opinion: DOLPHIN v. STARR, Postmaster.
  No. 10135.
  Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  Sept. 16, 1942.
  Edgar S. Hadley, of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
  J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., and Gerald Shucklin, and Tom A. Durham, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
  Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
  PER CURIAM.
  The sole question presented to this court in this case, namely, whether the Postmaster General of the United States is an indispensable party to a suit of this nature, has been heretofore decided by this court, and the question is no longer open to dispute. We held, in Neher v. Harwood, Postmaster, etc., 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 846, 852, that the Postmaster General was an indispensable party in an action to enjoin a postmaster from carrying into effect a “fraud” order issued by the Postmaster General under 39 U.S. C.A. § 259.
  Accordingly, the order of the court below is affirmed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: auto industry chemical industry drug industry food industry oil & gas industry clothing & textile industry electronic industry alcohol and tobacco industry other unclear