title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1022/98 by José APOLINÁRIO to the Commission. Structural Funds and the outermost regions

eurovoc_concepts:
Structural Funds
cross-border cooperation
equal treatment
island region
peripheral region
regional cooperation
rural development

text: C 386/72 Euroopan yhteis(cid:246)jen virallinen lehti FI 11. 12. 98 Perinteiseen tapaan Euroopan kulttuurikaupungille my(cid:246)nnett(cid:228)v(cid:228)n yhteis(cid:246)n tuen tarkka m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228) ilmoitetaan asianomaisen varainhoitovuoden alussa. Kun otetaan huomioon kulttuuribudjetin rahoitusn(cid:228)kym(cid:228)t, on syyt(cid:228) kuitenkin muistuttaa, ett(cid:228) yhteis(cid:246)n tuen osuus on v(cid:228)ist(cid:228)m(cid:228)tt(cid:228) vain symbolinen. (98/C 386/094) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-1019/98 esitt(cid:228)j(cid:228)(t): Freddy Blak (PSE) komissiolle (6. huhtikuuta 1998) Aihe: Nuorten alkoholin kulutus Tanskassa Onko komissio tietoinen siit(cid:228), ett(cid:228) tanskalaisilla nuorilla on kutakuinkin alkoholin kulutuksen maailmanenn(cid:228)tys? Mit(cid:228) aloitteita komissio on toteuttanut vastustaakseen alkoholin v(cid:228)(cid:228)rink(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)(cid:228) j(cid:228)senvaltioiden nuorten keskuu- dessa? Aikooko komissio ryhty(cid:228) erityistoimiin korjatakseen tilanteen Tanskassa, miss(cid:228) ongelma n(cid:228)ht(cid:228)v(cid:228)sti on suurempi kuin muissa j(cid:228)senvaltioissa? Komission j(cid:228)senen PÆdraig Flynnin komission puolesta antama vastaus (11. toukokuuta 1998) Komissio on hyvin perill(cid:228) alkoholin kulutuksen m(cid:228)(cid:228)rist(cid:228) j(cid:228)senvaltioissa ja tuntee my(cid:246)s tilanteen Tanskassa. Komissio on huolissaan lis(cid:228)(cid:228)ntyvist(cid:228) ongelmista, joita lasten ja nuorten alkoholink(cid:228)ytt(cid:246) ja erityisesti alkoholi- pitoisten virvoitusjuomien v(cid:228)(cid:228)rink(cid:228)ytt(cid:246) aiheuttavat j(cid:228)senvaltioissa. Komissio on neuvotellut j(cid:228)senvaltioiden kanssa alkoholin myynnin, markkinoinnin ja mainonnan k(cid:228)yt(cid:228)nnes(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ist(cid:228) alaik(cid:228)isten alkoholink(cid:228)ytt(cid:246)ongel- man ratkaisemiseksi. T(cid:228)t(cid:228) pidet(cid:228)(cid:228)n j(cid:228)rkevimp(cid:228)n(cid:228) menettelytapana t(cid:228)ss(cid:228) vaiheessa. Komissiolla ei ole toimivaltaa ryhty(cid:228) erityistoimiin yksitt(cid:228)isiss(cid:228) j(cid:228)senvaltioissa. (98/C 386/095) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS P-1022/98 esitt(cid:228)j(cid:228)(t): JosØ ApolinÆrio (PSE) komissiolle (26. maaliskuuta 1998) Aihe: Rakennerahastot ja EU:n j(cid:228)senvaltioiden ulkoalueet Uuden unionisopimuksen › Amsterdamin sopimus › tekstiss(cid:228) esiintyy k(cid:228)site ulkoalueet. Analysoitaessa Agenda 2000 -asiakirjaa ja k(cid:228)ytett(cid:228)viss(cid:228) olevia tietoja rakennerahastoja koskevista uusista s(cid:228)(cid:228)nn(cid:246)ist(cid:228) huomataan, ett(cid:228) komission ehdotuksissa ei ole otettu huomioon Amsterdamin sopimuksen n(cid:228)it(cid:228) alueita koskevia m(cid:228)(cid:228)r(cid:228)yksi(cid:228). Voiko komissio tarkentaa, miten se aikoo suhtautua unionin j(cid:228)senvaltioiden ulkoalueisiin, erityisesti A(cid:231)oreihin? Ottaen huomioon, ett(cid:228) REGIS-aloite p(cid:228)(cid:228)ttyy pian, eik(cid:246) komissio ole sit(cid:228) mielt(cid:228), ett(cid:228) sen s(cid:228)(cid:228)nt(cid:246)ehdotuksissa ulkoalueet ovat j(cid:228)(cid:228)neet vaille riitt(cid:228)v(cid:228)(cid:228) huomiota?


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 933/98 dell'on. Giuseppe RAUTI alla Commissione. Vendita dei "Luoghi storici" del regno del sud d'Italia

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Italy
cultural heritage
cultural policy
heritage protection
historic site
public property
sale

formats: html print


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 880/98 του Nikitas KAKLAMANIS Προβλήματα στην ελεύθερη διακίνηση για την απόκτηση ειδικότητας ιατρικής στην Ε.Ε. (Συμπληρωματ κή απάντηση)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
doctor
freedom of movement
freedom to provide services
medical specialisation
professional qualifications
recognition of diplomas
right of establishment
vocational training

formats: html pdf print

text: 21. 12. 1999 EL Επι΄σηµη Εφηµερι΄δα των Ευρωπαι¨κω΄ν Κοινοτη΄των C 370/3 Συµπληρωµατικη΄ απα΄ντηση του κ. Flynn εξ ονο΄µατος της Ευρωπαι¨κη΄ς Επιτροπη΄ς (29 Ιουνι΄ου 1999) Πε΄ραν της απα΄ντηση΄ς της της 5ης Ιουνι΄ου 1998 (1), η Ευρωπαι¨κη΄ Επιτροπη΄ ει΄ναι ση΄µερα σε θε΄ση να παρα΄σχει τις ακο΄λουθες συµπληρωµατικε΄ς πληροφορι΄ες. Η απο΄φαση της Επιτροπη΄ς να φε΄ρει ενω΄πιον του ∆ικαστηρι΄ου το ζη΄τηµα της µεταχει΄ρισης των λεκτο΄ρων ξε΄νης γλω΄σσας στα ιταλικα΄ πανεπιστη΄µια µε βα΄ση το α΄ρθρο 226 της Συνθη΄κης ΕΚ (πρω΄ην α΄ρθρο 169) δεν επηρεα΄σθηκε απο΄ δηµοσιευ΄µατα στον Τυ΄πο. Η απο΄φαση της Επιτροπη΄ς βασι΄ζεται σε νοµικα΄ επιχειρη΄µατα και σε ε΄γγραφες αποδει΄ξεις που προκυ΄πτουν απο΄ την ε΄ρευνα΄ της στο πλαι΄σιο του φακε΄λου της εν λο΄γω παρα΄βασης. Απο΄ νοµικη΄ α΄ποψη, η Επιτροπη΄ θεµελι΄ωσε την απο΄φαση΄ της στο γεγονο΄ς ο΄τι υπη΄ρξαν ουσιω΄δεις αποδει΄ξεις ο΄τι τα κεκτηµε΄να δικαιω΄µατα των λεκτο΄ρων ξε΄νης γλω΄σσας δεν ε΄χουν κατοχυρωθει΄ ο΄πως πρε΄πει σε ορισµε΄να ιταλικα΄ πανεπιστη΄µια. (1) ΕΕ C 310 της 15. 12. 1998. (1999/C 370/004) ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ E-0870/98 υποβολη΄: Gerhard Hager (NI) προς την Επιτροπη΄ (26 Μαρτι΄ου 1998) Θε΄µα: Νοµιµοποι΄ηση των παρα΄νοµων µεταναστω΄ν Η ε΄κθεση που εγκρι΄θηκε στο πλαι΄σιο της Ολοµε΄λειας του Φεβρουαρι΄ου σχετικα΄ µε την κατα΄σταση των ανθρωπι΄νων δικαιωµα΄των στην Ευρωπαι¨κη΄ Ένωση κατα΄ το 1996, ανε΄φερε ρητα΄ ορισµε΄να κρα΄τη µε΄λη, τα οποι΄α µετα΄ απο΄ µι΄α συγκεκριµε΄νη προθεσµι΄α νοµιµοποιου΄ν το καθεστω΄ς σε ο΄,τι αφορα΄ τα δικαιω΄µατα διαµονη΄ς των ατο΄µων που ευρι΄σκονται παρανο΄µως στην επικρα΄τεια΄ τους. Θεωρει΄ η Επιτροπη΄ ο΄τι ο τρο΄πος δρα΄σεως των εν λο΄γω κρατω΄ν µελω΄ν ευρι΄σκεται σε αντι΄θεση µε την 1. υφιστα΄µενη νοµοθετικη΄ κατα΄σταση στην Ένωση; Πιστευ΄ει η Επιτροπη΄ ο΄τι αυτη΄ η διαδικασι΄α των εν λο΄γω κρατω΄ν µελω΄ν ει΄ναι αντι΄θετη µε τις συµφωνι΄ες του 2. Schengen; Τι προτι΄θεται να πρα΄ξει σχετικα΄ η Επιτροπη΄ λαµβα΄νοντας υπο΄ψη την ενσωµα΄τωση του κεκτηµε΄νου της 3. συµφωνι΄ας του Schengen στην Ευρωπαι¨κη΄ Ένωση καθω΄ς επι΄σης και την υ΄παρξη παροµοι΄ων διαφορω΄ν; Συµπληρωµατικη΄ απα΄ντηση του κυρι΄ου Monti εξ ονο΄µατος της Επιτροπη΄ς (28 Ιουνι΄ου 1999) Ου΄τε η νοµοθεσι΄α της Ένωσης, ου΄τε το κεκτηµε΄νο του Schengen που µο΄λις ενσωµατω΄θηκε στο κοινοτικο΄ πλαι΄σιο αντιτα΄σσονται στη νοµιµοποι΄ηση απο΄ ε΄να κρα΄τος µε΄λος της κατα΄στασης των παρα΄νοµων µεταναστω΄ν που βρι΄σκονται στο ε΄δαφο΄ς του. (1999/C 370/005) ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ E-0880/98 υποβολη΄: Nikitas Kaklamanis (UPE) προς την Επιτροπη΄ (26 Μαρτι΄ου 1998) Θε΄µα: Προβλη΄µατα στην ελευ΄θερη διακι΄νηση για την απο΄κτηση ειδικο΄τητας ιατρικη΄ς στην Ε. Ε. Η Οδηγι΄α 93/16 (1) ε΄χει δηµιουργη΄σει προβλη΄µατα αναφορικα΄ µε την απο΄κτηση ειδικο΄τητας ιατρικη΄ς στα κρα΄τη µε΄λη της Ε. Ε. Πιο συγκεκριµε΄να, ενω΄ πριν απο΄ την ε΄ναρξη ισχυ΄ος της Οδηγι΄ας αυτη΄ς (Απρι΄λιος 1993) η΄ταν δυνατο΄ να αναγνωρισθει΄ στην Ελλα΄δα το πτυχι΄ο που αποκτου΄σε κα΄ποιος π. χ. στην Αυστρι΄α, και ακολου΄θως να λα΄βει την α΄δεια ασκη΄σεως επαγγε΄λµατος για να κα΄νει την ειδικο΄τητα στην Ελλα΄δα, µε την Οδηγι΄α αυτη΄ η ρυ΄θµιση


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 831/98 by Pedro MARSET CAMPOS to the Commission. Anti-social measures by the Murcia local authorities in the zone where the URBAN project is being implemented and neighbouring areas (Spain)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Region of Murcia
Roma
aid to disadvantaged groups
housing
housing policy
living conditions
marginalisation
socially disadvantaged class
standard of living

text: 22. 12. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 402/37 Kommissionen anser att det (cid:228)r medlemsstaternas sak att v(cid:228)lja v(cid:228)g i fr(cid:229)ga om k(cid:228)rnkraften. Vad betr(cid:228)ffar den svenska regeringens beslut att st(cid:228)nga k(cid:228)rnkraftverket i Barseb(cid:228)ck kan kommissionen meddela att ett klagom(cid:229)l inkommit i enlighet med gemenskapens konkurrensregler. Eftersom detta klagom(cid:229)l fortfarande (cid:228)r f(cid:246)rem(cid:229)l f(cid:246)r utredning kan kommissionen inte f(cid:246)ruts(cid:228)ga vilka slutsatser som kommer att dras. (1) KOM(95) 682 slutlig. (98/C 402/045) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0828/98 fr(cid:229)n Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (26 mars 1998) ˜mne: ¯terbetalning av momsskuld till bomullsodlare I Grekland sker moms(cid:229)terbetalningen till bomullsodlarna i form av en klumpsumma motsvarande 3,5 %. Medansvarsavgiften skall inte dras ifr(cid:229)n den summa p(cid:229) vilken (cid:229)terbetalningen av momsen ber(cid:228)knas. F(cid:246)r perioden 1990-1995 begick den grekiska staten ett misstag vid (cid:229)terbetalningen av momsen till bomulls- odlarna, n(cid:229)got som den ocks(cid:229) sj(cid:228)lv medgivit. Momsen (cid:229)terbetalades utan att medansvarsavgiften var medtagen i den summa (cid:229)terbetalningen ber(cid:228)knades p(cid:229), vilket lett till att bomullsodlarnas inkomster har lidit skada. Den grekiska regeringen v(cid:228)grar nu att (cid:229)terbetala momsen p(cid:229) summan f(cid:246)r medansvarsavgiften f(cid:246)r perioden 1990- 1995, med motiveringen att tillk(cid:228)nnagivandet till gemenskapen avseende moms(cid:229)terbetalningen till jordbrukare redan (cid:228)r avslutad och att det saknas prejudikat f(cid:246)r ett (cid:229)terupptagande av fr(cid:229)gan, eftersom det inte stadgas om n(cid:229)got s(cid:229)dant f(cid:246)rfarande inom EU. Mot bakgrund av att de grekiska bomullsodlarna har lidit skada p(cid:229) grund av n(cid:229)got som den grekiska staten b(cid:228)r ansvaret f(cid:246)r, avser kommissionen att i samarbete med den grekiska regeringen utreda fr(cid:229)gan om (cid:229)terbetalning av momsskulden avseende summan f(cid:246)r medansvarsavgiften f(cid:246)r (cid:229)ren 1990-1995? Svar fr(cid:229)n Mario Monti P(cid:229) kommissionens v(cid:228)gnar (6 maj 1998) Enligt artikel 25 i r(cid:229)dets sj(cid:228)tte direktiv 77/388/EEG av den 17 maj 1977 om harmonisering av medlemsstaternas lagstiftning r(cid:246)rande oms(cid:228)ttningsskatter › Gemensamt system f(cid:246)r merv(cid:228)rdesskatt: enhetlig ber(cid:228)kningsgrund (1) f(cid:229)r medlemsstaterna till(cid:228)mpa ett s(cid:228)rskilt beskattningssystem f(cid:246)r sm(cid:229) jordbruk. I artikel 25 anges att ett system med schablonregler kan anv(cid:228)ndas f(cid:246)r att kompensera schablonbeskattade jordbrukare f(cid:246)r den ing(cid:229)ende merv(cid:228)rdesskatt som de betalar. Kompensationstalen best(cid:228)ms av medlemsstaterna p(cid:229) grundval av makroekon- omiska statistiska uppgifter. Dessa tal f(cid:229)r inte anv(cid:228)ndas f(cid:246)r att ge jordbrukare (cid:229)terbetalningar som (cid:228)r st(cid:246)rre (cid:228)n den ing(cid:229)ende merv(cid:228)rdesskatten. Medlemsstaterna kan dock v(cid:228)lja att minska dessa procenttal till noll. De grekiska schablonbeskattade jordbrukarna f(cid:229)r sin kompensation genom en statlig (cid:229)terbetalning. Jordbrukarna f(cid:229)r enligt artikel 25 beg(cid:228)ra att de normala merv(cid:228)rdesskattereglerna till(cid:228)mpas p(cid:229) dem. Mot denna bakgrund finns det inga sk(cid:228)l f(cid:246)r kommissionen att tillsammans med Grekland unders(cid:246)ka fr(cid:229)gan om (cid:229)terbetalning f(cid:246)r den ifr(cid:229)gavarande perioden. (1) EGT L 145, 13. 6. 1977. (98/C 402/046) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0831/98 fr(cid:229)n Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (26 mars 1998) ˜mne: Antisociala (cid:229)tg(cid:228)rder i kommunen Murcia i det omr(cid:229)de som Urban-projektet skall genomf(cid:246)ras och angr(cid:228)nsande omr(cid:229)den (Spanien) Europeiska kommissionen h(cid:229)ller p(cid:229) att behandla ett godk(cid:228)nnande av Urban-planen i kommunen Murcia. Urban (cid:246)r framf(cid:246)r allt inriktat p(cid:229) stadsdelar med l(cid:229)g levnadsstandard, h(cid:246)g grad av social utslagning, brist p(cid:229) sociala


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 1022/98 do Deputado José APOLINÁRIO à Comissão. Os Fundos Estruturais e as regiões ultraperiféricas

text: C 386/72 Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias PT 11. 12. 98 A divulga(cid:231)ªo do montante preciso da contribui(cid:231)ªo comunitÆria atribu(cid:237)da (cid:224) «Capital Europeia da Cultura» serÆ feita, como habitualmente, no final do processo or(cid:231)amental do ano correspondente. Tendo em conta as perspectivas financeiras do or(cid:231)amento cultural, importa contudo recordar que a contribui(cid:231)ªo comunitÆria para este tipo de manifesta(cid:231)ªo se revestirÆ necessariamente de carÆcter simb(cid:243)lico. (98/C 386/094) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-1019/98 apresentada por Freddy Blak (PSE) (cid:224) Comissªo (6 de Abril de 1998) Objecto: Consumo de Ælcool dos jovens na Dinamarca Tem a Comissªo conhecimento de que os jovens dinamarqueses sªo quase os recordistas mundiais em matØria de consumo de Ælcool? Que iniciativas tomou a Comissªo para lutar contra o abuso do Ælcool entre os jovens dos Estados-membros? Tenciona a Comissªo desenvolver ac(cid:231)ıes especiais para corrigir a situa(cid:231)ªo existente na Dinamarca, onde aparentemente o problema Ø maior do que nos restantes Estado-membros? Resposta dada por P. Flynn em nome da Comissªo (11 de Maio de 1998) A Comissªo estÆ bem consciente dos nœmeros relativos ao consumo de Ælcool nos Estados-membros incluindo a Dinamarca. Alertada pelos problemas cada vez maiores causados pelo abuso do consumo de Ælcool entre as crian(cid:231)as e os jovens em vÆrios Estados-membros, especialmente no que se refere aos alcopops, a Comissªo tem vindo a discutir com os Estados-membros um c(cid:243)digo de conduta relativo (cid:224) venda, comercializa(cid:231)ªo e publicidade do Ælcool a fim de solucionar o consumo precoce de bebidas alco(cid:243)licas. Este Ø considerado o melhor meio de enfrentar o problema nesta fase. A Comissªo nªo tem competŒncia para assumir medidas especificamente destinadas a um determinado Estado-membro. (98/C 386/095) PERGUNTA ESCRITA P-1022/98 apresentada por JosØ ApolinÆrio (PSE) (cid:224) Comissªo (26 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Objecto: Os Fundos Estruturais e as regiıes ultraperifØricas O novo Tratado da Uniªo › o Tratado de Amesterdªo › insere no seu texto o conceito de regiıes ultraperifØricas. Analisando a Agenda 2000 e a informa(cid:231)ªo dispon(cid:237)vel sobre os novos regulamentos dos Fundos Estruturais constata-se que esta disposi(cid:231)ªo do Tratado nªo Ø contemplada nos textos propostos pela Comissªo. Assim sendo, pergunto (cid:224) Comissªo qual a abordagem espec(cid:237)fica que tenciona dar (cid:224)s regiıes ultraperifØricas, nomeadamente os A(cid:231)ores, e se, designadamente, por perspectivar o fim da iniciativa REGIS, nªo considera afinal insuficiente e incompleta a forma como tomou em conta as regiıes ultraperifØricas nas propostas de regulamentos?


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 863/98 af Graham MATHER til Kommissionen. Mulige bankfusioner i Det Forenede Kongerige

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
bank
economic concentration
merger
restriction on competition

text: C 323/88 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende 21. 10. 98 (98/C 323/122) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0863/98 af Graham Mather (PPE) til Kommissionen (26. marts 1998) Om: Mulige bankfusioner i Det Forenede Kongerige Der er fra flere sider udtrykt bekymring over muligheden for bankfusioner i Det Forenede Kongerige i den n(cid:230)rmeste fremtid. BIFU (bank-, forsikrings- og finanssammenslutning, som jeg er r(cid:229)dgiver for) har navnlig p(cid:229)peget risikoen for, at s(cid:229)danne fusioner vil fłre til begr(cid:230)nsninger i konkurrencen, besk(cid:230)ftigelsen og d(cid:230)kningsgraden i mindre samfund i landdistrikterne. Selv om Kommissionen naturligvis m(cid:229) bedłmme de enkelte fusioner hver for sig, s(cid:229) er der dog grund til at stille fłlgende spłrgsm(cid:229)l: 1. Er Kommissionen klar over situationen med hensyn til mulige bankfusioner i Det Forenede Kongerige? 2. Har Kommissionen nogen kommentarer i denne sag? Svar afgivet p(cid:229) Kommissionens vegne af Karel van Miert (7. maj 1998) Kommissionen er opm(cid:230)rksom p(cid:229), at der er ubekr(cid:230)ftede spekulationer i pressen om muligheden for fremtidige bankfusioner i Det Forenede Kongerige. Hvis en s(cid:229)dan fusionssituation giver anledning til en koncentration af EF-dimension, hvor den s(cid:229)kaldte fusionsforordning › R(cid:229)dets forordning (E(cid:216)F) nr. 4065/89 af 21. december 1989 om kontrol med fusioner og virksomhedsovertagelser (1) › finder anvendelse, vil Kommissionen vurdere, om fusionen er i overensstemmelse med forordningens bestemmelser. N(cid:229)r Kommissionen modtager anmeldelser om fusioner, offentliggłres de ved en meddelelse i EFT, og interesserede parter opfordres til at fremkomme med bem(cid:230)rkninger. (1) EFT L 257 af 21. 9. 1990. (98/C 323/123) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0870/98 af Gerhard Hager (NI) til Kommissionen (26. marts 1998) Om: Regularisering af illegale indvandrere I den bet(cid:230)nkning om respekten for menneskerettighederne i Den Europ(cid:230)iske Union (1996), der blev vedtaget under młdeperioden i februar, blev opm(cid:230)rksomheden udtrykkeligt henledt p(cid:229) nogle bestemte medlemsstater, som efter en vis periode regulariserer den opholdsretlige status for personer, der illegalt opholder sig p(cid:229) deres omr(cid:229)de. 1. Mener Kommissionen, at disse medlemsstaters praksis strider mod g(cid:230)ldende f(cid:230)llesskabsret? 2. Mener Kommissionen, at disse medlemsstaters praksis strider mod Schengen-aftalens bestemmelser? Hvad agter Kommissionen at foretage sig for at f(cid:229) integreret Schengen-aftalens bestemmelser i 3. f(cid:230)llesskabsretten og afhj(cid:230)lpe s(cid:229)danne forskelle? Svar afgivet p(cid:229) Kommissionens vegne af Mario Monti (5. juni 1998) Kommissionen er i łjeblikket ved at foretage en grundig undersłgelse af det af det (cid:230)rede medlem n(cid:230)vnte problem og skal snarest muligt meddele ham udfaldet


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 855/98 de Michl EBNER à la Commission. Restriction des importations en République tchèque de pommes en provenance de l'UE

eurovoc_concepts:
Czechia
EU production
export policy
import policy
import restriction
pip fruit
restriction on competition
trading operation

text: 9. 10. 98 FR Journal officiel des Communaute·s europe·ennes C 310/139 En vue de reme·dier autant que possible aux conse·quences de cette discrimination, les services de la Commission ont demande· au Comite· organisateur de re·server la totalite· des 160 000 billets restants exclusivement a‘ des acheteurs ne re·sidant pas sur le territoire fran(cid:231)ais. Le Comite· organisateur a indique· le 23 mars 1998 qu(cid:146)il ne pouvait re·pondre favorablement a‘ cette demande, mais qu(cid:146)en revanche il proposerait ces billets aux re·sidents fran(cid:231)ais et non-fran(cid:231)ais sur une base non discriminatoire. Compte tenu du refus du Comite· organisateur d(cid:146)attribuer les billets restants exclusivement aux acheteurs ne re·sidant pas sur le territoire fran(cid:231)ais, M. Van Miert a annonce· re·cemment que ses services pre·paraient une proce·dure officielle contre le Comite· organisateur en ce qui concerne les billets de·ja‘ vendus dans le cadre des dispositions discriminatoires susmentionne·es. La Commission entend agir rapidement, tout en respectant les exigences de proce·dure. Si elle reconna(cid:14)(cid:136)t l(cid:146)importance des proble‘mes de se·curite· dans tout syste‘me de distribution de billets pour la Coupe du monde, la Commission conside‘re, a‘ ce stade de la proce·dure, que le syste‘me institue· par le Comite· organisateur ne peut e(cid:136)tre justifie· par des raisons de se·curite·. (98/C 310/189) QUESTION E· CRITE E-0855/98 pose·e par Michl Ebner (PPE) a‘ la Commission (26 mars 1998) Objet: Restriction des importations en Re·publique tche‘que de pommes en provenance de l(cid:146)UE Conside·rant que le gouvernement tche‘que a de·cide·, le 29 janvier 1998, de restreindre les importations de pommes en provenance de l(cid:146)UE, conside·rant que cette mesure n(cid:146)est pas compatible avec les dispositions du traite· europe·en UE/Re·publique tche‘que puisqu(cid:146)elle est contraire a‘ la clause de «statu quo» applicable au re·gime douanier et semble discriminatoire, e·tant donne· qu(cid:146)elle concerne uniquement les importations de pommes en provenance de l(cid:146)UE, 1. 2. 3. Quelles mesures la Commission entend-elle prendre contre cette de·cision discriminatoire? La Commission a-t-elle de·ja‘ engage· des de·marches par le biais des services compe·tents? Dans l(cid:146)affirmative, la Commission peut-elle indiquer quel est l(cid:146)e·tat d(cid:146)avancement de ces ne·gociations? Re·ponse donne·e par M. Van den Broek au nom de la Commission (20 avril 1998) La Commission est pleinement informe·e de cette affaire et a de·ja‘ e·te· en contact e·troit avec les autorite·s tche‘ques depuis les premie‘res indications sur l(cid:146)existence de cette mesure. Le 2 fe·vrier 1998, elle a explique· au gouvernement tche‘que que cette mesure n(cid:146)e·tait pas conforme a‘ l(cid:146)accord europe·en. Elle a donc demande· son retrait imme·diat et la tenue d(cid:146)urgence de consultations bilate·rales. Ces consultations, qui ont eu lieu le 17 fe·vrier 1998, ont fait appara(cid:14)(cid:136)tre clairement que les autorite·s tche‘ques n(cid:146)avaient pas l(cid:146)intention de rapporter cette de·cision a‘ bre‘ve e·che·ance. La Commission a donc propose· des contre-mesures, qui ont e·te· adopte·es par le Conseil en date du 17 mars 1998. La Communaute· suspendra certaines concessions commerciales agricoles (jus de pommes, produits de viande, produits laitiers) qui sont actuellement accorde·es a‘ la Re·publique tche‘que sur une base autonome. L(cid:146)objectif est de re·duire les exportations pre·fe·rentielles tche‘ques d(cid:146)un montant correspondant aux pertes subies par la Communaute· dans ses exportations de pommes. La Commission poursuivra ses efforts en vue de re·soudre cette affaire d(cid:146)une manie‘re qui sauvegarde e·galement les inte·re(cid:136)ts des exportateurs communautaires


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 810/98 van Jens-Peter BONDE aan de Commissie. Publicatie van douanevoorschriften in het Publicatieblad van de EG

eurovoc_concepts:
EC Regulation
EU Official Journal
EU publication
customs duties
customs regulations

text: 11. 12. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen C 386/45 (98/C 386/060) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0810/98 van Jens-Peter Bonde (I-EDN) aan de Commissie (26 maart 1998) Betreft: Publicatie van douanevoorschriften in het Publicatieblad van de EG Kan de Commissie erop toezien dat alle douanevoorschriften in het Publicatieblad verschijnen alvorens zij in werking kunnen treden? Antwoord van de heer Santer namens de Commissie (7 mei 1998) Krachtens artikel 191 van het EG-Verdrag worden de voorschriften bekendgemaakt in het Publicatieblad en treden zij in werking op de datum die zij daartoe bepalen of, bij gebreke daarvan, op de twintigste dag volgende op die van hun bekendmaking. De Commissie beijvert zich van haar kant om te voorzien in een voldoende lange termijn tussen de bekendmaking van een voorschrift en de inwerkingtreding ervan om de belanghebbenden de gelegenheid te geven zich aan de nieuwe juridische situatie aan te passen. Dit beginsel is ook van toepassing voor de douanerechten. Deze zijn vastgesteld in bijlage I van Verordening (EEG) 2658/87 van de Raad van 23 juli 1987 met betrekking tot de tarief- en statistieknomenclatuur en het gemeenschappelijke douanetarief (1), die ieder jaar integraal wordt vervangen bij een verordening van de Commissie, laatstelijk bij Verordening (EG) 2086/97 van de Commissie van 4 november 1997 (2). Deze verordening is in werking getreden op 1 januari 1998. Intussen heeft de Commissie nog twee verordeningen tot wijziging van bijlage I van Verordening 2658/87 aangenomen, namelijk Verordening 2472/97 van de Commissie van 11 december 1997 (3), die in werking is getreden op de zestigste dag volgende op die van haar bekendmaking, alsmede Verordening 2509/97 van de Commissie van 15 december 1997 (4), die in werking is getreden op de eenentwintigste dag volgende op die van haar bekendmaking. De verordeningen die behoren tot de bijzondere categorie van voorschriften waarbij de juridische situatie wordt gewijzigd wegens herhaalde veranderingen op de markten, moeten uiteraard worden aangenomen op een ogenblik dat zo dicht mogelijk ligt bij het ogenblik waarop zij van toepassing worden, zodat kan worden uitgegaan van de meest recente marktprijzen. In dergelijke verordeningen, in het bijzonder in de besluiten van dagelijks beheer in het kader van het gemeenschappelijk landbouwbeleid die gewoonlijk een beperkte geldigheidsduur hebben, is bijgevolg vaak vastgesteld dat zij op korte termijn in werking treden, namelijk op de dag van hun bekendmaking of op de eerste werkdag die volgt op hun bekendmaking. De Commissie is van oordeel dat de marktdeelnemers die in deze sectoren werkzaam zijn, vertrouwd zijn met deze situatie en de wijziging van de regelgeving en de snelle inwerkingtreding van een dergelijke verordening, zelfs op de dag van de bekendmaking ervan, verwachten. Het beginsel van de rechtszekerheid verzet zich ertegen dat een gemeenschapsbesluit reeds v(cid:243)(cid:243)r afkondiging ervan van kracht is. Het Hof van Justitie heeft evenwel erkend dat hiervan bij wijze van uitzondering kan worden afgeweken indien dit voor het te bereiken doel noodzakelijk is en het rechtmatige vertrouwen van de betrokkenen naar behoren in acht is genomen (5). PB L 256 van 7. 9. 1987. PB L 312 van 14. 11. 1997. PB L 341 van 12. 12. 1997. PB L 345 van 16. 12. 1997. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Arrest van 25 januari1979, zaak 98/78, Racke, Jurispr. 1979, blz. 69 (overweging20). (98/C 386/061) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0818/98 van JosØ ApolinÆrio (PSE) aan de Commissie (26 maart 1998) Betreft: Communautair initiatief PESCA en het toerisme Kan de Commissie mededelen welk totaalbedrag per lidstaat beschikbaar is gesteld voor specifiek voor het toerisme bestemde acties en projecten in het kader van het communautaire initiatief PESCA gedurende de financiºle programmeringsperiode 1994-1999?


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 800/98 de Nuala AHERN à la Commission. Existence d'un deuxième puits/silo de stockage dans le complexe industriel nucléaire de Dounreay (Caithness, Écosse)

eurovoc_concepts:
EAEC Treaty
Scotland
United Kingdom
nuclear power station
nuclear safety
radioactive waste
storage of waste

text: C 386/44 Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes FR 11. 12. 98 RØponse donnØe par M. Fischler au nom de la Commission (8 mai 1998) (cid:192) la lumiŁre de l(cid:146)expØrience acquise dans le contexte de l(cid:146)ESB, la Commission a transfØrØ la totalitØ du personnel de l(cid:146)office vØtØrinaire et phytosanitaire (cid:224) la DG XXIV, soit 42 A, 7 B et 13 C, plus trois experts nationaux affectØs (cid:224) l(cid:146)office, ainsi que du personnel supplØmentaire composØ de 5 A et 14 C. (cid:192) titre de compensation, 8 postes A ont ØtØ attribuØs (cid:224) la DG VI. Les mesures permettant de disposer d(cid:146)un nombre suffisant de vØtØrinaires (cid:224) embaucher en qualitØ d(cid:146)effectifs permanents sont actuellement (cid:224) l(cid:146)examen. Pour Øviter des problŁmes (cid:224) court terme, un appel a ØtØ lancØ aux (cid:201)tats membres pour qu(cid:146)ils transmettent des listes d(cid:146)experts vØtØrinaires pouvant satisfaire aux critŁres applicables aux agents temporaires. ConformØment au projet de budget 1999, 10 postes permanents seront mis (cid:224) la disposition de la DG VI. Celle-ci envisage d(cid:146)affecter quatre de ces postes au service de l(cid:146)apurement des comptes (l(cid:146)augmentation du personnel dans ce secteur est Øgalement jugØe prioritaire par le Parlement). La plupart des six postes restants seront destinØs au renforcement des unitØs chargØes de la santØ publique, de la santØ animale et des questions phytosanitaires, qui constituent une prioritØ absolue. (98/C 386/059) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-0800/98 posØe par Nuala Ahern (V) (cid:224) la Commission (26 mars 1998) Objet: Existence d(cid:146)un deuxiŁme puits/silo de stockage dans le complexe industriel nuclØaire de Dounreay (Caithness, (cid:201)cosse) (cid:201)tant donnØ que l(cid:146)Agence de l(cid:146)Ønergie atomique britannique a reconnu, le 2 fØvrier 1998, que le complexe de Dounreay (Caithness, (cid:201)cosse) comporte un deuxiŁme puits/silo de stockage dans lequel des dØchets radioactifs ont ØtØ dØversØs sauvagement depuis 1971, la Commission pourrait-elle rectifier les informations communiquØes au Parlement dans sa rØponse (cid:224) la question Øcrite P-3167/96 (1)? (1) JO C 87 du 14. 3. 1997, p. 124. RØponse donnØe par Mme Bjerregaard au nom de la Commission (22 avril 1998) Le silo de Dounreay est une installation de stockage agrØØe, soumise (cid:224) la surveillance normale du Nuclear installations inspectorate (NII), l(cid:146)autoritØ britannique responsable. Ce silo et son contenu sont dØcrits dans le document (1) dØj(cid:224) mentionnØ dans la rØponse (cid:224) la question Øcrite P-3167/96 de Mme Bloch von Blottnitz (2) et accessible (cid:224) tous. Le gouvernement britannique a Øgalement annoncØ que les dØchets seraient retirØs du puits de stockage intermØdiaire et du silo de Dounreay pour Œtre retraitØs. La Commission attire Øgalement l(cid:146)attention de l(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire sur la rØponse donnØe (cid:224) la question Øcrite P-661/98 par Mme Bloch von Blottnitz (3) sur le mŒme sujet. Depuis l(cid:146)adhØsion du Royaume-Uni (cid:224) la CommunautØ, le silo et son contenu sont placØs sous le contr(cid:244)le de sØcuritØ d(cid:146)Euratom et la Commission a re(cid:231)u et re(cid:231)oit toutes les informations nØcessaires pour mener (cid:224) bien les activitØs de surveillance prØvues par le traitØ d(cid:146)Euratom. (1) DOE/RAS/96. 001 (Rapport 95 de la UK Nirex Ltd de mai 1996). (2) (3) JO C 83 du 14. 3. 1997. JO C 310 du 9. 10. 1998, p. 113


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 817/98 by Giuseppe RAUTI to the Commission. The scandal of low wages in Eastern Europe

eurovoc_concepts:
Norway
Romania
Sweden
furniture industry
international sanctions
low pay
transfer of businesses
wood industry
working conditions

text: C 354/28 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 19. 11. 98 (98/C 354/58) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0817/98 fr(cid:229)n Giuseppe Rauti (NI) till kommissionen (26 mars 1998) A¤mne: Skandalo¤st l(cid:229)ga lo¤ner i O¤ steuropa A¤ r kommissionen tillra¤ckligt uppma¤rksam p(cid:229) den bojkott som det norska tra¤industriarbetarfo¤rbundet (NTIF) a¤mnar genomfo¤ra i alla nordeuropeiska la¤nder mot IKEA:s produkter? Den svenska mo¤belja¤tten har hundratals filialer i Europeiska unionen. NTIF inledde (cid:229)tga¤rder (jfr. Le Monde av den 25 februari 1998, s. 28) efter att Sunday Times den 22 februari 1998 hade publicerat en underso¤kning av arbetsvillkoren och lo¤nerna fo¤r IKEA:s leveranto¤rer i Ruma¤nien. Av underso¤kningen framg(cid:229)r det bland annat att IKEA:s 900 ansta¤llda i Ruma¤nien f(cid:229)r 2,25 FRF per timme (ca 3 SEK), medan de ansta¤llda inom samma sektor i Sverige har en timlo¤n som motsvarar o¤ver 80 FRF. En ruma¤nsk ansta¤lld kostar s(cid:229)ledes IKEA 35 g(cid:229)nger mindre a¤n en svensk (eller norsk, finla¤ndsk eller europeisk i allma¤nhet). Detta fo¤rklarar varfo¤r a¤ven IKEA h(cid:229)ller p(cid:229) att (cid:148)utlokalisera(cid:148) sin produktion med den p(cid:229)fo¤ljden att arbetslo¤sheten o¤kar. IKEA sa¤ljer emellertid de ruma¤nska produkterna i Europa till priser som inte motsvarar den oerho¤rda skillnaden i kostnader och go¤r da¤rfo¤r enorma vinster. A¤ mnar kommissionen ingripa eller (cid:229)tminstone vidta (cid:229)tga¤rder mot situationer av denna typ, t. ex. genom att fo¤resl(cid:229) en (cid:148)socialavgift(cid:148) fo¤r import fr(cid:229)n tredje la¤nder, da¤r arbetskostnaderna a¤r la¤gre a¤n i Europa, i syfte att sta¤vja det arbetslo¤shetsproblem som en dylik (cid:148)otyglad kapitalism(cid:148) medfo¤r och fo¤rva¤rrar fo¤r varje dag? Svar fr(cid:229)n Hans van den Broek p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (28 april 1998) Handelsfo¤rbindelserna mellan Ruma¤nien och gemenskapen styrs av besta¤mmelserna i Europaavtalet av den 1 februari 1995, (cid:229) ena sidan, och i Allma¤nna tull- och handelsavtalet (GATT), (cid:229) andra sidan. Ruma¤nien a¤r ocks(cid:229) medlem av Va¤rldshandelsorganisationen (WTO). Enligt dessa besta¤mmelser a¤r det inte mo¤jligt att info¤ra sociala utja¤mningsavgifter p(cid:229) import med ursprung i Ruma¤nien. Rent allma¤nt utgo¤r den omsta¤ndighet att det a¤r olika lo¤neniv(cid:229)er i ett samarbetsland och inom gemenskapen inte p(cid:229) n(cid:229)got sett n(cid:229)got bera¤ttigande fo¤r protektionistiska (cid:229)tga¤rder. Utvecklingen av handeln och sammanfla¤tningen av v(cid:229)ra ekonomier genom direktinvesteringar bidrar snarare till den ekonomiska utvecklingen p(cid:229) b(cid:229)da sidor. Detta a¤r sa¤rskilt va¤lkommet i fr(cid:229)ga om ett kandidatland som Ruma¤nien som fo¤rbereder sig fo¤r anslutningens utmaningar och integrationen i gemenskapsmarknaden › och gemenskapen sto¤der landet i dessa anstra¤ngningar. (98/C 354/59) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA P-0824/98 fr(cid:229)n Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) till kommissionen (11 mars 1998) A¤mne: Avgifter av skattenatur, dubbelbeskattning och fri ro¤rlighet I sitt svar p(cid:229) min muntliga fr(cid:229)ga H-0045/98 (1) ville kommissionen f(cid:229) ytterligare upplysningar om vilka avgifter av skattenatur (enligt skattejuridisk terminologi i Sverige: egenavgifter) som inte omfattas av dubbelbeskatt- ningsavtalet. I Finland uppba¤rs sjukfo¤ra¤kringsavgifterna (cid:229)r 1998 enligt fo¤ljande: 1,5 % p(cid:229) alla fo¤rva¤rvsinkomster, dessutom 2,7 % p(cid:229) pensionsinkomster samt ytterligare 1,95 % p(cid:229) de fo¤rva¤rvsinkomster som o¤verstiger 80 000 mk. De sammanlagda avgifterna av detta slag kan uppg(cid:229) till maximalt 6,05 % och de tas inte i betraktande som avdrag p(cid:229) pensioner fr(cid:229)n Sverige. Tillsammans med den finla¤ndske riksdagsmannen Esko-Juhani Tennila¤ har jag sa¤nt ett brev till kommissionen da¤r jag fa¤ster uppma¤rksamhet p(cid:229) att detta problem hindrar den fria ro¤rligheten fo¤r personer. Ta¤nker kommissionen ingripa och vidta n(cid:229)gra (cid:229)tga¤rder fo¤r att avhja¤lpa detta faktiska hinder mot fri ro¤rlighet? (1) Europaparlamentets debatter (februari 1998)


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 837/98 by Esko SEPPÄNEN to the Commission. The content of television programmes and freedom of expression

eurovoc_concepts:
Finland
censorship
freedom of expression
law relating to information
right to information
television

text: 9. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 310/137 (98/C 310/185) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0837/98 by Esko Seppa¤nen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (26 March 1998) Subject: The content of television programmes and freedom of expression There are four independent television channels in Finland, all of which are journalistically independent of the state. One of them (Oy Yleisradio Ab) has › for journalistic purposes and without sponsorship › produced a series of programmes designed to promote the sale of Finnish-made products. The Commission responded by writing a letter to the Finnish Ministry of Communications prohibiting the making of such programmes. In so doing, the Commission violated journalistic freedom of expression and interfered with the content of television programmes. Does the Commission consider that its officials acted correctly in this matter, and if so, on what EU treaty does it base its view? Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission (5 June 1998) The Commission is conducting a detailed investigation of the problem raised by the Honourable Member and will inform him of the outcome as soon as possible. (98/C 310/186) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0845/98 by Edith Mu¤ ller (V) to the Commission (26 March 1998) Subject: Visits by senior figures from Directorate-General IA to Bosnia-Herzegovina Directorate-General IA is responsible for various EU programmes in aid of Bosnia-Herzegovina. How often has Commissioner van den Broek been in Bosnia-Herzegovina since January 1996? How often has Director-General Burghardt been there over the same period? Answer given by Mr Van den Broek on behalf of the Commission (20 April 1998) In order to lay the foundations for the actions of the Commission, the responsible member of the Commission has visited Bosnia-Herzegovina four times since the beginning of 1996 including a visit to Sarajevo with the Irish Presidency in July 1996. The responsible member of the Commission has set the framework for the services under his authority (DGIA › External relations: Europe and the New Independent States (NIS), Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and external service) to be fully involved at all levels of the relevant hierarchy. This is moreover the case not only since 1996, but equally during the five years preceding the Dayton Agreements. This has led to regular visits to Bosnia-Herzegovina as well as attendance at numerous international meetings, including the various Community led peace efforts, the Dayton negotiations themselves, of the Contact Group, and donor conferences, which the Director-General co-chaired with the Vice-President of the World Bank


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 917/98 af Heidi HAUTALA til Kommissionen. Fremskyndelse af gennemførelse af Natura 2000- nettet

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
application of EU law
national implementing measure
protected area
protected species
protection of animal life
protection of plant life
wildlife


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 921/98 dell'on. Dietrich ELCHLEPP alla Commissione. Rispetto delle norme igieniche comunitarie nei mattatoi tedeschi e francesi

eurovoc_concepts:
France
Germany
consumer protection
frontier region
health control
health legislation
meat processing industry

text: 19. 11. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee C 354/39 Risposta data dal Sig. ra Bonino in nome della Commissione (21 aprile 1998) La Commissione e‘ pienamente consapevole del problema sollevato, che e‘ stato oggetto di importanti discussioni e decisioni in sede di commissione internazionale per la conservazione di tonnidi dell(cid:146)Atlantico (ICCAT). Dopo l(cid:146)adesione della Comunita‘ all(cid:146)ICCAT, nel novembre 1997, la Commissione rappresenta la Comunita‘ in tale organizzazione ed ha partecipato attivamente alle discussioni. Le Consiglio ha adottato il regolamento (CE) n. 65/98, del 19 dicembre 1997 (1), che limita le catture di pesce spada nell(cid:146)Atlantico settentrionale, in accordo con le raccomandazioni adottate dall(cid:146)ICCAT. E‘ in corso altres(cid:14)‘ la trasposizione del totale annuo di catture (TAC) di pesce spada nell(cid:146)Atlantico meridionale, anch(cid:146)essa raccomandata dall(cid:146)ICCAT. Per quanto riguarda l(cid:146)eventuale adozione di misure di ritorsione commerciale nei confronti dei paesi che concedono bandiere di comodo, la Commissione non ignora che la possibilita‘ di adottare tale tipo di misure e‘ prevista nel piano d(cid:146)azione sul pesce spada adottato dall(cid:146)ICCAT. Al momento opportuno e in funzione delle informazioni che saranno presentate alla prossima riunione annuale (del 16 al 23 novembre 1998), la Commissione sara‘ in grado di esprimersi sull(cid:146)argomento. Va comunque ricordato che l(cid:146)ICCAT ha gia‘ raccomandato misure commerciali per certi paesi terzi relativamente alla pesca del tonno rosso. Le proposte di misure riguardanti l(cid:146)Honduras e il Belize sono gia‘ state adottate dalla Commissione (2) e trasmesse al Consiglio ai fini della loro eventuale adozione. (1) GU L 12 del 19. 1. 1998. (2) COM(1998) 48 def. (98/C 354/73) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0921/98 di Dietrich Elchlepp (PSE) alla Commissione (26 marzo 1998) Oggetto: Rispetto delle norme igieniche comunitarie nei mattatoi tedeschi e francesi Gli agricoltori e i macellai tedeschi temono distorsioni della concorrenza derivanti da differenze nell(cid:146)applica- zione, attuazione e controllo delle norme igieniche dell(cid:146)UE nei macelli della zona frontaliera ai confini fra Germania e Francia nella parte meridionale dell(cid:146)Alto Reno. Di quali informazioni e‘ in possesso la Commissione a tale riguardo? Vi e‘ uniformita‘ fra le prassi di questi due paesi in materia di attuazione delle norme igieniche comunitarie e relativi controlli da parte delle autorita‘ nazionali? Risposta della Sig. ra Bonino a nome della Commissione (19 maggio 1998) La Commissione non e‘ al corrente del fatto che esistano differenze significative nell(cid:146)applicazione delle norme igieniche comunitarie nei mattatoi presenti sui territori menzionati dall(cid:146)Onorevole Parlamentare. Spetta agli Stati membri garantire la corretta applicazione della legislazione comunitaria nei loro territori. La Commissione, attraverso l(cid:146)Ufficio alimentare e veterinario, della Direzione Generale XXIV, Politica dei consumatori e protezione della salute dei consumatori, controlla il modo in cui gli Stati membri assolvono tale responsabilita‘. A tal fine, l(cid:146)Ufficio alimentare e veterinario effettua controlli e ispezioni in tutti gli Stati membri e in numerosi paesi terzi. La Commissione ha preso atto delle questioni sollevate dall(cid:146)Onorevole Parlamentare e ne terra‘ conto al momento della pianificazione delle sue future attivita‘ di controllo e d(cid:146)ispezione


title: Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on connected telecommunications equipment and the mutual recognition of the conformity of equipment

eurovoc_concepts:
EC conformity marking
approximation of laws
harmonisation of standards
quality label
telecommunications equipment

formats: pdf print

text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 26. 03. 1998 COM(1998) 176 final 97/0149 (COD) Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON CONNECTED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF THE CONFORMITY OF EQUIPMENT (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 189 a (2) of the EC-Treaty) SUMMARY On 29 January 1998, the European Parliament approved the Commission proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on connected telecommunications equipment and the mutual recognition of the conformity of equipment (COM(97)257) with amendments (PE A4-0023/98). This modified proposal takes into account the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, which are accepted by the Commission. The Directive will create the single market for telecommunications terminal and radio equipment and proposes a substantial relaxation of the regulations governing the placing on the market, the free movement and the putting into service of such equipment. The Directive will replace two Council Directives (91/263/EEC1 - telecommunications terminal equipment and 93/97/EEC2 - satellite earth station equipment), simplify the application of two other Council Directives (93/68/EEC3 - conformity marking and 89/336/EEC4 - electromagnetic compatibility) and replace a large number of national regulations. The issues of concern to the European Parliament are: • The role of harmonised standards (7, 8,10); • The licensing of use of radio equipment (6, 15); • Access of disabled people to telecommunications (4, 8); • Reciprocity with third countries (19); • Transparency of implementation of the Directive (9, 10, 15,16,17, 18); • Exclusion of self-built radio amateur equipment (5, 8); • Essential requirements and network protection (8,13); • Strengthening the role of industry in the implementation of this Directive (16). 19 Amendments were formulated on which the Commission has taken the following position: acceptable acceptable in part or in principle not acceptable I 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 9,17,18 8,10,13, 15,16,20,21, 23 6, 7,19 1 2 3 4 OJNoL 128, 23. 5. 1991, p. 1. OJ No L 290, 24. 11. 1993, p. 1. OJ No L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1. OJNoL. 139, 23. 5. 1989, p. 19. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Commission hereby presents a modified proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on radio and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity. The modified proposal incorporates those amendments proposed by the European Parliament as First Reading which were accepted by the Commission. INTRODUCTION a) Background The Commission adopted its proposal on 4 June 1997 and it was formally transmitted to the EP and the Council on 6 June 19975. The Economic and Social Committee gave a favourable Opinion on 10 December 1997. The European Parliament adopted a favourable Resolution at its First Reading on 29 January 1998 and proposed 23 amendments to the Commission proposal6. b) Purpose of the Directive The Directive will create the single market for telecommunications terminal and radio equipment and proposes a substantial relaxation of the regulations governing the placing on the market, the free movement and the putting into service of such equipment. The Directive will replace two Council Directives (91/263/EEC7 - telecommunications terminal equipment and 93/97/EEC8 - satellite earth station equipment), simplify the application of two other Council Directives (93/68/EEC9 - conformity marking and 89/336/EEC10 - electromagnetic compatibility) and replace a large number of national regulations. The major elements of the new Directive are: • Enlargement of the range of equipment covered with the inclusion of radio equipment; • A set of new definitions which will make the Directive valid well into the future by taking into account the liberalisation of infrastructures and competition between operators; 5O J C 2 4 8, 14/08/1997 p. 4 6 A4-0023/96, PV 29-01-98 OJ No L 128, 23. 5. 1991, p. 1. OJ No L 290, 24. 11. 1993, p. 1. OJNo L 220, 30. 8. 1993, p. 1. 7 8 9 10 OJ No L. 139, 23. 5. 1989, p. 19. • The development of the concept of essential requirements specific to telecommunications to take into account technological trends; • A flexible decision-making process whereby future network infrastructures and'systems can be readily covered; • A less onerous conformity assessment regime based upon the principle of manufacturer's declarations. The Directive complements other legislative developments in telecommunications and is a response to the inevitable changes to the radio and telecommunications terminal equipment market caused by the liberalisation of the telecommunications infrastructures and services. EP AMENDMENTS ACCEPTED BY THE COMMISSION Of the 19 amendments adopted by the European Parliament at First Reading, the Commission accepted 8 in full and 8 in part or in principle, making a total of 16: Amendments accepted in full Amendments accepted in part or in part or in 8,10,13,15,16,20, 21, 23 principle 1,2, 3,4, 5, 9,17,18 The Commission accepted those amendments which: • reinforce the importance to maximise the classes of equipment covered by the Directive; • clarify the procedures on dealing with radio equipment; • • introduce a consultation mechanism where equipment considered non-compliant with the Directive is withdrawn from the market; introduce possibilities for network operators to disconnect equipment in special circumstances; • further clarify the text in a manner consistent with the aims of the Directive; • are consistent with other EU legislation. EP AMENDMENTS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE COMMISSION The Commission has not accepted 4 amendments and parts of 10 other amendments. The reasons are given below and the amendments are placed in categories: Limitation of coverage of putting into service of equipment not operating in harmonised frequency bands (amendment 6) The Commission recognises the fact that the usage of radio equipment is governed by authorisations and that they are in general given on a national basis. Directive 91/263/EEC provides for community-wide authorisations for a limited class of equipment, operating in harmonised frequency bands. Since on the one hand there is equipment, which does not operate in harmonised frequency bands but for which it is possible to provide a Community wide authorisation scheme and, whereas, on the other, there is equipment operating in harmonised frequency bands for which the putting into service is nonetheless authorised on a national level, the amendment would unnecessarily restrict the scope of the Directive. Usage of harmonised standards (amendments 7,10 (part) Although it may not have been the intention of the European Parliament to render mandatory harmonised standards where they exist, the amendments 7 and 10 would have this effect. The principle that the usage of harmonised standards should be promoted is fully supported but is already embedded by virtue of the more onerous conformity assessment procedure, which applies when harmonised standards are not used. Making applicable the essential requirement enabling disabled people to use all equipment covered by this Directive (amendment 8 (part) The Commission agrees with the European Parliament that the disabled should have access to telecommunication services but is of the opinion that, in principle, market forces should, and will, ensure this. Where the market fails, regulators should however have a possibility to intervene and to enforce usability on certain classes of products. The European Parliament proposes to apply this requirement to all equipment. This is felt unnecessary for classes where the market will ensure usability. For other classes of products (e. g. professional equipment) such a requirement would be inappropriate. Strengthening of the essential requirements and leaving selection of requirements to ETSI (amendment 8 (part)) Although the Commission fully agrees with the Parliament that it is up to ETSI to interpret the essential requirements into harmonised standards, it is the task of the regulators to define which requirements apply. The selection of which special essential requirements would apply is, therefore, to be made by the Commission after consultation of the TCAM. Amendment 8 also proposes making the requirement "misuse of network resources causing an unacceptable degradation of service" obligatory for all equipment. The Commission understands the reasoning behind making it obligatory and would expect terminal equipment to comply with it. It is, however, difficult to translate this requirement into harmonised standards as the origin of degradation of service is not necessarily a result of faulty elements in the terminal equipment. For this reason, the Commission feels the requirement should be kept optional. A requirement to ensure that equipment properly interworks with the network is considered an aspect of product quality and not a necessary feature. Equipment which will not properly interwork with the network does not necessarily cause problems to that network. Market forces would ensure that such products are unsuccessful. Specific provisions on radio amateur equipment (amendments 8 (part) Some amendments reflect the concerns of the radio amateur community, that self-built equipment would be subjected to the conformity assessment procedures of the Directive. This equipment is not placed on the market and therefore not covered by this Directive. The risks associated with such equipment are regulated via the licenses which radio amateurs need to be allowed to put such equipment into service. Making special provisions in this Directive to exclude such equipment are not necessary. Amendment 8 proposes introducing limitations on the technical requirements which can be imposed on commercially built radio amateur equipment placed on the market. Such a provision would be contrary to the principles of the new approach which leave such an assessment to the standardisation organisations. Extension of markings on equipment (amendment 15 (part)) The European Parliament proposes adding references to the notified bodies and harmonised standards to the marking. Extended marking beyond the CE mark needs to be justified. It only seems justified for certain classes of radio equipment, operating in non-harmonised frequency bands and thus should not be the general rule. Transparency of procedures of the TCAM (amendment 16 (part)) The Community is bound by Council Decision 87/373/EEC which does not allow for the proceedings of such Committees to be made public. Reciprocity (amendment 19) The European Parliament proposes keeping in place the existing Directives, (which are onerous in both requirements and conformity assessment procedures), for products the originating from countries not providing reciprocal access for products from Community. Such a provision is not in line with the Most Favoured Nation principal and the National Treatment Principal of the GATT and the TBT code and is discriminatory. The maintenance of two very different legal regimes is, in addition, very costly and, therefore, quite undesirable. Introduction of a right to disconnect (amendment 20 (partly accepted)) Refusal of connection can be accepted if equipment seriously affects the operation, of a network. Usage of such a measure should, however, be controlled by the regulators in order to avoid abuse by operators. To only allow it when the user can be offered an alternative solution does not provide sufficient guarantees to avoid such abuse. Extension of liabilities (amendments 23) The European Parliament proposes that manufacturers should be liable not only for direct economic damage, but also for indirect damage and that they be liable towards any party suffering damage. This seems to exclude that other parties could be liable as well (e. g. network operators who have not specified the characteristics of their networks properly). The proposal might have unforeseen side effects and the view is taken, therefore, that these issues continue to be handled under the existing national liability legislation. Where a product manufactured in the Community for other markets is re re-imported into the Community, both the importer and the manufacturer are liable for that product. If the product was not intended to be used in the Community and the importer is, or should have been aware of it, it is up to the courts to determine to what extent the producer should pay compensation for damages caused by the product. CONCLUSIONS The Commission has accepted 16 of the 19 amendments proposed by the European Parliament at First Reading either in whole, in part or in principle. In accordance with Article 189a paragraph 2 of the EC Treaty, the Commission amends its initial proposal, incorporating these amendments. AMENDED PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL mEE£TLY£ ON RADIO AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TERMINAL EQUIPMENT AND THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF THEIR CONFORMITY Original text Amended text Recital 3 a (new) (new) Whereas, given the increasing importance of telecommunications terminal equipment and networks using radio transmission besides equipment connected through wired links, the manufacturing, any marketing and use of R&TTE should cover both classes of such equipment; regulation on Recital 5 the electromagnetic Whereas compatibility related essential requirements laid down by Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on laws of the to electromagnetic Member States compatibilityM, by amended Directive 93/68/EEC, are sufficient to cover connected telecommunications equipment: approximation of relating as last the Whereas the electromagnetic compatibility related essential requirements laid down by Council Directive 89/336/EEC of 3 May 1989 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility12, by Directive 93/68/EEC, are sufficient to cover radio terminal and equipment; telecommunications amended last as Recital 6 relating Whereas the provisions of Council Directive 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member I States equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits14, as last amended by Directive 93/68/EEC, are sufficient to cover radio and telecommunications equipment, whatever the operating voltage limits; to electrical terminal Whereas the provisions of Council Directive the 73/23/EEC of 19 February 1973 on harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits13, as last amended by Directive 93/68/EEC, are sufficient to cover connected equipment. telecommunications whatever the operating voltage limits; n 12 13 14 OJNoL 139, 23. 5. 1989, p. 19. OJNoL 139,23. 5. 1989, p. 19. OJ No L 77, 26. 3. 1973, p. 29. OJNoL 77, 26. 3. 1973, p. 29. Recital 8 than Whereas unacceptable degradation of service to connected other the telecommunications be prevented; equipment should user of Whereas unacceptable degradation of service radio and to other telecommunications equipment should be prevented; the user of terminal than Recital 10 connected telecommunications Whereas equipment can occupy an excessive proportion of limited resources such as radio frequency spectrum; Whereas the most efficient possible use according to the state of the art of limited resources such as frequency spectrum is to be ensured and promoted; radio the Récita 12 of connected Whereas the essential requirements relevant to a class telecommunications equipment should depend on the nature and the needs of that class of equipment; whereas these requirements must be applied with discernment in order not to inhibit technological innovation or the meeting of the needs of a free-market economy; the needs of Whereas the essential requirements relevant to a class of radio and telecommunications terminal equipment should depend on the nature and that class of equipment; whereas these requirements must be applied with discernment in order not to inhibit the meeting of free-market economy; the needs of a innovation or technological Recital 13 Whereas care should be taken that connected should not telecommunications represent an avoidable hazard to health; equipment Whereas care should be taken that radio and equipment telecommunications should not represent an avoidable hazard to health; terminal Récita 14 Whereas telecommunications are important to the well-being and employment of people with disabilities who represent a substantial and growing proportion of the population of Europe; Whereas telecommunications are important to the well-being and employment of people with disabilities who represent a substantial and growing proportion of the population telecommunications of Europe; whereas equipment therefore whenever possible be designed in such a way that disabled people may use it without or with only minimal adaptation: should Recital 15 Whereas equipment required by emergency and security services; connected can provide certain telecommunications functions and radio Whereas telecommunications terminal equipment can provide certain functions required by emergency and security services; telecommunications Whereas equipment should not permit the infringement of connected telecommunications Whereas terminal equipment should not permit the radio and Recital 16 individual privacy; infringement of individual privacy; Récita 1! Whereas it is desirable to have harmonized standards at European level to safeguard the public interest in connection with the design and manufacture of connected telecommunications equipment: whereas such harmonized standards may be used to demonstrate conformity to the essential requirements; Whereas it is desirable to have harmonized standards at European level to safeguard the public interest in connection with the design and and manufacture telecommunications equipment; whereas such harmonized standards may be used the essential requirements; to demonstrate conformity of terminal radio to Récita 19 resulting requirements from disparities Whereas Community law provides that obstacles to the free movement of goods within the in Community, national legislation relating to the marketing of products, can only be justified where any national and the proportionate; harmonization of laws must be limited only to those requirements necessary the essential requirements relating to connected telecommunications equipment: whereas these requirements must replace the relevant national requirements; are necessary therefore, to satisfy whereas, resulting law provides the Community, Whereas Community that obstacles to the free movement of goods from within disparities in national legislation relating to the marketing of products, can only be justified where any national requirements are proportionate; whereas, necessary therefore, the harmonization of laws must be limited only to those requirements necessary to satisfy the essential requirements relating to radio and telecommunications terminal equipment; whereas these requirements must replace the relevant national requirements; and Récita 20 and radio Whereas telecommunications terminal equipment which complies with the relevant essential requirements should be permitted to circulate freely and be put into service in all Member States; whereas radio and telecommunications terminal equipment which does not comply with the applicable essential requirements should be regarded as defective products within the meaning of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products 16 States; whereas connected Whereas telecommunications equipment which complies with the relevant essential requirements should be permitted to circulate freely and be put into service in all Member connected telecommunications equipment which does not comply with essential requirements should be regarded as defective the meaning of Council products within Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products15; applicable the 15 OJ No L 210, 7. 8. 1985, p. 29. 16 OJ No L 210, 7. 8. 1985, p. 29. 10 Recital 20a (new) Whereas this Directive does not restrict the non-commercial building, transformation or in Amateur Radio and use of R&TTE Satellite services by licensed radio amateurs; Article 1 Scope and aim regulatory establishes a European This Directive Community the for placing on the market, free circulation and connected service putting telecommunications equipment (£IE) which complies with the essential requirements. framework into of This Directive establishes a European Community regulatory framework for the placing on the market, free circulation and and putting Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) which complies with the essential requirements. of Radio service into For the purpose of this Directive the following definitions shall apply: Article 2 Definitions For following definitions shall apply: the purpose of this Directive the (a) Connected Telecommunications (a) Equipment (CTE) Equipment capable of communication by transmission utilizing means of radio spectrum allocated terrestrial/space radio communication excluding equipment which is intended for exclusive public security use, to Radio Terminal Equipment (R&TTE) and Tejecommunications Equipment capable of communication by means of radio transmission utilizing spectrum allocated to terrestrial/space excluding radio equipment which for exclusive public security use, communication intended is or or the relevant components of equipment to to an Open Network be connected Termination this allowing Point, equipment to interwork with the relevant network; the relevant components of equipment to be connected to an Open Network this Termination Point, the equipment relevant network; allowing interwork with to (b) Open Telecommunications Network (b) Open Telecommunications Network Termination Point (ONTP) Termination Point (ONTP) point termination A a telecommunications network at which users of the network may connect any Connected conforming of point termination A a telecommunications network at which users of the network may connect any and conforming Radio of 17 OJ No L 109, 26. 4. 1983, p. 8. 11 Telecommunications Equipment of a type supported at that ONTP. Connection may be by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means. An ONTP supports one or more types of CTE. In exceptional cases in the public interest, ONTP types can be termination points of other than public networks; (c) £ IE TyPe The CTE type identifies the type of Open Network Termination Point to which the equipment is to be connected by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means; (d) Technical specification A specification contained in a document which describes those characteristics of a product which implement the applicable essential requirements; (e) Harmonized standard Telecommunications Terminal Equipment of a type supported at that ONTP. Connection may be by wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means. An ONTP supports one or more types of R&TTE. In exceptional cases in the public interest, ONTP types can be termination points of other than public networks; (c) R&TTE Type The R&TTE type identifies the type of Open Network Termination Point to which the equipment is to be connected radio, optical or other by wire, electromagnetic means; (d) Technical specification specification contained describes in a A document which those characteristics of a product which the applicable essential implement requirements; technical specification A adopted by a recognized standards body under a mandate from the Commission in conformity with the procedures in Council Directive 83/189/EEC17 for the purpose of requirement, compliance with which is not compulsory. a European establishing down laid (e) Harmonized standard procedures A technical specification adopted by a recognized standards body under a mandate from the Commission in conformity with in the down Council Directive 83/189/EEC18 for the purpose a European establishing requirement, compliance with which is not compulsory. laid of Article 3 Essential requirements l • The following general essential 1. requirements are applicable to all CTE: The R&TTE referred to in Article 2 shall be so constructed that: (a) the equipment, when properly used, does not endanger the health or the safety of the user or any other person; OJNoL109, 26. 4. 1983, p. 8. 12 (a) (b) the essential requirements contained in Directive 73/23/EEC with respect to safety whatever the voltage limits oftheCTE; the essential requirements contained in Directive 89/336/EEC with respect to electromagnetic compatibility. (b) (c) specific requirements essential The applicable to each type of CTE may be selected in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 from the following list: (a) (b) (c) prevention of misuse of network resources causing an unacceptable degradation of service to other than the user oftheCTE; interworking via network(s) and Community-wide portability between ONTPs of the same type; effective use of spectrum allocated to radio terrestrial/space communication. the equipment meets the essential in requirements Directive 73/23/EEC with respect to safety whatever the voltage limits of the R&TTE; contained be contained 89/336/EEC shall the the equipment meets the essential in requirements with Directive respect electromagnetic to compatibility. equipment that so Radio constructed equipment effectively uses the spectrum allocated to radio communication and orbital resources, in accordance Radio Regulations. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12, the Commission may decide that Terminal Equipment within certain Equipment Class shall be so constructed that: terrestrial/space with ITU (a) misuse of network causing deterioration prevented; an of and/or that resources unacceptable is service (b) it interworks via network(s) and can be ported between ONTPs of the same type in the Community; and/or that (c) it contains safeguards to ensure that the individual privacy of the user is protected ; and/or that it supports certain (d) ensuring emergency services ; access to safety features, and In the interest of people with special the needs and procedure laid down in Article 12, the in accordance with 13 Commission may decide that Terminal equipment, which may be used by people with special needs shall support certain features. Article 4 Publication of specifications of interface points Article 4 Identification of relevant specific essential requirements JL The Commission shall identify the specific essential requirements applicable to each CTE type the procedure laid down in Article 12. In selecting essential requirements, the Commission shall give- as appropriate, due consideration to: accordance with applicable the in (a) protection of health, (b) features for users with disabilities. (c) features for emergency and security services. (d) protection of individual privacy, shall States specific applicable The essential requirements shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Member the Commission of the types of ONTP which are available or due to become available as soon as they are aware of them. In turn, the Commission shall inform the Committee referred (hereinafter in Article 12 referred to as "the Committee") of existing and planned ONTP types. notify to that Member States shall ensure the operators of all networks publish and regularly update, accurate and adequate technical specifications of the available ONTPs and the CTE types supported. The specifications should be in sufficient detail to permit the design of compatible CTE. 14 shall notify the Member States Commission of the radio interfaces they have regulated unless they have been notified pursuant to the provisions of Directive 83/189/EEC. After consulting the Committee provided for in Article 12, the Commission shall establish the equivalence between interfaces an notified equipment category indicator, which shall be published the Official Journal of the European Communities. the shall determine and in shall notify Member States the Commission of the types of ONTP which are used by networks offering services to the public. Member States shall ensure the operators of networks offering services to the public publish and regularly update accurate and adequate technical specifications that concerning these network termination points. These specifications should be in sufficient detail to permit the design of compatible terminal equipment Article 5 Harmonized standards When CTE meets the relevant harmonized standards whose reference numbers have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, Member States shall presume compliance with those of the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 and Article 4 as are covered in these standards. At the choice of the manufacturer and, in particular, in the standard. absence of compliance with the relevant essential requirements can be demonstrated by means of compliance with a technical specification appropriate to the relevant essential requirements. a harmonized considers 2. Where a Member State or that the Commission a harmonized standard referred to in paragraph 1 does not conform to the selected essential specific requirements referred to in Article 3m the Commission or the Member State concerned shall bring the matter before the Committee and initiate the procedures described in Article 12. and Article 4(1). 1. When R&TTE meets the relevant harmonized standards whose reference numbers have been published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, Member States shall presume compliance with those of the essential requirements referred to in Article 3 and Article 4 as are covered in these standards. At the choice of the the manufacturer compliance with relevant essential requirements can be demonstrated by means of compliance specification with appropriate to the relevant essential requirements in accordance with the procedures provided for in Article 9(4). technical a considers 2. Where a Member State or that the Commission a harmonized standard or a specification referred to in paragraph 1 does not conform specific essential requirements referred to in Article 3, which it intends to cover, the Commission or the Member State concerned shall bring the matter before the Committee. selected the to the Committee, and After consulting in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 12, the Commission may circulate guidelines concerning the interpretation of the harmonized standard and may publish a list of the corrections made to the harmonized standard, pending formal correction thereof. After consulting the Committee, and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 12, the Commission may withdraw the harmonized standards from publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. 15 Article 6 Placing on the market and putting into service 1. Member States Member States shall ensure that CTE which complies with the appropriate essential requirements identified in Article 3(1) and (2) and Article 4(1) is permitted to circulate freely and is not subject to further national regulation. Where the specific essential requirements for a type of CTE have not yet been determined, a manufacturer shall not be subject to national regulation and may place the CTE on the market provided he complies with the requirements essential identified in Article 3(1). CTE which complies with the essential requirements applicable at the time of first placing on the market can continue to be placed on the market. general shall States ensure Member that connection of CTE to appropriate ONTPs is not refused on the grounds of technical incompatibility when the CTE complies with the requirements of Article 3. Member States shall ensure that, when placed on the market, CTE is accompanied by documentation informing the potential purchaser or user of the CTE that the equipment complies with the relevant essential requirements and of any usage conditions resulting from the selection of requirements. These usage essential conditions should include, inter alia, the ONTP type(s) to which the CTE may be connected and any limitations on use made necessary by lack of harmonization of radio spectrum. shall that ensure the R&TTE which complies with requirements essential appropriate identified in Article 3 is permitted to circulate freely and is not subject to further national regulation. Where the specific essential requirements for a type of R&TTE have not yet been determined, a manufacturer shall not be subject to national regulation and may place the market provided he complies with the general essential in Article 3(1). R&TTE which complies with requirements essential applicable at the time of first placing on the market can continue to be placed on the market. the R&TTE on requirements identified the 2. Member States shall ensure that refuse network operators do not connection of R&TTE to appropriate ONTPs on technical grounds when the equipment the complies requirements of Article 3. with the market, R&TTE 3. Member States shall ensure that, when is placed on accompanied documentation by informing the potential purchaser or user of the R&TTE that the equipment complies with the relevant essential requirements usage and of conditions resulting from the selection of essential requirements. These usage conditions should include, inter alia, the ONTP type(s) to which the R&TTE may be connected and any limitations on use made necessary by lack of harmonization of radio spectrum. any demonstrate 4. Where a telecommunications operator that Apparatus, can declared to be in conformity with this Directive causes damage to his network or is not being used properly, the surveillance authority may authorize 16 to refuse connection of his him equipment to his network. Member States shall notify the Commission of such authorizations. Article 7 Non-compliance Where a Member State finds that CTE being placed on the market in its territory does not comply with the essential requirements relevant to the CTE type, it shall take all appropriate measures to withdraw such products from the market and prohibit their being placed on the market. The Member State concerned shall immediately notify the Commission of all \Q non-COmplianCC decisions indicating the reasons for its decision and whether non-compliance is due to: relating (a) (b) (c) the application incorrect harmonized standards referred to in Article 5, of in shortcomings standards referred to in Article 5, the harmonized use of an inappropriate specification, technical 17 all take appropriate 1. Where a Member State ascertains that equipment within the scope of this Directive does not comply with the requirements referred to in Article 3. it shall and proportionate measures in its terrotory to avoid the consequences of such non compliance, such as authorizing the the operators equipment networks, withdrawing the equipment from the market, prohibiting its placing on the market or restricting its free movement. The Member State concerned shall immediately notify the Commission and other Member States of any such measures indicating the reasons for its decision and whether non-compliance is due to: to connect their to refuse from (a) (b) (c) incorrect the application harmonized standards referred to in Article 5, of shortcomings in the harmonized standards referred to in Article 5, failure to satisfy the requirements referred to in Article 3. where the equipment does not meet the standards referred to in Article referred Where the decision to in paragraph 1 is attributed to incorrect application of the harmonized standards referred to in Article 5 or a failure to satisfy those requirements, when the equipment does not meet the standards referred the Commission shall consult the parties concerned as soon as possible. If the such finds. Commission is that consultations, in Article 5(1). action after the to Where the non-compliance referred to in paragraph 2 is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonized standards applicable, the Commission shall bring the matter before the Committee within two months of the date of notification bv the Member State. informed of The Commission shall keep the Member the progress and State outcome of initiated pursuant to paragraph 3. any procedure 4. to in the the other Member referred attributed the decision is 1 justified, it shall immediately inform the Member State that took the action and States accordingly. in Where to paragraph shortcomings harmonized standards, the Commission shall bring the matter before the Committee within two months. The Committee shall deliver an opinion in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12. If the Commission finds, after such consultations, IS justified, it shall immediately inform the Member State that took the action and other Member States and shall initiate the procedures referred to in Article 5(2). action that the shall The Commission the Member State informed of the progress and outcome of any procedure initiated pursuant to paragraph 3. keep The Commission shall maintain a record of the cases notified by Member SlaiÊS* Article S Liability for non-compliance their QL established within authorized Manufacturers representatives the Community who place products on the Community market which do not comply with the applicable essential requirements shall be liable for damage as described in Article 9 of Directive 85/374/EEC and for direct economic damage suffered as a consequence of the non-compliance. The economic damage shall not include any anticipated profits. or their established within authorized Manufacturers representatives the Community shall not be liable for the damages referred to in paragraph 1 if they can prove that the essential requirement(s) with which their product does not comply had not been identified pursuant to Article 18 1. Manufacturers, their authorized representatives established within the Community or in their absence the responsible person, who place products on the Community market which do not comply with the applicable essential requirements shall be liable for damage as described in Article 9 of Directive 85/374/EEC and for direct economic damage suffered as a consequence of the non-compliance. The economic damage any not anticipated profits. include shall 2. Manufacturers, their authorized representatives established within the Community or in their absence the responsible person, who place products on the Community market shall not be 4 at the time when the equipment was placed on the market. liable for the damages referred to in paragraph 1 if they can prove that the essential requirement(s) with which their product does not comply had not been identified pursuant to Article 4 at the time when the equipment was placed on the market. Article 9 Conformity assessment procedures The conformity assessment procedures identified in this Article will be used to demonstrate the compliance of the CTE with all the relevant essential requirements identified in Article 3(1) and (2) and Article 4(1). CTE which does not make use of the spectrum allocated terrestrial/space radio communication shall be subject to internal production control, as described in Annex I. to 1. The conformity assessment procedures identified in this Article will be used to the demonstrate R&TTE with all the relevant essential requirements identified in Article 3. the compliance of spectrum 2. R&TTE which does not make use of to allocated the terrestrial/space radio communication shall be subject to internal production control, as described in Annex I. to CTE which docs make use of the spectrum allocated radio communication shall be subject to internal production control and specific product tests, as described in Annex II. terrestrial/space 3. 4. The records and correspondence relating to the production control procedures referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be in an official language of the Member State where the said procedure will be carried out, or in a language accepted by the notified body involved. Article U CE marking 1 representative within CTE complying with the relevant essential requirements shall bear the CE conformity marking referred to in Annex IV. It shall be affixed by the manufacturer or his authorized the Community. Where appropriate, it shall be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body referred to in Article 10(2). Any other marking may be affixed to the visibility and legibility of the CE marking the equipment provided that 19 R&TTE which does make use of the spectrum allocated to terrestrial/space radio communication shall be subject to internal production control and specific product tests, as described in Annex II. and records to correspondence The relating the production control procedures referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be in an official language of the Member State where the said procedure will be carried out, or in a language accepted by the notified body involved. requirements and all R&TTE complying with all the relevant essential the Directives applicable to it shall bear the CE conformity marking referred to in Annex IV. It shall be affixed by the manufacturer authorized representative within the Community. Where be accompanied by identification number of the notified body referred to in Article 10(2) and of an equipment class identifier. Any other marking may appropriate, shall the his or it is not thereby reduced. No CTE. whether it complies with the relevant essential requirements or not, may bear any other marking which is likely to deceive third parties as to the meaning and form of the CE marking specified in Annex IV. The competent Member State shall take appropriate action against any person who has affixed marking not in conformity with paragraphs 1 and 2. If the person who affixed the marking is not identifiable, the action shall be taken against the holder of the CTE when non-compliance was discovered. be by shall identified the CTE manufacturer by means of type, batch and/or serial numbers and by the name of the manufacturer supplier responsible for placing it on the market. and/or be affixed to the equipment provided that the visibility and legibility of the CE marking is not thereby reduced. No R&TTE, whether it complies with the relevant essential requirements or not, may bear any other marking which is likely to deceive third parties as to the meaning the and CE marking specified in Annex IV. form of The competent Member State shall take appropriate action against any person who has affixed marking not in conformity with paragraphs 1 and 2. If the person who affixed the marking is not identifiable, the action shall be taken against the holder of the R&TTE when non-compliance was discovered. R&TTE shall be identified by the manufacturer by means of type, batch and/or serial numbers and by the name of the manufacturer and/or supplier bearing liability in the event of non compliance with essential requirements. Article 12 Constitution and procedures the The Commission shall be assisted by a Telecommunication Committee, Conformity Assessment and Market surveillance committee (TCAM), of an the advisory representatives of the Member States and chaired of the Commission. representative composed nature the by of The Committee shall be consulted on the matters covered by Articles 4, 5 and 2. The Committee may be consulted, where necessary, on the effectiveness of the surveillance tasks related to the operation of this Directive. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft, 20 1. 2. 3. The Commission shall be assisted by a the Telecommunication Committee, Conformity Assessment and Market surveillance committee (TCAM), of an the advisory nature composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission. The Commission shall consult the representatives of the telecommunications network providers, the consumers and the manufacturers on a continuous basis. It shall keep the Committee regularly informed of the outcome of such consultations. The Committee shall be consulted on the matters covered by Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6. The Committee may be consulted, where necessary, on the effectiveness of within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote. in the The opinion shall be recorded minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the Committee. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account and decide within one month after having received the opinion of the Committee. the surveillance tasks related to the operation of this Directive. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures taken. The to be Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft, within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. L. ol representatives The Commission shall periodically consult the the telecommunications networks providers. the consumers and the manufacturers. It regularly shall keep such informed of consultations. the outcome of the Committee It The Commission shall take- the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the Committee. the Committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into account and decide within one month after having received the opinion of the Committee. inform shall Article 13 Review and reporting to report taking thereon The Commission shall review the operation of this Directive and the European Parliament and to the Council, on the first occasion not later than [31 December 1999] and every third year thereafter. This review shall inter alia assess whether the scope of the Directive should be maintained or should be reduced technical account development. The report shall cover progress on drawing up the relevant standards, as well as any problems that have arisen in the course of implementation. The report shall also outline the activities of the Committee, and assess progress in achieving an open competitive market for CTE at Community level. It shall in particular examine whether essential requirements are still terminal for all categories of necessary equipment covered. of The Commission shall review the operation of this Directive and report thereon to the European Parliament and to the Council, on the first occasion not later than [31 December 1999] and every third year thereafter. This review shall inter alia assess whether the scope of the Directive should be maintained taking account of or should be reduced technical the how development for placing on the regulatory framework market and putting into service of radio and telecommunications equipment should be developed to terminai and a) b) that a coherent system ensure is achieved at Community level for all radio and telecommunications terminal equipment; allow of telecommunications, audiovisual and convergence for 21 information technology sectors; c) enable harmonisation of regulatory measures at an international level. The report shall cover progress on drawing up the relevant standards, as well as any problems that have arisen in the course of implementation. The report shall also outline the activities of the Committee, and assess progress in achieving an open competitive market for R&TTE at Community level. It shall in particular examine whether essential requirements are still necessary for all categories of terminal equipment covered. Article 14 Transitional provisions 1. The harmonized standards or parts thereof through Common Technical identified Regulations adopted under Directive 91/263/EEC or Directive 93/97/EEC may be used as the basis for a presumption of conformity with the specific essential requirements referred to Article 3(2) and Article 4(1) until such time as the Commission indicates, by publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities^ that thev are no longer applicable. 1. The harmonized standards or parts identified through Common thereof Technical Regulations adopted under Directive 91/263/EEC or Directive 93/97/EEC may be used as the basis for a presumption of conformity with the specific essential requirements referred to Article 3. The Commission shall publish a list of references to these standards in the Official Journal of the European Communities immediately after this Directive comes into force. 2. Any measure adopted by Member States in accordance with Directive 91/263/EEC or Directive 93/97/EEC shall continue to be valid. 2. Any measure adopted by Member States in accordance with Directive 91/263/EEC or Directive 93/97/EEC shall continue to be valid. Article 16 Repeal Directive 91/263/EEC, Directive 97/97/EEC and Article 11 of Directive 93/68/EEC âEg hereby repealed. From the entry into force of the present Directive 91/263/EEC, Directive 93/97/EEC and Article 11 of Directive 93/68/EEC shall no longer be applicable. 22 ISSN 0254-1475 COM(98) 176 final DOCUMENTS EN 15 16 01 10 Catalogue number : CB-CO-98-176-EN-C ISBN 92-78-32333-0 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg 22


