title: Legislazione farmaceutica : Medicinali per uso umano.

eurovoc_concepts:
health policy
pharmaceutical legislation
pharmaceutical product
veterinary medicinal product


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 545/98 dell'on. Roberta ANGELILLI alla Commissione. Strage funivia comportata da un aereo militare statunitense

eurovoc_concepts:
Autonomous Province of Trento
United States
air safety
air traffic
civil defence
civilian victim
judicial inquiry
man-made disaster
military aircraft
transport accident

formats: html print


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 589/98 de Mirja RYYNÄNEN à la Commission. Cadre européen pour la certification en matière forestière

eurovoc_concepts:
Community certification
EU environmental policy
forest conservation
forestry policy
wood industry
wood product

formats: html pdf print

text: C 386/28 Journal officiel des CommunautØs europØennes FR 11. 12. 98 (98/C 386/035) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-0589/98 posØe par Mirja Ryyn(cid:228)nen (ELDR) (cid:224) la Commission (4 mars 1998) Objet: Cadre europØen pour la certification en matiŁre forestiŁre Les pressions qui s(cid:146)exercent au sein du marchØ poussent (cid:224) l(cid:146)adoption de divers rØgimes de certification. Le danger est de voir les (cid:201)tats membres, en situation de concurrence, Œtre contraints d(cid:146)arrŒter dans la prØcipitation un rØgime de certification ayant des visØes monopolistiques, mais ne convenant pas (cid:224) toutes les circonstances. Le secteur forestier de l(cid:146)Union europØenne se trouverait alors en situation d(cid:146)infØrioritØ par rapport (cid:224) celui d(cid:146)autres pays. Dans son rapport sur la stratØgie forestiŁre de l(cid:146)Union europØenne, le Parlement europØen s(cid:146)est prononcØ pour que la Commission crØe un rØgime de certification reconnu au plan international, qui soit transparent, volontaire, non discriminatoire et qui prenne en compte les spØcificitØs Øcologiques, biologiques et socio-Øconomiques de chaque pays, y compris le systŁme de propriØtØ des forŒts (rapport Thomas). Quelles mesures la Commission a-t-elle prises pour accØlØrer la mise sur pied d(cid:146)un cadre de certification 1. inspirØ par la proposition du Parlement europØen et faire en sorte que l(cid:146)ensemble des intØrŒts du secteur forestier soit suffisamment pris en compte au cours de son Ølaboration? La Commission entend-elle s(cid:146)efforcer de crØer un cadre de certification communautaire propre (cid:224) mettre sur 2. un mŒme pied les rØgimes de certification instituØs nationalement? RØponse donnØe par M. Fischler au nom de la Commission (30 avril 1998) La Commission suit les dØveloppements actuels en matiŁre de certification des forŒts, entre autres, les aspects y relatifs liØs aux marchØs des produits forestiers. Tout en maintenant un dialogue ouvert avec toutes les parties intØressØes, la Commission Øtudie actuellement l(cid:146)opportunitØ et la faisabilitØ pratique et juridique d(cid:146)une Øventuelle initiative communautaire en la matiŁre, et en fonction des rØsultats de cette Øvaluation, elle fera les propositions les plus appropriØes, ceci dans le cadre de sa rØponse (cid:224) la rØsolution du Parlement sur une stratØgie forestiŁre de la CommunautØ. L(cid:146)Honorable Parlementaire voudra Øgalement bien se reporter (cid:224) la rØponse que la Commission a donnØe (cid:224) la question Øcrite E-164/98 de Mme Pollack au sujet des systŁmes de certification des forŒts (1). (1) JO C 310 du 9. 10. 1998, p. 31. (98/C 386/036) QUESTION (cid:201)CRITE E-0604/98 posØe par Carlos Carnero GonzÆlez (GUE/NGL), Laura GonzÆlez `lvarez (GUE/NGL), Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) et Alonso Puerta (GUE/NGL) (cid:224) la Commission (4 mars 1998) Objet: Soumission (cid:224) la consultation du public du projet de train rapide Madrid-Valladolid du ministŁre espagnol des travaux publics Le projet de train rapide Madrid-Valladolid du ministŁre espagnol des travaux publics, qui est actuellement soumis (cid:224) la consultation du public, a fortement alarmØ l(cid:146)opinion publique de la communautØ autonome de Madrid (CAM), notamment des municipalitØs de la vallØe du Lozoya et d(cid:146)autres localitØs que cette ligne traverserait comme Tres Cantos. Ce projet, qui correspond dans une large mesure au projet ØlaborØ parallŁlement par le gouvernement de la CAM, a ØtØ critiquØ en raison du prØjudice qu(cid:146)il porterait (cid:224) cette vallØe, dotØe de grandes richesses naturelles, ainsi qu(cid:146)(cid:224) la qualitØ de vie des habitants des centres urbains concernØs. Les maires de dix municipalitØs de la rØgion, la Coordination des associations de la Montaæa de la Sierra Norte, divers groupes parlementaires rØgionaux et les centrales syndicales se sont prononcØs contre le projet. Le dimanche 15 fØvrier,


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 538/98 by Michl EBNER to the Commission. Level of subsidies for the transport of slaughter cattle

eurovoc_concepts:
animal welfare
application of EU law
economic support
export refund
health certificate
protection of animals
slaughter of animals
transport of animals


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 581/98 by Jan MULDER to the Commission. Implementation of budget heading B2-5122

eurovoc_concepts:
European Commission
aid recipient
aid system
common agricultural policy
exchange of information
implementation of the budget
single market

text: C 323/48 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 21. 10. 98 As to whether the tax arrangements for non-residents could be in breach of Community law, the Commission takes the view that this is not the case as Community law stands at the moment. It would refer the Honourable Member to the detailed answers given to Written Questions E-2459/95 by Mr Vanhecke (1) and E-910/92 by Mr Seligman (2), which are concerned with the same taxes. (1) OJ C 82, 17. 3. 1998. (2) OJ C 58, 1. 3. 1993. (98/C 323/65) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0550/98 by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission (4 March 1998) Subject: Regional operational programme for Attiki › sub-programme 1, measure 1 Sub-programme 1, measure 1 of the regional operational programme for Attiki is concerned with water supply, drainage and biological purification. According to the timetable, ECU 20 620 million of the public funds earmarked for this purpose, should have been utilised by the end of 1997. 1. What progress has been made with the actual project? 2. Were changes made (and if so what changes) during the CSF review and what were the budgetary implications? 3. Which of the drainage networks are presenting the greatest problems concerning the utilisation of appropriations and what are the principal reasons for the delay? 4. What funds had been utilised by 31 December 1997? Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (22 April 1998) According to the financing tables amended on 21 October 1997, public expenditure on measure 1. 1 of the (cid:145)Attiki(cid:146) operational programme (water supply network, sewers and treatment plants) programmed up to 1997 amounts to ECU 13. 2 million. At the last meeting of the Monitoring Committee of the Community support framework (CSF), held on 31 October 1997, no amendments were made to the regional programmes. For technical details of the work programmed, its progress and the causes of any delays, the Commission would request the Honourable Member to apply to the Attiki regional authorities, which are responsible for implementation of the CSF. At the end of 1997, the appropriations used amounted to ECU 10. 7 million. (98/C 323/66) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0581/98 by Jan Mulder (ELDR) to the Commission (4 March 1998) Subject: Implementation of budget heading B2-5122 1. How many organizations received funding under this budget heading in 1997, and which were they? In how many cases in 1997 was an application for a subsidy granted, and in how many cases was it 2. rejected? What were the commonest reasons for rejection?