title: Communication from the Commission - Energy efficiency in the European Community - Towards a strategy for the rational use of energy

eurovoc_concepts:
electrical energy
energy policy
energy saving
environmental protection
pollution control measures

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 29. 04. 1998 COM(1998) 246 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION Energy Efficiency in the European Community «Towards a Strategy for the Rational use of Energy 1. The need for renewed efforts to promote Energy Efficiency There is an urgent need to reinvigorate commitment both at Community and Member State level to promote energy efficiency more actively, especially, but not only, in the light of the Kyoto agreement to reduce C02 emissions. Improved energy efficiency will lead to a more sustainable energy policy and enhanced security of supply, as well as to many other benefits. It is important to underline, however, that it will play a key role in helping the Community to meet its challenging Kyoto target economically. The underlying assumption behind this Communication is that, whilst energy intensity has decreased slowly but surely over recent years, it is essential to take the necessary steps to ensure that energy efficiency is substantially improved, and reflected in a significantly reduced level of energy intensity. The role of Member States and of regional and local authorities will be crucial in this context as much of the action on energy efficiency takes place at national level. The Commission's objectives in presenting this Communication at this point in time, can be summarised as follows: -To underline the economic potential for energy efficiency which exists. -To present both the successes and failures of the policies followed so far, and draw the necessary conclusions. -To highlight the need for more action at Member State and regional level in parallel with action at Community level. -To refocus attention on promoting energy efficiency and stimulate discussion towards a more detailed Action Plan. -To prepare the ground in this specific field for common and coordinated policies and actions which will need to be undertaken in the light of the Kyoto Agreement. Saving energy has been a stated policy objective of the Community and its Member States since the first oil crisis in 1973, when energy security became of paramount concern and saving energy was an important element of the strategy to reduce oil imports, particularly in a context of high energy prices. However, as these pressures disappeared, so has much of the effort to improve energy efficiency. A more long-term view of energy demand reduction led in time to the realisation that it was possible to "delink" economic growth and energy consumption, allowing GDP to increase without commensurate increases in energy consumption. Market barriers and falling prices, however, have limited the scope and extent to which delinking has occurred, especially regarding the final or end-use of energy. It is worth noting the development of energy intensity in the Union between 1974 and 19951, shown in Diagram A. In spite of the existence of Community and Member State energy end-use efficiency programmes designed to remove them, many of the barriers to the rational use of 1 Energy in Europe "1997 -Annual Energy Review", European Commission , September 1997, p. 66. And Eurostat(Gross Inland Consumption/GDP. ) 1 ••Sy-iMMl. M I M — —— energy from the 1970s persist today. Analysis of the current situation indicates that strengthened efforts, including better common and co-ordinated policies and measures at Community and Member State level, are needed to increase energy efficiency, notably in the use of electricity, the generation of which accounts for some 30% of the Community's C02 emissions. 330 Energy Intensity 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 Year Diagram A. Development of Primary Energy Intensity 1974 1995 (toe/1990 MECU) In this document the Commission: (i) outlines the potential for energy efficiency improvements from now until the year 2010; (ii) analyses the nature and types of barriers to the exploitation of this potential; (iii) reviews programmes and measures and their relevance to barriers and potentials; (iv) examines the economic rationale for programmes to remove barriers to energy efficiency, and (v) proposes elements for a strategy and priorities to exploit available potential which reflects Community and Member State roles and capabilities. This Communication is only the first step towards a strategy for the rational use of energy. It indicates a policy commitment towards energy efficiency and focuses on what is realistically and economically feasible in the short and medium term. Following input from the other institutions, Member States and other interested parties, a more specific Action Plan for Energy Efficiency will be developed and more concrete actions and ways to implement them will be proposed. The manner in which energy efficiency, together with other sectoral measures will contribute to the Kyoto commitments will be further developed in a forthcoming Commission Communication on a comprehensive post-Kyoto strategy for C02 emission reduction. 2. Realising the Available Energy Efficiency Potential Community and Member State activity improving energy efficiency and energy intensity can be justified economically if significant potential individual and societal benefits remain unrealised by the operation of market forces. This is today the case, since due to market failure resulting from market barriers, many cost-effective investments in energy efficient technology and methods are not undertaken. If no action is taken to promote energy efficiency only the market potential for energy saving can be expected to be achieved in practice, which is what can be realised by individuals and firms in the face of imperfect knowledge and other market barriers and without market intervention. However, what is very important to achieve, especially in the light of the Kyoto commitment is the full economic potential. Further action, beyond what is suggested in this Communication, can lead to the realisation of the societal potential and the technical potential. This Communication specifically focuses on action necessary to promote the economic potential for improving energy efficiency, as a first and necessary no-regrets step for reaping economic benefits, ensuring continued security of energy supply and meeting Community targets for the reduction of C02 emissions. Estimates are that the available economic potential between 1998 and the year 2010, for all sectors combined, is approximately 18 % of final annual energy consumption 1995, as shown in Table l2. Table 1. Available Economic Potential in the European Union 1998 -2010 Sector Final Energy Consumption, 1995 (Mtoe) Available Potential to 2010. Per cent of 1995 Consumption Industry Transport Domestic and Tertiary Total 1 268 270 358 896 17% 14% 22% 18% 3. Why the Potential Is Not Being Realised: Imperfections, Barriers and Shortcomings Despite the environmental, economic and energy policy advantages that energy efficiency offers, we are not realising sufficiently the cost-effective potential. Neither the Community nor the Member States efforts undertaken have so far managed to overcome the existing barriers to investments in energy efficiency. An effective strategy for the future must successfully tackle the main obstacles outlined below. Energy efficiency will only fully penetrate the market if energy prices accurately reflect energy costs. Internalisation of externalities through taxation and fees is an effective way to increase investments in energy efficiency as outlined in the Community's Fifth Environmental Action Plan, "Towards Sustainability". It is important to realise that at the same time as efforts are being made to increase energy 2 MURE model estimation, based on current energy prices. European Commission March 1998. The calculation for the transport sector is based entirely on fuel efficiency improvements. If other effects, including modal shifts, are included, the potential for the transport sector is estimated to be around 25% by the year 2010. efficiency, the energy sector is undergoing significant changes, due in part to EU initiatives. These changes will affect the perception and role of energy efficiency. The completion of the internal market for energy, for example, with liberalisation and restructuring of both the electricity and gas sectors, will most certainly have an impact on energy efficiency. On the one hand, competitive pressure will improve the efficiency in energy production. Market forces will be released, economies of scale will be discovered and developed, tariff structures will change and new stakeholders will emerge to assume new roles. On the other hand, the liberalisation of the energy markets will inevitably mean lower energy prices. However, at the same time, increased competition as a result of the internal energy market is likely to lead to a tariff structure for the electricity industry which will better reflect true production costs without hidden cross-subsidies. It is clear that in a period of generally falling energy prices, specific measures to promote energy efficiency are more critical than ever. After price signals, lack of or incomplete information is usually the first barrier to energy efficiency which one encounters. It is also the most ubiquitous. Imperfect knowledge of the product and lack of foresight on price development on the part of consumers, manufacturers and other stakeholders hampers the introduction of efficiency measures. Consumers receive inadequate or incomplete information from the service sector on running costs. Purchases are then often based on lowest initial cost or other criteria. Information on system applications of energy technology is also often unavailable or inaccessible. As a result, equipment is often over-sized or incorrectly installed. There is also often a lack of technical skills and training in the energy maintenance and service sector. Because of expectations of relatively low and stable end-use energy prices, information on efficiency has also become less important in the planning and purchase of automobiles, appliances and other equipment. Poor feedback of information to energy consumers also acts as a disincentive. This is particularly true for consumers who see no immediate or appreciable change in energy costs after haven chosen energy-efficient alternatives. At a different level, lack of harmonised and comparable evaluation methods for analysing the results of energy efficiency initiatives can also be a barrier. There are numerous institutional and legal barriers to greater energy efficiency. One example is found in the energy supply industry, where the institutionalised energy planning mind set has proven difficult to change. This tends to associate greater credibility with highly centralised power production than with more decentralised demand-side measures to meet increases in demand. Yet, least-cost analyses have shown that investments in demand-side energy efficiency are often more cost-effective than production-side investments. One of the most difficult institutional barriers to overcome today is the continued practice of selling energy in the form of kWh instead of as energy services such as heating and cooling, lighting and power. Services are invariably what the energy consumer actually wants, not energy for its own sake. This is one of the arguments in favour of the development of energy service companies and the use of integrated resource planning. Other institutional barriers include things such as the practice among builders and landlords in some Member States to choose and install appliances with low initial costs but high running costs for energy, costs which are usually incurred by the home- buyer or tenant. The landlord-tenant problem of "split-incentives,, is a classic example of this type of institutional barriers. Lack of political commitment can also be said to constitute an institutional barrier. As energy efficiency occurs in small increments, there is never a grandiose ceremony associated with it as is the case when a new power station or highway is opened. Politically motivated incentive structures in the form of taxes and subsidies are also often based on short-term or fiscal goals. There are also many different types of technical barriers to energy efficiency. Countless energy-efficient technologies have been held back from the market due to inadequate support in the form of technicians, consultants, trained repairmen etc. leading to lack of confidence on the part of the consumer, either regarding product reliability or maintenance of the equipment. Barriers also arise because many manufacturers of equipment and appliances and builders are not specifically in the "efficiency" business and thus have different priorities in designing and selling their refrigerators, pumps, buildings etc. Low energy prices have contributed to this. Reaching sufficient production volume for economies of scale to make the cost of a new product competitive is another common technical barrier. The lack of standardised components, spare parts and fixtures for energy-efficient solutions is a barrier which the lighting, building and other industries have experienced. Community' standardisation measures and programmes are helping to alleviate this problem, with the single market in mind. Financial barriers such as lack of up-front capital are major barriers to cost-effective investment in energy efficiency. Self-financing capacities and loan facilities have traditionally been far better for energy producers than for energy consumers. Banks e. g. , do not include reduced energy costs resulting from extra investment in energy efficiency in the calculations upon which they base the size of their loans. The above list of barriers is not exhaustive. Its purpose is rather to illustrate the main categories of barriers to energy efficiency in order to address the question of how to remove them. 4. Existing Measures for Energy Efficiency Future measures have to build on existing initiatives, overcoming weakness and pursuing successful experiences. It is important to underline that initiatives, with varying degrees of effectiveness, have been undertaken at Community level since the late 1970's. However, by the late 1980s* the Commission concluded that the different energy efficiency instruments passed by Council in the 1970s and early 1980s had not fulfilled expectations. More effort was then required from the Member States. In 1986, the Council adopted a Resolution concerning new Community energy objectives, which inter alia, called for a 20% improvement in energy intensity of final demand by the year 19953. A 1987 Communication entitled "Towards a continuing policy for energy efficiency in the European Community" (COM(87)233 final) proposed 14 energy efficiency measures to Member States to help achieve the 1995 target. In the 1990 SAVE proposal which followed, it was recognised that this Communication had had no appreciable effect, and it was necessary for the Commission to act at Community level. The Commission's proposal of 13 November 1990 (COM(90)365final) for a Council Decision concerning the promotion of energy efficiency in the Community stated that "Community action in this field is revived in the light of changes in economic trends for energy and the need for greater environmental protection. In the energy policies pursued by,most Member States, energy efficiency generally has become a lesser priority. " The 1990 proposal stated further that the "majority of Member States have reduced or even completely abolished their programmes which directly support energy efficiency-linked investments. " This conclusion led, among other things, to the approval in 1991 of the multi-annual SAVE Programme for energy efficiency. In spite of SAVE, for the Community as a whole, the overall rate of decrease in energy intensity was not significant. By 1995, the improvement was only 12 %, far short of the target of 20 %. Even more alarming was the fact that the pace of improvement had slowed down to only -0. 6 % per year between 1990 and 1995, compared to -2. 0 % per year between 1985 and 19904. An important factor underlying the slow penetration of energy efficiency measures continues to be the relatively low priority attributed to energy saving by Member States, despite the Community efforts in this direction as described below. There has been recognition at Community level, that technological programmes can play an important role m providing the basis for energy efficient technologies. In the JOULE-THERMIE programme launched in 1995 as a specific programme of the Fourth Framework Programme for RTD, 280 MECU were devoted to energy efficiency, representing 27% of the total budget and contributing to substantial achievements, especially in the reduction of energy intensity in buildings, transport and the process industries. A recent evaluation of THERMIE indicates that this Community programme is very well known amongst stakeholders on Community 3 Council Resolution of 16 September 1986 concerning New Community Energy Policy Objectives for 1995 and Convergence of the Policies of theMember States. OJC 241 of 25 September 1986. 4 Eurostat 1997. Energy intensity for final energy consumption is only an indicator for energy efficiency, because it also includes economic restructuring, changes in fuel mix, etc. energy markets and that it has impacted on market shares for energy-efficiency technology. 5 However, the principal focus of the Community's action has been the SAVE Programme. After evaluation of the results of SAVE I, the SAVE II programme was adopted in December 1996 with an indicative budget of 45 MECU for five years. Its aim is "improving energy intensity of final consumption by a further one percentage point per annum over that which would have been otherwise attained. Compared with the original SAVE Programme, SAVE II was enlarged by the addition of the regional and urban energy efficiency programme and an electricity end-use programme. 6 and in March 1998, the Commission adopted its decision opening up the SAVE programme to Bulgaria, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. One of the major elements of the Commission's non-technological efforts relates to the development and adoption of legislation having a Community-wide scope. The legislative programme largely relates to traded goods and, as such, is essential in completing the internal market. Evaluations of the effects in Member States of the Community labelling programme indicate that the programme has had a positive impact both on the share of energy-efficient models in EU manufactures' assortment of products and the market share of sales of efficient models. An extrapolation of the present trend of improvement in the energy intensity of cold appliances as a result of labelling, for example, indicates a reduced average intensity of 15% for the entire EU cold appliance market by the year 2010. That this improvement is in large measure a result of labelling is supported by the fact that there was no significant rate of change before labelling was introduced. An important element of SAVE has been its focus on helping to build the necessary capacity and infrastructure for energy efficiency and to improve policy analysis. SAVE provides support for pilot actions and information dissemination activities in the areas of appliances, buildings, CHP, DSM, education & training, industry and transport. Over 350 pilot actions and studies have been carried out for this purpose, and the asessment of their effectiveness has indicated the areas of priority action where there is Community added-value. Programme evaluations show clearly that the SAVE programme has played a significant role in capacity-building in the energy sector but we have still not reached the stage where this has produced sufficient results in practice. A separate component of the SAVE Programme which supports the creation of energy agencies at regional, local and island level has proved to be significant. To date 140 such SAVE agencies have been set up throughout the Community, and their impact is starting to be felt at a local level. One of their roles, which needs to be strengthened is the exchange of experience and best practices. A further important element of Community action has been support for investments in less developed regions. The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund have the possibility to contribute to increased energy efficiency. This s Horizontal Evaluation of DGXVII Energy Programmes, Report to the Commission, December 1996. 6 Council Decision 96/737/EC of 16. 12. 97 concerning a multiannual programme for the promotion of energy efficiency in the Community - SAVE II. is possible in both Objective 1 and Objective 2 areas, where national as well as regional energy programmes usually include specific measures to improve energy efficiency. However, a greater interest needs to be shown by Member States in these possibilities. Evaluations of the programmes indicate that the programmes dealing with energy efficiency have had an impact on reducing energy intensity but have not been in themselves sufficient to bring about changes on a scale necessary. THERMIE is judged to have contributed significantly to meeting the Community goal of increased industrial competitiveness, especially among SMEs. The SAVE Programme has had measurable effect on capacity-building for energy efficiency and in CHP through replication of focused pilot projects. Through its legislative programme, SAVE has been judged to have made an important contribution to the improvement of energy efficiency. Estimates of the C02 abatement effects of different actions in SAVE and THERMIE support the claim that the programmes are producing tangible results. 7. The main conclusions drawn point to the need to better focus and coordinate Community and Member State measures, to improve and strengthen existing measures, to facilitate exchanges of experience and best practice, and to select priority areas of action, in order to bring about the increased rate of improvement in energy intensity which individual and societal benefits and costs fully justify. It should also be noted that efforts to improve energy efficiency outside the Union are important in the context of international cooperation, especially in the light of the global reduction of C02 emissions. The PHARE and TACIS programmes, intended to support reform and restructuring in the CEEC and CIS countries, respectively have promoted energy efficiency. INCO-Copernicus, an element of the Fourth Framework Programme intended for non-member countries, promotes both the efficient use of energy in buildings, industry and transport, as well as the clean and efficient production of energy from fossil fuels, through joint research and demonstration projects. INCO-DC has provided support to JOULE-THERMIE's accompanying measures in developing countries, aiming at promoting the use of clean and efficient energy in these countries. SYNERGY also supports energy efficiency projects in non- member countries. However, the economic energy efficiency potential in countries outside the Union is also far from being realised, and needs to be further encouraged. 5. Towards a Strategy for the Rational Use of Energy The fact the Union is not realising the full cost-effective potential for energy efficiency improvements, raises the question of why this is not happening. There are two important points to consider. First, it is clear that the market is still not functioning properly because there are market failures and barriers which hinder expected investments and actions. Secondly, the policies and programmes that the Community and its Member States have put in place have fallen short either because they were not sufficient, not fully effective or not adequately co-ordinated, or a combination of these. If we are to achieve, as a minimum, the economic potential for - Horizontal Evaluation of DGXVII Energy Programmes, Report to the Commission, December 1996. energy efficiency, a renewed Community-wide commitment at Community, national, regional and local level is essential in order to implement the appropriate policies and measures as part of a wider strategy. We need to build on the foundations for a comprehensive Community energy efficiency strategy which are already in place. A number of Community initiatives are already running, one of which is the SAVE Programme and the activities arising from it. Member States have programmes in place, as shown in Annex 2 which have had a greater or lesser degree of success. Numerous evaluations of energy efficiency programmes have been carried out in Member States, which show clear cost-effective increases in the market shares for energy-efficient lighting, appliances, heat-pumps and other energy-consuming equipment, often after only a few years of programme activity. Extrapolated over the life of the investments undertaken as a result of the programme, these activities impact on the energy intensity of individual end-use sectors by factors of up to 65%. The proposals made in this Communication build on documented successful experiences, and aim to ensure that they are more widely taken up. A number of coordinated measures need to be taken. Progress will need to be closely monitored. One of the shortcomings of the current energy efficiency programmes is the insufficient monitoring and evaluation of results. Monitoring will become even more important in the future as it will be necessary to track the progress in meeting the Kyoto commitments. The Commission will continue to strengthen its activities in this area. An energy efficiency strategy cannot be successfully implemented without the co operation and support of a wide variety of actors throughout the Community. Increased co-operation with Member States must be sought as well as with the energy service industry, manufacturers, distributors, installers, industry associations, branch organisations, utilities, consumer organisations and NGOs. Member States must be encouraged to promote awareness on energy efficiency. Particular importance should be given to increasing consumer awareness of the many cost-effective energy efficiency opportunities and new emerging technologies. OPETs, SAVE Agencies, consumer networks and other Community-supported dissemination networks can be more effectively used to increase co-operation in pursuit of such common objectives. Better coordination of actions is very important, facilitated by the existence of a special forum where energy efficiency policies are discussed. If a group on convergence of national energy policies is established by Council as already proposed by the Commission, then a sub-group on energy efficiency with a special emphasis on improved co-ordination of national and Comnrmity measures will be foreseen. Alternatively an appropriate forum may need to be established to promote a re-newed impetus and commitment io energy efficiency, permit experience to be shared and follow and review progress at EU and Member Sta ? 'eve!. There is clearly a need to identify and raise the profile of improving energy efficiency, giving it a more positive thrust both at Community and Member States level. It must be placed on an equal basis with energy supply options. While energy and environmental policy objectives cannot be achieved by demand-side options alone, neither can they be achieved solely by supply-side options. Energy efficiency programmes must be put in place and implemented effectively, but at Community and Member State level. Below is a first outline of what can be cost-effectively undertaken: 5. 1 Promoting Energy Efficiency in Other Policies Greater focus needs to be placed on promoting energy efficiency via other policies. The regional and urban dimensions of energy efficiency must be developed more fully. Integrated regional and urban partnerships involving a wide variety of actors from different sectors need to be promoted as part of the activities undertaken under SAVE. The European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund must continue to contribute to increased energy efficiency by including specific policies and measures, but Member States must also ensure that they submit appropriate proposals. Transport is another priority area for energy efficiency. Without appropriate policy action, emissions from transport will increase by about 40% between 1990 and 2010. The European Union has adopted a strategy on C02 and cars, which aims to reduce by 30% the average C02 emissions of new cars to 120g/km in 2005/2010 against the 8, the Commission 1990 baseline. In the recent Communication on Transport and C02 made an assessment of how to reduce energy use and hence C02 emissions from transport. The measures proposed concern four principal elements: further action on vehicle fuel economy; progress with fair and efficient pricing in transport; completion of the internal market in rail transport; as well as measures for better integrating the various modes of transport. It can be expected that those measures represent a cost- effective policy approach capable of halving the growth in C02 emissions by 2010. Beyond 2010, the large-scale introduction of new technologies (e. g. hybrid cars, fuel cells and alternative fuels) will reduce the use of fossil fuels and cut emissions significantly. Energy efficiency needs to become an integral part of transport policy. Internalisation of externalities through taxation and fees, where appropriate, continues to be considered as a means to allow energy prices to reflect true costs. Market liberalisation benefits in the form of lower prices should partially accrue to environmental improvement when appropriate. The Commission tabled a tax proposal to the Council in 1997 concerning taxation of energy products, which would establish a broader minimum tax base. The Council is currently examining this proposal, which includes provisions for possible tax-exemptions for energy efficiency investments. It is important for progress to be made on this proposal. In parallel, Member States should be encouraged to examine what special tax incentives they can provide for energy-saving. 8 COM(98)204 final of 31. 3. 98 10 Science Research and Technology Policy also has a role to play in the energy efficiency strategy. The Fifth RTD Framework Programme forsees two specific key actions for "cleaner energy systems, including renewable energies" and "economic and efficient energy for a compétitive Europe". Actions to be carried out by the JRC are also foreseen, for example, on new materials for high efficiency power generation system on prospective studies on upcoming technologies. The Community and Member States must pursue intensified research and development efforts on energy efficiency. International Commitment and Cooperation for energy efficiency is also critical. The European Union is fully committed to participate in the implementation of the Energy Charter Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects. Increased co-operation with other international organisations such as the International Energy Agency must be sought. Strengthened co-operation with international banks will allow more leverage for Community programmes and projects. Ensuring that the accession countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Cyprus are adequately prepared in the field of energy efficiency prior to membership, as identified in the Accesion Partnerships with each of the countries concerned, is also a high priority. 5. 2 Specific Priorities For Action On the basis of an assessment of the economic potential for greater energy efficiency and an évaluation of the effectiveness of actions already undertaken, the following areas for action are proposed as priorities for the short to medium-term. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of actions, but rather indicate the main directions to follow, coordinating action at Community and Member State level. (!) Energy-Efficient Buildings Buildings account for 40% of the EU's energy requirements. The building sector offers one of the largest single potentials for energy efficiency and should thus be a major focus for action. In addition to installed components and equipment, energy conscious design and use of buildings and new concepts in building renovation, refurbishment and life cycle analysis and costs are important. Initiatives which can be undertaken under the SAVE Programme include e. g. , the development of simple tools to help installers to design appropriate systems, training and certification in their use of these tools. This must be combined with information schemes providing the final customer with clear and reliable information about the performance of the energy systems they may be considering. Further measures in this field will include the review of Council Directive 93/76/EEC (below) which needs to be strengthened to improve energy efficiency in buildings. 9 It is important for Member States also to review their national standards for energy efficiency in buildings, to identify where improvements might be made. 9 The development of harmonised European standards under the Construction Products Directive (89/106/EEC) for products such as thermal insulation, windows, heat emitters, etc. can lead to the adoption of standards and indications in the form of information on inter alia product energy economy and heat retention properties. 11 (ii) Review of Council Directive 93/76/EEC to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions Council Directive 93/76/EEC has the potential to improve substantially energy efficiency and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by helping overcome a number of barriers. Results to date indicate, however, that many Member States have not given the Directive sufficient priority. This is attributed in part to the subsidiarity in the Directive. The Directive requires Member States to develop actions in six programme areas, (such as individual metering and billing of energy use, and energy audits in industry) but allows considerable flexibility regarding which instruments to choose and how. Member States are also required to monitor and report on the impact of the measures. Strengthening specific articles in the Directive will enhance its impact. Making it more focused and precise is also necessary. Therefore, a directive amending Council Directive 93/76EEC will be proposed by the Commission. The main areas of the present Directive which need to be strengthened include energy certification of buildings to include existing buildings and not only new buildings, further standards for the installation of insulation and proposals for inspections and energy audits. (iii) Energy-efficient Household Appliances and Other End-use Equipment The technical barriers to energy efficiency need to be overcome. For domestic appliances, labelling has been established for a number of years and should be extended to cover all the major appliances. For rninimum efficiency requirements, progress has been slower due to the long decision process and lack of cooperation from manufacturers. The "refrigerator directive" (96/57/EC), was a first example, followed by negotiated agreements for washing machines and televisions, as mentioned below. In the near future energy-efficiency standards for electric water heaters and room air conditioners will be negotiated. In the commercial and industrial sectors there is no labelling scheme, and therefore negotiated minimum efficiency requirements are necessary. Proposals to introduce minimum efficiency requirements should be developed, for example, for ballasts for fluorescent lighting, electric motors, pumps, compressors, fans and commercial refrigeration equipment. For office equipment a voluntary quality mark to indicate the most efficient equipment for large purchasers (public authorities and large commercial enterprises such as banks, insurance companies, etc) is under discussion, based on world-wide harmonised technical specifications and the logo, Energy Star. Incentive schemes in favour of the. most efficient appliances, together with disincentives for inefficient appliances, should be promoted as a means of ensuring rapid market penetration of energy-efficient equipment. in industry through minimum efficiency (iv) Wider Use of Negotiated and Long-Term Agreements There is a large savings potential which can be realised by the removal of technical requirements or equivalent barriers negotiated for manufactured goods. Therefore these instruments should be strengthened and expanded to other appliances and equipment, especially in the commercial and industrial sectors. Adequate funding under the SAVE Programme to allow detailed establishing minimum requirement agreements efficiency 12 technical/economic analysis and mandates (CEN/CENELEC) is necessary to implement this strategy. to the standardisation bodies Several Member States have insisted on the use of more flexible instruments such as negotiated agreements between manufacturers to reach the same objective as mandatory minimum efficiency requirements. Negotiated agreements are considered a valid alternative to the introduction of legislation if they include commitments by a large segment of the manufacturers in a branch (at least 80%), stipulate quantified commitments to improvements in the appliances and equipment they produce and if they include an effective monitoring and self-regulating scheme and non-compliance procedures. Currently two agreements have been negotiated by the Commission with appliance manufacturers, for the reduction of energy consumption of stand-by losses of TVs and VCRs and for washing machines. A wider use of negotiated agreements should be sought, with targets corresponding to or exceeding any objectives set for energy intensity. These agreements concern tradeable goods such as appliances and equipment, but the inclusion of energy services should also be considered. Should negotiated agreements fail to deliver the expected results, mandatory standards must be implemented. The Commission has adopted a Communication on Environmental Agreements (COM (96) 561), which aims "to promote and facilitate the use of effective and acceptable Environmental Agreements" as part of the effort to broaden the range of co-operation with industry. Long-Term Agreements (LTAs) with industry branches, are a specific type of Environmental Agreement, characterised by the fact that the industrial trade association in question and its members commit themselves to a quantified target for energy efficiency in their manufacturing processes. Wider use of this instrument should be made. (v) Increased Dissemination of Information Information dissemination must remain a high priority under the SAVE Programme and in Member States programmes, in order to remove the information barriers mentioned above. A renewed Community information campaign is planned, focusing the attention of consumers and other stakeholders on the fact that energy efficiency is more essential than ever and on how it achieves benefits. This campaign would require the active participation of all the energy stakeholders including consumer organisations. The current successful programme of energy efficiency labelling of household appliances needs to be expanded to include other energy-using equipment, including building components. Information on this must be made more readily available. Consumer organisation participation in the dissemination of consumer information should be increased. There is a need to increase the use of information technology and other innovative methods to reach new audiences with labelling and other information on energy efficiency and energy-efficient technology. For Commission projects, a greater emphasis will be placed on dissemination of results through e. g. , new and existing 13 Çommunity-wide networks. It is also recommended that training and certification on the use and maintenance of energy-efficient technology be expanded. A new system of awards for energy efficiency, to be developed in cooperation with relevant organisations under the SAVE Programme, is being considered. This could be offered yearly for the institutions, organisations, authorities or persons in Member States making the most important contribution to energy efficiency. The system should be under the auspices of the Commission, with strong Member State participation. It is also important to strengthen information dissemination on best practices in Energy Efficiency. Under the SAVE Programme, a European Energy Efficiency Best Practice Programme,in cooperation with Member States will be proposed. (vi)Third-party Financing, Guarantee of Results and Other Creative Financing Schemes Financial barriers require special attention. Third-party financing has been promoted for several years by the Commission in both the SAVE and THERMIE programmes as a means of removing such barriers. Model contracts have been prepared for all Member States and several projects have been carried out. Council SAVE Directive 93/76 requires Member States to develop actions related to third-party financing in the public sector. While this has been reasonably successful, the full potential of this instrument has not yet been achieved. The instrument needs to be strengthened by use in larger public sector undertakings and expanded to cover private sector needs. Therefore, new ways must be sought to promote the instrument and to increase the interest of commercial banks in assuming the role of guarantor for energy service companies (ESCOs) considering third-party contracting. In addition to increased commercial bank participation, new contract forms may need to be developed, such as the guarantee of results procedure which has been successfully used by the ALTENER programme. Energy efficiency investment project clearing houses will also need to be tested as a means of providing commercial banks with independent evaluations of the viability of proposed investments. Studies and pilot actions in these specified areas need to be carried out. (vii) Energy Efficiency in the Electricity and Gas sectors and CHP. It is important to overcome the institutional and legal barriers identified. Integrated resource planning or rational planning techniques are an important tool, especially in the context of liberalisation of the electricity and gas markets. The institutional barriers in these sectors may or may not be removed by increased competition. The Commission remains of the view, especially in the light of Kyoto, that IRP is an important component of the EU's energy efficiency strategy to increase the focus on the electricity and gas industry's role in providing energy services. There is a modified Draft Directive on Rational Planning Techniques which, while strongly supported by the European Parliament has yet to obtain sufficient support in the Council for adoption. The Commission continues to consider this Directive important, especially in view of the development of energy services arising from market liberalisation, and will consider the best way to proceed. 14 The use of combined heat and power in industry, the domestic and tertiary and the power sectors is critical for energy efficiency and must continue to be promoted by the Community and the Member States. The recent Communication on Cogeneration (COM(97)514 final) outlines the barriers and strategy for the European Union, and was endorsed by Member States in December 1997 in the form of a Council Resolution. It should be noted that the forthcoming proposal for a revision of Council Directive 88/609/EEC on polluting emissions from large combustion plants will require that new plants apply CHP where feasible, make provisions for the use of. * biomass and promote efficient production with fossil fuels. More generally, there is a need to expand the promotion of energy efficiency undertaken by both electricity and gas utilities. A voluntary partnership will be developed whereby utilities support EU initiatives such as the labelling and appliance efficiency programmes through negotiated agreements. The Commission will continue to promote DSM through pilot projects and dissemination activities under the SAVE Programme. Commitments will be sought from utilities to market energy services and energy efficiency as part of their corporate goal. (viii) Energy Management and Technology Procurement. In order to promote energy efficiency in the public sector, the Commission intends to present a Proposal for a Directive on Energy Management, in which Member States and EÙ Institutions agree to follow established guidelines for purchasing cost- effective energy-efficient technology whenever constructing, repairing or furnishing buildings owned or leased by them. This should include all EU and Member State nationally-owned energy-using equipment, including automobiles. The intention is for public bodies to take the lead by setting examples regarding energy efficiency. Corporate commitment based on best practices programmes will be a logical extension of this. This work will be co-ordinated with the Community environmental management and audit scheme (EMAS). It will also include life-cycle cost analysis (LCC). Compatibility with in implementing the programme will be assured. The potential in the building sector is judged to be large and the institutional barriers to realizing this potential are well known. An energy management programme for public buildings and property of this type is deemed to be an effective way to remove these barriers. The Commission will also continue to examine and improve its own energy management practices. the Commission's public procurement rules Cooperative technology procurement is an instrument to specify and aggregate the demand for energy efficiency in technology. It has been shown to work well in removing several different types of technical barriers. Technology procurement aims at encouraging new products to meet a demand (in this case for energy efficiency) that existing products on the market are unable to fulfil. Technology procurement is used to match producers' and consumers' perspectives in order to make the market function more efficiently with regard to energy efficiency. A group of knowledgeable and influential purchasers, defined as a "buyers' group", formulate product specifications with the help of technical experts, and initiate competition among producers to meet these demands. Technology procurement has been used successfully by several Member States. The feasibility of an EU-levcl procurement has been studied by the SAVE programme and the concept applied in a THERMIE 15 project. A new pilot project is now being considered and ways will be sought to broaden and increase this instrument's areas of application. 6. Next steps A strong commitment and clear signals from all decision-makers and stakeholders regarding the importance and priority of energy efficiency is needed if any significant energy saving is to be made, particularly in the light of the Union's commitment, undertaken in Kyoto, to reduce C02 emissions. Apart from a Community Strategy, Member States will need to develop their own national strategies. In this context, consideration will need to be given to setting an objective to reduce energy intensity at Community and national levels, as well as in different sectoral activities. It has been estimated that if a basic package of measures such as those proposed above, is implemented in an effective and co-ordinated fashion, it would have a measurable impact on reducing energy intensity in the Community over and above the trend of recent years (-0. 6% /p. a. ). If an additional annual reduction of energy intensity of 1% were to be achieved with the win-win measures proposed (which is realistic), this must be regarded as an achievement against the background of expected continuing low energy prices. The focus of our strategy over the next years has to be the full realisation of the significant economic potential for the improvement in energy efficiency which exists in the EU, estimated to be, by 2010, as much as 18% of 1995 energy consumption. This Communication is a first step in such a strategy. In the light of further discussion and input on the basis of the ideas presented in this Communication, the Commission intends to produce an Action Plan for Energy Efficiency. 16 Annex 1. Changes in Energy Intensity (Total Final Consumption/GDP)(toe/MECU 1990) 1985 1990 1995 Austria Belgium Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Portugal Spain Sweden United Kingdom ww<i«f«jij. •«> 161. 5 202. 1 143. 0 196. 8 143. 5 177. 4 230. 6 201. 1 128. 4 409. 9 192. 8 217. 1 145. 8 166. 9 177. 2 a<ao Source: 1997 — Annual Energy Review, European Commission, September 1997. 159. 6 210. 1 133. 8 216. 9 142. 7 154. 8 231. 4 161. 9 128. 4 318. 2 196. 5 234. 3 154. 5 181. 4 173. 1 ;. 18I9^S&- 181. 2 223. 5 152. 8 205. 8 160. 0 204. 3 253. 4 216. 7 129. 7 443. 3 222. 1 229. 3 152. 7 192. 9 194. 7 15|f»iU/13S1S1 Annual % Change 90/85 -2. 3 -2. 0 -1. 3 -0. 9 -2. 2 -2. 8 -1. 9 -1. 5 -0. 2 -1. 6 -2. 8 -1. 1 -0. 9 -2. 9 -1. 9 v&<H\ ,: Annual % Change 95/90 -0. 2 0. 8 -1. 3 2. 0 -0. 1 -2. 7 0. 1 -4. 2 0. 0 -4. 9 0. 4 1. 5 1. 2 1. 7 -0. 5 K $ 4 'V 17 Annex 2. Outline of Member State Programmes and Measures for Energy Efficiency Austria There is an Agreement between the Federal Government and the Federal Provinces (Article 15a of the Federal Constitution on Energy Conservation) which came into force on 15 June 1995. The article provides for the possibility of a common approach to energy policy throughout the country. The agreement covers: heat conservation in buildings, energy-saving hot water preparation, subsidies, individual heat cost billing, labelling of household appliances, certification of boilers and energy conservation in the industrial sector. An agreement with the Association of Austrian Energy Consumers provides for energy consultancy to companies with energy use of at least 20 TJ per year. Austria has adopted targets for 2000, in relation to 1991 in order to decrease energy for heating and water by 20%, decrease specific industry use of energy by 20% and decrease energy consumption of transport by 10%. m • Belgium Energy efficiency is the responsibility of the regional governments. In 1993, the region of Wallonia adopted a decree to promote energy efficiency in all sectors by creating a coherent legal framework. The region adopted the thermal efficiency standard used in the Flemish region in 1997. Since 1992, the Flemish region has adopted a series of actions related to energy efficiency including thermal efficiency standards, energy agreements and consultancy services. The regions have a variety of subsidy and information programmes. Denmark Energy 21, the most recent action plan for energy, was published in 1996. The main purpose is to contribute to sustainable development. A high priority of Energy 21 is to promote more efficient use of energy. The objective of Energy 21 is to achieve a 20 per cent improvement in energy intensity between 1994 and 2005. There is also a longer-term objective to improve energy intensity by 55% between 1994 and 2030. There is a heavy reliance on carbon taxes in combination with a full range of policy measures. Denmark is a pioneer in the use of energy labelling for buildings and recently revised the programme to improve effectiveness. It gives a high priority to encouraging cogeneration and in 1996 it established the Electricity Saving Trust to support electricity conservation initiatives. Finland The most recent energy policy was sent to Parliament in June 1997. It calls for further improvement of energy efficiency. The goal is to bring the growth of total energy consumption to a halt in the next 10 to 15 years which means more specifically to increase energy efficiency by 10-20% by 2010. A Government Decision on the Implementation of Energy Conservation from December 1995 states that energy conservation has been a key of Finnish energy policy for the past two decades and will continue to be in the future. Finland is giving high priority to voluntary agreements with industry and municipalities. Finland also relies on the use of carbon taxes to help 18 encourage energy efficiency and has an extensive information programme and major technology development programmes. France Energy efficiency has been a major element of French energy policy since the 1970s and France has traditionally had one of the most comprehensive approaches in the European Union. In recent years, there have been government cutbacks which have affected the overall thrust of the programme. However, there are indications that there will be a significant budget increase starting in 1999. Since 1993, ADEME, the executive agency for energy efficiency, and the national utility, EDF, have had joint demand-side management programmes. ADEME also has one of the most effective regional networks in the EU and has had an effective consumer information programme for all end-use sectors. Germany Energy efficiency policies are largely designed to support the climate change and related environmental strategies as well as meet EU obligations. Germany has traditionally had a strong energy efficiency effort, both at the federal and state levels. The policies include regulations and voluntary agreements, combined with a strong emphasis on relying on the market mechanism. Germany was one of the first EU countries to require consumption-based billing of costs of central heating and hot water. There is also an important energy advisory service undertaken by the consumer association AgV which provides service in 330 cities. The government has voluntary agreements with 19 industry associations. Many Lander promote demand-side management. Greece In recent years, Greece has improved its energy efficiency programme, linking it closely to environmental objectives. Energy efficiency is being promoted through the Global Action Plan and the energy conservation sub-programme of the National Environmental and Energy Programme. The Global Action Plan, entitled Energy 2001, is the national action plan for energy conservation in the built environment. There are a number of subsidy programmes and energy audits which are undertaken by CRES. There are also voluntary agreements with energy -intensive industries. Support is being provided to encourage the development of energy service companies (ESCOs). Ireland Energy efficiency is one of the three pillars of Irish energy policy. It is an important element in the government's climate change strategy and strategy towards sustainable development. Ireland has developed an energy rating system for buildings and created the National Irish Centre for Energy Rating to deliver the programme. There are two major audit programmes for industry and a programme to fund measures recommended by the audit. The Irish utility, ESB, has an important demand-side management programme. 19 Italy The 1988 National Energy Programme (PEN) gives high priority to energy efficiency. Most of the policy instruments being used result from Law No. 10/91, entitled "Regulations for the implementation of the National Energy Plan with regard to the rational use of energy, energy savings and the development of renewable energy sources. " It is a framework law to introduce regulations aimed at improving energy efficiency in all end-use sectors. Many of the regulations are still not completely in place. One, however, requires energy managers in companies and organisations consuming more than 10,000 toe (industry) or 1,000 toe (other). A number of subsidy programmes ended in 1995 due to lack of funding. Luxembourg Parliament adopted the general Energy Efficiency Law of August 5, 1993. The law gives authority to several energy efficiency measures to be implemented, including new thermal efficiency standards that came into effect in 1996. A Grand Ducal ^decree requires the promotion of energy efficiency in municipalities. There are various subsidies for industry as well as mandatory energy audits in industrial enterprises consuming more than 3 GWh per year. The Netherlands Energy policy gives high priority to both energy efficiency improvements and developing a sustainable energy economy. The Third White Paper on Energy Policy, published in 1996, set a target of an energy efficiency improvement equivalent to one- third of energy consumption within the next 25 years (33% improvement between 1995-2020, equivalent to 1. 7% per year). Energy efficiency policies focus on three end-use groups: manufacturing industry, homes and buildings, and traffic and transport. The Netherlands has been one of the pioneers in the use of voluntary agreements in all sectors and provides a variety of subsidies to support the agreements. There are also several environmental taxes to encourage energy efficiency. The 1995 Action Plan for Sustainable Construction calls for revisions in the thermal efficiency standards in 1998 and 2000. The government has actively supported cogeneration. The utilities implement the Environmental Action Plan (MAP) which covers a range of subsidies and information programmes related to energy efficiency. Portugal The Energy Programme, created in 1994 and partly funded by the EU, is primarily designed to provide financial incentives for energy efficiency. The objectives are to increase the use of indigenous energy sources and to improve energy efficiency. The Energy Programme for Buildings came into effect in 1995. Enterprises consuming more than 1,000 toe per year are required to establish energy management systems and their energy use patterns must be examined every five years. The five-year plans must be approved by the government. The Strategic Programme for the Expansion and Modernisation of Portuguese Industry provides incentives and voluntary actions to help industry both modernise and meet environmental goals. SIURE, the Regional Incentive System for the Rational Use of Energy, encourages investments in energy efficiency through audits, investment support, demonstration and information. 20 Spain The most recent energy policy is laid out in the National Energy Plan 1991-2000 (PEN), approved by Parliament in April 1992. The PEN gives high priority to energy efficiency. The goal of the energy efficiency plan is to reduce projected final energy demand by 7. 6 per cent in the year 2000 compared to 1991 by decreasing 7% in industry, 9. 6% in transport and 5% in the residential sector. There are a variety of subsidy programmes. IDAE, the Institute for Energy Diversification and Savings, provides third-party financing for hospitals and industry. The government launched a DSM programme in 1995. IDAE negotiated the first voluntary agreements with industry in 1996. Sweden Sweden has traditionally had an ambitious energy efficiency strategy. The 1997 Bill on Sustainable Energy Supply gives a strong emphasis to energy efficiency using technology procurement. The goals for Sweden's 1997 energy policy are to secure the. long-term and short-term supplies of electricity and other energy in internationally competitive terms. Until the 1997 Bill on Sustainable Energy Supply, the most recent official Swedish energy policy dated from 1991. Sweden also relies on a variety of environmental taxes, including a tax on carbon dioxide emissions. Sweden provides support for municipal energy management and requires municipalities to prepare energy plans. United Kingdom The energy policy in the United Kingdom is based on ensuring secure, diverse and sustainable supplies of energy in the forms that people and businesses want, and at competitive prices. It is the government's view that this can be achieved through competitive energy markets working within a stable legal framework. Energy efficiency has been a major element of energy policy since the 1970s. The Energy Saving Trust was established to encourage investments in energy efficiency. The 1995 Home Energy Conservation Act requires all local housing authorities to identify measures that will improve energy efficiency in public and private housing. The United Kingdom is one of the leaders in developing a Best Practice Programme, which provides technical information for professionals in all sectors. The government also has an ambitious programme to improve the energy use of its own operations. 21 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 246 final DOCUMENTS EN 12 06 01 10 Catalogue number : CB-CO-98-286-EN-C ISBN 92-78-35495-3 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1285/98 de Gerardo FERNÁNDEZ-ALBOR à la Commission. Développement d'instruments d'association avec l'Amérique latine

