HUGHES et al. v. WMCA, INC., et al.
No. 623.
Decided February 1, 1965
John H. Hughes, pro se, for appellants in No. 623.
.Leonard B. Sand, Max Gross, Leo A. Larkin, Jack B. ■Weinstein and Robert B. McKay for appellees in No, 623.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. Mcllwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, David J. Mays and Henry T. Wickham for appellants in No. 718.
Edmund D. Campbell and E. A. Prichard for Mann et al., and Henry E. Howell, Jr., Leonard B. Sachs and Sidney H. Kelsey for Glanville et al., appellees in No. 718.
Together with No. 718, Davis, Secretary, State Board of Elections, et al. v. Mann et al., on appeal from the' United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and. the judgments are affirmed.
Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Goldberg join the affirmance in No. 623 since it is their understanding that it in no way interferes with the power of the District Court, in the light of circumstances as they may develop, to vacate or .otherwise modify its order requiring an election in the fall of 1965.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason