in time. Support activities would be meant as an incentive to speed up cooperation and the use of information and communications technologies for geographically dispersed facilities leading to improve transfer and exploitation of results, in particular for SMEs, in the field of materials, production technologies, and measurement and testing. — Support for European metrological infrastructure will reinforce cohesion between Member States and third countries. This will benefit mutual recognition and conformity agreements. Particular attention will be paid to the impact of these agreements on SMEs. Community funding will be directed towards intercomparisons and inter-laboratory performance analyses, support for interoperable database structures, the production of certified reference materials and the improved use by SMEs in particular of the implementation of the abovementioned agreements and the ISO 9000, ISO 14000 and EN 45000 standards. C 260/46 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 18. 8. 98 — Reference databases have been identified as one of the means of strengthening the European research fabric. Efforts will focus on ensuring that the data generated are of acceptable quality and comparability and on bringing together sectorial and local activities in support of European research. Such activities will preserve the property rights of individual organisations. Support activities, in particular for materials and aeronautics research, will help to catalogue and compare RTD actions at national and international level and the output of different research facilities. ANNEX III SPECIFIC RULES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAMME The specific programme will be implemented through the indirect RTD actions defined in Annexes II and IV to the fifth framework programme. In addition, the following rules specific to this programme will apply: 1. Accompanying measures The accompanying measures will comprise in particular: — studies in support of the specific programme, including the preparation of future activities, — the exchange of information, conferences, seminars, workshops and scientific and technical meetings, — recourse to external expertise, including access to scientific databases, in particular for the purposes of the monitoring of the specific programme provided for in Article 5(1) of the fifth framework programme, the external assessment provided for in Article 5(2) of the fifth framework programme and the evaluation of indirect RTD actions and the monitoring of their implementation, — dissemination, information and communication activities, including scientific publications, activities for the exploitation of results and the transfer of technologies, — training schemes related to RTD activities covered by the specific programme other than Marie Curie fellowships, — support for schemes to provide information and assistance for research players, including SMEs — recourse to external expertise in setting up and providing access to information, assistance and research and innovation promoting services and networks. 2. Coordination arrangements The Commission will endeavour to ensure complementarity between the indirect RTD actions under the programme, in particular by grouping them around a common objective, and to avoid duplication, while respecting the legitimate interests of proposes of indirect RTD actions. Coordination will also be ensured between actions under the specific programme and those carried out in: — other specific programmes implementing the fifth framework programme, — the research and training programmes implementing Council Decision. /. /Euratom of. concerning the fifth framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for research and training activities (1998-2002), — other European research frameworks such as Eureka, COST and IMS, — other Community research-related instruments such as PHARE, TACIS, MEDA, the EIF, the Structural Funds and the EIB, 18. 8. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 260/47 It will comprise: (i) the identification of common themes or priorities, resulting in particular in: — the exchange of information, — the carrying out of work decided upon jointly, entailing in particular the joint initiation of one of the procedures referred to in Article 9 of the rules for participation and dissemination, (ii) the reassignment of proposals for indirect RTD actions between specific programmes or between a specific programme and a research and training programme


title: 98/687/CECA: Décision de la Commission du 10 juin 1998 portant sur des interventions financières de l'Allemagne en faveur de l'industrie houillère en 1997 [notifiée sous le numéro C(1998) 2046] (Le texte en langue allemande est le seul faisant foi.) (Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)

eurovoc_concepts:
Germany
State aid
aid system
aid to industry
coal industry
control of State aid

text: L 324/30 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 2. 12. 98 COMMISSION D(cid:144)CISION DE LA COMMISSION du 10 juin 1998 portant sur des interventions financi(cid:138)res de l’Allemagne en faveur de l’industrie houill(cid:138)re en 1997 [notifi(cid:130)e sous le num(cid:130)ro C(1998) 2046] (Le texte en langue allemande est le seul faisant foi. ) (Texte pr(cid:130)sentant de l’int(cid:130)r(cid:136)t pour l’EEE) (98/687/CECA) LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUT(cid:144)S EUROP(cid:144)ENNES, vu le trait(cid:130) instituant la Communaut(cid:130) europ(cid:130)enne de charbon et de l’acier, vu la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA de la Commission du 28 d(cid:130)cembre 1993 relative au r(cid:130)gime communautaire des interventions des (cid:144)tats membres en faveur de l’industrie houill(cid:138)re (1), et notamment son article 2, paragraphe 1, et son article 9, consid(cid:130)rant ce qui suit: I Par lettre du 30 septembre 1996, l’Allemagne a notifi(cid:130) (cid:133) la Commission, conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 9, paragraphe 1, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, des interventions finan- ci(cid:138)res qu’elle se propose d’effectuer en faveur de l’indus- trie houill(cid:138)re au titre