Alicia The only comment that I have to the swap schedules is that I think we need to  have an exception built into the arbitration language that permits us to go  to court to enforce the remedies that we describe in the confidentiality  section.
This probably hold true for all of the docs where we have  arbitration and a ca provision.
Alos, there may be some defined terms that  are now used in the new confidentiality language that haven't been defined  (i.e, Enron, Enron Put Agreement etc)  Finally, should we upper case  "affiliates" in the confidentiality   language and either use the ISDA def or  some other def?
Carol

Comments
Alicia The only comment that I have to the swap schedules is that I think we need to have an exception built into the arbitration language that permits us to go to court to enforce the remedies that we describe in the confidentiality section.
This probably hold true for all of the docs where we have arbitration and a ca provision.
Alos, there may be some defined terms that are now used in the new confidentiality language that haven't been defined (i.e, <COMPANY>, <COMPANY> Put Agreement etc) Finally, should we upper case "affiliates" in the confidentiality language and either use the ISDA def or some other def?
Carol
defined swap schedules use isda built arbitration language permits hold true docs finally upper remedies case affiliates confidentiality