Finally, simulators must become more robust, with perhaps computer-enhanced clinical sce- narios, before the residents who train on them are qualified to care for patients. Staff American College of Cardiology Foundation David R. Holmes, Jr, MD, FACC, President John C. Lewin, MD, Chief Executive Officer Janet Wright, MD, FACC, Senior Vice President, Science and Quality Charlene May, Senior Director, Science and Clinical Policy Erin A. Barrett, MPS, Senior Specialist, Science and Clinical Policy American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Lisa Bradfield, CAE, Director, Science and Clinical Policy Debjani Mukherjee, MPH, Associate Director, Evidence- Based Medicine Sue Keller, BSN, MPH, Senior Specialist, Evidence-Based Medicine Maria Koinis, Specialist, Science and Clinical Policy Jesse M. Welsh, Specialist, Science and Clinical Policy American Heart Association Ralph L. Sacco, MS, MD, FAAN, FAHA, President Nancy Brown, Chief Executive Officer Rose Marie Robertson, MD, FAHA, Chief Science Officer Gayle R. Whitman, PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN, Senior Vice President, Office of Science Operations Cheryl L. Perkins, MD, RPh, Science and Medicine Advisor, Office of Science Operations References 1. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Methodologies and Policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guideline. Available at http:// assets.cardiosource.com/Methodology_Manual_for_ACC_AHA_Writing_ Committees.pdf and http://circ.ahajournals.org/site/manual/index.xhtml. Accessed July 1, 2011. 2. Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. 3. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. 4. Hawkes CA, Dhileepan S, Foxcroft D. Early extubation for adult cardiac surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; CD003587 10.1002/14651858.CD003587. 5. Myles PS, Daly DJ, Djaiani G, et al. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:982 7. 6. van Mastrigt GA, Maessen JG, Heijmans J, et al.


6. van Mastrigt GA, Maessen JG, Heijmans J, et al. Does fast-track treatment lead to a decrease of intensive care unit and hospital length of stay in coronary artery bypass patients? A meta-regression of ran- domized clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1624 34. 7. Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Cheng DC. Patient-controlled versus nurse- controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:492 9. 8. Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:205 21. 9. Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hynynen M. Pain after cardiac surgery: a pro- spective cohort study of 1 year incidence and intensity. Anesthe- siology. 2006;105:794 800. 10. Serfontein L. Awareness in cardiac anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;23:103 8. 11. Taillefer M-C, Carrier M, Belisle S, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of chronic nonanginal postoperative pain after a cardiac operation: a cross-sectional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131:1274 80. 12. Martinez EA, Marsteller JA, Thompson DA, et al. The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists FOCUS initiative: locating Errors through Networked Surveillance (LENS) project vision. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:307 11. 13. Wadhera RK, Parker SH, Burkhart HM, et al. Is the sterile cockpit concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardio- pulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:312 9. 14. Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, et al. Association between implemen- tation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:1693 700. 15. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491 9. 16. Cahalan MK, Stewart W, Pearlman A, et al. American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists task force guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography.


American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists task force guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:647 52. 17. Mathew JP, Glas K, Troianos CA, et al. American Society of Echo- cardiography/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists recommen- dations and guidelines for continuous quality improvement in periop- erative echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:1303 13. 18. Thys DM. Cardiac anesthesia: thirty years later the second annual Arthur E. Weyman lecture. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1782 90. 19. Dowd NP, Cheng DC, Karski JM, et al. Intraoperative awareness in fast-track cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1068 73. 20. Groesdonk HV, Pietzner J, Borger MA, et al. The incidence of intra- operative awareness in cardiac surgery fast-track treatment. J Cardio- thorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:785 9. 21. Cheng DC, Karski J, Peniston C, et al. Early tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery reduces costs and improves resource use: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthe- siology. 1996;85:1300 10. 22. Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:64 101. 23. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, et al. Recovery of neuro- muscular function after cardiac surgery: pancuronium versus rocu- ronium. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1301 7. 24. Nygard E, Kofoed KF, Freiberg J, et al. Effects of high thoracic epidural analgesia on myocardial blood flow in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2005;111:2165 70. 25. Tenenbein PK, Debrouwere R, Maguire D, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia improves pulmonary function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:344 50. 26. Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, et al. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1081 91. 27.


Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1081 91. 27. Ott E, Nussmeier NA, Duke PC, et al. efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:1481 92. 28. Lowenstein E, Hallowell P, Levine FH, et al. Cardiovascular response to large doses of intravenous morphine in man. N Engl J Med. 1969; 281:1389 93. 29. Reiz S, Balfors E, Sorensen MB, et al. isoflurane a powerful coronary vasodilator in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:91 7. 30. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Ott E. Preoperative propranolol therapy and aortocoronary bypass operation. JAMA. 1978;240:1487 90. 31. London MJ, Shroyer AL, Grover FL. Fast tracking into the new millennium: an evolving paradigm. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:911 5. 32. Frassdorf J, De Hert S, Schlack W. Anaesthesia and myocardial isch- aemia/reperfusion injury. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:89 98. Hillis et al 2011 ACCF/AHA CABG Guideline e701 33. Tanaka K, Ludwig LM, Kersten JR, et al. Mechanisms of cardio- protection by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:707 21. 34. Butterworth J, James R, Prielipp RC, et al., CABG Clinical Bench- marking Data Base Participants. Do shorter-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs or opioids associate with reduced intensive care unit or hospital lengths of stay after coronary artery bypass grafting? Anes- thesiology. 1998;88:1437 46. 35. Berendes E, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al. Reversible cardiac sym- pathectomy by high thoracic epidural anesthesia improves regional left ventricular function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1283 90. 36. Bignami E, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai GG, et al. Epidural analgesia improves outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:586 97. 37. Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL.


J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:586 97. 37. Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL. Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta- analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:153 61. 38. Svircevic V, van Dijk D, Nierich A, et al. Meta-analysis of thoracic epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Anes- thesiology. 2010;114:271 82. 39. McDonald SB, Jacobsohn E, Kopacz DJ, et al. Parasternal block and local anesthetic infiltration with levobupivacaine after cardiac surgery with desflurane: the effect on postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and tracheal extubation times. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:25 32. 40. Horswell JL, Herbert MA, Prince SL, et al. Routine immediate extu- bation after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: 514 consecutive patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19:282 7. 41. Royse CF, Royse AG, Soeding PF. Routine immediate extubation after cardiac operation: a review of our first 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1326 9. 42. Straka Z, Brucek P, Vanek T, et al. Routine immediate extubation for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting without thoracic epidural analgesia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1544 7. 43. van Mastrigt GA, Heijmans J, Severens JL, et al. Short-stay intensive care after coronary artery bypass surgery: randomized clinical trial on safety and cost-effectiveness. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:65 75. 44. van Mastrigt GA, Joore MA, Nieman FH, et al. Health-related quality of life after fast-track treatment results from a randomized controlled clinical equivalence trial. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:631 42. 45. Chamchad D, Horrow JC, Nachamchik L, et al. The impact of immediate extubation in the operating room after cardiac surgery on intensive care and hospital lengths of stay. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:780 4. 46. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, et al. Morphine-based cardiac anesthesia provides superior early recovery compared with fentanyl in elective cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:311 9. 47.


Morphine-based cardiac anesthesia provides superior early recovery compared with fentanyl in elective cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:311 9. 47. Antman EM, Bennett JS, Daugherty A, et al. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update for clinicians: a Scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;115:1634 42. 48. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non- ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2007;116:e148 304. 49. Bainbridge D, Cheng DC, Martin JE, et al. NSAID-analgesia, pain control and morbidity in cardiothoracic surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53:46 59. 50. AstraZeneca. Brilinta REMS document. NDA 22-433. Reference ID: 2976456. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/ PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM264004. pdf. [Package insert]. Accessed August 16, 2011. 51. Gengo FM, Rubin L, Robson M, et al. Effects of ibuprofen on the magnitude and duration of aspirin s inhibition of platelet aggregation: clinical consequences in stroke prophylaxis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 48:117 22. 52. Merry AF, Ramage MC, Whitlock RM, et al. First-time coronary artery bypass grafting: the anaesthetist as a risk factor. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68:6 12. 53. Slogoff S, Keats AS. Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction? Anesthesiology. 1985;62:107 14. 54. Walsh SR, Bhutta H, Tang TY, et al. Anaesthetic specialisation leads to improved early- and medium-term survival following major vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:719 25. 55. Hirai S. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;9:365 70. 56.


Hirai S. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;9:365 70. 56. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Microemboli from cardiopul- monary bypass are associated with a serum marker of brain injury. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:40 4. 57. Liu YH, Wang DX, Li LH, et al. The effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on the number of cerebral microemboli and the incidence of cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1013 22. 58. Motallebzadeh R, Bland JM, Markus HS, et al. Neurocognitive function and cerebral emboli: randomized study of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83: 475 82. 59. Djaiani G, Fedorko L, Borger MA, et al. Continuous-flow cell saver reduces cognitive decline in elderly patients after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:1888 95. 60. Rubens FD, Boodhwani M, Mesana T, et al. The cardiotomy trial: a randomized, double-blind study to assess the effect of processing of shed blood during cardiopulmonary bypass on transfusion and neuro- cognitive function. Circulation. 2007;116:I89 97. 61. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1827 37. 62. Rinder CS, Fontes M, Mathew JP, et al. Neutrophil CD11b upregu- lation during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with postoperative renal injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:899 905. 63. Schurr UP, Zund G, Hoerstrup SP, et al. Preoperative administration of steroids: influence on adhesion molecules and cytokines after cardio- pulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1316 20. 64. Werdan K, Pilz G, Muller-Werdan U, et al. Immunoglobulin G treatment of postcardiac surgery patients with score-identified severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome the ESSICS study. CritCare Med. 2008;36:716 23. 65. Chen YF, Tsai WC, Lin CC, et al.


2008;36:716 23. 65. Chen YF, Tsai WC, Lin CC, et al. Effect of leukocyte depletion on endothelial cell activation and transendothelial migration of leukocytes during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:634 42. 66. Nesher N, Frolkis I, Vardi M, et al. Higher levels of serum cytokines and myocardial tissue markers during on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 2006;21:395 402. 67. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:21 8. 68. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, The Octopus Study Group, et al. A com- parison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394 402. 69. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revas- cularization. Circulation. 2007;116:1145 52. 70. Kuss O, von SB, Borgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pro- pensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:829 35, e1 13. 71. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Asso- ciation Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia in collabo- ration with the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2005;111:2858 64. 72. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:745 53. 73. Eifert S, Kilian E, Beiras-Fernandez A, et al.


2004;77:745 53. 73. Eifert S, Kilian E, Beiras-Fernandez A, et al. Early and mid term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in women depends on the surgical protocol: retrospective analysis of 3441 on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:90. Abstract. 74. Jensen BO, Hughes P, Rasmussen LS, et al. Cognitive outcomes in elderly high-risk patients after off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2006;113: 2790 5. 75. Jensen BO, Rasmussen LS, Steinbruchel DA. Cognitive outcomes in elderly high-risk patients 1 year after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. A randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:1016 21. 76. Li Y, Zheng Z, Hu S. Early and long-term outcomes in the elderly: comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques in 1191 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Car- diovasc Surg. 2008;136:657 64. 77. Mack MJ, Brown P, Houser F, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a matched sample of women: a comparison of outcomes. Circulation. 2004;110:II1 6. 78. Moller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, et al. No major differences in 30 day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial. Cir- culation. 2010;121:498 504. 79. Panesar SS, Athanasiou T, Nair S, et al. Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques. Heart. 2006;92:1808 16. 80. Puskas JD, Edwards FH, Pappas PA, et al. Off-pump techniques benefit men and women and narrow the disparity in mortality after coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1447 54. 81. Puskas JD, Kilgo PD, Kutner M, et al. Off-pump techniques dispro- portionately benefit women and narrow the gender disparity in outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation.


Off-pump techniques dispro- portionately benefit women and narrow the gender disparity in outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116: I192 9. 82. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Kilgo P, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1142 7. 83. Sharony R, Bizekis CS, Kanchuger M, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and stroke in patients with athero- matous aortas: a case control study. Circulation. 2003;108 Suppl 1:II15 20. 84. Misfeld M, Potger K, Ross DE, et al. Anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting significantly reduces neurological complications compared to off-pump and conventional on-pump surgery with aortic manipulation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:408 14. 85. Lev-Ran O, Loberman D, Matsa M, et al. Reduced strokes in the elderly: the benefits of untouched aorta off-pump coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:102 7. 86. Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis: comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:657 62. 87. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts: effects on survival over a 15 year period. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:216 9. 88. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. influence of the internal- mammary-artery graft on 10 year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1 6. 89. Sabik JFI, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:544 51. 90. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:855 72. 91. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, et al.


1999;117:855 72. 91. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2005 12. 92. Sabik JFI, Blackstone EH, Gillinov AM, et al. influence of patient characteristics and arterial grafts on freedom from coronary reop- eration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:90 8. 93. Sabik JFI, Stockins A, Nowicki ER, et al. Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting? Circulation. 2008;118 Suppl:S210 5. 94. Stevens LM, Carrier M, Perrault LP, et al. Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on mortality and event-free survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1408 15. 95. Sabik JFI, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, et al. Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76:1490 6. 96. Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny JY, et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:981 9. 97. Maniar HS, Sundt TM, Barner HB, et al. Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:45 52. 98. Moran SV, Baeza R, Guarda E, et al. Predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1552 6. 99. Possati G, Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, et al. Midterm clinical and angiographic results of radial artery grafts used for myocardial revas- cularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:1015 21. 100. Royse AG, Royse CF, Tatoulis J, et al. Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:294 304. 101. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, et al.


2000;17:294 304. 101. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, et al. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2302 9. 102. FitzGibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:616 26. 103. Chesebro JH, Fuster V, Elveback LR, et al. Effect of dipyridamole and aspirin on late vein-graft patency after coronary bypass operations. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:209 14. 104. Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Campeau L, et al. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation. 1985;72:V71 8. 105. Fuster V, Dewanjee MK, Kaye MP, et al. Noninvasive radioisotopic technique for detection of platelet deposition in coronary artery bypass grafts in dogs and its reduction with platelet inhibitors. Circulation. 1979;60:1508 12. 106. Chesebro JH, Clements IP, Fuster V, et al. A platelet-inhibitor-drug trial in coronary-artery bypass operations: benefit of perioperative dipyridamole and aspirin therapy on early postoperative vein-graft patency. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:73 8. 107. Metke MP, Lie JT, Fuster V, et al. Reduction of intimal thickening in canine coronary bypass vein grafts with dipyridamole and aspirin. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:1144 8. 108. Tector AJ, Kress DC, Downey FX, et al. Complete revascularization with internal thoracic artery grafts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;8:29 41. 109. FitzGibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Interventions for coronary stenosis a Canadian experience of 30 revolutionary years. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:893 900. 110. Grondin CM, Campeau L, Lesperance J, et al. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation. 1984;70:I208 12. 111.


Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation. 1984;70:I208 12. 111. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Car- diovasc Surg. 1985;90:668 75. 112. Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P, et al. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:202 8. 113. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, et al. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10 year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:599 605. 114. Galbut DL, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, et al. Seventeen-year experience with bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990; 49:195 201. 115. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Thurer RL, et al. Isolated left anterior descending coronary atherosclerosis: long-term comparison of internal mammary artery and venous autografts. Circulation. 1980;61:869 74. 116. Bjork VO, Ivert T, Landou C. Angiographic changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts, two weeks, one year and five years after coronary bypass surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;15:23 30. 117. Barner HB, Barnett MG. Fifteen- to twenty-one-year angiographic assessment of internal thoracic artery as a bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:1526 8. 118. Barner HB. Double internal mammary-coronary artery bypass. Arch Surg. 1974;109:627 30. 119. Sims FH. A comparison of coronary and internal mammary arteries and implications of the results in the etiology of arteriosclerosis. Am Heart J. 1983;105:560 6. 120. Sisto T, Isola J. Incidence of atherosclerosis in the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;47:884 6. Hillis et al 2011 ACCF/AHA CABG Guideline e703 121. Pearson PJ, Evora PR, Schaff HV. Bioassay of EDRF from internal mammary arteries: implications for early and late bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1078 84.


Bioassay of EDRF from internal mammary arteries: implications for early and late bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1078 84. 122. Luscher TF, Diederich D, Siebenmann R, et al. Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:462 7. 123. Ivert T, Huttunen K, Landou C, et al. Angiographic studies of internal mammary artery grafts 11 years after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:1 12. 124. Geha AS, Baue AE. Early and lage results of coronary revasculariza- tion with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery grafts. Am J Surg. 1979;137:456 63. 125. Hashimoto H, Isshiki T, Ikari Y, et al. Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postop- erative follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:399 407. 126. Seki T, Kitamura S, Kawachi K, et al. A quantitative study of postop- erative luminal narrowing of the internal thoracic artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104: 1532 8. 127. Pagni S, Storey J, Ballen J, et al. ITA versus SVG: a comparison of instantaneous pressure and flow dynamics during competitive flow. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:1086 92. 128. Shimizu T, Hirayama T, Suesada H, et al. Effect of flow competition on internal thoracic artery graft: postoperative velocimetric and angio- graphic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:459 65. 129. Pagni S, Storey J, Ballen J, et al. Factors affecting internal mammary artery graft survival: how is competitive flow from a patent native coronary vessel a risk factor? J Surg Res. 1997;71:172 8. 130. Nasu M, Akasaka T, Okazaki T, et al. Postoperative flow character- istics of left internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59: 154 61. 131. Glineur D, D hoore W, El Khoury G, et al.


Glineur D, D hoore W, El Khoury G, et al. Angiographic predictors of 6 month patency of bypass grafts implanted to the right coronary artery a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery and saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:120 5. 132. Suma H, Isomura T, Horii T, et al. Late angiographic result of using the right gastroepiploic artery as a graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120:496 8. 133. Gurne O, Buche M, Chenu P, et al. Quantitative angiographic follow-up study of the free inferior epigastric coronary bypass graft. Circulation. 1994;90:II148 54. 134. Buche M, Schroeder E, Gurne O, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the inferior epigastric artery. Midterm clinical and angiographic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:553 9. 135. Bonaros N, Schachner T, Wiedemann D, et al. Quality of life improvement after robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiology. 2009;114:59 66. 136. Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:926 32. 137. Eltzschig HK, Rosenberger P, Loffler M, et al. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on surgical decisions in 12 566 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85: 845 52. 138. Savage RM, Lytle BW, Aronson S, et al. Intraoperative echocardiog- raphy is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:368 73. 139. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiogra- phy. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 2010;112: 1084 96. 140. Bergquist BD, Bellows WH, Leung JM. Transesophageal echocardi- ography in myocardial revascularization: II. influence on intraoperative decision making. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:1139 45. 141. Moises VA, Mesquita CB, Campos O, et al.


1996;82:1139 45. 141. Moises VA, Mesquita CB, Campos O, et al. Importance of intraop- erative transesophageal echocardiography during coronary artery surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11:1139 44. 142. Qaddoura FE, Abel MD, Mecklenburg KL, et al. Role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1586 90. 143. Swaminathan M, Morris RW, De Meyts DD, et al. Deterioration of regional wall motion immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with long-term major adverse cardiac events. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:739 45. 144. Wang J, Filipovic M, Rudzitis A, et al. Transesophageal echocardiog- raphy for monitoring segmental wall motion during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:965 73. 145. Zimarino M, Gallina S, Di Fulvio M, et al. Intraoperative ischemia and long-term events after minimally invasive coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:135 41. 146. Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiog- raphy and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:870 84. 147. Glas KE, Swaminathan M, Reeves ST, et al. Guidelines for the per- formance of a comprehensive intraoperative epiaortic ultrasono- graphic examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiol- ogists. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1376 84. 148. Reeves ST, Glas KE, Eltzschig H, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive epicardial echocardiography examination: recommen- dations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007; 20:427 37. 149. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al.


2007; 20:427 37. 149. Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiogra- phy summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/ AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation. 2003;108:1146 62. 150. Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ, et al. Echocardiographic and hemo- dynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:376 87. 151. Fontes ML, Bellows W, Ngo L, et al. Assessment of ventricular function in critically ill patients: limitations of pulmonary artery cath- eterization. Institutions of the McSPI Research Group. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13:521 7. 152. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications [published correction appears in J Am Soc Echo- cardiogr. 2010;23:734]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:351 369. 153. Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, et al. Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:98 106. 154. Skubas N. Intraoperative Doppler tissue imaging is a valuable addition to cardiac anesthesiologists armamentarium: a core review. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:48 66. 155. Jacka MJ, Cohen MM, To T, et al. The use of and preferences for the transesophageal echocardiogram and pulmonary artery catheter among cardiovascular anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1065 71. 156. Argenziano M, Katz M, Bonatti J, et al. Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1666 74. 157. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N, et al. Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:146 53. 158.


Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:146 53. 158. Chaney MA, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Fluder EM, et al. Port-access min- imally invasive cardiac surgery increases surgical complexity, increases operating room time, and facilitates early postoperative hospital discharge. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1637 45. 159. Gurbuz AT, Hecht ML, Arslan AH. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography modifies strategy in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1035 40. 160. Kato M, Nakashima Y, Levine J, et al. Does transesophageal echocar- diography improve postoperative outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993;7: 285 9. 161. Kihara C, Murata K, Wada Y, et al. Impact of intraoperative trans- esophageal echocardiography in cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery: Experience in 1011 cases. J Cardiol. 2009;54:282 8. 162. Mierdl S, Byhahn C, Dogan S, et al. Segmental wall motion abnor- malities during telerobotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:774 80. 163. Turner WF Jr, Sloan JH. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass on a beating heart: initial experience and implications for the future. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:790 4. 164. Kallmeyer IJ, Collard CD, Fox JA, et al. The safety of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: a case series of 7200 cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1126 30. 165. Min JK, Spencer KT, Furlong KT, et al. Clinical features of compli- cations from transesophageal echocardiography: a single-center case series of 10 000 consecutive examinations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:925 9. 166. Augoustides JG, Hosalkar HH, Milas BL, et al. Upper gastrointestinal injuries related to perioperative transesophageal echocardiography: index case, literature review, classification proposal, and call for a registry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20:379 84. 167. Ramadan AS, Stefanidis C, Ngatchou W, et al. Esophageal stents for iatrogenic esophageal perforations during cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1034 6. 168.


Esophageal stents for iatrogenic esophageal perforations during cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1034 6. 168. Hogue CW Jr, Lappas GD, Creswell LL, et al. Swallowing dysfunction after cardiac operations. Associated adverse outcomes and risk factors including intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:517 22. 169. Partik BL, Scharitzer M, Schueller G, et al. Videofluoroscopy of swallowing abnormalities in 22 symptomatic patients after cardiovas- cular surgery. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:987 92. 170. Rousou JA, Tighe DA, Garb JL, et al. Risk of dysphagia after trans- esophageal echocardiography during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:486 9. 171. Harrington OB, Duckworth JK, Starnes CL, et al. Silent aspiration after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1599 603. 172. Sukernik MR, Bennett-Guerrero E. The incidental finding of a patent foramen ovale during cardiac surgery: should it always be repaired? A core review. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:602 10. 173. Krasuski RA, Hart SA, Allen D, et al. Prevalence and repair of intraop- eratively diagnosed patent foramen ovale and association with periopera- tive outcomes and long-term survival. JAMA. 2009;302:290 7. 174. Dyub AM, Whitlock RP, Abouzahr LL, et al. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2008;23:79 86. 175. Heusch G. Heart rate in the pathophysiology of coronary blood flow and myocardial ischaemia: benefit from selective bradycardic agents. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:1589 601. 176. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1731]. Circulation. 2002;106:1883 92. 177. Lavana JD, Fraser JF, Smith SE, et al.


2002;106:1883 92. 177. Lavana JD, Fraser JF, Smith SE, et al. influence of timing of intraaortic balloon placement in cardiac surgical patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:80 5. 178. Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Zangrillo A, et al. desflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:502 11. 179. Lucchinetti E, Hofer C, Bestmann L, et al. Gene regulatory control of myocardial energy metabolism predicts postoperative cardiac function in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: inhalational versus intravenous anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2007;106: 444 57. 180. Yao YT, Li LH. sevoflurane versus propofol for myocardial protection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-anal- ysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin Med Sci J. 2009;24:133 41. 181. Yu CH, Beattie WS. The effects of volatile anesthetics on cardiac ischemic complications and mortality in CABG: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:906 18. 182. Rabi D, Clement F, McAlister F, et al. Effect of perioperative glucose- insulin-potassium infusions on mortality and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26:178 84. 183. Buckberg GD. Controlled reperfusion after ischemia may be the unifying recovery denominator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140:12 8. 184. Alexander JH, Emery R Jr, Carrier M, et al. efficacy and safety of pyridoxal 5 -phosphate (MC-1) in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the MEND-CABG II randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1777 87. 185. Mangano DT. Effects of acadesine on myocardial infarction, stroke, and death following surgery: a meta-analysis of the 5 international randomized trials: the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. JAMA. 1997;277:325 32. 186. Mangano DT, Miao Y, Tudor IC, et al. Post-reperfusion myocardial infarction: long-term survival improvement using adenosine regulation with acadesine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:206 14.


Post-reperfusion myocardial infarction: long-term survival improvement using adenosine regulation with acadesine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:206 14. 187. Shernan SK, Fitch JC, Nussmeier NA, et al. Impact of pexelizumab, an anti-C5 complement antibody, on total mortality and adverse cardio- vascular outcomes in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopul- monary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:942 9. 188. Smith PK, Shernan SK, Chen JC, et al. Effects of C5 complement inhibitor pexelizumab on outcome in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting: Combined results from the PRIMO-CABG I and II trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;142:89 98. 189. Testa L, Van Gaal WJ, Bhindi R, et al. Pexelizumab in ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 15 196 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:884 93. 190. Laurikka J, Wu ZK, Iisalo P, et al. Regional ischemic preconditioning enhances myocardial performance in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2002;121:1183 9. 191. Penttila HJ, Lepojarvi MV, Kaukoranta PK, et al. Ischemic precondi- tioning does not improve myocardial preservation during off-pump multivessel coronary operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1246 52. 192. Walsh SR, Tang TY, Kullar P, et al. Ischaemic preconditioning during cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes in randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008; 34:985 94. 193. Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, et al. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:575 9. 194. Rahman IA, Mascaro JG, Steeds RP, et al. Remote ischemic precon- ditioning in human coronary artery bypass surgery: from promise to disappointment? Circulation. 2010;122 Suppl:S53 9. 195. Venugopal V, Hausenloy DJ, Ludman A, et al. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2009;95:1567 71. 196.


Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2009;95:1567 71. 196. Luo W, Li B, Chen R, et al. Effect of ischemic postconditioning in adult valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:203 8. 197. Ovize M, Baxter GF, Di Lisa F, et al. Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? Position paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87:406 23. 198. Mohammed AA, Agnihotri AK, van Kimmenade RR, et al. Pro- spective, comprehensive assessment of cardiac troponin T testing after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2009;120:843 50. 199. Ramsay J, Shernan S, Fitch J, et al. Increased creatine kinase MB level predicts postoperative mortality after cardiac surgery independent of new Q waves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:300 6. 200. Yau JM, Alexander JH, Hafley G, et al. Impact of perioperative myocardial infarction on angiographic and clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (from PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Trans- fection [PREVENT] IV). Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:546 51. 201. Chowdhury UK, Malik V, Yadav R, et al. Myocardial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting: on-pump versus off-pump comparison by measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, creatine kinase-MB, and myo- globin release. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1110 9,9. 202. Rahimi K, Banning AP, Cheng AS, et al. Prognostic value of coronary revascularisation-related myocardial injury: a cardiac magnetic res- onance imaging study. Heart. 2009;95:1937 43. 203. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2173 95. 204. Venge P, Johnston N, Lindahl B, et al.


2007;50:2173 95. 204. Venge P, Johnston N, Lindahl B, et al. Normal plasma levels of cardiac troponin I measured by the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I access prototype assay and the impact on the diagnosis of myocardial ische- mia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1165 72. 205. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1121 35. 206. Mentzer RM Jr, Bartels C, Bolli R, et al. Sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibition by cariporide to reduce the risk of ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results of the Expedition study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1261 70. Hillis et al 2011 ACCF/AHA CABG Guideline e705 207. Turer AT, Hill JA. Pathogenesis of myocardial ischemiareperfusion injury and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:360 8. 208. Ghorbel MT, Cherif M, Mokhtari A, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with fewer gene expression changes in the human myocardium in comparison with on-pump surgery. Physiol Genomics. 2010;42:67 75. 209. Podgoreanu MV, Schwinn DA. New paradigms in cardiovascular med- icine: emerging technologies and practices: perioperative genomics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1965 77. 210. Castellheim A, Hoel TN, Videm V, et al. Biomarker profile in off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in low-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1994 2002. 211. Parolari A, Camera M, Alamanni F, et al. Systemic inflammation after on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery: a one-month follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:823 8. 212. Paulitsch FS, Schneider D, Sobel BE, et al. Hemostatic changes and clinical sequelae after on-pump compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Coron Artery Dis. 2009;20:100 5. 213. Serrano CV Jr, Souza JA, Lopes NH, et al. Reduced expression of systemic proinflammatory and myocardial biomarkers after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective ran- domized study.


Reduced expression of systemic proinflammatory and myocardial biomarkers after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective ran- domized study. J Crit Care. 2010;25:305 12. 214. Ghosh S, Galinanes M. Protection of the human heart with ischemic preconditioning during cardiac surgery: role of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:133 42. 215. Jenkins DP, Pugsley WB, Alkhulaifi AM, et al. Ischaemic precondi- tioning reduces troponin T release in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart. 1997;77:314 8. 216. Loubani M, Ghosh S, Galinanes M. The aging human myocardium: tolerance to ischemia and responsiveness to ischemic preconditioning. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:143 7. 217. Wu ZK, Iivainen T, Pehkonen E, et al. Ischemic preconditioning suppresses ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial revascular- ization. Circulation. 2002;106:3091 6. 218. Walsh SR, Tang T, Sadat U, et al. Cardioprotection by remote ischaemic preconditioning. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:611 6. 219. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, et al. Opioids and cardiopro- tection: the impact of morphine and fentanyl on recovery of ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20:493 502. 220. Peart JN, Gross GJ. Cardioprotective effects of acute and chronic opioid treatment are mediated via different signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H1746 53. 221. Wang B, Shravah J, Luo H, et al. Propofol protects against hydrogen peroxide-induced injury in cardiac H9c2 cells via Akt activation and Bcl-2 up-regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389: 105 11. 222. Xia Z, Huang Z, Ansley DM. Large-dose propofol during cardiopul- monary bypass decreases biochemical markers of myocardial injury in coronary surgery patients: a comparison with isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:527 32. 223. De Hert SG, ten Broecke PW, Mertens E, et al. sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:42 9. 224.


sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function in coronary surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:42 9. 224. De Hert SG, Van der Linden PJ, Cromheecke S, et al. Cardioprotective properties of sevoflurane in patients undergoing coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are related to the modalities of its adminis- tration. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:299 310. 225. De Hert SG, Van der Linden PJ, Cromheecke S, et al. Choice of primary anesthetic regimen can influence intensive care unit length of stay after coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthe- siology. 2004;101:9 20. 226. Garcia C, Julier K, Bestmann L, et al. Preconditioning with sevoflurane decreases PECAM-1 expression and improves one-year cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94:159 65. 227. Julier K, da Silva R, Garcia C, et al. Preconditioning by sevoflurane decreases biochemical markers for myocardial and renal dysfunction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a double-blinded, placebo- controlled, multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1315 27. 228. Fillinger MP, Surgenor SD, Hartman GS, et al. The association between heart rate and in-hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1483 8. 229. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, et al. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dys- function (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised con- trolled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:817 21. 230. Breisblatt WM, Stein KL, Wolfe CJ, et al. Acute myocardial dys- function and recovery: a common occurrence after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1261 9. 231. Ekery DL, Davidoff R, Orlandi QG, et al. Imaging and diagnostic testing: diastolic dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting: a frequent finding of clinical significance not influenced by intravenous calcium. Am Heart J. 2003;145:896 902. 232. Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Kappen TH, et al.


232. Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Kappen TH, et al. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension as a function of the chosen definition: literature definitions applied to a retrospective cohort using automated data collection. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:213 20. 233. Aronson S, Stafford-Smith M, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability predicts 30 day mortality in aorto- coronary bypass surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:305 12. 234. Nikolov NM, Fontes ML, White WD, et al. Pulse pressure and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:335 40. 235. Alexiou K, Kappert U, Staroske A, et al. Coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome: which determinants of outcome remain? Clin Res Cardiol. 2008;97:601 8. 236. Chiu FC, Chang SN, Lin JW, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a pro- pensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:1326 30. 237. DeWood MA, Spores J, Berg R Jr, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: a decade of experience with surgical reperfusion in 701 patients. Circulation. 1983;68:II8 16. 238. Donatelli F, Benussi S, Triggiani M, et al. Surgical treatment for life-threatening acute myocardial infarction: a prospective protocol. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:228 33. 239. Filizcan U, Kurc E, Cetemen S, et al. Mortality predictors in ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Angiology. 2011;62:68 73. 240. Chevalier P, Burri H, Fahrat F, et al. Perioperative outcome and long-term survival of surgery for acute post-infarction mitral regurgi- tation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:330 5. 241. Lemery R, Smith HC, Giuliani ER, et al. Prognosis in rupture of the ventricular septum after acute myocardial infarction and role of early surgical intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:147 51. 242. Russo A, Suri RM, Grigioni F, et al.


1992;70:147 51. 242. Russo A, Suri RM, Grigioni F, et al. Clinical outcome after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation due to papillary muscle rupture. Circulation. 2008;118:1528 34. 243. Shamshad F, Kenchaiah S, Finn PV, et al. Fatal myocardial rupture after acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion Trial (VALIANT). Am Heart J. 2010;160:145 51. 244. Tavakoli R, Weber A, Brunner-La Rocca H, et al. Results of surgery for irreversible moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation secondary to myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:818 24. 245. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: SHOCK Investigators: Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 625 34. 246. Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, et al. Percutaneous coronary inter- vention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease? Am Heart J. 2010;159:141 7. 247. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Car- diogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. Circulation. 2005;112:1992 2001. 248. Ngaage DL, Cale AR, Cowen ME, et al. Early and late survival after surgical revascularization for ischemic ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1278 81. 249. Parikh SV, de Lemos JA, Jessen ME, et al. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:419 27. 250. Lim HS, Farouque O, Andrianopoulos N, et al.


2010;3:419 27. 250. Lim HS, Farouque O, Andrianopoulos N, et al. Survival of elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myo- cardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:146 52. 251. Amin AP, Nathan S, Prodduturi P, et al. Survival benefit from early revascularization in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a cohort study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21: 305 12. 252. Migliorini A, Moschi G, Valenti R, et al. Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock com- plicating acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;152:903 8. 253. Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock com- plicating acute myocardial infarction etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry: SHould we emer- gently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1063 70. 254. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, et al. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myo- cardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:828 37. 255. Coskun KO, Coskun ST, Popov AF, et al. Experiences with surgical treatment of ventricle septal defect as a post infarction complication. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:3. 256. Oliva PB, Hammill SC, Edwards WD. Cardiac rupture, a clinically predictable complication of acute myocardial infarction: report of 70 cases with clinicopathologic correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22: 720 6. 257. Kjaergard H, Nielsen PH, Andreasen JJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days after treatment of acute myocardial infarctions with angioplasty or fibrinolysis a surgical substudy of DANAMI-2. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2004;38:143 6. 258. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al.


2004;38:143 6. 258. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Role of cardiac surgery in the hospital phase management of patients treated with primary angio- plasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1292 6. 259. Creswell LL, Moulton MJ, Cox JL, et al. Revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:19 26. 260. Kamohara K, Yoshikai M, Yunoki J, et al. Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndrome: comparative surgical and long-term results. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:95 102. 261. Kjaergard HK, Nielsen PH, Andreasen JJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting within the first year after treatment of large acute myocardial infarctions with angioplasty or fibrinolysis. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006; 40:25 8. 262. Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, et al. Optimal timing of revascular- ization: transmural versus nontransmural acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1197 202. 263. Wasvary H, Shannon F, Bassett J, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction. Am Surg. 1997;63: 710 5. 264. Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:503 11, e1 3. 265. Lee JH, Murrell HK, Strony J, et al. Risk analysis of coronary bypass surgery after acute myocardial infarction. Surgery. 1997;122:675 80. 266. Thielmann M, Neuhauser M, Marr A, et al. Predictors and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:17 24. 267. Purcaro A, Costantini C, Ciampani N, et al. Diagnostic criteria and management of subacute ventricular free wall rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:397 405. 268. von Segesser LK, Popp J, Amann FW, et al. Surgical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:363 8. 269.


Surgical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:363 8. 269. Danner BC, Didilis VN, Stojanovic T, et al. A three-group model to predict mortality in emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1433 9. 270. Thielmann M, Massoudy P, Neuhauser M, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative cardiac troponin I in patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass surgery with non-ST-elevation or ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2006;114:I448 53. 271. Every NR, Fahrenbruch CE, Hallstrom AP, et al. influence of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent outcome of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1435 9. 272. Kelly P, Ruskin JN, Vlahakes GJ, et al. Surgical coronary revascular- ization in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest: its effect on inducible ventricular arrhythmias and long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:267 73. 273. Autschbach R, Falk V, Gonska BD, et al. The effect of coronary bypass graft surgery for the prevention of sudden cardiac death: recurrent episodes after ICD implantation and review of literature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:552 8. 274. Cook JR, Rizo-Patron C, Curtis AB, et al. Effect of surgical revascu- larization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable defibrillators (AVID) Registry. Am Heart J. 2002;143:821 6. 275. Berntsen RF, Gunnes P, Lie M, et al. Surgical revascularization in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation exposed by exercise-induced ischaemia. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1297 303. 276. Daoud EG, Niebauer M, Kou WH, et al. Incidence of implantable defibrillator discharges after coronary revascularization in survivors of ischemic sudden cardiac death. Am Heart J. 1995;130:277 80. 277. Budeus M, Feindt P, Gams E, et al. Risk factors of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113:201 8. 278.


Risk factors of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113:201 8. 278. Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Qi A, McNeill E, et al. New-onset sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation early after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:2083 8. 279. Pires LA, Hafley GE, Lee KL, et al. Prognostic significance of non- sustained ventricular tachycardia identified postoperatively after coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dys- function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13:757 63. 280. Barakate MS, Bannon PG, Hughes CF, et al. Emergency surgery after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty: a review of 15 years experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1400 5. 281. Roy P, de Labriolle A, Hanna N, et al. Requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass surgery following percutaneous coronary inter- vention in the stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:950 3. 282. Craver JM, Weintraub WS, Jones EL, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty: a 10 year experience. Ann Surg. 1992;215:425 33. 283. Stamou SC, Hill PC, Haile E, et al. Clinical outcomes of nonelective coronary revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:28 33. 284. Frutkin AD, Mehta SK, Patel T, et al. Outcomes of 1090 consecutive, elective, nonselected percutaneous coronary interventions at a com- munity hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:53 7. 285. Singh M, Gersh BJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Outcomes of a system-wide protocol for elective and nonelective coronary angioplasty at sites without on-site surgery: the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:501 8. 286. Ting HH, Raveendran G, Lennon RJ, et al. A total of 1007 percuta- neous coronary interventions without onsite cardiac surgery: acute and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1713 21. 287. Andreasen JJ, Mortensen PE, Andersen LI, et al.


2006;47:1713 21. 287. Andreasen JJ, Mortensen PE, Andersen LI, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2000;34:242 6. 288. Berger PB, Stensrud PE, Daly RC, et al. Time to reperfusion and other procedural characteristics of emergency coronary artery bypass surgery after unsuccessful coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:565 9. 289. Carey JA, Davies SW, Balcon R, et al. Emergency surgical revascu- larisation for coronary angioplasty complications. Br Heart J. 1994;72: 428 35. 290. Hake U, Iversen S, Jakob HG, et al. influence of incremental preop- erative risk factors on the perioperative outcome of patients undergoing emergency versus urgent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Car- diothorac Surg. 1989;3:162 8. 291. Talley JD, Weintraub WS, Roubin GS, et al. Failed elective percuta- neous transluminal coronary angioplasty requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. In-hospital and late clinical outcome at 5 years. Cir- culation. 1990;82:1203 13. 292. Wang N, Gundry SR, Van Arsdell G, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty failures in patients with multivessel disease. Is there an increased risk? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:214 21. 293. Klepzig H Jr, Kober G, Satter P, et al. Analysis of 100 emergency aortocoronary bypass operations after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: which patients are at risk for large infarctions? Eur Heart J. 1991;12:946 51. Hillis et al 2011 ACCF/AHA CABG Guideline e707 294. Bonaros N, Hennerbichler D, Friedrich G, et al. Increased mortality and perioperative complications in patients with previous elective per- cutaneous coronary interventions undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:846 52. 295. Karthik S, Musleh G, Grayson AD, et al. Effect of avoiding cardiopul- monary bypass in non-elective coronary artery bypass surgery: a pro- pensity score analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:66 71. 296. Ladowski JS, Dillon TA, Deschner WP, et al.


2003;24:66 71. 296. Ladowski JS, Dillon TA, Deschner WP, et al. Durability of emergency coronary artery bypass for complications of failed angioplasty. Car- diovasc Surg. 1996;4:23 7. 297. Reinecke H, Roeder N, Schmid C, et al. Outcome of women is impaired in patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed PTCA. Z Kardiol. 2001;90:729 36. 298. Ghanta RK, Shekar PS, McGurk S, et al. Nonelective cardiac surgery in the elderly: is it justified? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140:103 9 e1. 299. Beller GA, Ragosta M. Decision making in multivessel coronary dis- ease: the need for physiological lesion assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:315 7. 300. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816 21. 301. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Cir- culation. 2010;121:2645 53. 302. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961 72. 303. Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, et al., BARI Investigators. Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investi- gation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. Circulation. 2000;101:2795 802. 304. King SBI, Barnhart HX, Kosinski AS, et al. Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible registry and randomized patients in the EAST trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes: Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial Inves- tigators. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1453 9. 305.


Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible registry and randomized patients in the EAST trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes: Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial Inves- tigators. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1453 9. 305. Chakravarty T, Buch MH, Naik H, et al. Predictive accuracy of SYNTAX score for predicting long-term outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107: 360 6. 306. Grover FL, Shroyer AL, Hammermeister K, et al. A decade s expe- rience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons national databases. Ann Surg. 2001;234:464 72. 307. Kim YH, Park DW, Kim WJ, et al. Validation of SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score for prediction of outcomes after unprotected left main coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:612 23. 308. Shahian DM, O Brien SM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1 coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88 1 Suppl:S2 22. 309. Shahian DM, O Brien SM, Normand SL, et al. Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, mor- bidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:273 82. 310. Welke KF, Peterson ED, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, et al. Comparison of cardiac surgery volumes and mortality rates between the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Medicare databases from 1993 through 2001. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1538 46. 311. Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A, et al. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascular- ization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:538 45. 312. Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, et al.


2008;51:538 45. 312. Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, et al. Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease: long-term CASS experience. Circulation. 1995;91:2325 34. 313. Chaitman BR, Fisher LD, Bourassa MG, et al. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease: report of the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS). Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:765 77. 314. Dzavik V, Ghali WA, Norris C, et al. Long-term survival in 11 661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: a report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Am Heart J. 2001;142:119 26. 315. Takaro T, Hultgren HN, Lipton MJ, et al. The VA cooperative ran- domized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. Circulation. 1976;54: III107 17. 316. Takaro T, Peduzzi P, Detre KM, et al. Survival in subgroups of patients with left main coronary artery disease: Veterans Administration Coop- erative Study of Surgery for Coronary Arterial Occlusive Disease. Circulation. 1982;66:14 22. 317. Taylor HA, Deumite NJ, Chaitman BR, et al. Asymptomatic left main coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Circulation. 1989;79:1171 9. 318. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10 year results from ran- domised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 1994;344:563 70. 319. Capodanno D, Caggegi A, Miano M, et al. Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Inter- vention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:287 97. 320.


Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Inter- vention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:287 97. 320. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary- artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:331 41. 321. Ellis SG, Tamai H, Nobuyoshi M, et al. Contemporary percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary stenoses: initial results from a multicenter registry analysis 1994 1996. Circulation. 1997;96: 3867 72. 322. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Moretti C, et al. A collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis on 1278 patients undergoing per- cutaneous drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2008;155:274 83. 323. Boudriot E, Thiele H, Walther T, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stem stenosis [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1792]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:538 45. 324. Brener SJ, Galla JM, Bryant RI, et al. Comparison of percutaneous versus surgical revascularization of severe unprotected left main coronary stenosis in matched patients. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101: 169 72. 325. Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F, et al. Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation. 2006;113: 2542 7. 326. Chieffo A, Magni V, Latib A, et al. 5 year outcomes following per- cutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: the Milan experience. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3: 595 601. 327. Lee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F, et al.


2010;3: 595 601. 327. Lee MS, Kapoor N, Jamal F, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug- eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:864 70. 328. Makikallio TH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, et al. Coronary angioplasty in drug eluting stent era for the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis compared to coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Med. 2008;40: 437 43. 329. Naik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T, et al. A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:739 47. 330. Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, et al. Comparison between coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (the Bologna Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:54 9. 331. Park DW, Seung KB, Kim YH, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5 year results from the MAIN- COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:117 24. 332. Rodes-Cabau J, Deblois J, Bertrand OF, et al. Nonrandomized com- parison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians. Circulation. 2008;118:2374 81. 333. Sanmartin M, Baz JA, Claro R, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting stents versus surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:970 3. 334. Kappetein AP, Mohr FW, Feldman TE, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.


Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;17:2125 34. 335. Seung KB, Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1781 92. 336. White AJ, Kedia G, Mirocha JM, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of left main coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1:236 45. 337. Montalescot G, Brieger D, Eagle KA, et al. Unprotected left main revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2308 17. 338. Lee MS, Tseng CH, Barker CM, et al. Outcome after surgery and percutaneous intervention for cardiogenic shock and left main disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:29 34. 339. Lee MS, Bokhoor P, Park SJ, et al. Unprotected left main coronary disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a contem- porary review and argument for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:791 5. 340. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1727. 341. Jones RH, Kesler K, Phillips HR, III, et al. Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. J Thorac Car- diovasc Surg. 1996;111:1013 25. 342. Myers WO, Schaff HV, Gersh BJ, et al. Improved survival of sur- gically treated patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease and severe angina pectoris. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:487 95. 343. Smith PK, Califf RM, Tuttle RH, et al.


1989;97:487 95. 343. Smith PK, Califf RM, Tuttle RH, et al. Selection of surgical or percu- taneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1420 8. 344. Varnauskas E. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:332 7. 345. Borger van der Burg AE, Bax JJ, Boersma E, et al. Impact of percu- taneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting on outcome after nonfatal cardiac arrest outside the hospital. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:785 9. 346. Deleted in proof. 347. Kaiser GA, Ghahramani A, Bolooki H, et al. Role of coronary artery surgery in patients surviving unexpected cardiac arrest. Surgery. 1975; 78:749 54. 348. Di Carli MF, Maddahi J, Rokhsar S, et al. Long-term survival of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: implications for the role of myocardial viability assessment in man- agement decisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:997 1004. 349. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:2900 7. 350. Sorajja P, Chareonthaitawee P, Rajagopalan N, et al. Improved survival in asymptomatic diabetic patients with high-risk SPECT imaging treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2005;112: I311 6. 351. Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascular- ization. Circulation. 1997;95:2037 43. 352. Alderman EL, Fisher LD, Litwin P, et al. Results of coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function (CASS). Circu- lation. 1983;68:785 95. 353. O Connor CM, Velazquez EJ, Gardner LH, et al.


353. O Connor CM, Velazquez EJ, Gardner LH, et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy on long-term outcome in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (a 25 year expe- rience from the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Databank). Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:101 7. 354. Phillips HR, O Connor CM, Rogers J. Revascularization for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2007;153:65 73. 355. Tarakji KG, Brunken R, McCarthy PM, et al. Myocardial viability testing and the effect of early intervention in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2006;113:230 7. 356. Tsuyuki RT, Shrive FM, Galbraith PD, et al. Revascularization in patients with heart failure. CMAJ. 2006;175:361 5. 357. Deleted in proof. 358. Deleted in proof. 359. Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, et al. Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 2004;109:2290 5. 360. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2174 83. 361. Deleted in proof. 362. The BARI Investigators. influence of diabetes on 5 year mortality and morbidity in a randomized trial comparing CABG and PTCA in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascular- ization Investigation (BARI). Circulation. 1997;96:1761 9. 363. The BARI Investigators. The final 10 year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1600 6. 364. Banning AP, Westaby S, Morice MC, et al. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3 vessel coronary artery disease: com- parison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1067 75. 365. Hoffman SN, TenBrook JA, Wolf MP, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes.


A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1293 304. 366. Hueb W, Lopes NH, Gersh BJ, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1082 9. 367. Malenka DJ, Leavitt BJ, Hearne MJ, et al. Comparing long-term survival of patients with multivessel coronary disease after CABG or PCI: analysis of BARI-like patients in northern New England. Circu- lation. 2005;112:I371 6. 368. Niles NW, McGrath PD, Malenka D, et al., Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Survival of patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of a large regional prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1008 15. 369. Weintraub WS, Stein B, Kosinski A, et al. Outcome of coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients with multi- vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:10 9. 370. Boden WE, O Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503 16. 371. Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, et al. Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1625. 372. Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, et al. Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1616. 373. Brener SJ, Lytle BW, Casserly IP, et al. Predictors of revascularization method and long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention or repeat coronary bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary disease and previous coronary bypass surgery. Eur Heart J. 2006;27: 413 8. 374. Gurfinkel EP, Perez dlH, Brito VM, et al.


2006;27: 413 8. 374. Gurfinkel EP, Perez dlH, Brito VM, et al. Invasive vs non-invasive treatment in acute coronary syndromes and prior bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2007;119:65 72. 375. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, et al. The effect of coronary reop- eration on the survival of patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993; 105:605 12. 376. Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J, et al. Percutaneous coronary inter- vention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with Hillis et al 2011 ACCF/AHA CABG Guideline e709 medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:143 9. 377. Pfautsch P, Frantz E, Ellmer A, et al. [Long-term outcome of therapy of recurrent myocardial ischemia after surgical revascularization]. Z Kardiol. 1999;88:489 97. 378. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B, et al. First cardiological or car- diosurgical reintervention for ischemic heart disease after primary coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14: 480 7. 379. Stephan WJ, O Keefe JH Jr, Piehler JM, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1140 6. 380. Subramanian S, Sabik JF, III, Houghtaling PL, et al. Decision-making for patients with patent left internal thoracic artery grafts to left anterior descending. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1392 8. 381. Weintraub WS, Jones EL, Morris DC, et al. Outcome of reoperative coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty after previous bypass surgery. Circulation. 1997;95:868 77. 382. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al.


1997;95:868 77. 382. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic bur- den: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283 91. 383. Cashin WL, Sanmarco ME, Nessim SA, et al. Accelerated progression of atherosclerosis in coronary vessels with minimal lesions that are bypassed. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:824 8. 384. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1703 8. 385. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213 24. 386. Sawada S, Bapat A, Vaz D, et al. Incremental value of myocardial viability for prediction of long-term prognosis in surgically revascu- larized patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:2099 105. 387. TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358:951 7. 388. Benzer W, Hofer S, Oldridge NB. Health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease after different treatments for angina in routine clinical practice. Herz. 2003;28:421 8. 389. Bonaros N, Schachner T, Ohlinger A, et al. Assessment of health- related quality of life after coronary revascularization. Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8:E380 5. 390. Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2000;321:73 7. 391. Favarato ME, Hueb W, Boden WE, et al. Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial.


Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial. Int J Cardiol. 2007;116:364 70. 392. Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, et al. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): a randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122:949 57. 393. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, et al. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3 year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation. 1996;94:135 42. 394. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Clayton T, et al. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:907 14. 395. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 677 87. 396. Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, et al. Meta-anal- ysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:370 9. 397. Schofield PM, Sharples LD, Caine N, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation in patients with refractory angina: a randomised con- trolled trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 1999;353:1714]. Lancet. 1999;353:519 24. 398. Aaberge L, Nordstrand K, Dragsund M, et al. Transmyocardial revas- cularization with CO2 laser in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Clinical results from the Norwegian randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1170 7. 399. Burkhoff D, Schmidt S, Schulman SP, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial. ATLANTIC Investigators. Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison.


Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial. ATLANTIC Investigators. Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison. Lancet. 1999;354:885 90. 400. Allen KB, Dowling RD, DelRossi AJ, et al. Transmyocardial laser revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter, blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:540 9. 401. Stamou SC, Boyce SW, Cooke RH, et al. One-year outcome after combined coronary artery bypass grafting and transmyocardial laser revascularization for refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89:1365 8. 402. The VA Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. Eighteen-year follow-up in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for stable angina. Circulation. 1992; 86:121 30. 403. Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, et al. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1665 71. 404. Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:2503 15. 405. Al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr, Salam AM, et al. Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta- analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2004;147:815 22. 406. Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138: 777 86. 407. Trikalinos TA, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quan- titative 20 year synopsis and a network meta-analysis [published cor- rection appears in Lancet. 2009;374:378]. Lancet. 2009;373:911 8. 408. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, et al.


2009;373:911 8. 408. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, et al. Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:1030 9. 409. Cecil WT, Kasteridis P, Barnes JW Jr, et al. A meta-analysis update: percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14: 521 8. 410. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-anal- ysis. Circulation. 2005;111:2906 12. 411. Schomig A, Mehilli J, de Waha A, et al. A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of a percutaneous coronary intervention-based strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:894 904. 412. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:414 5. 413. Hambrecht R, Walther C, Mobius-Winkler S, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2004; 109:1371 8. 414. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV, et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorva- statin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:70 6. 415. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Ran- domized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet. 1993; 341:573 80. 416. CABRI Trial Participants. First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). Lancet. 1995;346:1179 84. 417. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217 25. 418. Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investi- gation (BARI) Investigators. Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease. A multicenter randomized trial. JAMA. 1997;277: 715 21. 419. Carrie D, Elbaz M, Puel J, et al.


1997;277: 715 21. 419. Carrie D, Elbaz M, Puel J, et al. Five-year outcome after coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in multivessel coronary artery dis- ease: results from the French Monocentric Study. Circulation. 1997; 96:II6. 420. Goy JJ, Eeckhout E, Burnand B, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet. 1994;343:1449 53. 421. Goy JJ, Eeckhout E, Moret C, et al. Five-year outcome in patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis treated by angioplasty or left internal mammary artery grafting. A prospective trial. Circulation. 1999;99:3255 9. 422. Hamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, et al. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI). N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 1037 43. 423. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp SJ, et al. Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina. Lancet. 1998;352:1419 25. 424. Hueb WA, Soares PR, Almeida De OS, et al. Five-year follow-up of the medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty, or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 1999;100:II107 13. 425. King SB III, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS, et al. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 1044 50. 426. King SBI, Kosinski AS, Guyton RA, et al. Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1116 21. 427. Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Balino N, et al.


2000;35:1116 21. 427. Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Balino N, et al. Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1 year follow-up. ERACI Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1060 7. 428. Rodriguez A, Mele E, Peyregne E, et al. Three-year follow-up of the Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease (ERACI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1178 84. 429. Wahrborg P. Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 1 year follow-up in the Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularization investigation (CABRI) trial. Eur Heart J. 1999;20: 653 8. 430. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary inter- vention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:965 70. 431. Cisowski M, Drzewiecki J, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, et al. Primary stenting versus MIDCAB: preliminary report-comparision of two methods of revascularization in single left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1334 9. 432. Cisowski M, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Ulczok R, et al. Primary direct stenting versus endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery a prospective, randomised study. Kardiol Pol. 2004; 61:253 61. 433. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:561 6. 434. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Winter JB, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: three-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1955 60. 435. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Middel B, et al.


2002;40:1955 60. 435. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Middel B, et al. Comparison of late (four years) functional health status between percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention and off-pump left internal mammary artery bypass grafting for isolated high-grade narrowing of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1414 7. 436. Eefting F, Nathoe H, van Dijk D, et al. Randomized comparison between stenting and off-pump bypass surgery in patients referred for angioplasty. Circulation. 2003;108:2870 6. 437. Goy JJ, Kaufmann U, Goy-Eggenberger D, et al. A prospective ran- domized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: the SIMA trial. Stenting vs Internal Mammary Artery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1116 23. 438. Hueb W, Soares PR, Gersh BJ, et al. The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1743 51. 439. Kim JW, Lim DS, Sun K, et al. Stenting or MIDCAB using minister- notomy for revascularization of proximal left anterior descending artery? Int J Cardiol. 2005;99:437 41. 440. Pohl T, Giehrl W, Reichart B, et al. Retroinfusion-supported stenting in high-risk patients for percutaneous intervention and bypass surgery: results of the prospective randomized myoprotect I study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;62:323 30. 441. Reeves BC, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, et al. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1 43. 442. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J, et al., ERACI II Investigators. Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in patients with Multiple-Vessel Disease (ERACI II): 30 day and one-year follow-up results.