opinion: Carl Allen COLE, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
  No. 7096.
  United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
  Dec. 3, 1962.
  Eugene J. Roberts, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
  Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
  Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges.
  PER CURIAM.
  This appeal was submitted to the Court after oral argument at the November term. Petitioner, then in the custody of the State of Kansas, sought relief by way of Writ of Error Coram Nobis from a judgment of conviction for a federal offense and the sentence imposed pursuant to such judgment upon claim that the federal sentence, although fully served, formed the basis for his retention by the State of Kansas. We are now informed that petitioner has since been released from state custody pursuant to a Writ of Habeas Corpus issued by the Kansas state court. The issues of this appeal are thus moot and the appeal is dismissed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. You will be asked a question pertaining to issues that may appear in civil law issues involving government actors. The issue is: "Did the court support the decision of an administrative law judge? Answer the question based on the directionality of the appeals court decision. If the court discussed the issue in its opinion and answered the related question in the affirmative, answer "Yes". If the issue was discussed and the opinion answered the question negatively, answer "No". If the opinion considered the question but gave a mixed answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part, answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion does not discuss the issue, or notes that a particular issue was raised by one of the litigants but the court dismissed the issue as frivolous or trivial or not worthy of discussion for some other reason, answer "Issue not discussed". If the opinion considered the question but gave a "mixed" answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part (or if two issues treated separately by the court both fell within the area covered by one question and the court answered one question affirmatively and one negatively), answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion either did not consider or discuss the issue at all or if the opinion indicates that this issue was not worthy of consideration by the court of appeals even though it was discussed by the lower court or was raised in one of the briefs, answer "Issue not discussed".