Randy, based upon the records review, this is the only issue that may be a= =20 problem.
If a tank has been moved to another location, it would trigger=20 requirements which were enacted on the date of the relocation.
For instanc= e,=20 if a tank constructed prior to 1973 was moved in 1978, there would be=20 emissions control requirements placed on the tank as required by the 1978= =20 tank regulations.
If the tank had remained at its original location, it=20 would be grandfathered with respect to emissions.
However, because the tan= k=20 was relocated, it is looked upon as being a tank constructed in 1978 and=20 subject to the 1978 regulations and is no longer grandfathered.
I was not given this information during the records review, so I dont know = if=20 any of the tanks apply.
If any of the tanks fit into the above scenerio,= =20 EOTT or Koch will be  looking at some major $$$$$ to bring any subject tank= =20 into compliance.
Generally speaking, the regualtions and costs to comply= =20 increase as a function of date.
=20   1.
Q.
Of the tanks listed on the spreadsheet, have any of the tanks been=20 relocated from its original construction locations?
List the tank, date=20 moved and   location moved to.
A.  Benevides Station Tank 6125 and Mirando Station Tank 28591 were relocat= ed=20 to those stations.
Three Rivers Tanks 28508 and 28100 were   relocated and= =20 re-erected at that station.
Duval Station Tank 28052 and Mirando Station= =20 28045 were relocated and re-erected at those stations prior  to Koch=01,s= =20 acquisition of those assets.

Koch South Texas pipeline data room questions and answers
Randy, based upon the records review, this is the only issue that may be a= =<NUMBER> problem.
If a tank has been moved to another location, it would trigger=<NUMBER> requirements which were enacted on the date of the relocation.
For instanc= e,=<NUMBER> if a tank constructed prior to <NUMBER> was moved in <NUMBER>, there would be=<NUMBER> emissions control requirements placed on the tank as required by the <NUMBER>= =<NUMBER> tank regulations.
If the tank had remained at its original location, it=<NUMBER> would be grandfathered with respect to emissions.
However, because the tan= k=<NUMBER> was relocated, it is looked upon as being a tank constructed in <NUMBER> and=<NUMBER> subject to the <NUMBER> regulations and is no longer grandfathered.
I was not given this information during the records review, so I dont know = if=<NUMBER> any of the tanks apply.
If any of the tanks fit into the above scenerio,= =<NUMBER> EOTT or Koch will be looking at some major <CUR> to bring any subject tank= =<NUMBER> into compliance.
Generally speaking, the regualtions and costs to comply= =<NUMBER> increase as a function of date.
=<NUMBER> <NUMBER>.
Q.
Of the tanks listed on the spreadsheet, have any of the tanks been=<NUMBER> relocated from its original construction locations?
List the tank, date=<NUMBER> moved and location moved to.
A. Benevides Station Tank <NUMBER> and Mirando Station Tank <NUMBER> were relocat= ed=<NUMBER> to those stations.
Three Rivers Tanks <NUMBER> and <NUMBER> were relocated and= =<NUMBER> re-erected at that station.
Duval Station Tank <NUMBER> and Mirando Station= =<NUMBER> <NUMBER> were relocated and re-erected at those stations prior to Koch=<NUMBER>,s= =<NUMBER> acquisition of those assets.
prior number instanc tank regulations moved benevides station apply acquisition assets speaking regualtions costs increase function based records review