title: What is your ratio Bug fixing vs Enhancements?
body: <p>In the spirit of <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/743442/implementing-features-vs-bug-fixing">this question</a> I wanted to have a sense of what is the proportion of time split between fixing bugs and implementing new features.  If possible try to give an estimate for the product as a whole as opposed to individual developer stats and try to make an average over the course of a typical year.  Do provide a general descriptive of the product/project to allow comparison.  Specifically :</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Maturity of project</li>
  <li>Is it still actively developed or strictly in maintenance ?</li>
  <li>Size estimate of the product/project</li>
  <li>Size of team developing it (all inclusive)</li>
  <li>What is your team score on the <a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000043.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Joel test</a>.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>Ex :</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>approx 80% time spent bug fixes 20% new stuff</li>
  <li>Mature software (20 years old)</li>
  <li>Actively developed</li>
  <li>1.5M Line of Text, approx 700k - 900k LOC</li>
  <li>12-15 actively coding in it.</li>
  <li>we got 5/12 for sure, some would say 7/12.</li>
  </ul>