PALMER OIL CORP. et al. v. AMERADA PETROLEUM CORP. et al.
NO. 301.
Continued November 5, 1951.
Coleman Hayes, Mark H. Adams and Charles E. Jones for appellants in No. 301.
Reford Bond, Jr. for appellants in No. 302.
Harry D. Page íor the Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Earl A. Brown, Robert W. Richards and Charles B. Wallace for the ivfagnolia Petroleum Co.; M. D. Kirlifor the Sunray Oil Corporation; and Rayburn L. Foster, Harry Turner and R. M. Williams for the Phillips Petro- - leum Co., appellees.
Per Curiam.
The Court is advised that, on May 26, 1951, the Oklahoma Legislature repealed Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, the constitutionality of which is drawn in question by these appeals. The causes are therefore ordered/ continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals.
Cause' continued.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason