opinion: MILLS et al. v. LOUISIANA.
  No. 74.
  Argued April 22, 1959.
  Decided June 8, 1959
  Eugene Stanley argued the cause for petitioners in No. 74. With him on the brief was Albert B. Koorie.
  Milo B. Williams argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 75.
  Michael E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, and J. David McNeill argued the causes for respondent. With Mr. Culligan on the brief were Jack P. F. Gremillion', Attorney General of Louisiana, and Richard A. Dowling.
  Together with No. 75, Mills v. Louisiana, also on certiorari to the same Court.
  Per Curiam.
  The judgments are affirmed. Knapp v. Schweitzer, 357 U.S. 371.
  Mr. Justice Brennan joins the Court’s opinion, reiterating his belief, expressed in Knapp v. Schweitzer, 357 U. S. 371, 381, that reconsideration of the holding in Feldman v. United States, 322 U. S. 487, is inappropriate in this case. He also reiterates his belief that nothing in this decision forecloses reconsideration of the Feldman holding in a case presenting the issue presented by Feldman.
choices: case did not arise on cert or cert not granted federal court conflict federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question putative conflict conflict between federal court and state court state court conflict federal court confusion or uncertainty state court confusion or uncertainty federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty to resolve important or significant question to resolve question presented no reason given other reason