import Mathlib set_option linter.unusedVariables.analyzeTactics true theorem imo_1965_p2 (x y z : ℝ) (a : ℕ → ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < a 0 ∧ 0 < a 4 ∧ 0 < a 8) (h₁ : a 1 < 0 ∧ a 2 < 0) (h₂ : a 3 < 0 ∧ a 5 < 0) (h₃ : a 6 < 0 ∧ a 7 < 0) (h₄ : 0 < a 0 + a 1 + a 2) (h₅ : 0 < a 3 + a 4 + a 5) (h₆ : 0 < a 6 + a 7 + a 8) (h₇ : a 0 * x + a 1 * y + a 2 * z = 0) (h₈ : a 3 * x + a 4 * y + a 5 * z = 0) (h₉ : a 6 * x + a 7 * y + a 8 * z = 0) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 ∧ z = 0 := by by_cases hx0: x = 0 . rw [hx0] at h₇ constructor . exact hx0 . rw [hx0] at h₈ h₉ simp at h₇ h₈ h₉ by_cases hy0: y = 0 . constructor . exact hy0 . rw [hy0] at h₇ simp at h₇ . cases' h₇ with h₇₀ h₇₁ . exfalso linarith . exact h₇₁ . by_cases hyn: y < 0 . have g1: 0 < a 1 * y := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₁.1 hyn have g2: a 1 * y = -a 2 * z := by linarith rw [g2] at g1 have g3: a 2 *z < 0 := by linarith have hzp: 0 < z := by exact pos_of_mul_neg_right g3 (le_of_lt h₁.2) exfalso have g4: a 4 * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₀.2.1 hyn have g5: a 5 * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.2 hzp linarith . push_neg at hy0 hyn have hyp: 0 < y := by exact lt_of_le_of_ne hyn hy0.symm exfalso have g1: a 1 * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₁.1 hyp have g2: 0 < z * a 2 := by linarith have hzp: z < 0 := by exact neg_of_mul_pos_left g2 (le_of_lt h₁.2) have g3: 0 < a 4 * y := by exact mul_pos h₀.2.1 hyp have g4: 0 < a 5 * z := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₂.2 hzp linarith . exfalso push_neg at hx0 by_cases hxp: 0 < x . by_cases hy0: y = 0 . rw [hy0] at h₇ h₈ h₉ simp at h₇ h₈ h₉ have g1: 0 < a 0 * x := by exact mul_pos h₀.1 hxp have g2: a 2 * z < 0 := by linarith have hzn: 0 < z := by exact pos_of_mul_neg_right g2 (le_of_lt h₁.2) have g3: a 3 * x < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.1 hxp have g4: a 5 * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.2 hzn linarith . push_neg at hy0 by_cases hyp: 0 < y . have g1: a 6 * x < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₃.1 hxp have g2: a 7 * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₃.2 hyp have g3: 0 < z * a 8 := by linarith have hzp: 0 < z := by exact pos_of_mul_pos_left g3 (le_of_lt h₀.2.2) ------ here we consider all the possible relationships between x, y, z by_cases rxy: x ≤ y . by_cases ryz: y ≤ z -- x <= y <= z . have g2: 0 < (a 6 + a 7 + a 8) * y := by exact mul_pos h₆ hyp have g3: 0 ≤ a 6 * (x-y) := by exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₃.1) (by linarith)-- exact mul_nonneg (le_of_lt h₃.1) (by linarith),}, have g4: 0 ≤ a 8 * (z-y) := by exact mul_nonneg (le_of_lt h₀.2.2) (by linarith) linarith push_neg at ryz by_cases rxz: x ≤ z -- x <= z < y . have g2: 0 < (a 3 + a 4 + a 5) * y := by exact mul_pos h₅ hyp have g3: 0 ≤ a 3 * (x-y) := by exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₂.1) (by linarith) have g4: 0 < a 5 * (z-y) := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₂.2 (by linarith) linarith push_neg at rxz -- z < x <= y have g2: 0 < (a 3 + a 4 + a 5) * y := by exact mul_pos h₅ hyp have g3: 0 ≤ a 3 * (x-y) := by exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₂.1) (by linarith) have g4: 0 < a 5 * (z-y) := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₂.2 (by linarith) linarith push_neg at rxy by_cases rzy: z ≤ y -- z <= y < x . have g2: 0 < (a 0 + a 1 + a 2) * y := by exact mul_pos h₄ hyp have g3: 0 < a 0 * (x-y) := by exact mul_pos h₀.1 (by linarith) have g4: 0 ≤ a 2 * (z-y) := by exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₁.2) (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rzy by_cases rzx: z ≤ x -- y < z <= x . have g2: 0 < (a 0 + a 1 + a 2) * z := by exact mul_pos h₄ hzp have g3: 0 ≤ a 0 * (x-z) := by exact mul_nonneg (le_of_lt h₀.1) (by linarith) have g4: 0 < a 1 * (y-z) := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₁.1 (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rzx -- y < x < z have g2: 0 < (a 6 + a 7 + a 8) * z := by exact mul_pos h₆ hzp have g3: 0 < a 6 * (x-z) := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₃.1 (by linarith) have g4: 0 < a 7 * (y-z) := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₃.2 (by linarith) linarith -------- new world where y < 0 and 0 < x . push_neg at hyp have hyn: y < 0 := by exact lt_of_le_of_ne hyp hy0 -- show from a 0 that 0 < z have g1: 0 < a 0 * x := by exact mul_pos h₀.1 hxp have g2: 0 < a 1 * y := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₁.1 hyn have g3: a 2 * z < 0 := by linarith have hzp: 0 < z := by exact pos_of_mul_neg_right g3 (le_of_lt h₁.2) -- then show from a 3 that's not possible have g4: a 3 * x < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.1 hxp have g5: a 4 * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₀.2.1 hyn have g6: a 5 * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.2 hzp linarith . push_neg at hxp have hxn: x < 0 := by exact lt_of_le_of_ne hxp hx0 by_cases hyp: 0 ≤ y . have g1: a 0 * x < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₀.1 hxn have g2: a 1 * y ≤ 0 := by refine mul_nonpos_iff.mpr ?_ right constructor . exact le_of_lt h₁.1 . exact hyp have g3: 0 < z * a 2 := by linarith have hzn: z < 0 := by exact neg_of_mul_pos_left g3 (le_of_lt h₁.2) -- demonstrate the contradiction have g4: 0 < a 3 * x := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₂.1 hxn have g5: 0 ≤ a 4 * y := by exact mul_nonneg (le_of_lt h₀.2.1) hyp have g6: 0 < a 5 * z := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₂.2 hzn linarith . push_neg at hyp -- have hyn: y < 0, {exact lt_of_le_of_ne hyp hy0,}, have g1: 0 < a 6 * x := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₃.1 hxn have g2: 0 < a 7 * y := by exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg h₃.2 hyp have g3: z * a 8 < 0 := by linarith have hzp: z < 0 := by exact neg_of_mul_neg_left g3 (le_of_lt h₀.2.2) -- we have x,y,z < 0 -- we will examine all the orders they can have by_cases rxy: x ≤ y . by_cases ryz: y ≤ z -- x <= y <= z . have g2: (a 0 + a 1 + a 2) * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₄ hyp have g3: a 0 * (x-y) ≤ 0 := by exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₀.1) (by linarith) have g4: a 2 * (z-y) ≤ 0 := by exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h₁.2) (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at ryz by_cases rxz: x ≤ z -- x <= z < y . have g2: (a 0 + a 1 + a 2) * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₄ hzp have g3: a 0 * (x-z) ≤ 0 := by exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₀.1) (by linarith) have g4: a 1 * (y-z) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₁.1 (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rxz -- z < x <= y have g2: (a 6 + a 7 + a 8) * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₆ hzp have g3: a 6 * (x-z) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₃.1 (by linarith) have g4: a 7 * (y-z) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₃.2 (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rxy by_cases rzy: z ≤ y -- z <= y < x . have g2: (a 6 + a 7 + a 8) * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₆ hyp have g3: a 6 * (x-y) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₃.1 (by linarith) have g4: a 8 * (z-y) ≤ 0 := by exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_of_lt h₀.2.2) (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rzy by_cases rzx: z ≤ x -- y < z <= x . have g2: (a 3 + a 4 + a 5) * z < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₅ hzp have g3: a 3 * (x-z) ≤ 0 := by exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (le_of_lt h₂.1) (by linarith) have g4: a 4 * (y-z) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₀.2.1 (by linarith) linarith . push_neg at rzx -- y < x < z have g2: (a 3 + a 4 + a 5) * y < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg h₅ hyp have g3: a 3 * (x-y) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.1 (by linarith) have g4: a 5 * (z-y) < 0 := by exact mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos h₂.2 (by linarith) linarith