Drawz PE, Ix JH, volume 29, Copyright 2018, permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.10 ONTARGET was published in 2008.11 The BP measurement approach used in the trial was subsequently published in the 2012 article referenced above. de Galan et al.12 Peralta et al.13 CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular ltration rate; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SCr, serum creatinine; T2D, type 2 diabetes. chapter 1 www.kidney-international.org unattended and attended measurements.26 Nonetheless, similar BP levels and CV disease risk reduction were observed in the intensive group in SPRINT participants, whether the measurement technique used was primarily attended or unattended. Unattended AOBP measurements may have some practical advantages over attended standardized BP measurements, such as discouraging talking by the patients and freeing clinic staff to complete other duties during the BP measurement process. Practice Point 1.3: Oscillometric devices can be used to measure BP among patients with atrial brillation. It is a misperception that oscillometric devices do not measure BP accurately among patients with atrial brillation. Prior studies comparing BP measured using oscillometric devices versus auscultatory techniques suggest that oscillo- metric devices provide a valid systolic BP (SBP) assessment in patients with atrial brillation.27 Although oscillometric de- vices may be less accurate for estimating diastolic BP (DBP) than auscultatory techniques, the population with atrial brillation is, on average, older, and the emphasis in older adults has been on SBP.28 Recommendation 1.2: We suggest that out-of-of ce BP measurements with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM) be used to complement standardized of ce BP readings for the management of high BP (2B). This recommendation places a relatively higher value on detecting a potential difference in BP status based on of ce versus out-of-of ce BP (Figure 4). 