title: Directiva 97/77/CE a Consiliului din 16 decembrie 1997 de modificare a Directivelor 93/23/CEE, 93/24/CEE și 93/25/CEE privind anchetele statistice care trebuie realizate privind producția de porcine, bovine, ovine și caprine

eurovoc_concepts:
agricultural statistics
cattle
goat
sheep
statistical method
swine

formats: pdf print xhtml

text: 03/vol. 23 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 141 31997L0077 L 10/28 JURNALUL OFICIAL AL COMUNITĂȚILOR EUROPENE 16. 1. 1998 DIRECTIVA 97/77/CE A CONSILIULUI din 16 decembrie 1997 de modificare a Directivelor 93/23/CEE, 93/24/CEE ș(cid:13)i 93/25/CEE privind anchetele statistice care trebuie realizate privind producția de porcine, bovine, ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine CONSILIUL UNIUNII EUROPENE, ADOPTĂ PREZENTA DIRECTIVĂ: având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunității Europene, în special articolul 43, Articolul 1 având în vedere propunerea Comisiei (1), având în vedere avizul Parlamentului European (2), întrucât, în scopul asigurării gestionării corespunzătoare a politi- cii agricole comune, în special când sunt implicate piețele cărnii de porc, de vită ș(cid:13)i vițel ș(cid:13)i ovină ș(cid:13)i caprină, Comisia solicită date periodice despre tendințele privind efectivele de animale ș(cid:13)i producția de carne de porc, vită ș(cid:13)i vițel ș(cid:13)i ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine; întrucât Directiva 93/23/CEE a Consiliului din 1 iunie 1993 pri- vind anchetele statistice care trebuie efectuate în domeniul pro- ducției de porcine (3), Directiva 93/24/CEE a Consiliului din 1 iunie 1993 privind anchetele statistice care trebuie efectuate în domeniul producției de bovine (4)ș(cid:13)i Directiva 93/25/CEE a Con- siliului din 1 iunie 1993 privind anchetele statistice care trebuie efectuate în domeniul producției de ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine (5) reglemen- tează frecvența anchetelor statistice care trebuie realizate privind producția de porcine, bovine ș(cid:13)i ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine; întrucât perioadele de referință trebuie adaptate în scopul unei mai bune utilizări a resurselor disponibile pentru anchetele statis- tice agricole; întrucât trebuie redusă sarcina exploatațiilor agricole în legătură cu realizarea anchetelor statistice; Directiva 93/23/CEE se modifică după cum urmează: 1. În articolul 1: (a) al doilea paragraf din alineatul următorul: (2) se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu „Statele membre ale căror efective de porcine sunt mai mici de 3 milioane de capete pot fi autorizate să realizeze ancheta o dată pe an în aprilie, mai/iunie, august sau noiembrie/decembrie. Dacă decid să realizeze ancheta în aprilie, mai/iunie sau august, înaintează Comisiei o esti- mare a efectivelor de porcine în una din primele zile ale lunii decembrie a anului de referință. ”; (b) se adaugă alineatele (4) ș(cid:13)i (5) după cum urmează: „(4) Comisia poate autoriza statele membre, la cererea acestora, să realizeze doar două anchete pe an, la un interval de ș(cid:13)ase luni în mai/iunie ș(cid:13)i noiembrie/decembrie. Această autorizație poate fi acordată doar cu condiția ca statele membre să aplice metode adecvate, care garantează calitatea previziunilor prevăzute în articolul 12. Docu- mentația metodologică adecvată trebuie prezentată de statele membre atunci când prezintă cererea respectivă. (5) Statelor membre care întreprind mai mult de trei anchete pe an li se permite o variație de până la trei zile la două dintre datele pe care le fixează pentru anchete, pre- văzute în alineatul (4). ” întrucât diferitele anchete statistice în sectorul agricol trebuie sincronizate pe cât posibil; 2. La articolul 5 se adaugă următoarele alineate: întrucât, în unele state membre, efectivele diferite de animale reprezintă o parte relativ minoră din totalul efectivelor de animale din Comunitate; întrucât, astfel, acestor state membre le pot fi acordate unele derogări, (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) JO C 288, 23. 9. 1997, p. 9. JO C 339, 10. 11. 1997. JO L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 1. Directivă modificată de Actul de aderare din 1994. JO L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 5. Directivă modificată de Actul de aderare din 1994. JO L 149, 21. 6. 1993, p. 10. Directivă modificată de Actul de aderare din 1994. „(3) Statele membre autorizate să realizeze doar două anchete pe an informează Comisia despre rezultatele provizorii ale anchetelor, incluzând estimări suplimentare înainte de: — 15 august a aceluiaș(cid:13)i an pentru ancheta din mai/iunie; — 15 februarie a anului următor pentru ancheta din noiembrie/decembrie. Statele membre a căror populație porcină este mai mică de 3 milioane de capete ș(cid:13)i care au fost autorizate să realizeze doar o anchetă pe an ș(cid:13)i care nu o realizează în noiembrie/decembrie, informează Comisia despre estimarea pe decembrie până la 15 februarie a anului următor. 142 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 03/vol. 23 (4) Statele membre autorizate să realizeze doar două anchete pe an informează Comisia despre rezultatele anchetelor, inclu- zând estimări suplimentare, aș(cid:13)a cum sunt definite în articolul 4 alineatul (2), înainte de: Articolul 3 Directiva 93/25/CEE se modifică după cum urmează: — 15 septembrie a aceluiaș(cid:13)i an pentru ancheta din mai/iunie; 1. În articolul 1: — 1 aprilie a anului următor pentru ancheta din (a) alineatul (1) se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu următorul: noiembrie/decembrie. ” 3. La articolul 6: (a) în alineatul (1) termenul „decembrie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu termenii „decembrie sau noiembrie/decembrie”; (b) în alineatul (2) termenul „aprilie sau mai/iunie”. termenul „aprilie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu 4. La articolul 8 alineatul (1) termenul „decembrie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu termenul „noiembrie/decembrie”. Articolul 2 Directiva 93/24/CEE se modifică după cum urmează: 1. La articolul 1: (a) alineatul (1) se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu următorul: „(1) Statele membre realizează în fiecare an o anchetă statistică a efectivelor de ovine cu referire la o zi din noiembrie/decembrie. ” (b) în alineatul (2) litera (a) cuvintele „la una din primele zile din decembrie” se înlocuiesc cu termenul „la o zi din noiembrie/decembrie”. 2. Articolul 6 alineatul (2) se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu următorul: „(2) Prin derogare de la articolele 1 ș(cid:13)i 5, Belgia, Danemarca, Germania ș(cid:13)i Țările de Jos sunt autorizate să estimeze efectivele de ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine, iar Regatul Unit efectivele de caprine deți- nute în noiembrie/decembrie, pe baza efectivelor de animale înregistrate în cursul recensământului anual al efectivelor de animale sau al anchetei structurale în agricultură pe care o întreprind în acelaș(cid:13)i an. Ele înaintează Comisiei rezultatele provizorii menționate în articolul 5 alineatul (1) înainte de 1 martie iar rezultatele menționate în articolul 5 alineatul (2) înainte de 1 aprilie a anului următor anului de referință. ” 3. Articolul 9 se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu următorul: „(1) Statele membre realizează anchete statistice ale efec- tivelor de bovine de pe teritoriul lor în fiecare an cu refe- rire la o zi din luna mai/iunie ș(cid:13)i cu referire la o zi din luna noiembrie/decembrie. „Articolul 9 Statele membre pot fi autorizate să înlocuiască ancheta din mai/iunie printr-o anchetă în aprilie, dacă înaintează Comisiei, înainte de 30 septembrie a aceluiaș(cid:13)i an, o esti- mare a efectivelor de bovine pentru una din primele zile ale lui iunie. ” (b) în alineatul următorul: (2) primul paragraf se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu „(2) Statele membre, la cererea acestora, pot fi autorizate să realizeze anchetele din mai/iunie sau noiembrie/ decembrie în regiunile selectate, cu condiția ca aceste veri- ficări să acopere cel puțin 70 % din efectivul de bovine. ” Prin derogare de la articolul 8: (a) Belgia, Germania ș(cid:13)i Țările de Jos sunt autorizate să noti- fice numărul ovinelor pe «région/gewest», «Länder» sau «provincie» în cazul efectivelor de animale acoperite de recensământul efectivelor de animale sau ancheta structu- rală în agricultură realizată în primele ș(cid:13)ase luni ale anului de referință, înainte de 15 octombrie a anului respectiv; (b) statele membre menționate în articolul 1 alineatul (2) litera (b) sunt scutite de notificarea defalcării pe regiuni a efectivului de caprine. ” 4. Articolul 12 se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu următorul: 2. În articolul 5 alineatul (1) a doua liniuță ș(cid:13)i alineatul (2) a doua liniuță termenul „decembrie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu termenul „noiembrie/decembrie”. „Articolul 12 3. În articolul 6 alineatul (1) termenul „decembrie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu termenul „noiembrie/decembrie”. 4. În articolul 8 alineatul (1) termenul „decembrie” se înlocuieș(cid:13)te cu termenul „noiembrie/decembrie”. Prin derogare de la articolul 11, Belgia, Danemarca, Germania ș(cid:13)i Țările de Jos sunt autorizate să notifice datele cu privire la structura efectivelor de ovine ș(cid:13)i caprine, iar Regatul Unit pe acelea privind efectivele de caprine acoperite de recensământul efectivelor de animale sau ancheta structurală în agricultură realizată în anul de referință, înainte de 15 mai a anului următor. ” 03/vol. 23 RO Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene 143 Articolul 4 Articolul 5 (1) Statele membre iau măsurile necesare pentru intrarea în vigoare a actelor cu putere de lege ș(cid:13)i a actelor administrative pen- tru a se conforma dispozițiilor prezentei directive până la 31 decembrie 1998 cel târziu. Când statele membre adoptă aceste dispoziții, ele conțin o trimitere la prezenta directivă sau sunt însoțite de o asemenea trimitere în momentul publicării lor oficiale. Statele membre sta- bilesc modalitatea de efectuare a acestei trimiteri. (2) Statele membre comunică Comisiei textul principalelor dis- poziții de drept intern, pe care le adoptă în domeniul reglementat de prezenta directivă. Prezenta directivă întră în vigoare în a douăzecea zi de la publicarea în Jurnalul Oficial al Comunităților Europene. Articolul 6 Prezenta directivă se adresează statelor membre. Adoptată la Bruxelles, 16 decembrie 1997. Pentru Consiliu Preș(cid:13)edintele F. BODEN


