1998;32:1657 64. 178. Daugherty SL, Magid DJ, Kikla JR, et al. Gender differences in the prognostic value of exercise treadmill test characteristics. Am Heart J. 2011;161:908 14. 179. Ovrehus KA, Jensen JK, Mickley HF, et al. Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:773 9. 180. Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, et al. Use of a prognostic treadmill score in identifying diagnostic coronary disease subgroups. Circu- lation. 1998;98:1622 30. 181. Mulvagh SL, DeMaria AN, Feinstein SB, et al. Contrast echocardiog- raphy: current and future applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000; 13:331 42. 182. Abdelmoneim SS, Bernier M, Dhoble A, et al. Assessment of myo- cardial perfusion during adenosine stress using real time threedimen- sional and two-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. Echo- cardiography. 2010;27:421 9. 183. Berman D, Hachamovitch R, Shaw L, et al. Nuclear Cardiology. In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, O Rourke RA, et al., eds. Hurst s The Heart, 11th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2004: 563 98; 2004. 184. Fukushima K, Javadi MS, Higuchi T, et al. Prediction of short-term cardiovascular events using quantification of global myocardial flow reserve in patients referred for clinical 82Rb PET perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:726 32. 185. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: com- parison with (13)N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1062 71. 186. Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Manabe O, et al. Incremental Diagnostic Value of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification Over Relative Perfusion Imaging With Generator-Produced Rubidium-82 PET. Circ J. 2011;75:2628 34. 187. Duvall WL, Sweeny J, Croft LB, et al. 