title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 671/98 by Antoni GUTIÉRREZ DÍAZ to the Commission. Conditions for upgrading the Spanish 'Ingeniero Técnico' engineering qualification in comparison with others

text: 19. 11. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 354/13 (98/C 354/24) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0643/98 fr(cid:229)n Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall Varfo¤r har kommissionen i den spanska versionen av meddelandet om anordnande av de allma¤nna uttagningsproven KOM/A/720 och KOM/A/721 (EGT C 52 A, 28 februari 1991) inkluderat ett krav p(cid:229) att den so¤kande skall ha en (cid:148)ho¤gre(cid:148) examen, trots att detta krav inte finns med i de o¤vriga spr(cid:229)kens versioner av detta meddelande? (98/C 354/25) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0644/98 fr(cid:229)n Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall Spanjoren Vicente Alonso Morales innehar titeln Ingeniero Te·cnico, och anma¤lde sig som so¤kande till det allma¤nna uttagningsprovet KOM/A/1047 (EGT C 145 A, 13 maj 1997). Hur kommer det sig att kommissionen p(cid:229) honom sta¤llde ett krav som inte na¤mnts i meddelandet om anordnande av uttagningsprovet, na¤mligen en examen fr(cid:229)n en la¤ngre utbildning (licentiatexamen eller motsvarande)? (98/C 354/26) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0645/98 fr(cid:229)n Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) till kommissionen (9 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall Varfo¤r har kommissionen i den spanska versionen av meddelandet om anordnande av det allma¤nna uttagningsprovet KOM/A/1047 (EGT C 145 A, 13 maj 1997) inkluderat ett krav p(cid:229) att den so¤kande skall ha en universitetsexamen, medan detta krav inte finns med i den tyska versionen av detta meddelande om allma¤nt uttagningsprov? (98/C 354/27) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0669/98 fr(cid:229)n Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (10 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall A¤ r det sant att kommissionen vid de allma¤nna uttagningsproven till tja¤nster inom EU:s tja¤nstekategori A/LA antar eller har antagit anso¤kningar fr(cid:229)n personer som innehar yrkesho¤gskolediplom (Fachhochschuldiplom)? (98/C 354/28) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0670/98 fr(cid:229)n Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (10 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall Anser kommissionen att titeln Fachhochschuldiplom a¤r den ho¤gsta examenstiteln i Tyskland, eller att det ista¤llet a¤r universitetsexamen Hochschuldiplom som a¤r den ho¤gsta titeln i denna medlemsstat? (98/C 354/29) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0671/98 fr(cid:229)n Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (10 mars 1998) A¤mne: Villkor fo¤r befordran fo¤r personer med den spanska examenstiteln Ingeniero Te·cnico, ja¤mfo¤rt med andra fall Anser kommissionen att examenstiteln Fachhochschuldiplom ger ho¤gre kompetens a¤n titeln Ingeniero Te·cnico? Varfo¤r?


title: Re-examined proposal for a Council Directive on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)

eurovoc_concepts:
chemical product
dangerous substance
health risk
occupational health
occupational safety

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10. 03. 1998 COM(1998) 162 final - SYN 459 Re-examined proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 c (d) of the EC Treaty) 1 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The initial proposal was adopted hy the Commission on 14 May 1993 and forwarded lo Council on 17 May I993(l). The aim of. the proposal is to lay down minimum requirements for the protection of workers from risk to their safety and health arising from the effects of chemical agents that are present at the workplace or as a result of any work activity involving chemical agents. Further to the first reading at the European Parliament, the Commission forwarded an amended proposal to the Council on 9 June 1994(2). On account of significant divergences in delegations' positions, work on the amended proposal was suspended in 1994 and only resumed on the basis of a compromise text put forward by the Irish Presidency in October 1996. On 7 October 1997 a common position'1' was adopted by the Council laying down general principles covering all chemical agents. The common position reflected most of (he principles proposed by the Commission and was therefore supported. In particular the common position accepted the existence of two kinds of occupational limit values (indicative and binding). It confirmed the Commission's proposal that in conformity with Directive 89/391/EEC, the employer shall assess any risk to the safety and health of workers, but additionally it defined the type of risk assessment to be undertaken for the hazardous chemical agents at work. It also provided more details relating lo health surveillance for workers exposed to hazardous chemical agents by introducing in the text requirements mentioned in the Annex of the amended proposal. On the other hand the common position did not include some technical requirements which were included in the Annex of the Commission's amended proposal, e. g. requirements in respect of measuring procedures, and in respect of specific protective measures. The European Parliament at its second reading proposed 12 amendments lo the common position adopted by the Council. O JC 165,16. 6. 1993, p. 4 O. IC 191, 14. 7. 1994, p. 7 O J C 3 7 5, 10. 12. 1997, p. 1 tflL The Commission has agreed on 9 amendments (plus one part amendment), which it considers improve the text of the common position. The amendments draw particular attention to the training of and information to workers, to the need to make cross reference to particular Directives such as Directive 89/654/EEC0 concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace, directive 89/656/EEC(,) on the minimum health and safety requirements for the use by workers of personal protective equipment at the workplace, Directive 92/85/EEC(6) on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding and Directive 94/33/1 ;MC{1) on (he protection of young people at work and to appropriate actions to be taken by the Commission for closer harmonization in the field of occupational exposure limits. The legal consistency under Article 8 the Commission has also inserted reference to Article 12 of Directive 89/39 l/EEC to align the text with the title of the Article. This re-examined proposal contains the amendments accepted by the Commission and is presented by the Commission under the terms of article 189 C(d) of the Treaty. (4) (5) (6) (7) OJ No L 393, 30. 12. 1989, p. 1 OJ No L 393, 30. 12. 1989, p. 18 OJ No L 348, 28. 11. 1992, p. 1 OJ No L 216, 20. 8. 1994, p. 12 It. Re-examined proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (Text with EEA relevance) PREVIOUS TEXT AMENDED TEXT THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the in particular European Community, and Article 118a thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission0', drawn up after consultation with the Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work, Having regard to Economic and Social Committee(2), the Opinion of the Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 189c of the Treaty(3), ( i) (2) (3) OJNoC 165, 16. 6. 1993, p. 4. OJNoC 34, 2. 2. 1994, p. 42. Opinion of the European Parliament of 20 April 1994 (OJ NoC 128, 9. 5. 1994, p. 167), Council common position or 7 October 1997 (O. J. C 375, 10. 12. 1997, p. 1) and Decision of the European Parliament of (not yet published in the Official Journal). (1) Whereas Article 118a of the Treaty provides that the Council shall adopt by means of Directives minimum requirements for encouraging improvements, especially in the working environment, to guarantee a better level of protection of the safety and health of workers; to that Article, (2) Whereas, pursuant imposing avoid shall such Directives administrative, legal financial constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and development of small and medium-sized undertakings; and the improvement of (3) Whereas workers' safety, hygiene and health at work is an objective which should not be subordinated economic considerations; purely to (4) Whereas the respect of minimum requirements on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents aims to ensure not only the protection of the health and safety of each individual worker but also to provide a level of minimum protection of all workers in the Community which avoids the area of any possible distortion competition; in a from level related consistent risks of (5) Whereas protection to the chemical agents has to be established for the Community as a whole; whereas that level of protection has to be set not by detailed prescriptive requirements but by a framework of general principles to enable Member States the minimum to apply requirements consistently; (6) Whereas a work activity involving chemical agents is likely to expose workers to risk; Council (7) Whereas Directive 80/1107/EEC of 27 November 1980 on the protection of workers from the risks related to chemical, physical and to exposure agents at work(4), Council biological Directive 82/605/EEC of 28 July 1982 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to metallic lead and its ionic compounds at work (first individual Directive within the meaning of Article 8 of Directive 80/1107/EEC)(5) and Council Directive 88/364/EEC of 9 June 1988 on the protection of workers by the banning of certain specific agents and/or certain work activities (fourth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 8 of Directive 80/1107/EEC)(r,), of sake for consistency and clarity as well as for technical reasons, should be revised and included in a single Directive laying down minimum requirements for the protection of the health and safety of workers in work activities agents; whereas these Directives can be repealed; involving chemical the is 16(1) this Directive (8) Whereas an individual Directive within the meaning of of Council Directive Article the 89/391/EEC of introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work<7) ; 12 June 1989 on (9) Whereas therefore the provisions of the said Directive apply the exposure of workers to chemical agents, without prejudice to more stringent and/or specific this Directive; provisions contained in full to in 14) (5) (6) 17) OJ No L 327, 3. 12. 1980, p. 8. Directive as last amended by DirecUve 88/642/EEC (OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1988, p. 74). OJ No L 247, 23. 8. 1982, p. 12. OJ No L 179, 9. 7. 1988, p. 44. OJ No L 183, 29. 6. 1989, p. 1. stringent (10) Whereas more and/or specific provisions relating to the transport of hazardous chemical agents are contained in binding international agreements and conventions incorporated into Community provisions on transport of dangerous goods by road, rail, water and air; 88/379/EEC(9) on (11) Whereas in Directive 67/548/EEC(8) the and Directive approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of, substances and respectively, dangerous preparations, laid down a the Council system of criteria for the classification of dangerous substances and preparations, (12) Whereas the definition of hazardous chemical agent should include any chemical substance which meets these criteria and also any chemical substance which whilst not meeting these criteria may because of or its toxicological properties, and the way it is used or is present in the workplace, present a risk to the safety and health of workers; physico-chemical, chemical of specific information (13) Whereas in Directive 90/492/EEC(,(,) the Commission defined and laid down a on system dangerous substances and preparations, in the form of safety data sheets principally intended for industrial users to enable them to take the measures necessary to ensure the protection of the safety and health of workers; whereas Council Directive the 92/58/EEC of 24 June minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work (ninth 1992 on (8) (3) (10) OJ No 196, 16. 8. 1967, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/56/EC (OJ No L 236, IH. 9. 1996, p. 35). OJ No L 187, 16. 7. 1988, p. 14. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive %/65^EC (OJ No L 265, 18. 10. 1996, p. 15). OJNoL275, 5. 10. 1990, p. 35. individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)(,,) establishes a system for marking containers and pipes used for dangerous substances or preparations at work; (14) Whereas the employer should assess any risk to the safety and health of workers arising from the presence of hazardous chemical agents at the workplace, in order the necessary preventive and to protective measures this Directive; set out take in the preventive measures (15) Whereas identified by the assessment of risk and taken by the employer should be consistent with the need to protect public health and the environment; to and supplement (16) Whereas, the information available to workers so as to ensure an improved level of protection, it is necessary their for workers representatives to be informed about the risks which chemical agents can pose for their safety and health and about the measures necessary to reduce or eliminate those risks, and for them to be in a position to check that the necessary protective measures are taken; for whom (17) Whereas the health surveillance of workers the results of the aforementioned assessment reveal a risk to health, can contribute to the prevention and protection measures to be undertaken by the employer; (18) Whereas the employer must on a regular basis carry out evaluation and measurements and be aware of new developments in technology with a view to improving the protection of workers' safety and health; 1111 OJ No L 245, 26. 8. 1992, p. 23. the evaluated (19) Whereas should scientists setting occupational exposure limit values; latest scientific data independent in the Commission to assist by be (20) Whereas, although in some cases scientific knowledge may not be such that a level of exposure to a chemical agent can be established below which risks to health cease to exist, a reduction in exposure to these chemical agents will nonetheless reduce these risks; indicative (21) Whereas in Directive 91/322/EEC(,2) and Directive 96/94/EC<l3) the Commission laid down limit values as provided for by Directive 80/1107/EEC; whereas the former Directives should be maintained current framework ; part the of as in by assist necessary to making technical (22) Whereas to this Directive should be adjustments drawn in the Commission up cooperation with the Committee set up by the Directive 89/391/EEC Commission technical individual Directives to adaptations adopted under that Directive; whereas the Commission, after first seeking the advice of the Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work in accordance with Decision 74/325/EEC<N), should also draw up practical guidelines for the application of this Directive; framework of the the (23) Whereas repeal of Directive 80/1107/EEC must not give rise to the lowering of the present standards of worker from chemical, physical and protection standards agents; whereas biological resulting from the existing Directives on ,12) '13) (14) OJNoL 177, 5. 7. 1991, p. 22 OJ No L 338, 28. 12. 1996, p. 86 OJ No L 185, 9. 7. 1974, p. 15 Decision as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession. biological agents, the proposed Directive on physical agents, this Directive and any amendments to these texts should rellect and at least maintain the standards laid down in the said Directive; (24) Whereas this Directive is a practical the social towards creating contribution dimension of the internal market HAS ADOPTED TINS DIRECTIVE: SECTION I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article I Objective and scope requirements I. This Directive, which is the fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16( I) of Directive 89/391/EEC, lays down minimum the protection of workers from risks to their safety and health arising, or likely to arise, from the effects of chemical agents that are present at the workplace or as a result of any work chemical agents. involving activity for 2. The requirements of this Directive apply where hazardous chemical agents are present or may be present at the workplace, without prejudice the provisions for to chemical agents to which measures for radiation protection apply pursuant to the Treaty Directives establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. adopted under this Directive 3 For carcinogens at work the provisions of shall apply without prejudice to more stringent and/or specific provisions contained in Council Directive 90/394/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens (sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/39l/EEC)(,5). 4. The provisions of Directive 89/391/EEC shall apply fully to the whole field referred to in this Article, without prejudice to more provisions stringent contained in this Directive. specific and/or Directive individual directives, 4 The provisions of Directive 89/391/EEC and subsequent in 89/654/EEO"0 particular concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for the workplace. Directive 89/656/EEC(17> on the minimum health and safety requirements for the use by workers of personal protective equipment at the workplace. Directive 92/85/EEC(18) on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding and Directive 94/33/EEC(>9) on. the protection of young people at work. shall apply fully to the whole field referred to in this Article, without prejudice to more stringent provisions contained in this Directive. specific and/or agents 5. As far as the transport of hazardous the is chemical provisions of this Directive shall apply without prejudice to more stringent and/or specific provisions contained in Directive 94/55/EC (20), in Directive 96/49/EC (21), in concerned, (15) (17) ( I X) (20) OJNoL 196, 26. 7. 1990, p. I. OJ No I. 393, 30. 12. 1989. p. I OJ No I-393, 30. 12. 1989, p. 18 OJ No L 348, 28. 11. 1992, p. I OJ No L 216, 20. 8. 1994, p. 12 Council Directive 94/55/EC of 21 November 1994 on the approximation of ihc laws of the Member Stales with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by road (OJ No L 319, 12. 12. 1994, p. 7). Directive as amended by Commission Directive 96/86/EC (OJ No L 335, 24. 12. 1996, p. 43). the IMDG Code, the provisions of IBCCode and 1GC Code as defined in Article 2 of Directive 93/75/EEC (22), in the provisions of the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterway and the Carriage of of for Dangerous Substances on the Rhine as incorporated in Community law and in the technical instructions for the safe transport of dangerous goods issued, at the date of entry into force of this Directive, by the International Civil Aviation Organization. the Regulation Article 2 Definitions For the purpose of this Directive, the terms used shall have the following meanings: (a) "Chemical agent" means any chemical element or compound, on its own or admixed, as it occurs in the natural state or as produced, used or released, including release as waste, by any work activity, whether or not produced intentionally and whether or not placed on the market; (b) "Hazardous chemical agent" means: (i) any chemical agent which meets the criteria for classification as a dangerous substance according to to the criteria Directive 67/548/EEC, whether or not is classified under that Directive, other than in Annex VI that substance (21) Council Directive 96/49/EC of 23 July 1996 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States with regard to the transport of dangerous goods by rail (OJ L No 235, 17. 9. 1996, p. 25). Directive as amended by Commission Directive 96/87/EC (OJ No L 335, 24. 12 1996, p. 45). Council Directive 93/75/HEC of 13 September 1993 concerning minimum requirements for vessels bound for or leaving Community ports and carrying dangerous or polluting goods (OJ No L 247, 5. 10. 1993, p. 19). Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 97/34/EC (OJ No L 158, 17. 6. 1997, p. 40). those substances which only meet the criteria for classification as dangerous for the environment; (ii) any chemical agent which meets the criteria for classification as a dangerous preparation within the meaning of Directive 88/379/EEC, whether or not that preparation is classified under that Directive, preparations those other which only meet the criteria for classification as dangerous for the environment; than the criteria as dangerous (iii) any chemical agent which, whilst not meeting for in classification accordance with (i) and (ii), may, because of its physico-chemical, toxicological chemical properties and the way it is used or is present the workplace, present a risk to the safety and health of workers, including any chemical an occupational exposure limit value under Article 3. assigned agent or in (c) "Activity involving chemical agents" means any work in which chemical agents arc used, or are intended to be including used, production, storage, transport or disposal and treatment, or which result from such work; handling, process, any in (d) "Occupational exposure limit value" means, unless otherwise specified, the limit of the time-weighted average of the concentration of a chemical agent in the air within the breathing zone of a worker specified reference period; relation to a in 11 (e) "Biological limit value" means the limit of the concentration in the appropriate relevant biological medium of agent, its metabolite, or an indicator of effect; the (f) "Health surveillance" means the assessment of an individual worker to determine the state of health of that individual, as related to exposure to specific chemical agents at work; (g) "Hazard" means the intrinsic property of a chemical agent with the potential to cause harm; (h) "Risk" means the likelihood that the potential for harm will be attained under the conditions of use and/or exposure. Article 3 Occupational exposure limit values and biological limit values shall evaluate 1. The Commission the relationship between the health effects of hazardous chemical agents and the level of occupational exposure by means of an independent scientific assessment of the latest available scientific data. 2. On the basis of the evaluation described in paragraph 1, the Commission, after first consulting the Advisory Committee on Safety, Hygiene and Health Protection at Work, shall propose European objectives in the occupational exposure limit values for the protection of workers from chemical risks, to be set at Community level. indicative form of 12 These limit values shall be established or revised, taking into account the availability of measurement techniques, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/391/EEC. Member States employers' shall keep workers' and organizations informed of occupational exposure limit values set at Community level. These limit values shall be established or revised, taking into account the availability of validated measurement techniques, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 89/391/EEC. Member States shall keep workers' and of employers' organizations indicative occupational limit values set at Community level. of Directive exposure informed 3. For any chemical agent for which an indicative occupational exposure limit value is established at Community level, Member States national establish occupational exposure limit value, taking into account the Community limit value, determining its nature in accordance with national legislation and practice. shall a to the in addition limit 4. Binding occupational exposure values may be drawn up at Community factors level and, considered when establishing indicative occupational exposure limit values, shall reflect feasibility factors while maintaining the aim of ensuring the health of workers at work. Such limit values shall be established in accordance with Article 118a of the Treaty and laid down in Annex I to this Directive. 5 For any chemical agent for which a binding occupational exposure limit value is established, Member States shall establish a corresponding binding occupational exposure limit value based on, but not exceeding, the Community limit value. national 6. Binding biological limit values may be drawn up at Community level on the basis of the evaluation described in paragraph 1 and of the availability of measurement feasibility techniques, and shall reflect the aim of factors while maintaining ensuring the health of workers at work. 13 Such limit values shall be established in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 118a of the Treaty and laid down in Annex II to this Directive, together with other surveillance information. relevant health 7. For any chemical agent for which a binding biological limit value is established, Member a corresponding national binding biological limit value based on, but not exceeding, the Community limit value. establish States shall 8. Where a Member State introduces or revises a national occupational exposure limit value or a national biological limit value for a chemical agent on the basis of new data, it shall inform the Commission and other Member States thereof together with the relevant scientific and technical data. The Commission shall undertake the appropriate action. 8. Where a Member State introduces or, on the basis of new data, revises a national limit value or a occupational exposure national biological for a the it chemical Commission and other Member States thereof together with the relevant scientific and technical data. The Commission shall undertake the appropriate action. limit value inform agent, shall 8a. On the basis of the reports provided by the Member States under Article 15 the Commission shall carry out an assessment of the way in which Member States have indicative taken account of Community lim i t_ values when the corresponding occupational national exposure limit values. If this assessment reveals wide differences in standards the Commission shall undertake appropriate action with a view to closer harmonization in this area. establishing for methods 9. Standardized the measurement and evaluation of workplace to air occupational exposure limit values shall be developed in accordance with Article 12(2). concentrations relation in 14 SECTION II EMPLOYERS' OBLIGATIONS A Hide 4 Determination and assessment of risk of hazardous chemical agents the employer shall I. En carrying out the obligations laid down in Articles 6(3) and 9(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC, first determine whether any hazardous chemical agents are present at the workplace. If so, he shall then assess any risk to the safety and health of workers arising from the presence of those chemical agents, taking into consideration the following: - their hazardous properties; - information on safety and health that shall be provided by the supplier, (e. g. in the relevant the provisions of accordance with Directive or Directive 88/379/EEC); safety data sheet 67/548/EEC - the level, type and duration of exposure; - the circumstances of work involving such agents, including their amount; - any occupational exposure limit values or biological limit values established on the territory of the Member State in question; - the effect of preventive measures taken or to be taken; - where available, the conclusions to be drawn from any health surveillance already undertaken. I. s shall obtain The employer additional information which is needed for the risk assessment from the supplier or from other Where readily appropriate, this information shall comprise the specific assessment concerning the risk the basis of to users established on Community legislation on chemical agents. available sources. 2. The employer must be in possession of an assessment of the risk in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 89/391/EEC, and shall identify which measures have been taken in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 of this Directive. The risk assessment shall be documented in a suitable form according to national law and practice, and may include a justification by the employer that the nature and extent of the risks related to chemical agents make a further detailed risk unnecessary. risk assessment The assessment up-to-date, shall be kept particularly if there have been significant changes which could render it out-of-date, or when the results of health surveillance show it to be necessary. 2. The employer must be in possession of an assessment of the risk in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 89/391/EEC, and shall identify which measures have been taken in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 of this Directive. The risk assessment shall be recorded in a suitable form according to national law and practice, and may include a justification by the employer that the nature and extent of the risks related to chemical agents make a further detailed risk unnecessary. risk assessment The assessment up-to-date, shall be kept particularly if there have been significant changes which could render it out-of-date, or when the results of health surveillance show it to be necessary. 3. Certain activities within the undertaking or establishment, such as maintenance, in respect of which it is foreseeable that there is a potential for significant exposure, or which may result in deleterious effects to safety and health for other reasons, even technical measures have been after all risk taken, assessment. shall be included the in the case of activities 4. In involving to several hazardous chemical exposure agents, the risk shall be assessed on the basis of the risk presented by all such chemical agents in combination. 16 5. In the case of a new activity involving hazardous chemical agents, work shall only commence after an assessment of the risk of that activity has been made and any preventive measures identified have been implemented. 6. Practical guidelines for the determination and assessment of risk, and for their review and, if necessary, adjustment, shall be developed in accordance with Article 12(2). Article 5 General principles for prevention of risks associated with hazardous chemical agents and application of this Directive in relation to assessment of risks 1. In carrying out his obligation to ensure the health and safety of workers in any involving hazardous chemical activity the the employer agents necessary preventive measures set out in of Article 6(1) the Directive 89/391/EEC and measures set out in this Directive. and (2) include shall take 2. Risks to the health and safety of workers involving hazardous chemical at work agents shall be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by: - - the design and organization of systems of work at the workplace; the provision of suitable equipment for work with and chemical maintenance procedures which ensure the health and safety of workers at work; agents 17 3. Where the results of the assessment referred to in Article 4(1) reveal a risk to the safety and health of workers, the and specific monitoring measures in Articles 6, 7 and 10 shall be applied. prevention laid protection, down - reducing to a minimum the number of to be likely workers exposed or exposed; - reducing to a minimum the duration and intensity of exposure; - appropriate hygiene measures; - reducing the quantity of chemical agents present at the workplace to the minimum required for the type of work concerned; for transport within suitable working procedures including the safe handling, arrangements the and storage workplace of hazardous chemical agents and waste containing such chemical agents. Practical guidelines for preventive measures to control risk shall be developed in accordance with Article 12(2). 3. Where the results of the assessment referred to in Article 4(1) reveal a risk to the safety and health of workers, the specific protection, prevention, monitoring and information measures laid down in Articles 6, 7, 8 and 10 shall be applied. 4. Where the results of the risk assessment in Article 4(1) show that, referred to because of the quantities of a hazardous chemical agent present in the workplace, there is only a slight risk to the safety and health of workers, and the measures taken in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article are sufficient to reduce that risk, the provisions of Articles 6, 7 and 10 shall not apply. 18 Article 6 Specific protection and prevention measures 1. The employer shall ensure that the risk from a hazardous chemical agent to the safety and health of workers at work is eliminated or reduced to a minimum. 2. In applying paragraph 1, substitution shall by preference be undertaken, whereby the employer shall avoid the use of a hazardous chemical agent by replacing it with a chemical agent or process which, under its condition of use, is not hazardous or is less hazardous to workers' safety and health, as the case may be Where the nature of the activity does not permit risk to be eliminated by substitution, having regard to the activity and risk assessment referred to in Article 4, the employer shall ensure that the risk is reduced to a minimum by application of protection prevention measures, consistent with the assessment of the risk made pursuant to Article 4. These will include, in order of priority: and (a) design of appropriate work processes and engineering controls and use of adequate equipment and materials, so as to avoid or minimize the release of hazardous chemical agents which may present a risk to workers' safety and health at the place of work; (b) application of collective protection measures at the source of the risk, such as adequate ventilation and appropriate organizational measures; (c) where exposure cannot be prevented of measures protective protection personal other means, application by individual including equipment. Practical guidelines for protection and prevention measures to control risk shall be developed in accordance with Article 12(2). 3. The measures referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall be accompanied by in accordance with health surveillance Article 10 if it is appropriate to the nature of the risk. the employer clearly 4. Unless demonstrates by other means of evaluation that, in accordance with paragraph 2, adequate prevention and protection have been achieved, the employer shall carry out on a regular basis, and when any change occurs in the conditions which may affect workers' exposure to chemical agents, such measurements of chemical agents which may present a risk to workers' health at the workplace as are necessary, in particular in relation to the occupational exposure limit values. 5. The employer shall take into account the results of the procedures referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article in carrying out the obligations laid down in or resulting as a consequence of Article 4. In any event, where an occupational exposure limit value ellectively established on the territory of a Member State has been exceeded, the employer shall immediately take steps, taking into account the nature of that the situation by carrying out preventive and protective measures. to remedy limit, 20 technical 6. On the basis of the overall assessment of and general principles for the prevention of risks in Articles 4 and 5, the employer shall take organizational and/or measures appropriate to the nature of the operation, including storage, handling and segregation chemical agents, providing protection of workers against hazards arising from the physico- chemical properties of chemical agents. In particular he shall take measures, in order of priority, to: incompatible of technical 6. On the basis of the overall assessment of and general principles for the prevention of risks in Articles 4 and 5, the employer shall take organizational and/or measures appropriate to the nature of the operation, including storage and handling, providing protection of workers against hazards arising from the physico-chemical properties of chemical agents. In particular he shall take measures, in order of priority, to hazardous concentrations (a) prevent the presence at the workplace of of inflammable substances or hazardous quantities unstable substances or, where the nature of the work does not allow that, chemically of (b) avoid the presence of ignition sources which could give rise to fires and conditions explosions, or which could cause chemically unstable substances or mixtures of substances to give rise to harmful physical effects, and adverse (c) mitigate the detrimental effects to the health and safety of workers in the event of fire or explosion due to the ignition of inflammable substances, or harmful physical effects arising from substances or chemically unstable mixtures of substances. Work equipment and protective systems provided by the employer for the protection of workers shall comply with the relevant design, Community provisions to manufacture and supply with respect and/or health and organizational measures the employer shall take account of and be group the consistent with taken by equipment Technical safety. on 21 I to Directive in Annex categorization 94/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 March 1994 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems in potentially intended explosive atmospheres (23). for use sufficient take measures control to The employer shall provide plant, equipment and machinery or provision of or equipment suppression explosion explosion pressure relief arrangements. of Article 7 Arrangements to deal with accidents, incidents and emergencies I. Without prejudice to the obligations laid down in Article 8 of Directive 89/391/EEC, the employer shall, in order to protect the safety and health of workers from an accident, incident or emergency related to the presence of hazardous chemical agents at the workplace, establish procedures (action plans) which can be put into effect when any such event occurs, so that These action appropriate is arrangements shall include any relevant safety drills which are to be performed at regular the provision of appropriate first aid facilities. intervals, and taken. 2. In the case of the occurrence of an event such as is mentioned in paragraph 1, the employer shall immediately take steps to mitigate the effects of the event and to inform the workers concerned thereof. In order to restore the situation to normal: - employer the appropriate measures situation as soon as possible; shall to implement the remedy )i No !, 100, 19. 4. i 994, p. 1. 22 only those workers who are essential to the carrying out of repairs and other to necessary work shall be permitted work in the affected area. 3. The workers who are permitted to work in the affected area shall be provided with appropriate protective clothing, personal protective equipment, specialized safety equipment and plant which they must use as long as the situation persists; that situation shall not be permanent. Unprotected persons shall not be permitted to remain in the aflectcd area prejudice to Article 8 of 4. Without Directive 89/391/EEC the employer shall take the measures necessary to provide the warning and other communication systems required to signal an increased risk to safety and health, to enable an appropriate response and to launch remedial actions, assistance, escape and rescue operations immediately if the need arises. shall ensure employer that 5. The information on emergency arrangements involving hazardous chemical agents is available. internal and external accident and emergency services shall have access to this information. It shall include the following: relevant The identification - advance notice of relevant work hazards, hazard arrangements, precautions and procedures, so that the their emergency services can prepare own and response precautionary measures; and procedures 23 any available information concerning specific hazards arising, or likely to arise, al the time of an accident or emergency, including information on procedures prepared pursuant to this Article. Article 8 Information for workers Information and training for workers 3. Without prejudice to Article 30 of Directive 89/391/EEC the employer shall ensure their thai workers representatives are provided with: and/or 3. Without prejudice to Articles 10 and 12 of Directive 89/391/EEC the employer shall ensure that workers and/or their representatives are provided with: - the data obtained pursuant to Article 4 of this Directive, and further informed whenever a major alteration at the workplace leads to a change in these data; information on hazardous chemical agents, such as the identity of such agents, the risks to safety and health, relevant occupational exposure limit values and other legislative provisions; information on the hazardous chemical agents in the workplace and hazardous chemical agents identified in the risk assessment made pursuant to Article 4( 1 ) such as the identity of these agents, the risks to safety and health, relevant occupational exposure limit values and other legislative provisions; - information on appropriate precautions and actions to be taken in order to safeguard themselves and other workers at the workplace; training and information on appropriate precautions and actions to be taken in order to safeguard themselves and other workers at the workplace; the supplier access to any safely dala sheet provided by in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 88/379/EEC and Article 27 of Directive 92/32/EEC "',); And that the information is: OJNoI, 154, 5. 6. 1992, p. 1. 24 from oral provided in a manner appropriate to the outcome of the risk assessment pursuant to Article 4 of this Directive. This may vary to training individual supported by in writing, depending on the nature and degree of the risk revealed by the assessment required by the said Article; communication and information instruction - updated to take account of changing circumstances. containers and pipes for 2. Where hazardous chemical agents used at work are not marked in accordance with the relevant Community legislation on the labelling of chemical agents and on safety signs at the workplace, the employer shall, without prejudice to the derogations provided for in the above mentioned legislation, ensure that the contents of the containers and pipes, together with the nature of those contents and any associated hazards, are clearly identifiable. 3. Member States may take measures necessary to ensure that employers may, preferably from the producer or supplier, obtain on request all information on hazardous chemical agents needed to apply Article 4(1) of this Directive, insofar as Directives 67/548/EEC and 88/379/EEC do not to provide information. include any obligation 2. S SECTION m M I S C E L L A N E O US PROVISIONS Article 9 Prohibitions 1. To prevent the exposure of workers to health risks from certain chemical agents and/or certain activities involving chemical agents, the production, manufacture or use at work of the chemical agents and the in Annex III shall be activities set out prohibited to the extent specified therein. 2. Member States may permit derogations from the requirements of paragraph 1 in the following circumstances: - - the for sole purpose of research and testing, including analysis; scientific eliminate intended for activities chemical agents that are present in the form of by-products or waste products; to the production of for the chemical agents referred to in paragraph 1 for use as intermediates, and for such use. The exposure of workers to chemical agents referred to in paragraph 1 must be prevented, in particular by providing that the production and earliest possible use of such chemical agents as intermediates must take place in a single closed system, from which the aforesaid chemical agents may be removed only to the extent necessary to monitor the process or service the system. Member States may provide for systems of individual authorizations. 26 derogations 3. When permitted pursuant to paragraph 2, the competent authority shall request the employer to submit the following information: are - the reason for requesting the derogation; - the quantity of the chemical agent to be used annually; the activities processes involved; and/or reactions or - the number of workers involved; liable to be - - the precautions envisaged to protect the safety and health of workers concerned; technical the organizational and measures taken to prevent the exposure of workers. 4. The Council, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 118a of the Treaty, may amend the list of prohibitions under paragraph I of this Article, to include further chemical agents or activities. 27 A Hide 10 Health Surveillance I. Without prejudice to Article 14 of Directive 89/391 /EEC, Member States shall introduce arrangements for carrying out appropriate health surveillance of workers for whom the results of the assessment referred to in Article 4 of this Directive reveal These to arrangements, including the requirements specified for health and exposure records and their availability, shall be introduced in accordance with national laws and/or practice health. risk a Health surveillance, the results of which in applying shall be taken into account specific preventive measures workplace, shall be appropriate where: the in - the worker to a the exposure of hazardous chemical agent is such that an identifiable disease or adverse health effect may be related to the exposure; and - there is a likelihood that the disease or effect may occur under the particular conditions of the worker's work, and the technique of investigation is of low risk to workers. Furthermore, there shall be valid techniques for detecting indications of the disease or effect. Health surveillance procedures shall be agreed with the worker concerned. 28 a be shall Where a binding biological limit value has been set as indicated in Annex II, health surveillance compulsory requirement for work with the hazardous chemical agent in question, in accordance that Annex. with Workers this of requirement before being assigned to the the involving risk of exposure task hazardous chemical agent indicated. in informed the procedures shall be to shall that States to ensure 2. Member establish for each arrangements worker who undergoes health surveillance in accordance with the requirements of paragraph I, individual health and exposure records are made and kept up-to-date. records carried out 3. Health and exposure shall contain a summary of the results of health and of any surveillance monitoring data the Biological exposure of the monitoring and related requirements may form part of health surveillance. representative of individual. Health and exposure records shall be kept in a suitable to permit consultation at a later date, taking into account any confidentiality. so as form Copies of the appropriate records shall be to the competent authority on supplied request. The individual worker shall, at his request, have access to the health and exposure records relating to him personally. Where an undertaking ceases to trade, the health and exposure records shall be made available to the competent authority. 4. Where, as a result of health surveillance. 29 the worker shall be informed by the doctor or other suitably qualified person of the result which relates to him personally, including information and advice regarding any health surveillance which he should undergo following the end of the exposure, and a worker is found to have an identifiable disease or adverse health effect which is considered by a doctor or occupational health-care professional to be the result of exposure at work to a hazardous chemical agent; or a binding biological limit value is found to have been exceeded, the worker shall be informed of the result which relates to him personally, including information and advice regarding any health surveillance which he should undergo following the end of the exposure, and the employer shall: - review the risk assessment made pursuant to Article 4( I ); the measures provided review to eliminate or reduce risks pursuant to Articles 5 and 6; take into account the advice of the occupational health-care professional or other suitably qualified person or the competent authority in implementing any measures required to eliminate or reduce risk in accordance with Article 6, including the possibility of assigning the worker to alternative work where there is no risk of further exposure, and 30 arrange continued health surveillance and provide for a review of the health status of any other worker who has been In such cases the similarly exposed. competent occupational the professional health-care competent authority may propose that exposed persons undergo a medical examination doctor or or Consultation and participation of workers and/or their representatives shall take place in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 89/39l/EEC on the matters covered by this Directive, including the Annexes hereto. Workcrs and/or their representatives shall in particular_bje_consulted in relation to the outcome of the risk assessment. referred to in Article 4(1) and the protection and prevention measures referred to in Articles 5 and 6. Article 11 Consultation and participation of workers Consultation and participation of workers and/or their representatives shall take place in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 89/391/EEC on the matters covered by this Directive, including the Annexes hereto. Article 12 Adaptation of the Annexes, preparation and adoption of technical guidance I. Adjustments of a strictly technical nature to the Annexes in line with: the adoption of Directives in the field of technical and standardisation chemical agents, and/or harmonization concerning progress, technical in international standards or specifications and new findings concerning chemical agents, changes 31 shall be adopted in accordance with the in Article 17 of laid down procedure Directive 89/391/EEC. 2. The Commission shall draw up practical guidelines of a non-binding nature. These guidelines shall address the topics referred to in Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6, and Annex II, section I. The Commission shall first consult the Advisory Committee on Safely, Hygiene in at Work Protection and Health accordance with Decision 74/325/EEC. shall far as possible of In the context of the application of this take Directive, Member States account as these guidelines in drawing up their national policies for the protection of the health and safety of workers. Article 13 Repeal and amendment of earlier Directives 1. Directives 80/1107/EEC, 82/605/EEC and 88/364/EEC shall be repealed on the date referred to in Article 14(1). 2. Council Directive 83/477/EEC of 19 September 1983 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure individual to asbestos at work (second Directive within the meaning of Article X of Directive SO/I 107/EEC) ('S), is amended as follows: OJ No L 263, 24. 9. 1983, p. 25. Directive as amended by Directive 91/382/EEC (OJ No I, 206, 29. 7. 1991, p. 16). 32 (a) in the first sentence of Article 1(1), the following words shall be deleted: individual the "which second Directive within the meaning of Article X of Directive 80/1 107/EEC"; is (b) Article 9(2) shall be replaced by the following: the procedure "2. The amendments necessary to adapt the Annexes to this Directive to technical progress shall be adopted in accordance with laid in Article 17 of Council down Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety the and workplace. of workers health at (c) the second subparagraph of in Article 15(1) the words "in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 10 of Directive 80/1 107/EEC" shall be replaced by "in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Directive 89/39l/EEC". 86/188/EEC of 3. Council Directive 12 May 1986 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to noise at work (2f,) is amended as follows: (a) in Article 1(1), the following words shall be deleted: "which is the third the individual Directive within meaning of Directive 80/1107/EEC"; (b) in Article 12(2), second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following: the (26) OJNoL 137, 24. 5. 1986, p. 28. 33 "Annexes I and II shall be adapted to technical progress in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on introduction of the measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at the workplace. in Directive reference 4. Any other 83/477/EEC and Directive 86/188/EEC to Directive 80/1107/EEC shall be obsolete the said from Directive the date of repeal of 5. Directives 91/322/EEC and 96/94/EC remain in force. SECTION IV Final provisions Article 14 and regulations 1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, administrative provisions necessary to comply with this ]( '. They Directive not later than [ shall the Commission inform thereof. forthwith adopt States When Member these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. for making such reference shall be laid down by Member States. The methods 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of they have already national adopted or which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive. law which Three years aller publication of this Directive in the Official Journal of the European Communities. 34 Article 15 shall to report five years on the Member States Commission every the practical implementation of this Directive, indicating the views of employers and workers. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Economic and Social Committee thereof. Article 16 This Directive shall enter into force on the its following twentieth day publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. that of Article 17 This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done a I For the Council The President 35 ANNEX 1 List of binding occupational exposure limit values Name ol" agent KINKCS ( ' ) No CAS (2) No ()ccu pat i ona 1 exposu re limit value 8 h (') Inorganic lead and its compounds mg/m' 0,15 pom O Occupational exposure limit value Short-term f/) mg/m* ppm (') EÎNECS: European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances (2) CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service C) Measured or calculated in relation to a reference period of 8 hours, limc-wcightcd average C1) A limit value above which exposure should not occur, and which is related to a 15 minute period uniess otherwise specified C) jiig/ni"* = milligrams per cubic metre of air at 20° C and 101,3 KPa (6) ppm = parts per million by volume in air (ml/m3) 36 ANNEX H Binding biological limit values and health surveillance measures I. Lead and its ionic compounds 1. 1. Biological monitoring must include measuring the blood-lead absorption (PbB) spectrometry or a method giving equivalent results. The binding biological limit value is: using level 70ugPb/100mlblood 1. 2. Medical surveillance is carried out if: exposure to a concentration of lead in air is greater than 0,075 mg/m3, calculated as a time-weighted average over 40 hours per week, or blood-lead level a 40 pg Pb/100 ml blood individual workers. greater is measured than in surveillance must be developed 1. 3. Practical guidelines for biological monitoring and in medical accordance with Article 12(2). These must include recommendations of biological indicators (e. g. ALAU, ZPP, ALAD) and biological monitoring strategies. 37 ANNEX 111 Prohibitions The production, manufacture or use at work of the chemical agents and activities involving chemical agents set out below are prohibited. The prohibition does not apply if the chemical agent is present in another chemical agent, or as a constituent of waste, provided that its individual concentration therein is less than the limit specified. (a) Chemical Agents EINECS (') No CAS (2) No Name of agent 202-080-4 91-59-8 201-177-1 92-67-1 202-199-1 92-87-5 2-naphthylaminc and its salts 4- aminodiphenyl and its salts Benzidine and its salts Concentration Limit for exemption 0,l%w/w 0. 1%w/w 0,l%w/w 202-204-7 92-93-3 4-nitrodiphenyl 0. 1%w/w (') EINECS: European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances (2) CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (b) Work Activities None. 28 The Commission is unable to accept the following amendments proposed bv the European Parliament 1. part of Amendment N° 5 (concerning Article 4. 2) This part of the amendment requires employers to record the risk assessment in a suitable form taking into account national law and practice. This would certainly weaken the common position which requires the records to be made according to national law and practice, that is with full respect of the national law. 2. Amendment N° 8 (concerning Article 6. 5) The amendment requires the employers always to adhere to the occupational exposure limit value, irrespective of the nature of the national provision. The Commission considers that this amendment would undermine the distinction between indicative and binding limit value. 3. Amendment N° 14 (concerning Article 12, 1, second indent) This amendment requires deletion of "new findings" among situations requiring technical adjustments of Annexes. The Commission believes that "new findings" are indeed one of the main reasons behind a need for technical changes. The procedure presented in the common position gives the Community the possibility to react rapidly with technical solutions to "new findings"; the use of this procedure is limited to strictly technical adjustments. 3. 1 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 162 final DOCUMENTS EN 04 05 15 Catalogue number : CB-C0-98-161-EN-C ISBN 92-78-32043-9 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 678/98 dell'on. Antoni GUTIÉRREZ DÍAZ alla Commissione. Condizioni di promozione degli "Ingenieros técnicos" spagnoli comparate con quelle di altri casi

eurovoc_concepts:
European official
Spain
administrator
competition (EU)
diploma
engineer
equal treatment
equivalence of diplomas
recognition of studies
recruitment

formats: html pdf print

text: 19. 11. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee C 354/15 (98/C 354/35) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0677/98 di Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) alla Commissione (10 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Condizioni di promozione degli «Ingenieros te·cnicos» spagnoli comparate con quelle di altri casi Per quale motivo la Commissione ha inserito il requisito del possesso di un titolo «superiore» nella versione spagnola del bando relativo ai concorsi generali COM/A/720 e COM/A/721 (GU C 52 A del 28. 2. 1991), mentre tale requisito non compare nelle altre versioni linguistiche del bando citato? (98/C 354/36) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0678/98 di Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) alla Commissione (10 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Condizioni di promozione degli «Ingenieros te·cnicos» spagnoli comparate con quelle di altri casi Quali ragioni inducono la Commissione a chiedere al Sig. Vicente Alonso Morales, «Ingeniero te·cnico» spagnolo candidato al concorso generale COM/A/1047 (GU C 145 A del 13. 5. 1997), di soddisfare un requisito che non figura nel testo del bando, ovvero il possesso di un diploma di studi di lunga durata (laurea o equivalente)? (98/C 354/37) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0679/98 di Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) alla Commissione (10 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Condizioni di promozione degli «Ingenieros te·cnicos» spagnoli comparate con quelle di altri casi Per quale motivo la Commissione ha inserito il requisito del possesso di un titolo «universitario» nella versione spagnola del bando relativo al concorso generale COM/A/1047 (GU C 145 A del 13. 5. 1997), mentre tale requisito non compare nella versione tedesca del bando citato? (98/C 354/38) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0724/98 di In(cid:152) igo Me·ndez de Vigo (PPE) alla Commissione (18 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Accesso degli ingegneri tecnici spagnoli alla categoria A/LA della funzione pubblica europea Risponde al vero che la Commissione accoglie o ha accolto le candidature dei titolari di un «Fachhochschul- diplom» nei concorsi generali per l(cid:146)assunzione di funzionari pubblici europei della categoria A/LA? Qual e‘, secondo la Commissione, il titolo piu‘ elevato in Germania, il «Fachhochschuldiplom» o il diploma universitario «Hochschuldiplom»? Ritiene la Commissione che il «Fachhochschuldiplom» garantisca una qualifica superiore a quella del titolo spagnolo di ingegnere tecnico? In caso affermativo, perche·? Per quale motivo la Commissione sostiene che il diploma spagnolo di ingegnere tecnico si trova in una situazione simile a quello del diploma conseguito in una «Fachhochschule», quando questo ultimo diploma e‘ ammesso nella maggior parte dei concorsi generali per la categoria A/LA? (98/C 354/39) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0725/98 di In(cid:152) igo Me·ndez de Vigo (PPE) alla Commissione (18 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Accesso degli ingegneri tecnici spagnoli alla categoria A/LA della funzione pubblica europea Per quale motivo la Commissione ha inserito il requisito del possesso di un diploma «universitario» nella versione spagnola del bando relativo al concorso COM/A/1047 (Gazzetta Ufficiale C 145 A, del 13. 5. 97), mentre lo stesso non compare nella versione tedesca del bando citato?


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 650/98 de Nikitas KAKLAMANIS à la Commission. Emprisonnement d'un dirigeant kurde en Turquie

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU relations
Kurdistan question
Türkiye
democratisation
human rights
political prisoner
rule of law

text: C 310/112 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes 9. 10. 98 (98/C 310/148) QUESTION E· CRITE E-0650/98 pose·e par Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) a‘ la Commission (10 mars 1998) Objet: Emprisonnement d(cid:146)un dirigeant kurde en Turquie M. Habdi Touranli, pre·sident du Parti de·mocratique du Kurdistan du Nord, a e·te· arre(cid:136)te· par la police turque le 13 janvier. Il est incarce·re· a‘ Ankara et encourt une peine de vingt-deux ans de prison. Il faut signaler qu(cid:146)il est atteint d(cid:146)un cancer et que son e·tat exige une surveillance me·dicale constante. Amnesty International a demande· sa libe·ration le 16 janvier. Le ministre des Affaires e·trange‘res de la Re·publique fe·de·rale, M. Kinkel, a introduit une reque(cid:136)te allant dans le me(cid:136)me sens par l(cid:146)interme·diaire de l(cid:146)ambassade d(cid:146)Allemagne a‘ Ankara. M. Touranli posse‘de en effet la double nationalite· allemande et turque. Quelle est la position officielle de la Commission a‘ ce sujet? Comment envisage-t-elle d(cid:146)intervenir aupre‘s des autorite·s turques pour obtenir la libe·ralisation de ce combattant de la cause kurde et pour les obliger a‘ mettre un terme aux pratiques inhumaines auxquelles elles recourent pour terroriser les Kurdes vivant sur le territoire de la Turquie? Re·ponse donne·e par M. Van den Broek au nom de la Commission (20 avril 1998) La Commission est au courant du cas de M. Turanli. Celui-ci a e·te· remis en liberte· provisoire le 26 fe·vrier 1998. Dans tous ses contacts avec les autorite·s turques, la Commission insiste aupre‘s de ses interlocuteurs sur la ne·cessite· d(cid:146)ame·liorer la situation des droits de l(cid:146)homme et de poursuivre le processus de de·mocratisation dans ce pays. Malgre· la de·cision d(cid:146)Ankara de suspendre tout dialogue politique avec la Communaute·, la Commission entend continuer a‘ insister sur ce point. S(cid:146)agissant particulie‘rement de la situation dans le sud-est de la Turquie, la Commission a rappele· a‘ plusieurs reprises la ne·cessite· de trouver une solution civile et non militaire a‘ ce proble‘me, ainsi que de maintenir la lutte contre le terrorisme dans le cadre du respect de l(cid:146)e·tat de droit et des droits de l(cid:146)homme. La Commission entend par ailleurs contribuer au de·veloppement socio-e·conomique de cette re·gion par le financement de projets de ce type dans le cadre du programme MEDA. (98/C 310/149) QUESTION E· CRITE E-0652/98 pose·e par Gerardo Ferna·ndez-Albor (PPE) a‘ la Commission (10 mars 1998) Objet: Participation des entreprises de Galice au programme communautaire Al-Invest Apre‘s ses deux premie‘res anne·es de fonctionnement, le programme Al-Invest, dont l(cid:146)objectif est de faciliter les e·changes commerciaux, le know-how, les transferts de technologie et financiers, a permis d(cid:146)organiser quarante rencontres d(cid:146)entreprises et d(cid:146)en programmer soixante autres, avec un volume d(cid:146)affaires de 250 millions d(cid:146)e·cus. La vocation ibe·ro-ame·ricaine de la re·gion espagnole de Galice est bien connue, ainsi que l(cid:146)interde·pendance des e·conomies sous ces deux latitudes, comme le montrent les statistiques successives a‘ cet e·gard; aussi le programme communautaire pre·cite· reve(cid:136)t-il une importance particulie‘re pour une re·gion aussi oriente·e par vocation vers l(cid:146)Ame·rique Latine. La Commission peut-elle indiquer quelle a e·te· l(cid:146)incidence de ce programme communautaire sur les relations entre la Galice et l(cid:146)Ame·rique Latine, combien de rencontres d(cid:146)entreprises ont eu lieu dans l(cid:146)espace ge·ographique galicien et quelle a e·te· l(cid:146)importance de la repre·sentation de la Galice dans l(cid:146)ensemble du programme?


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 654/98 del Esko SEPPÄNEN a la Comisión. Limitación del uso de antibióticos en animales en Finlandia y Suecia

eurovoc_concepts:
Finland
Sweden
animal nutrition
antibiotic
food additive
foodstuffs legislation
health risk
public health
veterinary drug
veterinary legislation

text: C 354/18 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas 19. 11. 98 (98/C 354/44) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0654/98 de Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) a la Comisio·n (10 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Limitacio·n del uso de antibio·ticos en animales en Finlandia y Suecia En las negociaciones de adhesio·n a la UE, Finlandia y Suecia obtuvieron el derecho de aplicar unos l(cid:14)·mites en el uso de antibio·ticos en animales ma·s estrictos que los existentes en los pa(cid:14)·ses que ya eran miembros de la UE anteriormente. Se obtuvo tal autorizacio·n debido a que una utilizacio·n incorrecta de los antibio·ticos hace a las bacterias resistentes a muchos de los antibio·ticos que necesitan las personas. ¿Tiene previsto autorizar la Comisio·n a Finlandia o a Suecia la aplicacio·n de esas disposiciones espec(cid:14)·ficas, o esta· preparando unos l(cid:14)·mites en el uso de antibio·ticos tambie·n en los dema·s pa(cid:14)·ses, lo que estar(cid:14)·a plenamente justificado? Respuesta del Sr. Fischler en nombre de la Comisio·n (22 de abril de 1998) Las disposiciones establecidas en el Acta de adhesio·n no permiten a la Comisio·n prolongar el re·gimen especial del que disfrutan actualmente Finlandia y Suecia en lo que respecta a la utilizacio·n de antibio·ticos en su territorio. En virtud del Acta de adhesio·n, la Comisio·n tiene la obligacio·n de decidir sobre el fundamento de las motivaciones que le han sido presentadas tanto por Finlandia como por Suecia para justificar la prohibicio·n parcial o total de los antibio·ticos autorizados como aditivos en la alimentacio·n animal por la Directiva 70/524/CEE del Consejo, de 23 de noviembre de 1970, sobre los aditivos en la alimentacio·n animal (1). Si los riesgos alegados por Finlandia y Suecia se demuestran cient(cid:14)·ficamente, la Comisio·n debera· prohibir en toda la Comunidad la utilizacio·n de los antibio·ticos en cuestio·n. En caso contrario, la Comisio·n debera· invitar a esos dos Estados miembros a suspender las prohibiciones actuales. En cualquier caso, la Comisio·n tiene la intencio·n de solicitar la opinio·n del Comite· cient(cid:14)·fico competente. (1) DO L 270 de 14. 12. 1970. (98/C 354/45) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0656/98 de Ste·phane Buffetaut (I-EDN) a la Comisio·n (10 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Ayudas a la construccio·n naval Las autoridades norteamericanas han anunciado su intencio·n de reabrir el astillero de Filadelfia merced a subvenciones ingentes, violando as(cid:14)· de forma patente el acuerdo OCDE que contiene una cla·usula de congelacio·n («standstill») de las medidas de ayuda. La Comisio·n hab(cid:14)·a considerado que dicha medida era suficientemente coercitiva como para no incrementar los l(cid:14)·mites ma·ximos de ayuda a la construccio·n naval en Europa. ¿Tiene intencio·n la Comisio·n de aplicar en Europa, en el marco de un acuerdo OCDE, medidas restrictivas que sus propios socios no aplican? Respuesta del Sr. Van Miert en nombre de la Comisio·n (8 de abril de 1998) La denominada cla·usula de congelacio·n a la que hace referencia Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a no forma parte del Acuerdo de la Organizacio·n de Cooperacio·n y Desarrollo Econo·micos (OCDE), que au·n no ha entrado en vigor, sino del Acta Final de las negociaciones del Acuerdo. Segu·n sus disposiciones, las Partes acordaron no aumentar los niveles de ayuda vigentes ni introducir nuevas medidas de apoyo antes de la entrada en vigor del Acuerdo. La Comisio·n comparte la preocupacio·n de Su Sen(cid:152)or(cid:14)·a sobre la aparente infraccio·n de estas disposiciones por parte de los Estados Unidos. La Comisio·n se ha dirigido por escrito a las autoridades estadounidenses pidie·ndoles nuevas explicaciones y detalles sobre el contenido de los acuerdos y sobre su conformidad con la cla·usula de congelacio·n


title: Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 546/98 της Επιτροπής της 10ης Μαρτίου 1998 για τον καθορισμό, για το έτος 1998, των λεπτομερειών εφαρμογής του καθεστώτος εισαγωγής όσον αφορά ορισμένα προϊόντα του τομέα του βοείου κρέατος που προβλέπονται από την απόφαση 97/831/ΕΚ του Συμβουλίου

eurovoc_concepts:
North Macedonia
beef
cattle
import policy
originating product
tariff quota

text: L 72/8 ‹ EL ‹ Ep˜isglg Evgleq˜ida tym Euqypaˇij ˜ym Joimot ˜gtym 11. 3. 98 JAMOMISLOS (EJ) aqih. 546/98 TGS EPITQOPGS tgr 10gr Laqt˜iou 1998 cia tom jahoqisl ˜o, cia to ˜etor 1998, tym keptoleqei ˜ym evaqloc ˜gr tou jahest ˜ytor eisacyc ˜gr ˜osom avoq ˜a oqisl ˜ema pqoiˇ ˜omta tou tol ˜ea tou boe˜iou jq ˜eator pou pqobk ˜epomtai ap ˜o tgm ap ˜ovasg 97/831/EJ tou Sulbouk˜iou G EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA˘IJYM JOIMOTGTYM, ENEDYSE TOM PAQOMTA JAMOMISLO: ˜Ewomtar up ˜oxg: tg sumh ˜gjg cia tgm ˜idqusg tgr Euqypaˇij ˜gr Joim ˜otgtar, tgm ap ˜ovasg 97/831/EJ tou Sulbouk˜iou, tgr 27gr Moel- ˜osom avoq ˜a tgm s ˜umaxg sulb ˜aseyr sumeqca- bq˜iou 1997, s˜iar letan ˜u tgr Euqypaˇij ˜gr Joim ˜otgtar jai tgr Pq ˜ygm Cioucjoskabij ˜gr Dglojqat˜iar tgr Lajedom˜iar (1), tom jamomisl ˜o (EJ) aqih. 77/98 tou Sulbouk˜iou, tgr 9gr Iamouaq˜iou 1998, swetij ˜a le oqisl ˜emer keptol ˜eqeier evaq- loc ˜gr tgr sulvym˜iar sumeqcas˜iar letan ˜u tgr Euqypaˇij ˜gr Joim ˜otgtar jai tgr Pq ˜ygm Cioucjoskabij ˜gr Dglojqat˜iar tgr Lajedom˜iar (2), jai id˜iyr to ˜aqhqo 1, Ejtil ˜ymtar: ˜oti sto ˜aqhqo 15 paq ˜acqavor 2 tgr sulvym˜iar sumeqca- s˜iar pou episum ˜aptetai stgm ap ˜ovasg 97/831/EJ ˜ewei pqobkevhe˜i cia to 1998 daslokocij ˜g pos ˜ostysg 1 650 t ˜omym tym pqoˇi ˜omtym pou amav ˜eqomtai sto paq ˜aqtgla E ˜oti pq ˜epei tgr sulvym˜iar, ejvqasl ˜emou se b ˜aqor svac˜iou· ma hespisho ˜um oi keptol ˜eqeier evaqloc ˜gr tgr em k ˜ocy posost ˜yseyr· ˜oti cia ma e˜imai dumat ˜g g ekastij ˜g evaqloc ˜g tgr posost ˜y- seyr aut ˜gr pq ˜epei ma pqobkevhe˜i ˜ema jahest ˜yr ait ˜gseym pou ha avoqo ˜um ep˜i tym dijaiyl ˜atym eisacyc ˜gr· ˜oti b ˜asei tym dijaiyl ˜atym aut ˜ym o epiweiqglat˜iar d ˜umatai jah ˜okg tg di ˜aqjeia tou ˜etour 1998 ma fgt ˜a pistopoigtij ˜a eisacy- c ˜gr se evaqloc ˜g tou jamomislo ˜u (EOJ) aqih. 3719/88 tgr Epitqop ˜gr, tgr 16gr Moelbq˜iou 1998, peq˜i joim ˜ym keptole- qei ˜ym evaqloc ˜gr tou jahest ˜ytor tym pistopoigtij ˜ym eisa- cyc ˜gr, enacyc ˜gr jai pqojahoqislo ˜u cia ta ceyqcij ˜a pqoˇi- ˜omta (3), ˜opyr tqopopoi ˜ghgje tekeuta˜ia ap ˜o tom jamomisl ˜o (EJ) aqih. 1404/97 (4), jai tou jamomislo ˜u (EJ) aqih. 1445/95 tgr Epitqop ˜gr tgr 26gr Ioum˜iou 1995, peq˜i keptole- qei ˜ym evaqloc ˜gr tou jahest ˜ytor tym pistopoigtij ˜ym eisa- cyc ˜gr jai enacyc ˜gr stom tol ˜ea tou boe˜iou jq ˜eator jai cia jat ˜aqcgsg tou jamomislo ˜u (EOJ) aqih. 2377/80 (5), ˜opyr tqopopoi ˜ghgje tekeuta˜ia ap ˜o tom jamomisl ˜o (EJ) aqih. 260/98 (6), pqobk ˜epomtar sucwq ˜omyr oqisl ˜emer paqejjki- tij ˜er diat ˜aneir ep˜i tou h ˜elator· ˜oti cia tom oqh ˜o ˜ekecwo tgr jatacyc ˜gr tym pqoˇi ˜omtym pq ˜epei ma apaite˜itai g upobok ˜g e˜ite em ˜or pistopoigtijo ˜u jujkovoq˜iar EUR 1 e˜ite l˜ia d ˜gkysg ep˜i tou tilokoc˜iou s ˜ulvyma le tir diat ˜aneir tou pqytoj ˜okkou aqih. 2 tgr sulvym˜iar sumeqcas˜iar· ˜oti ta l ˜etqa pou pqobk ˜epomtai stom paq ˜omta jamomisl ˜o e˜imai s ˜ulvyma le tg cm ˜ylg tgr epitqop ˜gr diawe˜iqisgr boe˜iou jq ˜eator, (1) EE L 348 tgr 18. 12. 1997, s. 1. (2) EE L 8 tgr 14. 1. 1998, s. 1. (3) EE L 331 tgr 2. 12. 1988, s. 1. (4) EE L 194 tgr 23. 7. 1997, s. 5. (5) EE L 143 tgr 27. 6. 1995, s. 35. (6) EE L 25 tgr 31. 1. 1998, s. 42. ˜Aqhqo 1 1. Cia tgm peq˜iodo ap ˜o 1gr Iamouaq˜iou ˜eyr 31 Dejel- bq˜iou 1998 amo˜icetai daslokocij ˜g pos ˜ostysg 1 650 t ˜omym oqisl ˜emym pqoˇi ˜omtym tou tol ˜ea tou boe˜iou jq ˜eator, ejvqa- sl ˜emym se b ˜aqor svac˜iou, jatacyc ˜gr Pq ˜ygm Cioucjoska- bij ˜gr Dglojqat˜iar tgr Lajedom˜iar. G pos ˜ostysg aut ˜g v ˜eqei tom a ˜unomta aqihl ˜o 09. 4505. ex 0102 90 59, 2. G eisacyc ˜g sto pka˜isio tgr posost ˜yseyr pou amav ˜e- qetai stgm paq ˜acqavo 1 epivuk ˜assetai se oqisl ˜ema fymtam ˜a f ˜ya jai oqisl ˜ema jq ˜eata pou up ˜acomtai stour jydijo ˜ur SO: — ex 0102 90 51, 0102 90 79, — ex 0201 10 00, — ex 0201 20 20, — ex 0201 20 30, — ex 0201 20 50, pou amav ˜eqomtai sto paq ˜aqtgla E tgr odgc˜iar 97/831/EJ. ex 0102 90 71 jai ex 3. Cia tom jatakocisl ˜o stgm pos ˜ostysg aut ˜g, 100 wiki ˜ocqalla fymtamo ˜u b ˜aqour isodumalo ˜um le 50 wiki ˜o- cqalla b ˜aqour svac˜iou. 4. O tekymeiaj ˜or dasl ˜or ad valorem jai ta eidij ˜a pos ˜a tym dasl ˜ym pou jahoq˜ifomtai sto joim ˜o daslok ˜ocio (JD) lei ˜ymomtai jat ˜a 80 % cia ta pqoˇi ˜omta pou eis ˜acomtai sto pka˜isio tgr posost ˜yseyr aut ˜gr. ˜Aqhqo 2 Cia ma epyvekghe˜i tou jahest ˜ytor eisacyc ˜gr pou amav ˜e- qetai sto ˜aqhqo 1, o ait ˜ym dija˜iyla eisacyc ˜gr pq ˜epei ma e˜imai vusij ˜o ˜g molij ˜o pq ˜osypo to opo˜io, jat ˜a tg sticl ˜g tgr upobok ˜gr tgr ait ˜gseyr, pq ˜epei ma apode˜inei, pqor ijamopo˜igsg tym aqlod˜iym aqw ˜ym tou sucjejqil ˜emou jq ˜atour l ˜ekour, ˜ewei asj ˜gsei jat ˜a tg di ˜aqjeia tym tekeuta˜iym d ˜ydeja lgm ˜ym l˜ia touk ˜awistom voq ˜a elpoqij ˜g dqastgqi ˜otgta stir sumakkac ˜er boe˜iou jq ˜eator le tq˜iter w ˜yqer· o ait ˜ym pq ˜epei ep˜isgr ma e˜imai eccecqall ˜emor se ˜ema ehmij ˜o lgtq ˜yo VPA. ˜oti ˜Aqhqo 3 1. G a˜itgsg woqgc ˜gseym dijaiyl ˜atym eisacyc ˜gr lpoqe˜i ma upobkghe˜i l ˜omo sto jq ˜ator l ˜ekor sto opo˜io o ait ˜ym e˜imai eccecqall ˜emor jat ˜a tgm ˜emmoia tou ˜aqhqou 2. 2. G a˜itgsg woqgc ˜gseyr dijaiyl ˜atym eisacyc ˜gr pq ˜epei ma avoq ˜a ek ˜awistg pos ˜otgta 15 t ˜omym se b ˜aqor svac˜iou wyq˜ir ma upeqba˜imei tg sumokij ˜g pos ˜otgta tgr posost ˜y- seyr. 11. 3. 98 ‹ EL ‹ Ep˜isglg Evgleq˜ida tym Euqypaˇij ˜ym Joimot ˜gtym L 72/9 3. L˜ia a˜itgsg woqgc ˜gseyr dijaiyl ˜atym eisacyc ˜gr lpoqe˜i ma upobkghe˜i l ˜omo ˜eyr tir 13 Laqt˜iou 1998. 4. L˜ia l ˜omo a˜itgsg lpoqe˜i ma upobkghe˜i ap ˜o tom ˜idio emdiaveq ˜olemo. Se peq˜iptysg upobok ˜gr ap ˜o tom ˜idio emdia- veq ˜olemo peqissot ˜eqym ait ˜gseym, ˜oker oi ait ˜gseir apoqq˜i- ptomtai. 5. Ta jq ˜atg l ˜ekg amajoim ˜ymoum stgm Epitqop ˜g, to aqc ˜o- teqo stir 20 Laqt˜iou 1998 tir upobkghe˜iser ait ˜gseir. Stgm amajo˜imysg aut ˜g pq ˜epei ma peqikalb ˜ametai o jat ˜akocor tym aito ˜umtym jai oi fgtghe˜iser pos ˜otgter. ˜Oker oi amajoim ˜yseir, sulpeqikalbamol ˜emgr tgr amajoim ˜y- seyr «jal˜ia», pqaclatopoio ˜umtai le t ˜eken ˜g tgkevytoa- mt˜icqavo wqgsilopoi ˜ymtar stgm peq˜iptysg jat ˜a tgm opo˜ia oi ait ˜gseir ˜ewoum jatatehe˜i, to ˜emtupo pou peqikalb ˜ametai sto paq ˜aqtgla tou paq ˜omtor jamomislo ˜u. ˜Aqhqo 4 G Epitqop ˜g apovas˜ifei se poio bahl ˜o lpoqe˜i ma dohe˜i sum ˜eweia stir ait ˜gseir. E ˜am oi pos ˜otgter tir opo˜ier avoqo ˜um oi ait ˜gseir upeqba˜imoum tir diah ˜esiler pos ˜otgter, g Epitqop ˜g jahoq˜ifei emia˜io posost ˜o lei ˜yseyr tym poso- t ˜gtym pou ˜ewoum fgtghe˜i. ˜Aqhqo 5 1. G eisacyc ˜g tym posot ˜gtym pou ˜ewoum jatajuqyhe˜i enaqt ˜atai ap ˜o tgm pqosj ˜olisg em ˜or ˜g peqissot ˜eqym pisto- poigtij ˜ym eisacyc ˜gr. Le tgm epiv ˜ukang tym diat ˜aneym tou paq ˜omtor jamomi- slo ˜u, evaql ˜ofomtai oi diat ˜aneir tym jamomisl ˜ym (EOJ) aqih. 3719/88 jai (EJ) aqih. 1445/95. 2. G a˜itgsg woqgc ˜gseyr pistopoigtijo ˜u lpoqe˜i ma jata- tehe˜i l ˜omo sto jq ˜ator l ˜ekor sto opo˜io o epiweiqglat˜iar ˜ewei fgt ˜gsei ta dijai ˜ylata eisacyc ˜gr. 3. Stgm a˜itgsg woqgc ˜gseyr tou pistopoigtijo ˜u jai sto pistopoigtij ˜o pq ˜epei ma peqikalb ˜amomtai oi aj ˜okouher emde˜ineir: a) stg h ˜esg 8, g ˜emdeing tgr Pq ˜ygm Cioucjoskabij ˜gr Dglojqat˜iar tgr Lajedom˜iar· to pistopoigtij ˜o dgli- ouqce˜i tgm upowq ˜eysg eisacyc ˜gr ap ˜o tgm w ˜yqa aut ˜g· b) stg h ˜esg 20, o a ˜unym aqihl ˜or 09. 4505 jah ˜yr jai l˜ia touk ˜awistom ap ˜o tir aj ˜okouher emde˜ineir: — Reglamento (CE) no 546/98 — Forordning (EF) nr. 546/98 — Verordnung (EG) Nr. 546/98 — Jamomisl ˜or (EJ) aqih. 546/98 — Regulation (EC) No 546/98 — R(cid:138)glement (CE) no 546/98 — Regolamento (CE) n. 546/98 — Verordening (EG) nr. 546/98 — Regulamento (CE) nº 546/98 — Asetus (EY) N:o 546/98 — F(cid:148)rordning (EG) nr 546/98. 4. Jat ˜a paq ˜ejjkisg ap ˜o to ˜aqhqo 8 paq ˜acqavor 4 tou jamomislo ˜u (EOJ) aqih. 3719/88, o dasl ˜or tou joimo ˜u daslokoc˜iou pou isw ˜uei jat ˜a tgm gleqolgm˜ia h ˜eseyr se eke ˜uheqg jujkovoq˜ia eispq ˜attetai sto aj ˜eqaio cia ˜oker tir pos ˜otgter pou upeqba˜imoum eje˜imer pou amacq ˜avomtai ep˜i tou pistopoigtijo ˜u eisacyc ˜gr. 5. Jat ˜a paq ˜ejjkisg ap ˜o to ˜aqhqo 3 tou jamomislo ˜u (EJ) aqih. 1445/95, ta pistopoigtij ˜a eisacyc ˜gr pou ˜ewoum sumtawhe˜i s ˜ulvyma le tom paq ˜omta jamomisl ˜o isw ˜uoum ˜eyr tir 31 Dejelbq˜iou 1998. Ta ejdid ˜olema pistopoigtij ˜a isw ˜uoum se ok ˜ojkgqg 6. tgm Joim ˜otgta. ˜Aqhqo 6 Ta pqoˇi ˜omta epyveko ˜umtai tym dasl ˜ym pou amav ˜eqomtai sto ˜aqhqo 1 let ˜a ap ˜o pqosj ˜olisg e˜ite em ˜or pistopoigtijo ˜u jujkovoq˜iar EUR 1 pou ejd˜idetai ap ˜o tgm w ˜yqa enacyc ˜gr, s ˜ulvyma le tir diat ˜aneir tou pqytoj ˜okkou aqih. 2 pou episum ˜aptetai stg sulvym˜ia sumeqcas˜iar, e˜ite liar dgk ˜y- seyr ep˜i tilokoc˜iou g opo˜ia sumt ˜assetai ap ˜o tom enacy- c ˜ea s ˜ulvyma le tir diat ˜aneir tou em k ˜ocy pqytoj ˜okkou. ˜Aqhqo 7 O paq ˜ym jamomisl ˜or aqw˜ifei ma isw ˜uei tgm tq˜itg gl ˜eqa ap ˜o tg dglos˜ieus ˜g tou stgm Ep˜isglg Evgleq˜ida tym Euqy- paˇij˜ym Joimot˜gtym. Evaql ˜ofetai ap ˜o tgm 1g Iamouaq˜iou 1998. O paq ˜ym jamomisl ˜or e˜imai desleutij ˜or yr pqor ˜oka ta l ˜eqg tou jai isw ˜uei ˜alesa se j ˜ahe jq ˜ator l ˜ekor. Bqun ˜ekker, 10 Laqt˜iou 1998. Cia tgm Epitqop˜g Franz FISCHLER L˜ekor tgr Epitqop˜gr L 72/10 ‹ EL ‹ Ep˜isglg Evgleq˜ida tym Euqypaˇij ˜ym Joimot ˜gtym 11. 3. 98 PAQAQTGLA Van aqih. : (32-2) 296 60 27 Evaqloc ˜g tou jamomislo ˜u (EJ) aqih. 546/98 A ˜unym aqihl ˜or: 09. 4505 EPITQOPG TYM EUQYPA˘IJYM JOIMOTGTYM CD VI/D. 2 — TOLEAS BOEIOU JQEATOS AITGSG DIJAIYLATYM EISACYCGS Gleqolgm˜ia:. Peq˜iodor:. Jq ˜ator l ˜ekor:. Aqihl ˜or tou aito ˜umtor (1) Ait ˜ym ( ˜omola jai die ˜uhumsg) Pos ˜otgter S ˜umoko Jq ˜ator l ˜ekor:. van aqih. :. tgk ˜evymo aqih. :. (1) A ˜unousa aq˜ihlgsg


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 652/98 von Gerardo FERNÁNDEZ-ALBOR an die Kommission. Beteiligung galicischer Unternehmen am Gemeinschaftsprogramm Al-Invest

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Galicia
Latin America
extra-EU trade
inter-company agreement
inter-company cooperation
international cooperation
sectoral agreement

text: C 310/112 DE Amtsblatt der Europa¤ischen Gemeinschaften 9. 10. 98 (98/C 310/148) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-0650/98 von Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) an die Kommission (10. Ma¤rz 1998) Betrifft: Inhaftierung eines kurdischen Parteivorsitzenden in der Tu¤rkei Hamdi Touranli, Vorsitzender der Demokratischen Partei von Nord-Kurdistan (PDK), wurde von den tu¤rkischen Beho¤rden am 13. Januar festgenommen und in Ankara inhaftiert. Herr Touranli hat eine Haftstrafe von 22 Jahren vor sich und ist an Krebs erkrankt, der sta¤ndige a¤rztliche Betreuung erforderlich macht. Amnesty International forderte am 16. Januar die Freilassung von Herrn Touranli; auch der deutsche Au(cid:223)enminister Kinkel intervenierte (u¤ber die Deutsche Botschaft in Ankara) zugunsten der Freilassung des kurdischen Parteifu¤hrers, der (neben der tu¤rkischen) die deutsche Staatsbu¤rgerschaft besitzt. Kann die Europa¤ische Kommission ihren offiziellen Standpunkt in dieser Angelegenheit mitteilen? Welche Schritte will sie bei den tu¤rkischen Stellen unternehmen, damit der krebskranke kurdische Freiheitska¤mpfer aus der Haft entlassen wird und in diesem Land den unmenschlichen Terrorhandlungen gegen die Kurden ein Ende bereitet wird? Antwort von Herrn Van den Broek im Namen der Kommission (20. April 1998) Die Kommission ist im Fall von Herrn Turanli auf dem laufenden. Dieser wurde am 26. Februar 1998 vorla¤ufig freigelassen. In allen Kontakten mit der tu¤rkischen Regierung besteht die Kommission bei ihren Gespra¤chspartnern darauf, da(cid:223) es notwendig ist, die Menschenrechtssituation zu verbessern und den Demokratisierungsproze(cid:223) in diesem Land weiter zu verfolgen. Trotz der Entscheidung Ankaras, den politischen Dialog mit der Gemeinschaft zu unterbrechen, will die Kommission auch weiterhin auf diesem Punkt bestehen. Was vor allem die Situation im Su¤dosten der Tu¤rkei anbelangt, so hat die Kommission mehrmals betont, da(cid:223) es notwendig ist, dieses Problem mit zivilen und nichtmilita¤rischen Mitteln zu lo¤sen sowie die Beka¤mpfung des Terrorismus im Rahmen der Wahrung der Grundsa¤tze des Rechtsstaates und der Achtung der Menschenrechte fortzusetzen. Die Kommission mo¤chte im u¤brigen im Rahmen des MEDA-Programms zur sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung dieser Region beitragen, indem sie Mittel fu¤r darauf ausgerichtete Projekte bereitstellt. (98/C 310/149) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-0652/98 von Gerardo Ferna·ndez-Albor (PPE) an die Kommission (10. Ma¤rz 1998) Betrifft: Beteiligung galicischer Unternehmen am Gemeinschaftsprogramm Al-Invest Im Rahmen des Programms Al-Invest, dessen Ziel darin besteht, den Handel, das Know-how sowie den Technologie- und Finanztransfer zu fo¤rdern, konnten in den ersten beiden Jahren seines Bestehens 40 Treffen zwischen Unternehmern veranstaltet und weitere 60 geplant werden, und zwar mit einem Umsatz von 250 Mio. Ecu. Die engen Beziehungen zwischen der spanischen Region Galicien und Iberoamerika ebenso wie die wechselseitige Abha¤ngigkeit der Volkswirtschaften dieser beiden Regionen sind allgemein bekannt, wie auch aus den aufeinanderfolgenden Statistiken hervorgeht; daher ist das genannte Gemeinschaftsprogramm fu¤r diese Region, die so freundschaftliche Beziehungen zu Iberoamerika unterha¤lt, von ganz besonderer Bedeutung. Ko¤nnte die Kommission mitteilen, wie sich das genannte Gemeinschaftsprogramm auf die Beziehungen zwischen Galicien und Iberoamerika ausgewirkt hat, wie viele Treffen zwischen Unternehmern in Galicien stattgefunden haben und in welchem Ausma(cid:223) Galicien am Gesamtprogramm beteiligt ist?


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 654/98 do Deputado Esko SEPPÄNEN à Comissão. Limitação da utilização de antibióticos em animais na Finlândia e na Suécia

text: C 354/18 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 19. 11. 98 (98/C 354/44) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0654/98 apresentada por Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (10 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Limita(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de antibio·ticos em animais na Finla(cid:136)ndia e na Sue·cia Nas negocia(cid:231)o(cid:152)es de adesa(cid:152)o a‘ UE, a Finla(cid:136)ndia e a Sue·cia foram autorizadas a aplicar limites mais rigorosos na utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de antibio·ticos em animais do que os vigentes nos antigos Estados-membros. Foi conferida essa autoriza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o em virtude de a utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o inadequada de antibio·ticos tornar as bacte·rias resistentes a va·rios antibio·ticos de que as pessoas necessitam. Tenciona a Comissa(cid:152)o autorizar so· a Finla(cid:136)ndia e a Sue·cia a implementar essas disposi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es particulares ou estara· a definir limites a‘ utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de antibio·ticos tambe·m noutros pa(cid:14)·ses, o que seria fundamentado? Resposta dada por Franz Fischler em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (22 de Abril de 1998) As disposi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es previstas no Acto de Adesa(cid:152)o na(cid:152)o permitem que a Comissa(cid:152)o prorrogue o regime especial de que gozam, actualmente, a Finla(cid:136)ndia e a Sue·cia no que se refere a‘ utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos antibio·ticos no respectivo territo·rio. A Comissa(cid:152)o tem a obriga(cid:231)a(cid:152)o, por for(cid:231)a do Acto de Adesa(cid:152)o, de decidir em rela(cid:231)a(cid:152)o ao fundamento dos motivos que lhe foram apresentados pela Finla(cid:136)ndia e pela Sue·cia para justificarem a proibi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o parcial ou total dos antibio·ticos autorizados como aditivos na alimenta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para animais pela Directiva 70/524/CEE do Conselho, de 23 de Novembro de 1970, relativa aos aditivos na alimenta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para animais (1). Se a Finla(cid:136)ndia e a Sue·cia demonstrarem cientificamente os riscos invocados, a Comissa(cid:152)o devera· proibir, em toda a Comunidade, a utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos antibio·ticos em causa. Caso contra·rio, a Comissa(cid:152)o na(cid:152)o podera· deixar de convidar os dois Estados-membros a adiarem a aplica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dessas proibi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es. De qualquer modo, a Comissa(cid:152)o tem a inten(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de pedir um parecer ao comite· cient(cid:14)·fico competente. (1) JO L 270 de 14. 12. 1970. (98/C 354/45) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0656/98 apresentada por Ste·phane Buffetaut (I-EDN) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (10 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Ajudas a‘ constru(cid:231)a(cid:152)o naval As autoridades norte-americanas anunciaram que tinham a inten(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de reactivar o estaleiro naval de Filade·lfia recorrendo a subven(cid:231)o(cid:152)es maci(cid:231)as, o que constitui uma flagrante viola(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do acordo OCDE, que inclui uma cla·usula que determina a suspensa(cid:152)o («standstill») das medidas de ajuda. A Comissa(cid:152)o considerara esta medida suficientemente vinculativa para se coibir de aumentar os limites ma·ximos da ajuda a‘ constru(cid:231)a(cid:152)o naval na Europa. Poderia a Comissa(cid:152)o indicar se tenciona aplicar na Europa, no quadro de um acordo OCDE rejeitado pela Assembleia Nacional francesa, medidas restritivas que os seus pro·prios parceiros na(cid:152)o aplicam? Resposta dada por Karel Van Miert em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (8 de Abril de 1998) A designada cla·usula de suspensa(cid:152)o, referida pelo Senhor Deputado, na(cid:152)o faz parte do acordo da Organiza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o para a Coopera(cid:231)a(cid:152)o e Desenvolvimento Econo·mico (OCDE), que na(cid:152)o entrou em vigor, mas antes do acto final das negocia(cid:231)o(cid:152)es destinadas a esse acordo. Em conformidade com as respectivas disposi(cid:231)o(cid:152)es, as diversas partes concordaram em na(cid:152)o aumentar os n(cid:14)·veis dos subs(cid:14)·dios existentes ou na(cid:152)o introduzirem novas medidas de apoio na pende(cid:136)ncia da entrada em vigor do acordo. A Comissa(cid:152)o partilha da preocupa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do Senhor Deputado relativamente a‘ aparente inobserva(cid:136)ncia do que foi combinado com os Estados Unidos. A Comissa(cid:152)o escreveu a‘s autoridades americanas solicitando explica(cid:231)o(cid:152)es adicionais e pormenores quanto ao conteu·do das combina(cid:231)o(cid:152)es e a‘ sua conformidade com a cla·usula de suspen(cid:231)a(cid:152)o


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 649/98 van Daniela RASCHHOFER aan de Commissie. Drankaccijns

eurovoc_concepts:
Austria
EU law - national law
VAT
alcoholic beverage
application of EU law
catering industry
exchange of information
infringement of EU law
infringement procedure (EU)
tax system

formats: html print


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 671/98 του Antoni GUTIERREZ DIAZ προς την Επ τροπή. Όροι αναβάθμισης της ειδικότητας των ισπανών τεχνολόγων μηχανικών σε σύγκριση με άλλες περιπτώσεις

text: 19. 11. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 354/13 (98/C 354/24) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0643/98 ypobolh· : Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) prow thn Epitroph· (9 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a·llew periptv· seiw Gia poio· lo·go pro·suese h Epitroph· sthn ispanikh· e·kdosh thw prokh·ryjhw tvn genikv· n diagvnismv· n COM/A/720 kai COM/A/721 (EE C 52 A, thw 28. 2. 1991) thn apai·thsh na kate·xoyn oi ypoch·fioi e·nan «anv· tero» ti·tlo spoydv· n, env· den pro·bale thn i·dia apai·thsh stiw ypo·loipew glvssike·w ekdo·seiw thw proanaferuei·saw prokh·ryjhw; (98/C 354/25) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0644/98 ypobolh· : Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) prow thn Epitroph· (9 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a·llew periptv· seiw Gia poio· lo·go h Epitroph· proba·llei sthn peri·ptvsh toy k. Vicente Alonso Morales, ypochfi·oy sto geniko· diagvnismo· COM/A/1047 (EE C 145 A, thw 13. 5. 1997) apai·thsh poy den perilamba·netai sto kei·meno thw prokh·ryjhw, h·toi na kate·xei ti·tlo spoydv· n pentaetoy·w foi·thshw; (98/C 354/26) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0645/98 ypobolh·: Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) prow thn Epitroph· (9 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a·llew periptv· seiw Gia poio· lo·go h Epitroph· pro·suese sthn ispanikh· e·kdosh thw prokh·ryjhw toy genikoy· diagvnismoy· (COM/A/1047 (EE C 145 A, thw 13. 5. 1997) thn apai·thsh gia katoxh· «panepisthmiakoy·» ti·tloy spoydv· n kai den e·praje to i·dio kai sth germanikh· e·kdosh thw i·diaw prokh·ryjhw; (98/C 354/27) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0669/98 ypobolh· : Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) prow thn Epitroph· (10 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a·llew periptv· seiw Alhuey·ei o·ti h Epitroph· ka·nei h· e·xei ka·nei dekte·w tiw aith·seiw ypochfio·thtaw kato·xvn toy Fachhochschuldip- lom se genikoy·w diagvnismoy·w gia thn plh·rvsh ue·sevn A/LA sta koinotika· uesmika· o·rgana; (98/C 354/28) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0670/98 ypobolh· : Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) prow thn Epitroph· (10 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a·llew periptv· seiw Uevrei· h Epitroph· o·ti o ti·tlow spoydv· n Fachhochschuldiplom ei·nai o anv· terow ti·tlow sth Germani·a, h· mh·pvw pistey·ei o·ti o anv· terow ti·tlow spoydv· n sth xv· ra ayth· ei·nai to Hochschuldiplom; (98/C 354/29) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0671/98 ypobolh·: Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) prow thn Epitroph· (10 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:211)roi anaba·umishw thw eidiko·thtaw tvn ispanv· n texnolo·gvn mhxanikv· n se sy·gkrish me a· llew periptv· seiw Pistey·ei h Epitroph· o·ti o ti·tlow spoydv· n Fachhochschuldiplom apotelei· anv· tero proso·n e·nanti toy ti·tloy toy «texnolo·goy mhxanikoy·»; Gia poio· lo·go;


title: Resolution on the euro and tourism

eurovoc_concepts: euro tourism


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 669/98 af Antoni GUTIÉRREZ DÍAZ til Kommissionen. Forfremmelsesvilkår for spanske "Ingenieros Técnicos" i forhold til andre kategorier

text: 19. 11. 98 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende C 354/13 (98/C 354/24) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0643/98 af Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) til Kommissionen (9. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Hvorfor har Kommissionen i den spanske version af indkaldelsen af ansłgninger til de almindelige udv(cid:230)lgelsesprłver KOM/A/720 og KOM/A/721 (EFT C 52 A af 28. 2. 1991) indfłjet et krav om besiddelse af et eksamensbevis for en »hłjere« uddannelse, n(cid:229)r et s(cid:229)dant krav ikke figurerer i de łvrige sprogversioner af omtalte indkaldelse? (98/C 354/25) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0644/98 af Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) til Kommissionen (9. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Hvad har f(cid:229)et Kommissionen til at frems(cid:230)tte et krav, der ikke fremg(cid:229)r af ordlyden i indkaldelsen › nemlig besiddelse af et eksamensbevis for en uddannelse med et langt uddannelsesforlłb (svarende til kandidateksa- men) › til Vicente Alonso Morales, Ingeniero Te·cnico, der er kandidat til den almindelige udv(cid:230)lgelsesprłve KOM/A/1047 (EFT C 145 A fra 13. 5. 1997)? (98/C 354/26) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0645/98 af Jorge Hernandez Mollar (PPE) til Kommissionen (9. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Med hvilken begrundelse har Kommissionen indfłjet et krav om besiddelse af et eksamensbevis for en »universitets«-uddannelse i den spanske version af indkaldelsen af ansłgninger til den almindelige udv(cid:230)lgel- sesprłve KOM/A/1047 (EFT C 145 A fra 13. 5. 1997), n(cid:229)r den ikke har indfłjet det samme krav i den tyske udgave af ovenn(cid:230)vnte indkaldelse til udv(cid:230)lgelsesprłven? (98/C 354/27) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0669/98 af Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) til Kommissionen (10. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Er det rigtigt, at Kommissionen godkender eller har godkendt ansłgninger fra indehavere af et »Fachhochs- chuldiplom« om deltagelse i almindelige udv(cid:230)lgelsesprłver til bes(cid:230)ttelse af stillinger som EU-tjenestem(cid:230)nd i kategorien A/LA? (98/C 354/28) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0670/98 af Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) til Kommissionen (10. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Finder Kommissionen, at uddannelsen med »Fachhochschuldiplom« er den hłjeste uddannelse i Tyskland, eller mener den, at universitetsuddannelsen med »Hochschuldiplom« er den hłjeste uddannelse i den p(cid:229)g(cid:230)ldende medlemsstat? (98/C 354/29) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0671/98 af Antoni Gutie·rrez D(cid:14)·az (GUE/NGL) til Kommissionen (10. marts 1998) Om: Forfremmelsesvilk(cid:229)r for spanske »Ingenieros Te·cnicos« i forhold til andre kategorier Er Kommissionen af den opfattelse, at eksamensbeviset »Fachhochschuldiplom« er udtryk for bedre kvalifikationer end uddannelsen til »Ingeniero Te·cnico«? I bekr(cid:230)ftende fald, hvorfor?