title: Decyzja Komisji z dnia 16 grudnia 1997 r. ustalająca tymczasowe wykazy zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów uzyskanych z wołowiny, wieprzowiny, mięsa końskiego, mięsa baraniego oraz mięsa koziegoTekst mający znaczenie dla EOG

eurovoc_concepts:
import
import policy
meat product
originating product
third country

formats: html pdf print

text: 03/t. 22 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 215 31998D0010 L 3/14 DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJSKICH 7. 1. 1998 DECYZJA KOMISJI z dnia 16 grudnia 1997 r. ustalająca tymczasowe wykazy zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów uzyskanych z wołowiny, wieprzowiny, mięsa końskiego, mięsa baraniego oraz mięsa koziego (Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG) (98/10/WE) tymczasowe wykazy zakładów produkujących produkty mięsne mogą być zatem sporządzone w odniesieniu do Chorwacji; środki przewidziane w niniejszej decyzji są zgodne z opinią Stałego Komitetu Weterynaryjnego, PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ: Artykuł 1 1. Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów uzyskanych z wołowiny, wieprzowiny, mięsa końskiego, mięsa baraniego i mięsa koziego, z przedsiębiorstw wymienionych w Załączniku do niniejszej decyzji. 2. Przywóz produktów mięsnych podlega nadal wspólno- towym przepisom weterynaryjnym przyjętym w innych aktach prawnych. Artykuł 2 Niniejszą decyzję stosuje się od dnia 15 grudnia 1997 r. Artykuł 3 Niniejsza decyzja skierowana jest do Państw Członkowskich. Sporządzono w Brukseli, dnia 16 grudnia 1997 r. W imieniu Komisji Franz FISCHLER Członek Komisji KOMISJA WSPÓLNOT EUROPEJSKICH, uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Wspólnotę Europejską, uwzględniając decyzję Rady 95/408/WE z dnia 22 czerwca 1995 r. w sprawie warunków ustalania na okres przejściowy tymczasowych wykazów zakładów z państw trzecich, z których Państwom Członkowskim zezwala się na przywóz niektórych produktów pochodzenia zwierzęcego, produktów żywych małży (1), rybołówstwa decyzją 97/34/WE (2), w szczególności jej art. 2 ust. 4, zmienioną lub a także mając na uwadze, co następuje: decyzja Komisji 97/222/WE (3) ustala wykaz państw trzecich, z których przywóz produktów mięsnych; Członkowskie dopuszczają Państwa dla krajów znajdujących się na tym wykazie wymagania w zakresie warunków zdrowotnych zwierząt i świadectw wetery- naryjnych przy przywozie produktów mięsnych zostały ustano- wione w decyzji Komisji 97/221/WE (4); tymczasowe wykazy zakładów państw trzecich, z których Państwa Członkowskie dopuszczają przywóz produktów uzys- kanych z wołowiny, wieprzowiny, mięsa końskiego, mięsa baraniego oraz mięsa koziego zostały sporządzone decyzją Komisji 97/365/WE (5); Komisja otrzymała od Chorwacji wykaz zakładów z gwaran- cjami, że spełniają one w pełni odpowiednie wspólnotowe wymagania zdrowotne oraz że w przypadku niezastosowania się do tych wymagań przez zakład wywóz do Wspólnoty Euro- pejskiej zostanie zawieszony; Komisja nie mogła ustalić we wszystkich danych państwach trzecich, czy zakłady spełniają wymagania Wspólnoty, jak również ważności gwarancji udzielonych przez właściwe władze; (1) Dz. U. L 243 z 11. 10. 1995, str. 17. (2) Dz. U. L 13 z 16. 1. 1997, str. 33. (3) Dz. U. L 89 z 4. 4. 1997, str. 39. (4) Dz. U. L 89 z 4. 4. 1997, str. 32. (5) Dz. U. L 154 z 12. 6. 1997, str. 41. 216 PL Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej 03/t. 22 ANEXO — BILAG — ANHANG — ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ — ANNEX — ANNEXE — ALLEGATO — BIJLAGE — ANEXO — LIITE — BILAGA LISTA DE LOS ESTABLECIMIENTOS — LISTE OVER VIRKSOMHEDER — VERZEICHNIS DER BETRIEBE — ΚΑΤΑΛΟΓΟΣ ΕΓΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΕΩΝ — LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS — LISTE DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS — ELENCO DEGLI STABILIMENTI — LIJST VAN BEDRIJVEN — LISTA DOS ESTABELECIMENTOS — LUETTELO LAITOKSISTA — FÖRTECKNING ÖVER ANLÄGGNINGAR Producto: productos cárnicos — Produkt: kødprodukter — Erzeugnis: Fleischerzeugnisse — Pρoϊόν: νωπό κρέας πονλερικών — Product: meat products — Produit: Produits à base de viandes — Prodotto: prodotti a base di carne — Product: vleesproducten — Produto: produtos à base de carne — Tuote: lihatuotteet — Varuslag: kött- varor 1 = Referencia nacional — National reference — National-Code — Εθνικόζ κωδικόζ αριθµόζ — National reference — Référence nationale — Riferimento nazionale — Nationale code — Referência nacional — Kansallinen referenssi — Nationell referens 2 = Nombre — Navn — Name — Όνοµα — Name — Nom — Nome — Naam — Nome — Nimi — Namn 3 = Ciudad — By — Stadt — Πόλη — Town — Ville — Cittá — Stad — Cidade — Kaupunki — Stad 4 = Región — Region — Region — Περιφέρεια — Region — Région — Regione — Regio — Região — Alue — Region 5 = Menciones especiales — Særlige betingelser — Spezielle Bemerkungen — Ειδικέζ παρατηρήσειζ — Special remarks — Mentions spéciales — Note particolari — Bijzondere opmerkingen — Menções especiais — Erikoismainintoja — Anmärkningar 6 = * Países y establecimientos que cumplen todos los requisitos del apartado 4 del artculo 2 de la artículo 2 de la Deci- sión 95/408/CE del Consejo. * Lande og virksomheder, der opfylder alle betingelserne i artikel 2, stk. 4, i Rådets beslutning 95/408/EF. * Länder und Betriebe, die alle Anforderungen des Artikels 2 Absatz 4 der Entscheidung 95/408/EG des Rates erfüllen. * Χώρεζ και εγκαταστάσειζ που πληρούν τιζ προϋποθέσειζ του άρθρου 2 παράγραφοζ 4 τηζ απόφασηζ 95/408/EK του Συµβουλίου. * Countries and establishments complying with all requirements of Article 2 (4) of Council Decision 95/408/EC. * Pays et établissements remplissant 95/408/CE du Conseil. * Paese e stabilimenti che ottemperano a tutte le disposizioni dell'articolo 2 paragrafo 4 della decisione 95/408/CE del Consiglio. * Landen en inrichtingen die voldoen aan al de voorwaarden van artikel 2, lid 4, van Beschikking 95/408/EG van de Raad. * Países e estabelecimentos que respeitam todas as exigências do no 4 do artigo 2o da Decião 95/408/CE do Conselho. * Neuvoston päätöksen 95/408/EY 2 artiklan 4 kohdan kaikki vaatimukset täyttäävät maat ja laitokset. * Länder och anläggningar som uppfyller alla krav i artikel 2. 4 i rådets beslut 95/408/EG. l'ensemble des dispositions de l'article 2 paragraphe 4 de la décision País: CROACIA — Land: KROATIEN — Land: KROATIEN — Χωρα: KROATIA — Country: CROATIA — Pays: CROATIE — Paese: CROAZIA — Land: KROATIE — País: CROACIA — Maa: KROATIA — Land: KROATIEN 2 3 4 PIK-VRBOVEC-Mesna industrija d. d. PPK 'KARLOVAC' d. d. -Karlovac 'DANICA' d. o. o. -Klaonica i perada mesa 'ZAGREPEANKA' d. d. -Zagreb IM 'IVANEC' d. d. 'GAVRILOVIÆ' d. o. o. -Petrinja Vrbovec Karlovac Koprovnica Zagreb Ivanec Petrinja 1 10 31 139 162 214 399 5 6 6 6 6 6 6


title: KOMMISSIONENS FÖRORDNING (EG) nr 2516/97 av den 16 december 1997 om fastställande av exportbidrag för nötkött

eurovoc_concepts:
beef
cattle
customs formalities
export refund
health certificate
third country


title: 98/118/EG: Beschluß des Rates vom 16. Dezember 1997 über den Abschluß des Protokolls über den Beitritt des Fürstentums Monaco zum Übereinkommen zum Schutz der Alpen

eurovoc_concepts:
Alpine Region
Monaco
action programme
cross-border cooperation
environmental protection
international convention

text: 7. 2. 98 ‹ ‹DE Amtsblatt der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaften L 33/21 II (Nicht ver(cid:148)ffentlichungsbed(cid:129)rftige Rechtsakte) RAT BESCHLUSS DES RATES vom 16. Dezember 1997 (cid:129)ber den Abschluß des Protokolls (cid:129)ber den Beitritt des F(cid:129)rstentums Monaco zum (cid:154)bereinkommen zum Schutz der Alpen (98/118/EG) DER RAT DER EUROP(cid:142)ISCHEN UNION — gest(cid:129)tzt auf den Vertrag zur Gr(cid:129)ndung der Europ(cid:132)ischen Gemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 130 s Absatz 1 in Verbindung mit Artikel 228 Absatz 2 und Absatz 3 Unterabsatz 1, Die Ausdehnung das F(cid:129)rstentum Monaco erm(cid:148)glicht einen besseren Schutz der Alpen im gesamten Alpenraum. der Alpen-Konvention auf Die Gemeinschaft sollte daher das Protokoll geneh- migen — auf Vorschlag der Kommission ( 1), BESCHLIESST: nach Stellungnahme des Europ(cid:132)ischen Parlaments ( 2), in Erw(cid:132)gung nachstehender Gr(cid:129)nde: Die Europ(cid:132)ische Gemeinschaft ist Vertragspartei des (cid:154)bereinkommens zum Schutz der Alpen (Alpenkonven- tion) (3). Der Schutz der Alpen geh(cid:148)rt wegen des grenz(cid:129)berschrei- tenden Charakters der wirtschaftlichen, (cid:148)kologischen und sozialen Probleme des Alpenraums zu den wichtigsten Aufgaben aller Mitgliedstaaten. Die Gemeinschaft beteiligte sich an den Verhandlungen (cid:129)ber das Protokoll zum Beitritt des F(cid:129)rstentums Monaco zur Alpenkonvention, das sie am 20. Dezember 1994 unterzeichnete. Die Zustimmung, durch die Alpenkonvention gebunden zu sein, setzt die Zustimmung, durch das Protokoll gebunden zu sein, mit dem der geographische Anwen- dungsbereich des (cid:154)bereinkommens ausgedehnt wird, voraus. (1) ABl. C 347 vom 18. 11. 1997, S. 7. (2) ABl. C 339 vom 10. 11. 1997. (3) ABl. L 61 vom 12. 3. 1996, S. 31. Artikel 1 Das Protokoll (cid:129)ber den Beitritt des F(cid:129)rstentums Monaco zum (cid:154)bereinkommen zum Schutz der Alpen wird im Namen der Gemeinschaft genehmigt. Der Wortlaut des Protokolls ist diesem Beschluß beige- f(cid:129)gt. Artikel 2 Der Pr(cid:132)sident des Rates wird erm(cid:132)chtigt, die Person oder Personen zu bestellen, die befugt sind, im Namen der Gemeinschaft gem(cid:132)ß Artikel 11 Absatz 2 der Alpen-Konvention bei der Repu- blik (cid:153)sterreich zu hinterlegen. Genehmigungsurkunde die Geschehen zu Br(cid:129)ssel am 16. Dezember 1997. Im Namen des Rates Der Pr(cid:132)sident J. LAHURE


title: Verordening (EG) Nr. 2604/97 van de Commissie van 16 december 1997 tot instelling van voorafgaand communautair toezicht op de invoer van bepaalde onder het EGKS-Verdrag en het EG-Verdrag vallende ijzer- en staalproducten van oorsprong uit bepaalde derde landen

eurovoc_concepts:
ECSC Treaty
customs document
import policy
iron and steel product
third country

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: Règlement (CE) n° 2603/97 de la Commission du 16 décembre 1997 fixant les modalités d'application pour l'importation de riz originaire des États ACP ainsi que pour l'importation de riz originaire des pays et territoires d'outre-mer (PTOM)

eurovoc_concepts:
ACP countries
import licence
import policy
originating product
overseas countries and territories
rice


title: 97/874/ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ: Απόφαση της Επιτροπής της 16ης Δεκεμβρίου 1997 για τροποποίηση του άρθρου 5 της απόφασης 94/204/ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ για τη σύσταση της ευρωπαϊκής συνέλευσης επιστημών και τεχνολογιών (Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU research policy
advisory committee (EU)
research and development
research programme
scientific cooperation
technological change


title: Komisijas Lēmums (1997. gada 16. decembris), ar kuru groza Lēmumu 97/467/EK, ar ko izveido to trešo valstu uzņēmumu pagaidu sarakstus, no kuriem dalībvalstis atļauj ievest trušu gaļu un saimniecībā audzētu medījamo dzīvnieku gaļudokuments attiecas uz EEZ

eurovoc_concepts:
game meat
health legislation
import
rabbit meat
third country
veterinary legislation

text: 03/22. sēj. LV Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis 199 31997D0871 24. 12. 1997. EIROPAS KOPIENU OFICIĀLAIS VĒSTNESIS L 353/47 KOMISIJAS LĒMUMS (1997. gada 16. decembris), ar kuru groza Lēmumu 97/467/EK, ar ko izveido to trešo valstu uzņēmumu pagaidu sarakstus, no kuriem dalībvalstis atļauj ievest trušu gaļu un saimniecībā audzētu medījamo dzīvnieku gaļu (Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ) (97/871/EK) EIROPAS KOPIENU KOMISIJA, ņemot vērā Eiropas Kopienas dibināšanas līgumu, 22. vērā jūnija Padomes 1995. gada ņemot Lēmumu 95/408/EK par nosacījumiem to trešo valstu uzņēmumu pagaidu sarakstu izveidošanai uz pārejas posmu, no kuriem dalībvalstīm atļauts ievest noteiktus dzīvnieku izcelsmes produktus, zvejniecības produktus vai dzīvas gliemenes (1), kas grozīts ar Padomes Lēmumu 97/34/EK (2), un jo īpaši tā 2. panta 1. punktu, tā kā to uzņēmumu pagaidu saraksti, kuri ražo trušu gaļu un saimniecībā audzētu medījamo dzīvnieku gaļu, izveidoti saskaņā ar Komisijas Lēmumu 97/467/EK (3), kurā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Komisijas Lēmumu 97/869/EK (4); ir tā kā Ķīnas Tautas Republika ir nosūtījusi to uzņēmumu sarakstu, kuri ražo trušu gaļu un saimniecībā audzētu medī- jamo dzīvnieku gaļu un attiecībā uz kuriem atbildīgās iestādes apliecina, ka šie uzņēmumi atbilst Kopienas noteikumiem; tā kā Kopienas veterinārās misijas laikā noskaidrots, ka par šo uzņēmumu apstiprināšanu atbildīgajai kompetentajai iestādei ir pietiekama struktūra un organizācija un ka minētajai kompe- tentajai iestādei dotās pilnvaras nodrošina Kopienas noteikumu īstenošanu; tā kā šīs pārbaudes ietvēra arī pārbaudes uz vietas šajā sarakstā iekļautajos uzņēmumos, un tajās noskaidrots, ka šiem uzņēmumiem ir pietiekami higiēnas standarti; tā kā tādēļ attiecībā uz Ķīnas Tautas Republiku var izveidot trušu gaļu ražojošo uzņēmumu pagaidu sarakstu; tā kā šajā lēmumā paredzētie pasākumi ir saskaņā ar Pastāvīgās veterinārijas komitejas atzinumu, IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU. 1. pants Šā lēmuma pielikumu pievieno Lēmuma 97/467/EK pieli- kumam. Šo lēmumu piemēro no 1998. gada 1. janvāra. 2. pants Šis lēmums ir adresēts dalībvalstīm. 3. pants Briselē, 1997. gada 16. decembrī Komisijas vārdā — Komisijas loceklis Franz FISCHLER (1) OV L 243, 11. 10. 1995. , 17. (2) OV L 13, 16. 1. 1997. , 33. (3) OV L 199, 26. 7. 1997. , 57. (4) OV L 353, 24. 12. 97. , 43. lpp. lpp. lpp. lpp. 200 LV Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis 03/22. sēj. PIELIKUMS País: República Popular de China — Land: Folkerepublikken Kina — Land: Volksrepublik China — Χώρα: Λαϊκή ∆ηµοκρατία της Κίνας — Country: People's Republic of China — Pays: Republique populaire de Chine — Paese: Repubblica popolare cinese — Land: China (Volksrepubliek) — País: República Popular da China — Maa: Kiinan kansantasavalta — Land: Folkrepubliken Kina 1 2 3 4 3700/03067 Weifang Rabbit Slaughterhouse 3700/03136 Junan Ruijing Foodstuffs Co. Ltd, Rabbit Slaughterhouse 3700/03175 Cangshan Rabbit Slaughterhouse Weifang Shandong Junan Shandong Shenshan Shandong SH-CP 5 SH-CP SH-CP 6 a a a


title: KOMISSION ASETUS (EY) N:o 2515/97, annettu 16 päivänä joulukuuta 1997, määrättyyn järjestelmään liittyvien lokakuussa 1997 jätettyjen tiettyjä muna-alan ja siipikarjanliha-alan tuotteita koskevien tuontilupahakemusten hyväksyttävyydestä asetuksen (EY) N:o 1474/95 ja asetuksen (EY) N:o 1251/96 mukaisesti annetun asetuksen (EY) N:o 2118/97 oikaisemisesta

eurovoc_concepts:
egg
import licence
poultrymeat
quantitative restriction


title: 98/664/EC: Commission Decision of 16 December 1997 on State aid granted by the Land of Thuringia to Thüringer Motorenwerke GmbH [notified under document number C(1997) 4341] (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance)

eurovoc_concepts:
State aid
Thuringia
common market
loan
motor vehicle industry
regional aid

text: L 316/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 11. 98 COMMISSION DECISION of 16 December 1997 on State aid granted by the Land of Thuringia to Thüringer Motorenwerke GmbH (notified under document number C(1997) 4341) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (98/664/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMUNITIES Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 93(2) thereof, Having regard European Article 62(1)(a) thereof, to Economic Area, the Agreement establishing and the particular in Having given the other Member States and other parties concerned notice in submit accordance with Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty, their comments, to Whereas: I aid State for Thüringer Motorenwerke GmbH (hereinafter referred to as ‘TMW’) was notified by Germany to the Commission by letter dated 8 August 1996, received on 12 August 1996. The notification concerned rescue aid provided under a scheme known as the Consolidation Fund of the Land of Thuringia (Konsolidierungsfonds des Landes Thüringen), authorised by the Commission on 20 December 1995 (1). Several loans totalling DEM 4,8 million had been made to the company under the scheme in 1995 and 1996 without awaiting the Commission’s decision. The case was therefore registered as non-notified aid under the reference NN 99/96. TMW’s main business is the production of engines for motor vehicles. letter dated 8 November 1996, By the German authorities informed the Commission that Gesamtvoll- streckungsverfahren proceedings (insolvency proceedings prior to a takeover or the winding-up of the company) had been initiated on 30 September 1996. The Commission informed Germany, by letter dated 23 January 1997, that it was initiating Article 93(2) proceedings in respect of the whole of the rescue aid measures in the form of subsidised loans (with a nominal value of DEM 4,8 million), on the following grounds: — doubts as to the compatibility of the loans with the common market, in view of the period they covered, which was more than six months, — doubts as to the compatibility with the common market, of the loans granted in 1996, since the principle that the aid should be a one-off operation did not seem to have been complied with; also, doubts as to the nature of the aid and whether the respite obtained through the granting of the loans had actually been used to draw up a coherent restructuring plan aimed at restoring the company’s long-term viability, — doubts whether various commitments entered into when the company IFA Motorenwerke Nordhausen GmbH was privatised by the Treuhandanstalt (‘THA’) had been adhered to in the business plans presented. letter also stated that the business prospects The described by Germany took no account whatever of TMW’s insolvency. By a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (2), the Commission gave the other Member States and the opportunity to submit any comments on the measures in question within one month of its publication. interested parties II Having requested on 24 February 1997 a one-month extension of the period initially set for presenting their comments, a request which the Commission granted, the German authorities submitted their comments by letter dated 1 April 1997. Since in the Commission’s view the answers provided were not complete, it asked additional questions on 7 May 1997 and 6 August 1997. Germany then provided additional information by letters dated 26 June 1997, 10 October 1997 and 6 November 1997. (1) OJ C 215, 25. 7. 1996, p. 6. (2) OJ C 104, 3. 4. 1997, p. 6. 25. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 316/21 (a) Germany pointed out that the three loans granted in July 1995 (DEM 2 million), February 1996 (DEM 0,8 million) and April 1996 (DEM 2 million) by the public-law Thüringer Aufbaubank (‘TAB’) are subject to Commission approval and that, in the event of a negative decision, they would have to be recovered. III No comments from third parties were received by the Commission. (b) In addition, Germany noted that the first loan to had been granted when ZMW belonged Antriebstechnik Weimar-Amberg GmbH (‘AWA’). Following the insolvency of AWA, the failure of what the German authorities described as the ‘first restructuring’ of TMW and the intervention of the company Rebag, which envisaged injecting DEM 2 million in new capital, it became apparent that the first loan was not sufficient to carry out successfully a new restructuring plan. A commercial bank had then stated that it was prepared to grant a DEM 6 million loan if it obtained a guarantee from the Land of Thuringia. The guarantee was not given, however, because, according, to the information provided by the German authorities on 6 November 1997, the regional authorities had doubts as to the effectiveness of the restructuring plan, the stability of the balance-sheet situation, which was deteriorating. In the the conditions to be re-established for the granting of the loan by the private bank, the TAB granted a third liquidity. This arrangement, described by Germany as the ‘second restructuring plan’ also proved to be a failure. Following the insolvency of TMW, repayment of the loans was requested by the TAB, which instituted legal proceedings to recover its claims. the company’s management loan to safeguard TMW’s intervening period team and to allow intended (c) Germany maintains its view that the loans granted to TMW were in the nature of ‘restructuring’ aid. (d) The information communicated by Germany shows the following picture: (in DEM million) 1993 1994 1995 30 June 1996 Workforce Turnover 115 11 85 15 87 6 87 7 Profit or loss − 3,3 − 7,9 − 6,9 − 2,2 The net position at 30 June 1996 showed debt of DEM 16,1 million. Production was halted as from September 1996. IV (a) The Land of Thuringia granted three successive loans to TMW through the intermediary of the TAB. It seems certain that, in view of its financial situation, TMW could not have obtained any loan to maintain its solvency and creditworthiness from a commercial bank. The preferential terms on which the loans were granted to TMW distort or threaten to distort competition. Furthermore, the market in engines for motor vehicles, on which TMW operates, involves significant intra-Community trade. There is therefore evidence of State aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement. (b) The Consolidation Fund of the Land of Thuringia authorised by the Commission on 20 December 1995 (3), under which the loans were granted, provides rescue and restructuring aid within the meaning of the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty ‘the Guidelines’) (4). It requires individual notification where aid is granted in sensitive sectors, including the motor vehicle industry. Furthermore, the first loan, amounting to DEM 2 million, was granted in July 1995, before the Commission had approved the scheme. The German authorities should therefore have notified this first loan to the Commission as ad hoc aid, which they failed to do. that Germany had agreed In its letter of 6 February 1996, the Commission to notify noted individually all cases in which rescue or restructuring aid was repeatedly granted to one and the same firm and in which the amount of restructuring aid previously granted exceeded ECU 1 million (some DEM 1,9 million). Since it considers all the aid to be restructuring aid, Germany should therefore have notified individually the second and third loans; this was not done. The Commission concludes from the above that the three loans were notifiable under Article 93(3) of the (e) By letter dated 10 October 1997, Germany informed the Commission that TMW no longer existed as a commercial undertaking. (3) See footnote 1. (4) OJ C 368, 23. 12. 1994, p. 12. L 316/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 11. 98 EC Treaty. Since, moreover, the German authorities did not comply with the suspensory effect of Article 93(3) by granting the three loans before the Commission had taken a final decision, the aid provided through each of the loans is illegal in its form. In order to be able to ascertain the compatibility of the aid with the common market under one of the derogations provided for in Article 93(3)(a) or (c) of the EC Treaty, the Commission must examine, respectively, whether the aid promotes the long-term development of the relevant region or whether the conditions laid down in the Community Framework on State aid to the motor vehicle industry (5) and the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty are complied with. (c) The aid element contained in such loans depends on the financial situation of the company. If its financial situation is not too unfavourable, the aid consists of the difference between the rate which the firm would obtain from a commercial bank, on the basis of the risk which it represents, and the rate on the loan granted through State assistance. However, if the company is in too precarious a financial situation, no commercial bank would grant a loan. The Commission’s practice is then to consider that the aid element corresponds to the whole of the loan. On the basis of the information communicated by such as TMW’s balance-sheet situation in 1995 and 1996, and the the very unfavourable Commission considers that, in 1995 and 1996, TMW was in such a serious financial situation as to make it unable to obtain any loan whatsoever without the Commission considers that the amouont of aid is the total amount of the loans, i. e. DEM 4,8 million. assistance. Consequently, the German authorities, trend of turnover, State (d) Article 92(1) of the EC Treaty lays down the principle that aid corresponding to the circumstances which it envisages is incompatible with the common market. However, Article 92(2) of the EC Treaty sets out a number of exemptions from this principle. Given the aid, Article 92(2)(a) and (b) are not applicable here. Nor has Germany argued or shown that the aid intended to compensate for the economic was disadvantages caused by the division of Germany. The exemption provided for in Article 92(2)(c) is therefore also not applicable in this instance. the nature and purpose of Article 92(3) sets out the types of aid which may be considered to be compatible with the common market. Compatibility with the EC Treaty must be assessed in the context of the Community as a whole and not in a purely national context. In order to safeguard the proper functioning of the common market and in view of the principles set out in Article 3(g) of the EC Treaty, the derogation criteria provided for in Article 92(3) must be interpreted strictly. As regards the derogation provided for in Article 92(3)(b) of the Treaty, the relevant aid is clearly not intended to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the German economy. V Germany claims that what is involved is three successive grants of restructuring aid. The Commission cannot agree with this view. (a) The documents submitted by Germany show that the purpose of the three loans is to secure TMW’s solvency in the short term by making available financial resources for the payment of salaries and outstanding debts. Furthermore, even if the limited resources which Rebag would have made available to TMW are included, the loans cannot at the same time secure the firm’s short-term solvency and finance a hypothetical restructuring programme. The information provided by Germany following the initiation of Article 93(2) proceedings does nothing to rebut the Commission’s view. By their nature and their objective, the three loans are therefore rescue aid. (b) Even if it had accepted Germany’s mistaken description of the aid as restructuring aid, the Commission never received from Germany any information on any restructuring plan, within the meaning of the Guidelines, in respect of the granting of the first loan. In the absence of any such plan, the Commission is unable to regard such alleged restructuring aid as being compatible with the Treaty. (c) The German authorities did not present any information that would have removed the doubts expressed by initiating the Commission proceedings regarding the existence of a coherent restructuring plan for restoring TMW’s long-term viability in connection with the second and third loans. In addition, the Commission considers that the plan for reorientating the firm’s acitivities, described briefly in the notification and amplified, in (5) OJ C 284, 28. 10. 1995, p. 3. 25. 11. 98 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 316/23 to the the real replies chances of insufficiently, the in albeit Commission’s additional questions in 1996 and following the initiation of Article 93(2) proceedings, was not capable of restoring the firm’s long-term viability. The DEM 6 million bank loan referred to in various letters from Germany was ultimately not granted, by the private commercial bank because, according to the letter of 6 November 1997, the Land guarantee was not given in view of doubts as to the firm. reorganisation plan presented by Consequently, it is apparent that both the regional authorities, which refused to give an additional guarantee to the tune of DEM 6 million, and the commercial bank, which refused to grant the loan without a guarantee from a public body, took the view that the ‘restructuring’ would not allow TMW to restore its long-term viability. Another conclusion which the Commission draws from examination of the sequence in which events occurred is that the third loan was granted at a time when the German authorities already had doubts as to the quality of the restructuring plan and the company’s viability. implementing the The essential requirement that a plan for restoring the long-term viability of the firm must be drawn up and implemented has thus not been met as regards third amounts of either therefore ‘restructuring’ aid. The Commission concludes loans are also the that incompatible with the Treaty. second or two last the the (d) In addition, the period over which the loans were granted (nine months) and the breakdown of the total volume of aid into three separate agreements, with different amounts (DEM 2 million, DEM 0,8 million and DEM 2 million), show clearly that three successive grants of aid were involved, not to be confused with the payment by instalments which was provided for in the various loan agreements. The Guidelines stipulate that, like rescue aid, aid for restructuring should normally need to be granted only once. The Guidelines also state that recurrent injections of aid in an assisted area will not be viewed any more leniently than in non-assisted areas. (e) Consequently, even if it had accepted the German authorities’ unjustified description of the aid as restructuring aid, the Commission would have had to conclude that the three loans were incompatible with the Treaty. viability on the basis of the restructuring plan communicated by the German authorities. VI After careful scrutiny of the documents transmitted by the German authorities, the Commission considers that what is in fact at issue is three successive grants of rescue aid, as evidenced by the nature and purpose of the loans. Their compatibility with the Treaty should therefore be examined on that basis. (a) The Commission notes that the period covered by the first loan (from July 1995 to February 1996, when the second loan was granted) amounts to a little over six months. This repayable loan clearly constitutes liquidity help. As may be seen from the contract with the TAB, the loan is restricted to the amount needed to keep the firm in business, and in particular to the covering of its social security costs and routine operations. Furthermore, the loan is warranted on the grounds of the risk of the imminent cessation of payments by the firm and hence the unemployment of its workforce. Because of the level of business of the firm as illustrated, for example, by its turnover in 1995 and 1996, the scale of the rescue aid is not such as to have any undue adverse effects on the industrial situation in other Member States. the conditions set out The first rescue aid, namely the first loan, thus complies with the Guidelines. Consequently, the Commission concludes that, although illegal, this aid is compatible with the Treaty, since it qualifies for the exemption provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. in (b) The Guidelines stipulate that rescue aid should be a one-off operation and that a series of rescues (in this case, the loan renewals) that merely maintain the status quo, postponing the inevitable and in the mean time transferring the attendant industrial and social problems to other, more efficient producers and other Member States is clearly unacceptable. Rescue aid should therefore be a one-off holding operation mounted over a limited period during which the company’s future can be assessed. (f) The Commission also notes that TMW’s bankruptcy and the winding-up of its business confirm that it long-term was impossible to restore the firm’s The period during which the aid enabled TMW to remain in business was from July 1995 until the beginning of Gesamtvollstreckungsverfahren L 316/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25. 11. 98 insolvency proceedings, at the end of September 1996, giving a total of 15 months, whereas the Guidelines stipulate that such aid may be granted only for a period generally not exceeding six months. Furthermore, the Commission considers that no real restructuring plan under which the firm’s long-term viability could be restored was drawn up during the additional period in which the firm was kept in business thanks to the second and third loans. Lastly, the German authorities do not cite any external factors which the firm could not have foreseen in order to justify the granting of the last two loans. In conclusion, the aid granted illegally through the second and third loans does not qualify for the exemption provided for in Article 92(3)(a) of the EC Treaty, since the aid covered by that provision must help to promote the long-term development of the region, which is not the case in this instance, given the fact that the aid is intended only to cover the firm’s operating costs and its losses without bringing about any structural improvement. The Commission would add that the derogations whereby certain operating aid in the assisted areas may be authorised under Article 92(3)(a) of the EC Treaty are not applicable this case, notably because such operating aid may not be granted in breach of the specific rules covering aid granted to firms in difficulty, and because the aid must be intended to promote lasting and balanced development of economic activity, which is clearly not the case here. Lastly, the aid does not qualify for the exemption provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the Treaty, since it does not comply with the principles set out in the Guidelines. in HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The aid granted to Thüringer Motorenwerke GmbH under the first loan of July 1995 amounting to DEM 2 million is illegal, but is compatible with the common market since it qualifies for the exemption provided for in Article 92(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. Article 2 The aid granted to Thüringer Motorenwerke GmbH under the second loan of February 1996 amounting to DEM 0,8 million and the third loan of April 1996 amounting to DEM 2 million is not eligible for the exemptions provided for in Article 92(3) and is therefore incompatible with the common market. Article 3 Germany shall recover the aid provided referred to in Article 2. Repayment shall be made in accordance with the procedures and provisions of German law, together with interest as from the date on which the aid was granted, at an interest rate equal to the percentage value on such date of the reference rate used to calculate the net grant equivalent of regional aid in Germany. Article 4 VII Germany shall inform the Commission within two months from the date of notification of this Decision of the measures it has taken to comply therewith. The Guidelines state that the Commission will take account of the special features of small and medium-sized enterprises. Applying these specific criteria to TMW does not lead to any change in the assessment of the aid. Since the aid provided under the second and third loans is illegal and incompatible with the Treaty, it must be recovered by the German authorities. Repayment must be made in accordance with the procedures and provisions of German law, together with interest running from the date on which the aid was granted, at an interest rate equal to the percentage value on such date of the reference rate used to calculate the net grant equivalent of regional aid in Germany, Article 5 This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany. Done at Brussels, 16 December 1997. For the Commission Karel VAN MIERT Member of the Commission


title: Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 16. prosince 1997, kterým se mění rozhodnutí 97/569/ES, kterým se stanoví prozatímní seznamy zařízení třetích zemí, z nichž členské státy povolují dovoz masných výrobkůText s významem pro EHP

eurovoc_concepts:
health certificate
health control
import
meat product
third country

text: 03/sv. 22 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 213 31998D0009 L 3/12 ÚŘEDNÍ VĚSTNÍK EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ 7. 1. 1998 ROZHODNUTÍ KOMISE ze dne 16. prosince 1997, kterým se mění rozhodnutí 97/569/ES, kterým se stanoví prozatímní seznamy zařízení třetích zemí, z nichž členské státy povolují dovoz masných výrobků (Text s významem pro EHP) (98/9/ES) KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ, PŘIJALA TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ: s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství, Článek 1 Příloha rozhodnutí 97/569/ES se doplňuje o přílohu tohoto rozhodnutí. Článek 2 Toto rozhodnutí se použije ode dne 15. prosince 1997. Článek 3 Toto rozhodnutí je určeno členským státům. V Bruselu dne 16. prosince 1997. Za Komisi Franz FISCHLER člen Komise Rady 95/408/ES rozhodnutí s ohledem na dne 22. června 1995 o podmínkách sestavování prozatímních seznamů zařízení třetích zemí na přechodné období, ze kterých jsou členské státy oprávněny dovážet některé produkty živočiš- ného původu, produkty rybolovu nebo živé mlže (1), ve znění rozhodnutí 97/34/ES (2), a zejména na čl. 2 odst. 4 uvedeného rozhodnutí, ze vzhledem k tomu, že prozatímní seznamy zařízení třetích zemí vyrábějících masné výrobky byly sestaveny rozhodnutím Komise 97/569/ES (3); vzhledem k tomu, že Jižní Afrika zaslala seznam zařízení, které vyrábějí drůbeží masné výrobky, a pro které příslušné orgány potvrzují, že tato zařízení jsou v souladu s předpisy Společen- ství; vzhledem k tomu, že je možné sestavit pro Jižní Afriku proza- tímní seznam zařízení, která vyrábějí drůbeží masné výrobky; že rozhodnutí 97/569/ES by proto mělo být odpovídajícím způsobem změněno; vzhledem k tomu, že opatření tohoto rozhodnutí jsou v sou- ladu se stanoviskem Stálého veterinárního výboru, (1) Úř. věst. L 243, 11. 10. 1995, s. 17. (2) Úř. věst. L 13, 16. 1. 1997, s. 33. (3) Úř. věst. L 234, 26. 8. 1997, s. 16. 214 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 03/sv. 22 País: SUDÁFRICA / Land: SYDAFRIKA / Land: SÜDAFRIKA / Χώρα: ΝΟΤΙΑ ΑΦΡΙΚΗ / Country: SOUTH AFRICA / Pays: AFRIQUE DU SUD / Paese: SUDAFRICA / Land: ZUID-AFRIKA / País: ÁFRICA DO SUL / Maa: ETELÄ-AFRIKKA / Land: SYDAFRIKA PŘÍLOHA 1 ZA 21 2 3 4 Finlar Foods Stikland 5 PMP 6


