text: COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 06. 09. 1996 COM(96) 436 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS OF 26 APRIL 1994 ON THE ROLE OF THE JRC - 1- Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION Towards implementation of a new approach for the JRC Page 1 ^V. B. JRC'S ACTIVITIES Institutional Activities Institutional Research Institutional Support Activities Competitive Activities C. JRC OPERATING IN NETWORKS D. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Advice, interchange and guidance to the JRC Evaluations Relations w i th Programme Committees Board of Governors CONCLUSION ANNEXES I II JRC institutional research activities 1996 Number of publications w r i t t en by JRC Scientists III (a) List of the Inter-DG Agreements in Institutional Support to the Commission III (b) JRC institutional support activities IV V VI VII JRC institutional s/t support activities 1996 Shared Cost Actions JRC Institutes response to the first calls of the 4th FWP Targets of Evolution of JRC Competitive Activities 1995-1998 Distribution of JRC Cooperation w i th National Research Organisations and Universities, by country VIII JRC Commitment Appropriations 1995-1998 2 2 3 5 6 9 10 12 13 14 14 16 17 18 19, 20 21 22 23 24 25 _ A O L- A. INTRODUCTION Towards Implementation of a New Approach for the JRC 1. The debate in the Community Institutions back in 1993 and 1994, leading to the April 1994 Decisions on the 4th Framework Programme of Community Activities of Research, Technological Development and Demonstration for the EC and the EAEC Framework Programme of Community Activities of Research and Training, included a substantial discussion on the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and its role in the achievement of the Union's policies. Overall it was recognised that a new approach should be added to the traditional role of the JRC, in order for the Union to draw optimal benefit from the activities of the Centre and that clear plans and guidelines should be set to this end. 2. The Council in its Conclusions of 26 April, 1994 on the Role of the Joint Research Centre* coined its views on the future of the JRC and provided guidelines for this. As an introduction, the Council reaffirmed: the Community character of the JRC and achievement of the objectives of the Union, its role in the the need for the JRC to pursue and reinforce its move towards a more competitive approach on the basis of a genuine customer/contractor relationship. It reiterated the JRC contribution to Community research policy and underlined the need to add a new approach for the JRC, whereby it would progressively enter in specific programmes under the Framework Programmes and give scientific and technical support to Community policies of a kind suitable for that competitive approach. the competitive arena 3. The Council furthermore "calls upon the Commission to submit a report on the progress in the implementation of these Conclusions to the European Parliament and the Council in 1996, after obtaining the Opinion of the Board of Governors, so as to enable the European Parliament and the Council to draw up an assessment of the situation". O. J. C126/1, 7. 5. 94 4. The present Communication from the Commission intends to answer this request. It is largely structured along the Council Conclusions and should demonstrate: • • the progress made so far, the further steps necessary, and in general provide an illustration of • the JRC situation at mid-term in its 1995-1998 programme. It should be added that the JRC and its Board of Governors took the initiatives immediately, the process of elaboration and relevant arrangement of all these decisions and measures took much more time than had been expected by the Council in its Conclusions. Therefore, the full implementation of the latter had to be shifted until the full legal process was completed and the present report can only cover one year of an experience which is continuing and has to be seen within the overall context of the Framework Programmes (1994- 1998). The present Communication is accompanied by an Opinion of the Board of Governors. 5. 1995 was the first year of JRC operation under the new approach. The present Communication, therefore, is to be considered together with the JRC Annual Report 1995' issued by tne Commission and also accompanied by an Opinion of the JRC Board of Governors. B. JRC'S ACTIVITIES 6. The activities of the JRC are Outlined in the Council Conclusions and notably in its guidelines defined in detailed terms, in particular in the context of the Framework Research Programmes. A distinction is made between the • • • institutional activities competitive activities under the Framework programmes competitive activities outside the Framework programmes. The following description of progress, the present situation and further plans thus adheres to this structure. Institutional Activities 7. in this The Community character of the JRC is to the forefront spectrum of activities. The activities, as foreseen in the Council Conclusions, are entirely funded by the Framework Programmes. They should allow the JRC to contribute to Community research policy, particularly in those sectors where it has special, if not unique, skills 1) COM(96}158 final, 17. 4,96 and in areas where its neutrality is essential for scientific and technical support for Community policies. 8. The JRC institutional activities contribute to the following themes of the Framework Programmes: Information Technologies (S) Industrial and Materials Technologies (R) Standards, Norms and Measurements (R) Environment and Climate (R,S) Agriculture and Fisheries (S) Non-Nuclear Energies (R) Targeted Socio-Economic Research (R,S) Nuclear Fission Safety (R,S) Thermo-nuclear Fusion (R) MECU 11. 7 89. 5 111. 8 306. 9 50. 0 17. 1 35. 0 259. 8 49. 0 930. 8 the Council The scientific and technical objectives are given Decisions on the JRC specific programmes 1995-1998. They provide a clear separation between the objectives for institutional research activities (R) and institutional scientific and technical support activities (S), for the formulation and implementation of Community policies and the tasks allotted to the Commission pursuant to the Treaties. in in institutional activities The figures in the preceding list give the distribution of the 930. 8 the MECU for 1995-1998 attributed to the Decisions on the Framework Programmes and their first adaptation following the adhesion of the three new Member States. To this amount of 930. 8 MECU should be added 17 MECU and 10. 7 MECU for JRC participation (50% contribution) in shared-cost activities in the EC and the EAEC fields, respectively, bringing the totai for the 4 year operational budget to 958. 5 MECU. The Council Conclusions foresaw a total of 900 MECU. To this is added 6. 5% (58. 5 MECU) from the above-mentioned decisions on the first adaptation of the Framework Programmes. Possible additional funding was foreseen by the Council Conclusions for the second adaptation of the Framework Programmes. The Commission, however, has retained a different approach in its proposal for this second adaptation*. 9. The results of the work in 1995 are provided in the JRC 1995 Annual Report and the 1995 Annual Reports from the JRC Institutes and the further planning in the 1996 Annual Workprogramme discussed with the the Board of Governors. The 1996 resource distribution over various themes for institutional research is illustrated in Annex i. Institutional Research 10. Four significant examples, amongst the numerous described in the 1995 Annual Report, may institutional research. They have been selected to demonstrate use of particular JRC skills, the network oriented approach to JRC work, industrial relations and to give an example of the exploitation of a special research facility available m the Centre: illustrate the scope of JRC COM(96) 12 final, O. J C115, 19. 4. 96 * * * Composite Materials: Novel Research with contributions to European industry. On the basis of the longstanding research on high temperature materials and composites, the JRC Institute for Advanced Materials (Petten and in collaboration with industry, has developed new coated fibres of high strength for structural materials like gas turbines or heat exchangers. in high temperature applications, Ispra), Earthquake Engineering: European research network centred around a JRC major research facility. More than 20 national laboratories collaborate with for Systems, Informatics and Safety (Ispra) on use of the unique ELSA reaction wall in Ispra and shaking tables The prenormative research includes support to the development of European standards for designing civil engineering structures in seismic areas. in national institutes. the JRC Institute Information System: 1995 saw the completion of Information the Forest Forest (FIRS) projects' from Remote Sensing Planning Phase in cooperation with consortia of organisations from France, Germany, Sweden, the Czech Republic, Russia, Poland, Spain, Ireland and Finland. The major objective of the project is to contribute to the development of a Unified European Forest Information System, providing both production related and In 1995 the project developed environmental forest information. a régionalisation and forest e c o s y s t e ms and the unified E u r o p e an F o r e st Nomenclature System. final stratification of European finalised * Reactor Safety Code: Development with national laboratories of a new reactor safety code for calculating fuel/coolant interactions in cases of severe accidents, combined with experimental tests in the FARO installation. 11. The results of the institutional research are provided through the • • extensive networks industry, national for collaboration with research centres and universities, which include JRC participation in selected EUREKA projects, notably with industry, participation in technical committees of standardisation bodies International Electro-technical such as CEN, Committee (IEC), ISO and the • Commission activities for exploitation of research results, and, as for any other research centre, • JRC generated publications, participation in scientific meetings, congresses, seminars and symposia. (Annex II gives the number of publications written by JRC scientists in 1994 and 1995). 12. The Commission, however, as encouraged by the Board of Governors is still and independent evaluations of the JRC, agrees that there further scope for an improved identification of the users of the JRC research focus on materialisation of research results 5- ' and, in a wider sense, an exploitation of the institutional research and its output. New measures to this end are planned to bring concrete results before the end of the current programme period. for 13. Related to this is the Commission's own use of the competences and skills developed through the JRC's research activities. They clearly institutional support the concrete projects of form the basis described below. They also allow the Centre to be ready - within the defined scientific-technical objectives of the JRC programme - for new orientations which may be decided for Community research. The Commission is thus profiting from the competences of the JRC in the the Task F o r c es w h i ch h a ve set up on c o m p o s i t i on of industry/research related themes and one of these Task Forces - Environment-Water - is led by the Director of the JRC Environment Institute. Institutional Support Activities 14. In the Council Conclusions these are defined as activities necessary for the formulation and implementation of Community policies and of the tasks allotted to the Commission pursuant to the Treaties, which necessitate the neutrality of the JRC. While ensuring maximum flexibility, the financial resources earmarked for these activities will be entered in the research budget and administered by the Commission within a framework, giving responsibility to the customer Directorates- General which will use the JRC as a service provider. As stated above, their scientific-technical objectives are defined in the Council Decisions on the JRC specific programmes 1995-1998 and the financial resources included in these. The appropriations are decided on an annual basis, together with other JRC institutional activities, by the Budgetary Authority (Council and European Parliament) the General Budget of the European Union, the subsection on Research and Technological Development. The resources are around one third of the total for the JRC's institutional activities. in 15. The support activities respond to demands from the Commission services in charge of the various policies of the Union - notably environment, energy, agriculture and industry - or tasks allotted to the Commission pursuant to the Treaties (such as nuclear safeguards). The work requested is normally planned on a medium to long term basis. the relevant Commission services and the JRC, specifying objectives, follow-up, reporting and accounting measures. Major resources, support activities have been announced the European Parliament through Communications from the Commission. Annex these III provides a list of the Agreements and a list of Communications. It is regulated through standard agreements between the Council and to 16. The detailed annual planning is included in the Workprogramme with a 1996 resource distribution as given in Annex IV. The outcome of the work is illustrated in the 1995 Annual Report and typical examples are: # The European Reference Laboratory for Air Pollution: Harmonisation of EC directives on air pollution, organisation of quality assurance, validation of new monitoring techniques. $ Application of Remote Sensing to Agricultural Policy: Agricultural statistics, monitoring of crop acreage, monitoring and control in support of the Common Agricultural Policy. 0 Nuclear Safeguards: inspectors, harmonisation of Training of inspection practices, equipment and systems development, design and operation of on-site laboratories at reprocessing plants, analysis of nuclear materials samples. # Detection of Illicit Nuclear Material: At the request of the Commission, responding to a Member State illicit the JRC contributes demand, trafficking of nuclear material by using laboratory facilities the characterisation of samples discovered by national authorities. the combat against its unique for to The latter examples are related to tasks allotted to the Commission by the EAEC Treaty and all the Commission derives from the neutrality of the JRC. four examples illustrate the use 17. The a priori definition of the objectives and detailed project planning for the institutional support was made in close consultation with the relevant Commission services at the time of preparing the proposals for the JRC specific programmes 1995-1998. These were decided in December, 1994. Yet further demands have arisen and, given the Union's focus on control measures, it has been possible in the 1996 work programme - within the overall allocated resources - to include projects on: Systems developments (UCLAF); for the Commission's Anti-fraud Unit for animal tagging using microchips, Novel methods the Commission's Directorate General for Agriculture. An application of a technique developed in a different context (seals for use by safeguards' inspectors). for The inclusion of these new projects was possible using the adaptation of institutional support foreseen in the Council Decisions on the JRC specific programmes (Article 7. 3, last sentence). Nevertheless, these examples illustrate the desirability for future JRC programmes to define objectives with a further degree of flexibility. 18. The full spectrum of competitive activities, given in the guidelines of the Council Conclusions, is: Under the Framework Programmes Participation of the JRC in Shared-Cost Actions. The JRC in association with partners in the Member States may submit proposals in the context of calls for proposals issued by the Commission. Competitive Support Measures. Scientific and technical support activities suited for a competitive approach, where the JRC may respond to requests from the Commission Directorates General. Outside the Framework Programmes Activities on behalf of third parties. The conduct of research and supply of services under contract to in the context of third parties, including contracts secured Member States/RTD programmes. Other Community Activities. JRC participation in Community actions (e. g. PHARE, TACIS, developing countries, etc. ) obtaining Community funding in the context of a competitive approach. The JRC has had an opportunity to conduct activities on behalf of third parties since 1988-1989 and has reported on these in successive annual reports. All the other types of competitive activities were, however, new and only available to the JRC from 1995 onwards. 19. The Council decided that the transfer to competitive activities should average 22% for the EC Framework Programme and 10% for the EAEC Framework Programme from 1995-1998 and that this transition should be a gradual and progressive process over the 4 year period. In order to make this possible the Council in its Conclusions invited the Commission to amend its internal rules as necessary and propose to the Council all required decisions as early as possible. 20. The JRC, in response, made early plans to grasp the new opportunities for competitive activities as soon as these materialised and as soon as the necessary clarification of the JRC's role in relation to rules and regulations could be provided. 21. For the shared-cost actions under the specific RTD programmes under the Framework Programmes, the JRC was thus ready to respond, together with national partners, to the first calls tor proposals issued by the Commission. These were published from 15 December 1994 onwards and in establishing partnerships the JRC largely, but not exclusively, drew on the wide scientific networks already established in previous years. These also included collaboration with the New Member States (Austria, Finland and Sweden), stemming from their previous participation in JRC activities under the European Economic Area Agreement. The JRC Institutes and their partners responded to the first calls for proposals for 15 specific programmes and of these, 100 proposals were accepted, representing an overall acceptance rate of 29% with a considerable variation, however, from programme to programme, as illustrated in Annex V. The total earnings tor the JRC from the subsequent contractual arrangements amount to 11 MECU, to be matched during the execution of the work by the same amount from JRC budget lines. This participation in shared-cost actions has continued. In response to further calls tor proposals the JRC and its partners have presented In its 126 proposals and are awaiting a final decision on the outcome. planning for 1996 the JRC noted fewer calls for proposals than were issued in 1995 or at the end of 1994. 8 It is noteworthy that the JRC, together with its partners, has sought opportunities and obtained acceptance both from shared-cost actions within the Framework Programme themes corresponding to the JRC institutional activities and from some shared-cost actions in other themes, e. g. telematics, advanced communication technologies and services or marine sciences and technologies. This illustrates that the JRC as a multi-disciplinary research centre can develop scientific disciplines outside the prescribed Framework Programme themes in support of its institutional activities which are also fruitful in the competitive arena. 22. The competitive support measures first launched by the Commission during 1995 were a completely new type of activity within the EC Framework Programme. JRC projects totalling 12 MECU were accepted in 1995. The work was in response to openings launched by Commission services and are within the fields of: information technology support; systems support to environmental problems and non-nuclear energies; analytical methodologies in the area of agriculture and fisheries; remote sensing applications for agriculture and fisheries including land use classification and agricultural products. Finally, under the Third activities of the EC Framework Programme: projects related to technology transfer and exploitation of EC research results. 23. Outside the Framework Programmes the JRC has earned contracts in other actions introduced by the Community, namely from the PHARE and TACIS programmes. They total some 5 MECU (as of May 1996) and encompass: • • • A major PHARE project on agricultural information systems, including applications of remote sensing for 6 PHARE countries. Extensions are foreseen for a further 5 PHARE countries and the project may be extended into following years. Another, but smaller PHARE project is concerned with assistance to the Bulgarian authorities on safety of reactor fuel, while a TACIS project provides support to the investigation of the environmental impact of the Chernobyl accident in the Ukraine. Several PHARE and TACIS projects described in detail in the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on illicit trafficking of nuclear materials2 in Annex III. 24. Alongside these new types of activity, the JRC has continued the work for third parties. New contracts won in 1995 totalled 24. 8 MECU and 6. 6 MECU in the first two quarters of 1996. Recent major contracts include: continuing work tor the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission of a major experimental installation in Ispra; 2) COM(96)171 final, 19. 4. 96 establishment of a Centre for the prevention of pollution and risks associated with the handling and toxic substances in a Member State region; transportation of nuclear instrument development for a large nuclear industrial firm in a Member State; development of numerical methods for the simulation of behaviour of concrete structures for a national electricity utility; the development of ultrasonic systems for monitoring liquid circuits for an industrial company in a Member State. 25. The 1995 outturn of the competitive activities are summarised in the table below. Competitive activities Amounts earned in 1995 (Mioecu) Shared Cost Actions (50%) Competitive Support Competitive Activities outside the Framework Programme Third Party Work TOTAL Earned during 1995 Inscribed as 1995 credits 0) inscribed 1. 1. -30. 6. 96 10. 7 12. 0 2. 3 3. 9 4. 9 1. 3 4. 6 j 6. 9 4. 0(3) 24. 8(2) 49. 8 24. 5(2) 34. 6 6. 6(3) 22. 1 (1) (2) (3) The balance will be inscribed as i996 credits, after conclusion of procedures Including 6. 4 Mioecu for work at the HFR reactor coming from contracts with partners contract under discussion in 1995 industrial Annex VI summarises the targets for competitive activities which were given to the Board of Governors in May 1996 by the JRC, together with the financial results obtained in 1995 and early 1996. C. JRC OPERATING IN NETWORKS 26. The Council Conclusions stressed the need for the JRC to become better integrated in networks with partners belonging to all the Member States. A similar recommendation was included m the Council Resolution on the JRC of 29 April 1992. 27. In a published report entitled "JRC Cooperation with National Research Organisations and Universities"'. 87 bilateral and 49 multilateral cooperation agreements are described. The number of collaboration agreements has further increased to respectively 93 and 63 and Annex VII illustrates the distribution of partners over the Member States. 3) EUR 16289 EN, 1994 10 28. Some examples of institutional research given above in Section B illustrate the extent to which the JRC is working in networks. In addition to the already well established networks by the Institute for Advanced Materials (ENIQ, NESC, AMES, EPERC), typical examples are: further REIMEPIMEP Regular European Interlaboratory Measurement Evaluation Programme International Measurement Evaluation Programme. The JRC Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements for (Geel) has organised networks of up comparative measurements of nuclear and non-nuclear samples and to provide the reference value. laboratories to 70 FARO: Fuel Melting and Release Oven, where in addition to bilateral agreements with the French CE A and the U. S. NRC, the JRC conducts a network of industrial, national authorities and research organisations on the effects of fuel meltdown in case of reactor accidents and their mitigation, centred around a unique experimental installation at the Ispra Site. Bilateral cooperation is illustrated by Atmospheric Chemistry Pollution: in Global Change and Urban Air Where the JRC Environment Institute (Ispra) exchanges staff and organises joint field campaigns for, as an example, studies on urban air chemistry, with a group of national laboratories in a Member State (Denmark). 29. in shared-cost actions, has The new spectrum of competitive activities, and notably participation further dimension being added to the JRC's collaboration in networks and consortia with industry and national research. The JRC are currently executing around 100 accepted projects for shared-cost actions with some 250 different partners, including around a third from industry. The partners are found in all Member States and associated countries under the EEA Agreement. to a lead D. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES 30. The Council, in setting out its Conclusions on the Role of the JRC and endorsing the guidelines tor the definition of the JRC activities, foresaw this would require: • • flexible and dynamic operation of the JRC, the necessity to ensure a gradual transition and an adaptation of the existing rules and regulations, an action programme for defining the fundamental objectives and thereby permitting an evaluation of the progress. The Council furthermore referred to: • an effective coordination between activities provided institutional the Framework Programmes, by the Centre's for in -11 - systematic exchanges of views to be held between the JRC, including the Board of Governors, and the Committees for the specific programmes, with due respective responsibilities. regard their to The Council finally underlined: • the need to evaluation by independent experts take due account of the results of the 1994 and, above all, • the role of conclusions and guidelines. the Board of Governors in implementing the The progress in these implementation measures is addressed below. 3 1. When faced in early 1994 with the modified role, the Commission had two chief concerns for the JRC for allowing the Centre to make this applicable as and from 1 January, 1995. the Council Decisions on the objectives and resources institutional activities, to which end the specific programmes 1995-1998 were decided on 15 December, 1994 for the JRC activities for the EC and the EAEC, respectively. for A battery of decisions on amendments to existing rules and regulations or decisions on new ones, as already listed in the guidelines annexed to the Council Conclusions. The latter encompassed legal, budgetary, financial and administrative matters. Some were internal Commission rules, while others required decisions by the Council upon proposals by the Commission. The total body of required decisions was made before the end of 1995. In summary, they may be described as follows: in for participation on a competitive basis Legal basis the Framework Programmes, provided through the Council Decision on Rules for the Participation of undertakings, research centres in research, technological development and and universities demonstration activities of the European Community-' and the Council Decision concerning the Rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in research and training activities of the European Atomic Energy Community^. These decisions establish in Community the same indirect action RTD activities under conditions and with the same rights as other participants. The EC decision also provides for the participation of the JRC in the competitive support activities of the Framework Programme; the JRC can participate that Related amendments to the Financial Regulation decided by the Council on 18 September 1995°, to foresee the new competitive activities of the JRC, to ensure JRC access to appropriations for earned activities, both under the Framework Programmes and under other Community programmes, and a degree of flexibility in transfer possibilities tor appropriations; A new structure from 1995 onwards in the JRC section of the research General Budget for the European Union (under the 4) 5) 6) Council Decision 94 763 EC, O. J. I 306, 30 11. 94 Council Decision 94 761 Euratom, O. J. I 306, 30. 11. 94 Council Regulation No. 2335 95, O. J. I 240 7. 10. 95 budget) following the institutional activities and with appropriations for the JRC of a 50% contribution to earned shared-cost actions. Appropriate lines for income and expenditure of appropriations earned from competitive activities. Annex VIII provides a table of the 1995-1998 schedule for commitment appropriations under the Budgets of the European Union; Similar amendments to the accounting systems, with accounting for the competitive activities being separated from the accounting for the institutional activities; for New simplified cost reimbursement model contract the Community activities in the field of RTD, adopted by Commission on 26 July 1995' and its derived contracts, which in their special conditions provide for the participation of the JRC as a contractor. Relations between Directorates General providing funds and the JRC are specifically regulated by administrative arrangements. Similar administrative arrangements apply to JRC participation in other Community competitive activities within or outside the Framework Programmes. 32. With regard to personnel management the new approach gave rise to several internal measures on staff training, reassignment of staff and a substantial amount of communications to staff at all levels. The early implementation of the new approach to the JRC's operations coincided with the Commission Decisions in 1995 on a new policy for all Commission research staff. The concept of a 25% contingent of highly mobile staff should add the flexibility necessary for staff management in the JRC, while the new policy also includes a more permanent nucleus of staff in order to ensure continuity in the Centre's work. 33. Furthermore, on 16 January 1996, a reorganisation of the JRC was decided by the Commission and the JRC became an autonomous Directorate General separate from the Directorate General for Science, Research and Development (DGXII). A new post of Deputy Director General was created, whose commercialisation and communication, while a reorganisation at the Ispra Site merged two of its Institutes into the Institute for Systems, Informatics and Safety (ISIS), thereby strengthening the JRC research performed on technological risk evaluation and safety issues, in particular. responsibilities will include Advice, interchange and guidance to the JRC Evaluations 34. As stipulated in the Council Conclusions, due account should be taken of the results of the evaluation of the JRC by independent experts. Reference is made to the follow-up on the results. The results of this evaluation, conducted by 9 Visiting Groups to the JRC Institutes with an overall evaluation by Sir Hermann Bondi, FRS, were made available to the Council, the European Parliament and the Board of Governors as soon as the individual reports were released by the evaluators and provided early guidelines and advice for the discussions in 1994 on the JRC specific programmes 1995-1998 under the Framework Programmes. The full set of all evaluation reports accompanied by the comments of the Board of Governors was issued by the Commission 7) Commission Decision written pioceduru E 1412 95, 26. 7. 95 - 13- ' on research orientations, research management in early 1995''. The evaluation reports include 118 recommendations issues, customer relations, quality assurance and policy issues related to financial and The Board of Governors m 1995, at personnel management. successive meetings with the JRC management, reviewed in detail the follow-up on the recommendations. It was found in September, 1995 that a total of 84 recommendations were fulfilled or under immediate implementation. A few recommendations tell outside the scope of the JRC and in 13 cases needed more reflection, which has now led to concrete implementation plans but in a few cases, cannot presently be implemented due to incompatibility with the regulations in force. Some 15 recommendations, particularly related to management issues, while they were judged acceptable, could not likewise be implemented within the rules and regulations currently governing the JRC. 35. More recently, the Report of the 1995 Framework Monitoring Panel of "the Commission should give that March 1996 has advised consideration to changes in the reporting of the JRC's activities, which reflect its prominent position within the Framework Programme through both direct and indirect action. ". The Commission is concerned that more and adequately structured information should be available. One action being considered is discussions with the Board of Governors on ways to improve the reporting of the JRC's activities from 1996 onwards. 36. On the occasion of the 5-years' evaluation of the Community research activities, as foreseen in the Decisions on the Framework Programme, an evaluation will be performed by Visiting Groups of external experts to the JRC Institutes, as was the case for the 1994 evaluations. The late calendar established calls for the reports October 1996. to be available in Relations with Programme Committees 37. The Council Conclusions, as well as the Council Decisions on the JRC specific programmes, underlined the role of the Board of Governors as being the committee in charge of assisting the Commission in the programme implementation. Nevertheless, the Council Conclusions institutional prescribed effective coordination between the Centre's research activities and the in for the other activities provided Framework Programmes, through the systematic exchange of views between the JRC, the Board of Governors and the Committees for the specific programmes. This concerns six themes from the Framework Programmes (next to the theme of Thermo-nuclear Fusion, where the JRC contribution is fully integrated in the specific community Fusion Programme work through a Coordination Committee between DG XII - Fusion and JRC). While the JRC has contributed to all relevant programme committees, an exchange of views with the participation of Members of the Board of Governors has been conducted with four of these programme committees, thus making the committees familiar with the JRC work in the respective themes. The Board of Governors has declared its to intention encompass all relevant programme committees. Both the JRC and the Board of Governors find that the first experiences demonstrate there is room for progress, but with respect to the remit of the Board of Governors. these mutually useful meeting points intensify to 8) COM(95)60 final, 6. 3 95 To this end, a programme committee (nuclear fission safety) has taken the initiative to fully integrate the JRC in its recent efforts in the coordination of Community and national research in this field. Board of Governors 38. The terms of reference for this body of high-level representatives of the Member States is decided by the Commission. Over the years these terms of reference have undergone an evolution towards strengthening the role of the Board of Governors in assisting and advising the Director General of the JRC in all aspects of the JRC planning operations and providing advice to the Commission. An amended version of the terms of reference of November 19949 took fully into account the new spectrum of competitive activities introduced in the modes of operation and was reconfirmed by the Commission in early 1996">. that Furthermore, the Council Decisions on the JRC specific programmes stipulate their implementation and be assisted in this task by the Board of Governors and assign a role to the Board of Governors in relation to reporting and evaluating the activities. the Commission shall be responsible for 39. The Board of Governors, consequently - as foreseen in the Council Conclusions - exercised and continues to exercise its role in the implementation of these Conclusions and guidelines for the new approach set out for the JRC. The Board's independent views on the achievements obtained so far and the further steps it advises to be taken are given in the Opinion attached to the present Communication and which the Commission acknowledges. CONCLUSION 40. The present Communication from the Commission provides a review of the situation at mid-1996 - point by point - on the progress in implementing the 1994 Council Conclusions on the Role of the JRC. They called tor new modes of operation and it can be seen that the JRC, without exception, has fully engaged itself in these and yielded promising first results. There has been particular attention on the new range of competitive activities assigned to the Centre. for progress on Many changes in the overall approach to the JRC and its operations are also under way and, as illustrated in the Communication, there is still room the emerging new developments. This applies notably to the further commercialisation of the research results and the introduction of yet further ways for interactions with the users of the JRC and its customer relations, operating under rules which fully allow the exploitation of the JRC potentials. the basis of 41. Meanwhile, in its proposal for the second adaptation of the Framework Programmes the Commission has presented new perspectives for the bonding of research and industry. The Green Book on Innovation also offers novel challenges for the corporate research laboratory of the Innovative concepts for more intensive industrial collaboration, Union. 9) 10) O. J. No L 330, p. 64 of 21. 12. 94 Article 4 of the Commission Decision 96 283. EURATOM, O. J. No. I 107. of 30. 4. iHi,p, 12 -15- such as those suggested by IRDAC (Industrial Research and ' Development Advisory Committee), are under consideration. Demands for further research to meet societal needs of a Community dimension have been placed at the door of the JRC. The Commission intends to engage the JRC in these developments and is reflecting on the role to be assigned to it. 42. To meet the present and future challenges the JRC, with the approval of the Board of Governors, has suggested an ambitious strategy for the medium and long term, in a strategic plan, leaving room for a continual process of implementation of the Community Institutions and the Member States' expectations of the Centre. 43. The present report, as intended by the Commission, provides the status at a given check-point in the ongoing evolution of an important instrument for the fulfilment of the European Union's objectivés - the Joint Research Centre. Activities Industrial technologies and material technologies Measurement and testing Environment and climate Non-nuclear energy Targeted socio economic research Nuclear safety and safeguards Controlled thermonuclear fusion Total 12. 97 16. 82 28. 91 2. 66 3. 11 28. 03 7. 50 100. 00 ANNEX I JRC institutional research activities 1996 Controlled thermonuclear fusion Industrial technologies and material technologies 12. 97% Nuclear safety and safeguards 28. 03% Targeted socio-economic research 3. 11 Non-nuclear energy 2. 66% 16 Measurement and testing 16. 82% Environment and climate 28. 91% ANNEX II Number of Publications written by JRC Scientists EUR Reports Conference Papers Articles In Scientific Journals with Referee system 1994 1995 103 117 646 772 195 233 TOTAL 944 1122 Sources: JRC Annual Reports 17 ANNEX III (a) List of the Inter-DG Agreements in Institutional Support to the Commission Directorate General Subjects ' D a te of Signature S. G. - UCLAFO Antifraud Policy Support Office F. S. U. ("") Prospective Technological Studies I III III III VI XI XI XI XI XI XVII XVII XXIV IAEA Safeguards Support Information Technologies Foodstuffs Analysis Industrial Innovation Systems - Technology Foresight and Prospective Studies Agricultural Policies (Monitoring MARS-STAT, MARS-PAC FEOGA, Animal Identification, BEVABS, Quality Control of Foodstuffs) ECVAM - ECB - ERLAP - REM Major Accident Hazards Bureau Biotechnology Safety 22. 12. 1995 21. 6. 1996 Pending 25 04. 1996 03. 06. 1996 Pending 17. 07. 1995 07. 12. 1995 10. 01. 1994 09. 02. 1996 15. 03. 1996 Nuclear Safety - European Networks on Component Ageing, 19. 01. 1996 Inspection Techniques and Structural Integrity Nuclear Safety - Harmonization of Safety Criteria 15. 03. 1996 Nuclear Safety - European Networks on Component Ageing, 23. 01. 1996 Inspection Techniques and Structural Integrity On-site Laboratories, ECSAM, Safeguards 20. 02. 1996 Quality Control - Cosmetics - Salety of Products - Food 23. 10. 1995 Products EEA(***) Harmonisation of environmental measurement techniques 02. 02. 1995 EMEA(~") O n D ETOMEP: European Technical Office for Medicinal Products Unité Coordination Lutte Antifraude Forward Studies Unit European Environment Agency European Agency for the Evolution of Medicinal Products 16. 03. 1995 18 JRC Institutional Support Activities ANNEX III (b) INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES DECISIONS. DIRECTIVES, REGULATIONS OF THE COUNCIL AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES OF THE JRC Environment and Climate European Reference Laboratory for Air Pollution (ERLAP) European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) Support to the European Environment Agency (EEA) Work in support of Directives 80779 EEC, 89 427 EEC. 82 884 EEC. 85'203 EEC and 92 72 EEC Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament (93C1 02). OJ No. C1 '3 of 5. 01. 1993 on the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Work in support of Directives 67548 EEC. 92 32 EEC Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament SEC(91)1794 final of 29. 10. 1991. Establishment of a European Center for the Validation of Alternate Methods (ECVAM). Work in support of Directive 86 609 EEC Council Regulation (EEC) No. 121090 of 7. 5. 1990 on the creation of the European Environment Agency (OJ No. L120 1, 11. 5. 1990) (see in particular Article 15 and Annex A Cooperation with the JRC) European Community Pharmaceutical Information Network 'ECPHIN) Work in support of Directives 93 '39 EEC. 93 40 EEC and Council Regulations 93 2309 EEC and EEC 237790 Quality Control of Consumer Products (Consumer Protection) Industrial Reliability: Major Hazards. Biotechnology Safety Methodologies for UCLAF Agriculture and Fisheries Remote Sensing for Agriculture On Cosmetics: 6th modification of Regulation EC 76 768 on Safety of Products: General Safety Directive 92'59 EEC of 29. 6. 1994 Communication COM(96) 7 final, on the Major Accident Hazards Bureau from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament: Work in support of Directive 82'501 EEC Commission Decision SEC(87) 1310 6 and SEC(95)249 Decision of the Council of 14. 11. 1994 on Remote Sensing applications to Agricultural Statistics for the period 1994-1998 (94753 EEC, OJ No. L299 27. 22. 11. 1994) 19 INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES Animal Identification I — —— —• "* " I DECISIONS, DIRECTIVES, REGULATIONS OF THE COUNCIL AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES OF THE JRC i European Office for Wine. Alcohol and Spirit Drinks (BEVABS) Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament (COM(93)360'3). Work in support of Council Regulations (EEC) No. 2048'89. 2348/91 and 2347'91 and Commission Regulation No. 2676'90 Reference Measurements and Materials for Quality Control of Foodstuffs EC Directives on foodstuffs and other consumer goods Nuclear Safety and Safeguards Euratom Safeguards Support:General Euratom Safeguards Support: On-Site laboratories and ECSAM IAEA Safeguards Support Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament of 24. 3. 1992 fSEC (92)515 final, concerning the Commission Decision on on-site laboratories, for the period 1991-1996 (see in particular Art. 16 Cooperation with the JRC) Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament COM(94)383 final, of 7. 9. 1994 concerning the illicit circulation of radioactive material Communication from the Commission to the Council COM (80) 681 final, concerning an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the International Atomic Energy Agency on the one hand and the Commission on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, on the other, on cooperation in the field of research and development in Safeguards 20 JRC institutional s/t support activities 1996 SG/UCLAF 1. 66% DGXXIV 2. 85% DG I 5. 64% DGXVII 24. 49% ANNEX IV DG III DG VI 17. 16% Activities SG/UCLAF DGÏ DGin DO VI DGXI DG XVII DG XXIV Total % 1. 66 5. 64 9. 65 17. 16 38. 55 24. 49 2. 85 100. 00 DGXI 38. 55% 21 SHARED COST ACTIONS JRC INSTITUTES RESPONSE TO THE FIRST CALLS OF THE 4TH FWP (15/12/94 through 27/04/95) Summary of Results by Specific Programme SPECIFIC PROGRAMME JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Submitted Accepted % 1 Telematics 2 Advanced Communication Technologies and Services 3. Information Technologies 4. Industrial and Materials Technologies 5. Standards, Measurement and Testing 6. Environment and Climate 7. Marine Sciences and Technologies 8. Biotechnology 9. Biomedicine and Health 10. Agriculture and Fisheries 11. Non-nuclear Energy 12. Nuclear F:ission Safety 13. Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion 14. Transport [ 15. Targeted Socio-Economic Research l | Activity 1: Research, technological development and demonstration programmes (sub-totals) 16. Activity 2: Cooperation with third countries and international organisations 17. Activity 3: Dissemination and exploitation of research results 18. Activity 4: Stimulation of training and mobility of researchers (TMR) 13 4 8 53 27 98 12 - 6 4 55 45 - 1 - 326 12 5 4 5 2 1 6 8 32 1 - 1 0 14 25 - 0 38% 50% 13% 11% 30% 33% 8% - 17% 0% 25% 56% - 0% I 95 29% 1 3 1 8% 60% 25% TOTAL 347 100 29% 22 ANNEX VI TARGETS OF EVOLUTION OF JRC COMPETITIVE ACTIVITIES 1995-1998 (in Mecu) I Updated Targets 1995-1998 II Earnings 1995 III Targets 1996 (new contracts) IV Targets 1997 V Targets 1998 Total ll-V Shared-cost actions 50% Competitive support Other Community activities Third Party Work TOTAL 27. 7 80. 0 18. 0 60. 0 185. 7 10. 7 12. 0 2. 3 18. 40) 43. 4 7. 5 19. 5 4. 5 20. 0 51. 5 6. 0 22. 0 4. 0 21. 0 53. 0 3. 4 26. 6 5. 0 22. 0 57. 0 27. 6 80. 1 15. 8 81. 4 204. 9 (1) HFR - Reactor Third Party Work not included. 23 Distribution of JRC Cooperation with National Research Organisations and Universities, by country Distribution per country in percentages Others 13. 0% BE 4. 7% DK 2. 0% - Country Percentage AT BE DK DE ES GR FI FR IRL IT LUX NL PT SE UK "Others Total 4. 9 4. 7 2. 0 17. 6 5. 8 2. 3 2. 3 13. 1 1. 2 10. 9 0. 4 5. 8 2. 3 2. 8 10. 9 m 13. 0 " " UK 10. 9% LUX 0. 4% J 100. 0 IT 10. 9% IRL 1. 2% FR 13. 1% 24 f DE 17. 6% ES 5. 8% GR2. 30/ 70 FI 2. 3% ANNEX VIII 1995-1998 TOTAL 11,700,000 89,500,000 JRC COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS 1995-1998 (in ECU) Budget Line Title 1995 Execution 1996 Budget 1997 Proposed 1998 Foreseen B6-2113 B6-2121 B6-2122 B6-2131 B6-2143 B6-2151 B6-2171 B6-291 'B6-3111 B6-3121 B6-391 Information Technologies 1,924,124 3,346,831 3,219,103 3,209,942 Industrial and Material Technologies 24,983,909 20,993,470 21,499,776 22,022,845 Measurement and Testing 28,258,930 27. 171. 331 27,821. 772 28. 547,967 111,800. 000 Environment and Climate Agriculture and Fisheries Non-nuclear Energy Targeted Socio-Economic Research JRC Participation in Shared Cost Actions (EC)(50%) 74,671,577 75,924. 604 77,324. 747 78. 979,072 306,900,000 10,228. 685 11,604. 084 13,883,237 14,283,994 5,040. 023 5,133. 323 51. 102 3,723. 607 9. 178. 246 4. 699. 827 4,117,059 4. 219. 311 10,206,430 10. 482,001 6,880,876 5. 368,195 50,000,000 17,100,000 35,000,000 17,000. 000 TOTAL EC Programme 150,291. 672 156,642. 000 164,953,000 167. 113. 328 639. 000,000 Nuclear Fission Safety and Safeguards 63,813,825 64. 193,094 65,184. 585 66,608. 496 259,800,000 Controlled Thermo-nuclear Fusion 11,486,770 12,303,171 12,587,121 JRC Participation in Shared Cost Actions (EAEC)(50°/o) 0 2,799. 735 2,375,294 12. 622,938 5,524,971 49,000,000 10,700,000 TOTAL EAEC Programme 75,300,595 79,296,000 80,147,000 84,756,405 TOTAL EC + EAEC Programmes 225,592,267 235,938,000 245,100,000 251,869,733 25 2£ CA(96)48 9 August, 1996 OPINION OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE ON THE COMMUNICATION OF THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS OF 26 APRIL 1994 ON THE ROLE OF THE JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE (JRC) INTRODUCTION 1. 2. The Council Conclusions of 26 April 1994 on the Role of the JRC call upon the Commission to submit a report in 1996 to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of these Conclusions, after obtaining the Opinion of the European Parliament and the Council to draw up an assessment of the situation. the Board of Governors, so as to enable After considering the text of the report from the Commission and following extensive discussions on the current situation of the JRC, the Board of Governors expresses the following Opinion. JRC EVOLUTION S1MCE 1994 3. 4. The Council Conclusions outline the role of the JRC and set out guidelines for its operations. They signal a new approach to the JRC and call for a transition which should be introduced progressively during the period from 1995 to 1998. This includes targets for a novel set of competitive activities, the necessary changes to rules and regulations governing the JRC and a call for further collaboration with partners belonging to all the Member States. The JRC is now approaching mid-term in this evolutionary process, for which the planning was initiated with the Board of Governors in 1994, upon the decisions of the Framework Programmes for 1994-1998 and the issue of the Council Conclusions on the Role of the JRC. The report from the Commission and the JRC 1995 Annual Report which reports on the first year under the modified role of the JRC, clearly bear witness to the fact that encouraging progress has already been made towards fulfilling the intentions of the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission. This modified role included participation in a wider spectrum of competitive activities than was the case in the past. The JRC should participate in Community programmes on an equal basis with partners from research and industry, to whom collaboration should be extended. The Board notes that the Centre responded in a dynamic way to the new challenge and that it has obtained good results in the competition, exceeding expectations. With regard to shared cost action (specific) programmes under the Framework Programmes, the Board wishes to draw attention to the fact that this encompasses accepted projects outside the themes where the JRC has institutional activities, thus capitalising on its multi-disciplinary competences. Good results were also obtained for the other modes of competitive activities. In general, targets were exceeded. At the same time, the JRC has continued through its institutional activities to contribute to the formulation and implementation of Community policies, including research policy. Ties with national research activities have been reinforced and efforts in this direction should be maintained. Having confirmed its overall favourable impression with progress to date, the Board emphasises, however, the need to sustain the initiatives already taken and remarks that there is still room for improvement, both in the operations of the Centre itself and In the boundary conditions which govern its activities and that an effort is still required before the Council Conclusions can be said to be fully implemented. THE WAY FORWARD 5. The Board welcomed the steps taken by the Commission in accordance with its recommendations to further strengthen the commercialisation and communication of the JRC's work and its results. The addition of a Deputy Director General to the management team of the Centre is welcomed and should facilitate further progress in this direction. Related to this, the Board points to new ways in which the JRC in fulfilment of its objectives may industry, and a series of further augment additional measures (performance indicators) of the JRC, its institutes and the satisfaction of its customers. its relations with European for measuring the performance The Board notes that its relations with the committees of the specific programmes which share the same framework programmes lines with the JRC own research programmes, have been initiated but need strengthening. Specifically, it would be beneficial for Institute Directors to have detailed annual discussions with relevant Programme Committees. With regard to the management team of the JRC, the Board has also, as described in its Observations to the JRC Annual Report 1995, advised the Commission on appointments to vacant senior posts at Institute Director level. The considerable number of highly qualified applicants confirmed the exciting and challenging nature of these posts and the growing recognition of the merits of the JRC in the European scientific and industrial community. 6. to give As prescribed in the Council Conclusions and recorded in the Report of the - Commission, thé new modes of operation of the JRC, and notably the competitive activities, required a series of amendments to the rules and regulations governing the JRC and its working methods. Such amendments and new rules have been implemented and the Board welcomes the Commission's Decision the JRC status as an autonomous Directorate General. As indicated previously in the Observations to the JRC Annual Report 1995, the Board is of the firm opinion that a further evolution in the status of the JRC within the Commission is essential to allow the Centre to fully live up to expectations for its working methods and relations with the Framework Programmes arid highlighted in the Council Conclusions. Whereas a series of incremental! changes have been accomplished, a more basic reorganisation of the JRC statute is called for. The Board acknowledges the Commissioner's indications of the intentions in this direction and looks forward to playing a full part in advising on these important matters, which for the benefit of the JRC may include a redefinition of the operation and responsibilities of the Board itself. research, as set out by industry and national Like the staff of many other European research institutes, the JRC staff has an age distribution which will continually result in vacancies in the coming few years, a process which is already in progress and' which requires replacements at all levels. The JRC is about to undergo significant changes involving increased participation in competitive activities and an improved responsiveness to the new needs of its customers, and an increased flexibility in its operations is necessary. In this situation the Commission has established a new policy for its entire research personnel, including JRC staff. Its most important feature is the three categories: officials, temporary agents and the new category of temporary agents having non-renewable, three year contracts, and the assignment of goals for the proportion between these categories (40%, 35% and 25%). Ever since its inception it has had the attention of the Board. Whereas the Board welcomes the Commission's recognition of the need for a contingent of highly mobile staff, it has persistently expressed reservations as far as the JRC is concerned with regard to the implications of raising the proportion of officials, at present 33%, within the total staff contingent of the JRC. The Board expects to be consulted on this process of change. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7. The Board finally notes that the Council Conclusions underlined its role in implementing the conclusions and guidelines. The Board appreciates the responsiveness it has had from the Commissioner and the Director General, in particular, to its views and advice, but notes that its views on the above- mentioned staff policy have not fully been taken into account. The Board for looks forward to further discussions on it has had with the Commissioner * welcomes the several contacts Research, Mrs. Edith Cresson, and the evolution of the JRC status and strategy. 2 *$ ISSN 0254-1475 COM(96) 436 final DOCUMENTS EN 15 Catalogue number : CB-CO-96-438-EN-C ISBN 92-78-08592-8 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg


title: REGULAMENTO (CE) Nº 1741/96 DA COMISSÃO de 6 de Setembro de 1996 que restabelece o direito aduaneiro preferencial de importação de rosas de flor pequena originárias de Israel

eurovoc_concepts:
CCT duties
Israel
floriculture
import
restoration of customs duties
tariff preference


title: WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2404/96 by Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Information on the amount of EC aid granted to the Saarland between January and December 1995

eurovoc_concepts:
EAGGF
EU aid
European Regional Development Fund
European Social Fund
Saarland
energy policy
environmental policy
research programme

formats: html print


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 2394/96 von Hiltrud BREYER an die Kommission. Entscheidung 94/730/EG zur Festlegung von vereinfachten Verfahren für die absichtliche Freisetzung genetisch veränderter Pflanzen

eurovoc_concepts:
administrative formalities
application of EU law
crop production
environmental protection
genetically modified organism
public awareness campaign
public health


eurovoc_concepts:
North-South relations
drug addiction
drug traffic
fight against crime
narcotic

formats: html pdf pdfa1b print

text: KOMMISSION DER EUROPÄISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN Brüssel, den 06. 09. 1996 KOM(96) 427 cndg. 95/0167 (SYN) Geänderter Vorschlag für eine VERORDNUNG (EG) DES RATES ÜBER DIE NORD-SÜD-ZUSAMMENARBEIT BEI DER BEKÄMPFUNG DES DROGENM1SSBRAUCHS UND DER DROGENABHÄNGIGKEIT (Haushaltsposten B7-6210) (gemäß Artikel 189 a, Absatz 2 des EG-Vertrages von der Kommission vorgelegt) BEGRÜNDUNG Von den am 18. April erörterten 37 Änderungsanträgen hielt das Europäische Parlament schließlich nur 25 aufrecht. Davon übernimmt die Kommission 15 (in dem geänderten Verordnungsvorschlag fett gedruckt), zwei davon teilweise. Folgende Änderungen werden aus den jeweils angegebenen Gründen übernommen: Änderungsantrag 1: "Zu diesen Leitlinien hat sich das Europäische Parlament in seiner Entschließung vom 15. Juni 1995 zu der genannten Mitteilung geäußert": Es handelt sich um die Feststellung einer Tatsache, der sich die Kommission nur anschließen kann. Änderungsanträge 3 und 4. "Die Kommission führt Aktionen in Zusammenarbeit mit den Entwicklungsländern durch, in denen der politische Wille zur Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs auf höchster Ebene eindeutig zum Ausdruck gebracht wird. Ein Hinweis auf diesen Willen kann. " "Das politische Engagement der Drittstaaten muß unter anderem durch die Anwendung der Rechtsvorschriften dieser Staaten gegen die Geldwäsche unter Beweis gestellt werden": Die Kommission teilt die Auffassung, derzufolge die Zusammenarbeit in erster Linie mit den Ländern erfolgen muß, die den Kampf gegen Drogenmißbrauch und Drogenabhängigkeit entschlossen aufgenommen haben. Nach Ansicht der Kommission muß dieses Engagement in der Ratifikation der VN- Konventionen zum Ausdruck kommen. sein, zu der Änderungsantrag 5: "Vorbeugende Maßnahmen gegen Drogenabhängigkeit müssen Gegenstand einer konsequenten Politik insbesondere die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Polizei, Sozialhelfern, Ärzten und NKO sowie eine sachliche Information über die Folgen der Drogenabhängigkeit, die sich in erster Linie an die Jugendlichen wendet, gehören. Die Kommission ist bemüht, auf die internationalen Geber und die Finanzinstitutionen (IWF, Weltbank usw. ) Einfluß zu nehmen, um zu verhindern, daß deren Politik im Widerspruch zu den Zielen der einzelstaatlichen Drogenbekämpfungspolitiken gerät. Seitens der Gemeinschaft findet die Zusammenarbeit in einem vom Dialog geprägten Klima statt, wobei den realen kulturellen Unterschieden, die die Einstellung gegenüber die mit Drogenmißbrauch und Drogenabhängigkeit verbundenen Probleme beeinflussen, Rechnung getragen wird. Ein solcher Dialog ist ausschlaggebend, wenn die soziale und politische Tragbarkeit der Drogenbekämpfungsstrategien gewährleistet werden soll": Diesen drei Absätzen kann zugestimmt werden. Sie handeln von der Vorbeugung, der notwendigen Kohärenz zwischen den Zielen einzelstaatlicher Politiken und den von den internationalen Finanzinstitutionen empfohlenen Politiken; ferner von der Bedeutung der unterschiedlichen Situationen in den einzelnen Ländern, denen Rechnung zu tragen ist. Änderungsantrag 6: "wobei sie der Tatsache Rechnung trägt, daß diese Aktionen innerhalb eines zuvor festgelegten Zeitraums positive und greifbare Auswirkungen haben müssen": Diesem Änderungsantrag kann insoweit zugestimmt werden, als er sich auf die Tatsache bezieht, daß die von der Kommission unterstützten nationalen Aktionen effektive Wirkungen haben müssen. Änderungsantrag 8: "Förderung von Pilotprojekten im Bereich der alternativen Entwicklung entsprechend der Begriffsbestimmung der Dublin-Gruppe sowie von Projekten, in deren Rahmen für alternative Erzeugnisse Handelspräferenzen gewährt werden": Dieser Satz kann unter dem Vorbehalt übernommen werden, daß der Verweis auf die Dublin-Gruppe (informelle Gruppe) durch die von der Dublin-Gruppe formulierte Definition des Begriffs alternative Entwicklung ersetzt wird; diese Definition lautet wie folgt: ein Prozeß, durch den die Erzeugung verbotener Drogen unterbunden und verhindert wird, und zwar durch geeignete Maßnahmen der ländlichen Entwicklung im Rahmen eines stetigen Wirtschaftswachstums der betreffenden Staaten Dazu sollten wirtschaftliche und soziale Maßnahmen gehören, die den Faktoren Rechnung tragen, dje die unerlaubte Drogenerzeugung fördern. Änderungsantrag 9; "der Bekämpfung des Handels mit und der Herstellung von synthetischen Drogen". Diese Änderung Heroin, Kokain und gefährlichen unterstreicht die Bedeutung des Kampfes gegen die Herstellung von und den Handel mit bestimmten Drogen, unter anderem Heroin und synthetische Drogen, die insbesondere in Europa gefragt sind. Änderungsantrag 11 : "vor allem wenn es sich um die Durchführung von Plänen zur Vernichtung von Drogenpflanzenkulturen handelt; besondere Aufmerksamkeit wird der Schlüsseirolie der Frau und den sozialen und ökologischen Folgen der Aktionen zuteil"; " der Unterstützung der Bevölkerungsgruppen, die beschlossen haben, die Erzeugung von Drogen oder Drogenausgangsstoffen aufzugeben, durch Hilfestellung bei der Entwicklung von Alternativen": Die Kommission teilt die Auffassung, daß die volle Einbeziehung der betroffenen Bevölkerung in die Projekte im Bereich der alternativen Entwicklung und der Vernichtung von Kulturen Vorrang haben sollte. Dagegen kann sie den letzten Teil des Änderungsantrags, in dem vom Schutz der Bevölkerung die Rede ist, nicht übernehmen (der Schutz der Bevölkerung kann von der Kommission weder übernommen noch garantiert werden). Änderungsantrag 14: "die Gemeinschaft unterstützt nur Projekte, in deren Rahmen die Achtung der Menschenrechte gewährleistet ist": Die Auffassung, daß die Achtung der Menschenrechte von fundamentaler Bedeutung ist, wird von der Kommission voll und ganz geteilt. 16: "wobei Änderungsantrag Wirtschaftlichkeit Rechnung vermeidet": Der Grundsatz der Wirtschaftlichkeit Kommission. sie der Bedeutung des Grundsatzes der trägt und übermäßige Verwaltungsausgaben ist einer der Grundsätze der Änderungsantrag 17: "Es wird alles getan, um die Evaluierung, die Kontrolle und die Begriindetheit der Hilfen voll und ganz zu gewährleisten": Die Evaluierung der Programme wird in Artikel 9 des Verordnungsentwurfs erwähnt Änderungsantrag 19: "Verweis auf Artikel 8" (geographische Ausschüsse) anstatt auf Artikel 9. Bei dem Verweis auf Artikel 9 handelte es sich um einen Schreibfehler in der ersten Fassung des Kommissionsvorschlags. Änderungsantrag 21: "Ausnahmen sind nur nach Vereinbarung mit der zuständigen Dienststelle und insbesondere dann möglich, wenn den Partnern andernfalls überhöhte Kosten oder übermäßige Belastungen entstehen würden": Dieser Änderungsantrag entsprich der Haushaltsordnung. Änderungsantrag 24: Darin wird "Zusammenfassung" durch "Bericht" ersetzt, was nicht problematisch ist. Änderungsantrag 33: "Versorgung. der Drogenabhängigen; Entwicklungspolitik und Politik zur Bekämpfung der Armut und der wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Ausgrenzung" : Diese Änderung ergänzt Artikel 3 und kann übernommen werden. Geänderter Vorschlag für eine VERORDNUNG (EG) DES RATES ÜBER DIE NORD-SÜD-ZUSAMMENARBEIT BEI DER BEKÄMPFUNG DES DROGENMISSBRAUCHS UND DER DROGENABHÄNGIGKEIT (Haushaltsposten B7-6210) DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION - gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 130 w, auf Vorschlag der Kommission, in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Europäischen Parlament, in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe: In ihrer Mitteilung vom 23. Juni 1994 hat die Kommission dem Rat und dem Europäischen Parlament Leitlinien für einen Aktionsplan der Europäischen Union zur Drogenbekämpfung (1995-99), insbesondere auf internationaler Ebene, übermittelt. Zu diesen Leitlinien hat sich das Europäische Parlament in seiner am 15. Juni 1995 abgegebenen Stellungnahme zu der genannten Mitteilung geäußert. Der Beitritt aller Staaten zum Einheits-Übereinkommen von 1961 über Suchtstoffe sowie zu der durch das Protokoll von 1972 geänderten Fassung dieses Übereinkommens, zum Übereinkommen von 1971 über psychotrope Stoffe und zum Übereinkommen von 1988 zur Bekämpfung des illegalen Handels mit Suchtstoffen und psychotropen Substanzen und die systematische Umsetzung dieser Übereinkommen auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene bilden die Grundlage der internationalen Strategie zur Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs und des illegalen Drogenhandels. Die Europäische Gemeinschaft ist Vertragspartei des Übereinkommens von 1988, insbesondere aufgrund des Artikels 12 dieses Übereinkommens. Die Europäische Gemeinschaft hat aufgrund der Empfehlungen der von der G-7 und dem Präsidenten der Europäischen Kommission im 4 1989 eingesetzten Jahr entsprechende Gemeinschaftsvorschriften erlassen, deren globale Wirksamkeit durch den Erlaß angemessener Rechtsvorschriften und die Einfuhrung geeigneter Mechanismen in anderen Regionen der Welt gesteigert würde. Arbeitsgruppe (CATF) Chemie Die Europäische Gemeinschaft hat eine Richtlinie zur Geldwäsche erlassen, die den Empfehlungen der durch die G-7 und den Präsidenten der Europäischen Kommission im Jahr 1989 eingesetzten Arbeitsgruppe Finanzen (GAFI) folgt und deren globale Wirksamkeit durch den Erlaß angemessener Rechtsvorschriften und die Einfuhrung geeigneter Mechanismen in anderen Regionen der Welt gesteigert würde. Das Vierte Abkommen von Lomé und die Kooperations-, Assoziations- oder Partnerschaftsabkommen, die die Europäische Gemeinschaft mit den Entwicklungsländern geschlossen hat, enthalten Bestimmungen über die Zusammenarbeit bei der Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs und des illegalen Drogenhandels, die Überwachung des Handels mit Di ogenausgangsstoffen, chemischen Erzeugnissen und psychotropen Substanzen und über den Austausch einschlägiger Informationen, einschließlich Maßnahmen gegen die Geldwäsche. Die Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Gemeinschaft haben die Politische Erklärung und das Globale Aktionsprogramm unterschrieben, die von der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen anläßlich deren 17. Sondertagung angenommen wurden. Die Zusammenarbeit bei der Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs und der Drogenabhängigkeit trägt wesentlich dazu bei, daß die in Artikel 130 u des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft genannten Ziele der Politik der Gemeinschaft auf dem Gebiet der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit erreicht werden - HAT FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN: Artikel 1 Die Europäische Gemeinschaft führt Aktionen im Rahmen der Zusammenarbeit bei der Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs und der Drogenabhängigkeit vorrangig in den Entwicklungsländern durch, in denen der politische Wille zur Bekämpfung des Drogenmißbrauchs auf höchster Ebene eindeutig zum Ausdruck gebracht wird. Ein Hinweis auf diesen Willen kann die Ratifikation des Einheits-Übereinkommens von 1961 3 über Suchtstoffe, dessen mit dem Protokoll von 1972 geänderter Fassung, des Übereinkommens von 1971 und des Übereinkommens von 1988 sein. Das politische Engagement der Drittstaaten muß unter anderem durch die Anwendung der Rechtsvorschriften dieser Staaten gegen die Geldwäsche unter Beweis gestellt werden. Artikel 2 Auf Antrag eines Partnerlandes leistet die Gemeinschaft im Benehmen mit dem Programm der VN zur internationalen Drogenkontrolle vorrangige Hilfe bei der Vorbereitung eines "National Drug Control Master Plan". Dieser "Plan" legt nicht nur die Ziele, Strategien und Prioritäten der Drogenbekämpfung durch ein Partnerland fest, sondern auch den Bedarf an Hilfsmitteln aller Art, einschließlich finanzieller Mittel, und bildet so ein integriertes, pluridisziplinäres und multisektorales Konzept, das die Wirksamkeit der von der Europäischen Gemeinschaft geleisteten Hilfe fördert. Vorbeugende Maßnahmen gegen Drogenabhängigkeit müssen Gegenstand einer konsequenten Politik sein, zu der insbesondere die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Polizei, Sozialhelfern, Ärzten und NRO sowie eine sachliche Information über die Folgen der Drogenabhängigkeit, die sich in erster Linie an die Jugendlichen wendet, gehören. Die Kommission ist bemüht, auf die internationalen Geber und die Finanzinstitutionen (IWF, Weltbank usw. ) Einfluß zu nehmen, um zu verhindern, daß deren Politik in Widerspruch zu den Zielen der einzelstaatlichen Drogenbekämpfungspolitiken gerät. Seitens der Gemeinschaft findet die Zusammenarbeit in einem vom Dialog geprägten Klima statt, wobei den realen kulturellen Unterschieden, die die Einstellung gegenüber den mit Drogenmißbrauch und Drogenabhängigkeit verbundenen Problemen beeinflussen, Rechnung getragen wird. Ein solcher Dialog ist ausschlaggebend, wenn die soziale und politische Tragbarkeit der Drogenbekämpfungsstrategien gewährleistet werden soll. Artikel 3 Ferner unterstützt die Gemeinschaft vorzugsweise in dem durch die nationalen Pläne festgelegten strategischen Rahmen spezifische Aktionen in den nachstehenden Bereichen, G wobei sie der Tatsache Rechnung trägt, daß diese Aktionen (innerhalb eines zuvor festgelegten Zeitraums positive und greifbare) Auswirkungen haben müssen: Entwicklung der notwendigen "National Drug Control Master Plan"; institutionellen Kapazität zur Durchfuhrung des aufgrund von Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und einzelnen "sensiblen" Partnerländern über die Zusammenarbeit zwecks Verhinderung der Abzweigung von Vorläufersubstanzen, die bei der Herstellung illegaler Drogen und psychotroper Substanzen verwendet werden, hilft die Gemeinschaft beim Ausbau der institutionellen Kapazität des betreffenden Landes im Hinblick auf eine rasche und wirksame Durchfuhrung dieser Abkommen und die Förderung der Zusammenarbeit auf regionaler oder subregionaler Ebene; aufgrund von Abkommen zwischen der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und einzelnen "sensiblen" Partnerländern über die Zusammenarbeit beim Kampf gegen die Geldwäsche, kann die Gemeinschaft im Rahmen der verfügbaren Mittel den Ländern, die insbesondere durch die Ratifizierung des Wiener und des Straßburger Übereinkommens sowie dadurch, daß sie den Empfehlungen der GAFI nachkommen, ihr diesbezügliches Engagement bewiesen haben, technische Hilfe in diesem Bereich gewähren; Einführung von Mechanismen zur Überwachung des Handels mit erlaubten Betäubungsmitteln und psychotropen Substanzen sowie des Verbrauchs dieser Mittel und Substanzen; Analyse des in dem jeweiligen Land festzustellenden Verbrauchs an verbotenen Drogen und psychotropen Substanzen, Versorgung, Behandlung und Resozialisierung der Drogenabhängigen sowie Verringerung der Risiken und Einbindung dieser Maßnahmen insbesondere in die Gesundheits- und Bildungspolitik, in die Entwicklungspolitik und in die Politik zur Bekämpfung der Armut und der wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Ausgrenzung. Bei diesen Maßnahmen sind die Menschenrechte zu achten; Förderung von Pilotprojekten im Bereich der alternativen Entwicklung (im Sinne eines Prozesses, durch den die Erzeugung verbotener Drogen unterbunden und } verhindert wird, und zwar durch geeignete Maßnahmen der ländlichen Entwicklung im Rahmen eines stetigen Wirtschaftswachstums der betreffenden Staaten; dazu sollten wirtschaftliche und soziale Maßnahmen gehören, die den Faktoren Rechnung tragen, die die unerlaubte Drogenerzeugung fordern) sowie von Projekten, in deren Rahmen für alternative Erzeugnisse Handelspräferenzen gewährt werden, insbesondere zum Nutzen der kleinen unabhängigen Erzeuger von Ausgangsstoffen für verbotene Drogen, und von Aktionen zur direkten Unterstützung der Drogenbekämpfungsmaßnahmen dieser Länder. Besondere Beachtung gilt der Bekämpfung des Handels mit und der Herstellung von Heroin, Kokain und gefahrlichen synthetischen Drogen; der Partizipation der unmittelbar angesprochenen lokalen Bevölkerung oder sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Gruppen bei der Auswahl, Planung und Ausfuhrung der Aktionen, vor allem wenn es sich um die Durchführung von Plänen zur Vernichtung von Drogenpflanzenkulturen handelt; besondere Aufmerksamkeit wird der Schlüsselrolle der Frauen und den sozialen und ökologischen Folgen der Aktionen zuteil; der Unterstützung der Bevölkerungsgruppen, die beschlossen haben, die Erzeugung von Drogen oder DrogenausgangsstofTen aufzugeben, durch Hilfestellung bei der Entwicklung von Alternativen; den Aktionen zum Ausbau der institutionellen Kapazität der Entwicklungsländer auf nationaler, lokaler und regionaler Ebene; die Gemeinschaft unterstützt nur Projekte, in deren Rahmen die Achtung der Menschenrechte gewährleistet ist. Artikel 4 Zu den Empfängern der Hilfe und den Kooperationspartnern gehören nicht nur Staaten und Regionen, sondern auch dezentrale Einrichtungen, regionale Organisationen, öffentliche Körperschaften, traditionelle oder lokale Gemeinschaften, private Wirtschaftsbeteiligte und 2 Unternehmen sowie Genossenschaften, Nichtregierungsorganisationen und repräsentative Vereinigungen der lokalen Bevölkerung. Artikel 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Die Mittel, die im Rahmen der in Artikel 2 und 3 genannten Aktionen eingesetzt werden können, sind insbesondere für Studien, technische Hilfe, Ausbildung oder andere Dienstleistungen, für Lieferungen und Arbeiten sowie für Rechnungsprüfungen und Evaluierungs- und Kontrollmissionen vorgesehen. Aus Gemeinschaftsmitteln finanziert werden können je nach dem bei der Durchführung der Aktionen auftretenden Bedarf sowohl Investitionsausgaben - mit Ausnahme von in Devisen oder Ausgaben für Immobilienkäufe - als auch Betriebsausgaben Landeswährung. Jedoch können die Betriebskosten außer bei Ausbildungs- und Forschungsprogrammen im allgemeinen nur während der Startphase übernommen werden, wobei der entsprechende Gemeinschaftsbeitrag schrittweise gesenkt wird. Es wird systematisch angestrebt, daß die Akteure oder Partner, denen die jeweilige Aktion letztlich zugute kommen soll (Land, lokale Gemeinschaften, Unternehmen oder andere), im Rahmen ihrer Möglichkeiten und je nach Art der einzelnen Aktionen einen Beitrag, insbesondere finanzieller Art, leisten. Angestrebt werden mögliche Kofinanzierungen insbesondere mit den Mitgliedstaaten oder multilateralen, regionalen oder sonstigen Organisationen. Es werden die notwendigen Maßnahmen getroffen, um den Gemeinschaftscharakter der aufgrund dieser Verordnung gewährten Hilfe zum Ausdruck zu bringen. Um die Kohärenz und die Komplementarität der von der Gemeinschaft finanzierten Aktionen mit den von den Mitgliedstaaten finanzierten Aktionen zu stärken und eine optimale Effizienz aller Aktionen zu gewährleisten, trifft die Kommission alle fur die Koordinierung notwendigen Maßnahmen, wobei sie der Bedeutung des Grundsatzes der Wirtschaftlichkeit Rechnung trägt und übermäßige Verwaiiungsausgaben vermeidet: a) b) Aufbau eines Systems für den systematischen Austausch von Informationen über die finanzierten Aktionen oder Aktionen, deren Finanzierung die Gemeinschaft und die Mitgliedstaaten vorsehen; Koordinierung am Ort der Durchführung der Aktionen im Zuge regelmäßiger Sitzungen und des Informationsaustauschs zwischen den Vertretern der Kommission und der Mitgliedstaaten in dem Empfängerland. Artikel 6 Die finanzielle Unterstützung aufgrund dieser Verordnung wird in Form nichtrückzahlbarer Zuschüsse gewährt. Es wird alles getan, um die Evaluierung, die Kontrolle und die Begründetheit der Hilfen voll und ganz zu gewährleisten. (1) (2) (3) Artikel 7 Die Kommission prüft, beschließt und verwaltet die unter diese Verordnung fallenden Aktionen gemäß den geltenden Haushaltsverfahren und sonstigen Verfahren, insbesondere gemäß den in der Haushaltsordnung der Gemeinschaft vorgesehenen Verfahren. Beschlüsse über Aktionen, die aufgrund dieser Verordnung mit mehr als 2 Mio. ECU je Aktion finanziert werden, sowie alle Beschlüsse zur Änderung dieser Aktionen, aufgrund deren der für eine Aktion ursprünglich vorgesehene Betrag um mehr als 20 % überschritten wird, werden nach dem Verfahren des Artikels 8 gefaßt. Alle aufgrund dieser Verordnung geschlossenen Finanzierungsabkommen oder -vertrage sehen insbesondere vor, daß die Kommission und der Rechnungshof vor Ort Kontrollen nach den üblichen Verfahren vornehmen können, die von der Kommission für im Rahmen den der geltenden Bestimmungen, festgelegt Gesamthaushaltsplan der Gemeinschaften geltenden Haushaltsordnung wurden. insbesondere der (4) Soweit im Rahmen der Aktionen Finanzierungsabkommen zwischen der Gemeinschaft und dem Empfängerland geschlossen werden, sehen diese Abkommen vor, daß 4o (5) (6) (1) Steuern, Zölle und ausgeschlossen sind. sonstige Abgaben von der Gemeinschaftsfinanzierung Die Teilnahme an den Ausschreibungen und der Auftragsvergabe steht allen natürlichen und juristischen Personen der Mitgliedstaaten und des Empfängerstaats zu gleichen Bedingungen offen. Das Recht andere Entwicklungsländer ausgedehnt werden. zur Teilnahme kann auch auf Die Lieferungen sollten aus den Mitgliedstaaten oder dem Empfängerstaat oder aus anderen Entwicklungsländern stammen. Ausnahmen sind nur nach Vereinbarung mit der zuständigen Dienststelle und insbesondere dann möglich, wenn den Partnern andernfalls überhöhte Kosten oder übermäßige Belastungen entstehen würden. Artikel 8 Die Kommission wird von einem Ausschuß mit beratender Funktion unterstützt, der sich aus Vertretern der Mitgliedstaaten zusammensetzt und in dem der Vertreter der Kommission den Vorsitz führt; dabei handelt es sich je nach Empfängerland oder - region um folgenden Ausschuß: a) b) c) bei den Ländern in Afrika, im karibischen Raum und im Pazifischen Ozean um den EEF-Ausschuß, der mit Artikel 21 des am 16. Juli 1990 von den im Rat vereinigten Vertretern der Regierungen der Mitgliedstaaten beschlossenen internen Übereinkommens 91/401/EWG über die Finanzierung und Verwaltung der Hilfen der Gemeinschaft im Rahmen des Vierten AKP-EWG-Abkommens eingesetzt wurde; bei den Mittelmeerländern um den MED-Ausschuß, der mit Artikel 6 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1762/92 des Rates vom 29. Juni 1992 eingesetzt wurde; bei den Ländern in Lateinamerika und Asien um den ALA-Ausschuß, der mit Artikel 15 der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 443/92 des Rates vom 25. Februar 1992 eingesetzt wurde. 41 (2) Der Vertreter der Kommission unterbreitet dem Ausschuß einen Entwurf der zu treffenden Maßnahmen. Der Ausschuß gibt - gegebenenfalls nach Abstimmung -seine Stellungnahme zu diesem Entwurf innerhalb einer Frist ab, die der Vorsitzende unter Berücksichtigung der Dringlichkeit der betreffenden Frage festsetzen kann. Die Stellungnahme wird in das Protokoll des Ausschusses aufgenommen; darüber hinaus hat jeder Mitgliedstaat das Recht zu verlangen, daß sein Standpunkt im Protokoll festgehalten wird. Die Kommission berücksichtigt soweit wie möglich die Stellungnahme des Ausschusses. Sie unterrichtet den Ausschuß darüber, inwieweit sie seine Stellungnahme berücksichtigt hat. Artikel 9 Nach jedem Haushaltsjahr unterbreitet die Kommission dem Europäischen Parlament und dem Rat einen Jahresbericht, der eine Zusammenfassung der im Laufe des Haushaltsjahres finanzierten Aktionen sowie eine Evaluierung der Durchführung dieser Verordnung während des Haushaltsjahres umfaßt. Der Bericht enthält insbesondere Angaben über die Partner, an die Aufträge vergeben oder mit denen Lieferverträge geschlossen wurden. Ferner enthält der Bericht eine Zusammenfassung der gegebenenfalls im Zusammenhang mit spezifischen Aktionen von unabhängigen Sachverständigen vorgenommenen Evaluierungen. Artikel 10 Diese Verordnung tritt am dritten Tag nach ihrer Veröffentlichung Europäischen Gemeinschaften in Kraft. im Amtsblatt der Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat. Geschehen zu Brüssel am. Im Namen des Rates Der Präsident 41 ISSN 0254-1467 KOM(96) 427 endg. DOKUMENTE DE il os Katalognummer : CB-CO-96-432-DE-C ISBN 92-78-08524-3 Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L-2985 Luxemburg 1>>


