Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. Circulation. 1983;68:951 60. 368. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217 25. 369. Leape LL, Park RE, Bashore TM, et al. Effect of variability in the inter- pretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coro- nary revascularization procedures. Am Heart J. 2000;139:106 13. 370. Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myo- cardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:56 62. 371. Little WC, Constantinescu M,Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiogra- phy predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 1988;78:1157 66. 372. Braunwald E. Epilogue: what do clinicians expect from imagers? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C101 C103. 373. Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. The Veterans Adminis- tration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1333 9. 374. Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, Mock M, et al. Prognostic value of angio- graphic indices of coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Clin Invest. 1983;71:1854 66. 375. Alderman EL, Bourassa MG, Cohen LS, et al. Ten-year follow-up of survival and myocardial infarction in the randomized Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation. 1990;82:1629 46. 376. Gersh BJ, Califf RM, Loop FD, et al. Coronary bypass surgery in chronic stable angina. Circulation. 1989;79:I46 I59. 377. Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al. Continuing evolution of ther- apy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1994;89:2015 25. 377a. Snow V, Barry P, Fihn SD, et al. 