opinion: UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., Appellant, v. CENTROPOLIS BANK OF KANSAS CITY, MO., a CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.
  (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
  February 16, 1927.)
  No. 7412.
  Appeal from the District Court of the-United States for the Western District of Missouri; Merrill E. Otis, Judge.
  Whitson Rogers and Ellison A. Neel, both.of Kansas City, Mo. (Armwell L. Cooper,. of Kansas City, Mo., and Joseph A. McCullough and John M. McFall, both of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.
  Leslie J. Lyons and Ilus M. Lee, both of Kansas City, Mo. (R. R. Brewster and Henry M. Griffith, both of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for appellees.
  Before BOOTH, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judges.
  PHILLIPS, District Judge.
  This appeal presents the same questions of law upon substantially the same state of facts which were considered and decided in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Centropolis Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, a Corporation, et al. (No. 7411; opinion filed February 9, 1927) 17 F.(2d) 913.
  On the authority of that ease, the decree of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to modify the decree and award the appellant a mandatory injunction, directing and commanding C. E. French, commissioner of finance, and H. F. Lawrence, deputy commissioner of finance, to allow the claim of the appellant against the assets of the Centropolis Bank of Kansas City, Mo., and to pay to the appellant dividends thereon, pro rata with the general creditors of the bank.
  The costs of the appeal will be assessed equally against Jackson county and the commissioner of finance as liquidating officers of the bank.
  It is so ordered.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "financial institution". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: bank insurance savings and loan credit union other pension fund other financial institution or investment company unclear