opinion: ELLIOTT TRUCK PARTS, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. ELLIOTT TRUCK PARTS, INC., Appellee.
  Nos. 13425, 13426.
  United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
  Dec. 11, 1958.
  Charles A. Bryan, Detroit, Mich., for Elliott Truck Parts, Inc.
  Paul A. Sweeney, Howard E. Shapiro, Washington, D. C., Fred W. Kaess, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for the United States.
  Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
  PER CURIAM.
  This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal of Elliott Truck Parts, Inc., and upon the cross-appeal of the United States of America;
  And having been duly considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and upon the record in the cause, this court is of opinion that the judgment of the district court awarding plaintiff the total amount of $38,381.43 [being a modification of plaintiff’s claim mitigating damages] should be affirmed upon the basis of the opinion of United States District Judge Picard, D.C., 149 F.Supp. 52, consisting of his findings of fact and conclusions of law, dealing in detail with the issues involved.
  Affirmed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: auto industry chemical industry drug industry food industry oil & gas industry clothing & textile industry electronic industry alcohol and tobacco industry other unclear