2003;24:66 71. 296. Ladowski JS, Dillon TA, Deschner WP, et al. Durability of emergency coronary artery bypass for complications of failed angioplasty. Car- diovasc Surg. 1996;4:23 7. 297. Reinecke H, Roeder N, Schmid C, et al. Outcome of women is impaired in patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed PTCA. Z Kardiol. 2001;90:729 36. 298. Ghanta RK, Shekar PS, McGurk S, et al. Nonelective cardiac surgery in the elderly: is it justified? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140:103 9 e1. 299. Beller GA, Ragosta M. Decision making in multivessel coronary dis- ease: the need for physiological lesion assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:315 7. 300. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816 21. 301. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Cir- culation. 2010;121:2645 53. 302. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961 72. 303. Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, et al., BARI Investigators. Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investi- gation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. Circulation. 2000;101:2795 802. 304. King SBI, Barnhart HX, Kosinski AS, et al. Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible registry and randomized patients in the EAST trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes: Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial Inves- tigators. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1453 9. 305. 