title: PREGUNTA ESCRITA n. 903/98 del Nuala AHERN a la Comisión. Montañas Cairngorm (Escocia)

eurovoc_concepts:
Scotland
protected area
protected species
protection of animal life
protection of plant life
tourism
tourism policy
vehicle on rails
wildlife

text: C 402/42 Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europead ES 22. 12. 98 puede tener la seguridad de que en cuanto estØn finalizadas, la Comisi(cid:243)n examinarÆ detalladamente las normas para la venta de entradas propuestas por la UEFA con vistas a asegurar su compatibilidad con las normas de competencia comunitarias. (98/C 402/051) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0901/98 de Bryan Cassidy (PPE) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (26 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Puente para Poole (Reino Unido) La Comisi(cid:243)n debe estar al corriente de la importancia del enlace a travØs del Canal de la Mancha entre Poole en el Reino Unido y Cherburgo en Francia. Esta ruta es de gran importancia tanto para el transporte de mercanc(cid:237)as como para el turismo que atraviesa dicho canal. La ruta Poole-Cherburgo es importante, pues, a nivel europeo. No obstante, el acceso al puerto de Poole es restringido, puesto que los veh(cid:237)culos que llegan o salen del puerto tienen que atravesar un puente muy antiguo que debe cerrarse en ocasiones para permitir el paso a embarcaciones de recreo. Algunos funcionarios de la Comisi(cid:243)n indicaron en el pasado que estudiar(cid:237)an favorablemente una solicitud de financiaci(cid:243)n comunitaria para la sustituci(cid:243)n del puente de Poole. ¿Sigue siendo vÆlido este punto de vista? ¿QuØ consejos podr(cid:237)a dar la Comisi(cid:243)n al Consejo Municipal de Poole para que presente una solicitud de financiaci(cid:243)n comunitaria abocada al Øxito y destinada a cofinanciar los gastos de sustituci(cid:243)n del actual puente que resulta inadecuado? Respuesta del Sr. Kinnock en nombre de la Comisi(cid:243)n (5 de junio de 1998) El proyecto objeto de la pregunta no se adecua a ningœn programa que pueda financiarse con el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional y, por otra parte, el otro œnico fondo comunitario disponible para financiar proyectos de infraestructuras de transporte es el destinado al desarrollo de redes transeuropeas de transportes (RTE-T), tal como se establece en las directrices recogidas en la Decisi(cid:243)n no 1692/96/CE (1). Con arreglo a dicha normativa, la financiaci(cid:243)n de puertos ha venido limitÆndose a los estudios de desarrollo de infraestructuras portuarias y no a la construcci(cid:243)n de infraestructuras. Dado que el puente propuesto en Poole no forma parte de una red viaria transeuropea, su sustituci(cid:243)n no se ajusta a otros criterios para la financiaci(cid:243)n dentro de las RTE. Se recomienda a Su Seæor(cid:237)a presente el caso de la mejora del acceso al puerto de Poole a las autoridades nacionales, ya que, en las condiciones actuales, la Comunidad no dispone de medios legales para financiar proyectos de ese tipo. (1) DO L 228 de 9. 9. 1996. (98/C 402/052) PREGUNTA ESCRITA E-0903/98 de Nuala Ahern (V) a la Comisi(cid:243)n (26 de marzo de 1998) Asunto: Montaæas Cairngorm (Escocia) Las autoridades del Reino Unido han designado una parte importante de las montaæas Cairngorm en Escocia como AEP (`rea Especialmente Protegida), de conformidad con la Directiva 79/409/CEE relativa a la conservaci(cid:243)n de las aves silvestres (1). Asimismo, se ha propuesto esta zona como AEC (`rea Especial de Conservaci(cid:243)n), de conformidad con la Directiva 92/43/CEE relativa a la conservaci(cid:243)n de los hÆbitats naturales y de la fauna y flora silvestres (2)


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 812/98 του Hilde HAWLICEK προς την Επ τροπή. Δημιουργία "Culture-Desks" στα κράτη μέλη

eurovoc_concepts:
EU financing
EU programme
artistic profession
candidate
cultural policy
culture
dissemination of EU information
information network
technical cooperation

text: C 323/78 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn 21. 10. 98 e·kuesh» An appraisal of technologies of political control › interim study» toy STOA toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy (RE 166. 499/Int. St), o·poy diapistv· netai o·ti h «orizo·ntia dia·dosh» ne·vn texnikv· n synepa·getai apeile·w gia ton en lo·gv tome·a; (98/C 323/103) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0809/98 ypobolh· : Hedy d(cid:146)Ancona (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: (cid:201)reyna ypo· ton ti·tlo «An appraisal of technologies of political control › interim study» toy STOA toy Eyrvpa(cid:14)¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy (RE 166. 499/Int. St) Poia syne·xeia pro·keitai na dv· sei h Epitroph· stiw systa·seiw poy anafe·rontai sthn e·kuesh «An appraisal of technologies of political control › interim study» toy STOA toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy (RE 166. 499/Int. St), kyri·vw o·son afora· tiw (ne·ew) texnike·w anakri·sevn kai basanisthri·vn; Koinh· apa· nthsh toy k. Santer ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w stiw grapte·w ervth· seiw E-0807/98, E-0808/98 kai E-0809/98 (7 Mai(cid:143)oy 1998) H Epitroph· uevrei· o·ti h ypo·uesh ayth· den ei·nai thw armodio·thta·w thw. (98/C 323/104) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0812/98 ypobolh· : Hilde Hawlicek (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (26 Marti·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Dhmioyrgi·a «Culture-Desks» sta kra·th me·lh Ek me·royw tvn kallitexnv· n epikaloy·ntai syxna· problh·mata sthn epikoinvni·a me thn Epitroph·. Paradei·gmatow xa·rin lo·gv asafv· n diatypv· sevn sta e·ntypa aith·sevn anaky·ptoyn ervth·mata sta opoi·a h Epitroph· den ei·nai se ue·sh na apanth·sei para· thn ypobolh· kai ek tvn yste·rvn polya·riumvn symplhrvmatikv· n ervth·sevn. (cid:201)xv akoy·sei, o·ti h Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· proti·uetai ple·on na dhmioyrgh·sei sta kra·th me·lh yphresi·ew enhme·rvshw poy ua apokaloy·ntai «Culture-Desks», v· ste na antimetvpi·sei ayto· to e·lleimma plhrofo·rhshw kai epikoinvni·aw, gegono·w gia to opoi·o ekfra·zv thn ikanopoi·hsh· moy. Gia na mpore·soyn ayte·w oi yphresi·ew plhrofo·rhshw na ergasuoy·n epityxv· w, ua e·prepe kai oi boyleyte·w toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Koinoboyli·oy, oi opoi·oi h·dh para·goyn mega·lo e·rgo enhme·rvshw, na symperilhfuoy·n se ayto· to plai·sio. Gia na katastei· dynato· na mpore·soyme na enhmerv· noyme kaly·tera toyw dhmioyrgoy·w kallite·xnew, ua epiuymoy·sa na ue·sv ta ako·loyua ervth·mata: 1. Sy·mfvna me poia· anti·lhch erga·zontai ta «Culture-Desks», poie·w armodio·thtew e·xoyn (p. x. : proepilogh· programma·tvn sy·mfvna me epi·shma «krith·ria») kai poia· ua ei·nai h akribh·w apostolh· toyw; 2. Poia· xrhmatika· me·sa diaue·toyn ta «Culture-Desks»; 3. Poio· ro·lo ua diadramati·soyn ta «Culture-Desks» kata· th dia·rkeia thw fa· sevw toy ek ne·oy prosanatoli- smoy· thw provuh·sevw toy politismoy· sthn EE; 4. Poio· ro·lo ua diadramati·soyn ta «Culture-Desks» sto ne·o pro·gramma politismoy·; Apa· nthsh toy k. Oreja ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (15 Mai(cid:143)oy 1998) H Epitroph· kataba·llei h·dh shmantike·w prospa·ueiew gia thn enhme·rvsh toy koinoy· sxetika· me ta progra·mmata· thw. Eja·lloy, ta e·ntypa ypochfio·thtaw tvn programma·tvn synodey·ontai apo· ejairetika· safei·w odhgoy·w toy ypochfi·oy


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 865/98 by Anita POLLACK to the Commission. Tropical forests and biodiversity in Indonesia

eurovoc_concepts:
EU environmental policy
Indonesia
biodiversity
deforestation
fire protection
forest conservation
forestry holding
forestry policy
management of resources
tropical forest