opinion: FOUST INVESTMENT COMPANY, Inc., a Debtor, Appellant, v. CREST INVESTMENT TRUST, INCORPORATED, and Maryland Holding Company, Incorporated, Appellees. In the Matter of Foust Investment Company, Inc., a Debtor.
  No. 11239.
  United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
  Argued May 5, 1967.
  Decided Aug. 29, 1967.
  Woodrow E. Faulkner, Washington, D. C. (Ralph R. Curry, Arlington, Va., on brief), for appellant.
  Irving Bowers, Baltimore, Md., for Crest Investment Trust, Inc.
  Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
  PER CURIAM:
  Foust Investment Company, Inc., filed its petition for a reorganization under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act in the District Court at Alexandria, Virginia. Foust is a Virginia corporation whose principal assets consist of an old, nonoperating, dilapidated distillery in Glen Rock, Pennsylvania, and certain distilling equipment. No plan of reorganization was disclosed and no current financial statement indicating insolvency was ever presented to the court. After an oral hearing leave was granted to file a current and up-to-date financial statement disclosing the true financial condition of the corporation but no such statement was filed. The petition was dismissed primarily for failure of petitioner to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 530(4), (6), (7), and for lack of a showing of good faith in compliance with 11 U.S.C. § 541.
  Upon consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel we cannot say that the court erred in dismissing the petition.
  Affirmed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "financial institution". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: bank insurance savings and loan credit union other pension fund other financial institution or investment company unclear