title: Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 2523/97 zo 16. decembra 1997, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (EHS) č. 1014/90 stanovujúce podrobné vykonávacie pravidlá na definovanie, opis a uvádzanie liehovínText s významom pre EHP

eurovoc_concepts:
Austria
alcoholic beverage
fruit product
marketing standard
spirits

text: 03/zv. 22 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 141 31997R2523 L 346/46 ÚRADNÝ VESTNÍK EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV 17. 12. 1997 NARIADENIE KOMISIE (ES) č. 2523/97 zo 16. decembra 1997, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (EHS) č. 1014/90 stanovujúce podrobné vykonávacie pravidlá na definovanie, opis a uvádzanie liehovín (Text s významom pre EHP) KOMISIA EURÓPSKYCH SPOLOČENSTIEV, keďže opatrenia stanovené v tomto nariadení sú v súlade so stanoviskom výkonného Výboru pre liehoviny, so zreteľom na Zmluvu o založení Európskeho spoločenstva, so zreteľom na nariadenie Rady (EHS) č. 1576/89 z 29. mája 1989, ktorým sa stanovujú všeobecné pravidlá na definíciu, opis a uvádzanie liehovín (1), naposledy zmenené a doplnené Aktom o pristúpení Rakúska, Fínska a Švédska, najmä na článok 1 (4) i) (1) b) a článok 15, PRIJALA TOTO NARIADENIE: keďže nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 2482/95 z 25. októbra 1995 stanovujúce určité prechodné opatrenia pre Rakúsko, ktoré sa týkajú liehovín (2), naposledy zmenené a doplnené nariadením (ES) č. 158/97 (3), povoľuje, aby sa určité ovocné destiláty pripravovali s množstvom metanolu najviac 1 500 g na 1 hektoliter 100 %-ného etanolu, ktoré sa majú vyrábať a predávať v Rakúsku do 31. decembra 1997 až do posúdenia možností zníženia tohto množstva metanolu; z niektorých bobúľ, keďže sa v tejto etape zavedú nové nižšie limity pre množstvo metanolu v určitých liehovinách vyrábaných v Rakúsku, so zreteľom na výsledky rakúskych štúdií o možnosti zníženia množstva metanolu v príslušných ovocných destilátoch; keďže je tiež potrebné monitorovať vplyv vývoja rôznych aspektov súvisiacich s najvyšším množstvom metanolu v týchto ovoc- ných destilátoch, pretože také limity musia platiť aj pre tie isté ovocné destiláty vyrábané v iných členských štátoch; keďže skúmanie možností zníženia obsahu metanolu v týchto ovoc- ných destilátoch bude pokračovať, berúc do úvahy vývoj postupov, nezabúdajúc pritom na tradičné vlastnosti týchto produktov; Článok 1 Do článku 6 nariadenia (EHS) č. 1014/90 sa vkladajú tieto odseky: destilátoch pripravovaných „4. V súlade s článkom 1 (4) i) (1) b) nariadenia (EHS) č. 1576/89, musí byť najvyššie množstvo metanolu v ovocných z červených jarabiny (Sorbus aucuparia) a čiernych ríbezlí (druh Ribes), a bazy čiernej (Sambucus nigra) 1 350 g na 1 hekto- liter100 %-ného etanolu a najvyššie množstvo metylalko- holu v ovocných destilátoch pripravovaných z malín (Rubus idaeus L. ) a černíc (Rubus fruticosus L. ) musí byť 1 200 g na 1 hektoliter 100 %-ného etanolu. 5. Ovocné destiláty uvedené v odseku 4, vyrobené v Rakúsku a určené na predaj konečnému spotrebiteľovi k 31. decembru 1997 v súlade s ustanoveniami o množ- stve metanolu s účinnosťou k tomuto dátumu v Rakúsku sa môžu uviesť na trh a vyvážať až do vyčerpania zásob. “ keďže sa musia vypracovať prechodné ustanovenia, ktoré by povoľovali odbyt takých ovocných destilátov vyrábaných v Rakúsku ešte pred nadobudnutím účinnosti nižšieho limitu pre množstvo metanolu; Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť tretí deň odo dňa jeho uverejnenia v Úradnom vestníku Európskych spoločenstiev. Článok 2 (1) Ú. v. ES L 160, 12. 6. 1989, s. 1. (2) Ú. v. ES L 256, 26. 10. 1995, s. 12. (3) Ú. v. ES L 27, 30. 1. 1997, s. 8. Bude sa uplatňovať od 1. januára 1998. 142 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 03/zv. 22 Toto nariadenie je záväzné vo svojej celistvosti a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch. V Bruseli 16. decembra 1997 Za Komisiu Franz FISCHLER člen Komisie


title: Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Directive on emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (C4-0627/97 95/0209(COD))

eurovoc_concepts:
agricultural vehicle
approximation of laws
atmospheric pollutant
motor vehicle
pollution control measures
technical regulations

formats: html print


title: 98/10/CE: Decisão da Comissão de 16 de Dezembro de 1997 que estabelece as listas provisórias de estabelecimentos de países terceiros a partir dos quais os Estados- membros autorizam a importação de produtos à base de carne de bovino, de suíno, de equídeo, de ovino e de caprino (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

text: L 3/14 ‹ PT ‹ Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 7. 1. 98 DECIS (cid:5)AO DA COMISS (cid:5)AO de 16 de Dezembro de 1997 que estabelece as listas provis(cid:155)rias de estabelecimentos de pa(cid:146)ses terceiros a partir dos quais os Estados-membros autorizam a importa(cid:135)˜ao de produtos (cid:133) base de carne de bovino, de su(cid:146)no, de equ(cid:146)deo, de ovino e de caprino (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE) (98/10/CE) comunit ´arias nem a validade das garantias fornecidas pelas autoridades competentes; Considerando, por conseguinte, que (cid:130) poss(cid:146)vel elaborar, para a Cro ´acia, uma lista provis(cid:155)ria de estabelecimentos que fabricam produtos (cid:133) base de carne; Considerando que as medidas previstas na presente deci- s˜ao est˜ao em conformidade com o parecer do Comit(cid:130) Veterin ´ario Permanente, ADOPTOU A PRESENTE DECIS (cid:5)AO: Artigo 1º 1. Os Estados-membros autorizam as importa(cid:135)˜oes de produtos (cid:133) base de carne de bovino, de su(cid:146)no, de equ(cid:146)deo, de ovino e de caprino, provenientes dos estabelecimentos que figuram no anexo. As importa(cid:135)˜oes de produtos (cid:133) base de carne perma- 2. necem sujeitas (cid:133)s disposi(cid:135)˜oes comunit ´arias adoptadas no dom(cid:146)nio veterin ´ario. Artigo 2º A presente decis˜ao (cid:130) aplic ´avel com efeitos desde 15 de Dezembro de 1997. Artigo 3º Os Estados-membros s˜ao os destinat ´arios da presente decis˜ao. Feito em Bruxelas, em 16 de Dezembro de 1997. Pela Comiss ˜ao Franz FISCHLER Membro da Comiss ˜ao A COMISS (cid:5)AO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS, Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia, Tendo em conta a Decis˜ao 95/408/CE do Conselho, de 22 de Junho de 1995, relativa (cid:133)s regras de elabora(cid:135)˜ao, por um per(cid:146)odo transit(cid:155)rio, de listas provis(cid:155)rias de estabeleci- mentos de pa(cid:146)ses terceiros dos quais os Estados-membros s˜ao autorizados a importar determinados produtos de origem animal, produtos da pesca e moluscos bivalves vivos (1), alterada pela Decis˜ao 97/34/CE (2), e, nomeada- mente, o nº 4 do seu artigo 2º, Considerando que a Decis˜ao 97/222/CE da Comiss˜ao (3) estabelece uma lista de pa(cid:146)ses terceiros a partir dos quais os Estados-membros autorizam a importa(cid:135)˜ao de produtos (cid:133) base de carne; Considerando que, em rela(cid:135)˜ao aos pa(cid:146)ses que figuram nessa lista, as condi(cid:135)˜oes de pol(cid:146)cia sanit ´aria e de certifica- (cid:135)˜ao sanit ´aria exigidas para a importa(cid:135)˜ao de produtos (cid:133) base pela Decis˜ao carne 97/221/CE da Comiss˜ao (4); foram estabelecidas de Considerando que a Decis˜ao 97/365/CE da Comiss˜ao (5) estabeleceu as listas provis(cid:155)rias de estabelecimentos de pa(cid:146)ses terceiros a partir dos quais os Estados-membros autorizam a importa(cid:135)˜ao de produtos (cid:133) base de carne de bovino, de su(cid:146)no, de equ(cid:146)deo, de ovino e de caprino; Considerando que a Comiss˜ao recebeu da Cro ´acia uma lista de estabelecimentos, acompanhada das garantias de que estes satisfazem as exig(cid:136)ncias sanit ´arias adequadas da Comunidade e de que, em caso de inobserv(cid:131)ncia destas garantias por qualquer estabelecimento, as suas actividades de exporta(cid:135)˜ao para a Comunidade Europeia ser˜ao suspen- sas; Considerando que a Comiss˜ao n˜ao teve a possibilidade de verificar, em rela(cid:135)˜ao a todos os pa(cid:146)ses terceiros em causa, a conformidade dos estabelecimentos com as exig(cid:136)ncias (1) JO L 243 de 11. 10. 1995, p. 17. (2) JO L 13 de 16. 1. 1997, p. 33. (3) JO L 89 de 4. 4. 1997, p. 39. (4) JO L 89 de 4. 4. 1997, p. 32. (5) JO L 154 de 12. 6. 1997, p. 41. 7. 1. 98 ‹ PT ‹ Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias L 3/15 ANEXO / BILAG / ANHANG / PAQAQTGLA / ANNEX / ANNEXE / ALLEGATO / BIJLAGE / ANEXO / LIITE / BILAGA LISTA DE LOS ESTABLECIMIENTOS / LISTE OVER VIRKSOMHEDER / VERZEICHNIS DER BETRIEBE / PIMAJAS TYM ECJATASTASEYM / LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS / LISTE DES (cid:144)TABLISSEMENTS / ELENCO DEGLI STABILIMENTI / LIJST VAN BEDRIJVEN / LISTA DOS ESTABELECIMENTOS / LUETTELO LAITOKSISTA / F(cid:153)RTECKNING (cid:153)VER ANL(cid:142)GGNINGAR Producto: productos c ´arnicos / Produkt: kødprodukter / Erzeugnis: Fleischerzeugnisse / Pqoiˇ ˜om: myp ˜o jq ˜ear poukeqij ˜ym / Product: meat products / Produit: Produits (cid:133) base de viandes / Prodotto: prodotti a base di carne / Product: vleesproducten / Produto: produtos (cid:133) base de carne / Tuote: lihatuotteet / Varuslag: k(cid:148)ttvaror 1 = Referencia nacional / National reference / Nationaler Code / Ehmij ˜or aqihl ˜or ˜ecjqisgr / National reference / R(cid:130)f(cid:130)rence nationale / Riferimento nazionale / Nationale code / Refer(cid:136)ncia nacional / Kansallinen referenssi / Nationell referens 2 = Nombre / Navn / Name / T˜itkor ecjat ˜astasgr / Name / Nom / Nome / Naam / Nome / Nimi / Namn 3 = Ciudad / By / Stadt / P ˜okg / Town / Ville / Citt(cid:133) / Stad / Cidade / Kaupunki / Stad 4 = Regi(cid:155)n / Region / Region / Peqiow ˜g / Region / R(cid:130)gion / Regione / Regio / Regi˜ao / Alue / Region 5 = Menciones especiales / Særlige bemærkninger / Besondere Bemerkungen / Eidij ˜er paqatgq ˜gseir / Special remarks / Mentions sp(cid:130)ciales / Note particolari / Bijzondere opmerkingen / Men(cid:135)˜oes especiais / Erikoismainintoja / Anm(cid:132)rkningar 6 = * Pa(cid:146)ses y establecimientos que cumplen todos los requisitos del apartado 4 del art(cid:146)culo 2 de la Decisi(cid:155)n 95/408/CE del Consejo. * Lande og virksomheder, der opfylder alle betingelserne i artikel 2, stk. 4, 95/408/EF. * L(cid:132)nder und Betriebe, die alle Anforderungen des Artikels 2 Absatz 4 der Entscheidung 95/408/EG des Rates erf(cid:129)llen. * W ˜yqer jai ecjatast ˜aseir pou pkgqo ˜um tir pqoˇupoh ˜eseir tou ˜aqhqou 2 paq ˜acqavor 4 tgr ap ˜ovasgr 95/408/EJ tou Sulbouk˜iou. i R(cid:134)dets beslutning * Countries and establishments complying with all requirements of Article 2 (4) of Council Decision 95/408/EC. * Pays et (cid:130)tablissements remplissant l’ensemble des dispositions de l’article 2 paragraphe 4 de la d(cid:130)cision 95/408/CE du Conseil. * Paese e stabilimenti che ottemperano a tutte le disposizioni dell’articolo 2 paragrafo 4 della decisione 95/408/CE del Consiglio. * Landen en inrichtingen die voldoen aan al de voorwaarden van artikel 2, lid 4, van Beschikking 95/408/EG van de Raad. * Pa(cid:146)ses e estabelecimentos que respeitam todas as exig(cid:136)ncias do nº 4 do artigo 2º da Decis˜ao 95/408/CE do Conselho. * Neuvoston p(cid:132)(cid:132)t(cid:148)ksen 95/408/EY 2 artiklan 4 kohdan kaikki vaatimukset t(cid:132)ytt(cid:132)v(cid:132)t maat ja laitokset. * L(cid:132)nder och anl(cid:132)ggningar som uppfyller alla krav i artikel 2. 4 i r(cid:134)dets beslut 95/408/EG. Pa(cid:146)s: CROACIA / Land: KROATIEN / Land: KROATIEN / W ˜yqa: JQOATIA / Country: CROATIA / Pays: CROATIE / Paese: CROAZIA / Land: KROATI(cid:220) / Pa(cid:146)s: CRO (cid:1)ACIA / Maa: KROATIA / Land: KROATIEN 2 3 4 PIK-VRBOVEC-Mesna industrija d. d. PPK «KARLOVAC» d. d. -Karlovac Vrbovec Karlovac 1 10 31 139 «DANICA» d. o. o. -Klaonica i perada mesa Koprivnica 162 «ZAGREP(cid:221)ANKA» d. d. -Zagreb 214 IM «IVANEC» d. d. 399 «GAVRILOVIÆ» d. o. o. -Petrinja Zagreb Ivanec Petrinja 5 6 6 6 6 6 6