import Mathlib set_option linter.unusedVariables.analyzeTactics true open Real lemma mylemma_1 (a b c : ℝ) (x y z : ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ 0 < c) (h₂: c ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a) (h₃: z ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x) : a * z + c * y + b * x ≤ c * z + b * y + a * x := by suffices h₄: c * (y - z) + b * (x - y) ≤ a * (x - z) . linarith . have h₅: c * (y - z) + b * (x - y) ≤ b * (y - z) + b * (x - y) := by simp refine mul_le_mul h₂.1 ?_ ?_ ?_ . exact le_rfl . exact sub_nonneg_of_le h₃.1 . exact le_of_lt h₀.2.1 refine le_trans h₅ ?_ rw [mul_sub, mul_sub, add_comm] rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_add_cancel] rw [← mul_sub] refine mul_le_mul h₂.2 ?_ ?_ ?_ . exact le_rfl . refine sub_nonneg_of_le ?_ exact le_trans h₃.1 h₃.2 . exact le_of_lt h₀.1 lemma mylemma_2 (a b c : ℝ) (x y z : ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ 0 < c) (h₂: c ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a) (h₃: z ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x) : b * z + a * y + c * x ≤ c * z + b * y + a * x := by suffices h₄: c * (x - z) + b * (z - y) ≤ a * (x - y) . linarith . have h₅: c * (x - z) + b * (z - y) ≤ b * (x - z) + b * (z - y) := by simp refine mul_le_mul h₂.1 ?_ ?_ ?_ . exact le_rfl . refine sub_nonneg_of_le ?_ exact le_trans h₃.1 h₃.2 . exact le_of_lt h₀.2.1 refine le_trans h₅ ?_ rw [mul_sub, mul_sub] rw [← add_sub_assoc, sub_add_cancel] rw [← mul_sub] refine mul_le_mul h₂.2 ?_ ?_ ?_ . exact le_rfl . exact sub_nonneg_of_le h₃.2 . exact le_of_lt h₀.1 -- case #1 lemma mylemma_cba (a b c : ℝ) (hap : 0 < a ) (hbp : 0 < b ) (hcp : 0 < c ) (h₁ : c < a + b) -- (h₂ : b < a + c) (h₃ : a < b + c) (hba: b ≤ a) (hcb: c ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a^2 * b * (a - b) + b^2 * c * (b - c) + c^2 * a * (c - a) := by have g₀: b * c ≤ a * c := by exact (mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right hcp).mpr hba have g₁: a * c ≤ a * b := by exact (mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left hap).mpr hcb have g₂: a * (b + c - a) ≤ b * (a + c - b) := by have g₂₁: 0 ≤ (a-b) * (a+b-c) := by refine mul_nonneg ?_ ?_ . exact sub_nonneg_of_le hba . refine le_of_lt ?_ exact sub_pos.mpr h₁ linarith have g₃: b * (a + c - b) ≤ c * (a + b - c) := by have g₃₁: 0 ≤ (b - c) * (b + c - a) := by refine mul_nonneg ?_ ?_ . exact sub_nonneg_of_le hcb . refine le_of_lt ?_ exact sub_pos.mpr h₃ linarith have g₄: (a * b) * (a * (b + c - a)) + (b * c) * (b * (a + c - b)) + (a * c) * (c * (a + b - c)) ≤ (b * c) * (a * (b + c - a)) + (a * c) * (b * (a + c - b)) + (a * b) * (c * (a + b - c)) := by refine mylemma_1 (a * b) (a * c) (b * c) (c * (a + b - c)) (b * (a + c - b)) (a * (b + c - a)) ?_ ?_ ?_ . constructor . exact mul_pos hap hbp . constructor . exact mul_pos hap hcp . exact mul_pos hbp hcp . exact { left := g₀, right := g₁ } . exact { left := g₂, right := g₃ } linarith -- tight version lemma mylemma_cba_tight (a b c : ℝ) (hap : 0 < a ) (hbp : 0 < b ) (hcp : 0 < c ) (h₁ : c < a + b) -- (h₂ : b < a + c) (h₃ : a < b + c) (hba: b ≤ a) (hcb: c ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a^2 * c * (a - c) + c^2 * b * (c - b) + b^2 * a * (b - a) := by have g₀: b * c ≤ a * c := by exact (mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right hcp).mpr hba have g₁: a * c ≤ a * b := by exact (mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left hap).mpr hcb have g₂: a * (b + c - a) ≤ b * (a + c - b) := by have g₂₁: 0 ≤ (a-b) * (a+b-c) := by refine mul_nonneg ?_ ?_ . exact sub_nonneg_of_le hba . refine le_of_lt ?_ exact sub_pos.mpr h₁ linarith have g₃: b * (a + c - b) ≤ c * (a + b - c) := by have g₃₁: 0 ≤ (b - c) * (b + c - a) := by refine mul_nonneg ?_ ?_ . exact sub_nonneg_of_le hcb . refine le_of_lt ?_ exact sub_pos.mpr h₃ linarith have g₄: (a * c) * (a * (b + c - a)) + (a * b) * (b * (a + c - b)) + (b * c) * (c * (a + b - c)) ≤ (b * c) * (a * (b + c - a)) + (a * c) * (b * (a + c - b)) + (a * b) * (c * (a + b - c)) := by refine mylemma_2 (a * b) (a * c) (b * c) (c * (a + b - c)) (b * (a + c - b)) (a * (b + c - a)) ?_ ?_ ?_ . constructor . exact mul_pos hap hbp . constructor . exact mul_pos hap hcp . exact mul_pos hbp hcp . exact { left := g₀, right := g₁ } . exact { left := g₂, right := g₃ } linarith theorem imo_1983_p6 (a b c : ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ 0 < c) (h₁ : c < a + b) (h₂ : b < a + c) (h₃ : a < b + c) : 0 ≤ a^2 * b * (a - b) + b^2 * c * (b - c) + c^2 * a * (c - a) := by wlog ho₀: b ≤ a generalizing a b c . clear this push_neg at ho₀ wlog ho₁: c ≤ b generalizing a b c . clear this push_neg at ho₁ -- a < b < c rw [add_comm] at h₁ h₂ h₃ have g₀: 0 ≤ c ^ 2 * a * (c - a) + a ^ 2 * b * (a - b) + b ^ 2 * c * (b - c) := by exact mylemma_cba_tight c b a h₀.2.2 h₀.2.1 h₀.1 h₃ h₁ (le_of_lt ho₁) (le_of_lt ho₀) linarith . wlog ho₂: c ≤ a generalizing a b c . clear this -- a < c ≤ b push_neg at ho₂ rw [add_comm] at h₁ h₂ have g₀: 0 ≤ b ^ 2 * c * (b - c) + c ^ 2 * a * (c - a) + a ^ 2 * b * (a - b) := by exact mylemma_cba b c a h₀.2.1 h₀.2.2 h₀.1 h₃ h₂ ho₁ (le_of_lt ho₂) linarith . -- c ≤ a < b rw [add_comm] at h₁ have g₀: 0 ≤ b ^ 2 * c * (b - c) + c ^ 2 * a * (c - a) + a ^ 2 * b * (a - b) := by exact mylemma_cba_tight b a c h₀.2.1 h₀.1 h₀.2.2 h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt ho₀) ho₂ linarith . wlog ho₁: c ≤ b generalizing a b c . clear this push_neg at ho₁ wlog ho₂: c ≤ a generalizing a b c . clear this push_neg at ho₂ -- b < a < c rw [add_comm] at h₂ h₃ have g₀: 0 ≤ c ^ 2 * a * (c - a) + a ^ 2 * b * (a - b) + b ^ 2 * c * (b - c) := by exact mylemma_cba c a b h₀.2.2 h₀.1 h₀.2.1 h₂ h₁ (le_of_lt ho₂) ho₀ linarith . rw [add_comm] at h₃ exact mylemma_cba_tight a c b h₀.1 h₀.2.2 h₀.2.1 h₂ h₃ ho₂ (le_of_lt ho₁) . exact mylemma_cba a b c h₀.1 h₀.2.1 h₀.2.2 h₁ h₃ ho₀ ho₁