opinion: SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA.
  No. 301, Misc.
  Decided April 15, 1963.
  Petitioner pro se.
  Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Calvin W. Torrance, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
  Per Curiam.
  The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
  Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason