these difficulties include cold welding between the screw head and locking screw hole , stripping of the recess of the screw head for the screwdriver , and cross - threading between threads in the screw head and screw hole . however , there are cases in which removal is difficult .
we describe a new technique for removing a round headed , jammed locking screws from a locking plate .
55 years old male patient received a locking distal tibial plate along with distal fibular plate 3years back from uae .
now patient came with complaint of non - healing ulcer over medial aspect of lower 1/3rd of right leg from past 1 year .
the patient consented to implant removal , with the express understanding that implant removal might be impossible because already one failed attempt had been performed at some other hospital six months back .
we used stainless steel metal cutting blades that are used to cut door locks or pad locks to cut the remaining stripped headed screws .
this technique is very quick , easy to perform and inexpensive because the metal cutting blades which are used to cut the screws are very cheap .
yet it is very effective technique to remove the stripped headed or jammed locking screws .
it is also very less destructive because of very less heat production during the procedure there is no problem of thermal necrosis to the bone or the surrounding soft tissue .
these difficulties include cold welding between the screw head and locking screw hole , stripping of the recess of the screw head for the screwdriver , and cross - threading between threads in the screw head and screw hole .
these include using a conical extraction screw , cutting the plate , and using high - speed carbide drill bits and burrs to remove the screw heads , and removing the shanks with conical extraction screws .
the available screw removal kits make implant removal successful more often than not . however , there are cases in which removal is difficult .
we describe a new technique for removing a round headed , jammed locking screws from a locking plate .
preoperative antero - posterior and lateral view showing locking plate in distal tibia with 5 distal locking screws and 5 proximal locking screws .
the 55 years old male patient received a locking distal tibial plate along with distal fibular plate 3years back from uae . now
patient came with complaint of non healing ulcer over medial aspect of lower 1/3rd of right leg from past 1 year .
the patient consented to implant removal , with the express understanding that implant removal might be impossible because already one failed attempt had been performed at some other hospital six months back .
we used the ao synthes screw extraction kit along with conical extraction screw ( ao synthes ) but the screws did not come out .
we used stainless steel metal cutting blades that are used to cut door locks or pad locks to cut the remaining stripped headed screws .
firstly , after exposing the plate to be removed a space is created between locking plate and bone adjacent to screws to be cut with the help of sharp osteotome .
then an iron cutting blade which was previously autoclaved introduced between plate and bone adjacent to screws to be cut and with to and fro motion all the remaining screws were cut .
the remaining threaded parts of screws were left in the bone because there removal may further weaken the bone .
screws were cut with care with slow to and fro motion of blades but with firm pressure on blade to avoid any unnecessary soft tissue injury .
it only takes 10 minutes to cut all the remaining 4 proximal screws and there was no heating problem during the cutting of screws as there is with other procedures such carbide drills and high speed burrs . at the end of the procedure ,
we name this technique as rohit s technique for removal of stripped headed / jammed interlocking screws .
implant removal is considered for pain related to implants , part of treatment , and patient - requested implant removal .
risks of implant removal include wound - healing problems , neurovascular injury , failure to remove all of the implant , and refracture .
difficulties in removing a titanium locking screw include jammed screws , damage to the recess in the screw head ( stripping ) for the screwdriver , and broken screws .
instruments including conical extraction screws , hollow reamers , extraction bolts , modular devices , and carbide drill bits have been described in the methods used for removing locking screws [ 2 , 6 ] .
it also is accepted that no one technique can solve all problems in implant removal .
we believe failure to remove the distal screws directly with the conical extraction screw was attributable to the following factors :   jamming of the screw head in the locking screw hole , owing to cross - threading and not necessarily cold welding ;   grip of the screw threads in the far cortex ;   bony growth over the titanium screw at the far cortex ; and   as the conical extraction screw was inserted , the screw head jammed farther in the screw hole by expanding the screw head .
there is always the danger of thermal bone necrosis or iatrogenic bony injury when using high speed burrs and discs .
but our technique is less destructive as produces very less heat as compared to any others because it is not mechanical but a manual procedure .
intraoperative picture showing remaining threaded part of screws in the bone afte removal of plate along with jammed / stripped heads of screws .
post operative picture of removed tibial plate along with jammed screws in plate that are cut along the undersurface of plate .
it is essential to have all the appropriate implant removal instruments , including carbide drill bits and high - speed burrs and discs , and prepare for a long procedure .
the risks of high - speed burrs and discs are high local temperature and metal debris .
this technique requires running normal saline solution and continuous suction to remove all the metal debris .
this technique is very quick , easy to perform and inexpensive because the metal cutting blades which are used to cut the screws are very cheap .
yet it is very effective technique to remove the stripped headed or jammed locking screws .
it is also very less destructive because of very less heat production during the procedure there is no problem of thermal necrosis to the bone or the surrounding soft tissue .
inexpensive & effective method for removal of such implants which are extremely difficult as a result of round headed , cold welding and jammed locking screws heads .
 introduction : the advent of locking plates has brought new problems in implant removal . 
 difficulty in removing screws from a locking plate is well - known . 
 these difficulties include cold welding between the screw head and locking screw hole , stripping of the recess of the screw head for the screwdriver , and cross - threading between threads in the screw head and screw hole . however , there are cases in which removal is difficult . 
 we describe a new technique for removing a round headed , jammed locking screws from a locking plate.case report:55 years old male patient received a locking distal tibial plate along with distal fibular plate 3years back from uae . 
 now patient came with complaint of non - healing ulcer over medial aspect of lower 1/3rd of right leg from past 1 year . 
 non operative management did not improve the symptoms . 
 the patient consented to implant removal , with the express understanding that implant removal might be impossible because already one failed attempt had been performed at some other hospital six months back . 
 we then decided to proceed with the new technique . 
 the rest of the proximal screws were removed using a technique not previously described . 
 we used stainless steel metal cutting blades that are used to cut door locks or pad locks to cut the remaining stripped headed screws.conclusion:this technique is very quick , easy to perform and inexpensive because the metal cutting blades which are used to cut the screws are very cheap . 
 yet it is very effective technique to remove the stripped headed or jammed locking screws . 
 it is also very less destructive because of very less heat production during the procedure there is no problem of thermal necrosis to the bone or the surrounding soft tissue . 
Introduction:
Case Report:
Conclusion:
Introduction
Case report
Discussion
Conclusion