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU programme
EU relations
European Association Agreement
Latin America
economic cooperation
foreign policy
political cooperation
trade cooperation

formats: html print


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 1310/98 af José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL til Kommissionen. EURO 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Community budget
Economic and Monetary Union
Germany
budget deficit
budgetary equilibrium
coordination of EMU policies
currency adjustment
economic convergence
euro
gross domestic product

formats: html pdf print

text: 21. 10. 98 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende C 323/123 kr(cid:230)nkelser viser, at den fanatisme, der dyrkes i det officielle Tyrkiet, har »b(cid:229)ret frugt«. De tyrkiske myndigheder har ikke truffet en eneste foranstaltning for at beskytte de mindesm(cid:230)rker, der tilhłrer de mindretal, der har mod til at blive boende i deres hjemegn. Har Kommissionen kendskab til denne sag? Hvilke foranstaltninger agter den at tr(cid:230)ffe for at f(cid:229) Tyrkiet til at słrge for, at de skyldige i denne afskyelige handling straffes? Svar afgivet p(cid:229) Kommissionens vegne af Hans Van den Broek (25. maj 1998) Det (cid:230)rede medlem henvises til Kommissionens svar p(cid:229) mundtlig forespłrgsel nr. H-425/98 fremsat af Nikolaos Papakyriazis i spłrgetiden under Parlamentets młde i maj 1998 (1). (1) Forhandlinger i Parlamentet (maj 1998). (98/C 323/189) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-1310/98 af Jose· Garc(cid:14)·a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) til Kommissionen (29. april 1998) Om: EURO 1999 I medfłr af den stabilitets- og v(cid:230)kstpagt, som Det Europ(cid:230)iske R(cid:229)d vedtog p(cid:229) sit młde i Amsterdam i juni 1997, skal medlemsstaterne p(cid:229) mellemlang sigt słge at n(cid:229) frem til en budgetsaldo, som er »t(cid:230)t p(cid:229) balance eller i overskud«. S(cid:229)fremt medlemsstaterne i de efterfłlgende (cid:229)r forts(cid:230)tter med at justere budgettet, vil de offentlige finansers stilling dermed głre det lettere for medlemsstaterne at h(cid:229)ndtere de budgetm(cid:230)ssige konsekvenser af en eventuel negativ udvikling i łkonomien. Men hvordan mener Kommissionen, at situationen ville have v(cid:230)ret i Tyskland i dag, hvis stabilitets- og v(cid:230)kstpagten var blevet gennemfłrt i perioden 1992-1997? Svar afgivet p(cid:229) Kommissionens vegne af Yves-Thibault de Silguy (2. juni 1998) Stabilitets- og v(cid:230)kstpagten er oprettet ved Det Europ(cid:230)iske R(cid:229)ds resolution af 7. juni 1997 (1) og R(cid:229)dets forordning (EF) nr. 1466/97 af 7. juli 1997 om styrkelse af overv(cid:229)gningen af budgetstillinger samt overv(cid:229)gning og samordning af łkonomiske politikker (2) og R(cid:229)dets forordning (EF) nr. 1467 af 7. juli 1997 om fremskyndelse og afklaring af gennemfłrelsen af proceduren i forbindelse med uforholdsm(cid:230)ssigt store underskud (2). Pagten sigter mod budgetdisciplin i Den (cid:216)konomiske og Monet(cid:230)re Union ((cid:216)MU) for derigennem at skabe de stabilitetsbetingelser, der er nłdvendige for vedvarende v(cid:230)kst. Pagten indeholder et effektivt program, der tilskynder en medlemsstat til at undg(cid:229) et uforholdsm(cid:230)ssigt stort underskud og til hurtigt at korrigere et s(cid:229)dant underskud, hvis det skulle opst(cid:229). I 1992 havde Tyskland et offentligt underskud p(cid:229) 2,6% af sit bruttonationalprodukt (BNP), og i 1993 var underskuddet p(cid:229) 3,2% af BNP. Denne situation resulterede i R(cid:229)dets afgłrelse af 26. september 1994, hvori der konstateredes et uforholdsm(cid:230)ssigt stort underskud i Tyskland (EF-traktatens artikel 104 C, stk. 6). Afgłrelsen blev oph(cid:230)vet i juli 1995 › idet underskuddet for 1994 faldt til 2,4% › men genindfłrt i juni 1996, da underskuddet for 1995 steg til 3,3%. I perioden fra 1992 til 1997, som det (cid:230)rede medlems spłrgsm(cid:229)l vedrłrer, var Tysklands budgetpolitik hovedsageligt rettet mod konvergens med henblik p(cid:229) at korrigere det uforholds- m(cid:230)ssigt store underskud og derved imłdekomme EF-traktatens artikel 104 C, som omhandler sanktioner, og som ikke blev anvendt i anden fase af (cid:216)MU. (1) EFT C 236 af 2. 8. 1997. (2) EFT L 209 af 2. 8. 1997


title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 922/98 av den 29 april 1998 om ändring av exportbidragen för vitsocker och råsocker som exporteras i obearbetat skick

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
raw sugar
white sugar

formats: pdf print

text: 30. 4. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning L 128/59 KOMMISSIONENS F(cid:153)RORDNING (EG) nr 922/98 av den 29 april 1998 om (cid:132)ndring av exportbidragen f(cid:148)r vitsocker och r(cid:134)socker som exporteras i obear- betat skick EUROPEISKA GEMENSKAPERNAS KOMMISSION HAR ANTAGIT DENNA F(cid:153)RORDNING dragen b(cid:148)r (cid:132)ndras till de belopp som anges i bilagan till den h(cid:132)r f(cid:148)rordningen. med beaktande av F(cid:148)rdraget om uppr(cid:132)ttandet av Euro- peiska gemenskapen, med beaktande av r(cid:134)dets f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1785/81 av den 30 juni 1981 om den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden f(cid:148)r socker (1), senast (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 1599/96 (2), s(cid:132)rskilt artikel 19. 4 andra stycket i denna, och med beaktande av f(cid:148)ljande: Exportbidragen f(cid:148)r vitsocker och r(cid:134)socker som exporteras i obearbetat skick fastst(cid:132)lldes i kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 909/98 (3). Till(cid:132)mpningen av de n(cid:132)rmare best(cid:132)mmelserna i f(cid:148)rord- ning (EG) nr 909/98 p(cid:134) de uppgifter som kommissionen har k(cid:132)nnedom om medf(cid:148)r att de nu g(cid:132)llande exportbi- H(cid:142)RIGENOM F(cid:153)RESKRIVS F(cid:153)LJANDE. Artikel 1 Exportbidragen f(cid:148)r de produkter som r(cid:132)knas upp i artikel 1. 1 a i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1785/81, odenaturerade och exporterade i obearbetat skick, fastst(cid:132)lldes i bilagan till den (cid:132)ndrade f(cid:148)rordningen (EG) nr 909/98 och skall (cid:132)ndras till de belopp som anges i bilagan till den h(cid:132)r f(cid:148)rordningen. Artikel 2 Denna f(cid:148)rordning tr(cid:132)der i kraft den 1 maj 1998. Denna f(cid:148)rordning (cid:132)r till alla delar bindande och direkt till(cid:132)mplig i alla medlemsstater. Utf(cid:132)rdad i Bryssel den 29 april 1998. P(cid:134) kommissionens v(cid:132)gnar Franz FISCHLER Ledamot av kommissionen (1) EGT L 177, 1. 7. 1981, s. 4. (2) EGT L 206, 16. 8. 1996, s. 43. (3) Se sida 25 i denna tidning. L 128/60 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30. 4. 98 till kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning av den 29 april 1998 om (cid:132)ndring av exportbidragen f(cid:148)r vitsocker och r(cid:134)socker som exporteras i obearbetat skick BILAGA Produktnummer 1701 11 90 9100 1701 11 90 9910 1701 11 90 9950 1701 12 90 9100 1701 12 90 9910 1701 12 90 9950 Bidragsbelopp (cid:190) ecu/100 kg (cid:190) 41,05 38,96 41,05 38,96 (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) 1701 91 00 9000 0,4463 (cid:190) ecu/1 % sackaros (cid:253) 100 kg (cid:190) 1701 99 10 9100 1701 99 10 9910 1701 99 10 9950 (cid:190) ecu/100 kg (cid:190) 44,63 44,63 44,63 1701 99 90 9100 0,4463 (cid:190) ecu/1 % sackaros (cid:253) 100 kg (cid:190) (1) Till(cid:132)mpligt p(cid:134) r(cid:134)socker med utbyte p(cid:134) 92 %. Om utbytet (cid:132)r ett annat (cid:132)n 92 % skall det till(cid:132)mpliga exportbidraget ber(cid:132)knas i enlighet med best(cid:132)mmelserna i artikel 17a. 4 i f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 1785/81. (2) Fastst(cid:132)llande upph(cid:132)vt genom kommissionens f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 2689/85 (EGT L 255, 26. 9. 1985, s. 12), (cid:132)ndrad genom f(cid:148)rordning (EEG) nr 3251/85 (EGT L 309, 21. 11. 1985, s. 14)


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1239/98 des députes Amedeo AMADEO , Salvatore TATARELLA à la Commission. Crimes contre l'enfance

eurovoc_concepts:
UN convention
child
child protection
crime against humanity
fight against crime
human rights

text: 22. 12. 98 FR Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes C 402/99 RØponse donnØe par M. Kinnock au nom de la Commission (29 mai 1998) Dans la suite de son Livre vert sur «La politique europØenne future de lutte contre le bruit» (1), la Commission est en train de mettre en place des groupes de travail responsables de la prØparation technique de la future politique en Øtroite coopØration avec les experts des (cid:201)tats membres. (cid:192) l(cid:146)issue de cette Øvaluation technique, la Commission devrait disposer des ØlØments nØcessaires pour dØfinir les actions les plus appropriØes (cid:224) entreprendre dans les domaines mentionnØs par l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire. La Commission a l(cid:146)intention de publier une communication sur les transports aØriens et l(cid:146)environnement vers la fin de cette annØe. Les questions environnementales qui se posent (cid:224) l(cid:146)intØrieur et aux alentours des aØroports figureront parmi les thŁmes traitØs dans ce document. (1) COM(96) 540 final. (98/C 402/127) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1239/98 posØe par Amedeo Amadeo (NI) et Salvatore Tatarella (NI) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: Crimes contre l(cid:146)enfance ConsidØrant que le rapport du ComitØ prØparatoire des Nations unies pour la crØation d(cid:146)un tribunal pØnal international permanent affirme que «l(cid:146)on entend par crime contre l(cid:146)humanitØ le fait de commettre de maniŁre systØmatique ou (cid:224) une grande Øchelle, l(cid:146)un des actes suivants: la souffrance, l(cid:146)extermination, la torture, la rØduction en esclavage, la persØcution pour des motifs politiques, raciaux, religieux ou ethniques, la discrimina- tion institutionnalisØe qui comportent la violation des libertØs et des droits fondamentaux de l(cid:146)Œtre humain, la dØportation forcØe de populations opØrØe de maniŁre arbitraire, l(cid:146)incarcØration arbitraire, la sØquestration de personnes, l(cid:146)incitation (cid:224) la prostitution et toutes les autres formes de violences sexuelles, ainsi que les autres actes inhumains qui portent gravement atteinte (cid:224) l(cid:146)intØgritØ physique et mentale, (cid:224) la santØ et (cid:224) la dignitØ humaine tels que les mutilations et les sØvices graves». La Commission voudrait-elle Ølaborer une directive prØvoyant: 1. 2. 3. que les organisations qui provoquent systØmatiquement la souffrance et la mort par le biais de l(cid:146)exploitation de mineurs, soient, combattues comme toutes les autres formes de criminalitØ organisØe (trafic de drogue, armes, fraudes); par l(cid:224) oø un crime a ØtØ perpØtrØ contre des enfants il soit qualifiØ de crime contre l(cid:146)humanitØ; que la capacitØ de discernement des enfants ou leur consentement prØsumØ mais constituent une circonstance aggravante pour la qualification des crimes commis? RØponse donnØe par Mme Gradin au nom de la Commission (2 juin 1998) Les crimes ØnumØrØs dans la question, particuliŁrement lorsque des enfants en sont les victimes, inspirent notamment (cid:224) la Commission la mŒme horreur qu(cid:146)aux Honorables Parlementaires. Au sein de l(cid:146)Union europØenne, la compØtence en matiŁre pØnale, notamment en ce qui concerne la qualification des infractions pØnales, relŁve des (cid:201)tats membres, sous rØserve, bien sßr, des responsabilitØs et engagements auxquels ils ont souscrit dans le cadre des conventions et des accords internationaux. La Commission soutient activement les travaux de l(cid:146)UnitØ «Drogues» Europol (UDE) dans le domaine de la lutte contre la traite des Œtres humains, tels qu(cid:146)ils sont fixØs par l(cid:146)Action commune (1) adoptØe par le Conseil Justice et Affaires intØrieures, du 16 dØcembre 1996, qui Øtend le mandat de l(cid:146)UDE (cid:224) la traite des Œtres humains. (1) JO L 342 du 31. 12. 1996


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1329/98 by Graham MATHER to the Commission. Effect of WTO deals on EU animal welfare provision

eurovoc_concepts:
World Trade Organisation
animal experimentation
animal welfare
bilateral agreement
hunting regulations
international standard
marketing standard
multilateral agreement
protection of animals
third country


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 1235/98 van Allan MACARTNEY aan de Commissie. Subsidies voor de geitenteelt

eurovoc_concepts:
distribution of aid
goatmeat
production aid
sheepmeat

text: C 354/82 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 19. 11. 98 Antwoord van de heer Fischler namens de Commissie (5 mei 1998) De Commissie beschikt meestal niet over regionale uitsplitsingen van de gegevens per land. Sinds 1997 verstrekt Spanje echter voor sommige autonome regio(cid:146)s die over erkende betaalorganen beschikken, de cijfers over de uitgaven per autonome regio. Daardoor is de Commissie in staat om voor 1997 de gevraagde gegevens over Catalonie¤ in 1997 ongeveer 41 000 miljoen PTA (ongeveer 250,3 miljoen ecu). te verstrekken. In totaal bedroegen de betrokken uitgaven in Catalonie¤ (98/C 354/131) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-1235/98 van Allan Macartney (ARE) aan de Commissie (29 april 1998) Betreft: Subsidies voor de geitenteelt Kan de Commissie bevestigen dat de subsidies voor de geitenteelt uit hoofde van de communautaire regeling voor schapen- en geitenvlees alleen in die lidstaten overeenkomen met de subsidies voor de schapenteelt waar traditioneel geitenvlees wordt gegeten? Heeft de Commissie aandacht besteed aan de mogelijke discrepanties die uit dit beleid kunnen voortvloeien en aan het effect dat het heeft op de geitenteelt in landen die niet zijn geclassificeerd als landen waar het eten van geitenvlees traditie is? Beoogt de Commissie dit in de toekomst te veranderen, zodat de subsidies voor de geitenteelt in alle lidstaten gelijk zullen zijn? Antwoord van de heer Fischler namens de Commissie (15 mei 1998) De Commissie kan bevestigen dat geitenpremies uitsluitend worden betaald in die regio(cid:146)s van de Gemeenschap waar het houden van geiten voor de vleesproductie een traditionele bedrijfstak is die te vergelijken is met de schapenhouderij. De Commissie vindt niet dat de huidige regeling tot discrepanties leidt. Met de jaarlijkse premie in het kader van de regeling voor schapen- en geitenvlees wordt beoogd de vleesproducenten te ondersteunen. Daarom komt alleen geitenhouderij die rechtstreeks op de vleesproductie is gericht en met soortgelijke technieken als in de schapenhouderij wordt beoefend, voor de betrokken steun in aanmerking. In lidstaten waar het eten van geitenvlees geen traditie is, is zulks niet het geval, aangezien geiten daar hoofdzakelijk voor de wol- of melkproductie worden gehouden. De Commissie is niet van plan de premieregeling uit te breiden tot geitenhouders die zich niet voornamelijk op de vleesproductie toeleggen. (98/C 354/132) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-1236/98 van Allan Macartney (ARE) aan de Commissie (29 april 1998) Betreft: Inspecties in het kader van de premieregeling voor zoogkoeien en de compensatieregeling voor vee in heuvelachtige gebieden Is de Commissie bekend of in verband met de vereisten die gelden om in aanmerking te komen voor premies uit hoofde van de premieregeling voor zoogkoeien en de compensatieregeling voor vee in heuvelachtige gebieden enige speelruimte mogelijk is bij de regel: bezoeken voor inspectiedoeleinden vinden plaats zonder voorafgaande kennisgeving? Kan een inspectie worden geweigerd wanneer er verzachtende omstandigheden zijn, zoals onvoldoende personeel voor het verzorgen van de dieren?


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1226/98 by Roberta ANGELILLI to the Commission. Insurance agencies in Italy

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
freedom to provide services
insurance occupation
national law
right of establishment


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1273/98 de Freddy BLAK à la Commission. Accès à la connaissance et aux technologies de l'information

eurovoc_concepts:
access to information
information technology
multinational enterprise
new technology
telecommunications

text: C 402/104 Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes FR 22. 12. 98 (98/C 402/133) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1273/98 posØe par Freddy Blak (PSE) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: AccŁs (cid:224) la connaissance et aux technologies de l(cid:146)information De grandes entreprises multinationales comme Siemens-Nixdorf et IBM ont interdit (cid:224) leurs personnels l(cid:146)accŁs (cid:224) Internet et ce, alors mŒme que l(cid:146)activitØ de ces entreprises consiste (cid:224) vendre les technologies de l(cid:146)information. La Commission n(cid:146)estime-t-elle pas qu(cid:146)une initiative communautaire est nØcessaire afin de garantir qu(cid:146)il ne soit pas imposØ de limites aux salariØs europØens dans l(cid:146)utilisation des technologies de l(cid:146)information et l(cid:146)accŁs (cid:224) la connaissance? RØponse donnØe par M. Bangemann au nom de la Commission (18 juin 1998) (cid:192) l(cid:146)instar de l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire, la Commission est d(cid:146)avis qu(cid:146)il est indispensable que les entreprises et organisations de toute taille ainsi que leurs salariØs aient accŁs (cid:224) la connaissance et aux technologies de l(cid:146)information. MŒme lorsqu(cid:146)elle dispose de l(cid:146)infrastructure nØcessaire en termes de rØseaux, une entreprise peut toutefois se refuser (cid:224) accorder un accŁs illimitØ (cid:224) l(cid:146)Internet (cid:224) chacun des membres de son personnel, compte tenu de plusieurs facteurs. En premier lieu, c(cid:146)est l(cid:146)entreprise qui finance l(cid:146)obtention de la bande passante nØcessaire pour permettre la connexion (cid:224) l(cid:146)Internet. En Europe, le coßt des lignes louØes demeure malheureusement beaucoup plus ØlevØ qu(cid:146)aux (cid:201)tats-Unis, pour un service Øquivalent, mŒme si la libØralisation des tØlØcommunications est censØe entra(cid:238)ner les prix (cid:224) la baisse. La charge imposØe aux rØseaux des entreprises par le trafic liØ (cid:224) l(cid:146)utilisation de l(cid:146)Internet peut Øgalement soulever des rØticences. Enfin, les entreprises peuvent reculer devant les risques de sØcuritØ que pose le tØlØchargement de virus informatiques, les questions de responsabilitØ liØes au tØlØchargement de documents pornographiques ou de logiciels copiØs sans permission et les Øventuelles « pertes de temps » qu(cid:146)elle subit lorsque le personnel consulte pendant les heures de travail des sites qui n(cid:146)ont pas de rapport direct avec ses activitØs professionnelles. En l(cid:146)Øtat actuel des choses, il ne semble pas opportun de lØgifØrer (cid:224) l(cid:146)Øchelon europØen pour dicter aux entreprises l(cid:146)attitude qu(cid:146)elles doivent adopter en la matiŁre. La Commission est nØanmoins favorable aux initiatives prises par les entreprises confrontØes (cid:224) ce type de problŁmes pour rechercher des solutions concrŁtes en se concertant avec d(cid:146)autres entreprises et avec leur personnel ou ses reprØsentants. (98/C 402/134) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1278/98 posØe par Gerhard Hager (NI) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: Programme Euro-Jus Pour la rØalisation du projet communautaire «Euro-Jus», des conseillers juridiques locaux collaborent avec les bureaux de la Commission dans les (cid:201)tats membres et fournissent aux citoyens des informations objectives et non officielles concernant leurs droits et la mise en (cid:156)uvre de ces droits dans le cadre des dispositions juridiques communautaires. D(cid:146)aprŁs les informations dont dispose l(cid:146)auteur de la question, ce projet est bien accueilli. La Commission 1. dispose-t-elle de donnØes plus prØcises (cid:224) cet Øgard? 2. 3. 4. Quelle ligne budgØtaire finance les coßts et quel est le montant global de ceux-ci? D(cid:146)aprŁs quels critŁres les «conseillers juridiques locaux» sont-ils sØlectionnØs? Qui sont en Autriche les conseillers juridiques locaux d(cid:146)«Euro-Jus»?


