opinion: PALMER OIL CORP. et al. v. AMERADA PETROLEUM CORP. et al.
  NO. 301.
  Continued November 5, 1951.
  Coleman Hayes, Mark H. Adams and Charles E. Jones for appellants in No. 301.
  Reford Bond, Jr. for appellants in No. 302.
  Harry D. Page íor the Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Earl A. Brown, Robert W. Richards and Charles B. Wallace for the ivfagnolia Petroleum Co.; M. D. Kirlifor the Sunray Oil Corporation; and Rayburn L. Foster, Harry Turner and R. M. Williams for the Phillips Petro- - leum Co., appellees.
  Per Curiam.
  The Court is advised that, on May 26, 1951, the Oklahoma Legislature repealed Okla. Stat., 1941 (Cum. Supp. 1949), Tit. 52, §§ 286.1-286.17, the constitutionality of which is drawn in question by these appeals. The causes are therefore ordered/ continued for such period as will enable appellants with all convenient speed to secure in an appropriate state proceeding a determination as to the effect of this repeal on the matters raised in these appeals.
  Cause' continued.
choices: cert appeal bail certification docketing fee rehearing or restored to calendar for reargument injunction mandamus original prohibition stay writ of error writ of habeas corpus unspecified, other