opinion: HARTMAN v. UNITED STATES.
  No. 447,
  Misc.
  Decided June 25, 1962.
  Lawrence Speiser for petitioner.
  Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls for the United States.
  Per Curiam.
  The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.
  Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
  Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason