title: Suggested promotion standard for develop branches
body: <p>We have what I have come to know as a standard pattern in GIT:  Master -> Develop -> Feature</p>
  
  <p>Our team usually finishes a feature, have it code reviewed and approved before promoting to Develop.  But in this case we are being asked to review and promote unfinished code.</p>
  
  <p>The up-side to this is that the team will stay closer to parity.  The downside if my approval will be on code that is not ready to ship in our develop branch.</p>
  
  <p>Curious if others out in the coding world have faced this situation and how you proceeded.</p>