one of the most frequently asked questions to those of us at june is what kinds of manuscripts are appropriate for inclusion in the journal .
any manuscript with the aim of enabling others to enhance their teaching of neuroscience to undergraduates is appropriate ; those with empirically - tested protocols of innovative pedagogy are particularly welcomed and prioritized for publication in june . beyond manuscripts devoted to new classroom approaches and laboratory exercises ,
a variety of manuscripts in other aspects that are relevant to undergraduate neuroscience education are welcomed , such as : 
 editorials .
june welcomes book reviews ranging from popular press volumes relevant to neuroscience to textbooks.media reviews .
june welcomes reviews of media such as films , television shows , websites , and software that may have particular value to neuroscience education.commentaries .
june welcomes reviews of media such as films , television shows , websites , and software that may have particular value to neuroscience education .
manuscripts must be properly formatted according to the instructions to authors available at the june website ( http://funjournal.org ) .
manuscripts should be carefully proofread , and attention should be given to both the flow and appearance of information and positioning of tables , figures , and captions . to facilitate indexing ,
authors are welcome to provide a list of suggested reviewers , which may or may not be used in the review of their article .
the first step in the process is an initial screen by the editors to ensure that the manuscript is appropriate for the journal .
if not , a notification indicating why the manuscript does not fit the criteria for inclusion in june is sent to the author(s ) . sometimes , an editor may provide suggestions of how the manuscript may be modified to better fit the criteria .
once the initial reviews are received , the editors make a decision to accept , request revisions and resubmissions , or reject .
often times the difference between acceptance and rejection hinges on a few key issues . in the case of manuscripts detailing innovative approaches to teaching , contentions of effectiveness
need to be supported with discussion of appropriate methods of assessment and supporting evidence provided by the results obtained . in some cases
, an author may inadvertently fail to obtain permission to use and discuss copyrighted material . in all cases
if an author has been asked to revise portions of their manuscript , a cover letter indicating how each of the reviewer s comments and concerns have been addressed should be included in the resubmission .
one of the most frequently asked questions to those of us at june is what kinds of manuscripts are appropriate for inclusion in the journal .
any manuscript with the aim of enabling others to enhance their teaching of neuroscience to undergraduates is appropriate ; those with empirically - tested protocols of innovative pedagogy are particularly welcomed and prioritized for publication in june . beyond manuscripts devoted to new classroom approaches and laboratory exercises ,
a variety of manuscripts in other aspects that are relevant to undergraduate neuroscience education are welcomed , such as : 
 editorials .
june welcomes book reviews ranging from popular press volumes relevant to neuroscience to textbooks.media reviews .
june welcomes reviews of media such as films , television shows , websites , and software that may have particular value to neuroscience education.commentaries .
june welcomes reviews of media such as films , television shows , websites , and software that may have particular value to neuroscience education .
manuscripts must be properly formatted according to the instructions to authors available at the june website ( http://funjournal.org ) .
manuscripts should be carefully proofread , and attention should be given to both the flow and appearance of information and positioning of tables , figures , and captions . to facilitate indexing ,
authors are welcome to provide a list of suggested reviewers , which may or may not be used in the review of their article .
the first step in the process is an initial screen by the editors to ensure that the manuscript is appropriate for the journal .
if not , a notification indicating why the manuscript does not fit the criteria for inclusion in june is sent to the author(s ) . sometimes , an editor may provide suggestions of how the manuscript may be modified to better fit the criteria .
all manuscripts that are deemed appropriate for the journal are sent to reviewers . once the initial reviews are received ,
the editors make a decision to accept , request revisions and resubmissions , or reject .
often times the difference between acceptance and rejection hinges on a few key issues . in the case of manuscripts detailing innovative approaches to teaching , contentions of effectiveness
need to be supported with discussion of appropriate methods of assessment and supporting evidence provided by the results obtained . in some cases
, an author may inadvertently fail to obtain permission to use and discuss copyrighted material . in all cases
if an author has been asked to revise portions of their manuscript , a cover letter indicating how each of the reviewer s comments and concerns have been addressed should be included in the resubmission .
there is a range of ways readers of june can contribute to the journal beyond the submission of manuscripts .
one very important way is to use the journal as a resource in your own teaching and to encourage your colleagues to do this as well .
in addition , you can promote june to other neuroscience educators , encouraging them to read the journal and to submit manuscripts discussing their own approaches and innovative techniques for teaching neuroscience .
it s important to support june in another way as well  by joining and holding membership in fun .
while june is an open - access journal and free to all , june does cost money to publish .
fun members , through a portion of their very reasonable annual dues , provide critical support for june . consider also being a reviewer for june .
one is to become an ad hoc reviewer ; to do so , simply send the editor  in - chief a short email message expressing your willingness to review articles , indicating your particular areas of expertise .
while review board members are regularly called on to complete reviews , such service is typically limited to two or three reviews per year .
review board members are also considered to fill vacancies that happen periodically on the editorial board
. to be considered for service on the june review board , please contact the june editor - in - chief regarding a possible appointment .
june has come a long way since being founded in 2002 . through the efforts of our contributing authors , reviewers , and the entire editorial board ,
june has contributed to the success of undergraduate programs and neuroscience education around the globe .
an important milestone for the second decade of june will be the successful completion of our efforts to become indexed across major databases and services , including psych info , scopus , the national science digital library , the directory of open access journals , medline and pubmed ( grisham , 2012 ) . at this writing , only indexing in medline and pubmed remain to be accomplished , and the application process is partially completed . as technology changes and new avenues for electronic communication become available , expect june to change as well , adding new features or altering existing ones to reflect latest developments .
with support from fun members , the undergraduate neuroscience educational community will continue to have a readily available venue for learning about the latest innovations in laboratory exercises and improved teaching approaches .
be sure to visit june online at ( http://funjournal.org ) , in person at the fun and at the society for neuroscience annual meetings , or both .
publish in , and review articles for june and join in the fun of promoting undergraduate neuroscience education and research .
 in the fall of 2002 , the faculty for undergraduate neuroscience ( fun ) began publication of its flagship journal , the journal of undergraduate neuroscience education ( june ) . 
 for the past ten years , june has been a major forum for the free exchange of information among undergraduate neuroscience educators . 
 numerous articles on laboratory exercises , media , pedagogy , curriculum , and issues pertinent to neuroscience educators have been published in june during the past decade . 
 given the vast expertise in pedagogy amongst the fun membership and within the undergraduate neuroscience education community at large , we strongly encourage all fun members and june readers to become actively involved in june by contributing manuscripts and/or by offering your services as a reviewer . 
WRITING FOR THE JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION
Types of manuscripts 
Submitting manuscripts to 
OTHER WAYS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION
THE JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION: THE NEXT TEN YEARS