HINKLE, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. v. NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 28.
Argued October 15, 1958.
Decided November 10, 1958.
Leland S. Forrest argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
Phineas M. Henry argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Vincent V. B. Booth.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari in this case is dismissed as improvidently granted. See Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, 261 U. S. 387; Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 U. S. 701, 707-708; General Box Co. v. United States, 351 U. S. 159, 165.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason