opinion: FERRO, INC., and Bolling R. Powell, Jr., Appellants v. JOHN THOMPSON BEACON WINDOWS, LTD., Appellee.
  No. 15533.
  United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
  Argued April 14, 1960.
  Decided April 28, 1960.
  Petition for Rehearing Denied June 13, 1960.
  Mr. Bolling R. Powell, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellants.
  Mr. John J. Sexton, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Harry M. Plotkin, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
  Before Mr. Justice Reed, retired, and Edgerton and Bastían, Circuit Judges.
  Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 294(a).
  PER CURIAM.
  a n x x, t -ix Appellant Ferro, Inc., an insolvent eorporation, paid its debt to appellant Powell, its sole stockholder and managing director. The District Court found that. this Pansier of the corporation’s funds. was made with intent “to hinder or delay” appellee, a creditor. The finding . , . , . , ,, is not clearly erroneous and supports the court’s conclusion that the transfer was vo^ as a&ainst aPPe^ee under D.C.Code, § 12-401.
  Affirmed,
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: auto industry chemical industry drug industry food industry oil & gas industry clothing & textile industry electronic industry alcohol and tobacco industry other unclear