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1345/98 des députes Laura GONZÁLEZ ÁLVAREZ , Pedro MARSET CAMPOS , Alonso PUERTA à la Commission. Indices d'une utilisation inappropriée de crédits européens en liaison avec le "Parque Lineal" de Madrid (Espagne)

eurovoc_concepts:
Cohesion Fund
Spain
decontamination
environmental impact
environmental protection
exchange of information
pollution control measures
use of aid
waste disposal

text: C 13/28 Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes FR 18. 1. 1999 (1999/C 13/038) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1336/98 posØe par Glyn Ford (PSE) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: Opposition (cid:224) l(cid:146)extension des centrales nuclØaires en Lituanie La Commission pourrait-elle indiquer si des financements sont accordØs (cid:224) la Lituanie pour dØvelopper l(cid:146)Ønergie nuclØaire et le montant Øventuel des crØdits consacrØs (cid:224) l(cid:146)Øtude d(cid:146)autres types de combustibles? RØponse donnØe par M. Van den Broek au nom de la Commission (2 juin 1998) La Commission informe l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire qu(cid:146)aucun financement communautaire n(cid:146)est accordØ (cid:224) la Lituanie pour dØvelopper l(cid:146)Ønergie nuclØaire, ni d(cid:146)ailleurs pour l(cid:146)Øtude d(cid:146)autres types de combustibles. L(cid:146)assistance fournie dans le secteur nuclØaire, soit directement par la CommunautØ, soit par le biais du compte de sßretØ nuclØaire de la Banque europØenne pour la reconstruction et le dØveloppement (BERD), vise (cid:224) amØliorer la sØcuritØ de la centrale nuclØaire existante d(cid:146)Ignalina. (1999/C 13/039) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1345/98 posØe par Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL), Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) et Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: Indices d(cid:146)une utilisation inappropriØe de crØdits europØens en liaison avec le «Parque Lineal» de Madrid (Espagne) Le «Parque Lineal del Manzanares» (Madrid) fait l(cid:146)objet, depuis 1985, de diverses actions engagØes par la mairie de Madrid qui a voulu installer sur ce terrain vague un parc aquatique, opØration qui a laissØ derriŁre elle une Ønorme montagne de dØchets, qui devait servir de base au parc aquatique, et qui dØsormais bouche l(cid:146)horizon des riverains et provoque des nuisances olfactives. Les organismes riverains ont menØ une action de dØfense du site en tant que parc «ruralisØ» oø implanter des expØriences d(cid:146)Øconomie sociale dans une zone en dØclin, affectØe par de graves problŁmes sociaux, et, au terme de maintes dØmarches, ont obtenu que la mairie de Madrid demande des crØdits au titre du Fonds de cohØsion pour la rØinsertion de la zone dans le plan d(cid:146)assainissement global. Les riverains sont inquiets (cid:224) la suite d(cid:146)une intervention du gouvernement autonome qui entendrait privatiser le parc et le dØmembrer en parcelles qui seraient proposØes (cid:224) des entreprises (cid:224) but lucratif. Il est suspectØ que ces pratiques spØculatives ont pour arriŁre-plan l(cid:146)octroi d(cid:146)un important concours financier de l(cid:146)Union europØenne qui serait dŁs lors orientØ vers d(cid:146)autres projets. En outre, les autoritØs entendent rØaliser une opØration consensuelle (cid:224) laquelle ne participent ni les organisations de riverains ni les organisations Øcologistes. De mŒme, les dispositions du Livre vert de l(cid:146)Union europØenne sur l(cid:146)environnement urbain sont bafouØes pour ce qui est de la participation des personnes concernØes (cid:224) l(cid:146)opØration projetØe. 1. La Commission est-elle informØe de cette situation? 2. Quelles mesures la Commission peut-elle prendre afin de garantir l(cid:146)application, par les autoritØs espagnoles, de la lØgislation communautaire en matiŁre d(cid:146)environnement et, plus prØcisØment, de la directive 85/337/CEE (1) concernant l(cid:146)Øvaluation des incidences de certains projets publics et privØs sur l(cid:146)environnement? 3. La Commission peut-elle indiquer si ce projet bØnØficie des interventions structurelles de l(cid:146)Union europØenne? Peut-elle prØciser si le «Parque Lineal» a bØnØficiØ d(cid:146)aides structurelles et, dans l(cid:146)affirmative, quelle en a ØtØ l(cid:146)affectation?


title: Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 909/98 af 29. april 1998 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne for hvidt sukker og råsukker i uforarbejdet stand

text: 30. 4. 98 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 128/25 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 909/98 af 29. april 1998 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne for hvidt sukker og råsukker i uforar- bejdet stand KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR (cid:190) under henvisning til Europæiske Fællesskab, traktaten om oprettelse af Det under henvisning til Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 af 1. juni 1981 om den fælles markedsordning for sukker (1), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1599/ 96 (2), særlig artikel 19, stk. 4, første afsnit, litra a), og ud fra følgende betragtninger: I henhold til artikel 19 i forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 kan forskellen mellem noteringerne og priserne på verdensmarkedet for de produkter, som er nævnt i forord- ningens artikel 1, stk. 1, litra a), og priserne for disse produkter inden for Fællesskabet udlignes ved en eksport- restitution; i henhold til forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81 skal restitutio- nerne for hvidt sukker og råsukker, der ikke er denatu- reret, og som udføres i uforarbejdet stand, fastsættes under hensyntagen til situationen på fællesskabsmarkedet og på verdensmarkedet for sukker og navnlig under hensyn- tagen til de pris- og omkostningsfaktorer, som er nævnt i forordningens artikel 17a; ifølge samme artikel skal der endvidere tages hensyn til de påtænkte udførslers økono- miske aspekt; for råsukkers vedkommende skal restitutionen fastsættes for standardkvaliteten; denne er defineret i artikel 1 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 431/68 af 9. april 1968 om fastsættelse af råsukker og af standardkvaliteten for Fællesskabets grænseovergangssted for beregning af cif- priserne inden for sukkersektoren (3), ændret ved forord- ning (EF) nr. 3290/94 (4); denne restitution fastsættes i øvrigt i overensstemmelse med artikel 17a, stk. 4, i forord- ning (EØF) nr. 1785/81; kandissukker er defineret i forordning (EF) nr. 2135/95 af 7. Kommissionens i september 1995 om gennemførelsesbestemmelser for sukkersektoren (5); den således eksportrestitutioner beregnede restitution bør, for så vidt angår sukker tilsat smagsstoffer eller farvestoffer, gælde for det pågældende sukkers sakkaroseindhold og fastsættes pr. 1 % af dette indhold; situationen på verdensmarkedet eller de særlige krav på visse markeder kan gøre det nødvendigt at differentiere restitutionen for sukker efter dets bestemmelse; i særlige tilfælde kan restitutionsbeløbet fastsættes i rets- akter af anden karakter; de i artikel 1 i Rådets forordning (EØF) nr. 3813/92 (6), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 150/95 (7), fastsatte repræsentative markedskurser anvendes til omregning af det beløb, der er udtrykt i tredjelandenes valuta, og ligger til grund for fastlæggelsen af landbrugsomregningskur- serne for medlemsstaternes valutaer; betingelserne for anvendelse og fastsættelse af disse omregningskurser blev fastlagt ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 1068/ 93 (8), senest ændret ved forordning (EF) nr. 1482/96 (9); restitutionen skal ændres i mellemtiden; fastsættes hver anden uge; den kan anvendelsen af disse bestemmelser på den nuværende situation på sukkermarkedet, navnlig på noteringer eller kurser på sukker i Fællesskabet og på verdensmarkedet, fører til at fastsætte restitutionerne til de beløb, der er angivet i bilaget; de i denne forordning fastsatte foranstaltninger er i over- ensstemmelse med udtalelse fra Forvaltningskomitéen for Sukker (cid:190) UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 Eksportrestitutionerne for de produkter, der er nævnt i artikel 1, stk. 1, litra a), i forordning (EØF) nr. 1785/81, i uforarbejdet stand og ikke denaturerede, fastsættes til de beløb, der er angivet i bilaget. Artikel 2 Denne forordning træder i kraft den 30. april 1998. (1) EFT L 177 af 1. 7. 1981, s. 4. (2) EFT L 206 af 16. 8. 1996, s. 43. (3) EFT L 89 af 10. 4. 1968, s. 3. (4) EFT L 349 af 31. 12. 1994, s. 105. (5) EFT L 214 af 8. 9. 1995, s. 16. (6) EFT L 387 af 31. 12. 1992, s. 1. (7) EFT L 22 af 31. 1. 1995, s. 1. (8) EFT L 108 af 1. 5. 1993, s. 106. (9) EFT L 188 af 27. 7. 1996, s. 22. L 128/26 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende 30. 4. 98 Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart medlemsstat. i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 29. april 1998. På Kommissionens vegne Franz FISCHLER Medlem af Kommissionen til Kommissionens forordning af 29. april 1998 om fastsættelse af eksportrestitutionerne for hvidt sukker og råsukker i uforarbejdet stand BILAG Produktkode 1701 11 90 9100 1701 11 90 9910 1701 11 90 9950 1701 12 90 9100 1701 12 90 9910 1701 12 90 9950 1701 91 00 9000 1701 99 10 9100 1701 99 10 9910 1701 99 10 9950 Restitutionsbeløb (cid:190) ECU/100 kg (cid:190) 38,91 38,96 38,91 38,96 (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (cid:190) ECU/1 % sakkarose × 100 kg (cid:190) 0,4230 (cid:190) ECU/100 kg (cid:190) 42,30 44,63 44,63 (cid:190) ECU/1 % sakkarose × 100 kg (cid:190) 1701 99 90 9100 0,4230 (1) Dette beløb anvendes for råsukker med et udbytte på 92 %. Såfremt det udførte råsukkers udbytte ikke udgør 92 %, beregnes størrelsen af den restitution, der skal anvendes, i overensstemmelse med bestemmelserne i artikel 17a, stk. 4, i forord- ning (EØF) nr. 1785/81. (2) Denne fastsættelse blev suspenderet ved Kommissionens forordning (EØF) nr. 2689/85 (EFT L 255 af 26. 9. 1985, s. 12), ændret ved forordning (EØF) nr. 3251/85 (EFT L 309 af 21. 11. 1985, s. 14)


title: ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 915/98 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗΣ της 29ης Απριλίου 1998 για τον καθορισμό της επιστροφής στην παραγωγή για τα ελαιόλαδα που χρησιμοποιούνται για την παρασκευή ορισμένων κονσερβών

eurovoc_concepts:
olive oil
preserved product
production refund

text: 30. 4. 98 EL Ep(cid:148)sglg Evgleq(cid:148)da tym Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:150)m Joimot(cid:147)tym L 128/43 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 915/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 29gr Apqik(cid:148)ou 1998 cia tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr epistqov(cid:147)r stgm paqacyc(cid:147) cia ta ekai(cid:149)kada pou wqgsilopoio(cid:151)mtai cia tgm paqasjeu(cid:147) oqisl(cid:146)mym jomseqb(cid:150)m G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA(cid:136)JYM JOIMOTGTYM, (cid:130)womtar up(cid:149)xg: tg sumh(cid:147)jg cia tgm (cid:148)dqusg tgr Euqypa(cid:152)j(cid:147)r Joim(cid:149)tgtar, tom jamomisl(cid:149) aqih. 136/66/EOJ tou Sulbouk(cid:148)ou, tgr 22ar Septelbq(cid:148)ou 1966, peq(cid:148) joim(cid:147)r oqcam(cid:150)seyr acoq(cid:145)r stom tol(cid:146)a tym kipaq(cid:150)m ousi(cid:150)m (1), (cid:149)pyr tqopopoi(cid:147)hgje tekeu- ta(cid:148)a ap(cid:149) tom jamomisl(cid:149) (EJ) aqih. 1581/96 (2), jai id(cid:148)yr to (cid:145)qhqo 20a, Ejtil(cid:150)mtar: (cid:149)ti sto (cid:145)qhqo 20a tou jamomislo(cid:151) aqih. 136/66/EOJ pqo- bk(cid:146)petai g woq(cid:147)cgsg epistqov(cid:147)r stgm paqacyc(cid:147) cia to ekai(cid:149)kado pou wqgsilopoie(cid:148)tai cia tgm paqasjeu(cid:147) oqi- sl(cid:146)mym jomseqb(cid:150)m· (cid:149)ti, s(cid:151)lvyma le tgm paq(cid:145)cqavo 6 tou (cid:145)qhqou auto(cid:151) jai le tgm epiv(cid:151)kang tgr paqacq(cid:145)vou 3, g Epitqop(cid:147) jahoq(cid:148)fei j(cid:145)he d(cid:151)o l(cid:147)mer tgm epistqov(cid:147) aut(cid:147)· (cid:149)ti, s(cid:151)lvyma le to (cid:145)qhqo 20a paq(cid:145)cqavor 2 tou pqoama- veqh(cid:146)mtor jamomislo(cid:151), g epistqov(cid:147) jahoq(cid:148)fetai le b(cid:145)sg tgm ap(cid:149)jkisg pou up(cid:145)qwei letan(cid:151) tym til(cid:150)m pou dialoqv(cid:150)- momtai stg diehm(cid:147) acoq(cid:145) jai stgm joimotij(cid:147) acoq(cid:145) kalb(cid:145)- momtar up(cid:149)xg tgm epib(cid:145)qumsg jat(cid:145) tgm eisacyc(cid:147) pou evaql(cid:149)fetai cia to ekai(cid:149)kado pou up(cid:145)cetai stom jydij(cid:149) SO 1509 90 00 jat(cid:145) tg di(cid:145)qjeia liar peqi(cid:149)dou amavoq(cid:145)r, jah(cid:150)r jai ta stoiwe(cid:148)a pou epik(cid:146)cgsam jat(cid:145) tom jahoqisl(cid:149) tym epistqov(cid:150)m jat(cid:145) tgm enacyc(cid:147) pou isw(cid:151)oum cia ta ekai(cid:149)kada aut(cid:145) jat(cid:145) tg di(cid:145)qjeia liar peqi(cid:149)dou amavoq(cid:145)r· (cid:149)ti, yr peq(cid:148)odor amavoq(cid:145)r, pq(cid:146)pei ma heyqghe(cid:148) g peq(cid:148)odor tym d(cid:151)o lgm(cid:150)m pou pqogco(cid:151)mtai tgr peqi(cid:149)dou isw(cid:151)or tgr epistqov(cid:147)r stgm paqacyc(cid:147)· (cid:149)ti to pqoamaveqh(cid:146)m pos(cid:149) pqosaun(cid:145)metai jat(cid:145) pos(cid:149) (cid:148)so le tgm em(cid:148)swusg stgm jata- m(cid:145)kysg pou isw(cid:151)ei tgm gl(cid:146)qa h(cid:146)seyr se evaqloc(cid:147) tgr epistqov(cid:147)r aut(cid:147)r· (cid:149)ti ap(cid:149) tgm evaqloc(cid:147) tou pqoamaveqh(cid:146)mtym jqitgq(cid:148)ym odgco(cid:151)leha stom jahoqisl(cid:149) tgr jatyt(cid:146)qy epistqov(cid:147)r, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: (cid:129)qhqo 1 Cia tour l(cid:147)mer L(cid:145)io jai Io(cid:151)mio 1998, g epistqov(cid:147) stgm paqacyc(cid:147) pou amav(cid:146)qetai sto (cid:145)qhqo 20a paq(cid:145)cqavor 2 tou jamomislo(cid:151) aqih. 136/66/EOJ iso(cid:151)tai le 60,07 Ecu am(cid:145) 100 wiki(cid:149)cqalla. (cid:129)qhqo 2 O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r aqw(cid:148)fei ma isw(cid:151)ei tgm 1g La(cid:155)ou 1998. O paq(cid:150)m jamomisl(cid:149)r e(cid:148)mai desleutij(cid:149)r yr pqor (cid:149)ka ta l(cid:146)qg tou jai isw(cid:151)ei (cid:145)lesa se j(cid:145)he jq(cid:145)tor l(cid:146)kor. Bqun(cid:146)kker, 29 Apqik(cid:148)ou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop(cid:147) Hans VAN DEN BROEK L(cid:146)kor tgr Epitqop(cid:147)r (1) EE 172 tgr 30. 9. 1966, s. 3025/66. (2) EE L 206 tgr 16. 8. 1996, s. 11


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1255/98 del Leonie van BLADEL a la Comisión. Daños a la pequeña y mediana empresa a causa del abuso de la posición de monopolio de las compañías de correos y telecomunicaciones neerlandesas y europeas

eurovoc_concepts:
Netherlands
liberalisation of the market
monopoly
postal and telecommunications services
quality standard
restriction on competition
single market
small and medium-sized enterprises


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1192/98 del Stephen HUGHES a la Comisión. Excedentes agrícolas en la Comunidad Europea

eurovoc_concepts:
agricultural situation
agricultural surplus
report

text: C 31/22 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas ES 5. 2. 1999 Respuesta del Sr. Monti en nombre de la Comisi(cid:243)n (13 de julio de 1998) Su Seæor(cid:237)a plantea la cuesti(cid:243)n el juego en Internet y su regulaci(cid:243)n. Como sabrÆ Su Seæor(cid:237)a, en 1991 la Comisi(cid:243)n emprendi(cid:243) un estudio sobre el juego en el mercado interior. En aquella Øpoca no se abogaba por la regulaci(cid:243)n de este Æmbito debido al carÆcter limitado de los flujos fronterizos de estos servicios. Obviamente, esta situaci(cid:243)n estÆ cambiando ahora debido a la posibilidad de ofrecer estos servicios en l(cid:237)nea. En su actual examen sobre el marco jur(cid:237)dico para el comercio electr(cid:243)nico, la Comisi(cid:243)n estÆ analizando el problema de la regulaci(cid:243)n de estos servicios. Dado que la Comisi(cid:243)n aœn no ha finalizado su anÆlisis de la situaci(cid:243)n reglamentaria, en esta fase no es posible indicar si la Comisi(cid:243)n formularÆ propuestas de regulaci(cid:243)n de este Æmbito ni cuÆl serÆ su alcance y su contenido. (1999/C 31/026) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1192/98 de Stephen Hughes (PSE) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (29 de abril de 1998) Asunto: Excedentes agr(cid:237)colas en la Comunidad Europea ¿Podr(cid:237)a proporcionar la Comisi(cid:243)n datos pormenorizados desde 1976 en lo que se refiere a la salida dada anualmente a cada tipo de producto almacenado, a saber: 1. 2. 3. 4. donaciones a los pa(cid:237)ses mÆs pobres, ventas a unos precios considerablemente reducidos a pa(cid:237)ses con ingresos medios, como por ejemplo la Uni(cid:243)n SoviØtica, alimentos para animales, o destrucci(cid:243)n/eliminaci(cid:243)n? Respuesta del Sr. Fischler en nombre de la Comisi(cid:243)n (11 de junio de 1998) En el marco de una respuesta a una pregunta escrita, la Comisi(cid:243)n no puede emprender las bœsquedas largas y costosas necesarias para ofrecer a Su Seæor(cid:237)a la informaci(cid:243)n solicitada, de forma sintØtica. Sin embargo, la mayor(cid:237)a de la informaci(cid:243)n solicitada ha sido publicada por la Comisi(cid:243)n en los informes anuales relativos a la situaci(cid:243)n de la agricultura. (1999/C 31/027) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1196/98 de Concepci(cid:243) Ferrer (PPE) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (24 de abril de 1998) Asunto: Propuesta legislativa sobre Pol(cid:237)tica Forestal La importancia medioambiental y comercial de los bosques europeos de la Uni(cid:243)n Europea, ya sea como fuente de salud y como fuente de empleo hace que la estrategia forestal deba basarse en su multifuncionalidad y en la necesidad de una sostenibilidad ecol(cid:243)gica, econ(cid:243)mica y social que reconozca la diversidad forestal existente en la Uni(cid:243)n Europea. Teniendo en cuenta estos factores y tras la petici(cid:243)n realizada por el Parlamento en su informe sobre Pol(cid:237)tica Forestal (Resoluci(cid:243)n A4-0414/96) (1) en el que instaba a la Comisi(cid:243)n a presentar una propuesta legislativa sobre una estrategia forestal europea, ¿cuÆndo piensa la Comisi(cid:243)n elaborar dicha propuesta? (1) DO C 55 de 24. 2. 1997, p. 22