Caring for the adult with congenital heart disease in an adult catheterization laboratory by pediatric interventionalists safety and efficacy. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8:111 6. S3.4.6-4. Opotowsky AR, Landzberg MJ, Kimmel SE, et al. Percutaneous clo- sure of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect in adults: the impact of clinical variables and hospital procedure volume on in- hospital adverse events. Am Heart J. 2009;157:867 74. S3.4.6-5. Reant P, Brunot S, Lafitte S, et al. Predictive value of noninvasive coronary angiography with multidetector computed tomography to detect significant coronary stenosis before valve surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1506 10. S3.4.6-6. Gilard M, Cornily J-C, Pennec P-Y, et al. Accuracy of multislice computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of coronary CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES disease in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2020 4. S3.4.6-7. Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Broadley AJ, et al. 16-Detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:749 57. S3.4.6-8. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CAG, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1658 65. S3.4.6-9. Galas A, Hryniewiecki T, K pka C, et al. May dual-source computed tomography angiography replace invasive coronary angiography in the evaluation of patients referred for valvular disease surgery? Kardiol Pol. 2012;70:877 82. 3.4.7. Exercise Testing S3.4.7-1. Diller G-P, Dimopoulos K, Okonko D, et al. Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation. 2005;112:828 35. S3.4.7-2. Hager A, Hess J. Comparison of health related quality of life with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2005;91:517 20. S3.4.7-3. Ross RM, Murthy JN, Wollak ID, et al. 