I have a question about the SFTS conversions that were done a while back so that the customer could utilize our capacity release program.
I noticed that The City of Chattahoochee converted their SFTS to FTS-1 and that the temporary acquisitions on their FTS-1 have a gap.
More specifically, they have a release in place for 10/1/02 thru 4/30/03 and the next release begins 10/1/03 thru 4/30/04.
Do the releases have to be consecutive in order for them to retain their conversion to FTS-1?
Because they will not have a release in place for May thru Sept. of 2003 according to their releases.
Is this wrong?
I haven't checked to see if this occurs on any of the other coversions and will if this is an issue.
Please advise.
nb

SFTS conversions
I have a question about the SFTS conversions that were done a while back so that the customer could utilize our capacity release program.
I noticed that The City of Chattahoochee converted their SFTS to FTS-<NUMBER> and that the temporary acquisitions on their FTS-<NUMBER> have a gap.
More specifically, they have a release in place for <NUMBER>/<NUMBER>/<NUMBER> thru <NUMBER>/<NUMBER>/<NUMBER> and the next release begins <NUMBER>/<NUMBER>/<NUMBER> thru <NUMBER>/<NUMBER>/<NUMBER>.
Do the releases have to be consecutive in order for them to retain their conversion to FTS-<NUMBER>?
Because they will not have a release in place for May thru Sept. of <NUMBER> according to their releases.
Is this wrong?
I haven't checked to see if this occurs on any of the other coversions and will if this is an issue.
Please advise.
nb
coversions issue advise temporary acquisitions wrong converted sfts fts city chattahoochee customer utilize capacity release program noticed gap specifically consecutive order retain