In its judgment of 9 November 2010 in Joined Cases C-92/09 and 93/09 [24] Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen the Court of Justice of the European Union declared point (8b) of Article 42 and Article 44a of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 259/2008 [25] to be invalid in so far as, with regard to natural persons benefiting from the European agricultural funds, those provisions imposed an obligation to publish personal data relating to each beneficiary without drawing a distinction based on relevant criteria such as the periods during which those persons have received such aid, the frequency of such aid or the nature and amount thereof.
Le breithiúnas na Cúirte Bhreithiúnais an 9 Samhain 2010, i gCásanna Uamtha C-92/09 agus 93/09 [24] Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen, dearbhaíodh, maidir le pointe (8b) d'Airteagal 42 agus le hAirteagal 44a de Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1290/2005, agus le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 259/2008 [25] ón gCoimisiún go raibh an méid sin neamhbhailí sa mhéid is, maidir leis na daoine nádúrtha a thairbhíonn de na Cistí, go bhforchuireann na forálacha sin oibleagáid faisnéis phearsanta a bhaineann le gach tairbhí a fhoilsiú gan idirdhealú a dhéanamh bunaithe ar chritéir ábhartha amhail na tréimhsí ina bhfuair na daoine sin an chabhair sin, agus minicíocht, cineál nó méid na cabhrach sin.