SUPERIOR FILMS, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF OHIO, DIVISION OF FILM CENSORSHIP, HISSONG, SUPERINTENDENT.
NO. 217.
Argued January 6, 1954.
Decided January 18, 1954.
John C. Harlor argued the cause for appellant in No. 217. With him on the brief were F. J. Wright and Michael Oesas. Earl F. Morris was also of counsel.
Florence Perlow Shientag argued the cause for appellant in No. 274. With her on the brief was Philip J. O’Brien, Jr.
C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, argued the cause for appellee in No. 217. With him on the brief were Robert E. Leach, Chief Counsel, and Gwynne B. Myers, Assistant Attorney General.
Charles A. Brind, Jr. argued the cause for appellees in No. 274. With him on the brief were Nathaniel L. Gold-stein, Attorney General of New York, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Ruth Kessler Toch, Assistant Attorney General.
Briefs of amici curiae supporting appellant in No. 217 were filed by Sidney A. Schreiber and Philip J. O’Brien, Jr. for the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. et al.; and by Morris L. Ernst for the National Council on Freedom from Censorship, a Committee of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Per Curiam.
The judgments are reversed. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U. S. 495.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason