Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with  Glynn:  Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing  included a list of top twenty creditors.
Our negative CTC claim was  apparently not taken into account in compiling that list.
The list is  nonbinding, however.
PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on  April 20.
Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured  claims).
You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and  state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as  uncontested) in the April 20 filing.
(Note: if PG&E does not include the  claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the  court determines the validity of the claim).
Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee:  PG&E may have the opportunity  to influence representation on the creditors' committees.
There are several  reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2)  we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the  real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as  significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers  ... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on  the creditors committee anyway).

Call to Bob Glynn
Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with Glynn: Adding <COMPANY>'s "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing included a list of top twenty creditors.
Our negative CTC claim was apparently not taken into account in compiling that list.
The list is nonbinding, however.
PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on April <NUMBER>.
Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured claims).
You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as uncontested) in the April <NUMBER> filing.
(Note: if PG&E does not include the claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the court determines the validity of the claim).
Including <COMPANY> on the Creditors' Committee: PG&E may have the opportunity to influence representation on the creditors' committees.
There are several reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: <NUMBER>) we are a big creditor, <NUMBER>) we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and <NUMBER>) we are one of the real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers ... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on the creditors committee anyway).
creditors negative ctc conversations state expectation helpful crafting px iso required file schedules solution number real claim appear preferably want remind glynn