title: A better usage of Weighted Round Robin Routing in Amazon Route 53
body: <p>The question might not be as fundamental as you thought. First of all, thanks for reading it. I am a computer science student. I just begin to learn about AWS, especially the Route 53 so please forgive me if there is anything that hurts your eyes :)</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>We all know that Amazon Route 53 provides customers with the ability
    to route users to EC2 instances, S3 buckets, and elastic Load
    Balancers across multiple availability zones and regions and there are
    different forms of DNS load balancing including:</p>
    
    <ul>
    <li>LBR/Latency Based Routing, to route to the region with the lowest latency</li>
    <li>WRR/Weighted Round Robin, to assign weights to different targets</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>Also, user-specified configurations that combine both are possible
    (LBR+WRR).</p>
    
    <p>Route 53 flexibility allows users to save costs, however manual
    configuration can become increasingly complex for final users. Looking
    for the best non-probabilistic policy (such as the WRR weights) is
    NP-complete.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>What are the possible cases that we need to give server ip addresses different weight ? given that there can be EC2 servers that across multiple availability zones and instances can contain both front end and back end or contain either application tiers or databases only ? Are there any <strong>ideas</strong> of finding a possible better usage of Route 53 in combination with other AWS services, in order to improve the performance of interactive multi-tier cloud applications ?</p>
  
  <p>Sorry for the lengthy question. I am looking for <strong>thoughts and ideas</strong> about the best way/<strong>starting point</strong> to experiment about the better usage of Route 53 and in combination with other AWS services for a multi-tier cloud application. Not necessarily a 100% correct answer. Any ideas or suggestions are welcomed. Many thanks in advance !</p>
  
  <p><strong>UPDATE:</strong></p>
  
  <p>I should probably rephrase the question: What is the purpose of having Weighted record set in Route 53 i.e in a DNS service ? Obviously, WRR in DNS can control potions of traffic but if we simply rely on this DNS load balance (or load distribution) we are going to put heavy workload on the many other DNS servers. One case I could think off is that web sites like google or Facebook will potentially gets tons of tons domain name queries, WRR DNS load balancing can be useful and there has to be some sort of session stickiness since sharing session across servers seems to be a bad idea.</p>
  
  <p>Are there any other way / purpose of using Weighted record in Route 53. </p>
  
  <p>Thank you very much for considering my question !</p>