Definitions Define unfamiliar terms and those critical to correct application of the guideline that might be subject to misinterpretation. Abbreviations and Acronyms. tions and rationale State the recommended action precisely and the specific circumstances under which to perform it. Justify each recommendation by describing the linkage between the recommendation and its supporting evidence. Indicate the quality of evidence and the recommendation strength, based on the criteria described in Topic 9. Each guideline chapter contains recommendations for lipid management in CKD patients. Each recommendation builds on a supporting rationale with evidence tables if available. The strength of the recommendation and the quality of evidence are provided in parenthesis within each recommendation. 15. Potential benefits and harms Describe anticipated benefits and potential risks associated with implementation of guideline recommendations. The benefits and harm for each comparison of interventions are provided in summary tables and summarized in evidence profiles. The estimated balance between potential benefits and harm was considered when formulating the recommendations. preferences Describe the role of patient preferences when a recommendation involves a substantial element of personal choice or values. Recommendations that are level 2 or discretionary indicate a greater need to help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with her or his values and preferences. 17. Algorithm Provide (when appropriate) a graphical description of the stages and decisions in clinical care described by the guideline. No overall algorithm. considerations Describe anticipated barriers to application of the recommendations. Provide reference to any auxiliary documents for providers or patients that are intended to facilitate implementation. Suggest review criteria for measuring changes in care when the guideline is implemented. These recommendations are intended for a global audience. Review criteria were not suggested because implementation with prioritization and development of review criteria have to proceed locally. 