opinion: Patricia F. CHILDRESS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Combined Insurance Company of America et al., Defendants.
  No. 78-1578
  Summary Calendar.
  United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
  Jan. 9, 1979.
  Francis G. Weller, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.
  Dan C. Garner & Associates, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
  Before CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.
  Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
  PER CURIAM:
  The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the district court, 461 F.Supp. 704.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "financial institution". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: bank insurance savings and loan credit union other pension fund other financial institution or investment company unclear