PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI et al.
No. 483.
Decided December 5, 1960.
Arthur C. Fink for appellant.
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450.
Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason