opinion: ANDERSON v. ALABAMA.
  No. 326.
  Argued April 25-26, 1961.
  Decided May 1, 1961.
  Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Hall, Fred D. Gray, Orzell Billingsley and Thurgood Marshall.
  David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General.
  Per Curiam.
  The judgment is reversed. Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U. S. 354; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U. S. 282; Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U. S. 475.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason