Thanks Chris - I assume you are speaking about credit risk on the thirty day  deal when you refer to the $2M exposure on $100 - has Tim spoken to John  about this?
I am supportive of this proposal and approach.
Like our  discussion, we have to find a way to be supportive to the re-development of  this market without creating un-acceptable credit or market losses.
We also  have to support Lay's efforts in California.
Regards

Freeman and CDWR
Thanks Chris - I assume you are speaking about credit risk on the thirty day deal when you refer to the <CUR>0M exposure on <CUR><NUMBER> - has Tim spoken to John about this?
I am supportive of this proposal and approach.
Like our discussion, we have to find a way to be supportive to the re-development of this market without creating un-acceptable credit or market losses.
We also have to support Lay's efforts in California.
Regards
chris assume speaking support lay efforts number tim day deal refer 0m market creating acceptable exposure cur credit risk thirty california thanks