de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997. (cid:211) la demande de la Commission, l’Allemagne a communiqu(cid:130) des informa- tions compl(cid:130)mentaires par les lettres dat(cid:130)es du 15 octobre 1996, du 5 juin 1997, du 22 octobre 1997, du 27 janvier 1998 et du 4 mars 1998. En vertu de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, la Commission statue, au titre de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997, sur les mesures financi(cid:138)res suivantes: a) une aide au fonctionnement dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision, (cid:133) concurrence de 6 364 millions de marks allemands; b) une aide (cid:133) la r(cid:130)duction d’activit(cid:130) dans le cadre de l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)cision, (cid:133) concurrence de 3 217 millions de marks allemands; d(cid:130)cision (cid:133) concurrence de 87 millions de marks allemands; d) une aide (cid:133) la couverture des charges exceptionnelles dans le cadre de l’article 5 de la d(cid:130)cision en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saarbergwerke AG, Preussag Anthrazit GmbH et Sophia Jacoba GmbH (cid:133) concurrence de 200 millions de marks allemands; e) une aide (cid:133) la couverture des charges exceptionnelles dans le cadre de l’article 5 en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saarbergwerke AG et Sophia Jacoba GmbH permettant aux entreprises de couvrir les co(cid:150)ts qui r(cid:130)sultent ou qui ont r(cid:130)sult(cid:130) de la restructuration de l’industrie charbonni(cid:138)re et qui ne sont pas en rapport avec la production courante, (cid:133) concurrence de 609,2 millions de marks allemands. Les mesures financi(cid:138)res envisag(cid:130)es par l’Allemagne en faveur de l’industrie houill(cid:138)re rel(cid:138)vent des dispositions de l’article 1er, paragraphe 1, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA. La Commission doit, d(cid:138)s lors, statuer sur ces mesures au titre de l’article 9, paragraphe 4, de ladite d(cid:130)cision. L’appr(cid:130)ciation de la Commission est subor- donn(cid:130)e au respect des objectifs et crit(cid:138)res g(cid:130)n(cid:130)raux (cid:130)nonc(cid:130)s (cid:133) l’article 2 et aux crit(cid:138)res sp(cid:130)cifiques (cid:130)tablis aux articles 3 et 4 de cette d(cid:130)cision ainsi qu’(cid:133) leur compatibi- lit(cid:130) avec le bon fonctionnement du march(cid:130) commun. En outre, lors de son examen, la Commission (cid:130)value, confor- m(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 9, paragraphe 6, de la d(cid:130)cision, la conformit(cid:130) des mesures notifi(cid:130)es au plan de modernisa- tion, de rationalisation et de restructuration qui a fait l’objet d’un avis favorable de la Commission adopt(cid:130) dans sa d(cid:130)cision 94/1070/CECA (2). c) une aide li(cid:130)e au r(cid:130)gime visant (cid:133) maintenir la main-d’œuvre de fond dans les mines souterraines (Bergmannspr(cid:132)mie) dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la Par lettre du 5 mai 1998, l’entreprise houill(cid:138)re RJB Mining Plc, une entreprise au sens de l’article 80 du trait(cid:130), a introduit une plainte aupr(cid:138)s de la Commission (cid:133) l’en- (1) JO L 329 du 30. 12. 1993, p. 12. (2) JO L 385 du 31. 12. 1994, p. 18. 2. 12. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 324/31 contre des mesures d’aides (cid:133) l’industrie houill(cid:138)re telles qu’elles sont envisag(cid:130)es par l’Allemagne au titre des ann(cid:130)es 1997 et 1998. Selon le plaignant, ces aides sont susceptibles de porter atteinte au fonctionnement normal du march(cid:130) et de la concurrence; elles seraient donc contraires au trait(cid:130), et notamment (cid:133) ses articles 2 et 4. II Les interventions financi(cid:138)res reprises au point I sous a) et b), pour un montant total de 9 581 millions de marks allemands, se r(cid:130)f(cid:138)rent, selon la notification de l’Alle- magne, (cid:133) des dispositifs de r(cid:130)partition des aides fond(cid:130)s sur les ventes de houille et de coke (cid:133) la sid(cid:130)rurgie de la Communaut(cid:130) (cid:133) concurrence de 2 581 millions de marks allemands d’une part et de houille pour la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130) (cid:133) concurrence de 7 000 millions de marks allemands d’autre part. Ces aides sont d(cid:130)finies par l’Alle- magne en tant qu’aides (cid:133) l’(cid:130)coulement. L’aide (cid:133) l’(cid:130)coulement de houille et de coke destin(cid:130)s (cid:133) la sid(cid:130)rurgie de la Communaut(cid:130) provient d’une provision triennale telle qu’elle a (cid:130)t(cid:130) communiqu(cid:130)e par l’Allemagne dans sa notification du 5 octobre 1995. Celle-ci s’(cid:130)l(cid:138)ve pour la p(cid:130)riode 1995-1997, (cid:133) 8 065 millions de marks allemands, dont 5 010 millions (cid:133) charge du budget f(cid:130)d(cid:130)ral et 2 700 millions (cid:133) charge du budget du Land de Rh(cid:130)nanie-du-Nord-Westphalie. La contribution annuelle du gouvernement f(cid:130)d(cid:130)ral passe de 1 760 millions au titre de l’exercice 1995 (cid:133) 1 650 millions au titre de l’exercice 1996 et (cid:133) 1 600 millions au titre de l’exercice 1997. Celle du Land de Rh(cid:130)nanie-du-Nord-Westphalie descend de 948,5 millions en 1995 (cid:133) 889,2 millions en 1996 et 862,3 millions en 1997. (cid:211) la contribution du Land de Sarre s’est substitu(cid:130)e l’inscription d’une cr(cid:130)ance (cid:133) charge du budget f(cid:130)d(cid:130)ral et au b(cid:130)n(cid:130)fice de l’entreprise Saarbergwerke AG (cid:133) hauteur de 355 millions, dont 118,4 millions pour couvrir les pertes d’exploitation en 1995 et les m(cid:136)mes montants pour couvrir les pertes d’exploitation en 1996 et 1997. Les montants en question donnent lieu (cid:133) des versements (cid:133) partir de l’exercice 1996 et feront l’objet d’un d(cid:130)compte final en 1998. La provision au titre de ce r(cid:130)gime d’aide est (cid:133) consid(cid:130)rer comme un plafond. (cid:211) la fin de la p(cid:130)riode triennale, un d(cid:130)compte pr(cid:130)cis sera (cid:130)tabli, afin de d(cid:130)terminer la diff(cid:130)- rence exacte entre le prix consenti et le co(cid:150)t de produc- tion par tonne pour l’ensemble des livraisons effectu(cid:130)es. Contrairement au syst(cid:138)me en vigueur dans le pass(cid:130), le volume des livraisons annuelles couvert par l’aide n’est pas les quantit(cid:130)s effectivement livr(cid:130)es interviennent dans le calcul. Le cas (cid:130)ch(cid:130)ant, le trop-per(cid:135)u sera r(cid:130)cup(cid:130)r(cid:130) apr(cid:138)s le d(cid:130)compte final. fix(cid:130) d’avance. Seules L’aide (cid:133) l’(cid:130)coulement de houille destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130) entre dans le cadre de la cinqui(cid:138)me loi du 12 d(cid:130)cembre 1995 (1) concernant le charbon destin(cid:130) (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130). En vertu de cette loi, les entreprises charbonni(cid:138)res doivent d(cid:130)montrer l’utilisation des sommes forfaitaires qui leurs ont (cid:130)t(cid:130) allou(cid:130)es en notifiant les quantit(cid:130)s qui sont (cid:130)coul(cid:130)es aupr(cid:138)s des centrales thermiques au cours de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997. Le montant d’aide moyen par tonne ne peut exc(cid:130)der, selon la loi, l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de production moyen et le prix rendu en centrale thermique du charbon import(cid:130) de pays tiers. Dans ce syst(cid:138)me, un d(cid:130)passement du plafond pour motif d’augmentation des ventes est exclu. Cette aide a (cid:130)t(cid:130) plafonn(cid:130)e, en 1996, (cid:133) un niveau de 7 500 millions de marks allemands, pour devenir ensuite d(cid:130)gressive avec un niveau de 7 000 millions en 1997. La Commission constate apr(cid:138)s examen des informations communiqu(cid:130)es par l’Allemagne que les aides pr(cid:130)vision- nelles par tonne notifi(cid:130)es dans le cadre de ces syst(cid:138)mes d’aides (cid:133) l’(cid:130)coulement n’exc(cid:138)dent pas l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de production et la recette pr(cid:130)visible r(cid:130)sultant du libre consentement des parties contractantes et ne conduisent pas (cid:133) des prix rendus pour le charbon communautaire inf(cid:130)rieurs (cid:133) ceux pratiqu(cid:130)s pour des charbons de qualit(cid:130) similaire en provenance des pays tiers. Les aides effectivement vers(cid:130)es devront faire le cas (cid:130)ch(cid:130)ant l’objet d’une r(cid:130)gularisation annuelle sur la base des co(cid:150)ts et recettes r(cid:130)els et des quantit(cid:130)s r(cid:130)ellement vendues avant la fin de l’ann(cid:130)e 1998. Dans son analyse des deux dispositifs d(cid:130)crits ci-dessus, la Commission estime que quels que soient les principes d’allocation des aides d(cid:130)finis par l’Allemagne pour les entreprises productrices de houille couvertes par le trait(cid:130), en l’occurrence des aides (cid:133) l’(cid:130)coulement, ces mesures, en couvrant une part importante des co(cid:150)ts de production desdites entreprises quel que soit le march(cid:130) auquel l’offre s’adresse, constituent en fait des aides (cid:133) la production courante entrant dans le cadre des articles 3 et 4 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. III L’aide au fonctionnement pr(cid:130)vue dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA s’adresse aux si(cid:138)ges d’extraction appartenant aux entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saarbergwerke AG et Preussag Anthrazit GmbH. Pour ce qui est de l’entreprise Ruhrkohle AG, la mesure b(cid:130)n(cid:130)fi- ciera aux si(cid:138)ges Friedrich Heinrich/Rheinland, Nieder- berg, Walsum, Lohberg/Osterfeld, Prosper/Haniel, Wes- terholt, Auguste Victoria, Blumenthal/Haard et Heinrich Robert. Pour l’entreprise Saarbergwerke AG, la mesure sera prise en faveur des si(cid:138)ges Ensdorf et Warndt/Luisen- thal. Enfin, pour l’entreprise Preussag Anthrazit GmbH, la (1) Bundesgesetzblatt, partie I, p. 1638. L 324/32 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 2. 12. 98 mesure sera prise en faveur du si(cid:138)ge d’Ibbenbueren. Cette aide d’un montant de 6 364 millions de marks allemands est destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) couvrir l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de production et le prix de vente r(cid:130)sultant du libre consentement des parties contractantes au regard des conditions qui pr(cid:130)va- lent sur le march(cid:130) mondial pour des charbons de qualit(cid:130) similaire en provenance des pays tiers. Sur la base des informations communiqu(cid:130)es par l’Alle- magne et des dispositions de l’article 3, paragraphe 3, de ladite d(cid:130)cision, la Commission constate qu’une r(cid:130)duction des co(cid:150)ts de l’ordre de 15 % est observ(cid:130)e (cid:133) prix constants en 1996 par rapport (cid:133) l’ann(cid:130)e 1992. On note un (cid:130)cart important entre les co(cid:150)ts de production moyens qui (cid:130)taient en termes courants de 269 marks allemands en 1996 par tonne (cid:130)quivalent charbon et les prix pratiqu(cid:130)s sur les march(cid:130)s internationaux pour des qualit(cid:130)s (cid:130)quiva- lentes de 80 marks allemands par tonne (cid:130)quivalent charbon. Cet (cid:130)cart est cependant susceptible dans une certaine mesure de se r(cid:130)duire en fonction de la concentra- tion de la production au cours des prochaines ann(cid:130)es sur les exploitations ayant la productivit(cid:130) la plus (cid:130)lev(cid:130)e. La r(cid:130)duction des co(cid:150)ts observ(cid:130)e est sup(cid:130)rieure (cid:133) celle qui avait (cid:130)t(cid:130) notifi(cid:130)e par l’Allemagne dans le cadre du plan de modernisation, de rationalisation et de restructuration qui a fait l’objet d’un avis favorable de la Commission dans sa d(cid:130)cision no 94/1070/CECA. La Commission consid(cid:138)re (cid:130)galement que le principe de d(cid:130)gressivit(cid:130) des aides introduit par l’Allemagne dans les dispositifs juridique et budg(cid:130)taire depuis l’approbation dudit plan contribuera (cid:133) renforcer cette tendance. (cid:144)tant donn(cid:130) l’objectif de minimisation des aides octroy(cid:130)es et si on se base sur les principes (cid:130)nonc(cid:130)s par l’Allemagne de limiter l’octroi des aides aux productions destin(cid:130)es (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130) et (cid:133) la sid(cid:130)rurgie de la Communaut(cid:130), l’Allemagne s’engage (cid:133) assurer que les productions (cid:130)coul(cid:130)es dans les secteurs industriel et des foyers domestiques le soient (cid:133) des prix couvrant les co(cid:150)ts de production. Si la Commission n’(cid:130)l(cid:138)ve pas d’objection (cid:133) l’(cid:130)gard des aides que le gouvernement allemand se propose d’oc- troyer (cid:133) un volume de production de l’entreprise Preussag Anthrazit GmbH de 1,28 million de tonnes de fines d’an- thracite destin(cid:130)es (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130), elle n’est pas encore en mesure de rendre une d(cid:130)cision dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA sur un montant de 65 millions de marks allemands au b(cid:130)n(cid:130)- fice de cette entreprise, que l’Allemagne a notifi(cid:130) (cid:133) la Commission au titre de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997. Ce montant couvre pour les quantit(cid:130)s d’anthracite calibr(cid:130) vendues par l’entre- prise dans les secteurs industriel et des foyers domestiques de la Communaut(cid:130), (cid:133) savoir 647 000 tonnes, la diff(cid:130)rence entre le co(cid:150)t de production et le prix de vente moyen de l’anthracite calibr(cid:130). La Commission rendra sa d(cid:130)cision (cid:133) l’issue de la proc(cid:130)- dure d’examen en cours concernant des ventes d’anthra- cite calibr(cid:130) de cette entreprise au Royaume-Uni. La Commission a, suite (cid:133) des plaintes et (cid:133) ses investigations, adress(cid:130) au gouvernement allemand, le 2 ao(cid:150)t 1997, une lettre de mise en demeure, dans laquelle elle lui commu- niquait officiellement le contenu des plaintes en deman- dant des explications sur le comportement des entreprises mentionn(cid:130)es, ainsi que sur celui du gouvernement alle- mand (1). L’Allemagne s’engage (cid:133) ce que, dans le cadre des disposi- tions de l’article 86 du trait(cid:130), les aides soient limit(cid:130)es (cid:133) ce qui est strictement n(cid:130)cessaire au regard des consid(cid:130)rations sociales et r(cid:130)gionales li(cid:130)es (cid:133) la r(cid:130)gression de l’industrie charbonni(cid:138)re dans la Communaut(cid:130). Elles ne peuvent conf(cid:130)rer un avantage (cid:130)conomique ni directement ni indi- rectement (cid:133) des productions pour lesquelles les aides ne sont pas autoris(cid:130)es ou (cid:133) des activit(cid:130)s autres que la produc- tion de houille, comme par exemple des activit(cid:130)s indus- trielles d(cid:130)riv(cid:130)es de la production ou de la transformation de la houille communautaire. sociales et Dans son appr(cid:130)ciation de l’aide au fonctionnement au titre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, la Commission a tenu compte de la priorit(cid:130) qu’il convenait d’accorder, dans le cadre de la restructuration du secteur charbonnier, (cid:133) la n(cid:130)cessit(cid:130) d’att(cid:130)nuer dans toute la mesure du possible les cons(cid:130)quences r(cid:130)gionales conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’objectif (cid:130)nonc(cid:130) (cid:133) l’article 2, paragraphe 1, deuxi(cid:138)me tiret, de ladite d(cid:130)cision. Elle prend note (cid:130)galement, conform(cid:130)ment aux dispositions de l’article 3, paragraphe 2, deuxi(cid:138)me alin(cid:130)a, de la r(cid:130)duction tendan- cielle des co(cid:150)ts de production qui est intervenue (cid:133) prix constants. Il convient en outre d’ajouter que la politique de restructuration envisag(cid:130)e par l’Allemagne pour les ann(cid:130)es (cid:133) venir lors de l’accord intervenu le 13 mars 1997 entre les (cid:144)tats producteurs de Rh(cid:130)nanie-du-Nord-West- phalie et de Sarre, les entreprises charbonni(cid:138)res alle- mandes, les repr(cid:130)sentants des travailleurs et le gouverne- ment f(cid:130)d(cid:130)ral devrait permettre de poursuivre cette r(cid:130)duc- tion des co(cid:150)ts de production ainsi que des aides. La Commission constate, apr(cid:138)s examen des informations communiqu(cid:130)es par l’Allemagne, que les aides par tonne notifi(cid:130)es n’exc(cid:138)dent pas l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de produc- tion et la recette pr(cid:130)visible r(cid:130)sultant du libre consente- ment des parties contractantes et ne conduisent pas (cid:133) des prix rendus pour le charbon communautaire inf(cid:130)rieurs (cid:133) ceux pratiqu(cid:130)s pour les charbons de qualit(cid:130) similaire en provenance des pays tiers. Sous r(cid:130)serve d’un montant de 65 millions de marks alle- mands, sur la base des informations fournies par l’Alle- magne et vu les engagements de l’Allemagne repris au point VIII, l’aide pr(cid:130)vue pour l’ann(cid:130)e 1997 est compatible avec la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, et notamment ses articles 2 et 3. (1) JO C 258 du 23. 8. 1997, p. 2. 2. 12. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 324/33 IV L’aide (cid:133) la r(cid:130)duction d’activit(cid:130) pr(cid:130)vue dans le cadre de l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA d’un montant de 3 217 millions de marks allemands est destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) couvrir l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de production et le prix de vente r(cid:130)sultant du libre consentement des parties contrac- tantes au regard des conditions qui pr(cid:130)valent sur le march(cid:130) mondial pour les charbons de qualit(cid:130) similaire en provenance des pays tiers. En ce qui concerne l’entreprise Ruhrkohle AG, la mesure b(cid:130)n(cid:130)ficiera aux si(cid:138)ges Sophia- Jacoba, F(cid:129)rst Leopold/Wulfen, Ewald/Hugo, Haus Aden/ Monopol, et Westfalen. Pour l’entreprise Saarbergwerke AG, la mesure sera prise en faveur du si(cid:138)ge de G(cid:148)ttel- born/Reden. Cette aide s’ins(cid:138)re dans le cadre d’un programme de fermeture totale ou partielle qui affectera les si(cid:138)ges mentionn(cid:130)s ci-dessus. (cid:211) l’exception de la fermeture du si(cid:138)ge de Sophia-Jacoba qui s’ins(cid:130)rait dans le plan de modernisation, de rationali- sation et de restructuration de l’Allemagne qui a fait l’objet d’un avis favorable de la Commission le 13 d(cid:130)cembre 1994, les autres fermetures pr(cid:130)cit(cid:130)es font partie de l’accord intervenu le 13 mars 1997 qui conduira entre les ann(cid:130)es 1997 et 2002 (cid:133) une r(cid:130)duction des capacit(cid:130)s de production de l’ordre de 16 millions de tonnes (soit 34 % de la capacit(cid:130) de production totale) et (cid:133) la suppression de quelque 33 000 emplois. Conform(cid:130)ment aux dispositions de l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)ci- sion no 3632/93/CECA, la fermeture totale du si(cid:138)ge d’ex- traction Sophia-Jacoba est intervenue en 1997 et celle des si(cid:138)ges de G(cid:148)ttelborn/Reden, Ewald/Hugo et Westfalen interviendra avant l’expiration de la d(cid:130)cision. En ce qui concerne les fermetures partielles par le regroupement de si(cid:138)ges d’extraction, elles conduiront (cid:133) une r(cid:130)duction continue d’activit(cid:130) pr(cid:130)voyant une diminution significative avant l’expiration de la d(cid:130)cision. Conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 2, paragraphe 1, deuxi(cid:138)me tiret, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/ 93/CECA, cette aide concourt (cid:133) r(cid:130)soudre les probl(cid:138)mes sociaux et r(cid:130)gionaux li(cid:130)s (cid:133) la r(cid:130)duction d’activit(cid:130) totale ou partielle d’unit(cid:130)s de production. La r(cid:130)duction de la production observ(cid:130)e en 1996, soit 17 % par rapport (cid:133) l’ann(cid:130)e 1992, est conforme aux objec- tifs pr(cid:130)vus dans le cadre du plan de modernisation, de rationalisation et de restructuration qui a fait l’objet d’un avis favorable de la Commission dans sa d(cid:130)cision no 94/1070/CECA. (cid:144)tant donn(cid:130) l’objectif de minimisation des aides octroy(cid:130)es et en suivant le principe (cid:130)nonc(cid:130) par l’Allemagne de limiter l’octroi des aides aux productions destin(cid:130)es (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130) et (cid:133) la sid(cid:130)rurgie de la Commu- naut(cid:130), l’Allemagne s’engage (cid:133) assurer que les productions (cid:130)coul(cid:130)es dans foyers domestiques le soient (cid:133) des prix couvrant les co(cid:150)ts de production. industriel et des secteurs les Si la Commission n’(cid:130)l(cid:138)ve pas d’objection (cid:133) l’(cid:130)gard des aides que le gouvernement allemand se propose d’oc- troyer (cid:133) un volume de production de l’entreprise Sophia Jacoba GmbH de 125 000 tonnes de fines d’anthracite destin(cid:130)es (cid:133) la production d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130), elle n’est pas encore en mesure de rendre une d(cid:130)cision dans le cadre de l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA sur un montant de 12 millions de marks allemands au b(cid:130)n(cid:130)fice de cette entreprise, que l’Allemagne a notifi(cid:130) (cid:133) la Commission dans le cadre des aides octroy(cid:130)es (cid:133) l’entre- prise Ruhrkohle AG au titre de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997. Ce montant correspond, pour les quantit(cid:130)s vendues par l’entreprise dans les secteurs industriel et des foyers domestiques de la Communaut(cid:130), (cid:133) savoir 120 000 tonnes, (cid:133) la diff(cid:130)rence entre le co(cid:150)t de production et le prix de vente moyen de l’anthracite calibr(cid:130). La Commission rendra sa d(cid:130)cision (cid:133) l’issue de la proc(cid:130)- dure d’examen concernant des ventes d’anthracite de cette entreprise au Royaume-Uni. La Commission a, suite (cid:133) des plaintes et (cid:133) ses investigations, adress(cid:130) au gouvernement allemand, le 2 ao(cid:150)t 1997, une lettre de mise en demeure, le dans laquelle elle lui communiquait officiellement contenu des plaintes en demandant des explications sur le comportement des entreprises mentionn(cid:130)es, ainsi que sur celui du gouvernement allemand (1). Sous r(cid:130)serve d’un montant de 12 millions de marks alle- mands, sur la base des informations fournies par l’Alle- magne et vu les engagements de l’Allemagne repris au point VIII, l’aide pr(cid:130)vue pour l’ann(cid:130)e 1997 est compatible avec la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, et notamment ses articles 2 et 4. V L’intervention de 87 millions de marks allemands, destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) financer les primes aux mineurs de l’industrie houill(cid:138)re allemande (Bergmannspr(cid:132)mie), soit 10 marks allemands par poste de travail prest(cid:130) sous terre, constitue une mesure incitative ayant pour objet d’encourager le personnel qualifi(cid:130) (cid:133) travailler au fond et (cid:133) contribuer (cid:133) la rationalisation de la production. Sur la base de la notifica- tion de l’Allemagne, cette aide couvre un avantage en esp(cid:138)ces pour le mineur et all(cid:138)ge d’autant le co(cid:150)t de production des entreprises houill(cid:138)res. Elle constitue donc une aide qui doit (cid:136)tre examin(cid:130)e au regard de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. L’aide pr(cid:130)vue facilite la restructuration et la rationalisation de l’industrie charbonni(cid:138)re en contribuant (cid:133) (cid:130)lever dans la mesure du possible le niveau de productivit(cid:130). Cette aide contribue ainsi (cid:133) la r(cid:130)alisation de l’objectif vis(cid:130) (cid:133) l’article (1) Voir note pr(cid:130)c(cid:130)dente. L 324/34 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 2. 12. 