MDs in SBP and DBP for combined aerobic/resistance exercise versus control were -5.9 mm Hg and -3.5 mm Hg, respectively. A 2016 meta-analysis by Corso et al. (2016) also examined the efficacy of combining aerobic and resistance exercise interventions of similar duration for blood pressure reduction in slightly younger (mean age across studies 56 years) prehypertensive adults.[112] Statistically significant reductions of -3.2 mm Hg (SBP) and - 2.5 mm Hg (DBP) were seen for concurrent aerobic and resistance training versus control. Herrod et al. (2018) also reported data favoring separate aerobic, resistance, and isometric exercise interventions over control.[111] MDs in SBP and DBP for aerobic exercise versus control were -5.1 mm Hg and -2.2 mm Hg, respectively, while MDs in SBP and DBP for resistance exercise versus control were -5.5 mm Hg and -2.0 mm Hg, respectively. Only two studies included in the SR looked at isometric exercise versus control; MDs of -9.1 mm Hg (SBP) and -3.0 mm Hg (DBP) were reported. Additional data on aerobic exercise comes from a 2016 RCT comparing aerobic dance training to non-exercise controls in participants on two antihypertensive agents.[113] Statistically significant differences in both SBP and DBP favored dance training. A larger proportion of participants in the dance group were able to reduce their number of blood pressure medications; however, control participants were older and had a higher BMI at baseline. Recreational group sports may offer similar blood pressure reductions as combination aerobic/resistance exercise, as well as improving other cardiovascular risk factors. Bellissimo et al. (2018) conducted an SR and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effects of community-based, recreational-level group sports on cardiometabolic risk factors and fitness parameters in adults.