In the original article, there was a mistake in [**Figure 2**](#f2){ref-type="fig"} as published. Although the correct statistical values were reported both in the legend of [**Figure 2**](#f2){ref-type="fig"} and in the text of the manuscript, some incorrect values were reported in [**Figure 2**](#f2){ref-type="fig"} due to a copy and paste error. In addition, the wrong years were listed is some of the study names. The corrected [**Figure 2**](#f2){ref-type="fig"} appears below.

![The findings showed that the prevalence rate of comorbid personality diagnoses in clinical-high-risk (CHR) patients was 39.4% \[95% Cl (26.5%--52.3%)\]. More specifically, 13.4% \[95% Cl (8.2%--18.5%)\] and 11.9% \[95% Cl (0.73%--16.6%)\] of this clinical population presented with the schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD), respectively.](fpsyt-11-00235-g002){#f2}

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

[^1]: Edited and reviewed by: Silvana Galderisi, Second University of Naples, Italy

[^2]: This article was submitted to Psychopathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry
