Jane:  Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the  "governing law" issue was raised.
I do not have any memoranda addressing  which choice of law would be binding on Enron Japan Corp.
However, I note  that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by Enron Japan  Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated 9/21/00).
Are either  Texas or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement?
Thanks for your assistance.
Regards.

Representative Agreement between Enron Japan Corp. and Enron North  America Corp. (the "Services Agreement")
Jane: Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the "governing law" issue was raised.
I do not have any memoranda addressing which choice of law would be binding on <COMPANY> Japan Corp.
However, I note that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by <COMPANY> Japan Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated <NUMBER>/<NUMBER>/<NUMBER>).
Are either <STATE> or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement?
Thanks for your assistance.
Regards.
isda marked memoranda addressing choice japanese preferable susan trying revise number state new york law aa services agreement governing thanks assistance regards corp ibj elects