opinion: Niels R. J. ELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY.
  No. 16640.
  United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
  Submitted on Briefs Jan. 18, 1968.
  Decided Feb. 15, 1968.
  Niels R. J. Ellis, pro se.
  Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, State of New Jersey, New Brunswick, N. J. (Christopher R. Wood, Legal Assistant, New Brunswick, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
  Before HASTIE, Chief Judge, GAN-EY, Circuit Judge, and WEINER, District Judge.
  OPINION OF THE COURT
  PER CURIAM.
  This appellant is a state prisoner serving a term of 15 to 25 years in prison pursuant to a conviction of murder on his plea of nolo contendere. He now seeks relief by federal habeas corpus.
  The district court analyzed each of the prisoner’s contentions and denied habeas corpus in a carefully reasoned, very detailed and sound opinion with which we agree.
  The judgment will be affirmed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. You will be asked a question pertaining to issues that may appear in civil law issues involving government actors. The issue is: "Did the court conclude that it should defer to agency discretion? For example, if the action was committed to agency discretion. Answer the question based on the directionality of the appeals court decision. If the court discussed the issue in its opinion and answered the related question in the affirmative, answer "Yes". If the issue was discussed and the opinion answered the question negatively, answer "No". If the opinion considered the question but gave a mixed answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part, answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion does not discuss the issue, or notes that a particular issue was raised by one of the litigants but the court dismissed the issue as frivolous or trivial or not worthy of discussion for some other reason, answer "Issue not discussed". If the opinion considered the question but gave a "mixed" answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part (or if two issues treated separately by the court both fell within the area covered by one question and the court answered one question affirmatively and one negatively), answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion either did not consider or discuss the issue at all or if the opinion indicates that this issue was not worthy of consideration by the court of appeals even though it was discussed by the lower court or was raised in one of the briefs, answer "Issue not discussed".