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 2380/96 van James PROVAN aan de Commissie. Brucellose in Italië

eurovoc_concepts:
EU aid
Italy
action programme
aid to agriculture
brucellosis
cattle
slaughter of animals
veterinary inspection


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 2404/96 do Deputado Hiltrud BREYER à Comissão. Informação sobre o montante das ajudas comunitárias concedidas ao Estado do Sarre entre Janeiro e Dezembro de 1995


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 2386/96 af Jens-Peter BONDE til Kommissionen. Target-systemet

eurovoc_concepts:
European Monetary Institute
Treaty on European Union
bank
banking system
competition law
financial transaction
international payment
intra-EU payment
single market
single monetary policy


title: PERGUNTA ESCRITA n. 2400/96 do Deputado Hiltrud BREYER à Comissão. Decisão 94/730/CE que estabelece processos simplificados relativos à libertação deliberada no ambiente de plantas geneticamente modificadas - alcance (RESPOSTA COMPLEMENTAR)

eurovoc_concepts:
administrative formalities
application of EU law
environmental protection
genetically modified organism
health risk
impact study
public health
research

formats: html pdf print

text: C 60/4 PT Jornal Oficial das Comunidades Europeias 25. 2. 98 Quem verifica e por que processo se as caracter(cid:14)·sticas do ecossistema receptor sa(cid:152)o tomadas em 5. considera(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de forma objectiva no a(cid:136)mbito da avalia(cid:231)a(cid:152)o dos riscos? 6. De que forma pode a opinia(cid:152)o pu·blica controlar essa verifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o? (1) (2) JO L 279 de 12. 11. 1993, p. 42. JO L 292 de 12. 11. 1994, p. 31. (98/C 60/08) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-2400/96 apresentada por Hiltrud Breyer (V) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (6 de Setembro de 1996) Objecto: Decisa(cid:152)o 94/730/CE que estabelece processos simplificados relativos a‘ liberta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o deliberada no ambiente de plantas geneticamente modificadas › alcance Que Estados-membros requereram a aplica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de um processo simplificado, nos termos da Decisa(cid:152)o 1. 94/730/CE (1), para que plantas geneticamente modificadas e com que modifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o? Que dados cient(cid:14)·ficos sobre a seguran(cid:231)a da liberta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o experimental para a sau·de humana e o ambiente 2. foram apresentados para que plantas geneticamente modificadas e com que modifica(cid:231)a(cid:152)o? Com base em que informa(cid:231)o(cid:152)es e dados e para que plantas geneticamente modificadas foi demonstrado que 3. foi recolhida experie(cid:136)ncia suficiente no que respeita a‘ seguran(cid:231)a para a sau·de humana e o ambiente? Para que plantas geneticamente modificadas e com base em que dados cient(cid:14)·ficos foi demonstrado que na(cid:152)o 4. apresentavam riscos para a sau·de humana e o ambiente? (1) JO L 292 de 12. 11. 1994, p. 31. (98/C 60/09) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-2401/96 apresentada por Hiltrud Breyer (V) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (6 de Setembro de 1996) Objecto: Decisa(cid:152)o 94/730/CE que estabelece processos simplificados relativos a‘ liberta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o deliberada no ambiente de plantas geneticamente modificadas › crite·rios Com base em que crite·rios foi examinado, no caso de plantas geneticamente modificadas, se estas na(cid:152)o 1. apresentam riscos para a sau·de humana e o ambiente? 2. Em que elementos assentam esses crite·rios? (98/C 60/10) PERGUNTA ESCRITA E-2402/96 apresentada por Hiltrud Breyer (V) a‘ Comissa(cid:152)o (6 de Setembro de 1996) Objecto: Decisa(cid:152)o 94/730/CE que estabelece processos simplificados relativos a‘ liberta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o deliberada no ambiente de plantas geneticamente modificadas › sobreposi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o com o Regulamento (CEE) no 2092/91 De que forma podera· ser transposto o Regulamento (CEE) no 2092/91 (1), se, nos termos do ponto 6. 1. do 1. Anexo a‘ Decisa(cid:152)o 94/730/CE (2), na(cid:152)o e· necessa·rio fornecer indica(cid:231)o(cid:152)es como, por exemplo, a descri(cid:231)a(cid:152)o do local da liberta(cid:231)a(cid:152)o? 2. Foi obtido um consenso entre a Comissa(cid:152)o e o Conselho segundo o qual a questa(cid:152)o da utiliza(cid:231)a(cid:152)o de organismos geneticamente modificados na agricultura ecolo·gica esta· actualmente fora de causa. Na medida em que, nos termos do ponto 6. 1. , a informa(cid:231)a(cid:152)o na(cid:152)o e· necessa·rio, tal deixa de poder ser assegurado por parte das explora(cid:231)o(cid:152)es agr(cid:14)·colas ecolo·gicas. Qual a posi(cid:231)a(cid:152)o da Comissa(cid:152)o sobre esta questa(cid:152)o? (1) (2) JO L 198 de 22. 7. 1991, p. 1. JO L 292 de 12. 11. 1994, p. 31


title: QUESTION ECRITE no 2403/96 de Hiltrud BREYER à la Commission. Décision 94/730/CE établissant des procédures simplifiées pour la dissémination volontaire dans l'environnement de plantes génétiquement modifiées, conformément à l'article 6 paragraphe 5 de la directive 90/ 220/CEE - compétences de la Comm<

eurovoc_concepts:
EU competence
EU control
European Commission
administrative formalities
application of EU law
environmental protection
genetically modified organism
health risk


