title: Why does map return a map object instead of a list in Python 3?
body: <p>I am interested in understanding the <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1303347/getting-a-map-to-return-a-list-in-python-3-x">new language design of Python 3.x</a>.</p>
  
  <p>I do enjoy, in Python 2.7, the function <code>map</code>:</p>
  
  <pre><code>Python 2.7.12
  In[2]: map(lambda x: x+1, [1,2,3])
  Out[2]: [2, 3, 4]
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>However, in Python 3.x things have changed:</p>
  
  <pre><code>Python 3.5.1
  In[2]: map(lambda x: x+1, [1,2,3])
  Out[2]: &lt;map at 0x4218390&gt;
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>I understand the how, but I could not find a reference to the why. Why did the language designers make this choice, which, in my opinion, introduces a great deal of pain. Was this to arm-wrestle developers in sticking to list comprehensions?</p>
  
  <p>IMO, list can be naturally thought as <a href="http://learnyouahaskell.com/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids" rel="noreferrer">Functors</a>; and I have been somehow been thought to think in this way:</p>
  
  <pre><code>fmap :: (a -&gt; b) -&gt; f a -&gt; f b
  </code></pre>