opinion: ROBINSON et al. v. JOHNSON et al.
  No. 67.
  Decided May 5, 1969.
  William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.
  Per Curiam.
  The judgment is affirmed.
  Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.
  Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason