PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 39.
Argued November 14, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Peter G. Fetros, by appointment of the Court, 393 U. S. 812, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General.
Per Curiam.
The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents from the dismissal of the writ.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason