Did you get a copy of this?
It looks as if in September that our=20 intercompany balances were relatively low (EES and ENA), with an increase i= n=20 October with Enron Europe.
Do you have details behind this?
Are EES=20 balances gas only, or gas and power?
How do we have imbalances with=20 ourselves?
What kind of reporting do you get from financial ops on a regul= ar=20 basis that gives you the details behind this?
I am assuming that these=20 imbalances are created from commodity transactions, so that we would really= =20 be closer to the details than would financial ops.
Is that a good=20 assumption?
--Sally=20

Intercompany Balances
Did you get a copy of this?
It looks as if in September that our=<NUMBER> intercompany balances were relatively low (EES and <COMPANY>), with an increase i= n=<NUMBER> October with <COMPANY> Europe.
Do you have details behind this?
Are EES=<NUMBER> balances gas only, or gas and power?
How do we have imbalances with=<NUMBER> ourselves?
What kind of reporting do you get from financial ops on a regul= ar=<NUMBER> basis that gives you the details behind this?
I am assuming that these=<NUMBER> imbalances are created from commodity transactions, so that we would really= =<NUMBER> be closer to the details than would financial ops.
Is that a good=<NUMBER> assumption?
--Sally=<NUMBER>
ops regul ar kind reporting financial relatively intercompany balances low ees company gas power basis gives details looks september good number assumption