Conventional models overestimate the sta- tistical significance of volume-outcome associations, compared with multilevel models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:391 400. 833. Shahian DM. Improving cardiac surgery quality volume, outcome, process? JAMA. 2004;291:246 8. 834. Shahian DM, Normand SL. Low-volume coronary artery bypass sur- gery: measuring and optimizing performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1202 9. 835. Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med. 2005;24:1185 202. 836. de Leval MR, Francois K, Bull C, et al. Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. Application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:914 23. 837. Grigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhalter DJ. Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res. 2003;12:147 70. 838. Spiegelhalter D, Grigg O, Kinsman R, et al. Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:7 13. 839. Luft HS. Better for whom? Policy implications of acting on the relation between volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1931 3. 840. Selim M. Perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:706 13. 841. McKhann GM, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM Jr, et al. Predictors of stroke risk in coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:516 21. 842. Filsoufi F, Rahmanian PB, Castillo JG, et al. Incidence, topography, predictors and long-term survival after stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:862 70. 843. Tarakji KG, Sabik JF III, Bhudia SK, et al. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2011;305:381 90. 844. Gottesman RF, Sherman PM, Grega MA, et al. Watershed strokes after cardiac surgery: diagnosis, etiology, and outcome. Stroke. 2006;37: 2306 11. 845. 