2003;92:43 6. 3. Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, et al. Incidence of aortic complica- tions in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2011;306:1104 12. 4. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:17 27. 5. Masri A, Kalahasti V, Alkharabsheh S, et al. Characteristics and long-term outcomes of contemporary patients with bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:1650 9.e1. 6. McKellar SH, Michelena HI, Li Z, et al. Long-term risk of aortic events fol- lowing aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1626 33. 7. Girdauskas E, Disha K, Borger MA, et al. Long-term prognosis of ascend- ing aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tri- cuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:276 82. 8. Novaro GM, Griffin BP. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve and rate of as- cending aortic dilatation. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:525 6. 9. Davies RR, Kaple RK, Mandapati D, et al. Natural history of ascending aortic aneurysms in the setting of an unreplaced bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1338 44. 10. Girdauskas E, Rouman M, Disha K, et al. The fate of mild-to-moderate proximal aortic dilatation after isolated aortic valve replacement for bicus- pid aortic valve stenosis: a magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study . Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:e80 6. 11. Borger MA, Fedak PWM, Stephens EH, et al. The American Associa- tion for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve- related aortopathy: Full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:e41 74. 5.1.2. Interventions for Patients With BAV 5.1.2.1. Intervention: Repair or Replacement of the Aorta 1. Masri A, Svensson LG, Griffin BP, et al. 