1996;125:646 652. 42. Hamed KA, Dormitzer PR, Su CK, Relman DA. Haemophilus parainflu- enzae endocarditis: application of a molecular approach for identification of pathogenic bacterial species. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:677 683. 43. Podglajen I, Bellery F, Poyart C, Coudol P, Buu-Ho A, Bruneval P, Mainardi JL. Comparative molecular and microbiologic diagnosis of bac- terial endocarditis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1543 1547. doi: 10.3201/ eid0912.030229. 44. Goldenberger D, K nzli A, Vogt P, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2733 2739. 45. Lamas CC, Eykyn SJ. Suggested modifications to the Duke criteria for the clinical diagnosis of native valve and prosthetic valve endo- carditis: analysis of 118 pathologically proven cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:713 719. 46. Berlin JA, Abrutyn E, Strom BL, Kinman JL, Levison ME, Korzeniowski OM, Feldman RS, Kaye D. Assessing diagnostic criteria for active infec- tive endocarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:887 891. 47. Reynolds HR, Jagen MA, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Sensitivity of transtho- racic versus transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of native valve vegetations in the modern era. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:67 70. doi: 10.1067/mje.2003.43. 48. Daniel WG, M gge A, Grote J, Hausmann D, Nikutta P, Laas J, Lichtlen PR, Martin RP. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocar- diography for detection of abnormalities of prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:210 215. 49. Heidenreich PA, Masoudi FA, Maini B, Chou TM, Foster E, Schiller NB, Owens DK. Echocardiography in patients with suspected endocarditis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Med. 1999;107:198 208. 50. Lindner JR, Case RA, Dent JM, Abbott RD, Scheld WM, Kaul S. Diagnostic value of echocardiography in suspected endocarditis: an evaluation based on the pretest probability of disease. Circulation. 1996;93:730 736. 51. 