2006;21:185 90. 2. Karthikeyan G, Senguttuvan NB, Joseph J, et al. Urgent surgery compared with fibrinolytic therapy for the treatment of left-sided prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1557 66. 3. Keuleers S, Herijgers P, Herregods M-C, et al. Comparison of thrombolysis versus surgery as a first line therapy for prosthetic heart valve thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:275 9. 4. Nagy A, D nes M, Lengyel M. Predictors of the outcome of thrombolytic therapy in prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis: a study of 62 events. J Heart Valve Dis. 2009;18:268 75. 5. zkan M, akal B, Karakoyun S, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of prosthetic heart valve thrombosis in pregnancy with low- dose, slow infusion of tissue-type plasminogen activator. Circulation. 2013;128:532 40. 6. zkan M, G nd z S, Biteker M, et al. Comparison of different TEE-guided thrombolytic regimens for prosthetic valve thrombosis: the TROIA trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:206 16. 7. Roudaut R, Lafitte S, Roudaut M-F, et al. Management of prosthetic heart valve obstruction: fibrinolysis versus surgery. Early results and long-term follow-up in a single-centre study of 263 cases. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;102:269 77. 8. Tong AT, Roudaut R, Ozkan M, et al. Transesophageal echocardiogra- phy improves risk assessment of thrombolysis of prosthetic valve throm- bosis: results of the international PRO-TEE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:77 84. 9. Bade AS, Shaikh SSA, Khemani H, et al. Thrombolysis is an effective and safe therapy in stuck mitral valves with delayed presentation as well as hemodynamically unstable patients: a single centre study. Cardiol Res. 2018;9:161 4. 10. Pragt H, van Melle JP, Javadikasgari H, et al. Mechanical valves in the pul- monary position: an international retrospective analysis. J Thorac Cardio- vasc Surg. 2017;154:1371 8.e1. CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES 11. 