For December 21, 2000 activity, I reported a weighted average price of $16.00  for activity for December 22-26, 2000.
The weighted average trade price via Enron Online will reflect a price of  $15.76, but coupled with the volume not transacted online, this price was  estimated to be a $16.00 midpoint.
Specificially the following trades were  transacted over the telephone:  Nicor Gas Company  $18.16  20,000  Via ANR @ Hampshire Altrade    GDD +.05 10,000  NGPL Nicor WPS    GDD    5,000  NGPL Nicor Nicor Gas Company  $12.00  20,000  NGPL Nicor PG&E    $14.00   9,000  NGPL Nicor Kaztex    $18.16       4,000  NBPL/Nicor    The reason for the interest in this time period is as follows:  Nicor Gas Company observed their company holiday on December 22nd, while most  companies observed the company holiday on December 26th.
As a result,  volumes were traded for the December 22-26 time period.
Gas Daily published  a price of $15.70 for the December 22-26 time period.
Nicor Gas Company made  a decision to buy gas on December 22nd for the December 23-26 time period.
I  received several phone calls from various marketing companies expressing  concern that Gas Daily was going to revise the posting, based on the minimal  activity that transacted on December 22nd.
While, my practice is to simply take the price as reported on Enron Online,  from time-to-time, the there will be significant volumes transacted over the  telephone that will impact the Enron Online price.
My volume  is a little  over-stated, but simply  from a cursory glance standpoint, as opposed to  intentionally reporting erroneous information.

Chicago Midpoint pricing for December 21, 22, and 23, 2000
For December <NUMBER>, <NUMBER> activity, I reported a weighted average price of <CUR><NUMBER> for activity for December <NUMBER>-<NUMBER>, <NUMBER>.
The weighted average trade price via <COMPANY> Online will reflect a price of <CUR><NUMBER>, but coupled with the volume not transacted online, this price was estimated to be a <CUR><NUMBER> midpoint.
Specificially the following trades were transacted over the telephone: Nicor Gas Company <CUR><NUMBER> <NUMBER> Via ANR @ Hampshire Altrade GDD <NUMBER> <NUMBER> NGPL Nicor WPS GDD <NUMBER> NGPL Nicor Nicor Gas Company <CUR><NUMBER> <NUMBER> NGPL Nicor PG&E <CUR><NUMBER> <NUMBER> NGPL Nicor Kaztex <CUR><NUMBER> <NUMBER> NBPL/Nicor The reason for the interest in this time period is as follows: Nicor Gas Company observed their company holiday on December 00nd, while most companies observed the company holiday on December 00th.
As a result, volumes were traded for the December <NUMBER>-<NUMBER> time period.
Gas Daily published a price of <CUR><NUMBER> for the December <NUMBER>-<NUMBER> time period.
Nicor Gas Company made a decision to buy gas on December 00nd for the December <NUMBER>-<NUMBER> time period.
I received several phone calls from various marketing companies expressing concern that Gas Daily was going to revise the posting, based on the minimal activity that transacted on December 00nd.
While, my practice is to simply take the price as reported on <COMPANY> Online, from time-to-time, the there will be significant volumes transacted over the telephone that will impact the <COMPANY> Online price.
My volume is a little over-stated, but simply from a cursory glance standpoint, as opposed to intentionally reporting erroneous information.
company online time posting based minimal weighted average trade concern gas erroneous cursory glance standpoint hampshire altrade transacted telephone impact