opinion: TRIANGLE IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL et al. v. RITCHIE, COMMISSIONER, STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, et al.
  No. 712.
  Argued March 22, 1971
  Decided May 17, 1971
  Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, Elizabeth B. DuBois, and Thomas J. O’Sullivan.
  William Bradford Reynolds argued the cause for the federal respondents pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Gray. Stanley E. Preiser argued the cause and filed a brief for the state respondents.
  Kenneth F. Phillips filed a brief for the National Housing and Economic Development Law Project as amicus curiae urging reversal.
  Per Curiam.
  The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason