title: camel splitter parallel processing
body: <p>We have a service call which returns a list of ids with which we call another service which takes only one id at a time, so we are using the camel splitter with parallel processing turned to <code>true</code>. Now the call we make for the service is through a seda so we can put a timeout on it. This will cause the problem that parallel processing will not be parallel anymore since seda by default has only 1 concurrent consumers working on it.</p>
  
  <p>Options:</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li>put a ?concurrentConsumers=x on the seda </li>
  <li>use direct rather than seda. (no timeout option?)</li>
  <li>Any other option?</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>Of 1 and 2 which one would be preferable?</p>