opinion: PER CURIAM.
  The appellant prosecutes this appeal from an order of the District Court ratifying and confirming the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the order of the x'eferee in bankruptcy adjudicating it a bankrupt.
  Two judgments were entered against appellant by an Illinois Justice of the Peace. Executions were issued on the judgments and delivered to the constable. Under Illinois law liens arose upon appellant’s personal property when the executions were issued and delivered. Appellant did not vacate or discharge the liens within a thirty day period. No levy and return having been made the liens expired after seventy days. The petition for adjudication was filed five days thereafter.
  We conceive the main issue presented by the appeal to be whether an involuntary adjudication of bankruptcy premised on 11 U.S.C.A. § 21, sub. a(3) requix'es that the lien suffered or pex*mitted to remain unvacated and undischarged for the thirty day period also-remain unexpired at the time the petition is filed. We agx-ee with the conclusion reached by the referee and the District Court that it need not. In our opinion the “act of bankruptcy” is the failure-to vacate or discharge the lien during the thirty day period from the date of its-inception. Cf. Weinbrenner, Inc. v. Finne, 9 Cir., 105 F.2d 272.
  The record amply suppox’ts the finding of insolvency as of the time of failure to vacate or discharge the liens, and at the time the petition was filed.
  We have considered the additional and subsidiary issues raised, the arguments advanced by the appellant pertaining thereto, and the cases cited and relied upon in connection therewith, but we are of the view that none of them merit discussion.
  The order of the District Court is affirmed.
  Affirmed.
instruction: What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
  Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
  When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 
  
  Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.
choices: auto industry chemical industry drug industry food industry oil & gas industry clothing & textile industry electronic industry alcohol and tobacco industry other unclear