Janine:  With respect to the attached (internal) FX product for EOL, I just wanted to  verify with you that internal counterparties should transact on EOL with:  (1)  RMT  (as principal for Houston FX desk)  (2)  EEFT as agent for RMT (as principal for London FX desk).
In this  regard, was the services agreement between ENA and EEFT ever extended to  include RMT for internal trades?
(3)  Enron Japan Corp. (as principal for Tokyo FX desk)  There appears to be some confusion since our meeting of November 3.
Thanks.
Sara

FX Product
Janine: With respect to the attached (internal) FX product for EOL, I just wanted to verify with you that internal counterparties should transact on EOL with: (<NUMBER>) RMT (as principal for Houston FX desk) (<NUMBER>) EEFT as agent for RMT (as principal for London FX desk).
In this regard, was the services agreement between <COMPANY> and EEFT ever extended to include RMT for internal trades?
(<NUMBER>) <COMPANY> Japan Corp. (as principal for Tokyo FX desk) There appears to be some confusion since our meeting of November <NUMBER>.
Thanks.
Sara
principal houston november number extended counterparties transact eol tokyo fx include rmt internal desk janine respect attached agreement