No. 29.
Nukk et al. v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Gloria Agrin and Blanch Freedman argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Gray Thoron argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop and L. Paul Winings.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Argued October 19, 1955. Decided October 24, 1955.
Per Curiam:
The Court is of opinion that the complaints do present a case and controversy. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for consideration on the merits.
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason