Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16:87 94. 821. Hollenbeck BK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Volume, process of care, and operative mortality for cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2007; 69:871 5. 822. Hannan EL. The relation between volume and outcome in health care. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1677 9. 823. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, et al. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery. 2002;131:6 15. 824. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era. Circulation. 2005; 112:1171 9. 825. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty volume- outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA. 1997; 277:892 8. 826. Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Tranmer B, et al. Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. Stroke. 1998;29:2292 7. 827. Shahian DM, Normand SL. The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to Leapfrog. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1048 58. 828. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog ini- tiative. Surgery. 2001;130:415 22. 829. Halm E, Lee C, Chassin M. How is volume related to quality in health care? A systematic review of the research literature. In: Hewitt M, editor. Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of health care quality: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. 830. Luft H, Garnick D, Mark D. Hospital volume, physician volume, and patient outcomes: assessing the evidence. Ann Harbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1990. 831. Hewitt M. Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of health care quality: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. 832. Urbach DR, Austin PC. Conventional models overestimate the sta- tistical significance of volume-outcome associations, compared with multilevel models. 