CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner
v.
Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.
No. 16-1495.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 29, 2018.
David R. Cooper, Lauren Laushman, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith LLP, Topeka, KS, John T. Bird, City Attorney, Glassman, Bird, Brown, & Powell LLP, Hays, KS, Toby J. Heytens, Daniel R. Ortiz, University of Virginia, School of Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Charlottesville, VA, for Petitioner.
Morgan L. Roach, McCauley & Roach, LLC, Kansas City, MO, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Thomas M. Bondy, Benjamin Chagnon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Daniel A. Rubens, Alison M. Kilmartin, Haley Jankowski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason