title: Is it safe to use a Spring @Transactional annotation on a Java 8 default interface method?
body: <p>The Spring documentation recommends against putting @Transactional annotations on interface methods because interface annotations are not inherited by classes. However, with Java 8 we can provide a concrete default implementation in the interface. If such a default interface method needs to be the transactional boundary, we have no other choice: we have to put the @Transactional annotation on the interface method.</p>
  
  <p>Will this work (i.e. will spring respect the transaction boundary in this case)? If so, are there any hidden pitfalls to this approach?</p>