CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES 34. Arcidi JM Jr, Rodriguez E, Elbeery JR, et al. Fifteen-year experience with minimally invasive approach for reoperations involving the mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1062 8. 35. Holzhey DM, Seeburger J, Misfeld M, et al. Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analy- sis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center. Circulation. 2013;128:483 91. 36. Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:72 80.e1 4. 37. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: estab- lishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:970 9. 38. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, et al. Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: a propensity score analysis of early outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1185 90. 39. David TE, Armstrong S, McCrindle BW, et al. Late outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Circulation. 2013;127:1485 92. 40. David TE, David CM, Tsang W, et al. Long-term results of mitral valve repair for regurgitation due to leaflet prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1044 53. 41. Quintana E, Suri RM, Thalji NM, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair the fallacy of normal preoperative myocardial func- tion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2752 60. 42. Sorajja P, Vemulapalli S, Feldman T, et al. Outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States: an STS/ACC TVT registry report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2315 27. 43. Yankah CA, Siniawski H, Detschades C, et al. Rheumatic mitral valve re- pair: 22-year clinical results. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011;20:257 64. 7.3. Chronic Secondary MR 7.3.1. 