eurovoc_concepts:
export refund
sugar
syrup

text: L 60/50 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28. 2. 98 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 480/98 of 27 February 1998 fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the common organization of the markets in the sugar sector (1), as last amended by Regula- tion (EC) No 1599/96 (2), and in particular Article 17 (5) thereof, Whereas Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 provides that the difference between quotations or prices on the world market for the products listed in Article 1 (1) (d) of that Regulation and prices for those products within the Community may be covered by an export refund; Whereas Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2135/95 of 7 September 1995 laying down detailed rules of application for the grant of export refunds in the sugar sector (3), provides that the export refund on 100 kilo- grams of the products listed in Article 1 (1) (d) of Regula- tion (EEC) No 1785/81 is equal to the basic amount including, where multiplied by the sucrose content, appropriate, other sugars expressed as sucrose; whereas the sucrose content of the product in question is deter- mined in accordance with Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2135/95; Whereas Article 17 (6) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 provides that the basic amount of the refund on sorbose exported in the natural state must be equal to the basic amount of the refund less one-hundredth of the produc- tion refund applicable, pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1010/86 of 25 March 1986 laying down general rules for the production refund on sugar used in the chemical industry (4), last amended by Commission Regu- lation (EC) No 1126/96 (5), to the products listed in the Annex to the last mentioned Regulation; Whereas the basic amount of the refund on the other products listed in Article 1 (1) (d) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 exported in the natural state must be equal to (1) OJ L 177, 1. 7. 1981, p. 4. (2) OJ L 206, 16. 8. 1996, p. 43. (3) OJ L 214, 8. 9. 1995, p. 16. (4) OJ L 94, 9. 4. 1986, p. 9. (5) OJ L 150, 25. 6. 1996, p. 3. one-hundredth of an amount which takes account, on the the difference between the intervention one hand, of price for white sugar for the Community areas without deficit for the month for which the basic amount is fixed and quotations or prices for white sugar on the world market and, on the other, of the need to establish a balance between the use of Community basic products in the manufacture of processed goods for export to third countries and the use of third country products brought in under inward processing arrangements; Whereas the application of the basic amount may be limited to some of the products listed in Article 1 (1) (d) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81; Whereas Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 makes provision for setting refunds for export in the natural state of products referred to in Article 1 (1) (f) and (g) and (h) of that Regulation; whereas the refund must be fixed per 100 kilograms of dry matter, taking account of the export refund for products falling within CN code 1702 30 91 and for products referred to in Article 1 (1) (d) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 and of the economic aspects of the intended exports; whereas, in the case of the products referred to in the said Article (1) (f) and (g), the refund is to be granted only for products complying with the conditions in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95; whereas, for the products referred to in Article 1 (h), the refund shall be granted only for products (1) complying with the conditions in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95; Whereas the refunds referred to above must be fixed every month; whereas they may be altered in the inter- vening period; Whereas application of these quotas results in fixing refunds for the products in question at the levels given in the Annex to this Regulation; Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, 28. 2. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 60/51 HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto. The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1 (1) (d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81, Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 March 1998. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 27 February 1998. For the Commission Franz FISCHLER Member of the Commission L 60/52 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28. 2. 98 to the Commission Regulation of 27 February 1998 fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state ANNEX Product code Amount of refund (cid:190) ECU/100 kg dry matter (cid:190) 1702 40 10 9100 1702 60 10 9000 1702 60 80 9100 40,79 40,79 77,50 (2) (2) (4) (cid:190) ECU/1 % sucrose (cid:253) 100 kg (cid:190) 1702 60 95 9000 0,4079 (1) (cid:190) ECU/100 kg dry matter (cid:190) 1702 90 30 9000 40,79 (2) (cid:190) ECU/1 % sucrose (cid:253) 100 kg (cid:190) 1702 90 60 9000 1702 90 71 9000 1702 90 99 9900 0,4079 (1) 0,4079 (1) 0,4079 (1) (3) (cid:190) ECU/100 kg dry matter (cid:190) 2106 90 30 9000 40,79 (2) (cid:190) ECU/1 % sucrose (cid:253) 100 kg (cid:190) 2106 90 59 9000 0,4079 (1) (1) The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95. (2) Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95. (3) The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 12). (4) Applicable only to products defined under Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95. NB: The product codes and the footnotes are defined in amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24. 12. 1987, p. 1)


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 477/98 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Role of Community economic development in future structural fund programmes

eurovoc_concepts:
EU regional policy
Structural Funds
economic and social cohesion
fight against unemployment
regional development
structural policy

formats: html print


title: REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 493/98 DA COMISSÃO de 27 de Fevereiro de 1998 que fixa os direitos de importação no sector dos cereais

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
United States
cereals
import
stock-exchange listing

formats: pdf print

text: 28. 2. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 60/75 REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 493/98 DA COMISS(cid:212)O de 27 de Fevereiro de 1998 que fixa os direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o no sector dos cereais A COMISS(cid:212)O DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92 do Conselho, de 30 de Junho de 1992, que estabelece a organiza(cid:135)(cid:209)o comum de mercado no sector dos cereais (1), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regula- mento (CE) nº 923/96 da Comiss(cid:209)o (2), Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96 da Comiss(cid:209)o, de 28 de Junho de 1996, que estabelece as normas de execu(cid:135)(cid:209)o do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92 do Conselho no que respeita aos direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o no sector dos cereais (3), com a (cid:156)ltima redac(cid:135)(cid:209)o que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) nº 2092/97 (4), e, nomea- damente, o nº 1 do seu artigo 2º, Considerando que o artigo 10º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92 prev(cid:136) que, na importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o dos produtos referidos no artigo 1º do mencionado regulamento, ser(cid:209)o cobradas as taxas dos direitos da pauta aduaneira comum; que, todavia, no que respeita aos produtos referidos no nº 2 do mesmo artigo, o direito de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o (cid:130) igual ao pre(cid:135)o de interven(cid:135)(cid:209)o v(cid:145)lido para esses produtos no momento da importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o, majorado de 55 % e diminu(cid:146)do do pre(cid:135)o de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o CIF aplic(cid:145)vel (cid:133) remessa em causa; Considerando que, por for(cid:135)a do nº 3 do artigo 10º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92, os pre(cid:135)os de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o CIF s(cid:209)o calculados com base nos pre(cid:135)os representativos para os produtos em quest(cid:209)o no mercado mundial; 1766/92 no que respeita aos direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o no sector dos cereais; Considerando que os direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o s(cid:209)o aplic(cid:145)- veis at(cid:130) que entre em vigor o resultado de uma nova fixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o; que esses direitos permanecem igualmente em vigor se n(cid:209)o estiver dispon(cid:146)vel qualquer cota(cid:135)(cid:209)o na bolsa de refer(cid:136)ncia mencionada no anexo II do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96 no decurso das duas semanas anteriores (cid:133) fixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o peri(cid:155)dica seguinte; Considerando que, para permitir o funcionamento normal do regime dos direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o, (cid:130) conveni- ente utilizar para o c(cid:145)lculo destes (cid:156)ltimos as taxas repre- sentativas do mercado verificadas durante um per(cid:146)odo de refer(cid:136)ncia no que diz respeito (cid:133)s moedas flutuantes; Considerando que a aplica(cid:135)(cid:209)o do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96 conduz a fixar os direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o em conformidade com o anexo do presente regulamento, ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO: Artigo 1º Os direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o no sector dos cereais referidos no nº 2 do artigo 10º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92 s(cid:209)o fixados no anexo I do presente regulamento com base nos elementos constantes do anexo II. Artigo 2º Considerando que o Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96 esta- beleceu as normas de execu(cid:135)(cid:209)o do Regulamento (CEE) nº O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 1 de Mar(cid:135)o de 1998. O presente regulamento (cid:130) obrigat(cid:155)rio em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplic(cid:145)vel em todos os Estados-membros. Feito em Bruxelas, em 27 de Fevereiro de 1998. Pela Comiss(cid:209)o Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comiss(cid:209)o (1) JO L 181 de 1. 7. 1992, p. 21. (2) JO L 126 de 24. 5. 1996, p. 37. (3) JO L 161 de 29. 6. 1996, p. 125. (4) JO L 292 de 25. 10. 1997, p. 10. L 60/76 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 28. 2. 98 Direitos de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o dos produtos referidos no nº 2 do artigo 10º do Regulamento (CEE) nº 1766/92 ANEXO I C(cid:155)digo NC Designa(cid:135)(cid:209)o da mercadoria 1001 10 00 Trigo duro (1) 1001 90 91 Trigo mole, para sementeira 1001 90 99 Trigo mole de alta qualidade, com exclus(cid:209)o do trigo mole para sementeira (3) de qualidade m(cid:130)dia de qualidade baixa 1002 00 00 Centeio 1003 00 10 Cevada, para sementeira 1003 00 90 Cevada, com exclus(cid:209)o de cevada para sementeira (3) 1005 10 90 Milho para sementeira, com exclus(cid:209)o do h(cid:146)brido 1005 90 00 Milho, com exclus(cid:209)o do milho para sementeira (3) 1007 00 90 Sorgo de gr(cid:209)o, com exclus(cid:209)o do h(cid:146)brido destinado a sementeira Direito de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o por via terrestre, fluvial ou mar(cid:146)tima proveniente de portos mediterr(cid:131)nicos, do mar Negro ou do mar B(cid:145)ltico (em ecus/t) Direito de importa(cid:135)(cid:209)o por via a(cid:130)rea ou por via mar(cid:146)tima proveniente de outros portos (2) em ecus/t 0,00 45,93 45,93 62,77 75,42 72,69 72,69 72,69 87,23 87,23 72,69 0,00 35,93 35,93 52,77 65,42 62,69 62,69 62,69 77,23 77,23 62,69 (1) Em rela(cid:135)(cid:209)o ao trigo duro que n(cid:209)o satisfa(cid:135)a a qualidade m(cid:146)nima referida no anexo I do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96, (cid:130) aplic(cid:145)vel o direito fixado para o trigo mole de baixa qualidade. (2) No que respeita (cid:133)s mercadorias que chegam (cid:133) Comunidade atrav(cid:130)s do oceano Atl(cid:131)ntico ou via Canal do Suez [nº 4 do artigo 2º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96], o importador pode beneficiar de uma diminui(cid:135)(cid:209)o dos direitos de: (cid:190) 3 ecus/t, se o porto de descarga se situar no Mediterr(cid:131)neo, (cid:190) 2 ecus/t, se o porto de descarga se situar na Irlanda, no Reino Unido, na Dinamarca, na Su(cid:130)cia, na Finl(cid:131)ndia ou na costa atl(cid:131)ntica da Pen(cid:146)nsula Ib(cid:130)rica. (3) O importador pode beneficiar de uma redu(cid:135)(cid:209)o forfet(cid:145)ria de 14 ou 8 ecus/t, sempre que as condi(cid:135)(cid:210)es estabelecidas no nº 5 do artigo 2º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96 estejam satisfeitas. 28. 2. 98 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 60/77 ANEXO II Elementos de c(cid:145)lculo dos direitos (per(cid:146)odo de 13. 02. 1998 a 26. 02. 1998) 1. M(cid:130)dias no per(cid:146)odo das duas semanas anteriores ao dia da fixa(cid:135)(cid:209)o: Cota(cid:135)(cid:210)es em bolsa Minneapolis Kansas-City Chicago Chicago Minneapolis Minneapolis Produto (% de prote(cid:146)nas humidade) a 12 % de HRS2. 14 % HRW2. 11,5 % SRW2 YC3 HAD2 US barley 2 Cota(cid:135)(cid:209)o (ecus/t) 124,41 114,65 109,10 96,38 206,15 (1) 118,08 (1) Pr(cid:130)mio relativo ao Golfo (ecus/t) 20,43 13,35 6,24 7,16 Pr(cid:130)mio relativo aos Grandes Lagos (ecus/t) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (cid:190) (1) Fob Gulf. 2. Fretes/despesas: Golfo do M(cid:130)xico-Roterd(cid:209)o: 11,72 ecus/t, Grandes Lagos-Roterd(cid:209)o: 24,14 ecus/t. 3. Subven(cid:135)(cid:210)es referidas no nº 2, terceiro par(cid:145)grafo, do artigo 4º do Regulamento (CE) nº 1249/96: 0,00 ecu/t (HRW2) 0,00 ecu/t (SRW2)


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 443/98 του Eryl McNALLY προς την Επ τροπή. Συμφωνία σύνδεσης ΕΕ-Ισραήλ

eurovoc_concepts:
association agreement (EU)
citrus fruit
customs fraud
fruit juice
preferential agreement
re-export

formats: html pdf print

text: C 304/106 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn 2. 10. 98 (98/C 304/159) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0441/98 ypobolh· : Anna Karamanou (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (27 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Kakokairi·a sthn Ella·da › Tragike·w syne·peiew se Le·sbo-Sa·mo Lamba·nontaw ypo·ch tiw biblike·w katastrofe·w poy proka· lese h kakokairi·a sta nhsia· Le·sbo kai Sa·mo stiw 2 Febroyari·oy 1998, tiw apv· leiew se anurv· pinew zve·w › dy·o paidia· kai mia· gynai·ka › thn plh·rh katastrofh· thw agrotikh·w paragvgh·w, ton pnigmo· deka·dvn zv· vn, tiw anypolo·gistew ylike·w zhmie·w kai oikonomike·w syne·peiew. Ti· me·tra proti·uetai na la·bei h Epitroph· v· ste na syndra·mei me koinotikoy·w po·royw tiw plhgei·sew perioxe·w; Koinh· apa· nthsh toy k. Santer ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w stiw grapte·w ervth· seiw E-0440/98 kai E-0441/98 (27 Marti·oy 1998) Ekfra·zontaw th ly·ph thw gia tiw zhmi·ew poy proklh·uhkan apo· tiw pro·sfatew kakokairi·ew sta nhsia· Sa·mo kai Le·sbo sthn Ella·da, h Epitroph· uevrei· sko·pimo na ypogrammi·sei o·ti ta diarurvtika· tamei·a den e·xoyn vw skopo· na parembai·noyn se periptv· seiw fysikv· n katastrofv· n. Oi sto·xoi toyw kai to pedi·o efarmogh·w toyw kauori·zontai stoyw kanonismoy·w, poy ekdo·uhkan apo· to Symboy·lio ton Deke·mbrio toy 1988 kai anauevrh·uhkan ton Ioy·lio toy 1993, kai anafe·rontai sth xrhmatodo·thsh ependy·sevn kai ypodomv· n stiw perife·reiew poy paroysia·zoyn anaptyjiakh· kauyste·rhsh, stiw parakma·zoysew biomhxanike·w perife·reiew kai stiw agrotike·w perife·reiew. Kata· syne·peia, h sth·rijh· toyw den ua mporoy·se na ei·nai para· e·mmesh, sto me·tro poy oi perifereiake·w arxe·w ua pro·teinan na xorhghuoy·n oi enisxy·seiw gia thn ekte·lesh ypodomv· n kai ependy·sevn oikonomikh·w ana·ptyjhw kata· proteraio·thta stiw perioxe·w poy eplh·ghsan apo· tiw kakokairi·ew. (cid:211)son afora· tiw dynato·thtew paroxh·w e·ktakthw eni·sxyshw ype·r tvn politv· n poy ype·sthsan tiw zhmi·ew, h Epitroph· ypenuymi·zei o·ti ayth· h morfh· symbolikh·w pare·mbashw ype·r tvn ato·mvn den mporei· ple·on na ylopoihuei· gia to gegono·w o·ti, apo· to tre·xon oikonomiko· e·tow, e·xei diagrafei· apo· ton proy¤pologismo· to kondy·li B-3400. (cid:211)son afora· eidiko·tera to Eyrvpai¤ko· Gevrgiko· Tamei·o Prosanatolismoy· kai Eggyh·sevn (EGTPE) › Tmh·ma Prosanatolismoy·, o kanonismo·w (EOK) ariu. 4256/88 (1) proble·pei th lh·ch me·trvn apokata· stashw kai pro·lhchw se peri·ptvsh fysikv· n katastrofv· n. Entoy·toiw kai gia to lo·go o·ti h ekte·lesh tvn sxetikv· n epixeirhsiakv· n programma·tvn bri·sketai se proxvrhme·no sta· dio, ta posa· toy EGTPE e·xoyn sxedo·n sto sy·nolo· toyw xorhghuei· se sygkekrime·na sxe·dia kai ene·rgeiew kai, praktika·, den ypa·rxoyn periuv· ria xrhsimopoi·hshw adia·uetvn pistv· sevn. Par(cid:146) o·la ayta·, dedome·noy toy e·ktaktoy xarakth·ra thw kata·stashw poy dhmioyrgh·uhke apo· tiw fysike·w katastrofe·w kai efo·son oi armo·diew arxe·w apeyuy·noyn sthn Epitroph· ai·thma gia xa·rajh ne·vn proteraioth·tvn sta progra·mmata, h Epitroph· ua ejeta·sei uetika· to en lo·gv ai·thma, me thn proy¤po·uesh na throy·ntai oi kano·new epilejimo·thtaw kai oi loipe·w ektelestike·w diata·jeiw tvn diarurvtikv· n tamei·vn. Pa·ntvw, pre·pei na gi·nei safe·w o·ti mia endexo·menh pare·mbash toy EGTPE, an ypa·rjei, ua ei·nai entelv· w e·ktakth kai periorisme·nh. (1) EE L 374 thw 31. 12. 1988. (98/C 304/160) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0443/98 ypobolh· : Eryl McNally (PSE) prow thn Epitroph· (27 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Symfvni·a sy·ndeshw EE-Israh·l Ua h·uela na efisth·sv thn prosoxh· thw Epitroph·w sth symfvni·a sy·ndeshw EE-Israh·l h opoi·a te·uhke en isxy· ton Noe·mbrio 1995. (cid:201)xei enhmervuei· h Epitroph· gia tiw anhsyxi·ew poy e·xoyn ekfrasuei· o·ti to Israh·l den se·betai sthn pragmatiko·thta toyw o·royw kai tiw proy¤poue·seiw thw en lo·gv symfvni·aw; Sygkekrime·na, gnvri·zei h Epitroph· o·ti: › to Israh·l profanv· w parabia·zei toyw kano·new sxetika· me th xv· ra proe·leyshw dedome·noy o·ti e·xei ejaga·gei sthn EE xymo· portokalioy· o opoi·ow e·xei eisaxuei· sth xv· ra apo· th Brazili·a › to Israh·l e·xei apokry·cei ton to·po proe·leyshw proerxome·noy apo· toyw para·nomoyw oikismoy·w thw Ga·zaw xymoy· portokalioy· › oi telvneiake·w yphresi·ew thw Bretani·aw e·xoyn pragmatopoih·sei e·reyna sxetika· me thn pragmatikh· proe·leysh eno·w eyre·vw fa·smatow proi¤o·ntvn, o·pvw p. x. ypoleimma·tvn yfasma· tvn kai nhma·tvn, kauv· w kai thlepikoinvniakoy· ejoplismoy·, ta opoi·a e·xoyn eisaxuei· sto HB apo· to Israh·l;


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 466/98 του Allan MACARTNEY προς την Επ τροπή. Κανόνες ανταγωνισμού και τηλεοπτικά δικαιώματα για το Ευρωπαiκό Πρωτάθλημα Ποδοσφαίρου του 2000

eurovoc_concepts:
EU law
Scotland
broadcasting
free movement of programmes
restriction on competition
sporting event
television

text: 2. 10. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 304/111 (98/C 304/166) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0464/98 ypobolh· : Allan Macartney (ARE) prow thn Epitroph· (27 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Symboyleytikh· Epitroph· Aliei·aw Ei·nai se ue·sh h Epitroph· na koinopoih·sei ta ono·mata tvn ato·mvn kai tvn organismv· n poy ekprosvpoy·ntai sthn Symboyleytikh· Epitroph· Aliei·aw, na paroysia·sei tiw genike·w gramme·w toy progra·mmatow ergasi·aw gia to 1998 kai na dieykrini·sei thn sy·nuesh toy proedrei·oy thw kai tvn oma·dvn ergasi·aw ana· tome·a; Apa· nthsh thw kaw Bonino ej ono·matow thw Epitroph· w (27 Marti·oy 1998) H Epitroph· diabiba·zei apeyuei·aw sto Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy kai sth Genikh· Grammatei·a toy Orga·noy aytoy· tiw plhrofori·ew poy zhth·uhkan. (98/C 304/167) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0466/98 ypobolh· : Allan Macartney (ARE) prow thn Epitroph· (27 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Kano·new antagvnismoy· kai thleoptika· dikaiv· mata gia to Eyrvpai¤ko· Prvta·ulhma Podosfai·roy toy 2000 H ejasfa·lish tvn thleoptikv· n dikaivma·tvn gia to Eyrvpai¤ko· Prvta·ulhma Podosfai·roy toy 2000 apo· to Kana·li 5 shmai·nei o·ti pa·nv apo· e·na ekatommy·rio Skv· toi (30% toy plhuysmoy·) den ua mpore·soyn na parakoloyuh·soyn th zvntanh· anameta·dosh tvn 5 prokrimatikv· n agv· nvn poy ua diekdikh·sei h Skvti·a. Gnvri·zei h Epitroph· o·ti o organismo·w poy e·dvse ta symbo·laia › h radiothleoptikh· epixei·rhsh toy Loyjemboy·rgoy CLT-UFA › diaue·tei to 29% tvn metoxv· n toy kanalioy· 5; Mporei· h Epitroph· na maw epibebaiv· sei th diadikasi·a me thn opoi·a xorhgh·uhkan se thleoptike·w etairei·ew ta dikaiv· mata thw apeyuei·aw anameta·doshw tvn agv· nvn toy Eyrvpai¤koy· Podosfairikoy· Prvtaulh·matow toy 2000; Epiple·on, zhth·uhke apo· thn Epitroph· na ejeta·sei ea·n parabia· suhke opoiadh·pote ptyxh· tvn kano·nvn toy antagvnismoy· dedome·noy o·ti, o·pvw anafe·retai, den do·uhke stoyw radiothleoptikoy·w staumoy·w thw Skvti·aw h dynato·thta na ypoba·loyn prosfore·w; Apa· nthsh toy k. Van Miert Ej ono· matow thw Epitroph· w (25 Marti·oy 1998) Apo· tiw plhrofori·ew poy pare·sxe to ajio·timo me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy, den fai·netai para·nomh h ana·uesh thw sy·mbashw radiothleoptikh·w meta·doshw toy prvtaulh·matow Eyrv· phw ek me·royw toy dikaioy·xoy thleoptikoy· organismoy· CLT-UFA, sto Channel 5, sto opoi·o diaue·tei symmetoxh· 29%, me apote·lesma, sy·mfvna me to ajio·timo me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy, na sterhuei· to 30% toy plhuysmoy· thw Skvti·aw thn apeyuei·aw anameta·dosh 5 agv· nvn pro·krishw thw xv· raw toy. Oi diorganvte·w toy eyrvpai¤koy· prvtaulh·matow podosfai·roy den desmey·ontai apo· toyw kano·new peri· dhmosi·vn symba·sevn, sy·mfvna me toyw opoi·oyw oi symba·seiw pre·pei na apoteloy·n antikei·meno dhmopra·thshw. H Epitroph· den e·labe kami·a kataggeli·a ek me·royw radiothleoptikv· n organismv· n poy ekfra·zoyn thn apogoh·teysh· toyw me ton isxyrismo· o·ti h sy·mbash apotelei· para·bash tvn kano·nvn peri· antagvnismoy· thw synuh·khw. Prin apo· thn ejagvgh· opoivndh·pote symperasma·tvn sxetika· me to kata· po·so yph·rje para·bash ei·te toy a·ruroy 85, poy afora· tiw perioristike·w toy antagvnismoy· symfvni·ew, h· toy a·ruroy 86, poy afora· thn kata·xrhsh despo·zoysaw ue·shw, apaitei·tai ajiolo·ghsh tvn pragmatikv· n peristatikv· n apo· nomikh·w kai oikonomikh·w pleyra·w. Ako·mh kai an diapistvuei· o·ti h CLT/UFA kate·xei despo·zoysa ue·sh se orisme·nh agora·, h xorh·ghsh tvn dikaivma·tvn apokleistikh·w radiothleoptikh·w meta·doshw se a· llh etairei·a den ei·nai piuano· na dhmioyrgei· problh·mata th·rhshw tvn kano·nvn antagvnismoy·, ekto·w an h dia· rkeia thw xorhgoy·menhw apoklei- stiko·thtaw ei·nai yperbolikh· h· afora· poly· mega·lo ariumo· dikaivma· tvn. Epiple·on, h sy·mbash ende·xetai, makropro·uesma, na enisxy·ei ton antagvnismo· ston tome·a tvn radiothleoptikv· n metado·sevn sto Hnvme·no Basi·leio, dedome·noy o·ti to Channel 5 ei·nai e·naw sxetika· ne·ow antagvnisth·w kai xreia·zetai e·na stauero· koino·, to opoi·o ua apokth·sei me th meta·dosh elkystikv· n programma·tvn


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 448/98 by Gerardo BIANCO , Michl EBNER , Pierluigi CASTAGNETTI to the Council. Cavalese (Trento) tragedy

eurovoc_concepts:
Eurocontrol
Italy
air safety
air traffic
civil aviation
man-made disaster
military aircraft

text: C 304/108 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti 2. 10. 98 Komission ja¤senen Monika Wulf-Mathiesin komission puolesta antama vastaus (31. maaliskuuta 1998) Rakennerahastojen tavoin myo¤s Interreg II (1) -yhteiso¤aloitteen ta¤yta¤nto¤o¤npanossa noudatetaan toissijaisuuspe- riaatetta. Komissio on siten hyva¤ksynyt monivuotisia toimenpideohjelmia, kun taas hankkeiden valitseminen ja hyva¤ksyminen on kansallisten tai alueellisten ja paikallisten viranomaisten tehta¤va¤. Interreg II -ohjelman yhteydessa¤ komissio on myo¤nta¤nyt Espanjalle 484,7 miljoonaa ecua (vuoden 1994 hintatason mukaan) Interreg IIA -ohjelmaa varten (raja-alueiden kehitta¤minen ja raja-alueyhteistyo¤), 80 miljoonaa ecua (vuoden 1995 hintatason mukaan) Interreg IIB -ohjelmaa varten (Portugalin ja Espanjan kaasunsiirtoja¤rjestelmien yhteenkytkeminen) ja 116,1 miljoonaa ecua (vuoden 1996 hintatason mukaan) Interreg IIC -ohjelmaa varten (aluesuunnittelu), josta noin 10 miljoonaa ecua on tarkoitettu ylikansalliseen yhteistyo¤ho¤n ja 106 miljoonaa ecua kuivuuden torjumiseen. Espanja osallistuu yhteiso¤n rahoitustuella ta¤lla¤ hetkella¤ useaan rajat ylitta¤va¤a¤n tai ylikansalliseen toimenpide- ohjelmaan: › Espanjan ja Ranskan toimenpideohjelma, kokonaiskustannukset noin 140 miljoonaa ecua, josta yhteiso¤n rahoitusosuus on yhteensa¤ 61,6 miljoonaa ecua; › Espanjan ja Portugalin toimenpideohjelma, kokonaiskustannukset noin 755 miljoonaa ecua, josta yhteiso¤n rahoitusosuus on yhteensa¤ 552,0 miljoonaa ecua; › Espanjan ja Marokon raja-alueiden toimenpideohjelma, kokonaiskustannukset noin 185 miljoonaa ecua, josta yhteiso¤n rahoitusosuus on yhteensa¤ 100,0 miljoonaa ecua; › Va¤limeren alueen seka¤ Ranskan ja Italian Alppien alueen toimenpideohjelma, kokonaiskustannukset noin 23 miljoonaa ecua, josta yhteiso¤n rahoitusosuus on yhteensa¤ 13,3 miljoonaa ecua; › Lounais-Euroopan toimenpideohjelma, kokonaiskustannukset noin 10 miljoonaa ecua, josta yhteiso¤n rahoitusosuus on yhteensa¤ 5,2 miljoonaa ecua. (1) EYVL C 180, 1. 7. 1994. (98/C 304/162) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0448/98 neuvostolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Gerardo Bianco (PPE), Michl Ebner (PPE) ja Pierluigi Castagnetti (PPE) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Cavalesen tragedia (Trento) Amerikkalainen sotilaskone katkaisi 3. helmikuuta 1998 Cavalesessa (Trento) sijaitsevan Cermisin vuoren ko¤ysiradan kaapelit aiheuttaen 20 ihmisen kuoleman. Uhrit olivat kuutta eri kansallisuutta. Kone oli suorittamassa matalalla harjoituslentoa todenna¤ko¤isesti kyseisia¤ sotilasharjoituksia varten annettujen turvalli- suusma¤a¤ra¤ysten vastaisesti. Aikooko puheenjohtaja puuttua yhteiso¤n alueella operoivien ilmavoimien antamiin ma¤a¤ra¤yksiin ja ryhtya¤ kaikkiin tarvittaviin toimenpiteisiin, joilla varmistetaan turvallisuusvaatimusten noudattaminen harjoituslennoil- la? Vastaus (4. kesa¤kuuta 1998) Arvoisat parlamentin ja¤senet ovat varmasti hyvin tietoisia siita¤, miten ta¤rkea¤na¤ neuvosto pita¤a¤ ilmailuturvalli- suuteen liittyvia¤ seikkoja. Euroopan yhteiso¤ pyrkii parantamaan turvallisuusvaatimuksia ja se aikookin hakea Eurocontrolin ja¤senyytta¤ tavoitteenaan luoda ja panna ta¤yta¤nto¤o¤n mekanismi, jonka avulla ilmaliikenteen hallintaan liittyvia¤ turvallisuus- sa¤a¤nno¤ksia¤ voidaan kehitta¤a¤ ja yhdenmukaistaa monenkeskisesti. Samalla Euroopan yhteiso¤ tutkii mahdollisuut- ta perustaa siviili-ilmailun turvallisuudesta vastaava eurooppalainen ja¤rjesto¤ (EASA). Neuvosto ei ole saanut komissiolta mita¤a¤n ehdotusta, joka liittyisi arvoisien parlamentin ja¤senten mainitsemasta onnettomuudesta saatuihin kokemuksiin


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 504/98 by Dominique SOUCHET to the Council. Prohibition on the use of driftnets

eurovoc_concepts:
France
Portugal
Spain
anti-discriminatory measure
economic consequence
fishing area
fishing net
fishing regulations
fishing rights
fishing vessel

text: 21. 10. 98 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti C 323/43 Telekuuntelun osalta neuvosto tarkastelee parhaillaan keskina¤ista¤ oikeusapua rikosasioissa koskevan, Euroopan unionin perustamissopimuksen VI osaston mukaisesti laadittua yleissopimusehdotusta, jossa mm. vahvistetaan rikostutkinnan yhteydessa¤ sovellettavat, laillista telekuuntelua koskevat sa¤a¤nno¤t rajat ylitta¤vissa¤ tapauksissa. (98/C 323/55) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0502/98 neuvostolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Ajoverkkojen ka¤yto¤n kielta¤minen Yhdistyneiden kansakuntien 22. joulukuuta 1989 antama pa¤a¤to¤slauselma sisa¤lta¤a¤ selkea¤n varovaisuus- periaatteen, jolla pyrita¤a¤n kielta¤ma¤a¤n (cid:148)suurten ajoverkkojen(cid:148) ka¤ytto¤ avomerella¤ riippumatta alueesta tai siita¤, minka¤laista kalastusta harjoitetaan. Yhteiso¤ on jo ratkaissut (cid:148)suuren ajoverkon(cid:148) ka¤sitetta¤ koskevan kysymyksen ma¤a¤rittelema¤lla¤ ajoverkon enimma¤ispituudeksi 2,5 kilometria¤ Atlantin valtamerella¤ ja Va¤limerella¤ 27. tammikuuta 1992 annetulla sa¤a¤do¤ksella¤, joka perustuu kyseisen pa¤a¤to¤slauselman soveltamiseen. Miksi neuvosto haluaa kielta¤a¤ ajoverkkojen ka¤yto¤n Atlantilla, kun niiden pituus on jo rajoitettu 2,5 kilometriin, mutta sallii 21 kilometria¤ pitkien ajoverkkojen ka¤yto¤n Ita¤merella¤? Onko ta¤ma¤ toimenpide neuvoston mielesta¤ tasapuolinen, oikeudenmukainen seka¤ toimenpide, joka ei syrji keta¤a¤n? (98/C 323/56) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0504/98 neuvostolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Ajoverkkojen ka¤yto¤n kielta¤minen Komission viimeisimpien esitysten mukaan ajoverkkojen ka¤ytto¤ olisi kiellettya¤ avomerella¤ Atlantin valtamerella¤ ja se olisi edelleen sallittua rannikolla. Ta¤ma¤ merkitsisi sita¤, etta¤ ajoverkkojen ka¤ytto¤ olisi kielletty ranskalaisilta kalastajilta, jotka kalastavat (Azorien lajike), mutta kalastus olisi sallittua espanjalaisille valkotonnikalaa, jota esiintyy avomerella¤ kalastajille, silla¤ yksi ta¤ma¤n kalalajin (Iberian niemimaan lajike) ka¤ytta¤mista¤ vaellusreiteista¤ kulkee Kantabrian rannikkoa pitkin Espanjassa. Toisin sanoen ajoverkko olisi (cid:148)hyva¤ kalastusva¤line(cid:148) (eli on valikoiva, eika¤ ole ha¤irio¤ksi merenkululle tai tonnikalan luonnolliselle vaellukselle) niin kauan, kun sita¤ ei ka¤yteta¤ 12 meripeninkulmaa pitemmilla¤ eta¤isyyksilla¤ rannikosta ja (cid:148)huono kalastusva¤line(cid:148), jos sita¤ ka¤yteta¤a¤n kalastusalueilla, jotka sijaitsevat rannikosta yli 500 kilometrin pa¤a¤ssa¤. Voisiko neuvosto antaa selvityksen siita¤, onko ta¤ma¤n ja¤rjestelma¤n sisa¤lta¤mille eroille tieteellisia¤, ekologisia tai teknisia¤ perusteita ilman, etta¤ selitys saa ranskalaiset uskomaan ja¤rjestelma¤n suosivan Espanjaa ja Portugalia heida¤n kustannuksellaan? (98/C 323/57) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0506/98 neuvostolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Ajoverkkojen ka¤yto¤n kielta¤minen Morleyn kalastusvaliokunnalle 3. tammikuuta 1998 antaman esityksen perusteella vaikuttaa silta¤, etta¤ neuvoston aikomuksena olisi ka¤ytta¤a¤ yhteiso¤n varoja Ranskan, Ison-Britannian ja Irlannin tonnikalan verkkokalastuksen lopettamiseen Atlantin valtamerella¤. Morley on esitta¤nyt, etta¤ Italian noudattama monipuolistamispolitiikka on esimerkki, jota olisi seurattava. Eiko¤ neuvoston olisi kuitenkin syyta¤ varmistua siita¤, etta¤ Italian ja¤rjestelma¤ todellakin tuottaa tuloksia, ennen kuin neuvosto harkitsee ta¤ma¤n ja¤rjestelma¤n ka¤ytto¤o¤nottoa Atlantilla? Onko neuvostolla vedenpita¤via¤ todisteita siita¤, etta¤ kalastaminen laittoman pitkilla¤ ajoverkoilla olisi todellakin lopetettu Va¤limerella¤ eli todisteita siita¤, etta¤ ne kalastusalukset, jotka ovat saaneet tukea kalastusmenetelmiensa¤ muuttamiseen eiva¤t ole siirtyneet toisen lipun alle, ja etta¤ asianomaiset alusten omistajat ja miehisto¤t ovat todellakin lopettaneet aikaisemman toimintansa?


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 508/98 af Dominique SOUCHET til Rådet. Forbud mod anvendelse af drivgarn

eurovoc_concepts:
Atlantic Ocean
Baltic Sea
EU aid
EU law - national law
UN resolution
environmental impact
fishing net
fishing regulations
fishing vessel
impact study

text: C 323/44 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende 21. 10. 98 (98/C 323/58) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0508/98 af Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) til R(cid:229)det (27. februar 1998) Om: Forbud mod anvendelse af drivgarn Den Videnskabelige, Tekniske og (cid:216)konomiske Komite· for Fiskeri, der er Kommissionens ekspertorgan, anerkender b(cid:229)de de anvendte metoder og kvaliteten af resultaterne i forbindelse med den undersłgelse, som IFREMER, det franske institut for havforskning, gennemfłrte i 1993 af de łkologiske konsekvenser af brugen af drivgarn i Atlanterhavet. I sine konklusioner bem(cid:230)rker komiteen blot, at fiskeri med drivgarn skal »overv(cid:229)ges nłje«. Siden 1993 har l(cid:230)ngden af drivgarn v(cid:230)ret begr(cid:230)nset til 2,5 km, antallet af fartłjer, der anvender dette fangstredskab, er blevet begr(cid:230)nset, og garnteknologien er blevet forbedret, og der er ingen tvivl om, at dłdeligheden er blevet betydeligt reduceret. Mener R(cid:229)det p(cid:229) baggrund af denne udvikling, at det vil v(cid:230)re hensigtsm(cid:230)ssigt at godkende Kommissionens forslag om at forbyde brugen af drivgarn i Atlanterhavet (uden for kystomr(cid:229)der)? (98/C 323/59) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-0510/98 af Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) til R(cid:229)det (27. februar 1998) Om: Forbud mod anvendelse af drivgarn R(cid:229)det har til hensigt at (cid:230)ndre sin holdning vedrłrende forbuddet mod anvendelse af drivgarn i Atlanterhavet (uden for kystomr(cid:229)der). Hvilke videnskabelige motiver ligger der til grund for, at R(cid:229)det s(cid:229)ledes fraviger sin traditionelle holdning og tilslutter sig Kommissionens holdning? Der er ingen tvivl om, at der sker ułnsket fangst i forbindelse med fiskeri med drivgarn i (cid:216)stersłen. Oplysninger, indsamlet af CIEM, Co(cid:136)te d(cid:146)Ivoires Center for havopdr(cid:230)t, viser, at fangsterne inkluderer flere fuglearter (lomvie og alk) og havpattedyr (s(cid:230)ler og marsvin). Blandt havpattedyrerne er der arter, hvor antallet i disse omr(cid:229)der er blevet betydelig reduceret (marsvin og sp(cid:230)ttede s(cid:230)ler). Derudover er bestanden af vilde laks i (cid:216)stersłen truet. Mener R(cid:229)det p(cid:229) baggrund af disse oplysninger, at det er logisk at forbyde brugen af drivgarn p(cid:229) 2,5 km i Atlanterhavet (uden for kystomr(cid:229)der) og tillade drivgarn p(cid:229) 21 km i (cid:216)stersłen? Samlet svar p(cid:229) skriftlige forespłrgsler E-0502/98, E-0504/98, E-0506/98, E-0508/98 og E-0510/98 (6. juli 1998) P(cid:229) samlingen den 8. juni 1998 vedtog R(cid:229)det forordningen om forbud mod anvendelse af drivgarn fra den 1. januar 2002. Fiskerfartłjerne kan i en overgangsperiode opbevare om bord eller drive fiskeri med drivgarn af en l(cid:230)ngde p(cid:229) hłjst 2,5 km efter tilladelse fra flagmedlemsstaten. N(cid:229)r der ses bort fra (cid:216)stersłen, B(cid:230)lterne og (cid:216)resund, finder denne forordning anvendelse i alle farvande, der henhłrer under medlemsstaternes hłjhed eller jurisdiktion, og uden for disse farvande for alle EF-fiskerfartłjer. Som det er det (cid:230)rede medlem bekendt, opfordrer resolution 44/225, vedtaget af De Forenede Nationers Generalforsamling den 22. december 1989, som er blevet bekr(cid:230)ftet af flere senere resolutioner, senest af Generalforsamlingens resolution 51/36 af 9. december 1996, til fuld gennemfłrelse af et globalt moratorium for alt storstilet pelagisk drivgarnsfiskeri p(cid:229) verdenshavene. I (cid:216)stersłen er drivgarnsfiskeriet efter laks underlagt de regler for fiskeriet, som den ansvarlige regionale organisation, Den Internationale (cid:216)stersł-fiskerikommission, har fastsat, og som i f(cid:230)llesskabslovgivningen er udmłntet i R(cid:229)dets forordning nr. 88/98 (1)


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 535/98 by Raymonde DURY to the Council. Cultural repression of the Albanian-speaking peoples' right to education in a mother tongue

eurovoc_concepts:
Albania
Commission Delegation
Kosovo
ethnic discrimination
ethnic group
human rights
mother tongue
right to education
university

text: 9. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 310/79 (98/C 310/104) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0535/98 by Raymonde Dury (PSE) to the Council (27 February 1998) Subject: Cultural repression of the Albanian-speaking peoples(cid:146) right to education in a mother tongue We hear with growing concern of the worsening persecution of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, due to the Serbian policy of (cid:145)Ethnic Cleansing(cid:146). This question highlights the repression in the educational sphere. A Serb police occupation of the University of Prishtina, which has now continued for 7 years, has forced the ethnic Albanians out of the university buildings. Albanians attempt to continue with clandestine teaching, yet teachers are beaten when discovered holding classes in their mother tongue. Peaceful protests are violently quashed by the Serb police and 80% of University buildings stand empty. Could the Council specify: How it intends to apply diplomatic pressure in reaction to Serbian policy, which contravenes international 1. law guaranteeing the fundamental human right to education in mother tongues? 2. Why the decision to set up a European representative in Kosovo, agreed several months ago, has still not been implemented? 3. Any further measures it may intend to put in motion to restore democratic and civil freedoms, or pressure it may bring to bear upon Milosevic, in particular concerning the Serbian failure to implement the (cid:145)Educational Agreement(cid:146) of 1996, signed between Presiding Rugova and Milosevic to ease tensions, as a previous response to international pressure regarding economic sanctions. Answer (16-17 June 1998) 1. Throughout the past months, the concern of the Honourable Member of Parliament about the deteriorating situation in Kosovo has been also that of the Council, which has devoted much of its attention to it and, specifically, to the implementation of the Education Agreement signed between the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) and the Kosovar Albanian leadership in 1996. Dissatisfaction with FRY policy in the field of human rights and respect for democratic standards prompted 2. the decision, taken by the Council in December 1997, to withdraw the Autonomous Trade Measures it had granted the FRY on 29 April 1997. The Council has repeatedly confirmed its firm and unequivocal stance in favour of a large degree of autonomy for the region concerned, which entails a full reinstatement of the right of ethnic Kosovar Albanians to education in their mother tongue. On 19 March 1998, the Council appointed Mr Felipe Gonzalez as EU Special Representative for the FRY, with a view to enhancing the effectiveness of the EU(cid:146)s contribution to the resolution of problems in the FRY. 3. The issue of an EU office in Pristina has been taken up several times in the past by the EU with the FRY authorities, which have still to respond to the EU request. There is however a growing EU presence in Pristina. ECHO has established a permanent presence in the Kosovar capital, as has the European Community Monitor Mission (ECMM), which has re-deployed to that city two observers previously stationed in Podgorica. The issue of a permanent EU presence in Pristina is still under discussion. 4. Firm diplomatic pressure by the EU, in conjunction with that exerted by the other international actors in the Kosovo crisis, has induced the Serbian authorities to sign with the Kosovar Albanian leadership, on 23 March 1998, an agreement implementing the 1996 Education Agreement. Throughout the process, the EU has strongly supported the efforts of the St. Egidio Community, which has remained in close contact with the EU Presidency and Member States. The EU has already declared that it is willing to substantially support implementation of the agreement; the Presidency and the Commission have undertaken a joint mission to Belgrade and Pristina on 31 March and 1 April 1998, to liaise directly with Monsignor Paglia and the local authorities in order to examine how best the EU can support the Agreement


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 502/98 dell'on. Dominique SOUCHET al Consiglio. Divieto di utilizzare le reti a strascico

eurovoc_concepts:
Atlantic Ocean
Baltic Sea
EU aid
European standard
Mediterranean Sea
UN resolution
economic consequence
fishing net
fishing regulations
fishing vessel

text: 21. 10. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee C 323/43 Riguardo all(cid:146)intercettazione delle telecomunicazioni, il Consiglio sta attualmente esaminando un progetto di convenzione, basata sul titolo VI del trattato, relativa all(cid:146)assistenza giudiziaria in materia penale, che dovra‘ stabilire tra l(cid:146)altro le norme sull(cid:146)intercettazione legale delle telecomunicazioni nel quadro di indagini transnazionali di carattere penale. (98/C 323/55) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0502/98 di Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) al Consiglio (27 febbraio 1998) Oggetto: Divieto di utilizzare le reti a strascico La risoluzione delle Nazioni Unite del 22 dicembre 1989 pone chiaramente un principio cautelativo inteso a vietare le «grandi reti a strascico» in alto mare in qualsiasi regione o fondale di pesca. La Comunita‘ ha gia‘ risolto la questione della definizione della «grande rete a strascico» fissandone il limite inferiore a 2,5 km nell(cid:146)Atlantico e nel Mediterraneo con il regolamento del 27 gennaio 1992 basato sull(cid:146)applicazione di detta risoluzione. Quali sono le ragioni che inducono il Consiglio a vietare l(cid:146)utilizzazione delle reti a strascico nell(cid:146)Atlantico, gia‘ limitate a 2,5 km, mentre tollera la pesca con reti a strascico di 21 km nel Mar Baltico? Pensa il Consiglio che questa misura sia equa, non discriminatoria e giusta? (98/C 323/56) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0504/98 di Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) al Consiglio (27 febbraio 1998) Oggetto: Divieto di utilizzare le reti a strascico Secondo le ultime proposte della Commissione, l(cid:146)impiego delle reti a strascico sarebbe vietato in alto mare nell(cid:146)Atlantico e sarebbe tuttora autorizzato nella fascia costiera. In questo modo la rete a strascico sarebbe vietata ai pescatori francesi che pescano il tonno bianco presente in alto mare (filone delle Azzorre), ma autorizzata per i soli pescatori spagnoli poiche· una delle vie di migrazione di questa specie passa lungo le coste cantabriche spagnole (filone iberico). In altri termini la rete a strascico sarebbe un «buono strumento» (vale a dire selettivo, che non reca danno alla navigazione ne· alle migrazioni naturali di tonno, ecc. ) al di sotto delle 12 miglia e un «cattivo strumento» di pesca al di la‘ di tale limite, nelle zone internazionali situate ad oltre 500 km dalle coste. E(cid:146) in grado il Consiglio di spiegare la logica scientifica, ecologica o tecnica che giustifica una tale discrepanza di regimi senza che i pescatori francesi pensino che cio‘ favorisce la Spagna e il Portogallo a loro svantaggio? (98/C 323/57) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0506/98 di Dominique Souchet (I-EDN) al Consiglio (27 febbraio 1998) Oggetto: Divieto di utilizzare le reti a strascico Secondo il discorso tenuto dal Sig. Morley dinanzi alla commissione per la pesca il 3 febbraio 1998, sembra che il Consiglio sia intenzionato ad utilizzare i fondi finanziari comunitari per ottenere la cessazione della pesca dei pescatori di tonno bianco francesi, britannici e irlandesi che utilizzano reti a strascico nell(cid:146)Atlantico. Il Sig. Morley si e‘ riferito alla politica di diversificazione condotta in Italia come ad un esempio da seguire. Prima di poter immaginare di trasferire questa formula all(cid:146)Atlantico, non sarebbe opportuno che il Consiglio si assicuri prima dei risultati effettivi del piano italiano? Dispone il Consiglio di prove irrefutabili che dimostrano che la pesca con reti a strascico di lunghezza illegale e‘ effettivamente cessata nel Mediterraneo; che le imbarcazioni che hanno beneficiato degli aiuti non abbiano cambiato bandiera e che i padroni e l(cid:146)equipaggio interessati hanno effettivamente cessato le loro precedenti attivita‘?


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 469/98 dell'on. Richard HOWITT alla Commissione. Il ruolo degli orientamenti nell'approvazione di programmi dei fondi strutturali, come convenuto nel Consiglio informale in Irlanda (14-15.11.1996)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
Structural Funds
budget policy

text: C 402/12 Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:224) europee IT 22. 12. 98 In data 6-7 aprile 1998, la Commissione ha organizzato e finanziato un simposio scientifico sul problema ancora irrisolto della continua presenza della peste suina classica nei cinghiali di talune zone della Germania, dell(cid:146)Italia e della Francia. Questo problema verr(cid:224) ulteriormente discusso nell(cid:146)ambito del comitato veterinario permanente e del comitato scientifico veterinario, allo scopo di riesaminare l(cid:146)idoneit(cid:224) delle misure finora adottate. Le perdite economiche provocate dall(cid:146)epidemia possono essere difficilmente valutate con precisione. In caso di malattia, gli Stati membri interessati erogano una compensazione per la macellazione dei suini imputabile a motivi sanitari. La Comunit(cid:224) rimborsa il 50 % di tali costi (stima per la partecipazione comunitaria relativa ai casi verificatisi nel 1997: 116,8 milioni di ecu). Inoltre la Commissione ha adottato numerose decisioni che stabiliscono misure eccezionali a sostegno dei mercati negli Stati membri in cui si Ł manifestata la malattia. La Comunit(cid:224) rimborsa a concorrenza del 70 % i costi di dette misure (partecipazione comunitaria nel 1997: 497,59 milioni di ecu). (1) JO L 47 del 21. 2. 1980. (98/C 402/012) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA P-0460/98 di Shaun Spiers (PSE) alla Commissione (16 febbraio 1998) Oggetto: Benessere delle galline ovaiole Quando intende la Commisisone presentare proposte per il miglioramento del benessere delle galline ovaiole? Risposta data dal sig. Fischler in nome della Commissione (13 marzo 1998) La Commissione si pregia di rinviare l(cid:146)Onorevole Parlementare alla risposta da essa data all(cid:146) interrogazione scritta E-115/98 dell(cid:146)Onorevole Pollack (1). (1) JO C 304 del 2. 10. 1998, pag. 33. (98/C 402/013) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-0469/98 di Richard Howitt (PSE) alla Commissione (27 febbraio 1998) Oggetto: Il ruolo degli orientamenti nell(cid:146)approvazione di programmi dei fondi strutturali, come convenuto nel Consiglio informale in Irlanda (14-15. 11. 1996) Qual Ł la valutazione della Commissione circa il grado di efficacia del ruolo svolto dalla pubblicazione degli orientamenti a livello di Commissione nell(cid:146)influenzare concretamente i programmi all(cid:146)interno degli Stati membri? Di quale procedura si avvale la Commissione per effettuare a tale valutazione? La Commissione intende continuare tali orientamenti inserendoli nei nuovi programmi di fondi strutturali da essa proposti? In caso di risposta positiva, quale nuova consultazione avr(cid:224) luogo sugli orientamenti ed entro quale data la Commissione intende approvarli? Risposta data dalla sig. ra Wulf-Mathies in nome della Commissione (6 aprile 1998) Come indicato nel documento della Commissione pubblicato il 30 maggio 1997 (1), gli orientamenti, unitamente alle valutazioni intermedie dei programmi, serviranno da base per gli adattamenti necessari nel quadro della revisione a met(cid:224) percorso dei programmi 1994-1999


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 455/98 van Carlo SECCHI aan de Commissie. Wijziging in de afbakening van de berggebieden van de gemeente Lario Orientale

eurovoc_concepts:
EAGGF Guidance Section
administrative procedure
agricultural structure
farm modernisation
hill farming
less-favoured agricultural area
mountain region
regions of Italy

text: 17. 7. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen C 223/173 (98/C 223/225) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0433/98 van Leonie van Bladel (UPE) aan de Commissie (24 februari 1998) Betreft: Stimuleren positieve ontwikkelingen in Montenegro In de Joegoslavische deelrepubliek Montenegro is het proces van overgang naar een open en democratische samenleving verder gevorderd dan in de andere deelrepubliek Servie¤. Een ongestoorde ontwikkeling in deze richting kan al op korte termijn een bevruchtende werking hebben op de situatie in zowel Servie¤ als in Joegoslavie¤ als geheel. Deze positieve ontwikkeling wordt echter afgeremd door zowel interne als externe factoren. Intern is er sprake van be(cid:14)¤nvloeding in negatieve zin door de autoriteiten in Servie¤, zowel direct als via organen van de Joegoslavische federatie. Zo voeren de staatsmedia in Servie¤ al maandenlang een lastercampagne tegen de nieuwe Montenegrijnse president Djukanovic en zijn geestverwanten. Extern heeft Montenegro te kampen met beperkende maatregelen op zowel financieel als handelsgebied, die Joegoslavie¤ als geheel door de internationale gemeenschap zijn opgelegd. Kan de Commissie aangeven of en op welke wijze het mogelijk is om de positieve ontwikkeling van de situatie in Montenegro met concrete maatregelen te stimuleren? Is de Commissie bereid om via de daartoe gee¤igende wegen er bij zowel de Servische als Joegoslavische autoriteiten op aan te dringen het in de Joegoslavische grondwet vastgelegde recht van de republiek Montenegro om zijn eigen zaken te regelen, te respecteren? Antwoord van de heer Van den Broek namens de Commissie (25 maart 1998) De Commissie draagt tot de blijvende positieve ontwikkeling in Montenegro bij door steun voor het democratiseringsproces, de mensenrechten, de rechten van minderheden en de onafhankelijke media, die alle een belangrijke rol te vervullen hebben. De Unie verleent eveneens een duidelijke politieke steun voor het ree¤le streven naar democratisering in Montenegro. De mogelijkheid tot opname van de Federale Republiek Joegoslavie¤ in het autonome handelsstelsel en het Phare-programma hangt af van de naleving door dat land van de desbetreffende politieke en economische voorwaarden, wat nog steeds niet is gebeurd. Aangezien deze maatregelen en programma(cid:146)s gelden voor staten (dat wil zeggen de Federale Republiek Joegoslavie¤) en niet voor delen daarvan (bijvoorbeeld de deelrepublieken Servie¤ en Montenegro), komt Montenegro op dit ogenblik niet in aanmerking voor handelspreferenties of voor Phare. Er zouden evenwel passende projecten kunnen worden gefinancierd uit de beschikbare begrotingsmid- delen voor wederopbouw in het voormalige Joegoslavie¤. (98/C 223/226) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0455/98 van Carlo Secchi (PPE) aan de Commissie (27 februari 1998) Betreft: Wijziging in de afbakening van de berggebieden van de gemeente Lario Orientale In 1995 heeft de berggemeente Lario Orientale (Lecco) via het bevoegde ministerie een verzoek ingediend bij DG VI tot uitbreiding van haar berggebieden in de zin van richtlijn 75/268 (1) (vervangen door verordening 950/97) (2). In maart 1996 heeft zij de door het DG gevraagde aanvullende documentatie toegezonden. Volgens informaties van de Commissiediensten is dit dossier, hoewel compleet en volledig in overeenstemming met de geldende bepalingen, nog niet goedgekeurd door de Commissie, omdat zij eerst de voltooiing van het onderzoek inzake de inmiddels door andere Italiaanse regio(cid:146)s ingediende aanvragen wil afwachten


eurovoc_concepts:
award of contract
export refund
rice
third country

text: 28. 2. 98 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen L 60/33 VERORDENING (EG) Nr. 470/98 VAN DE COMMISSIE van 27 februari 1998 betreffende de offertes voor de uitvoer van rondkorrelige volwitte rijst bestemd voor bepaalde derde landen, die zijn ingediend in het kader van de inschrijving bedoeld in Verordening (EG) nr. 2098/97 DE COMMISSIE VAN DE EUROPESE GEMEENSCHAPPEN, Gelet op het Verdrag tot oprichting van de Europese Gemeenschap, Gelet op Verordening (EG) nr. 3072/95 van de Raad van 22 december 1995 houdende een gemeenschappelijke ordening van de rijstmarkt (1), gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 192/98 (2), en met name op artikel 13, lid 3, Overwegende dat bij Verordening (EG) nr. 2098/97 van de Commissie (3) een inschrijving voor de vaststelling van de restitutie bij uitvoer van rijst is opengesteld; Overwegende dat, overeenkomstig artikel 5 van Verorde- ning (EEG) nr. 584/75 van de Commissie (4), laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 299/95 (5), de Commissie volgens de procedure van artikel 22 van Verordening (EG) nr. 3072/95 op grond van de inge- diende offertes kan besluiten niet tot toewijzing over te gaan; Overwegende dat het, met name rekening houdend met de in artikel 13 van Verordening (EG) nr. 3072/95 genoemde criteria, niet wenselijk is een maximumresti- tutie vast te stellen; Overwegende dat de in deze verordening vervatte maatre- gelen in overeenstemming zijn met het advies van het Comit(cid:130) van beheer voor granen, HEEFT DE VOLGENDE VERORDENING VASTGESTELD: Artikel 1 Er wordt geen gevolg gegeven aan de offertes die van 23 tot en met 26 februari 1998 zijn ingediend in het kader van de in Verordening (EG) nr. 2098/97 bedoelde inschrijving voor de uitvoer van rondkorrelige volwitte rijst bestemd voor bepaalde derde landen. Artikel 2 Deze verordening treedt in werking op 28 februari 1998. Deze verordening is verbindend in al haar onderdelen en is rechtstreeks toepassel¶k in elke lidstaat. Gedaan te Brussel, 27 februari 1998. Voor de Commissie Franz FISCHLER Lid van de Commissie (1) PB L 329 van 30. 12. 1995, blz. 18. (2) PB L 20 van 27. 1. 1998, blz. 16. (3) PB L 292 van 25. 10. 1997, blz. 25. (4) PB L 61 van 7. 3. 1975, blz. 25. (5) PB L 35 van 15. 2. 1995, blz. 8


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 445/98 van Concepció FERRER aan de Commissie. Decentralisatie van het Interreg II-programma

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
decentralisation
frontier region
management
operational programme
regional cooperation

text: C 310/64 NL Publicatieblad van de Europese Gemeenschappen 9. 10. 98 De bijdrage uit het EOGFL komt overeen met 75 % van de uitgaven, aangezien Ierland een onder doelstelling 1 vallende regio is. In andere regio(cid:146)s bedraagt de communautaire bijdrage slechts 50 %. Het aandeel van de in het kader van het REPS verleende bijstand in de totale uitgaven van het EOGFL voor programma(cid:146)s in de sector landbouw en milieu bedroeg 4 % in 1995, 3 % in 1996 en meer dan 6 % in 1997. Ter vergelijking, Ierland beschikt over 3,3 % van het totale landbouwareaal van de Gemeenschap. Met betrekking tot de uitsplitsing naar soort maatregelen heeft de Commissie van Ierland nog geen verslag ontvangen over de uitvoering van het programma; de tot nu toe medegedeelde gegevens betreffen alleen algemene cijfers. De Commissie vestigt de aandacht van het geachte Parlementslid op het verslag van de Commissie (2) over de toepassing van Verordening (EEG) nr. 2078/92, dat op 4 december 1997 bij het Parlement is ingediend. (1) PB L 215 van 30. 7. 1992. (2) COM(97) 620 def. (98/C 310/83) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0445/98 van Concepcio· Ferrer (PPE) aan de Commissie (27 februari 1998) Betreft: Decentralisatie van het Interreg II-programma Het doel van Interreg II is de toepassing van doeltreffende mechanismen om de samenwerking tussen grensregio(cid:146)s te vergemakkelijken. Een aantal lidstaten, waaronder Frankrijk, hebben gekozen voor decentralisatie en hebben het kantoor dat belast is met het beheer van het programma gevestigd in de regio waar het programma wordt uitgevoerd. Dat is bv. het geval voor het kantoor van Toulouse, bevoegd voor de regio Midi-Pyre·ne·es. Acht de Commissie het niet wenselijk om alle lidstaten te verzoeken de kantoren voor het beheer van het programma te decentraliseren, om dichter bij de realiteit van de regio te staan, een nauwer contact te hebben met de begunstigden van het programma en aldus een doeltreffender beheer ervan mogelijk te maken? Antwoord van mevrouw Wulf-Mathies namens de Commissie (2 april 1998) In de richtsnoeren voor de operationele programma(cid:146)s van Interreg II (1) onderstreept de Commissie hoeveel belang zij eraan hecht dat in de grensregio(cid:146)s, in samenwerking met de betrokken regionale en plaatselijke autoriteiten, gezamenlijke institutionele en administratieve structuren worden opgezet of verder worden ontwikkeld die ook bevoegd zouden moeten zijn voor de tenuitvoerlegging van de projecten. Aan de lidstaten is gevraagd hiermee zoveel mogelijk rekening te houden. (1) PB C 180 van 1. 7. 1994. (98/C 310/84) SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG E-0447/98 van Concepcio· Ferrer (PPE) aan de Commissie (27 februari 1998) Betreft: Huidige situatie in de sector uien Bij de hervorming van de GMO in de sector groenten en fruit werd geen rekening gehouden met het voorstel van het Europees Parlement om bijlage II van de desbetreffende verordening uit te breiden tot een aantal andere producten, waaronder uien, zodat ook deze sector aanspraak zou kunnen maken op steun voor het uit de handel nemen van producten


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 528/98 του Concepcio FERRER προς το Συμβούλ ο. IV πρόγραμμα κατά της φτώχειας

eurovoc_concepts:
Community budget
EU programme
European social policy
United Kingdom
aid to disadvantaged groups
marginalisation
poverty
socially disadvantaged class

text: 17. 7. 98 EL Epi·shmh Efhmeri·da tvn Eyrvpai¤kv· n Koinoth·tvn C 223/177 (98/C 223/231) GRAPTH ERVTHSH E-0528/98 ypobolh· : Concepcio· Ferrer (PPE) prow to Symboy· lio (27 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: IV pro·gramma kata· thw ftv· xeiaw Meta· thn oloklh·rvsh toy III progra·mmatow kata· thw ftv· xeiw, stiw 30 Ioyni·oy 1994, ekponh·uhke e·na ne·o pro·gramma poy den e·xei ako·mh egkriuei· apo· to Symboy·lio. Lamba·nontaw ypo·ch o·ti to pro·gramma ayto· proe·blepe th xrhmatodo·thsh dra·sevn me sto·xo th belti·vsh tvn synuhkv· n katoiki·aw kai thn koinvnikh· e·ntajh tvn aste·gvn, ua mporoy·se to Symboy·lio na anafe·rei po·te proble·petai na egkriuei· to pro·gramma ayto·; Apa· nthsh (11 Mai(cid:143)oy 1998) (cid:211)pvw anafe·rei to Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy, h Epitroph· ype·bale sto Symboy·lio, to 1994, pro·tash apo·fashw gia th ue·spish pro·typoy mesopro·uesmoy progra·mmatow gia thn katapole·mhsh toy oikonomikoy· kai koinvnikoy· apokleismoy· kai thn prov· uhsh thw allhleggy·hw. To pro·gramma ayto· aforoy·se thn peri·odo 1994-1999. H omofvni·a gia thn pro·tash ayth·, thn opoi·a apaitei· h nomikh· ba·sh (a·ruro 235 thw SEK), den diapistv· uhke sto epi·pedo toy Symboyli·oy thw 24hw Ioyni·oy 1994. To Symboy·lio den syne·xise e·ktote tiw ergasi·ew toy sxetika· me thn pro·tash apo·fashw gia to pro·gramma katapole·mhshw toy oikonomikoy· kai koinvnikoy· apokleismoy·. Eja·lloy, to Ajio·timo Me·low toy Koinoboyli·oy gnvri·zei asfalv· w o·ti, en tv metajy·, to Hnvme·no Basi·leio a·skhse env· pion toy Dikasthri·oy (1h Aprili·oy 1996) prosfygh· kata· thw Epitroph·w, zhtv· ntaw thn aky·rvsh tvn apofa·sevn poy anafe·rontai sthn anakoi·nvsh ty·poy thw Epitroph·w thw 23hw Ianoyari·oy 1996, me to skeptiko· o·ti h Epitroph· den mporei· na anala·bei dapa·nh sto plai·sio tvn eggegramme·nvn ston proy¤pologismo· pistv· sevn › gia thn katapole·mhsh thw ftv· xeiaw › xvri·w na e·xei ek toy no·moy thn ejoysi·a, afoy· to Symboy·lio den e·xei ekdv· sei thn apo·fash. Pro·keitai gia thn ypo·uesh C-106/96 (1). H apo·fash toy Dikasthri·oy aname·netai. (1) EE C 145 thw 18. 05. 1996, seli·da 7 (98/C 223/232) GRAPTH ERVTHSH P-0548/98 ypobolh·: Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) prow thn Epitroph· (19 Febroyari·oy 1998) Ue·ma: Ry·umish thw aliei·aw me tra·tew sthn Itali·a Apo· to 1990, polya·riumoi italoi· efopliste·w ype·balan, me·sv thw Genikh·w Diey·uynshw Aliei·aw toy Ypoyrgei·oy Emporikh·w Naytili·aw, ai·thsh gia koinotikh· xrhmatodotikh· syndromh· gia thn kataskeyh· polya·riumvn skafv· n aliei·aw me to sy·sthma thw «pelagikh·w tra·taw me po·rtew» (prin apo· thn apo·syrsh eno·w a· lloy alieytikoy· ska·foyw poy leitoyrgoy·se me a·deia aliei·aw me tra·ta byuoy·). H Epitroph· Xrhmatodoth·sevn toy en lo·gv ypoyrgei·oy ei·xe h·dh gnvmodoth·sei uetika· gia polle·w aith·seiw xrhmatodo·thshw aytoy· toy ei·doyw, sy·mfvna me tiw diata·jeiw toy Kanonismoy· EOK (ariu. 4028/86) (1). Sthn prokeime·nh peri·ptvsh, to Ypoyrgei·o ene·krine kai thn xorh·ghsh adei·aw aliei·aw gia to i·dio sy·sthma tra·taw byuoy· o·pvw kai gia to sy·sthma «pelagikh·w tra·taw me po·rtew». Pra·gmati, to ypoyrgei·o o·pvw kai oi efopliste·w uevroy·san ane·kauen to teleytai·o ayto· sy·sthma vw isody·namo me to sy·nolo tvn systhma·tvn aliei·aw me tra·ta. Vsto·so, to 1996, to ypoyrgei·o gnvstopoi·hse stoyw endiafero·menoyw efopliste·w o·ti ayth· h a·deia antibai·nei me tiw diata·jeiw toy Kanonismoy· EOK kai proe·bh sthn ana·klhsh· thw. Epeidh· h nayph·ghsh ne·vn skafv· n bri·sketai se poly· proxvrhme·no sta·dio, oi endiafero·menoi zh·thsan thn epaneje·tash thw ypo·ueshw. H Diey·uynsh Aliei·aw toy ypoyrgei·oy zh·thse, me th seira· thw, th gnv· mh thw Eyrvpai¤kh·w Epitroph·w, alla· mo·non o·son afora· ta en leitoyrgi·a alieytika·, xvri·w na lamba·nei ypo·ch ta ypo· nayph·ghsh ska·fh, poy apoteloy·san antikei·meno thw i·diaw koinotikh·w xrhmatodo·thshw. H Eyrvpai¤kh· Epitroph· gnvmodo·thse, kat(cid:146) ejai·resh, ype·r toy aith·matow kai thw xorh·ghshw adei·aw aliei·aw me tra·tew byuoy· mo·no gia ta ska·fh poy h·dh leitoyrgoy·san


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 485/98 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Continuity and change in eligible areas between different structural fund programming periods

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
EU financing
European Regional Development Fund
Structural Funds
eligibility criteria
less-favoured region
structural policy

text: 9. 10. 98 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 310/73 Svar avgivet av Monika Wulf-Mathies p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (27 april 1998) Kommissionen h(cid:229)ller p(cid:229) att inha¤mta de upplysningar som beho¤vs fo¤r att kunna besvara fr(cid:229)gan. Den kommer att vidarebefordra dessa s(cid:229) snart som mo¤jligt. (98/C 310/96) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0482/98 fr(cid:229)n Richard Howitt (PSE) till kommissionen (27 februari 1998) A¤mne: Regional effektivitet under na¤sta programplaneringsperiod Strukturfondsprogrammen syftar till att sto¤dja den nuvarande omvandlingen av regionala och lokala ekonomier och har tidigare alltfo¤r ofta grundat sig p(cid:229) fo¤r(cid:229)ldrad statistik. Kan kommissionen uppge vilka underso¤kningar den har genomfo¤rt eller a¤mnar genomfo¤ra avseende regionernas och industrisektorns effektivitet under perioden 2000-2006? Vilka a¤r kommissionens prelimina¤ra resultat avseende detta? Hur a¤mnar kommissionen info¤rliva denna analys i programmens inneh(cid:229)ll fo¤r den nya perioden efter 1999? Svar fr(cid:229)n Monika Wulf-Mathies p(cid:229) kommissionens va¤gnar (30 mars 1998) Beslut om regioners sto¤dbera¤ttigande enligt m(cid:229)l 1 och det nya m(cid:229)l 2 (cid:150) som kommissionen lade fram ett fo¤rslag om den 18 mars 1998 (1) (cid:150) m(cid:229)ste grunda sig p(cid:229) s(cid:229) fa¤rska uppgifter som mo¤jligt. Hur snabbt s(cid:229)dana uppgifter kan tas fram varierar dock kraftigt. Na¤r det ga¤ller till exempel statistik o¤ver bruttonationalprodukten (BNP) fo¤r olika regioner a¤r fo¤rdro¤jningen n(cid:229)got mer a¤n tv(cid:229) (cid:229)r, medan motsvarande siffra fo¤r regional arbetslo¤shetsstatistik a¤r ett (cid:229)r. Med tanke p(cid:229) att m(cid:229)l 1 och 2 avser strukturella problem, vilka per definition fo¤ra¤ndras endast l(cid:229)ngsamt, a¤r s(cid:229)dana fo¤rseningar fullt acceptabla, och na¤mnda statistik kommer da¤rfo¤r ocks(cid:229) i fortsa¤ttningen att utgo¤ra grunden fo¤r beslut om sto¤dbera¤ttigande. Statistiska uppgifter utgo¤r ett betydligt ba¤ttre underlag fo¤r beslut om regioners sta¤dbera¤ttigande a¤n uppgifter som ha¤rro¤r fr(cid:229)n sektorsvisa och regionala prognoser. Anledningen till att de senare uppgifterna a¤r alltfo¤r osa¤kra a¤r att den ekonomiska utvecklingen p(cid:229)verkas av s(cid:229) m(cid:229)nga olika faktorer. Kommissionen har da¤rfo¤r inga planer p(cid:229) att utveckla nya regionala kriterier p(cid:229) detta omr(cid:229)de. (1) KOM(98) 131 slutlig. (98/C 310/97) SKRIFTLIG FR¯GA E-0485/98 fr(cid:229)n Richard Howitt (PSE) till kommissionen (27 februari 1998) A¤mne: Kontinuitet och fo¤ra¤ndringar fo¤r bidragsbera¤ttigade omr(cid:229)den vid o¤verg(cid:229)ng fr(cid:229)n en programplanerings- period till en annan inom ramen fo¤r strukturfonderna Kan kommissionen la¤gga fram en o¤versikt o¤ver graden av kontinuitet vad ga¤ller antalet omr(cid:229)den och den totala finansieringen i procenttal fo¤r bidragsbera¤ttigade omr(cid:229)den som bevarade ra¤tten till bidrag fr(cid:229)n Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden under de tv(cid:229) reformerna av strukturfonderna 1988 och 1993? Kan kommissionen mot bakgrund av de nuvarande uppskattningarna la¤gga fram en prognos o¤ver motsvarande siffror fo¤r den nya programplaneringsperioden 1999-2006? Vilka underso¤kningar har kommissionen genomfo¤rt vad ga¤ller fo¤r- delarna med en s(cid:229)dan kontinuitet mellan de olika programplaneringsperioderna i syfte att go¤ra det mo¤jligt att genomfo¤ra strukturella a¤ndringar, ja¤mfo¤rt med de fall d(cid:229) ra¤tten till bidrag a¤ndras fo¤r att man i ho¤gre grad skall beakta behoven i m(cid:229)lomr(cid:229)dena? Vilka prelimina¤ra slutsatser drar kommissionen avseende detta?


title: ΓΡΑΠΤΗ ΕΡΩΤΗΣΗ αρ θ. 441/98 του Anna KARAMANOU προς την Επ τροπή. Κακοκαιρία στην Ελλάδα - Τραγικές συνέπειες σε Λέσβο- Σάμο

eurovoc_concepts:
Aegean Islands
EAGGF Guidance Section
EU aid
Structural Funds
flood
natural disaster


title: Vijfde protocol bij de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake de handel in diensten - Besluit van het Comité voor de handel in financiële diensten houdende goedkeuring van het vijfde protocol bij de Algemene Overeenkomst inzake de handel in diensten (S/L/44) - Besluit van de Raad voor de handel in diensten van december 1997 inzake verbintenissen betreffende financiële diensten (S/L/50)

eurovoc_concepts:
GATS
World Trade Organisation
financial services
international trade
multilateral agreement
protocol to an agreement


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 449/98 dell'on. Carlo RIPA DI MEANA alla Commissione. Conferimento rifiuti urbani della Regione Lombardia

eurovoc_concepts:
Lombardy
biodegradability
infringement procedure (EU)
storage of waste
transport document
transport of dangerous goods
waste
waste disposal
waste management
waste recycling


title: Регламент (ЕО) № 497/98 на Комисията от 27 февруари 1998 година относно класирането на определени стоки в Комбинираната номенклатура

eurovoc_concepts:
Combined Nomenclature
chemical compound
chemical salt
farming sector

formats: html pdf print xhtml

text: 02/т. 10 BG Официален вестник на Европейския съюз 241 31998R0497 L 62/21 ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИТЕ ОБЩНОСТИ 3. 3. 1998 РЕГЛАМЕНТ (ЕО) № 497/98 НА КОМИСИЯТА от 27 февруари 1998 година относно класирането на определени стоки в Комбинираната номенклатура КОМИСИЯТА НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИТЕ ОБЩНОСТИ, като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, като взе предвид Регламент (ЕИО) № 2658/87 на Съвета относно тарифната и статистическа номенклатура и Общата митническа тарифа (1), последно изменен с Регламент (ЕО) № 2509/97 на Комисията (2), и по-специално член 9, като има предвид, че за да се осигури еднакво прилагане на Ком- бинираната номенклатура, приложена към цитирания по-горе рег- ламент, е необходимо да бъдат приети разпоредби относно класирането на стоките, които са включени в приложение към настоящия регламент; като има предвид, че Регламент (ЕИО) № 2658/87 установява общите правила за тълкуване на Комбинираната номенклатура; че тези правила се прилагат и за всяка друга номенклатура, която се основава изцяло или частично на нея, или която добавя ако е необходимо подразделения към нея, и която е установена чрез спе- цифични разпоредби на Общността, с оглед прилагането на тариф- ните или другите мерки, свързани с търговията със стоки; като има предвид, че чрез прилагане на упоменатите по-горе общи правила, стоките, описани в колона 1 на приложената към настоя- щия регламент таблица, трябва да се класират в съответните кодове по КН, посочени в колона 2, въз основа на мотивите, посочени в колона 3; като има предвид, че съгласно разпоредбите на член 12, параг- раф 6 от Регламент (ЕИО) № 2913/92 на Съвета от 12 октомври 1992 г. създаване на Митнически кодекс на Общността (3), е целесъобразно ползването на обвързващите тарифни информации, издадени от митническите органи на относно държавите-членки относно класирането на стоки в Комбинира- ната номенклатура, които не съответстват на разпоредбите от нас- тоящия регламент, да може да се продължи за период от три месеца; като има предвид, че секция „Тарифна и статистическа номенкла- тура“ на Комитета по Митническия кодекс не е издала становище в срока, определен от неговия председател, ПРИЕ НАСТОЯЩИЯ РЕГЛАМЕНТ: Член 1 Стоките, които са описани в колона 1 на приложената таблица, трябва да бъдат класирани в съответните кодове по КН, посочени в колона 2. Член 2 Съгласно разпоредбите на член 12, параграф 6 от Регламент (ЕИО) № 2913/92 ползването на обвързващата тарифна информация, издадена от митническите органи на държавите-членки, която не съответства на разпоредбите на настоящия регламент, може да се продължи за период от три месеца. Член 3 Настоящият регламент влиза в сила на двайсет и първия ден след публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейските общности. Настоящият регламент е задължителен в своята цялост и се прилага пряко във всички държави-членки. Съставено в Брюксел на 27 февруари 1998 година. За Комисията Mario MONTI Член на Комисията (1) ОВ L 256, 7. 9. 1987 г. , стр. 1. (2) ОВ L 345, 16. 12. 1997 г. , стр. 44. (3) ОВ L 302, 19. 10. 1992 г. , стр. 1. 242 BG Официален вестник на Европейския съюз 02/т. 10 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ Класиране (Код от КН) (2) 3808 10 90 Описание на стоката (1) Смес от бромметан (67 % тегловно) и хлорпикрин (33 % тегловно), използвана като дезинфекционно средство за опушване на поч- вата преди сеитба. Мотиви (3) Класирането се определя от разпоредбите на общи правила 1 и 6 за тълкуване на Комбини- раната номенклатура, бележка 1, буква а), точка 2 към глава 38, както и от текстовете на кодове по КН 3808, 3808 10 и 3808 10 90


title: VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 482/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 27. Februar 1998 zur Festsetzung der Erzeugungserstattung für zur Konservenherstellung bestimmtes Olivenöl

eurovoc_concepts:
olive oil
preserved product
production refund

text: 28. 2. 98 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 60/55 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 482/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 27. Februar 1998 zur Festsetzung der Erzeugungserstattung f(cid:129)r bestimmtes Oliven(cid:148)l zur Konservenherstellung DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung Nr. 136/66/EWG des Rates vom 22. September 1966 (cid:129)ber die Errichtung einer gemeinsamen Marktorganisation f(cid:129)r Fette (1), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1581/96 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 20a, in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Nach Artikel 20a der Verordnung Nr. 136/66/EWG wird zur Erzeugung von Oliven(cid:148)l, das zur Herstellung bestimmter Konserven verwendet wird, eine Erstattung gew(cid:132)hrt. Unbeschadet von Absatz 3 wird diese Erstattung gem(cid:132)ß Absatz 6 des genannten Artikels jeden zweiten Monat festgesetzt. Nach Artikel 20a Absatz 2 derselben Verordnung richtet sich diese Erstattung nach dem Unterschied zwischen den Weltmarkt- und den Gemeinschaftsmarktpreisen unter besonderer Ber(cid:129)cksichtigung der Einfuhrabgabe, die in einem bestimmten Bezugszeitraum auf Oliven(cid:148)l des KN-Codes 1509 90 00 zu erheben ist, und der Bestandteile, die in die Berechnung der in demselben Bezugszeitraum f(cid:129)r dasselbe Oliven(cid:148)l gew(cid:132)hrten Ausfuhr- erstattungen einbezogen werden. Als Bezugszeitraum sollten die zwei Monate vor dem Anwendungszeitraum der Erzeugungserstattung gelten. Die obengenannte Erstattung wird um einen Betrag erh(cid:148)ht, der der am Tag ihrer Anwendung g(cid:129)ltigen Verbrauchsbeihilfe entspricht. Die Anwendung der genannten Bestimmungen hat die Festsetzung der nachstehenden Erzeugungserstattung zur Folge (cid:190) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 F(cid:129)r M(cid:132)rz und April 1998 wird die in Artikel 20a Absatz 2 der Verordnung Nr. 136/66/EWG genannte Erzeugungs- erstattung auf 62,07 ECU/100 kg festgesetzt. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am 1. M(cid:132)rz 1998 in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 27. Februar 1998 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Hans VAN DEN BROEK Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. 172 vom 30. 9. 1966, S. 3025/66. (2) ABl. L 206 vom 16. 8. 1996, S. 11


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 484/98 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Transitional arrangements for KONVER areas losing eligibility after 1999

eurovoc_concepts:
European Regional Development Fund
Structural Funds
arms industry
eligibility criteria
eligible region
industrial conversion

text: 2. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 304/115 In order to promote diversity based on assessment of need by local partnerships within eligible regions, the Commission has ensured that regional SPDs are developed on the basis of genuinely regional plans developed by the partnerships concerned. Each programme is then overseen by its own monitoring committee, which includes local authorities and other relevant economic actors at the regional level, and each monitoring committee has devised its own administrative processes and project selection criteria. In this context, the Commission welcomes the decision of the United Kingdom government to extend membership of the programme monitoring committees to social partners. The Commission attaches great importance to the regional identity of structural funds programmes and their local ownership. Where possible, the Commission encourages a bottom-up approach to the development of solutions to local economic and employment problems and in many instances the development of local strategies, e. g. for business support, is a prerequisite for aid. The production of guidelines for the application of the structural funds is an important tool for ensuring a focus on core European issues while addressing local needs. The Commission does not agree that they should be abandoned. For instance, priorities defined by the European Council in Madrid in November 1995 were subsequently developed into the guidelines which informed the Commission(cid:146)s general approach to the negotiation of all objective 2 SPDs in 1996-1997. The guidelines were essential in the production of regional frameworks which match local needs to Community priorities, and each of the new programmes in the United Kingdom contains a specific chapter identifying how priorities have been taken into account in the local process. (98/C 304/172) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0484/98 by Richard Howitt (PSE) to the Commission (27 February 1998) Subject: Transitional arrangements for KONVER areas losing eligibility after 1999 Given the fact that fifty per cent of the designated areas for the KONVER Community Initiative Europe-wide fall outside eligible areas under mainstream ERDF programmes, will the Commission consider funding transitional arrangements for such areas which are no longer eligible within the new Structural Fund programmes after 1999? If not, what explanation can the Commission give for treating such areas different from Objective 2 areas which lose eligibility but which are intended to benefit from transitional arrangements? Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (31 March 1998) The Commission guidelines on the Community Konver initiative, published in 1994 (1), permit Member States to propose areas not eligible for support under the Structural Funds › provided that the percentage of such areas does not exceed 50% of the total Community contribution. In terms of the Community contribution, the published list of eligible areas (2) proposes only around 35% of areas not eligible for support under the Structural Funds. Moreover, under the review of the Structural Funds, the Commission envisages permitting a transitional period only for areas which are currently eligible under Objectives 1 and 2 and which would no longer be so during the period 2000-2006. Thus eligibility is a prerequisite for a transitional period, and areas not eligible would not be entitled to such a period. However, areas falling outside Objectives 1 and 2 could be covered by the new Objective 3 measures. The purpose of this Objective is to develop measures to modernise the labour markets in coordination with the multi-annual employment plans and the new chapter on employment in the Treaty of Amsterdam. Priority will also be accorded to measures aimed at adapting and modernising systems of education, training and employment with a view to increasing the Community economy(cid:146)s competitiveness and to providing support for the economic and social changes throughout the EU. (1) OJ C 180, 1. 7. 1994. (2) OJ C 402, 31. 12. 1994


text: 28. 2. 98 DA De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende L 60/55 KOMMISSIONENS FORORDNING (EF) Nr. 482/98 af 27. februar 1998 om fastsættelse af produktionsrestitutionen for de olivenolier, der benyttes til fremstilling af visse former for konserves KOMMISSIONEN FOR DE EUROPÆISKE FÆLLESSKABER HAR (cid:190) under henvisning til Europæiske Fællesskab, traktaten om oprettelse af Det under henvisning til R(cid:134)dets forordning nr. 136/66/EØF september 1966 om oprettelse af en fælles af 22. senest ændret ved markedsordning for forordning (EF) nr. 1581/96 (2), særlig artikel 20a, og fedtstoffer (1), ud fra følgende betragtninger: Ifølge artikel 20a i forordning nr. 136/66/EØF ydes der en produktionsrestitution for olivenolie, der anvendes til fremstilling af visse former for konserves; i henhold til nævnte artikels stk. 6 fastsætter Kommissionen hver anden m(cid:134)ned restitutionsbeløbet, jf. dog nævnte artikels stk. 3; ifølge ovennævnte forordnings artikel 20a, stk. 2, fast- sættes produktionsrestitutionens størrelse p(cid:134) grundlag af forskellen mellem priserne p(cid:134) verdensmarkedet og EU- markedet, idet der tages hensyn til importbelastningen for olivenolie henhørende under underposition KN-kode løbet af en referenceperiode samt til de 1509 90 00 i elementer, der anvendes ved fastsættelsen af eksportresti- tutionerne for denne olivenolie i løbet af en referencepe- riode; det er hensigtsmæssigt at anse perioden p(cid:134) to m(cid:134)neder forud for begyndelsen af produktionsrestitutio- nens gyldighedsperiode for referenceperiode; restitutions- beløbet forhøjes dog med et beløb svarende til den forbrugerstøtte, der gælder p(cid:134) den dag, som produktions- restitutionen anvendes fra; anvendelsen af de ovenfor omhandlede kriterier fører til fastsættelse af restitutionen som anført nedenfor (cid:190) UDSTEDT FØLGENDE FORORDNING: Artikel 1 For marts og april 1998 er den i artikel 20a, stk. 2, i forordning nr. 136/66/EØF omhandlede produktionsre- stitution lig med 62,07 ECU/100 kg. Artikel 2 Denne forordning træder i kraft den 1. marts 1998. Denne forordning er bindende i alle enkeltheder og gælder umiddelbart medlemsstat. i hver Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 27. februar 1998. P(cid:134) Kommissionens vegne Hans VAN DEN BROEK Medlem af Kommissionen (1) EFT 172 af 30. 9. 1966, s. 3025/66. (2) EFT L 206 af 16. 8. 1996, s. 11


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 482/98 by Richard HOWITT to the Commission. Projections of regional performance during the next programming period

eurovoc_concepts:
EU programme
EU statistics
economic analysis
eligibility criteria
less-favoured region
structural policy

text: 9. 10. 98 FI Euroopan yhteiso¤jen virallinen lehti C 310/73 Komission ja¤senen Wulf-Mathiesin komission puolesta antama vastaus (27. huhtikuuta 1998) Komissio kera¤a¤ parhaillaan tietoja, joita se tarvitsee vastatakseen kysymykseen. Se ilmoittaa tuloksistaan mahdollisimman pian. (98/C 310/96) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0482/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Richard Howitt (PSE) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Alueellisen suorituskyvyn kuvaaminen ensi ohjelmakaudella Rakennerahaston ohjelmilla on ma¤a¤ra¤ avustaa alueellisten ja paikallisten talouksien nykyisissa¤ muutoksissa, ja aiemmin ne ovat perustuneet liian usein tilastoihin, jotka eiva¤t ole ajan tasalla. Onko komissio teetta¤nyt tai aikooko se teetta¤a¤ tutkimuksia alueellisen suorituskyvyn ja teollisuuden suorituskyvyn kuvauksista vuosien 2000(cid:151)2006 kautta varten? Milla¤ tavoin komissio aikoo sisa¤llytta¤a¤ kyseisen analyysin uuden kauden ohjelmien sisa¤lto¤o¤n vuoden 1999 ja¤lkeen? Komission ja¤senen Monika Wulf-Mathiesin komission puolesta antama vastaus (30. maaliskuuta 1998) Komission 18. maaliskuuta 1998 (1) tekema¤n ehdotuksen mukaisten pa¤a¤to¤sten, jotka koskevat kelpoisuutta tavoitteen 1 ja uuden tavoitteen 2 alueiksi, ta¤ytyy perustua uusimpiin tietoihin. Ta¤llaisten tietojen saatavuuden viive vaihtelee. Esimerkiksi bruttokansantuotetta (BKT) ka¤sittelevien tilastojen alueelliset tiedot saadaan hieman yli kahden vuoden viiveella¤. Tiedot alueellisista tyo¤tto¤myysasteista saadaan yhden vuoden viiveella¤. Ottaen huomioon etta¤ tavoitteet 1 ja 2 liittyva¤t rakenneongelmiin, jotka muuttuvat ma¤a¤ritelmilta¤a¤n hitaasti ajan kuluessa, na¤ma¤ viiveet ovat hyva¤ksytta¤vissa¤ rajoissa, ja ne mahdollistavat luotettavan perustan ka¤ytta¤misen tehta¤essa¤ pa¤a¤to¤ksia¤ kelpoisuudesta. Ta¤llaiset tiedot antavat huomattavasti luotettavamman perustan tukikelpoisuutta koskeville pa¤a¤to¤ksille kuin alakohtaisista tai alueellisista laskelmista saatavat tiedot, joihin liittyva¤t epa¤varmuustekija¤t ylitta¤va¤t hyva¤ksyt- ta¤va¤t rajat, koska monet tekija¤t vaikuttavat taloudelliseen suorituskykyyn. Na¤in ollen komissiolla ei ole suunnitelmia uusien alueellisten kriteerien kehitta¤miseksi. (1) KOM(1998) 131 lopullinen. (98/C 310/97) KIRJALLINEN KYSYMYS E-0485/98 komissiolle esitta¤ja¤(t): Richard Howitt (PSE) (27. helmikuuta 1998) Aihe: Jatkuvuus ja muutokset tukikelpoisissa alueissa rakennerahaston eri ohjelmakausilla Aikooko komissio esitta¤a¤ taulukon, josta ka¤y ilmi alueiden lukuma¤a¤ra¤a¤ ja niiden kokonaisrahoituksesta saamaa prosenttiosuutta koskeva jatkuvuus niilla¤ tukikelpoisilla alueilla, jotka ovat sa¤ilyneet tukikelpoisina vuosien 1998 ja 1993 va¤lisena¤ aikana toteutetuissa Euroopan aluekehitysrahaston pera¤tta¤isissa¤ uudistuksissa? Aikooko komissio esitta¤a¤ nykyisten arvioiden perusteella kuvauksen vastaavista luvuista uudella, vuosia 1999(cid:151)2006 koskevalla ohjelmakaudella? Mita¤ tutkimuksia komissio on teetta¤nyt jatkuvuudesta koituvista hyo¤dyista¤, kun rakennemuutokset on pyritty viema¤a¤n loppuun, siihen verrattuna, etta¤ tukikelpoisuutta muutettaisiin, jotta tuki pystytta¤isiin kohdentamaan tarpeiden mukaisesti? Mita¤ alustavia johtopa¤a¤to¤ksia¤ komissio tekee ta¤sta¤ asiasta?


title: Palvelukaupan yleissopimuksen viiden pöytäkirja - Rahoituspalvelujen kauppaa käsittelevän komitean  päätös palvelukaupan yleissopimuksen viidennen pöytäkirjan hyväksymisestä (S/L/44) - Palvelukauppaneuvoston joulukuussa 1997 tekemä päätös rahoituspalveluja koskevista sitoumuksista (S/L/50)


title: VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 469/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 27. Februar 1998 bezüglich der im Rahmen der Ausschreibung gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2097/97 eingereichten Angebote für die Ausfuhr von geschliffenem langkörnigem Reis nach gewissen Drittländern

text: L 60/32 DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften 28. 2. 98 VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 469/98 DER KOMMISSION vom 27. Februar 1998 bez(cid:129)glich der im Rahmen der Ausschreibung gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2097/97 eingereichten Angebote f(cid:129)r die Ausfuhr von geschliffenem lang- k(cid:148)rnigem Reis nach gewissen Drittl(cid:132)ndern DIE KOMMISSION DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN (cid:190) gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, gest(cid:129)tzt auf die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 3072/95 des Rates vom 22. Dezember 1995 (cid:129)ber die gemeinsame Markt- organisation f(cid:129)r Reis (1), ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 192/98 (2), insbesondere auf Artikel 13 Absatz 3, in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2097/97 der Kommis- sion (3) wurde eine Ausschreibung der Erstattung bei der Ausfuhr von Reis er(cid:148)ffnet. Nach Artikel 5 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 584/75 der Kommission (4), zuletzt ge(cid:132)ndert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 299/95 (5), kann die Kommission auf der Grund- lage der eingereichten Angebote nach dem Verfahren des 3072/95 Artikels beschließen, die auf die Ausschreibung eingegangenen Angebote nicht zu ber(cid:129)cksichtigen. der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 22 Unter Ber(cid:129)cksichtigung insbesondere der Kriterien nach dem Artikel 13 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 3072/95 ist die Festsetzung einer H(cid:148)chsterstattung nicht angezeigt. Die in dieser Verordnung vorgesehenen Maßnahmen entsprechen der Stellungnahme des Verwaltungsaus- schusses f(cid:129)r Getreide (cid:190) HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die gem(cid:132)ß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2097/97 im Rahmen der Ausschreibung der Erstattung bei der Ausfuhr von geschliffenem langk(cid:148)rnigem Reis des KN- Codes 1006 30 67 nach gewissen Drittl(cid:132)ndern vom 23. bis 26. Februar 1998 eingereichten Angebote werden nicht ber(cid:129)cksichtigt. Artikel 2 Diese Verordnung tritt am 28. Februar 1998 in Kraft. Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Br(cid:129)ssel, den 27. Februar 1998 F(cid:129)r die Kommission Franz FISCHLER Mitglied der Kommission (1) ABl. L 329 vom 30. 12. 1995, S. 18. (2) ABl. L 20 vom 27. 1. 1998, S. 16. (3) ABl. L 292 vom 25. 10. 1997, S. 22. (4) ABl. L 61 vom 7. 3. 1975, S. 25. (5) ABl. L 35 vom 15. 2. 1995, S. 8


