A decision analysis approach to the surgical dilemma. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1241 7. 64. Gillinov AM, Garcia MJ. When is concomitant aortic valve replacement indicated in patients with mild to moderate stenosis undergoing coronary revascularization? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2005;7:101 4. 65. Bhattacharyya S, Hayward C, Pepper J, et al. Risk stratification in as- ymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a critical appraisal. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2377 87. 66. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:1 25. 67. deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME, et al. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low trans- valvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:191 4. 68. Tarantini G, Covolo E, Razzolini R, et al. Valve replacement for severe aor- tic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction exceeding 0.50. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1808 15. 69. Clavel M-A, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient de- spite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1259 67. 70. Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic se- vere aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grad- ing classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:235 43. 71. Mehrotra P, Jansen K, Flynn AW, et al. Differential left ventricular remodel- ling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1906 14. 72. Lauten J, Rost C, Breithardt OA, et al. Invasive hemodynamic characteris- tics of low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection frac- tion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1799 808. 73. Mangner N, Stachel G, Woitek F, et al. 