title: Allowing Session in a Web Farm? Is StateServer Good Enough?
body: <p>First of all to give you a bit of background on the current environment.  We have a number of ASP.NET applications, all of which use session for certain aspects.  We are "Load Balanced" over multiple servers due to traffic levels, however, our load balancing is set to use "Sticky Sessions" as currently all web applications are set to use "InProc" for session state.</p>
  
  <p>We are looking at being able to remove the "Sticky Sessions" configuration on our load balancer, as due to our traffic loads servers can and do get overloaded.  We want to go with a more balanced approach, but must be able to use session.</p>
  
  <p>I know that SqlServer for session state will work, but for reasons beyond our control, we cannot use SqlServer to store our state.  In researching it seems that StateServer is our best bet.  We have an additional server, with loads of memory sitting around.  This server could be our StateServer for the entire Web Cluster.  We just want to know the following things.</p>
  
  <p>1.) Besides any potential serialization issues with the switch from InProc to StateServer, are there any major known issues with losing session objects or generating errors with the above listed environment?</p>
  
  <p>2.) Aside from the single point of failure, and slighly slower performance are there any other gotchas that we need to be aware of with using StateServer.</p>
  
  <p>3.) Are there any metrics that show the performance differences between the three types of state storage?</p>