98 2, paragraphe 1, premier tiret, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA, (cid:133) savoir r(cid:130)aliser, (cid:133) la lumi(cid:138)re des prix du charbon sur le march(cid:130) mondial, de nouveaux progr(cid:138)s vers la viabi- lit(cid:130) (cid:130)conomique, afin de r(cid:130)aliser la d(cid:130)gressivit(cid:130) des aides. Dans son (cid:130)valuation de l’aide, la Commission a tenu compte de la priorit(cid:130) qui doit (cid:136)tre accord(cid:130)e (cid:133) la n(cid:130)cessit(cid:130) d’att(cid:130)nuer dans toute la mesure du possible les cons(cid:130)- quences sociales et r(cid:130)gionales de la restructuration confor- m(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 2, paragraphe 1, deuxi(cid:138)me tiret, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. Cette aide concourt, conform(cid:130)ment aux dispositions de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision, (cid:133) une l(cid:130)g(cid:138)re am(cid:130)lioration de la viabilit(cid:130) (cid:130)conomique des entreprises en question en contribuant (cid:133) la r(cid:130)duction de leurs co(cid:150)ts de production gr(cid:131)ce aux gains de productivit(cid:130) acquis par le maintien d’une main-d’œuvre qualifi(cid:130)e au fond. Compte tenu de ce qui pr(cid:130)c(cid:138)de, sur la base des informa- tions fournies par l’Allemagne et vu les engagements de l’aide pr(cid:130)vue pour l’Allemagne repris au point VIII, l’ann(cid:130)e 1997 est compatible avec la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA, et notamment ses articles 2 et 3. VI L’aide de 200 millions de marks allemands destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) la couverture des charges exceptionnelles en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saarbergwerke AG, Preussag Anthrazit GmbH et Sophia Jacoba GmbH, sert (cid:133) couvrir les frais suppl(cid:130)mentaires d’exhaure r(cid:130)sultant de l’arr(cid:136)t de la production, dans le cadre des mesures de restructura- tion, de si(cid:138)ges d’extraction qui avoisinent les si(cid:138)ges en activit(cid:130). L’arr(cid:136)t ou le ralentissement de l’(cid:130)vacuation des eaux dans les si(cid:138)ges ayant l’objet de mesures de fermetures provoque des arriv(cid:130)es d’eau suppl(cid:130)mentaires qui ne sont en aucun cas li(cid:130)es (cid:133) la production courante et qui occasionnent des co(cid:150)ts suppl(cid:130)mentaires. fait Cette aide explicitement pr(cid:130)vue au point II b) de l’annexe de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA couvre les d(cid:130)penses provoqu(cid:130)es par des restructurations pour l’approvisionne- ment en eau et l’(cid:130)vacuation des eaux us(cid:130)es. Pour (cid:136)tre conforme aux dispositions de l’article 5 de ladite d(cid:130)cision, l’aide sp(cid:130)cifique ne peut d(cid:130)passer les co(cid:150)ts. Apr(cid:138)s examen par la Commission des contrats conclus entre les pouvoirs publics et les entreprises et v(cid:130)rification des donn(cid:130)es relatives (cid:133) ces co(cid:150)ts qui ont fait l’objet d’un audit par les r(cid:130)viseurs aux comptes, elle constate que l’aide ne d(cid:130)passe pas les co(cid:150)ts engag(cid:130)s. L’all(cid:130)gement ainsi rendu possible des charges support(cid:130)es par les entreprises concern(cid:130)es r(cid:130)duit le d(cid:130)s(cid:130)quilibre finan- cier de ces entreprises et leur permet ainsi de poursuivre leur activit(cid:130) et r(cid:130)pond donc aux objectifs de l’article 2, paragraphe 1, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. VII L’aide destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) la couverture des charges exception- nelles en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saarberg- werke AG et Sophia Jacoba GmbH (cid:133) concurrence de 609,2 millions de marks allemands est destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) couvrir les co(cid:150)ts qui r(cid:130)sultent et ont r(cid:130)sult(cid:130) de la restructuration de l’industrie et qui ne sont pas en rapport avec la production courante (charges h(cid:130)rit(cid:130)es du pass(cid:130)). Cette aide r(cid:130)sulte des d(cid:130)cisions qui furent prises lors des n(cid:130)gociations du Kohlerunde du 11 novembre 1991 men(cid:130)es entre les entreprises charbonni(cid:138)res, le gouverne- ment gouvernements des L(cid:132)nder de Rh(cid:130)nanie-du-Nord-Westphalie et de Sarre ainsi que les organisations syndicales du secteur houiller et les produc- teurs d’(cid:130)lectricit(cid:130). f(cid:130)d(cid:130)ral, les les autres d(cid:130)penses exceptionnelles pour Elle est destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) couvrir les charges de paiement des prestations sociales entra(cid:140)n(cid:130)es par la mise (cid:133) la retraite de travailleurs avant qu’ils n’aient atteint l’(cid:131)ge l(cid:130)gal de la retraite; les travailleurs priv(cid:130)s de leur emploi (cid:133) la suite de restructura- tions et de rationalisations; le paiement de retraites et d’indemnit(cid:130)s en dehors du syst(cid:138)me l(cid:130)gal aux travailleurs priv(cid:130)s de leur emploi par suite de restructurations et de rationalisations et (cid:133) ceux qui y avaient droit avant les restructurations; les livraisons gratuites de charbon aux travailleurs priv(cid:130)s de leur emploi (cid:133) la suite de restructura- tions et rationalisations et (cid:133) ceux qui y avaient droit auparavant. Au plan technique et financier, elle est destin(cid:130)e (cid:133) couvrir les travaux suppl(cid:130)mentaires de s(cid:130)curit(cid:130) au fond provoqu(cid:130)s par des restructurations et les d(cid:130)pr(cid:130)cia- tions intrins(cid:138)ques exceptionnelles pour autant qu’elles r(cid:130)sultent de la restructuration de l’industrie. Cette aide qui couvre des co(cid:150)ts mentionn(cid:130)s explicitement au point I sous a), b), c), d), f) et k) de l’annexe de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA ne peut, pour (cid:136)tre conforme aux dispositions de l’article 5 de ladite d(cid:130)cision, d(cid:130)passer lesdits co(cid:150)ts. Apr(cid:138)s v(cid:130)rification des donn(cid:130)es relatives (cid:133) ces co(cid:150)ts qui ont fait l’objet d’un audit par les r(cid:130)viseurs aux comptes, la Commission constate que l’aide ne d(cid:130)passe pas les co(cid:150)ts engag(cid:130)s. L’all(cid:130)gement ainsi rendu possible des charges support(cid:130)es par les entreprises concern(cid:130)es r(cid:130)duit le d(cid:130)s(cid:130)quilibre finan- cier de ces entreprises et leur permet ainsi de poursuivre leur activit(cid:130). L’aide r(cid:130)pond donc aux objectifs de l’article 2, paragraphe 1, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. 2. 12. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes L 324/35 VIII A ARR(cid:219)T(cid:144) LA PR(cid:144)SENTE D(cid:144)CISION: La Commission prend note que l’Allemagne, dans les dispositions qu’elle a adopt(cid:130)es, met en œuvre les mesures n(cid:130)cessaires afin que les aides autoris(cid:130)es au titre de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision n’exc(cid:138)dent pas, pour chaque entreprise ou unit(cid:130) de production, l’(cid:130)cart entre le co(cid:150)t de production et le prix de vente (franco entreprise de destination) r(cid:130)sul- tant du libre consentement des parties contractantes au regard des conditions qui pr(cid:130)valent le march(cid:130) mondial. Le montant de l’aide (cid:133) la production courante par tonne ne pourra pas conduire (cid:133) des prix rendus pour le charbon communautaire inf(cid:130)rieurs (cid:133) ceux pratiqu(cid:130)s pour les charbons de qualit(cid:130) similaire des pays tiers. L’Allemagne veillera en outre (cid:133) ce que les aides n’intro- duisent pas de distorsions de concurrence et ne cr(cid:130)ent pas de discriminations entre producteurs de charbon, entre acheteurs ou utilisateurs dans la Communaut(cid:130). sur La pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision ne pr(cid:130)juge pas de la position de la Commission (cid:133) l’(cid:130)gard du plan de restructuration pour la p(cid:130)riode allant de 1998 (cid:133) 2002 qui devra faire l’objet d’une d(cid:130)cision ult(cid:130)rieure de la Commission au titre de l’article 8 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. Afin que la Commission puisse v(cid:130)rifier que les unit(cid:130)s de production b(cid:130)n(cid:130)ficiant d’aides au fonctionnement dans le cadre des dispositions de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA proc(cid:138)dent effectivement (cid:133) des r(cid:130)ductions tendancielles des co(cid:150)ts de production (cid:133) la lumi(cid:138)re des prix du charbon sur les march(cid:130)s internationaux, l’Alle- magne s’engage (cid:133) notifier (cid:133) la Commission, au plus tard le 30 septembre de chaque ann(cid:130)e, les co(cid:150)ts de production de l’ann(cid:130)e ant(cid:130)rieure desdites unit(cid:130)s de production ainsi que toute autre information mentionn(cid:130)e (cid:133) l’article 9 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA. S’il s’av(cid:138)re que pour certaines unit(cid:130)s de production, les conditions fix(cid:130)es (cid:133) l’article 3, paragraphe 2, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA ne peuvent la Commission, conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)cision, leur inscription dans un plan de fermeture avant le 23 juillet 2002 ou dans un plan de r(cid:130)duction progressive et continue d’activit(cid:130) en cas de raisons sociales et r(cid:130)gionales exceptionnelles. l’Allemagne proposera atteintes, (cid:136)tre (cid:133) Conform(cid:130)ment (cid:133) l’article 3, paragraphe 1, deuxi(cid:138)me tiret, et (cid:133) l’article 9, paragraphes 2 et 3, de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, la Commission doit v(cid:130)rifier que les aides autoris(cid:130)es pour la production courante r(cid:130)pondent aux seules fins (cid:130)nonc(cid:130)es aux articles 3 et 4 de la d(cid:130)cision. Par l’Allemagne notifiera, au plus tard le 30 cons(cid:130)quent, septembre 1998, le montant des aides effectivement vers(cid:130)es au cours de l’ann(cid:130)e 1997 en faisant (cid:130)tat des r(cid:130)gu- aux larisations montants initialement notifi(cid:130)s. Elle fournira lors de ce d(cid:130)compte annuel toute information n(cid:130)cessaire (cid:133) la v(cid:130)rifi- cation des crit(cid:138)res (cid:130)tablis aux articles concern(cid:130)s, intervenues par (cid:130)ventuelles rapport Article premier L’Allemagne est autoris(cid:130)e (cid:133) prendre en faveur de son industrie houill(cid:138)re les mesures suivantes: a) une aide au fonctionnement dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, (cid:133) concurrence de 6 299 millions de marks allemands. La Commission statuera ult(cid:130)rieurement sur un solde de 65 millions de marks allemands au b(cid:130)n(cid:130)fice de l’entreprise Preussag Anthrazit GmbH; b) une aide (cid:133) la r(cid:130)duction d’activit(cid:130) dans le cadre de l’article 4 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/CECA, (cid:133) concur- rence de 3 205 millions de marks allemands. La Commission statuera ult(cid:130)rieurement sur un solde de 12 millions de marks allemands au b(cid:130)n(cid:130)fice de l’entre- prise Sophia Jacoba GmbH; c) une aide li(cid:130)e au r(cid:130)gime visant (cid:133) maintenir la main- d’œuvre de fond dans les mines souterraines (Berg- mannspr(cid:132)mie) dans le cadre de l’article 3 de la d(cid:130)ci- sion no 3632/93/CECA, (cid:133) concurrence de 87 millions de marks allemands; d) une aide (cid:133) la couverture des charges exceptionnelles dans le cadre de l’article 5 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saar- bergwerke AG, Preussag Anthrazit GmbH et Sophia Jacoba GmbH, (cid:133) concurrence de 200 millions de marks allemands; e) une aide (cid:133) la couverture des charges exceptionnelles dans le cadre de l’article 5 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA en faveur des entreprises Ruhrkohle AG, Saar- bergwerke AG et Sophia Jacoba GmbH permettant aux entreprises de couvrir les co(cid:150)ts qui r(cid:130)sultent et qui ont r(cid:130)sult(cid:130) de la restructuration de l’industrie charbon- ni(cid:138)re et qui ne sont pas en rapport avec la production courante, (cid:133) concurrence de 609,2 millions de marks allemands. Article 2 Conform(cid:130)ment aux dispositions de l’article 86 du trait(cid:130) CECA, l’Allemagne s’engage (cid:133) prendre toutes les mesures g(cid:130)n(cid:130)rales ou particuli(cid:138)res propres (cid:133) assurer l’ex(cid:130)cution des obligations r(cid:130)sultant de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Elle veille (cid:133) ce que les aides autoris(cid:130)es soient destin(cid:130)es aux seules fins (cid:130)nonc(cid:130)es et (cid:133) ce que lui soit rembours(cid:130)e toute d(cid:130)pense non effectu(cid:130)e, surestim(cid:130)e ou incorrectement utilis(cid:130)e concernant un des (cid:130)l(cid:130)ments faisant l’objet de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Article 3 L’Allemagne communique, au plus tard le 30 septembre 1998, les montants d’aide effectivement vers(cid:130)s au cours de l’exercice 1997 ainsi que sp(cid:130)cifiques mentionn(cid:130)es (cid:133) l’article 9 de la d(cid:130)cision no 3632/93/ CECA. les donn(cid:130)es L 324/36 FR Journal officiel des Communaut(cid:130)s europ(cid:130)ennes 2. 12. 98 La R(cid:130)publique f(cid:130)d(cid:130)rale d’Allemagne est destinataire de la pr(cid:130)sente d(cid:130)cision. Article 4 Fait (cid:133) Bruxelles, le 10 juin 1998. Par la Commission Christos PAPOUTSIS Membre de la Commission


