1.5.3 Offer CABG to people with stable angina and suitable coronary anatomy when: their symptoms are not satisfactorily controlled with optimal medical treatment and revascularisation is considered appropriate and PCI is not appropriate. 1.5.4 Offer PCI to people with stable angina and suitable coronary anatomy when: their symptoms are not satisfactorily controlled with optimal medical treatment and revascularisation is considered appropriate and CABG is not appropriate. 1.5.5 When either procedure would be appropriate, explain to the person the risks and benefits of PCI and CABG for people with anatomically less complex disease whose symptoms are not satisfactorily controlled with optimal medical treatment. If the person does not express a preference, take account of the evidence that suggests that PCI may be the more cost-effective procedure in selecting the course of treatment. 1.5.6 When either procedure would be appropriate, take into account the potential survival advantage of CABG over PCI for people with multivessel disease whose symptoms are not satisfactorily controlled with optimal medical treatment and who: have diabetes or are over 65 years or have anatomically complex three-vessel disease, with or without involvement of the left main stem. 1.5.7 Consider the relative risks and benefits of CABG and PCI for people with stable angina using a systematic approach to assess the severity and complexity of the person's coronary disease, in addition to other relevant clinical factors and comorbidities. 1.5.8 Ensure that there is a regular multidisciplinary team meeting to discuss the risks and benefits of continuing drug treatment or revascularisation strategy (CABG or PCI) for people with stable angina. The team should include cardiac surgeons and interventional cardiologists. 