WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN et al.
No. 82-2042.
Argued March 19, 1984
Decided April 30, 1984
James W. Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Walter A. Paulson II and Stuart I. Saltman.
Clyde E. Murphy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, 0. Peter Sherwood, Ronald L. Ellis, Judith Reed, and John W. Walker
Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Barbara L. Neilson filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason