title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1312/98 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. EURO 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Community budget
budget policy
coordination of EMU policies
currency adjustment
economic convergence
economic growth
economic stabilisation
public finance

text: C 402/110 Official Journal of the European Communities EN 22. 12. 98 (98/C 402/142) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1312/98 by JosØ Garc(cid:237)a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) to the Commission (29 April 1998) Subject: EURO 1999 As a result of the Pact for Stability and Growth adopted by the Amsterdam European Council in June 1997, the Member States(cid:146) medium-term budgetary objective will be to achieve (cid:145)positions close to balance or in surplus(cid:146). If the Member States continue their budgetary adjustments in subsequent years, their public finances will be in the best position to tackle the budgetary consequences of a possible downturn in the economy. But what does the Commission think would be the current situation in Belgium if the Stability Pact had been applied during the period 1992-1997? Answer given by Mr de Silguy on behalf of the Commission (2 June 1998) The stability and growth pact is constituted by a resolution of the European Council of 7 June 1997 (1), by Council Regulation (EC) 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (2), and Council Regulation (EC) 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure2. The pact aims at fiscal discipline in the economic and monetary union (EMU) thus creating the appropriate stability conditions for sustained growth. It provides a powerful system of incentives for a Member State not to incur an excessive deficit and to correct it rapidly if such a situation should occur. In 1992, Belgium had a general government deficit of 6. 9 % of gross domestic product (GDP) and in 1993 the deficit was 7. 1 % of GDP. this situation led to a Council decision of 26 September 1994 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Belgium (Article 104c (6) of the EC Treaty). In the period covered by the Honourable Member(cid:146)s question, i. e. 1992 to 1997, Belgium budgetary policy was mainly geared towards convergence, i. e. to correct the excessive deficit situation and thus to meet the convergence criteria on the budgetary position. Moreover, paragraphs 9 and 11 of Article 104c of the EC Treaty, which deal with sanctions, did not apply during stage two of EMU. (1) OJ C 236, 2. 8. 1997. (2) OJ L 209, 2. 8. 1997. (98/C 402/143) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1322/98 by Angela Sierra GonzÆlez (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (29 April 1998) Subject: Development of the Barranco de Veneguera (Gran Canaria) The Canary Islands Parliament has recently adopted a bye-law authorizing the urban development of the Barranco de Veneguera (Gran Canaria, Canary Islands), in spite of a Popular Legislative Initiative bearing about 50 000 signatures which calls for it to be included in the Law on Canary Island Nature Conservancy Areas as an area of nature conservancy. The request for the Barranco de Veneguera to be included in the Nublo Countryside Park was prompted by the important zoological and botanical value of the area. Scientists regard Veneguera as the most important nature conservancy area for the tabaiba cardoon in Gran Canaria. They have identified 12 species endemic to Gran Canaria, and 34 to the Canaries archipelago. In other words, the area contains a striking example of the (cid:145)habitat of thermo-Mediterranean and pre-steppe brush(cid:146) protected by Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and wild flora and fauna (1)


title: Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the 'Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision on the coordinated introduction of mobile and wireless communications (UMTS) in the Community'

eurovoc_concepts:
EU policy
new technology
radio telecommunications
standardisation
telecommunications industry
trade licence

formats: html pdf print

text: C 214/92 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 7. 98 Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision on the coordinated introduction of mobile and wireless communications (UMTS) in the Community’ (98/C 214/25) On 24 March 1998, the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Article 198 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proiposal. The Section for Transport and Communications was instructed to prepare the Committee’s work on the subject; it set up a study group and appointed Mr Mobbs as rapporteur. At its 354th plenary session (meeting of 29 April 1998), the Economic and Social Committee appointed Mr Mobbs as rapporteur-general and adopted the following opinion by 65 votes with 1 vote against. 1. Introduction 1. 1. Such is the speed of technological developments and the pressure from the mobile telephone market for a Community UMTS policy that the Commission has submitted three papers within the space of less than a year on the third generation of mobile phones UMTS (). 1. 2. The first Commission communication () was a report on the further development of mobile communi- cations. The second Commission communication () was a synthesis of comments and contributions of all those who had responded to the first communication. The Committee adopted one opinion on both communi- cations in December 1997 (). Generally, consensus emerged from all consultations that Commission pro- posals would help create favourable conditions for the development of UMTS and thus help to serve the needs of European consumers and to preserve the competitiveness of European industry. 1. 3. The first generation of mobile phones (analogue) is being supplemented by the second generation (digital) where the European GSM () which has become the widely accepted standard for mobile communications with over 200 operators (in over 110 countries) running or building a network, the majority of them outside Europe. (1) Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). (2) Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the further development of mobile and wireless communications — Challenges and choices for the European Union — COM(97) 217 final , 29. 5. 1997. (3) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Com- mittee and the Committee of the Regions — strategy and policy orientations with regard to the further development of mobile and wireless communications — Outcome of the public consultation and proposals for creating a favourable environment — COM(97) 513 final, 15. 10. 1997. (4) OJ C 73, 9. 3. 1998, p. 109. (5) Global System for Mobile (GSM). In its December 1997 opinion, the Committee 1. 4. noted that Europe’s success in launching and establishing the GSM system could be ascribed to the timely and adequate coordination and cooperation between industry and the EU public authorities. The Committee urged the adoption of an equivalent approach to the issues attached to the transition to UMTS. This is important when considering that the EU market for cellular mobile services including UMTS is expected to reach by 2005 over ECU 100 billion annual revenues (according to the Commission and the UMTS Forum). 1. 5. UMTS is the European concept for the third generation of mobile communications. It will offer users a wireless access to the Internet and other multi-media services in addition to the mobile telephony and mes- saging services available today. The inclusion of satellite capabilities will be of particular importance not only in advanced societies but also in sparsely populated regions and developing countries. 1. 6. Against this background the Commission pro- poses a Decision to be adopted on the coordinated introduction of mobile and wireless communications (UMTS). Whilst there is broad recognition that develop- ment must be market-led in order to facilitate investment and innovation, it is necessary to create, within the legal certainty that existing regulatory framework, licenses will be awarded and spectrum made available in good time. 2. Commission proposal 2. 1. The explanatory memorandum to the Com- mission proposal provides a very clear and concise introduction to the overall proposal. The following summarizes some of the key points. A strong home market in Europe will provide 2. 1. 1. the best conditions for European industry to compete 10. 7. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/93 on the global market and consolidate the leading position which it holds with GSM. 2. 1. 7. The timely availability of frequency spectrum is a prerequisite for the introduction of UMTS services in the Community. The timetable (Annex II) highlights this for spectrum allocations identified by the CEPT. 2. 1. 2. Adoption of the proposed decision will prove the political determination to make UMTS a success and will provide for the requisite legal certainty to industry. Member States and their regulatory authorities will have to ensure the harmonization of national licensing procedures and the granting of licenses and authorizations for UMTS. The proposed decision estab- lishes a procedure to foster the licensing process building on cooperation with CEPT/ERC (), CEPT/ECTRA () and ETSI (). 2. 1. 3. The need for a common, open and inter- nationally competitive standard for the UMTS radio interface has been stressed by all Community insti- tutions. The industry/ETSI consensus of 29 January 1998 also reflected this need. The technical specifications will now need to be defined, in view of ETSI’s adoption of the final UMTS standards. This agreement should position UMTS as a key element of the International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT 2000) family of standards which is currently in preparation at the ITU () for implementation in the year 2000. 2. 1. 4. conditions of application of existing legislation, particular the Licensing Directive (97/13/EC). Action is required to clarify without delay the in 2. 1. 5. Action is also required to ensure the harmoni- zation and rapid introduction of compatible UMTS services to secure Europe-wide roaming of Community- wide and pan-European services. 1 January 2000 is proposed as the date for the establishment by Member States of authorization procedures which are necessary for the introduction of UMTS. The provision of UMTS services in Member States should be allowed as from 1 January 2002. The proposed decision establishes rights and obligations on commercial players to negotiate international roaming. 2. 1. 6. Whilst the components of UMTS have still to be defined, the characteristics contained in Annex I reflect the common understanding on UMTS by all actors consulted. (1) European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT); European Radiocommunications Committee (ERC). (2) European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT); Committee of European Tele- communications Regulatory Authorities (ECTRA). (3) European Telecommunications Standardization Institute (ETSI). 3. General comments The Committee congratulates the Commission 3. 1. on the speed of its actions in connection with UMTS where the need to capitalize on Europe’s success of GSM is paramount. A clear and stable regulatory framework is needed to enable development to proceed which will advance European mobile and wireless technologies. The Committee welcomes the proposed decision 3. 2. and endorses the Commission’s objective of facilitating the rapid introduction of UMTS. UMTS will be developed taking into account the existing GSM plat- form. The GSM systems will not become redundant and the currently proposed developments for GSM will last for years. The Committee is particularly pleased to read in 3. 3. the explanatory memorandum that the Commission expects that ‘UMTS should lead to the creation of tens of thousands of new jobs in the Community’. However, the Committee would like to see evidence to substantiate this welcomed forecast. The date for full liberalization of telephony 3. 4. (subject to some derogations) on 1 January 1998 has passed. Whilst the Commission achieved its objective of having in place all the rules and regulations for liberalization by the required dates, their implementation by all Member States is far from complete. The Com- mission’s ‘Third report on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package’ () highlights a number of areas where progress is far from satisfactory, in fact legal proceedings are being undertaken in a number of instances. 3. 4. 1. Some of the unsatisfactory areas relate to mobile telephony. This indicates that progress on telephony (fixed or mobile) liberalization varies from one Member State to another. This could be a problem as there may well be difficulties in implementing to schedule and to the same extent and time, the various actions contained in the Commission’s proposed decision. (4) International Telecommunications Union (ITU) (5) COM(98) 80 final. C 214/94 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 7. 98 4. Specific comments 4. 1. Article 2 — Definition — characteristics of UMTS The Committee agrees that UMTS should be defined with reference to the capabilities of the system, which need to be distinguished from the services that may be provided. In particular, the definition should be market-led and its components should be determined by the market, in the light of developments in technology and consumer needs. By including in Annex I a list of the essential components of UMTS, there is a risk that the characteristics of UMTS contained in the Commission’s proposal may prove either not to be required by consumers or, alternatively, insufficient. The Committee recognizes the need to list the elements of UMTS but it should be made clear that what UMTS will comprise will be decided by the market. Annex I should contain a minimum set of characteristics of UMTS for its initial stage of introduction. 4. 2. Article 3 — Coordinated authorization 4. 2. 1. The Committee recognizes the need to have a date for the completion of the harmonization of national licensing procedures to create certainty about the intro- duction of UMTS. This should not restrain those Member States which may be able or simply want to proceed with the introduction of UMTS earlier than others. 4. 2. 2. The timetable set out in Annex II concerns the harmonization of the frequency spectrum which is necessary for UMTS. This timetable should be respected. Authorizations for UMTS new entrants should take into account the need to achieve compatibility of UMTS systems at a European level. Brussels, 29 April 1998. 4. 3. Article 4 — Roaming rights and obligations There is also reference to roaming in Article 3 — ‘Member States shall ensure that licenses support roam- ing throughout the Community’. However, Article 3 does not make clear whether the Commission intends that only cross-border roaming should be negotiated between UMTS operators or that the same rights and obligations should apply to roaming within a Member State. The Commission’s intention should be made clear. 4. 4. Article 5 — Cooperation with CEPT CEPT harmonization of UMTS frequency spectrum use and conditions is essential for Europe’s success in establishing UMTS as the world leading standard. Accordingly, the Committee considers that there should be the possibility, at national level, to proceed at a faster pace towards regulating the use of frequencies and the conditions of authorizations without compromising the CEPT harmonization work. The successful introduction of UMTS depends on addressing the requirements of the market and administrative procedures should be adjusted to achieve this objective. The Commission should ensure, as soon as possible, that all necessary steps are taken at a Community level in cooperation with the relevant international fora (CEPT/ECTRA, CEPT/ERC, ETSI) to achieve the timely allocation of sufficient frequency spectrum for UMTS services. 4. 5. Article 6 — Cooperation with ETSI The Committee is pleased to learn of the progress achieved recently at ETSI regarding the adoption of a common and open air interface standard for UMTS, which is known as UTRA (). All institutions involved should make all necessary efforts to maintain the momentum for the introduction of a common standard. This will enhance the opportunities for the widest possible acceptance of UMTS. 4. 6. Article 13 — Report The Committee requests that it is sent a copy of the report. (1) UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA). The President of the Economic and Social Committee Tom JENKINS


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 1302/98 von Francesco BALDARELLI an die Kommission. Einstellung der Alitalia-Direktflüge nach Santiago de Chile

eurovoc_concepts:
Chile
Italy
air transport
airline
cessation of trading
trade agreement

text: C 96/4 Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:228)ischen Gemeinschaften DE 8. 4. 1999 Die Kommission kann der Frau Abgeordneten mitteilen, da(cid:223) der Bericht der Kommission (cid:252)ber Busse mit einer L(cid:228)nge von 15 m demn(cid:228)chst angenommen und dem Rat und dem Parlament zur Kenntnisnahme zugeleitet werden soll. (1) ABl. L 235 vom 17. 9. 1996, S. 59. (1999/C 96/005) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-1292/98 von Patricia McKenna (V) an die Kommission (29. April 1998) Betrifft: Beihilfezusch(cid:252)sse an Coillte, das halbstaatliche irische Waldbauunternehmen Vergangenes Jahr legte die Europ(cid:228)ische Kommission dem Ministerrat und dem Europ(cid:228)ischen Parlament einen Bericht (cid:252)ber die Regelung der Finanzhilfe f(cid:252)r Waldbauma(cid:223)nahmen in Irland vor. Der Schwerpunkt des Berichts lag auf der Anwendung der Verordnung Nr. 2080/92, die sich mit den im Rahmen des Europ(cid:228)ischen Ausrich- tungs-und Garantiefonds f(cid:252)r die Landwirtschaft (EAGFL) gew(cid:228)hrten Beihilfen befa(cid:223)t. Nach dieser Verordnung sollen Beihilfen aus diesem Fonds vorzugsweise Personen gew(cid:228)hrt werden, die hauptberuflich Landwirtschaft betreiben. Das nationale Parlament von Irland, DÆil Eireann, hat k(cid:252)rzlich erfahren, da(cid:223) das halbstaatliche Waldbauunter- nehmen Coillte aufgrund dieser Regelung umfangreiche Beihilfen erhalten hat. Mit diesen Beihilfen konnte es im Jahr 1993 6. 125 Hektar, im Jahr 1994 5. 355 Hektar, im Jahr 1995 5. 155 Hektar, im Jahr 1996 3. 658 Hektar und im vergangenen Jahr 2. 773 Hektar Land aufforsten. In der Verordnung gibt es keine Bestimmung, in der die finanzielle Unterst(cid:252)tzung halbstaatlicher Unternehmen vorgesehen ist. Wird die Kommission angesichts der Tatsache, da(cid:223) dieser Sachverhalt im vergangenen Jahr nicht in ihrem Bericht erw(cid:228)hnt wurde, Sorge daf(cid:252)r tragen, da(cid:223) er nun untersucht wird? Ist sie der Auffassung, da(cid:223) die Verwendung dieser Mittel durch Irland zur Unterst(cid:252)tzung von Coillte gegen die Verordnung Nr. 2080/92 versto(cid:223)en k(cid:246)nnte? Antwort von Herrn Fischler im Namen der Kommission (15. Juni 1998) Die Frau Abgeordnete erkl(cid:228)rt, in der Verordnung (EWG) 2080/92 gebe es keine Bestimmung, mit der die finanzielle Unterst(cid:252)tzung halbstaatlicher Unternehmen vorgesehen sei. Nach Artikel 2 der Verordnung k(cid:246)nnen die Beihilfen jedoch (cid:132)allen nat(cid:252)rlichen und juristischen Personen gew(cid:228)hrt werden, die landwirtschaftliche Fl(cid:228)chen aufforsten(cid:147). Demnach sind sowohl Privatunternehmen als auch (cid:246)ffentliche Dienste potentielle Nutznie(cid:223)er dieser Verordnung. Die Tatsache, da(cid:223) die Aufforstung durch Landwirte bevorzugt wird, kommt dadurch zum Ausdruck, da(cid:223) f(cid:252)r sie h(cid:246)here Pr(cid:228)mien zum Ausgleich von Einkommensverlusten vorgesehen sind als f(cid:252)r Nichtlandwirte. Die Kommission beabsichtigt keine Untersuchung der Aufforstung durch halbstaatliche Unternehmen im Rahmen der Verordnung (EWG) 2080/92, da die Aufforstung durch diese Unternehmen keinen Versto(cid:223) gegen die Bestimmungen der Verordnung darstellt. (1999/C 96/006) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-1302/98 von Francesco Baldarelli (PSE) an die Kommission Betrifft: Einstellung der Alitalia-Direktfl(cid:252)ge nach Santiago de Chile (29. April 1998) Die italienische Gemeinschaft in Chile hat mitgeteilt, da(cid:223) die nationale italienische Fluggesellschaft Alitalia ab 31. M(cid:228)rz 1998 den w(cid:246)chentlichen Direktflug nach Santiago de Chile einstellen wird. Die Fl(cid:252)ge der Alitalia gehen also nur bis Buenos Aires, den Anschlu(cid:223)flug nach Santiago de Chile (cid:252)bernimmt gem(cid:228)(cid:223) einem Abkommen zwischen den zwei Unternehmen L. A. N. Chile


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1320/98 del José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL a la Comisión. Euro 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Economic and Monetary Union
Portugal
budget deficit
budget policy
budgetary discipline (EU)
economic convergence
third stage of EMU

text: 19. 11. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas C 354/93 (98/C 354/148) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1320/98 de Jose· Garc(cid:14)·a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) a la Comisio·n (29 de abril de 1998) Asunto: Euro 1999 Gracias al Pacto de estabilidad y crecimiento ›adoptado por el Consejo Europeo de Amsterdam, en junio de 1997› los Estados miembros fijara·n como objetivo presupuestario a medio plazo la obtencio·n de «situaciones que este·n cerca del equilibrio o excedentarias». Si continu·an sus ajustes presupuestarios en los an(cid:152)os siguientes, los Estados miembros contara·n con unas finanzas pu·blicas cuya situacio·n les permitira· hacer frente ma·s fa·cilmente a las consecuencias presupuestarias de posibles evoluciones desfavorables de la econom(cid:14)·a. ¿Cua·l cree la Comisio·n que ser(cid:14)·a la situacio·n actual en Portugal si el Pacto de estabilidad hubiese sido aplicado durante el per(cid:14)·odo 1992-1997? Respuesta del Sr. de Silguy en nombre de la Comisio·n (2 de junio de 1998) El Pacto de estabilidad y crecimiento esta· constituido por una resolucio·n del Consejo Europeo de 7 de junio de 1997, el Reglamento (CE) no 1466/97 del Consejo, de 7 de julio de 1997 (1), relativo al reforzamiento de la supervisio·n de las situaciones presupuestarias y a la supervisio·n y coordinacio·n de las pol(cid:14)·ticas econo·micas (2) y el Reglamento (CE) no 1467/97 del Consejo, de 7 de julio de 1997, relativo a la aceleracio·n y clarificacio·n del procedimiento de de·ficit excesivo (2). El Pacto pretende lograr la disciplina presupuestaria en la Unio·n Econo·mica y Monetaria (UEM) y crear as(cid:14)· las condiciones apropiadas de estabilidad para generar un crecimiento sostenido. Al mismo tiempo, establece un poderoso sistema de incentivos para que los Estados miembros no incurran en un de·ficit excesivo y para que rectifiquen ra·pidamente, de darse el caso. En 1992, Portugal ten(cid:14)·a un de·ficit de las administraciones pu·blicas del 3,0 % del producto interior bruto (PIB), que en 1993 fue del 6,1 %. Esta situacio·n desemboco· en una Decisio·n del Consejo, de 26 de septiembre de 1994, relativa a la existencia de un de·ficit excesivo en Portugal (Art(cid:14)·culo 104c (6) del Tratado CE). En el periodo al que se refiere la pregunta formulada por Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a, es decir, entre 1992 y 1997, el objetivo principal de la pol(cid:14)·tica presupuestaria portuguesa era la convergencia, es decir, corregir esta situacio·n de de·ficit excesivo para poder cumplir los criterios de convergencia desde un punto de vista presupuestario. Adema·s, los apartados 9 y 11 del art(cid:14)·culo 104c del Tratado CE, que hacen referencia a las sanciones, no eran de aplicacio·n en la segunda fase de la UEM. (1) DO C 236 de 2. 8. 1997. (2) DO L 209 de 2. 8. 1997. (98/C 354/149) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-1325/98 de Giuseppe Rauti (NI) a la Comisio·n (29 de abril de 1998) Asunto: Pol(cid:14)·tica exterior y de defensa de la Unio·n Europea y ampliacio·n de la Unio·n Desear(cid:14)·a conocer la opinio·n de la Comisio·n sobre un problema de fondo que esta· surgiendo mientras esta· en marcha el proceso de ampliacio·n de la Unio·n Europea: Como es sabido, hay otros once Estados que han solicitado la adhesio·n a la Unio·n. Es menos sabido que los candidatos a la adhesio·n, con sus cien millones de habitantes, traera·n a la Unio·n un producto industrial bruto (PIB) equivalente aproximadamente al de Be·lgica, Holanda y Luxemburgo. Todos los expertos preve·n que, en consecuencia, durante los pro·ximos veinte an(cid:152)os como m(cid:14)·nimo, la Unio·n Europea en fase de ampliacio·n estara· enteramente dedicada a resolver los formidables problemas que se derivan de este desnivel, sobre todo en econom(cid:14)·a, intercambios comerciales, normativa social y pol(cid:14)·ticas agr(cid:14)·colas


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1226/98 by Roberta ANGELILLI to the Commission. Insurance agencies in Italy

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
freedom to provide services
insurance occupation
national law
right of establishment

formats: html print


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1312/98 do Deputado José GARCÍA- MARGALLO Y MARFIL à Comissão. EURO 1999

text: C 402/110 Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias PT 22. 12. 98 (98/C 402/142) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-1312/98 apresentada por JosØ Garc(cid:237)a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) (cid:224) Comissªo (29 de Abril de 1998) Objecto: EURO 1999 Devido ao Pacto de estabilidade e crescimento adoptado pelo Conselho Europeu de Amesterdªo em Junho de 1997, os Estados-membros tŒm como objectivo or(cid:231)amental a mØdio prazo, a obten(cid:231)ªo de posi(cid:231)ıes «pr(cid:243)ximas ao equil(cid:237)brio ou excedentÆrias». Se nos pr(cid:243)ximos anos mantiverem os seus ajustamentos or(cid:231)amentais, os Estados- -membros terªo uma situa(cid:231)ªo melhor das suas finan(cid:231)as pœblicas que lhes permitirÆ fazer frente com mais facilidade (cid:224)s consequŒncias or(cid:231)amentais de uma poss(cid:237)vel evolu(cid:231)ªo desfavorÆvel da economia. No entanto, e na opiniªo da Comissªo, qual seria a situa(cid:231)ªo actual da BØlgica se o Pacto de estabilidade tivesse sido aplicado durante o per(cid:237)odo de 1992-97? Resposta dada pelo ComissÆrio de Silguy em nome da Comissªo (2 de Junho de 1998) O Pacto de Estabilidade e Crescimento Ø constitu(cid:237)do por uma resolu(cid:231)ªo do Conselho Europeu de 7 de Junho de 1997 (1), pelo Regulamento (CE) 1466/97 do Conselho de 7 de Julho de 1997 relativo ao refor(cid:231)o da supervisªo das situa(cid:231)ıes or(cid:231)amentais e (cid:224) supervisªo e coordena(cid:231)ªo das pol(cid:237)ticas econ(cid:243)micas (2) e pelo Regulamento (CE) 1467/97 do Conselho de 7 de Julho de 1997 relativo (cid:224) acelera(cid:231)ªo e clarifica(cid:231)ªo do procedimento relativo aos dØfices excessivos2. O pacto tem por finalidade a disciplina or(cid:231)amental no contexto da Uniªo Econ(cid:243)mica e MonetÆria (UEM), e, consequentemente, a cria(cid:231)ªo das condi(cid:231)ıes de estabilidade necessÆrias para um crescimento sustentado. O pacto compreende um poderoso sistema de incentivos destinados a evitar que um Estado-membro incorra em dØfices excessivos e para que os corrija rapidamente no caso de estes ocorrerem. Em 1992, a BØlgica teve um dØfice do sector pœblico administrativo de 6,9 % do Produto Interno Bruto (PIB) e em 1993 esse dØfice era de 7,1 %. Tal situa(cid:231)ªo levou a uma decisªo do Conselho de 26 de Setembro de 1994 relativa (cid:224) existŒncia de um dØfice excessivo na BØlgica (no 6 do artigo 104o-C do Tratado CE). Durante o per(cid:237)odo compreendido pela questªo do Senhor Deputado, isto Ø, entre 1992 e 1997, a pol(cid:237)tica or(cid:231)amental belga foi essencialmente orientada para a convergŒncia, ou seja, para a correc(cid:231)ªo da situa(cid:231)ªo de dØfice excessivo, de forma a respeitar os critØrios de convergŒncia. Refira-se ainda que os nos 9 e 11 do artigo 104o-C do Tratado CE, relativos (cid:224)s san(cid:231)ıes, nªo eram aplicÆveis durante a segunda fase da UEM. (1) (2) JO C 236 de 2. 8. 1997. JO L 209 de 2. 8. 1997. (98/C 402/143) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-1322/98 apresentada por Angela Sierra GonzÆlez (GUE/NGL) (cid:224) Comissªo (29 de Abril de 1998) Objecto: Urbaniza(cid:231)ªo do Barranco de Veneguera (Gran CanÆria) Recentemente, o Parlamento das CanÆrias adoptou uma lei de (cid:226)mbito auton(cid:243)mico, a qual autoriza a urbaniza(cid:231)ªo do Barranco de Veneguera (Gran CanÆria- Ilhas CanÆrias), apesar de uma Iniciativa Legislativa Popular com perto de 50. 000 assinaturas, que solicitava a sua inclusªo, como espa(cid:231)o natural protegido, na Lei de Espa(cid:231)os Naturais das CanÆrias. O pedido de inclusªo do Barranco de Venegara no Parque Rural do Nublo tem por base os importantes valores zoo-bot(cid:226)nicos da zona. Para os cientistas, Veneguera Ø considerada a mais importante reserva natural de determinadas espØcies de cactus da Gran CanÆria. Nela foram identificadas 12 espØcies da Gran CanÆria e 34 do ArquipØlago canÆrio. Quer isto dizer, que o referido espa(cid:231)o abrange uma representa(cid:231)ªo importante das «moitas termomediterr(cid:226)nicas e prØ-estØpicas»protegidas pela Directiva 92/43/CEE (1) relativa (cid:224) preserva(cid:231)ªo dos habitats naturais e da fauna e da flora selvagens


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 1236/98 dell'on. Allan MACARTNEY alla Commissione. Ispezioni nel quadro del regime del premio alla vacca nutrice (PVN) e delle indennità compensative per gli animali di montagna (ICAM)

eurovoc_concepts:
aid system
beef
suckler cow
veterinary inspection

text: C 354/82 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee 19. 11. 98 Risposta data dal Sig. Fischler in nome della Commissione (5 maggio 1998) La Commissione non dispone in generale di dati nazionali ripartiti per regione. Tuttavia, nel caso specifico della Spagna che dal 1997, per alcune regioni autonome aventi organismi pagatori riconosciuti, dichiara i dati di spesa per singola regione, la Commissione e‘ in grado di fornire le cifre richieste relative alla Catalogna che sono ammontate a 41 000 milioni di PTA (circa 250,3 milioni di ECU) nel 1997. (98/C 354/131) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-1235/98 di Allan Macartney (ARE) alla Commissione (29 aprile 1998) Oggetto: Sovvenzioni all(cid:146)allevamento caprino Puo‘ la Commissione confermare che, nell(cid:146)ambito del regime relativo alle carni ovine e caprine dell(cid:146)Unione europea, le sovvenzioni agricole all(cid:146)allevamento caprino si situano allo stesso livello delle sovvenzioni all(cid:146)allevamento ovino solo negli Stati membri che hanno una tradizione di consumo di carni caprine? Puo‘ la Commissione far sapere se ha studiato le possibili disparita‘ che possono risultare da tale politica e l(cid:146)effetto che questa ha sull(cid:146)allevamento caprino nei paesi non classificati con una tradizione di consumo di carni caprine? Prevede la Commissione per il futuro una modifica di tale politica che assicuri un(cid:146)equa distribuzione delle sovvenzioni per l(cid:146)allevamento caprino in tutti gli Stati membri? Risposta data dal Sig. Fischler in nome della Commissione (15 maggio 1998) La Commissione puo‘ confermare che il pagamento del premio per capra e‘ limitato alle regioni comunitarie in cui l(cid:146)allevamento caprino orientato alla produzione di carni risulta una pratica tradizionale paragonabile all(cid:146)allevamento ovino. La Commissione non ritiene che l(cid:146)attuale regime sia fonte di disparita‘. Il versamento di un premio annuo nel quadro del regime per gli ovini e i caprini e‘ inteso a sostenere i produttori di carni. Per poter beneficiare di tali versamenti, l(cid:146)allevamento caprino deve essere pertanto orientato principalmente alla produzione di carni e le tecniche di allevamento degli ovini e dei caprini devono essere della stessa natura. Cio‘ non avviene negli Stati membri dove non esiste una tradizione di consumo di carni caprine, dato che le capre vengono allevate principalmente per la produzione di lana o prodotti lattiero-caseari. La Commissione non prevede di estendere il regime di premi ai produttori di caprini la cui principale attivita‘ non sia la produzione di carni. (98/C 354/132) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-1236/98 di Allan Macartney (ARE) alla Commissione (29 aprile 1998) Oggetto: Ispezioni nel quadro del regime del premio alla vacca nutrice (PVN) e delle indennita‘ compensative per gli animali di montagna (ICAM) Per quanto concerne i requisiti previsti perche· i produttori possano beneficiare del regime del premio alla vacca nutrice e di quello delle indennita‘ compensative per gli animali di montagna, risulta alla Commissione che vi sia una discrezionalita‘ quanto alla norma che prevede che le visite a scopo d(cid:146)ispezione vengono effettuate senza preavviso (PVN 1997/ICAM 1998)? Puo‘ far sapere la Commissione se un(cid:146)ispezione puo‘ essere rifiutata ove vi siano circostanze attenuanti, come ad esempio in caso non vi sia personale sufficiente per occuparsi degli animali durante l(cid:146)ispezione?


title: Regolamento (CE) n. 913/98 della Commissione del 29 aprile 1998 che fissa le restituzioni all'esportazione nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari

eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
milk
milk product

formats: pdf print

text: L 128/32 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 30. 4. 98 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 913/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 29 aprile 1998 che fissa le restituzioni all’esportazione nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, a) dei prezzi praticati sui mercati dei paesi terzi; visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, b) dei prezzi pi(cid:151) favorevoli all’importazione, in prove- nienza dai paesi terzi, nei paesi terzi di destinazione; visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 804/68 del Consiglio, del 27 relativo all’organizzazione comune dei giugno 1968, mercati nel settore del lattiero- latte e dei prodotti caseari (1), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1587/96 (2), in particolare l’articolo 17, paragrafo 3, considerando che, a norma dell’articolo 17 del regola- mento (CEE) n. 804/68, la differenza tra i prezzi nel commercio internazionale dei prodotti di cui all’articolo 1 del regolamento suddetto e i prezzi di tali prodotti nella Comunit(cid:133) pu(cid:149) essere compensata da una restituzione all’esportazione entro i fissati nel quadro degli limiti accordi conclusi conformemente all’articolo 228 del trat- tato; considerando che, a norma del regolamento (CEE) n. 804/ 68, le restituzioni per i prodotti di cui all’articolo 1 del suddetto regolamento, esportati come tali, devono essere fissate prendendo in considerazione: (cid:190) la situazione e le prospettive di evoluzioni, sul mercato della Comunit(cid:133), dei prezzi del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari e delle disponibilit(cid:133) nonch(cid:130), nel commercio internazionale, dei prezzi del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari, (cid:190) le spese di commercializzazione e le spese di trasporto pi(cid:151) favorevoli dai mercati della Comunit(cid:133) fino ai porti o altri luoghi di esportazione della Comunit(cid:133), nonch(cid:130) le spese commerciali e di resa ai paesi di destinazione, (cid:190) gli obiettivi dell’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari, volti ad assicurare a detti mercati una situazione equilibrata ed uno sviluppo naturale sul piano dei prezzi e degli scambi, (cid:190) i limiti convenuti nel quadro degli accordi conclusi in conformit(cid:133) con l’articolo 228 del trattato, (cid:190) l’interesse di evitare perturbazioni sul mercato della Comunit(cid:133), (cid:190) l’aspetto economico delle esportazioni previste; considerando che, ai sensi dell’articolo 17, paragrafo 5 del regolamento (CEE) n. 804/68, i prezzi nella Comunit(cid:133) sono stabiliti tenendo conto dei prezzi praticati che si rivelino pi(cid:151) favorevoli ai fini dell’esportazione, dato che i prezzi nel sono stabiliti tenendo conto in particolare: commercio internazionale c) dei prezzi alla produzione constatati nei paesi terzi esportatori tenuto conto, se del caso, delle sovvenzioni accordate da questi paesi; d) dei prezzi d’offerta franco frontiera della Comunit(cid:133); regolamento (CEE) n. 804/68, considerando che, a norma dell’articolo 17, paragrafo 3 del la situazione del commercio internazionale o le esigenze specifiche di alcuni mercati possono rendere necessaria la differenzia- zione della restituzione per i prodotti di cui all’articolo 1 del suddetto regolamento secondo la loro destinazione; considerando che l’articolo 17, paragrafo 3 del regola- mento (CEE) n. 804/68 prevede che l’elenco dei prodotti per i quali (cid:138) accordata una restituzione all’esportazione e l’importo della restituzione sono fissati almeno una volta ogni quattro settimane; che, tuttavia, l’importo della resti- tuzione pu(cid:149) essere mantenuto allo stesso livello per pi(cid:151) di quattro settimane; che, aggiunto; saccarosio considerando che, a norma dell’articolo 12 del regola- mento (CE) n. 1466/95 della Commissione, del 27 giugno 1995, che stabilisce le modalit(cid:133) d’applicazione delle resti- tuzioni all’esportazione nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 897/98 (4), la restituzione accordata ai prodotti lattieri zuccherati (cid:138) pari alla somma di due elementi, di cui uno deve tener conto del quantitativo di prodotti lattiero-caseari e l’altro deve tener conto del quantitativo di tuttavia, quest’ultimo elemento (cid:138) preso in considerazione solo se il saccarosio aggiunto (cid:138) stato prodotto a base di barbabietole o di canne da zucchero raccolte nella Comunit(cid:133); che, per i prodotti di cui ai codici NC ex 0402 99 11, ex 0402 99 19, ex 0404 90 51, ex 0404 90 53, ex 0404 90 91 e ex 0404 90 93 aventi tenore, in peso, di materie grasse pari o inferiore al 9,5 % e aventi tenore, in peso, di sostanza secca del latte non grassa, pari o superiore al 15 %, il primo dei due elementi (cid:138) fissato a 100 kg di prodotto intero; che, per gli altri prodotti zuccherati di cui ai codici NC 0402 e 0404, questo elemento (cid:138) calcolato moltiplicando l’importo di base per il contenuto di prodotti lattieri del prodotto esaminato; che quest’importo di base (cid:138) pari alla restitu- zione da fissare per un chilogrammo di prodotti lattieri contenuti nel prodotto intero; (1) GU L 148 del 28. 6. 1968, pag. 13. (2) GU L 206 del 16. 8. 1996, pag. 21. (3) GU L 144 del 28. 6. 1995, pag. 22. (4) GU L 126 del 29. 4. 1998, pag. 22. 30. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 128/33 considerando che il secondo elemento (cid:138) calcolato molti- plicando per il tenore di saccarosio del prodotto intero l’importo di base della restituzione applicabile il giorno dell’esportazione per i prodotti di cui all’articolo 1, para- grafo 1, lettera d) del regolamento (CEE) n. 1785/81 del Consiglio, del 30 giugno 1981, relativo all’organizzazione comune dei mercati nel settore dello zucchero (1), modifi- cato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1599/96 (2); considerando che il tasso della restituzione per i formaggi (cid:138) calcolato per prodotti destinati al consumo diretto; che le croste e gli scarti di formaggi non sono prodotti rispon- denti a tale destinazione; che, per evitare qualsiasi confu- sione d’interpretazione, (cid:138) opportuno precisare che i formaggi con un valore franco frontiera inferiore a 230,00 ECU/100 kg non beneficiano di restituzione; considerando che il regolamento (CEE) n. 896/84 della Commissione (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CEE) n. 222/88 (4), ha previsto disposizioni complemen- tari per quanto concerne la concessione delle restituzioni al momento del passaggio alla nuova campagna; che tali disposizioni prevedono la possibilit(cid:133) di differenziare le restituzioni in funzione della data di fabbricazione dei prodotti; considerando che per calcolare l’importo della restitu- zione per i fusi (cid:138) necessario disporre che, qualora vengano aggiunti caseina e/o caseinati, detto quantitativo non debba essere preso in considerazione; formaggi considerando che l’applicazione di tali modalit(cid:133) alla situa- zione attuale dei mercati nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari ed in particolare ai prezzi di tali prodotti nella Comunit(cid:133) e sul mercato mondiale conduce a fissare la restituzione agli importi e per i prodotti elen- cati in allegato al presente regolamento; considerando che il comitato di gestione per il latte e i prodotti lattiero-caseari non ha emesso alcun parere nel termine fissato dal suo presidente, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 1. Le restituzioni all’esportazione di cui all’articolo 17 del regolamento (CEE) n. 804/68, per i prodotti esportati come tali, sono fissate agli importi di cui all’allegato. 2. Non (cid:138) fissata alcuna restituzione per le esportazioni verso la destinazione n. 400 per i prodotti di cui ai codici NC 0401, 0402, 0403, 0404, 0405 e 2309. 3. Non (cid:138) fissata alcuna restituzione per le esportazioni verso le destinazioni n. 022, 024, 028, 043, 044, 045, 046, 052, 404, 600, 800 e 804 per i prodotti di cui al codice NC 0406. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 4 maggio 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 29 aprile 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 177 dell’1. 7. 1981, pag. 4. (2) GU L 206 del 16. 8. 1996, pag. 43. (3) GU L 91 dell’1. 4. 1984, pag. 71. (4) GU L 28 dell’1. 2. 1988, pag. 1. L 128/34 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 30. 4. 98 ALLEGATO al regolamento della Commissione, del 29 aprile 1998, che fissa le restituzioni all’esportazione nel settore del latte e dei prodotti lattiero-caseari (ECU/100 kg peso netto, salvo diversa indicazione) Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni 0401 10 10 9000 0401 10 90 9000 0401 20 11 9100 0401 20 11 9500 0401 20 19 9100 0401 20 19 9500 0401 20 91 9100 0401 20 91 9500 0401 20 99 9100 0401 20 99 9500 0401 30 11 9100 0401 30 11 9400 0401 30 11 9700 0401 30 19 9100 0401 30 19 9400 0401 30 19 9700 0401 30 31 9100 0401 30 31 9400 0401 30 31 9700 0401 30 39 9100 0401 30 39 9400 0401 30 39 9700 0401 30 91 9100 0401 30 91 9400 0401 30 91 9700 0401 30 99 9100 0401 30 99 9400 0401 30 99 9700 0402 10 11 9000 0402 10 19 9000 0402 10 91 9000 0402 10 99 9000 0402 21 11 9200 0402 21 11 9300 0402 21 11 9500 0402 21 11 9900 0402 21 17 9000 0402 21 19 9300 0402 21 19 9500 0402 21 19 9900 0402 21 91 9100 0402 21 91 9200 0402 21 91 9300 0402 21 91 9400 0402 21 91 9500 0402 21 91 9600 0402 21 91 9700 970 * * * 970 * * * 970 * * * 970 * * * 970 * * * 970 * * * 970 * * * + 970 * * * + + 970 * * * 970 * * * + + 970 * * * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2,327 (cid:190) 2,327 (cid:190) 2,327 (cid:190) 3,597 (cid:190) 2,327 (cid:190) 3,597 (cid:190) 4,551 (cid:190) (cid:190) 4,551 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 10,50 (cid:190) 15,77 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 15,77 (cid:190) 38,32 59,85 66,00 38,32 59,85 66,00 75,22 110,55 129,01 75,22 110,55 129,01 68,00 68,00 0,6800 0,6800 68,00 90,54 95,38 102,60 68,00 90,54 95,38 102,60 103,34 104,05 105,34 112,58 115,09 124,73 130,38 0402 21 91 9900 0402 21 99 9100 0402 21 99 9200 0402 21 99 9300 0402 21 99 9400 0402 21 99 9500 0402 21 99 9600 0402 21 99 9700 0402 21 99 9900 0402 29 15 9200 0402 29 15 9300 0402 29 15 9500 0402 29 15 9900 0402 29 19 9200 0402 29 19 9300 0402 29 19 9500 0402 29 19 9900 0402 29 91 9100 0402 29 91 9500 0402 29 99 9100 0402 29 99 9500 0402 91 11 9110 0402 91 11 9120 0402 91 11 9310 0402 91 11 9350 0402 91 11 9370 0402 91 19 9110 0402 91 19 9120 0402 91 19 9310 0402 91 19 9350 0402 91 19 9370 0402 91 31 9100 0402 91 31 9300 0402 91 39 9100 0402 91 39 9300 0402 91 51 9000 0402 91 59 9000 0402 91 91 9000 0402 91 99 9000 0402 99 11 9110 0402 99 11 9130 0402 99 11 9150 0402 99 11 9310 0402 99 11 9330 0402 99 11 9350 0402 99 19 9110 0402 99 19 9130 0402 99 19 9150 0402 99 19 9310 0402 99 19 9330 0402 99 19 9350 0402 99 31 9110 0402 99 31 9150 0402 99 31 9300 0402 99 31 9500 0402 99 39 9110 0402 99 39 9150 0402 99 39 9300 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 136,76 103,34 104,05 105,34 112,58 115,09 124,73 130,38 136,76 0,6800 0,9054 0,9538 1,0262 0,6800 0,9054 0,9538 1,0262 1,0334 1,1258 1,0334 1,1258 (cid:190) (cid:190) 11,31 13,85 16,84 (cid:190) (cid:190) 11,31 13,85 16,84 (cid:190) 19,91 (cid:190) 19,91 (cid:190) (cid:190) 63,94 63,94 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0,2555 0,3067 0,4077 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0,2555 0,3067 0,4077 (cid:190) 0,4245 0,3832 0,6600 (cid:190) 0,4245 0,3832 30. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 128/35 Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) 0402 99 39 9500 0402 99 91 9000 0402 99 99 9000 0403 10 11 9400 0403 10 11 9800 0403 10 13 9800 0403 10 19 9800 0403 10 31 9400 0403 10 31 9800 0403 10 33 9800 0403 10 39 9800 0403 90 11 9000 0403 90 13 9200 0403 90 13 9300 0403 90 13 9500 0403 90 13 9900 0403 90 19 9000 0403 90 31 9000 0403 90 33 9200 0403 90 33 9300 0403 90 33 9500 0403 90 33 9900 0403 90 39 9000 0403 90 51 9100 0403 90 51 9300 0403 90 53 9000 0403 90 59 9110 0403 90 59 9140 0403 90 59 9170 0403 90 59 9310 0403 90 59 9340 0403 90 59 9370 0403 90 59 9510 0403 90 59 9540 0403 90 59 9570 0403 90 61 9100 0403 90 61 9300 0403 90 63 9000 0403 90 69 9000 0404 90 21 9100 0404 90 21 9910 0404 90 21 9950 0404 90 23 9120 0404 90 23 9130 0404 90 23 9140 0404 90 23 9150 0404 90 23 9911 0404 90 23 9913 0404 90 23 9915 0404 90 23 9917 0404 90 23 9919 0404 90 23 9931 0404 90 23 9933 0404 90 23 9935 0404 90 23 9937 0404 90 23 9939 0404 90 29 9110 0404 90 29 9115 0404 90 29 9120 0404 90 29 9130 0404 90 29 9135 0404 90 29 9150 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 970 * * * + + + + 970 * * * + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,6600 0,7522 0,7522 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 66,85 66,85 89,73 94,53 101,68 102,44 0,6685 0,6685 0,8973 0,9453 1,0168 1,0244 2,327 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 15,77 (cid:190) 38,32 59,85 66,00 75,22 110,55 129,01 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 68,00 (cid:190) 11,31 68,00 90,54 95,38 102,60 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 11,31 13,85 16,84 19,91 20,81 103,34 104,05 105,34 112,58 115,09 124,73 0404 90 29 9160 0404 90 29 9180 0404 90 81 9100 0404 90 81 9910 0404 90 81 9950 0404 90 83 9110 0404 90 83 9130 0404 90 83 9150 0404 90 83 9170 0404 90 83 9911 0404 90 83 9913 0404 90 83 9915 0404 90 83 9917 0404 90 83 9919 0404 90 83 9931 0404 90 83 9933 0404 90 83 9935 0404 90 83 9937 0404 90 89 9130 0404 90 89 9150 0404 90 89 9930 0404 90 89 9950 0404 90 89 9990 0405 10 11 9500 0405 10 11 9700 0405 10 19 9500 0405 10 19 9700 0405 10 30 9100 0405 10 30 9300 0405 10 30 9500 0405 10 30 9700 0405 10 50 9100 0405 10 50 9300 0405 10 50 9500 0405 10 50 9700 0405 10 90 9000 0405 20 90 9500 0405 20 90 9700 0405 90 10 9000 0405 90 90 9000 0406 10 20 9100 0406 10 20 9230 0406 10 20 9290 0406 10 20 9300 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * Ammontare delle restituzioni 130,38 136,76 0,6800 (cid:190) 0,2555 0,6800 0,9054 0,9538 1,0262 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 0,2555 0,3067 0,4077 0,4245 1,0334 1,1258 0,4601 0,6600 0,7522 165,85 170,00 165,85 170,00 165,85 170,00 165,85 170,00 165,85 170,00 165,85 170,00 176,22 155,49 161,71 216,00 170,00 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 22,83 22,83 37,68 (cid:190) (cid:190) 21,24 15,29 35,05 (cid:190) (cid:190) 9,329 7,834 15,39 L 128/36 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 30. 4. 98 Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni 0406 10 20 9610 0406 10 20 9620 0406 10 20 9630 0406 10 20 9640 0406 10 20 9650 0406 10 20 9660 0406 10 20 9830 0406 10 20 9850 0406 10 20 9870 0406 10 20 9900 0406 20 90 9100 0406 20 90 9913 0406 20 90 9915 0406 20 90 9917 0406 20 90 9919 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + + + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) 30,98 30,98 51,11 (cid:190) (cid:190) 31,42 31,42 51,83 (cid:190) (cid:190) 35,06 35,06 57,86 (cid:190) (cid:190) 51,54 48,35 85,03 (cid:190) (cid:190) 42,95 25,44 70,86 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 15,93 13,38 26,28 (cid:190) (cid:190) 19,31 16,22 31,87 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 35,62 31,59 58,77 (cid:190) (cid:190) 47,01 42,12 77,56 (cid:190) (cid:190) 49,94 44,75 82,41 (cid:190) (cid:190) 55,82 50,02 92,10 0406 20 90 9990 0406 30 31 9710 0406 30 31 9730 0406 30 31 9910 0406 30 31 9930 0406 30 31 9950 0406 30 39 9500 0406 30 39 9700 0406 30 39 9930 0406 30 39 9950 0406 30 90 9000 0406 40 50 9000 + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 9,54 8,346 17,88 (cid:190) (cid:190) 13,99 12,25 26,24 (cid:190) (cid:190) 9,54 8,346 17,88 (cid:190) (cid:190) 13,99 12,25 26,24 (cid:190) (cid:190) 20,36 17,81 38,17 (cid:190) (cid:190) 13,99 12,25 26,24 (cid:190) (cid:190) 20,36 17,81 38,17 (cid:190) (cid:190) 20,36 17,81 38,17 (cid:190) (cid:190) 23,02 21,14 43,16 (cid:190) (cid:190) 24,15 21,14 45,28 (cid:190) (cid:190) 54,55 32,98 90,00 30. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 128/37 Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni 0406 40 90 9000 0406 90 13 9000 0406 90 15 9100 0406 90 17 9100 0406 90 21 9900 0406 90 23 9900 0406 90 25 9900 0406 90 27 9900 0406 90 31 9119 0406 90 33 9119 0406 90 33 9919 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) 56,01 32,98 92,42 (cid:190) (cid:190) 60,16 60,16 99,26 (cid:190) (cid:190) 62,17 62,17 102,58 (cid:190) (cid:190) 62,17 62,17 102,58 (cid:190) (cid:190) 61,63 44,53 101,68 (cid:190) (cid:190) 36,51 18,57 75,31 (cid:190) (cid:190) 36,98 21,16 76,25 (cid:190) (cid:190) 33,48 18,57 69,06 (cid:190) (cid:190) 38,17 25,56 62,99 (cid:190) (cid:190) 38,17 25,56 62,99 (cid:190) (cid:190) 34,36 20,33 56,69 0406 90 33 9951 0406 90 35 9190 0406 90 35 9990 0406 90 37 9000 0406 90 61 9000 0406 90 63 9100 0406 90 63 9900 0406 90 69 9100 0406 90 69 9910 0406 90 73 9900 0406 90 75 9900 0406 90 76 9300 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) 36,20 20,01 59,72 28,95 28,95 61,40 61,40 101,30 (cid:190) (cid:190) 54,68 40,19 90,22 (cid:190) (cid:190) 60,16 60,16 99,26 40,61 40,61 65,82 57,27 108,59 37,12 37,12 63,89 63,89 105,42 29,52 29,52 48,93 48,93 80,75 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 48,93 48,93 80,75 (cid:190) (cid:190) 52,63 52,63 86,83 (cid:190) (cid:190) 51,97 22,27 85,75 (cid:190) (cid:190) 34,88 20,12 71,94 L 128/38 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 30. 4. 98 Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni 0406 90 76 9400 0406 90 76 9500 0406 90 78 9100 0406 90 78 9300 0406 90 78 9500 0406 90 79 9900 0406 90 81 9900 0406 90 85 9910 0406 90 85 9991 0406 90 85 9995 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) 40,07 23,22 82,65 (cid:190) (cid:190) 38,60 23,22 79,62 (cid:190) (cid:190) 32,73 18,14 67,50 (cid:190) (cid:190) 40,07 20,12 82,65 (cid:190) (cid:190) 40,07 23,22 82,65 (cid:190) (cid:190) 30,31 19,23 62,51 (cid:190) (cid:190) 53,71 47,61 88,63 28,95 28,95 59,27 59,27 97,79 (cid:190) (cid:190) 54,68 40,19 90,22 (cid:190) (cid:190) 51,97 21,16 85,75 0406 90 85 9999 0406 90 86 9100 0406 90 86 9200 0406 90 86 9300 0406 90 86 9400 0406 90 86 9900 0406 90 87 9100 0406 90 87 9200 0406 90 87 9300 0406 90 87 9400 0406 90 87 9951 0406 90 87 9971 0406 90 87 9972 + + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 099 400 * * * (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 29,74 27,65 61,34 (cid:190) (cid:190) 30,78 30,30 63,48 (cid:190) (cid:190) 34,58 34,28 71,32 (cid:190) (cid:190) 43,80 40,24 90,34 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 24,78 24,78 51,11 (cid:190) (cid:190) 28,27 28,02 58,31 (cid:190) (cid:190) 30,66 30,66 63,25 (cid:190) (cid:190) 42,19 42,19 87,04 (cid:190) (cid:190) 42,07 34,41 86,78 16,03 13,67 33,07 30. 4. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 128/39 Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni Codice prodotto Destinazione (*) Ammontare delle restituzioni 0406 90 87 9973 0406 90 87 9974 0406 90 87 9979 0406 90 88 9100 0406 90 88 9105 0406 90 88 9300 2309 10 15 9010 2309 10 15 9100 2309 10 15 9200 2309 10 15 9300 2309 10 15 9400 2309 10 15 9500 2309 10 15 9700 2309 10 19 9010 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + 037 039 099 400 * * * 037 039 099 400 * * * + + + + + + + + (cid:190) (cid:190) 37,66 24,08 77,68 (cid:190) (cid:190) 42,07 24,08 86,78 (cid:190) (cid:190) 36,51 24,08 75,31 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 52,46 30,30 86,56 (cid:190) (cid:190) 31,84 30,30 52,55 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 2309 10 19 9100 2309 10 19 9200 2309 10 19 9300 2309 10 19 9400 2309 10 19 9500 2309 10 19 9600 2309 10 19 9700 2309 10 19 9800 2309 10 70 9010 2309 10 70 9100 2309 10 70 9200 2309 10 70 9300 2309 10 70 9500 2309 10 70 9600 2309 10 70 9700 2309 10 70 9800 2309 90 35 9010 2309 90 35 9100 2309 90 35 9200 2309 90 35 9300 2309 90 35 9400 2309 90 35 9500 2309 90 35 9700 2309 90 39 9010 2309 90 39 9100 2309 90 39 9200 2309 90 39 9300 2309 90 39 9400 2309 90 39 9500 2309 90 39 9600 2309 90 39 9700 2309 90 39 9800 2309 90 70 9010 2309 90 70 9100 2309 90 70 9200 2309 90 70 9300 2309 90 70 9500 2309 90 70 9600 2309 90 70 9700 2309 90 70 9800 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 13,85 18,47 23,09 27,70 32,32 36,94 40,63 (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) 13,85 18,47 23,09 27,70 32,32 36,94 40,63 (*) I numeri di codice delle destinazioni sono quelli indicati nell’allegato del regolamento (CE) n. 2317/97 della Commissione (GU L 321 del 22. 11. 1997, pag. 19). Tuttavia: (cid:190) il codice «099» raggruppa tutti i codici di destinazione dal n. 053 al n. 096 (incluso); (cid:190) il codice «970» comprende le esportazioni di cui all’articolo 34, paragrafo 1, lettere a) e c), del regolamento (CEE) n. 3665/87 della Commissione (GU L 351 del 14. 12. 1987, pag. 1), e all’articolo 42, paragrafo 1, lettere a) e b). Per le destinazioni diverse da quelle indicate per ciascun «codice prodotto», l’importo della restituzione applicabile (cid:138) contrassegnato da ***. Se non (cid:138) indicata alcuna destinazione («+»), l’importo della restituzione si applica all’esportazione per tutte le destinazioni diverse da quelle di cui all’articolo 1, paragrafi 2 e 3. NB: I codici prodotto e i relativi richiami in calce sono definiti dal regolamento (CEE) n. 3846/87 della Commissione (GU L 366 del 24. 12. 1987, pag. 1), modificato


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1313/98 de José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL à la Commission. EURO 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
Community budget
Spain
budget deficit
coordination of EMU policies
currency adjustment
economic convergence
economic growth
economic stabilisation
multilateral surveillance
public finance


title: Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the 'Commission Proposals on the prices for agricultural products and related measures (1998-1999) - Vols. I, II and III'

eurovoc_concepts:
EU act
agricultural product
fixing of prices
intervention price
marketing year

text: 10. 7. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/67 Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Commission Proposals on the prices for agricultural products and related measures (1998-1999) — Vols. I, II and III’ () (98/C 214/17) On 19 February 1998 the Council decided to consult the Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 43 and 198 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposals. The Section for Agriculture and Fisheries, which was responsible for preparing the Committee’s work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 2 April 1998. The rapporteur was Mr Barato Triguero. At its 354th plenary session of 29 and 30 April 1998 (sitting of 29 April), the Economic and Social Committee adopted its opinion by 106 votes to two, with 14 abstentions. 1. Presentation by the Commission 1. 1. Agricultural production and situation in 1997 1. 1. 1. The Commission proposal summarizes the general situation of production and the agricultural economy for 1997 as follows: — The economic situation of agriculture was much more balanced in 1997 than in 1996. — Despite the serious swine fever outbreaks in the pigmeat sector, the market situation was generally favourable for most EU producers. — The agricultural year was quite positive for oilseeds, sugar beet and poultry. — Climatic conditions were less advantageous than in the previous year, but less disastrous than expected. — Milk production is expected to have reached 1996 levels (121 million tonnes). As a result, prices remained stable. — Beef and veal production was stable (7,9750 million tonnes). Prices recovered due to exports. — Following the swine fever outbreaks in the Nether- lands and Spain pigmeat experienced a series of ups and downs, as did prices. — Poultry production rose by 3,4 % compared with 1996. — Lastly, sheep and goat meat production fell slightly. 1. 1. 2. Production prices fell by 3,4 % in real terms, particularly in vegetable crops (5,3 %), principally due to price falls for olive oil (36 %) and cereals (8,9 %). Animal production fell by an average of 3,1 %. — With the exception of Ireland and the United currencies underwent major Kingdom (whose revaluations in the course of 1997), agricultural conversion rates rose moderately in 1997. 1. 1. 3. According to Commission figures, farm income fell by 3,1 % in 1997. It should be pointed out that this fall in farm income across the EU as a whole masks highly diverse situations between countries and sectors. — Cereal production is estimated at 202 million tonnes, less than 1996, although the area sown increased by 2 % due, basically, to the lower percentage of compulsory set-aside (down from 10 % to 5 %). — Oilseed production achieved a record level of 14,7 million tonnes. — Production of protein crops rose by 20 %. — Sugar production also reached a record level, of 17 million tonnes. — Olive oil rose to 1 859 400 tonnes, a record figure which led to a sustained fall in prices. — Wine production fell by 5 %, due in particular to falls in Italy and France. The quality, however, is considered to be outstanding. (1) OJ C 87, 23. 3. 1998. 1. 2. Budgetary context 1. 2. 1. 1998 budget appropriations for the EAGGF- Guarantee Section have been set at ECU 40 596 million, lower than those for 1997 (ECU 40 805 million). The financial guideline for 1998 is ECU 43 263 million, leaving a margin of ECU 2 667 million. 1. 3. The Commission proposal 1. 3. 1. The Commission proposal is based on that for the previous agricultural year, with the following modifications: — Arable crops: in the context of regionalized base areas, the Commission is allowing the Member States to set the deadline for informing producers by 15 September instead of 15 May. C 214/68 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 7. 98 — Rice: in accordance with the provisions adopted under the CMO reform for the sector, the Com- mission proposes to set the price for paddy rice in the 1998/1999 marketing year at ECU 315,5 per tonne, 5,3 % lower than the price for the previous year. However, the monthly increases are kept are ECU 2/tonne/month. — Sugar: the latest statistics indicate that Italy is not a deficit area and consequently no derived intervention price for white sugar is proposed. — Flax: in anticipation of a Council decision on an amendment to the CMO, the Commission proposes the same level of aid per hectare. — Hemp: reduction in aid per hectare, on account of the increased area sown. — Olive oil: the Commission is currently preparing a reform, quite separate from the present package, which includes price setting for the 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 marketing years. No prices are therefore proposed in the present package. — Wine: it is in anticipation of a new proposal, necessary to avoid legal gaps and for this reason an extension by one year of the ban on new plantings and of the regime for permanent abandonment is proposed. — Tobacco: in anticipation of the adoption of the Commission proposal to reform the CMO, the current provisions for the sector are extended. — Beef: increased ceilings for Spain and Portugal so that applications do not exceed them by more than 10 %. It is also proposed to extend by one year the reduction of ceilings which was decided in 1996 for the years 1997 and 1998. — Sheepmeat and goatmeat: the Commission proposes to freeze the basic price and keep the stabilizer at 7 %. 2. 1. 3. Regrettably, the Commission makes no pro- posals concerning the non-food outlets for agricultural production, such as, for example, renewable and sus- tainable sources of energy. The Commission should adopt a courageous policy in favour of such new, non-food outlets, providing stable, direct supplementary aid for the raw materials in question, together with a series of tax measures and others giving priority to the use of such materials to produce fuel. 2. 1. 4. It is difficult to understand why the Com- mission also fails, in its explanatory memorandum, to mention Mediterranean agriculture and, more specifi- cally, the recently reformed fruit and vegetable sector. The Commission must carry out a serious, objective analysis of the effects of applying the new reform of the sector on the farmers and areas affected: such an analysis should cover the impact of preferential imports from third countries. 2. 2. Specific comments 2. 2. 1. A r a b l e c r o p s 2. 2. 1. 1. In view of crop prospects, the Committee urges the Commission to set the percentage of compul- sory set-aside well in advance and at a level significantly lower than in the basic Regulation 1765/92. Similarly, the Committee considers that the 2. 2. 1. 2. date of compensatory payments should be brought forward to 31 October (instead of 31 December) for cereals and protein crops. 2. 2. 1. 3. The Committee believes that the base areas of the new German Länder should now be definitively established. 2. Comments on the proposal 2. 1. Preliminary comments 2. 2. 2. C e r e a l s 2. 1. 1. The Commission proposal fails to take account of the repercussions of price setting measures on farmers’ income as well as the impact on EU consumers. The Committee therefore urges the Commission to carry out an in-depth study of the impact of its farm prices policy on EU consumers. 2. 1. 2. For most products, the Commission proposal means freezing the prices and related measures in comparison with the previous year. However, the Commission fails to take account of the documented 3,1 % loss of income in the sector during 1997. This is all the more serious given that committed expenditure is more than ECU 2 500 million below the financial guideline. 2. 2. 2. 1. In fixing the monthly increases, the Com- mission should take account of aspects, other than interest rates, which are connected with the real cost of cereal storage. 2. 2. 2. 2. The Commission should allow for the fact that, in certain parts of the EU, harvesting takes place several months before the opening date for intervention. 2. 2. 2. 3. The Commission should display a degree of flexibility in establishing its quality criteria for intervention eligibility, particularly when justified on the grounds of exceptional climatic conditions. 10. 7. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/69 2. 2. 2. 4. Similarly, weather conditions should be taken into account when deciding on penalties for exceeding base areas. Such conditions may compel farmers to adjust their crop plans. 2. 2. 3. R i c e 2. 2. 3. 1. The Committee is concerned at the crisis in the European rice sector, which is experiencing severe problems in providing its producers with income, due to the continued fall in market prices within the EU. This has been triggered principally by large-scale imports of milled rice from third countries. This situation cannot be resolved simply by maintaining the level of monthly increases, as the Commission claims: because the fall in prices was greater than expected by the Commission, the necessary increase in aid per hectare did not occur. 2. 2. 4. P r o t e i n c r o p s 2. 2. 4. 1. The reduction in areas sown more than justifies an increase in the reference aid for these crops. A series of crops, such as kidney beans, should be included under grain legumes, with the corresponding increase in the Maximum Guaranteed Area in order to ensure their viability. 2. 2. 5. O i l s e e d s In view of the size of the compensatory 2. 2. 5. 1. payments and yield and world price trends in this sector, it would seem appropriate to ask for the advance on the premium to be 80 % rather than the proposed 50 %. 2. 2. 5. 2. The recorded reference price should accu- rately reflect the real prices received by producers in each region as practised on the market each month. 2. 2. 6. H e m p 2. 2. 6. 1. The measure reducing production aid for hemp by 25 % is not the best way of stabilizing areas used for this crop, putting as it does the viability of production zones at risk. The reduction is not justified given that this is an ecological crop, and since demand is expanding rapidly there is no surplus; producers and processors have invested heavily in it. On the contrary, in view of the potential for use and consumption of the crop, the Committee considers that the Commission should encourage production. and pending Consequently, 2. 2. 6. 2. the Com- mission’s presentation of proposals for hemp production controls in the forthcoming months, the Committee believes that the amounts of aid for hemp production should remain unaltered. 2. 2. 7. S u g a r The Committee recalls the loss of income 2. 2. 7. 1. experienced by beet growers from sale of sliced beet, as a result of the fall in cereal prices. Secondly, the Committee would point to the 2. 2. 7. 2. Council’s call for the Commission to carry out research on inter-occupational relations. 2. 2. 8. F r u i t a n d v e g e t a b l e s 2. 2. 8. 1. The Committee regrets the Commission pro- posal’s lack of attention to this sector. There is no analysis of the impact of the first year of reform implementation. The Committee would point to the situation of the processed citrus fruit sector, which is heavily penalized because the reform takes no account of its production capacity when setting thresholds. 2. 2. 8. 2. The Committee also stresses the need to establish, at Community level, clear and objective criteria for the definition, identification and classification of juices, as the best safeguard for consumer information on product quality and origin. 2. 2. 9. L i v e s t o c k In general 2. 2. 9. 1. the Committee would terms, emphasize the need to guarantee the competitiveness of EU livestock production in the world context. It would therefore warn of the need for compensation in the event of animal welfare or environmental protection measures which are stricter than those demanded of imported products. 2. 2. 9. 2. The EU should also aim to maximize all its export opportunities, ensuring our produce is present on international markets, taking into account third world agriculture. 2. 2. 10. B e e f a n d v e a l 2. 2. 10. 1. The Commission’s proposal to increase the ceiling on the number of male bovines eligible for the premium in Spain and Portugal does not match the Commission’s own figures. It is therefore necessary to clarify the real increase in the number of male bovines which will qualify. It should be borne in mind that in the EU as a whole, 85 % of male bovines are entitled to aid, while only 60 % of animals qualify in Spain and Portugal. A more balanced distribution of premiums should be achieved. 2. 2. 10. 2. The Committee also regrets that in its proposals the Commission does not refer to extension of the special measures applicable in the new German C 214/70 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 10. 7. 98 Länder with regard to the ceilings for beef premiums on farms with 90 animals. full use. This should not be hampered by administrative measures concerning the fixing of export support. 2. 2. 11. S h e e p m e a t a n d g o a t m e a t 2. 2. 11. 1. Freezing the basic price for the fifth consecu- tive year means there can be no increase in the premium for sheepmeat and goatmeat. 2. 2. 11. 2. The establishment of individual references for premium eligibility means that maintaining the stabilizer is pointless. The Committee therefore calls for it to be abolished. 2. 2. 12. M i l k 2. 2. 12. 1. The Committee accepts the Commission’s proposal to maintain prices for the 1998-99 marketing year, but believes that in the context of WTO commit- ments, the export support mechanism should be put to 2. 2. 13. O l i v e o i l 2. 2. 13. 1. The Committee highlights the need to put forward a farm prices proposal for the sector, bearing in mind that there is no guarantee that the Council debate on the reform of the CMO in olive oil will end before the new marketing year begins. 2. 2. 14. C o t t o n The Committee recalls the need to adjust 2. 2. 14. 1. the MGQ and, consequently, the national reference quantities, for the sector at EU level, bringing it into line with real production in the main EU producer countries. Furthermore, the Committee considers that 2. 2. 14. 2. the calculation of advances on aid must be better managed, so that the 15 % currently taken into account by the Commission in increasing estimated production can be reduced without delaying payment dates. Brussels, 29 April 1998. The President of the Economic and Social Committee Tom JENKINS


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 1266/98 de Ernesto CACCAVALE à la Commission. Confusion à propos des règlements concernant la culture du chanvre

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
Italy
aid system
hemp
narcotic
production aid

text: C 31/30 Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes FR 5. 2. 1999 (1999/C 31/036) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-1266/98 posØe par Ernesto Caccavale (UPE) (cid:224) la Commission (29 avril 1998) Objet: Confusion (cid:224) propos des rŁglements concernant la culture du chanvre ConsidØrant que la rØglementation italienne de lutte contre la drogue interdit (T. U. 309/1990); la culture du cannabis considØrant que selon d(cid:146)Øminents toxicologues, la teneur en tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dans le chanvre indien varie de 3,4 (cid:224) 4,8 %; considØrant qu(cid:146)il est notoire que le contenu de THC peut varier considØrablement au sein d(cid:146)une mŒme variØtØ selon les conditions mØtØorologiques et climatiques; considØrant que, dans l(cid:146)impossibilitØ de distinguer la variØtØ par ses aspects morphologiques et botaniques, la Cour de cassation italienne a Øtabli, faute d(cid:146)une rØglementation spØcifique, qu(cid:146)il convenait, (cid:224) des fins pØnales, de considØrer comme cannabis le chanvre dont la teneur en THC dØpasse 0,3 %, en se rØfØrant (cid:224) la rØglemen- tation CEE qui subordonne l(cid:146)octroi de l(cid:146)aide communautaire (cid:224) la culture du chanvre (cid:224) la condition que la semence soit certifiØe comme appartenant (cid:224) une variØtØ de fibres ØnoncØe (cid:224) l(cid:146)annexe du rŁglement CEE 1164/89 (1) et ne dØpasse pas en teneur la moyenne de 0,3 %; considØrant que cette position adoptØe par la Cour de cassation italienne (qui ne tient pas compte du fait que la teneur en THC des variØtØs de fibres italiennes peuvent, dans des conditions mØtØorologiques et climatiques particuliŁres, atteindre 1 %), mise en vigueur par les forces de l(cid:146)ordre, a en fait entra(cid:238)nØ l(cid:146)abandon de la culture, la perte d(cid:146)une grande partie des variØtØs italiennes, la destruction de la filiŁre chanvre et des techniques qui s(cid:146)y rapportent, ce qui cause de graves prØjudices (cid:224) l(cid:146)Øconomie et (cid:224) l(cid:146)environnement; considØrant que la rØintroduction du chanvre en Italie et en particulier des variØtØs italiennes traditionnelles est unanimement considØrØe d(cid:146)une importance vitale pour la dØfense de l(cid:146)environnement et pour l(cid:146)Øconomie de vastes zones dans notre pays; La Commission peut-elle indiquer quelles initiatives elle entend prendre afin de mettre un terme (cid:224) cette rØfØrence impropre (cid:224) la rØglementation communautaire pour l(cid:146)apprØciation, (cid:224) des fins pØnales, des cultures provenant de semences certifiØes comme appartenant aux variØtØs italiennes traditionnelles? (1) JO L 121 du 29. 4. 1989, p. 4. RØponse donnØe par M. Fischler au nom de la Commission (5 juin 1998) La rØglementation communautaire en matiŁre de conditions d(cid:146)octroi de l(cid:146)aide au chanvre comporte des exigences strictes (cid:224) divers titres. Elle prØvoit effectivement de limiter l(cid:146)octroi de l(cid:146)aide (cid:224) des semences certifiØes de variØtØs dont la teneur en substances inØbriantes assure que le taux de tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) n(cid:146)excŁde pas 0. 3 %. (cid:192) cette fin, il est Øtabli une liste communautaire de variØtØs respectant ce critŁre pour lesquelles une mØthode communautaire de quantification chimique permet d(cid:146)en assurer le rØsultat. Cette liste comporte actuellement 18 variØtØs dont les variØtØs italiennes «Carmagnola», «CS» et «Fibranova». En outre, sont Øgalement exigØes la livraison des Øtiquettes officielles des semences utilisØes ainsi que l(cid:146)obligation de rØcolte aprŁs la formation des graines. La Commission a pris position dans le passØ sur le fait qu(cid:146)une interdiction nationale de la culture du chanvre Øtait incompatible avec l(cid:146)existence de l(cid:146)organisation commune de marchØ. Toutefois, un (cid:201)tat membre est libre de prendre des mesures qu(cid:146)il considŁre nØcessaires (cid:224) des fins pØnales pour autant que celles-ci ne rendent pas la culture impossible. Selon les informations dont dispose la Commission, la culture du chanvre en Italie fait rØcemment l(cid:146)objet d(cid:146)un faible ensemencement: 3 hectares en 1994, 20 hectares en 1995 et 10 hectares en 1996


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1230/98 by Marie-Paule KESTELIJN- SIERENS to the Commission. Planning of aiports on the basis of noise pollution caused to the surrounding area

eurovoc_concepts:
European standard
air transport
airport
approximation of laws
environmental protection
noise
residential area
restriction on competition

text: C 402/98 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning SV 22. 12. 98 (98/C 402/125) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-1230/98 fr(cid:229)n Marie-Paule Kestelijn-Sierens (ELDR) till kommissionen (29 april 1998) ˜mne: Zonindelning av flygplatser utg(cid:229)ende fr(cid:229)n bullerbelastningen p(cid:229) omgivningen I sin resolution (A-0183/97) (1) som antogs den 10 juni 1997 och behandlade (cid:148)kommissionens gr(cid:246)nbok: framtidens bullerpolitik(cid:148) uppmanade Europaparlamentet kommissionen att l(cid:228)gga fram ett f(cid:246)rslag till ett direktiv om tvingande normer och etablering (2) av flygplatser p(cid:229) grundval av ett europeiskt system f(cid:246)r bullerbek(cid:228)mpning (punkt 30 i n(cid:228)mnda resolution). Jag skulle g(cid:228)rna vilja h(cid:246)ra fr(cid:229)n kommissionen 1. 2. om det redan finns n(cid:229)gon enhetlig m(cid:228)tmetod f(cid:246)r m(cid:228)tning av bullerbelastningen kring flygplatserna? Om s(cid:229) inte (cid:228)r fallet, (cid:228)r kommissionen f(cid:246)r att s(cid:229)dana enhetliga m(cid:228)tmetoder skall fastst(cid:228)llas? om kommissionen (cid:228)r f(cid:246)r att flygplatserna skall indelas i olika zoner utg(cid:229)ende fr(cid:229)n ett europeiskt system, s(cid:229)som ett s(cid:228)tt att tydligt kartl(cid:228)gga vilken respektive bullerbelastning de uts(cid:228)tter omgivningen f(cid:246)r och s(cid:229)som en grundval f(cid:246)r ytterligare (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder mot de flygplatser som uts(cid:228)tter sin omgivning f(cid:246)r den st(cid:246)rsta belastningen? (1) (2) EGT C 200, 30. 6. 1997, s. 28. I den svenska utg(cid:229)van av det ifr(cid:229)gavarande numret av EGT har det nederl(cid:228)ndska ord, som p(cid:229) (cid:246)vriga st(cid:228)llen i denna text (cid:229)tergivits med (cid:148)zonindelning(cid:148) (cid:246)versatts med ordet (cid:148)etablering(cid:148). ((cid:214)vers. anm. ). Svar fr(cid:229)n Neil Kinnock p(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (29 maj 1998) 1. Det finns f(cid:246)r n(cid:228)rvarande inte n(cid:229)gon enhetlig metod i gemenskapen f(cid:246)r m(cid:228)tning av buller kring flygplatser. Kommissionen (cid:228)r i f(cid:228)rd med att utarbeta ett lagf(cid:246)rslag om bullerbelastningen p(cid:229) omgivningen, och den kommer i n(cid:228)ra samarbete med medlemsstaterna och s(cid:228)rskilda organisationer att g(cid:246)ra en bed(cid:246)mning av huruvida det (cid:228)r m(cid:246)jligt att inr(cid:228)tta en gemensam bullerenhet och gemensamma metoder. Eventuella f(cid:246)rslag fr(cid:229)n kommissionens sida kommer att baseras p(cid:229) resultaten av denna tekniska bed(cid:246)mning. Kommissionen kommer (cid:228)ven att beakta fr(cid:229)gan om en zonindelning utifr(cid:229)n bullerbelastning, vilket (cid:228)ven 2. inbegriper fr(cid:229)gan om buller kring flygplatser. (98/C 402/126) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-1231/98 fr(cid:229)n Marie-Paule Kestelijn-Sierens (ELDR) till kommissionen (29 april 1998) ˜mne: Bullerbegr(cid:228)nsning kring flygplatser I sin resolution (A-0183/97) (1) som antogs den 10 juni 1997 och behandlade (cid:148)kommissionens gr(cid:246)nbok: framtidens bullerpolitik(cid:148) beg(cid:228)rde Europaparlamentet att kommissionen (cid:148)omedelbart skall fastst(cid:228)lla tvingande normer f(cid:246)r flygtrafiken och harmonisera kraven f(cid:246)r minskning av buller fr(cid:229)n flygplan och omr(cid:229)den kring flygplatser(cid:148) (punkt 29 i n(cid:228)mnda resolution). Jag skulle g(cid:228)rna vilja h(cid:246)ra fr(cid:229)n kommissionen 1. 2. vilka (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder eller initiativ kommissionen under tiden vidtagit i anledning av denna beg(cid:228)ran? om kommissionen delar (cid:229)sikten om att europeiska tvingande normer f(cid:246)r flygtrafiken och f(cid:246)r att harmonisera kraven f(cid:246)r minskning av buller fr(cid:229)n flygplan och omr(cid:229)den kring flygplatser (cid:228)r enda s(cid:228)ttet att undvika att vissa regionala flygplatser som till(cid:228)mpar en mera sl(cid:228)pph(cid:228)nt politik f(cid:246)r bullerbek(cid:228)mpning p(cid:229) det s(cid:228)ttet kommer (cid:229)t att f(cid:246)rst(cid:228)rka sin position inom konkurrensen gentemot storflygplatserna? (1) EGT C 200, 30. 6. 1997, s. 28


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1219/98 by José GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL to the Commission. European Central Bank

eurovoc_concepts:
Economic and Monetary Union
European Central Bank
European System of Central Banks
decision-making body (EU)
institutional structure
president of an institution
vice-president of an institution

text: C 386/96 Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning SV 11. 12. 98 Det b(cid:246)r uppm(cid:228)rksammas att ECB-r(cid:229)det, som (cid:228)r bankens h(cid:246)gsta beslutande organ, best(cid:229)r av cheferna f(cid:246)r alla deltagande medlemsstaters nationella centralbanker samt av ECB:s direktionsledam(cid:246)ter. I ECB:s beslutande organ ing(cid:229)r (cid:228)ven ECB:s allm(cid:228)nna r(cid:229)d, vars beh(cid:246)righet fastst(cid:228)lls i artikel 47 i stadgan f(cid:246)r Europeiska centralbankssystemet (ECBS). I det allm(cid:228)nna r(cid:229)det ing(cid:229)r cheferna f(cid:246)r samtliga medlemsstaters centralbanker. (98/C 386/133) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-1218/98 fr(cid:229)n JosØ Garc(cid:237)a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) till kommissionen (29 april 1998) ˜mne: ECB I enlighet med artikel 109a andra stycket a i F(cid:246)rdraget om Europeiska unionen skall ECB:s direktion best(cid:229) av ordf(cid:246)randen, vice ordf(cid:246)randen och fyra andra ledam(cid:246)ter. I punkt b s(cid:228)gs att samtliga dessa skall utses genom (cid:246)verenskommelse mellan medlemsstaternas regeringar p(cid:229) stats- eller regeringschefsniv(cid:229) p(cid:229) rekommendation av r(cid:229)det som skall ha h(cid:246)rt Europaparlamentet och ECB-r(cid:229)det. Skall f(cid:246)retr(cid:228)dare f(cid:246)r de l(cid:228)nder som inte ing(cid:229)r i Ekonomiska och monet(cid:228)ra unionen f(cid:229) delta i ECB:s direktion? Svar fr(cid:229)n Yves-Thibault de Silguy p(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (11 juni 1998) Europeiska centralbankens (ECB:s) direktion best(cid:229)r av ECB:s ordf(cid:246)rande och vice ordf(cid:246)rande samt fyra andra ledam(cid:246)ter. Endast medborgare i de deltagande medlemsstaterna f(cid:229)r vara direktionsledam(cid:246)ter. ECB-r(cid:229)det best(cid:229)r av ECB:s direktionsledam(cid:246)ter samt cheferna f(cid:246)r de deltagande medlemsstaternas nationella centralbanker. ECB-r(cid:229)det och -direktionen (cid:228)r ECB:s beslutande organ som styr Europeiska centralbanksystemet (ECBS). Det allm(cid:228)nna r(cid:229)det (cid:228)r ECB:s tredje beslutande organ. Det best(cid:229)r av ECB:s ordf(cid:246)rande och vice ordf(cid:246)rande samt cheferna f(cid:246)r de nationella centralbankerna i samtliga medlemsstater. Det allm(cid:228)nna r(cid:229)dets ansvarsomr(cid:229)den omfattar fr(cid:228)mst r(cid:229)dgivande uppgifter och utg(cid:246)r en l(cid:228)nk mellan centralbankerna i de deltagande och i de icke deltagande medlemsstaterna. Det finns inget i EG-f(cid:246)rdraget eller ECBS-stadgan som hindrar ECB fr(cid:229)n att anst(cid:228)lla personal fr(cid:229)n medlemsstater som (cid:228)nnu inte ing(cid:229)r i euroomr(cid:229)det. (98/C 386/134) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-1219/98 fr(cid:229)n JosØ Garc(cid:237)a-Margallo y Marfil (PPE) till kommissionen (29 april 1998) ˜mne: ECB I enlighet med artikel 109a andra stycket a i F(cid:246)rdraget om Europeiska unionen skall ECB:s direktion best(cid:229) av ordf(cid:246)randen, vice ordf(cid:246)randen och fyra andra ledam(cid:246)ter. I punkt b s(cid:228)gs att samtliga dessa skall utses genom (cid:246)verenskommelse mellan medlemsstaternas regeringar p(cid:229) stats- eller regeringschefsniv(cid:229) p(cid:229) rekommendation av r(cid:229)det som skall ha h(cid:246)rt Europaparlamentet och ECB-r(cid:229)det


title: Komission asetus (EY) N:o 955/98, annettu 29 päivänä huhtikuuta 1998, tiettyjen tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeistöön

eurovoc_concepts:
Combined Nomenclature
audiovisual equipment
classification

text: L 133/12 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti 7. 5. 98 KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 955/98, annettu 29 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) huhtikuuta 1998, tiettyjen tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeist(cid:148)(cid:148)n EUROOPAN YHTEIS(cid:153)JEN KOMISSIO, joka ottaa huomioon Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)n perustamissopi- muksen, ottaa huomioon tariffi- ja tilastonimikkeist(cid:148)st(cid:132) ja yhtei- sest(cid:132) tullitariffista 23 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) hein(cid:132)kuuta 1987 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2658/87 (1), sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna komission asetuksella (EY) N:o 2509/97 (2), ja erityisesti sen 9 artiklan, sella vahvistettujen s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten mukaisia, voidaan edelleen vedota yhteis(cid:148)n tullikoodeksista 12 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) lokakuuta 1992 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2913/92 (3) 12 artiklan 6 kohdan mukaisesti kolmen kuukauden ajan, ja t(cid:132)ss(cid:132) asetuksessa s(cid:132)(cid:132)detyt toimenpiteet ovat tullikoodeksi- tilastonimikkeist(cid:148)jaoston ja komitean lausunnon mukaiset, tullitariffi- sek(cid:132) katsoo, ett(cid:132) mainitun asetuksen liitteen(cid:132) olevan yhdistetyn nimik- keist(cid:148)n yhdenmukaisen soveltamisen varmistamiseksi on tarpeen antaa t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n asetuksen liitteess(cid:132) esitettyjen tava- roiden luokittelua koskevia s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ksi(cid:132), asetuksessa (ETY) N:o 2658/87 vahvistetaan yhdistetyn nimikkeist(cid:148)n yleiset tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)t; n(cid:132)it(cid:132) s(cid:132)(cid:132)nt(cid:148)j(cid:132) sovel- letaan my(cid:148)s kaikkiin muihin nimikkeist(cid:148)ihin, jotka perustuvat kokonaan tai osittain yhdistettyyn nimikkeis- t(cid:148)(cid:148)n taikka joissa siihen mahdollisesti lis(cid:132)t(cid:132)(cid:132)n alajakoja ja jotka vahvistetaan yhteis(cid:148)n erityiss(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)ksill(cid:132) tavaroiden kauppaa koskevien tariffim(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ysten tai muiden toimen- piteiden soveltamiseksi, mainittujen yleisten tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nt(cid:148)jen mukaan on t(cid:132)m(cid:132)n asetuksen liitteen taulukossa olevassa 1 sarakkeessa esitetyt tavarat luokiteltava 2 sarakkeen CN-koodeihin 3 sarakkeesta ilmenevin perustein, ON ANTANUT T(cid:142)M(cid:142)N ASETUKSEN: 1 artikla Liitteen taulukossa olevassa 1 sarakkeessa esitetyt tavarat luokitellaan yhdistetyss(cid:132) nimikkeist(cid:148)ss(cid:132) taulukossa olevan 2 sarakkeen CN-koodeihin. 2 artikla J(cid:132)senvaltioiden tulliviranomaisten antamiin sitoviin tarif- fitietoihin, jotka eiv(cid:132)t ole t(cid:132)ll(cid:132) asetuksella vahvistettujen s(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)sten mukaisia, voidaan vedota asetuksen (ETY) N:o 2913/92 12 artiklan 6 kohdan mukaisesti viel(cid:132) kolmen kuukauden ajan. 3 artikla on asianmukaista, ett(cid:132) j(cid:132)senvaltioiden tulliviranomaisten tavaroiden luokittelusta yhdistettyyn nimikkeist(cid:148)(cid:148)n anta- miin sitoviin tariffitietoihin, jotka eiv(cid:132)t ole t(cid:132)ll(cid:132) asetuk- T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus tulee voimaan kahdentenakymmenenten(cid:132)- ensimm(cid:132)isen(cid:132) p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) sen j(cid:132)lkeen, kun se on julkaistu Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallisessa lehdess(cid:132). T(cid:132)m(cid:132) asetus on kaikilta osiltaan velvoittava, j(cid:132)senvaltioissa. ja sit(cid:132) sovelletaan sellaisenaan kaikissa Tehty Brysseliss(cid:132) 29 p(cid:132)iv(cid:132)n(cid:132) huhtikuuta 1998. Komission puolesta Mario MONTI Komission j(cid:132)sen (1) EYVL L 256, 7. 9. 1987, s. 1 (2) EYVL L 345, 16. 12. 1997, s. 44 (3) EYVL L 302, 19. 10. 1992, s. 1 7. 5. 98 FI Euroopan yhteis(cid:148)jen virallinen lehti L 133/13 LIITE Luokittelu CN-koodi (2) Tavaran kuvaus (1) 1. Langattomat tuina sarjaksi, stereokuulokkeet pakat- jossa on: 8518 30 80 (cid:190) paristoilla kuulokkeet, toimivat joissa on sis(cid:132)(cid:132)nrakennettu suurtaa- juusradiovastaanotin, (cid:190) kolmikanavainen suurtaajuusradio- l(cid:132)hetin, jonka kantama on 100 m, ja (cid:190) sovitin, jonka avulla l(cid:132)hetin voidaan yhdist(cid:132)(cid:132) erilaisiin (cid:132)(cid:132)nilaitteisiin 2. (cid:142)(cid:132)nitaajuuslaite, joka koostuu prosesso- rista, joka vastaanottaa ja muuntaa eri l(cid:132)hteist(cid:132) (esim. CD-soittimista, video- elokuvaprojektoreista) laitteista tulevat signaalit (cid:132)(cid:132)nisignaaleiksi ja jossa on seuraavat toiminnot: tai (cid:190) (cid:132)(cid:132)niymp(cid:132)rist(cid:148)jen simulaatio (esim. kirkon tai diskon) ja (cid:190) (cid:132)(cid:132)nitaajuuden vahvistaminen Perusteet (3) Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimik- keist(cid:148)n 1 ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n, XVI jakson 4 huomautuksen sek(cid:132) CN- koodien 8518, 8518 30 ja 8518 30 80 nimiketekstien mukaan 8543 89 95 Luokittelu m(cid:132)(cid:132)r(cid:132)ytyy yhdistetyn nimik- keist(cid:148)n 1, 3c ja 6 yleisen tulkintas(cid:132)(cid:132)nn(cid:148)n sek(cid:132) CN-koodien 8543, ja 8543 89 95 nimiketekstien mukaan. 8543 89 P(cid:132)(cid:132)toimintoa ei voi m(cid:132)(cid:132)ritt(cid:132)(cid:132)


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 1220/98 von Ernesto CACCAVALE an die Kommission. Mutmaßliche Unregelmäßigkeiten bei der Verwendung von Mitteln für Zusammenarbeit durch CESTAS

eurovoc_concepts:
Angola
EU aid
Italy
emergency aid
financial aid
financial control
health aid
non-governmental organisation