opinion: ETABLISSMENTS RIGAUD, Inc., Appellant, v. Jane M. HOEY, as Executrix of the Estate of James J. Hoey, Deceased, Appellee.
  No. 306.
  Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
  June 28, 1943.
  Walter L. Post, of New York City (Edward Holloway, of New York City, and Robert M. Post, of White Plains, of counsel), for appellant.
  William L. Lynch, and Mathias F. Correa, U. S. Atty., both of New York City, for appellee.
  Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
  PER CURIAM.
  Affirmed on opinion below, SO F.Supp. S98.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: auto industry chemical industry drug industry food industry oil & gas industry clothing & textile industry electronic industry alcohol and tobacco industry other unclear