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 1199/98 della Commissione del 10 giugno 1998 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli

eurovoc_concepts:
agri-monetary policy
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
pip fruit

formats: pdf print

text: L 166/4 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 11. 6. 98 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1199/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 10 giugno 1998 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determina- zione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 della Commissione, del 21 dicembre 1994, recante modalit(cid:133) di applicazione del regime di importazione degli ortofrutticoli (1), modifi- cato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2375/96 (2), in particolare l’articolo 4, paragrafo 1, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 3813/92 del Consiglio, del 28 dicembre 1992, relativo all’unit(cid:133) di conto e ai tassi di conversione da applicare nel quadro della politica agricola comune (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 150/95 (4), in particolare l’articolo 3, paragrafo 3, considerando che il regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 prevede, in applicazione dei risultati dei negoziati commerciali multilaterali nel quadro dell’Uruguay Round, i criteri in base ai quali la Commissione fissa i valori forfettari all’im- portazione dai paesi terzi, per i prodotti e per i periodi precisati nell’allegato; considerando che in applicazione di tali criteri, i valori forfettari all’importazione devono essere fissati ai livelli figuranti nell’allegato del presente regolamento, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 I valori forfettari all’importazione di cui all’articolo 4 del regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 sono fissati nella tabella riportata nell’allegato. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore l’11 giugno 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 10 giugno 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 337 del 24. 12. 1994, pag. 66. (2) GU L 325 del 14. 12. 1996, pag. 5. (3) GU L 387 del 31. 12. 1992, pag. 1. (4) GU L 22 del 31. 1. 1995, pag. 1. 11. 6. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 166/5 ALLEGATO al regolamento della Commissione, del 10 giugno 1998, recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni orto- frutticoli Codice NC Codice paesi terzi (1) (ECU/100 kg) Valore forfettario all’importazione 0702 00 00 0707 00 05 0709 90 70 0805 30 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0809 10 00 0809 20 95 204 999 052 999 052 999 382 388 528 999 388 400 404 508 512 524 528 804 999 052 999 052 616 999 85,8 85,8 86,9 86,9 59,3 59,3 59,8 60,5 53,0 57,8 71,0 91,5 91,0 96,9 76,0 63,6 72,7 107,4 83,8 228,5 228,5 334,8 376,1 355,4 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal regolamento (CE) n. 2317/97 della Commissione (GU L 321 del 22. 11. 1997, pag. 19). Il codice «999» rappresenta le «altre origini»


title: Verordening (EG) nr. 1205/98 van de Commissie van 10 juni 1998 tot vaststelling van het bedrag van het voorschot op de kosten voor de afzet van bepaalde door distillatie verkregen producten voor 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
EAGGF
alcohol
distillation
sales aid
wine

text: L 166/34 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 11. 6. 98 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 1205/98 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 10 juni 1998 tot vaststelling van het bedrag van het voorschot op de kosten voor de afzet van bepaalde door distillatie verkregen producten voor 1999 DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EEG) nr. 822/87 van de Raad van 16 maart 1987 houdende een gemeenschappel¶ke orde- ning van de w¶nmarkt (1), laatstel¶k gew¶zigd b¶ Veror- dening (EEG) nr. 2087/97 van 20 oktober 1997 (2), en met name op artikel 37, lid 2, Overwegende dat het Europees Ori(cid:137)ntatie- en Garantie- fonds voor de landbouw (EOGFL) voor alcohol afkomstig van distillatie als bedoeld in de artikelen 35 en 36 van Verordening (EEG) nr. 822/87 alleen de kosten ten laste neemt voor de afzet van de betrokken alcohol; dat het bedrag van het voorschot op de kosten voor de afzet van die producten moet worden vastgesteld met inachtneming van de soortgel¶ke waardevermindering als voor alcohol afkomstig van distillatie als bedoeld in artikel 39 van genoemde verordening, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 Het bedrag van het voorschot op de kosten voor de afzet van de door distillatie als bedoeld in de artikelen 35 en 36 van Verordening (EEG) nr. 822/87 verkregen producten, wordt bepaald door toepassing van een co(cid:137)ffici(cid:137)nt op de waarde van de door de interventiebureaus aangekochte producten. Die co(cid:137)ffici(cid:137)nt wordt voor het w¶noogstjaar 1999 vastge- steld op 0,70. Artikel 2 De aldus bepaalde uitgaven worden aan de Commissie medegedeeld in de op grond van Verordening (EG) nr. 296/96 van de Commissie (3) ingevoerde aangiften. Artikel 3 Deze verordening treedt in werking op de zevende dag volgende op die van haar bekendmaking in het Publica- tieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen. Z¶ is van toepassing met ingang van 1 oktober 1998. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepassel¶k in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 10 juni 1998. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 84 van 27. 3. 1987, blz. 1. (2) PB L 292 van 25. 10. 1997, blz. 1. (3) PB L 39 van 17. 2. 1996, blz. 5