The east and west power desks are creating slightly different floating price  language for some of the power pools.
The west desk wants "negative prices"  to be averaged in as "zeroes"; the east desk wants to average in all prices  "positive or negative".
I'm inclined to let the traders do as they wish.
I  can't seem to get an explanation for the difference in approach (in each  instance ENA may take either side of the deal).
The confirm desk will have  to pay attention to the source of the confirms to use the correct pricing  language.
I don't know if this will create an on-line trading issue.
What do you think?
Sara

Financial Power - "Negative Pricing"
The east and west power desks are creating slightly different floating price language for some of the power pools.
The west desk wants "negative prices" to be averaged in as "zeroes"; the east desk wants to average in all prices "positive or negative".
I'm inclined to let the traders do as they wish.
I can't seem to get an explanation for the difference in approach (in each instance <COMPANY> may take either side of the deal).
The confirm desk will have to pay attention to the source of the confirms to use the correct pricing language.
I don't know if this will create an on-line trading issue.
What do you think?
Sara
floating price language difference approach instance positive negative inclined pools source confirms use think sara company average power desks creating