Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial  script.
Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC  Busters"???
Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on  relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to  it.
With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to  assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to  breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests.
The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme.
Maybe we  ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how  our response plays.
DF

Mock Trial
Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial script.
Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC Busters"???
Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to it.
With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests.
The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme.
Maybe we ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how our response plays.
DF
philosophy breach jad theme northern ipec busters contracts response plays df maybe vitriol producers didn occur marked mock judge relevance grounds