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 2395/96 dell'on. Hiltrud BREYER alla Commissione. Decisione 94/730/CE che stabilisce procedure semplificate concernenti l'emissione deliberata nell'ambiente di piante geneticamente modificate - Statuto giuridico (RISPOSTA COMPLEMENTARE)

eurovoc_concepts:
EU control
administrative formalities
application of EU law
crop production
environmental protection
genetically modified organism

text: C 60/2 IT Gazzetta ufficiale delle Comunita‘ europee 25. 2. 98 2. Dove si trova definita la nozione di «informazione adeguata» prevista dalle procedure semplificate? 3. Quali sono il momento e il tipo di informazione adeguati per informare la popolazione ai sensi dell(cid:146)articolo 1, primo comma della direttiva 90/220/CEE (2) in caso di «procedure semplificate» e qual e‘ la disposizione che disciplina questi aspetti? 4. Quando e in che misura e‘ informata la popolazione in applicazione della procedura di cui ai punti 6. 1 e 7 dell(cid:146)allegato alla decisione 94/730/CE (3) e della procedura di cui ai punti 7. 1 e 7. 2? 5. a) Dove e con quale frequenza i cavolfiori sono stati emessi nell(cid:146)ambiente? 5. b) Come si motiva l(cid:146)esperienza sufficiente? (1) GU C 345 del 15. 11. 1996, pag. 92. (2) GU L 117 del 8. 5. 1990, pag. 15. (3) GU L 292 del 12. 11. 1994, pag. 31. (98/C 60/03) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-2395/96 di Hiltrud Breyer (V) alla Commissione (6 settembre 1996) Oggetto: Decisione 94/730/CE che stabilisce procedure semplificate concernenti l(cid:146)emissione deliberata nell(cid:146)ambiente di piante geneticamente modificate › Statuto giuridico 1. Conformemente al combinato disposto dell(cid:146)articolo 1, paragrafo 5 e dell(cid:146)articolo 2, paragrafo 2 della decisione 93/584/CEE (1) e dell(cid:146)articolo 4, paragrafi 1 e 3, dell(cid:146)articolo 5, primo comma e dell(cid:146)articolo 7 della direttiva 90/220/CEE (2), le disposizioni contenute nell(cid:146)allegato alla decisione 94/730/CE (3) hanno, per gli Stati membri destinatari, carattere indicativo o cogente ai sensi dell(cid:146)articolo 189, paragrafo 4 del trattato CE? Nel caso della decisione 94/730/CE, si tratta di criteri per una procedura semplificata o di una procedura 2. semplificata tout court? 3. Qualora si tratti di criteri: a) in che modo la Commissione, il Consiglio dei ministri e il Parlamento ne hanno verificato l(cid:146)applicazione? b) quali possibilita‘ di controllo esistono? 4. Qualora si tratti di una procedura tout court, a) in che modo la Commissione, il Consiglio dei ministri e il Parlamento ne hanno verificato l(cid:146)applicazione? b) quali possibilita‘ di controllo esistono? (1) GU L 292 del 12. 11. 1994, pag. 31. (2) GU L 279 del 12. 11. 1993, pag. 42. (3) GU L 117 del 8. 5. 1990, pag. 15. (98/C 60/04) INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA E-2396/96 di Hiltrud Breyer (V) alla Commissione (6 settembre 1996) Oggetto: Decisione 94/730/CE che stabilisce procedure semplificate concernenti l(cid:146)emissione deliberata nell(cid:146)ambiente di piante geneticamenteo modificate › Articolo 145 del trattato CE 1. 2. 3. Per quale motivo la Commissione, con la decisione 94/730/CE (1), ha violato l(cid:146)articolo 145 del trattato CE? Condivide la Commissione il parere che si sia violato il trattato? In caso negativo, come giustifica la sua posizione? (1) GU L 292 del 12. 11. 1994, pag. 31


title: Kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1743/96 av den 6 september 1996 om ändring av förordning (EG) nr 1318/96 om undantag från förordning (EEG) nr 2456/93 vad beträffar offentlig intervention

eurovoc_concepts:
EU Member State
award of contract
beef
derogation from EU law
intervention price
market support

formats: html pdfa1b print


title: SKRIFTLIG FORESPØRGSEL nr. 2395/96 af Hiltrud BREYER til Kommissionen. Beslutning 94/730/EF fastlæggelse af forenklede procedurer for udsætning i miljøet af genetisk modificerede planter - retlig status (SUPPLERENDE SVAR)

text: C 60/2 DA De Europ(cid:230)iske F(cid:230)llesskabers Tidende 25. 2. 98 2. Hvor er det defineret, hvad der som led i »den forenklede procedure« skal forst(cid:229)s ved »fyldestgłrende orientering«? 3. P(cid:229) hvilket tidspunkt og i hvilket omfang er denne orientering under henvisning til artikel 1, stk. 1, 1. punktum, i direktiv 90/220/E(cid:216)F (2) fyldestgłrende for den berłrte befolkning ved anvendelse af den »forenklede« procedure, og af hvilken bestemmelse fremg(cid:229)r dette? 4. Hvorn(cid:229)r og i hvilket omfang bliver befolkningen orienteret efter proceduren i nr. 6. 1. og 7. i bilaget til beslutning 94/730/EF (3) under henvisning til nr. 7. 1. og 7. 2. ? 5a. Hvorn(cid:229)r og hvor ofte er der blevet udsat blomk(cid:229)l? 5b. Hvordan p(cid:229)vises det, at der er opn(cid:229)et tilstr(cid:230)kkelig erfaring? (1) EFT C 345 af 15. 11. 1996, s. 92. (2) EFT L 117 af 8. 5. 1990, s. 15. (3) EFT L 292 af 18. 11. 1994, s. 31. (98/C 60/03) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-2395/96 af Hiltrud Breyer (V) til Kommissionen (6. september 1996) Om: Beslutning 94/730/EF fastl(cid:230)ggelse af forenklede procedurer for uds(cid:230)tning i miljłet af genetisk modificerede planter › retlig status Har indholdet af bilaget til beslutning 94/730/EF (1) for de medlemsstater, den er rettet til, i overensstem- 1. melse med artikel 1, stk. 5, og artikel 2, stk. 2, i beslutning 93/584/E(cid:216)F (2) samt artikel 4, stk. 1 og 3, artikel 5, nr. 1, og artikel 7 i uds(cid:230)tningsdirektivet 90/220/E(cid:216)F (3) karakter af forslag eller bindende bestemmelser efter EF-traktatens artikel 189, stk. 4? Drejer det sig i beslutning 94/730/EF om kriterier for anvendelse af en forenklet procedure eller om en 2. forenklet procedure som s(cid:229)dan? 3. S(cid:229)fremt det drejer sig om kriterier, a) hvordan er gennemfłrelsen af kriterierne for anvendelse af den forenklede procedure da blevet undersłgt af Kommission, R(cid:229)d og Parlament, og b) hvilke muligheder for undersłgelse findes der? 4. S(cid:229)fremt det drejer sig om en procedure som s(cid:229)dan, a) hvordan er iv(cid:230)rks(cid:230)ttelsen og gennemfłrelsen da blevet undersłgt af Kommission, R(cid:229)d og Parlament, og b) hvilke muligheder for undersłgelse findes der? (1) EFT L 292 af 12. 11. 1994, s. 31. (2) EFT L 279 af 12. 11. 1993, s. 42. (3) EFT L 117 af 8. 5. 1990, s. 15. (98/C 60/04) SKRIFTLIG FORESP(cid:216)RGSEL E-2396/96 af Hiltrud Breyer (V) til Kommissionen (6. september 1996) Om: Beslutning 94/730/EF om fastl(cid:230)ggelse af forenklede procedurer for uds(cid:230)tning i miljłet af genetisk modificerede planter › EF-traktatens artikel 145 1. 2. 3. Hvorfor har Kommissionen med beslutning 94/730/EF (1) tilsidesat EF-traktatens artikel 145? Deler Kommissionen den opfattelse, at der foreligger en traktatkr(cid:230)nkelse? Hvordan kan dette i ben(cid:230)gtende fald begrundes? (1) EFT L 292 af 12. 11. 1994, s. 31


title: SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE Nr. 2395/96 von Hiltrud BREYER an die Kommission. Entscheidung 94/730/EG zur Festlegung von vereinfachten Verfahren für die absichtliche Freisetzung genetisch veränderter Pflanzen - rechtlicher Status (ERGAENZENDE ANTWORT)

text: C 60/2 DE Amtsblatt der Europa¤ischen Gemeinschaften 25. 2. 98 2. Wo ist definiert, was im Rahmen (cid:132)vereinfachter Verfahren(cid:147) (cid:132)angemessene Unterrichtung(cid:147) ist? 3. Welcher Zeitpunkt und welcher Umfang der Unterrichtung ist fu¤r die betroffene Bevo¤lkerung nach Art. 1 (1) Satz 1 der Richtlinie 90/220/EWG (2) bei (cid:132)vereinfachten(cid:147) Verfahren angemessen und aus welcher Vorschrift ergibt sich das? 4. Wann und in welchem Umfang wird die Bevo¤lkerung im Verfahren nach 6. 1 und 7. des Anhangs zu der Entscheidung 94/730/EWG (3) gema¤(cid:223) Ziffer 7. 1. und 7. 2. unterrichtet? 5a. Wo und wie oft wurde Blumenkohl freigesetzt? 5b. Wie wird die genu¤gende Erfahrung begru¤ndet? (1) ABl. C 345 vom 15. 11. 1996, S. 92. (2) ABl. L 117 vom 8. 5. 1990, S. 15. (3) ABl. L 292 vom 12. 11. 1994, S. 31. (98/C 60/03) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-2395/96 von Hiltrud Breyer (V) an die Kommission (6. September 1996) Betrifft: Entscheidung 94/730/EG zur Festlegung von vereinfachten Verfahren fu¤r die absichtliche Freisetzung genetisch vera¤nderter Pflanzen › rechtlicher Status Haben die Inhalte des Anhangs zur Entscheidung 94/730/EG (1) fu¤r die Mitgliedstaaten, an die sie sich 1. richtet, in U¤ bereinstimmung mit Artikel 1 Abs. 5 und Artikel 2 Abs. 2 der Entscheidung 93/584/EWG (2) und Art. 4 Abs. 1 und 3, Art. 5 Satz 1 und Art. 7 der Freisetzungsrichtlinie 90/220/EWG (3) Vorschlagscharakter oder Verbindlichkeit im Sinne von Artikel 189 Abs. 4 EG-Vertrag? Handelt es sich bei der Entscheidung 94/730/EG um Kriterien fu¤r ein vereinfachtes Verfahren oder um ein 2. vereinfachtes Verfahren selbst? 3. Wenn es sich um Kriterien handelt, a) wie wurde die Umsetzung der Kriterien fu¤r vereinfachte Verfahren durch Kommission, Ministerrat und Parlament gepru¤ft? b) welche Mo¤glichkeiten der U¤ berpru¤fung bestehen? 4. Wenn es sich um ein Verfahren selbst handelt, a) wie wurde die Einsetzung und Umsetzung durch Kommission, Ministerrat und Parlament gepru¤ft? b) welche Mo¤glichkeiten der U¤ berpru¤fung bestehen? (1) ABl. L 292 vom 12. 11. 1994, S. 31. (2) ABl. L 279 vom 12. 11. 1993, S. 42. (3) ABl. L 117 vom 8. 5. 1990, S. 15. (98/C 60/04) SCHRIFTLICHE ANFRAGE E-2396/96 von Hiltrud Breyer (V) an die Kommission (6. September 1996) Betrifft: Entscheidung 94/730/EG zur Festlegung von vereinfachten Verfahren fu¤r die absichtliche Freisetzung genetisch vera¤nderter Pflanzen › Artikel 145 des EG-Vertrags 1. Warum hat die Kommission bei der Entscheidung 94/730/EG (1) gegen Artikel 145 des EG-Vertrags versto(cid:223)en? 2. Teilt die Kommission die Auffassung, da(cid:223) eine Vertragsverletzung vorliegt? 3. Wenn nein, wie wird das begru¤ndet? (1) ABl. L 292 vom 12. 11. 1994, S. 31


title: INTERROGAZIONE SCRITTA n. 2382/96 dell'on. Glenys KINNOCK alla Commissione. Cooperazione allo sviluppo dell'Unione europea con l'Etiopia

eurovoc_concepts:
EDF
EU aid
Ethiopia
aid system
development aid
economic analysis
political cooperation
project evaluation


title: SCHRIFTELIJKE VRAAG nr. 2390/96 van Glyn FORD aan de Commissie. Prijsmaatregel voor farmaceutische produkten

eurovoc_concepts:
United Kingdom
application of EU law
competition
economic survey
imposed price
pharmaceutical product
selling price


title: REGLAMENTO (CE) N° 1740/96 DE LA COMISIÓN de 6 de septiembre de 1996 por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) n° 1179/96 y se eleva a 800 000 toneladas la licitación permanente para la exportación de cebada en poder del organismo de intervención alemán

eurovoc_concepts:
Germany
award of contract
barley
export
intervention agency
third country