title: REGLAMENTO (CE) N° 472/98 DE LA COMISIÓN de 27 de febrero de 1998 relativo a las ofertas presentadas para la exportación de arroz blanqueado de grano medio y largo A con destino a determinados terceros países en el marco de la licitación contemplada en el Reglamento (CE) n° 2096/97

text: 28. 2. 98 ES Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas L 60/35 REGLAMENTO (CE) No 472/98 DE LA COMISI(cid:222)N de 27 de febrero de 1998 relativo a las ofertas presentadas para la exportaci(cid:155)n de arroz blanqueado de grano medio y largo A con destino a determinados terceros pa(cid:146)ses en el marco de la licitaci(cid:155)n contemplada en el Reglamento (CE) no 2096/97 LA COMISI(cid:222)N DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS, Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea, Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 3072/95 del Consejo, de 22 de diciembre de 1995, por el que se establece la organiza- ci(cid:155)n com(cid:156)n de mercados del arroz (1), modificado por el Reglamento (CE) no 192/98 (2), y, en particular, el apar- tado 3 de su art(cid:146)culo 13, Considerando que el Reglamento (CE) no 2096/97 de la Comisi(cid:155)n (3), ha abierto una licitaci(cid:155)n para la restituci(cid:155)n a la exportaci(cid:155)n de arroz; Considerando que, de acuerdo con el art(cid:146)culo 5 del Reglamento (CEE) no 584/75 de la Comisi(cid:155)n (4), cuya (cid:156)ltima modificaci(cid:155)n la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 299/95 (5), la Comisi(cid:155)n, bas(cid:145)ndose en las ofertas presen- tadas y, de acuerdo con el procedimiento previsto en el art(cid:146)culo 22 del Reglamento (CE) no 3072/95, podr(cid:145) decidir no dar curso a la licitaci(cid:155)n; 95, no resulta conveniente proceder a la fijaci(cid:155)n de una restituci(cid:155)n m(cid:145)xima; Considerando que las medidas previstas en el presente Reglamento se ajustan al dictamen del Comit(cid:130) de gesti(cid:155)n de los cereales, HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO: Art(cid:146)culo 1 No se dar(cid:145) curso a las ofertas presentadas del 23 al 26 de febrero de 1998 en el marco de la licitaci(cid:155)n de la restitu- ci(cid:155)n a la exportaci(cid:155)n de arroz blanqueado de grano medio y largo A con destino a determinados terceros pa(cid:146)ses, contemplada en el Reglamento (CE) no 2096/97. Art(cid:146)culo 2 Considerando que, teniendo en cuenta los criterios previstos en el art(cid:146)culo 13 del Reglamento (CE) no 3072/ El presente Reglamento entrar(cid:145) en vigor el 28 de febrero de 1998. El presente Reglamento ser(cid:145) obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro. Hecho en Bruselas, el 27 de febrero de 1998. Por la Comisi(cid:155)n Franz FISCHLER Miembro de la Comisi(cid:155)n (1) DO L 329 de 30. 12. 1995, p. 18. (2) DO L 20 de 27. 1. 1998, p. 16. (3) DO L 292 de 25. 10. 1997, p. 19. (4) DO L 61 de 7. 3. 1975, p. 25. (5) DO L 35 de 15. 2. 1995, p. 8


title: REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 468/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 27 febbraio 1998 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli

eurovoc_concepts:
agri-monetary policy
citrus fruit
fruit vegetable
import price
perennial vegetable
pip fruit

text: L 60/30 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee 28. 2. 98 REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 468/98 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 27 febbraio 1998 recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determina- zione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNIT(cid:211) EUROPEE, visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunit(cid:133) europea, visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 della Commissione, del 21 dicembre 1994, recante modalit(cid:133) di applicazione del regime di importazione degli ortofrutticoli (1), modifi- cato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 2375/96 (2), in particolare l’articolo 4, paragrafo 1, visto il regolamento (CEE) n. 3813/92 del Consiglio, del 28 dicembre 1992, relativo all’unit(cid:133) di conto e ai tassi di conversione da applicare nel quadro della politica agri- cola comune (3), modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 150/95 (4), in particolare l’articolo 3, paragrafo 3, regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 il considerando che risultati dei negoziati prevede, in applicazione dei commerciali multilaterali nel dell’Uruguay Round, i criteri in base ai quali la Commissione fissa i quadro forfettari all’importazione dai paesi valori prodotti e per i periodi precisati nell’allegato; terzi, per i considerando che in applicazione di tali criteri, i valori forfettari all’importazione devono essere fissati ai livelli figuranti nell’allegato del presente regolamento, HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO: Articolo 1 I valori forfettari all’importazione di cui all’articolo 4 del regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 sono fissati nella tabella riportata nell’allegato. Articolo 2 Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 28 febbraio 1998. Il presente regolamento (cid:138) obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri. Fatto a Bruxelles, il 27 febbraio 1998. Per la Commissione Franz FISCHLER Membro della Commissione (1) GU L 337 del 24. 12. 1994, pag. 66. (2) GU L 325 del 14. 12. 1996, pag. 5. (3) GU L 387 del 31. 12. 1992, pag. 1. (4) GU L 22 del 31. 1. 1995, pag. 1. 28. 2. 98 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunit(cid:133) europee L 60/31 ALLEGATO al regolamento della Commissione, del 27 febbraio 1998, recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all’importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni orto- frutticoli Codice NC 0702 00 00 0707 00 05 0709 10 00 0709 90 70 0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50 0805 20 10 0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70, 0805 20 90 (ECU/100 kg) (ECU/100 kg) Codice paesi terzi (1) Valore forfettario all’importazione Codice NC Codice paesi terzi (1) Valore forfettario all’importazione 204 212 624 999 052 053 068 999 220 999 052 204 999 052 204 212 600 624 999 204 999 052 204 400 65,0 106,3 205,8 125,7 107,4 170,8 132,5 136,9 159,1 159,1 143,7 131,2 137,4 44,7 38,4 38,3 49,8 49,1 44,1 77,6 77,6 56,7 68,8 68,5 0805 30 10 0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90 0808 20 50 464 512 600 624 662 999 052 400 600 999 060 388 400 404 528 720 728 999 388 400 512 528 999 115,4 97,7 76,0 74,4 36,2 74,2 47,3 39,5 82,2 56,3 53,2 131,7 94,1 102,9 117,0 64,5 96,0 94,2 85,3 111,8 80,5 79,4 89,3 (1) Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal regolamento (CE) n. 2317/97 della Commissione (GU L 321 del 22. 11. 1997, pag. 19). Il codice «999» rappresenta le «altre origini»


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 454/98 do Deputado Cristiana MUSCARDINI à Comissão. Manutenção do regime de concessão no que respeita às comunicações móveis e pessoais

eurovoc_concepts:
Italy
communications systems
liberalisation of the market
telecommunications
telephone charges
trade licence

text: C 310/68 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 9. 10. 98 1. Na(cid:152)o entende a Comissa(cid:152)o que a natureza das obras mencionadas na a·rea de Tor Marancia exige um estudo espec(cid:14)·fico de avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do seu impacte ambiental, conforme disposto no D. P. R. 12/4/96, que transpo(cid:152)e a Directiva 85/337/CE (1)? Na(cid:152)o entende a Comissa(cid:152)o que as obras supramencionadas na a·rea de Tor Marancia exigem uma avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o 2. espec(cid:14)·fica do seu impacte ambiental, conforme previsto na Directiva 97/3/CE (2), al(cid:14)·nea c), no 10 do Anexo II? (1) (2) JO L 175 de 5. 7. 1985, p. 40. JO L 27 de 30. 1. 1997, p. 30. Resposta comum a‘s perguntas escritas E-0450/98 e E-0451/98 dada pela Comissa·ria Bjerregaard em nome da Comissa(cid:152)o (24 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1998) Com base nas informa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es fornecidas pelo Senhor Deputado, tudo indica, no entender da Comissa(cid:152)o, que se trata de projectos das categorias enumeradas no Anexo II da Directiva 85/337/CEE do Conselho, de 27 de Junho de 1985, relativa a‘ avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos efeitos de determinados projectos pu·blicos e privados no ambiente. Tais projectos devem ser submetidos a uma avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do impacto ambiental (AIP) quando os Estados-membros considerarem que as suas caracter(cid:14)·sticas assim o exigem. Na(cid:152)o tendo conhecimento dos projectos mencionados, a Comissa(cid:152)o tomara· as medidas adequadas para reunir informa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es detalhadas sobre eles e garantir a observa(cid:136)ncia do direito comunita·rio. A Directiva 97/3/CE, citada pelo Senhor Deputado, na(cid:152)o e· pertinente. Essa directiva altera a Directiva 77/93/CEE relativa a‘s medidas de protec(cid:231)a(cid:152)o contra a introdu(cid:231)a(cid:152)o nos Estados-membros de organismos prejudiciais a‘s plantas e produtos vegetais e contra a sua difusa(cid:152)o na Comunidade (1). A Directiva 97/11/CE e· a nova directiva que altera a Directiva 85/337/CEE relativa a‘ avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos efeitos de determinados projectos pu·blicos e privados no ambiente (2). No no 10, al(cid:14)·nea c), do Anexo II, na(cid:152)o existe nada relacionado com o tipo de projecto mencionado pelo Senhor Deputado. Na al(cid:14)·nea b), esta(cid:152)o enumerados os «projectos de desenvolvimento urbano», que correspondem exactamente aos enumerados na Directiva 85/337/CEE. De qualquer modo, o prazo-limte para os Estados-membros darem cumprimento a‘ Directiva 97/11/CE e· 14 de Mar(cid:231)o de 1999. (1) (2) JO L 26 de 31. 1. 1977. JO L 73 de 14. 3. 1997. (98/C 310/88) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-0454/98 apresentada por Cristiana Muscardini (NI) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (27 de Fevereiro de 1998) Objecto: Manuten(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do regime de concessa(cid:152)o no que respeita a‘s comunica(cid:231)o(cid:152)es mo·veis e pessoais Considerando que em 1 de Janeiro de 1998 entrou em vigor em todos os pa(cid:14)·ses da Unia(cid:152)o Europeia a completa liberaliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos servi(cid:231)os de telecomunica(cid:231)o(cid:152)es; Considerando que a Directiva 90/338/CE (1) e seguintes preve(cid:136)em a aboli(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do regime de concessa(cid:152)o em favor do regime de licen(cid:231)as; Considerando que no DPR 318 de 19. 9. 1997 (Regulamento para aplica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o das directivas comunita·rias), na(cid:152)o e· mencionada qualquer concessa(cid:152)o: 1. Pode a Comissa(cid:152)o informar por que motivo na(cid:152)o aboliu o Governo italiano a «taxa de concessa(cid:152)o governamental» e se essa concessa(cid:152)o na(cid:152)o sera· contra·ria a‘ legisla(cid:231)a(cid:152)o comunita·ria?


text: 9. 10. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 310/73 Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (27 April 1998) The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible. (98/C 310/96) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0482/98 by Richard Howitt (PSE) to the Commission (27 February 1998) Subject: Projections of regional performance during the next programming period Given the fact that structural fund programmes are intended to assist current changes in regional and local economies and have too often in the past been based on out-of-date statistics, which studies has the Commission undertaken or will it undertake on projection(s) for regional performance and by industrial sector for the period 2000-2006? What are the Commission(cid:146)s preliminary findings in this respect? How does the Commission intend to incorporate this analysis into the content of programmes for the new period after 1999? Answer given by Mrs Wulf-Mathies on behalf of the Commission (30 March 1998) The decisions on the eligibility of regions under objective 1 and the new objective 2 proposed by the Commission on 18 March 1998 (1) must be based on the most recent data. The time lags for the availability of such data vary. For example, for statistics on the gross domestic product (GDP), the time lag for regional data is just over two years. For regional unemployment rates the time lag is one year. Given that objectives 1 and 2 address structural problems, which by definition change only slowly over time, these delays are well within acceptable limits and remain a sound basis for eligibility decisions. Such data represent a considerably more solid basis for decisions on the eligibility of regions than information deriving from sectoral or regional projections. The levels of uncertainty surrounding such projections are beyond acceptable limits given the many factors which determine economic performance. The Commission therefore has no plans to develop new regional criteria in this respect. (1) COM(98) 131 final. (98/C 310/97) WRITTEN QUESTION E-0485/98 by Richard Howitt (PSE) to the Commission (27 February 1998) Subject: Continuity and change in eligible areas between different structural fund programming periods Will the Commission provide a table of figures which show the level of continuity in terms of number of areas and percentage of funding totals for eligible areas retaining eligibility at each successive reform of the Structural Funds for the European Regional Development Fund in 1988 and 1993? Will the Commission provide projections, based on current estimates, for the same figures in respect of the new programming period 1999-2006? Which studies has the Commission undertaken on the benefits of continuity between periods to enable the completion of structural change, as against changes in eligibility in order to target need more effectively? What preliminary conclusions does the Commission draw in this respect?