My opponent is endorsed by Citizens United.
Sen. Claire McCaskill and Attorney General Josh Hawley have traded allegations of being cozy with dark money — political money with an unknown source — during their Senate contest. McCaskill has tied Hawley to Citizens United, the group behind the famous Supreme Court case that redefined rules for campaign finance. "The people who got unlimited anonymous money from corporations into elections is a group called Citizens United," McCaskill said during a Q&A on Sept. 10 at Truman State University. "My opponent is endorsed by Citizens United. He is all down for the dark money." We decided to investigate the claim. Context, court cases, conservative organizations Citizens United is an interest group for conservative causes. According to its website, Citizens United performs a number of functions — including production of documentaries pushing conservative ideas, advocacy campaigns for issues and contributions to candidates. The 2010 Citizens United vs. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court decision established corporations as people and money as speech. PolitiFact wrote in 2010: "While corporations are still barred from giving directly to federal candidates, they are no longer forced to create political action committees in order to spend money on electioneering. A corporation, the justices held, may simply spend funds from its own accounts." The Citizens United Political Victory Fund has donated $10,000 to Hawley’s Senate campaign (two $5,000 donations), per its website and FEC data. David Bossie, the president of Citizens United, wrote an op-ed favoring Hawley’s 2016 attorney general bid in USA Today entitled "Josh Hawley for Attorney General." "I was proud to be an early supporter of Josh Hawley for Attorney General and will support him again in his race for the Senate," Bossie wrote in a Fox News story published Oct. 23, 2017. The story detailed his support for a variety of conservative Senate candidates. Bossie was adamant that he hoped Hawley, someone he sees as outside the Republican establishment, would triumph over McCaskill, and he was particularly impressed with Hawley’s "fine work fighting for religious liberty in the Hobby Lobby case at the U.S. Supreme Court." Hawley campaign spokeswoman Kelli Ford pointed out that McCaskill has benefitted from the dark money that she decried. In another fact-check, we found that dark money group Majority Forward has spent nearly $3 million opposing Hawley. Our ruling McCaskill said, "My opponent is endorsed by Citizens United." Campaign donations and writing from the group’s president confirm the statement. We rate the statement True.
['None']